CN102999709B - A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method - Google Patents

A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102999709B
CN102999709B CN201210559062.7A CN201210559062A CN102999709B CN 102999709 B CN102999709 B CN 102999709B CN 201210559062 A CN201210559062 A CN 201210559062A CN 102999709 B CN102999709 B CN 102999709B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
index
centerdot
risk
underground water
activity district
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CN201210559062.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN102999709A (en
Inventor
席北斗
潘红卫
何小松
许其功
姜永海
白顺果
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
Original Assignee
Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences filed Critical Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences
Priority to CN201210559062.7A priority Critical patent/CN102999709B/en
Publication of CN102999709A publication Critical patent/CN102999709A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN102999709B publication Critical patent/CN102999709B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, by setting up a set of index system with judging, sampled point is arranged with the method for spatial discretization, gather underground water water sample, and according to primary election index feature screening index, by the degree of membership of the weight and each sampled point index that calculate each index, comprehensive evaluation is made to local ground watering pollution risk, and subregion and classification are carried out to underground water risk.The present invention is directed to China's rural activity district features of pollution, there is stronger adaptability and generalization, can science, reasonably assessment is made to the underground water risk class in rural activity district and risk distribution.

Description

A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method
Technical field
The invention belongs to groundwater contamination and risk assessment field, specifically for the new feature of current rural activity district Groundwater Contamination Risk, propose a kind of reasonably rural activity district underground water risk stratification and assessing zonings method.
Background technology
In the water-using structure that China is current, underground water occupies 20% of national total supply, 70% of potable water output, 40% of the field irrigation water yield, 38% of industrial water consumption, this water-using structure can not change in a short time, and therefore underground water is most important to China's sustainable development that is economic and society from now on.Meanwhile, China is a large agricultural country, and agricultural chemicals annual production reaches 500,000 t, occupies the second in the world.Use amount is at about 230,000 t, and average amount of application is 2.33kg/hm 2.And the agricultural chemicals used approximately only has 20% to be attached on crop, the agricultural chemicals of 80% finally enters soil, and under extreme weather or irrigation situation, agricultural chemicals very easily permeates the ground water, pollutes it.In recent years, underground water Pesticides in rural areas in our country was detected often.If cotton growing area, Tianmen county, Hubei Province of China is because of a large amount of applying pesticides, cause local potable water to be subject to severe contamination, in underground water, 1605 content reach 1.25mg/L, exceed national standard 375 times, DDT content reaches 0.44mg/L, exceeds standard 1.25 times, and indivedual villages and small towns well water can not be drunk completely; Organophosphorus pesticide is detected in the underground water of Dezhou City some areas, and the phenomenon that ubiquity exceeds standard, the underground water in Kaxgar Prefecture Chan Mian great county Shache county and Yingjisha two county 70% receives the pollution in various degree such as DDVP, benzene hexachloride, D.D.T. (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane), Azodrin, flolimat.Therefore, rural activity district agricultural chemicals has become a kind of problem become increasingly conspicuous to the pollution of underground water, and as the underground water of the most of regional drinking water source of China once be polluted, the health of the mankind will be subject to grave danger, it is administered in addition will also be an extremely difficult process.
How scientificlly and effectively the rural activity district Groundwater Contamination Risk of a large amount of agricultural chemicals is used to assess to these, for agricultural chemicals administrative authority provides strong foundation, thus final reduce in agricultural production process the generation of the pollution of groundwater environment and spread, taking precautions against agricultural chemicals to the ecosystem and the issuable risk of health, is a problem in science urgently to be resolved hurrily.Rural activity district agricultural chemicals is to the pollution problem of underground water, one is less to relating to of agricultural chemicals in current quality of groundwater standard, conventional pesticide is only D.D.T. (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) and benzene hexachloride, because China forbids this two kinds of agricultural chemicals already, different novel agrochemicals is brought into use in different regions, therefore, to again be examined closely evaluation index; Two is choosing evaluation method, and objective comprehensive evaluation method is also make to risk the basis accurately estimated; 3rd, rural activity district groundwater contamination situation is in the displaying visually in space, and realize classification and the subregion of rural activity district Groundwater Contamination Risk, this proposes requirements at the higher level to the risk assessment of rural activity district groundwater contamination.
Summary of the invention
The object of the present invention is to provide one comparatively reasonably rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, rural activity district risk subregion and classification are evaluated underground water potential risk district.
For achieving the above object, rural activity district provided by the invention underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, by setting up a set of index system with judging, sampled point is arranged with the method for spatial discretization, gather underground water water sample, and according to primary election index feature screening index, by the degree of membership of the weight and each sampled point index that calculate each index, comprehensive evaluation is made to local ground watering pollution risk, and subregion and classification are carried out to underground water risk.
Described evaluation method, wherein, index system is divided into three layers, and top layer is destination layer, and middle layer is rule layer, and bottom is indicator layer; According to pollutant classification, the pollutant class of rule layer separately includes organic pollutants, inorganic pollutant and heavy metal; Organic contaminant comprises the Insecticides (tech) & Herbicides (tech) in rural activity district, acaricide and germifuge; Inorganic pollutant comprises the inorganic ion of conventional polluted underground water, potential of hydrogen, total hardness, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand; Heavy metal comprises copper, zinc, iron, lead, nickel, cadmium, chromium, arsenic and mercury.
