CA2941271A1 - Method for treatment of oil and sand cuttings - Google Patents
Method for treatment of oil and sand cuttings Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2941271A1 CA2941271A1 CA2941271A CA2941271A CA2941271A1 CA 2941271 A1 CA2941271 A1 CA 2941271A1 CA 2941271 A CA2941271 A CA 2941271A CA 2941271 A CA2941271 A CA 2941271A CA 2941271 A1 CA2941271 A1 CA 2941271A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- oil
- slurry
- cuttings
- sand
- bitumen
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 37
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 title claims description 19
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 239000003921 oil Substances 0.000 claims description 35
- 239000010426 asphalt Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000000527 sonication Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000000295 fuel oil Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 229910003480 inorganic solid Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002173 cutting fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000306 component Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000003027 oil sand Substances 0.000 abstract description 16
- 239000003129 oil well Substances 0.000 abstract description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 11
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000499 gel Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003795 desorption Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004614 Process Aid Substances 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012223 aqueous fraction Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005234 chemical deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003889 chemical engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002425 crystallisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008025 crystallization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007599 discharging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000839 emulsion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000008394 flocculating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001879 gelation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000518 rheometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010977 unit operation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930195735 unsaturated hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B21/00—Methods or apparatus for flushing boreholes, e.g. by use of exhaust air from motor
- E21B21/06—Arrangements for treating drilling fluids outside the borehole
- E21B21/063—Arrangements for treating drilling fluids outside the borehole by separating components
- E21B21/065—Separating solids from drilling fluids
- E21B21/066—Separating solids from drilling fluids with further treatment of the solids, e.g. for disposal
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
Abstract
A method of treating oil-sand cuttings generated in the development of oil wells to reduce their oil content. A slurry is formed of the oil-sand cuttings and the slurry is sonicated using a sonic reactor to release floatable entrained hydrocarbons. The solids are separated from the sonicated slurry and are sufficiently clean to be returned to the environment. The recovered oil is reusable in industrial bulk oil applications.
Description
METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF OIL AND SAND CUTTINGS
Field The present invention pertains to the treatment of oil and sand cuttings, in particular sand-containing heavy oil and bitumen suspensions in water to release floatable bitumen components trapped or blocked by the sand matrix.
Background of the Invention Drill cuttings are a pervasive waste product generated from developing oil wells.
Instead of discharging drilling waste to the environment, oil-based mud cuttings can be treated in onsite settling ponds, or treated using thermal desorption technology, to reduce residual oil on cuttings sufficiently for disposal. Thermal desorption technology has been used widely in drilling cuttings processing, but the capital costs are high and there are treatability concerns with the recovered oil and its suitability for re-use. The problem is that the thermal energy required to distill enough hydrocarbons from the cuttings to render them suitable for disposal may result in some cracking or other thermal degradation of the oil, creating aromatics and unsaturated hydrocarbons that adversely affect the toxicity and performance of the drilling fluid.
It is known that components in oil sands processing flowsheets, especially bitumen/water/sand/clay suspensions, are susceptible to undesirable gelation which creates "blocking gels" which act as a barrier to the flotation of entrained bitumen and heavy oil. This phenomenon is described by J.B. O'Carroll in University of Ottawa Masters Thesis "Factors Affecting Bitumen Recovery from Oil Sands" (1999).
Further discussion can be found in: Wallace, Ti, Komishke, B. and Wallwork, V., "On the Standardization of Extractability Protocols", Oil Sands 2006 Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, February 22 -24, 2006. A description of the effect of shear on the viscosity of suspensions of materials was also reported in Chow, R., Zhou, J., and Wallace, D., "The Rheology of Oil Sands Slurries", Oil Sands 2006 Conference, Edmonton, AB, February 22 ¨ 24, 2006.
Field The present invention pertains to the treatment of oil and sand cuttings, in particular sand-containing heavy oil and bitumen suspensions in water to release floatable bitumen components trapped or blocked by the sand matrix.
Background of the Invention Drill cuttings are a pervasive waste product generated from developing oil wells.
Instead of discharging drilling waste to the environment, oil-based mud cuttings can be treated in onsite settling ponds, or treated using thermal desorption technology, to reduce residual oil on cuttings sufficiently for disposal. Thermal desorption technology has been used widely in drilling cuttings processing, but the capital costs are high and there are treatability concerns with the recovered oil and its suitability for re-use. The problem is that the thermal energy required to distill enough hydrocarbons from the cuttings to render them suitable for disposal may result in some cracking or other thermal degradation of the oil, creating aromatics and unsaturated hydrocarbons that adversely affect the toxicity and performance of the drilling fluid.
