CA2356149C - Improved method for diffusion coating of metal objects - Google Patents
Improved method for diffusion coating of metal objects Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2356149C CA2356149C CA002356149A CA2356149A CA2356149C CA 2356149 C CA2356149 C CA 2356149C CA 002356149 A CA002356149 A CA 002356149A CA 2356149 A CA2356149 A CA 2356149A CA 2356149 C CA2356149 C CA 2356149C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- chromium
- diffusion
- slurry
- aluminum
- coating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Landscapes
- Solid-Phase Diffusion Into Metallic Material Surfaces (AREA)
- Chemically Coating (AREA)
Abstract
An improved method of diffusion coating a workpiece, such as ferritic tubing employing a ceramic carrier provided with a diffusion composition. The diffusion composition includes a diffusion element such as chromium, silicon, aluminum, and boron. The carrier is subjected to an elevated diffusion temperature in a controlled environment to diffusion coat either the external or internal surface of the workpiece.
Description
METHOD FOR DIFFUSION COATING OF METAL OBJECTS EMPLOYING
CERAMIC CARRIER PROVIDED WITH DIFFUSION COMPOSITION
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates tc> an improved method for diffusion coating of ~,urfaces such as chromizinl; ferri.tic surfaces and, more pnrticul~rly, the interior and exterior surfaces of steel. boiler tubes, pipes and like components, particularly small bore tubing.
Chromizing is a process used to produce a high chromium surface layer on :Lyon or steel by high temperature heating of a solid packing materia7_ containing chromium powder. 'Luis process is used on boiler tubes, pipes, and other components, l.i.ke boiler components, to provide surface which is resistant to exfoliation, i.e.,, high temperature oxidation wi.t:lr subsequent 'breaking away or loss of the oxide :Layer. F3oiler components are often chromized by a process known as pack cementation. This processing technique has been widely used throughout industry for many years.
In the pack cementation proce:>s, a pack mixture comprising chromium, an inert filler (e. g., alumina) and a halide activator (e. g., ammonium chloride) are blended together. The boiler component to be treated, i.e., the tubing or pipe, is filled with the mixture. The component is then loaded into a controlled atmosphere retort or sealed by r_he welding of caps to its ends to produce a self-contained retort. The entire assembly is heated to an elevated temperature and held fc>r a spccifi.ed length of time to allow the desired chemical reactions and subsequent diffusion process to occur. Tire high ~;nsl: 4~~ 14 chrom-ium content surface layer is formed on tl~e surface of tire component by diffusion of chromium into the iron. T'1e component is then cooled to room temperature. The used pack mixture is removed from t:he interior. 'f1e component is then subjected to a post process cleaning step. 'flee end result of this process is a relatively thick (equal or greater than (1.002 inches) chromium diffusion coating on tile internal surface of the tubular t:~oiler component.
This process technique has proven to be effective for chromizing boiler components. However, it has several inherent disadvantages. For example, the mix preparation, loading, and removal steps are tedious and time consuming.
The gravity loading techniques, which are typically employed for fj_lling elongated tubular components, require shop areas with high ceiling:> or floor pits, or both, to accommodate components as long as 30 feet in length.
In addition, it is diffj_r.ult to control pack mix density and composition along the length of the small. bore of tubular components (e.g., le<.>s than one inch internal diameter) with normal l;ravity filling techniques. Mix removal and post process cleaning can also be a problem in small bore tubes.
Moreover, diffusion thermal cycles are relatively long due to the poor thermal conductivity of the pack mix" Finally, large quantities of pack m.ix can be required since the internal cavity of the component to be cliromized must be filled, and this is quite expensive.
Therefore, a need exist;> for an improved method of diffusion coating particularly as relates to cliromi_zing of boiler tubing. Moreover, a general technique for chromizing as well as applyinf; diffusion coatings of other elements, for example, silicon, alumin um and boron, to various configurations and shapes would have significant advantap,es and widespread application.
'r cnSE 4814 SUMI°IARY OF THE INVEN'CION
'the invention comprises an irnprcwed method for dif fu sloe co;cting of the surfaces of workpieces includ:fng, but not limited to, the inside and outside surfaces of tubular components and, as well, configurations with other than tubular geometries.
The inventive techniques comprise providing a ceramic carrier and applying a coating or impregnation composition to the carrier which includes one or more elements which are to be diffused into the workpiece. 'the carrier, after being coated or impregnated with the applied composition, is subjected to an elevated temperature in a controlled environment with the workpiece for a sufficient time to cause the element to diffuse onto and coat the workpiece. .
A chromium containing pack mixture is produced in a form which can be inserted into the internal cavity of the tubing. The pack mixture form, in one embodiment of the invention, comprises inserts like pellets or slugs which are inserted directly into the tubing and, in an alternate embodiment, the pack mixture is blended into a slurry there coated on an inert refractory container, for example, in the form of a spun alumina blanket, braided sleeve, or ceramic insert, or impregnated wihtin <3 formed sleeve.
The slurry is composed of a blended mixture of chromium, alucni.na, vehicle and binder. In some applications, the halide activator is omitted from the insert and separately placed into the component which is to be chromized.
Another aspect of the invention comprises providing elongated ceramic solid inserts which contain the required chromium particles and other ingredients to facilitate chc-omizing of the tubing. 'The chromium containing solid inserts and the tubing t:o be chromized are preheated for a desired amount of time and the inserts placed into the tubing. Thereafter, an activator i~> added to the tubing. 'I~he tubing; is then prepared, by sealing the ends, and subjected to a normal pack cementation thermal cycle.
The inserts, in accordance with further aspects of the inventive technique, comprise ceramic f:Lber cylinders, either impregnated or coated with chromium, or vacuum-formed ceramic fiber sleeves coated with a slurry containing chromium.
Inserts made in accordance with t1e invention can be readily loaded into the tubing by hand, without the use of a crane, in the horizontal position.
After the chromizing step, t:he inserts can be easily removed, resulting in minimal clean-up requirement. The use of the insert significantly reduces the quantity of chromium required as compared to the pack cementation technique.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved alternative to the conventional pack cementation technique of chromizing either the interior or exterior surfaces of ferritic tubing.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the present invention, and the operating advantages attained by its use, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which a preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF 'IHE DRAWINGS
In the accompanying drawings, forming a part of this specification, and in which reference numerals shown in the drawings designate like or corresponding parts throughout the same:
cnal: 4814 Fig. 1 is a longitudinal schematic perspective of an embodiment of tte present invention as a coarse fe,rain sing;
Fig. 2 is similar to Fig. 1 except in this embodiment it is a fine grain slug;
Fig. 3 is a longitudinal sectional illustration of an alternate embodiment of the present invention wherein t:he slug is contained in an outer inert shell;
Fig. 4 is similar to Fig. 3 yet still is another embodiment wherein the slurry mix is in the form of a prefabricated string within an inert shell;
Fig. 5 is a longitudinal schemaCic perspective view of part of a cylindrical ceramic fiber insert containing chromium particles on i.ts surface for use in accordance with the method of the invention;
Fig. 6 is a cross-sectic>n al schematic illustration of a multilayer cylindrical ceramic fiber with a mid-section containing chromium particles;
Fig. 7 is a photomicrograph of as-received 4130 steel materia:L;
Fig. 8 is a photomicrograph of this material after a conventional high-temperature (1700° - 1900°F) aluminizing treatment;
Fig. 9 is a photomicrograph of the inner diameter of an outer tube of this material after the lower temperature aluminizing treatment; and Fig. 10 is similar to F'ig. 9 but is the outer diameter of the inner tube.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the embodiments depicted in Figs. 1 - 6 of the present invention, inserts in the form of slugs or pellets 10, continuous sticks 12, prefabricated strings 14, coated inert sh ells 16 and layered shells 18, insertable into a tubing to be treated, are fabricated from a slurry mix.
