CN101658167B - Antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity - Google Patents
Antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN101658167B CN101658167B CN2009101158933A CN200910115893A CN101658167B CN 101658167 B CN101658167 B CN 101658167B CN 2009101158933 A CN2009101158933 A CN 2009101158933A CN 200910115893 A CN200910115893 A CN 200910115893A CN 101658167 B CN101658167 B CN 101658167B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- cotton
- safener
- antidotal
- glyphosate
- poisoning
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Landscapes
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
An antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity is prepared from the following raw materials by weight percent: 0.0006-0.0007% of benzyladenine, 0.0006-0.0007% of gibberellin GGA3, 0.000012-0.000015% of brassinolide and the balance of water. A preparation method of the antidotal safener is that the three medicines are mixed and then dissolved in the water so that in the antidotal safener, the benzyladenine content is 6.664-6.666mg/L, the gibberellin GGA3 content is 6.664-6.666mg/L and the brassinolide content is 0.133-0.134mg/L. When the antidotal safener is used, a sprayer is used for spraying the antidotal safener on cotton which is subject to the phytotoxicity before or after the weeding of glyphosate herbicide. Results from glyphosate herbicide phytotoxicity resisting cotton selection tests show that the antidotal safener achieves an antidotal and safe effect on the glyphosate herbicide phytotoxicity resistance of the cotton, is an ideal safener for the cotton in resisting the glyphosate herbicide phytotoxicity and has value prospect of commercial varieties.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate.
Background technology
Safener in the weed killer herbicide is also claimed antipoison or protectant; Can be used to the poisoning that cover crop avoids weed killer herbicide; Increase crop safety and the compound that improves weed control efficacy, since Hoffman proposed the safener notion first in 1962, business-like in the world kind have nearly 20 kinds (the safener progress [J] in the weed killer herbicide. Chinese plant protection guide; 2004,24 (1)).So far can be used on the weed killer herbicide the safener kind very little; Like the glyphosate herbicidal that on cotton, uses; So far do not have effective safener and remove poisoning, cause the cotton grower to use glyphosate herbicidal to prevent and kill off unifacial leaf and dicotyledonous mixing when growing thickly weeds in the cotton field, usually take place former thereby produce the poisoning of glyphosate herbicidal cotton because of spray liquor drift etc.; Thereby gently then cause the cotton underproduction, heavy then cause cotton plant dead.
Summary of the invention
The object of the invention overcomes above-mentioned defective exactly, and a kind of antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate is provided.
The antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate of the present invention, process by following raw materials by weight percent:
Benayl aminopurine 0.0006-0.0007%, gibberellin GGA3 0.0006-0.0007%,
Brassin lactones 0.000012-0.000015%, water surplus.
Its preparation method is that three kinds of medicaments are mixed, and is dissolved in the water, and makes the medicine content 6.664-6.666mg/L of benayl aminopurine in the antidotal safener, the medicine content 6.664-6.666mg/L of gibberellin GGA3, the medicine content 0.133-0.134mg/L of brassin lactones.During use, on the cotton when before or after with the glyphosate herbicidal weeding, producing poisoning with the sprayer spraying.
The detoxifying effect that is used for the antidotal safener of cotton resistance glyphosate poisoning of the present invention:
With benayl aminopurine (manufacturer: Taizhou, Zhejiang Province city roc pharmaceutcal corporation, Ltd); Gibberellin GA3 (manufacturer: Jiangsu Fengyuan Biology Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.); CPPU (manufacturer: Lanyue Sci. & Tech. Development Co., Sichuan Prov.); (manufacturer: Lanyue Sci. & Tech. Development Co., Sichuan Prov.), (manufacturer: Xianyang, Shanxi province De Feng Co., Ltd), (manufacturer: Chongqing Shuan Feng agricultural chemicals Co., Ltd) 6 plant growth regulators combine 16 cotton resistance glyphosate phytotoxicity tests processing to heteroauxin to Thidiazuron to brassin lactones; Every processing adds 41% glyphosate isopropyl amine salt 2730mg/L (effective content) mixing back and sprays by each processing experimental plot; Other establishes 41% glyphosate isopropyl amine salt 2730mg/L (effective content) and is contrast 1, and blank is treated to contrast 2, carries out cotton resistance glyphosate poisoning safener experiment sieving.Carried out the investigation of cotton glyphosate poisoning safe effect behind the medicine in 1,3,5,7 day, carried out the cotton plant height in 1 month behind the medicine to count detoxifying effect investigation with cotton buds and bolls.Each is handled as follows:
