CN103106812A - Method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks - Google Patents
Method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN103106812A CN103106812A CN 201310016286 CN201310016286A CN103106812A CN 103106812 A CN103106812 A CN 103106812A CN 201310016286 CN201310016286 CN 201310016286 CN 201310016286 A CN201310016286 A CN 201310016286A CN 103106812 A CN103106812 A CN 103106812A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- risk
- straton
- collision
- ships
- boats
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Abstract
The invention discloses a method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks. The method includes: layering and simplifying a topological structure of the whole sea intelligent transport network at one moment through a reduction algorithm based on hierarchical clustering, eliminating ships without consideration of collision risks, basing the collision risks of collision preventation systems of two ships, and obtaining system collision risks from subsystems to the whole sea transport network through a weighted average fusion method from bottom to top.
Description
Technical field
The invention belongs to infotech and navigational field, particularly relate to a kind of method of obtaining the average risk of collision of marine ships system.
Background technology
Along with the prosperity and development of global trade, the marine ships magnitude of traffic flow increases day by day, so the also obviously increase thereupon of the internal risks of marine ships traffic system, thereby causes the complexity of marine intelligent traffic administration system and pressure also day by day to show especially.Marine intelligent transportation network is the dynamic network that comprises a large amount of boats and ships, occupies significant proportion in the traffic hazard at sea of its collision accident, annual because of its economic loss that causes and casualties very large.Therefore, to the ship collision risk in marine intelligent transportation network effectively identify, assessment and risk control management seems extremely important.
The research of the Collision Risk Index in marine intelligent transportation network has obtained numerous researchers' concern, and the Advanced Information Processing Techniques such as application fuzzy theory, information fusion and neural network have obtained some useful achievements in research.The scheme of the Ship ' Risk-Degree of Collision that is generally adopted by people at present is: each collision prevention ship is with from as standard, based on DCPA and TCPA and some other factors obtain the target boats and ships to the Risk-Degree of Collision of this ship separately.Therefore, calculating the method research of Risk-Degree of Collision mainly carries out from Ship Controling person's angle, from the measurement of microcosmic point to risk of collision, be difficult to satisfy maritime sector in the demand of carrying out on macroanalysis and global decisions, simultaneously single (two ships) Risk-Degree of Collision definition does not possess the risk ability of Direct function description system (macroscopic view) aspect.Also have some documents to provide research to whole marine site ship collision risk, but risk wherein is based on the research that the statistic of ship's navigation data is for many years carried out, and is system's risk of collision of a long period yardstick meaning.System's risk of collision that maritime sector needs in global decisions is time scale shorter ' immediately ' system risk, namely the content of our invention.
Up to the present, not yet see the report of the relevant system's risk of collision of obtaining marine intelligent transportation network that the present invention relates to.
Summary of the invention
The objective of the invention is to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, a kind of method of obtaining the average risk of collision of marine ships system is provided.
The objective of the invention is to be achieved through the following technical solutions: a kind of method of obtaining the average risk of collision of marine ships system, the method comprises the steps:
(1) obtain the AIS data of a period of time: the standard A IS data of obtaining the maritime traffic of a period of time from boats and ships VTS system; Extract the data of following field: mmsi, shipname, sog, cog, heading, lon, lat and f_update_time.
The aeronautical data of a certain each boats and ships of sampling instant of marine ships AIS extracting data that (2) obtain from step 1.
(3) data that step 2 obtained are carried out hierarchical clustering and are divided classification.
(4) the some classes to obtaining in step 3, carry out the layering abbreviation.
(5) the every straton system to obtaining in step 4, calculate its system's risk of collision.