Raw materials used to provi<.ie the slurry mix include a diffusion coating material 20, such as chromium or other metal to be diffused, alumina, a lic,uid vehicle, e.g., water, a binder of methyl cellulose or ammonium algin at:e, and a halide activator such as ammonium chlor de, sodium chloride or ammonium bromide. When chromium is employed, it i~, preferably electrolytic grade chromium and is provided, in powdered form, ~ 100 mesh, in an amount of at least 10 percent, by weight, of the slurry mix. The alumina, which functions as an inert filler, is preferably tabular alumina grade T-6L, availab:Le from Alcoa, L 100 mesh, and is also provided in an amount of at least 10 percent, by weight, of the slurry mix. 'ahe water is provided in an amount of at least 12 percent by weight of the slurry mix. 'Ihe binder is present in an amount of about 2 percent by weight of the water. halide activator, in powdered form, i.s provided in an amount of no greater than 14 percent by weight of the slurry mix or at least greater than or equal to 0.25 grams per square inch of the area of the tubing surface to be diffusion coated.
In some applications, an inert refractory container 22 in tl~e form of a woven inert or refractory-type material. such as a spun Kaowool brand alumina fiber in the form of a braided sleeve or string 14 may be used to contain the solidified form as best illustrated in I~ig. 4.
The slurry mixture is prepared by blending the diffusion metal, e.g., chromium, inert filler, and the halide activator, with a premixed solution of the water and binder, utilizing; standard mixing equipment to form a relatively viscous slurry (, 40~ solids).
The solidified shapes, such as pellets or si~igs 10, can be prepared by using standard pelletizing equipment. 'Ihe pellets or slugs 10 in the preferred embodiments have a diameter of less than or equal to one inch and a length of less than or equal to three inches. The pellets may be loaded directly into the internal cavity of a tube for chromizi.ng. Alternatively, the pellets can be loaded into an external sleeve of a woven, inert material 22 prior to insertion into the tube (not :shown) to be chromized as is depicted in Fig. 3. The outer shell 22 i.s an inert: material suci~ as a refractory or a ceramic. The prefabricated slug l0 is situ ated therein. A prefabricated activator slug 24 which may consist of a different coating metal 20 is staggered between the prefabricated slugs 10 within the inert shell 22.
Other elongated solidified inserts can be produced by extruding the slurry mix such as a prefabricated string 14 in Fig. 4.
Subsequent to formation, the inserts 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 are cured by heating in an atmospheric furnace to a temperature between 1.50° and 250°F for a period of at least two hours. 'the inserts are allowed to cool to room temperature before subsequent usage.
Preformed refractory objects, 16, 18 referred to hereafter as a ceramic carrier, in accordance with the present invention, are provided with elements, such as chromium particles and other ingredients, which are to be diffusion coated onto a workpiece. The ceramic carrier 16, 18 is associated with the workpi.ece in a controlled environment, for example, by loading both. into a retort and sealing the retort, and subjected to high (refractory-range) temperatures for a sufficient time period to cause the element to diffuse into and coat the surface of the workpi.ece.
The carrier 16, 18 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention comprises a ceramic fiber composition, such as an alumino-silicate fiber such as, KAOWOOL, a.registered trademark of The I3abcock & Wilcox Company Such inorganic fibers are made from blowing a molten kaolin stream, as is well-known, and are typically formed into blankets or other general forms which are used for thermal insulation in heat treating furnaces, molten metal systems, and like application:. Vacuum forming processes which involve suspending the fibers in a liquid slurry and then evacuating tyre slurry under a vacuum through a fine mesh ~>c:reen scraped to form a desired configuration can also be used for forming the carrier. Such ceramic fiber tubes, sleeves, and boards are often vacuum formed for the foundry and steel industry as molten metal feeding aids (risers or hot tops). Ceramic carriers 16, 18 containing the diffusion elements in the form of particulates can be made by adding the particulates to the fiber slurry and then vacuum forming the carrier_ from the mixture.
Alternatively, a ceramic carrier in the form of a ceramic fiber_ sleeve or other shapes may be made for diffusion coating by vacuum forming a slurry of the fibers and the particles of the element to be diffused, by taking a ceramic fiber sleeve and then painting, dipping or spraying a slurry mixture of the particles onto the sleeve, or by rolling up a ceramic blanket to form a sleeve and then painting this sleeve with a diffusion element or putting the particles into the mid-wall of- the blanket by peeling apart the wal:L of the blanket, or by extruding a slurry of the fibers and the particles o.f the element to be diffused into a desired shape followed by an elevated temperature firing operation t:o drive off tire low temperature volatile constituents from the liquid slurry.
Thus, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is an insert composed of a ceramic material with a composition containing chromium particles.
In the embodiment of the invention illu:~trated in Fig. 5, the insert, designated generally at 16, has a cylindrical configuration. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the <rrt that the concept of the invention is equally applicable to the use of elongated elements in hollow tubular form, to solid cylinders, to multilayerf~d concentric elements and to other elongated forms.
The insert 16 may be comprised primarily of inorganic fibers, particularly highly refractive Fibers composed wholly of alumina and silica, or primarily of alumina and silica.
The insert 16 is provided with chromium particles 20 which initially were contained in an aqueous composition which was applied to the insert 16. For example, the ceramic fiber cylinder can be either impregnated or the outer surface coated with a chromium containing composition. Alternatively, as shown in Fig. 6, an insert 18 is formed of three layers 26, 28, 30. The outer layer 30 is designed to prevent direct contact of chromium with the internaJ_ surface of the ferritic tubing which is to be chromized in order to eliminate adherence of the chromium particles. The :Inner layer 26 has a higher density so as to be less permeable than the outer layer 30, thereby causing the chromium 20 contained in the middle layer 28 to diffuse through the outer layer 30 toward the surface of the tubing (not shown) whiciv is to be.
chromized.
The following examples are illustrative and explanatory of the invention.
All percentages are expressed as weight percentages unless otherwise indicated.
FXAMPLF I
The slurry mixture i_s prepared by blending the chromium, inert filler, and the halide activator to a premixed solution of the water and binder resulting in a relatively viscous fluid suspension. In some instances, it may be desirable to omit the halide activator from t;~is combination. When layered coatings are employed in this technique, the separate slurries eg, chromium based or aluminum based are prepared. Standard mixing/agitation equipment is used an preparing these slurries.
The aqueous compositions used in this example are each prepared by adding ammonium alginate' (SUPERLOID* made by Kelco Co.) to water, mixing the solution, and by blending chromium (8-20 mesh electrolytic chromium,) alumina (8-20 mesh Alcoa tabular alumina -T61) and ammonium chloride in powered form into the solution to form the relatively viscous aqueous slurries of Table 1.
Inserts can be formed in a variety of ways including standard pelletizing equipment. For this example, solid slugs of the compositions given in Table I were poured in a tube having end caps.
The capped tube was evaluated in the retort concept.
The slurry mix was in the form of cylindrical pellets about 1/2 inch in diameter and about .3/4 inch long.
Slurry Chromium Alumina Ammonium Ammonium Water Specimen (% by weight) (% by weight) Chloride Alginate 1% by weightl 1% by weightl (% by weight) 1 14.52 58.10 14.52 0.26 12.60 2 11.56 46.90 11.56 U.87 29.11 *trade-mark TAt3l.f: 2 (:hromizing 'Itierrnal Cycle Calculated Slurry Temp. Time Chrome Specimen (F) (trrs) Atm. Potential (gm/in2) 1 2000 1 Ar 0.32 2 2000 1 Ar U.33 Experimental test results have indicated that chromium must be present in the slurry mix to provide a chromium potential within tire range of C1.3 to 2.0 grams per square inch of surface to be chromized. The best results appear to be obtained when chromium potential is equal to or greater than 0.7 grams per square inch.
If a dry activator is added to inserts when loaded into a tube such as is depicted in Fig. 3, the hygroscopic nature of the preferred activator requires there not to be an excessive delay between loadink of the inserts into the components to be chromized and initiation of the diffusion coating thermal cycle.