Described evaluation method, wherein, the method for spatial discretization arranges sampled point, is be evenly arranged on evaluation region by sampled point, and adopt plum blossom to layout method, sampled point quantity is not less than 15; When gathering underground water water sample, underground water should be taken from.
Described evaluation method, wherein, primary election index feature be by Comparative indices between correlativity and water quality standard more each other.
Described evaluation method, wherein, the calculating of weight is the comprehensive importance being carried out measurement index by the product of integrated risk exponential sum unordered index two indices; Computing formula is:
W=[w(1),w(2),…,w(n)] 1×n
Wherein, W is the synthetic weights vector of n index, and ρ is the integrated risk index of each index, for the unordered index of each index.
Described evaluation method, wherein, degree of membership be desired value and risk class grade scale are substituted into selected by membership function refer to calculate, subordinated-degree matrix T and membership function t=t (k, j) are as follows respectively:
T = t 11 t 12 · · · t 1 n t 21 t 21 · · · t 2 n · · · · · · · · · · · · t 51 t 52 · · · t 5 n 5 × n , Then t ijcomputing method be:
For forward index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 5 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 5 )
For reverse index:
Described evaluation method, wherein, integrated risk index determines its importance with the frequency of grade residing for pollutant and risk class; Computing formula is:
ρ ( j ) = Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) Σ j = 1 n Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) ( j = 1 , · · · , n , k = 1 , · · · , 5 )
In above formula, α (j, k) is for a jth index is below or above the number of k grade, and u (k) is score value corresponding to k grade, if underground water risk falls into 5 types, then u (1) to u (5) is respectively 1,2,3,4,5.
Described evaluation method, wherein, unordered index is the weight size representing rural activity district underground water risk indicator with entropy, and first do standardization to raw data, the standardized method of data is as follows:
For forward index:
y ( i , j ) = x ( i , j ) - f 2 ( j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n )
In formula, f 1(j)=max{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, f 2(j)=min{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}
For reverse index:
y ( i , j ) = f 1 ( j ) - x ( i , j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , u , j = 1 , · · · , v )
Computing information entropy: h ( j ) = - k Σ j = 1 m s ( i , j ) ln s ( i , j )
In above formula, s ( i , j ) = y ( i , j ) Σ i = 1 m y ( i , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n ) , When x (i, j)=0, f (i, j)=0.00001; K=1/ln (m).
Calculating entropy is weighed:
Described evaluation method, wherein, synthetic weights vector carries out matrix multiplication operation with the transposition of subordinated-degree matrix, computing formula is: Q=WT', wherein, and Q=[q (1), q (2), q (3), q (4), q (5)], by above-mentioned Matrix Multiplication with V={v (j), j=1,2,3,4,5}, v 1, v 2, v 3, v 4, v 5value be respectively 100,80,60,40,20, an integrate score value between 20 to 100 can be obtained, so above-mentioned multiple attribute synthetical evaluation is become the result of a single index.
Described evaluation method, wherein, the evaluation of classification and subregion, adopt ArcGIS to carry out subregion and classification to underground water risk: by corresponding with integrate score for each sample point coordinate, be loaded in ArcGIS, space interpolation is carried out to the discrete data of each sampled point, relatively IDW interpolation, Kriging interpolation, NaturalNeighbor interpolation and Spline interpolation four kinds of interpolation methods, select the interpolation method meeting spatial spreading evaluation result most, finally, adopt the method can obtain whole area of space continuous print water quality score, according to each water quality scoring rank interval, water quality result is spatially classified, obtain region continuous print underground water risk degree and zoning figure.
Rural activity district of the present invention underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, index system is comprehensive, evaluation method meets China's reality, can promote in China's rural activity district underground water risk assessment
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the block schematic illustration of the assessment indicator system of certain rural activity district underground water risk in embodiment.
Fig. 2 is the schematic flow sheet that the present invention sets up assessment indicator system.
Fig. 3 is certain rural activity district underground water risk stratification block plan in embodiment.
Embodiment
New rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method provided by the invention, by tentatively setting up a set of comprehensive, representative assessment indicator system, method based on spatial discretization arranges sampled point, rational method is adopted to gather underground water water sample, and according to primary election index feature screening index, by calculating the rational weight of each index and the rational degree of membership of each sampled point index, comprehensive evaluation is made to local ground watering pollution risk, and subregion and classification are carried out to underground water risk.
The structure of comprehensive, representative assessment indicator system that the present invention sets up and the method for selecting index are: in the present invention, index system is divided into three layers, top layer is destination layer and local ground watering risk, middle layer is the classification that rule layer and Risk Evaluation Factors divide, and bottom is indicator layer and the quantifiable index relevant to Groundwater Contamination Risk.According to pollutant classification, rule layer comprises three, is respectively organic contaminant, inorganic pollutant and heavy metal.The agricultural chemicals that organic contaminant comprises rural activity district conventional comprises some Insecticides (tech) & Herbicides (tech)s, acaricide and germifuge; Inorganic pollutant comprises the inorganic ion of conventional polluted underground water, potential of hydrogen, total hardness, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand etc.; Heavy metal comprises copper, zinc, iron, lead, nickel, cadmium, chromium, arsenic, mercury etc.First, set up the index system of three-decker, then from these indexs, tentatively choose pollutant index according to regional features of pollution, the principle of screening is representative, stability and can availability.
