CA2629281A1 - Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information - Google Patents
Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2629281A1 CA2629281A1 CA002629281A CA2629281A CA2629281A1 CA 2629281 A1 CA2629281 A1 CA 2629281A1 CA 002629281 A CA002629281 A CA 002629281A CA 2629281 A CA2629281 A CA 2629281A CA 2629281 A1 CA2629281 A1 CA 2629281A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- bid
- item
- selling price
- auction
- items
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Financial Or Insurance-Related Operations Such As Payment And Settlement (AREA)
Abstract
A system and method for conducting a multi-person, interactive auction, in a variety of formats, without using a human auctioneer to conduct the auction. The system is preferably implemented in software. The system allows a group of bidders to interactively place bids over a computer or communications network. Those bids are recorded by the system and the bidders are updated with the current auction status information. When appropriate, the system closes the auction from further bidding and notifies the winning bidders and losers as to the auction outcome.
Description
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING
AND TRANSbiITTING ELECTRONIC AUCTION INFORMATION
This application is a divisional of Canadian Patent Application No. 2,529,148 filed January 9, 2006 which is a divisional of Canadian Patent Application No. 2,253,543 filed March 19, 1997.
1. Fieid of the Invention The present invention relates generaliy to eiectronic commerce and more particularly to conducting an interactive auction over an electronic network.
AND TRANSbiITTING ELECTRONIC AUCTION INFORMATION
This application is a divisional of Canadian Patent Application No. 2,529,148 filed January 9, 2006 which is a divisional of Canadian Patent Application No. 2,253,543 filed March 19, 1997.
1. Fieid of the Invention The present invention relates generaliy to eiectronic commerce and more particularly to conducting an interactive auction over an electronic network.
2. Description of the Related Art Auctions usiually take the form of a physical gathering of bidders assembled together- within an auction house. Aurxions prPCenting more valuable, collectible merchandise, such as art, coins and antiques, are often preceded by preparation of a catalog of merchandise, circulated to interested parties in advance of the gathering at the auction house, where bidding by those physically present will take place. For auctions of more mundane items, such as household possessions, estate sales 4 .
and the like, the interested bidders simply appear at the appointed time and place and bid on merchandise in which they are interested.
Traditional auctions requiring a bidder's physical presence disadvantageously require that the merchandise lots up for sale be available at the auction venue for inspection by the bidders and subsequent pickup by the successful bidders. For many types of merchandise it would be far easier for both buyer and seller to leave the inventory at -its original source and ship purchased items to the successful bidders at the end, of the auction. Moreover, physical auctions have the still further disadvantage that only one item may be auctioned at a time. The auctioneer solicits bids from the floor for a given lot, but once the highest bid has been accepted, the lot is closed and the next lot brought forward. This sequential processing combined with the finite amount of time available to a gathered group is inherently limiting because multiple lots cannot be auctioned simultaneously to the same group of people during their limited period of avaiiability:
Some changes in bidding requirements have made traditional auctions somewhat more convenient for bidders. Many auction firms allow bidders to submit their bids in advance o~ the auction. Advance bidding may be done by mail as a convenience to the bidders so that they do not have to be physically present at the auction. Also, the advent of the telephone and facsimile machine allowed bidders to submit bids in near real-time during the course of an auction. These technologies free the bidder from being physically present at the auction, thereby saving time and travel expense. To incorporate these technologies into the traditional auction format, representatives of the auction firm receive telephone or facsimile bids from their clients and alert the auctioneer of these new bids. Similarly, the representatives may relay information about the current bid items, such as the current high bid, back to the telephone biddQrs:
Bidding by mail or facsimile suffers a significant disadvantage as compared to bidding in person or by telephone because the mailing or faxing bidder has no opportunity to increase a bid in quick response to competitive bids received from the floor or by telephone. Moreover, although telephone bidding allows the bidder to avoid travel expense and inconvenience, traditional auctions may be scheduled at inconvenient times for many remote bidders. Also, because of the large number of items or fots sold in a typical auction, which can number in the thousands, it is impractical for a telephone bidder to stay on the line for a two. to eight hour period in order to be present when the few lots in which the bidder has an interest come up for sale. The lots in which the telephone bidder is interested-may be scattered throughout the lengthy traditional auction. Trme zone differences further diminish the appeal of telephone bidding for an international potential customer baso. 30 All of these limitations and disadvantages of physical auctions, even when telephone bidding or bidding by facsimile is permitted, serve to discourage a large number of bidders and ultimately leads to lower selling prices to the economic detriment of the auctioneer and seller.
Electronic auctions hefd_ over the Internet using electronic mail (E-mail) have provided a minor innovation as compared to more traditional physical options. In E-mail, auctions, an auction catalog is electronically mailed to people interested in bidding. Subsequently, bidders subrtiit their bids on individual lots to an auctioneer via E-mail. The auctioneer reads the electronic mail bids and enters them in a database of bids.
When the auction closes, the auctioneer notifies the winning bidders, usually via electronic mail, and ships the merchandise to the winning bidders.
There are several disadvantages to E-mail auctions. First, a human auctioneer is required to prepare the auction catalog and to read and process the electronic mail bids. This takes a considerable amount of effort in a large auction. Secondly, it is difficult to keep the bidders updated -as to the current high bids on the various items. Electronic mail .n ;rost large putbiic networ ks, such as the Internet, is* lower priority traffic than most, meaning it can take several hours for bids to reach the auctioneer and for bidding updates to reach the bidders. Thirdly, as the auction closing draws near, the volume of bids may prohibit the auctioneer from sending out high bid information to the bidders because of the time involved in reading the electronic mail -bids and in entering them into the bid database.
..f' A recent innovation applied to E-mail auctions is the use of the Internet's World Wide Web (WWW) facility to post descriptions of the merchandise and show the current high bids.. This innovation provides 25 the advantage of eliminating the need to eiectronically mail bidding updates to bidders. And since WWW traffic is much higher priority on the Internet, bidders suffer less of a time lag in seeing updated Web pages. However, a human auctioneer is still involved and is required to manually process the electronlc mail bids, enter them into the bid database, and to update the World Wide Web pages with current high bid information.
Sales firms other than auction houses have also used the Internet's World Wide Web facility to post descriptions of their merchandise and to offer the merchandise for sale at a set price. These systems are automated and are capable of accepting an order -from a customer by having that customer fill out an online order form. This order information is taken by the system and piaced. into an order database or accounting system which then processes the order.
However, such systems sell merchandise only at a fixed price and do not allow merchandise to be auctioned off, or to have their prices dynamically adjusted in an interactive manner In response to bids and other market conditions such as supply and demand. Security brokerage firms for years have used automated transaction systems for matching buy and sell orders for securities. For *
example, the New Yotk Stock Exchange's DOTS (Direct Order Transmission System) and the NASDAQ's SOES '(Smali Order Execution System) systems offer complete electronic matching of buyers and sellers. However, these systems do not operate an auction. They merely pair buy orriers ~.=;tr~' seii orders when the pricing criteria of both sides of the trade. are met.
A number of issued U.S. patents relate to various forms of electronic commerce. These patents fall into three broad categories: 1) patents relating to on-line networks, 2) patents relating to electronic commerce over on-line networks, anrl 3) patents related to various forms of securities (e.g., stocks and futures) trading via electronic means.
From the first of these groups, on-line networks, U.S. Patents Nos.
5,406,475 issued April 11, 1995 and entitled Data Processing Network Having A Plurality Of Independent Subscribers, 5,235,680 issued August 10, 1993 and.entitled Apparatus And Method For Camnunicating Textu,a]. And Image Information Between A Host Coaiputer And A Remte Display Tenmi.nal, and 5,310,997 issued N1ay 10, 1994 and entitled Automated Order And Delivery System, are representative of the prior art. These patents describe systems of terminals connected over wide area networks to centralized carputers. However, they do not disclose the details of electronic coimierce or auctions in particular.
In the second group, patents relating to electronic coauterce, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,285,383 issued February 8, 1994 and entitled Method For Carrying Out Transactions Using Electranic Title, and 5,297,031 issued March 22, 1994 and entitled Method And Apparatus For Order Management By Market Brokers, describe various means for-conducting transactions over electronic com<tninications networks. They also describe various means for displaying merchandise for sale to a *Trade-mark plurality of customers connected -to a centrai 'computer of a computer network and various means for conducting simple sale transactions where a buyer purchases an item at the stated price. As a group, these patents do not disclose the means for conducting electronic auctions or any.sales format other than a-simple or "straight" sale.
One particular U.S. patent, No. 4,789,928 issued Decenber 6, 1998, discloses a nx3ans for soliciting bids over an el.ectronic network from bidders that are remote to and simultaneously transmits the current high bid from the floor of the physical auction to the terminals of the remote bidders. However, this patent does not disclose or suggest the concept of an electronicaiiy conducted auction including a means for automatically closing the auction under certain conditions and without benefit of a live human auctioneer. Furthermore, this patent faiis to disclose or suggest a means for auctioning a plurality of items simuitaneousiy;. rather, the disclosed system is strictly tied to the sequential proceedings of a physical -auction. Finally, this system contemplates only a simple "highest bidder"
auction where a single lot gqes to an individuai high bidder. This system cannot handie' a lot available for auction which includes a piurality of, items and where a plurality of winning bidders sufficient to match the plurality of auctioned items exists.
in the-third group of patents related to electronic conamerce, patents relating to securities trading, U.S. Patents Nos. 4,412,287 issued October 25, 1983 and entitled Automated Stock Exchange, and 5,077,665 issued December 31, 1991 and entitled Distributed Matching System, disclose means for prospective buyers tot post offers to buy a given security at a specific price and for prospective sellers to post offers to sell a given security at a specific price. These automated systems maintain lists of buy and sell orders. If an offer to buy a security is placed at a price greater than or equal to an existing offer to sell that security at a given price, these systems will automatically consummate the trade by matching the buyer with the seller. While the securities industry uses, and these patents disclose, such terms as "auction" and "bid", they are actually referring to the process of matching a set of buyers' bids with a set of sellers' prices: There is no auction in the true sense of a plurality of bidders simultaneously bidding in a manner accessible to all bidders and sellers in order to achieve a high selling price. In fact, these patented systems do not include disclosure of the list of open buy or sell orders, thus depriving the seller of the ability to openly solicit the highest price for securities. Instead, the market price of securities sold through these automated systems fluctuates up and down based upon the last successful match between an open buy order and an open sell order when both the buyer and seller have placed orders at compatible prices. There is no ability in such systems to conduct truly competitive and open bidding.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electronic commerce system, comprising:
a bid validator to receive via a web-based form and via a network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price; a manager, coupled to the bid validator, automatically to award the auction item.of the lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the auction item wherein the manager is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and a merchandise catalog page generator, coupled to the manager, to update a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager to display a reduced posted selling price.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method to facilitate an electronic commerce transaction, the method comprising:
and the like, the interested bidders simply appear at the appointed time and place and bid on merchandise in which they are interested.
Traditional auctions requiring a bidder's physical presence disadvantageously require that the merchandise lots up for sale be available at the auction venue for inspection by the bidders and subsequent pickup by the successful bidders. For many types of merchandise it would be far easier for both buyer and seller to leave the inventory at -its original source and ship purchased items to the successful bidders at the end, of the auction. Moreover, physical auctions have the still further disadvantage that only one item may be auctioned at a time. The auctioneer solicits bids from the floor for a given lot, but once the highest bid has been accepted, the lot is closed and the next lot brought forward. This sequential processing combined with the finite amount of time available to a gathered group is inherently limiting because multiple lots cannot be auctioned simultaneously to the same group of people during their limited period of avaiiability:
Some changes in bidding requirements have made traditional auctions somewhat more convenient for bidders. Many auction firms allow bidders to submit their bids in advance o~ the auction. Advance bidding may be done by mail as a convenience to the bidders so that they do not have to be physically present at the auction. Also, the advent of the telephone and facsimile machine allowed bidders to submit bids in near real-time during the course of an auction. These technologies free the bidder from being physically present at the auction, thereby saving time and travel expense. To incorporate these technologies into the traditional auction format, representatives of the auction firm receive telephone or facsimile bids from their clients and alert the auctioneer of these new bids. Similarly, the representatives may relay information about the current bid items, such as the current high bid, back to the telephone biddQrs:
Bidding by mail or facsimile suffers a significant disadvantage as compared to bidding in person or by telephone because the mailing or faxing bidder has no opportunity to increase a bid in quick response to competitive bids received from the floor or by telephone. Moreover, although telephone bidding allows the bidder to avoid travel expense and inconvenience, traditional auctions may be scheduled at inconvenient times for many remote bidders. Also, because of the large number of items or fots sold in a typical auction, which can number in the thousands, it is impractical for a telephone bidder to stay on the line for a two. to eight hour period in order to be present when the few lots in which the bidder has an interest come up for sale. The lots in which the telephone bidder is interested-may be scattered throughout the lengthy traditional auction. Trme zone differences further diminish the appeal of telephone bidding for an international potential customer baso. 30 All of these limitations and disadvantages of physical auctions, even when telephone bidding or bidding by facsimile is permitted, serve to discourage a large number of bidders and ultimately leads to lower selling prices to the economic detriment of the auctioneer and seller.