(6) judge system's risk of collision of marine intelligent transportation network: f according to result
1During 〉=f, think that whole marine intelligent transportation network on-demand system risk of collision is larger, f
1During<f, think that the on-demand system risk of collision of whole marine intelligent transportation network is less; Wherein, f is risk threshold value.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows: can carry out the collision at sea risk assessment for maritime sector according to system's risk of collision value of the marine intelligent transportation network that obtains, the whole risk of collision that reduces marine intelligent transportation network provides decision-making foundation.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the hierarchical tree schematic diagram that bee-line method cluster obtains;
Fig. 2 is by threshold value layering result schematic diagram after bee-line method cluster;
Fig. 3 is marine intelligent transportation network abbreviation result schematic diagram.
Embodiment
Describe the present invention in detail below in conjunction with accompanying drawing, it is more obvious that purpose of the present invention and effect will become.
The present invention obtains the method for the average risk of collision of marine ships system, comprises the steps:
Step 1: the AIS data of obtaining a period of time.
Obtain the standard A IS data of the maritime traffic of a period of time from boats and ships VTS system.Extract the data of following field: the mmsi(Hull Number), the shipname(name of vessel), the sog(speed on the ground), the cog(course over ground), the heading(course), the lon(longitude), the lat(latitude) and f_update_time(update time).
Step 2: the aeronautical data of a certain each boats and ships of sampling instant of marine ships AIS extracting data that obtain from step 1.
Extract in the raw data that the aeronautical data of a certain each boats and ships of sampling instant is obtained from step 1, the form of preservation is identical with step 1.
Step 3: the data that step 2 obtains are carried out hierarchical clustering and divided classification.
Boats and ships data in extraction step 2, each data is two-dimensional spaces, is obtained by the conversion through actual range of the longitude of boats and ships and latitude, and its conversion is that intersection point take zero degree warp and parallel is as imaginary coordinate axis initial point, being eastwards positive x direction, is northwards positive y direction.Market demand bee-line (Euclidean distance) method cluster to a sampling instant of N the boats and ships later that convert obtains size and is the class of N, and N is ships quantity.This class is a complete hierarchical tree, its reflection be relation between the boats and ships geographic distance, gather into from the near to the remote a class by distance between boats and ships.Then we are with a distance threshold d crosscut clustering tree, this value will block tree several connect, the boats and ships node division that belongs to each connection is a class.Therefore whole marine intelligent transportation network is gathered into some classes, is designated as { C
1, C
2, C
3..., C
n, wherein, C
iThe class that clustering obtains, i=1,2 ..., n, n are natural number.Between the boats and ships in each class, geographic distance is no more than d.Its physical significance is: belonging to the ultimate range between the boats and ships in class is d, and in other words, suitable selected threshold d can be divided into a class at a distance of nearer boats and ships with the geographic position.From the angle of ship collision risk identification, bump between the nearer boats and ships probability of event of distance is obviously higher, so when computing system risk of collision next, do not need to consider to belong to the risk of collision between inhomogeneous boats and ships.Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 are the schematic diagram of said method.
Step 4: to the some classes that obtain in step 3, carry out the layering abbreviation.
To the class { C that obtains in step 3
1, C
2, C
3..., C
n, further simplify.At first stipulate S
iRepresent the i straton system of marine intelligent transportation network, S
i,jBe j system in i straton system.Layering abbreviation to class is specially:
If 4.1 C
iIn only have a node, obviously the boats and ships in such do not consist of collision system, need not to consider.
