CN102214922B - Evaluation system of power network planning scheme - Google Patents

Evaluation system of power network planning scheme Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN102214922B
CN102214922B CN201110174803.5A CN201110174803A CN102214922B CN 102214922 B CN102214922 B CN 102214922B CN 201110174803 A CN201110174803 A CN 201110174803A CN 102214922 B CN102214922 B CN 102214922B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
load
evaluation module
network
electric power
state
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201110174803.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN102214922A (en
Inventor
麻常辉
杨慎全
牛新生
贾善杰
薛万磊
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Shandong Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Shandong Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by State Grid Corp of China SGCC, Electric Power Research Institute of State Grid Shandong Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical State Grid Corp of China SGCC
Priority to CN201110174803.5A priority Critical patent/CN102214922B/en
Publication of CN102214922A publication Critical patent/CN102214922A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN102214922B publication Critical patent/CN102214922B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Landscapes

  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses an evaluation system of a power network planning scheme, comprising an adequacy evaluation module, a safety evaluation module, a tidal current distribution rationality evaluation module and a short-circuit current rationality evaluation module, wherein the adequacy evaluation module evaluates the capacity of an electric power system to meet electric power and electric energy of a user under the static condition; the safety evaluation module evaluates the capacity of the electric power system to endure sudden disturbance and provide the electric power and the electric energy to the user continuously under a dynamic condition; the tidal current distribution rationality evaluation module estimates size distribution of line loads and load distribution indexes of the whole transmission network; and the short-circuit current rationality evaluation module detects the maximal short-circuit current, thus short-circuit capacity of each station in the system is kept in the range of the rated cutting-off capacity of equipment. The evaluation system provides a basis for selecting the most reasonable planning scheme.

