CA2211166A1 - Process and composition for cleaning surfaces - Google Patents
Process and composition for cleaning surfacesInfo
- Publication number
- CA2211166A1 CA2211166A1 CA002211166A CA2211166A CA2211166A1 CA 2211166 A1 CA2211166 A1 CA 2211166A1 CA 002211166 A CA002211166 A CA 002211166A CA 2211166 A CA2211166 A CA 2211166A CA 2211166 A1 CA2211166 A1 CA 2211166A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- composition
- spray
- product
- solvent
- cleaning
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
- C11D17/04—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties combined with or containing other objects
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D17/00—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
- C11D17/04—Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties combined with or containing other objects
- C11D17/041—Compositions releasably affixed on a substrate or incorporated into a dispensing means
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/26—Organic compounds containing nitrogen
- C11D3/30—Amines; Substituted amines ; Quaternized amines
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/16—Organic compounds
- C11D3/37—Polymers
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C11—ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
- C11D—DETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
- C11D3/00—Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
- C11D3/43—Solvents
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Detergent Compositions (AREA)
- Containers And Packaging Bodies Having A Special Means To Remove Contents (AREA)
Abstract
When products comprising aqueous solutions of nonionics or nonionic/solvent systems are sprayed as fine droplets to form a discontinuous film, either less cleaning effort can be used with the same level of product, or the same effort can be used with less product. It is believed that the effect is due to the presence of an increased number of menisci and evaporation of the aqueous liquor or part of any solvent component from the product on the surface, and further believed that this evaporation causes local increases in concentration and/or local turbulence which enhances the cleaning process. Accordingly, a first aspect of the invention provides a packaged, aqueous or solvent-containing, nonionic cleaning composition, in a container provided with a spray jet adapted to deliver the composition to a surface in the form of a spray, characterized in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5 ml and the said dose is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray is operated 15 cm from the surface. A further aspect of the invention relates to a method using the above-mentionned packaged composition. Preferred compositions have a pH of > 10 and comprises, in admixture with water, nonionic surfactant, solvent, an alkanolamine, buffer/alkali and a polymer.
Description
WO 96/26263 PCT[EP96/00544 PRQCESS AND COMPOSITION FOR CLEANING SURFACES
Field of the 2nvention The present invention relates to a process and composition for cleaning surfaces.
Backaround to the Tõtrnr,l-ir,r, It is known to apply cleaning compositions containing surfactants, to surfaces, by spraying droplets of the composition onto a surface. In known spraying processes the film of composition deposited on the surface is continuous over a large part of its area, although, towards the edges of the spray pattern a discontinous field of droplets may be observed. This manner of application enables the product to be targeted in the region of the surface at which it is required. The spraying apparatus, such as so-called 'trigger pumps' which are used to deliver cleaning compositions generally deliver large doses of product in the form of relatively large droplets which flow and coalesce on surfaces so as to form a continuous film of the composition.
It is also known to spray foams, which are by definition not homogeneous on a small scale, onto a surface. Again, the trigger pumps which are used to deliver compositions in this form are known to deliver relatively large quantities of product.
Field of the 2nvention The present invention relates to a process and composition for cleaning surfaces.
Backaround to the Tõtrnr,l-ir,r, It is known to apply cleaning compositions containing surfactants, to surfaces, by spraying droplets of the composition onto a surface. In known spraying processes the film of composition deposited on the surface is continuous over a large part of its area, although, towards the edges of the spray pattern a discontinous field of droplets may be observed. This manner of application enables the product to be targeted in the region of the surface at which it is required. The spraying apparatus, such as so-called 'trigger pumps' which are used to deliver cleaning compositions generally deliver large doses of product in the form of relatively large droplets which flow and coalesce on surfaces so as to form a continuous film of the composition.
It is also known to spray foams, which are by definition not homogeneous on a small scale, onto a surface. Again, the trigger pumps which are used to deliver compositions in this form are known to deliver relatively large quantities of product.
Brief Descriotion of the Invention We have determined that when products comprising aqueous solutions of nonionics or nonionic/solvent systems are sprayed as fine droplets to form a discontinuous film, either less cleaning effort can be used with the same level of product, or the same effort can be used with less product. It is believed that the effect is due to the presence of an increased number of menisci and evaporation of the aqueous liquor or part of any solvent component from the product on the surface. It is further believed that this evaporation, especially at menisci, causes local increases in concentration and/or local turbulence which enhances the cleaning process. We have determined that a similar effect can also be observed with foams.
3petailed Descrivtion of the nvention Accordingly, a first aspect of the invention provides a packaged, aqueous or solvent-containing, nonionic cleaning composition, in a container provided with a spray jet adapted to deliver the composition to a surface in the form of a spray, characterised in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5m1 and the said dose is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray jet is operated 15cm from the surface.
