CA2415119A1 - Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles - Google Patents

Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CA2415119A1
CA2415119A1 CA002415119A CA2415119A CA2415119A1 CA 2415119 A1 CA2415119 A1 CA 2415119A1 CA 002415119 A CA002415119 A CA 002415119A CA 2415119 A CA2415119 A CA 2415119A CA 2415119 A1 CA2415119 A1 CA 2415119A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
animals
animal
subgroup
genotype
growth
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CA002415119A
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
CA2415119C (en
Inventor
Jeremy Francis Taylor
Scott K. Davis
Luke Lind
Sara L.F. Davis
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Viagen Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2415119A1 publication Critical patent/CA2415119A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA2415119C publication Critical patent/CA2415119C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01KANIMAL HUSBANDRY; AVICULTURE; APICULTURE; PISCICULTURE; FISHING; REARING OR BREEDING ANIMALS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; NEW BREEDS OF ANIMALS
    • A01K29/00Other apparatus for animal husbandry
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A22BUTCHERING; MEAT TREATMENT; PROCESSING POULTRY OR FISH
    • A22BSLAUGHTERING
    • A22B5/00Accessories for use during or after slaughtering
    • A22B5/0017Apparatus for cutting, dividing or deboning carcasses
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A22BUTCHERING; MEAT TREATMENT; PROCESSING POULTRY OR FISH
    • A22BSLAUGHTERING
    • A22B5/00Accessories for use during or after slaughtering
    • A22B5/0064Accessories for use during or after slaughtering for classifying or grading carcasses; for measuring back fat
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6888Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for detection or identification of organisms

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

A method of managing and marketing a group of commercial animals, such as cattle, based on a predetermined genetic profile includes the steps of determining, prior to entry of an animal into a feedlot, a genotype of a subject animal with respect to genetic mark-ers for selected ones of at least the traits for growth; quality grade, yield grade, marbling, rib-eye muscle area, dressing percentage and meat tenderness, and feeding the animal utiliz-ing criteria based on the genotype of the animal. The animal is grouped with other animals into a subgroup having either a defined genotype, a similar animal economic value or a com-mon market endpoint, and the subgroup is assigned to a pen. The subgroup is managed, fed, slaughtered and marketed according to the genotypic profile for the subgroup.
The animal is fed each day a ration having a quality determined by using a biological model of potential growth based on the genotypic profile of the animal. Weight and breed data of the animal are gathered at entry into a feedlot, and are used along with the biological model to predict an amount of growth of muscle and fat tissue for each of a plurality of hypothetical rations fed for respective hypothetical periods of time. A net value of the animal is estimated using a bioeconomic model along with at least a cost of feed ration, predicted yield and quality, and corresponding market price. An optimal time to send the subgroup to slaughter is de-termined based on at least the net value estimated using the bioeconomic model. Subgroups having a genotype corresponding to an undesirable genotype are identified and are managed differently.

Claims (17)

1. A method of managing a group of animals comprising:
(a) determining the genotype of each animal in the group using one or more genetic markers for one or more traits selected from the group consisting of growth, quality grade, yield grade, marbling, rib-eye muscle area, dressing percentage, and meat tenderness;
(b) forming subgroups of animals according to the genotypes of the animals, wherein each animal in a subgroup has the same genetic markers; and (c) managing the animals based on the subgroups until the animals are slaughtered.
2. A method of managing a group of animals comprising:
(a) determining the genotype of each animal in the group using one or more genetic markers for one or more traits selected from the group consisting of growth, quality grade, yield grade, marbling, rib-eye muscle area, dressing percentage, and meat tenderness;
(b) predicting an economic value for an animal according to its genotype;
(c) forming subgroups of the animals according to the predicted economic value of the animals, the animals further possessing at least one of the traits; and (d) managing the animals based on the subgroups and/or economic value until the animals are slaughtered.
3. The method of claims 1 or 2, further comprising predicting a hypothetical muscle growth rate and fat tissue accumulation rate based on the genotype of the animals in each of the subgroups.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising gathering weight and breed data of each animal in each subgroup at entry into a feedlot, wherein the weight and breed data are used in predicting muscle growth rate and fat tissue accumulation.
5. The method of claim 2, further comprising predicting the economic value of the animals for each of a plurality of days the animals are fed a ration.
6. The method of claim 2, further comprising predicting the economic value of the subgroups, wherein the predicted value is calculated by summing economic values of each of the animals in a subgroup, the economic values of each animal predicted for each of a plurality of days the animals are fed a ration.
7. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein the animals are cattle.
8. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein the genotype of each animal is determined in step (a) prior to entry of the animal into a feedlot.
9. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein the group of traits in step (a) further consist of meat toughness, slow growth, low meat marbling content, and high meat marbling content.
10. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein in step (c) each subgroup is rationed feed on a daily basis according to the economic value of the animals in the subgroup.
11. The method of claims 1 or 2, further comprising the step of estimating a net value of the subgroup by using a bioeconomic model including a cost of fed ration, and predicted yield, quality, and market price.
12. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of determining an optional time to send the subgroup to slaughter, based on at least the estimated net value of the subgroup using the bioeconomic model.
13. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein in step (c) each subgroup is fed a ration over a plurality of days, wherein the ration and plurality of days is determined by the economic value of the subgroup.
14. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein in step (c) animals in at least one subgroup are treated with a growth promoting implant or fed a ration with feed additives.
15. The method of claim 15, wherein the implant comprises a hormone.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the additives are selected from the group consisting of Vitamin E, a growth promotant, and concentrated proteins.
17. The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein in step (c) animals in at least one subgroup are subjected post-slaughter to an electrical stimulation and/or a mechanical tenderization process.
CA2415119A 2000-07-05 2001-07-05 Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles Expired - Fee Related CA2415119C (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US61049700A 2000-07-05 2000-07-05
US09/610,497 2000-07-05
PCT/US2001/021180 WO2002002822A2 (en) 2000-07-05 2001-07-05 Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2415119A1 true CA2415119A1 (en) 2002-01-10
CA2415119C CA2415119C (en) 2010-03-16

