CN102236725A - Part de-rating design system and method - Google Patents
Part de-rating design system and method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN102236725A CN102236725A CN2010101547328A CN201010154732A CN102236725A CN 102236725 A CN102236725 A CN 102236725A CN 2010101547328 A CN2010101547328 A CN 2010101547328A CN 201010154732 A CN201010154732 A CN 201010154732A CN 102236725 A CN102236725 A CN 102236725A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- parameter value
- product
- derate
- real work
- effective
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a part de-rating design method, which comprises the following steps of: acquiring the specification of a product and all parts of the product from a storage device, classifying all the acquired parts to obtain different types of parts, and acquiring actual working parameter values and rated parameter values of the parts of each type; judging whether the parts have de-rating spaces or not according to the acquired parameter values; when the parts have the de-rating spaces, analyzing the actual working parameter values of the parts to obtain analysis results; judging whether the results obtained by the analysis are effective or not according to a part inspection criterion list in the storage device; if the results obtained by the analysis are judged to be effective, setting de-rated parameter values according to the actual working parameter values and the rated parameter values; assessing whether the set de-rated parameter values are effective or not according to the specification of the product; and when the set de-rated parameter values are assessed to be effective, updating the set de-rated parameter values into a bill of material list of the product. The invention also provides a part de-rating design system.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of part design of Reducing Rating system and method.
Background technology
For the crash rate that makes electronic component reduces, thus when circuit design, to carry out design of Reducing Rating, so that optimize performance when minimum in that power consumption is reduced to.Traditional design of Reducing Rating is by manually finishing, and needs the deviser to design according to self experience, there is no the idea of robotization and procedure design, thus, may omit some stages wherein because of deviser's carelessness, causes design mistake to occur.
Summary of the invention
In view of above content, the invention provides a kind of part design of Reducing Rating system, standard the flow process of each part design of Reducing Rating of product, and automatically the derate parameter value that obtains is assessed.
In addition, also be necessary to provide a kind of part design of Reducing Rating method, standard the flow process of each part design of Reducing Rating of product, and automatically the derate parameter value that obtains is assessed.
A kind of part design of Reducing Rating system, this system runs in the computing machine, this system comprises: acquisition module, be used for obtaining the specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from the memory storage of computing machine, obtain all parts that product comprises, and the part that is obtained classified, obtaining dissimilar parts, and from memory storage, obtain the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts; Analysis module, be used for each the real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has the derate space, when described part has the derate space, real work parameter value to part is analyzed, obtaining analysis result, and judge according to described component test Specificationslists whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective; Module is set, be used for the result that obtains when described analysis when effective, real work parameter value and nominal parameter value according to each part are provided with corresponding derate parameter value, wherein, the derate parameter value of described each part should be greater than the real work parameter value of this part and less than the nominal parameter value of this part; Whether evaluation module is used for according to the set derate parameter value of the specification assessment of described product effective; And update module, be used for when set derate parameter value is effective, during the Bill of Material (BOM) that the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated to the described product of memory storage is tabulated.
A kind of part design of Reducing Rating method, this method is applied in the computing machine, and the method comprising the steps of: the specification and the component test Specificationslists that obtain product from the memory storage of computing machine; From memory storage, obtain all parts that product comprises, and the part that is obtained is classified, to obtain dissimilar parts; From memory storage, obtain the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts; Each the real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has the derate space; When described part has the derate space, the real work parameter value of part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result; Judge according to described component test Specificationslists whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective; When the result who obtains when described analysis is effective, according to real work parameter value and nominal parameter value the derate parameter value is set, wherein, described derate parameter value should be greater than the real work parameter value and less than nominal parameter value; Whether effective according to the derate parameter value that the specification assessment of described product is set; And when set derate parameter value is effective, during the Bill of Material (BOM) that the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated to the described product of memory storage is tabulated.
