CA2861892C - Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives - Google Patents
Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2861892C CA2861892C CA2861892A CA2861892A CA2861892C CA 2861892 C CA2861892 C CA 2861892C CA 2861892 A CA2861892 A CA 2861892A CA 2861892 A CA2861892 A CA 2861892A CA 2861892 C CA2861892 C CA 2861892C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- adhesive
- pillar
- pad
- adhesion
- gecko
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 106
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 105
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 title abstract description 7
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 claims description 30
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 24
- 239000004205 dimethyl polysiloxane Substances 0.000 claims description 19
- 229920000435 poly(dimethylsiloxane) Polymers 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 12
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 claims description 11
- -1 polydimethylsiloxane Polymers 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 11
- 229920001059 synthetic polymer Polymers 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 33
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 25
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 20
- 235000012431 wafers Nutrition 0.000 description 17
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000036316 preload Effects 0.000 description 9
- 241001505523 Gekko gecko Species 0.000 description 8
- 229920002120 photoresistant polymer Polymers 0.000 description 8
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000001878 scanning electron micrograph Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 241000270290 Gekkota Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000003278 mimic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920001730 Moisture cure polyurethane Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000002390 adhesive tape Substances 0.000 description 2
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000005388 borosilicate glass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000708 deep reactive-ion etching Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000206 photolithography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001020 plasma etching Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000623 plasma-assisted chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002174 soft lithography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- PYJJCSYBSYXGQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N trichloro(octadecyl)silane Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC[Si](Cl)(Cl)Cl PYJJCSYBSYXGQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004971 Cross linker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004826 Synthetic adhesive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005411 Van der Waals force Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002041 carbon nanotube Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910021393 carbon nanotube Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005229 chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009194 climbing Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000004209 hair Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002094 self assembled monolayer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013545 self-assembled monolayer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003371 toe Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000012876 topography Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09J—ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES
- C09J9/00—Adhesives characterised by their physical nature or the effects produced, e.g. glue sticks
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B81—MICROSTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY
- B81C—PROCESSES OR APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS
- B81C1/00—Manufacture or treatment of devices or systems in or on a substrate
- B81C1/00015—Manufacture or treatment of devices or systems in or on a substrate for manufacturing microsystems
- B81C1/00023—Manufacture or treatment of devices or systems in or on a substrate for manufacturing microsystems without movable or flexible elements
- B81C1/00103—Structures having a predefined profile, e.g. sloped or rounded grooves
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
- B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
- B82Y30/00—Nanotechnology for materials or surface science, e.g. nanocomposites
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09J—ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES
- C09J175/00—Adhesives based on polyureas or polyurethanes; Adhesives based on derivatives of such polymers
- C09J175/04—Polyurethanes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09J—ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES
- C09J183/00—Adhesives based on macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions forming in the main chain of the macromolecule a linkage containing silicon, with or without sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, or carbon only; Adhesives based on derivatives of such polymers
- C09J183/04—Polysiloxanes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09J—ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES
- C09J7/00—Adhesives in the form of films or foils
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B81—MICROSTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY
- B81B—MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS, e.g. MICROMECHANICAL DEVICES
- B81B2203/00—Basic microelectromechanical structures
- B81B2203/03—Static structures
- B81B2203/0361—Tips, pillars
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B81—MICROSTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGY
- B81B—MICROSTRUCTURAL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS, e.g. MICROMECHANICAL DEVICES
- B81B2207/00—Microstructural systems or auxiliary parts thereof
- B81B2207/05—Arrays
- B81B2207/053—Arrays of movable structures
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C09—DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- C09J—ADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES
- C09J2301/00—Additional features of adhesives in the form of films or foils
- C09J2301/30—Additional features of adhesives in the form of films or foils characterized by the chemical, physicochemical or physical properties of the adhesive or the carrier
- C09J2301/31—Additional features of adhesives in the form of films or foils characterized by the chemical, physicochemical or physical properties of the adhesive or the carrier the adhesive effect being based on a Gecko structure
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16B—DEVICES FOR FASTENING OR SECURING CONSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS OR MACHINE PARTS TOGETHER, e.g. NAILS, BOLTS, CIRCLIPS, CLAMPS, CLIPS OR WEDGES; JOINTS OR JOINTING
- F16B11/00—Connecting constructional elements or machine parts by sticking or pressing them together, e.g. cold pressure welding
- F16B11/006—Connecting constructional elements or machine parts by sticking or pressing them together, e.g. cold pressure welding by gluing
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16B—DEVICES FOR FASTENING OR SECURING CONSTRUCTIONAL ELEMENTS OR MACHINE PARTS TOGETHER, e.g. NAILS, BOLTS, CIRCLIPS, CLAMPS, CLIPS OR WEDGES; JOINTS OR JOINTING
- F16B5/00—Joining sheets or plates, e.g. panels, to one another or to strips or bars parallel to them
- F16B5/07—Joining sheets or plates, e.g. panels, to one another or to strips or bars parallel to them by means of multiple interengaging protrusions on the surfaces, e.g. hooks, coils
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T428/00—Stock material or miscellaneous articles
- Y10T428/24—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.]
- Y10T428/24479—Structurally defined web or sheet [e.g., overall dimension, etc.] including variation in thickness
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Nanotechnology (AREA)
- Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Composite Materials (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Adhesives Or Adhesive Processes (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to an easy, scalable method, relying on conventional and unconventional techniques, to incorporate tilt in the fabrication of synthetic polymer-based dry adhesives mimicking the gecko adhesive system. These dry, reversible adhesives demonstrate anisotropic adhesion properties, providing strong adhesion and friction forces when actuated in the gripping direction and an initial repulsive normal force and negligible friction when actuated in the releasing direction.
Description
USE OF SHEAR TO INCORPORATE TILT INTO THE MICROSTRUCTURE OF
REVERSIBLE GECKO-INSPIRED ADHESIVES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention 100011/ [0002] The present invention relates to novel reversible gecko-inspired adhesives, and a method of producing novel reversible gecko-inspired adhesives using shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of novel reversible gecko-inspired adhesives.
II. General Background [0003] The superior adhesive properties of geckos, which allow them to repeatedly attach strongly and detach easily from a variety of surfaces, have inspired the fabrication of synthetic dry adhesives. However, an adhesive material that exhibits all the characteristics of gecko adhesion still remains elusive. The superior adhesive properties of geckos are attributed to the complex, hierarchical topography of fine tilted and curved columnar structures (setae) each bearing multiple trapezoidal-shaped terminal pads (spatulae) that make up the adhesive arrays on gecko toes. Natural gecko setal arrays show strong adhesion and friction forces originating from van der Waals interactions when sheared in the "gripping direction" towards the axis of tilt, but show no adhesion and smaller friction when sheared in the opposite "releasing direction." This mechanically-controllable adhesion anisotropy allows for easy and rapid locomotion on vertical and inverted surfaces.
[0004] Synthetic adhesives based on a variety of materials and fabrication schemes have been developed to mimic gecko adhesion, yet a true mimic still remains elusive because of limitations in current nanofabrication techniques. The Dhinojwala group used chemical vapor deposition to create gecko-inspired adhesive tape based on high-density carbon nanotubes. The Sitti group fabricated by soft lithography approaches slanted polyurethane-based microstructures that showed anisotropic adhesion. The del Campo group used a combination of multi-step photolithography and soft lithography to generate hierarchical structures.
Jeong et al. fabricated micro/nanoscale hierarchical polymeric hairs using a two-step UV-assisted capillary molding technique. The Cutkosky group used microfabrication techniques to develop single level wedge-shaped dry adhesives with anisotropic properties, and the Israelachvili group used photolithography and molding techniques to create microflaps composed of polydimethylsiloxane, which also showed anisotropic tribological properties.
[0005] Although anisotropic soft polymer structures (elastic modulus E-0.1-1 MPa) had been fabricated previously, in 2008, the Fearing group was the first to fabricate anisotropic gecko-inspired dry adhesives from a hard polymer, polypropylene (E¨I .4 GPa). The Turner group reported that improved adhesion could be obtained with the integration of nano and microstructures due to enhanced structural compliance, and the Bhushan group provided a theoretical analysis on a multi-level hierarchical structure showing adhesion enhancement to rough surfaces.
100061 While a major focus in fabricating gecko-like adhesives has been on the geometrical design of the structures, recent work has shown that chemistry - i.e., surface functionality and presence of lipids - should also be considered in their future designs. The above synthetic dry adhesives either do not show anisotropic adhesion or rely on multi-step, expensive fabrication schemes, which are not easily scalable for hierarchical structures. There is thus a need for an easy, scalable fabrication scheme for dry, reversible adhesives that exhibit anisotropic adhesion. The present invention can be shown to have numerous advantages over conventional adhesives such as tapes that rely on tacky filaments and over other synthetic dry adhesives.
100071 The scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments set forth herein, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[00081 An aspect of the present invention includes a method of fabricating an adhesive which comprises the steps of fabricating a patterned mold, applying a first polymer to said patterned mold, allowing said first polymer to partially cure, removing said partially-cured first polymer from said patterned mold, applying a predetermined lateral shear distance to said partially-cured first polymer, allowing said sheared partially-cured first polymer to fully cure, applying a second polymer to said sheared fully-cured first polymer, allowing said second polymer to fully cure, and removing said second fully-cured polymer from said sheared first polymer.
REVERSIBLE GECKO-INSPIRED ADHESIVES
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention 100011/ [0002] The present invention relates to novel reversible gecko-inspired adhesives, and a method of producing novel reversible gecko-inspired adhesives using shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of novel reversible gecko-inspired adhesives.
