CN102359228A - Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment - Google Patents

Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102359228A
CN102359228A CN2011102243095A CN201110224309A CN102359228A CN 102359228 A CN102359228 A CN 102359228A CN 2011102243095 A CN2011102243095 A CN 2011102243095A CN 201110224309 A CN201110224309 A CN 201110224309A CN 102359228 A CN102359228 A CN 102359228A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
rho
sigma
moment
concrete
reinforcement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN2011102243095A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN102359228B (en
Inventor
孙俊贻
李英民
蔡珍红
何晓婷
郑周练
司景龙
陈强
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chongqing University
Original Assignee
Chongqing University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chongqing University filed Critical Chongqing University
Priority to CN 201110224309 priority Critical patent/CN102359228B/en
Publication of CN102359228A publication Critical patent/CN102359228A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN102359228B publication Critical patent/CN102359228B/en
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of a steel-concrete beam under a use bending moment. The method comprises the following steps of: making a group of steel-concrete beams with rectangular sections, wherein concrete strengths, reinforcing steel bar grades, beam lengths, section sizes and protective layer thicknesses of the beams are kept consistent with each other, and reinforcement ratios pi of the beams are distributed within a range of 0.2-2% from small to large; and then carrying out symmetric loading test to two simply support points of each beam; and by using the data obtained through test, figuring out an analytical expression Hcr (p) of the variation of a ratio Hcr between the cracking height hcr and beam height h of the steel-concrete beam under the use bending moment along with the reinforcement ratio p, wherein the obtained Hcr (p) is significant to the design and analysis of the steel-concrete structure.