EXAMPLE II
The outer surface of a quantity of two-inch internal diameter cylindrical ceramic sleeves 12 -inches long, and having a wall thickness of 1/20 inch were coated by brushing a chromium rich suspension thereon and drying the sleeves to produce chromium contents of 100 gm Cr per linear foot. (0.7'> gms Cr per square inch of internal surface for a 3-1/?-inch internal diameter tube) and 4UC) gm Cr yer linear foot (3.0 gms Cr per s~yaare inch of internal surface for a 3-1/2-inch internal diameter tube). Two of the sleeve> were wrapped in a thin (U.020-inch) Kaowool brand alumina-silicate sheet to determine if providing a physical barrier between the tube to be chromized and the chromium particles would improve tube clean up after thermal cycles were performed.
Each insert was inserted into a length of 3-1/2-inch, schedule 40, Croloy 2-1/4 (ASTM A-335, Gr<rde P-11) pipe which had been grit blasted to provide a clean inner surface. The pipe and insert were preheated to about 180 degrees F prior to inserting the insert. An activator was added to the pipe. The pipe was sealed and evacuated. 'Che combined pipe and insert were then heated to 2200° F, maintained at such temperature for two hours, and cooled to room temperature.
The results are illustrated in the 'fable 3.
The tabulated results and examination of photomicrographs of the specimens indicate that the lower chromium content (0.75 gm Cr/in~ of tube I.D. surface) produced a total chromized layer of about 2.5 mils in thickness.
The increased activator concentration (54 grams vs. 36 grams N114Br) did not produce any observable differences in the chromized layer thickness. In addition, the presence of tl~e thin outer wrap of Kaowool alumina-:>ilicate paper (0.020") did not produce any noticeable differences in the chromized layer thickness with the low chromium content sleeves.
Tubes that were chromiz.ed with the ceramic inserts containing a higher .r chromium content (3 gm Cr/in' of tube I.D, surface) produced chromized layers which ranged from 6.5 to 10 mils with a carbide layer of 0.25 to 0.50 mils in thickness. The chromized layers produced during these trials appear metallographically identical to those produced by the standard pack cementation mix processes.
*trade-mark ChSE 4814 ~I1 tf'1I~. ~D ~1 W
-. O
N cn ~-1 N N I ~ CO ~ I f~ c'J N
Ql r-1 c0 ~, r-I a I I ~~ I I I m I I I
_ ,y E-, N N w r~ r~ am n ~ cJ N
b ~ m a~ cn ~r NN N vY ~ ~ ~Y ~Y ~' ~.t ~, .~ \ \ 1 \ \ \
~ x .~ .~ .-~ I ..-.
o U .fl a ~.~ a I I ~7 ~ ~ ~ I I I I
_ U ~ V H H ~-~--'r-' -" H H H H
a~
G
o G
ca d cn ~~ w d w U ~ d a~ a p., U
O
aJ
f;
cd P-r-1 N
O
S-~
CERAMIC CARRIER PROVIDED WITH DIFFUSION COMPOSITION
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates tc> an improved method for diffusion coating of ~,urfaces such as chromizinl; ferri.tic surfaces and, more pnrticul~rly, the interior and exterior surfaces of steel. boiler tubes, pipes and like components, particularly small bore tubing.
Chromizing is a process used to produce a high chromium surface layer on :Lyon or steel by high temperature heating of a solid packing materia7_ containing chromium powder. 'Luis process is used on boiler tubes, pipes, and other components, l.i.ke boiler components, to provide surface which is resistant to exfoliation, i.e.,, high temperature oxidation wi.t:lr subsequent 'breaking away or loss of the oxide :Layer. F3oiler components are often chromized by a process known as pack cementation. This processing technique has been widely used throughout industry for many years.
In the pack cementation proce:>s, a pack mixture comprising chromium, an inert filler (e. g., alumina) and a halide activator (e. g., ammonium chloride) are blended together. The boiler component to be treated, i.e., the tubing or pipe, is filled with the mixture. The component is then loaded into a controlled atmosphere retort or sealed by r_he welding of caps to its ends to produce a self-contained retort. The entire assembly is heated to an elevated temperature and held fc>r a spccifi.ed length of time to allow the desired chemical reactions and subsequent diffusion process to occur. Tire high ~;nsl: 4~~ 14 chrom-ium content surface layer is formed on tl~e surface of tire component by diffusion of chromium into the iron. T'1e component is then cooled to room temperature. The used pack mixture is removed from t:he interior. 'f1e component is then subjected to a post process cleaning step. 'flee end result of this process is a relatively thick (equal or greater than (1.002 inches) chromium diffusion coating on tile internal surface of the tubular t:~oiler component.
This process technique has proven to be effective for chromizing boiler components. However, it has several inherent disadvantages. For example, the mix preparation, loading, and removal steps are tedious and time consuming.
The gravity loading techniques, which are typically employed for fj_lling elongated tubular components, require shop areas with high ceiling:> or floor pits, or both, to accommodate components as long as 30 feet in length.
In addition, it is diffj_r.ult to control pack mix density and composition along the length of the small. bore of tubular components (e.g., le<.>s than one inch internal diameter) with normal l;ravity filling techniques. Mix removal and post process cleaning can also be a problem in small bore tubes.
Moreover, diffusion thermal cycles are relatively long due to the poor thermal conductivity of the pack mix" Finally, large quantities of pack m.ix can be required since the internal cavity of the component to be cliromized must be filled, and this is quite expensive.
Therefore, a need exist;> for an improved method of diffusion coating particularly as relates to cliromi_zing of boiler tubing. Moreover, a general technique for chromizing as well as applyinf; diffusion coatings of other elements, for example, silicon, alumin um and boron, to various configurations and shapes would have significant advantap,es and widespread application.
'r cnSE 4814 SUMI°IARY OF THE INVEN'CION
'the invention comprises an irnprcwed method for dif fu sloe co;cting of the surfaces of workpieces includ:fng, but not limited to, the inside and outside surfaces of tubular components and, as well, configurations with other than tubular geometries.
The inventive techniques comprise providing a ceramic carrier and applying a coating or impregnation composition to the carrier which includes one or more elements which are to be diffused into the workpiece. 'the carrier, after being coated or impregnated with the applied composition, is subjected to an elevated temperature in a controlled environment with the workpiece for a sufficient time to cause the element to diffuse onto and coat the workpiece. .
A chromium containing pack mixture is produced in a form which can be inserted into the internal cavity of the tubing. The pack mixture form, in one embodiment of the invention, comprises inserts like pellets or slugs which are inserted directly into the tubing and, in an alternate embodiment, the pack mixture is blended into a slurry there coated on an inert refractory container, for example, in the form of a spun alumina blanket, braided sleeve, or ceramic insert, or impregnated wihtin <3 formed sleeve.
The slurry is composed of a blended mixture of chromium, alucni.na, vehicle and binder. In some applications, the halide activator is omitted from the insert and separately placed into the component which is to be chromized.
Another aspect of the invention comprises providing elongated ceramic solid inserts which contain the required chromium particles and other ingredients to facilitate chc-omizing of the tubing. 'The chromium containing solid inserts and the tubing t:o be chromized are preheated for a desired amount of time and the inserts placed into the tubing. Thereafter, an activator i~> added to the tubing. 'I~he tubing; is then prepared, by sealing the ends, and subjected to a normal pack cementation thermal cycle.
The inserts, in accordance with further aspects of the inventive technique, comprise ceramic f:Lber cylinders, either impregnated or coated with chromium, or vacuum-formed ceramic fiber sleeves coated with a slurry containing chromium.
Inserts made in accordance with t1e invention can be readily loaded into the tubing by hand, without the use of a crane, in the horizontal position.