Electronic auctions hefd_ over the Internet using electronic mail (E-mail) have provided a minor innovation as compared to more traditional physical options. In E-mail, auctions, an auction catalog is electronically mailed to people interested in bidding. Subsequently, bidders subrtiit their bids on individual lots to an auctioneer via E-mail. The auctioneer reads the electronic mail bids and enters them in a database of bids.
When the auction closes, the auctioneer notifies the winning bidders, usually via electronic mail, and ships the merchandise to the winning bidders.
There are several disadvantages to E-mail auctions. First, a human auctioneer is required to prepare the auction catalog and to read and process the electronic mail bids. This takes a considerable amount of effort in a large auction. Secondly, it is difficult to keep the bidders updated -as to the current high bids on the various items. Electronic mail .n ;rost large putbiic networ ks, such as the Internet, is* lower priority traffic than most, meaning it can take several hours for bids to reach the auctioneer and for bidding updates to reach the bidders. Thirdly, as the auction closing draws near, the volume of bids may prohibit the auctioneer from sending out high bid information to the bidders because of the time involved in reading the electronic mail -bids and in entering them into the bid database.
..f' A recent innovation applied to E-mail auctions is the use of the Internet's World Wide Web (WWW) facility to post descriptions of the merchandise and show the current high bids.. This innovation provides 25 the advantage of eliminating the need to eiectronically mail bidding updates to bidders. And since WWW traffic is much higher priority on the Internet, bidders suffer less of a time lag in seeing updated Web pages. However, a human auctioneer is still involved and is required to manually process the electronlc mail bids, enter them into the bid database, and to update the World Wide Web pages with current high bid information.
Sales firms other than auction houses have also used the Internet's World Wide Web facility to post descriptions of their merchandise and to offer the merchandise for sale at a set price. These systems are automated and are capable of accepting an order -from a customer by having that customer fill out an online order form. This order information is taken by the system and piaced. into an order database or accounting system which then processes the order.
However, such systems sell merchandise only at a fixed price and do not allow merchandise to be auctioned off, or to have their prices dynamically adjusted in an interactive manner In response to bids and other market conditions such as supply and demand. Security brokerage firms for years have used automated transaction systems for matching buy and sell orders for securities. For *
example, the New Yotk Stock Exchange's DOTS (Direct Order Transmission System) and the NASDAQ's SOES '(Smali Order Execution System) systems offer complete electronic matching of buyers and sellers. However, these systems do not operate an auction. They merely pair buy orriers ~.=;tr~' seii orders when the pricing criteria of both sides of the trade. are met.
A number of issued U.S. patents relate to various forms of electronic commerce. These patents fall into three broad categories: 1) patents relating to on-line networks, 2) patents relating to electronic commerce over on-line networks, anrl 3) patents related to various forms of securities (e.g., stocks and futures) trading via electronic means.
From the first of these groups, on-line networks, U.S. Patents Nos.
5,406,475 issued April 11, 1995 and entitled Data Processing Network Having A Plurality Of Independent Subscribers, 5,235,680 issued August 10, 1993 and.entitled Apparatus And Method For Camnunicating Textu,a]. And Image Information Between A Host Coaiputer And A Remte Display Tenmi.nal, and 5,310,997 issued N1ay 10, 1994 and entitled Automated Order And Delivery System, are representative of the prior art. These patents describe systems of terminals connected over wide area networks to centralized carputers. However, they do not disclose the details of electronic coimierce or auctions in particular.
In the second group, patents relating to electronic coauterce, U.S. Patent Nos. 5,285,383 issued February 8, 1994 and entitled Method For Carrying Out Transactions Using Electranic Title, and 5,297,031 issued March 22, 1994 and entitled Method And Apparatus For Order Management By Market Brokers, describe various means for-conducting transactions over electronic com<tninications networks. They also describe various means for displaying merchandise for sale to a *Trade-mark plurality of customers connected -to a centrai 'computer of a computer network and various means for conducting simple sale transactions where a buyer purchases an item at the stated price. As a group, these patents do not disclose the means for conducting electronic auctions or any.sales format other than a-simple or "straight" sale.
One particular U.S. patent, No. 4,789,928 issued Decenber 6, 1998, discloses a nx3ans for soliciting bids over an el.ectronic network from bidders that are remote to and simultaneously transmits the current high bid from the floor of the physical auction to the terminals of the remote bidders. However, this patent does not disclose or suggest the concept of an electronicaiiy conducted auction including a means for automatically closing the auction under certain conditions and without benefit of a live human auctioneer. Furthermore, this patent faiis to disclose or suggest a means for auctioning a plurality of items simuitaneousiy;. rather, the disclosed system is strictly tied to the sequential proceedings of a physical -auction. Finally, this system contemplates only a simple "highest bidder"
auction where a single lot gqes to an individuai high bidder. This system cannot handie' a lot available for auction which includes a piurality of, items and where a plurality of winning bidders sufficient to match the plurality of auctioned items exists.
in the-third group of patents related to electronic conamerce, patents relating to securities trading, U.S. Patents Nos. 4,412,287 issued October 25, 1983 and entitled Automated Stock Exchange, and 5,077,665 issued December 31, 1991 and entitled Distributed Matching System, disclose means for prospective buyers tot post offers to buy a given security at a specific price and for prospective sellers to post offers to sell a given security at a specific price. These automated systems maintain lists of buy and sell orders. If an offer to buy a security is placed at a price greater than or equal to an existing offer to sell that security at a given price, these systems will automatically consummate the trade by matching the buyer with the seller. While the securities industry uses, and these patents disclose, such terms as "auction" and "bid", they are actually referring to the process of matching a set of buyers' bids with a set of sellers' prices: There is no auction in the true sense of a plurality of bidders simultaneously bidding in a manner accessible to all bidders and sellers in order to achieve a high selling price. In fact, these patented systems do not include disclosure of the list of open buy or sell orders, thus depriving the seller of the ability to openly solicit the highest price for securities. Instead, the market price of securities sold through these automated systems fluctuates up and down based upon the last successful match between an open buy order and an open sell order when both the buyer and seller have placed orders at compatible prices. There is no ability in such systems to conduct truly competitive and open bidding.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electronic commerce system, comprising:
a bid validator to receive via a web-based form and via a network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price; a manager, coupled to the bid validator, automatically to award the auction item.of the lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the auction item wherein the manager is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and a merchandise catalog page generator, coupled to the manager, to update a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager to display a reduced posted selling price.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method to facilitate an electronic commerce transaction, the method comprising:
receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system;
automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item; automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further item of the lot of items upon detecting that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a machine-readable medium having executable instructions to cause one or more machines to perform a method to facilitate an electronic transaction, the method including: receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system; automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item; automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further one item of the lot of items upon failing to achieve a certain sales volume within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item; automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further item of the lot of items upon detecting that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a machine-readable medium having executable instructions to cause one or more machines to perform a method to facilitate an electronic transaction, the method including: receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system; automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item; automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further one item of the lot of items upon failing to achieve a certain sales volume within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electronic auction system, comprising: validating means for receiving via a web-based form and via the network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price, manager means, coupled to the validating means for automatically awarding an auction item of a lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item, wherein the manager means is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; storage means coupled to the manager means, for storing the posted selling price; and a merchandise catalog page generator means, coupled to the manager means, for updating a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager means for displaying the reduced posted selling price.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The aforementioned advantages of the invention, as well as additional advantages thereof, will more fully be understood as a result of a detailed description of a preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The aforementioned advantages of the invention, as well as additional advantages thereof, will more fully be understood as a result of a detailed description of a preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a preferred computer environment for implementing the system and method of the present invention.
FIG. 2 illustrates a merchandise catalog page offering an item for _ 5 sale via electronic auction on the Internet's World Wide Web;
FIG. 3 depicts a bid form for bidding on an auction item;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of components illustrating a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the bid validator and 'its method of operation;
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the auction manager and its method of operation;
FIG. 7 Is a f(owchart Illustrating the bid manager and its method of operation;
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating the electronic maii messenger and its method of operation;
FIG, 9 is a flowchart illustrating the standard auction format and its method of operation;
FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating the.Dutch auction format and its method of operation;
FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating the progressive auction- format and its method of operation;
FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating the buy or bid sale format and its method of operation;
FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating bid quantity determination. and its method of operation; and FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating the markdown price adjustment feature of the present invention and its method of operation..
pETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
_ 5 An inventive method and system is disclosed for conducting a multi-bidder, interactive auction without using a human auctioneer to conduct the auction. Preferably implemented in software, the electronic auction system allows a group of bidders to interactively place bids over a computer or communications network, automatically records the bids, updates the bidders with the current auction status information, closes the auction from further bidding when appropriate, and notifies the winning bidder or bidders and loser or losers as to the auction outcome.
The inventive system includes a database for maintaining descriptions of the merchandise for auction, the bids, and other relevant information in a commercially available database system. Database searches are preferably performed periodtcatly to check for new items to be made visible to potential bidders. Such periodic searching allows an individual charged with maintairiing this system to load relevant information into the database at his or her leisure. Once the database is loaded with information about the item and the item is scheduled for presentation to potential bidders, the system takes the merchandise information and creates a human readable catalog page for a viewing over a public network such as the Internet's World Wide Web. Bidders are then able to view the new item for auction and to place their bids.
_These catalog pages preferably contain the current high bid, bid increment, quantity available, merchandise description, and picture of the item.
Upon accessing a public network and seeing an item's catalog page, the bidder may press a button on the catalog page or take some similar action which causes a bid form to be displayed on the screen.
The bidder then enters the information necessary to place a bid, such as their name and address, bid amount, payment information, etc., and then presses a bid submission button, or takes a similar action which sends the bid to the system.
The system receives the electronic bid information and places it in the bid database. Because this new bid will, in general, be a bid for a higher amount than was last bid by another party, the system will regenerate the item's catalog page. This updated catalog page will then show the new high bid to any prospective bidders who later access that catalog page.
Because most bidders will not, in general, be accessing the network and viewing the merchandise catalog pages as they are updated with new high bids, the system may send electronic mail notifications to bidders who have been outbid by the just-placed bid. These electronic mail notification messages preferably contain the relevant merchandise information, the current high bid, the bid increment, etc., and encourage the bidder to submit a new and higher bid to outbid the current high bidder. These electronic mail notification messages allow the bidder to enter a new bid by replying to the electronic mail message and sending it back to the system.
Upon receiving a new or revised bid via electronic mail, the system follows the same set of actions as when the bidder places a bid using the electronic bid form when viewing a merchandise catalog page, namely, the system extracts the relevant bid information from the electronic mail message, deposits this information in the bid database, and then updates the merchandise catalog page as appropriate. Such an electronic mail message bid may further cause a new round of electronic mail notifications to go out to the recently outbid bidders.