Description

The method of steel concrete beam cracking height and reinforcement ratio relation under a kind of definite use moment of flexure
Technical field
The present invention relates to reinforced concrete beam in definite method of using cracking height and reinforcement ratio relation under the moment of flexure.
Background technology
Because concrete (abbreviation concrete) contraction of coarse aggregate and cement mortar in process of setting is poor, and the microstress field action of uneven temperature, the generation of humidity place, structural concrete is before bearing load or external force; The inner microcrack that has just had some dispersions; Under load or external force effect, these microcracks will increase and expand gradually, develop into macrocrack gradually by micro crack; Be destroyed up to final member; Therefore, in commission reinforced concrete beam (being called for short steel concrete beam) all is in band crack duty usually.Cracking will influence the macro-mechanical property of reinforced concrete beam, the bending rigidity of weakening reinforced concrete beam.Usually, adopt prefabricated rectangle cross section REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM WITH SINGLE REINFORCEMENT (promptly only disposing the beam of longitudinal reinforcement in the tensile region), carry out the test of freely-supported two point symmetry load bendings, the research cracking is to the influence of reinforced concrete beam mechanical property, and is as shown in Figure 1.As far as the bend test of under-reinforced beam (being the suitable beam of arrangement of reinforcement ratio), the concrete strain of tensile region at first reaches its tension failure strain value, and strain stress promptly ftractures Cr, corresponding moment of flexure is cracking moment M CrContinue to load, draw the concrete in district macroscopic crack to occur, along with the carrying out that loads, tensile reinforcement stress reaches yield strength f y, corresponding moment of flexure is yield moment M y, and this moment, the nip concrete strain did not reach resistance to compression failure strain ε as yet Cu, claim again that therefore under-reinforced beam is the low amount of reinforcing bar; Proceed along with what load, the nip concrete strain will reach resistance to compression failure strain ε Cu, corresponding moment of flexure is breaking bending moment M uThe destruction of under-reinforced beam is generally a kind of ductile failure pattern, that is, it is big to destroy preceding reinforcing bar strain, so beam has very big distortion before destroying, is also referred to as pulling force and destroys.If the experimental test result of the amount of deflection w of moment M and beam is depicted as coordinate diagram M (w), the M of under-reinforced beam (w) schemes to demonstrate usually the Changing Pattern of tri linear form, and the moment M that is applied reaches breaking bending moment M uAfter, moment M will downward trend occur along with the increase of amount of deflection w, and promptly having a maximal bending moment value on M (w) figure (is breaking bending moment M u), as shown in Figure 2.As far as the design of under-reinforced beam, hope M usually Cr≈ (0.2~0.3) M u, M y≈ (0.9~0.95) M u, moment of flexure increment Delta M=M like this y-M CrIt is big to try one's best, and hopes to use moment of flexure (being the maximum service moment of flexure) to be M k≈ (0.5~0.6) M uTherefore, we can hold the macro-mechanical property of reinforced concrete structure (abbreviation Reinforced Concrete Structure) better through the relation of reinforced concrete beam cracking height under the research use moment of flexure with reinforcement ratio, improve the Reinforced Concrete Structure designed rationality.
Usually, the designer of reinforced concrete structure hopes and can directly determine reinforced concrete beam in the cracking degree of using under the moment of flexure according to certain design parameters very much.Yet; Present most of experimental study work all is based on modulus elasticity theory such as classical; In the basic unit of result of the test; Qualitative or cracking is discussed quantitatively to using the influence degree of reinforced concrete beam bending rigidity under the moment of flexure, and these achievements in research are very inconvenient to the design and analysis that instructs reinforced concrete structure.As everyone knows, experimental study will consume a large amount of expense inputs.For reaching the purpose that improves the experimental study business efficiency; Can make disposable economy drop into; Obtain the permanent experimental study achievement that conveniently instructs the reinforced concrete structure design and analysis; This field presses for new experimental study method, with accuracy and the convenience demand that satisfies design and analysis work.
Summary of the invention
The problem and shortage part of bringing in order to overcome modulus elasticity theory such as having experimental study work employing classics now; The present invention is based on the tension and compression different modulus elasticity theory; The method of steel concrete beam cracking height and reinforcement ratio relation under a kind of definite use moment of flexure has been proposed: prefabricated one group of REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM WITH SINGLE REINFORCEMENT; And it is carried out freely-supported two point symmetry load tests; As shown in Figure 1, obtain the coordinate graph of a relation M (w) that each root reinforced concrete beam moment M changes with bottom amount of deflection w in the girder span, those moment M are schemed to use as result of the test with the M (w) that amount of deflection w demonstrates tri linear metamorphosis rule; As shown in Figure 2, get these figure in the maximal bending moment value be the breaking bending moment M of corresponding beam uAnd get (0.5~0.6) M (i), u(i) be the use moment M of corresponding beam k(i), corresponding M k(i) the bottom deflection value is w in the girder span k(i).Because the nip of each beam only has concrete, so the pressurized elastic mould value
Figure BDA0000081505500000021
Can be taken as concrete elastic modulus E c, so by M k(i) and w k(i) can try to achieve the elastic mould value that drawn in every Liang La district Then, utilize the reinforcement ratio ρ of each root beam iAnd correspondence
Figure BDA0000081505500000023
