CA2108038A1 - Dry bleach composition with improved dispersibility - Google Patents

Dry bleach composition with improved dispersibility

Info

Publication number
CA2108038A1
CA2108038A1 CA 2108038 CA2108038A CA2108038A1 CA 2108038 A1 CA2108038 A1 CA 2108038A1 CA 2108038 CA2108038 CA 2108038 CA 2108038 A CA2108038 A CA 2108038A CA 2108038 A1 CA2108038 A1 CA 2108038A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
composition
surfactant
calcium stearate
dry
oxidant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA 2108038
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Kelly J. Brodbeck
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Clorox Co
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of CA2108038A1 publication Critical patent/CA2108038A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/16Organic compounds
    • C11D3/20Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • C11D3/2075Carboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • C11D3/2079Monocarboxylic acids-salts thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D17/00Detergent materials or soaps characterised by their shape or physical properties
    • C11D17/0039Coated compositions or coated components in the compositions, (micro)capsules
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/02Inorganic compounds ; Elemental compounds
    • C11D3/04Water-soluble compounds
    • C11D3/10Carbonates ; Bicarbonates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/39Organic or inorganic per-compounds
    • C11D3/3942Inorganic per-compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C11ANIMAL OR VEGETABLE OILS, FATS, FATTY SUBSTANCES OR WAXES; FATTY ACIDS THEREFROM; DETERGENTS; CANDLES
    • C11DDETERGENT COMPOSITIONS; USE OF SINGLE SUBSTANCES AS DETERGENTS; SOAP OR SOAP-MAKING; RESIN SOAPS; RECOVERY OF GLYCEROL
    • C11D3/00Other compounding ingredients of detergent compositions covered in group C11D1/00
    • C11D3/39Organic or inorganic per-compounds
    • C11D3/3945Organic per-compounds

Abstract

A dry, fabric bleaching composition, which leaves minimal residue in cold water washes, comprising (a) a bleaching-effective amount of a peroxygen bleach; (b) an alkaline builder material in an amount sufficient to provide an alkaline pH and building capacity;
(c) about 0.05-0.5 % of a calcium stearate powder; and (d) 0 -about 5 % of a surfactant. A method of making the composition of the present invention is also disclosed, and comprises dry blending or agglomerating the peroxygen bleach and alkaline builder, as well as any other dry ingredients. To this is added the calcium stearate powder which is further blended until uniformly coated.
Last, the liquids, especially nonaqueous liquids such as surfactant, are applied using a relatively coarse spray pattern, while continuing to mix, to result in a uniformly coated, free flowing dry mixture.

Description

WO 92/21744 PCI`/I,'S92/04500 2 1 ~ 8 DRY BLEACH COMPOSITION
WIT~ IMPROVED DISPERSIBILITY

Backaround of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention 10 This invention relates to dry fabric bleaching products for household use, and more particularly to such dry bleach products based upon peroxygen bleaches, which are formulated to exhibit improved dispersibility/solubility in cold water.

2. Descri~tion of Related Art Bleaching compositions have long been used in households for the bleaching and cleaning of fabrics. Liquid bleaches based upon hypochlorite chemical species have been used extensively, as they are inexpensive, highly effective, easy to produce, and stable. However, the advent of modern synthetic dyes and the use of modern automatic laundering machines have introduced new requirements in bleaching techniques, and have created a need for other types of bleaching compositions. In order to satisfy this need, and to 2, broaden and ~x~n tn~ u.~ f ; .e;~-r.es i`! ~r~,eao l..d US:, other bleach systems have been introduced in recent years, most notable are the peroxygen bleaches which generate hydroperoxide ion as the oxidizing species. A particularly preferred peroxygen bleach is sodium perborate which is suitable for a dry granular formulation- Preferably sodium perborate is combined with an alkalinity boo5terlbuilder such as sodium carbonate and is used as a laundry additive. Such a ~. :

WO92t21744 PCT/US92/04500 2i~8~3~

laundry additive composition is more fully described in US
3,697,271 to Maddox, incorporated by reference herein.
s While these compositions have a demonstrated effectiveness, changes in laundering procedures often dictated by environmental concerns, can reduce their effectiveness. Cold water washes, for example, coupled with shortened wash cycles may hamper solubility/dispersion of sodium perborate/sodium carbonate formulations. Detergents or additives having high sodi~m carbonate levels readily form bridged hydrated product lumps when placed in piles and submerged in cold water. In a washing machine, these lumps can not be broken apart by l; agitation and leave residual product known as cold water residue (CWR). When the bulk solution temperature is low enough to cool the internal structure of the submerged pile below the melting points of the carbonate hydrates, precipitation of hydrates occurs in the saturated internal pile spaces and a bridged CWR mass is formed. CWR has been observed in the washer at temperatures as high as 75O~.
Approximately 25% of all U.S. washloads are conducted at or below this temperature.
Several references have addressed the question of improving cold water dissolution of laundry detergent compositions, however, these limit themselves to compositions containing detersive levels (above about 5%) of surfactant. Cala et al, US 4,196,095, describes and claims a dry blended, carbonate-based detergent comprising 30 to 90% of a builder salt, at least one third of which is sodium carbonate; sodium silicate; S to 30% of a surfactant, and O.1 to 2% of magnesium stearate. The magnesium stearate is employed to reduce insoluhle lumps formed when a detergent composition contacts cold water. Nakamura_et _l, US 4,970,017, claims a process .: - ;.
~.
21 ~8~3~

for producing a granular detergent composition having high density and wherein one step of the claimed process comprises coating a disintegrated granular detergent co~position with 0.5 to 5% by weight of a water-insoluble finely divided powder.