After the chromizing step, t:he inserts can be easily removed, resulting in minimal clean-up requirement. The use of the insert significantly reduces the quantity of chromium required as compared to the pack cementation technique.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved alternative to the conventional pack cementation technique of chromizing either the interior or exterior surfaces of ferritic tubing.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the present invention, and the operating advantages attained by its use, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which a preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF 'IHE DRAWINGS
In the accompanying drawings, forming a part of this specification, and in which reference numerals shown in the drawings designate like or corresponding parts throughout the same:
cnal: 4814 Fig. 1 is a longitudinal schematic perspective of an embodiment of tte present invention as a coarse fe,rain sing;
Fig. 2 is similar to Fig. 1 except in this embodiment it is a fine grain slug;
Fig. 3 is a longitudinal sectional illustration of an alternate embodiment of the present invention wherein t:he slug is contained in an outer inert shell;
Fig. 4 is similar to Fig. 3 yet still is another embodiment wherein the slurry mix is in the form of a prefabricated string within an inert shell;
Fig. 5 is a longitudinal schemaCic perspective view of part of a cylindrical ceramic fiber insert containing chromium particles on i.ts surface for use in accordance with the method of the invention;
Fig. 6 is a cross-sectic>n al schematic illustration of a multilayer cylindrical ceramic fiber with a mid-section containing chromium particles;
Fig. 7 is a photomicrograph of as-received 4130 steel materia:L;
Fig. 8 is a photomicrograph of this material after a conventional high-temperature (1700° - 1900°F) aluminizing treatment;
Fig. 9 is a photomicrograph of the inner diameter of an outer tube of this material after the lower temperature aluminizing treatment; and Fig. 10 is similar to F'ig. 9 but is the outer diameter of the inner tube.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In the embodiments depicted in Figs. 1 - 6 of the present invention, inserts in the form of slugs or pellets 10, continuous sticks 12, prefabricated strings 14, coated inert sh ells 16 and layered shells 18, insertable into a tubing to be treated, are fabricated from a slurry mix.
Raw materials used to provi<.ie the slurry mix include a diffusion coating material 20, such as chromium or other metal to be diffused, alumina, a lic,uid vehicle, e.g., water, a binder of methyl cellulose or ammonium algin at:e, and a halide activator such as ammonium chlor de, sodium chloride or ammonium bromide. When chromium is employed, it i~, preferably electrolytic grade chromium and is provided, in powdered form, ~ 100 mesh, in an amount of at least 10 percent, by weight, of the slurry mix. The alumina, which functions as an inert filler, is preferably tabular alumina grade T-6L, availab:Le from Alcoa, L 100 mesh, and is also provided in an amount of at least 10 percent, by weight, of the slurry mix. 'ahe water is provided in an amount of at least 12 percent by weight of the slurry mix. 'Ihe binder is present in an amount of about 2 percent by weight of the water. halide activator, in powdered form, i.s provided in an amount of no greater than 14 percent by weight of the slurry mix or at least greater than or equal to 0.25 grams per square inch of the area of the tubing surface to be diffusion coated.
In some applications, an inert refractory container 22 in tl~e form of a woven inert or refractory-type material. such as a spun Kaowool brand alumina fiber in the form of a braided sleeve or string 14 may be used to contain the solidified form as best illustrated in I~ig. 4.
The slurry mixture is prepared by blending the diffusion metal, e.g., chromium, inert filler, and the halide activator, with a premixed solution of the water and binder, utilizing; standard mixing equipment to form a relatively viscous slurry (, 40~ solids).
The solidified shapes, such as pellets or si~igs 10, can be prepared by using standard pelletizing equipment. 'Ihe pellets or slugs 10 in the preferred embodiments have a diameter of less than or equal to one inch and a length of less than or equal to three inches. The pellets may be loaded directly into the internal cavity of a tube for chromizi.ng. Alternatively, the pellets can be loaded into an external sleeve of a woven, inert material 22 prior to insertion into the tube (not :shown) to be chromized as is depicted in Fig. 3. The outer shell 22 i.s an inert: material suci~ as a refractory or a ceramic. The prefabricated slug l0 is situ ated therein. A prefabricated activator slug 24 which may consist of a different coating metal 20 is staggered between the prefabricated slugs 10 within the inert shell 22.
Other elongated solidified inserts can be produced by extruding the slurry mix such as a prefabricated string 14 in Fig. 4.
Subsequent to formation, the inserts 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 are cured by heating in an atmospheric furnace to a temperature between 1.50° and 250°F for a period of at least two hours. 'the inserts are allowed to cool to room temperature before subsequent usage.
Preformed refractory objects, 16, 18 referred to hereafter as a ceramic carrier, in accordance with the present invention, are provided with elements, such as chromium particles and other ingredients, which are to be diffusion coated onto a workpiece. The ceramic carrier 16, 18 is associated with the workpi.ece in a controlled environment, for example, by loading both. into a retort and sealing the retort, and subjected to high (refractory-range) temperatures for a sufficient time period to cause the element to diffuse into and coat the surface of the workpi.ece.
The carrier 16, 18 in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention comprises a ceramic fiber composition, such as an alumino-silicate fiber such as, KAOWOOL, a.registered trademark of The I3abcock & Wilcox Company Such inorganic fibers are made from blowing a molten kaolin stream, as is well-known, and are typically formed into blankets or other general forms which are used for thermal insulation in heat treating furnaces, molten metal systems, and like application:. Vacuum forming processes which involve suspending the fibers in a liquid slurry and then evacuating tyre slurry under a vacuum through a fine mesh ~>c:reen scraped to form a desired configuration can also be used for forming the carrier. Such ceramic fiber tubes, sleeves, and boards are often vacuum formed for the foundry and steel industry as molten metal feeding aids (risers or hot tops). Ceramic carriers 16, 18 containing the diffusion elements in the form of particulates can be made by adding the particulates to the fiber slurry and then vacuum forming the carrier_ from the mixture.
Alternatively, a ceramic carrier in the form of a ceramic fiber_ sleeve or other shapes may be made for diffusion coating by vacuum forming a slurry of the fibers and the particles of the element to be diffused, by taking a ceramic fiber sleeve and then painting, dipping or spraying a slurry mixture of the particles onto the sleeve, or by rolling up a ceramic blanket to form a sleeve and then painting this sleeve with a diffusion element or putting the particles into the mid-wall of- the blanket by peeling apart the wal:L of the blanket, or by extruding a slurry of the fibers and the particles o.f the element to be diffused into a desired shape followed by an elevated temperature firing operation t:o drive off tire low temperature volatile constituents from the liquid slurry.
Thus, in accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, there is an insert composed of a ceramic material with a composition containing chromium particles.
In the embodiment of the invention illu:~trated in Fig. 5, the insert, designated generally at 16, has a cylindrical configuration. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the <rrt that the concept of the invention is equally applicable to the use of elongated elements in hollow tubular form, to solid cylinders, to multilayerf~d concentric elements and to other elongated forms.
The insert 16 may be comprised primarily of inorganic fibers, particularly highly refractive Fibers composed wholly of alumina and silica, or primarily of alumina and silica.
The insert 16 is provided with chromium particles 20 which initially were contained in an aqueous composition which was applied to the insert 16. For example, the ceramic fiber cylinder can be either impregnated or the outer surface coated with a chromium containing composition. Alternatively, as shown in Fig. 6, an insert 18 is formed of three layers 26, 28, 30. The outer layer 30 is designed to prevent direct contact of chromium with the internaJ_ surface of the ferritic tubing which is to be chromized in order to eliminate adherence of the chromium particles. The :Inner layer 26 has a higher density so as to be less permeable than the outer layer 30, thereby causing the chromium 20 contained in the middle layer 28 to diffuse through the outer layer 30 toward the surface of the tubing (not shown) whiciv is to be.
chromized.
The following examples are illustrative and explanatory of the invention.
All percentages are expressed as weight percentages unless otherwise indicated.
FXAMPLF I
The slurry mixture i_s prepared by blending the chromium, inert filler, and the halide activator to a premixed solution of the water and binder resulting in a relatively viscous fluid suspension. In some instances, it may be desirable to omit the halide activator from t;~is combination. When layered coatings are employed in this technique, the separate slurries eg, chromium based or aluminum based are prepared. Standard mixing/agitation equipment is used an preparing these slurries.
