CN102236725B - Part de-rating design system and method - Google Patents
Part de-rating design system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102236725B CN102236725B CN201010154732.8A CN201010154732A CN102236725B CN 102236725 B CN102236725 B CN 102236725B CN 201010154732 A CN201010154732 A CN 201010154732A CN 102236725 B CN102236725 B CN 102236725B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- parameter value
- product
- derate
- real work
- value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a part de-rating design method, which comprises the following steps of: acquiring the specification of a product and all parts of the product from a storage device, classifying all the acquired parts to obtain different types of parts, and acquiring actual working parameter values and rated parameter values of the parts of each type; judging whether the parts have de-rating spaces or not according to the acquired parameter values; when the parts have the de-rating spaces, analyzing the actual working parameter values of the parts to obtain analysis results; judging whether the results obtained by the analysis are effective or not according to a part inspection criterion list in the storage device; if the results obtained by the analysis are judged to be effective, setting de-rated parameter values according to the actual working parameter values and the rated parameter values; assessing whether the set de-rated parameter values are effective or not according to the specification of the product; and when the set de-rated parameter values are assessed to be effective, updating the set de-rated parameter values into a bill of material list of the product. The invention also provides a part de-rating design system.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of part de-rating design system and method.
Background technology
For the crash rate of electronic component is reduced, thus when circuit design, to carry out design of Reducing Rating, to power consumption is being down to Optimal performance when minimum.Traditional design of Reducing Rating is by manually completing, and needs deviser to design according to self experience, there is no the idea of robotization and procedure design, thus, may omit some stages wherein because of deviser's carelessness, causes design to occur mistake.
Summary of the invention
In view of above content, the invention provides a kind of part de-rating design system, standard the flow process of each part de-rating design of product, and automatically the derate parameter value obtaining is assessed.
In addition, be also necessary to provide a kind of part de-rating design method, standard the flow process of each part de-rating design of product, and automatically the derate parameter value obtaining is assessed.
A kind of part de-rating design system, this system runs in computing machine, this system comprises: acquisition module, for obtain specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from the memory storage of computing machine, obtain all parts that product comprises, and obtained part is classified, to obtain dissimilar part, and from memory storage, obtain real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts; Analysis module, for each real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has derate space, when described part has derate space, real work parameter value to part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result, and judge that according to described component test Specificationslists whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective; Module is set, when effective for the result that obtains when described analysis, according to the real work parameter value of each part and nominal parameter value, corresponding derate parameter value is set, wherein, the derate parameter value of described each part should be greater than the real work parameter value of this part and be less than the nominal parameter value of this part; Evaluation module, whether effective for assess set derate parameter value according to the specification of described product; And update module, when effective for the derate parameter value when set, the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) list of product described in memory storage.
A method, the method is applied in computing machine, and the method comprising the steps of: the specification and the component test Specificationslists that from the memory storage of computing machine, obtain product; From memory storage, obtain all parts that product comprises, and obtained part is classified, to obtain dissimilar part; From memory storage, obtain real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts; Each real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has derate space; When described part has derate space, the real work parameter value of part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result; According to described component test Specificationslists, judge that whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective; When the result that obtains when described analysis is effective, according to real work parameter value and nominal parameter value, derate parameter value is set, wherein, described derate parameter value should be greater than real work parameter value and be less than nominal parameter value; Whether effectively according to the specification of described product, assess set derate parameter value; And when set derate parameter value is effective, the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) list of product described in memory storage.
Compared to prior art, described part de-rating design system and method, standard the flow process of each part de-rating design of product, and automatically the derate parameter value obtaining is assessed, improved the work efficiency of part de-rating design and the reliability of product.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is the applied environment figure of part de-rating design system of the present invention preferred embodiment.
Fig. 2 is the implementing procedure figure of part de-rating design method of the present invention preferred embodiment.
Main element symbol description
| Computing machine | 1 |
| |
2 |
| Part de-rating |
10 |
| |
100 |
| |
101 |
| Module is set | 102 |
| |
103 |
| |
104 |
Embodiment
As shown in Figure 1, be the applied environment figure of part de-rating design system of the present invention preferred embodiment.In this preferred embodiment, described part de-rating design system 10 runs in computing machine 1, and described computing machine 1 also comprises memory storage 2.Described memory storage 2 for example, for the specification of storage products and the information of the included part of this product: the title of part, the nominal parameter value of part, component test Specificationslists.Described part de-rating design system 10 comprises acquisition module 100, analysis module 101, module 102 is set, evaluation module 103 and update module 104.The alleged module of the present invention has been the computer program code segments of a specific function, than program, be more suitable in describing the implementation of software in computing machine, therefore below the present invention to all describing with module in software description.
