CA2044939A1 - Scoring system for athletic events - Google Patents

Scoring system for athletic events

Info

Publication number
CA2044939A1
CA2044939A1 CA 2044939 CA2044939A CA2044939A1 CA 2044939 A1 CA2044939 A1 CA 2044939A1 CA 2044939 CA2044939 CA 2044939 CA 2044939 A CA2044939 A CA 2044939A CA 2044939 A1 CA2044939 A1 CA 2044939A1
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
judge
computer
audience
score
contest
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
CA 2044939
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Edward J. Sweeney
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to CA 2044939 priority Critical patent/CA2044939A1/en
Publication of CA2044939A1 publication Critical patent/CA2044939A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

ABSTRACT
A scoring system for sporting contests includes positioning an appro-priate number of judges about the site of the contest and providing each with a signalling device which is connected to a display which superimposes the points awarded on a picture of the contest. The picture is generated by a television camera positioned so as to present a view of the contest com-parable to that of each judge. The signalling device for each judge is also connected to a computer which records and totals the scores thus provided and produces a total score. Variations of the system provide differential scores for the contestants for each increment of the contest.

Description

: 2~9~

SCORING SYSTEI~q FO~ ILETIC EVENT~

This invention relates, in general, to the scoring of athletic contests and relates, in particular, to a system for both improving the qualiLy of the Sscoring of the event and enhancing the enjoyment thereof on the part of the audience.
The invention will be illustrated and described in the context of the sport of boxing, but it will also be noted that the principles hereof have applicability to other sporting events, such as kick boxing, wrestling, etc., 10wherein judges award points based upon the performance of the participants, as contrasted to athletic events wherein points are awarded automatically upon the achievement of certain objective goals, such as crossing a goal line.
Accordingly, while reference will be made throughout to boxing as the contest being scored, for simplicity of explanation, the invention is by no means intended to be so limited in its scope.
Applicant's earlier U.S. Patent 3,737,889 disclosed a method and ap-paratus for scoring athletic events, such as boxing contests, wherein each official was provided with an individual panel upon which performance points were recordable. The points scored by each individual judge or official were 20then transmitted to a master console for cumulative progressive scoring of the event during its progress. The collected points were then flashed on a scoreboard, visible to the audience, so that they might be made progressively aware of the standing of the contestants.
This was an improvement over the then existing prior art, wherein the 25three judges or two judges and a referee normally assigned to evaluate a boxing match simply recorded their decisions manually at the end of each round and the official scorecards were then totalled at the end of the event.
The obvious difficulty previous to Appiicant's earlier invention was that the audience had no really accurate knowledge of the true standings of the contestants until the contest ended.
Of course, in addition to being disadvantageous from the standpoint of the audience, there were other difficulties, such as, for example, the fact thatthe judges could conceivably be, even unintentionally, influenced by crowd reaction and crowd noise. That problem was also solved in the system dis-35closed in U.S.~ Patent 3,737,889 by making provision for isolating the judges from these possibly distracting or prejudicial influences.
In addition to simply enhancin~ the interest of spectators by malcing them currently aware of the relative standing of the contestants as the bout . -- . .

. , % ~

progressed, this advance also added to the attraction of the event for those who had wagered on the outcome.
While the system of the above-referred to patent was effective for the purposes for which it was designed, it has been found that still further improvements can be made to further enhance the quality of the judging and the enjoyment of the audience.
Specifically, it is believed to be desirable to be able to monitor and control the quali~ of the performance of the individual official or judge so that it can be evaluated following the contest. It is, therefore, believed desirable to provide some means by which the precise event which triggered the award of points by the judge can be objectively reviewed and evaluated.
It is also well-known ~hat wagering of various types is often desired by the audience observing contests of this type, and it is believed desirable to provide visual means for evaluating the outcome of the fight, such as, for example, following each individual round so as to enhance the wagering environment.
It is also believed desirable in some circumstances to provide for a pari-mutual betting arrangement so that, in addition to wagering on each round or other segment of the contest, wagering can be conducted on the final ultimate outcome and various other aspects of the contest.
It is, accordingly then, a principal object of this invention to provide a computeri~ed system for obtaining a record of the scoring by each judge or other official at the athletic event and to provide for a display of that scoring to the audience as the contest progresses.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a system whereby a visual record can be kept of the scoring by each judge or other official for subsequent review to insure quality in the judging and scoring.
It is a still further object of this invention to provide means for re-cording and perhaps printing the scoring results by judge.
It is still a further object of this invention to provide a system whereby wagering can be conducted on a round-by-round basis as the contest pro-gresses.
It is a still further object of this invention to provide a system to facilitate pari-mutual betting on the ultimate outcome of the contest.
These and other objects of the invention will become more apparent upon a reading of the following brief specification considered and interpreted in view of the accompanying drawings.