The aqueous compositions used in this example are each prepared by adding ammonium alginate' (SUPERLOID* made by Kelco Co.) to water, mixing the solution, and by blending chromium (8-20 mesh electrolytic chromium,) alumina (8-20 mesh Alcoa tabular alumina -T61) and ammonium chloride in powered form into the solution to form the relatively viscous aqueous slurries of Table 1.
Inserts can be formed in a variety of ways including standard pelletizing equipment. For this example, solid slugs of the compositions given in Table I were poured in a tube having end caps.
The capped tube was evaluated in the retort concept.
The slurry mix was in the form of cylindrical pellets about 1/2 inch in diameter and about .3/4 inch long.
Slurry Chromium Alumina Ammonium Ammonium Water Specimen (% by weight) (% by weight) Chloride Alginate 1% by weightl 1% by weightl (% by weight) 1 14.52 58.10 14.52 0.26 12.60 2 11.56 46.90 11.56 U.87 29.11 *trade-mark TAt3l.f: 2 (:hromizing 'Itierrnal Cycle Calculated Slurry Temp. Time Chrome Specimen (F) (trrs) Atm. Potential (gm/in2) 1 2000 1 Ar 0.32 2 2000 1 Ar U.33 Experimental test results have indicated that chromium must be present in the slurry mix to provide a chromium potential within tire range of C1.3 to 2.0 grams per square inch of surface to be chromized. The best results appear to be obtained when chromium potential is equal to or greater than 0.7 grams per square inch.
If a dry activator is added to inserts when loaded into a tube such as is depicted in Fig. 3, the hygroscopic nature of the preferred activator requires there not to be an excessive delay between loadink of the inserts into the components to be chromized and initiation of the diffusion coating thermal cycle.
EXAMPLE II
The outer surface of a quantity of two-inch internal diameter cylindrical ceramic sleeves 12 -inches long, and having a wall thickness of 1/20 inch were coated by brushing a chromium rich suspension thereon and drying the sleeves to produce chromium contents of 100 gm Cr per linear foot. (0.7'> gms Cr per square inch of internal surface for a 3-1/?-inch internal diameter tube) and 4UC) gm Cr yer linear foot (3.0 gms Cr per s~yaare inch of internal surface for a 3-1/2-inch internal diameter tube). Two of the sleeve> were wrapped in a thin (U.020-inch) Kaowool brand alumina-silicate sheet to determine if providing a physical barrier between the tube to be chromized and the chromium particles would improve tube clean up after thermal cycles were performed.
Each insert was inserted into a length of 3-1/2-inch, schedule 40, Croloy 2-1/4 (ASTM A-335, Gr<rde P-11) pipe which had been grit blasted to provide a clean inner surface. The pipe and insert were preheated to about 180 degrees F prior to inserting the insert. An activator was added to the pipe. The pipe was sealed and evacuated. 'Che combined pipe and insert were then heated to 2200° F, maintained at such temperature for two hours, and cooled to room temperature.
The results are illustrated in the 'fable 3.
The tabulated results and examination of photomicrographs of the specimens indicate that the lower chromium content (0.75 gm Cr/in~ of tube I.D. surface) produced a total chromized layer of about 2.5 mils in thickness.
The increased activator concentration (54 grams vs. 36 grams N114Br) did not produce any observable differences in the chromized layer thickness. In addition, the presence of tl~e thin outer wrap of Kaowool alumina-:>ilicate paper (0.020") did not produce any noticeable differences in the chromized layer thickness with the low chromium content sleeves.
Tubes that were chromiz.ed with the ceramic inserts containing a higher .r chromium content (3 gm Cr/in' of tube I.D, surface) produced chromized layers which ranged from 6.5 to 10 mils with a carbide layer of 0.25 to 0.50 mils in thickness. The chromized layers produced during these trials appear metallographically identical to those produced by the standard pack cementation mix processes.
*trade-mark ChSE 4814 ~I1 tf'1I~. ~D ~1 W
-. O
N cn ~-1 N N I ~ CO ~ I f~ c'J N
Ql r-1 c0 ~, r-I a I I ~~ I I I m I I I
_ ,y E-, N N w r~ r~ am n ~ cJ N
b ~ m a~ cn ~r NN N vY ~ ~ ~Y ~Y ~' ~.t ~, .~ \ \ 1 \ \ \
~ x .~ .~ .-~ I ..-.
o U .fl a ~.~ a I I ~7 ~ ~ ~ I I I I
_ U ~ V H H ~-~--'r-' -" H H H H
a~
G
o G
ca d cn ~~ w d w U ~ d a~ a p., U
O
aJ
f;
cd P-r-1 N
O
S-~
cr1 o a ~' ' rd ~ ' '_' m w x G
~-7 G G ~, O
d H a G
I
a cd W O vD ~p m I
~ ~ ~ ''' U 1., a N
d W as cn v .n P. ~
H n~
U
cd ~K
a O ~n r rl O
t1 O cb c~1 O
V O cn a U
t~
G
G
cb w O
.--i N
N
vz G
a, .r, Cl7 1 r-~
N N
az H
i:vnt,.toi c TT c A slurry was formed from a composition composed of 1600 ml of 2~ r4ethocel* in list filled water, 50U gms of alumina powder and 8UC1 gms of Alcoa grade 129 aluminum powder.
Two low alloy steal (Grade 413()) tubes were arranged in spaced, concentric relationship; the inner tube being 2-3/8" OD by 0.147"
wall placed inside an outer tube 3-1/2" ()D by 0.254" wall. A
1/16-inch thick layer of the slurry was applied by brushing slurry onto the outside diameter of a 12-inch long inner tube (only) which has been preheated as in Example I. The application of a 1/16 inch thick layer results in an effective coverage of alruminum powder <it 0.3 gram per square inch of surface area to be coated. As in Example I, an activator was added (N114C1) and the pipe sealed and evacuated; the pipe was then heated to 1775°F for three hours followed by a slow furnace cool to room temperature accomplished by shutting off power to the furnace. Subsequent metallurgical examination of the outside diameter surface of the inner tube disclosed an aluminized coating thickness of 5 to 7 mils. In a second case, a 1/8 inch th:LCk layer of the slurry composition was placed on the outer surface of a 12 inch long 2-3/8" OD inner tube to produce an effective coverage of aluminum powder of 0.7 gram per square inch of surface area to be coated. This inner tube was also arranged in spaced, concentric relationsh:Lp inside a larger 3-1/2"
OD by 0.254" wall tube and subjected to floe same thermal. cycle stated in the first case above (1775°F for 3 hours followed by a furnace cool to room temperature). An aluminized coating thickness *trade-marks of 7 to 9 mils was formed on ttie outside diar~eter surface of tire inner tube for the second case.
In both of the cases cited above, in addition to a uniform diffusion coating layer adjacent to the steel tube surface, a heavier excess layer (referred to as a "sintered layer") was evident which appears to be unreac;ted excess aluminum. The thickness of this excess unreacted aluminum layer ranged from 5 to 7 mils for the first case and from 5 to a'_0 mils for the second case. Increasing the time held at the 1775"F temperature would most likely convert more of this excess unreacted layer resulting in a subsequent increase in the aluminum diffusion coating thickness. Increasing the available aluminum during the coating; process from 0.3 grn per square inch for Case ~I1 to 0.7 gm per square inch produced a slight improvement in the coating thickness achieved but also resulted in an increased amount of excess unreacted aluminum. l.t would appear that a lower level of available aluminum (0.3 gm/in?) is sufficient to achieve acceptable aluminum diffusion coating thicknesses.
