CA2355943A1 - Method and apparatus for controlling the ratio of an output signal and an input signal - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for controlling the ratio of an output signal and an input signal Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2355943A1 CA2355943A1 CA002355943A CA2355943A CA2355943A1 CA 2355943 A1 CA2355943 A1 CA 2355943A1 CA 002355943 A CA002355943 A CA 002355943A CA 2355943 A CA2355943 A CA 2355943A CA 2355943 A1 CA2355943 A1 CA 2355943A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- signal
- amplifier unit
- input
- output
- optical
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 40
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 85
- 230000003321 amplification Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000003199 nucleic acid amplification method Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 229910052691 Erbium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- -1 erbium ions Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000008247 Echinochloa frumentacea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910000530 Gallium indium arsenide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 240000004072 Panicum sumatrense Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910052777 Praseodymium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- UYAHIZSMUZPPFV-UHFFFAOYSA-N erbium Chemical compound [Er] UYAHIZSMUZPPFV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005281 excited state Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- PUDIUYLPXJFUGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N praseodymium atom Chemical compound [Pr] PUDIUYLPXJFUGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052761 rare earth metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
- H04B10/29—Repeaters
- H04B10/291—Repeaters in which processing or amplification is carried out without conversion of the main signal from optical form
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H03—ELECTRONIC CIRCUITRY
- H03G—CONTROL OF AMPLIFICATION
- H03G3/00—Gain control in amplifiers or frequency changers
- H03G3/20—Automatic control
- H03G3/30—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices
- H03G3/3084—Automatic control in amplifiers having semiconductor devices in receivers or transmitters for electromagnetic waves other than radiowaves, e.g. lightwaves
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B10/00—Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Lasers (AREA)
- Control Of Amplification And Gain Control (AREA)
- Optical Communication System (AREA)
Abstract
The operating ratio of an input signal and an output signal of a device (for example, the gain of an amplifier) is controlled by the use of two signals having respective levels corresponding to the input and output signal levels . The ratio is controlled to a target value based on a difference between the two signals, without the need for either a reference signal representing the target value or a division operation to calculate the operating ratio. In a preferred mode, the two signals are produced by corresponding amplifier unit s which have known gains and which are connected, respectively, to the input a nd the output of the device.
Description
METHOD AND APPARATUS I=OR CONTROLLING THE RATIO
This.application claims the benefit of II.S. Provisional Patent Application Number 601113,083, filed ~ecember 21, 1998.
Backctround of the Invention This invention relates to a method and apparatus for controlling a ratio of an output signal and an input signal of a device. The invention can be implemented using relatively simple control electronics and is suitable for a wide variety of appiications including, for example, electronic control of electrical and optical amplifiers and attenuato~rs.
Conventional signal ratio control techniques typically involve monitoring an output signal or an input signal of a devices relative to an external reference signal that is set in accordance with a predetermined target ratio. The device is controlled to operate at the target ratio based on an error signal representing a difference between the monitored signal and the reference signal.
Another conventional technique involves monitoring both the output signal and the input signal of a device in order to determine a ratio of the two signals. The ratio thus determined is compared with an external reference signal, corresponding to the target ratio, in order to generate an error signal representing the difference between the determined ratio and the target ratio.
The device is controlled to operate at the target ratio based on the error signal.
Fig. 1 illustrates the conventional technique just described. In Fig. 1, a divider 12 receives signal levels x and y proportional to the input and output w0 00138318 PCTIUS99/29679 signal levels of a controlled device 10, respectively. That is, x = C~X and y =
C2Y, where X and Y are the input and output signal levels, respectively, and and Cz are proportionality constants depending upon the particular system design (often C~ = C2 }. The signal levels x and y may, for example, represent voltage, current, or power levels of the input and output signals.
The ratio G of the output signal level to the input signal level may be represented as follows:
G = (Y/X) = K(ylx) . . . ( 1 ) where K = C2/C~, Thus, the signal levels x and y are related as follows:
y = Gx/K . . . (2) The divider 12 performs a division operation based on the inputs x and y, and outputs a ratio signal proportional to the ratio G:
y/x = GIK . . . (3) The ratio signal is supplied to a subtrac;tor 14. Also supplied to the subtractor is a specified reference signal level Gsp = GTIK, where GT is the target ratio: The subtractor 14 subtracts the rneasured ratio ylx from the specified ratio Gsp to generate an error signal level E:
E = GSP - ylx = (G-rIK) - (GIK) _ (GT - G)/K . . . (4) The error E is supplied to a controller 16 which adjusts the device operation in order to bring the error E to zero. In this state, G becomes equal to GT as will be recognized from Equation (4).
Disclosure of the Invention The present invention reflects a new and unique approach to the ratio 2~ control process that does not require an external reference signal or a division operation as in conventional techniques. Briefly speaking, the invention utilizes first and second signals having levels corresponding to the input signal level and the output signal level of the device, respectively. As will be seen hereinafter, by subtracting one of the signals from the other, an error signal is generated for supply to a controller which, in turn, controls the device operation 3 v to bring the error signal level to zero. In this ;>tate, the ratio of the input and output signal levels of the device will match a predetermined target ratio.
As shown in the illustrative embodiments hereinafter, the first and second signals may be produced, respectively, using first and second amplifier units of known gains. When the error signal level is zero, the ratio of the input and. output signal levels matches a predetermined target ratio based on the known gains of the first and second amplifier units.
Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating basic principles of implementation using first and second amplifier units as just described. In Fig. 2, an input-side amplifier unit 23 having a known gain G; and an output-side amplifier unit 25 having a known gain Go are connected to the input and output, respectively, of a device 20 to be controlled (the connections having been omitted from the drainring for simplicity). The input-side amplifier unit 23 produces a signal having a level S; = G;x, where x is proportional to the input signal level of the device 20. The output-side amplifier unit 25 produces a signal having a level So = Goy, where y is proportions! to the outpuit signal level of the device 20.
The signals from the input-side and output-side amplifier units are supplied to a subtractor 24, which produces an error signal having a level Serr:
Serr = So - Si . . . (5) The error Semis supplied to a controller 26, which adjusts the operation of device 20 so as to bring the error Serr to zero and to maintain this condition.
Substituting for So and S;, Equation (5) can be rewritten as follows:
Serr = Goy - Gix . . . (6) Substituting GxIK for y (see Equation (:?)) in Equation (6) yields:
Serr = (GoGx/K) - G;x = x{(GoGIK) - G;} . . . (7) Multiplying the right-hand side of Equation (7) by G;IG; yields:
Serr = Gix'~(GoIKG;)G - 1} . . . (8) As is evident from Equation (8), Serr willl be zero when G = KG;IGo. In other words, the selection of the input-side and output-side amplifier units or, more precisely, their gains-establishes a target ratio WO 00!38318 PCT/US99/29679 GT = KG;IGo. And controlling device 10 to maintain Serr at zero will thus result in a constant ratio G = GT = KG;/Go.
The same results are obtained if the minuend and the subtrahend in Equation (5) are reversed:
Sen = S; - So . . . (5') Serr may thus be expressed more generally as follows:
Serr = '!' (So - Si) . . . (9) As will be appreciated from the foregoing discussion, the present invention does not require an external reference signal representing the target input-output signal ratio and does not require .a division to determine the actual operating ratio G. Instead, the control operation is based on a simple subtraction of signals having levels corresponding to the input and output signal levels. By avoiding the need for an external reference signal and a division operation, as are used in conventional techniques, the present invention offers the advantages of simplified control electronics and high control speeds at low cost.
Furthermore, the principles of the invention are not limited to application to any particular device or class of devices, or to the use of particular components to produce the signals to be subtracted. It will thus be understood that the applications mentioned herein, as well as the illustrative embodiments, are merely exemplary.
The use of amplifier units to produce the signals to be subtracted may be preferred; as in the illustrative embodiments, due to advantages in accommodating devices having low input (ancl possibly also low output) signal levels; as well as devices that utilize non-electrical signals. For example, transimpedance amplifier units may be employed in applications involving devices that utilize optical signals.
w0 OU/38318 PCTIUS99129679 Summary of the Invention As. mentioned above, the present invention enables ratio control of an input signal and an output signal of a device without the need for an external reference signal or a division operation.