II. General Background [0003] The superior adhesive properties of geckos, which allow them to repeatedly attach strongly and detach easily from a variety of surfaces, have inspired the fabrication of synthetic dry adhesives. However, an adhesive material that exhibits all the characteristics of gecko adhesion still remains elusive. The superior adhesive properties of geckos are attributed to the complex, hierarchical topography of fine tilted and curved columnar structures (setae) each bearing multiple trapezoidal-shaped terminal pads (spatulae) that make up the adhesive arrays on gecko toes. Natural gecko setal arrays show strong adhesion and friction forces originating from van der Waals interactions when sheared in the "gripping direction" towards the axis of tilt, but show no adhesion and smaller friction when sheared in the opposite "releasing direction." This mechanically-controllable adhesion anisotropy allows for easy and rapid locomotion on vertical and inverted surfaces.
[0004] Synthetic adhesives based on a variety of materials and fabrication schemes have been developed to mimic gecko adhesion, yet a true mimic still remains elusive because of limitations in current nanofabrication techniques. The Dhinojwala group used chemical vapor deposition to create gecko-inspired adhesive tape based on high-density carbon nanotubes. The Sitti group fabricated by soft lithography approaches slanted polyurethane-based microstructures that showed anisotropic adhesion. The del Campo group used a combination of multi-step photolithography and soft lithography to generate hierarchical structures.
Jeong et al. fabricated micro/nanoscale hierarchical polymeric hairs using a two-step UV-assisted capillary molding technique. The Cutkosky group used microfabrication techniques to develop single level wedge-shaped dry adhesives with anisotropic properties, and the Israelachvili group used photolithography and molding techniques to create microflaps composed of polydimethylsiloxane, which also showed anisotropic tribological properties.
[0005] Although anisotropic soft polymer structures (elastic modulus E-0.1-1 MPa) had been fabricated previously, in 2008, the Fearing group was the first to fabricate anisotropic gecko-inspired dry adhesives from a hard polymer, polypropylene (E¨I .4 GPa). The Turner group reported that improved adhesion could be obtained with the integration of nano and microstructures due to enhanced structural compliance, and the Bhushan group provided a theoretical analysis on a multi-level hierarchical structure showing adhesion enhancement to rough surfaces.
100061 While a major focus in fabricating gecko-like adhesives has been on the geometrical design of the structures, recent work has shown that chemistry - i.e., surface functionality and presence of lipids - should also be considered in their future designs. The above synthetic dry adhesives either do not show anisotropic adhesion or rely on multi-step, expensive fabrication schemes, which are not easily scalable for hierarchical structures. There is thus a need for an easy, scalable fabrication scheme for dry, reversible adhesives that exhibit anisotropic adhesion. The present invention can be shown to have numerous advantages over conventional adhesives such as tapes that rely on tacky filaments and over other synthetic dry adhesives.
100071 The scope of the claims should not be limited by the embodiments set forth herein, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[00081 An aspect of the present invention includes a method of fabricating an adhesive which comprises the steps of fabricating a patterned mold, applying a first polymer to said patterned mold, allowing said first polymer to partially cure, removing said partially-cured first polymer from said patterned mold, applying a predetermined lateral shear distance to said partially-cured first polymer, allowing said sheared partially-cured first polymer to fully cure, applying a second polymer to said sheared fully-cured first polymer, allowing said second polymer to fully cure, and removing said second fully-cured polymer from said sheared first polymer.
2 [0009] A further aspect of the present invention includes a method for fabricating an adhesive comprising: a step for forming a patterned mold; a step for forming an inverse replica of said patterned mold, said step for forming the inverse replica comprising:
(i) a step for applying a first polymer to said patterned mold, (ii) a step for allowing said first polymer to partially cure, (iii) a step for removing said partially-cured first polymer from said patterned mold, (iv) a step for shearing said partially-cured first polymer, and (v) a step for allowing said sheared partially cured first polymer to fully cure; and a step for forming a final adhesive using said sheared inverse replica of said patterned mold.
[0010] A still further aspect of the present invention includes an adhesive comprising: a base; at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being cylindrical in shape and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
[0011] A still further aspect of the present invention includes an adhesive comprising: a base; at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being in the shape of a triangular prism and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
[0012] A still further aspect of the present invention includes a device for adhering comprising a means for supporting a plurality of adhesive assemblies, and a means for gripping a surface when shearing forces are applied in a first direction and for releasing said surface when shearing forces are applied in a second direction, wherein said gripping means are attached to said supporting means.
[0013] A still further aspect of the present invention includes a base, a pillar having a first end and a second end, wherein said first end is attached to said base, and a pad-like structure, wherein said pad-like structure is attached to said second end.
[0014] The above and other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the drawings, the description given herein, and the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[00151 For a further understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference should be had to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like parts are given like reference numerals.
100161 Figure 1 shows SEM images of (A) the side view of a Tokay gecko setal array, (B) a magnified view of the spatula pads, (C) a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present
(i) a step for applying a first polymer to said patterned mold, (ii) a step for allowing said first polymer to partially cure, (iii) a step for removing said partially-cured first polymer from said patterned mold, (iv) a step for shearing said partially-cured first polymer, and (v) a step for allowing said sheared partially cured first polymer to fully cure; and a step for forming a final adhesive using said sheared inverse replica of said patterned mold.
[0010] A still further aspect of the present invention includes an adhesive comprising: a base; at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being cylindrical in shape and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
[0011] A still further aspect of the present invention includes an adhesive comprising: a base; at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being in the shape of a triangular prism and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
[0012] A still further aspect of the present invention includes a device for adhering comprising a means for supporting a plurality of adhesive assemblies, and a means for gripping a surface when shearing forces are applied in a first direction and for releasing said surface when shearing forces are applied in a second direction, wherein said gripping means are attached to said supporting means.
[0013] A still further aspect of the present invention includes a base, a pillar having a first end and a second end, wherein said first end is attached to said base, and a pad-like structure, wherein said pad-like structure is attached to said second end.
[0014] The above and other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent from the drawings, the description given herein, and the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[00151 For a further understanding of the nature and objects of the present invention, reference should be had to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like parts are given like reference numerals.
100161 Figure 1 shows SEM images of (A) the side view of a Tokay gecko setal array, (B) a magnified view of the spatula pads, (C) a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present
3 invention, and (D) a magnified view of the pad-like structures of a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention.
[0017] Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration of the different steps involved in fabricating gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention.
[0018] Figure 3 shows SEM images of gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention composed of polyurethane with pillars at (A) 900, (B) 80 , (C) 70 , and (D) 60 tilt angles.
[0019] Figure 4 shows a schematic illustration of the tribological measurements of gecko-inspired adhesives tests in the gripping and releasing direction.
[0020] Figure 5A shows a graph of the dynamic measurements of the adhesion forces generated by a gecko-inspired adhesive sample with 700 tilt when sheared in the gripping and releasing direction.
[0021] Figure 5B shows a graph of the dynamic measurements of the friction forces generated by a gecko-inspired adhesive sample with 70 tilt when sheared in the gripping and releasing direction.
[0022] Figure 6 shows a graph of the static and dynamic adhesion and friction forces generated by the gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention with different tilt angles.
[0023] Figure 7 shows a normalized normal force vs. friction force plot for a Tokay gecko setal array (black dots) and for a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention with 70 tilt (grey open dots) wherein the forces are normalized to their maximum respective magnitudes.
[0024] Figure 8 shows the static adhesion (grey curve) and friction forces (black curve) generated by a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention during eight cycles, each consisting of shearing in the gripping direction followed by the releasing direction.
[0025] Figure 9 shows the initial (or as fabricated) tilt angle 0 of the pillars compared to their static tilt angles 0, during shearing in the gripping direction.
[0026] Figure 10 shows a graph of the static adhesion force generated by gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention as a function of the static tilt angle 05 whereinthe solid line is a fit of the Peel Zone model.
[0027] Figure 11A shows a SEM image of an alternative embodiment of gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention consisting of a first level of triangular prism pillars and a second level of thinner rectangular pad-like structures (i.e., adhesive pads) biased towards one of the flat edges wherein the inset showing a magnified view of the terminal end of the prismatic pillars.
[0017] Figure 2 shows a schematic illustration of the different steps involved in fabricating gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention.
[0018] Figure 3 shows SEM images of gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention composed of polyurethane with pillars at (A) 900, (B) 80 , (C) 70 , and (D) 60 tilt angles.
[0019] Figure 4 shows a schematic illustration of the tribological measurements of gecko-inspired adhesives tests in the gripping and releasing direction.
[0020] Figure 5A shows a graph of the dynamic measurements of the adhesion forces generated by a gecko-inspired adhesive sample with 700 tilt when sheared in the gripping and releasing direction.
[0021] Figure 5B shows a graph of the dynamic measurements of the friction forces generated by a gecko-inspired adhesive sample with 70 tilt when sheared in the gripping and releasing direction.
[0022] Figure 6 shows a graph of the static and dynamic adhesion and friction forces generated by the gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention with different tilt angles.
[0023] Figure 7 shows a normalized normal force vs. friction force plot for a Tokay gecko setal array (black dots) and for a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention with 70 tilt (grey open dots) wherein the forces are normalized to their maximum respective magnitudes.
[0024] Figure 8 shows the static adhesion (grey curve) and friction forces (black curve) generated by a gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention during eight cycles, each consisting of shearing in the gripping direction followed by the releasing direction.
[0025] Figure 9 shows the initial (or as fabricated) tilt angle 0 of the pillars compared to their static tilt angles 0, during shearing in the gripping direction.
[0026] Figure 10 shows a graph of the static adhesion force generated by gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention as a function of the static tilt angle 05 whereinthe solid line is a fit of the Peel Zone model.
[0027] Figure 11A shows a SEM image of an alternative embodiment of gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention consisting of a first level of triangular prism pillars and a second level of thinner rectangular pad-like structures (i.e., adhesive pads) biased towards one of the flat edges wherein the inset showing a magnified view of the terminal end of the prismatic pillars.