Compared to prior art, described part design of Reducing Rating system and method, standard the flow process of each part design of Reducing Rating of product, and automatically the derate parameter value that obtains is assessed, improved the work efficiency and the reliability of products of part design of Reducing Rating.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the applied environment figure of part design of Reducing Rating of the present invention system preferred embodiment.
Fig. 2 is the implementing procedure figure of part design of Reducing Rating method of the present invention preferred embodiment.
The main element symbol description
| Computing machine | 1 |
| Memory storage | ?2 |
| Part design of Reducing Rating system | ?10 |
| Acquisition module | ?100 |
| Analysis module | ?101 |
| Module is set | ?102 |
| Evaluation module | ?103 |
| Update module | ?104 |
Embodiment
As shown in Figure 1, be the applied environment figure of part design of Reducing Rating of the present invention system preferred embodiment.In this preferred embodiment, described part design of Reducing Rating system 10 runs in the computing machine 1, and described computing machine 1 also comprises memory storage 2.Described memory storage 2 is used for the specification of storage products and the information of the included part of this product, for example: the title of part, the nominal parameter value of part, component test Specificationslists.Described part design of Reducing Rating system 10 comprises acquisition module 100, analysis module 101, module 102 is set, evaluation module 103 and update module 104.The alleged module of the present invention is to finish the computer program code segments of a specific function, be more suitable in describing the implementation of software in computing machine than program, therefore below the present invention to all describing in the software description with module.
Described acquisition module 100 is used for obtaining from memory storage 2 specification and the component test Specificationslists of product.The specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.Described component test Specificationslists comprises the standard value range that is optimized simulation analysis gained result according to the real work parameter of each part.
Described acquisition module 100 also is used for obtaining all parts that this product comprises from memory storage 2, and the part that is obtained is classified, to obtain dissimilar parts, for example: capacitance kind part, resistance class part and inductor part.
Described acquisition module 100 also is used for obtaining from memory storage 2 the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts.Described real work parameter value is the parameter value of part in real work that user's throughput records, and the user is stored to the real work parameter value that described measurement obtains in the memory storage 2.Described real work parameter includes, but not limited to the current value of real work, the magnitude of voltage of real work, the performance number of real work, the frequency values and the actual work temperature value of real work.Described nominal parameter value includes, but not limited to load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
Described analysis module 101 is used for each real work parameter value of described all kinds of parts and corresponding nominal parameter value are compared, and judges whether described part has the derate space.During less than the nominal parameter value of correspondence, described analysis module 101 judges that described part has the derate space as the real work parameter value of part; When each real work parameter value of part equaled the nominal parameter value of correspondence, described analysis module 101 judged that described part does not have the derate space.
Described analysis module 101 also is used for when described part has the derate space, the real work parameter value of part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result.Described analysis includes, but are not limited to, and optimizes analysis, risk analysis, sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo method analysis.
Described analysis module 101 also is used for judging according to the component test Specificationslists of memory storage 2 whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective.Result that described analysis module 101 obtains described analysis and the standard value in the component test Specificationslists in the memory storage 2 compare, when within the standard value range of result in the component test Specificationslists that described analysis obtains, the result that the described analysis of described analysis module 101 judgements obtains is effective, when result that described analysis obtains was not within the standard value range in the component test Specificationslists, described analysis module 101 judged that the result that described analysis obtains is invalid.
The described module 102 that is provided with is used for the result that obtains when described analysis when effective, according to the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of each part corresponding derate parameter value is set.Wherein, the described derate parameter value that module 102 settings are set should meet the following conditions: nominal parameter value＞derate parameter value＞real work parameter value.
Whether described evaluation module 103 is used to assess set derate parameter value effective.Described evaluation module 103 carries out functional test and reliability testing according to described derate parameter value to product, with the function of judging the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and reliability whether within the specification limit of product.When within the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments is effective; When the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and reliability were not within the specification limit at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments was invalid.