According to one of its principal aspeci;s, the invention provides a method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
providing a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to the input signal level;
providing a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level come;>ponding to the output signal level; and adjusting the ratio based on a difference between the levels of the first and second signals.
According to one preferred mode, the device itself is an amplifier unit, the first and second components are first and second amplifier units, and the controlled ratio is a gain of the amplifier unit.
In a specific implementation, the device is a pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit, and the controlled ratio is an optical gain of the fiber-optic amplifier unit.
The optical gain is adjusted by adjusting pump power of a pump laser of the fiber-optic amplifier unit. The first and second amplifier units are transimpedance amplifier units which are connected by corresponding photodetectors to the input and output of the fiber-optic amplifier unit. (A
transimpedance amplifier provides an output voltage signal proportional to an input current signal.) Each of the input signal and the outpui: signal may be a composite signal constituted by a plurality of signals. In such case, the signal levels of the aforementioned first and second signals may correspond to the RMS signal levels of the composite input and output sign<~Is, respectively, and the controlled ratio may be an RMS optical gain.
According to another of its principal aspects, the present invention provides apparatus for implementing the above method.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising, producing a first signal having a level corresponding to the input signal level, producing a second signal rEaving a level corresponding to the output signal level, and adjusting the ratio based on a difference between the levels of the first and second signals The aforementioned and additional aspects of the present invention, as weH as its various features and advantages, will be more fully understood upon consideration of the following detailed description with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawincfs Fig. 1 is a diagram for explaining a conventional ratio control technique.
Fig. 2 is a diagram for explaining the control technique according to the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a first apparatus according to the invention.
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating a second apparatus according to the invention Fig. 5 is a diagram illustrating a third apparatus according to the invention.
Fig. 6 is a diagram illustrating a fourth .apparatus according to the invention.
Fig. 7 is a diagram of the control electronics employed in a test apparatus constructed according to Fig. 4.
Fig. 8 is a flow diagram of the control operation in the test apparatus.
Fig. 9 is an oscillograph showing tempura! dynamics of an optical amplifier unit of the test apparatus without they ratio control circuitry in operation.
Figs. 10 and 11 are oscillographs showing temporal dynamics of the optical amplifier with the ratio control circuitry in operation.
Detailed Description of the Invention Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a first a~>paratus 1 according to the present invention. Reference number 30 in tlhe figure represents an electrical device operable with a controllable ratio G of an input signal and an output signal. In the form shown, device 30 is an adljustable-gain amplifier unit including a single amplifier. But, in practice; device 30 may be any electrical device that has a controllable ratio of its inpuir and output signals (e:g., a multi-stage amplifier having cascaded amplifiers, a single or multi-stage attenuator, etc.). The input and output signals may be voltage or current signals, for example.
A first amplifier unit 33 of known gain (3;, and preferably including a single amplifier, is connected to the input sidE: of the controlled amplifier unit 30. A second amplifier unit 35 of known gain Go, also preferably including a single amplifier, is connected to the output side of the controlled amplifier unit 30. The connections of amplifier units 33 and 35 to the input and output sides of amplifier unit 30 may be direct, as shown, or they may be indirect (e.g., via a current sensor) depending on the requirements of a given implementation.
The output signals of the amplifier units 33 and 35 are supplied to a controller 3fi, which operates, as discussed in mare dei;ail below, to adjust the operatian of the controlled amplifier unit 30 so as to control the ratio G. In the illustrative implementation, G is of course a gain of the amplifier unit 30.
The input-side amplifier unit 33 outputs a signal level Si = G;x, where x is an input signal level to the input-side amplifier unit and is proportional to the input signal level X of the controlled amplifier unit 30. The output-side amplifier unit 35 outputs a signal level So = Goy, where y is an input signal level to the output-side amplifier unit and is proportional to the output signal level Y of the controlled amplifier unit 30.
The controller 36 performs a subtraction as previously explained to determine an error value Se,~ = t (So - S;), and it outputs a control signal S~, to the controlled amplifier unit 30 to adjust its gain such that Serr is substantially maintained at zero. Thus, the amplifier unit 3~D is maintained at a substantially constant gain G = G~-KG;IGo, that is, a target chin proportional to a ratio of the known gains of the input-side and output-side amplifier units 33 and 35.
To give a more concrete example, assume that the input and output signals to the controlled amplifier unit are voltage signals having levels V;
and Vo ( = GV;), respectively. Assuming sufficiently high input impedances of the amplifiers 33 and 35, the respective input voltage levels thereof will be V;
and Vo (corresponding to the case C~ = Cz, K=1 ). The output voltages of the input-side and output-side amplifier units may be expressed as follows:
Si = GiVi So = GoVo = GoGVi In this case, G; and Go represent the respective voltage gains of the input-side and output-side amplifier units 33 and 35, and G represents the voltage gain of the controlled amplifier unit 30.
The controller 36 subtracts the voltage S; from the voltage So to determine the error Sera Serr = So - Si = GoGV; - G;V;
= Vi(GoG - Gi) = G;V;{(GoIG;)G - 1~ . . . (10) Based on the error thus determined, the controller 38 adjusts the gain of amplifier unit 30 to bring the error Sen to zero .and to maintain that state.
In that state, the gain G will be equal to the target gain GT = G;IGo, as will be evident from Equation (10).
The controller 36 may utilize any suitable control algorithm for controlling the ratio G based on the error Serr. Proportional-integral (PI) or proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control algorithms many be preferred for optimal performance. Both digital and analog controllers may be used. Suitable 9 a algorithms for specifc applications may be deaermined by conventional techniques for example, empirically andlor by computer simulation. For a more complete discussion of PI, PID, and other control techniques; see Koenig, D., Control and Analysis of Noisy Processes, Prentice Hall, 1991 (incorporated herein by reference).
Fig. 4 illustrates a second apparatus 2 according to the present invention for controlling the optical gain (optical power gain) of an optical amplifier unit 40. in this embodiment, the optical amplifier unit 40 is a singie-stage (single-coil) pumped fiber-optic amplifier. Such amplifiers are well known in the art and so wilt not be discussed in detail herein.
Briefly, the amplifier unit includes a fiber-optic coil 41 doped with ions of a rare-earth element (e.g., erbium or praseodymium) and a wavelength-division-multiplex (WDM) optical coupler 42 that couples an input optical signal with "pump" light from a controller Laser source 44: Note that thin lines connecting components in Fig. 4 represent optical fiber connections, whereas bold lines connecting components represent electrical connections. The laser source or pump laser unit 44 operates at an pptical wavelength that is outside the wavelength band of the optical input signal to the amplifier but effective to excite the doped ions in the optical fiber coil 41. The optical input signal may be composed of a single optical signal at a predetermined wavelength, or it may be a composite signal composed of a plurality of optical signals at different predetermined wavelengths, as is typical in WDM fiber-optic communication networks. Light of the input signal stimulates the excited ions in the fiber coil 41 to emit additional light of the same wavelength(s), effectively amplifying the input optical signal.
The optical power gain G of the amplifier unit 40 depends on the output power of the pump laser unit 44, and therefore can be controlled by adjusting the output power of the pump laser unit. When the input signal is to be a composite signal, the optical amplifier unit 40 may incorporate a gain-flattening filter so that the individual wavelength components of the composite signal experience equal gain. Otherwise, the optical power gain will be the RMS gain for the collective wavelength components. The optical amplifier unit 40 may also include optical isolators (not shown) at it;> input and output sides.
In the arrangement of Fig. 4, a first transimpedance amplifier (TIA) unit 43, preferably including a single amplification stage, has its input connected to 5 an input side of the optical amplifier by way of a photodetector 47 (e.g., photodiode) and an optical tap 48. The optic<al tap functions to couple a small portion of the incoming optical signal from an input fiber I of the apparatus to a monitor output 48b which is connected to photodetector 47. The remainder of the incoming optical signal propagates via a rnain output 48a of the tap to the 10 input of the optical amplifier unit 40.
A second TIA unit 45 has its input connected to an output side of the optical amplifier unit 40 via a corresponding photodetector 4T and associated optical tap 48'. This optical tap operates to couple a small portion of the output light from the optical amplifeer unit to a monitor output 48b' which is connected to photodetector 47'. The remainder of the output light propagates via a main output 48a' of the tap 48' to an output fiber O of the apparatus.