JP 60-96698 (Hara et al), describes a method for manufacturing a granular detergent composition wherein 0.S to 5 weight percent of calcium stearate or other water insoluble powder is added to a granulated detergent product specifically to improve solubility in cold water. JP 62-228000 Saito et al, describes and claims a high density granular detergent lS composition, also employing a hydrophohic powder such as calcium stearate, as a means of improving cold water solubility. JP 64-20298 to Nakamura et al also describes and claims a high density granular detergent composition having as its object the attainment of a better cold water dissolution rate. This application points out one of the disadvantages in the use of hydrophobic fine powders to attain satisfactory dissolution rates, that is, while the hydrophobicity of the powder may aid dispersion, it can also impede dissolution.
Summarv of the Invention It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a dry peroxygen bleach formulation which exhibits minimal cold water residue and retains good flowability and pour qualities.
It is also an object of the invention to provide a dry peroxygen bleach formulation which is highly soluble in aqueous media at low temperature.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from a review of the following description and the claims appended hereto.

.
~ ~ .

'':
- . ~
.:

WO92/21744 P~T/~IS92/04~00 i; ", 210803~

Briefly, the present invention is a dry, fabric bleaching composition comprising (a) a bleaching-effective amount of a peroxygen bleach;
(b) an alkaline builder material in an amount sufficient to provide an alkaline pH and building capacity;
(c) about 0.05-0.5% of a calcium stearate powder; and (d) o to about 5% of a surfactant.

The laundry additive composition of the present invention exhibits a dramatic reduction in cold water residue compared with similar compositions of the art having no calcium stearate powder. ~urprisingly, the improvement in cold water residue does not result in a reduction in pour qualities or flowabillty of the composition, nor are the dissolution properties adversely affected.

A method of making the composition of the present invention is also disclosed, and comprises dry blending the peroxygen bleach and alkaline builder, as well as any other dry ingredients. To this is added the calcium stearate powder 2 which is further blended until completely dispersed, uniformly coating the other dry ingredients. Generally about 5-10 minutes in a tumble style mixer is required. Last, any liquids, particularly nonaq~eous liquids such as surfactant, are applied using a coarse spray, while contlnuing to mix, to result in a uniformly coated dry mixture. Optimally, the initial dry blending step may be replaced by an agglomeration step wherein the oxidant and builder are coagglomerated with an agglomerating agent.

If the agglomeration step option is utilized, it is preferred that the builder be preloaded with a low level (less than about S%) surfactant prior to agglomerating with the oxidant.

- .

;., : "-...
. . . , ~ .

W092/21744 PCT/US92/~4500 21~3~

escriDtion of the Drawinas Fiqures 1 and 2 are graphs showing the effect on bulk solution dissolution of various levels of calcium stearate powder (as calcium stearate). T~e data were obtained using a sodiu~
perborate/sodium carbonate laundry additive matrix, and wash conditions were a water temperature of 4.5~C, 100 ppm hardness and five pounds of ballast. Results were obtained as conductance (in millisiemenstcm).

Fig. 1 is a graph showing the effect of 0.25 weight percent of calcium stearate on bulk solution dissolution compared to a control having no calcium stearate; and Fig. 2 is a graph showing the effect of 0.5 weight percent of calcium stearate on bulk solution dissolution compared to the same control.

Detailed DescriDtion of the Invention Briefly, the present invention is a dry, fabric bleaching composition comprising 2i (a) a bleachlng-effecti~e amoun; of a pei-oxygen bleach;
(b) an alkaline builder material in an amount sufficient to provide an alkaline pH and building capacity;
(c) about 0.05-0.5~ of a calcium stearate powder; and (d) 0 to about 5% of a surfactant.

A first method of making the composition of the present invention is also disclosed, and comprises dry blending the peroxygen bleach and alkaline bullder, as well as any other dry ingredients. To this is added the calcium stearate powder .