Description

A kind of evaluating system of power network planning scheme
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of evaluating system of power network planning scheme.
Background technology
In the world, a large-scale market-oriented reform is being carried out in electric power system, whether the economy of electric power transmission network is reasonable, and whether fail safe meets the demands, and whether transmission capacity, grid structure reach the most excellent vital interests that are all related to different main market players.Along with progressively going deep into of China's interconnected network scale expanding day, " separate the factory and network, surf the Net at a competitive price " reform, the uncertain factor of operation of power networks increases, and the Transmission Expansion Planning in Electric work of China is also faced with huge challenge.
The basic demand of Electric Power Network Planning guarantees that electric energy safe effectively delivers to user exactly, Transmission Expansion Planning in Electric not only will be considered the reliability of Transmission Expansion Planning in Electric, also to consider the reasonability of planning, therefore how determining the satisfaction degree of each programme of quantitative analysis to technical requirement, is current urgent problem.
Summary of the invention
For making up the deficiencies in the prior art, the invention provides a kind of evaluating system of power network planning scheme.
For achieving the above object, the present invention adopts following technical scheme:
An evaluating system for power network planning scheme, it comprises adequacy evaluation module, security assessment module, trend distribution rationality evaluation module and short circuit current reasonable evaluation module; Described adequacy evaluation module estimation is under static conditions, and electric power system meets the ability of user to electric power and electric flux; Described security assessment module is evaluated at electric power system under dynamic condition and withstands Sudden Disturbance, and the ability of electric power and electric flux is provided to user incessantly; Described trend distribution rationality evaluation module utilizes the size distribution of line load and the load Distribution index of whole electric power transmission network to assess; Described short circuit current reasonable evaluation module is carried out the check of maximum short circuit current so that in system the capacity of short circuit of each plant stand all within the scope of the specified connecting-disconnecting function of equipment;
Wherein: adequacy evaluation module estimation relates to trend calculating, accident analysis and eliminates and transships, generates electricity to reschedule, load and cut down and handover operation; Described security assessment module is utilized the transient stability of transient stability fault scanning program to each programme exhaustive examination network to be evaluated, after exhaustive scanning, can show that the number of times of Transient Instability appears in system under given failure collection, and adopt fuzzy evaluation set to be quantified as evaluation index.
Described adequacy evaluation module estimation method is as follows:
Step1: first obtain Future Power System rack data and generating and the prediction data of loading, and the Technical Economic Data of generating equipment;
Step2: in power transmission network, transmission line adopts forced outage model, and adopt non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation select POWER SYSTEM STATE and calculate their probability;
Step3: after POWER SYSTEM STATE is determined, select certain load level of load condition;
Step4: carry out Monte Carlo sampling, by sampled analog network state, and judge whether this network state has circuit to disconnect, as circuit proceeds to step7 continuation execution without disconnecting;
Step5: disconnect and judge whether circuit is still communicated with if any circuit, proceeding in this way step6 carries out, otherwise network is divided into isolated node and major part network, calculate major part network trend and isolated node and lack load, and judge that whether major part network trend transships, and proceeds to step8 in this way;
Step6: revise admittance matrix;
Step7: calculate trend and whether transship;
Step8: have a tidal wave of to flow through to carry and call minimum tangential load function, and overload counting is added to one, record load;
Step9: judge whether Monte Carlo frequency in sampling reaches maximum, proceed in this way step10, continue to carry out otherwise proceed to step4;
Step10: calculate that load under the load level that step8 records is cut down probability and expectation lacks amount of power supply;
Step11: judge whether that load under all load levels cuts down probability and expectation and lack amount of power supply and all calculate completely, as do not calculate the complete step3 that proceeds to and proceed; Otherwise the load that calculates electric power system cuts down probability and expectation lacks amount of power supply.
The variance of each line load rate of utilizing described trend distribution rationality evaluation module reflects in the fluctuation situation of all line load rates, maximum load rate in peak load situation lower network can reflect the ability to bear of network under peak load, and the formula of each corresponding index is defined as:
Figure BDA0000071421190000021
Figure BDA0000071421190000023
Maximum load rate=max (l 1, l 2... l n)
Wherein: n is the number of lines, l ibe i bar line load rate,
Figure BDA0000071421190000024
mean value for all line load rates.
Described short circuit current reasonable evaluation module utilizes the mean value of each bus three-phase shortcircuit electric current allowance to characterize short circuit current reasonability index, and its expression formula is:
Figure BDA0000071421190000025
Wherein: m represents total number of node.
Described POWER SYSTEM STATE deterministic process is as follows: the reliability of electric power system determines by electricity generation system, transmission system and load three parts are common, because hypothesis electricity generation system 100% is reliable, so system mode depends on transmission system state and load condition;