Calculated value and concrete elastic modulus E cElastic modulus E with tensile reinforcement s, try to achieve cracking height h CrRatio H with deck-molding h CrAnalytical expression H with reinforcement ratio ρ variation Cr(ρ).Like this; The designer only need just can determine the cracking degree of reinforced concrete beam under the use moment of flexure that is designed according to design parameters reinforcement ratio ρ easily, and; As far as with the reinforced concrete beam under the condition, the empirical formula H that disposable test obtained Cr(ρ), can be used as permanent use.
The technical solution adopted for the present invention to solve the technical problems is:
The REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM WITH SINGLE REINFORCEMENT of manufacturing n root square-section, wherein n>=12 let concrete strength, reinforcing bar grade, beam length, deck-siding, deck-molding and the protective layer thickness of all beams be consistent basically, and let the reinforcement ratio ρ of each root beam iBe distributed in from small to large in 0.2% to 2% the scope.All beams are carried out the test of freely-supported two point symmetry load bendings, as shown in Figure 1, and record the coordinate graph of a relation M (w) that each root beam moment M changes with bottom amount of deflection w in the girder span.Choose M (w) figure that those moment M and amount of deflection w demonstrate tri linear metamorphosis rule and use as result of the test, as shown in Figure 2, the maximal bending moment value of getting among these figure is the breaking bending moment M of corresponding beam uAnd get (0.5~0.6) M (i), u(i) be the use moment M of corresponding beam k(i), corresponding M k(i) the bottom deflection value is w in the girder span k(i).
Theoretical according to the small deflection plain bending of shallow beam, every simply supported beam is under load action, and beam can deflection, and is in the bottom and is drawn and the stress of upper portion pressurized, is neither drawn also the not neutral line of pressurized thereby form.Suppose that the tension and compression modulus of elasticity is designated as
Figure BDA0000081505500000031
With
Figure BDA0000081505500000032
Because the nip of every beam only has concrete, so the pressurized elastic mould value
Figure BDA0000081505500000033
Can be taken as concrete elastic modulus E cEvery simply supported beam span length is designated as l, deck-siding and is designated as the tensile region height that b, deck-molding be designated as h, beam and is designated as h 1(i), the depth of compression zone of beam is designated as h 2(i), using moment M k(i) radius of curvature of neutral line is designated as R (i), is using moment M down k(i) underbeam span centre bottom deflection value is designated as w k(i), therefore h=h is arranged 1(i)+h 2(i).
According to tension and compression different modulus pure bending beam theoretical (C.A. A Mubaerchumiyang work. Wu Ruifeng; Zhang Yunzhen etc. translate. different modulus elasticity theory [M]. and Beijing: China Railway Press; 1986.), for the investigation point apart from neutral line y place, its strain can be expressed as e=y/R; Therefore, the above (h of neutral line 2≤y<0) longitudinal fiber is a pressurized, and (0<y≤h below the neutral line 1) longitudinal fiber drawn.According to the broad sense law of elasticity, the normal stress σ of tensile region +Normal stress σ with pressure zone -Should be respectively
&sigma; + = E + y R , 0 < y &le; h 1 &sigma; - = E - y R , - h 2 &le; y < 0
The projection of all normal force on the x axle equals zero, and their moment equals the moment M that acted on, can obtain following equilibrium equation like this
&Integral; - h 2 0 &sigma; x - bdy + &Integral; 0 h 1 &sigma; x + bdy = 0
And
&Integral; - h 2 0 &sigma; x - ybdy + &Integral; 0 h 1 &sigma; x + ybdy = M
By above expression formula, we can push away
Figure BDA0000081505500000044
Simultaneous equality h=h so 1+ h 2After, can get
h 1 = E - E + + E - h , h 2 = E + E + + E - h
In addition, can also push away by above
1 R [ E - bh 2 3 3 + E + bh 1 3 3 ] = M
If to tension and compression different modulus pure bending beam introduce bending stiffness notion
Figure BDA0000081505500000048
then following formula can be changed into
The deformation formula D=RM of well-known pure bending beam.Therefore, we have
&sigma; + = E + D My 0 < y &le; h 1 &sigma; - = E - D My - h 2 &le; y < 0
Because the nip of every beam only has concrete, so pressurized elastic mould value E -Can be taken as concrete elastic modulus E cThe effective height of supposing tensile region concrete cracking part is designated as h Cr, and note H Cr=h Cr/ h, so in the tensile region, the total pulling force N of all longitudinal fibers +Should be,
N + = &Integral; 0 h 1 &sigma; + ds = &Integral; 0 h 1 E + y R bdy = bE + 2 R h 1 2
In fact, this total pulling force N +It is pulling force by tensile reinforcement
Figure BDA00000815055000000411
With the tensile region do not ftracture the part concrete pulling force
Figure BDA00000815055000000412
Form, promptly Wherein
N s + = E s h 1 R A S , N c + = bE c 2 R ( h 1 - h cr ) 2
In the formula, E sBe the modulus of elasticity of tensile reinforcement, A sThe gross area for tensile reinforcement.Therefore, we finally can push away
h cr h = E c E + + E c ( 1 - E + E c - 2 E s E c E + + E c E c A S bh )
So, as far as above-mentioned test beam, we have
h 1 ( i ) = E i - E i + + E i - h , h 2 ( i ) = E i + E i + + E i - h
And
E i - bh 2 3 ( i ) 3 + E i + bh 1 3 ( i ) 3 = R ( i ) M k ( i )
Geometrical relationship during by the beam deflection can get
R ( i ) = w k 2 ( i ) + l 2 4 2 w k ( i ) - h 1 ( i )
We finally can obtain so to consider
bh 3 E i + E c ( E i + + E c ) 2 + 3 h M k ( i ) E c E i + + E c = 3 M k ( i ) 4 w k ( i ) 2 + l 2 8 w k ( i )
With M k(i) and w k(i) the above equation of substitution then can be tried to achieve the elastic mould value that drawn in every Liang La district Because in most cases, the protective layer thickness of reinforcing bar remains 2.5cm basically, so we can define reinforcement ratio ρ i=A s(i)/bh, wherein A s(i) be the tensile reinforcement gross area of each root beam, utilize the reinforcement ratio ρ of each root beam so iAnd correspondence
Figure BDA00000815055000000511
Calculated value, just can try to achieve regression equation E +Alpha among=α ρ+β and β,