Described update module 104 is used for when set derate parameter value is effective, the derate parameter value of each set part is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) tabulation of this product of memory storage 2.
As shown in Figure 2, be the method flow diagram of a kind of part of the present invention with the preferred embodiment of volume method for designing.At first, step S10, acquisition module 100 obtain the specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from memory storage 2.The specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.Described component test Specificationslists comprises the standard value range that is optimized simulation analysis gained result according to the real work parameter of each part.
Step S11, acquisition module 100 obtain all parts that this product comprises from memory storage 2, and the part that is obtained is classified, to obtain dissimilar parts, for example: capacitance kind part, resistance class part and inductor part.
Step S12, acquisition module 100 obtain the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts from memory storage 2.Described real work parameter includes, but not limited to the current value of real work, the magnitude of voltage of real work, the performance number of real work, the frequency values and the actual work temperature value of real work.Described nominal parameter value includes, but not limited to load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
Step S13, analysis module 101 compares each the real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts, judges whether described part has the derate space.During less than the nominal parameter value of correspondence, described analysis module 101 judges that described part has the derate space as the real work parameter value of part; When each real work parameter value of part equaled the nominal parameter value of correspondence, described analysis module 101 judged that described part does not have the derate space.
Step S14, when described part had the derate space, the real work parameter value of 101 pairs of parts of analysis module was analyzed, to obtain analysis result.Described analysis includes, but are not limited to, and optimizes analysis, risk analysis, sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo method analysis.
Step S15, analysis module 101 judges according to the component test Specificationslists in the memory storage 2 whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective.Result that described analysis module 101 obtains described analysis and the standard value in the component test Specificationslists in the memory storage 2 compare, when within the standard value range of result in the component test Specificationslists that described analysis obtains, the result that the described analysis of described analysis module 101 judgements obtains is effective, when result that described analysis obtains was not within the standard value range in the component test Specificationslists, described analysis module 101 judged that the result that described analysis obtains is invalid.
Step S16 when the result who obtains when described analysis is effective, is provided with module 102 and according to the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of each part corresponding derate parameter value is set.Wherein, the described derate parameter value that module 102 settings are set should meet the following conditions: nominal parameter value＞derate parameter value＞real work parameter value.
Whether step S17, evaluation module 103 are used to assess set derate parameter value effective.Described evaluation module 103 carries out functional test and reliability testing according to described derate parameter value to product, with the function of judging the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and reliability whether within the specification limit of product.When within the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments is effective; When the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and reliability were not within the specification limit at product, the set derate parameter value of described evaluation module 103 assessments was invalid.
Step S18, described update module 104 is used for when set derate parameter value is effective, the derate parameter value of each set part is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) tabulation of described product of memory storage 2.
Should be noted that, above embodiment is only unrestricted in order to technical scheme of the present invention to be described, although the present invention is had been described in detail with reference to preferred embodiment, those of ordinary skill in the art is to be understood that, can make amendment or be equal to replacement technical scheme of the present invention, and not break away from the spirit and scope of technical solution of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. part design of Reducing Rating system, this system runs in the computing machine, it is characterized in that, and this system comprises:
Acquisition module, be used for obtaining the specification and the component test Specificationslists of product from the memory storage of computing machine, obtain all parts that product comprises, and the part that is obtained classified, to obtain dissimilar parts, reach real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of from memory storage, obtaining all kinds of parts;
Analysis module, be used for each the real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has the derate space, when described part has the derate space, real work parameter value to part is analyzed, obtaining analysis result, and judge according to described component test Specificationslists whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective;
Module is set, be used for the result that obtains when described analysis when effective, real work parameter value and nominal parameter value according to each part are provided with corresponding derate parameter value, wherein, the derate parameter value of described each part should be greater than the real work parameter value of this part and less than the nominal parameter value of this part;
Whether evaluation module is used for according to the set derate parameter value of the specification assessment of described product effective; And
Update module is used for when set derate parameter value is effective, and the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) tabulation of the described product of memory storage.