The coupling ratios of the optical taps ~48, 48' may be the same or different. Also, they are not restricted to any ;particular limit. But, it is generally preferred to use coupling ratios which substantially preserve the input and output signal powers of the apparatus for example, a coupling ratio of at least 90!10 (meaning that 10% of the light is coupled to the monitor output with 90% of the light propagating to the main output).
Returning to Fig. 4, the photodetectors 47, 4T convert the light received from taps 48, 48' into electrical current signahs having levels proportional to the amounts of light received via monitor outputs 48b, 48b'. The current signals are thus proportional to the optical power levels of the input and output optical signals of the optical amplifier 40. The TIA units 43 and 45, in turn, produce output voltage signals proportional to their input current signals, and these output signals are supplied to a controller 46. The respective output valtage signals S; and So of the TIA units 43 and 45 may represented as follows:
S. = G~C~ P.
Sfl = GaC2Po = GoC2GP;
In the foregoing, G; and Go respectively represent the transimpedance gains of the input-side TlA unit 43 and the output-side TIA unit 45, P; and Po respectively represent the input optical signal power level and the output optical signal power level, G represents the optical power gain of the optical amplifier unit, and C~ and Cz represent proportionality constants dependent upon the coupling ratios of the taps 48, 48' and the responsivities of the photodetectors 47, 47'.
The controller subtracts one of the two voltage signal levels from the 9 0 other to obtain an error voltage level Serr:
Serr = '~' (So - Si) _ ~ (GoCzpa - G;C~Pi) _ ~ (GoC2GP; - G;C~P;) _ ~ P;(GoCzG - G;C~) = t P;G;C~ {(GoC2IG;C~) G - 11} . . . (11) Based on the error voltage, the controller 46 generates a control signal to adjust the operation of the pump laser unit 44, and thereby adjust the optical gain of the amplifier unit 40, to bring Serr to zero and maintain that condition.
For example, the pump laser unit may incorporate a conventional voltage-controlled pump current controller, and the control signal from controller 46 may be a voltage established based on a PI or PID control algorithm using the error signal level Serr: Again, the control algorithm may be implemented by digital or analog circuitry as desired in a particular application.
As will be appreciated from Equation (11 ), when the error Serr is brought to zero, the optical gain of amplifier unit 40 will be G = GT =
(G;IGo)(C~ICz).
When the selected optical taps 48, 48' have the same coupling ratio and the selected photodetectors 47, 4T have the sama responsivity, C~ and Cz will be equal, so that the target gain is simply GT = G;/Go.
~By controlling the pump laser unit to maintain Serf at zero, the amplifier unit 40 operates at a constant gain G = GT. And the target gain is simply a predetermined value based on the known gains of the input-side and output-side amplifier units 43, 45. No external reference signal representing the target gain is required. Nor is a division operation to~ determine the actual operating gain G.
Fig. 5 illustrates another embodiment 3. of the invention, in this case for controlling a multi-stage pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit 40'. The arrangement in Fig. 5 is generally similar to that in Fig. 4, except that the amplifier unit includes a plurality of amplification stages, each including a doped fiber coil 41, WDM coupler 42, and pump laser unit 44 as preciously described in connection with Fig. 4. Here, they number of amplification stages is two, but a greater number of stages may bE: used. The amplifier coils of the different stages (which may be pumped the same but provide the same or different gains depending upon the particular ~appiication) are connected in series, as shown. Each stage rnay also include a gain-flattening filter (not shown).
As in the embodiment of Fig. 4, the controller in Fig. 5 subtracts one of the TIA output voltages S;, So from the other to obtain an error signal level Ser~.
Based on the error thus obtained, the controlller generates control signals for adjusting the outputs of the pump laser units and thereby adjusts the optical gain of the optical amplifier unit 40' to bring the error Serr to zero and to maintain that state. In that state, the optical gain of the amplifier unit 40' will equal the target gain, which is based on the known gains of the input-side and output-side TIA units, as previously explained. The pump laser units may receive identical control signals, even though the two amplification stages may or may not be identical. Uf course, in a case where the amplification stages differ and do not provide equal contributions to the overall gain, they can be controlled differently, based on their respective gain contributions:
Fig. 6 shows another embodiment 4 in which two individually controlled optical amplifier units 40 are connected in seriies to form a multi-stage amplifier unit. This arrangement allows for more precisE: control of the overall optical gain than the arrangement of Fig. 5, since each amplification stage is individually monitored and controlled.
As shown in Fig. 6, the output-side TIA unit 45 for the first (left) amplification stage and the input-side TIA unit 43 for the second (right) amplification stage may have their inputs connected in common to a photodetector 47' (47). Each amplification stage is separately controlled in the manner described in connection with Fig. 4. C)f course, although the firvo amplification stages are the same in Fig. 6, as. are their respective control systems, this need not be the case in practice. In practice, the two amplification stages may differ, as may their control systems (e.g., the TIA
unit pairs may be selected to provide different target gains).
An apparatus as described in connection with Fig. 4 was constructed and tested to examine its temporal dynamics. The single coil amplifier unit was composed of 13.7 m of conventional erbium-dloped fiber, two optical isolators at the input and output, a 'i550/980 nm WDM optical coupler, and a standard 976 nm grating stabilized pump laser unit including a voltage-controlled pump current source capable of sub-microsecond (ys} response time. The input signal to the controlled amplifier unit consisted of two signals:
a -10 dBm continuous wave (CW) 1555 nm signal, and a O dBm, 500 Hz on/off modulated square-wave signal at 1553 nm.
The TIA units were constructed from respective operational amplifiers (frequency response at least 10 MHz}, resistors, and capacitors to have transimpedance gains of 10,000 for the input-side TIA unit and 681 for the output-side TIA unit. These values were determined to be suitable based on the particular physical parameters of the system, such as splice losses, characteristics of the pump laser, characteristics of the photodetectors, etc.
The TIA units were connected to the input and output sides of the optical amplifier unit via 90/10 optical coupler;> and substantially identical photodetectors (InGaAs PIN photodiodes with at least 10 MHz frequency response). Thus, the proportionality constant C~ and C2 were related as C2 = (9/70) C~. This is readily derived from the fact that, by virtue of the 90!10 coupling ratios, the amount of fight coupled to the input-side photodetector is 1/9 of the light input to the optical amplifier unit, and the amount of light w0 00/38318 PCT/US99/29679 14 ~'~
coupled to the output-side photodetector is 1110 of the light output from the optical amplifier unit.
The input and output fibers of the apparatus were standard SMF-28 optical fiber. Optical connections between components of the apparatus were also made with SMF-28 optical fiber. The signal on the output fiber was measured with a 125 MHz photoreceiver and a 500 MHz digital oscilloscope.
In order to provide a wide range of control flexibility, we used a digital, microprocessor-based control system including:
- two 8-bit, analog-to-digital (AID) converters (sampling at 2.5 Mhz) - a Mach XL Programmable Array Logic (PAL) - an IBM Power PC microprocessor running at 16 MHz - an 8-bit digital-to-analog (DIA) converter Fig. 7 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of the control system 100 and its connections to the TIA units and I;aser pump current controller (pump drive circuitry).
The two AID converters 101 and 102 are used to digitize the electrical output voltages from the input-side and output-side TIA units 43 and 45, respectively. The PAL 103 performs a fast hardware subtraction of the digitized amplifier outputs from the AID converters. The subtraction result, representing the error Seer, is used by the microprocessor 104 to execute a Pl control algorithm, and the resulting calculated control signal is then output.
via the D/A converter 105 to the pump drive circuitry of the laser unit 44.
Fig. 8 is a flow diagram of the control process. In step S1, the PAL
reads the digitized TIA outputs (S;, So) from AID converters 101, 102. Next, in step S2, PAL 103 calculates the error Serr(n) _- S; - So, where n denotes the present (nth) control iteration. In step S3, the microprocessor 104 calculates a control move M(n) for adjusting the pump laser output to bring the error Serr to 0.
The calculation is performed in accordance with the following PI control algorithm:
M(n) = M(n-1 ) + I Sen(n) + P (Serr(n) - Serr(n-1 )) where coefficients I and P are, respectively, the integral and proportional control gains and may be selected and optimized empiricaliy. For a more complete discussion of PI control, see the aforementioned Koenig text. The optimum values of 1 and P for the test apparaEtus were determined empirically 5 to be 1 and 500, respectively.