(a) deterministic process of transmission system state: transmission line operational failure and the simulation of operation binary states stochastic variable, every one of used for transmission line is simulated at [0,1] interval uniform random number; Suppose that every line failure is separate, makes S i, F irepresent respectively state and the probability of malfunction of circuit i, R ifor [0,1] interval random number that circuit i is generated, circuit i state is:
S i = 0 , 0 &le; R i &le; F i 1 , F i < R i &le; 1
S wherein i=0 representing fault state, S i=1 represents running status, and when system is comprised of N bar circuit, system transmission system state representation is:
S=(S 1,S 2,...S N)
(b) deterministic process of load treatment system state: very many owing to affecting the factor of payload, and some is to be difficult to prediction, so be difficult to the exact value of prediction load definitely, use Monte Carlo Analogue Method can simulate the change at random characteristic of load, make evaluation result more objective; The randomness of general load variations is simulated with normal distribution random number, establishes node j load for L j, and node j load obedience average is μ j, standard deviation is σ jnormal distribution:
L j ~ N ( &mu; j , &sigma; j 2 )
When system is comprised of M load bus, the load condition of system is:
L=(L 1,L 2,...L M)
Comprehensive transmission system and system loading two parts, the state of system can be expressed as:
Sys=(S,L)。
Beneficial effect: native system utilizes adequacy evaluation module under static conditions, has assessed electric power system and has met the ability of user to electric power and electric flux; Utilize security assessment module to assess electric power system under dynamic condition and withstand Sudden Disturbance, and the ability of electric power and electric flux is provided to user incessantly; Utilize trend distribution rationality evaluation module to assess the load Distribution index of the size distribution of line load and whole electric power transmission network; Utilize short circuit current reasonable evaluation module to carry out the check of maximum short circuit current so that in system the capacity of short circuit of each plant stand all within the scope of the specified connecting-disconnecting function of equipment.The present invention provides foundation for selecting the most rational programme.
Accompanying drawing explanation
Fig. 1 is transmission line two states model;
Fig. 2 is adequacy evaluation flow chart;
Fig. 3 is fuzzy evaluation set quantification figure;
Fig. 4 is garver-6 system original net shelf structure schematic diagram;
Fig. 5 is the grid structure schematic diagram of the feasible programme 1 of garver-6 system;
Fig. 6 is the grid structure schematic diagram of the feasible programme 2 of garver-6 system;
Fig. 7 is the grid structure schematic diagram of the feasible programme 3 of garver-6 system;
Fig. 8 is the grid structure schematic diagram of the feasible programme 4 of garver-6 system;
Fig. 9 is the grid structure schematic diagram of the feasible programme 5 of garver-6 system.
Embodiment
Below in conjunction with drawings and Examples, the invention will be further described:
The basic demand of Electric Power Network Planning guarantees that electric energy safe effectively delivers to user exactly, so technical indicator is an essential and most important aspect in overall merit.Technical indicator comprises adequacy indexes, safety indexes, trend distribution rationality index and short circuit current reasonability index.Wherein, two indexs of abundant intensity and fail safe are characterizing the reliability of electric power system.
(1) abundant intensity
Abundant intensity refers to be considered the planned outage of element and is reasonably expecting in unplanned stoppage in transit situation, and electric power system maintains the ability of the total electricity needs of continuous supply user and total electric flux.Abundant intensity claims again static reliability, and namely, under static conditions, electric power system meets the ability of user to electric power and electric flux.
The adequacy evaluation of transmission system relates to trend calculating, accident analysis and reschedules, loads and cut down and the corrective measure such as handover operation such as eliminating overload, generating.Generally include the content of following four aspects:
● determine element outage model
Using power transmission network as the main target of paying close attention to, therefore to suppose that other system 100% is reliable, thereby only carry out transmission system adequacy evaluation, transmission system adequacy evaluation is only considered line out of service.
The stoppage in transit pattern of transmission line has the multiple stoppage in transit patterns such as forced outage, planned outage, half forced outage, partial failure.Wherein forced outage can be divided into again can repairing to force and lost efficacy and unrepairable forces inefficacy.The random generation of forced outage and most of forced outage are recoverable.For simplifying, calculate, in Transmission System Reliability Evaluations, conventionally adopt forced outage model, and suppose that transmission line is two states model, as shown in Figure 1:
● selective system state also calculates their probability
System mode can adopt analytic method or Monte Carlo Analogue Method to select.Analytic method adopts Fault enumeration to carry out condition selecting, and generally, the selection of the system failure is to select one by one by certain logic, and when system is comprised of N two state elements, the status number of system is 2 so ntherefore the number of system mode is that increase with system element number is exponential increase, so, for the system that includes a large amount of elements, enumerate all system modes is unpractical on calculating, and a kind of common way is to terminate on certain given level enumerating.Monte Carlo Analogue Method utilizes arbitrary sampling method to carry out condition selecting, according to the difference of random sampling principle, can be divided into again sequential Monte Carlo simulation and non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation, the method amount of calculation does not increase with system scale, has more superiority when calculating large scale system.
Analytic method physical concept is clear, model accuracy is high but be not easy to process large scale system, and Monte Carlo method belongs to statistical test method, simple, intuitive, is easy to by engineers and technicians, grasped and understand, and easily process multiple faults situation, be convenient to process the change at random characteristic of load, China's network capacity constantly increases in recent years simultaneously, and network size is increasing, therefore, herein, adopt non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation selective system state.