It is known that components in oil sands processing flowsheets, especially bitumen/water/sand/clay suspensions, are susceptible to undesirable gelation which creates "blocking gels" which act as a barrier to the flotation of entrained bitumen and heavy oil. This phenomenon is described by J.B. O'Carroll in University of Ottawa Masters Thesis "Factors Affecting Bitumen Recovery from Oil Sands" (1999).
Further discussion can be found in: Wallace, Ti, Komishke, B. and Wallwork, V., "On the Standardization of Extractability Protocols", Oil Sands 2006 Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, February 22 -24, 2006. A description of the effect of shear on the viscosity of suspensions of materials was also reported in Chow, R., Zhou, J., and Wallace, D., "The Rheology of Oil Sands Slurries", Oil Sands 2006 Conference, Edmonton, AB, February 22 ¨ 24, 2006.
2 In addition, an analysis of the bitumen recovery process from Syncrude Canada Ltd.
states that the type of energy may be more important than the quantity of energy (i.e.
shear may be the determining factor): Sanford, E.C., "Processability of Athabasca Oil Sand: Interrelationship Between Oil Sand Fine Solids, Process Aids, Mechanical Energy and Oil Sand Age After Mining," The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1983, 61, 554 ¨ 567. This analysis was done specifically in the context of initial slurrying ¨ a step in the process that not only influences the initial liberation of bitumen from the oil sand but the interaction among particles that control subsequent flotation processes.
Accordingly, there is a recognized need for methods which can wholly or partially break up the oil-sand cuttings slurry in oil sands processing and in the collection of subsequent sand cuttings.
Sonic reactors (sometimes called sonic generators) that convert electrical energy into kinetic energy via acoustic resonance for transfer to process fluid mediums are known, e.g. Nyberg et al., US 5,005,773, incorporated herein by reference.
They allow for maximum and efficient transmission of the kinetic energy emitted by the resonating element into the fluid medium, thus minimizing energy losses to the support structure. Industrial applications of sonic reactors include (a) grinding or dispersing of agglomerated minerals, and/or (b) concentrated mixing of solid, fluid and/or mixed solid-fluid mediums. The high intensity energy transferred to the fluid being processed facilitates deagglomeration of solids to allow for enhanced separation and recovery of desirable minerals, and/or uniformly distributes solid and/or fluid particles throughout the medium, which maximizes and intensifies the effective surface-to-surface contact shear area between fluid and/or solid mediums and allows for efficient conversion of desired chemical reactions and/or depositions.
Summary of the Invention According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of treating oil and sand cuttings to reduce the oil content of the cuttings, comprising forming a slurry
states that the type of energy may be more important than the quantity of energy (i.e.
shear may be the determining factor): Sanford, E.C., "Processability of Athabasca Oil Sand: Interrelationship Between Oil Sand Fine Solids, Process Aids, Mechanical Energy and Oil Sand Age After Mining," The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1983, 61, 554 ¨ 567. This analysis was done specifically in the context of initial slurrying ¨ a step in the process that not only influences the initial liberation of bitumen from the oil sand but the interaction among particles that control subsequent flotation processes.
Accordingly, there is a recognized need for methods which can wholly or partially break up the oil-sand cuttings slurry in oil sands processing and in the collection of subsequent sand cuttings.
Sonic reactors (sometimes called sonic generators) that convert electrical energy into kinetic energy via acoustic resonance for transfer to process fluid mediums are known, e.g. Nyberg et al., US 5,005,773, incorporated herein by reference.
They allow for maximum and efficient transmission of the kinetic energy emitted by the resonating element into the fluid medium, thus minimizing energy losses to the support structure. Industrial applications of sonic reactors include (a) grinding or dispersing of agglomerated minerals, and/or (b) concentrated mixing of solid, fluid and/or mixed solid-fluid mediums. The high intensity energy transferred to the fluid being processed facilitates deagglomeration of solids to allow for enhanced separation and recovery of desirable minerals, and/or uniformly distributes solid and/or fluid particles throughout the medium, which maximizes and intensifies the effective surface-to-surface contact shear area between fluid and/or solid mediums and allows for efficient conversion of desired chemical reactions and/or depositions.