This process preferably continues untii the system detects that the item is scheduled to be closed for further bidding or another closing trigger is detected. At this point, the system closes the auction by updating the merchandise catalog page with the final winning bid .
information and by sending electronic mail notifications to both the winning bidder or bidders and the losing bidder or bidders. .:
The present invention provides an electronic auction method and system for presenting merchandise for sale at auction to customers over an electronic network, such as the Internet's World Wide Web. Potential ~11 customers are presented with a series of descriptive merchandise catalog pages through which they may navigate to find items (lots) of interest.
Upon finding a lot of interest, customers may click a button on screen to display a form for placing a bid on the lot. After submitting this bid, the electronic auction system records the bid and updates the lot's merchandise catalog page to show the current high bid or bids and to whom such bids are attributable. When the auction is closed, after a period of no bidding activity, at a predetermined time, or when a desired sales volume is reached, the electronic auction system notifies the winning and losing bidders by electronic mail and posts a list of the winning bidders on the closed lot's merchandise catalog page.
The present invention is preferably implemented as a computer program 248 running on a central server host computer 250, shown in FIG. 1, attached to a wide area network 275 accessible by many potential customers through remote terminals 210. A preferred network for implementing the present invention is the Internet which is accessible by a significant percentage of the world population, although the network may also be a local area or- limited area accessible network.
Potential customers are presented at screen 280 with merchandise catalog pages, such as the one shown in FIG. 2, generated by merchandise catalog page generator 25 shown in FIG. 4. Each merchandise catalog page includes several action buttons 5 that allow the customer to move from catalog page to catalog page and to place bids using keyboard 240 and pointing device 260. The user may call up an index of availabie merchandise by pressing button 7 or may return to a central home page by pressing button 9.
By pressing bid button 1 in FIG. 2, the customer is presented with a bid form such as the one shown in FIG. 3. The customer fills out the required information in the bid form and presses "Place Bid" button 2 to send the bid to the electronic auction system for processing. Other equivalent means for submitting a bid could be used, as understood by those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains.
FIG. 4 illustrates a high level.block diagram of the electronic auction system of the present invention. As shown, information from bid form 20 is received by the electronic auction system where it is processed by bid validator 21. Bid validator 21 examines the bid information entered by the customer on bid form 20 to ensure that the bid is properly formatted, all necessary data is present, and the data values entered look credible. Exemplary functions of bid validator 21 include verifying credit card information entered by the customer, checking that a complete name and shipping address has been entered, that the proper state abbreviation and zip code have been entered, that an appropriate bid amount has been entered, and that a telephone or facsimile number has been entered. Once the bid information has been validated, the bid validator 21 places the bid in bid database 31.
Auction manager 26 preferably frequently queries the bid database 31 to see if any new bids have been placed. If new bids ,re found during the query, then auction manager 26 calculates the current high bidder or bidders and instructs merchandise catalog page generator 25 to regenerate a catalog page with the updated bid information.
Auction manager 26 is also responsible for opening and closing auctions. This entails making merchandise lots available for bidding by customers and disabling their associated buy or bid features on the merchandise pages that have been posted to potential bidders but have closed. When auction manager -26 determines that a new lot should be opened for bidding or an available lot should be closed, it instructs merchandise catalog page generator 25 to create or update the -merchandise catalog pages for the appropriate lots.
_ Electronic mail messenger 27 frequently queries bid database 31 for bids recently marked by auction manager 26 as having been outbid or as having won an item in a recently closed auction. If such bids are found, the electronic mail messenger 27 formats an appropriate electronic mail notification message 24 and sends this message to the customer.. Many customers read their electronic mail throughout the day, making this a convenient mechanism for keeping them informed about the status of merchandise on which they are actively bidding.
Bidders .may reply to an electronic mail notification message 24 informing them that they. have been outbid by including an increased bid amount in the reply message. An electronic mail bid 22 sent in reply to the notification is received by the electronic auction system and processed by bid validator 21 as described above.
_ 5 FIG. 5 illustrates in detail the procedure of bid validation as accomplished by bid validator 21 shown in FIG. 4. A bid is received by bid validator 21 and the customer is looked up at step 41 in customer database 28. tf no customer record exists for the customer then a new customer record is created 42 and placed in customer database 28.
From there, the bid information is validated 43 as previously described.
If the bid data includes one or more errors, then an error message is returned 44 to the bidder, preferably in the form of a well-formatted .page posted across the network, itemizing the errors found,in the bid. If the bid is valid, as found in step 43, then the bid is ptaced 46 in bid 1 IS database31.
FIG. 6 provides a detailed illustration of the procedures carried out by auction manager 26. Auction manager 26 is preferably a continuously running system that begins by getting the current time as at step 51. It then checks to see if any new items for sale are to be opened by examining the merchandise database to see if any new merchandise items are scheduled to be made available for bidding by customers at or before the current time. Operator 300, or some automated substitute, may upioad merchandise and scheduling information to the database, as shown in FIG. 1. If new merchandise _items are scheduled for posting, these items are opened for bidding 52.
The auction manager then examines the merchandise database to see if any merchandise items are scheduled to be closed from customer bidding. If so, these items are closed from bidding 53. Auction manager 26 then examines the merchandise database to see if any merchandise items posted with a price markdown feature are scheduled to have their prices adjusted. If so, the prices of these items are adjusted 54 in accordance with the particular item's price adjustment parameters. Such parameters may include bidding activity over time, amount of bids received, and number of items bid for. Auction manager 26 then updates 55 the bid list for open items by recalculating the current high bidder list and regenerating the merchandise catalog pages 56 to reflect these new bids. This step is -more fully described below with reference to FIG. 7.
FIG. 7 illustrates the procedures carried out by the bid manager in updating the bid list for open items 55 as shown in FIG. 6: The bid manager begins by checking 61 if there are more merchandise items to be processed. If such items are found, the bid manager selects 62 a merchandise item to process and queries 64 the bid database for bids for this item. These bids are sorted 65 using a variety of different priority ranking schemes depending upon the auction method and system used for the particular merchandise item, as described in more detail below.
Then, the bids are marked 66 as either successful or unsuccessful depending upon the bid price of the respective bids and the quantity of the item being bid on relative to the quantity of the item being auctioned. In a preferred embodiment, a quantity of an item may be put up for auction, and Individual bidders may bid on any quantity of the item desired, up to the quantity of the item being auctioned.
The bid manager then checks 67 to see if there are any active proxy bids marked as unsuccessful. A proxy bid is a special bid type that allows auction manager 26 to automatically bid on the bidder's behalf up to a limited amount established by the bidder when his or her initial bid is placed. The auction manager will increase the bid as ' necessary up to the limit amount. : This feature allows the customer to get the lowest possible price without exceeding a limit preferably -estabiished when the bid is entered. If there are active proxy bids marked as unsuccessful, then- the bid manager increments 69 the proxy bids by a preset bid increment. This procedure of sorting 65 marking 66 bids and incrementing 69 the proxy bids as required continues until -' either there are no additional proxy bids marked as unsuccessful or the proxy limits have been reached on the proxy bids. At this point, bid database 31 is updated 68 with the marked bids. This process is then repeated for each merchandise lot open at the current time for bidding by customers.
FIG. 8 illustrates the procedures carried out by electronic mail messenger 27 which notifies bidders when they have been outbid.
When marked bids are updated in bid database 31 as shown in FIG. 7, electronic mail messenger 27 detects 81 the presence of these marked bids and then looks up 82 the customer's electronic mail address and looks up 83 inventory information on the item desired by the bidder.
With this information, electronic mail messenger 27 constructs 84 an electronic mail message informing the bidder that he or she has been outbid. Once constructed, the electronic mail notification message 24 is sent to the bidder as shown at step 85. -One skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will recognize that the various components of the electronic auction system can communicate between themselves in a variety of ways. In a preferred embodiment, bid validator 21, auction manager 26, and electronic mail messenger 27 communicate by adding, marking, and updating records in the various databases. Each of these components periodically checks at least one of the databases to see if anything relevant to their respective functions has changed and take action accordingly. However, the components could send direct messages between themselves or call each other by means of program subroutines to signal important events that would require one or the other component to update its state.
One skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will further recognize that a variety of different auction formats may be =
implemented using the basic technique described above. The simplest is the "Standard Auction" format, whereby the electronic auction system awards the merchandise to the top bidder or bidders in accordance with their bids once bidding has stopped. Using this format, if there is a plurality of a specific item, the system awards the merchandise to the top bidders. Bidders may bid on more than one unit, and. different successful bidders will, in general, pay different prices for an item. ~-FIG. 9 illustrates the Standard Auction format where bid manager 55, shown in FIG. 6, determines which bids to mark as successful or unsuccessful, as shown in step 66 in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 91 the -bids by amount of the bid. If there are bids remaining to be processed, determined at step 97, the highest remaining bid is 16 selected 98 to be checked. If the bid is below the minimum bid allowed for the particular merchandise item, as determined at step 93, the bid is marked 99 as unsuccessful. If not, the bid is checked 94 to see if the quantity may be satisfied. A bid may be satisfied if the quantity of the item bid upon is available. This information is available from'auction database 29. If not, then the bid is marked 99 as unsuccessful.
Optionally, the system could ask the user if a lesser quantity than bid upon will be acceptable, as shown in FIG. 2 at box 310. If the bid quantity can be satisfied, as determined at step 94, then the bid is marked 95 as successful and the item quantity remaining, recorded in auction database 29, is decremented 96 by the bid quantity. After the quantity remaining is decremented 96, and if, as determined at step 97, there are still bids remaining to be marked, the next highest bid is selected 98 and the steps of FIG. 9 are repeated.
The eiectronic auction system of the present invention also provides a "Dutch Auction" format, wherein the electronic auction system awards the merchandise to all of the top bidders for whom-there is available inventory at the price bid by the lowest successful bidder.
This format may be preferred by customers for being the most fair when a plurality of a specific item is being auctioned. As with all bidding, there will be a range of bids submitted. In the Dutch Auction format, - the highest bidders are awarded the merchandise but at the same price for all successful bidders, the price bid by the lowest successful bidder.
- FIG. 10 illustrates the Dutch Auction format whereby bid manager 55 shown in FIG. 6 determines which bids to mark 66 as successful or unsuccessful,-as shown in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 111 the bids by amount of the bid. If there are bids remaining- to be -'".
processed, as determined at step 97 the highest bid. is selected 98- to be checked. If the. bid is below the minimum bid allowed for the particuiar merchandise item, as determined at step 93, the bid is marked as unsuccessful 99. If not, the bid is checked 94 to see if the bid quantity may be satisfied.. If the bid cannot be satisfied, then the bid is marked as unsuccessful at step 99. If the bid quantity can be satisfied, then the bid is marked as successful at step 95 and the item quantity remaining is decremented 96 by the bid quantity.. At this time the MinWin price is=
.17 recorded 117. The MinWin price is the price. above which a new bidder must bid in order to be successful in the Dutch Auction format were the auction to close at that moment. The MinWin price is, in general, the bid price of the lowest bid that is marked as successful. After recording the _ 5 MinWin price at step 117, where there are still bids remaining to be marked, as determined at step 97, the next highest bid is selected 98 and the steps of FIG. 10 are repeated.
The electronic auction system of the present invention also includes a"Progressive Auction" format, wherein the electronic auction system awards the merchandise to the top bidders based on price bid.
As with the Dutch Auction format, the highest price bids are awarded the merchandise up to the quantity available of the item being auctioned.
However, unlike the Dutch Auction format, the syster.xi a~-*ards tl?c-merchandise to the su'ccessful bidders at different prices depending on the quantity bid. In a preferred embodiment, a successful bidder for a singie unit of an item is awarded the item at the price of the lowest successful bid for a single unit of the item. A successful bidder for a higher quantity of the same item is awarded the item at the price of the lowest successful bid at that quantity or any lower quantity. For example, a successful bidder for a quantity of five would pay the lowest price for any successful bid for quantity one through five of the item.
The price paid for a given quantity is termed the "MinWin" price for that quantity. The Progressive Auction format ensures that successful bidders for a quantity of an item pay the lowest price paid by any other _successful bidder at that quantity level or below. Use of this fonmat leads to lower prices for those who successfully bid on larger quantities of an item, provides an impetus for volume buying, * and therefiore leads to greater sales volume.