: , : : ~

W092/2~744 PCT/US92/04500 2~08~38 which is further blended until completely dispersed, uniformly coating the other dry ingredients. Generally about 5-10 minutes in a tumble style mixer is required. Last, any liquids, particularly nonaqueous liquids such as surfactant, are applied using a coarse spray, which continuing to mix, to result in a unifor~ly coated dry mixture.
A second method of making the composition of the present invention is an agglomeration process wherein the oxidant material and alkaline builder are agglomerated prior to addition of the calcium stearate powder. In this method, the 1~ alkaline builder is first preloaded with surfactant, and any additional liquid additives. Thus surfactant is applied to the builder in a mixer, preferably, a tumble-style or falling curtain rotary mixer, and mixed sufficiently for the builder to substantially absorb the surfactant. Sufficient surfactant is applied to the builder to result in a final product (after agglomeration) surfactant content of 0 to about 5 wt. %, preferably about 0.1 - 3 wt.%. Generally on a surfactant to builder weight basis about 0-20 wt. ~ surfactant is applied to the builder, more preferably about 1- 15 wt. %. The preloaded 2~ builder and oxidant are then charged to the agglomerator. Any agglomerating apparatus known to the art may be employed and preferred are rotary or vertical turbo agglomerators.
Similarly, any agglomerating agent may be used, with sodium silicate and polyacrylates preferred. The agglomerate is then mixed with the calcium stearate powder and any additional dry ingredients in a mixing means, especially a rotary or tumble mixer.

In both processes, care must be taken to minimize physical contact between the calcium stearate and the surfactant, in order to ensure the efficacy of each component.

. ' .: ~-W092/2~744 PCT/US92/04500 210~0~

Unless indicated to the contrary, all percentages, ratios, or parts are determined by weight.

Bleach Preferred as bleaches are peroxygen or peracid bleaches in solid form. Preferred peroxygen bleaches include sodium percarbonate, sodium perborate, sodium phosphate peroxyhydrate, potassium permonosulfates and metal peroxides.
Sodium perborate is most preferred and may be in the form of tetrahydrate or monohydrate. Bleach activators, also known as peracid precursors, can be included with the peroxygen compounds. Examples of activators include tetraacetyl ethylenediamine (T~ED), nonanoyloxy benzene-sulfonate (NOBS), and nonanoylglycoylphenol sulfonate (NOGPS). NOGPS is disclosed, for example, in US patent 4,778,618 issued to Fonq et aL and in E~ 373743 to Bolkan et al, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. If added, the peracid percursor is added in an amount effective to provide oxidizing power, and generally in a mole ratio to oxidant bleach of about 0.1:1 to 10:1. Peracid bleaches (including monoperacids and diperacids) may be advantageous in terms of ~' bleacn_nq perrormar.ce. Examples include pera~e aic and diperazelaic acids, diperoxydodecanedioic acid (DPBDA) and alkyl monoperoxysuccinic acid. Peracid bleaching species, and a method for their production, are described in V. S. patent 4,337,213 to Marvnowski et al, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The bleach is present in an amount sufficient to provide effective bleaching, e.g., from about 5 to 50% by weight active, preferably from about 8-25%
by weight active, most preferably from about 10 to 13% by weight active depending on the bleaching species chosen.

. .

~lo~a33;

Alkaline Builder An alkaline builder material is added to provide to a pH of between about 8-12. The builder also has the capacity to sequester or precipitate hardness ions (e.s. Ca2+ and Mg2+). Al~ali-metal carbonates, sesquicarbonates and bicarbonates are suitable builders, and preferred are sodium and/or potassium carbonates. The carbonate acts as the builder to remove diYalent metal ions such as calcium, and additionally provides alkalinity and aids in soil removal.
Generally, in terms of weight percent of the composition, at least about 25%, preferably 50%, most preferably 80% carbonate is employed. Higher levels can be employed, however, at levels greater than about 90% there is insufficient room for the other ingredients which contribute to the overall effectiveness of the composition.

Calcium Stearate Powder Very low levels of a calcium stearate powder are i~portant to siqnificantly reduce the levels of CWR in the dry peroxygen bleaching matrix. Preferred are calcium stearates, available, for example, from The Synthetic Products Company (Synpro), of Cleveland, Ohio. Examples of particularly preferred calcium stearate are Synpro's finely-sized grades, especially grades 15, 12B, 24-46, 114-36, NF and Food Grade. Preferably, the calcium stearate powder has a particle size distribution such that at least 95 percent is smaller than a US 200 mesh screen, and has a bulk density of about O.1-0.4 g/c~3. More preferably the calclum stearate powder has a particle size distribution such that at least 99% is smaller than a US 200 mesh screen, and 95% is smaller than a 400 r.esh screen. A
f ine particle size is important to ensure effective coatin~ of . '' ~. ..
' WO92t21744 PCT/US92/04500 21~8i~3~ , the other dry ingredients to result in a hydrophobic S environment, thus mitigating cold water residue.

Granulometer measurements reveal that the most preferred calcium stearate fine powder has a median grain size of less than about 25 microns, preferably less than about 10 microns.