Handle 1:0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L+0.004% brassin lactones AS 0.133mg/L
Handle 2:20% gibberellin GA3 SPX 13.33mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L
Handle 3:20% gibberellin GA3 SPX 13.33mg/L+0.004% brassin lactones AS 0.133mg/L
Handle 4:20% gibberellin GA3 SPX 13.33mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L+0.004%
Brassin lactones AS 0.133mg/L
Handle 5:1% benayl aminopurine SL 6.665mg/L+1% gibberellin GA3 SL6.665mg/L
Handle 6:1% benayl aminopurine SL 6.665mg/L+1% gibberellin GA3 SL6.665mg/L+0.1% chlorine
Pyrrole urea SL 1.25mg/L
Handle 7: benayl aminopurine 6.665mg/L+ gibberellin GA3 6.665mg/L+ brassin lactones
0.133mg/L
Handle 8:1% benayl aminopurine 6.665mg/L+1% gibberellin GA3 6.665mg/L+0.1% CPPU
1.25mg/L+0.004% brassin lactones 0.133mg/L
Handle 9:0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L
Handle 10:0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L+0.004% rape
Plain lactone AS 0.133mg/L
Handle 11:0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L
Handle 12:0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L+0.004% brassin lactones AS 0.133mg/L
Handle 13:0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L+0.004% rape
Plain lactone AS0.133mg/L+1% benayl aminopurine SL 6.665mg/L+1% gibberellin GA3
SL6.665mg/L
Handle 14: (0.00052% heteroauxin+0.135% gibberellin GA3+0.00031% brassin) WP
0.0907mg/L
Handle 15: (0.00052% heteroauxin+0.135% gibberellin GA3+0.00031% brassin) WP
0.0907mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L+0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L
Handle 16: (0.00052% heteroauxin+0.135% gibberellin GA3+0.00031% brassin) WP
0.0907mg/L+1% benayl aminopurine SL 6.665mg/L+1% gibberellin GA3 SL
6.665mg/L+0.1% CPPU SL 1.25mg/L+0.2% Thidiazuron SL 0.667mg/L
CK1: single with 41% glyphosate isopropyl amine salt AS 2730mg/L
CK2: blank
Tested 9 days-August 10 July in 2009 and experimental field carry out in Jiangxi Cotton Research Institute.
The result:
Handle 7: [benayl aminopurine 6.665mg/L (effective content)+gibberellin GA36.665mg/L (effective content)+brassin lactones 0.133mg/L (effective content)]; Resistance glyphosate poisoning effect is rapid and obvious; Only handle 7 glyphosate poisoning indexes behind the medicine in 1-7 days and be lower than the CK1 contrast, through variance analysis, the least significant difference multiple ratio is test; LSD is significant difference and extremely remarkable on 5% and 1% level, and (1,3,7 day LSD poisoning index differential on 5% level is remarkable after handling 7 medicines; 5 days LSD are extremely remarkable in poisoning index differential on 1% level behind the medicine) all the other each handle and the CK1 contrast between, glyphosate poisoning index differential is all not remarkable.(seeing table 1).Explain that handling 7 has significantly quick and extremely remarkable resistance glyphosate poisoning safe effect, other each processing then do not have the safe effect of resistance glyphosate poisoning.(handle 7, behind the medicine 1 day, cotton glyphosate poisoning index 4.8, comparison is according to CK1 poisoning index 18.7 low 13.9 percentage points, and all the other pat equal poisoning index 20.9 everywhere, contrast high 2.2 percentage points than CK1; Behind the medicine 3 days, handle 7 poisoning indexes 39.26, than CK1 contrast poisoning index 53.02 low 13.76 percentage points, all the other pat equal poisoning index 63.9 everywhere, contrast high 10.9 percentage points than CK1; Behind the medicine 5 days, handle 7 poisoning indexes 36.5, comparison is according to CK1 poisoning index 56.7 low 20.2 percentage points, and all the other pat equal poisoning index 65.9 everywhere, exceed 9.2 percentage points than the CK1 contrast; Behind the medicine 7 days, handle 7 poisoning indexes 36.4, than CK1 contrast poisoning index 51.8 low 15.4 percentage points, all the other pat equal poisoning index 63.7 everywhere, exceed 11.9 percentage points than the CK1 contrast).(seeing table 1)