Summary of the Invention According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of treating oil and sand cuttings to reduce the oil content of the cuttings, comprising forming a slurry
3 of the oil-sand cuttings and sonicating the slurry to release floatable entrained hydrocarbons.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of wholly or partially rupturing and shearing bitumen flotation blocking gels of the bitumen-water-sands-clay suspensions during the processing of oil sands and cuttings by low frequency sonication. The oil-sand cuttings slurry is pumped through mixing chambers of a sonic reactor which are physically mounted to one or both free ends of the sonic reactor resonant element. Optionally, grinding media may be used in the mixing chambers. The acoustic frequency sonication breaks down and inhibits the formation of blocking gels and emulsions from the cuttings and related slurry mixtures, thereby releasing floatable entrained bitumen. The sonication may be carried out in an acoustic frequency range of approx. 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, alternatively 50 to 500 Hz.
Further aspects of the invention and features of specific embodiments of the invention are described below.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a schematic drawing of a portion of a sonic reactor apparatus for use in carrying out the method of the invention.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the treatment method of the invention.
Detailed Description Drill cuttings comprising small sand particles are made into a slurry, i.e.
and oil-sand cuttings slurry, or a water-oil-sand-clay cutting fluid slurry. Optionally, up to about1,000 mg/kg of flocculants may be added to the slurry prior to sonication. The cutting fluid may include selected hydrocarbons, surfactants and polymers that optimize flow viscosity.
According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of wholly or partially rupturing and shearing bitumen flotation blocking gels of the bitumen-water-sands-clay suspensions during the processing of oil sands and cuttings by low frequency sonication. The oil-sand cuttings slurry is pumped through mixing chambers of a sonic reactor which are physically mounted to one or both free ends of the sonic reactor resonant element. Optionally, grinding media may be used in the mixing chambers. The acoustic frequency sonication breaks down and inhibits the formation of blocking gels and emulsions from the cuttings and related slurry mixtures, thereby releasing floatable entrained bitumen. The sonication may be carried out in an acoustic frequency range of approx. 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz, alternatively 50 to 500 Hz.
Further aspects of the invention and features of specific embodiments of the invention are described below.
Brief Description of the Drawings Figure 1 is a schematic drawing of a portion of a sonic reactor apparatus for use in carrying out the method of the invention.
Figure 2 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of the treatment method of the invention.
Detailed Description Drill cuttings comprising small sand particles are made into a slurry, i.e.
and oil-sand cuttings slurry, or a water-oil-sand-clay cutting fluid slurry. Optionally, up to about1,000 mg/kg of flocculants may be added to the slurry prior to sonication. The cutting fluid may include selected hydrocarbons, surfactants and polymers that optimize flow viscosity.
4 Referring to Figure 1, an apparatus that may be used to carry out the sonication is a sonic reactor having a mixing chamber 10 physically mounted to a free end of the sonic reactor resonant element 8. The sonic reactor may be of the type disclosed in Nyberg et al., US 5,005,773, or a multi-module prong-type acoustic frequency sonic reactor. The sonication accomplishes the shear effects required to facilitate enhanced rupturing and shearing of bitumen flotation blocking gels in the oil-sand cuttings slurry 14. Optionally, the mixing chamber holds grinding media 12, depending on the composition of the feed slurry. The grinding media are retained in the mixing chambers by a screen assembly 16.
Figure 2 depicts an embodiment of the method of the invention. In step 1, cuttings from an oil well or a collection lagoon, with a significant quantity of wasted or spilled oil mixed with water, are stored in a largely unlined and uncovered condition, e.g. in tanks or bins. This comprises the oil-sand cuttings slurry that is subjected to the treatment of the invention.
In step 2, conventional gross material separation is done through an inclined screen for removal of bulk solids like large pieces of wood and rocks. This may alternatively be done in a water-sand-clay-bitumen separator tank.
In step 3, the slurry from step 2, which optionally may be heated, is subjected to low frequency sonication using an arrangement of multi-module horizontal bar-type sonic reactors comprised of one or more sonic reactor units. As described above, the sonic reactors are used to accomplish the shear effects required to facilitate enhanced rupturing and shearing of bitumen flotation blocking gels in a typical oil-sand cuttings slurry, e.g. a suspension of water-sand-clay-bitumen.