FIG. 11 illustrates the Progressive Auction format, wherein bid manager 55 shown in FIG. 6 determines which bids to mark as successful or unsuccessful 66.as shown in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 131 the bids by amount of the bid. If there are bids remaining to be processed, as determined at step 97, the highest bid is selected 98 to be checked. - If the bid is determined to be below the minimum bid aliowed for the particular merchandise item at step 93, the .18 bid is marked as unsuccessful 99. If not, the bid is checked at step 94 to see if the bid quantity can be satisfied. If not, then the bid is marked 99 as unsuccessful. If the bid quantity is checked and found to be satisfied at step 94, then the bid is marked as successful 95 and the item quantity remaining is decremented 96 by the bid quantity. The MinWin price is then recorded 137. The MinWin price is the price above which a new bidder must bid in order to be successful in the Progressive Auction format were the auction to close at that moment. The MinWin price is, in general, the bid price of the lowest bid at the current bid quantity or lower that is marked as successful. After recording the MinWin price 137, if there are still bids remaining to be marked, the next highest bid is selected 98 and the steps of FIG. 11 are repeated.
The electronic auct:orZ system also includes a "Buy Or-Bid" forrat wherein the electronic auction system awards merchandise to bidders who place bids at or above a posted selling price. The item remains for sale until the available quantity is purchased. Bids that are below the posted selling price are maintained in reserve by the system. lf a certain sales volume is not achieved in a specified period of time, the electronic auction system automatically reduces the price by a predetermined amount or a predetermined percentage of the price and updates the merchandise catalog page accordingly. The lower price may be at or below some of the bids already in the bid database. If such bids are present, they are then converted to orders and the quantity available is reduced accordingly. Similarly, if a certain sales volume is exceeded in a specified period of time, the electronic auction system automatically increases the price by a set. amount or by a set percentage of the price and updates the merchandise page accordingly. These automatic price ' changes allow the seller to respond quickly to market conditions while keeping the price of the merchandise as high as possible to the sellers benefit.
FIG. 12 illustrates the Buy Or Bid format whereby bid manager 55, as shown in FIG. 6, determines which bids to mark as successful or unsuccessful 66, as shown in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 151 the bids by amount. If there are bids remaining to be processed; as determined at step 97, the highest .bid is_seiected 98 to be checked: If the bid is below the current price of the merchandise item, as determined at 93, then the bid. is marked 99 unsuccessful. If the bid is not below the current price, as determined at 93, then the bid is checked 94 to see if the bid quantity can be satisfied. - If not, the bid is marked as unsuccessful 99. If the bid quantity can be satisfied, then the bid is converted into an order 155 at the current price of the item and the item's quantity remaining is decremented 96. The bids remaining to be processed, as determined at 97, are then checked and the steps of FIG.
11 are repeated. From time to time, the current price of the merchandise item may be raised or lowered either by manual input from an operator 300 as shown in FIG. 1 or 'by automatically using the "markdown" feature described below with reference to FIG: 14.
FIG. 13 illustrates in more detail the step of determining if the bid quantity can be satisfied 94. If the bid quantity is determined to be less than the available quantity of the merchandise item at step 171, then the test is found satisfied at step 174. If not, then the bid is checked at 172 to see if the bidder. is willing to accept a reduced quantity. Preferably, when placing a bid, the bidder indicates its willingness to accept a partial quantity in the event that an insufficient quantity of the item is available to satisfy the bid if successful. If the bidder is found willing to accept a reduced quantity at 172, then the test is found satisfied at 174. If not, the test fails at 173 and the bid is marked as unsuccessful at, for example, 99 in FIG. 9. .
The electronic auction system also includes a"markdown" feature, wherein the electronic auction system of the present invention awards merchandise to buyers who place orders at the currently posted selling price. The item remains on sale until the available quantity is purchased.
If a certain sales volume is not achieved in a specified period of time; the electronic auction system automatically reduces the price by a set amount or a set percentage and updates the merchandise catalog page . accordingly. This lower price encourages buyers to take advantage of the new price. If a certain sales volume is exceeded in a specified period of time, the electronic auction system automatically increases the price by a set amount or a set percentage and updates the merchandise page accordingly. These automatic price changes allow the system to respond to market conditions while keeping the prices of the merchandise as high as possible to the :seller's. benefit.
FIG. 14 illustrates the Markdown price adjustment feature whereby auction manager 26, as shown in FIG. 4, periodically adjusts 54 the sales prices or minimum bid prices, of the merchandise items according to a predetermined schedule as shown in FIG. 6. If more merchandise items are found in the merchandise database at 181, a merchandise item is selected 183 for Markdown. If a Markdown event has occurred for the item, as determined at 184, the item's price is adjusted 185 according to the schedule preset for the individual item.
Alternatively, the adjustment coUld be relative to prices offered for the merchandise. The merchandise item is then updated 186 in the database with the new sale price or minimum bid price. The steps of FIG. 14 are then repeated for each.successive merchandise item in the merchandise database.
The electronic auction system of the present Invention preferably includes a "Proxy Bidding" feature that may be applied to any of the auction formats described above. FIG. 7 fully describes auction manager 26 including the Proxy Bidding feature. When Proxy Bidding is employed, a bidder places a bid for the maximum amount they are willing to.pay. The electronic auction system, however, only displays the. amount necessary to win the _item up to the amount of the currently high proxy bids of other bidders. Typically, the currently high bids display an amount that is one bidding increment above the second highest bid or bids, although-a percentage above the second highest bids may be used as well. When a new bidder places a bid that is above a currently displayed high bid, the proxy feature will, in general, cause the currently high bid to_move up to an amount higher than the new bid, up to the maximum amount of the currently high bidder's proxy bid. Once a new bidder places a bid in excess of the currently high bidder's proxy bid, the new bid becomes the current high bid and the previous high bid becomes the second highest bid. This feature allows bidders to participate in the electronic auction without revealing to the other bidders the extent to which they are willing to increase their bids,. while maintaining control of their maximum bid without closely. monitoring the bidding. Participation is engaged in automatically on the bidder's behalf by the inventive system. The feature guarantees proxy bidders the lowest possible price up to a specified maximum without requiring frequent inquiries, as to the state of the bidding.
One skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will recognize that a variety of different auction formats may be implemented in addition to those described above. One skilled in the art will also recognize that the electronic auction system of the present invention can employ a "Floating Closing Time" feature whereby the auction for a particular item is automatically closed if no new bids are received within a predetermined time interval. This feature would typically be implemented in a manner similar to that used to close auctions of old items, as shown at step 53 in FIG. 6. This feature forces the bidding activity to occur within a shorter amount of time than would otherwise be achieved because bidders are aware that:the item will automatically close if no new bids have been received in a timeiy manner. Thus, bidders have an Incentive to stay active in the bidding process to avoid closure of an item before maximum, and most potentially winning, bids have been entered. The Floating Closing Time feature also allows more items to be auctioned during a period of time since each item is closed once bidding activity ceases; the bidding period is not protracted to an artificial length as is the case when an item closes at a preset date and time. The Floating Closing Time feature of the present invention may be employed either in conjunction with or independent of a fixed closing time for an item. When employed in conjunction with a fixed closing time, the auction is closed either when the preset fixed time period has expired for the item or when no bidding activity has occurred within a preset time interval. This forces the bidding to cease at a particular time in case the bidding activity becomes artificially protracted. =
A general description of the present invention as well as a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been set forth above.
Those skilied in the art to which the present invention pertains will recognize and be able to practice additional variations in the methods and system described which fall within the. teachings of this invention.
For example, although a preferred embodiment of the present invention chooses winning bids according -t.o monetary amount included in the bid, preference for bids may also be determined according to time of submission, quantity of inerchandise bid for, total bid value, or some other combination of these.- characteristics. Accordingly, all such _5 modifications and additions are deemed to be within the scope of the invention which is to be limited oniy by the claims appended hereto.
FIG. 2 illustrates a merchandise catalog page offering an item for _ 5 sale via electronic auction on the Internet's World Wide Web;
FIG. 3 depicts a bid form for bidding on an auction item;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of components illustrating a preferred embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating the bid validator and 'its method of operation;
FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the auction manager and its method of operation;
FIG. 7 Is a f(owchart Illustrating the bid manager and its method of operation;
FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating the electronic maii messenger and its method of operation;
FIG, 9 is a flowchart illustrating the standard auction format and its method of operation;
FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating the.Dutch auction format and its method of operation;
FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating the progressive auction- format and its method of operation;
FIG. 12 is a flowchart illustrating the buy or bid sale format and its method of operation;
FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating bid quantity determination. and its method of operation; and FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating the markdown price adjustment feature of the present invention and its method of operation..
pETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
_ 5 An inventive method and system is disclosed for conducting a multi-bidder, interactive auction without using a human auctioneer to conduct the auction. Preferably implemented in software, the electronic auction system allows a group of bidders to interactively place bids over a computer or communications network, automatically records the bids, updates the bidders with the current auction status information, closes the auction from further bidding when appropriate, and notifies the winning bidder or bidders and loser or losers as to the auction outcome.
The inventive system includes a database for maintaining descriptions of the merchandise for auction, the bids, and other relevant information in a commercially available database system. Database searches are preferably performed periodtcatly to check for new items to be made visible to potential bidders. Such periodic searching allows an individual charged with maintairiing this system to load relevant information into the database at his or her leisure. Once the database is loaded with information about the item and the item is scheduled for presentation to potential bidders, the system takes the merchandise information and creates a human readable catalog page for a viewing over a public network such as the Internet's World Wide Web. Bidders are then able to view the new item for auction and to place their bids.
_These catalog pages preferably contain the current high bid, bid increment, quantity available, merchandise description, and picture of the item.
Upon accessing a public network and seeing an item's catalog page, the bidder may press a button on the catalog page or take some similar action which causes a bid form to be displayed on the screen.
The bidder then enters the information necessary to place a bid, such as their name and address, bid amount, payment information, etc., and then presses a bid submission button, or takes a similar action which sends the bid to the system.
The system receives the electronic bid information and places it in the bid database. Because this new bid will, in general, be a bid for a higher amount than was last bid by another party, the system will regenerate the item's catalog page. This updated catalog page will then show the new high bid to any prospective bidders who later access that catalog page.
Because most bidders will not, in general, be accessing the network and viewing the merchandise catalog pages as they are updated with new high bids, the system may send electronic mail notifications to bidders who have been outbid by the just-placed bid. These electronic mail notification messages preferably contain the relevant merchandise information, the current high bid, the bid increment, etc., and encourage the bidder to submit a new and higher bid to outbid the current high bidder. These electronic mail notification messages allow the bidder to enter a new bid by replying to the electronic mail message and sending it back to the system.
Upon receiving a new or revised bid via electronic mail, the system follows the same set of actions as when the bidder places a bid using the electronic bid form when viewing a merchandise catalog page, namely, the system extracts the relevant bid information from the electronic mail message, deposits this information in the bid database, and then updates the merchandise catalog page as appropriate. Such an electronic mail message bid may further cause a new round of electronic mail notifications to go out to the recently outbid bidders.
This process preferably continues untii the system detects that the item is scheduled to be closed for further bidding or another closing trigger is detected. At this point, the system closes the auction by updating the merchandise catalog page with the final winning bid .
information and by sending electronic mail notifications to both the winning bidder or bidders and the losing bidder or bidders. .:
The present invention provides an electronic auction method and system for presenting merchandise for sale at auction to customers over an electronic network, such as the Internet's World Wide Web. Potential ~11 customers are presented with a series of descriptive merchandise catalog pages through which they may navigate to find items (lots) of interest.
Upon finding a lot of interest, customers may click a button on screen to display a form for placing a bid on the lot. After submitting this bid, the electronic auction system records the bid and updates the lot's merchandise catalog page to show the current high bid or bids and to whom such bids are attributable. When the auction is closed, after a period of no bidding activity, at a predetermined time, or when a desired sales volume is reached, the electronic auction system notifies the winning and losing bidders by electronic mail and posts a list of the winning bidders on the closed lot's merchandise catalog page.
The present invention is preferably implemented as a computer program 248 running on a central server host computer 250, shown in FIG. 1, attached to a wide area network 275 accessible by many potential customers through remote terminals 210. A preferred network for implementing the present invention is the Internet which is accessible by a significant percentage of the world population, although the network may also be a local area or- limited area accessible network.