Liauid Additives A surfactant may be provided to prevent "dusting~ of the dry ingredients, particularly sodium carbonate, sodium perborate, lS and fluorescent whitening agents. It is most preferred to use at least one nonionic surfactant, especially Cl_4 alkoxylated aliphatic alcohols and Cl_4 alkoxylated alkyl phenols. Particularly preferred are ethoxylated/propoxylated C8_14 alcohols. There should be at least about three alkoxy groups per alcohol, preferably at least about nine. Examples of preferred ethoxylated/propoxylated aliphatic alcohols are BASF Corporation's trademarked INDUSTROL, and PLURAFAC.
Certain Cl_ 4 alkylene oxide copolymers such as ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers are also preferred as _S sur a-tant- ~heso are ~xe~-;.Fl ` Cied by ~ASF's tr~demarke~
PLURONIC series. Other suitable nonionic surfactanes are polyethoxylated alcohols manufactured and marketed by the Shell Chemical Company under the trademark "NEODOL". Examples of preferred NEODOLS are NEODOL 25-7 which is a mixture of 12 to 15 carbon chain length alcohols with about 7 ethylene oxide groups per molecule, NEODOL 2~-65, a C12_13 mixture with about 6.5 moles of ethylene oxide, and NEODOL 25-9, a C12_15 mixture with about 9 moles of ethylene ~xide. Also useful are a trimethyl nonyl polyethylene ~lycol ether, manufactured and marketed by Union Carbide Corporation under the Trade~ark TERGITOL TMN-6, and an octyl phenoxy polyethoxy ethanol sold by Rohm and Haas under the Trademark TRITON X-114. Total :
.. :

;
~10803~

surfactant content may range from 0 to about 5%, preferably from about 0.1 to 3%, more preferably from 0.2 to 1~ and most preferably from about 0.2 to 0.3%. It is to be noted that higher levels of surfactant, and/or its application as an overly fine spray, tends to cause agglomeration of the calcium stearate powder, thus severely reducing its effectiveness. It is also preferred to a ratio of surfactant to calcium stearate powder be from about 3:1 to 1:5.

Adiuncts Adjuncts may be added in an amount of from 0 to about 5% and are useful to improve or enhance efficacy, aesthetics and/or consumer acceptance of the overall formulation. Enzymes are a particularly preferred adjunct, and may be selected from amylases, proteases, cellulases, and lipases. The hydrolytic enzyme should be present in an amount of about 0.01-2%, more preferably about 0.5-1%, by weight of the detergent. Mixtures of any of the foregoing hydrolases are desirable, especially protease/amylase blends.

Dyes, such as Monastral blue and anthra~uinone dyes (such as those described in Zielske, U.S. 4,661,293, and U.S. 4,746,461~, and pigments, e.g. titanium dioxide and ultramarine blue which are also suitable colorants, can be selected. Anti-redeposition agents, such as carboxymethylcellulose, are potentially desirable.
Sequestrants, such as EDTA, citric acid, polyphosphonates, aminopolyphosphonates, and the like, may also be desirable to complex transition metal ions which can destabilize bleaches.
Fluorescent whitening agents (FWAs) are desirable components for inclusion in bleaching formulations, as they , j ~' ,; ': `~.

.. ~, , .

WO92/21744 PCT/US~2/04500 2~8Q3`'~

counteract the yellowing of cotton and synthetic fibers. FWAs are absorbed ~n fabrics during the washing and/or bleaching ; process. FWAs function by absorbing ultraviolet light, which is then emitted as visible light, generally in the blue wavelength ranges. The resultant light emission yields a brighteninq and whitening effect, which counteracts yellowing or dulling of the bleached fabric. Such FW~s are available commercially from sources such as Ciba Geigy Corp. of Basel, Switzerland, under the trade name "Tinopal". Incorporation of the FWAs may be afforded by ~ixing a binding agent and bulking agents e.g., Na2SO4, and colorants. The mixture is then compacted to form particles, which are admixed into the bleach product. If added, the FWA particles may comprise from about 0.1% to 1% by weight of the composition.
A fragrance which imparts a pleasant odor to the bleaching composition is generally included. As fragrances are subject to oxidation by bleaches, they may be protected by encapsulation in polymeric materials such as polyvinyl alcohol, or by absorbing them into starch or sugar and forming them into beads. These fragrance beads are soluble in water, so that fragrance is released when the bleach composition is dissolved in water, but the fragrance is protected from oxidation by the bleach during storage.
Buffering, building, and/or bulking agents may also be present. Boric acid and/or sodium borate are preferred agents to buffer the pH of the composition. Other buffering agents and cobuilders such as sodium and potassium silicate, sodium phosphate, sodium tripolyphosphate, sodium tetraphosphate, aluminosilicates (zeolites), and organic builders such as sodium sulfosuccinate may be added. Optionally, fillers such as sodium sulfate are added. Buffer, builder, and bul~ing agents are included in the product in particulate form such ~' ' 21 ~38 that the entire composition forms a free-flowing dry product.
Buffers and cobuilders and/or bulking agents may range from o to about 80%, preferably 10-50% by the weight of composition.
For a dry-blend process, liquid ingredients, includinq liquid adjuncts, are preferably sprayed onto the dry ingredients after application of the calcium stearate powder, and more preferably, as a final step. It is important in the application of liquids, particularly nonaqueous liquids such as nonionic surfactants, that the application be carried out in such a way as to prevent aqglomeration of the calcium stearate. For the preferred method of applying liquids last, the liquid application apparatus should be selected to deliver a relatively coarse spray, and mixlng should be gentle to moderate. A desired coarse spray may be obtained by a pump-fed non-atomizing nozzle, having a fan-shaped spray pattern. An example is a nozzle sold under the name T-Jet 11002. It is within the scope of the dry-blending-process of the present invention, however, to preload surfactant or other liquids onto sodium carbonate prior to blending in the remaining dry ingredients, and prior to adding any remaining liquid ingredients. I, preloading is undert~ken, the spray density of surfactant ls less important as long as the carbonate is sufficiently mixed during and after spraying to assure maximum absorption of surfactant. It is preferred to employ a tumble-style or falling curtain rotary mixer for the preloading, and the surfactant may be applied using an air-fed atomizing spray apparatus.
Dry adjuncts may be added at any time during the process, for example with the sodium perborate and carbonate or after the addition of all liquid ingredients.