Behind the medicine 30 days, each is handled cotton plant height and the cotton buds and bolls number is investigated, it is 4 higher than the CK1 contrast with the plant height of handling 7, two processing that the result only handles, other respectively handle plant height all in various degree be lower than the CK1 contrast.Through the test of variance analysis least significant difference multiple ratio, significantly, processing 7 is extremely remarkable on LSD (1%) level on LSD (5%) level in processing 4.Between other each processing and the CK1 contrast, plant height difference is not remarkable.Test instructions: handling 4 pairs of glyphosate poisoning has detoxifying effect on the cotton plant height, handling 7 then has extremely strong detoxifying effect, and other each processing do not have detoxifying effect on plant height.(handle 7 plant height 73.30cm, 47.88cm exceeds 25.42cm than the CK1 contrast, and 99.27cm compares with CK2 blank plant height, few 25.97cm.Promptly handle 7 plant height loss percentages 26.16%, restoring force 73.84% is handled 4 plant height 59.22cm, exceeds 11.34cm than the CK1 contrast, compares few 40.05cm with the CK2 blank, handles 4 plant height loss percentages 40.34%, restoring force 59.66%.Two processing are compared, and handle 7 plant height loss percentages than handling 4 and lack 14.18 percentage points, and recovery rate is then many 14.18 percentage points, show that detoxifying effect processing 7 obviously is superior to handling 4.All the other pat equal plant height 43.80cm everywhere, than the low 4.08cm of CK1 contrast, compare plant height loss percentage 55.88% with the CK2 blank, compare restoring force 0 with the CK1 contrast).(seeing table 2)
Had only processing 7 in 1 month behind the medicine, individual plant has several 12.18 of average cotton buds and bolls, and all the other each processing and CK1 contrast cotton buds and bolls number are 0.Processing 7 is compared few 15.02 with several 27.20 of CK2 blank individual plant cotton buds and bolls, promptly handles 7 output restoring forces 44.78%, loss power 55.22%.Show quantitatively in cotton buds and bolls that it is thus clear that handle 7 cotton resistance glyphosate poisoning detoxifcation recovery effects is extremely remarkable, and each is handled with contrast CK1 and on the cotton buds and bolls recovery rate, is not had detoxifying effect.(seeing table 2)
Table 2: respectively handled plant height and cotton buds and bolls number behind the medicine in 1 month
| Handle | Average plant height/cm | 5% significance level | 1% significance level | Average cotton buds and bolls number/individual |
| 1 | 37.05 | d | D | 0 |
| 2 | 39.53 | d | D | 0 |
| 3 | 40.54 | d | D | 0 |
| 4 | 59.22 | c * | BC | 0 |
| 5 | 44.10 | d | CD | 0 |
| 6 | 42.01 | d | CD | 0 |
| 7 | 73.30 | b * | B ** | 12.18 |
| 8 | 47.20 | cd | CD | 0 |
| 9 | 43.81 | d | CD | 0 |
| 10 | 44.85 | d | CD | 0 |
| 11 | 40.07 | d | D | 0 |
| 12 | 38.55 | d | D | 0 |
| 13 | 41.74 | d | CD | 0 |
| 14 | 45.66 | d | CD | 0 |
| 15 | 46.29 | d | CD | 0 |
| 16 | 46.36 | d | CD | 0 |
| CK1 | 47.88 | cd | CD | 0 |
| CK2 | 99.27 | a | A | 27.20 |
Through cotton resistance glyphosate herbicide damage screening test; The result shows: the processing 7 of benayl aminopurine 6.665mg/L (effective content)+gibberellin GA36.665mg/L (effective content)+three kinds of medicament combinations of brassin lactones 0.133mg/L (effective content); Has cotton resistance glyphosate poisoning detoxifcation safe effect; Be the safener of a desirable cotton resistance glyphosate herbicide damage, have the value prospect of commercialization kind; Handle 4 combinations and can only say to have anti-toxic effect fruit, also do not have the value of commercialization kind because of no cotton buds and bolls output restoring force.
Embodiment
Embodiment 1:
A kind of antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate, process by following raw materials by weight percent:
Benayl aminopurine 0.0007%, gibberellin GGA3 0.0007%,
Brassin lactones 0.000015%, water surplus.
Its preparation method is that three kinds of medicaments are mixed, and is dissolved in the water.During use, on the cotton when before or after with the glyphosate herbicidal weeding, producing poisoning with the sprayer spraying.
Embodiment 2:
A kind of antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate, process by following raw materials by weight percent:
Benayl aminopurine 0.0007%, gibberellin GGA3 0.0007%,
Brassin lactones 0.000014%, water surplus.
Embodiment 3:
A kind of antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate, process by following raw materials by weight percent:
Benayl aminopurine 0.0006%, gibberellin GGA3 0.0007%,
Brassin lactones 0.000015%, water surplus.