The reliability of system determines by electricity generation system, transmission system and load three parts are common, because hypothesis electricity generation system 100% is reliable, so system mode depends on transmission system state and load condition.
(a) transmission line operational failure and the simulation of operation binary states stochastic variable, every one of used for transmission line is simulated at [0,1] interval uniform random number.Suppose that every line failure is separate, makes S i, F irepresent respectively state and the probability of malfunction of circuit i, R ifor [0,1] interval random number that circuit i is generated, circuit i state is:
S i = 0 , 0 &le; R i &le; F i 1 , F i < R i &le; 1 - - - ( 1 - 1 )
S wherein i=0 representing fault state, S i=1 represents running status, and when system is comprised of N bar circuit, system transmission system state representation is:
S=(S 1,S 2,...S N) (1-2)
(b) load in reliability assessment is processed.Owing to affecting, the factor of payload is very many, and some is to be difficult to prediction, so be difficult to the exact value of prediction load definitely, uses Monte Carlo Analogue Method can simulate the change at random characteristic of load, makes evaluation result more objective.The randomness of general load variations is simulated with normal distribution random number, establishes node j load for L j, and node j load obedience average is μ j, standard deviation is σ jnormal distribution:
L j ~ N ( &mu; j , &sigma; j 2 ) - - - ( 1 - 3 )
When system is comprised of M load bus, the load condition of system is:
L=(L 1,L 2,...L M) (1-4)
Comprehensive transmission system and system loading two parts, the state of system can be expressed as:
Sys=(S,L) (1-5)
● forecast accident analysis and corrective action
After system mode is determined, just need to system carry out accident analysis with recognition system whether in malfunction.The object of transmission system forecast accident analysis is Line Flow and the busbar voltage of calculating after one or more line out of service, to identify, whether causes that circuit overload, voltage out-of-limit, bus isolate or system is separated into the problems such as isolated island.When line out of service causes system problem, just need to eliminate system restriction by corrective action and disobey limit, the simultaneously the least possible load of avoiding is cut down.
The method of forecast accident analysis mainly contains AC power flow method and DC power flow algorithm.Owing to need to the system mode of magnanimity being carried out to accident analysis, in order to reduce amount of calculation, often adopt the DC power flow analytic approach to carry out accident analysis, in DC power flow algorithm, omitted all relevant to reactive power amount, for the assessment of programme, this is an acceptable Rational Simplification.
When line fault causes system problem, generally by generating, reschedule measure and proofread and correct to eliminate system problem, the reduction that simultaneously makes to load is minimum, is expressed as the minimum load shedding model based on DC power flow, and its mathematic(al) representation is:
min &Sigma; i &Element; ND C i
S.t.
P(Sys)=A(Sys)(PG-PD+C)
&Sigma; i &Element; NG PG i + &Sigma; i &Element; ND C i = &Sigma; i &Element; ND PD i - - - ( 1 - 6 )
PG i min &le; PG i &le; PG i max ( i &Element; NG )
0≤C i≤PD i(i∈ND)
| P k ( Sys ) | &le; P k max ( k &Element; L )
● computed reliability index
If minimum load reduction is not 0 under state Sys, this state is thrashing state.When the quantity of random sampling is enough large, the sampling frequency of state Sys can be used as its probability without inclined to one side estimation.Suppose the number of times that m (Sys) occurs in random sampling for state Sys, M is random sampling numbers, and the probability of state Sys is:
P ( Sys ) = m ( Sys ) M - - - ( 1 - 7 )
The index system of adequacy evaluation, basic index comprises probability, frequency, duration and desired value 4 classes, and the complexity of calculating according to index is chosen the index that probability and desired value index are evaluated as programme abundant intensity, and computing formula is:
(a) load is cut down probability (probability of load curtailments)
PLC = &Sigma; i = 1 NL ( &Sigma; Sys &Element; F i P ( Sys ) ) T i T - - - ( 1 - 8 )
NL is load condition number, F ifor the set of thrashing state under load condition i, T ibe the time span of load level i, T is (h) during total time of load curve.
(b) expectation lacks amount of power supply EENS (during MWh/) (expected energy not supplied)
EENS = &Sigma; i = 1 NL ( &Sigma; s &Element; F i P ( Sys ) * C ( Sys ) ) * T i - - - ( 1 - 9 )
Wherein C (Sys) is the load reduction of system under state Sys.
The content of comprehensive above each side, the calculation flow chart of transmission system abundant intensity as shown in Figure 2:
(2) fail safe
Fail safe refers to that electric power system bears the disturbance of unexpected generation, such as suddenly-applied short circuit or the short circuit of not expecting or lose the ability of the phenomenons such as system element.Fail safe also claims dynamic reliability, and under dynamic condition, electric power system withstands Sudden Disturbance, and the ability of electric power and electric flux is provided to user incessantly.
The object of safety evaluation is to estimate the ability to bear of electric power system to catastrophic failure, the method of safety evaluation has certainty assessment and probabilistic assessment, various countries, at planning and design of power system and in service, prevailingly all adopt deterministic computational methods in the world at present.The evaluation of certainty power system stability refers under the condition of given NETWORK STRUCTURE PRESERVING POWER SYSTEM, parameter, disturbance type and scene, uses deterministic Mathematical Modeling, evaluates electric power system and whether keeps stable.Certainty transient stability calculates following supposition and regulation:
1. supposition short trouble is metallicity;
2. do not consider the effect of DC component in short circuit current and suppose that generator unit stator resistance is zero;
3. press the equivalence model of selecting generating set to provisioning request, and think that rotary speed of generator group is near rated value;