If 4.2 C
iIn only have two nodes, if satisfy 0≤TCPA≤t
2(TCPA is the shortest meeting chance time, t
2The attention time), as second layer subsystem S
2, j;Otherwise, need not to consider;
If 4.3 C
iMiddle nodes travels through C more than two
iIn node in twos pair, screening stays satisfies 0≤TCPA≤t
2Node pair; If without qualified node pair, need not so to consider such; Otherwise, these nodes to integral body as second layer subsystem S
2, jIf the node logarithm surpasses 1, so also need carry out following simplification:
4.3.1 note consists of certain second layer subsystem S
2, jIn respective nodes to being the 4th straton S of system
4={ S
4,1, S
4,2S
4, k, i=1;
If 4.3.3 j<k, j=j+1;
If 4.3.4
X
i=S
4, j∪ X
i
4.3.5, repeating step 4.3.3 and 4.3.4;
4.3.6、S
4=S
4-X
i,i=i+1;
4.3.7, repeat 4.3.2~4.3.6;
4.3.8, X
iIn all nodes to consisting of S
3, i
4.3.9, return to this second layer S of system
2, jThe 3rd corresponding straton S of system
3,1, S
3,2
4.4, repeating step 4.1-4.3, travel through all classes, the level that finally obtains whole marine intelligent transportation network is divided.The ground floor system is marine intelligent transportation network, and it comprises several second layer subsystems, and each second layer subsystem comprises some the 3rd straton systems, and each the 3rd straton system is comprised of some the 4th straton systems again.Whole hierarchical relationship as shown in Figure 3.Attention: for the second layer subsystem that only has two ship collision avoidance systems, the 3rd layer of this system, the 4th straton system are the same with second layer subsystem.Finally, whole marine intelligent transportation network is divided into the system of four levels, and some do not need to consider that the boats and ships of risk of collision are disallowable, has reduced computational complexity.
Step 5: to the every straton system that obtains in step 4, calculate its system's risk of collision.
5.1 calculate the risk of the 4th straton system
The 4th straton system is actually two ship collision avoidance systems.Adopt Zhou Jianghua, Wu Chunjie: the structure of Collision Risk Factor Model, University Of Ningbo's journal (science and engineering version), 2004,17(1), the described method of 61-65. is calculated in the 4th straton system two ships Risk-Degree of Collision f separately
1 → 2(1 with respect to 2 Risk-Degree of Collision) and f
2 → 1(2 for 1 Risk-Degree of Collision).Note f
12It is system's risk of collision of boats and ships 1 and 2 collision avoidance systems that consist of.Common f
1 → 2≠ f
2 → 1, f
1 → 2,
If use f
1 → 2And f
2 → 1In any one weigh the entire system risk of collision of two ships, all have certain one-sidedness, must cause ignoring or weaken another Risk-Degree of Collision to the contribution of entire system risk of collision.But due to f
1 → 2, f
2 → 1And f
12Be from the sign of different angles to same problem, certainly exist some contacts between the three.Here adopt f
1 → 2And f
2 → 1The mode of weighting obtains f
12, namely
f
12=αf
1→2+βf
2→1
Wherein, α and β are respectively the weights of two risk factors, and they satisfy alpha+beta=1.According to the ultimate principle that linear weighted function merges, weight can be determined the contribution of system's risk of collision according to each Risk-Degree of Collision in this system.The contribution boats and ships less than risk factor that are appreciated that the boats and ships that risk factor is larger are contributed large.But, for two ship collision avoidance systems, f
1 → 2And f
2 → 1Become when being, become when its weight (α, β) should be also so.Therefore, get α=f
1 → 2(f
1 → 2+ f
2 → 1) and β=f
2 → 1(f
1 → 2+ f
2 → 1),
Calculate the 4th straton system risk of collision with this, the 4th straton system risk that obtains is designated as f successively
4, i, i=1,2 ..., m
4, wherein, m
4It is the number of the 4th straton system.
Above-mentioned weighting scheme is simple, intuitive both, can reflect preferably the impact that two risk factors are portrayed the entire system risk of collision again.Verified, the two boat system risk of collision values that above-mentioned computation model obtains are between [0,1], namely
Its probability as system's collision possibility can be understood so, this also meets the original intention of carrying out the assessment of Vessels Traffic System risk of collision.
5.2 calculate the risk of the 3rd straton system
To the 4th straton system risk that obtains in 5.1, calculate the 3rd straton system risk that belongs to corresponding second layer subsystem.Computing formula is as follows:
J=1,2 ..., m
3, wherein, f
3, jThe risk of j three straton systems, m
3The number of the 3rd straton system, N
4, jIt is the number that belongs to the 4th straton system of j three straton systems.The 3rd straton system risk of collision that calculates with this average weighted mode can characterize this average risk of collision of straton system from average meaning preferably.