&alpha; = n &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &CenterDot; &rho; i - &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i n &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 - &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i , &beta; = &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + - &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &CenterDot; &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i n &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 - &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i
Consider E +=α ρ+β, we finally can obtain so
H cr ( &rho; ) = E c &alpha;&rho; + &beta; + E c ( 1 - &alpha;&rho; + &beta; E c - 2 E s E c &alpha;&rho; + &beta; + E c E c &rho; )
At last, with α, β, E c, E sIn the above expression formula of substitution, just can be in the hope of cracking height h CrRatio H with deck-molding h CrAnalytical expression H with reinforcement ratio ρ variation Cr(ρ), wherein, the unit of all physical quantitys all adopts the International System of Units.
The invention has the beneficial effects as follows: only need be according to design parameters reinforcement ratio ρ; Just can determine the cracking degree of reinforced concrete beam under the use moment of flexure that is designed easily; And, as far as the reinforced concrete beam under the same terms, the empirical formula H that disposable test obtained Cr(ρ), can be used as permanent use, thereby reached the purpose that improves the experimental study business efficiency.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the mechanical model of reinforced concrete rectangular beam under two point symmetries load of the both sides freely-supported of the present invention's employing.Among the figure, x, y, z are that rectangular co-ordinate, l are that simply supported beam span length, a are that the shear span of beam is long, b is that deck-siding, h are deck-molding, h 1Tensile region height, h for beam 2For depth of compression zone, the P of beam is two point loads that two point symmetries are applied when loading.
Fig. 2 demonstrates M (w) sketch map of tri linear metamorphosis rule for moment M and amount of deflection w.Among the figure, " 1 " is first obvious turning point that load on M (w) figure-deflection curve occurs, and the bottom concrete strain of signal beam reaches cracking strain (being concrete pulling strain limit value); " 2 " are second obvious turning point that load on M (w) figure-deflection curve occurs, and the strain of signal longitudinal tensile reinforcing bar reaches yield strain; " 3 " are the 3rd the obvious turning point that load on M (w) figure-deflection curve occurs, and the top concrete strain of signal beam reaches failure strain (being concrete compressive strain limiting value); M Cr(i) represent the cracking moment of each root beam, the bottom deflection value is w in the corresponding girder span Cr(i); M k(i) represent the use moment of flexure of each root beam, the bottom deflection value is w in the corresponding girder span k(i); M y(i) represent the yield moment of each root beam, the bottom deflection value is w in the corresponding girder span y(i); M u(i) represent the breaking bending moment of each root beam, the bottom deflection value is w in the corresponding girder span u(i).
The specific embodiment
The reinforced concrete beam of manufacturing n root square-section, wherein n >=12 let concrete strength, reinforcing bar grade, beam length, deck-siding, deck-molding and the protective layer thickness of all beams be consistent basically.All beams are carried out freely-supported two point symmetry load tests; As shown in Figure 1; Span length when l carries out freely-supported two point symmetry load tests for all reinforced concrete beams, the shear span that a is beam length, b are that deck-siding, h are deck-molding; Therefore the point load that is applied when P is the loading of two point symmetries among the figure is the pure bending test section of beam, its moment M=aP between two point load application points that applied.The reinforced concrete beam that the test of each root is used only at tension side configuration longitudinal reinforcement, and lets the reinforcement ratio ρ of each root beam iBe distributed in from small to large in 0.2% to 2% the scope, and in the shear span district, the used reinforced concrete beam of each root test all disposes enough stirrup amounts, so that shear failure does not take place in loading procedure the guarantee test beam.Through load test, record the coordinate graph of a relation M (w) that each root beam moment M changes with bottom amount of deflection w in the girder span.Choose M (w) figure that those moment M and amount of deflection w demonstrate tri linear metamorphosis rule and use as result of the test, as shown in Figure 2, the maximal bending moment value of getting among these figure is the breaking bending moment M of corresponding beam uAnd get (0.5~0.6) M (i), u(i) be the use moment M of corresponding beam k(i), corresponding M k(i) the bottom deflection value is w in the girder span k(i).Get the pressurized elastic mould value
Figure BDA0000081505500000071
Be all concrete elastic modulus E c, with l, b, h, E cAnd M k(i) and w k(i) the following equation of substitution
bh 3 E i + E c ( E i + + E c ) 2 + 3 h M k ( i ) E c E i + + E c = 3 M k ( i ) 4 w k ( i ) 2 + l 2 8 w k ( i ) ,
Try to achieve the elastic mould value that drawn in each root Liang La district respectively
Figure BDA0000081505500000073
Reinforcement ratio ρ with each root beam i=A s(i)/bh and correspondence Calculated value, the following formula of substitution
&alpha; = n &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &CenterDot; &rho; i - &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i n &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 - &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i , &beta; = &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + - &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &CenterDot; &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i n &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 - &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i
Try to achieve alpha and β, again with the alpha of trying to achieve and β and E cAnd E sThe following formula of substitution
H cr ( &rho; ) = E c &alpha;&rho; + &beta; + E c ( 1 - &alpha;&rho; + &beta; E c - 2 E s E c &alpha;&rho; + &beta; + E c E c &rho; )
Try to achieve cracking height h CrRatio H with deck-molding h CrAnalytical expression H with reinforcement ratio ρ variation Cr(ρ), wherein, the unit of all physical quantitys all adopts the International System of Units.