4. given relaying protection operate time, the time of reclosing and automatic safety device can be determined given or as calculated.
Transient stability computing module in Based on Power System Analysis Software Package PSASP can be good at simulating various faults perturbation scheme and stabilizing measures, therefore utilizes PSASP synthesizer to carry out transient stability calculating herein.But because amount of calculation is huge, therefore utilize the transient stability of Visual FoxPro language compilation transient stability fault scanning program to each programme exhaustive examination network to be evaluated.
After exhaustive scanning, can show that the number of times of Transient Instability appears in system under given failure collection, and adopt fuzzy evaluation set to be quantified as evaluation index, the assignment of fuzzy evaluation set is shown in 3:
(3) trend distribution rationality
Reasonably trend distribution is the basis of grid health economical operation.Trend distribution rationality can utilize the size distribution of line load and the load Distribution index of whole electric power transmission network to reflect.If the heavy-loaded line way of network is too much, the investment shortcoming of this network is described, need to strengthen investment construction to alleviate circuit operation level, strengthen light power handling capabilities, meet the needs of load growth utmost point scheduling in breakdown state, the residue transmission line capability of system is not enough; And if light-loaded circuit is too much, explanation residue transmission line capability is large, and network scheduling ability is strong, but also explanation investment is too leading accordingly, causes the wasting of resources, and the two is not that we wish to see.A while rational grid structure, should not that some line load utilances are very low, and other circuit is approaching, meet, there is " network bottleneck " in explanation in this case, therefore utilize the variance of each line load rate to reflect in the fluctuation situation of all line load rates, called after load balancing degrees index.The maximum load rate of this external peak load situation lower network can reflect the ability to bear of network under peak load.The formula of each corresponding index is defined as:
Figure BDA0000071421190000083
Maximum load rate=max (l 1, l 2... l n) (1-13)
Wherein n is the number of lines, l ibe i bar line load rate,
Figure BDA0000071421190000084
mean value for all line load rates.
(4) short circuit current reasonability
Along with the expansion of electrical network scale and the growth of installed capacity, the short circuit current level of system constantly increases, the increase of short circuit current will bring hidden danger to the safe operation of equipment, must adopt replacing operational mode or the more measure of large capcity breaker of changing to reduce its impact.Therefore, power network planning scheme assessment need to be carried out the check of maximum short circuit current so that in system the capacity of short circuit of each plant stand all within the scope of the specified connecting-disconnecting function of equipment.Adopt the mean value of each bus three-phase shortcircuit electric current allowance to characterize short circuit current reasonability index herein, its expression formula is:
Figure BDA0000071421190000085
Embodiment:
Adopt garver-6 system herein, its original net shelf structure as shown in Figure 4.The grid structure of 5 feasible programmes of this system is respectively as shown in Fig. 5~9.
Each node load adopts random normal distribution, and each node load and node generating maximum output data are as shown in table 1:
Table 1garver-6 system generating and load data
Node number Load average (MW) Standard deviation Node maximum generation exert oneself (MW)
1 84 8 110
2 253 25 0
3 40 4 220
4 170 17 0
5 253 25 0
6 0 0 735
It is 0.0001 that abundant intensity is got all line outage probability in calculating, utilize the stochastic behaviour of Monte Carlo Analogue Method simulation load, the load curve duration is 8760h, and adopt the minimum load shedding model based on DC power flow to carry out accident analysis, according to the flow chart of adequacy evaluation shown in Fig. 2, write matlab calculation procedure, calculate each scheme load and cut down probability and expect to lack power supply value year.
In order to carry out fail safe scanning, for garver-6 system has been supplemented system generator parameter, and in synthesizer PSASP, set up each programme basic database, the larger load of the system of getting 900MW tests, and each node generated output and load value are in Table 2.
The generating of table 2 node and load value
Node number Generated output (MW) Load value (MW)
1 110 95
2 0 285
3 220 45
4 0 190
5 0 285
6 570 0
The fault type that carries out considering when transient stability scanning is calculated is in Table 3, and transient stability measure adopts the machine measure of cutting.After considering stabilizing measures, exhaustive scans each scheme, and Transient Instability situation does not all appear in each scheme, and therefore, it is 1 that each scheme comment value is all composed.
Table 3 transient stability calculates the fault type of considering
Figure BDA0000071421190000091
According to the PSASP database of setting up, utilize the trend in synthesizer to calculate and short circuit calculation function, can draw meritorious trend value and each busbar short-circuit current value of each circuit, respectively as shown in table 4 and table 5, in this example, set load factor >=0.9 for heavy-haul line, load factor≤0.1 is light-loaded circuit, according to formula (1-10)~(1-14), calculates trend distribute each index and short circuit current reasonability.
Each branch road of each scheme of table 4 trend value of gaining merit
Figure BDA0000071421190000102
Figure BDA0000071421190000111
Each busbar short-circuit current value of each scheme of table 5
Bus name Scheme 1 (kA) Scheme 2 (kA) Scheme 3 (kA) Scheme 4 (kA) Scheme 5 (kA)
b1 9.9946 9.9952 9.9976 9.9971 10.0057
b2 10.068 10.0658 10.0634 10.0635 10.0637
b3 10.0156 10.0207 10.024 10.0364 10.0191
b4 10.0229 10.0233 10.0228 10.0232 10.0397
b5 9.9969 10.0154 10.0139 10.0118 10.0061
b6 10.0867 10.0877 10.0882 10.089 10.0864
As shown in table 6 according to calculating above each evaluation index value:
Each programme desired value of table 6garver-6 example
Figure BDA0000071421190000112