Potential customers are presented at screen 280 with merchandise catalog pages, such as the one shown in FIG. 2, generated by merchandise catalog page generator 25 shown in FIG. 4. Each merchandise catalog page includes several action buttons 5 that allow the customer to move from catalog page to catalog page and to place bids using keyboard 240 and pointing device 260. The user may call up an index of availabie merchandise by pressing button 7 or may return to a central home page by pressing button 9.
By pressing bid button 1 in FIG. 2, the customer is presented with a bid form such as the one shown in FIG. 3. The customer fills out the required information in the bid form and presses "Place Bid" button 2 to send the bid to the electronic auction system for processing. Other equivalent means for submitting a bid could be used, as understood by those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains.
FIG. 4 illustrates a high level.block diagram of the electronic auction system of the present invention. As shown, information from bid form 20 is received by the electronic auction system where it is processed by bid validator 21. Bid validator 21 examines the bid information entered by the customer on bid form 20 to ensure that the bid is properly formatted, all necessary data is present, and the data values entered look credible. Exemplary functions of bid validator 21 include verifying credit card information entered by the customer, checking that a complete name and shipping address has been entered, that the proper state abbreviation and zip code have been entered, that an appropriate bid amount has been entered, and that a telephone or facsimile number has been entered. Once the bid information has been validated, the bid validator 21 places the bid in bid database 31.
Auction manager 26 preferably frequently queries the bid database 31 to see if any new bids have been placed. If new bids ,re found during the query, then auction manager 26 calculates the current high bidder or bidders and instructs merchandise catalog page generator 25 to regenerate a catalog page with the updated bid information.
Auction manager 26 is also responsible for opening and closing auctions. This entails making merchandise lots available for bidding by customers and disabling their associated buy or bid features on the merchandise pages that have been posted to potential bidders but have closed. When auction manager -26 determines that a new lot should be opened for bidding or an available lot should be closed, it instructs merchandise catalog page generator 25 to create or update the -merchandise catalog pages for the appropriate lots.
_ Electronic mail messenger 27 frequently queries bid database 31 for bids recently marked by auction manager 26 as having been outbid or as having won an item in a recently closed auction. If such bids are found, the electronic mail messenger 27 formats an appropriate electronic mail notification message 24 and sends this message to the customer.. Many customers read their electronic mail throughout the day, making this a convenient mechanism for keeping them informed about the status of merchandise on which they are actively bidding.
Bidders .may reply to an electronic mail notification message 24 informing them that they. have been outbid by including an increased bid amount in the reply message. An electronic mail bid 22 sent in reply to the notification is received by the electronic auction system and processed by bid validator 21 as described above.
_ 5 FIG. 5 illustrates in detail the procedure of bid validation as accomplished by bid validator 21 shown in FIG. 4. A bid is received by bid validator 21 and the customer is looked up at step 41 in customer database 28. tf no customer record exists for the customer then a new customer record is created 42 and placed in customer database 28.
From there, the bid information is validated 43 as previously described.
If the bid data includes one or more errors, then an error message is returned 44 to the bidder, preferably in the form of a well-formatted .page posted across the network, itemizing the errors found,in the bid. If the bid is valid, as found in step 43, then the bid is ptaced 46 in bid 1 IS database31.
FIG. 6 provides a detailed illustration of the procedures carried out by auction manager 26. Auction manager 26 is preferably a continuously running system that begins by getting the current time as at step 51. It then checks to see if any new items for sale are to be opened by examining the merchandise database to see if any new merchandise items are scheduled to be made available for bidding by customers at or before the current time. Operator 300, or some automated substitute, may upioad merchandise and scheduling information to the database, as shown in FIG. 1. If new merchandise _items are scheduled for posting, these items are opened for bidding 52.
The auction manager then examines the merchandise database to see if any merchandise items are scheduled to be closed from customer bidding. If so, these items are closed from bidding 53. Auction manager 26 then examines the merchandise database to see if any merchandise items posted with a price markdown feature are scheduled to have their prices adjusted. If so, the prices of these items are adjusted 54 in accordance with the particular item's price adjustment parameters. Such parameters may include bidding activity over time, amount of bids received, and number of items bid for. Auction manager 26 then updates 55 the bid list for open items by recalculating the current high bidder list and regenerating the merchandise catalog pages 56 to reflect these new bids. This step is -more fully described below with reference to FIG. 7.
FIG. 7 illustrates the procedures carried out by the bid manager in updating the bid list for open items 55 as shown in FIG. 6: The bid manager begins by checking 61 if there are more merchandise items to be processed. If such items are found, the bid manager selects 62 a merchandise item to process and queries 64 the bid database for bids for this item. These bids are sorted 65 using a variety of different priority ranking schemes depending upon the auction method and system used for the particular merchandise item, as described in more detail below.
Then, the bids are marked 66 as either successful or unsuccessful depending upon the bid price of the respective bids and the quantity of the item being bid on relative to the quantity of the item being auctioned. In a preferred embodiment, a quantity of an item may be put up for auction, and Individual bidders may bid on any quantity of the item desired, up to the quantity of the item being auctioned.
The bid manager then checks 67 to see if there are any active proxy bids marked as unsuccessful. A proxy bid is a special bid type that allows auction manager 26 to automatically bid on the bidder's behalf up to a limited amount established by the bidder when his or her initial bid is placed. The auction manager will increase the bid as ' necessary up to the limit amount. : This feature allows the customer to get the lowest possible price without exceeding a limit preferably -estabiished when the bid is entered. If there are active proxy bids marked as unsuccessful, then- the bid manager increments 69 the proxy bids by a preset bid increment. This procedure of sorting 65 marking 66 bids and incrementing 69 the proxy bids as required continues until -' either there are no additional proxy bids marked as unsuccessful or the proxy limits have been reached on the proxy bids. At this point, bid database 31 is updated 68 with the marked bids. This process is then repeated for each merchandise lot open at the current time for bidding by customers.
FIG. 8 illustrates the procedures carried out by electronic mail messenger 27 which notifies bidders when they have been outbid.
When marked bids are updated in bid database 31 as shown in FIG. 7, electronic mail messenger 27 detects 81 the presence of these marked bids and then looks up 82 the customer's electronic mail address and looks up 83 inventory information on the item desired by the bidder.
With this information, electronic mail messenger 27 constructs 84 an electronic mail message informing the bidder that he or she has been outbid. Once constructed, the electronic mail notification message 24 is sent to the bidder as shown at step 85. -One skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will recognize that the various components of the electronic auction system can communicate between themselves in a variety of ways. In a preferred embodiment, bid validator 21, auction manager 26, and electronic mail messenger 27 communicate by adding, marking, and updating records in the various databases. Each of these components periodically checks at least one of the databases to see if anything relevant to their respective functions has changed and take action accordingly. However, the components could send direct messages between themselves or call each other by means of program subroutines to signal important events that would require one or the other component to update its state.
One skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will further recognize that a variety of different auction formats may be =
implemented using the basic technique described above. The simplest is the "Standard Auction" format, whereby the electronic auction system awards the merchandise to the top bidder or bidders in accordance with their bids once bidding has stopped. Using this format, if there is a plurality of a specific item, the system awards the merchandise to the top bidders. Bidders may bid on more than one unit, and. different successful bidders will, in general, pay different prices for an item. ~-FIG. 9 illustrates the Standard Auction format where bid manager 55, shown in FIG. 6, determines which bids to mark as successful or unsuccessful, as shown in step 66 in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 91 the -bids by amount of the bid. If there are bids remaining to be processed, determined at step 97, the highest remaining bid is 16 selected 98 to be checked. If the bid is below the minimum bid allowed for the particular merchandise item, as determined at step 93, the bid is marked 99 as unsuccessful. If not, the bid is checked 94 to see if the quantity may be satisfied. A bid may be satisfied if the quantity of the item bid upon is available. This information is available from'auction database 29. If not, then the bid is marked 99 as unsuccessful.
Optionally, the system could ask the user if a lesser quantity than bid upon will be acceptable, as shown in FIG. 2 at box 310. If the bid quantity can be satisfied, as determined at step 94, then the bid is marked 95 as successful and the item quantity remaining, recorded in auction database 29, is decremented 96 by the bid quantity. After the quantity remaining is decremented 96, and if, as determined at step 97, there are still bids remaining to be marked, the next highest bid is selected 98 and the steps of FIG. 9 are repeated.
The eiectronic auction system of the present invention also provides a "Dutch Auction" format, wherein the electronic auction system awards the merchandise to all of the top bidders for whom-there is available inventory at the price bid by the lowest successful bidder.
This format may be preferred by customers for being the most fair when a plurality of a specific item is being auctioned. As with all bidding, there will be a range of bids submitted. In the Dutch Auction format, - the highest bidders are awarded the merchandise but at the same price for all successful bidders, the price bid by the lowest successful bidder.
- FIG. 10 illustrates the Dutch Auction format whereby bid manager 55 shown in FIG. 6 determines which bids to mark 66 as successful or unsuccessful,-as shown in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 111 the bids by amount of the bid. If there are bids remaining- to be -'".
processed, as determined at step 97 the highest bid. is selected 98- to be checked. If the. bid is below the minimum bid allowed for the particuiar merchandise item, as determined at step 93, the bid is marked as unsuccessful 99. If not, the bid is checked 94 to see if the bid quantity may be satisfied.. If the bid cannot be satisfied, then the bid is marked as unsuccessful at step 99. If the bid quantity can be satisfied, then the bid is marked as successful at step 95 and the item quantity remaining is decremented 96 by the bid quantity.. At this time the MinWin price is=
.17 recorded 117. The MinWin price is the price. above which a new bidder must bid in order to be successful in the Dutch Auction format were the auction to close at that moment. The MinWin price is, in general, the bid price of the lowest bid that is marked as successful. After recording the _ 5 MinWin price at step 117, where there are still bids remaining to be marked, as determined at step 97, the next highest bid is selected 98 and the steps of FIG. 10 are repeated.
The electronic auction system of the present invention also includes a"Progressive Auction" format, wherein the electronic auction system awards the merchandise to the top bidders based on price bid.
As with the Dutch Auction format, the highest price bids are awarded the merchandise up to the quantity available of the item being auctioned.
However, unlike the Dutch Auction format, the syster.xi a~-*ards tl?c-merchandise to the su'ccessful bidders at different prices depending on the quantity bid. In a preferred embodiment, a successful bidder for a singie unit of an item is awarded the item at the price of the lowest successful bid for a single unit of the item. A successful bidder for a higher quantity of the same item is awarded the item at the price of the lowest successful bid at that quantity or any lower quantity. For example, a successful bidder for a quantity of five would pay the lowest price for any successful bid for quantity one through five of the item.
The price paid for a given quantity is termed the "MinWin" price for that quantity. The Progressive Auction format ensures that successful bidders for a quantity of an item pay the lowest price paid by any other _successful bidder at that quantity level or below. Use of this fonmat leads to lower prices for those who successfully bid on larger quantities of an item, provides an impetus for volume buying, * and therefiore leads to greater sales volume.
FIG. 11 illustrates the Progressive Auction format, wherein bid manager 55 shown in FIG. 6 determines which bids to mark as successful or unsuccessful 66.as shown in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 131 the bids by amount of the bid. If there are bids remaining to be processed, as determined at step 97, the highest bid is selected 98 to be checked. - If the bid is determined to be below the minimum bid aliowed for the particular merchandise item at step 93, the .18 bid is marked as unsuccessful 99. If not, the bid is checked at step 94 to see if the bid quantity can be satisfied. If not, then the bid is marked 99 as unsuccessful. If the bid quantity is checked and found to be satisfied at step 94, then the bid is marked as successful 95 and the item quantity remaining is decremented 96 by the bid quantity. The MinWin price is then recorded 137. The MinWin price is the price above which a new bidder must bid in order to be successful in the Progressive Auction format were the auction to close at that moment. The MinWin price is, in general, the bid price of the lowest bid at the current bid quantity or lower that is marked as successful. After recording the MinWin price 137, if there are still bids remaining to be marked, the next highest bid is selected 98 and the steps of FIG. 11 are repeated.