The points distributing method of spatial discretization of the present invention is evenly arranged on evaluation region by sampled point, adopts plum blossom to layout method, sampled point quantity is not less than 15, if there are civilian well or monitor well in locality, utilize existing well as far as possible, and Optimizing on this basis.
The present invention gathers the method for underground water water sample, is that water sample should be taken from underground water, needs the water in existing well to extract out, avoids gathered water sample to be the water that rainfall in the past or runoff directly enter in well, and sampling after stable level, clarification.
Index screening method of the present invention, be by Comparative indices between correlativity and compare their water quality standard, the higher (R of the correlativity if there is several index 2be greater than 0.9), and its water quality standard is close, then can replace these indexs by one of them index.Related coefficient calculates in MatlabR2009a software, and its computing formula is:
r ij = Σ i = 1 m [ x ( i , j ) - h ( j ) ] [ x ( i , k ) - h ( k ) ] Σ i = 1 m [ x ( i , j ) - h ( j ) ] 2 [ x ( i , j ) - h ( k ) ] 2 ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n , k = 1 , · · · , n )
In formula, h (j)=average{x (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, h (k)=average{x (i, k) | i=1 ..., m}, i are i-th sampled point, j and k is respectively jth and kth item index.
Weighing computation method of the present invention is the comprehensive importance being carried out measurement index by the product of the exponential sum that comprehensively exceeds standard unordered index two indices.The larger impact on risk of the index that comprehensively exceeds standard is larger, and meanwhile, unordered index is larger, shows that this index is the most remarkable to the variable effect of entire system, and the method combined both therefore adopting calculates comprehensive weight.Computing method are:
W=[w(1),w(2),…,w(n)] 1×n
Wherein, W is the synthetic weights vector of n index, the integrated risk index that ρ (j) is j index, for the unordered index of j index.
Integrated risk index of the present invention, be consider according to the worst situation of evaluation result, the contribution of more serious pollutant to risk that exceed standard is larger, therefore can determine its importance by the frequency of grade residing for pollutant and risk class.Adopt the weight of following formula parameter:
ρ ( j ) = Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) Σ j = 1 n Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) ( j = 1 , · · · , n , k = 1 , · · · , 5 )
In above formula, α (j, k) is for a jth index is lower than the number of (or higher than) k grade, and u (k) is score value corresponding to k grade, in the present invention, underground water risk falls into 5 types, and from u (1) to u, (5) are respectively 1,2,3,4,5.Owing to only making assessment to pollution risk here, health risk is not considered, therefore, do not do the harmfulness contrast between index.
Unordered index of the present invention is the weight size representing rural activity district underground water risk indicator with entropy, and this is because the physics meaning of entropy is that system is more unordered, entropy is larger, and system is more unordered, and the information comprised is also larger, therefore the size of effectiveness can be represented with entropy, or the size of weight.First need to do standardization to raw data, the standardized method of data is as follows:
For forward (being worth more Risks larger) index:
y ( i , j ) = x ( i , j ) - f 2 ( j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n )
In formula, f 1(j)=max{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, f 2(j)=min{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}
For reverse (being worth less risk larger) index:
y ( i , j ) = f 1 ( j ) - x ( i , j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , u , j = 1 , · · · , v )
Computing information entropy: h ( j ) = - k Σ j = 1 m s ( i , j ) ln s ( i , j )
In above formula, s ( i , j ) = y ( i , j ) Σ i = 1 m y ( i , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n ) , When x (i, j)=0, f (i, j)=0.00001; K=1/ln (m).
Calculating entropy is weighed:
The calculating of rational degree of membership of the present invention, with tradition adopt fuzzy mathematics method calculate degree of membership unlike, it is considered herein that desired value not only can not belong to category-A but also belong to category-B according to the theory of fuzzy mathematics, it strictly can only be positioned at a grade interval, or belongs to category-A, belong to category-B, can not the two have concurrently, based on this, when certain index is positioned at a Risk interval, its degree of membership should be 1, and other interval is 0.Assuming that subordinated-degree matrix is
T = t 11 t 12 · · · t 1 n t 21 t 21 · · · t 2 n · · · · · · · · · · · · t 51 t 52 · · · t 5 n 5 × n , Then t k,jcomputing method be:
For forward index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 5 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 5 )
For reverse index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 1 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 1 )
The calculating of comprehensive evaluation value of the present invention, be carry out matrix multiplication operation to the transposition of W and T, computing formula is: Q=WT', wherein, Q=[q (1), q (2), q (3), q (4), q (5)], by above-mentioned Matrix Multiplication with V={v (j), j=1,2,3,4,5}, v 1, v 2, v 3, v 4, v 5value be respectively 100,80,60,40,20, an integrate score value between 20 to 100 can be obtained, so above-mentioned multiple attribute synthetical evaluation is become the result of a single index.