EXAMPLE LV
The standard thermal. cycles used for aluminum diffusion coating applications, (such as that used in Example III), employ an elevated temperature 1700° - 1900"F cycle to promote the formation of aluminum halide vapors and subsequent diffusion of aluminum into the surface being coated. When coating c:arb on or low alloy steels, this elevated temperature cycle produces a solid state phase transformation in the steel and growC:h of the individual crystals or grains of ttce steel. They>e physical clarny~es in the steel substrate produce a reduction of the mechanical ~trFength of the steel substrate. The deterioration of the steel substrate's mechanical properties resulting from conventional aluminizing treatments generally restricts aluminized materia:Ls to applications where the steel substrate mechanical properties are restricted to lower levels. In some cases, alonized material is given a treat treatment after aluminizing to attempt to improve the mechanical properties of the steel substrate. This additional he<3t treatment increases the processing costs to produce the end product which in some cases may make aluminizing economically unattractive.
To evaluate the potential for aluminizing steel substrates without degrading the steel's mechanical properties, attempts were made to produce aluminized coatings on steel substrates by employing a lower thermal cycle (1275°F - 1300°F) for a longer time (24 hours). In the first case, a slurry was formed from a composition of 32 gms of aluminum powder, 110 gms of colloidal silica solution and 1 gm of Methocel.
A total of 104 gms of the mix, in which the aluminum powder was Alcoa 1401 aluminum powder was coated onto tine outer surface of the inner tube and the inner surface of the outer tube, each of which were 6 inches long, at 100 gms/foot (0.5 gms/in'). As in Example III, activator was added and the tubes sealed and evacuated; and then heated at 1275° - 1300°F for about 24 hours followed by a furnace cool to room temps=rature. 'The resulting aluminized coating thickness was 1 to 2 mils.
In a second case, Alcoa 718 Grade A1-12~ silicon alloy powder was substituted for the Alcoa 1401 pure aluminum powder. It was speculated that an alloy of aluminum plus silicon with a lower melting temperature than a pure aluminum powder would provide a more active aluminum halide atmosphere at the 1275° - 130U°F
temperature range which would enhance the aluminizing process kinetics. The same process paramer_ers were used for this second case with the exception of the substitution of the Alcoa 718 Grade A1-12 silicon powder for the pure alumium Alcoa 1401 grade. The use of the A1-Silicon powder did not produce any measurable layer of vapor deposited coating on the steel substrate. Although the exact cause for this failure to produce a coating was not determined, the Silicon addition apparently interferes with the formation of the aluminum halide species either by dilution of tire total available aluminum at a fixed amount of alloy powder or by a chemical interaction with the halide activator.
The use of a lower temperature (1275° - 13U0°F) thermal.
cycle for this Example was designed to minimize a change in the mechanical properties of the steel substrate. Figs. 7 - 10 compare the microstructure of the 4130 steel material. Fig. 7 shows the microstructure of the as-received 4130 tubing. Fig. 8 is afts>_r a conventional high temperature (1700° - 1900°F) aluminizing treatment. Figs. 9 and 10 are after the lower temperature aluminizing treatment. All of these photomicrographs are at the same magnification. Examination of the steel substrate in each figure reveals that the conventional aluminizing treatment in Fig. 8 results in substantial grain growth in the steel substrate. Whereas in Figs. 9 and 10 the steel sul>str,it:e subjected to tte lower temperature thermal cycle is very slrnilar to the as-received steel substrate (Fig. 7) in microstructura:L characteristics. The lack of any substantial grain ~;rowtl in the steel substrates subjected to the lower thermal cycle indicates that the mechanical properties of these steel substrates :should be at ~r near the levels present in the as-received tubing. Although the aluminized coating thickness obtained at the 1275° - 1300°F treatment is much lower (1 to 2 mils) than the standard treatment (5-9 mils) the aluminized coating appears to be uniform in coverage and should provide a corrosion protective barrier to the steel substrate which may be acceptable for many applications.
FXAIrIPLE V
A demonstration wa=s pf~rformed using a preformed refractory sleeve (e. g. objects 16, 18 in Figs. 5 and 6) by the use of a vacuum farmed sleeve containing aluminum powders suspended in the refractory sleeve.
The refractory sleeve insert was vacuum formed into a 2 x 1/2 inch diameter tubular sleeve from a batch composition comprising 50~
Alcoa 1401 aluminum, 47.501 Bulk D fiber and 0.151 LudoY with starch added in sufficient duantit:ies to flocculate the aluminum powder to the fiber. The sleeve was dipped in <3 rigidizer (colloidal silica) dried at 125°F and w<is found to have a density of 24 to 25 pounds per cubic foot, and an aluminum content of about 100 gm/ft. (0.5 gm/in2).
*trade mark The sleeve was placed in between the two concentric tubes into which an activator was placed anct the tubes sealed as in Examples III and IV. 'Ihe tubes wore heated at 1275° - 1300°F for about 24 hours followed by a furnace cool to room temperature. Thereaft=er, the inner surface ~f the outer tube was found to have an aluminized thickness of 1 to 1.5 mils and the outer surface of the inner tube was found to have an aluminized thickness of 0.5 to 1.0 mils.
This example demonstrates that a refractory carrier with metal powder suspended in the carrier can be used directly as a substitute for a slurry application without any required changes in the aluminizing process parameters.
To compare the refractory carrier sleeve method employed for Example V, Case 1, a duplicate sample prepared via the slurry method was subjected to the same thermal cycle simultaneously as Example V, Case 1. The slurry used for the Example V, Case 2 was prepared in precisely the same method as the sample cited in Example IV, Case 1 using pure aluminum powder applied directly to the tube surfaces.
This slurry/substrate r_onfiguration was subjected to a 1275° -1300°F, 24 hour cycle simultaneously with Example V, Case 1. An aluminized surface of 1/2 to 1 mil resulted although the coating coverage was somewhat nonuniform.
The inconsistent coating coverage obtained in Example V, Case 2 as well as the inability to coat. the steel substrate in Example IV, Case 2 suggest the experimental conditions chosen for Examples IV
and V might be near a threshold where slight deviations in available aluminum content produce inconsistent coating response. The use of higher levels of available aluminum and/or activator for the lower temperature thermal cycle may be required to insure reproducible results.
The test conditions used for Examples III, IV and V are summarized in Table 4. The results of the experimental trials cited in Examples III, IV and V are illustrated in TablE: S.
TEST CONDITIC>NS FOR ALiJriINIZIN(~ TRIM, SERIES*
A1 Content 2 Application Thermal Example ~1 Case ~I I;m/foot (gm/in ) Method Cycle 3 1 62 (0.3) Slurry On 1775F - 3Hrs;
3 2 151 (0.7) Inner 'Tube Only Furnace Cool 4 1 100 (0.5) Slurry On 1275-1300F
- 24 Hrs;
4 2 100 (0.5) Loth 'Pubes Furnace Cool (A1-12 Si Powder) 1 100 (0.5) Sleeve from IPD~'~*1275-1300F
-24 Hrs;
~-7 G G ~, O
d H a G
I
a cd W O vD ~p m I
~ ~ ~ ''' U 1., a N
d W as cn v .n P. ~
H n~
U
cd ~K
a O ~n r rl O
t1 O cb c~1 O
V O cn a U
t~
G
G
cb w O
.--i N
N
vz G
a, .r, Cl7 1 r-~
N N
az H
i:vnt,.toi c TT c A slurry was formed from a composition composed of 1600 ml of 2~ r4ethocel* in list filled water, 50U gms of alumina powder and 8UC1 gms of Alcoa grade 129 aluminum powder.