The electronic auct:orZ system also includes a "Buy Or-Bid" forrat wherein the electronic auction system awards merchandise to bidders who place bids at or above a posted selling price. The item remains for sale until the available quantity is purchased. Bids that are below the posted selling price are maintained in reserve by the system. lf a certain sales volume is not achieved in a specified period of time, the electronic auction system automatically reduces the price by a predetermined amount or a predetermined percentage of the price and updates the merchandise catalog page accordingly. The lower price may be at or below some of the bids already in the bid database. If such bids are present, they are then converted to orders and the quantity available is reduced accordingly. Similarly, if a certain sales volume is exceeded in a specified period of time, the electronic auction system automatically increases the price by a set. amount or by a set percentage of the price and updates the merchandise page accordingly. These automatic price ' changes allow the seller to respond quickly to market conditions while keeping the price of the merchandise as high as possible to the sellers benefit.
FIG. 12 illustrates the Buy Or Bid format whereby bid manager 55, as shown in FIG. 6, determines which bids to mark as successful or unsuccessful 66, as shown in FIG. 7. Bid manager 55 begins by sorting 151 the bids by amount. If there are bids remaining to be processed; as determined at step 97, the highest .bid is_seiected 98 to be checked: If the bid is below the current price of the merchandise item, as determined at 93, then the bid. is marked 99 unsuccessful. If the bid is not below the current price, as determined at 93, then the bid is checked 94 to see if the bid quantity can be satisfied. - If not, the bid is marked as unsuccessful 99. If the bid quantity can be satisfied, then the bid is converted into an order 155 at the current price of the item and the item's quantity remaining is decremented 96. The bids remaining to be processed, as determined at 97, are then checked and the steps of FIG.
11 are repeated. From time to time, the current price of the merchandise item may be raised or lowered either by manual input from an operator 300 as shown in FIG. 1 or 'by automatically using the "markdown" feature described below with reference to FIG: 14.
FIG. 13 illustrates in more detail the step of determining if the bid quantity can be satisfied 94. If the bid quantity is determined to be less than the available quantity of the merchandise item at step 171, then the test is found satisfied at step 174. If not, then the bid is checked at 172 to see if the bidder. is willing to accept a reduced quantity. Preferably, when placing a bid, the bidder indicates its willingness to accept a partial quantity in the event that an insufficient quantity of the item is available to satisfy the bid if successful. If the bidder is found willing to accept a reduced quantity at 172, then the test is found satisfied at 174. If not, the test fails at 173 and the bid is marked as unsuccessful at, for example, 99 in FIG. 9. .
The electronic auction system also includes a"markdown" feature, wherein the electronic auction system of the present invention awards merchandise to buyers who place orders at the currently posted selling price. The item remains on sale until the available quantity is purchased.
If a certain sales volume is not achieved in a specified period of time; the electronic auction system automatically reduces the price by a set amount or a set percentage and updates the merchandise catalog page . accordingly. This lower price encourages buyers to take advantage of the new price. If a certain sales volume is exceeded in a specified period of time, the electronic auction system automatically increases the price by a set amount or a set percentage and updates the merchandise page accordingly. These automatic price changes allow the system to respond to market conditions while keeping the prices of the merchandise as high as possible to the :seller's. benefit.
FIG. 14 illustrates the Markdown price adjustment feature whereby auction manager 26, as shown in FIG. 4, periodically adjusts 54 the sales prices or minimum bid prices, of the merchandise items according to a predetermined schedule as shown in FIG. 6. If more merchandise items are found in the merchandise database at 181, a merchandise item is selected 183 for Markdown. If a Markdown event has occurred for the item, as determined at 184, the item's price is adjusted 185 according to the schedule preset for the individual item.
Alternatively, the adjustment coUld be relative to prices offered for the merchandise. The merchandise item is then updated 186 in the database with the new sale price or minimum bid price. The steps of FIG. 14 are then repeated for each.successive merchandise item in the merchandise database.
The electronic auction system of the present Invention preferably includes a "Proxy Bidding" feature that may be applied to any of the auction formats described above. FIG. 7 fully describes auction manager 26 including the Proxy Bidding feature. When Proxy Bidding is employed, a bidder places a bid for the maximum amount they are willing to.pay. The electronic auction system, however, only displays the. amount necessary to win the _item up to the amount of the currently high proxy bids of other bidders. Typically, the currently high bids display an amount that is one bidding increment above the second highest bid or bids, although-a percentage above the second highest bids may be used as well. When a new bidder places a bid that is above a currently displayed high bid, the proxy feature will, in general, cause the currently high bid to_move up to an amount higher than the new bid, up to the maximum amount of the currently high bidder's proxy bid. Once a new bidder places a bid in excess of the currently high bidder's proxy bid, the new bid becomes the current high bid and the previous high bid becomes the second highest bid. This feature allows bidders to participate in the electronic auction without revealing to the other bidders the extent to which they are willing to increase their bids,. while maintaining control of their maximum bid without closely. monitoring the bidding. Participation is engaged in automatically on the bidder's behalf by the inventive system. The feature guarantees proxy bidders the lowest possible price up to a specified maximum without requiring frequent inquiries, as to the state of the bidding.
One skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains will recognize that a variety of different auction formats may be implemented in addition to those described above. One skilled in the art will also recognize that the electronic auction system of the present invention can employ a "Floating Closing Time" feature whereby the auction for a particular item is automatically closed if no new bids are received within a predetermined time interval. This feature would typically be implemented in a manner similar to that used to close auctions of old items, as shown at step 53 in FIG. 6. This feature forces the bidding activity to occur within a shorter amount of time than would otherwise be achieved because bidders are aware that:the item will automatically close if no new bids have been received in a timeiy manner. Thus, bidders have an Incentive to stay active in the bidding process to avoid closure of an item before maximum, and most potentially winning, bids have been entered. The Floating Closing Time feature also allows more items to be auctioned during a period of time since each item is closed once bidding activity ceases; the bidding period is not protracted to an artificial length as is the case when an item closes at a preset date and time. The Floating Closing Time feature of the present invention may be employed either in conjunction with or independent of a fixed closing time for an item. When employed in conjunction with a fixed closing time, the auction is closed either when the preset fixed time period has expired for the item or when no bidding activity has occurred within a preset time interval. This forces the bidding to cease at a particular time in case the bidding activity becomes artificially protracted. =
A general description of the present invention as well as a preferred embodiment of the present invention has been set forth above.
Those skilied in the art to which the present invention pertains will recognize and be able to practice additional variations in the methods and system described which fall within the. teachings of this invention.
For example, although a preferred embodiment of the present invention chooses winning bids according -t.o monetary amount included in the bid, preference for bids may also be determined according to time of submission, quantity of inerchandise bid for, total bid value, or some other combination of these.- characteristics. Accordingly, all such _5 modifications and additions are deemed to be within the scope of the invention which is to be limited oniy by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (16)
1. An electronic commerce system, comprising:
a bid validator to receive via a web-based form and via a network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price;
a manager, coupled to the bid validator, automatically to award the auction item of the lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the auction item wherein the manager is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and a merchandise catalog page generator, coupled to the manager, to update a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager to display a reduced posted selling price.
a bid validator to receive via a web-based form and via a network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price;
a manager, coupled to the bid validator, automatically to award the auction item of the lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the auction item wherein the manager is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and a merchandise catalog page generator, coupled to the manager, to update a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager to display a reduced posted selling price.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the manager is to convert the offer to an order for the auction item.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the system is to maintain the offer in reserve if the offer is below the posted selling price.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the manager is to reduce the posted selling price by a predetermined amount.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the manager is to reduce the posted selling price by a percentage of the posted selling price.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the manager is automatically to increase the posted selling price upon determining that a certain sales volume was achieved within a specific time period; the system further comprising:
a merchandise catalog page generator to update a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager to display the increased posted selling price,
a merchandise catalog page generator to update a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager to display the increased posted selling price,
7. A method to facilitate an electronic commerce transaction, the method comprising:
receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system;
automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item;
automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further item of the lot of items upon detecting that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system;
automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item;
automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further item of the lot of items upon detecting that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the awarding of the at least one item includes converting the offer to an order for the at least one item.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the offer comprises a bid.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the posted selling price is reduced by a predetermined amount.
11. The method of claim 7, wherein the posted selling price is reduced by a percentage of the posted selling price.
12. The method of claim 7, further comprising automatically increasing the posted selling price upon exceeding a certain sales volume within a specific time period.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the posted selling price is increased by a predetermined amount.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein the posted selling price is increased by a percentage of the posted selling price.
15. A machine-readable medium having executable instructions to cause one or more machines to perform a method to facilitate an electronic transaction, the method including:
receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system;
automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item;
automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further one item of the lot of items upon failing to achieve a certain sales volume within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
receiving an offer for at least one item of a lot of items, the lot of items including a plurality of items and the offer being received from a user of an electronic commerce system, wherein the at least one item of the lot of items is available for purchase at a posted selling price via an auction facilitated by the electronic commerce system;
automatically awarding the at least one item of the lot of items to the user if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item;
automatically reducing the posted selling price for a further one item of the lot of items upon failing to achieve a certain sales volume within a specific time period; and updating a merchandise catalog page to present a reduced posted selling price for the further one item of the lot of items.
16. An electronic auction system, comprising:
validating means for receiving via a web-based form and via the network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price, manager means, coupled to the validating means for automatically awarding an auction item of a lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item, wherein the manager means is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period;
storage means coupled to the manager means, for storing the posted selling price; and a merchandise catalog page generator means, coupled to the manager means, for updating a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager means for displaying the reduced posted selling price.
validating means for receiving via a web-based form and via the network, an offer from a bidder as a bid for an auction item of a lot of auctions items available for purchase at a posted selling price, manager means, coupled to the validating means for automatically awarding an auction item of a lot of auction items to the bidder if the offer is at or above the posted selling price of the at least one item, wherein the manager means is automatically to reduce the posted selling price upon receiving an indication that a certain sales volume was not achieved within a specific time period;
storage means coupled to the manager means, for storing the posted selling price; and a merchandise catalog page generator means, coupled to the manager means, for updating a merchandise catalog page based on instructions received from the manager means for displaying the reduced posted selling price.