5.3 calculate the risk of second layer subsystem
To the 3rd straton system risk that obtains in 5.2, calculate the risk that belongs to corresponding second layer subsystem.Computing formula is as follows:
J=1,2 ..., m
2, f wherein
2, jThe risk of j two straton systems, m
2The number of second layer subsystem, N
3, jIt is the number that belongs to the 3rd straton system of j two straton systems.The second layer subsystem risk of collision that calculates with this average weighted mode can characterize this average risk of collision of straton system from average meaning preferably.
5.4 calculating ground floor system, i.e. system's risk of collision of marine intelligent transportation network
To the second layer subsystem risk that obtains in 5.3, calculate the risk f of ground floor system
1Computing formula is as follows:
Wherein, m
2It is the number of second layer subsystem.The ground floor system risk of collision that calculates with this average weighted mode can characterize the average risk of collision of whole system from average meaning preferably.
Layering through above-mentioned three sub-steps is calculated, can obtain the average risk of collision of whole marine ships system, and this algorithm can also demonstrate system's risk of collision of each subsystem effectively, reflects the situation of system's risk of collision and the risk situation of subregion from macroscopic view integral body and two aspects of subdivision.
Step 6: according to system's risk of collision of the marine intelligent transportation network of result judgement.
Choose suitable risk threshold value according to experience.Choose f=0.4 in the present invention as risk threshold value.
f
1During 〉=f, think that whole marine intelligent transportation network on-demand system risk of collision is larger.
f
1During<f, think that the on-demand system risk of collision of whole marine intelligent transportation network is less.
Because each straton system of systems risk of collision all can obtain in above-mentioned computation process, maritime affairs managerial personnel can monitor by the larger subsystem of selecting system risk of collision.
System's risk of collision acquisition methods of a kind of marine intelligent transportation network of the present invention is based on information fusion and hierarchical cluster, and whole marine intelligent transportation topology of networks is simplified, and avoids calculating the complicacy of the traversal of two foul risks; At first build system's risk of collision of two ship collision avoidance systems, then based on the result of this and system's abbreviation, with bottom-up Weighted Fusion method, calculated the subsystem risk of collision of every one deck and system of systems risk of collision greatly.Final result can be the macro-management maritime traffic of maritime affairs administrative authoritys, and the evaluating system risk of collision of identification is as quantitative foundation.
Claims (1)
1. a method of obtaining the average risk of collision of marine ships system, is characterized in that, the method comprises the steps:
(1) obtain the AIS data of a period of time: the standard A IS data of obtaining the maritime traffic of a period of time from boats and ships VTS system; Extract the data of following field: mmsi, shipname, sog, cog, heading, lon, lat and f_update_time.
The aeronautical data of a certain each boats and ships of sampling instant of marine ships AIS extracting data that (2) obtain from step 1.
(3) data that step 2 obtained are carried out hierarchical clustering and are divided classification: boats and ships data in extraction step 2, these data are two-dimensional spaces, obtained by the longitude of boats and ships and the conversion of latitude process actual range, its conversion is that intersection point take zero degree warp and parallel is as imaginary coordinate axis initial point, being eastwards positive x direction, is northwards positive y direction.Market demand bee-line (Euclidean distance) method cluster to a sampling instant of N the boats and ships later that convert obtains size and is the class of N, and N is ships quantity.This class is a complete hierarchical tree, its reflection be relation between the boats and ships geographic distance, gather into from the near to the remote a class by distance between boats and ships.Then use a distance threshold d crosscut clustering tree, this value will be blocked several connections of tree, and the boats and ships node division that belongs to each connection is a class.Therefore whole marine intelligent transportation network is gathered into some classes, is designated as { C
1, C
2, C
3..., C
n, wherein, C
iThe class that clustering obtains, i=1,2 ..., n, n are natural number.Between the boats and ships in each class, geographic distance is no more than d.