Described acquisition module 100 is for obtaining specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from memory storage 2.The specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.Described component test Specificationslists comprises the standard value range that is optimized simulation analysis acquired results according to the real work parameter of each part.
Described acquisition module 100 is also for obtain all parts that this product comprises from memory storage 2, and obtained part is classified, for example, to obtain dissimilar part: capacitance kind part, resistance class part and inductor part.
Described acquisition module 100 is also for obtaining real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts from memory storage 2.Described real work parameter value is the parameter value of the part that records of user's throughput in real work, and the real work parameter value that user obtains described measurement is stored in memory storage 2.Described real work parameter include, but not limited to the current value of real work, the performance number of the magnitude of voltage of real work, real work, the frequency values of real work and actual work temperature value.Described nominal parameter value includes, but not limited to load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
Described analysis module 101, for each real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judges whether described part has derate space.When having the real work parameter value of part to be less than corresponding nominal parameter value, the described part of described analysis module 101 judgement has derate space; When each real work parameter value of part equals corresponding nominal parameter value, the described part of described analysis module 101 judgement does not have derate space.
Described analysis module 101, also for when described part has derate space, is analyzed the real work parameter value of part, to obtain analysis result.Described analysis includes, but are not limited to, and optimizes analysis, risk analysis, sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo method analysis.
Whether described analysis module 101 is also effective for judge the result that described analysis obtains according to the component test Specificationslists of memory storage 2.The result that described analysis module 101 obtains described analysis and the standard value in the component test Specificationslists in memory storage 2 compare, in the time of within result that described analysis the obtains standard value range in component test Specificationslists, the result that the described analysis of described analysis module 101 judgement obtains is effective, when result that described analysis obtains is not within the standard value range in component test Specificationslists, the result that the described analysis of described analysis module 101 judgement obtains is invalid.
The described module 102 that arranges when effective for the result that obtains when described analysis, arranges corresponding derate parameter value according to the real work parameter value of each part and nominal parameter value.Wherein, the described derate parameter value that module 102 settings are set should meet the following conditions: nominal parameter value > derate parameter value > real work parameter value.
Whether described evaluation module 103 is effective for assessment of set derate parameter value.Described evaluation module 103 carries out functional test and reliability testing according to described derate parameter value to product, to judge that the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and reliability are whether within the specification limit of product.In the time of within the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments is effective; When the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and reliability are not within the specification limit at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments is invalid.
When described update module 104 is effective for the derate parameter value when set, the derate parameter value of each set part is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) list of this product of memory storage 2.
As shown in Figure 2, be that a kind of part of the present invention is by the method flow diagram of volume method for designing preferred embodiment.First, step S10, acquisition module 100 obtains specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from memory storage 2.The specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.Described component test Specificationslists comprises the standard value range that is optimized simulation analysis acquired results according to the real work parameter of each part.
Step S11, acquisition module 100 obtains all parts that this product comprises from memory storage 2, and obtained part is classified, for example, to obtain dissimilar part: capacitance kind part, resistance class part and inductor part.
Step S12, acquisition module 100 obtains real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts from memory storage 2.Described real work parameter include, but not limited to the current value of real work, the performance number of the magnitude of voltage of real work, real work, the frequency values of real work and actual work temperature value.Described nominal parameter value includes, but not limited to load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
Step S13, analysis module 101 compares each real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts, judges whether described part has derate space.When having the real work parameter value of part to be less than corresponding nominal parameter value, the described part of described analysis module 101 judgement has derate space; When each real work parameter value of part equals corresponding nominal parameter value, the described part of described analysis module 101 judgement does not have derate space.
Step S14, when described part has derate space, the real work parameter value of 101 pairs of parts of analysis module is analyzed, to obtain analysis result.Described analysis includes, but are not limited to, and optimizes analysis, risk analysis, sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo method analysis.
Step S15, analysis module 101 judges that according to the component test Specificationslists in memory storage 2 whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective.The result that described analysis module 101 obtains described analysis and the standard value in the component test Specificationslists in memory storage 2 compare, in the time of within result that described analysis the obtains standard value range in component test Specificationslists, the result that the described analysis of described analysis module 101 judgement obtains is effective, when result that described analysis obtains is not within the standard value range in component test Specificationslists, the result that the described analysis of described analysis module 101 judgement obtains is invalid.