Family

ID=24445250

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA2415119A Expired - Fee Related CA2415119C (en) 2000-07-05 2001-07-05 Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles

Country Status (5)

Country Link
AU (2) AU7180701A (en)
BR (1) BR0112227A (en)
CA (1) CA2415119C (en)
MX (1) MXPA03000098A (en)
WO (1) WO2002002822A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6681717B2 (en) 2000-12-15 2004-01-27 Can Technologies, Inc. Computer system for determining a customized animal feed
WO2004061125A2 (en) 2002-12-31 2004-07-22 Mmi Genomics, Inc. Compositions, methods and systems for inferring bovine traits
US20060036419A1 (en) 2004-07-29 2006-02-16 Can Technologies, Inc. System and method for animal production optimization
WO2018223102A1 (en) * 2017-06-02 2018-12-06 Performance Livestock Analytics, Inc. Adaptive livestock growth modeling using machine learning approaches to predict growth and recommend livestock management operations and activities
CN111134033A (en) * 2019-12-25 2020-05-12 佛山市木记信息技术有限公司 Intelligent animal feeder and method and system thereof
KR102551342B1 (en) * 2023-03-29 2023-07-04 농업회사법인 주식회사 안심한우목장 System to optimize electrical muscle stimulation profile for induction of muscle hypertrophy in livestock

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5374524A (en) * 1988-05-10 1994-12-20 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Solution sandwich hybridization, capture and detection of amplified nucleic acids
MXPA01006130A (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-03-27 Seghersgentec N V Selecting animals for parentally imprinted traits.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU7180701A (en) 2002-01-14
BR0112227A (en) 2004-08-24
CA2415119C (en) 2010-03-16
AU2001271807B2 (en) 2007-01-04
WO2002002822A2 (en) 2002-01-10
MXPA03000098A (en) 2004-06-14
WO2002002822A3 (en) 2002-07-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Hansen et al. Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed “ad libitum” from one or several self-feeders
Hessing et al. Implications of individual behavioural characteristics on performance in pigs
Jackson et al. Phenotypic characterization of Rambouillet sheep expressing the callipyge gene: I. Inheritance of the condition and production characteristics
Wertz et al. Early-weaning and postweaning nutritional management affect feedlot performance, carcass merit, and the relationship of 12th-rib fat, marbling score, and feed efficiency among Angus and Wagyu heifers
DE60318701T2 (en) METHOD FOR IMPROVING EFFICIENCY OF FARMING
Dikeman Cattle production systems to meet future consumer demands
Danner et al. Effect of feeding system on performance and carcass characteristics of yearling steers, steer calves and heifer calves
CA2415119A1 (en) Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles
Holechek et al. Supplementing range livestock.
Watson et al. Effect of hormonal growth promotants on palatability and carcass traits of various muscles from steer and heifer carcasses from a Bos indicus–Bos taurus composite cross
Clark et al. Spring defoliation effects on bluebunch wheatgrass. I. Winter forage quality.
Herring et al. Multi-trait prediction of feed conversion in feedlot cattle
AU2001271807A1 (en) Method of managing and marketing livestock based on genetic profiles
Lipsey et al. Carcass composition of different cattle types related to energy efficiency
YÜKSEL Effects of housing condition, feeding style, and age on fattening performances, comfort, and some slaughterhouse characteristics in Eastern Anatolian Red bulls
Lee et al. Influence of season of birth, sex and paternal line on growth performance and carcass traits in pigs
Jaume et al. The Mallorca Black pig: Production system, conservation and breeding strategies
Clark et al. Matching calving date with forage nutrients: production and economic impacts
Sambhu African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822): an ideal candidate for biowaste management
Barkawi et al. Growth and carcass characteristics of lambs in relation to plasma IGF-I and some histological traits of Longissimus lumbarum and Biceps femoris as affected by breed and age at slaughter
Landblom et al. Effect of weaning date and retained ownership on cattle performance and forage disappearance in spring calving beef systems
Hall et al. Rare and minority British sheep for meat production: the Shropshire and Ryeland as sires, and the Cotswold and primitive breeds as dams
Trukhachev et al. Effect of bull-calf management system on meat productivity
Shrestha et al. Review of Canadian, Outaouais and Rideau Arcott breeds of sheep: 1. Development and characterization
Bruns et al. Duration of Feeding: Decision Points

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
MKLA Lapsed