4 [0028] Figure 11B shows a drawing of an alternative embodiment of gecko-inspired adhesives of the present invention consisting of a triangular prism pillar and a thinner rectangular pad-like structure (i.e., adhesive pads) biased towards one of the flat edges of the triangular prism pillar.
[0029] Figure 12 shows (A) a side view SEM image of an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention under shear in the gripping direction, and (B) a side view SEM image of an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention under shear in the releasing direction.
[0030] Figure 13A shows a plot of the adhesion and friction forces generated by an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention against a flat borosilicate surface during a typical measurement in the gripping direction.
[0031] Figure 13B shows a plot of the maximum friction and maximum pull-off force over 30 cycles using an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention with no tilt (unfilled data points) and with tilt (bold data points).
[0032] Figure 14A shows a plot of the adhesion and friction forces generated by an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention against a flat borosilicate surface in one cycle involving a shearing step in the gripping direction to activate the adhesion followed by a shearing step in the releasing direction.
[0033] Figure 14B shows a plot of the friction and pull-off force over 30 cycles using an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention with no tilt (unfilled data points) and with tilt (bold data points).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0034] Detailed descriptions of one or more preferred embodiments are provided herein. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention may be embodied in various forms.
Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but rather as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to employ the present invention in any appropriate manner.
[0035] A
combination of microfabrication and molding techniques is used to fabricate 2-level polyurethane (PU) hierarchical structures (Figures 1C and 1D), which mimic the setal shaft and the spatula pad of geckos (Figures lA and 1B). Adhesion and friction forces are measured, using a universal materials tester, along the tilt direction ("gripping"
direction) and against the tilt direction ("releasing" direction). The gecko-inspired adhesives show anisotropic adhesion and friction generating strong adhesion and friction when sheared (or actuated) in the gripping direction and initial repulsive normal forces and weak friction when sheared in the releasing direction. The magnitude of the adhesion force is also consistent with a nanoscale tape-peeling model (the Peel zone model); the adhesion force increases as the tilt angle decreases.
[0036] Example 1:
[0037] Fabrication of patterned silicon mold [00381 Silicon master wafers were fabricated using standard microfabrication techniques.
Briefly, four-inch silicon wafers (Test grade, University Wafers) were cleaned in an oxygen plasma, after which a 600 nm oxide layer was grown using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Next, positive photoresist was spun onto the wafers (Shipley 1813), patterned with rectangular structures mimicking the gecko spatulae, and developed. The oxide layer was then opened by reactive ion etching with CF4. The patterned oxide layer formed the bottom of the two-layer etch mask. The remaining photoresist was stripped off, and a new layer of Shipley 1818 was spun onto the wafers. This new layer was patterned with cylindrical structures mimicking the gecko setae and developed. The photoresist layer formed the top of the two-layer etch mask. Once the two-layer etch mask was in place, the hierarchical structure itself was formed using deep reactive ion etching. First, the wafer was etched to a depth of 60 microns. The photoresist was then stripped from the wafer, revealing the bottom layer (oxide) etch mask. The wafer was then etched an additional 20 microns to form the final structure.
100391 Dry adhesive fitbrication scheme 100401 Figure 2 shows a schematic of the different steps in the fabrication of a 2-level hierarchical polyurethane-based (ST-1060 BJB Enterprise, Inc., Tustin, CA, USA) dry adhesive.
In the first step, the silicon master wafer was used as a mold to create an inverse PDMS replica.
TM
Sylgard 184 PDMS (Dow Corning, Midland, M1) was mixed in a 10:1 (pre-polymer to erosslinker) ratio. After removal of air bubbles formed during mixing, the viscous liquid was poured onto the silicon master and cross-linked at 75 C for 40 min. The partially cured PDMS
replica was then laterally sheared in a home-built shearing device by applying a predetermined shear distance to achieve the desired tilt angle (60 -90 ). In using the home-built shearing device, the partially cured PDMS replica was placed in between upper and lower surfaces (i.e., glass slides). The normal load and alignment were controlled using 4 screws to bring the upper and lower surfaces together while the springs provide the resistance. A manual linear translational stage, which moved the lower surface, was used to apply the desired strain. After shearing, the PDMS replica was then fully cured in its sheared state at 75 C
for 24 hours resulting in the PDMS replica mold with tilted cylindrical holes and rectangular tips.
Polyurethane was then poured onto the PDMS replica and allowed to cure at 75 C
for 72 hours.
The final polyurethane-based dry adhesive was peeled off from the PDMS replica (which could be re-used to create additional samples).
[0041] Adhesion and friction measurements [0042] Adhesion and friction measurements were performed on a universal materials tester (CETR Enterprise, Inc., Campbell, CA, USA). Specimens with tilted fibrillar arrays were fixed on a glass slide using double-sided tape. A curved borosilicate surface, used as the probe (radius of curvature=3 cm, Anchor Optics, Barrington, NJ), attached to a force sensor (FL, CETR, Campbell, CA) with a cantilever (spring constant k=520 N/m), was then brought into contact with the bottom surface at a predetermined preload. During a typical experiment, the probe was brought into contact with the sample with a predetermined preload of 2 mN
(contact area -0.78mm2). The probe was then dragged in gripping direction (or releasing direction) for lmm at a velocity of 10 p.m/s. After dragging, the probe was pulled off at 90 from the sample. Four samples with tilt angles 0 ranging from 90 (no tilt) to 60 with 10 tilt increments (Figure 3) were tested. Prior to each experiment, the probe was cleaned with ethanol and the samples were tested without further cleaning. A camera was used to digitally record a side view of the experiments and extract the dynamic (i.e., while shearing) tilt angles.
[0043] Design of dry adhesives [0044] The adhesive pads of the well-studied Tokay gecko consist of hierarchical structures (a dense array of cylindrical setal shafts grouped in tetrads in a square lattice (-100 p.m in length and -5 p.m in diameter, spaced -18 p.m apart) which split into hundreds of spatula shafts each bearing multiple spatula pads (-200 nm in width and 5-10 nm in thickness).
Although the gecko pads consist of a relatively stiff material, 13-keratin (-1-4 GPa modulus), the hierarchical structures provide compliance, which aids in maximizing the true contact area and adhesion to rough surfaces. In addition, the setal shafts are tilted by -45 , which provides anisotropic tribological properties depending on the direction in which the adhesive surface is sheared.
[0045] Inspired by the Tokay gecko, we incorporated two hierarchical levels in our synthetic gecko structures. The first level consisted of an array of cylindrical pillars (60 p.m in length, 20 p.m in diameter), attached to a base, which provided an overall compliance to the dry adhesive mimicking the setal shaft. The second level was a thinner rectangular pad-like structure (20 p.m in width, 7 p.m in thickness) over each pillar, which provided the local compliance and maximized contact with other surfaces for adhesion. The cylindrical pillars were organized in a rectangular lattice (40 p.m center-to-center distance in the tilt direction and 30 p.m center-to-center distance along the other in-plane axis) to minimize contact with the neighboring pillars when tilted. Different tilt angles were incorporated into our structures to generate the anisotropic tribological properties upon shearing.
[0046] Characterization of tribological properties [0047] Figure 4 shows a schematic of the different stages encountered when shearing the tilted samples (with an initial pillar tilt angle 0) in the gripping (the top figures) and releasing (the bottom figures) directions. Each experiment began with applying a 2 mN
preload (sufficient to deform the more compliant tips but not the cylindrical pillars to a large extent as determined optically). When shearing in the gripping direction, an initial period of static adhesion and friction (i.e., the thin pads remain adhered to the probe) was achieved during which the adhesion force caused the probe to move closer to the sample (by a distance Azõ), and the pillar tilt angle decreased to 0 õ from the initial tilt angle 0. At a critical shear force, the pads began to slide resulting in dynamic adhesion Fi,d and friction forces F ,d, which were lower than their static counterparts, while the tilt angle increased slightly to 0 d. By contrast, in the releasing direction, the sample initially exhibited an intermediate stage in which the pads change their orientation, resulting in a repulsive (i.e., negative adhesion) force pushing the probe by a distance Az,.
Continued shearing past the intermediate stage resulted in the cylindrical pillars and pads re-orienting themselves to the releasing direction while still providing dynamic adhesion and friction forces.
[0048] The different stages involved in the adhesion and friction forces in the gripping and releasing direction were apparent in the tribological data. Figure 5A shows the adhesion force as a result of shearing a polyurethane-based dry adhesive with cylindrical pillars tilted at 70 (Figure 3C). In the gripping direction, a maximum static adhesion force F ,, of ¨5 mN was obtained and the dynamic adhesion force Fi,d dropped to ¨2 mN during sliding.
In the releasing direction, the adhesion force F' ,, initially dropped ¨ -3mN (i.e., repulsive force) before increasing to a steady dynamic adhesion F' ,d of ¨2 mN. Figure 5B shows the corresponding friction forces from the same surface. Before sliding began, the static friction F Is force in the gripping direction was ¨10 mN compared to F' ¨6 mN in the releasing direction.
The drag velocity was 10 nm/s. Therefore, the dry adhesive provides a strong adhesion and friction (before sliding) when sheared in the gripping direction, and provides an initial intermediate repulsive force and low friction (before the static regime).
[0049] The adhesion and friction forces (both static and dynamic) in the gripping direction as a function of the tilt angle are summarized in Figure 6. Both the adhesion and friction forces showed an increase as the tilt angle was decreased with the 60 tilt sample showing a larger increase in forces compared to the other samples. In all cases, the static forces were larger than the dynamic forces.