A second aspect of the invention relates to a process for cleaning a hard surface which comprises the step of spraying a composition comprising a nonionic surfactant from a container provided with a spray jet, onto a surface in the form of a spray, characterised in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5m1 and the said dose 3 PCT(EP96(00544 is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray jet is operated 15cm from the surface.
As mentioned above, is believed that by spreading the product on the surface in the form of discrete droplets and/or a foam which does not form a continuous film, a meniscus cleaning effect is promoted which assists the cleaning process. It is an important feature of the present invention that coalescence of the product on the surface to form a continuous film should be minimised, although it will be appreciated that some coalescence can occur.
Typically, the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.2-0.4ml: dosages of 0.25-0.35m1 are particularly preferred. Prior-used sprays for hard-surface cleaners typically deliver upwards of 0.7ml per spraying operation, i.e. larger dosages than the sprays of the present invention. It is particularly preferred in the practice of the invention dosage is equivalent to at least 0.3ml of product delivered over an area of 80cmz.
The preferred cone angles of the spray are such that 0.15-0.5m1 of product is delivered over a circular region of at least 10cm diameter. The preferred droplet pattern on the surface is such that, for each pump cycle, a calculated 10-40 ml of product are delivered over each square meter of surface.
= Typical cone angles in embodiments of the present invention are 25-75 degrees. Prior-used sprays for hard-surface cleaners often deliver the product in a relatively narrow cone or jet as well as delivering significantly larger quantities of product per pump cycle. As noted above, an important feature of the present invention is the reduced dosage and/or increased coverage as compared with the prior art.
The preferred droplet size distribution is such that for a lOg discharge less than 350mg of product is present in droplets having a particle size of less than 7 microns.
Preferably, less than 700mg of product is present in droplets having a particle size of less than 30 microns.
Typically, the mean particle size will lie in the range 50-100 micron. It is believed that this avoids the problem of respirable particles whilst ensuring that product is delivered to the surface rather than remaining suspended in air. It is also believed that the use of this range of distribution gives good coverage of the surface and promotes the meniscus cleaning effect mentioned above.
The droplet size range for a typical product presently on the market ('CIF multiuso' (TM) trigger pack) appears to be 30-700 microns with a peak at around 250 microns.
The composition must have a viscosity such that it can be delivered in the form of spray. It is also believed essential that the composition comprises at least one nonionic surfactant. The compositions according to the present invention can be a simple solution or in a more complex form such as a microemulsion.
Particularly preferred compositions comprise 2-30% of nonionic surfactant, more preferably 3-13% nonionic.
Anionic surfactant is optional. Preferred nonionic surfactants include, alkoxylated alcohols, particularly ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohols having 3-8 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol. Other nonionic surfactants may be employed, a plurality of said surfactants are disclosed WO 96/26263 PC'Y1EP96100544 in 'Nonionic Surfactants' by Schick (Arnold: surfactant science series, volume 1).
The preferred concentrations of surfactant fall into the range 5-15%wt total surfactant, with levels of around 10%wt being particular preferred. These concentrations are higher than those typically used for spray compositions, but due to the lower dosage of the composition and the improved cleaning efficiency which is seen with the practice of the present invention it is possible to reduce the overall usage of surfactant. Not only does this have a direct environmental consequence, but there is an indirect benefit in that less packaging is used for the smaller containers in which the product may be packaged and less fuel in consumed in shipping the product. There is also a direct benefit to the consumer that effective cleaning can be obtained with a light yet effective delivery device.
Hydrophobic oils are optional components of compositions according to the present invention. Suitable oils include oils which rapidly dissolve troglyceride. When oils are present preferred oils include limonene, para-cymene, di-butyl ether and butyl butyrate.
Solvents are preferably present at levels of 3-20%wt, with levels of 5-10% being particularly preferred. Glycol ether and/or lower alcohols having 1-5 carbons are preferred as solvents although the use of short alkyl chain esters including ethyl acetate and/or pyrrolidones including N-methyl pyrrolidione, is also envisaged.
Preferably, the solvent is selected from: propylene glycol mono n-butyl ether, dipropylene glycol mono n-butyl ether, propylene glycol mono t-butyl ether, dipropylene glycol mono t-butyl ether, diethylene glycol hexyl ether, methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, di-ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and mixtures thereof.