In step 4, primarily inorganic solids separation is performed on the sonicated slurry produced in step 3. It may utilize a screening configuration based on produced analytical data from the sonicated slurry. Alternatively, it may use an array of settling tanks. At this stage, the solids (sand) are substantially separated from the oil/water.
The rejected solids are sufficiently clean to be returned to the land within local and federal regulations.
In step 5, the sonicated slurry left after the solids separation of step 4 is placed in a
Figure 2 depicts an embodiment of the method of the invention. In step 1, cuttings from an oil well or a collection lagoon, with a significant quantity of wasted or spilled oil mixed with water, are stored in a largely unlined and uncovered condition, e.g. in tanks or bins. This comprises the oil-sand cuttings slurry that is subjected to the treatment of the invention.
In step 2, conventional gross material separation is done through an inclined screen for removal of bulk solids like large pieces of wood and rocks. This may alternatively be done in a water-sand-clay-bitumen separator tank.
In step 3, the slurry from step 2, which optionally may be heated, is subjected to low frequency sonication using an arrangement of multi-module horizontal bar-type sonic reactors comprised of one or more sonic reactor units. As described above, the sonic reactors are used to accomplish the shear effects required to facilitate enhanced rupturing and shearing of bitumen flotation blocking gels in a typical oil-sand cuttings slurry, e.g. a suspension of water-sand-clay-bitumen.
In step 4, primarily inorganic solids separation is performed on the sonicated slurry produced in step 3. It may utilize a screening configuration based on produced analytical data from the sonicated slurry. Alternatively, it may use an array of settling tanks. At this stage, the solids (sand) are substantially separated from the oil/water.
The rejected solids are sufficiently clean to be returned to the land within local and federal regulations.
In step 5, the sonicated slurry left after the solids separation of step 4 is placed in a
5 vessel designed to float bitumen. For example, a low velocity clarifier or membrane separation may be used to separate the oil and water fractions. This step 5 may include additional inorganic solids settling techniques. Recovered water and rejected separation solids are sent back to step 1 for further treatment. This may be a separate recovery collection cell and/or oily water storage (step 7) in which the water and rejected separation solids are contained before returning to step 1. The concentrated oil stream from step 5 is sent to step 6.
In step 6, the residual water is removed from the concentrated oil stream, leaving the recovered oil. Membrane separation as well as conventional energy-based separation may be employed in both evaporation and freeze crystallization unit operations.
Recovered water and rejected separation solids are sent to the recovery collection cell (step 7) and then to step 1 for further treatment.
Once separated from the residual water in step 6, the recovered oil product is reusable in industrial bulk oil applications. It has good flow viscosity and reduced sulfur content. It may be used in upgrading heavy oils and bitumen for higher value applications.
Example 1 Sonication of a bitumen-sand slurry was performed for intervals of approximately 2 to 180 seconds at a frequency in the range of about 100 Hz to 500 Hz. The heavy oil floated quickly and thoroughly and the remaining sand matrix demonstrated lower quantities of retained heavy oil. The results clearly show that acoustic frequency sonication is able to rupture the bitumen flotation blocking gels in the heavy oil or bitumen/sand/cutting fluid slurry and effectively separate the entrained heavy oil or bitumen from the remaining slurry.
In step 6, the residual water is removed from the concentrated oil stream, leaving the recovered oil. Membrane separation as well as conventional energy-based separation may be employed in both evaporation and freeze crystallization unit operations.
Recovered water and rejected separation solids are sent to the recovery collection cell (step 7) and then to step 1 for further treatment.
Once separated from the residual water in step 6, the recovered oil product is reusable in industrial bulk oil applications. It has good flow viscosity and reduced sulfur content. It may be used in upgrading heavy oils and bitumen for higher value applications.
Example 1 Sonication of a bitumen-sand slurry was performed for intervals of approximately 2 to 180 seconds at a frequency in the range of about 100 Hz to 500 Hz. The heavy oil floated quickly and thoroughly and the remaining sand matrix demonstrated lower quantities of retained heavy oil. The results clearly show that acoustic frequency sonication is able to rupture the bitumen flotation blocking gels in the heavy oil or bitumen/sand/cutting fluid slurry and effectively separate the entrained heavy oil or bitumen from the remaining slurry.
6 The runs summarized below were completed on field cuttings samples provided by one or more major industrial producers of oil sand field cuttings from Alberta, Canada. Optimization work was perfomied around the sonication performance which was based on qualitative observation prior to completing a quantitative analysis. This was a clear and reliable method of evaluation in that the produced sand was visually cleaner and lighter than the original sand cuttings samples, as shown by analytical data below in Tables 1 and 2.