~ .
2 ~ ~ ;

OF THE DR~WIN(~S:
FIGU~E 1 is a schematic view showin~s the ring and scoreboard arrange-ment of the system.
S FIGURE 2 is a schematic view of the master control station operator interface.
FIGURE 3 is a schematic view of the overall system.
FIGURE 4 is a schematic view of the system adapted for pari~mutual betting.
Before describing the preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be noted that, in essence, the drawings are schematic only and it is believed apparent that a plurality of known electronic components will be employed in the system. The specific design and structure of the known components has not been illustrated herein since such is believed to be well within the skill of one with ordinary skill in this art. It is believed that the combination of elements into an overall system provides the inventive concept disclosed, described and claimed herein.
In its broadest sense, what is illustrated is a computerized system for scoring boxing contests. Referring to FIGURE 1 of the drawings, the system is comprised of a scoreboard 10 located in view of the spectators, three judging/scoring booths 11, 12 and 13 located on three sides of the ring 15 and the master control station 14 located on the fourth side of the ring. An input/output board is provided at each station, as indicated by the numerals 11a, 12a, 13a and 14a.
The three judges sit in the booths 11, 12 and 13, which are preferably soundproof, and may optionally wear headsets. Stereo music or white noise may be fed into the headsets to further mask crowd noise and influence if desired. Microphones (not shown) are disposed at each station and used to communicate with the master control operator at station 14 should problems with the system develop or if special instructions or questions are necessary.
The scoreboard` 10, which is positioned so as to be visible to the audience, displays relevant information including scores for each contestant as at 10a and 10b,~the round as at 10c and the elapsed time in the current round as at 10d, It ~is contemplated that the boxers will wear color-coded trunks, such as, for example, red and gold, and that the judges will score the fight with .

.
- : ; - . . . . . . . .
' :..... . : . ~ . -....

3 ~

momentary push-button switches that are color-coded to correspond to the boxers' trunks. Exemplary push-button switches are shown in ~IGURE 3 at 11b with it being understood that the arrangement is typical and would be duplicated for the other two judges. A gold switch held in one hand repre-5 sents the boxer in gold trunks and a red switch in the other hand representsthe boxer in red trunlcs. A single push of the switch scores a point for that boxer which represents a clean punch landed in a legal area of the opponent.
~ switch pushed twice represents an extremely hard blow to the opponent, scoring two points for that boxer. Input from these switches is locked out 10 at the end of each round and enabled at the beginning of the next round, although a slight delay of a few seconds may be provided at the end of the round to perrn~t recording the final blows.
The points awarded by each judge are accumulated in the computer 20 by individual counters and are displayed on the rnaster control CRT screen 30 15 (see also FIGURE 2). The accumulated points are also stored on a suitable storage medium for future analysis along with the individual boxers' scores.
Scoring of each boxer is accompl;shed by dividing the total number of switch pulses from all three judges by three in the form of the invention illustrated.
In other words, for each three pulses received for a given boxer, a point is 20 added to his total score, although a different formula may, in certain cir-cumstances, be employed. These weigkted scores are displayed on the score-board 10 in appropriate red or gold boxes lOa and lOb as well as the CRT
screen 30 at the master control station 14. It should be noted that the actual input from each individual judge is displayed only on the master con-25 trol screen 30, since this information is primarily important for the qualitycontrol aspect of the system. The counters are capable of storing and dis-playing up to 999 points for each boxer.
The master control operator may also add or subtract points from either boxers' score as necessary for bonus points or for penalty points with key-30 board 32. For example, five points are adde~ to a boxer's score if he offi-cially knocks down his opponent as signalled by the referee. And if a boxer commits some illegal action, the referee may signal that one or more points be subtracted from his score. The addition or subtraction of points is ac-complished from the master control station 14 with switches on the master 35 control console 31.
The computer 20 will maintain all current information, should a power failure occur, long enough to move the data onto a non-volatile storage , .
.

