CA1334781C - Method of forming a nonwoven web from a surface-segregatable thermoplastic composition - Google Patents

Abstract

A nonwoven web is prepared by the method of forming a nonwoven web from a composition composed of at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one defined siloxane-containing additive, which method involves the steps of (A) forming fibers by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition through a die; (B) drawing the fibers; (C) collecting the fibers on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fibers; and either (D) heating the web at a temperature of from about 27 to about 95° C for a period of time sufficient to cause additional additive to move to the surfaces of the fibers, or (E) passing the web through a pair of compacting rolls, at least one of which is heated, before removing the web from the foraminous surface.
The method of the present invention is particularly useful for the preparation of nonwoven webs, the fibers of which have at least one surface characteristic which is different from the surface characteristics of the polymer component of the thermoplastic composition. Such webs, in turn, are useful in the construction of such disposable absorbent products as diapers, feminine care products, incontinence products, and the like.

Description

METHOD OF ~IlNG A NO~w~v~N WEB FROM A
SURFACE-SEGREGATABLE THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITION

Back4Loulld of the Invention The present invention relates to a method of forming a nonwoven web from a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method of forming a nonwoven web from a thermoplastic composition which surface segregates in a controllable manner upon melt extrusion to form fibers having modified surface characteristics.
Polymers are used widely throughout the world to make a variety of products which include blown and cast films, extruded sheets, injection molded articles, foams, blow molded articles, extruded pipe, monofilaments, and nonwoven webs. Some of such polymers, such as polyolefins, are naturally hydrophobic, and for many uses this property is either a positive attribute or at least not a disadvantage.
20There~are a number of uses for polyolefins, however, where their hydrophobic nature either limits their useful-ness or requires some effort to modify the surface charac-teristics of the shaped articles made therefrom. By way of example, polyolefins are used to manufacture nonwoven webs which are employed in the construction of such disposable absorbent articles as diapers, fe~in;ne care products, incontinence products, and the like. Frequently, such nonwoven webs need to be wettable. Wettability can be obtained by spraying or coating the web with a surfactant solution during or after its formation. The web then must be dried, and the surfactant which remains on the web is removed upon exposure of the web to aqueous media.
Alternatively, a surfactant can be included in the polymer which is to be melt-processed, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,973,068 and 4,070,218. In that case, however, the surfactant must be forced to the surface of -1- ~

the fibers from which the web is formed. This typically is done by heating the web on a series of steam-heated rolls or "hot cans". This process, called "blooming", is expensive and still has the disadvantage of ready removal of the surfactant by aqueous media. Moreover, the surfac-tant has a tendency to migrate back into the fiber which adversely affects shelf life, particularly at high storage temperatures. In addition, it is not possible to incor-porate in the polymer levels of surfactant much above 1 percent by weight; surfactant levels at the surface appear to be limited to a maximum of about 0.33 percent by weight.
Most importantly, the blooming process results in web shrinkage in the cross-machine direction and a significant loss in web tensile strength.
Two common methods of preparing nonwoven webs are meltblowing and spunbonding. When using a surface-segre-gatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition to prepare a nonwoven web or fabric by either method as disclosed herein, it was found that certain problems could be encountered. Such problems typically were dependent upon the level of additive present in the composition prior to melt extrusion. For example, at additive levels less than about 1 percent by weight, there often was insufficient additive present at the surfaces of the fibers comprising the web to impart to the surfaces a characteristic of the additive. In addition, at levels of ~additive of from about 1 to about 2 percent by weight, the amount of additive at the fiber surfaces often was not as high as desired. The present invention addresses both problems.
Moreover, it was found in spunbonding processes that at additive levels equal to or greater than about 1 percent by weight, the formed web lacked coherency. That is, upon attempting to remove the web from the foraminous collecting surface, the web simply fell apart. The present invention addresses this problem and permits the use of spunbonding processes for the formation of nonwoven webs which have the neceææAry coherency for further processing and/or incorporation into products when the additive levels present in such thermoplastic composition are equal to or 5 greater than about 1 percent by weight.
As is well known in the art, nonwoven webs may be formed by meltblowing in accordance with U.S. Patent Nos.
3,016,599, 3,704,198, 3,755,527, and 3,849,241; or by spunbonding in accordance with U.S. Patent Nos. 3,341,394, 10 3,655,862, 3,692,618, 3,705,068, 3,802,817, 3,853,651, 4,064,605, 4,340,563, and 4,434,204; or by coforming in accordance with U.S. Patent Nos. 4,100,324 and 4,118,531 to E. R. Hauser. See also U.S. Patent No. 4,663,220.
In addition to those already described, other methods 15 of imparting wettability to, or otherwise affecting the surface characteristics of, fibers or other shaped articles made from polyolefins and other hydrophobic polymers are known. Representative examples of a number of such methods are described in the paragraphs which follow.
U.S. Patent No. 4,578,414 describes wettable olefin polymer fibers. The fibers are formed from a composition comprising a polyolefin resin and one or more defined surface-active agents. Such agents may be present in an amount of from about 0.01 to about 5 percent by weight.
25 The surface-active agents can be (1) an alkoxylated alkyl phenol in combination with a mixed mono-, di-, and/or -triglyceride; (2) or a polyoxyalkylene fatty acid ester;
or (3) a combination of (2) with any part of (1). The preferred polyolefin is polyethylene, and all of the 30 examples employed an ethylene/l-octene copolymer, the latter apparently being a minor component. The surface-active agents are stated to bloom to the fabricated fiber surfaces where at least one of the surface-active agents remains partially embedded in the polymer matrix. The 35 patent further states that the permanence of wettability can be controlled through the composition and concentration of the additive package.
Polysiloxane/polyoxazoline block copolymers are discIosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,659,777. The copolymers are stated to be useful as surface-modifying additives for base polymers. Such use apparently has primary reference to personal care products where the surface properties to be imparted include glossiness, smoothness, and lubricity.
However, incorporation of the copolymers into fibers is stated to impart surface stain resistance, antistatic properties, flame retardancy, and wettability by both polar and nonpolar solvents. Such incorporation preferably is in the range of from about 1 to 5 parts by weight.
Suitable base polymers include some vinyl polymers, acrylate 15 polymers, polyurethanes, cellulose derivatives, and poly-ethylene, polypropylene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, and copolymers of ethylene with, for example, vinyl acetate.
However, the single example illustrating incorporation of the disclosed copolymers into a base polymer employed as 20 the base polymer poly(vinyl chloride), and the resulting mixture was used to cast films from solution.
U.S. Patent No. 4,672,005 describes a process for improving the hygroscopic, soil release, and other surface properties of a polymer substrate. The process involves 25 contacting the substrate with an aqueous mixture containing a water-soluble vinyl monomer and a hydrophobic vinyl -monomer. Polymerization of the water-soluble vinyl monomer then is initiated by a polymerization initiator, thereby forming a vinyl polymer on the surface of the polymer substrate.
U.S. Patent No. 4,698,388 describes a method for modifying the surface of a polymer material by means of a block copolymer. The block copolymer consists of a hydro-philic polymer portion formed from a vinyl monomer and a - 35 polymer portion which is compatible with the polymer material, also formed from a vinyl monomer. The block 1 33~