[0050] Comparison of gecko-inspired adhesive to gecko setal array [0051] The adhesion and friction forces generated by the 70 tilt sample were compared to the tribological properties of a Tokay gecko setal array when sheared in the gripping direction (Figure 7). The forces were normalized to their corresponding maximum magnitudes to facilitate the comparison. We find a remarkable similarity in the tribological properties of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention to a Tokay gecko setal array. The solid line (having a slope of -2 in dimensional form) is consistent with the frictional adhesion model proposed by Autumn et al. for shearing in the adhesive or gripping direction, which predicts the magnitude of the ratio of the friction force to the adhesion force ought to be greater than -1/tan(30 )=-1.7 (based on a detachment angle of 30 for the Tokay gecko). The fact that the tribological properties of our gecko-inspired adhesives (grey open dots) follow predictions of the frictional adhesion model allows for potential fine control of the adhesion strength generated through tuning of the friction forces.
[0052] A key difference in the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention compared to a gecko setal array is the single stick-slip event which occurs in our samples but absent in the case of the gecko setal array. We attribute this phenomenon to the fact that a gecko setal array consists of millions of individual contact points, as opposed to the relatively fewer contact points in our samples (estimated number of contacts ¨650 for our experimental technique). In the case of a gecko setal array, the resulting adhesion and friction forces obtained during shearing originate from the temporal fraction of the millions of spatula that are adhered to the surface.
[0053] An isotropic tribological properties of gecko-inspired adhesive [0054] Figure 8 shows the adhesion and friction force generated by the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention during eight shearing cycles. Each cycle consisted of actuating the sample in the gripping direction until maximum static adhesion and friction was achieved (i.e., static adhesion regime) followed by actuating the sample in the releasing direction until the adhesion force was repulsive. The gradual decrease in the friction force generated in the gripping direction is attributed to material transfer (i.e. polyurethane) from the gecko-inspired adhesive to the glass probe with repeated use. We found that if the probe was cleaned with ethanol, we recovered maximum adhesion and friction forces. The adhesion force does not change significantly over the eight cycles.
[0055] Comparison to Peel Zone model [0056] The adhesion data generated from the samples with different tilt angles was compared to the Peel Zone model, which was developed to model the adhesion force of pressure sensitive tapes as a function of the applied pulling force. Applying the Peel Zone model, 2149., h ?T(1 where F ,, is the static adhesion force, b is the total width of the peeling elements, y is the adhesion energy, and Os is the static peel angle, to our system, the model predicts that the adhesion force F ,, ought to increase as the peel angle is decreased. In our case, the peel angle is equivalent to the static tilt angle Os, (refer to Figure 4) of the cylindrical pillars and pads during the static adhesion regime of our measurements in the gripping direction. A
camera was used to capture the side view of the samples while performing the tribological experiments and to extract the static tilt angle (Figure 9) for each sample. For example, the tilt angle of the initial 70 tilt sample reduced from 0 =70 to Os =29 at the point of maximum static adhesion force F ,, (peak in adhesion force in Figure 5A) during the static regime of the adhesion measurement.
[0057] Figure 10 shows a fit of the Peel Zone model to our data after accounting for the change in the tilt angle during the static regime of the adhesion force measurement. A good agreement was found between our data and the Peel Zone model inferring that our dry adhesive adheres to surfaces through a similar mechanism to adhesives tapes except that in our case, the adhesion energy is a result of van der Waals forces as opposed to tacky filaments found in adhesive tapes.
[0058] A novel, easy and scalable fabrication scheme is disclosed to incorporate tilt into polymer-based dry adhesives. A series of dry adhesives with different tilt angles was fabricated and the adhesion and friction forces were characterized using a universal materials tester. The samples with tilt angles 0<90 showed anisotropic adhesion and friction data with the magnitude of the static adhesion and friction forces increasing as the tilt angle was decreased. The ratio of the friction force to the adhesion force of our samples when actuated in the gripping direction was in agreement with the frictional adhesion model and similar to the value obtained when shearing setal arrays of the Tokay gecko in the gripping direction. The static adhesion data also showed good agreement to the Peel Zone model for tape peeling after accounting for the decrease in the tilt angle of the structures during the static regime of the measurement.
[0059] Example 2:
[0060] In an alternative embodiment, the polyurethane-based gecko-inspired structures consist of 2 levels of hierarchy (see Figure 11A); a triangular prism pillar (approximately 30 gm x 25 urn x 25 gm, and 80 gm high) terminated by a rectangular pad-like structure (approximately 20 gm x 20 gm x 7 gm), arranged in a rectangular lattice (approximately 30 gm center-to-center in the tilt (x-axis) direction, and 37 gm center-to-center along the in-plane or y-axis axis).
[0061] Fabrication of patterned silicon mold [0062] Silicon master wafers were fabricated using standard microfabrication techniques.
Briefly, 4 inch silicon wafers (test grade, University Wafers) were cleaned in an oxygen plasma, after which a 600 nm oxide layer was grown using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition.
Next, positive photoresist was spun onto the wafers (Shipley 1813), patterned with rectangular structures mimicking the gecko spatulae, and developed. The oxide layer was then opened by reactive ion etching with CF4. The patterned oxide layer formed the bottom of the two-layer etch mask. The remaining photoresist was stripped off, and a new layer of Shipley 1818 was spun onto the wafers. This new layer was patterned with triangular structures mimicking the gecko setae and developed. The photoresist layer formed the top of the two-layer etch mask. Once the two-layer etch mask was in place, the hierarchical structure itself was formed using deep reactive ion etching. First, the wafer was etched to a depth of 60 gm. The photoresist was then stripped from the wafer, revealing the bottom layer (oxide) etch mask. The wafer was then etched an additional 20 gm to form the final structure.
[0063] Dry Adhesive Fabrication Scheme.
[0064] Two-level hierarchical polyurethane (PU) based (ST-1060 BJB
Enterprise, Inc., Tustin, CA) dry adhesives were fabricated in a multi-step process. Briefly, in the first step, the silicon master wafer was used as a mold to create an inverse polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) replica. To facilitate the peeling of the PDMS inverse mold from the silicon master, the latter was pretreated with a self-assembled monolayer of octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) coating.
TM
Sylgarcl 184 PDMS (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) was mixed in a 10:1 (pre-polymer/cross-linker) ratio. After removal of air bubbles formed during mixing, the viscous liquid was poured onto the silicon master and cross-linked at 75 C for 40 min. As an optional step, the partially cured PDMS replica was then laterally sheared in a home-built shearing device by applying a predetermined shear distance to achieve the desired tilt angle (ranging from 60 -90 ). The PDMS
replica was then fully cured at 75 C for 24 hour, resulting in the PDMS
replica mold with triangular holes and rectangular tips. PU was then poured onto the PDMS
replica and allowed to cure at 75 C for 72 hours. The final PU-based dry adhesive was peeled off from the PDMS
replica.
[0065] Adhesion and friction measurements [0066] Adhesion and friction measurements were performed on a universal materials tester (CETR Enterprise, Inc., Campbell, CA). A flat 2 cm x 2 cm borosilicate glass surface, used as the probe, attached to a force sensor (DFM, CETR Enterprise, Inc., Campbell, CA) with a cantilever (spring constant k =4113 N/m), was then brought into contact with the gecko-inspired surface at a predetermined preload. During a typical experiment, the probe was brought into contact with the sample with a preload of 50 mN. The probe was dragged in the gripping direction at a velocity of 10 m/s after which it was pulled off at 90 from the sample at the same speed. For the detachment experiments, after shearing in the gripping direction (to activate the adhesion), the probe was then dragged in the opposite (releasing) direction and pulled off at 90 from the sample. Samples with tilt angles 0 of 90 (i.e., no tilt) and 63 were tested to study the influence of the tilt angle. Prior to each experiment, the probe was cleaned with ethanol while the samples were tested without pre-cleaning. A camera was used to digitally record a side view of the experiments, which provided the dynamic (i.e., while shearing) tilt angles.
[0067] Design of dry adhesives [0068] The triangular prism pillar design, as shown in Figures 1 lA and 11B, was introduced to minimize attractive interactions between neighboring pillars when or if the pillars came into contact (i.e., creating a line contact). This allows for a higher number of pillars to be patterned per unit area. As shown in Figure 11B, the thinner rectangular pad-like structure was purposely biased towards the longer edge of the triangle, which provides a large contact area when the structure is sheared in the gripping direction. In the gripping direction (shown in the top of Figure 11B), the large initial contact area A1 leads to large friction (since the friction is adhesion-controlled at the low loads), pinning the fiber, further increasing the contact area to Ai and creating a small peel angle (01,final) in the bifurcation region. Based on the peel-zone model for tape peeling, small peel angles are required for high adhesion forces.
Therefore, when the microstructured surface is sheared in the gripping direction, high friction and adhesion forces are generated.
[0069] However, when sheared in the opposite (or "releasing" direction, as shown in the bottom of Figure 11B), the apex of the triangular prism prevents full contact of the rectangular pad leading to a smaller initial contact area A2. The small contact area leads to lower friction and since the structure is unable to tilt further (due to the apex of the triangle preventing further contact), the tilt angles remain the same, i.e., 01,mitiai= 02,finai.
Therefore, when the microstructured surface is sheared in the releasing direction, lower friction and adhesion forces are generated.
[0070] The SEM
images of Figure 12 further illustrates the gripping (Figure 12A) and shearing (Figure 12B) of this embodiment. In the gripping direction, a large contact area is formed between the gecko-inspired structures and the opposing surface. In addition, the apex of the triangular prism prevents further contact between neighboring pillars thus minimizing their interactions. The latter is essential to allow the pillars to elastically regain their original configuration when the pillars are unloaded. If the interactions between neighboring pillars overcome the stored elastic energy (within the pillars) under load, self-matting (i.e., pillars remain stuck with each other) occurs, which is undesirable. In the releasing direction, the apex of the triangular prism now serves to prevent the rectangular pad from forming a good contact with the opposing surface.
[0071] Characterization of tribological properties [0072] The tribological properties of a gecko-inspired adhesive surface (area = 32 mm2) consisting of pillars with tilt angle Otilt=63 (i.e., tilt angle in the unloaded state) sheared in the gripping direction are shown in Figure 13A. In a typical experiment, a preload of 50 mN was applied onto the surface for 5 seconds followed by shearing of the opposing surface (flat borosilicate glass wafer as the probe). The shearing and pull-off velocities were both 10 p.m/s.