Claims (5)

1. an evaluating system for power network planning scheme, is characterized in that, it comprises adequacy evaluation module, security assessment module, trend distribution rationality evaluation module and short circuit current reasonable evaluation module; Described adequacy evaluation module estimation is under static conditions, and electric power system meets the ability of user to electric power and electric flux; Described security assessment module is evaluated at electric power system under dynamic condition and withstands Sudden Disturbance, and the ability of electric power and electric flux is provided to user incessantly; Described trend distribution rationality evaluation module utilizes the size distribution of line load and the load Distribution index of whole electric power transmission network to assess; Described short circuit current reasonable evaluation module is carried out the check of maximum short circuit current so that in system the capacity of short circuit of each plant stand all within the scope of the specified connecting-disconnecting function of equipment;
Wherein: adequacy evaluation module estimation relates to trend calculating, accident analysis and eliminates and transships, generates electricity to reschedule, load and cut down and handover operation; Described security assessment module is utilized the transient stability of transient stability fault scanning program to each programme exhaustive examination network to be evaluated, after exhaustive scanning, can show that the number of times of Transient Instability appears in system under given failure collection, and adopt fuzzy evaluation set to be quantified as evaluation index;
The assignment of described fuzzy evaluation set is [1,0.75,0.5,0.25,10 -5].
2. the evaluating system of a kind of power network planning scheme as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, described adequacy evaluation module estimation method is as follows:
Step1: first obtain Future Power System rack data and generating and the prediction data of loading, and the Technical Economic Data of generating equipment;
Step2: in power transmission network, transmission line adopts forced outage model, and adopt non-sequential Monte Carlo simulation select POWER SYSTEM STATE and calculate their probability;
Step3: after POWER SYSTEM STATE is determined, select certain load level of load condition;
Step4: carry out Monte Carlo sampling, by sampled analog network state, and judge whether this network state has circuit to disconnect, as circuit proceeds to step7 continuation execution without disconnecting;
Step5: disconnect and judge whether circuit is still communicated with if any circuit, proceeding in this way step6 carries out, otherwise network is divided into isolated node and major part network, calculate major part network trend and isolated node and lack load, and judge that whether most of network trend transships, and proceeds to step8 in this way;
Step6: revise admittance matrix;
Step7: calculate trend and whether transship;
Step8: have a tidal wave of to flow through to carry and call minimum tangential load function, and overload counting is added to one, record load;
Step9: judge whether Monte Carlo frequency in sampling reaches maximum, proceed in this way step10, continue to carry out otherwise proceed to step4;
Step10: calculate that load under the load level that step8 records is cut down probability and expectation lacks amount of power supply;
Step11: judge whether that load under all load levels cuts down probability and expectation and lack amount of power supply and all calculate completely, as do not calculate the complete step3 that proceeds to and proceed; Otherwise the load that calculates electric power system cuts down probability and expectation lacks amount of power supply.
3. the evaluating system of a kind of power network planning scheme as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, the variance of each line load rate of utilizing described trend distribution rationality evaluation module reflects in the fluctuation situation of all line load rates, maximum load rate in peak load situation lower network can reflect the ability to bear of network under peak load, and the formula of each corresponding index is defined as:
Figure FDA0000379278430000023
Maximum load rate=max (l 1, l 2... l n)
Wherein: n is the number of lines, l ibe i bar line load rate,
Figure FDA0000379278430000025
mean value for all line load rates.
4. the evaluating system of a kind of power network planning scheme as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that, described short circuit current reasonable evaluation module utilizes the mean value of each bus three-phase shortcircuit electric current allowance to characterize short circuit current reasonability index, and its expression formula is:
Figure FDA0000379278430000024
Wherein: m represents total number of node.
5. the evaluating system of a kind of power network planning scheme as claimed in claim 2, it is characterized in that, described POWER SYSTEM STATE deterministic process is as follows: the reliability of electric power system determines by electricity generation system, transmission system and load three parts are common, because hypothesis electricity generation system 100% is reliable, so system mode depends on transmission system state and load condition;
(a) deterministic process of transmission system state: transmission line operational failure and the simulation of operation binary states stochastic variable, every one of used for transmission line is simulated at [0,1] interval uniform random number; Suppose that every line failure is separate, S i, F irepresent respectively state and the probability of malfunction of circuit i, R ifor [0,1] interval random number that circuit i is generated, circuit i state is:
S i = 0,0 &le; R i &le; F i 1 , F i < R i &le; 1
S wherein i=0 representing fault state, S i=1 represents running status, and when system is comprised of N bar circuit, system transmission system state representation is:
S=(S 1,S 2,...S N)
(b) deterministic process of load treatment system state: very many owing to affecting the factor of payload, and some is to be difficult to prediction, so be difficult to the exact value of prediction load definitely, use Monte Carlo Analogue Method can simulate the change at random characteristic of load, make evaluation result more objective; The randomness of general load variations is simulated with normal distribution random number, establishes node j load for L i, and node j load obedience average is u j, standard deviation is δ jnormal distribution:
L j ~ N ( &mu; j , &sigma; j 2 )
When system is comprised of M load bus, the load condition of system is:
L=(L 1,L 2,...L M)
Comprehensive transmission system and system loading two parts, the state of system can be expressed as:
Sys=(S,L)。
CN201110174803.5A 2011-06-27 2011-06-27 Evaluation system of power network planning scheme Active CN102214922B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201110174803.5A CN102214922B (en) 2011-06-27 2011-06-27 Evaluation system of power network planning scheme