Particularly preferred solvents are selected from the group comprising ethanol (preferably as industrial methylated spirits)., propylene glycol mono n-butyl ether (available as 'Dowanol PnB' [RTM]) and di-ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (available as 'Butyl Digol' [RTM] or 'Butyl Carbitol' [RTM]). These solvents are preferred due to cost, availability and safety factors. We have determined that this selection of solvents gives enhanced cleaning performance as regards inks and dyestuffs.
While the compositions of the present invention can be alkaline, acidic or neutral, it is preferred that the composition are rather strongly alkaline, having preferred pH of >10.
It is particularly preferred that the composition comprises 1-10% of an alkanolamine, with levels of 2-6%wt being particularly preferred.
Particularly suitable alkanolamines include: 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol, mono-ethanolamine and di-ethanolamine.
These materials are believed to give improved cleaning on tough or aged soils.
We have determined that it is particularly advantageous to include a polymer in the compositions of the present invention so as to reduce the level of formation of exceptionally fine droplets, i.e. droplets which may be inhaled and cause irritation to the user. Suitable polymers include PVP, available in the marketplace as Polymer PVP K-90.
3petailed Descrivtion of the nvention Accordingly, a first aspect of the invention provides a packaged, aqueous or solvent-containing, nonionic cleaning composition, in a container provided with a spray jet adapted to deliver the composition to a surface in the form of a spray, characterised in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5m1 and the said dose is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray jet is operated 15cm from the surface.
A second aspect of the invention relates to a process for cleaning a hard surface which comprises the step of spraying a composition comprising a nonionic surfactant from a container provided with a spray jet, onto a surface in the form of a spray, characterised in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5m1 and the said dose 3 PCT(EP96(00544 is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray jet is operated 15cm from the surface.
As mentioned above, is believed that by spreading the product on the surface in the form of discrete droplets and/or a foam which does not form a continuous film, a meniscus cleaning effect is promoted which assists the cleaning process. It is an important feature of the present invention that coalescence of the product on the surface to form a continuous film should be minimised, although it will be appreciated that some coalescence can occur.
Typically, the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.2-0.4ml: dosages of 0.25-0.35m1 are particularly preferred. Prior-used sprays for hard-surface cleaners typically deliver upwards of 0.7ml per spraying operation, i.e. larger dosages than the sprays of the present invention. It is particularly preferred in the practice of the invention dosage is equivalent to at least 0.3ml of product delivered over an area of 80cmz.
The preferred cone angles of the spray are such that 0.15-0.5m1 of product is delivered over a circular region of at least 10cm diameter. The preferred droplet pattern on the surface is such that, for each pump cycle, a calculated 10-40 ml of product are delivered over each square meter of surface.
= Typical cone angles in embodiments of the present invention are 25-75 degrees. Prior-used sprays for hard-surface cleaners often deliver the product in a relatively narrow cone or jet as well as delivering significantly larger quantities of product per pump cycle. As noted above, an important feature of the present invention is the reduced dosage and/or increased coverage as compared with the prior art.
The preferred droplet size distribution is such that for a lOg discharge less than 350mg of product is present in droplets having a particle size of less than 7 microns.
Preferably, less than 700mg of product is present in droplets having a particle size of less than 30 microns.
Typically, the mean particle size will lie in the range 50-100 micron. It is believed that this avoids the problem of respirable particles whilst ensuring that product is delivered to the surface rather than remaining suspended in air. It is also believed that the use of this range of distribution gives good coverage of the surface and promotes the meniscus cleaning effect mentioned above.
The droplet size range for a typical product presently on the market ('CIF multiuso' (TM) trigger pack) appears to be 30-700 microns with a peak at around 250 microns.
The composition must have a viscosity such that it can be delivered in the form of spray. It is also believed essential that the composition comprises at least one nonionic surfactant. The compositions according to the present invention can be a simple solution or in a more complex form such as a microemulsion.
Particularly preferred compositions comprise 2-30% of nonionic surfactant, more preferably 3-13% nonionic.
Anionic surfactant is optional. Preferred nonionic surfactants include, alkoxylated alcohols, particularly ethoxylated C8-C18 alcohols having 3-8 moles of ethylene oxide per mole of alcohol. Other nonionic surfactants may be employed, a plurality of said surfactants are disclosed WO 96/26263 PC'Y1EP96100544 in 'Nonionic Surfactants' by Schick (Arnold: surfactant science series, volume 1).
The preferred concentrations of surfactant fall into the range 5-15%wt total surfactant, with levels of around 10%wt being particular preferred. These concentrations are higher than those typically used for spray compositions, but due to the lower dosage of the composition and the improved cleaning efficiency which is seen with the practice of the present invention it is possible to reduce the overall usage of surfactant. Not only does this have a direct environmental consequence, but there is an indirect benefit in that less packaging is used for the smaller containers in which the product may be packaged and less fuel in consumed in shipping the product. There is also a direct benefit to the consumer that effective cleaning can be obtained with a light yet effective delivery device.