2. part design of Reducing Rating as claimed in claim 1 system is characterized in that the specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.
3. part design of Reducing Rating as claimed in claim 1 system is characterized in that described real work parameter comprises the current value of real work, the magnitude of voltage of real work, the performance number of real work, the frequency values and the actual work temperature value of real work; Described nominal parameter value comprises load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
4. part design of Reducing Rating as claimed in claim 1 system, it is characterized in that, described analysis module is within the critical field of the result who obtains when described analysis in the component test Specificationslists time, judge that the result that described analysis obtains is effective, and when result that described analysis obtains is not within the critical field in the component test Specificationslists, judge that the result that described analysis obtains is invalid.
5. part design of Reducing Rating as claimed in claim 1 system, it is characterized in that, described evaluation module is when within the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, it is effective to assess set derate parameter value, and when the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and reliability were not within the specification limit at product, it was invalid to assess set derate parameter value.
6. part design of Reducing Rating method, this method is applied to it is characterized in that in the computing machine that the method comprising the steps of:
From the memory storage of computing machine, obtain the specification and the component test Specificationslists of product;
From memory storage, obtain all parts that product comprises, and the part that is obtained is classified, to obtain dissimilar parts;
From memory storage, obtain the real work parameter value and the nominal parameter value of all kinds of parts;
Each the real work parameter value and the corresponding nominal parameter value of described all kinds of parts are compared, judge whether described part has the derate space;
When described part has the derate space, the real work parameter value of part is analyzed, to obtain analysis result;
Judge according to described component test Specificationslists whether the result that described analysis obtains is effective;
When the result who obtains when described analysis is effective, according to real work parameter value and nominal parameter value the derate parameter value is set, wherein, described derate parameter value should be greater than the real work parameter value and less than nominal parameter value;
Whether effective according to the derate parameter value that the specification assessment of described product is set; And
When set derate parameter value is effective, the derate parameter value of each part of described setting is updated in the Bill of Material (BOM) tabulation of the described product of memory storage.
7. part design of Reducing Rating method as claimed in claim 6, the specification of described product comprises the effective range of product function and the effective range of product reliability.
8. part design of Reducing Rating method as claimed in claim 6 is characterized in that, described real work parameter comprises the current value of real work, the magnitude of voltage of real work, the performance number of real work, the frequency values and the actual work temperature value of real work; Described nominal parameter value comprises load current value, load voltage value, power-handling capability, rated frequency value and rated temperature value.
9. part design of Reducing Rating method as claimed in claim 6 is characterized in that, described according to described component test Specificationslists judge result that described analysis obtains whether effectively step comprise:
When within the critical field of result in the component test Specificationslists that described analysis obtains, judge that the result that described analysis obtains is effective;
When result that described analysis obtains is not within the critical field in the component test Specificationslists, judge that the result that described analysis obtains is invalid.