copolymer is added to the polymer material by, for example, coating the material with a solution or suspension of the block copolymer, mixing the block copolymer with the polymer material during formation of the article, forming 5 a film from the block copolymer which then is melt-pressed or adhered to the surface of the polymer material, and coating the surface of the polymer material with powdered block copolymer.
Polymer compositions having a low coefficient of 10 friction are described by U.S. Patent No. Re. 32,514.
The compositions comprise a blend of at least 80 percent by weight of a polymer and at least 0.35 percent by weight of a crosslinked silicone polycarbinol. The polymer preferably is a blend of cellulose nitrate and a hydrophobic 15 acrylate polymer. The silicone polycarbinol in general is a hydroxy-terminated polysiloxane or hydroxy-substituted polysiloxane. The compositions typically are prepared by dissolving the polymer or polymer blend, silicone polycar-binol, and crosslinking agent in a suitable solvent and 20 casting a film from which the solvent is allowed to evapor-ate.
Canadian Patent No. 1,049,682 describes the inclusion in a thermoplastic polymer of from 0.1 to 10 percent by weight of a carboxy-functional polysiloxane. Suitable 25 thermoplastic polymers include polyolefins. Such inclusion is stated to enhance the properties or characteristics of -the thermoplastic polymer in one or more ways. By way of illustration, products or articles made from the polymer mixture were stated to have self-lubricating properties and increased resistance to wear. For molded articles, less friction during transfer, injection or extrusion molding was observed, and better release of parts from the molds was obtained. See, also, German Published Patent Applica-tion (Offenlegungschrift) No. 2,506,667 tChem. Abstr., 35 84:91066z (1976)].

other, similar references which may be of interest include R. H. Somani and M. T. Shaw, Macromolecules, 14, 886 (1981), which describes the miæcibility of polydimethyl-siloxane in polystyrene; and S. N. Pandit et al., PolYm.
5 Compos., 2, 68 (1981), which reports the use of a vinyltri-ethoxysilane polymer as a coupling agent in glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene.
Also for the sake of completeness, it may be noted that polysiloxanes have been utilized in the production of 10 nonwoven webs or fabrics, or products made therefrom, as illustrated by the references which follow.
U.S. Patent No. 3,360,421 describes a bonded nonwoven backing material having perforate selvage which is used in the manufacture of carpet. In the production of the 15 nonwoven backing material, a nonwoven web is produced from a polyolefin such as polyethylene or polypropylene. The resulting web then is subjected to bonding conditions, followed by applying to the web a lubricant which can be, among other things, methyl hydrogen polysiloxane and 20 dimethyl polysiloxane.
A finish composition for application to a continuous filament polypropylene sheet is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,766,115. The composition comprises a mixture of two polysiloxane components, the first of which is a dyeable 25 component comprising a primary or secondary aminoalkyl- or aminoalkoxyalkylpolysiloxane fluid having an amine function-ality in the range of 4-7 percent and being substantially free of other reactive groups. The second component is a lubricant component comprising a polydialkyl/arylsiloxane fluid having hydroxy end groups and being substantially free of other reactive groups. The polypropylene sheet typically is a spunbonded sheet made from isotactic poly-propylene.
U.S. Patent No. 3,867,188 relates to a spunbonded 35 nonwoven fabric which is especially useful as a carpet backing. The fabric has on it a silicone-glycol copolymer having the general formula:

(CH3)3sio{(CH3)2sio}x{(CH3)GSio}ysi(cH3)3 in which G is a radical of the structure -R(C3H6)zOH, R is an alkylene radical containing from 1 to 18 carbon atoms, x has an average value of from 40-90, y has an average value of from 1-10, and z has an average value of from 1-10.
U.S. Patent No. 3,929,509 describes a hydrophilic microporous film which is useful as a battery separator.
The film comprises a hydrophobic microporous film coated with a silicone glycol copolymer surfactant, preferably at a level of from 2 to 20 percent by weight, based on the uncoated film. In preferred embodiments, the surfactant coating comprises a mixture of a silicone glycol copolymer surfactant and a second surfactant which preferably is an imidazoline tertiary amine. The silicone glycol copolymer surfactant preferably is a polyoxyethylene polymethyl-siloxane.
A yarn finish formulation is disclosed in U.S. PatentNo. 4,105,569. In preferred embodiments, the formulation contains a hydrocarbon-soluble, long molecular chain polymeric viscosity improver, such as polyisobutylene, and a polysiloxane. Preferably, the polysiloxane is an alkoxy-lated polysiloxane, such as a dimethylpolysiloxane with -substituted polyethylene glycol or polypropylene glycol side chains or mixed polyethylene/polypropylene glycol side chains.
U.S. Patent No. 4,563,190 describes a siloxane/oxy-alkylene copolymer as an optional component of a dyeing assistant for dyeing or printing polyamide fiber material with anionic dyes. See also U.S. Patent Nos. 4,444,563 and 4,426,203.
U.S. Patent No. 4,645,691 describes a method for treating materials with organopolysiloxane compounds. The method involves applying to the material a composition containing a silicone compound which has one or more alkoxysilylalkyl groups and one or more polyoxyalkylene groups. The materials to be treated preferably are fibers and fiber-containing materials.
For a limited review of similar applications of sili-cones, see A. J. Sabia and R. B. Metzler, Nonwovens Ind., 14, 16 (1983). Also note British Patent No. 1,273,445 [Chem. Abstr., 76: 89559z (1972)], which describes the use of a block polysiloxane, among other materials, in the preparation of a leather substitute.
It may be noted that the above review briefly discusses polysiloxanes which have been modified by inclusion of a poly(oxyalkylene) moiety; such modified polysiloxanes can 15 be employed in the composition of the present invention as an additive.
A modified polysiloxane in which the poly(oxyalkylene) moiety is a poly(oxypropylene) is described in U.S. Patent No. 3,867,188. The modified polysiloxane apparently is 20 employed as a lubricant which coats a spunbonded nonwoven fabric. The fabric, in turn, is employed as a carpet backing. The addition of the modified polysiloxane to the backing is stated to reduce damage to the backing which results from the tufting process used to manufacture the 25 carpet.
Additionally, polysiloxanes have been used in the - manufacture of films. For example, U.S. Patent No.
4,652,489 describes a sealable, opaque polyolefinic multi-layer film. The film is composed of a polypropylene base layer, a nonsealable surface layer, and a sealable surface layer. The nonsealable layer is a combination of a propyl-ene homopolymer and a slip agent which preferably is a polydiorganosiloxane. The polydiorganosiloxane is used in an amount of from about 0.3 to about 2.5 percent by weight and preferably comprises a polymethylphenylsiloxane or a polydimethylsiloxane.

Finally, several references are known which are or may be of interest in relation to the additive when it contains a disubstituted siloxane. Such references are described below.
Siloxane-oxyalkylene block copolymers are disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,629,308. The copolymers are stated to be particularly useful as a foam stabilizer in the production of polyurethane resin foams. The copolymers are represented by the formula:

R3SiO(RSiO)r[R~(ocmH2m)noR li 0 ]p 3 15 in which R is a monovalent hydrocarbon group, R0 is hydrogen or a monovalent hydrocarbon group, R' is hydrogen or a monovalent hydrocarbon group, R" is a divalent hydrocarbon group, r nas a value of at least 0, m is an integer that has a value of at least 2, n is a number that has a value 20 of at least 1 (preferably at least 4), p is a number that has a value of at least 1, there are not more than three hydrogen atoms represented by R0 in the copolymer (prefer-ably less than one or none), and at least 25 weight-percent of the groups represented by (OCmH2m) are oxyethylene 25 groups.
U.S. Patent No. 4,150,013 describes melt-processible -tetrafluoroethylene copolymers containing organopolysilox-anes which are useful as wire insulation coatings. The organopolysiloxane is present in an amount of between 30 about 0.2 and 5 percent by weight, based on the weight of the resulting copolymer composition. Representative organopolysiloxanes include polyphenylmethylsiloxane, polydimethylsiloxane, polymethylsiloxane, a copolymer of phenylmethylsiloxane and dimethylsiloxane, and the like.
- 35 A high viscosity silicone blending process is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,446,090. The blends produced by the ~ 3~17~11 process are stated to have engineering properties and flame retardance superior to known blends. The process involves (a) melting a solid thermoplastic composition comprising one or more thermoplastic polymers within an extruder, (b) injecting a high viscosity silicone fluid into the molten thermoplastic composition within the extruder, and (c) blending said molten thermoplastic composition with said high viscosity silicone fluid within the extruder. The thermoplastic compositions include polyethylene and polypropylene. The silicone fluid typi-cally is a polydimethylsiloxane. The blend can contain such additives as reinforcing fillers, antioxidants, lubricants, flame retardants, and the like. The additives can be introduced by means of the thermoplastic polymers, the silicone fluid, or both. Typical flame retardants include magnesium stearate, calcium stearate, barium stearate, antimony oxide, and decabromodiphenyloxide.
Siloxane-containing polymers are described in U. S.
Patent Nos. 4,480,009 and 4,499,149. The properties of polymeric compositions are stated to be improved by the presence of a polysiloxane unit having a defined formula.
The listing of polymers, however, does not include polyole-fins. The disclosed compositions apparently are useful as protective coatings and as molding, extruding, laminating, and calendaring compositions. Solutions of the composi-tions can be used to prepare films and fibers.
- U.S. Patent No. 4,500,659 relates to extrudable, curable polyorganosiloxane compositions. The compositions are similar to those of U.S. Patent No. 4,585,830, described below. In the present case, the compositions comprise (A) a liquid triorganosiloxy end-blocked polydimethylsiloxane wherein the triorganosiloxy units are dimethylvinylsiloxy or methylphenylvinylsiloxy; (B) a reinforcing silica filler which has been reacted with a liquid or solubilized treating agent, at least one component of which is a liquid hydroxy end-blocked polyorganosiloxane wherein at least S0 percent of the silicon atoms are bonded to a fluorine-substituted hydrocarbon radical; (C) a liquid methylhydrogensiloxane having an average of at least three silicon-bonded hydrogen atoms per molecule; and (D) a platinum-containing catalyst. The bonded treating agent for the silica filler would be incompatible, i.e., in-soluble, with the polydimethylsiloxane component if it were not bonded to the silica.
Olefin polymer compositions containing silicone additives are described in U.S. Patent No. 4,535,113.
The compositions apparently can be extruded through rela-tively narrow die gaps at commercial extrusion rates to provide films having improved optical and mechanical properties. The silicone additives have the formula, (R)(R)(R)Si-o-[si(R)(R)-o]x-[si(R)(Rl)-o]y-si(R)(R)(R)~

in which each R, which can be the same or different, is an alkyl radical preferably having from one to six carbon atoms, Rl is a monovalent organic radical containing at least one ethyleneoxide group, vicinal epoxy group, or amino group, and x and y, which can be the same or differ-ent, each have a value of at least 1 and generally have a value of from about 4 to about 5,000. The silicone addi-tives typically are present in the compositions in anamount of from about 0.01 to about 5 percent by weight.
-- U.S. Patent No. 4,585,830 describes polyorganosiloxane compositions useful for preparing unsupported extruded profiles. Such compositions are stated to include a triorganosiloxy end-blocked polydiorganosiloxane containing at least two vinyl radicals per molecule, in which at least 50 percent of the silicon-bonded organic radicals are methyl; and an organohydrogensiloxane containing at least two silicon-bonded hydrogen atoms per molecule, in 35 which said hydrogen atoms are bonded to different silicon atoms. Examples of such two types of compounds are di-methylvinylsiloxy end-blocked polydimethylsiloxanes and trimethylsiloxy end-blocked dimethylsiloxane/methylhydro-gensiloxane copolymers, respectively.
From the foregoing, it is evident that surfactants 5 have been added to polymers to impart a hydrophilic charac-ter to the surface of the shaped article made from the polymer. These efforts appear to fall into either of two categories. In the first category, the surfactant is compatible with the polymer at melt-extrusion temperatures, 10 in which the shaped article must be bloomed or heated after formation thereof to bring the surfactant to the surface.
However, the surfactant is incompatible at melt-extrusion temperatures. In the second, the surfactant moves spon-taneously to the surface of the shaped article because it 15 is incompatible with the polymer at any temperature. Such incompatibility at melt-extrusion temperatures prevents the use of such surfactants in the formation of melt-extruded fibers because the surfactant prevents the con-tinuous formation of fibers.
Although surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermo-plastic compositions are a significant advance in the art of modifying the surface characteristics of fibers prepared from a thermoplastic polymer, there is a need to overcome the aforementioned problems associated with the use of 25 such compositions in the formation of nonwoven webs by such processes as meltblowing, spunbonding, and coforming.

Summary of the Invention Accordingly, the present invention provides a method of forming a nonwoven web from a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition which comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one silox-ane-containing additive having at least two moieties, A
35 and B, which method comprises the steps of:

(A) forming fibers by extruding a molten thermoplastic - composition through a die;
(B) drawing said fibers;
(C) collecting said fibers on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fibers, which fibers have less than about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers, of solvent-extractable additive at their interfacial surfaces and have surface properties charac-teristic of said at least one thermoplastic polymer; and (D) heating said web at a temperature of from about 27 to about 95 C for a period of time sufficient to provide at least about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers, of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of the fibers, which fibers- have a surface property characteristic of said at least one additive as a consequence of said heating;
in which:
(1) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at tempera-tures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of said moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, 25 would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion --temperatures;

(2) moiety B has at least one functional group which imparts to said additive said at least one characteristic;
30(3) the molecular weight of said additive is in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000; and (4) said additive is present in said thermoplastic composition at a level of from about 0.5 to about 2 percent by weight, based on the weight of said polymer.
35The present invention further provides a method of forming a nonwoven web from a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition which comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one siloxane-containing additive having at least two moieties, A and B, which method comprises the steps of:
S (A) forming fibers by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition through a die;
( B) drawing said fibers;
(C) collecting said fibers on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fibers, which fibers have at least about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers, of solvent-extractable additive at their interfacial surfaces and have a surface property charac-teristic of said at least one additive; and (D) heating said web at a temperature of from about 27 to about 95~ C for a period of time sufficient to increase the amount of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of the fiber to at least about 0.75 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers;
in which:
(1) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at tempera-tures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of said 25 moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion temperatures;
(2) moiety B has at least one functional group which 30 imparts to said additive said at least one characteristic;

(3) the molecular weight of said additive is in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000; and (4) said additive is present in said thermoplastic composition at a level of from about 0.5 to about 2 percent - 35 by weight, based on the weight of said polymer.

The present invention also provides a method of forming a nonwoven web comprising the steps of:
(A) forming continuous filaments by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition through a die;
(B) quenching said continuous filaments to a solid state;
(C) drawing said filaments;
(D) collecting said continuous filaments on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fila-ments; and (E) passing said web between a pair of compacting rolls, at least one of which is heated, before removing said web from said moving foraminous surface, said compacting rolls applying heat and pressure to said web sufficient to impart coher-ency thereto;
wherein said thermoplastic composition comprises a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition which comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one additive having at least two moieties, A and B, in which:
(1) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at temper-atures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of 25 moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion ~-temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion temperatures;
(2) moiety B has at least one functional group which imparts to said additive at least one desired character-istic;
(3) said additive is a siloxane-containing compound;
(4) the molecular weight of said additive is in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000; and (5) the weight ratio of said polymer to said additive is in the range of from about lO to about lOO.