Claims (1)

1. method of confirm using steel concrete beam cracking height and reinforcement ratio relation under the moment of flexure; It is characterized in that: manufacturing n root rectangular reinforced concrete beam; N>=12 wherein; Every beam only at tension side configuration longitudinal reinforcement, lets concrete strength, reinforcing bar grade, beam length, deck-siding, deck-molding and the protective layer thickness of all beams be consistent basically, and lets the reinforcement ratio ρ of each root beam iBe distributed in from small to large in 0.2% to 2% the scope; All beams are carried out freely-supported two point symmetry load tests; Record the coordinate graph of a relation M (w) that each root beam moment M changes with bottom amount of deflection w in the girder span; Choose M (w) figure that those moment M and amount of deflection w demonstrate tri linear metamorphosis rule and use as result of the test, the maximal bending moment value of getting among these figure is the breaking bending moment M of corresponding beam uAnd get (0.5~0.6) M (i), u(i) be the use moment M of corresponding beam k(i), corresponding M k(i) the bottom deflection value is w in the girder span k(i), the pressurized elastic mould value of all beams All be taken as concrete elastic mould value E c, with E cAnd M k(i) and w k(i) substitution equation
bh 3 E i + E c ( E i + + E c ) 2 + 3 h M k ( i ) E c E i + + E c = 3 M k ( i ) 4 w k ( i ) 2 + l 2 8 w k ( i ) ,
Try to achieve the elastic mould value that drawn of corresponding beam
Figure FDA0000081505490000013
Wherein, span length, the b when l carries out freely-supported two point symmetry load tests for all reinforced concrete beams is that deck-siding, h are deck-molding, with the reinforcement ratio ρ of each root beam iAnd correspondence Calculated value, the following formula of substitution,
&alpha; = n &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &CenterDot; &rho; i - &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i n &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 - &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i , &beta; = &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + - &Sigma; i = 1 n E i + &CenterDot; &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i n &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i 2 - &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i &Sigma; i = 1 n &rho; i
Try to achieve alpha and β, again with α, β, E c, E sThe following expression formula of substitution
H cr ( &rho; ) = E c &alpha;&rho; + &beta; + E c ( 1 - &alpha;&rho; + &beta; E c - 2 E s E c &alpha;&rho; + &beta; + E c E c &rho; ) ,
Try to achieve cracking height h CrRatio H with deck-molding h CrAnalytical expression H with reinforcement ratio ρ variation Cr(ρ), wherein, E sBe the modulus of elasticity of tensile reinforcement, the unit of all physical quantitys all adopts the International System of Units.
CN 201110224309 2011-08-05 2011-08-05 Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment Expired - Fee Related CN102359228B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN 201110224309 CN102359228B (en) 2011-08-05 2011-08-05 Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN 201110224309 CN102359228B (en) 2011-08-05 2011-08-05 Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102359228A true CN102359228A (en) 2012-02-22
CN102359228B CN102359228B (en) 2013-06-05