WOg2/21744 PCT/US92/04500 ` 21~Q3~

FORMULATION EXAMPLES
s I nqred i ent y~

Na~C03 60-90 Sodium Perborate 2-30 Calcium Stearate 0.05-0.5 Surfactant 0-5 Enzyme 0-2.0 Brightener 0-0.5 UMB 0-0.2 Fragrance 0-0.3 Ex~erimental Table I below shows the importance of particle size distribution of the calcium stearate powder on CWR. The measurement of CWR is accomplished by placing a measured quantity of laundry composition, as a single pile, in the bottom of a washing machine. ~allast (10 lbs. of polycotton pillow cases) is piled on top of the composition. The washing machine is set to run a gentle eight minute cycle with 4.5C
incoming wash water. At the end of a complete wash cycle the ballast is removed and undissolved composition collected and weighed.

The data of Table I was obtained by placing 110 g of a sodium perborate/sodium carbonate - based additive formulation, containing 0.25 weight percent calcium stearate as the calcium stearate powder, in a pile in a washing machine. Ten pounds of ballast, in the form of polycotton pillowcases were added, and the wash was conducted at a water temperature of 4.5C, with the results shown in the table. All mesh sizes are US
mesh.
~5 .

..
.: .

WO92/217~ PCT/US92/04500 21~038 Table I

Hydrophobic Powder Grade Size Distribution CWR (q) A60% through 40 83.3 B 80% through 20035.4 C 99% through 200o.o D 95% through 2000.1 E 99% through 2002.3 F 99% through 2001.7 Control(1) 86.4 (1) No calcium stearate The results show that grades A and ~ were insufficiently finely sized to achieve an acceptable reduction in CWR.
Grades C-F, however, yielded an acceptable level of CWR. The results of Table I are accurate to within 5.0 g, thus C-F
2~ should be considered equal to each other. Generally, less than about 30 g, preferably less than about 10 g and most preferably less than about 5 g is acceptable. Alternatively, CWR is expressed as a percentage by comparing final weight of laundry product with the initial weight. Expressed as a percentage of additive remaining after a wash cycle, less than about 30% more preferably, less than about 10% and most preferably less than about 5% CWR is acceptable.

Table I~ shows the minimum amount of calcium stearate powder (as calcium stearate) necessary to achieve acceptable CWR
levels. The calcium stearate was added to a sodium carbonate/sodium perborate formulation as in the Example, and had a size distribution of 99% through a 200 mesh screen.
Experimental conditions were as given for Table I above, except more vigorous agitation was employed in the wash cycle.

- : :

~:

WO92/21744 PCT/US92/V4~0 i:
219~3~

Table II shows that for a sodium carbonate/perborate composition, at least about 0.05 wt. %, preferably at least about O.lS wt. S calcium stearate is important to reduce CWR
to acceptable levels.

Table II
Wt. S C lcium Stearate CWR (a~
0.0 78.6 0.025 74.4 0.050 28.6 0.150 0.3 0.250 0.2 0.500 0.1 For perborate/carbonate laundry additive formulations, a level of calcium stearate powder above 0.5 wt %, the product bridges or clumps slightly as it is poured with the degree of clumping becoming worse with increasing calcium stearate powder level.
This phenomenon is seen in the results of Table III whlch presents angle of repose data for compacted and uncompacted sodium carbonatejperborate samples containing calcium stearate, poured in a tilt plate apparatus. The tilt plate is a twelve inch long smooth surfaced-plate, upon which is placed about 100 g of sample, in a single pile. The plate is tilted to various angles and the angle at which the sample begins to flow is noted.

At a 0.25 weight percent calcium stearate level, the pourability of the formulation does not change. The 0.5 weight percent level produces a slight change relative to a stearate-free sample, thus may be considered a maximum level with respect to product pour/flow characteristics.

~ ~ .
.
.
. . .
,,,,,~ ~ .