- ~ 33478 1 In preferred embodiments, moiety A comprises at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene group, optionally associated with one or more groups selected from the group consisting of trisubstituted silyl and trisubstituted siloxy groups, the substituents of all such groups being independently selected from the group consisting of mono-valent alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and moiety B.
In still other preferred embodiments, the additive contains a plurality of groups selected from the group consisting of the following general formulae:
(1) Bl-, (2) B2-O-, (3) R1-, (4) R2-Si-, (5) (R3)(R4)(R5)Si-, (6) (R6)(R7)(R8)si--~

(7) t-Si(Rg)(R1o)-O-]a~ and (8) [-Si(Rl1)(B3)--]b;
in which each of R1 and R2 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of R3-R5, inclusive, independently is a mono-valent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, ~-cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and B4; each of R6-Rl1, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted; each of a and b independently represents an integer from 0 to about 70 which indicates only the quantity of the respective group present in the additive without indicating or requiring, in instances when an integer is greater than 1, that such plurality of the respective 1 ~3~ 7~ 1 group are connected to one another to form an oligomer or polymer or that all of such groups have identical sub-stituents; and each of B1-B4, inclusive, independently is a moiety which imparts to the additive at least one desired 5 characteristic; with the proviso that such plurality of groups results in at least one tetrasubstituted disilox-anylene group.
In still other preferred embodiments, the additive is a compound having the general formula, lRl2 B5-0-(-Si-O-)C-B6 in which each of R12 and R13 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-20 tuted; each of B5 and B6 independently is a monovalentgroup having a desired characteristic; and c represents an integer from 2 to about 70.
In yet other preferred embodiments, the additive is a compound having the general formula, IR15 IR17 IRlg lR2 o R14-Si--(-Si--)d-(-Si-O-)e~li R
Rl6 Rl8 B7 R22 in which each of R14-R22, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B7 is a monovalent group having a desired 35 characteristic; d represents an integer from O to about 70; and e represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

In yet other preferred embodiments, the additive is a compound having the general formula, R23-Sl[(-0-lsl-)f-B8]3 in which each of R23-R25, inclusive, independently is a 10 monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B8 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and f represents an integer from l to 15 about 70.
The process of the present invention is particularly useful for the preparation of nonwoven webs, the fibers of which have at least one surface characteristic which is different from the surface characteristics of the polymer 20 component of the thermoplastic composition. Such webs, in turn, are useful in the construction of such disposable absorbent products as diapers, feminine care products, incontinence products, and the like.

Brief Description of the Drawings Figure lA is a generalized flow diagram illustrating one process of the present invention.
Figure lB is a generalized flow diagram illustrating 30 another process of the present invention.
Figure 2 consists of two hand-drawn representations of photomicrographs of a composition of the present invention, i.e., the fibers of Example 325, taken through a hot-stage microscope at two different temperatures and a magnification of 350X.
Figure 3 consists of two hand-drawn representations of photomicLoyraphs of the polymer component only of the fibers of Example 325, taken through a hot-stage microscope at two different temperatures and a magnification of 350X.
Figure 4 consists of two hand-drawn representations of photomic~Gy~aphs of the composition of Example 38 consisting of the polymer component of the fibers of Example 325 and an incompatible silicon-containing compound, taken through a hot-stage microscope at two different temperatures and a magnification of 350X.
Figure 5 consists of two hand-drawn representations of photomicrographs of the composition of Example 43, taken through a hot-stage microscope at two different temperatures and a magnification of 350X.
Figure 6 is a diagrammatic representation of a section of melt-pressed film prepared from a composition of the present invention, as described in Examples 129-173, inclusive.
Figure 7 is a diagrammatic representation of a scanning electron mic~Gy~aph~ using a silicon x-ray probe, of a sample of the film of Example 169, superimposed on the diagrammatic representation of Figure 6, which film was prepared from a composition of the present invention in which the additive was a silicon-containing compound.
Figure 8 is a plot of silicon concentration in atom percent versus depth in A below the interfacial surface for a sample of the film of Example 169, the data for the plot having been obtained by Rutherford back scattering -spectrometry.
Figure 9 is a diagrammatic representation of a scanning electron micrograph, using a silicon x-ray probe, of a section of the spunbonded nonwoven web of Example 361 prepared from a composition of the present invention, in which the additive was a silicon-containing compound.
Figures 10 and 11 are plots of silicon concentrations in atom percent versus depth in A below the interfacial - 35 surface for the fibers of two spunbonded nonwoven webs made in accordance with the present invention, in which the additive was a silicon-containing compound, the data for the plots having been obtained by Rutherford back scattering spectrometry.
Figure 12 consists of two hand-drawn representations of photomic~G~aphs of a composition consisting of the polymer component of the fibers of Example 325 and a surfactant commonly used in a blooming process to render polypropylene fibers wettable, taken through a hot-stage microscope at two different temperatures and a magnification of 350X.