Two low alloy steal (Grade 413()) tubes were arranged in spaced, concentric relationship; the inner tube being 2-3/8" OD by 0.147"
wall placed inside an outer tube 3-1/2" ()D by 0.254" wall. A
1/16-inch thick layer of the slurry was applied by brushing slurry onto the outside diameter of a 12-inch long inner tube (only) which has been preheated as in Example I. The application of a 1/16 inch thick layer results in an effective coverage of alruminum powder <it 0.3 gram per square inch of surface area to be coated. As in Example I, an activator was added (N114C1) and the pipe sealed and evacuated; the pipe was then heated to 1775°F for three hours followed by a slow furnace cool to room temperature accomplished by shutting off power to the furnace. Subsequent metallurgical examination of the outside diameter surface of the inner tube disclosed an aluminized coating thickness of 5 to 7 mils. In a second case, a 1/8 inch th:LCk layer of the slurry composition was placed on the outer surface of a 12 inch long 2-3/8" OD inner tube to produce an effective coverage of aluminum powder of 0.7 gram per square inch of surface area to be coated. This inner tube was also arranged in spaced, concentric relationsh:Lp inside a larger 3-1/2"
OD by 0.254" wall tube and subjected to floe same thermal. cycle stated in the first case above (1775°F for 3 hours followed by a furnace cool to room temperature). An aluminized coating thickness *trade-marks of 7 to 9 mils was formed on ttie outside diar~eter surface of tire inner tube for the second case.
In both of the cases cited above, in addition to a uniform diffusion coating layer adjacent to the steel tube surface, a heavier excess layer (referred to as a "sintered layer") was evident which appears to be unreac;ted excess aluminum. The thickness of this excess unreacted aluminum layer ranged from 5 to 7 mils for the first case and from 5 to a'_0 mils for the second case. Increasing the time held at the 1775"F temperature would most likely convert more of this excess unreacted layer resulting in a subsequent increase in the aluminum diffusion coating thickness. Increasing the available aluminum during the coating; process from 0.3 grn per square inch for Case ~I1 to 0.7 gm per square inch produced a slight improvement in the coating thickness achieved but also resulted in an increased amount of excess unreacted aluminum. l.t would appear that a lower level of available aluminum (0.3 gm/in?) is sufficient to achieve acceptable aluminum diffusion coating thicknesses.
EXAMPLE LV
The standard thermal. cycles used for aluminum diffusion coating applications, (such as that used in Example III), employ an elevated temperature 1700° - 1900"F cycle to promote the formation of aluminum halide vapors and subsequent diffusion of aluminum into the surface being coated. When coating c:arb on or low alloy steels, this elevated temperature cycle produces a solid state phase transformation in the steel and growC:h of the individual crystals or grains of ttce steel. They>e physical clarny~es in the steel substrate produce a reduction of the mechanical ~trFength of the steel substrate. The deterioration of the steel substrate's mechanical properties resulting from conventional aluminizing treatments generally restricts aluminized materia:Ls to applications where the steel substrate mechanical properties are restricted to lower levels. In some cases, alonized material is given a treat treatment after aluminizing to attempt to improve the mechanical properties of the steel substrate. This additional he<3t treatment increases the processing costs to produce the end product which in some cases may make aluminizing economically unattractive.
To evaluate the potential for aluminizing steel substrates without degrading the steel's mechanical properties, attempts were made to produce aluminized coatings on steel substrates by employing a lower thermal cycle (1275°F - 1300°F) for a longer time (24 hours). In the first case, a slurry was formed from a composition of 32 gms of aluminum powder, 110 gms of colloidal silica solution and 1 gm of Methocel.
A total of 104 gms of the mix, in which the aluminum powder was Alcoa 1401 aluminum powder was coated onto tine outer surface of the inner tube and the inner surface of the outer tube, each of which were 6 inches long, at 100 gms/foot (0.5 gms/in'). As in Example III, activator was added and the tubes sealed and evacuated; and then heated at 1275° - 1300°F for about 24 hours followed by a furnace cool to room temps=rature. 'The resulting aluminized coating thickness was 1 to 2 mils.
In a second case, Alcoa 718 Grade A1-12~ silicon alloy powder was substituted for the Alcoa 1401 pure aluminum powder. It was speculated that an alloy of aluminum plus silicon with a lower melting temperature than a pure aluminum powder would provide a more active aluminum halide atmosphere at the 1275° - 130U°F
temperature range which would enhance the aluminizing process kinetics. The same process paramer_ers were used for this second case with the exception of the substitution of the Alcoa 718 Grade A1-12 silicon powder for the pure alumium Alcoa 1401 grade. The use of the A1-Silicon powder did not produce any measurable layer of vapor deposited coating on the steel substrate. Although the exact cause for this failure to produce a coating was not determined, the Silicon addition apparently interferes with the formation of the aluminum halide species either by dilution of tire total available aluminum at a fixed amount of alloy powder or by a chemical interaction with the halide activator.
The use of a lower temperature (1275° - 13U0°F) thermal.
cycle for this Example was designed to minimize a change in the mechanical properties of the steel substrate. Figs. 7 - 10 compare the microstructure of the 4130 steel material. Fig. 7 shows the microstructure of the as-received 4130 tubing. Fig. 8 is afts>_r a conventional high temperature (1700° - 1900°F) aluminizing treatment. Figs. 9 and 10 are after the lower temperature aluminizing treatment. All of these photomicrographs are at the same magnification. Examination of the steel substrate in each figure reveals that the conventional aluminizing treatment in Fig. 8 results in substantial grain growth in the steel substrate. Whereas in Figs. 9 and 10 the steel sul>str,it:e subjected to tte lower temperature thermal cycle is very slrnilar to the as-received steel substrate (Fig. 7) in microstructura:L characteristics. The lack of any substantial grain ~;rowtl in the steel substrates subjected to the lower thermal cycle indicates that the mechanical properties of these steel substrates :should be at ~r near the levels present in the as-received tubing. Although the aluminized coating thickness obtained at the 1275° - 1300°F treatment is much lower (1 to 2 mils) than the standard treatment (5-9 mils) the aluminized coating appears to be uniform in coverage and should provide a corrosion protective barrier to the steel substrate which may be acceptable for many applications.
FXAIrIPLE V
A demonstration wa=s pf~rformed using a preformed refractory sleeve (e. g. objects 16, 18 in Figs. 5 and 6) by the use of a vacuum farmed sleeve containing aluminum powders suspended in the refractory sleeve.
The refractory sleeve insert was vacuum formed into a 2 x 1/2 inch diameter tubular sleeve from a batch composition comprising 50~
Alcoa 1401 aluminum, 47.501 Bulk D fiber and 0.151 LudoY with starch added in sufficient duantit:ies to flocculate the aluminum powder to the fiber. The sleeve was dipped in <3 rigidizer (colloidal silica) dried at 125°F and w<is found to have a density of 24 to 25 pounds per cubic foot, and an aluminum content of about 100 gm/ft. (0.5 gm/in2).
*trade mark The sleeve was placed in between the two concentric tubes into which an activator was placed anct the tubes sealed as in Examples III and IV. 'Ihe tubes wore heated at 1275° - 1300°F for about 24 hours followed by a furnace cool to room temperature. Thereaft=er, the inner surface ~f the outer tube was found to have an aluminized thickness of 1 to 1.5 mils and the outer surface of the inner tube was found to have an aluminized thickness of 0.5 to 1.0 mils.
This example demonstrates that a refractory carrier with metal powder suspended in the carrier can be used directly as a substitute for a slurry application without any required changes in the aluminizing process parameters.
To compare the refractory carrier sleeve method employed for Example V, Case 1, a duplicate sample prepared via the slurry method was subjected to the same thermal cycle simultaneously as Example V, Case 1. The slurry used for the Example V, Case 2 was prepared in precisely the same method as the sample cited in Example IV, Case 1 using pure aluminum powder applied directly to the tube surfaces.
This slurry/substrate r_onfiguration was subjected to a 1275° -1300°F, 24 hour cycle simultaneously with Example V, Case 1. An aluminized surface of 1/2 to 1 mil resulted although the coating coverage was somewhat nonuniform.
The inconsistent coating coverage obtained in Example V, Case 2 as well as the inability to coat. the steel substrate in Example IV, Case 2 suggest the experimental conditions chosen for Examples IV
and V might be near a threshold where slight deviations in available aluminum content produce inconsistent coating response. The use of higher levels of available aluminum and/or activator for the lower temperature thermal cycle may be required to insure reproducible results.