Next, in step S4, the value Serr(n-1 ) for' use in the next iteration is set to the current error Serr(n).
Finally, the control move M(n} is output to the pump drive circuitry, and the flow returns to step S1 to perform the ne~;t control iteration.
10 The temporal dynamics of the single-coil amplifier described above, but without the automatic gain control system of ithe invention in operation, are shown in Fig. 9. More particularly, Fig. 9 shows the traces of the square-wave input signal and the resulting output signal. l'he relative scales of the two signal traces were set so that the traces could be superposed, as shown, for 15 easier comparison. A comparison of the signal traces reveals that the amplifier output suffers severe distortion due to the slow gain dynamics associated with erbium ions in glass.
Fig. 10 shows the temporal dynamics with the gain control system turned on. As seen in Fig. 10, the optical output signal has a square-wave shape with low distortion. The third trace in Fig. 10, above those of the input and output signals, represents the pump conirrol signal and is proportional to the pump power.
The details of the turn-on transient are shown in Fig. 11. The initial rapid increase in the output signal is provided by the initial inversion (inversion refers to the population of erbium ions in the excited state). However, the pumping rate is insufficient to accommodate 'the increased signal power.
Hence, after a processing delay of approximately 5 ps, the gain control circuit increases the pump power to the maximum allowed value. The amplifier responds with a temporally increasing gain until the desired gain is achieved.
The pump power is then decreased to the vallue required for steady-state operation. The total time that is required to correct the gain is approximately WO 00/3$31$ PCTIUS99I29679 25 ps. The response speed of the gain control system can, of course, be increased if more pump power is available during the turn-on transient.
Additionally, the response time can be reduced by using faster electronics, e.g., an analog control circuit instead of a microprocessor based circuit.
It bears repeating that the particular applications of the invention which are mentioned herein, as well as the illustrative embodiments, are merely exemplary. Numerous other implementations; are possible in keeping with the basic principles of the invention, the scope of the invention being set forth in the appended claims.
This.application claims the benefit of II.S. Provisional Patent Application Number 601113,083, filed ~ecember 21, 1998.
Backctround of the Invention This invention relates to a method and apparatus for controlling a ratio of an output signal and an input signal of a device. The invention can be implemented using relatively simple control electronics and is suitable for a wide variety of appiications including, for example, electronic control of electrical and optical amplifiers and attenuato~rs.
Conventional signal ratio control techniques typically involve monitoring an output signal or an input signal of a devices relative to an external reference signal that is set in accordance with a predetermined target ratio. The device is controlled to operate at the target ratio based on an error signal representing a difference between the monitored signal and the reference signal.
Another conventional technique involves monitoring both the output signal and the input signal of a device in order to determine a ratio of the two signals. The ratio thus determined is compared with an external reference signal, corresponding to the target ratio, in order to generate an error signal representing the difference between the determined ratio and the target ratio.
The device is controlled to operate at the target ratio based on the error signal.
Fig. 1 illustrates the conventional technique just described. In Fig. 1, a divider 12 receives signal levels x and y proportional to the input and output w0 00138318 PCTIUS99/29679 signal levels of a controlled device 10, respectively. That is, x = C~X and y =
C2Y, where X and Y are the input and output signal levels, respectively, and and Cz are proportionality constants depending upon the particular system design (often C~ = C2 }. The signal levels x and y may, for example, represent voltage, current, or power levels of the input and output signals.
The ratio G of the output signal level to the input signal level may be represented as follows:
G = (Y/X) = K(ylx) . . . ( 1 ) where K = C2/C~, Thus, the signal levels x and y are related as follows:
y = Gx/K . . . (2) The divider 12 performs a division operation based on the inputs x and y, and outputs a ratio signal proportional to the ratio G:
y/x = GIK . . . (3) The ratio signal is supplied to a subtrac;tor 14. Also supplied to the subtractor is a specified reference signal level Gsp = GTIK, where GT is the target ratio: The subtractor 14 subtracts the rneasured ratio ylx from the specified ratio Gsp to generate an error signal level E:
E = GSP - ylx = (G-rIK) - (GIK) _ (GT - G)/K . . . (4) The error E is supplied to a controller 16 which adjusts the device operation in order to bring the error E to zero. In this state, G becomes equal to GT as will be recognized from Equation (4).
Disclosure of the Invention The present invention reflects a new and unique approach to the ratio 2~ control process that does not require an external reference signal or a division operation as in conventional techniques. Briefly speaking, the invention utilizes first and second signals having levels corresponding to the input signal level and the output signal level of the device, respectively. As will be seen hereinafter, by subtracting one of the signals from the other, an error signal is generated for supply to a controller which, in turn, controls the device operation 3 v to bring the error signal level to zero. In this ;>tate, the ratio of the input and output signal levels of the device will match a predetermined target ratio.
As shown in the illustrative embodiments hereinafter, the first and second signals may be produced, respectively, using first and second amplifier units of known gains. When the error signal level is zero, the ratio of the input and. output signal levels matches a predetermined target ratio based on the known gains of the first and second amplifier units.
Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating basic principles of implementation using first and second amplifier units as just described. In Fig. 2, an input-side amplifier unit 23 having a known gain G; and an output-side amplifier unit 25 having a known gain Go are connected to the input and output, respectively, of a device 20 to be controlled (the connections having been omitted from the drainring for simplicity). The input-side amplifier unit 23 produces a signal having a level S; = G;x, where x is proportional to the input signal level of the device 20. The output-side amplifier unit 25 produces a signal having a level So = Goy, where y is proportions! to the outpuit signal level of the device 20.
The signals from the input-side and output-side amplifier units are supplied to a subtractor 24, which produces an error signal having a level Serr:
Serr = So - Si . . . (5) The error Semis supplied to a controller 26, which adjusts the operation of device 20 so as to bring the error Serr to zero and to maintain this condition.
Substituting for So and S;, Equation (5) can be rewritten as follows:
Serr = Goy - Gix . . . (6) Substituting GxIK for y (see Equation (:?)) in Equation (6) yields:
Serr = (GoGx/K) - G;x = x{(GoGIK) - G;} . . . (7) Multiplying the right-hand side of Equation (7) by G;IG; yields:
Serr = Gix'~(GoIKG;)G - 1} . . . (8) As is evident from Equation (8), Serr willl be zero when G = KG;IGo. In other words, the selection of the input-side and output-side amplifier units or, more precisely, their gains-establishes a target ratio WO 00!38318 PCT/US99/29679 GT = KG;IGo. And controlling device 10 to maintain Serr at zero will thus result in a constant ratio G = GT = KG;/Go.
The same results are obtained if the minuend and the subtrahend in Equation (5) are reversed:
Sen = S; - So . . . (5') Serr may thus be expressed more generally as follows:
Serr = '!' (So - Si) . . . (9) As will be appreciated from the foregoing discussion, the present invention does not require an external reference signal representing the target input-output signal ratio and does not require .a division to determine the actual operating ratio G. Instead, the control operation is based on a simple subtraction of signals having levels corresponding to the input and output signal levels. By avoiding the need for an external reference signal and a division operation, as are used in conventional techniques, the present invention offers the advantages of simplified control electronics and high control speeds at low cost.
Furthermore, the principles of the invention are not limited to application to any particular device or class of devices, or to the use of particular components to produce the signals to be subtracted. It will thus be understood that the applications mentioned herein, as well as the illustrative embodiments, are merely exemplary.
The use of amplifier units to produce the signals to be subtracted may be preferred; as in the illustrative embodiments, due to advantages in accommodating devices having low input (ancl possibly also low output) signal levels; as well as devices that utilize non-electrical signals. For example, transimpedance amplifier units may be employed in applications involving devices that utilize optical signals.
w0 OU/38318 PCTIUS99129679 Summary of the Invention As. mentioned above, the present invention enables ratio control of an input signal and an output signal of a device without the need for an external reference signal or a division operation.
According to one of its principal aspeci;s, the invention provides a method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
providing a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to the input signal level;
providing a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level come;>ponding to the output signal level; and adjusting the ratio based on a difference between the levels of the first and second signals.