Detailed Description of the Invention One method of the present invention applies to any nonwoven process, e.g., to meltblowing, spunbonding, and coforming processes. The other method of the present invention applies only to a spunbonding process. For con-venience, the two methods will be discussed separately as the general method and the spunbonding method, respectively.
The nature of the thermoplastic composition employed in both methods then will be described.
The General Method In the first step of the general method of the present invention, fibers are formed by extruding a molten thermo-plastic composition, hereinafter defined, through a die.Although the nature of the die is not known to be critical, -it most often will have a plurality of orifices arranged in one or more rows extending the full machine width.
Such orifices may be circular or noncircular in cross-section. The fibers extruded may be either continuous ordiscontinuous.
The fibers then are drawn, typically by entraining them in a fluid stream having a sufficiently high velocity.
When continuous fibers are produced, the fibers first are cooled in a quenching fluid which usually is low pressure air. The fluid stream which draws the fibers, usually air, can be a stream of high velocity air separate from the quenching fluid, or it can be a portion of the quenching fluid which is accelerated by passage into a narrow nozzle.
In the production of discontinuous fibers, on the other s hand, the fluid stream usually is a heated, high velocity stream of air which draws the fibers while they are in an at least partially molten or softened state.
The drawn fibers then are collected on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fibers. The foraminous surface can be, by way of example only, a revolving drum or a continuous belt or wire screen; the latter is most commonly used on commercial-scale equipment.
In some cases, the collected fibers will have at their interfacial surfaces less than about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of the fibers, of solvent-extractable additive. Such fibers typically will have surface properties characteristic of the at least one thermoplastic polymer component of the thermoplastic composition from which the fibers were prepared. When the collected fibers have at their interfacial surfaces at least about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of the fibers, of solvent-extractable additive, the fibers typical-ly will have surface properties characteristic of the additive.
As used herein, the term "solvent-extractable additive"
refers to additive which is on or sufficiently close to the interfacial surfaces of the fibers to be removed by a mild extraction procedure that does not result in fiber swelling. An example of such a procedure is soaking or agitating the fibers in isopropanol for 5-15 minutes. The amount of additive present in the extract then is readily determined by known means, such as by either gravimetric or chromatographic analysis.
Finally, the web of entangled fibers is heated at a temperature of from about 27 to about 95 C for a period of time sufficient to cause additional additive to move to the surfaces of the fibers. As a general rule, heating times of from about 1 to about 30 seconds will accomplish the desired movement of additive to the surfaces of the fibers. However, longer or shorter times can be used, 5 depending upon the level of additive in the thermoplastic composition, the average molecular weight and molecular weight range (polydispersity) of the additive, and the desired additive level at the fiber surfaces. Preferably, heating times of from about 1 to about 5 seconds at a 10 temperature of from about 65 to about 85 C will be employ-ed.
When the web before the heating step has surface properties characteristic of the at least one thermoplastic polymer component of the composition from which the fibers 15 were made, the fiber surfaces typically have at their interfacial surfaces an amount of solvent-extractable additive which is less than about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of fibers. In this context, the heating step will cause the amount of solvent-extractable additive at such surfaces to increase to at least about 0.35 percent by weight, which in turn results in the fibers having a surface property characteristic of the at least one additive present in the melt-extruded composition.
Preferably, the heating step will increase the amount of surface-extractable additive at the fiber surfaces to at least about 0.75 percent by weight, and most preferably to at least about 1 percent by weight, based on the weight of the fibers.
On the other hand, when the fibers of the web have, before the heating step, a surface property characteristic of the at least one additive present in the composition, the amount of solvent-extractable additive at the surfaces of the fibers usually is greater than about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of fibers. However, such amount usually is less than about 0.75 percent by weight.
Consequently, the heating step is intended to increase the amount of solvent-extractable additive at the fiber surfaces to at least about 0.75 percent by weight and preferably to at least about 1 percent by weight, based on the weight of the fibers.
The heating step can be accomplished by any known means. For example, the web can be irradiated with infrared or microwave radiation, passed through an oven, or passed over one or more heated rolls. If heated rolls are used, such rolls in turn may be heated by any convenient means.
Thus, such rolls can be heated with steam or by a circulat-ing heated oil or other heat-exchange medium. Alternative-ly, the surfaces of the rolls can be irradiated with, e.g., infrared radiation. In general, heated rolls are preferred for continuous processes. However, it is not necessary that the heating step immediately follow the formation of the web. That is, the web may be formed as described, then wound up as a roll of fabric and stored or set aside temporarily. The stored roll of fabric then can be unwound and subjected to the heating step.
Some aspects of the method of the present invention are described in more detail in earlier-referenced U.S.
Patent Nos. 3,016,599, 3,704,198, 3,755,527, 3,849,241, 3,341,394, 3,655,862, 3,692,618, 3,705,068, 3,802,817, 3,853,651, 4,064,605, 4,340,563, 4,434,204, 4,100,324, 4,118,531, and 4,663,220.

The general method is further described by reference to Figure lA which is a generalized flow diagram illustrat-ing a preferred embodiment. Although Figure lA illustrates a typical spunbonding process, it should be understood by those having ordinary skill in the art that meltblowing or other methods may be used.
In discussing Figure lA, the term "filaments" is used to emphasize the continuous nature of the fibers produced 3s by the spunbonding process. For the purposes of the present invention, however, the terms "filaments" and "fibers" are ,~ .

, used synonymously. Thus, the use of either term should not be construed as in any way limiting the scope of the present invention.
Turning now to Figure lA, the thermoplastic composi-tion is fed from supply 10 to hopper 12, then throughextruder 14, filter 16, and metering pump 17 to die head 18 having die face 22 with a plurality of orifices arranged in one or more rows generally in the cross-machine direc-tion. As the continuous filaments emerge from die face 22, they form a curtain of filaments 20 directed into quench chamber 24. In the quench chamber 24, filaments 20 are contacted with air or other cooling fluid through inlet 26. The quenching fluid is maintained at a tempera-ture which is lower than the temperature of the filaments 20, typically at ambient temperature, e.g., in the range of from about 4 to about 55 C. The quenching fluid is supplied under low pressure, i.e., less than about 12 psi, and preferably less than about 2 psi, and a portion prefer-ably is directed through the curtain of filaments 20 and removed as exhaust through port 28. The proportion of quenching fluid supplied that is discharged as exhaust will depend upon the composition being used and the rapidity of quenching needed to give the desired filament charac-teristics, such as denier, tenacity, and the like. In general, the greater the amount of fluid exhausted, the larger the resulting filament denier and, conversely, the lower the exhaust fluid ratio, the lower the filament denier.
As quenching is completed, the curtain of filaments 20 is directed through a smoothly narrowing lower end 30 of the quenching chamber into nozzle 32 where the quenching fluid attains a velocity of from about 45 to about 245 meters per second. Nozzle 32 extends the full width of the machine, equivalent to the width of die 22. Nozzle 32 preferably is formed by a stationary wall 34 and a movable wall 36, both of which also span the width of the machine.

The function of movable wall 36 is described in said U.S.Patent No. 4,340,563.
After exiting nozzle 32, filaments 20 are collected on a moving foraminous surface such as an endless screen or belt 38 to form a nonwoven web 40. Before being removed from belt or screen 38, web 40 is passed under compaction roll 42, optionally in conjunction with guide roll 46.
Compaction roll 42 conveniently is opposed by the forward drive and/or support roll 44 for the continuous foraminous belt or wire screen 38. Compaction roll 42 typically is not heated, although it could be, if desired. Upon exiting compaction roll 42, the web is bonded at roll nip 48. The web then is passed over two steam-heated rolls 51 and 52 having a surface temperature of about 85 C, after which the web is wound on take-up roll 54. Combined or total residence times of the web on rolls 51 and 52 typically is in the range of from about 1 to about 5 seconds, although longer or shorter times can be used, depending upon the nature of the additive, the extent to which additive already is located at the surfaces of the fibers, and the desired final amount of additive at the fiber surfaces.
Rolls 51 and 52, as already noted, may be heated by any convenient means (not shown). For example, a heated fluid may be circulated through them as described in the Examples.
Alternatively, the surface of rolls may be irradiated by infrared heaters or lamps with appropriate surface temper-~ature monitors in order to control the surface temperatures of the rolls.
The Spunbonding Method In the first step of the spunbonding method of the present invention, continuous filaments are formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition, hereinafter defined, through a die. Although the nature of the die is not known to be critical, it most often will have a plural-ity of orifices arranged in one or more rows extending the full machine width. Such orifices may be circular or noncircular in cross-section.
The continuous filaments thus formed then are quenched by means of a quenching fluid, usually air, which is at a 5 temperature lower than that of the filaments as they emerge from the die. The purpose of the quenching fluid is to cool the filaments to a solidified state. Most often, low pressure air is used.
The solidified filaments are drawn or attenuated, 10 typically by entraining the filaments in a fluid stream having a sufficiently high velocity. The fluid stream, which usually also is air, can be a stream of high velocity air separate from the quenching fluid or a portion of the quenching fluid which is accelerated by passage into a 15 narrow nozzle.
The drawn continuous filaments then are collected on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled filaments.
The foraminous surface can be, by way of example only, a revolving drum or a continuous belt or wire screen; the 20 latter is most commonly used on commercial-scale equipment.
Finally, the web of entangled fibers is passed between a pair of compacting rolls, at least one of which is heated, before removing the web from the foraminous surface, said compacting rolls applying heat and pressure to the 25 web sufficient to impart coherency thereto. If desired, one of the compacting rolls can be the forming drum or the forward drive and/or support roll for the continuous foraminous belt or wire screen, as appropriate.
The amount of pressure which is required generally is 30 small, typically in the range of from about S to about 20 psi. Preferably, the pressure applied by the compacting rolls will be in the range of from about 7 to about 13 psi. These pressure ranges, however, are given by way of suggestion only because the pressure employed is in part 35 dependent upon the temperature of the at least~one heated compaction roll. The use of higher temperatures usually permits lower pressures and vice versa.
The temperature of the at least one heated compaction roll typically will be in the range of from about 27 to about 150 C. The preferred temperature range is from about 27 to about 70 C.
The at least one compaction roll can be heated by any means known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
For example, a heated fluid may be circulated through the at least one compaction roll. Alternatively, the surface of the at least one compaction roll may be irradiated by infrared heaters or lamps with appropriate surface temper-ature monitors in order to control the temperature of the roll.
Some aspects of the method of the present invention are described in more detail in earlier-referenced U.S.
Patent Nos. 3,692,618 and 4,340,563.