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201110174803.5A CN102214922B (en) 2011-06-27 2011-06-27 Evaluation system of power network planning scheme

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN102214922A CN102214922A (en) 2011-10-12
CN102214922B true CN102214922B (en) 2014-02-12

Family

ID=44746097

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201110174803.5A Active CN102214922B (en) 2011-06-27 2011-06-27 Evaluation system of power network planning scheme

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN102214922B (en)

Families Citing this family (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102542355B (en) * 2011-11-19 2015-05-13 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 Operation planning part load method
CN102567650B (en) * 2012-03-12 2015-05-13 广东省电力调度中心 System for evaluating adequacy of power supply system
CN102663522B (en) * 2012-04-24 2015-01-07 湖南省电力公司调度通信局 On-line risk evaluation method of power grid
CN102737162B (en) * 2012-05-23 2015-06-24 广东电网公司电力科学研究院 Method and system for evaluating influence of relay protection system failure on reliability of large power grids
CN102723712B (en) * 2012-06-28 2014-09-17 天津大学 Method for improving transient stability analysis efficiency of electric power system
CN103258299B (en) * 2013-04-11 2016-09-21 国家电网公司 A kind of many direct currents concentrate the receiving end Net Frame of Electric Network optimization method of feed-in
CN103310296B (en) * 2013-05-09 2016-12-28 国家电网公司 A kind of operation order Security Checking method based on disturbance assessment and trend analysis
CN103353924B (en) * 2013-06-28 2016-04-13 国家电网公司 A kind of appraisal procedure stable based on the sequential building security of electrical network
CN105096019B (en) * 2014-05-19 2022-02-01 国家电网公司 Provincial power grid layered and partitioned typical power supply mode planning method
CN104143160A (en) * 2014-07-18 2014-11-12 国家电网公司 Method for evaluating power grid dispatching capacity on basis of computer implementation
CN104599189B (en) * 2014-12-25 2019-02-22 中国电力科学研究院 A kind of power network planning scheme methods of risk assessment being included in power system operation mode
CN106469908B (en) * 2015-08-19 2019-03-15 中国电力科学研究院 A kind of comprehensive aid decision-making method of the static security that multiple faults is coordinated
CN106558880B (en) * 2015-09-30 2019-09-27 中国电力科学研究院 The aid decision-making method of branch overload problem in a kind of transient stability analysis
CN105429129B (en) * 2015-10-14 2020-07-07 中国电力科学研究院 Intermittent energy power generation capacity confidence evaluation method considering network constraints
CN106815770A (en) * 2015-11-27 2017-06-09 中国电力科学研究院 It is a kind of to consider abundance and security of system the methods of risk assessment of system
CN105576655B (en) * 2016-01-13 2018-08-24 国网山西省电力公司大同供电公司 A kind of critical circuits recognition methods and system based on reliability worth increment
CN106532688B (en) * 2016-11-22 2019-02-26 国电南瑞科技股份有限公司 It is a kind of for assessing the method and system of micro-capacitance sensor operational reliability
CN107871202A (en) * 2017-09-14 2018-04-03 国网浙江省电力公司经济技术研究院 A kind of system adequacy evaluation method of meter and multi-voltage grade
CN109473991B (en) * 2018-02-12 2022-04-19 国网浙江省电力公司嘉兴供电公司 Regional power grid optimal load control method considering regional balance
CN108932576A (en) * 2018-04-10 2018-12-04 国网青海省电力公司经济技术研究院 It is a kind of based on the distribution network planning project reliability estimation method precisely invested
CN108667005B (en) * 2018-04-13 2021-11-23 湘潭大学 Power grid static and dynamic combination vulnerability assessment method considering new energy influence
CN108921452B (en) * 2018-07-27 2021-04-09 华北电力大学(保定) Power transmission line risk assessment composite early warning method based on fuzzy algorithm
CN109615245A (en) * 2018-12-14 2019-04-12 国网山东省电力公司经济技术研究院 A kind of method of pair of Electric Power Network Planning total evaluation
CN109659934B (en) * 2018-12-24 2021-08-03 中国电力科学研究院有限公司 New energy grid-connected planning optimization method based on short-circuit current margin
CN110365047B (en) * 2019-07-16 2020-08-18 金华电力设计院有限公司 Power grid short-circuit current probability evaluation method containing distributed photovoltaic power generation system
JP7254041B2 (en) * 2020-02-21 2023-04-07 株式会社日立製作所 SYSTEM PLANNING SUPPORT SYSTEM AND SYSTEM PLANNING SUPPORT METHOD

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1772938A2 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-11 Ansaldo Ricerche S.p.A. Reconfigurable power distribution network
CN102025153A (en) * 2010-12-15 2011-04-20 天津大学 Method for accurately calculating maximum power supply capacity of medium voltage distribution network

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1772938A2 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-11 Ansaldo Ricerche S.p.A. Reconfigurable power distribution network
CN102025153A (en) * 2010-12-15 2011-04-20 天津大学 Method for accurately calculating maximum power supply capacity of medium voltage distribution network