According to one preferred mode, the device itself is an amplifier unit, the first and second components are first and second amplifier units, and the controlled ratio is a gain of the amplifier unit.
In a specific implementation, the device is a pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit, and the controlled ratio is an optical gain of the fiber-optic amplifier unit.
The optical gain is adjusted by adjusting pump power of a pump laser of the fiber-optic amplifier unit. The first and second amplifier units are transimpedance amplifier units which are connected by corresponding photodetectors to the input and output of the fiber-optic amplifier unit. (A
transimpedance amplifier provides an output voltage signal proportional to an input current signal.) Each of the input signal and the outpui: signal may be a composite signal constituted by a plurality of signals. In such case, the signal levels of the aforementioned first and second signals may correspond to the RMS signal levels of the composite input and output sign<~Is, respectively, and the controlled ratio may be an RMS optical gain.
According to another of its principal aspects, the present invention provides apparatus for implementing the above method.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising, producing a first signal having a level corresponding to the input signal level, producing a second signal rEaving a level corresponding to the output signal level, and adjusting the ratio based on a difference between the levels of the first and second signals The aforementioned and additional aspects of the present invention, as weH as its various features and advantages, will be more fully understood upon consideration of the following detailed description with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawincfs Fig. 1 is a diagram for explaining a conventional ratio control technique.
Fig. 2 is a diagram for explaining the control technique according to the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a first apparatus according to the invention.
Fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating a second apparatus according to the invention Fig. 5 is a diagram illustrating a third apparatus according to the invention.
Fig. 6 is a diagram illustrating a fourth .apparatus according to the invention.
Fig. 7 is a diagram of the control electronics employed in a test apparatus constructed according to Fig. 4.
Fig. 8 is a flow diagram of the control operation in the test apparatus.
Fig. 9 is an oscillograph showing tempura! dynamics of an optical amplifier unit of the test apparatus without they ratio control circuitry in operation.
Figs. 10 and 11 are oscillographs showing temporal dynamics of the optical amplifier with the ratio control circuitry in operation.
Detailed Description of the Invention Fig. 3 is a diagram illustrating a first a~>paratus 1 according to the present invention. Reference number 30 in tlhe figure represents an electrical device operable with a controllable ratio G of an input signal and an output signal. In the form shown, device 30 is an adljustable-gain amplifier unit including a single amplifier. But, in practice; device 30 may be any electrical device that has a controllable ratio of its inpuir and output signals (e:g., a multi-stage amplifier having cascaded amplifiers, a single or multi-stage attenuator, etc.). The input and output signals may be voltage or current signals, for example.
A first amplifier unit 33 of known gain (3;, and preferably including a single amplifier, is connected to the input sidE: of the controlled amplifier unit 30. A second amplifier unit 35 of known gain Go, also preferably including a single amplifier, is connected to the output side of the controlled amplifier unit 30. The connections of amplifier units 33 and 35 to the input and output sides of amplifier unit 30 may be direct, as shown, or they may be indirect (e.g., via a current sensor) depending on the requirements of a given implementation.
The output signals of the amplifier units 33 and 35 are supplied to a controller 3fi, which operates, as discussed in mare dei;ail below, to adjust the operatian of the controlled amplifier unit 30 so as to control the ratio G. In the illustrative implementation, G is of course a gain of the amplifier unit 30.
The input-side amplifier unit 33 outputs a signal level Si = G;x, where x is an input signal level to the input-side amplifier unit and is proportional to the input signal level X of the controlled amplifier unit 30. The output-side amplifier unit 35 outputs a signal level So = Goy, where y is an input signal level to the output-side amplifier unit and is proportional to the output signal level Y of the controlled amplifier unit 30.
The controller 36 performs a subtraction as previously explained to determine an error value Se,~ = t (So - S;), and it outputs a control signal S~, to the controlled amplifier unit 30 to adjust its gain such that Serr is substantially maintained at zero. Thus, the amplifier unit 3~D is maintained at a substantially constant gain G = G~-KG;IGo, that is, a target chin proportional to a ratio of the known gains of the input-side and output-side amplifier units 33 and 35.
To give a more concrete example, assume that the input and output signals to the controlled amplifier unit are voltage signals having levels V;
and Vo ( = GV;), respectively. Assuming sufficiently high input impedances of the amplifiers 33 and 35, the respective input voltage levels thereof will be V;
and Vo (corresponding to the case C~ = Cz, K=1 ). The output voltages of the input-side and output-side amplifier units may be expressed as follows:
Si = GiVi So = GoVo = GoGVi In this case, G; and Go represent the respective voltage gains of the input-side and output-side amplifier units 33 and 35, and G represents the voltage gain of the controlled amplifier unit 30.
The controller 36 subtracts the voltage S; from the voltage So to determine the error Sera Serr = So - Si = GoGV; - G;V;
= Vi(GoG - Gi) = G;V;{(GoIG;)G - 1~ . . . (10) Based on the error thus determined, the controller 38 adjusts the gain of amplifier unit 30 to bring the error Sen to zero .and to maintain that state.
In that state, the gain G will be equal to the target gain GT = G;IGo, as will be evident from Equation (10).
The controller 36 may utilize any suitable control algorithm for controlling the ratio G based on the error Serr. Proportional-integral (PI) or proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control algorithms many be preferred for optimal performance. Both digital and analog controllers may be used. Suitable 9 a algorithms for specifc applications may be deaermined by conventional techniques for example, empirically andlor by computer simulation. For a more complete discussion of PI, PID, and other control techniques; see Koenig, D., Control and Analysis of Noisy Processes, Prentice Hall, 1991 (incorporated herein by reference).
Fig. 4 illustrates a second apparatus 2 according to the present invention for controlling the optical gain (optical power gain) of an optical amplifier unit 40. in this embodiment, the optical amplifier unit 40 is a singie-stage (single-coil) pumped fiber-optic amplifier. Such amplifiers are well known in the art and so wilt not be discussed in detail herein.
Briefly, the amplifier unit includes a fiber-optic coil 41 doped with ions of a rare-earth element (e.g., erbium or praseodymium) and a wavelength-division-multiplex (WDM) optical coupler 42 that couples an input optical signal with "pump" light from a controller Laser source 44: Note that thin lines connecting components in Fig. 4 represent optical fiber connections, whereas bold lines connecting components represent electrical connections. The laser source or pump laser unit 44 operates at an pptical wavelength that is outside the wavelength band of the optical input signal to the amplifier but effective to excite the doped ions in the optical fiber coil 41. The optical input signal may be composed of a single optical signal at a predetermined wavelength, or it may be a composite signal composed of a plurality of optical signals at different predetermined wavelengths, as is typical in WDM fiber-optic communication networks. Light of the input signal stimulates the excited ions in the fiber coil 41 to emit additional light of the same wavelength(s), effectively amplifying the input optical signal.
The optical power gain G of the amplifier unit 40 depends on the output power of the pump laser unit 44, and therefore can be controlled by adjusting the output power of the pump laser unit. When the input signal is to be a composite signal, the optical amplifier unit 40 may incorporate a gain-flattening filter so that the individual wavelength components of the composite signal experience equal gain. Otherwise, the optical power gain will be the RMS gain for the collective wavelength components. The optical amplifier unit 40 may also include optical isolators (not shown) at it;> input and output sides.
In the arrangement of Fig. 4, a first transimpedance amplifier (TIA) unit 43, preferably including a single amplification stage, has its input connected to 5 an input side of the optical amplifier by way of a photodetector 47 (e.g., photodiode) and an optical tap 48. The optic<al tap functions to couple a small portion of the incoming optical signal from an input fiber I of the apparatus to a monitor output 48b which is connected to photodetector 47. The remainder of the incoming optical signal propagates via a rnain output 48a of the tap to the 10 input of the optical amplifier unit 40.
A second TIA unit 45 has its input connected to an output side of the optical amplifier unit 40 via a corresponding photodetector 4T and associated optical tap 48'. This optical tap operates to couple a small portion of the output light from the optical amplifeer unit to a monitor output 48b' which is connected to photodetector 47'. The remainder of the output light propagates via a main output 48a' of the tap 48' to an output fiber O of the apparatus.