2 ~

medium or, in other words, to allow the computer to dump the information onto such a medium. This will be accomplished with an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) 40. The IJPS 40 will maintain the computer and scoring func-tions for up to five (5) minutes, excluding the scoreboard 10. The current S information will be updated on the scoreboard by the computer with complete score and time once full power is restored to the system.
Further functions of the computer 20 include the official timing of both the rounds and rest periods and counting of the rounds. The round counter shows zero or blank when the fight begins and advances to 1 at the begin-ning of Round 1 and continues to show Round 1 until the beginning of Round 2, at which time it advances. It will stop counting at the end of a preset number of rounds and can be reset at the master control station 14. The round/rest timer is a decrementing timer which alternately counts round periods and rest periods both of which can be preset as desired. This timer will be reinitialized when the round counter is reset. It is also possible to provide a hold switch at the master control station 14 to stop the timer if, for example, the referee signals a time out.
The timing and round count will be displayed on the scoreboard at 10c and 10d. The beginning and ending of rounds are signalled by a bell, and a buzzer is sounded ten (10) seconds before the end of the rest period in conventional fashion. The number of rounds and time per round can be pre-programmed to accommodate various rules for various jurisdictions, e.~., three minute or two minute rounds, etc. These variables can also be adjusted as necessary at fight time.
AS noted, the scoreboard 10 will display total accumulated points for each boxer, the current round, and the countdown time for the round or rest period. A countdown timer will also run continuously after the start of the first round, alternately displaying the round time or the rest time remaining.
The timer stops at the end of the last round. If the fight is officially stopped, the master control operator can also stop the timer manually.
~ sound system 41, separate from the computer scoring system, is used to mask crowd noise *om the scorers and for communication to and from the master control operator. The judges wear headsets and are in a soundproof booth. Stereo music or white noise may be fed into the headphones to further mask crowd noise and influence if desired. The master control opera-tor ~r judges may use the microphones to alert each other should problems with the scoring system arise.

. . ~ . .. . .. .
,, .:. . . :, .

- ' ' . :' ' ' '; . ~ ' , As previously noted, not only is it desired to rnonitor the points awarded by each judge, it is desired to be able to associate the awarding of points by each judge with the actual actions of the contestants which lead to the award of the points.
With that in mind and referring again to FIGURE 1 of the drawings, it will be seen that the basic boxing "ring", which is actually square, is generally indicated by the numeral 15 and has associated with it four video cameras of known types and generally indicated by the numerals 111, 112, 113 and 114.
These cameras are disposed about the four sides of the ring commonly used in boxing, wrestling and other similar athletic contests, although, of course, the precise configuration of the locus of the athletic contest would depend on the contest and might affect the location of the cameras. As noted at the outset however, the present invention is only being described primarily with relation to boxing for ease of description.
Accordingly, the disposition of the cameras 111, 112, 113 and 114 is such that, in general? a view from nearly all possible perspectives is provided by the combination of cameras. In particular, at least the views available to each judge are duplicated by the various cameras.
Three supplemental cameras 211, 212 and 213 are also provided. It will be assumed, again, that a boxing contest is involved and judging stations 11, 12 and 13 will be disposed on three sides of the ring. These judging stations will essentially consist of an isolation type booth, as described in Applicant'searlier Patent 3,737,889. Each judge is provided with the already described momentary push-button switches held in each hand with each switch repre-senting one of the individual contestants. As previously noted, a push of the switch will score a point for that contestant and the switch may be pushed twice for an extremely hard blow, etc. In any event, associated with each judge is an individual judges' scoreboard, as indicated by the numerals 311, 312 and 313 of FTGURE 1. While not available to the audience, the score recorded by the judge for a particular act of the contestant will be displayed on the boards 311, 312 and 313.
The supplemental cameras 211, 212 and 213 will film the display on the boards 311, 312 and 313 and this score will be superimposed on the picture being taken by the cameras 111, 112 and 113 in known fashion~ In this way, for each individual judge, a tape, film or other suitable storage media will be prepared so as to reflect the action which took place in the ring 15 and also, .