Classification of the present invention and assessing zonings, adopt ArcGIS to carry out subregion and classification to underground water risk, first, by corresponding with integrate score for each sample point coordinate, be loaded in ArcGIS, space interpolation is carried out to the discrete data of each sampled point, relatively IDW interpolation, Kriging interpolation, NaturalNeighbor interpolation and Spline interpolation four kinds of interpolation methods, optimize the interpolation method meeting spatial spreading evaluation result most, finally, adopt the method can obtain whole area of space continuous print water quality score, according to each water quality scoring rank interval, water quality result is spatially classified, obtain region continuous print underground water risk degree and zoning figure.
In other words, technical scheme of the present invention is the rural activity district underground water risk domain Evaluation on distribution method based on discrete sampling point, it is characterized in that by tentatively setting up a set of comprehensive, representative assessment indicator system, based on method collection, the detection underground water water sample of spatial discretization, and according to index feature screening index again, by calculating the rational weight of each index and the rational degree of membership of each sampled point index, comprehensive evaluation is made to local ground watering pollution risk, and subregion and classification are carried out to underground water risk.
1, build index system and index is screened: in the present invention, index system is divided into three layers, top layer is destination layer and local ground watering risk, middle layer is the classification that rule layer and Risk Evaluation Factors divide, and bottom is indicator layer and the quantifiable index relevant to Groundwater Contamination Risk.According to pollutant classification, rule layer comprises three, is respectively organic contaminant, inorganic pollutant and heavy metal.The agricultural chemicals that organic contaminant comprises rural activity district conventional comprises some Insecticides (tech) & Herbicides (tech)s, acaricide and germifuge; Inorganic pollutant comprises the inorganic ion of conventional polluted underground water, potential of hydrogen, total hardness, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand etc.; Heavy metal comprises copper, zinc, iron, lead, nickel, cadmium, chromium, arsenic, mercury etc.First, set up the index system of three-decker, then from these indexs, tentatively choose pollutant index according to regional features of pollution, the principle of screening is representative, stability and can availability.
2, the layout of sampled point and the collection of underground water water sample: sampled point adopts the plum blossom method of layouting to be evenly arranged on evaluation region, sampled point quantity is not less than 15, if there are civilian well or monitor well in locality, utilize existing well as far as possible, and Optimizing on this basis.Water sample should be taken from underground water, needs the water in existing well to extract out, avoids gathered water sample to be the water that rainfall in the past or runoff directly enter in well, and sampling after stable level, clarification.
3, index screening method: compare their water quality standard, the higher (R of the correlativity if there is several index by the correlativity between Comparative indices 2>0.9), and its water quality standard is close, then can replace these indexs by one of them index.
4, weighing computation method: the comprehensive importance being carried out measurement index by the product of the exponential sum that comprehensively exceeds standard unordered index two indices.The larger impact on risk of the index that comprehensively exceeds standard is larger, and meanwhile, unordered index is larger, shows that this index is the most remarkable to the variable effect of entire system, and the method combined both therefore adopting calculates comprehensive weight.
(1) calculating of integrated risk index: consider according to the worst situation of evaluation result, the contribution of more serious pollutant to risk that exceed standard is larger, therefore can determine its importance by the frequency of grade residing for pollutant and risk class.Adopt the weight of following formula parameter:
ρ ( j ) = Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) Σ j = 1 n Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) ( j = 1 , · · · , n , k = 1 , · · · , 5 )
In above formula, α (j, k) is for a jth index is lower than the number of (or higher than) k grade, and u (k) is score value corresponding to k grade, in the present invention, underground water risk falls into 5 types, and from u (1) to u, (5) are respectively 1,2,3,4,5.Owing to only making assessment to pollution risk here, health risk is not considered, therefore, do not do the harmfulness contrast between index.
(2) calculating of unordered index: entropy is a physics concept, and entropy more Iarge-scale system is more unordered, and the information comprised is also larger, therefore can represent the size of effectiveness with entropy, or the size of weight.First need to do standardization to raw data, the standardized method of data is as follows:
For forward (being worth more Risks larger) index:
y ( i , j ) = x ( i , j ) - f 2 ( j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n )
In formula, f 1(j)=max{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, f 2(j)=min{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}
For reverse (being worth less risk larger) index:
y ( i , j ) = f 1 ( j ) - x ( i , j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , u , j = 1 , · · · , v )
Computing information entropy: h ( j ) = - k Σ j = 1 m s ( i , j ) ln s ( i , j )
In above formula, s ( i , j ) = y ( i , j ) Σ i = 1 m y ( i , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n ) , When x (i, j)=0, f (i, j)=0.00001; K=1/ln (m).
Calculating entropy is weighed:
(3) calculating of comprehensive weight: computing method are:
W=[w(1),w(2),…,w(n)] 1×n
Wherein, W is the synthetic weights vector of n index, and ρ is the integrated risk index of each index, for the unordered index of each index.