Hydrophobic oils are optional components of compositions according to the present invention. Suitable oils include oils which rapidly dissolve troglyceride. When oils are present preferred oils include limonene, para-cymene, di-butyl ether and butyl butyrate.
Solvents are preferably present at levels of 3-20%wt, with levels of 5-10% being particularly preferred. Glycol ether and/or lower alcohols having 1-5 carbons are preferred as solvents although the use of short alkyl chain esters including ethyl acetate and/or pyrrolidones including N-methyl pyrrolidione, is also envisaged.
Preferably, the solvent is selected from: propylene glycol mono n-butyl ether, dipropylene glycol mono n-butyl ether, propylene glycol mono t-butyl ether, dipropylene glycol mono t-butyl ether, diethylene glycol hexyl ether, methanol, ethanol, isopropyl alcohol, ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, di-ethylene glycol monobutyl ether and mixtures thereof.
Particularly preferred solvents are selected from the group comprising ethanol (preferably as industrial methylated spirits)., propylene glycol mono n-butyl ether (available as 'Dowanol PnB' [RTM]) and di-ethylene glycol monobutyl ether (available as 'Butyl Digol' [RTM] or 'Butyl Carbitol' [RTM]). These solvents are preferred due to cost, availability and safety factors. We have determined that this selection of solvents gives enhanced cleaning performance as regards inks and dyestuffs.
While the compositions of the present invention can be alkaline, acidic or neutral, it is preferred that the composition are rather strongly alkaline, having preferred pH of >10.
It is particularly preferred that the composition comprises 1-10% of an alkanolamine, with levels of 2-6%wt being particularly preferred.
Particularly suitable alkanolamines include: 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol, mono-ethanolamine and di-ethanolamine.
These materials are believed to give improved cleaning on tough or aged soils.
We have determined that it is particularly advantageous to include a polymer in the compositions of the present invention so as to reduce the level of formation of exceptionally fine droplets, i.e. droplets which may be inhaled and cause irritation to the user. Suitable polymers include PVP, available in the marketplace as Polymer PVP K-90.
Suitable levels of PVP polymer range upwards from 50ppm.
~ Levels of 500-1500ppm are particularly preferred.
The composition preferably has a pH of >10 and comprises, in admixture with water,:
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant b) 0-10% solvent c) 2-6% alkanolamine d) 0-5% buffer/alkali, and, e) 50-1500ppm polymer.
Particularly preferred compositions have a pH of >10 and comprise, in admixture with water,:
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant (most preferably, C10-E05 nonionic surfactant) b) 5-10% solvent (most preferably, diethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether) c) 2-6% alkanolamine (most preferably, 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol) d) 1-5% buffer/alkali (most preferably, sodium or potassium carbonate), and, e) 500-1000ppm polymer (preferably PVP), said composition being packaged in a container adapted to produce a spray of 0.15-0.5m1 of product per spraying operation, said spray having an average drop size in the range 30-300 microns.
In order that the present invention may be better understood it will be described hereinafter with reference to examples and with reference to the sole accompanying figure.
Examnles Cleaning performance was determined on.soiled DECAMEL
(RTM, ex. Formica) sheets. 0.5mg/cmz (based on non-volatiles) of soil were deposited on an 'A4' sized area of 'DECAMEL' test surface by spraying. The soil comprised 1%
glycerol tripalmitate, 0.5% glycerol trioleate, 0.5%
kaolin, 0.2% liquid paraffin, 0.1% palmitic acid, 0.02%
carbon black in methylated spirits. The soil was allowed to age for 24 hours at room temperature prior to cleaning.
The effort used to remove the soil from the test surface using a cellulosic sponge cloth was measured.
Example 1 Compositions were prepared by mixing the components given in table 1 below. 30 Table 1 10% Imbentin 91-35 (TM) C10-E05 nonionic surfactant, 8% Butyl Digol (TM): diethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether, 4% 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol, 2% Buffer/alkali (sodium carbonate) to 100% Water From Table 1 it can be seen that the composition is a concentrate (as regards surfactant) as compared with conventional spray cleaning compositions which comprise around 4%wt surfactant, 5% solvent.