Family

ID=45584603

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN 201110224309 Expired - Fee Related CN102359228B (en) 2011-08-05 2011-08-05 Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102359228B (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU697665A1 (en) * 1978-01-06 1979-11-15 Всесоюзный Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательский Институт Гидротехники Им.Б.Е. Веденеева Reinforced-concrete element
RU2377372C1 (en) * 2008-10-20 2009-12-27 Федеральное государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Казанский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет ФГОУ ВПО КГАСУ Structural unit
CN101923024A (en) * 2010-08-04 2010-12-22 重庆大学 Method for determining elastic modulus and flexural rigidity of reinforced concrete beam with crack

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SU697665A1 (en) * 1978-01-06 1979-11-15 Всесоюзный Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательский Институт Гидротехники Им.Б.Е. Веденеева Reinforced-concrete element
RU2377372C1 (en) * 2008-10-20 2009-12-27 Федеральное государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования Казанский государственный архитектурно-строительный университет ФГОУ ВПО КГАСУ Structural unit
CN101923024A (en) * 2010-08-04 2010-12-22 重庆大学 Method for determining elastic modulus and flexural rigidity of reinforced concrete beam with crack

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
管俊峰等: "钢筋混凝土梁裂缝分布受配筋影响的试验研究", 《武汉理工大学学报》 *
蒋沧如: "基于裂缝控制的矩形截面受弯构件配筋计算实用方法", 《四川建筑科学研究》 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102359228B (en) 2013-06-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhao et al. Experimental investigation on the bearing mechanism of perfobond rib shear connectors
Liberati et al. Failure analysis of punching in reinforced concrete flat slabs with openings adjacent to the column
Tao et al. Behaviour of concrete-filled double skin rectangular steel tubular beam–columns
Badawi et al. Flexural strengthening of RC beams with prestressed NSM CFRP rods–experimental and analytical investigation
Liang et al. Local buckling of steel plates in concrete-filled thin-walled steel tubular beam–columns
CN105040904B (en) A kind of construction method of fracture width and the FRP Concrete Beam Reinforceds of amount of deflection control
CN102650579A (en) Flexural bearing capacity designing method for frame beam adopting pre-stressed steel reinforced concrete structure
CN113536419B (en) Method for determining bending-resistant bearing capacity of FRP profile reinforced existing reinforced concrete beam
CN110990922A (en) Method for calculating bending resistance bearing capacity of cross-section beam under action of negative bending moment
CN102383529A (en) Method for determining relation between stiffness reduction of steel concrete beam under use bending moment and reinforcement ratio
AlHamaydeh et al. Experimental quantification of punching shear capacity for large-scale GFRP-reinforced flat slabs made of synthetic fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete dataset
CN102392508A (en) Method for determining relation between elastic modulus and reinforcement ratio of steel concrete beam under used bending moment
CN102359229A (en) Suitable method for determining ideal ratio of reinforcement of reinforced concrete beam under usage of bending moment
CN104598723A (en) Method for predicting shear-bearing capacity of steel-concrete-steel combined deep beam
CN107908870A (en) A kind of analysis method of prestressing with bond gluing wooden frame bending bearing capacity
CN102359228B (en) Method for determining relationship between cracking height and reinforcement ratio of steel-concrete beam under use bending moment
CN116150845A (en) Method for calculating cracking bending moment and bending-resistant bearing capacity of assembled steel pipe concrete combined truss under action of hogging moment
CN102409806B (en) Method for determining relation between neutral layers of reinforced concrete beams with usable bending moment and reinforcement ratios
Chithra et al. Studies on prefabricated cage reinforced steel–concrete composite beams
Zhu et al. Experimental study on axial compressive behavior of concrete-filled double-skin thin-walled steel box columns with and without PBL
CN211772736U (en) Steel-concrete combined connection structure under concrete tension state
Zha et al. Experimental study on flexural behavior of steel-laminated concrete (NC and UHPC) composite beams with corrugated steel webs
Joyklad et al. Cyclic performance of beam–column joints with extended column fixed at base. Part I: experimental investigation
Li et al. Experimental study of T-shaped RC shear wall subjected to cyclic loading
Chithra et al. Flexural ductility of prefabricated cage reinforced steel-concrete composite beams

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee
CF01 Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee

Granted publication date: 20130605

Termination date: 20160805