! ` , Table III
Anqle of RePose Wei~ht ~ Calcium Uncom~acted Com~acted Stearate SamDle Sample o.oo 20 21 1.00 24 26 3.00 25 28 5.00 25 28 10.00 26 30O
once dispersed from the bottom of the washer by the agitator lS the individual granules of additive composition must dissolve in the bulk solution. Owing to the hydrophobic nature of the calcium stearate powder, an excess (above about 0.5%) can interfere with bulk solution dissolution of the additive, as the additive particles become sufficiently coated to prevent them from dissolving. Japanese patent application 62-22800 teaches that while stearate alone is effective for reducing CWR, it also inhibits bulX solution dissolution.

Fiqures 1 and 2 illustrate bulk solution conductivity profiles for a mixture of sodium carbonate/sodium perborate and calcium stearat~ at 4.5C. Bulk solution dissolution is measured by first filling a washing machine with water at the desired temperature. A 100 g sample was added to the water in the washer tub, and conductance was measured using a Radiometer America Conductivity Meter, Model CDM-83.
Conductance is expressed in millisiemens/cm, and increases with dissolution of the sample.

A11 materials were added to bulk solution (5 lbs ballast, 100 ppm hardness). At the 0.25 weight percent calcium stearate level, the bulk solution dissolution is equivalent to the .

. :. ', ` - ' :' 21~8~38 ~17-stearate-free control after eight minutes (both were 84%
dissolved). A reduction in solution conductivity is seen for the 0.5 wt % stearate level. Based on a conductance vs.
sodium carbonate level calibration curve (not shown) the pure sodium carbonate is 84% dissolved after eight minutes while the sodium carbonate with 0.5 wt. % stearate is 79%
dissolved. Therefore, the 0.5 wt. % calcium stearate prevents approximately S grams (5%) of sodium carbonate from dissolving after eight minutes. The 0.5% level thus is a maximal level ~for a sodium perborate/sodium carbonate additive formulation) above which the beneficial effects of lS the stearate on addi'ive dissolution is reduced.

Cleanina Performance To verify that calcium stearate does not reduce perfornance when a dry bleach composition (containing sodium perborate) is added directly to solution, standard condition (20, 3~, and 50C; lOO ppm hardness) performance and multi-cycle whitening studies were conducted. A leading commercially-available phosphate detergent served as the detergent matrix, and a leading commercially-available sodium perborate/sodium carbonate laundry additive, to which was added O.0 and 0.5 weight percent calcium stearate, was tested. The treatments were added directly to solution to prevent lumping. Soil removal, whitening and redeposition were each measured colorimetrically by comparing reflectance measurements on swatches of fabric before and after washing.
Whitening was measured after one, three and five cycles while redeposition was measured once after five cycles. Soil removal was measured after one cycle. As seen in the stain 3S and soil averages presented in Table IV, the calcium stearate does not reduce perfor~ance. All results are shown for the average of the three wash temperatures. No reduction was WO92/217~ PCT/~S92/04500 2~08038 found on any of the individual performance attributes as well (such as grass stains on cotton fabric or clay soil on polycotton fabric).

$able IV
Soi1 Remo~al Sebum/
3-qtain(l) 2_gOil(2) 3-Fabri~(3) Additive 75.7 81.9 86.0 Ad~i~ive ~ 0.5 wt. ~ stearate 76.7 83.6 87.7 LSD, 95~ t-test 1.7 3.4 1.4 Whitening Redeoo~ltlon C~cle 1 Cvcle 3 C~cle 5 Cvcle 5 Additive 17.7 19.5 21.0 -2.9 Additi~e + O.5 wt. ~ ~tearate17.2 18.8 20.8 -3.1 LSD, 95~ t-te~t 0.8 1.1 0.6 1.4 (1) three different proteinaceou~ stain~
t2) two particulate ooils (3) cotton, poly~otton ant polye~ter Table V lists the laundry performance improvements achieved when the additive containing 0.5 wt. % calcium stearate is placed at the bottom of a washer for a cold water wash.
Because the control formula lumps, it provides less alkalinity and brighteners to the wash resulting in the significantly reduced sebum and whitening performance.
Given the CWR results for the 0.15 wt. % and 0.25 wt. %
stearate levels presented in Table II, it is expected that the Table III results would be achieved by the additive plus 0.25 wt. % stearate formula as well.

:- , . .: .. ;:. ~~ ,. , ~: 21 a~o3s Table v Wash Condition Treatment %SR rE~
Sebum/cottonwith stearate72.6 21C, regularwithout stearate67.9 agitationLSD, 95% t-~est 2.5 Sebum/polyester with stearate 95.9 21C, regularwithout stearate91.8 agitationLSD, 95% t-test 3.0 Sebum/3-fabric with stearate 82.8 averagewithout stearate 79.6 21C, regularLSD, 95% t-test1.4 agitation Whiteningwith stearate 10.7 12.8C, regularwithout stearate 9.1 agitationLSD, 95% t-test l.o Whiteningwith stearate 8.9 4.5C, regularwithout stearate 6.8 agitationLSD, 95% t-test 0.8 Tables VI and VII illustrates the importance of the method of the present invention. Mixing time of dry ingredients and order of addition of surfactant and/or any liquids (e.g., fragrance) can impact stearate dispersion, thereby affecting CWR. The product of Table VI was made as a 10 lb.
dry-blended batch in a tumble mixer.