Step S16, when the result that obtains when described analysis is effective, arranges module 102, according to the real work parameter value of each part and nominal parameter value, corresponding derate parameter value is set.Wherein, the described derate parameter value that module 102 settings are set should meet the following conditions: nominal parameter value > derate parameter value > real work parameter value.
Step S17, whether evaluation module 103 is effective for assessment of set derate parameter value.Described evaluation module 103 carries out functional test and reliability testing according to described derate parameter value to product, to judge that the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and reliability are whether within the specification limit of product.In the time of within the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments is effective; When the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and reliability are not within the specification limit at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments is invalid.
Step S18, when described update module 104 is effective for the derate parameter value when set, is updated to the derate parameter value of each set part in the Bill of Material (BOM) list of described product of memory storage 2.
Should be noted that, above embodiment is only unrestricted in order to technical scheme of the present invention to be described, although the present invention is had been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiment, those of ordinary skill in the art is to be understood that, can modify or be equal to replacement technical scheme of the present invention, and not depart from the spirit and scope of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (8)
1. a part de-rating design system, this system runs in computing machine, it is characterized in that, and this system comprises:
Acquisition module, for obtain specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from the memory storage of computing machine, obtain all parts that product comprises, and obtained part is classified, to obtain dissimilar part, and from memory storage, obtaining real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts, described component test Specificationslists comprises the standard value range that is optimized simulation analysis acquired results according to the real work parameter of each part;
Analysis module, for each real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has derate space, when described part has derate space, real work parameter value to part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result, and judge that according to described component test Specificationslists whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective, in the time of within result that described analysis the obtains standard value range in component test Specificationslists, described analysis module judges that the result that described analysis obtains is effective, when result that described analysis obtains is not within the standard value range in component test Specificationslists, described analysis module judges that the result that described analysis obtains is invalid,
Module is set, when effective for the result that obtains when described analysis, according to the real work parameter value of each part and nominal parameter value, corresponding derate parameter value is set, wherein, the derate parameter value of described each part should be greater than the real work parameter value of this part and be less than the nominal parameter value of this part;
Evaluation module, whether effective for assess set derate parameter value according to the specification of described product; And
Update module, when effective for the derate parameter value when set, is updated to the derate parameter value of each part of described setting in the Bill of Material (BOM) list of product described in memory storage.
2. part de-rating design system as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, the specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.
3. part de-rating design system as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, described real work parameter comprise the current value of real work, the performance number of the magnitude of voltage of real work, real work, the frequency values of real work and actual work temperature value; Described nominal parameter value comprises load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
4. part de-rating design system as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, described evaluation module is within the function of the product when obtaining according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product time, assess set derate parameter value effective, and when the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and reliability are not within the specification limit at product, assess set derate parameter value invalid.
5. a part de-rating design method, the method is applied to, in computing machine, it is characterized in that, the method comprising the steps of:
The specification and the component test Specificationslists that from the memory storage of computing machine, obtain product, described component test Specificationslists comprises the standard value range that is optimized simulation analysis acquired results according to the real work parameter of each part;
From memory storage, obtain all parts that product comprises, and obtained part is classified, to obtain dissimilar part;
From memory storage, obtain real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts;
Each real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has derate space;
When described part has derate space, the real work parameter value of part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result;
According to described component test Specificationslists, judge that whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective, in the time of within result that described analysis the obtains standard value range in component test Specificationslists, judge that the result that described analysis obtains is effective, when result that described analysis obtains is not within the standard value range in component test Specificationslists, judge that the result that described analysis obtains is invalid;
When the result that obtains when described analysis is effective, according to real work parameter value and nominal parameter value, derate parameter value is set, wherein, described derate parameter value should be greater than real work parameter value and be less than nominal parameter value;
Whether effectively according to the specification of described product, assess set derate parameter value; And
When set derate parameter value is effective, the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) list of product described in memory storage.
6. part de-rating design method as claimed in claim 5, the specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.