Table 2 and figure 1 show results for six sprays using the composition described above. The compositions were sprayed onto unbaked soiled DECAMEL tiles prepared as described above using a variety of pumps. These pumps are identified in table 2 as P1-3 and Cl-3. The P-series pumps were obtained from 'Perfect Valois' (TM) and the C-series pumps from 'CALMAR' (TM). The P-series pumps are identified by manufacturers codes as follows: P1: PZ2/290 4627, P2: PZ2/290 3020, P3: PZ2/290 2502. The C-series pumps are identified by manufacturers codes as follows:
Cl: M300 HV, C2: M300 60 degree orifice, C3: M300 30 degree orifice.
In the table and the figure, 'DS' is the mean particle concentration averaged over a five minute period from spraying, in air, of particles per cc of a diameter less than 7 microns. Higher figures for the 'DS' correspond to lower average droplet diameters in the spray.
More extensive data were obtained for pumps P1-3 and is reproduced in table 3 below. From this data, it can be seen that there is a correlation between the drop size 'DS' as measured above and the mean particle size produced by the sprays.
Table 3 particle diameter in microns Spray DS' 260-85 85-30 30-5.8 P1 952 38.9% 50.1% 11%
P2 627 45.8% 44.7% 9.5%
P3 417 50.4% 43.6% 6%
Returning to Table 2, cone diameter is as measured at 15cm, i.e. it is the diameter of the spray pattern at 15cm from the spray head.
The dose is the dose applied to the tiles over the area sprayed with product. In all instances more than one cycle of the spraying apparatus was used.
Effort is the total effort required to clean a tile completely, measured in terms of the total effort applied by a human operator in Ns..
~ Levels of 500-1500ppm are particularly preferred.
The composition preferably has a pH of >10 and comprises, in admixture with water,:
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant b) 0-10% solvent c) 2-6% alkanolamine d) 0-5% buffer/alkali, and, e) 50-1500ppm polymer.
Particularly preferred compositions have a pH of >10 and comprise, in admixture with water,:
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant (most preferably, C10-E05 nonionic surfactant) b) 5-10% solvent (most preferably, diethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether) c) 2-6% alkanolamine (most preferably, 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol) d) 1-5% buffer/alkali (most preferably, sodium or potassium carbonate), and, e) 500-1000ppm polymer (preferably PVP), said composition being packaged in a container adapted to produce a spray of 0.15-0.5m1 of product per spraying operation, said spray having an average drop size in the range 30-300 microns.
In order that the present invention may be better understood it will be described hereinafter with reference to examples and with reference to the sole accompanying figure.
Examnles Cleaning performance was determined on.soiled DECAMEL
(RTM, ex. Formica) sheets. 0.5mg/cmz (based on non-volatiles) of soil were deposited on an 'A4' sized area of 'DECAMEL' test surface by spraying. The soil comprised 1%
glycerol tripalmitate, 0.5% glycerol trioleate, 0.5%
kaolin, 0.2% liquid paraffin, 0.1% palmitic acid, 0.02%
carbon black in methylated spirits. The soil was allowed to age for 24 hours at room temperature prior to cleaning.
The effort used to remove the soil from the test surface using a cellulosic sponge cloth was measured.
Example 1 Compositions were prepared by mixing the components given in table 1 below. 30 Table 1 10% Imbentin 91-35 (TM) C10-E05 nonionic surfactant, 8% Butyl Digol (TM): diethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether, 4% 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol, 2% Buffer/alkali (sodium carbonate) to 100% Water From Table 1 it can be seen that the composition is a concentrate (as regards surfactant) as compared with conventional spray cleaning compositions which comprise around 4%wt surfactant, 5% solvent.
Table 2 and figure 1 show results for six sprays using the composition described above. The compositions were sprayed onto unbaked soiled DECAMEL tiles prepared as described above using a variety of pumps. These pumps are identified in table 2 as P1-3 and Cl-3. The P-series pumps were obtained from 'Perfect Valois' (TM) and the C-series pumps from 'CALMAR' (TM). The P-series pumps are identified by manufacturers codes as follows: P1: PZ2/290 4627, P2: PZ2/290 3020, P3: PZ2/290 2502. The C-series pumps are identified by manufacturers codes as follows:
Cl: M300 HV, C2: M300 60 degree orifice, C3: M300 30 degree orifice.
In the table and the figure, 'DS' is the mean particle concentration averaged over a five minute period from spraying, in air, of particles per cc of a diameter less than 7 microns. Higher figures for the 'DS' correspond to lower average droplet diameters in the spray.
More extensive data were obtained for pumps P1-3 and is reproduced in table 3 below. From this data, it can be seen that there is a correlation between the drop size 'DS' as measured above and the mean particle size produced by the sprays.
Table 3 particle diameter in microns Spray DS' 260-85 85-30 30-5.8 P1 952 38.9% 50.1% 11%
P2 627 45.8% 44.7% 9.5%
P3 417 50.4% 43.6% 6%
Returning to Table 2, cone diameter is as measured at 15cm, i.e. it is the diameter of the spray pattern at 15cm from the spray head.