5, the calculating of rational degree of membership, with tradition adopt fuzzy mathematics method calculate degree of membership unlike, it is considered herein that desired value not only can not belong to category-A but also belong to category-B according to the theory of fuzzy mathematics, it strictly can only be positioned at a grade interval, or belongs to category-A, belong to category-B, can not the two have concurrently, based on this, when certain index is positioned at a Risk interval, should be 1 in its degree of membership of this Risk interval, other interval is 0.Assuming that subordinated-degree matrix is
T = t 11 t 12 · · · t 1 n t 21 t 21 · · · t 2 n · · · · · · · · · · · · t 51 t 52 · · · t 5 n 5 × n ,
Then t j,kcomputing method be:
For forward index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 5 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 5 )
For reverse index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 1 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 1 )
6, the calculating of comprehensive evaluation value: carry out matrix multiplication operation to the transposition of W and T, computing formula is: Q=WT', wherein, Q=[q (1), q (2), q (3), q (4), q (5)], by above-mentioned Matrix Multiplication with V={v (j), j=1,2,3,4,5}, v 1, v 2, v 3, v 4, v 5value be respectively 100,80,60,40,20, an integrate score value between 20 to 100 can be obtained, so above-mentioned multiple attribute synthetical evaluation is become the result of a single index.
7, the classification of underground water risk and assessing zonings: first, by corresponding with integrate score for each sample point coordinate, be loaded in ArcGIS, space interpolation is carried out to the discrete data of each sampled point, relatively IDW interpolation, Kriging interpolation, NaturalNeighbor interpolation and Spline interpolation four kinds of interpolation methods, optimize the interpolation method meeting spatial spreading evaluation result most, finally, adopt the method can obtain whole area of space continuous print water quality score, according to each water quality scoring rank interval, water quality result is spatially classified, obtain region continuous print underground water risk degree and zoning figure.
Below in conjunction with Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, embodiments of the present invention are illustrated.
1, assessment indicator system is set up.This rural activity district long-term cropping type is paddy rice, and according to Zoned application agricultural chemicals feature, organic contaminant is selected to poison barnyard grass with poison, and inorganic pollutant chooses DOC, COD, BOD 5, IC, nitrite, ammonia nitrogen, nitre nitrogen, chloride, sulfate, PH, dissolved oxygen DO, 12 indexs such as conductivity, heavy metal chooses 8 indexs such as chromium, manganese, iron, nickel, copper, zinc, cadmium, lead, 21 indexs altogether.Detect the desired value of each index, and consult its water quality standard, can with reference to the standard of the close pollutant of character for the standard do not had in GB.
2, do correlation analysis to each index, the related coefficient square between index is all less than 0.9, shows to have independence between each index, and therefore, these 21 indexs are all as this underground water risk assessment.
3, according to the following formula, integrated risk index is calculated.
ρ ( j ) = Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) Σ j = 1 n Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) ( j = 1 , · · · , n , k = 1 , · · · , 5 )
In above formula, α (j, k) is for a jth index is lower than the number of (or higher than) k grade, and u (k) is score value corresponding to k grade, in the present invention, underground water risk falls into 5 types, and from u (1) to u, (5) are respectively 1,2,3,4,5.
4, according to following formula, standardization is done to raw data X.
For forward (being worth more Risks larger) index:
y ( i , j ) = x ( i , j ) - f 2 ( j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n )
In formula, f 1(j)=max{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, f 2(j)=min{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}
For reverse (being worth less risk larger) index:
y ( i , j ) = f 1 ( j ) - x ( i , j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , u , j = 1 , · · · , v )
5, on standardized basis, according to following formula, entropy power is calculated.
Wherein, h ( j ) = - k Σ j = 1 m s ( i , j ) ln s ( i , j )
In above formula, s ( i , j ) = y ( i , j ) Σ i = 1 m y ( i , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m , j = 1 , · · · , n ) , When x (i, j)=0, f (i, j)=0.00001; K=1/ln (m).
6, according to following formula, comprehensive weight is calculated.
W=[w(1),w(2),…,w(n)] 1×n
Wherein, W is the synthetic weights vector of n index, and ρ is the integrated risk index of each index, for the unordered index of each index.
7, according to following formula, subordinated-degree matrix is calculated.
For forward index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 5 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 5 )
For reverse index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n , k = 1 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , · · · , m ; j = 2 , · · · , n ; k = 1 )
8, according to following formula, integrate score is calculated.
Q=WT', wherein, Q=[q (1), q (2), q (3), q (4), q (5)], by above-mentioned Matrix Multiplication with V={v (j), j=1,2,3,4,5}, v 1, v 2, v 3, v 4, v 5value be respectively 100,80,60,40,20
9, the classification of underground water risk and assessing zonings.First, by corresponding with integrate score for each sample point coordinate, be loaded in ArcGIS, space interpolation is carried out to the discrete data of each sampled point, relatively IDW interpolation, Kriging interpolation, NaturalNeighbor interpolation and Spline interpolation four kinds of interpolation methods, it is best that result shows to adopt Spline method interpolation, namely the interpolation result of the method is adopted, then, according to 0 ~ 20 in ArcGIS, 20 ~ 40, 40 ~ 60, 60 ~ 80, 80 ~ 100, risk integrative score is divided into five classes, wherein distinguish corresponding I class, II class, III class, IV class and V class risk.According to above-mentioned steps, obtain this rural activity district underground water classification of risks classification as shown in Figure 3.The bay status of this rural activity district underground water risk class not only can be obtained from this figure, therefrom can also judge underground water potential risk district, as shown in Figure 3, the underground water risk of the southeast, northeast, western part, east is all higher, therefore, can conclude that these areas are for pollution source, and direction of groundwater flow is from the southeast northwestwards, so the northwestward should be the region of future period groundwater contamination aggravation, be potential risks districts.Therefore, the assessment of the underground water classification of rural activity district and underground water potential risk can be realized by the present invention.