Upon shearing, the normal load Fl,shear entered the adhesive regime, and the friction force Fil,gripping increased. The probe was then retracted perpendicularly until it detached, which provided the pull off force F ,pai off¨ 500 mN. The relatively large ratio of the adhesion force to applied preload of 10 (i.e., 500 mN/50 mN) is particular attractive in climbing robots, in which low preloads (thus resulting in low corresponding reaction forces) allow for more stable locomotion of vertical and inverted surfaces. Data for the maximum adhesion F
,pai off and the maximum friction forces Fil,gripping before detachment were recorded for 30 cycles (Figure 13B) for 2 different samples; one with tilt angle Otilt=63 and another with no tilt (i.e., Otilt=90 ). The results show the influence of the tilt angle Nit on the adhesion and friction forces, and also demonstrate the reusability of the gecko-inspired adhesive structure.
[0073]
Similarly, the tribological properties of the gecko-inspired adhesive surface (area =32 mm2) were measured when first sheared in the gripping direction, followed by shearing in the releasing direction, and finally pulling off to simulate the detachment process, as shown in Figure 14A. The maximum adhesion force F ,pai off in the releasing direction was lower compared to the maximum adhesion force F ,pun off in the gripping direction.
The magnitude of the friction force in releasing direction F11,releasing was also found to be considerably lower compared to Fil,gripping (c.f., 0.9 N of friction force in the gripping direction versus 0.13 N in the releasing direction). Data for maximum F ,pun off and the maximum F11,releasing before detachment were recorded for 30 cycles (Figure 14B) for 2 different samples; one with tilt angle Otat=63 and another with no tilt (i.e., Otilt=90 ). The results show the influence of the tilt angle Atilt on the adhesion and friction forces, and also demonstrate the reusability of the gecko-inspired adhesive structure. These results show the geometrical design of the pillars provides high adhesion and friction when actuated in the gripping direction, yet provides lower adhesion and friction when actuated in the releasing direction for detachment.
[0074] Comparison to Peel Zone Model [0075] According to the peel zone model for tape peeling, smaller peel angles 0 between the adhesive pads and the opposing surface lead to larger adhesion and friction forces because of the larger interaction area in the bifurcation region of peeling surfaces. Our data was consistent with the peel zone model; pillars that had no tilt (i.e., Otat=90 ) produced smaller adhesion forces compared to the pillars with tilt. We also found that the maximum friction force was larger for the pillars with tilt compared to those without tilt, again consistent with the peel zone model.
The lower friction forces recorded for the pillars with tilt in Figure 13B is because in these experiments, the surfaces were sheared only to the point to obtain the maximum pull-off force (which did not coincide with a maximum friction force). We also found a monotonic decrease in the forces (both adhesion and friction) within the first 15 cycles. We attribute this decrease to material (i.e., polymer) transfer from the gecko-inspired adhesive to the probe. In these experiments the preload was 50mN, and the shearing and pull off velocities were both 10 um/s.
[0029] Figure 12 shows (A) a side view SEM image of an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention under shear in the gripping direction, and (B) a side view SEM image of an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention under shear in the releasing direction.
[0030] Figure 13A shows a plot of the adhesion and friction forces generated by an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention against a flat borosilicate surface during a typical measurement in the gripping direction.
[0031] Figure 13B shows a plot of the maximum friction and maximum pull-off force over 30 cycles using an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention with no tilt (unfilled data points) and with tilt (bold data points).
[0032] Figure 14A shows a plot of the adhesion and friction forces generated by an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention against a flat borosilicate surface in one cycle involving a shearing step in the gripping direction to activate the adhesion followed by a shearing step in the releasing direction.
[0033] Figure 14B shows a plot of the friction and pull-off force over 30 cycles using an alternative embodiment of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention with no tilt (unfilled data points) and with tilt (bold data points).
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0034] Detailed descriptions of one or more preferred embodiments are provided herein. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention may be embodied in various forms.
Therefore, specific details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but rather as a basis for the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in the art to employ the present invention in any appropriate manner.
[0035] A
combination of microfabrication and molding techniques is used to fabricate 2-level polyurethane (PU) hierarchical structures (Figures 1C and 1D), which mimic the setal shaft and the spatula pad of geckos (Figures lA and 1B). Adhesion and friction forces are measured, using a universal materials tester, along the tilt direction ("gripping"
direction) and against the tilt direction ("releasing" direction). The gecko-inspired adhesives show anisotropic adhesion and friction generating strong adhesion and friction when sheared (or actuated) in the gripping direction and initial repulsive normal forces and weak friction when sheared in the releasing direction. The magnitude of the adhesion force is also consistent with a nanoscale tape-peeling model (the Peel zone model); the adhesion force increases as the tilt angle decreases.
[0036] Example 1:
[0037] Fabrication of patterned silicon mold [00381 Silicon master wafers were fabricated using standard microfabrication techniques.
Briefly, four-inch silicon wafers (Test grade, University Wafers) were cleaned in an oxygen plasma, after which a 600 nm oxide layer was grown using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Next, positive photoresist was spun onto the wafers (Shipley 1813), patterned with rectangular structures mimicking the gecko spatulae, and developed. The oxide layer was then opened by reactive ion etching with CF4. The patterned oxide layer formed the bottom of the two-layer etch mask. The remaining photoresist was stripped off, and a new layer of Shipley 1818 was spun onto the wafers. This new layer was patterned with cylindrical structures mimicking the gecko setae and developed. The photoresist layer formed the top of the two-layer etch mask. Once the two-layer etch mask was in place, the hierarchical structure itself was formed using deep reactive ion etching. First, the wafer was etched to a depth of 60 microns. The photoresist was then stripped from the wafer, revealing the bottom layer (oxide) etch mask. The wafer was then etched an additional 20 microns to form the final structure.
100391 Dry adhesive fitbrication scheme 100401 Figure 2 shows a schematic of the different steps in the fabrication of a 2-level hierarchical polyurethane-based (ST-1060 BJB Enterprise, Inc., Tustin, CA, USA) dry adhesive.
In the first step, the silicon master wafer was used as a mold to create an inverse PDMS replica.
TM
Sylgard 184 PDMS (Dow Corning, Midland, M1) was mixed in a 10:1 (pre-polymer to erosslinker) ratio. After removal of air bubbles formed during mixing, the viscous liquid was poured onto the silicon master and cross-linked at 75 C for 40 min. The partially cured PDMS
replica was then laterally sheared in a home-built shearing device by applying a predetermined shear distance to achieve the desired tilt angle (60 -90 ). In using the home-built shearing device, the partially cured PDMS replica was placed in between upper and lower surfaces (i.e., glass slides). The normal load and alignment were controlled using 4 screws to bring the upper and lower surfaces together while the springs provide the resistance. A manual linear translational stage, which moved the lower surface, was used to apply the desired strain. After shearing, the PDMS replica was then fully cured in its sheared state at 75 C
for 24 hours resulting in the PDMS replica mold with tilted cylindrical holes and rectangular tips.
Polyurethane was then poured onto the PDMS replica and allowed to cure at 75 C
for 72 hours.
The final polyurethane-based dry adhesive was peeled off from the PDMS replica (which could be re-used to create additional samples).
[0041] Adhesion and friction measurements [0042] Adhesion and friction measurements were performed on a universal materials tester (CETR Enterprise, Inc., Campbell, CA, USA). Specimens with tilted fibrillar arrays were fixed on a glass slide using double-sided tape. A curved borosilicate surface, used as the probe (radius of curvature=3 cm, Anchor Optics, Barrington, NJ), attached to a force sensor (FL, CETR, Campbell, CA) with a cantilever (spring constant k=520 N/m), was then brought into contact with the bottom surface at a predetermined preload. During a typical experiment, the probe was brought into contact with the sample with a predetermined preload of 2 mN
(contact area -0.78mm2). The probe was then dragged in gripping direction (or releasing direction) for lmm at a velocity of 10 p.m/s. After dragging, the probe was pulled off at 90 from the sample. Four samples with tilt angles 0 ranging from 90 (no tilt) to 60 with 10 tilt increments (Figure 3) were tested. Prior to each experiment, the probe was cleaned with ethanol and the samples were tested without further cleaning. A camera was used to digitally record a side view of the experiments and extract the dynamic (i.e., while shearing) tilt angles.
[0043] Design of dry adhesives [0044] The adhesive pads of the well-studied Tokay gecko consist of hierarchical structures (a dense array of cylindrical setal shafts grouped in tetrads in a square lattice (-100 p.m in length and -5 p.m in diameter, spaced -18 p.m apart) which split into hundreds of spatula shafts each bearing multiple spatula pads (-200 nm in width and 5-10 nm in thickness).
Although the gecko pads consist of a relatively stiff material, 13-keratin (-1-4 GPa modulus), the hierarchical structures provide compliance, which aids in maximizing the true contact area and adhesion to rough surfaces. In addition, the setal shafts are tilted by -45 , which provides anisotropic tribological properties depending on the direction in which the adhesive surface is sheared.
[0045] Inspired by the Tokay gecko, we incorporated two hierarchical levels in our synthetic gecko structures. The first level consisted of an array of cylindrical pillars (60 p.m in length, 20 p.m in diameter), attached to a base, which provided an overall compliance to the dry adhesive mimicking the setal shaft. The second level was a thinner rectangular pad-like structure (20 p.m in width, 7 p.m in thickness) over each pillar, which provided the local compliance and maximized contact with other surfaces for adhesion. The cylindrical pillars were organized in a rectangular lattice (40 p.m center-to-center distance in the tilt direction and 30 p.m center-to-center distance along the other in-plane axis) to minimize contact with the neighboring pillars when tilted. Different tilt angles were incorporated into our structures to generate the anisotropic tribological properties upon shearing.