The dose is the dose applied to the tiles over the area sprayed with product. In all instances more than one cycle of the spraying apparatus was used.
Effort is the total effort required to clean a tile completely, measured in terms of the total effort applied by a human operator in Ns..
Table 2 Spray Dose 'DS' Cone diam Effort P1 0.59 952 14.0 cm 205 P2 0.64 627 10.2 cm 326 P3 0.62 417 7.6 cm 349 C1 0.61 745 9.5 cm 277 C2 0.62 551 8.0 cm 392 C3 0.83 130 7.0 cm 410 From the figures given in Table 2 it is possible to calculate the dose per unit area and thus the cleaning efficiency in terms of the effort required per dose of product per unit area sprayed. Figure 1 plots this efficiency against the two series of 'drop size' (DS) measurements expressed in terms of the quantity of fine droplets. From the figure it is clearly apparent that efficiency is higher for higher values of 'DS' i.e. the same quantity of product distributed in finer drops allows the surface to the cleaned with less effort. This is true for both the 'P' series sprays and the 'C' series sprays.
Example 2 In order to demonstrate the effect of a polymer on the = 30 drop size distribution the experiments were performed with a Calmar (TM) M300 6/35 / BB034 pump actuated as a finger pump from rear. These experiments showed that in the absence of polymer the mean particle concentration averaged over a five minute period from spraying, in air, of particles per cc of a diameter less than 7 microns was 315 however in the presence of 500 ppm PVP (Polymer PVP K-90), the mean particle concentration fell to 79.
Table 4 below gives additional data for a back in which the finger-pump (all available from Calmar) were actuated /
by a lever.
Table 4 PVP Pump Type Droplets 200 ppm M300 108 350 ppm M300 95 500 ppm M300 82 500 ppm M300 6/35 + 4mm extension post 60 It can be seen from table 4 that the use of a lever and an extension post further reduce the level of respirable droplets which are produced.
Example 3 In order to show directly the effect of variation in the manner in which the product is dosed, compositions were prepared by mixing the components given in table 5 below.
Example 2 In order to demonstrate the effect of a polymer on the = 30 drop size distribution the experiments were performed with a Calmar (TM) M300 6/35 / BB034 pump actuated as a finger pump from rear. These experiments showed that in the absence of polymer the mean particle concentration averaged over a five minute period from spraying, in air, of particles per cc of a diameter less than 7 microns was 315 however in the presence of 500 ppm PVP (Polymer PVP K-90), the mean particle concentration fell to 79.
Table 4 below gives additional data for a back in which the finger-pump (all available from Calmar) were actuated /
by a lever.
Table 4 PVP Pump Type Droplets 200 ppm M300 108 350 ppm M300 95 500 ppm M300 82 500 ppm M300 6/35 + 4mm extension post 60 It can be seen from table 4 that the use of a lever and an extension post further reduce the level of respirable droplets which are produced.
Example 3 In order to show directly the effect of variation in the manner in which the product is dosed, compositions were prepared by mixing the components given in table 5 below.
Table 5 10% Nonidet 91-6T (TM) C10-E06 nonionic surfactant 8% Butyl Digol (TM): diethylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether 4% 2-amino-2-methyl-l-propanol 1.25% Buffer/alkali (potassium carbonate) 1000ppm PVP K90 0.2% Perfume to 100% Water These compositions were applied to soiled DECAMEL tiles in three ways, by means of a conventional trigger spray, by means of a pipette and at low dosage accordance with the invention. Table 6 below, provides details of the dosage (ml), effort required to clean (Ns) and cleaning efficiency (10/[ln(effort) x dose]). Efficiency was, defined without reference to the spray coverage in this instance.
Table 6 Method Dose Effort Efficiency Pipette 2 304 0.9 Trigger 1.17 169 1.7 Invention 0.76 199 2.4 From the results in table 6 it can be seen that the application of the product in the low dosage characteristic of the invention gave more efficient cleaning than either the higher dosage of the conventional trigger pack, which would show some discontinuities of distribution or the particularly high dose of the pipette from which the product was dispensed as a pool. It should be noted that in these experiments the same composition was used in each instance to eliminate the possibility that the concentration of the product influenced the results.
Table 6 Method Dose Effort Efficiency Pipette 2 304 0.9 Trigger 1.17 169 1.7 Invention 0.76 199 2.4 From the results in table 6 it can be seen that the application of the product in the low dosage characteristic of the invention gave more efficient cleaning than either the higher dosage of the conventional trigger pack, which would show some discontinuities of distribution or the particularly high dose of the pipette from which the product was dispensed as a pool. It should be noted that in these experiments the same composition was used in each instance to eliminate the possibility that the concentration of the product influenced the results.