~'` ~ ' .
' ~ ' ' 2 ~

superimposed on the tape, film or other media will be the points awarded by each individual judge at the time the action took place.
~ ccordingly, it is a relatively simple matter at a subsequent time to review the tapes, films or other media to evaluate the merits of the judge's 5 decision as to the points awarded for any particular act by the competitors.
As has been noted and as can be seen from FIGURES 1, 2 and 3, the individual judge's stations 11, 12 and 13 are also electronically connected to amaster control station 14. This master control station is then connected to a main fight scoreboard 10 which is visible to the audience and displays the 10 cumulatiYe points for each contestant on that board, presumably at the end ofeach round. In this fashion, the audience is apprised, as the contest pro-gresses, of the relative standing of the contestants and, not necessarily incidentally, the contestants are also apprised of their standings.
The system described thus far is believed to be a definite improvement 15 over the prior art in that, in addition to keeping the audience apprised of the progress of the contest, so far as the points are concerned, it clearly pro-vides an improved quality control tool for evaluating the performance of the judges or of~icials.
The invention also lends itself to a further modification which enhances 20 wagering on the contest.
To that end, it is contemplated that a plurality of casino or wagering stations will be provided, each with a scoreboard designated by the numeral 70. These are "slave" scoreboards and they display the score for each in-dividual round on the scoreboards 70,70. It should be noted that only one 25 camera 71 is illustrated, but one would be associated with each scoreboard 70.
It is thus possible, through the computer 30, to set the score at zero prior to the outset of each round or other segment of the contest on score-boards 70,70.
In that fashion, as points are awarded by the judges and accumulated 30 through the computer, the standings will be reflected, as the round pro-gresses, on the scoreboards.
While many methods of wagering are possible, one is to add and sub-tract points as they are accumulated and the wagering would be on the basis of, first, which contestant is expected to win the round and, second, on the 35 basis of the point spread or differential.
In that regard, for example, the contestants would start out with zero points at the outset of the round and then, as points were awarded to the : . , . ~ ~ - ` , ,'; ' - , ' ' '' ' ' ~ .

.: :

-`-` 2 0 ~ 9 red contestant, for example, ~hey would be added to his total on a plus or minus basis. For example, if the first contestant were to score two points~
followed by the second contestant scoring one, thc scoreboard would reflect one point for the first contestant.
It is also contemplated that a pari-mutual betting arrangement can be provided by using the cameras 80,80 and the pari-mutual boards 81,81. The pari-mutual concept would involve the running computation of odds by a computer, the display of those odds, etc.
As previously noted, no great detail has been set forth with regard to the electronic components of the system since they will be reasonably known to those skilled in the art. However, certain exemplary components will now be described.
By way of example only then, the computer used for the system may be a personal computer that has been industrialized to withstand harsh environ-ments and rough handling. The computer is based on the industry standard PC Bus architecture and communicates with the scoreboard and scoring stations over an RS-422 serial communication link 50. The high noise immunity of RS-422 allows use of simple dual twisted-pair wiring for the network even in the most severe environments. The baud rate of the net-work will be in the range of 300 to 19,200.
All functions of the system will be handled by the computer 20, except for the mechanical counters used by the judges. The scoring inputs from the judges and bonus or penalty points from the master control operator will be accumulated, totalled, and displayed by the computer on the scoreboard 10 and on the master control CRT display 30. Display at the master control station 14 will optionally be on a color CRT screen simulating the actual scoreboard display described above.
As noted, the round counter 10c will contain zero before a fight begins and will advance to one (1) at the sound of the bell for the first round. In operating the system, the fight is started by the master control operator pressing the "Start" push-button 31a on his control board 31. After that, the counter 10c will advance one increment of one at the beginning of each round and the round counter will stop counting at the end of the last round.
The number of rounds, as well as the length of each round, will be pre-programmed into the computer prior to the beginning of the fight. The round counter is reset by the computer 20 as part of the normal operation in preparation for the next fight.

.