Claims (5)

1. a rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, by setting up a set of index system with judging, sampled point is arranged with the method for spatial discretization, gather underground water water sample, and according to primary election index feature screening index, by the degree of membership of the weight and each sampled point index that calculate each index, comprehensive evaluation is made to local ground watering pollution risk, and subregion and classification are carried out to underground water risk;
Wherein, the calculating of weight is the comprehensive importance being carried out measurement index by the product of integrated risk exponential sum unordered index two indices; Computing formula is:
W=[w(1),w(2),…,w(n)] 1×n
Wherein, W is the synthetic weights vector of n index, the integrated risk index that ρ (j) is j index, for the unordered index of j index;
Integrated risk index determines its importance with the frequency of grade residing for pollutant and risk class; Computing formula is:
ρ ( j ) = Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) Σ j = 1 n Σ k = 1 5 α ( j , k ) × u ( k ) , ( j = 1 , ... , n , k = 1 , ... , 5 ) ;
In above formula, α (j, k) is for a jth index is below or above the number of k grade, and u (k) is score value corresponding to k grade, if underground water risk falls into 5 types, then u (1) to u (5) is respectively 1,2,3,4,5;
Unordered index is the weight size representing rural activity district underground water risk indicator by entropy power, and first do standardization to raw data, the standardized method of data is as follows:
For forward index:
y ( i , j ) = x ( i , j ) - f 2 ( j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) , ( i = 1 , ... , m , j = 1 , ... , n ) ;
In formula, f 1(j)=max{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, f 2(j)=min{s (i, j) | i=1 ..., m}, s (i, j) represent the threshold value of a jth index in i grade, s ( i , j ) = y ( i , j ) Σ i = 1 m y ( i , j ) , ( i = 1 , ... , m , j = 1 , ... , n ) ;
For reverse index:
y ( i , j ) = f 1 ( j ) - x ( i , j ) f 1 ( j ) - f 2 ( j ) , ( i = 1 , ... , u , j = 1 , ... , v ) ;
Computing information entropy: h ( j ) = - k Σ j = 1 m s ( i , j ) ln s ( i , j ) ;
In above formula, when x (i, j)=0, f (i, j)=0.00001; K=1/ln (m);
Calculating entropy is weighed:
Degree of membership be desired value and risk class grade scale are substituted into selected by membership function calculate, subordinated-degree matrix T and membership function t=t (k, j) are as follows respectively:
then t ijcomputing method be:
For forward index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , ... , m ; j = 2 , ... , n , k = 5 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , ... , m ; j = 2 , ... , n ; k = 5 ) ;
For reverse index:
t ( k , j ) = 1 x ( i , j ) ≤ s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , ... , m ; j = 2 , ... , n , k = 1 ) 0 x ( i , j ) > s ( k , j ) ( i = 1 , ... , m ; j = 2 , ... , n ; k = 1 ) ;
Described comprehensive evaluation is carried out matrix multiplication operation by synthetic weights vector with the transposition of subordinated-degree matrix and is obtained, and computing formula is: Q=WT ', wherein, Q=[q (1), q (2), q (3), q (4), q (5)], by above-mentioned Matrix Multiplication with V={v (j), j=1,2,3,4,5}, v 1, v 2, v 3, v 4, v 5value be respectively 100,80,60,40,20, an integrate score value between 20 to 100 can be obtained, so above-mentioned multiple attribute synthetical evaluation is become the result of a single index.
2. rural activity district according to claim 1 underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, wherein, index system is divided into three layers, and top layer is destination layer, and middle layer is rule layer, and bottom is indicator layer;
According to pollutant classification, the pollutant class of rule layer separately includes organic pollutants, inorganic pollutant and heavy metal;
Organic contaminant comprises Insecticides (tech) & Herbicides (tech) and the germifuge in rural activity district;
Inorganic pollutant comprises the inorganic ion of conventional polluted underground water, potential of hydrogen, total hardness, turbidity, chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biochemical oxygen demand;
Heavy metal comprises copper, zinc, iron, lead, nickel, cadmium, chromium, arsenic and mercury.
3. rural activity district according to claim 1 underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, wherein, the method for spatial discretization arranges sampled point, is be evenly arranged on evaluation region by sampled point, and adopt plum blossom to layout method, sampled point quantity is not less than 15; When gathering underground water water sample, underground water should be taken from.
4. rural activity district according to claim 1 underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, wherein, primary election index feature be by Comparative indices between correlativity and water quality standard more each other determine.