(4) the some classes to obtaining in step 3, carry out the layering abbreviation: to the class { C that obtains in step 3
1, C
2, C
3..., C
n, further simplify.At first stipulate S
iRepresent the i straton system of marine intelligent transportation network, S
i,jBe j system in i straton system.Layering abbreviation to class is specially:
(4.1) if C
iIn only have a node, obviously the boats and ships in such do not consist of collision system, need not to consider.
(4.2) if C
iIn only have two nodes, if satisfy 0≤TCPA≤t
2(TCPA is the shortest meeting chance time, t
2The attention time), as second layer subsystem S
2, jOtherwise, need not to consider;
(4.3) if C
iMiddle nodes travels through C more than two
iIn node in twos pair, screening stays satisfies 0≤TCPA≤t
2Node pair; If without qualified node pair, need not so to consider such; Otherwise, these nodes to integral body as second layer subsystem S
2, jIf the node logarithm surpasses 1, so also need carry out following simplification:
(4.3.1) note consists of certain second layer subsystem S
2, jIn respective nodes to being the 4th straton S of system
4={ S
4,1, S
4,2S
4, k, i=1;
If (4.3.3) j<k, j=j+1;
(4.3.5) repeating step 4.3.3 and 4.3.4;
(4.3.6)S
4=S
4-X
i,i=i+1;
(4.3.7) repeat 4.3.2~4.3.6;
(4.3.8) X
iIn all nodes to consisting of S
3, i
(4.3.9) return to this second layer S of system
2, jThe 3rd corresponding straton S of system
3,1, S
3,2
(4.4) repeating step 4.1-4.3 travels through all classes, and the level that finally obtains whole marine intelligent transportation network is divided.The ground floor system is marine intelligent transportation network, and it comprises several second layer subsystems, and each second layer subsystem comprises some the 3rd straton systems, and each the 3rd straton system is comprised of some the 4th straton systems again.
(5) the every straton system to obtaining in step 4, calculate its system's risk of collision, specifically comprise the following steps: (5.1) calculate the risk of the 4th straton system: the 4th straton system is actually two ship collision avoidance systems, calculates in the 4th straton system two ships Risk-Degree of Collision f separately
1 → 2(the 1st ship is with respect to the Risk-Degree of Collision of the 2nd ship) and f
2 → 1(the 2nd ship is for the Risk-Degree of Collision of the 1st ship).Note f
12It is system's risk of collision of the collision avoidance system of the 1st ship and the 2nd ship formation; f
12=α f
1 → 2+ β f
2 → 1Wherein, α and β are respectively the weights of two risk factors, and they satisfy alpha+beta=1.α=f
1 → 2(f
1 → 2+ f
2 → 1), β=f
2 → 1(f
1 → 2+ f
2 → 1):
Calculate the 4th straton system risk of collision with this, the 4th straton system risk that obtains is designated as f successively
4, i, i=1,2 ..., m
4, wherein, m
4It is the number of the 4th straton system.
(5.2) calculate the risk of the 3rd straton system: to the 4th straton system risk that obtains in 5.1, calculate the 3rd straton system risk that belongs to corresponding second layer subsystem.Computing formula is as follows:
J=1,2 ..., m
3, f wherein
3, jThe risk of j three straton systems, m
3The number of the 3rd straton system, N
4, jIt is the number that belongs to the 4th straton system of j three straton systems.
(5.3) calculate the risk of second layer subsystem: to the 3rd straton system risk that obtains in 5.2, calculate the risk of corresponding second layer subsystem.Computing formula is as follows:
J=1,2 ..., m
2, f wherein
2, jThe risk of j two straton systems, m
2The number of second layer subsystem, N
3, jIt is the number that belongs to the 3rd straton system of j two straton systems.