, ' :- ' ~ ' ~ , , ' - `' : ' " ' ' .
:

2 ~

The bell an(l buzzer functions will also be controlled by the computer based on the status of the round/rest timer. At the beginning and end of each round, an output will be turned on by the computer 30 to sound the bell. Likewise, the rest timer will turn on an output 10 secon~s before the end of the rest period to sound the buzzer.
The uninterruptible power system 40 will be included in the overall control system to maintain the computer and scoring functions for up to five (5) minutes. The scoreboard and any ~emote displays or functions will not be maintained by the UPS 40 However, the scoreboard and remote displays will be refreshed ~vith the current scores and times as soon as full power i5 re-stored Input/output signals to and *om the computer will be handled by circuit boards originally designed for industrial control applications and adapted for use in the system These remote I/O stations 11a, 12a, 13a and 14a com-municate with the host computer 30 over an RS-422 serial communications link 50. Each I/O unit is assigned a unique address, making it possible to comrnunicate with up to 245 units over the single RS-422 link.
The network will provide error-free operation through the use of a simple secure protocol. All data and command messages exchanged between the host computer 30 and the I/O units 11a, 12a, 13a and 14a are represented as printable ASCII characters. This networlc approach with its simple proto-col allows scoring input (individual scoring by the judgesj and output (the scoreboard display) at remote locations without running large bundles of wire from the booths and scoreboard back to the master control station.
A rnodem can also be included in the network to comrnunicate with I/O
units over a radio link or telephone lines for longer distances.
Provisions will be incorporated into the system design and software/pro-gramrning to give remote display of the six individual scoring counters of the three scoring judges. These displays can be used for performance evaluation of judges and for training new judges. These displays can be tied into the net~vork allowing them to be placed remote from the computer CPU. These displays can be incorporated into a video tape of the fight for ultimate quality control over the scoring of a fight. The displays will also be color-coded for the fighters and will be three-digit displays capable of showing up to 999 points/punches for each fighter.
A further provision to be included is for remote differential point dis-plys 82 that will show the point difference between the two fighters and 9 .

:

2 ~ J

which one is ahead during a round. The difference count starts over at the beginning of each new round and can be used for casino applications of the system. These displays, too, can be tied into the network to allow remote viewing of the differential score between the two fighters. These displays S will be two-digit displays capable of showing up to 99 points difference between the fighters' scores.
~ printer 60 may also be included to print the fight results. The report will contain information from each round as well as the total points for each boxer. All the available information from the fight may be stored on disks 10 for future reference, analysis, and for evaluation of judges and fighters.
This information can be made available to coaches, trainers, commissions, etc., for training and evaluation assistance.

:

:
: .

::
~: :
:

:
10- ~
:

, .
. : . , , , ~ .

Claims (16)

1. A scoring system for athletic contests wherein one or more judges are positioned about the locus of the contest, comprising.
a) signalling means positioned adjacent each judge;
b) a computer connected to said signalling means for recording and totalling the input from said signalling means and establishing a score for each contestant therefrom;
c) audience observable display means connected to said computer for displaying the score for each contestant;
d) a first non-audience observable display means for displaying the input from each signalling means;
e) a second non-audience observable display means disposed adjacent each judge for recording and displaying the score recorded by each judge;
f) a first camera disposed adjacent each judge and positioned so as to record the action of the contest from substantially the same perspective as the judge;
g) a second camera disposed adjacent each judge and positioned so as to record the data recorded on said second non-audience observable display means; and h) means for superimposing the image from said second camera on the image from said first camera.
2. The system of Claim 1 wherein one or more audience observable slave scoreboards are connected to said computer for displaying scoring data therefrom.
3. The system of Claim 2 wherein means are provided for zeroing the score displayed on said slave scoreboards prior to the beginning of each segment of the contest.
4. The system of Claim 1 wherein pari-mutual odds calculating means are included in said computer; and a second audience observable display means is connected to said computer for display of the data provided thereby.
5. The system of Claim 1 wherein isolation means are positioned adjacent each judge.
6. The system of Claim S wherein said isolation means include a sound-proof booth.
7. The system of Claim S or 6 wherein said isolation means include head-sets for providing sound deadening noise to each judge.
8. The system of Claim 1 wherein said audience observable display means include round and time displays.
9. The system of Claim 8 wherein a decrementing timer is connected to said round and timer displays and said computer,
10. The system of Claim 1 wherein said signalling means include momentary push-buttons for each contestant for each judge; said computer including means for enabling and disenabling each push-button in a predetermined pattern,
11. The system of Claim 1 wherein means for recording the input from each said signalling means are provided in said computer.
12, The system of Claim 1 wherein a printer is connected to said computer.
13. The system of Claim 10 wherein a master control station is connected to said computer; and master signalling means are provided at said master control station for increasing or decreasing the score derived from the input from said signalling means positioned adjacent each judge.
14. A scoring system for athletic contests wherein one or more judges are positioned about the locus of the contest, comprising:
a) signalling means positioned adjacent each judge;
b) a computer connected to said signalling means for recording and totalling the input from said signalling means and establishing a score for each contestant therefrom;