[0046] Characterization of tribological properties [0047] Figure 4 shows a schematic of the different stages encountered when shearing the tilted samples (with an initial pillar tilt angle 0) in the gripping (the top figures) and releasing (the bottom figures) directions. Each experiment began with applying a 2 mN
preload (sufficient to deform the more compliant tips but not the cylindrical pillars to a large extent as determined optically). When shearing in the gripping direction, an initial period of static adhesion and friction (i.e., the thin pads remain adhered to the probe) was achieved during which the adhesion force caused the probe to move closer to the sample (by a distance Azõ), and the pillar tilt angle decreased to 0 õ from the initial tilt angle 0. At a critical shear force, the pads began to slide resulting in dynamic adhesion Fi,d and friction forces F ,d, which were lower than their static counterparts, while the tilt angle increased slightly to 0 d. By contrast, in the releasing direction, the sample initially exhibited an intermediate stage in which the pads change their orientation, resulting in a repulsive (i.e., negative adhesion) force pushing the probe by a distance Az,.
Continued shearing past the intermediate stage resulted in the cylindrical pillars and pads re-orienting themselves to the releasing direction while still providing dynamic adhesion and friction forces.
[0048] The different stages involved in the adhesion and friction forces in the gripping and releasing direction were apparent in the tribological data. Figure 5A shows the adhesion force as a result of shearing a polyurethane-based dry adhesive with cylindrical pillars tilted at 70 (Figure 3C). In the gripping direction, a maximum static adhesion force F ,, of ¨5 mN was obtained and the dynamic adhesion force Fi,d dropped to ¨2 mN during sliding.
In the releasing direction, the adhesion force F' ,, initially dropped ¨ -3mN (i.e., repulsive force) before increasing to a steady dynamic adhesion F' ,d of ¨2 mN. Figure 5B shows the corresponding friction forces from the same surface. Before sliding began, the static friction F Is force in the gripping direction was ¨10 mN compared to F' ¨6 mN in the releasing direction.
The drag velocity was 10 nm/s. Therefore, the dry adhesive provides a strong adhesion and friction (before sliding) when sheared in the gripping direction, and provides an initial intermediate repulsive force and low friction (before the static regime).
[0049] The adhesion and friction forces (both static and dynamic) in the gripping direction as a function of the tilt angle are summarized in Figure 6. Both the adhesion and friction forces showed an increase as the tilt angle was decreased with the 60 tilt sample showing a larger increase in forces compared to the other samples. In all cases, the static forces were larger than the dynamic forces.
[0050] Comparison of gecko-inspired adhesive to gecko setal array [0051] The adhesion and friction forces generated by the 70 tilt sample were compared to the tribological properties of a Tokay gecko setal array when sheared in the gripping direction (Figure 7). The forces were normalized to their corresponding maximum magnitudes to facilitate the comparison. We find a remarkable similarity in the tribological properties of the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention to a Tokay gecko setal array. The solid line (having a slope of -2 in dimensional form) is consistent with the frictional adhesion model proposed by Autumn et al. for shearing in the adhesive or gripping direction, which predicts the magnitude of the ratio of the friction force to the adhesion force ought to be greater than -1/tan(30 )=-1.7 (based on a detachment angle of 30 for the Tokay gecko). The fact that the tribological properties of our gecko-inspired adhesives (grey open dots) follow predictions of the frictional adhesion model allows for potential fine control of the adhesion strength generated through tuning of the friction forces.
[0052] A key difference in the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention compared to a gecko setal array is the single stick-slip event which occurs in our samples but absent in the case of the gecko setal array. We attribute this phenomenon to the fact that a gecko setal array consists of millions of individual contact points, as opposed to the relatively fewer contact points in our samples (estimated number of contacts ¨650 for our experimental technique). In the case of a gecko setal array, the resulting adhesion and friction forces obtained during shearing originate from the temporal fraction of the millions of spatula that are adhered to the surface.
[0053] An isotropic tribological properties of gecko-inspired adhesive [0054] Figure 8 shows the adhesion and friction force generated by the gecko-inspired adhesive of the present invention during eight shearing cycles. Each cycle consisted of actuating the sample in the gripping direction until maximum static adhesion and friction was achieved (i.e., static adhesion regime) followed by actuating the sample in the releasing direction until the adhesion force was repulsive. The gradual decrease in the friction force generated in the gripping direction is attributed to material transfer (i.e. polyurethane) from the gecko-inspired adhesive to the glass probe with repeated use. We found that if the probe was cleaned with ethanol, we recovered maximum adhesion and friction forces. The adhesion force does not change significantly over the eight cycles.
[0055] Comparison to Peel Zone model [0056] The adhesion data generated from the samples with different tilt angles was compared to the Peel Zone model, which was developed to model the adhesion force of pressure sensitive tapes as a function of the applied pulling force. Applying the Peel Zone model, 2149., h ?T(1 where F ,, is the static adhesion force, b is the total width of the peeling elements, y is the adhesion energy, and Os is the static peel angle, to our system, the model predicts that the adhesion force F ,, ought to increase as the peel angle is decreased. In our case, the peel angle is equivalent to the static tilt angle Os, (refer to Figure 4) of the cylindrical pillars and pads during the static adhesion regime of our measurements in the gripping direction. A
camera was used to capture the side view of the samples while performing the tribological experiments and to extract the static tilt angle (Figure 9) for each sample. For example, the tilt angle of the initial 70 tilt sample reduced from 0 =70 to Os =29 at the point of maximum static adhesion force F ,, (peak in adhesion force in Figure 5A) during the static regime of the adhesion measurement.
[0057] Figure 10 shows a fit of the Peel Zone model to our data after accounting for the change in the tilt angle during the static regime of the adhesion force measurement. A good agreement was found between our data and the Peel Zone model inferring that our dry adhesive adheres to surfaces through a similar mechanism to adhesives tapes except that in our case, the adhesion energy is a result of van der Waals forces as opposed to tacky filaments found in adhesive tapes.
[0058] A novel, easy and scalable fabrication scheme is disclosed to incorporate tilt into polymer-based dry adhesives. A series of dry adhesives with different tilt angles was fabricated and the adhesion and friction forces were characterized using a universal materials tester. The samples with tilt angles 0<90 showed anisotropic adhesion and friction data with the magnitude of the static adhesion and friction forces increasing as the tilt angle was decreased. The ratio of the friction force to the adhesion force of our samples when actuated in the gripping direction was in agreement with the frictional adhesion model and similar to the value obtained when shearing setal arrays of the Tokay gecko in the gripping direction. The static adhesion data also showed good agreement to the Peel Zone model for tape peeling after accounting for the decrease in the tilt angle of the structures during the static regime of the measurement.
[0059] Example 2:
[0060] In an alternative embodiment, the polyurethane-based gecko-inspired structures consist of 2 levels of hierarchy (see Figure 11A); a triangular prism pillar (approximately 30 gm x 25 urn x 25 gm, and 80 gm high) terminated by a rectangular pad-like structure (approximately 20 gm x 20 gm x 7 gm), arranged in a rectangular lattice (approximately 30 gm center-to-center in the tilt (x-axis) direction, and 37 gm center-to-center along the in-plane or y-axis axis).
[0061] Fabrication of patterned silicon mold [0062] Silicon master wafers were fabricated using standard microfabrication techniques.
Briefly, 4 inch silicon wafers (test grade, University Wafers) were cleaned in an oxygen plasma, after which a 600 nm oxide layer was grown using plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition.
Next, positive photoresist was spun onto the wafers (Shipley 1813), patterned with rectangular structures mimicking the gecko spatulae, and developed. The oxide layer was then opened by reactive ion etching with CF4. The patterned oxide layer formed the bottom of the two-layer etch mask. The remaining photoresist was stripped off, and a new layer of Shipley 1818 was spun onto the wafers. This new layer was patterned with triangular structures mimicking the gecko setae and developed. The photoresist layer formed the top of the two-layer etch mask. Once the two-layer etch mask was in place, the hierarchical structure itself was formed using deep reactive ion etching. First, the wafer was etched to a depth of 60 gm. The photoresist was then stripped from the wafer, revealing the bottom layer (oxide) etch mask. The wafer was then etched an additional 20 gm to form the final structure.
[0063] Dry Adhesive Fabrication Scheme.
[0064] Two-level hierarchical polyurethane (PU) based (ST-1060 BJB
Enterprise, Inc., Tustin, CA) dry adhesives were fabricated in a multi-step process. Briefly, in the first step, the silicon master wafer was used as a mold to create an inverse polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) replica. To facilitate the peeling of the PDMS inverse mold from the silicon master, the latter was pretreated with a self-assembled monolayer of octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) coating.
TM
Sylgarcl 184 PDMS (Dow Corning, Midland, MI) was mixed in a 10:1 (pre-polymer/cross-linker) ratio. After removal of air bubbles formed during mixing, the viscous liquid was poured onto the silicon master and cross-linked at 75 C for 40 min. As an optional step, the partially cured PDMS replica was then laterally sheared in a home-built shearing device by applying a predetermined shear distance to achieve the desired tilt angle (ranging from 60 -90 ). The PDMS
replica was then fully cured at 75 C for 24 hour, resulting in the PDMS
replica mold with triangular holes and rectangular tips. PU was then poured onto the PDMS
replica and allowed to cure at 75 C for 72 hours. The final PU-based dry adhesive was peeled off from the PDMS
replica.