Analyses were performed on the slurries before and after sonication and the results are shown in Table 1:
Table 1 Units Pre Sonication Post Sonication Mass Bitumen g 8.85 0.42 Mass % Bitumen wt % 9.64 0.36 (>96% reduction) Mass % Solids wt % 90.42 99.71 Mass % Water wt % <0.01 <0.01 Mass % Recovery wt % 100.07 100.07 Example 2 Sonication was performed as in Example 1, but with the addition of a heating stage in which the oil sand cuttings slurry was heated to 30 to 90 degrees C. prior to sonication. Commercially this can be accomplished by heating the oil-sand cuttings slurry with a heat exchanger prior to step 3 of Figure 2. The sonicated slurry was analyzed and the results are shown in Table 2. The runs shown in Table 2 reflect variable oil concentrations in heated cutting samples and the overall success of separating oil from the cuttings samples with more than 99% separation efficiency.
Analyses were performed on the slurries before and after sonication and the results are shown in Table 1:
Table 1 Units Pre Sonication Post Sonication Mass Bitumen g 8.85 0.42 Mass % Bitumen wt % 9.64 0.36 (>96% reduction) Mass % Solids wt % 90.42 99.71 Mass % Water wt % <0.01 <0.01 Mass % Recovery wt % 100.07 100.07 Example 2 Sonication was performed as in Example 1, but with the addition of a heating stage in which the oil sand cuttings slurry was heated to 30 to 90 degrees C. prior to sonication. Commercially this can be accomplished by heating the oil-sand cuttings slurry with a heat exchanger prior to step 3 of Figure 2. The sonicated slurry was analyzed and the results are shown in Table 2. The runs shown in Table 2 reflect variable oil concentrations in heated cutting samples and the overall success of separating oil from the cuttings samples with more than 99% separation efficiency.
7 Table 2 Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Mass Bitumen g 0.21 0.30 0.56 0.38 Mass Solids g 61.99 129.08 71.20 86.20 Mass Water g 0.08 0.03 0.09 0.09 Mass Total g 62.22 129.37 71.68 86.51 Mass % Bitumen wt % 0.34 0.23 0.78 0.44 Mass A Solids wt % 99.63 99.78 99.33 99.64 Mass % Water wt % 0.13 0.02 0.13 0.10 Mass % Recovery wt % 100.10 100.03 100.24 100.18 As will be apparent to those skilled in the art in the light of the foregoing disclosure, many alterations and modifications are possible in the practice of this invention without departing from the scope thereof. Accordingly, the scope of the invention is to be construed in accordance with the following claims.
Claims (11)
1. A method of treating oil and sand cuttings to reduce the oil content of the cuttings, comprising:
(a) forming a slurry of the oil and sand cuttings; and (b) sonicating the slurry to release floatable entrained hydrocarbons from the slurry.
(a) forming a slurry of the oil and sand cuttings; and (b) sonicating the slurry to release floatable entrained hydrocarbons from the slurry.
2. A method according to claim 1, where the released hydrocarbons comprise bitumen or heavy oil, or components thereof.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the sonication is done in an acoustic frequency range of 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz.
4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the sonication is done in an acoustic frequency range of 50 Hz to 500 Hz.
5. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising adding a flocculent to the slurry before step (b).
6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising heating the slurry before step (b).
7. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising separating inorganic solids from the sonicated slurry of step (b).
8. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising removing hydrocarbons from the slurry of step (b).
9. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the slurry of step (a) further comprises a cutting fluid.
10. A method of treating oil and sand cuttings to reduce the oil content of the cuttings, comprising:
(a) forming a slurry of the oil and sand cuttings;
(b) removing bulk solids from the slurry;
(c) sonicating the slurry to release floatable entrained hydrocarbons from the slurry;
(d) separating inorganic solids from the sonicated slurry, the separated inorganic solids having an oil content lower than that of the oil and sand cuttings of step (a); and (e) removing the oil from the sonicated slurry to form a concentrated oil stream.
(a) forming a slurry of the oil and sand cuttings;
(b) removing bulk solids from the slurry;
(c) sonicating the slurry to release floatable entrained hydrocarbons from the slurry;
(d) separating inorganic solids from the sonicated slurry, the separated inorganic solids having an oil content lower than that of the oil and sand cuttings of step (a); and (e) removing the oil from the sonicated slurry to form a concentrated oil stream.