The present invention is further described by reference to Figure lB which is a generalized flow diagram illustrat-ing a preferred embodiment of the spunbonding process of the present invention.
Turning now to Figure lB, the thermoplastic composi-tion is fed from supply 10 to hopper 12, then through extruder 14, filter 16, and metering pump 17 to die head 18 having die face 22 with a plurality of orifices arranged in-one or more rows generally in the cross-machine direc-tion. As the continuous filaments emerge from die face 22, they form a curtain of filaments 20 directed into 30 quench chamber 24. In the quench chamber 24, filaments 20 are contacted with air or other cooling fluid through inlet 26. The quenching fluid is maintained at a tempera-ture which is lower than the temperature of the filaments 20, typically at ambient temperature, e.g., in the range of 35 from about 4 to about 55~ C. The quenching fluid is supplied under low pressure, i.e., less than about 12 psi, ~",,~

and preferably less than about 2 psi, and a portion prefer-ably is directed through the curtain of filaments 20 and removed as exhaust through port 28. The proportion of quenching fluid supplied that is discharged as exhaust 5 will depend upon the composition being used and the rapidity of quenching needed to give the desired filament charac-teristics, such as denier, tenacity, and the like. In general, the greater the amount of fluid exhausted, the larger the resulting filament denier and, conversely, the 10 lower the exhaust fluid ratio, the lower the filament denier.
As quenching is completed, the curtain of filaments 20 is directed through a smoothly narrowing lower end 30 of the quenching chamber into nozzle 32 where the quenching 15 fluid attains a velocity of from about 45 to about 245 meters per second. Nozzle 32 extends the full width of the machine, equivalent to the width of die 22. Nozzle 32 preferably is formed by a stationary wall 34 and a movable wall 36, both of which also span the width of the machine.
20 The function of movable wall 36 is described in said U.S.
Patent No. 4,340,563.
After exiting nozzle 32, filaments 20 are collected on a moving foraminous surface such as an endless screen or belt 38 to form a nonwoven web 40. Before being removed 25 from belt or screen 38, web 40 is passed between compaction rolls 42 and 44, optionally in conjunction with guide roll 46. Compaction roll 44 conveniently is the forward drive and/or support roll for the continuous foraminous belt or wire screen 38. Heat and pressure are applied to web 40 30 by means of compaction roll 42. Upon exiting compaction rolls 42 and 44, web 40 now has sufficient coherency to permit further processing such as bonding at roll nip 48 and winding at 50.
Compaction roll 42, as already noted, may be heated by 35 any convenient means (not shown). For example, a heated fluid may be circulated through the at least one compaction roll as described in the Examples. Alternatively, the surface of the at least one compaction roll may be ir-radiated by infrared heaters or lamps with appropriate surface temperature monitors in order to control the 5 temperature of the roll.
The Thermoplastic ComDosition Fibers formed from a thermoplastic composition describ-ed herein have a differential, increasing concentration of the additive from the center to the surface thereof, 10 such that the concentration of additive in at least one of the interfacial surface, effective surface, and subsurface of the fiber is greater than the average concentration of additive in the core of the fiber, thereby imparting to the surface of the fiber at least one desired characteristic 15 which otherwise would not be present.
As used herein, the term "surface" consists of the interfacial surface and effective surface. The interfacial surface in essence is the monomolecular layer of the fiber which is at the air/polymer (or nonfiber/fiber) interface.
20 The effective surface begins at the interfacial surface and extends into the fiber a distance of about 15 A. The subsurface lies below the effective surface and extends into the fiber to a depth of about 1,000 A; thus, the subsurface has a thickness of about 985 A.
The term "core" has reference to the remainder of the fiber which is not included in the surface and subsur--face, i.e., that portion of the fiber which is below the subsurface. The term "bulk" refers to all of the fiber, i.e., the surface, subsurface, and core. The latter term 30 typically is used in reference to elemental analyses of the fiber.
The surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplas-tic composition employed in the present invention compris-es at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one 35 additivè.

The term "melt-extrudable" is equivalent to "melt-procecs~hle" and is not intended to be limited in any way.
That is, the term is intended to encompass the use of the composition in any melt-extrusion process which is or may 5 be employed to prepare fibers, provided the process meets the limitations imposed by the claims. Thus, the term includes the use of the composition in melt-spinning of continuous filaments; meltblowing, spunbonding, and coform-ing of nonwoven webs; and the like.
In general, the term "thermoplastic polymer" is used herein to mean any thermoplastic polymer which can be used for the preparation of filaments (fibers) by melt extrusion.
Examples of thermoplastic polymers include, by way of illustration only, end-capped polyacetals, such as poly(oxy-15 methylene)orpolyformaldehyde,poly(trichloroacetaldehyde), poly(n-valeraldehyde),poly(acetaldehyde),poly(propionalde-hyde), and the like; acrylic polymers, such as polyacryl-amide, poly(acrylic acid), poly(methacrylic acid), poly-( ethyl acrylate), poly(methyl methacrylate), and the like;
20 fluorocarbon polymers, such as poly(tetrafluoroethylene), perfluorinated ethylene-propylene copolymers, ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene copolymers, poly(chlorotrifluoroethyl-ene), ethylene-chlorotrifluoroethylene copolymers, poly-(vinylidene fluoride), poly(vinyl fluoride), and the like;
25 polyamides, such as poly(6-aminocaproic acid) or poly(~-caprolactam), poly(hexamethylene adipamide), poly(hexa--methylene sebacamide), poly(11-aminoundecanoic acid), and the like; polyaramides, such as poly(imino-1,3-phenylene-iminoisophthaloyl) or poly(_-phenylene isophthalamide), 30 and the like; parylenes, such as poly-~-xylylene, poly-(chloro-~-xylylene), and the like; polyaryl ethers, such as poly(oxy-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene) or poly(~-phenylene oxide), and the like; polyaryl sulfones, such as poly(oxy-1,4-phenylenesulfonyl-1,4-phenyleneoxy-1,4-phenylene-isopropylidene-1,4-phenylene),poly(sulfonyl-1,4-phenylene-oxy-1,4-phenylenesulfonyl-4,4'-biphenylene), and the like;