The coupling ratios of the optical taps ~48, 48' may be the same or different. Also, they are not restricted to any ;particular limit. But, it is generally preferred to use coupling ratios which substantially preserve the input and output signal powers of the apparatus for example, a coupling ratio of at least 90!10 (meaning that 10% of the light is coupled to the monitor output with 90% of the light propagating to the main output).
Returning to Fig. 4, the photodetectors 47, 4T convert the light received from taps 48, 48' into electrical current signahs having levels proportional to the amounts of light received via monitor outputs 48b, 48b'. The current signals are thus proportional to the optical power levels of the input and output optical signals of the optical amplifier 40. The TIA units 43 and 45, in turn, produce output voltage signals proportional to their input current signals, and these output signals are supplied to a controller 46. The respective output valtage signals S; and So of the TIA units 43 and 45 may represented as follows:
S. = G~C~ P.
Sfl = GaC2Po = GoC2GP;
In the foregoing, G; and Go respectively represent the transimpedance gains of the input-side TlA unit 43 and the output-side TIA unit 45, P; and Po respectively represent the input optical signal power level and the output optical signal power level, G represents the optical power gain of the optical amplifier unit, and C~ and Cz represent proportionality constants dependent upon the coupling ratios of the taps 48, 48' and the responsivities of the photodetectors 47, 47'.
The controller subtracts one of the two voltage signal levels from the 9 0 other to obtain an error voltage level Serr:
Serr = '~' (So - Si) _ ~ (GoCzpa - G;C~Pi) _ ~ (GoC2GP; - G;C~P;) _ ~ P;(GoCzG - G;C~) = t P;G;C~ {(GoC2IG;C~) G - 11} . . . (11) Based on the error voltage, the controller 46 generates a control signal to adjust the operation of the pump laser unit 44, and thereby adjust the optical gain of the amplifier unit 40, to bring Serr to zero and maintain that condition.
For example, the pump laser unit may incorporate a conventional voltage-controlled pump current controller, and the control signal from controller 46 may be a voltage established based on a PI or PID control algorithm using the error signal level Serr: Again, the control algorithm may be implemented by digital or analog circuitry as desired in a particular application.
As will be appreciated from Equation (11 ), when the error Serr is brought to zero, the optical gain of amplifier unit 40 will be G = GT =
(G;IGo)(C~ICz).
When the selected optical taps 48, 48' have the same coupling ratio and the selected photodetectors 47, 4T have the sama responsivity, C~ and Cz will be equal, so that the target gain is simply GT = G;/Go.
~By controlling the pump laser unit to maintain Serf at zero, the amplifier unit 40 operates at a constant gain G = GT. And the target gain is simply a predetermined value based on the known gains of the input-side and output-side amplifier units 43, 45. No external reference signal representing the target gain is required. Nor is a division operation to~ determine the actual operating gain G.
Fig. 5 illustrates another embodiment 3. of the invention, in this case for controlling a multi-stage pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit 40'. The arrangement in Fig. 5 is generally similar to that in Fig. 4, except that the amplifier unit includes a plurality of amplification stages, each including a doped fiber coil 41, WDM coupler 42, and pump laser unit 44 as preciously described in connection with Fig. 4. Here, they number of amplification stages is two, but a greater number of stages may bE: used. The amplifier coils of the different stages (which may be pumped the same but provide the same or different gains depending upon the particular ~appiication) are connected in series, as shown. Each stage rnay also include a gain-flattening filter (not shown).
As in the embodiment of Fig. 4, the controller in Fig. 5 subtracts one of the TIA output voltages S;, So from the other to obtain an error signal level Ser~.
Based on the error thus obtained, the controlller generates control signals for adjusting the outputs of the pump laser units and thereby adjusts the optical gain of the optical amplifier unit 40' to bring the error Serr to zero and to maintain that state. In that state, the optical gain of the amplifier unit 40' will equal the target gain, which is based on the known gains of the input-side and output-side TIA units, as previously explained. The pump laser units may receive identical control signals, even though the two amplification stages may or may not be identical. Uf course, in a case where the amplification stages differ and do not provide equal contributions to the overall gain, they can be controlled differently, based on their respective gain contributions:
Fig. 6 shows another embodiment 4 in which two individually controlled optical amplifier units 40 are connected in seriies to form a multi-stage amplifier unit. This arrangement allows for more precisE: control of the overall optical gain than the arrangement of Fig. 5, since each amplification stage is individually monitored and controlled.
As shown in Fig. 6, the output-side TIA unit 45 for the first (left) amplification stage and the input-side TIA unit 43 for the second (right) amplification stage may have their inputs connected in common to a photodetector 47' (47). Each amplification stage is separately controlled in the manner described in connection with Fig. 4. C)f course, although the firvo amplification stages are the same in Fig. 6, as. are their respective control systems, this need not be the case in practice. In practice, the two amplification stages may differ, as may their control systems (e.g., the TIA
unit pairs may be selected to provide different target gains).
An apparatus as described in connection with Fig. 4 was constructed and tested to examine its temporal dynamics. The single coil amplifier unit was composed of 13.7 m of conventional erbium-dloped fiber, two optical isolators at the input and output, a 'i550/980 nm WDM optical coupler, and a standard 976 nm grating stabilized pump laser unit including a voltage-controlled pump current source capable of sub-microsecond (ys} response time. The input signal to the controlled amplifier unit consisted of two signals:
a -10 dBm continuous wave (CW) 1555 nm signal, and a O dBm, 500 Hz on/off modulated square-wave signal at 1553 nm.
The TIA units were constructed from respective operational amplifiers (frequency response at least 10 MHz}, resistors, and capacitors to have transimpedance gains of 10,000 for the input-side TIA unit and 681 for the output-side TIA unit. These values were determined to be suitable based on the particular physical parameters of the system, such as splice losses, characteristics of the pump laser, characteristics of the photodetectors, etc.
The TIA units were connected to the input and output sides of the optical amplifier unit via 90/10 optical coupler;> and substantially identical photodetectors (InGaAs PIN photodiodes with at least 10 MHz frequency response). Thus, the proportionality constant C~ and C2 were related as C2 = (9/70) C~. This is readily derived from the fact that, by virtue of the 90!10 coupling ratios, the amount of fight coupled to the input-side photodetector is 1/9 of the light input to the optical amplifier unit, and the amount of light w0 00/38318 PCT/US99/29679 14 ~'~
coupled to the output-side photodetector is 1110 of the light output from the optical amplifier unit.
The input and output fibers of the apparatus were standard SMF-28 optical fiber. Optical connections between components of the apparatus were also made with SMF-28 optical fiber. The signal on the output fiber was measured with a 125 MHz photoreceiver and a 500 MHz digital oscilloscope.
In order to provide a wide range of control flexibility, we used a digital, microprocessor-based control system including:
- two 8-bit, analog-to-digital (AID) converters (sampling at 2.5 Mhz) - a Mach XL Programmable Array Logic (PAL) - an IBM Power PC microprocessor running at 16 MHz - an 8-bit digital-to-analog (DIA) converter Fig. 7 is a block diagram showing the arrangement of the control system 100 and its connections to the TIA units and I;aser pump current controller (pump drive circuitry).
The two AID converters 101 and 102 are used to digitize the electrical output voltages from the input-side and output-side TIA units 43 and 45, respectively. The PAL 103 performs a fast hardware subtraction of the digitized amplifier outputs from the AID converters. The subtraction result, representing the error Seer, is used by the microprocessor 104 to execute a Pl control algorithm, and the resulting calculated control signal is then output.
via the D/A converter 105 to the pump drive circuitry of the laser unit 44.
Fig. 8 is a flow diagram of the control process. In step S1, the PAL
reads the digitized TIA outputs (S;, So) from AID converters 101, 102. Next, in step S2, PAL 103 calculates the error Serr(n) _- S; - So, where n denotes the present (nth) control iteration. In step S3, the microprocessor 104 calculates a control move M(n) for adjusting the pump laser output to bring the error Serr to 0.
The calculation is performed in accordance with the following PI control algorithm:
M(n) = M(n-1 ) + I Sen(n) + P (Serr(n) - Serr(n-1 )) where coefficients I and P are, respectively, the integral and proportional control gains and may be selected and optimized empiricaliy. For a more complete discussion of PI control, see the aforementioned Koenig text. The optimum values of 1 and P for the test apparaEtus were determined empirically 5 to be 1 and 500, respectively.