Applications Claiming Priority (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US62394696A | 1996-03-29 | 1996-03-29 | |
US08/624,259 | 1996-03-29 | ||
US08/623,946 | 1996-03-29 | ||
US08/623,654 | 1996-03-29 | ||
US08/623,654 US5835896A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1996-03-29 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US08/624,259 US6243691B1 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1996-03-29 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
CA002529148A CA2529148C (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1997-03-19 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002529148A Division CA2529148C (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1997-03-19 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2629281A1 true CA2629281A1 (en) | 1997-10-09 |
CA2629281C CA2629281C (en) | 2015-05-05 |
Family
ID=27417342
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA2629281A Expired - Lifetime CA2629281C (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1997-03-19 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
CA002253543A Expired - Lifetime CA2253543C (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1997-03-19 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002253543A Expired - Lifetime CA2253543C (en) | 1996-03-29 | 1997-03-19 | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0900424B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2000503789A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE207638T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU717594B2 (en) |
CA (2) | CA2629281C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69707668T2 (en) |
IL (1) | IL126793A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997037315A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (184)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
AUPQ131399A0 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 1999-07-22 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | A method and apparatus (NPAGE02) |
US7937312B1 (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 2011-05-03 | Ebay Inc. | Facilitating electronic commerce transactions through binding offers |
US7702540B1 (en) | 1995-04-26 | 2010-04-20 | Ebay Inc. | Computer-implement method and system for conducting auctions on the internet |
US7249027B1 (en) | 1996-01-04 | 2007-07-24 | Efficient Auctions Llc | Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions |
US5905975A (en) * | 1996-01-04 | 1999-05-18 | Ausubel; Lawrence M. | Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions |
US6243691B1 (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2001-06-05 | Onsale, Inc. | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information |
US6850907B2 (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 2005-02-01 | Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. | Automated price improvement protocol processor |
US7249061B1 (en) | 1997-03-14 | 2007-07-24 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Method of electronic commerce including receiving an acceptance signal indicating a change in a transaction available period based on a time adjustment day |
CA2228331C (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 2002-01-15 | Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee | A token-based deadline enforcement system for electronic document submission |
US6415269B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2002-07-02 | Bidcatcher, L.P. | Interactive remote auction bidding system |
US7069243B2 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2006-06-27 | Dinwoodie David L | Interactive remote auction bidding system |
US6035288A (en) * | 1998-06-29 | 2000-03-07 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | Interactive computer-implemented system and method for negotiating sale of goods and/or services |
US6067532A (en) * | 1998-07-14 | 2000-05-23 | American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc. | Ticket redistribution system |
US6230146B1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2001-05-08 | Freemarkets, Inc. | Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots |
US7383206B2 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2008-06-03 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multiple variable bidding in an online auction |
US7792713B1 (en) | 2000-01-24 | 2010-09-07 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for disguised price bidding in online auctions |
US7152043B2 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2006-12-19 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions |
US7283980B2 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2007-10-16 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime intervals in electronic auctions |
US7249085B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2007-07-24 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with multi-parameter price equalization bidding |
EP1122667A3 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2001-09-26 | Freemarkets, Inc. | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions |
US7599878B2 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2009-10-06 | Ariba, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds |
AU755756B2 (en) * | 1998-10-15 | 2002-12-19 | Racebase Pty Ltd | Decision platform for object comparison |
AUPP650598A0 (en) * | 1998-10-15 | 1998-11-05 | Reay, Mark Richard | This 'n' that |
US6058417A (en) | 1998-10-23 | 2000-05-02 | Ebay Inc. | Information presentation and management in an online trading environment |
US7162446B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2007-01-09 | Ebay Inc. | Integrated auction |
AU781672B2 (en) * | 1998-12-08 | 2005-06-02 | Ebay Inc. | Integrated auction for remote online bidders and live participants at an auction site |
US8527392B2 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2013-09-03 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for holding a two-stage live auction for on-site and on-line bidders |
US7840472B1 (en) | 1999-12-08 | 2010-11-23 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for holding an online live auction to combine features of both the internet and traditional, real world auctions |
CA2394575A1 (en) * | 1998-12-17 | 2000-06-22 | Michael Peter Groves | An auction system |
US6871191B1 (en) | 2000-01-24 | 2005-03-22 | Sam E. Kinney, Jr. | Method and system for partial quantity evaluated rank bidding in online auctions |
US7499876B2 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2009-03-03 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction |
US7225152B2 (en) | 1999-02-19 | 2007-05-29 | Ariba, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for varying an award volume in an auction |
JP2000259744A (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2000-09-22 | Yoshiyuki Osawa | Real estate auction system |
US7801775B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2010-09-21 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for authenticating users when conducting commercial transactions using a computer |
US7010511B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2006-03-07 | Kinney Jr Sam E | Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with net present value bidding |
US7840476B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2010-11-23 | Ariba, Inc. | Transformation bidding with tooling requirements |
US7165046B2 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2007-01-16 | Efficient Auctions Llc | System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction |
US6564192B1 (en) | 1999-06-08 | 2003-05-13 | Freemarkets, Inc. | Method and system for differential index bidding in online auctions |
US7330826B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2008-02-12 | Perfect.Com, Inc. | Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet |
US6606608B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2003-08-12 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for providing a discount at an auction |
JP3764001B2 (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2006-04-05 | 株式会社ナムコ | Game device ranking display method |
WO2001018724A1 (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2001-03-15 | Priceline.Com Incorporated | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SUBSIDIZING CONDITIONAL PURCHASE OFFERS (CPOs) |
KR20010029173A (en) * | 1999-09-29 | 2001-04-06 | 김유신 | Method for controlling internet auction system |
US7475046B1 (en) * | 1999-10-05 | 2009-01-06 | Bloomberg L.P. | Electronic trading system supporting anonymous negotiation and indications of interest |
US7373312B1 (en) | 1999-12-03 | 2008-05-13 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating user registration in an on-line auction environment |
US6466917B1 (en) | 1999-12-03 | 2002-10-15 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for verifying the identity of a participant within an on-line auction environment |
WO2001042999A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-06-14 | Swisscom Mobile Ag | Computer-aided auctioning method and auctioning system |
US8145555B2 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2012-03-27 | Ausubel Lawrence M | System and method for the efficient clearing of spectrum encumbrances |
US7149718B1 (en) | 1999-12-21 | 2006-12-12 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for the creation and communication of notes concerning an auction participant or item within a network-based auction facility |
JP3659400B2 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2005-06-15 | 楽天株式会社 | Auction system |
US7835957B1 (en) | 2000-01-24 | 2010-11-16 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for correcting market failures with participant isolation in dutch style online auctions |
US8781940B2 (en) | 2000-01-26 | 2014-07-15 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of a category item in a transaction |
KR100428887B1 (en) * | 2000-01-27 | 2004-04-29 | 월드 니치에이 프론티어 쇼켄 가부시키가이샤 | Commerce information processor, commerce terminal, commerce information processing method, and recorded medium |
US6993503B1 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2006-01-31 | Priceline.Com Incorporated | System and method for allocating a conditional purchase offer for a travel related services reservation to one of a plurality of entities in a buyer driven electronic commerce system |
US8290809B1 (en) | 2000-02-14 | 2012-10-16 | Ebay Inc. | Determining a community rating for a user using feedback ratings of related users in an electronic environment |
US9614934B2 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2017-04-04 | Paypal, Inc. | Methods and systems for harvesting comments regarding users on a network-based facility |
US7428505B1 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2008-09-23 | Ebay, Inc. | Method and system for harvesting feedback and comments regarding multiple items from users of a network-based transaction facility |
JP2001250017A (en) * | 2000-03-07 | 2001-09-14 | Ntt Data Corp | System, terminal and method for estimate matching and recording medium with program recorded thereon |
US8706618B2 (en) | 2005-09-29 | 2014-04-22 | Ebay Inc. | Release of funds based on criteria |
JP2001290962A (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2001-10-19 | Hideki Tsukamoto | System for circularly reusing resource material or waste material |
JP4981201B2 (en) * | 2000-04-19 | 2012-07-18 | 株式会社 ディー・エヌ・エー | Auction system and method using network |
JP5001481B2 (en) * | 2000-04-19 | 2012-08-15 | 株式会社 ディー・エヌ・エー | Auction system and method using network |
US7523114B2 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2009-04-21 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for categorizing items in both actual and virtual categories |
US6604107B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2003-08-05 | Ebay Inc. | Generic attribute database system for storing items of different categories having shared attributes |
JP2004295158A (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2004-10-21 | Deinakku Tb:Kk | Auction device and method |
JP2002045574A (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2002-02-12 | Voltage Inc | Data communication method and service providing server |
US7877278B1 (en) | 2000-05-30 | 2011-01-25 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for reporting fraud and claiming insurance related to network-based transactions |
US7673229B1 (en) | 2000-06-07 | 2010-03-02 | Ebay Inc. | Apparatus and method for generating sub-codes to a turbo-encoder |
JP2002073508A (en) * | 2000-06-12 | 2002-03-12 | Koji Noda | Electronic bulletin board system, event reporting device and information sharing system |
GB2363483A (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2001-12-19 | Eteatrade Ltd | An auction system and method |
JP2002015173A (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-01-18 | Art Masters:Kk | Auction system |
JP2002024597A (en) * | 2000-07-03 | 2002-01-25 | Yojiro Aizawa | Device and method for carrying information and device and method for electronic commercial transaction |
JP4313933B2 (en) * | 2000-07-11 | 2009-08-12 | 日本電気株式会社 | Auction information providing system and auction information providing method |
US7409368B2 (en) | 2000-07-13 | 2008-08-05 | Oes, Inc. | Dutch auction system with preregistered bid feature |
JP2002063398A (en) * | 2000-08-17 | 2002-02-28 | Kazuhiro Sumiyama | Method for providing dealing and mediation information using internet |
JP2002092384A (en) * | 2000-09-11 | 2002-03-29 | Rumi Uejima | Grading of art object and sale system |
US6944599B1 (en) | 2000-09-13 | 2005-09-13 | Ebay Inc. | Monitoring and automatic notification of irregular activity in a network-based transaction facility |
US6976005B1 (en) | 2000-09-21 | 2005-12-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer program products for dynamically bidding in and conducting multiple simultaneous online auctions located across multiple online auction sites |
JP2002099662A (en) * | 2000-09-22 | 2002-04-05 | Sankyo Kk | Providing method for service using play acquired value |
US6523037B1 (en) | 2000-09-22 | 2003-02-18 | Ebay Inc, | Method and system for communicating selected search results between first and second entities over a network |
EP1331581A4 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2004-11-24 | Toshiba Kk | Electronic commerce server, electronic commerce method, recorded medium on which electronic commerce program is recorded |
JP2002109286A (en) * | 2000-10-03 | 2002-04-12 | Mitsunori Hikita | Bucket auction system, computer readable recording medium recording the same and bucket auction device |
JP2002117305A (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-04-19 | Tokyo Electric Power Co Inc:The | System and server for distributing contents |
US7660740B2 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2010-02-09 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for listing items globally and regionally, and customized listing according to currency or shipping area |
US6748422B2 (en) | 2000-10-19 | 2004-06-08 | Ebay Inc. | System and method to control sending of unsolicited communications relating to a plurality of listings in a network-based commerce facility |
US7340429B2 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2008-03-04 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within a online auction environment |
US7870054B2 (en) | 2000-11-10 | 2011-01-11 | Ariba, Inc. | Method, apparatus and system for advancing a bidder to a selected rank |
US8463714B1 (en) | 2000-11-13 | 2013-06-11 | Ebay Inc. | Automated cross-cultural conflict management |
US8458214B1 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2013-06-04 | Ebay Inc. | Taxonomy-based database partitioning |
US7634439B1 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2009-12-15 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and apparatus to perform buy versus leasing transformational bidding |
US8630938B2 (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2014-01-14 | Ebay Inc. | Method and apparatus to detect fraudulent activities within a network-based auction facility |
US7774276B1 (en) | 2000-11-20 | 2010-08-10 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for dealing with non-paying bidders related to network-based transactions |
US7299206B2 (en) | 2000-11-30 | 2007-11-20 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to implement seller authorized buying privileges within a network-based shopping facility |
US20020078152A1 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2002-06-20 | Barry Boone | Method and apparatus for providing predefined feedback |
JP2002203136A (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-19 | Takamura Garo:Kk | Artwork selling support system |
US8086518B1 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2011-12-27 | Ariba, Inc. | Allotting an award volume in an auction |