[0065] Adhesion and friction measurements [0066] Adhesion and friction measurements were performed on a universal materials tester (CETR Enterprise, Inc., Campbell, CA). A flat 2 cm x 2 cm borosilicate glass surface, used as the probe, attached to a force sensor (DFM, CETR Enterprise, Inc., Campbell, CA) with a cantilever (spring constant k =4113 N/m), was then brought into contact with the gecko-inspired surface at a predetermined preload. During a typical experiment, the probe was brought into contact with the sample with a preload of 50 mN. The probe was dragged in the gripping direction at a velocity of 10 m/s after which it was pulled off at 90 from the sample at the same speed. For the detachment experiments, after shearing in the gripping direction (to activate the adhesion), the probe was then dragged in the opposite (releasing) direction and pulled off at 90 from the sample. Samples with tilt angles 0 of 90 (i.e., no tilt) and 63 were tested to study the influence of the tilt angle. Prior to each experiment, the probe was cleaned with ethanol while the samples were tested without pre-cleaning. A camera was used to digitally record a side view of the experiments, which provided the dynamic (i.e., while shearing) tilt angles.
[0067] Design of dry adhesives [0068] The triangular prism pillar design, as shown in Figures 1 lA and 11B, was introduced to minimize attractive interactions between neighboring pillars when or if the pillars came into contact (i.e., creating a line contact). This allows for a higher number of pillars to be patterned per unit area. As shown in Figure 11B, the thinner rectangular pad-like structure was purposely biased towards the longer edge of the triangle, which provides a large contact area when the structure is sheared in the gripping direction. In the gripping direction (shown in the top of Figure 11B), the large initial contact area A1 leads to large friction (since the friction is adhesion-controlled at the low loads), pinning the fiber, further increasing the contact area to Ai and creating a small peel angle (01,final) in the bifurcation region. Based on the peel-zone model for tape peeling, small peel angles are required for high adhesion forces.
Therefore, when the microstructured surface is sheared in the gripping direction, high friction and adhesion forces are generated.
[0069] However, when sheared in the opposite (or "releasing" direction, as shown in the bottom of Figure 11B), the apex of the triangular prism prevents full contact of the rectangular pad leading to a smaller initial contact area A2. The small contact area leads to lower friction and since the structure is unable to tilt further (due to the apex of the triangle preventing further contact), the tilt angles remain the same, i.e., 01,mitiai= 02,finai.
Therefore, when the microstructured surface is sheared in the releasing direction, lower friction and adhesion forces are generated.
[0070] The SEM
images of Figure 12 further illustrates the gripping (Figure 12A) and shearing (Figure 12B) of this embodiment. In the gripping direction, a large contact area is formed between the gecko-inspired structures and the opposing surface. In addition, the apex of the triangular prism prevents further contact between neighboring pillars thus minimizing their interactions. The latter is essential to allow the pillars to elastically regain their original configuration when the pillars are unloaded. If the interactions between neighboring pillars overcome the stored elastic energy (within the pillars) under load, self-matting (i.e., pillars remain stuck with each other) occurs, which is undesirable. In the releasing direction, the apex of the triangular prism now serves to prevent the rectangular pad from forming a good contact with the opposing surface.
[0071] Characterization of tribological properties [0072] The tribological properties of a gecko-inspired adhesive surface (area = 32 mm2) consisting of pillars with tilt angle Otilt=63 (i.e., tilt angle in the unloaded state) sheared in the gripping direction are shown in Figure 13A. In a typical experiment, a preload of 50 mN was applied onto the surface for 5 seconds followed by shearing of the opposing surface (flat borosilicate glass wafer as the probe). The shearing and pull-off velocities were both 10 p.m/s.
Upon shearing, the normal load Fl,shear entered the adhesive regime, and the friction force Fil,gripping increased. The probe was then retracted perpendicularly until it detached, which provided the pull off force F ,pai off¨ 500 mN. The relatively large ratio of the adhesion force to applied preload of 10 (i.e., 500 mN/50 mN) is particular attractive in climbing robots, in which low preloads (thus resulting in low corresponding reaction forces) allow for more stable locomotion of vertical and inverted surfaces. Data for the maximum adhesion F
,pai off and the maximum friction forces Fil,gripping before detachment were recorded for 30 cycles (Figure 13B) for 2 different samples; one with tilt angle Otilt=63 and another with no tilt (i.e., Otilt=90 ). The results show the influence of the tilt angle Nit on the adhesion and friction forces, and also demonstrate the reusability of the gecko-inspired adhesive structure.
[0073]
Similarly, the tribological properties of the gecko-inspired adhesive surface (area =32 mm2) were measured when first sheared in the gripping direction, followed by shearing in the releasing direction, and finally pulling off to simulate the detachment process, as shown in Figure 14A. The maximum adhesion force F ,pai off in the releasing direction was lower compared to the maximum adhesion force F ,pun off in the gripping direction.
The magnitude of the friction force in releasing direction F11,releasing was also found to be considerably lower compared to Fil,gripping (c.f., 0.9 N of friction force in the gripping direction versus 0.13 N in the releasing direction). Data for maximum F ,pun off and the maximum F11,releasing before detachment were recorded for 30 cycles (Figure 14B) for 2 different samples; one with tilt angle Otat=63 and another with no tilt (i.e., Otilt=90 ). The results show the influence of the tilt angle Atilt on the adhesion and friction forces, and also demonstrate the reusability of the gecko-inspired adhesive structure. These results show the geometrical design of the pillars provides high adhesion and friction when actuated in the gripping direction, yet provides lower adhesion and friction when actuated in the releasing direction for detachment.
[0074] Comparison to Peel Zone Model [0075] According to the peel zone model for tape peeling, smaller peel angles 0 between the adhesive pads and the opposing surface lead to larger adhesion and friction forces because of the larger interaction area in the bifurcation region of peeling surfaces. Our data was consistent with the peel zone model; pillars that had no tilt (i.e., Otat=90 ) produced smaller adhesion forces compared to the pillars with tilt. We also found that the maximum friction force was larger for the pillars with tilt compared to those without tilt, again consistent with the peel zone model.
The lower friction forces recorded for the pillars with tilt in Figure 13B is because in these experiments, the surfaces were sheared only to the point to obtain the maximum pull-off force (which did not coincide with a maximum friction force). We also found a monotonic decrease in the forces (both adhesion and friction) within the first 15 cycles. We attribute this decrease to material (i.e., polymer) transfer from the gecko-inspired adhesive to the probe. In these experiments the preload was 50mN, and the shearing and pull off velocities were both 10 um/s.
Claims (32)
1. A method for fabricating an adhesive comprising:
a step for forming a patterned mold;
a step for forming an inverse replica of said patterned mold, said step for forming the inverse replica comprising:
(i) a step for applying a first polymer to said patterned mold, (ii) a step for allowing said first polymer to partially cure, (iii) a step for removing said partially-cured first polymer from said patterned mold, (iv) a step for shearing said partially-cured first polymer, and (v) a step for allowing said sheared partially-cured first polymer to fully cure;
and a step for forming a final adhesive using said sheared inverse replica of said patterned mold.
a step for forming a patterned mold;
a step for forming an inverse replica of said patterned mold, said step for forming the inverse replica comprising:
(i) a step for applying a first polymer to said patterned mold, (ii) a step for allowing said first polymer to partially cure, (iii) a step for removing said partially-cured first polymer from said patterned mold, (iv) a step for shearing said partially-cured first polymer, and (v) a step for allowing said sheared partially-cured first polymer to fully cure;
and a step for forming a final adhesive using said sheared inverse replica of said patterned mold.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said step for forming the patterned mold further comprises:
a step for forming a two-layer etch mask to a nonreactive base.
a step for forming a two-layer etch mask to a nonreactive base.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said nonreactive base comprises a silicon wafer.
4 The method of claim 2 or 3, wherein said two-layer etch mask comprises a first layer patterned with rectangular structures.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said two-layer etch mask further comprises a second layer patterned with cylindrical structures.
6 The method of claim 4, wherein said two-layer etch mask further comprises a second layer patterned with structures in the shape of triangular prisms.
7 The method of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said inverse replica is comprised of polydimethylsiloxane.
8 The method of any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said final adhesive is comprised of polyurethane
9. An adhesive comprising:
a base;
at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being cylindrical in shape and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
a base;
at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being cylindrical in shape and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
10. The adhesive of claim 9, wherein said at least one pillar is about 60 µm in length and about 20 µm in diameter.
11. The adhesive of claim 10, wherein said pad-like structure is rectangular in shape.
12. The adhesive of claim 11, wherein said pad-like structure is about 20 µm in width and 7 µm in thickness.
13. The adhesive of claim 12, wherein said at least one pillar comprises a plurality of pillars, and wherein said plurality of pillars are arranged in a rectangular lattice.
14. The adhesive of claim 13, wherein said rectangular lattice has a center-to-center distance in a first direction of about 40 µm and a center-to-center distance along a second direction of about 30 µm.
15. The adhesive of claim 9, wherein said angle is about 60° to about 90°.
16. The adhesive of claim 15, wherein said at least one pillar is about 60 um in length and about 20 µm in diameter.
17. The adhesive of claim 16, wherein said pad-like structure is rectangular in shape.
18. The adhesive of claim 17, wherein said pad-like structure is about 20 µm in width and 7 um in thickness.
19. The adhesive of claim 18, wherein said at least one pillar comprises a plurality of pillars, and wherein said plurality of pillars are arranged in a rectangular lattice.
20. The adhesive of claim 19, wherein said rectangular lattice has a center-to-center distance in a first direction of about 40 µm and a center-to-center distance along a second direction of about 30 µm.
21. An adhesive comprising:
a base;
at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being in the shape of a triangular prism and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
a base;
at least one pillar, said at least one pillar being in the shape of a triangular prism and being tilted at an angle, said at least one pillar having a first end and a second end, said first end being attached to said base; and a pad-like structure, said pad-like structure being attached to said second end.
22. The adhesive of claim 21, wherein a first face of said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 30 µm wide, a second face of said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 25 µm wide, and a third face of said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 25 µm wide, and wherein said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 80 µm in height.