(5.4) calculate the ground floor system, i.e. system's risk of collision of marine intelligent transportation network: to the second layer subsystem risk that obtains in 5.3, calculate the risk f of ground floor system
1Computing formula is as follows:
(6) judge system's risk of collision of marine intelligent transportation network: f according to result
1During 〉=f, think that whole marine intelligent transportation network on-demand system risk of collision is larger, f
1During<f, think that the on-demand system risk of collision of whole marine intelligent transportation network is less; Wherein, f is risk threshold value.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201310016286 CN103106812A (en) | 2013-01-17 | 2013-01-17 | Method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201310016286 CN103106812A (en) | 2013-01-17 | 2013-01-17 | Method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN103106812A true CN103106812A (en) | 2013-05-15 |
Family
ID=48314632
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN 201310016286 Pending CN103106812A (en) | 2013-01-17 | 2013-01-17 | Method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN103106812A (en) |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103353756A (en) * | 2013-05-27 | 2013-10-16 | 武汉理工大学 | Method for monitoring underway ship in real time based on AIS and VTS information integration |
CN104462856A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2015-03-25 | 江苏理工学院 | Ship conflict early warning method |
CN104504935A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2015-04-08 | 江苏理工学院 | Maritime traffic control method |
CN104504934A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2015-04-08 | 江苏理工学院 | Marine traffic control method |
CN105070102A (en) * | 2015-09-24 | 2015-11-18 | 上海海事大学 | Ship navigation dynamic risk inference system and method based on fuzzy logic |
CN105810013A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2016-07-27 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | Vehicle group risk-based vehicle collision-prevention control method and device |
CN106571067A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-04-19 | 江苏理工学院 | Planning method for ship conflict resolution based on rolling planning strategy |
CN107657144A (en) * | 2017-08-30 | 2018-02-02 | 天津大学 | A kind of offshore flow field inversion method based on watercraft AIS and log data |
CN109448442A (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2019-03-08 | 天津大学 | The efficient monitoring method of more foul danger levels in a kind of sea area |
CN110009936A (en) * | 2019-03-15 | 2019-07-12 | 北京海兰信数据科技股份有限公司 | A kind of ship auxiliary collision prevention method for crowded waters |
CN110322731A (en) * | 2019-06-20 | 2019-10-11 | 武汉理工大学 | A kind of ship meeting navaid method for early warning |
CN111899567A (en) * | 2019-05-06 | 2020-11-06 | 江苏金海星导航科技有限公司 | Ship anti-collision optimization method and system based on positioning |
CN113065996A (en) * | 2021-04-23 | 2021-07-02 | 苏州百胜动力机器股份有限公司 | Outboard engine navigation auxiliary system based on computer |
-
2013
- 2013-01-17 CN CN 201310016286 patent/CN103106812A/en active Pending
Cited By (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN103353756B (en) * | 2013-05-27 | 2016-01-06 | 武汉理工大学 | Based on the vessel underway oceangoing ship method for real-time monitoring of AIS and VTS information fusion |
CN103353756A (en) * | 2013-05-27 | 2013-10-16 | 武汉理工大学 | Method for monitoring underway ship in real time based on AIS and VTS information integration |
CN106571066A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-04-19 | 江苏理工学院 | Ship collision avoidance planning method based on rolling planning strategies |
CN106803361A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-06-06 | 江苏理工学院 | A kind of navigation method of control based on Rolling Planning strategy |
CN104462856B (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-07-11 | 江苏理工学院 | Ship conflict method for early warning |
CN104504935A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2015-04-08 | 江苏理工学院 | Maritime traffic control method |
CN105810013A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2016-07-27 | 中国移动通信集团公司 | Vehicle group risk-based vehicle collision-prevention control method and device |
CN104504934B (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-03-08 | 江苏理工学院 | A kind of navigation traffic control method |
CN106571067A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-04-19 | 江苏理工学院 | Planning method for ship conflict resolution based on rolling planning strategy |