The test conditions used for Examples III, IV and V are summarized in Table 4. The results of the experimental trials cited in Examples III, IV and V are illustrated in TablE: S.
TEST CONDITIC>NS FOR ALiJriINIZIN(~ TRIM, SERIES*
A1 Content 2 Application Thermal Example ~1 Case ~I I;m/foot (gm/in ) Method Cycle 3 1 62 (0.3) Slurry On 1775F - 3Hrs;
3 2 151 (0.7) Inner 'Tube Only Furnace Cool 4 1 100 (0.5) Slurry On 1275-1300F
- 24 Hrs;
4 2 100 (0.5) Loth 'Pubes Furnace Cool (A1-12 Si Powder) 1 100 (0.5) Sleeve from IPD~'~*1275-1300F
-24 Hrs;
5 2 100 (0.5) Slurry on Both Furnace Cool Tubes *36 gms NH4C1 Activator used for al:L tests.
**Industrial Products Division CASE: 4814 'IAI~I,E S
ItESIJh'IS OI? ALUMI~:L'I.LNG 'fRLAL.S
Excess Almminized SinterecE A1 Example I~ Case II Coat ing 'fhi.ck.ness (Mil s) Layer (Irtil.s) 3 1. 5 - 7 5 - 7 3 2 i - 9 5 - 20 4 ?_ __- _-_ 1 outer tube l - 1.5 2 - 3 1 inner tube 0.5 - 1.0 ---5 2 1/;~ - 1 but non-uniform coating coverage The foregoing examples are not intended to be limiting in liow the invention can be practiced. Although the process described above pertains to diffusion coating the internal_ surface of tubular shapes with chromium and aluminum, it should be understood that the method of the present invention may also be used for applying diffusion coatings of other elements (e. g., silicon, boron) or combinations thereof, for the outside diameter as well as the inside diameter, and for configurations other than tubular geometries such as solids, rectangles, etc. Although kaolin ceramic fiber preforms have been tested, inorganic fibers from other minerals may 1'e used and preforms from nonfibrous ceramics, such as porous insulated firebrick. The preforms need not be ho:Llow in shape for use in tubing, and in fact fc~r <.>rnall tubing, small solid, cylinders may be preferred for preforms due to ease of manufacture.
**Industrial Products Division CASE: 4814 'IAI~I,E S
ItESIJh'IS OI? ALUMI~:L'I.LNG 'fRLAL.S
Excess Almminized SinterecE A1 Example I~ Case II Coat ing 'fhi.ck.ness (Mil s) Layer (Irtil.s) 3 1. 5 - 7 5 - 7 3 2 i - 9 5 - 20 4 ?_ __- _-_ 1 outer tube l - 1.5 2 - 3 1 inner tube 0.5 - 1.0 ---5 2 1/;~ - 1 but non-uniform coating coverage The foregoing examples are not intended to be limiting in liow the invention can be practiced. Although the process described above pertains to diffusion coating the internal_ surface of tubular shapes with chromium and aluminum, it should be understood that the method of the present invention may also be used for applying diffusion coatings of other elements (e. g., silicon, boron) or combinations thereof, for the outside diameter as well as the inside diameter, and for configurations other than tubular geometries such as solids, rectangles, etc. Although kaolin ceramic fiber preforms have been tested, inorganic fibers from other minerals may 1'e used and preforms from nonfibrous ceramics, such as porous insulated firebrick. The preforms need not be ho:Llow in shape for use in tubing, and in fact fc~r <.>rnall tubing, small solid, cylinders may be preferred for preforms due to ease of manufacture.
Claims
CLAIM:
A method for aluminizing a ferritic material, comprising the steps of:
forming an aluminum slurry composition;
applying said aluminum slurry composition to the ferritic material for form coating;
adding a halide activator to the coated ferritic material;
and heating the coated ferritic material to a temperature of about 1275°F to about 1300°F for substantially 24 hours;
wherein said aluminum slurry composition comprises methyl cellulose, alumina, aluminum powder and water.
A method for aluminizing a ferritic material, comprising the steps of:
forming an aluminum slurry composition;
applying said aluminum slurry composition to the ferritic material for form coating;
adding a halide activator to the coated ferritic material;
and heating the coated ferritic material to a temperature of about 1275°F to about 1300°F for substantially 24 hours;
wherein said aluminum slurry composition comprises methyl cellulose, alumina, aluminum powder and water.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US07/486,481 US5041309A (en) | 1990-02-28 | 1990-02-28 | Method of chromizing a workpiece by applying a coating containing chromium particles onto a ceramic carrier, positioning the carrier proximate the workpiece, and heating both carrier and workpiece to diffuse chromium particles into the workpiece |
US486,481 | 1990-02-28 | ||
CA002033018A CA2033018C (en) | 1990-02-28 | 1990-12-21 | Method for diffusion coating of metal objects employing ceramic carrier provided with diffusion composition |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002033018A Division CA2033018C (en) | 1990-02-28 | 1990-12-21 | Method for diffusion coating of metal objects employing ceramic carrier provided with diffusion composition |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2356149A1 CA2356149A1 (en) | 1991-08-29 |
CA2356149C true CA2356149C (en) | 2005-09-20 |
Family
ID=25674425
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002356149A Expired - Lifetime CA2356149C (en) | 1990-02-28 | 1990-12-21 | Improved method for diffusion coating of metal objects |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CA (1) | CA2356149C (en) |
-
1990
- 1990-12-21 CA CA002356149A patent/CA2356149C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2356149A1 (en) | 1991-08-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5041309A (en) | Method of chromizing a workpiece by applying a coating containing chromium particles onto a ceramic carrier, positioning the carrier proximate the workpiece, and heating both carrier and workpiece to diffuse chromium particles into the workpiece | |
US5135777A (en) | Method for diffusion coating a workpiece with Cr, Si, Al or B by placing coated ceramic alumino-silicate fibers next to the workpiece and heating to diffuse the diffusion coating into the workpiece | |
US4350719A (en) | Diffusion coating and products therefrom | |
US5208071A (en) | Method for aluminizing a ferritic workpiece by coating it with an aqueous alumina slurry, adding a halide activator, and heating | |
JPS58185488A (en) | Oxidation-resistant and corrosion-resistant solid carbon product and manufacture | |
AU677709B2 (en) | Coating compositions for articles of graphite-alumina refractory material | |
US4476916A (en) | Method of casting metal matrix composite in ceramic shell mold | |
US4904501A (en) | Method for chromizing of boiler components | |
US5340014A (en) | Combustible slurry for joining metallic or ceramic surfaces or for coating metallic, ceramic and refractory surfaces | |
US5391606A (en) | Emissive coatings for investment casting molds | |
US5441767A (en) | Pack coating process for articles containing small passageways | |
CA2356149C (en) | Improved method for diffusion coating of metal objects | |
JPS61262625A (en) | Protective pipe for thermocouple and its preparation | |
US5468690A (en) | Combustible slurry for joining metallic or ceramic surfaces or for coating metallic, ceramic and refractory surfaces | |
US5120580A (en) | Methods of producing ceramic and ceramic composite bodies | |
WO1994016859A1 (en) | Combustible slurry for joining metallic or ceramic surfaces or for coating metallic, ceramic and refractory surfaces | |
JPH0257135B2 (en) | ||
PL70988B1 (en) | ||
US4929473A (en) | Corrosion resistance of low carbon steels in a vanadium, sulfur and sodium environment at high temperatures | |
US3771974A (en) | Surface-coated metal material having resistance to molten tin | |
US3393084A (en) | Coating carbon substrates with refractory metal carbides | |
CA1191435A (en) | Method for forming a carbide layer on the surface of a ferrous alloy article or a cemented carbide article | |
EP2927345B1 (en) | Coated articles and method of making the same. | |
US4370363A (en) | Coating compound for silica bricks | |
US4404154A (en) | Method for preparing corrosion-resistant ceramic shapes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKEX | Expiry |