23. The adhesive of claim 22, wherein said pad-like structure is rectangular in shape.
24. The adhesive of claim 23, wherein said pad-like structure is about 20 µm in width and 7 µm in thickness.
25. The adhesive of claim 24, wherein said at least one pillar comprises a plurality of pillars, and wherein said plurality of pillars are arranged in a rectangular lattice.
26. The adhesive of claim 25, wherein said rectangular lattice has a center-to-center distance in a first direction of about 40 µm and a center-to-center distance along a second direction of about 30 µm.
27. The adhesive of claim 21, wherein said angle is about 60° to about 90°.
28. The adhesive of claim 27, wherein a first face of said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 30 µm wide, a second face of said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 25 µm wide, and a third face of said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 25 µm wide, and wherein said at least one triangular-prism shaped pillar is about 80 µm in height.
29. The adhesive of claim 28, wherein said pad-like structure is rectangular in shape.
30. The adhesive of claim 29, wherein said pad-like structure is about 20 µm in width and 7 µm in thickness.
31. The adhesive of claim 30, wherein said at least one pillar comprises a plurality of pillars, and wherein said plurality of pillars are arranged in a rectangular lattice.
32. The adhesive of claim 31, wherein said rectangular lattice has a center-to-center distance in a first direction of about 40 µm and a center-to-center distance along a second direction of about 30 µm.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201261588471P | 2012-01-19 | 2012-01-19 | |
US61/588,471 | 2012-01-19 | ||
PCT/US2013/022469 WO2013110051A1 (en) | 2012-01-19 | 2013-01-22 | Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2861892A1 CA2861892A1 (en) | 2013-07-25 |
CA2861892C true CA2861892C (en) | 2016-11-08 |
Family
ID=48799740
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2861892A Active CA2861892C (en) | 2012-01-19 | 2013-01-22 | Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US9546308B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2804919A4 (en) |
AU (2) | AU2013209475B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2861892C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013110051A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111319177A (en) * | 2020-03-01 | 2020-06-23 | 西南交通大学 | Bionic adhesion material with mushroom-shaped end and preparation method thereof |
Families Citing this family (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CA2717633C (en) * | 2009-10-14 | 2018-06-19 | Simon Fraser University | Biomimetic dry adhesives and methods of production therefor |
EP2804919A4 (en) * | 2012-01-19 | 2015-09-09 | Univ Tulane | Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives |
US20150375472A1 (en) * | 2014-06-27 | 2015-12-31 | Mark Sprenger | Computing device having biomimetic material |
KR102254221B1 (en) * | 2014-10-07 | 2021-05-20 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Refrigerator |
FR3027879B1 (en) * | 2014-11-03 | 2016-11-18 | Interlab | SACHET OPENER EQUIPPING A GRAVIMETRIC DILUTOR |
FR3027880B1 (en) * | 2014-11-03 | 2018-08-31 | Interlab | SACHET OPENER EQUIPPING A GRAVIMETRIC DILUTOR |
WO2016134062A1 (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2016-08-25 | Lehigh University | Controlling friction characteristics of resilient members using near-surface microstructures |
US10500370B2 (en) * | 2015-09-02 | 2019-12-10 | Syracuse University | Antifouling urinary catheters with shape-memory topographic patterns |
DE102017102609A1 (en) | 2016-02-09 | 2017-08-10 | Comprisetec Gmbh | Connection of components by means of surface structures |
DE102017115704A1 (en) | 2016-07-12 | 2018-04-12 | Comprisetec Gmbh | Component for reversible adhesive adhesion to a smooth surface, kit and manufacturing process |
US10377044B2 (en) | 2016-08-10 | 2019-08-13 | Hoowaki, Llc | Microstructure arrangement for gripping low coefficient of friction materials |
CN106867419A (en) * | 2017-02-22 | 2017-06-20 | 李陈知 | A kind of high-performance adhesion material and preparation method thereof |
US10155318B2 (en) * | 2017-03-16 | 2018-12-18 | Perception Robotics, Inc. | Systems and methods for post-treatment of dry adhesive microstructures |
KR102343241B1 (en) | 2017-07-24 | 2021-12-27 | 삼성디스플레이 주식회사 | Display device and fabrication method of the same |
KR102559210B1 (en) | 2018-07-29 | 2023-07-25 | 비브이더블유 홀딩 에이쥐 | Patterned Surface with Suction |
JP7387749B2 (en) | 2019-02-01 | 2023-11-28 | シーイーエー イノベーションズ コーポレイション | Electromagnetic gripping device and its operating method |
KR102187349B1 (en) * | 2019-02-14 | 2020-12-07 | 성균관대학교산학협력단 | Dry adhesive patches having a micro-absorbent hybrid structure that can collect fluids and attach them to cleanly and the method thereof |
KR102327672B1 (en) * | 2020-02-05 | 2021-11-17 | 재단법인 멀티스케일 에너지시스템 연구단 | Structures having good slip resistance and preparation method thereof |
US11667480B2 (en) | 2020-06-24 | 2023-06-06 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods of applying reversible adhesion in a transportation system |
US11898068B2 (en) | 2020-06-24 | 2024-02-13 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Reversible adhesive apparatus |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6872439B2 (en) * | 2002-05-13 | 2005-03-29 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Adhesive microstructure and method of forming same |
US7811272B2 (en) * | 2003-12-29 | 2010-10-12 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Nanofabricated gecko-like fasteners with adhesive hairs for disposable absorbent articles |
WO2006060149A2 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2006-06-08 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Actively switchable nano-structured adhesive |
US7799423B2 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2010-09-21 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Nanostructured friction enhancement using fabricated microstructure |
US8703267B2 (en) * | 2010-11-03 | 2014-04-22 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Synthetic gecko adhesive attachments |
US20120295068A1 (en) * | 2011-04-20 | 2012-11-22 | Cutkosky Mark R | Synthetic Dry Adhesives |
EP2804919A4 (en) * | 2012-01-19 | 2015-09-09 | Univ Tulane | Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives |
-
2013
- 2013-01-22 EP EP13738051.5A patent/EP2804919A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2013-01-22 AU AU2013209475A patent/AU2013209475B2/en active Active
- 2013-01-22 CA CA2861892A patent/CA2861892C/en active Active
- 2013-01-22 WO PCT/US2013/022469 patent/WO2013110051A1/en active Application Filing
- 2013-01-22 US US14/373,278 patent/US9546308B2/en active Active
-
2016
- 2016-02-12 AU AU2016200932A patent/AU2016200932B2/en active Active
- 2016-12-01 US US15/366,444 patent/US10259975B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2019
- 2019-03-17 US US16/355,788 patent/US20190211235A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN111319177A (en) * | 2020-03-01 | 2020-06-23 | 西南交通大学 | Bionic adhesion material with mushroom-shaped end and preparation method thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2804919A4 (en) | 2015-09-09 |
AU2016200932A1 (en) | 2016-03-03 |
EP2804919A1 (en) | 2014-11-26 |
AU2013209475B2 (en) | 2015-11-26 |
CA2861892A1 (en) | 2013-07-25 |
WO2013110051A1 (en) | 2013-07-25 |
US20190211235A1 (en) | 2019-07-11 |
US20150159067A1 (en) | 2015-06-11 |
AU2013209475A1 (en) | 2014-08-14 |
US10259975B2 (en) | 2019-04-16 |
US20170137673A1 (en) | 2017-05-18 |
US9546308B2 (en) | 2017-01-17 |
AU2016200932B2 (en) | 2017-09-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2861892C (en) | Use of shear to incorporate tilt into the microstructure of reversible gecko-inspired adhesives | |
Sitti et al. | Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures for future wall-climbing robots | |
Parness et al. | A microfabricated wedge-shaped adhesive array displaying gecko-like dynamic adhesion, directionality and long lifetime | |
Jin et al. | Biomimetic bidirectional switchable adhesive inspired by the gecko | |
Jeong et al. | A nontransferring dry adhesive with hierarchical polymer nanohairs | |
Sitti et al. | Synthetic gecko foot-hair micro/nano-structures as dry adhesives | |
Jeong et al. | Nanohairs and nanotubes: Efficient structural elements for gecko-inspired artificial dry adhesives | |
Minsky et al. | Composite microposts with high dry adhesion strength | |
US7709087B2 (en) | Compliant base to increase contact for micro- or nano-fibers | |
Lee et al. | Sliding-induced adhesion of stiff polymer microfibre arrays. I. Macroscale behaviour | |
US6872439B2 (en) | Adhesive microstructure and method of forming same | |
Gillies et al. | Shear adhesion strength of thermoplastic gecko-inspired synthetic adhesive exceeds material limits | |
Paretkar et al. | Preload-responsive adhesion: effects of aspect ratio, tip shape and alignment | |
Tamelier et al. | Vertical anisotropic microfibers for a gecko-inspired adhesive | |
US20100021647A1 (en) | Dry adhesives and methods for making dry adhesives | |
Jeong et al. | Precise tip shape transformation of nanopillars for enhanced dry adhesion strength | |
US20070251648A1 (en) | On/off reversible adhesive | |
US11773298B2 (en) | Dry adhesives and methods for making dry adhesives | |
Pattantyus-Abraham et al. | Recent advances in nanostructured biomimetic dry adhesives | |
An et al. | Self-cleaning performance of the micropillar-arrayed surface and its micro-scale mechanical mechanism | |
Kim et al. | Drawing-based manufacturing of shear-activated reversible adhesives | |
Simaite et al. | Evaluation of silicone elastomers as structural materials for microstructured adhesives | |
Guo et al. | Fabrication and adhesion of a bio-inspired microarray: capillarity-induced casting using porous silicon mold | |
Geikowsky et al. | Bioinspired fibrillar adhesives with shape-controlled off-center caps for switchable and directional adhesion | |
Liu et al. | Fabrication of high aspect ratio microfiber arrays that mimic gecko foot hairs |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request |
Effective date: 20140926 |