-polycarbonates, such as poly(bisphenol A) or poly(carbonyl-dioxy-1,4-phenyleneisopropylidene-1,4-phenylene), and the like; polyesters, such as poly(ethylene terephthalate), poly(tetramethyleneterephthalate),poly(cyclohexylene-1,4-5 dimethylene terephthalate) or poly(oxymethylene-1,4-cyclo-hexylenemethyleneoxyterephthaloyl), and the like; polyaryl sulfides, such as poly(~-phenylene sulfide) or poly(thio-1,4-phenylene), and the like; polyimides, such as poly-(pyromellitimido-1,4-phenylene), and the like; polyolefins, 10 such as polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(l-butene), poly(2-butene), poly(l-pentene), poly(2-pentene), poly(3-methyl-l-pentene), poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), 1,2-poly-1,3-butadiene,l,4-poly-1,3-butadiene,polyisoprene,polychloro-prene, polyacrylonitrile, poly(vinyl acetate), poly(vinyl-15 idene chloride), polystyrene, and the like; copolymers ofthe foregoing, such as acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) copolymers, and the like; and the like.
The preferred polymers are polyolefins and polyesters, with polyolefins being more preferred. Even more preferred 20 are those polyolefins which contain only hydrogen and carbon atoms and which are prepared by the addition polymer-ization of one or more unsaturated monomers. Examples of such polyolefins include, among others, polyethylene, polypropylene, poly(l-butene), poly(2-butene), poly(1-25 pentene), poly(2-pentene), poly(3-methyl-1-pentene), poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), 1,2-poly-1,3-butadiene, 1,4-pol-y-1,3-butadiene, polyisoprene, polystyrene, and the like. In addition, such term is meant to include blends of two or more polyolefins and random and block copolymers 30 prepared from two or more different unsaturated monomers.
Because of their commercial importance, the most preferred polyolefins are polyethylene and polypropylene.
Broadly stated, the additive must have at least two moieties, A and B, in which:
(A) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at temper-atures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion 5 temperatures; and (B) moiety B has at least one functional group which imparts to said polymeric material at least one desired characteristic.
Because the additive is compatible with the polymer 10 at melt extrusion temperatures, the additive is miscible with the polymer and the polymer and the additive form a metastable solution. The solution formed by the additive and the polymer at temperatures above melt extrusion temperatures is referred to herein as a metastable solution 15 since the solution is not stable at temperatures below melt extrusion temperatures. As the temperature of the newly formed fiber drops below melt extrusion temperatures, the polymer begins to solidify which contributes to additive separating from the polymer phase. At the same time, the 20 additive becomes less compatible with the polymer. Both factors contribute to the rapid migration or segregation of additive toward the surface of the newly formed fiber which occurs in a controllable manner.
This preferential migration or segregation is control-25 lable because the extent or degree of migration is, atleast in part, a function of the molecular weight of the -additive, the shear rate, and the throughput. While the mechanism of additive migration or segregation is not fully understood, it appears that the rate of migration or 30 segregation is:
(1) indirectly proportional to the additive molecular weight - the higher the additive molecular weight, the slower the rate of segregation;
(2) directly proportional to the shear rate - the 35 higher the shear rate, the faster the rate of segregation;
and 1 334 78 ~
(3) indirectly proportional to throughput - the higher the throughput, the slower the rate of segregation.
There are at least three very surprising and unexpected aspects to the se~re~ation phenomenon. The first is that 5 the additive as defined herein is compatible with the polymer at melt extrusion temperatures, given the fact that moieties A and B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with the polymer at any temperature.
The second is that lower molecular weight additives perform 10 better than higher molecular weight additives; this is contrary to the conventional wisdom of polymer additives which favors higher molecular weights. The third and perhaps most startling aspect is the rapidity with which such segregation takes place.
As just noted, the effect of additive molecular weight on the rate of segregation was surprising, especially in view of past experiences with polydimethylsiloxane.
Upon reflection, it now appears that the movement of lower molecular weight additives through the gradually solidifying 20 polymer is roughly analogous to the movement of small particles through a viscous fluid - the larger the parti-cles, the greater the resistance to movement through the fluid. This analogy seem appropriate since it has been demonstrated that the additive exists as small globules in 25 the polymer, which globules become smaller as the tempera-ture of the molten composition increases. By imposing shear forces on the molten composition, the globules are broken down into smaller globules far more quickly than would have occurred in the absence of shear. Thus, shear is a 30 contributing factor which enhances the segregation of the additive to the surface of the newly formed filament.
In general, the shear rate will be in the range of from about 50 to about 30,000 sec~1. Preferably, the shear rate will be in the range of from about 150 to about 5,000 35 sec~1, and most preferably from about 300 to about 2,000 sec~l .

It perhaps should be mentioned at this point that the compatibility requirement is critical. That is, if the additive is not compatible with the polymer at melt-extru-sion temperatures, the composition cannot be melt processed 5 to give satisfactory filaments.
By way of clarification, it already has been noted that com~oullds such as polydimethylsiloxane have been incorpor-ated in polymers which were extruded, but not melt process-ed to give fibers. Such compounds migrated to the surface 10 of the extruded article to provide a lubricated surface to aid further processing or removal from a mold. Because extrusion times were very slow compared to the melt process-ing times typically experienced in fiber formation, migra-tion or segregation rates were not an issue. However, the incompatibility of the added compounds prevents acceptable melt-processing because of discontinuities in fiber forma-tion. In addition, such compounds often reduce friction within the extruder to the point that the molten mixture rotates essentially as a plug with no downstream movement 20 taking place.
Finally, throughput is of importance because it affects the time the newly formed filament is in a suffi-ciently molten or fluid state to allow migration or segre-gation of the additive to the newly formed surfaces, even 25 though throughput also affects the shear rate. Stated differently, it is possible to control the rate of migration or segregation by controlling the rate of cooling of the newly formed filament. Thus, for any given molecular weight additive, the extent of migration can be reduced by rapidly 30 cooling the filament. Alternatively, migration can be enhanced by reducing the rate of cooling.
Throughput typically will be in the range of from about 0.01 to about 5.4 kg/cm/hour. Preferably, throughput will be in the range from about 0.1 to about 4.0 kg/cm.hour.
- 35 The throughput most preferably will be in th~ range of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 kg/cm/hour.