10. part design of Reducing Rating method as claimed in claim 6 is characterized in that, described whether effective step comprises according to the set derate parameter value of the specification assessment of described product:
When within the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and the specification limit of reliability at product, it is effective to assess set derate parameter value;
When the function of the product that obtains according to described derate parameter value and reliability were not within the specification limit at product, it was invalid to assess set derate parameter value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010154732.8A CN102236725B (en) | 2010-04-26 | 2010-04-26 | Part de-rating design system and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010154732.8A CN102236725B (en) | 2010-04-26 | 2010-04-26 | Part de-rating design system and method |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN102236725A true CN102236725A (en) | 2011-11-09 |
| CN102236725B CN102236725B (en) | 2014-02-19 |
Family
ID=44887371
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201010154732.8A Expired - Fee Related CN102236725B (en) | 2010-04-26 | 2010-04-26 | Part de-rating design system and method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN102236725B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109815468A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-05-28 | 西南技术物理研究所 | A kind of component design of Reducing Rating report automatic generation method |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20060074589A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Qian Cui | Method of predicting quiescent current variation of an integrated circuit die from a process monitor derating factor |
| US20060090150A1 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2006-04-27 | Kayhan Kucukcakar | Method and apparatus for reducing timing pessimism during static timing analysis |
| CN101470763A (en) * | 2007-12-25 | 2009-07-01 | 英业达股份有限公司 | Derating checking method and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN101655695A (en) * | 2008-08-20 | 2010-02-24 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | System and method for improving reliability of electronic device |
-
2010
- 2010-04-26 CN CN201010154732.8A patent/CN102236725B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20060074589A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2006-04-06 | Qian Cui | Method of predicting quiescent current variation of an integrated circuit die from a process monitor derating factor |
| US20060090150A1 (en) * | 2004-10-22 | 2006-04-27 | Kayhan Kucukcakar | Method and apparatus for reducing timing pessimism during static timing analysis |
| CN101470763A (en) * | 2007-12-25 | 2009-07-01 | 英业达股份有限公司 | Derating checking method and computer-readable storage medium |
| CN101655695A (en) * | 2008-08-20 | 2010-02-24 | 鸿富锦精密工业（深圳）有限公司 | System and method for improving reliability of electronic device |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘畅: "二极管正向平均电流降额曲线的测试方法及分析", 《第19界中国天津2005IT、网络、信息技术、电子、仪器仪表创新学术会议》 * |
| 辛波，马静: "基于PSpice仿真的SLD控制电路降额设计", 《国外电子测量技术》 * |
| 陈江华: "蒙特卡罗分析方法与电子电路模拟", 《山东工业大学学报》 * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN109815468A (en) * | 2018-12-27 | 2019-05-28 | 西南技术物理研究所 | A kind of component design of Reducing Rating report automatic generation method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN102236725B (en) | 2014-02-19 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109996269A (en) | A kind of cordless communication network abnormal cause determines method, apparatus, equipment and medium | |
| CN111382546B (en) | Method for predicting service life of generator insulation system based on support vector machine modeling | |
| US11138358B2 (en) | Simulation and analysis of circuit designs | |
| JP2023156356A (en) | Vehicle battery cell consistency evaluation method, apparatus, device and storage medium | |
| CN115796708B (en) | Big data intelligent quality inspection method, system and medium for engineering construction | |
| CN105702595A (en) | Yield determination method of wafer and multivariate detection method of wafer acceptance test | |
| WO2016119755A1 (en) | Integrated circuit measurement method, device, and system | |
| CN110348717B (en) | Base station value scoring method and device based on grid granularity | |
| CN102236725B (en) | Part de-rating design system and method | |
| US20120310849A1 (en) | System and method for validating design of an electronic product | |
| CN114136174B (en) | Method, device, equipment and storage medium for detecting standard component via hole of plate | |
| JP2019028932A (en) | Defect factor extraction system and its method | |
| KR100987124B1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for Software Faults Prediction using Metrics | |
| CN115097320A (en) | Battery use estimation method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN116329138A (en) | Test method and device and electronic equipment thereof | |
| CN115935284A (en) | Power grid abnormal voltage detection method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115147236A (en) | Processing method, processing device and electronic equipment | |
| CN108828342B (en) | Power equipment state detection method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110134569A (en) | A kind of chip operation environment temperature detection method, system and read/write memory medium | |
| CN111341477B (en) | Nuclear power plant safety power supply renovation and maintenance method and device | |
| CN101957886B (en) | Electronic part strain ratio analysis system and method | |
| CN107391330B (en) | Method and system for testing computer performance under Itanium platform | |
| CN115906444A (en) | Analysis method and device for hardware failure risk of relay protection device and storage medium | |
| JP6907689B2 (en) | Defect search program, defect search method and defect search device | |
| CN115015794A (en) | UPS health state assessment method based on aluminum electrolytic capacitor |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20140219 Termination date: 20160426 |