Claims (8)
1. A packaged, aqueous or solvent-containing, nonionic cleaning composition, in a container provided with a spray jet adapted to deliver the composition to a surface in the form of a spray, characterised in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5ml and the said dose is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray jet is operated 15cm from the surface.
2. A process for cleaning a hard surface which comprises the step of spraying a composition comprising a nonionic surfactant from a container provided with a spray jet, onto a surface in the form of a spray, characterised in that the dosage applied to the surface by each operation of the spraying apparatus falls in the range 0.15-0.5ml and the said dose is applied over an area of at least 50 cm2 when the spray jet is operated 15cm from the surface.
3. A process according to claim 2 wherein droplet size distribution of the product in the spray is such that for a 10g discharge less than 350mg of product is present in droplets having a particle size of less than 7 microns.
4. A process according to claim 2 wherein the composition comprises 1-10% of an alkanolamine.
5. A process according to claim 2 wherein the composition comprises a polymer.
6. A process according to claim 2 wherein the composition has a pH of >10.
7. A process according to claim 2 wherein the composition has a pH of >10 and comprises, in admixture with water,:
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant b) 0-10% solvent c) 2-6% alkanolamine d) 0-5% buffer/alkali, and, e) 50-1500ppm polymer.
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant b) 0-10% solvent c) 2-6% alkanolamine d) 0-5% buffer/alkali, and, e) 50-1500ppm polymer.
8) A process according to claim 2 wherein composition has a pH of >10 and comprises, in admixture with water, :
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant b) 5-10% of a glycol ether solvent c) 2-6% alkanolamine d) 1-5% sodium or potassium carbonate, and, e) 500-1000ppm polymer (preferably PVP), said composition being packaged in a container adapted to produce a spray of 0.15-0.5ml of product per spraying operation, said spray having an average drop size in the range 30-300 microns.
a) 3-13% nonionic surfactant b) 5-10% of a glycol ether solvent c) 2-6% alkanolamine d) 1-5% sodium or potassium carbonate, and, e) 500-1000ppm polymer (preferably PVP), said composition being packaged in a container adapted to produce a spray of 0.15-0.5ml of product per spraying operation, said spray having an average drop size in the range 30-300 microns.
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GBGB9503595.2A GB9503595D0 (en) | 1995-02-23 | 1995-02-23 | Process and composition for cleaning surfaces |
GB9503595.2 | 1995-02-23 | ||
GBGB9514301.2A GB9514301D0 (en) | 1995-07-13 | 1995-07-13 | Process and composition for cleaning surfaces |
GB9514301.2 | 1995-07-13 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2211166A1 true CA2211166A1 (en) | 1996-08-29 |
Family
ID=26306566
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002211166A Abandoned CA2211166A1 (en) | 1995-02-23 | 1996-02-07 | Process and composition for cleaning surfaces |
Country Status (15)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0811053B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPH11500480A (en) |
KR (1) | KR19980702442A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1175975A (en) |
AR (1) | AR001005A1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU716833B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2211166A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE69602355T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2131928T3 (en) |
HU (1) | HUP9801683A3 (en) |
IN (1) | IN186941B (en) |
MY (1) | MY111862A (en) |
TR (1) | TR199700839T1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW364923B (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996026263A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9626610D0 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 1997-02-05 | Unilever Plc | Cleaning composition comprising monoalkyl cationic surfactants |
EP2640816A1 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2013-09-25 | Dow Global Technologies LLC | Hard surface cleaners comprising low voc, low odor alkanolamines |
US20120186606A1 (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2012-07-26 | Barss Steven H | Cleaning of Nozzle Plate |
PL3118299T3 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2019-04-30 | Procter & Gamble | Cleaning product |
PL3118301T3 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2019-04-30 | Procter & Gamble | Cleaning product |
EP3118294B1 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2018-10-17 | The Procter and Gamble Company | Cleaning product |
EP3118293B1 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2020-09-09 | The Procter and Gamble Company | Cleaning product |
EP3572490A1 (en) | 2018-05-24 | 2019-11-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Spray container comprising a detergent composition |