US20020087456A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Daniel Abeshouse | Method, apparatus, and system for synchronizing timing of an auction throug a computer network |
JP2002207891A (en) * | 2001-01-12 | 2002-07-26 | Toshiba Corp | Network auction system, method and storage medium |
JP2002215951A (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2002-08-02 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Auction method using network, auction system, computer readable record medium recording auction program and auction program |
JP2002215953A (en) * | 2001-01-22 | 2002-08-02 | Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> | Settlement method in auction system using network, auction system, computer readable recording medium recording auction program and auction program |
US7310733B1 (en) | 2001-01-29 | 2007-12-18 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for maintaining login preference information of users in a network-based transaction facility |
US7277878B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2007-10-02 | Ariba, Inc. | Variable length file header apparatus and system |
US7072061B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2006-07-04 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for extracting information from RFQ documents and compressing RFQ files into a common RFQ file type |
JP2002245288A (en) * | 2001-02-14 | 2002-08-30 | I Mart:Kk | Method for sales of goods by auction |
US8380608B2 (en) | 2001-02-15 | 2013-02-19 | Ariba, Inc. | System and method for creating a spot market |
US7392217B2 (en) | 2001-05-09 | 2008-06-24 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Systems and methods for controlling traders from manipulating electronic trading markets |
AUPR557001A0 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2001-07-12 | G.H. Michell & Sons (Australia) Pty. Ltd. | Wool tender selling system |
US8428996B2 (en) | 2001-06-11 | 2013-04-23 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system automatically to support multiple transaction types, and to display seller-specific transactions of various transaction types in an integrated, commingled listing |
US7890375B2 (en) | 2001-07-31 | 2011-02-15 | Half.Com, Inc. | Method and system to facilitate pre-ordering via an electronic commerce facility, and to automatically facilitate satisfying of a pre-order upon listing of an appropriate offer via the electronic commerce facility |
US7752266B2 (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2010-07-06 | Ebay Inc. | System and method to facilitate translation of communications between entities over a network |
US7536362B2 (en) | 2001-11-07 | 2009-05-19 | Ariba, Inc. | Method for selecting an optimal balance between direct cost and a number of suppliers |
US7305469B2 (en) | 2001-12-18 | 2007-12-04 | Ebay Inc. | Prioritization of third party access to an online commerce site |
US8126799B2 (en) * | 2002-01-09 | 2012-02-28 | Ariba, Inc. | Method of bidding to drive competition in an auction |
US7146331B1 (en) | 2002-01-17 | 2006-12-05 | Ariba, Inc. | Method and system for supplier prioritization |
US7483852B2 (en) | 2002-04-24 | 2009-01-27 | Ariba, Inc. | Total value bidding |
US8719041B2 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2014-05-06 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for customizing a network-based transaction facility seller application |
US8078505B2 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2011-12-13 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for automatically updating a seller application utilized in a network-based transaction facility |
US7941348B2 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2011-05-10 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for scheduling transaction listings at a network-based transaction facility |
US7974908B1 (en) | 2002-07-29 | 2011-07-05 | Ariba, Inc. | System and method for promoting competition in an auction |
US8554650B1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2013-10-08 | Ariba, Inc. | Importable template |
US8930256B2 (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2015-01-06 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Keyboard trading system |
US7693747B2 (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2010-04-06 | Ariba, Inc. | Methods, system, and medium for initiating an online auction utilizing a line item detail report |
GB2395036A (en) | 2002-10-31 | 2004-05-12 | Espeed Inc | Trading interface using keyboard |
US7904346B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2011-03-08 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to adjust a seller fixed price offer |
US7593866B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2009-09-22 | Ebay Inc. | Introducing a fixed-price transaction mechanism in conjunction with an auction transaction mechanism |
US8126701B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2012-02-28 | Ariba, Inc. | Translation technology in electronic sourcing |
US8688462B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2014-04-01 | Media Queue, Llc | Media auto exchange system and method |
US8700538B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2014-04-15 | Media Queue, Llc | Media exchange system and method |
US8712867B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2014-04-29 | Media Queue, Llc | System for providing access to playable media |
US9818136B1 (en) | 2003-02-05 | 2017-11-14 | Steven M. Hoffberg | System and method for determining contingent relevance |
US9881308B2 (en) | 2003-04-11 | 2018-01-30 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to facilitate an online promotion relating to a network-based marketplace |
US7409361B2 (en) | 2003-12-08 | 2008-08-05 | Bid Catcher L.P. | Auction system for remote bidding and method |
US8612311B2 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2013-12-17 | Media Queue, Llc | Hybrid distribution method for playable media |
US7685028B2 (en) | 2003-05-28 | 2010-03-23 | Gross John N | Method of testing inventory management/shipping systems |
US8433622B2 (en) | 2003-05-28 | 2013-04-30 | Media Queue, Llc | Method of controlling electronic commerce queue |
US7870066B2 (en) | 2003-06-06 | 2011-01-11 | Ebay Inc. | Automatic dispute resolution |
US8738541B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2014-05-27 | Media Queue, Llc | Method of processing rental requests and returns |
US7742985B1 (en) | 2003-06-26 | 2010-06-22 | Paypal Inc. | Multicurrency exchanges between participants of a network-based transaction facility |
US8781857B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2014-07-15 | Tag, Llc | Method for competitive prescription drug and/or bidding service provider selection |
US8447628B2 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2013-05-21 | Tag, Llc | Method for competitive prescription drug and/or bidding service provider selection |
CA2538661A1 (en) | 2003-09-19 | 2005-03-31 | Tag, Llc | Method for competitive prescription drug and/or bidding service provider selection |
US8131626B2 (en) | 2003-11-17 | 2012-03-06 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | Customizable trading display of market data |
US7428501B2 (en) | 2003-12-08 | 2008-09-23 | Bidcatcher, L.P. | Auction system for remote bidding and method |
US20050131837A1 (en) | 2003-12-15 | 2005-06-16 | Sanctis Jeanne D. | Method, system and program product for communicating e-commerce content over-the-air to mobile devices |
US7792763B2 (en) | 2004-04-12 | 2010-09-07 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to detect outlying behavior in a network-based marketplace |
US9189568B2 (en) | 2004-04-23 | 2015-11-17 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to display and search in a language independent manner |
US7895087B1 (en) | 2004-04-26 | 2011-02-22 | The Jellyvision Lab, Inc. | Method and system for providing an on-line auction |
JP2005323248A (en) | 2004-05-11 | 2005-11-17 | Funai Electric Co Ltd | Television program distribution system, and television program receiving terminal equipment for receiving charged television program distributed from the system |
US8370269B2 (en) | 2004-06-02 | 2013-02-05 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and methods for electronic commerce using personal and business networks |
US7720719B2 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2010-05-18 | France Telecom | Method and system for IMPS-based transient objects |
US7590589B2 (en) | 2004-09-10 | 2009-09-15 | Hoffberg Steven M | Game theoretic prioritization scheme for mobile ad hoc networks permitting hierarchal deference |
US20060089871A1 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2006-04-27 | Kazuhito Takagi | System and method for generating advertising sales |
GB2425626A (en) | 2005-03-24 | 2006-11-01 | Espeed Inc | System for protecting against erroneous price entries in the electronic trading of financial and other instruments |
US7650307B2 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2010-01-19 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within a multi-unit online auction environment |
US7979340B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2011-07-12 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System, program product, and methods for online image handling |
US8874477B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2014-10-28 | Steven Mark Hoffberg | Multifactorial optimization system and method |
US7697827B2 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2010-04-13 | Konicek Jeffrey C | User-friendlier interfaces for a camera |
MX2008011063A (en) | 2006-03-01 | 2009-01-27 | Tag Llc | Method for competitive prescription drug and/or bidding service provider selection. |
US8639782B2 (en) | 2006-08-23 | 2014-01-28 | Ebay, Inc. | Method and system for sharing metadata between interfaces |
US8799218B2 (en) | 2006-12-01 | 2014-08-05 | Ebay Inc. | Business channel synchronization |
US7945503B2 (en) | 2007-02-22 | 2011-05-17 | The Jellyvision Lab, Inc. | On-line auction interface |
US8549407B2 (en) | 2007-12-05 | 2013-10-01 | Ebay Inc. | Multi-dimensional dynamic visual browsing |
US8583480B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2013-11-12 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System, program product, and methods for social network advertising and incentives for same |
US8214804B2 (en) | 2007-12-31 | 2012-07-03 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for assigning computer users to test groups |
US8326662B1 (en) | 2008-06-18 | 2012-12-04 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Positioning E-commerce product related to graphical imputed consumer demand |
US9747622B1 (en) | 2009-03-24 | 2017-08-29 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Point-and-shoot product lister |
US8775398B2 (en) | 2009-06-01 | 2014-07-08 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for determining an order of presentation of search results |
US8676632B1 (en) | 2009-07-16 | 2014-03-18 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Pricing and forecasting |
US9047642B2 (en) | 2011-03-24 | 2015-06-02 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Social choice engine |
CA2841621C (en) | 2011-07-13 | 2023-09-19 | Sbb Business Services Ltd | Computer system and method for conducting auctions over a computer network |
US10546262B2 (en) | 2012-10-19 | 2020-01-28 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Supply chain management system |
US10949876B2 (en) | 2012-10-29 | 2021-03-16 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for management of email marketing campaigns |
US11676192B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2023-06-13 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Localized sort of ranked product recommendations based on predicted user intent |
US11023947B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2021-06-01 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Generating product recommendations using a blend of collaborative and content-based data |
US10810654B1 (en) | 2013-05-06 | 2020-10-20 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method of mapping product attributes between different schemas |
US9483788B2 (en) | 2013-06-25 | 2016-11-01 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for graphically building weighted search queries |
US10929890B2 (en) | 2013-08-15 | 2021-02-23 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method of personalizing online marketing campaigns |
US10872350B1 (en) | 2013-12-06 | 2020-12-22 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for optimizing online marketing based upon relative advertisement placement |
US10380656B2 (en) | 2015-02-27 | 2019-08-13 | Ebay Inc. | Dynamic predefined product reviews |
US10534845B2 (en) | 2016-05-11 | 2020-01-14 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for optimizing electronic document layouts |
US10970769B2 (en) | 2017-03-02 | 2021-04-06 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | Method and system for optimizing website searching with user pathing |
US11514493B1 (en) | 2019-03-25 | 2022-11-29 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for conversational commerce online |
US11205179B1 (en) | 2019-04-26 | 2021-12-21 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System, method, and program product for recognizing and rejecting fraudulent purchase attempts in e-commerce |
US11734368B1 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2023-08-22 | Overstock.Com, Inc. | System and method for creating a consistent personalized web experience across multiple platforms and channels |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
MC2199A1 (en) * | 1990-02-16 | 1992-10-05 | I V P Informations Ventes Publ | AUCTION PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEM |
GB9103907D0 (en) * | 1991-02-25 | 1991-04-10 | Beaumont Maxin International L | Interactive transaction processing system |
US5794219A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1998-08-11 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling |
NL9300266A (en) * | 1993-02-10 | 1994-09-01 | Theodoor Hubertus Maria Joseph | Automated selling system |
US5845265A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1998-12-01 | Mercexchange, L.L.C. | Consignment nodes |
-
1997
- 1997-03-19 CA CA2629281A patent/CA2629281C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-03-19 JP JP9535320A patent/JP2000503789A/en active Pending
- 1997-03-19 AU AU23383/97A patent/AU717594B2/en not_active Expired
- 1997-03-19 EP EP97916124A patent/EP0900424B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-03-19 IL IL12679397A patent/IL126793A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-03-19 AT AT97916124T patent/ATE207638T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1997-03-19 CA CA002253543A patent/CA2253543C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1997-03-19 WO PCT/US1997/004535 patent/WO1997037315A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1997-03-19 DE DE69707668T patent/DE69707668T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU717594B2 (en) | 2000-03-30 |
IL126793A (en) | 2000-10-31 |
AU2338397A (en) | 1997-10-22 |
ATE207638T1 (en) | 2001-11-15 |
EP0900424A1 (en) | 1999-03-10 |
DE69707668D1 (en) | 2001-11-29 |
CA2629281C (en) | 2015-05-05 |
CA2253543C (en) | 2006-05-16 |
JP2000503789A (en) | 2000-03-28 |
DE69707668T2 (en) | 2004-06-17 |
IL126793A0 (en) | 1999-08-17 |
CA2253543A1 (en) | 1997-10-09 |
EP0900424B1 (en) | 2001-10-24 |
WO1997037315A1 (en) | 1997-10-09 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2629281C (en) | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information | |
US5835896A (en) | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information | |
US6243691B1 (en) | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information | |
US7398229B2 (en) | System and method for conducting electronic commerce | |
US7917414B2 (en) | System and method for an automated sales system with remote negotiation and post-sale verification | |
US6415270B1 (en) | Multiple auction coordination method and system | |
US20140114791A1 (en) | System and method for encouraging competitive participation in an auction | |
US20110320304A1 (en) | Auction based procurement system | |
US7272579B1 (en) | Auction based procurement system | |
US20030216959A1 (en) | System and method for rewarding participation in an auction | |
WO2000021013A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for auctions with automatic matching | |
US20040267624A1 (en) | Novel auction method | |
US7765141B1 (en) | Online auction system facilitating flexible terms commodity trading | |
WO2001008072A1 (en) | Internet-based interactive market for sale of products and services | |
CA2529148C (en) | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information | |
US20030216992A1 (en) | Integrated method of exchanging goods electronically | |
KR20010000729A (en) | Method and system for network-based real time auction of stock information |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20170320 |