Table VI
Sample Mixinq Time (Min) CWR(g) A 5 51.5 A 10 4.8 B 5 52.9 B 10 50.8 B 15 23.0 A = perborate plus 0.25 wt. % calcium stearate B = A plus 0.40 wt. % nonionic surfactant/fragrance WO9~/21744 PCT/US92/04500 , 2 1 ~ 8 0 3 8 -20-Table VI shows that a minimum of ten minutes of mixing (in a small tumble mixer with gentle-moderate mixing) the dry ingredients is necessary to attain an acceptable CWR value.
Table VI also illustrates the disadvantages of using a fine surfactant spray, as this tends to cause agglomeration of the calcium stearate particles and increase CWX unless mixing is continued for a long time. The spray apparatus used to obtain the mixture of Table VI was an atomizing sprayer embodying a pressure of about 25 psl at 2 g/min delivery.
These spray conditions are accordingly not preferred where surfactant is added last.
l~ A scale up was run in a 100 lb. batch Pellisrini mixer (a baffled, tumble mixer) set to provide vigorous mixing. A
surfactant~fragrance mixture was applied as a coarse spray using a T-Jet 11002 Nozzle at 40 psi and 300 g/min delivery.
A substantial decrease in CWR was evidenced by these process parameters, as shown in Table VII.

Table VII
Sample Mixinq Time (Min~ CWR(g) A 5 0.49 A 10 0.45 B 5 3.51 B 10 1.05 ~ 15 1.41 A = perborate plus 0.25 wt. % calcium stearate B = A plus 0.40 wt. % nonionic surfactant/fragrance Both Tables VI and VII show that dispersion of stearate into the dry ingredients is important in achieving good CWR. The five minute value of Sample A of Table VII is sharply improved owing to the more rapid dispersion of stearate in the larger, more vigorous Pelligrini mixing apparatus. The .. ~ . - . .
-WO92/21744 2 ~ 3 8 PCT/US92/04500 coarser spray also improved CWR of the B samples, apparently by sharply reducing the tendency of the fine powder to agglomerate. Generally, only five minutes of mixing the dry ingredients, followed by another five minutes after surfactant addition, is needed to achieve acceptable CWR
values.
While described in terms of the presently preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that such disclosure is not to be interpreted as limiting. Various modifications and alterations will no doubt occur to one skilled in the art after having read the above disclosure. Accordingly, it is 1~ intended that the appended claims be interpreted as covering all such modifications and alterations as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims (16)

Claims
1. A dry bleaching composition comprising (a) a bleaching-effective amount of an oxidant, selected from the group consisting of peroxygen and peracid bleaches, and mixtures thereof;
(b) a building-effective and alkalinity-adjusting amount of an alkaline builder;
(c) 0.05 to 0.5 weight percent of a calcium stearate powder, having a particle size distribution such that about 95% is smaller than US 200 mesh; and (d) 0 to about 5 percent surfactant.
2. The composition of claim 1 characterized by a reduction in conductance of no more than about 5%, and a cold water residue of no more than about 30%.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein the oxidant is sodium perborate, and the alkaline builder is sodium carbonate.
4. The composition of claim 3 wherein the sodium carbonate is present in an amount of about 25-80 percent, and the sodium perborate is present in an amount of about 5-25%.
5. The composition of claim 1 and further including about 0.1 to 5% adjuncts, selected from the group consisting of enzymes, coloring agents, brighteners, fragrances, buffering agents, fillers, sequestrants and mixtures thereof.
6. The composition of claim 5 wherein said enzyme is selected from the group consisting of proteases, amylases, lipases, cellulases, and mixtures thereof.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein the surfactant is a nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated alcohols, alkylene oxide polymers and mixtures thereof.
8. The composition of claim 1 and further including about 10-50 % cobuilder.
9. The composition of claim 1 and further including an effective amount of a peracid precursor.
10. A laundry additive particle comprising (a) a core material consisting of an oxidant, an alkaline builder, or a mixture thereof;
(b) a plurality of particles of calcium stearate, having a particle size distribution such that about 95% are smaller than US 200 mesh, adsorbed onto the surface of said core; and (c) 0 to about 5% surfactant absorbed onto the surface of said core.
11. The particle of claim 10 wherein the oxidant is sodium perborate, and the builder is sodium carbonate.
12. The composition of claim 11 wherein the sodium carbonate is present in an amount of about 25-80 percent, and the sodium perborate is present in an amount of about 5-25%.
13. The particle of claim 10 wherein the surfactant is a nonionic surfactant selected from the group consisting of ethoxylated alcohols, alkylene oxide polymers and mixtures thereof.
14. A process for making a dry oxidant bleaching composition in steps comprising (a) dry blending, in a mixing means, dry ingredients comprising about 5 - 25% oxidant, about 25-80% builder, and 0 to about 5% adjuncts;
(b) adding about 0.05 to 0.5% calcium stearate, having a particle size distribution such that about 95% is smaller than US 200 mesh, while continuing to blend until the dry ingredients are uniformly coated with calcium stearate; and (c) applying to the dry ingredients a liquid ingredient selected form 0 to about 5% liquid surfactants, 0 to about 5%
liquid adjuncts, and mixtures thereof, with continued blending until a uniform composition is attained.
15. The process of claim 14 wherein the liquid surfactant is applied using a coarse spray with a non-atomizing spray apparatus.
16. A process for making a dry oxidant bleaching composition comprising (a) preloading a quantity of liquid surfactant onto a quantity of an alkaline builder to result in 0 to about 20%
surfactant being present on a weight basis relative to builder;
(b)coagglomerating a quantity of an oxidant bleach and said quantity of preloaded alkaline builder with an agglomerating agent;