CN106571065A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2017-04-19 | 江苏理工学院 | Planning method of ship conflict solution |
CN104462856A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2015-03-25 | 江苏理工学院 | Ship conflict early warning method |
CN104504934A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2015-04-08 | 江苏理工学院 | Marine traffic control method |
CN105070102A (en) * | 2015-09-24 | 2015-11-18 | 上海海事大学 | Ship navigation dynamic risk inference system and method based on fuzzy logic |
CN107657144A (en) * | 2017-08-30 | 2018-02-02 | 天津大学 | A kind of offshore flow field inversion method based on watercraft AIS and log data |
CN107657144B (en) * | 2017-08-30 | 2020-03-17 | 天津大学 | Near-shore flow field inversion method based on ship AIS and log data |
CN109448442A (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2019-03-08 | 天津大学 | The efficient monitoring method of more foul danger levels in a kind of sea area |
CN110009936A (en) * | 2019-03-15 | 2019-07-12 | 北京海兰信数据科技股份有限公司 | A kind of ship auxiliary collision prevention method for crowded waters |
CN111899567A (en) * | 2019-05-06 | 2020-11-06 | 江苏金海星导航科技有限公司 | Ship anti-collision optimization method and system based on positioning |
CN110322731A (en) * | 2019-06-20 | 2019-10-11 | 武汉理工大学 | A kind of ship meeting navaid method for early warning |
CN110322731B (en) * | 2019-06-20 | 2021-08-10 | 武汉理工大学 | Ship meeting navigation aid early warning method |
CN113065996A (en) * | 2021-04-23 | 2021-07-02 | 苏州百胜动力机器股份有限公司 | Outboard engine navigation auxiliary system based on computer |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN103106812A (en) | Method obtaining sea ship system average collision risks | |
CN102890875B (en) | Method for acquiring system collision risk of maritime intelligent transportation network | |
CN110009937B (en) | Ship collision risk analysis method based on AIS data | |
CN104408900B (en) | Neutral net flood warning devices and methods therefor based on dynamic optimization | |
Wang et al. | Safety assessment of shipping routes in the South China Sea based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process | |
CN104156525B (en) | A kind of method for improving storm surge disaster risk profile precision | |
Li et al. | Vulnerability evaluation of rainstorm disaster based on ESA conceptual framework: A case study of Liaoning province, China | |
CN107571965B (en) | A kind of ship operation on the sea auxiliary decision-making support system based on mobile terminal | |
Wang et al. | Sea-water-level prediction via combined wavelet decomposition, neuro-fuzzy and neural networks using SLA and wind information | |
CN102109619A (en) | System and method for predicting typhoon surge based on artificial intelligence | |
Goharnejad et al. | Vulnerability assessment of southern coastal areas of Iran to sea level rise: evaluation of climate change impact | |
CN106816039A (en) | A kind of ship cruise early warning dynamic monitoring method | |
CN111428916B (en) | Navigation path planning method for rescue vessel at sea | |
Zhou | A comprehensive framework for assessing navigation risk and deploying maritime emergency resources in the South China Sea | |
Xu et al. | Risk evaluation system of navigation security based on coupled wind and wave model: a case of study of Qiongzhou strait | |
Wang et al. | Risk assessment for typhoon-induced storm surges in Wenchang, Hainan Island of China | |
Rawson et al. | Developing contextually aware ship domains using machine learning | |
Özlem et al. | Grounding probability in narrow waterways | |
Lee et al. | Artificial neural network-based data recovery system for the time series of tide stations | |
Zhou et al. | A comprehensive path planning framework for patrolling marine environment | |
CN113962426A (en) | Offshore water navigation safety intelligent forecasting method and device | |
Mannarini et al. | VISIR-1. b: Ocean surface gravity waves and currents for energy-efficient navigation | |
Aisjah et al. | Maritime weather prediction using fuzzy logic in Java Sea for shipping feasibility | |
CN110414042A (en) | Ship cluster Situation analysis method under a kind of conflict Meeting Situation | |
CN105070102A (en) | Ship navigation dynamic risk inference system and method based on fuzzy logic |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C12 | Rejection of a patent application after its publication | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20130515 |