Next, in step S4, the value Serr(n-1 ) for' use in the next iteration is set to the current error Serr(n).
Finally, the control move M(n} is output to the pump drive circuitry, and the flow returns to step S1 to perform the ne~;t control iteration.
10 The temporal dynamics of the single-coil amplifier described above, but without the automatic gain control system of ithe invention in operation, are shown in Fig. 9. More particularly, Fig. 9 shows the traces of the square-wave input signal and the resulting output signal. l'he relative scales of the two signal traces were set so that the traces could be superposed, as shown, for 15 easier comparison. A comparison of the signal traces reveals that the amplifier output suffers severe distortion due to the slow gain dynamics associated with erbium ions in glass.
Fig. 10 shows the temporal dynamics with the gain control system turned on. As seen in Fig. 10, the optical output signal has a square-wave shape with low distortion. The third trace in Fig. 10, above those of the input and output signals, represents the pump conirrol signal and is proportional to the pump power.
The details of the turn-on transient are shown in Fig. 11. The initial rapid increase in the output signal is provided by the initial inversion (inversion refers to the population of erbium ions in the excited state). However, the pumping rate is insufficient to accommodate 'the increased signal power.
Hence, after a processing delay of approximately 5 ps, the gain control circuit increases the pump power to the maximum allowed value. The amplifier responds with a temporally increasing gain until the desired gain is achieved.
The pump power is then decreased to the vallue required for steady-state operation. The total time that is required to correct the gain is approximately WO 00/3$31$ PCTIUS99I29679 25 ps. The response speed of the gain control system can, of course, be increased if more pump power is available during the turn-on transient.
Additionally, the response time can be reduced by using faster electronics, e.g., an analog control circuit instead of a microprocessor based circuit.
It bears repeating that the particular applications of the invention which are mentioned herein, as well as the illustrative embodiments, are merely exemplary. Numerous other implementations; are possible in keeping with the basic principles of the invention, the scope of the invention being set forth in the appended claims.
Claims (45)
1. A method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
providing a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
providing a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and adjusting said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
providing a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
providing a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and adjusting said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
2. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said device is an amplifier unit and said ratio is a gain of that amplifier unit.
3. A method according to Claim 2, wherein each of said output signal and said input signal is a composite signal.
4. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said device is an optical device, said input and output signals are optical signals, and said first and second amplifier units are transimpedance amplifier units.
5. A method according to Claim 4, wherein each of said output signal and said input signal is a composite signal.
6. A method according to Claim 5, wherein said output and input signal levels are RMS levels of the composite signals.
7. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said adjusting includes producing an error signal level S err, where S err = ~ (S o - S i), S o is a signal level of said second signal, and S i is a signal level of said first signal, and using said error signal level as a basis to adjust said ratio.
8. A method according to Claim 7, wherein said first signal and said second signal are composite signals and S i and S o are RMS signal levels.
9. A method according to Claim 7, wherein said error signal level and said first and second signal levels are voltage levels.
10. A method according to Claim 1, wherein said adjusting includes adjusting a component of said device that affects said ratio.
11. A method of controlling an optical gain of an optical amplifier unit, comprising:
providing a first transimpedance amplifier unit connected to an input of said optical amplifier unit;
providing a second transimpedance amplifier unit connected to an output of said optical amplifier unit; and adjusting the optical gain based on a difference between an output signal of said first transimpedance amplifier unit and an output signal of said second transimpedance amplifier unit.
providing a first transimpedance amplifier unit connected to an input of said optical amplifier unit;
providing a second transimpedance amplifier unit connected to an output of said optical amplifier unit; and adjusting the optical gain based on a difference between an output signal of said first transimpedance amplifier unit and an output signal of said second transimpedance amplifier unit.
12. A method according to Claim 11, wherein said optical amplifier unit is a pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit and said adjusting includes adjusting pump power of a pump laser of said fiber-optic amplifier unit.
13. A method according to Claim 12, wherein the optical gain is RMS
optical gain for a composite plurality of wavelengths input to said fiber-optic amplifier unit.
optical gain for a composite plurality of wavelengths input to said fiber-optic amplifier unit.
14. A method according to Claim 12, wherein the pump power is adjusted by adjusting a drive control signal for said pump laser.
15. A method according to Claim 12, wherein said adjusting includes producing an error voltage S err, where S err = ~ (S o - S i), S o is an output voltage of said second transimpedance amplifier unit and S i is an output voltage of said first transimpedance amplifier unit, and using said error voltage as a basis to adjust the pump power of said pump laser.
16. A method according to Claim 15, wherein said first and second transimpedance amplifier units are respectively connected to said input and said output through corresponding photodetectors, and S o and S i satisfy the following relationships:
S o = G o C2G P i S i = G i C1P i where G o and G i are the respective transimpedance gains of said second transimpedance amplifier unit and said first transimpedance amplifier unit, P
i is input optical signal power, G is the optical gain, and C2 and C1 are constants.
S o = G o C2G P i S i = G i C1P i where G o and G i are the respective transimpedance gains of said second transimpedance amplifier unit and said first transimpedance amplifier unit, P
i is input optical signal power, G is the optical gain, and C2 and C1 are constants.
17. A method according to Claim 12, wherein said fiber-optic amplifier unit has a single fiber-optic amplification stage.
18. A method according to Claim 12, wherein said fiber-optic amplifier unit has a plurality of fiber-optic amplification stages connected in series.
19. An apparatus for controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and a controller connected to said first and second amplifier units and said device, said controller operating to adjust said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and a controller connected to said first and second amplifier units and said device, said controller operating to adjust said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
20. An apparatus according to Claim 19, wherein said device is an amplifier unit and said ratio is a gain of that amplifier unit.
21. An apparatus according to Claim 20, wherein each of said output signal and said input signal is a composite signal.
22. An apparatus according to Claim 19, wherein said device is an optical device and said first and second amplifier units are transimpedance amplifier units.
23. A method according to Claim 22, wherein each of said output signal and said input signal is a composite signal.
24. A method according to Claim 23, wherein said output and input signal levels are RMS levels of the composites signals.
25. An apparatus according to Claim 19, wherein said controller produces an error signal level S err, where S err = ~ (S o - S i), S o is a signal level of said second signal and S i is a signal level of said first signal, and said controller uses said error signal level as a basis to adjust said ratio.
26. A method according to Claim 19, wherein said controller adjusts a component of said device that affects said ratio.
27. A gain-controlled optical amplifier apparatus, comprising:
an optical amplifier unit;
a first transimpedance amplifier unit connected to an input of said optical amplifier unit;
a second transimpedance amplifier uni connected to an output of said optical amplifier unit; and a controller connected to said first and second transimpedance amplifier units and to said optical amplifier unit, said controller operating to adjust an optical gain of said optical amplifier unit based on a difference between an output signal of said first transimpedance amplifier unit and an output signal of said second transimpedance amplifier unit.
an optical amplifier unit;
a first transimpedance amplifier unit connected to an input of said optical amplifier unit;
a second transimpedance amplifier uni connected to an output of said optical amplifier unit; and a controller connected to said first and second transimpedance amplifier units and to said optical amplifier unit, said controller operating to adjust an optical gain of said optical amplifier unit based on a difference between an output signal of said first transimpedance amplifier unit and an output signal of said second transimpedance amplifier unit.
28. An apparatus according to Claim 27, wherein said optical amplifier unit is a pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit including a pump laser, and said controller adjusts pump power of said pump laser.
29. A method according to Claim 27, wherein the optical gain is RMS
optical gain for a composite plurality of wavelengths input to said fiber-optic amplifier unit.
optical gain for a composite plurality of wavelengths input to said fiber-optic amplifier unit.
30. An apparatus according to Claim 27, wherein said first and second transimpedance amplifier units are respectively connected to said input and said output through corresponding photodetectors.
31. An apparatus according to Claim 27, wherein said controller produces an error voltage S err, where S err = ~ (S o - S i), S o is an output voltage of said second transimpedance amplifier and S i is an output voltage of said first transimpedance amplifier, and said controller uses said error voltage as a basis to adjust the optical gain.