c) audience observable display means connected to said computer for displaying the score for each contestant;
d) a first non-audience observable display means for displaying the input from each signalling means;
e) a second non-audience observable display means disposed adjacent each judge for recording and displaying the score recorded by each judge;
f) a first camera disposed adjacent each judge and positioned so as to record the action of the contest from substantially the same perspective as the judge;
g) a second camera disposed adjacent each judge and positioned so as to record the data recorded on said second non-audience observable display means;
h) means for superimposing the image from said second camera on the image from said first camera; and i) means for recording and calculating wagering data.
15. The system of Claim 14 wherein said means for recording and calculating wagering data include pari-mutual odds calculating means included in said computer; and at least one pari-mutual, audience observable display means is connected to said computer for display of the pari-mutual odds calculated thereby.
16. The system of Claim 14 or 15 wherein said means for recording and cal-culating wagering data include differential score calculating means included in said computer; and at least one additional audience observa-ble display means is connected to said computer for display of the differential score for each increment of the contest.
CA 2044939 1991-06-19 1991-06-19 Scoring system for athletic events Abandoned CA2044939A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA 2044939 CA2044939A1 (en) 1991-06-19 1991-06-19 Scoring system for athletic events

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA 2044939 CA2044939A1 (en) 1991-06-19 1991-06-19 Scoring system for athletic events

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA2044939A1 true CA2044939A1 (en) 1992-12-20

Family

ID=4147863

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA 2044939 Abandoned CA2044939A1 (en) 1991-06-19 1991-06-19 Scoring system for athletic events

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2044939A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111527520A (en) * 2017-12-27 2020-08-11 富士通株式会社 Extraction program, extraction method, and information processing device

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN111527520A (en) * 2017-12-27 2020-08-11 富士通株式会社 Extraction program, extraction method, and information processing device

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5027102A (en) Scoring system for athletic events
EP0542664B1 (en) Electronic system for the controlled play of bingo and machines usable with the system
US4722526A (en) Game method and apparatus for use while viewing a sporting event
AU680920B2 (en) System for enhancing networked electronically monitored game machines
EP0267564B1 (en) Improvements relating to madines for gaming, amusement, education and the like
AU2001290099B2 (en) A gambling apparatus and method of monitoring a gambling event
CA2270062A1 (en) Method and apparatus for implementing in video a secondary game responsive to player interaction with a primary game
WO2009126982A2 (en) Device for performing a sports exercise or playing a game in spatially separate venues
CA2158770A1 (en) Electronic scorecard for the game of golf
KR100547345B1 (en) Method for playing a lottery game
US3737889A (en) Scoring system for athletic events
CA2618529A1 (en) Method and apparatus for officiating an athletic contest
US20120095577A1 (en) Real Time Fantasy Game Engine
CA2044939A1 (en) Scoring system for athletic events
US7384342B2 (en) Golfball, a team golf game system and method of play
JPH057641A (en) Scoring system for athletic sports
JPH04208180A (en) Guide system for hall for pin ball game machine
WO2007054805A2 (en) Sports officiating simulator
JP3170510B2 (en) Medal game machine
Masteralexis et al. Sports Law-Stealing Signs with Binoculars, or Other Equipment, in an NCAA Baseball Game Is Not Adequately Addressed in the Rules: A Case for Expanded Penalties in NCAA Baseball for Unethical and Unsportsmanlike Conduct
US4479181A (en) Electronic control device for decisions and scoring
JP2000254323A (en) Game machine system
EP0618826A1 (en) System and equipment for a football type game
KR100340305B1 (en) Method of and system for displaying contents of tae-kwondo fight
DE19822668A1 (en) Decision support system for games referee

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
EEER Examination request
FZDE Dead