7. part de-rating design method as claimed in claim 5, is characterized in that, described real work parameter comprise the current value of real work, the performance number of the magnitude of voltage of real work, real work, the frequency values of real work and actual work temperature value; Described nominal parameter value comprises load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
8. part de-rating design method as claimed in claim 5, is characterized in that, the described specification according to described product is assessed the whether effective step of set derate parameter value and comprised:
In the time of within the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, assess set derate parameter value effective;
When the function of the product obtaining according to described derate parameter value and reliability are not within the specification limit at product, assess set derate parameter value invalid.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010154732.8A CN102236725B (en) | 2010-04-26 | 2010-04-26 | Part de-rating design system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010154732.8A CN102236725B (en) | 2010-04-26 | 2010-04-26 | Part de-rating design system and method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102236725A CN102236725A (en) | 2011-11-09 |
| CN102236725B true CN102236725B (en) | 2014-02-19 |
Family
ID=44887371
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010154732.8A Expired - Fee Related CN102236725B (en) | 2010-04-26 | 2010-04-26 | Part de-rating design system and method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102236725B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109815468A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-05-28 | 西南技术物理研究所 | A kind of component design of Reducing Rating report automatic generation method |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20060074589A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Qian Cui | Method of predicting quiescent current variation of an integrated circuit die from a process monitor derating factor |
| US20060090150A1 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2006-04-27 | Kayhan Kucukcakar | Method and apparatus for reducing timing pessimism during static timing analysis |
| CN101470763A (en) * | 2007-12-25 | 2009-07-01 | 英业达股份有限公司 | Derating checking method and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN101655695A (en) * | 2008-08-20 | 2010-02-24 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | System and method for improving reliability of electronic device |
-
2010
- 2010-04-26 CN CN201010154732.8A patent/CN102236725B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20060074589A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Qian Cui | Method of predicting quiescent current variation of an integrated circuit die from a process monitor derating factor |
| US20060090150A1 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2006-04-27 | Kayhan Kucukcakar | Method and apparatus for reducing timing pessimism during static timing analysis |
| CN101470763A (en) * | 2007-12-25 | 2009-07-01 | 英业达股份有限公司 | Derating checking method and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN101655695A (en) * | 2008-08-20 | 2010-02-24 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | System and method for improving reliability of electronic device |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 二极管正向平均电流降额曲线的测试方法及分析;刘畅;《第19界中国天津2005IT、网络、信息技术、电子、仪器仪表创新学术会议》;20050930;第187~191页 * |
| 基于PSpice仿真的SLD控制电路降额设计;辛波，马静;《国外电子测量技术》;20070131(第2007年1期);第22~26页 * |
| 蒙特卡罗分析方法与电子电路模拟;陈江华;《山东工业大学学报》;20000229;第30卷(第1期);第91~95页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN102236725A (en) | 2011-11-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109996269A (en) | A kind of cordless communication network abnormal cause determines method, apparatus, equipment and medium | |
| US20210390238A1 (en) | Simulation and analysis of circuit designs | |
| CN105277820A (en) | Electrical equipment monitoring method and electrical equipment monitoring system | |
| CN105702595A (en) | Yield determination method of wafer and multivariate detection method of wafer acceptance test | |
| CN109116243B (en) | Power battery abnormity detection method and device | |
| KR101998972B1 (en) | Method of analyzing and visualizing the cause of process failure by deriving the defect occurrence index by variable sections | |
| WO2016119755A1 (en) | Integrated circuit measurement method, device, and system | |
| CN105447214B (en) | Method and device for determining device parameters | |
| CN102236725B (en) | Part de-rating design system and method | |
| CN108121656A (en) | A kind of software evaluation method and apparatus | |
| JP7019339B2 (en) | Defect cause extraction system and its method | |
| US20120310849A1 (en) | System and method for validating design of an electronic product | |
| CN113740693A (en) | Device performance testing method and device, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| CN114136174B (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for detecting standard component via hole of plate | |
| CN111784042A (en) | Power utilization node safety risk prediction method and device and storage medium | |
| CN116329138A (en) | Test method and device and electronic equipment thereof | |
| CN115935284A (en) | Power grid abnormal voltage detection method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115097320A (en) | Battery use estimation method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| KR20100088399A (en) | Apparatus and method for software faults prediction using metrics | |
| CN111341477B (en) | Nuclear power plant safety power supply renovation and maintenance method and device | |
| CN110134569A (en) | A kind of chip operation environment temperature detection method, system and read/write memory medium | |
| CN107102938B (en) | Test script updating method and device | |
| JP2014241066A (en) | Test method for integrated system | |
| CN107315922B (en) | Method and device for calculating additional contribution of genotype to phenotype | |
| CN101957886B (en) | Electronic part strain ratio analysis system and method |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20140219 Termination date: 20160426 |