11. A method according to claim 10, further comprising the step of removing water from the concentrated oil stream.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201361773005P | 2013-03-05 | 2013-03-05 | |
US61/773,005 | 2013-03-05 | ||
PCT/CA2014/050171 WO2014134726A1 (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2014-03-05 | Method for treatment of oil and sand cuttings |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2941271A1 true CA2941271A1 (en) | 2014-09-12 |
CA2941271C CA2941271C (en) | 2021-01-26 |
Family
ID=51490522
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2941271A Active CA2941271C (en) | 2013-03-05 | 2014-03-05 | Method for treatment of oil and sand cuttings |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2941271C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014134726A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11788939B2 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2023-10-17 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and systems for preparing drill cuttings for measuring petrophysical properties of subsurface formations |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104912504B (en) * | 2015-06-03 | 2018-04-03 | 江阴东辰钻探设备有限公司 | A kind of processing unit of environmentally friendly integrated form drilling wastes |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4443322A (en) * | 1980-12-08 | 1984-04-17 | Teksonix, Inc. | Continuous process and apparatus for separating hydrocarbons from earth particles and sand |
US5472620A (en) * | 1993-09-23 | 1995-12-05 | Exxon Production Research Company | Solid-liquid separation process using at least one polymer and cavitation energy |
US6110359A (en) * | 1995-10-17 | 2000-08-29 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Method for extracting bitumen from tar sands |
CA2713584C (en) * | 2008-03-17 | 2016-06-21 | Chevron Canada Limited | Recovery of bitumen from oil sands using sonication |
CA2752963C (en) * | 2010-09-22 | 2019-03-05 | 1612017 Alberta Ltd. | Solids removal system and method |
-
2014
- 2014-03-05 WO PCT/CA2014/050171 patent/WO2014134726A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-03-05 CA CA2941271A patent/CA2941271C/en active Active
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11788939B2 (en) | 2019-10-17 | 2023-10-17 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Methods and systems for preparing drill cuttings for measuring petrophysical properties of subsurface formations |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2941271C (en) | 2021-01-26 |
WO2014134726A1 (en) | 2014-09-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2018282374C1 (en) | Cleaning and dewatering fine coal | |
US7998342B2 (en) | Separation of tailings that include asphaltenes | |
RU2337938C1 (en) | Installation and method for carbon extraction form solid source | |
AU2022203563B2 (en) | Methods for separating and dewatering fine particles | |
WO2002102717A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for separating hydrocarbons from mineral substrates | |
US5829691A (en) | Method and apparatus for washing soil | |
EA016847B1 (en) | System and method of separating hydrocarbons | |
Zhou | Role of mineral flotation technology in improving bitumen extraction from mined A thabasca oil sands III. Next generation of water‐based oil sands extraction | |
CA2941271C (en) | Method for treatment of oil and sand cuttings | |
EP4058218B1 (en) | Treatment of hydrocarbon-contaminated materials | |
Ebrahiem et al. | Produced water treatment design methods in the gas plant: optimization and controlling | |
EA026296B1 (en) | Process for the recovery of bitumen from an oil sand | |
US20020104799A1 (en) | Tar sands extraction process | |
US11268032B2 (en) | Process and system for the above ground extraction of crude oil from oil bearing materials | |
Saleh et al. | Crude Oil Extraction and Technologically-Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM) Pre-Treatment of Petroleum Sludge: A Review | |
CA3037959C (en) | Pretreatment of froth treatment affected tailings with floatation and stripping prior to tailings dewatering and containment | |
CN112876023A (en) | Pretreatment method for recovering oil sludge by using thermal desorption device | |
CA2932835C (en) | Process for recovering bitumen from froth treatment tailings | |
US12043799B2 (en) | Process for extracting crude oil from diatomaceous earth | |
Tran et al. | Decontamination process of oil spills on beach sand and of petroleum bottom tank sludges | |
CA1036524A (en) | Treatment of tailings from tar sands | |
CA2845983C (en) | Lean froth process for oil sands processing | |
NL1037993C2 (en) | A method of reducing the hydrocarbon-content of oil-containing sand. | |
CA3101746A1 (en) | Treatment of oil sands whole tailings with lime | |
CA2750402A1 (en) | Elevated temperature treatment of bitumen froth |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20190301 |