Non-Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Madrid Allan等.sequential simulation applied to compisite system reliability evalution.《Generation,Transmission and Distribution》.1992,第139卷(第2期),全文.
sequential simulation applied to compisite system reliability evalution;Madrid Allan等;《Generation,Transmission and Distribution》;19920331;第139卷(第2期);全文 *
别朝红等.蒙特卡洛法在评估电力系统可靠性中的应用.《电力系统自动化》.1997,第21卷(第6期),全文.
大电力系统可靠性评估的蒙特卡洛仿真及概率密度估计;赵渊等;《重庆大学学报》;20071231;第30卷(第12期);全文 *
蒙特卡洛法在评估电力系统可靠性中的应用;别朝红等;《电力系统自动化》;19970630;第21卷(第6期);全文 *
赵渊等.大电力系统可靠性评估的蒙特卡洛仿真及概率密度估计.《重庆大学学报》.2007,第30卷(第12期),全文.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN102214922A (en) 2011-10-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN102214922B (en) Evaluation system of power network planning scheme
CN102999792B (en) A kind of method of comprehensive evaluation of power distribution network optimization allocation
CN104376504B (en) A kind of distribution system probabilistic reliability appraisal procedure based on analytic method
CN108183512B (en) Reliability assessment method for power system accessed with new energy
Chang et al. Risk assessment of generation and transmission systems considering wind power penetration
CN101567561B (en) Comparing and selecting system of power transmission network planning scheme
CN103036230A (en) Dynamic equivalence method of alternating-current-direct-current serial-parallel large power system based on engineering application
CN102509018A (en) System and method for evaluating importance of power system facilities
CN104077664B (en) Confidence capacity assessment method of energy storage and generation system of wind power
CN104599189A (en) Power grid planning scheme risk evaluation method considering power system operation mode
Liu et al. Probabilistic steady-state and dynamic security assessment of power transmission system
CN109377112B (en) Power transmission line safety and reliability evaluation method
CN102638041A (en) Method forquickly checking safety and stability of scheduling operation of power system on line
CN106655292A (en) Ultra-high-voltage AC/DC hybrid grid stability analysis method
CN111639841B (en) Lightning trip-out risk comprehensive evaluation method for high-voltage transmission line
CN110569534B (en) New energy grid-connected scale determination method and system considering short-circuit current influence
CN104283208B (en) The composition decomposition computational methods of the probability available transmission capacity of large-scale power grid
CN103311925B (en) Identification method for complex power grid self-organization critical state
CN110994614A (en) Reliability evaluation method, system and equipment of direct current transmission system
CN201774252U (en) Electrical power system simulation research and development platform based on imaging real-time simulation
CN113268007A (en) Wind power plant energy storage protection simulation test system and method
CN112217220B (en) Safety and stability defense method and device for new energy source sending multi-terminal flexible direct current power grid
Malmer et al. Network reconfiguration for renewable generation maximization
Dong et al. Reliability Evaluation of Multi-terminals VSC-HVDC System.
Ye et al. The maintenance strategy for optimizing distribution transformer life cycle cost

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
ASS Succession or assignment of patent right

Owner name: STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA

Effective date: 20121221

C41 Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model
TA01 Transfer of patent application right

Effective date of registration: 20121221

Address after: 250002 Ji'nan City Central District, Shandong, No. 2 South Road, No. 500

Applicant after: SHANDONG ELECTRIC POWER Research Institute

Applicant after: State Grid Corporation of China

Address before: 250002 Ji'nan City Central District, Shandong, No. 2 South Road, No. 500

Applicant before: SHANDONG ELECTRIC POWER Research Institute

C14 Grant of patent or utility model
GR01 Patent grant
CP02 Change in the address of a patent holder

Address after: 250003 No. 2000, Wang Yue Road, Shizhong District, Ji'nan, Shandong

Patentee after: Shandong Electric Power Research Institute

Patentee after: State Grid Corporation of China

Address before: 250002, No. 500, South Second Ring Road, Shizhong District, Shandong, Ji'nan

Patentee before: Shandong Electric Power Research Institute

Patentee before: State Grid Corporation of China

CP02 Change in the address of a patent holder
CP01 Change in the name or title of a patent holder

Address after: 250003 No. 2000, Wang Yue Road, Shizhong District, Ji'nan, Shandong

Patentee after: SHANDONG ELECTRIC POWER Research Institute

Patentee after: STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA

Address before: 250003 No. 2000, Wang Yue Road, Shizhong District, Ji'nan, Shandong

Patentee before: SHANDONG ELECTRIC POWER Research Institute

Patentee before: State Grid Corporation of China

CP01 Change in the name or title of a patent holder
TR01 Transfer of patent right

Effective date of registration: 20220125

Address after: 250003 No. 2000, Wang Yue Road, Shizhong District, Ji'nan, Shandong

Patentee after: ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF STATE GRID SHANDONG ELECTRIC POWER Co.

Patentee after: STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA

Address before: 250003 No. 2000, Wang Yue Road, Shizhong District, Ji'nan, Shandong

Patentee before: SHANDONG ELECTRIC POWER Research Institute

Patentee before: STATE GRID CORPORATION OF CHINA

TR01 Transfer of patent right