(c) applying 0 to about 1% of liquid adjuncts to the coagglomerate of (b), the liquid adjuncts being applied as a coarse spray; and (d) blending the resulting agglomerate of (c) with about 0.05 to 0.5% of a calcium stearate powder having a particle size distribution such that about 95% is smaller than US 200 mesh, and continuing the blending until the calcium stearate has effectively coated the agglomerate.
CA 2108038 1991-06-05 1992-05-28 Dry bleach composition with improved dispersibility Abandoned CA2108038A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US71047391A 1991-06-05 1991-06-05
US710,473 1991-06-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2108038A1 true CA2108038A1 (en) 1992-12-06

Family

ID=24854181

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA 2108038 Abandoned CA2108038A1 (en) 1991-06-05 1992-05-28 Dry bleach composition with improved dispersibility

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0587747A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2108038A1 (en)
MX (1) MX9202703A (en)
PL (1) PL170052B1 (en)
SK (1) SK136393A3 (en)
WO (1) WO1992021744A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6773625B2 (en) 2002-08-26 2004-08-10 Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa, Division Of Conopco, Inc. Dry bleach compositions
GB0306790D0 (en) 2003-03-24 2003-04-30 Unilever Plc Detergent composition or component therefor
US7955616B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2011-06-07 Orthocon, Inc. Absorbable implants and methods for their use in hemostasis and in the treatment of osseous defects
CN101052360B (en) * 2003-09-23 2012-05-16 奥索康公司 Absorbable implants and methods for their use in hemostasis and in the treatment of osseous defects

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3925226A (en) * 1973-07-04 1975-12-09 Lion Fat Oil Co Ltd Process for improving granulated detergents
DE3144470A1 (en) * 1981-11-09 1983-05-19 Unilever N.V., 3000 Rotterdam FOAM CONTROLLED DETERGENTS
GB8313941D0 (en) * 1983-05-19 1983-06-22 Unilever Plc Peroxide bleach and compositions
JPS6096698A (en) * 1983-10-31 1985-05-30 ライオン株式会社 Manufacture of granular detergent composition

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SK136393A3 (en) 1994-07-06
MX9202703A (en) 1993-08-01
PL170052B1 (en) 1996-10-31
WO1992021744A3 (en) 1993-01-07
WO1992021744A2 (en) 1992-12-10
EP0587747A1 (en) 1994-03-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2918991B2 (en) Bleach detergent composition
US5714451A (en) Powder detergent composition and method of making
US5423997A (en) Spray dried powdered automatic dishwashing composition containing enzymes
CA2368610C (en) Enzyme composite particles having an acidic barrier and a physical barrier coating
MX2008002305A (en) A solid laundry detergent composition comprising alkyl benzene sulphonate, carbonate salt and carboxylate polymer.
SK282287B6 (en) Encapsulated bleaching particles, their production method and bleaching detergent mixture
MX2008002308A (en) A solid laundry detergent composition comprising alkyl benzene sulphonate and a hydratable material.
JP3810847B2 (en) High density powder detergent composition
FR2689901A1 (en) Powdered composition for washing dishes.
EP0888425B1 (en) Process for making a free-flowing agglomerated surfactant detergent composition
PT100534A (en) COMPOSITION FOR AUTOMATIC CRAZY WASHING MACHINE, WITH PHOSPHATE, CONTAINING PROTEASE AND AMYLASE ENZYMES
CA2108038A1 (en) Dry bleach composition with improved dispersibility
CA2376227A1 (en) Particulate detergent composition containing zeolite
JP4163058B2 (en) Bleach-containing detergent composition
JP4871672B2 (en) Powder detergent enhancer
JP2777129B2 (en) Detergent composition
JP3297383B2 (en) Detergent composition
JP3694063B2 (en) Method for producing high-density granular detergent composition
JP2005239809A (en) Detergent composition for automatic dishwasher
JP4515195B2 (en) Cleaning composition
JP3367801B2 (en) Method for producing high bulk density granular detergent and high bulk density granular detergent particles
JP3877808B2 (en) High density granular detergent composition
CA2105017A1 (en) Dry bleach composition with improved dispersibility
JP3789511B2 (en) Method for producing high-density granular detergent composition
JP3650283B2 (en) High bulk density detergent composition

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FZDE Dead