5. rural activity district according to claim 1 underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method, wherein, the evaluation of classification and subregion, adopt ArcGIS to carry out subregion and classification to underground water risk: each sample point coordinate is corresponding with integrate score value, be loaded in ArcGIS, space interpolation is carried out to the discrete data of each sampled point, from IDW interpolation, Kriging interpolation, the interpolation method meeting spatial spreading evaluation result is most selected in NaturalNeighbor interpolation and Spline interpolation four kinds of interpolation methods, finally, adopt the method can obtain whole area of space continuous print water quality score, according to each water quality scoring rank interval, water quality result is spatially classified, obtain region continuous print underground water risk degree and zoning figure.
CN201210559062.7A 2012-12-20 2012-12-20 A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method Expired - Fee Related CN102999709B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201210559062.7A CN102999709B (en) 2012-12-20 2012-12-20 A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201210559062.7A CN102999709B (en) 2012-12-20 2012-12-20 A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102999709A CN102999709A (en) 2013-03-27
CN102999709B true CN102999709B (en) 2016-04-06

Family

ID=47928268

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201210559062.7A Expired - Fee Related CN102999709B (en) 2012-12-20 2012-12-20 A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102999709B (en)

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103412104B (en) * 2013-07-24 2015-07-15 环境保护部环境规划院 Method used for evaluating frangibility of underground water
CN103455720A (en) * 2013-08-27 2013-12-18 柳州市博源环科科技有限公司 Water production and supply industry environment risk source evaluating method
CN103744829A (en) * 2014-01-02 2014-04-23 环境保护部环境规划院 Underground water pollution prevention area dividing method
CN103886217A (en) * 2014-04-04 2014-06-25 江苏省环境科学研究院 Ecological risk determining method for heavy metal pollution in river and lake sediments
CN104063608B (en) * 2014-07-01 2017-02-01 天津市水文水资源勘测管理中心 Method of determining underground water controlled water level by utilizing risk evaluation
CN104636624A (en) * 2015-02-16 2015-05-20 中国电建集团成都勘测设计研究院有限公司 Risk decision method for water retaining standard of non-overflow earth-rock cofferdam
CN105046394B (en) * 2015-05-15 2018-07-17 中国环境科学研究院 The method that the identification of groundwater pollution of refuse landfill process divides
CN104931574B (en) * 2015-06-05 2017-10-24 浙江中烟工业有限责任公司 The method for visualizing of content of beary metal regionality distribution in a kind of tobacco leaf
CN106290276A (en) * 2016-08-01 2017-01-04 江苏大学 A kind of quality evaluation method of enclosed waters aquiculture fresh water
CN106777879B (en) * 2016-11-16 2019-03-29 北京大学深圳研究生院 Mangrove water environment health Evaluation method based on Biological indicators
CN106874960A (en) * 2017-03-03 2017-06-20 中国水产科学研究院黄海水产研究所 Based on the fisheries environment class of pollution appraisal procedure for improving SVMs
CN106920044B (en) * 2017-03-07 2021-01-12 北京工商大学 Pesticide residue risk assessment method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model
CN107122616A (en) * 2017-05-09 2017-09-01 山东大学 A kind of multi objective Normal Cloud integrated evaluating method of quality of groundwater
CN107730426A (en) * 2017-09-12 2018-02-23 中山大学 A kind of underground space suitability assessment model based on ArcGIS
CN111122813B (en) * 2019-12-23 2020-09-22 水利部信息中心 Water quality category evaluation method based on regional groundwater flow field direction
CN111353720B (en) * 2020-03-13 2021-02-05 南京大学 Method for identifying high-risk pollutants in regional soil environment
CN111521754B (en) * 2020-04-22 2021-04-13 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 Preliminary investigation and stationing method for soil pollution in coking enterprise site
CN112945300B (en) * 2021-02-02 2022-08-30 中国地质大学(武汉) Reservoir danger real-time comprehensive integrated monitoring system
CN113791186A (en) * 2021-08-12 2021-12-14 北京金水永利科技有限公司 Method and system for selecting water quality abnormity alarm monitoring factor
CN113917101B (en) * 2021-10-09 2024-01-12 中国人民大学 Method for predicting chronic toxicity of copper in watershed water environment and deducing long-term reference
CN114021967B (en) * 2021-11-04 2022-05-20 中国安全生产科学研究院 Safe production risk pre-control evaluation method for village and town government departments
CN116813158B (en) * 2023-08-31 2023-11-21 中海油能源发展股份有限公司采油服务分公司 Intelligent chemical agent filling method and system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20090093174A (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-02 연세대학교 산학협력단 Method and system for evaluating ground-water pollution vulnerability and risk assessment
CN101609483A (en) * 2008-06-19 2009-12-23 上海市园林科学研究所 Urban green space pest risk levels is determined method
CN101609516A (en) * 2008-06-19 2009-12-23 上海市园林科学研究所 Set up the method for urban green space pest risk evaluation system
CN101882274A (en) * 2010-07-20 2010-11-10 南京大学 Method for determining regional ecological risk early warning