Claims (1)
1. antidotal safener that is used for the poisoning of cotton resistance glyphosate, it is characterized in that: it is processed by following materials by weight percentage:
Benayl aminopurine 0.0006-0.0007%, gibberellin GA
30.0006-0.0007%,
Brassin lactones 0.000012-0.000015%, water surplus.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2009101158933A CN101658167B (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2009-09-08 | Antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2009101158933A CN101658167B (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2009-09-08 | Antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN101658167A CN101658167A (en) | 2010-03-03 |
| CN101658167B true CN101658167B (en) | 2012-07-25 |
Family
ID=41786590
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN2009101158933A Expired - Fee Related CN101658167B (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2009-09-08 | Antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN101658167B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP3381286A4 (en) * | 2015-11-17 | 2019-04-24 | Jiangsu Huifeng Bio Agriculture Co., Ltd. | Plant growth regulator composition having synergistic action |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN104430328A (en) * | 2014-12-18 | 2015-03-25 | 成都新朝阳作物科学有限公司 | Composition with function of relieving phytotoxicity of glyphosate herbicide and application of composition |
| CN106332903B (en) * | 2016-08-22 | 2019-03-19 | 安阳全丰生物科技有限公司 | Glyphosate class Herbicidal combinations containing gibberellin class compound |
| CN106577662B (en) * | 2016-12-16 | 2019-03-01 | 广西南亚热带农业科学研究所 | A method of it eliminating glyphosate and Queensland nut phytotoxicity is acted on |
| CN108077271A (en) * | 2017-12-28 | 2018-05-29 | 塔里木大学 | A kind of antidote and its application method for mepiquat chloride on cotton |
| CN109042664A (en) * | 2018-06-12 | 2018-12-21 | 湖南农业大学 | Promote the growth regulator and its method of administration of ratooning rice Dormant Buds and elongation |
-
2009
- 2009-09-08 CN CN2009101158933A patent/CN101658167B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| 刘玉琛等.除草剂安全剂作用机制研究进展.《山东农药信息》.2008,(第2期),第34-36页. * |
| 张兴华等.氯吡脲和芸苔素内酯对棉花田草甘膦药害的解毒效果.《农药》.2008,(第11期),第834-835页. * |
| 葛为彬等.低浓度草甘膦对单季杂交稻的药害及补救措施.《植物保护》.1998,(第3期),第47-48页. * |
| 许阳光等.除草剂中的安全剂研究进展.《中国植保导刊》.2004,(第1期),第8-11页. * |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP3381286A4 (en) * | 2015-11-17 | 2019-04-24 | Jiangsu Huifeng Bio Agriculture Co., Ltd. | Plant growth regulator composition having synergistic action |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN101658167A (en) | 2010-03-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN101658167B (en) | Antidotal safener for cotton in resisting glyphosate phytotoxicity | |
| CN107980620B (en) | Composition for chromosome doubling of corn haploid seedlings | |
| CN102742571B (en) | Cuppric nonyl phenolsulfonate-containing compound water-based pesticide and preparation method as well as application thereof | |
| CN107439561B (en) | Peach tree shoot control agent containing flumetralin and paclobutrazol | |
| Maas et al. | Crop load regulation in'Conference'pears | |
| CN111657288A (en) | Pesticide composition containing brassin, indolebutyric acid and plant resistance inducer | |
| US9872492B2 (en) | (S)-abscisic acid derivatives for thinning | |
| Dami et al. | Response of grapevines to soybean oil application | |
| Pesteanu | The influence of thinning agent on base of 6-BA and NAA on productivity and fruit quality of ‚Gala Must’variety | |
| Gollagi et al. | Effects of growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of fruit crops: a review | |
| NAITO et al. | Promotion of Berry Set in Grapes by Growth Retardants II. Effects of SADH and CCC Applied Directly to Clusters on Berry Set and Shoot Growth in Kyoho and Muscat of Alexandria Grapes | |
| Dussi et al. | Thinning programs in pears cv. Williams | |
| CN114868746A (en) | Bactericidal composition containing bronopol of alkaloid and alkaloid analogue | |
| Anand et al. | Evaluation of bio-efficacy and compatibility of emamectin benzoate with neem based biopesticide against fruit borers of brinjal and okra | |
| Khadivi et al. | Study of N-phenyl-phthalamic acid effects on fruit setting and fruit quality of sweet, sour and duke cherries | |
| CN1481682A (en) | Binary compound herbicide | |
| Reginato et al. | A single Metamitron spray thinned'Brookfield gala'apples as effectively as a program of treatments based on NAA, Carbaryl and Ba | |
| Soliman et al. | Effect of GA 3 on yield and fruit characteristics of Sakkoty date palm under Aswan conditions | |
| Peşteanu | The influence of different fruit thinning products on productivity and quality of “Fuji Kiku” variety | |
| Sotomayor et al. | Boron concentration affects in vitro pollen germination and tube growth in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) cultivar'Matua' | |
| Verma | Performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes for yield and quality trait under Chhattisgarh plains | |
| Racskó | Effect of Auxin-Synergistic Preparation and Fertilization on Fruit Setting and Fruit Quality ofApple | |
| CN116369328B (en) | Mite-killing composition containing azocyclotin and application thereof | |
| Taghipour et al. | The influence of fruit thinning on the apricot cultivar ‘Gerdi’ | |
| Lavee et al. | Further field studies of the mode of application and efficiency of various ethylene-releasing chemicals to facilitate olive fruit harvest |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| C17 | Cessation of patent right | ||
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20120725 Termination date: 20130908 |