32. An apparatus according to Claim 31, wherein said first and second transimpedance amplifier units are respectively connected to said input and said output through corresponding photodetectors, and S o and S i satisfy the following relationships:
S o = G oC2GP i S i = G iC1P i where G o and G i are the respective transimpedance gains of said second transimpedance amplifier unit and said first transimpedance amplifier unit, P
i is input optical signal power, G is the optical gaiin, and C2 and C1 are constants.
S o = G oC2GP i S i = G iC1P i where G o and G i are the respective transimpedance gains of said second transimpedance amplifier unit and said first transimpedance amplifier unit, P
i is input optical signal power, G is the optical gaiin, and C2 and C1 are constants.
33. An apparatus according to Claim 32, wherein said optical amplifier unit is a pumped fiber-optic amplifier unit including a pump laser, and said controller adjusts pump power of said pump laser.
34. An apparatus according to Claim 33, wherein said fiber-optic amplifier unit has a single fiber-optic amplification stage.
35. An apparatus according to Claim 33, wherein said fiber-optic amplifier unit has a plurality of fiber-optic amplification stages connected in series.
36. A method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
providing a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
providing a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and adjusting said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
providing a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
providing a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and adjusting said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
37. A method according to Claim 36, wherein said device is an amplifier unit and said ratio is a gain of that amplifier unit.
38. A method according to Claim 36, wherein said device is an optical device, said input and output signals are optical signals, and said first and second amplifier units are transimpedance amplifier units.
39. A method according to Claim 36, wherein said adjusting includes producing an error signal level S err, where S err = ~ (S o - S i), S o is a signal level of said second signal, and S i is a signal level of said first signal, and using said error signal level as a basis to adjust said ratio.
40. An apparatus for controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and a controller connected to said first and second amplifier units and said device, said controller operating to adjust said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
a first component connected to an input of the device to produce a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
a second component connected to an output of the device to produce a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and a controller connected to said first and second amplifier units and said device, said controller operating to adjust said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
41. An apparatus according to Claim 40, wherein said device is an amplifier unit and said ratio is a gain of said amplifier unit.
42. An apparatus according to Claim 40, wherein said controller produces an error signal level S err, where S err = ~ (S o - S i), S o is a signal level of said second signal and S i is a signal level of said first signal, and said controller uses said error signal level as a basis to adjust said ratio.
43. A method of controlling a ratio of an output signal level from a device and an input signal level to the device, comprising:
producing a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
producing a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and adjusting said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
producing a first signal having a level corresponding to said input signal level;
producing a second signal having a level corresponding to said output signal level; and adjusting said ratio based on a difference between the levels of said first and second signals.
44. An apparatus according to Claim 43, wherein said ratio is adjusted so as to substantially maintain a target ratio of said input and output signal levels, said target ratio being based on proportionality factors relating said first and second signal levels to said input and output signal levels, respectively.
45. An apparatus according to Claim 44, wherein said first signal and said second signal are produced, respectively, by a first amplifier unit and a second amplifier unit, said first and second amplifier units have predetermined gains, and said proportionality factors are said predetermined gains.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US11308398P | 1998-12-21 | 1998-12-21 | |
| US60/113,083 | 1998-12-21 | ||
| PCT/US1999/029679 WO2000038318A1 (en) | 1998-12-21 | 1999-12-14 | Method and apparatus for controlling the ratio of an output signal and an input signal |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2355943A1 true CA2355943A1 (en) | 2000-06-29 |
Family
ID=22347502
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002355943A Abandoned CA2355943A1 (en) | 1998-12-21 | 1999-12-14 | Method and apparatus for controlling the ratio of an output signal and an input signal |
Country Status (10)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP1142108A1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP2002533969A (en) |
| KR (1) | KR20010101311A (en) |
| CN (1) | CN1334988A (en) |
| AU (1) | AU2053300A (en) |
| BR (1) | BR9916386A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2355943A1 (en) |
| RU (1) | RU2001120339A (en) |
| TW (1) | TW461974B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2000038318A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP4603361B2 (en) | 2002-11-01 | 2010-12-22 | 富士通株式会社 | Optical amplifier control device |
| US7409197B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2008-08-05 | Intel Corporation | Transceiver with receive path overload protection and method |
| JP4770344B2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2011-09-14 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Power amplifier |
| JP5679618B2 (en) | 2007-05-31 | 2015-03-04 | 株式会社トリマティス | Optical amplifier |
| JP5245854B2 (en) * | 2009-01-19 | 2013-07-24 | 富士通株式会社 | WDM optical amplifier |
| CN104466681B (en) * | 2014-11-25 | 2018-12-25 | 武汉光迅科技股份有限公司 | A kind of cascade control system of fiber amplifier |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3900823A (en) * | 1973-03-28 | 1975-08-19 | Nathan O Sokal | Amplifying and processing apparatus for modulated carrier signals |
| NL8103833A (en) * | 1981-08-17 | 1983-03-16 | Philips Nv | DEVICE FOR DISPLAYING INFORMATION IN A TRACK OF A MAGNETIC RECORD CARRIER. |
| US4709215A (en) * | 1985-12-30 | 1987-11-24 | Hughes Aircraft Company | Traveling wave tube drive controller |
-
1999
- 1999-12-14 AU AU20533/00A patent/AU2053300A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-12-14 CA CA002355943A patent/CA2355943A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1999-12-14 BR BR9916386-1A patent/BR9916386A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-14 CN CN99814683A patent/CN1334988A/en active Pending
- 1999-12-14 JP JP2000590293A patent/JP2002533969A/en active Pending
- 1999-12-14 EP EP99964253A patent/EP1142108A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1999-12-14 RU RU2001120339/09A patent/RU2001120339A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-14 KR KR1020017007824A patent/KR20010101311A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-12-14 WO PCT/US1999/029679 patent/WO2000038318A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2000
- 2000-01-11 TW TW089100446A patent/TW461974B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP1142108A1 (en) | 2001-10-10 |
| CN1334988A (en) | 2002-02-06 |
| TW461974B (en) | 2001-11-01 |
| BR9916386A (en) | 2001-09-18 |
| WO2000038318A1 (en) | 2000-06-29 |
| AU2053300A (en) | 2000-07-12 |
| JP2002533969A (en) | 2002-10-08 |
| KR20010101311A (en) | 2001-11-14 |
| RU2001120339A (en) | 2003-06-27 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6836355B2 (en) | Universal controller for an optical amplifier that operates over a wide dynamic range of optical signals and optical amplifiers utilizing such controllers | |
| US6341034B1 (en) | Optical amplifier system with transient control using spectrally filtered input | |
| JP2003531546A (en) | Optical amplifier having simple gain / output control device | |
| JPH10261997A (en) | Light power monitor and light amplifier having the light power monitor | |
| JP2001007428A (en) | Light amplifier and method for controlling light amplifier | |
| CA2355943A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling the ratio of an output signal and an input signal | |
| US20010040721A1 (en) | Method for controlling perfomance of optical amplifiers | |
| KR100210913B1 (en) | Optical amplifier having auto signal trcking filter and there fore operating method | |
| US8094369B2 (en) | Regulatable optical amplifier, and method for regulating an optical amplifier | |
| JPH09219696A (en) | Optical amplifier | |
| JP5079199B2 (en) | Gain control in optical amplifiers | |
| JP4603361B2 (en) | Optical amplifier control device | |
| JP2728157B2 (en) | Optical amplifier | |
| US20030053193A1 (en) | Noise figure measuring system for optical amplifier | |
| US7038769B2 (en) | Characteristic monitoring method of pumping light source for optical amplification and optical amplifier | |
| US6606191B1 (en) | Method for controlling performance of optical amplifiers | |
| MXPA01006352A (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling the ratio of an output signal and an input signal | |
| JP2000244417A (en) | Optical pre-amplifier | |
| CN105897341A (en) | Fast approximating apparatus and method for light amplifier transient suppression | |
| JPH0492483A (en) | Optical amplifier exciting system | |
| EP2018689B1 (en) | Variable gain optical amplifiers | |
| JP3320225B2 (en) | Optical fiber amplifier | |
| JPH10144984A (en) | Optical fiber amplifier | |
| EP1058413A2 (en) | Gain-flattening optical amplifier | |
| KR100305106B1 (en) | Fiber Amplifiers with Gain Flatness Monitoring and Control |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FZDE | Dead |