CN102799949A (en) * 2012-06-25 2012-11-28 中国环境科学研究院 Risk assessment method and system for refuse landfill polluted groundwater

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20090093174A (en) * 2008-02-28 2009-09-02 연세대학교 산학협력단 Method and system for evaluating ground-water pollution vulnerability and risk assessment
CN101609483A (en) * 2008-06-19 2009-12-23 上海市园林科学研究所 Urban green space pest risk levels is determined method
CN101609516A (en) * 2008-06-19 2009-12-23 上海市园林科学研究所 Set up the method for urban green space pest risk evaluation system
CN101882274A (en) * 2010-07-20 2010-11-10 南京大学 Method for determining regional ecological risk early warning
CN102799949A (en) * 2012-06-25 2012-11-28 中国环境科学研究院 Risk assessment method and system for refuse landfill polluted groundwater

Non-Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
A new model of geo-environmental impact assessment of mining a multiple-criteria assessment method integrating Fuzzy-AHP with fuzzy synthetic ranking;ShuangBing Huang,et al.;《Environ Earth Sci》;20110817;第66卷;275-284 *
GB/T14848-9中华人民共和国国家标准地下水质量标准;国家技术监督局;《GB/T14848-9中华人民共和国国家标准地下水质量标准》;19931230;1-4 *
Groundwater vulnerability assessment using a composite model combining DRASTIC with extensive agricultural land use in Israel’s Sharon region;S.Secunda,et al.;《Journal of Environmental Management》;19981231;第54卷;39-57 *
Risk assessment of floor water inrush in coal mines based on secondary fuzzy comprehensive evaluation;Yi Wang,et al.;《International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences》;20120329;第52卷;50-55 *
三种地下水水质评价方法的对比分析;张新珏等;《水资源与水工程学报》;20110630;第22卷(第3期);113~118 *
基于指标模糊权和协调性下的地下水水质评价模型构建及应用;于会彬等;《环境工程》;20090831;第27卷(第4期);120~123 *
基于模糊权重下的多层评价地下水资源模型的构建及其应用;于会彬等;《环境科学研究》;20090228;第22卷(第2期);145~149 *
生活垃圾填埋场地下水污染风险分级方法研究;杨昱等;《生态环境学报》;20101231;第19卷(第7期);1704-1709 *
相对隶属度理论及其在地下水水质评价中应用;陈守煜等;《辽宁工程技术大学学报》;20031031;第22卷(第5期);691~694 *
简易垃圾填埋场地下水污染风险评价;刘增超等;《环境科学研究》;20120731;第25卷(第7期);833-839 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102999709A (en) 2013-03-27

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102999709B (en) A kind of rural activity district underground water risk stratification assessing zonings method
Madhav et al. Geochemical assessment of groundwater quality for its suitability for drinking and irrigation purpose in rural areas of Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi), Uttar Pradesh
Yang et al. Decline in water level boosts cyanobacteria dominance in subtropical reservoirs
Zahedi et al. Groundwater quality classification derivation using multi-criteria-decision-making techniques
Zhang et al. Assessment of non-point source pollution using a spatial multicriteria analysis approach
Pandey et al. Integrating hydro-meteorological and physiographic factors for assessment of vulnerability to drought
Tan et al. Development of a benthic diatom index of biotic integrity (BD-IBI) for ecosystem health assessment of human dominant subtropical rivers, China
Dalezios et al. Water scarcity management: Part 1: Methodological framework
Pandey et al. Assessing the impacts of watershed indexes and precipitation on spatial in-stream E. coli concentrations
CN107403253A (en) The method and apparatus for monitoring farmland quality
CN102831297A (en) Integration method for cause diagnosis of lake pollution
Wu et al. A new framework to evaluate ecosystem health: A case study in the Wei River basin, China
Tun et al. Assessment of land degradation and its impact on crop production in the Dry Zone of Myanmar
Sarkar et al. Drivers of water pollution and evaluating its ecological stress with special reference to macrovertebrates (fish community structure): a case of Churni River, India
Wan et al. A novel comprehensive model of set pair analysis with extenics for river health evaluation and prediction of semi-arid basin-A case study of Wei River Basin, China
Ghiglieri et al. Potential risks of nitrate pollution in aquifers from agricultural practices in the Nurra region, northwestern Sardinia, Italy
Li et al. Development of a bacteria-based index of biotic integrity (Ba-IBI) for assessing ecological health of the Three Gorges Reservoir in different operation periods
Soltani et al. An integrated approach for assessing surface water quality: Case of Beni Haroun dam (Northeast Algeria)
RANJBAR et al. Integrated river quality management by CCME WQI as an effective tool to characterize surface water source pollution (Case study: Karun River, Iran)
Sharifinia et al. Evaluation of water quality trends in the Maroon River Basin, Iran, from 1990 to 2010 by WQI and multivariate analyses
Li et al. A new risk assessment system based on set pair analysis–variable fuzzy sets for underground reservoirs
Colas et al. Scale dependency in the hydromorphological control of a stream ecosystem functioning
Zhang et al. Investigating river health and potential risks using a novel hybrid decision-making framework with multi-source data fusion in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau
Linjin et al. Water quality evaluation of Wenyu River based on single factor evaluation and comprehensive pollution index method
Molla et al. An assessment of geo-morphology and hydro-biological factors of major wetlands of Bangladesh

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20160406

Termination date: 20201220