EP3572492A1 (en) | 2018-05-24 | 2019-11-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Fine mist hard surface cleaning spray |
EP3572491A1 (en) | 2018-05-24 | 2019-11-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Spray container comprising a detergent composition |
EP3572493A1 (en) | 2018-05-24 | 2019-11-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Spray container comprising a detergent composition |
EP3572489A1 (en) | 2018-05-24 | 2019-11-27 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Spray container comprising a detergent composition |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2067588A (en) * | 1980-01-17 | 1981-07-30 | Unilever Ltd | Ovens cleaning compositions |
EP0513240B1 (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1998-08-12 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Liquid hard surface detergent compositions containing zwitterionic detergent surfactant and monoethanolamine and/or beta-aminoalkanol |
US5382376A (en) * | 1992-10-02 | 1995-01-17 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Hard surface detergent compositions |
EP0630965A1 (en) * | 1993-06-23 | 1994-12-28 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Concentrated liquid hard surface detergent compositions containing maleic acid-olefin copolymers |
-
1996
- 1996-02-07 ES ES96901798T patent/ES2131928T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-02-07 CA CA002211166A patent/CA2211166A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1996-02-07 DE DE69602355T patent/DE69602355T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1996-02-07 HU HU9801683A patent/HUP9801683A3/en unknown
- 1996-02-07 EP EP96901798A patent/EP0811053B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1996-02-07 CN CN96192074A patent/CN1175975A/en active Pending
- 1996-02-07 KR KR1019970705841A patent/KR19980702442A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1996-02-07 WO PCT/EP1996/000544 patent/WO1996026263A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1996-02-07 TR TR97/00839T patent/TR199700839T1/en unknown
- 1996-02-07 JP JP8525346A patent/JPH11500480A/en active Pending
- 1996-02-07 AU AU46231/96A patent/AU716833B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1996-02-13 IN IN88BO1996 patent/IN186941B/en unknown
- 1996-02-15 TW TW085101922A patent/TW364923B/en active
- 1996-02-15 MY MYPI96000578A patent/MY111862A/en unknown
- 1996-02-22 AR ARP960101472A patent/AR001005A1/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
IN186941B (en) | 2001-12-15 |
AU716833B2 (en) | 2000-03-09 |
CN1175975A (en) | 1998-03-11 |
TR199700839T1 (en) | 1998-01-21 |
ES2131928T3 (en) | 1999-08-01 |
TW364923B (en) | 1999-07-21 |
WO1996026263A1 (en) | 1996-08-29 |
EP0811053B1 (en) | 1999-05-06 |
DE69602355T2 (en) | 1999-10-21 |
AR001005A1 (en) | 1997-08-27 |
HUP9801683A2 (en) | 1999-01-28 |
MY111862A (en) | 2001-01-31 |
EP0811053A1 (en) | 1997-12-10 |
JPH11500480A (en) | 1999-01-12 |
AU4623196A (en) | 1996-09-11 |
KR19980702442A (en) | 1998-07-15 |
DE69602355D1 (en) | 1999-06-10 |
HUP9801683A3 (en) | 1999-03-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU716833B2 (en) | Process and composition for cleaning surfaces | |
EP0804536B1 (en) | Glass cleaner compositions | |
US5554320A (en) | Liquid cleaning compositions | |
US5462697A (en) | Hard surface cleaners/microemulsions comprising an anticorrosion system to protect acid-sensitive surfaces | |
CA2444441C (en) | Non-foaming cleaning compositions and a method for their use | |
JPH09137065A (en) | Water-based spray composition | |
WO2016042883A1 (en) | Cleaning fluid and cleaning method | |
US6288015B1 (en) | Multiphase cleaning composition containing lignin sulfonate | |
EP0694061B1 (en) | Hygienic cleaning composition and apparatus for spraying said composition | |
JP2003253297A (en) | Detergent and detergent product | |
EP1755432A1 (en) | Cleaning device | |
SK105794A3 (en) | Liquid cleaning compositions | |
EA021348B1 (en) | A process for cleaning an article such as fabric article | |
EP0741778A1 (en) | Liquid cleaning compositions | |
CA2180608A1 (en) | Packaged cleaning composition | |
US5851971A (en) | Liquid cleaning compositions | |
EP3481439B1 (en) | Air freshening formulation, aerosol product and method of freshening the air | |
PL186139B1 (en) | Liquid-crystalline composition | |
AU2006350750A1 (en) | Foaming hard surface cleaner | |
AU723136B2 (en) | Packaged cleaning composition | |
JP2001031995A (en) | Liquid detergent composition | |
JPH1192795A (en) | Spray type cleaning agent enclosed in container with injection nozzle | |
WO2002083828A1 (en) | Non-foaming cleaning compositions and a method for their use | |
CA2292966A1 (en) | A multiphase cleaning composition containing end-capped polyalkoxylated alcohol | |
GB2318778A (en) | Recharging a container for dispensing liquid preparations using a soluble sachet |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
FZDE | Discontinued |