As used herein, the phrase "molten state" does not nececc~rily mean "flowable". Rather, the term is used to denote a condition of the thermoplastic composition in which the additive molecules still are capable of migrating 5 or segregating to the surface of the newly formed filament.
Thus, the term is somewhat imprecise and not readily subject to accurate measurement. Consequently, this composition fluidity factor preferentially is described or accounted for by the term "throughput".
The controlled migration or segregation of additive toward the surface of the filament results in a controllable differential concentration of additive in the filament. If measurable migration is allowed to occur, the concentration of the additive in the filament will increase with increas-ing distance from the center thereof. By the proper selection of additive, additive molecular weight, shear rate, and throughput (or rate of cooling), a substantial amount, or perhaps even all, of the additive can be found in the surface. Because the concentration of additive in 20 the core of the filament typically will vary nonlinearly from the concentration of the additive in the surface, this concentration difference is referred to herein as a differential concentration.
While the additive can be either a liquid or a solid, 25 a liquid is preferred. It also is preferred that a liquid additive have a surface tension which is less than that of ~virgin polymer; the lower surface tension assures that the additive will be more likely to completely "wet" or cover the surface of the filament as the segregation process 30 proceeds to completion, especially under conditions favoring a large concentration differential.
As already noted, additive surface segregation is influenced by the molecular weight of the additive. More specifically, the lower the molecular weight of the addi-35 tive, the more rapid is the rate of segregation of theadditive to the surface of the filament at any given temperature at which the filament still is in a sufficiently molten state.
It should be apparent that the additive can be monomer-ic, oligomeric, or polymeric. Indeed, polymeric additives 5 are required in order to achieve the higher additive molecular weights permitted by the present invention.
Because lower additive molecular weights are preferred, the preferred additives perhaps are properly referred to as oligomers. However, such nomenclature can be misleading 10 and reliance instead should be placed on the molecular weight of the additive and the other parameters already described. It is for this reason that the additive is not referred to as a polymeric additive, even though in many instances the additive will be oligomeric or polymeric in 15 nature.
As already stated, the additive molecular weight will be in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000. This range encompasses suitable additive molecular weights, regardless of whether the additive is to be used by itself 20 or in a mixture of additives; the additive molecular weight range depends in part on whether or not an additive will be used by itself.
Accordingly, the molecular weight range for additives which are to be used individually in compositions for 25 filament formation and not as part of a mixture of additives typically is from about 400 to about 3,000. Preferably, -this range is from about 500 to about 2,000, and more preferably from about 500 to about 1,500. The most prefer-red range is from about 500 to about 1,000.
When additives are intended to be used in a mixture, however, higher molecular weights can be employed. Although the reasons for this are not clearly understood, mixtures of additives frequently are more compatible with the polymer at melt-extrusion temperatures than are the in-35 dividual additives. Although the selection of additive mixtures is somewhat empirical, in general such mixtures can utilize additives having molecular weights in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000 and preferably from about 400 to about 8,000.
In this regard, some clarification of the term "used sllcceRRfully" is necessary. The successful use of an additive or a mixture of additives has reference to two factors. First, the additive or additive mixture must segregate to the target zone in order to achieve the intended properties. For example, if water-wettable filaments are desired, the additive or additive mixture must segregate to either or both of the interfacial surface and the effective surface of the filaments. Second, the composition containing the additive or additive mixture must process well enough in commercial-scale spunbonding equip-15 ment to give a web or fabric having the required aestheticand physical properties.
It should be noted that the foregoing molecular weight ranges are based on the assumption that oligomeric or polymeric additives will have relatively broad polydisper-20 sities, e.g., of the order of about 1.2. While narrowpolydispersities certainly are achievable, usually at a higher cost, they are not necessary, even if relatively low molecular weight additives are to be employed. As a guideline, it may be noted that for a given additive, the 25 average molecular weight of an additive having a narrower polydispersity usually should be slightly lower than the ~-average molecular weight of an additive having a broad polydispersity. While this guideline is not precise and is somewhat empirical in nature, one skilled in the art 30 will be able to properly select an additive of any polydis-persity without undue experimentation.
The term "additive" is used broadly herein to encompass the use of two or more additives in a given composition.
Such two or more additives may have the same or similar - 35 moieties B, or different moieties B having the same charac-teristic, e.g., water wettability. On the other hand, two or more additives may be used which have different charac-teristics, which characteristics may be related or unre-lated. Such two or more additives may be present in similar or significantly different amounts. Moreover, the 5 additives may have the same or similar molecular weights in order to s6~L6~ate in the filament to approximately the same region. Alternatively, different molecular weight additives may be employed in order to effectively layer the additives in the surface.
The use of different molecular weight additives is especially attractive for some characteristics which reinforce each other, an example of which is the use of a first additive having a moiety B which is an absorber of ultraviolet radiation and a second additive having a light 15 stabilizing or degradation inhibiting moiety B which functions by deactivating excited oxygen molecules or terminating free radicals. The first additive normally will have a lower molecular weight than the second. While both additives segregate to the surface, the first additive 20 migrates primarily to the effective surface, while the second additive migrates primarily to the subsurface.
Thus, actinic radiation which is not absorbed by the first additive is effectively nullified by the second additive.
The result is a complimentary or even synergistic effect 25 which is greater than that which would be achieved if the two additives were commingled in the same region.
- The additive is a material which will be referred to herein loosely as a siloxane. Hence, moiety A will comprise at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene group, option-30 ally associated with one or more groups selected from thegroup consisting of trisubstituted silyl and trisubsti-tuted siloxy groups, the substituents of all such groups being independently selected from the group consisting of monovalent alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic 35 groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted.
As a practical matter, moiety A often will consist of all three groups. Moreover, more than one tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene group often will be present, particularly when the additive has an appreciable molecular weight.
As used herein, the term "tetrasubstituted disiloxanyl-5 ene group" means a group having the following general formula:

--S i--O--S i--l l in which each of R33-R36, inclusive, is a monovalent group independently selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups.
As noted, the substituents of the groups comprising moiety A can be alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, or heterocyclic ~ou~s which are the same or different and which in turn are substituted or unsubstituted. Other than the obvious requirement that such substituents not adversely affect additive stability or other properties, there are no known limitations to such substituents. However, for reasons relating primarily to commercial availability and ease of synthesis, such substituents preferably are alkyl groups and more preferably are unsubstituted alkyl groups having from 1 to 3 carbon atoms. Most preferably, such sub-stituents are methyl groups.
More specifically, the additive preferably contains a plurality of groups selected from the group consisting of the following general formulae, it being understood that not all groups need to be present and that the presence of some groups precludes the presence of others:
(1) Bs~~
(2) B6-O-, - 35 (3) R13-, (4) R14-Si-(5) (Rls)(R16)(R17)Si ,-39-(6) (R18)(Rl9)(R20)Si--~
(7) ~-si(R2l)(R22)-o-]a~ and (8) ~-si(R23)(B7)-o-]b;
in which each of R13 and R14 independently is a monovalent 5 group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of R15-R17, inclusive, independently is a mono-valent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, 10 cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and B8; each of R18-R23, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or 15 unsubstituted; each of a and b independently represents an integer from 0 to about 70 which indicates only the quantity of the respective group present in the additive without indicating or requiring, in instances when an integer is greater than 1, that such plurality of the respective 20 group are connected to one another to form an oligomer or polymer or that all of such groups have identical sub-stituents; and each of B5-B8, inclusive, independently is a moiety which imparts to the additive at least one desired characteristic; with the proviso that such plurality of groups results in at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanyl-ene group.
- Molecular weight limitations, if desired, are readily achieved by limiting the sum of a and b to the extent required to achieve the desired molecular weight.
In general, the preparation of the siloxane moiety is well known to those having ordinary skill in the art.
Siloxanes that have reactive groups, such as H-Sia, R0-sia, and Cl-sia~ are used as starting products. Such materials are prepared either by hydrolysis of, e.g., methylchlorosilanes or by copolymerization of cyclic or linear polymethylsiloxanes with functional siloxanes.

1 334 78 ~
See, for example, W. Noll, "Chemistry and Technology of Silicones," Academic Press, New York, 1968; and R. Meals, "Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology," Vol. 18, 2nd Edition, 1969, p.221.
Turning now to moiety B, it is this moiety which must have at least one functional group which imparts to the additive at least one desired characteristic. Because the additive rapidly migrates or segregates toward the surface of the filament upon its formation, it is the presence of 10 moiety B in the surface of the filament which results in such surface acquiring the at least one characteristic of moiety B. Such at least one characteristic clearly would not be found in the surface of the filament in the absence of the additive. Examples of such characteristics incIude, 15 by way of illustration only and without limitation, wett-ability by water or other polar solvents, preferential wettability by alcohols, enhanced hydrophobicity which contributes to a nonst~ining surface, and stability to actinic radiation, especially ultraviolet radiation.
It perhaps should be noted at this point that the term "functional group" refers to that portion of moiety B
which imparts the desired at least one characteristic; the term is not to be equated to "reactive", although a group which also is reactive is not precluded by the term "func-25 tional group".
Moiety B need not be limited to a single desired ~-characteristic. Alternatively, the additive can contain two or more moieties B which have different characteristics.
For example, a moiety B may have a wettable group and a 30 group which is stable to actinic radiation or a group which absorbs ultraviolet radiation and a group which - inhibits actinic radiation-induced degradation, or one moiety B may have a wettable group while a second moiety B
is stable to actinic radiation.
The point of attachment of moiety B to ~oiety A is not known to be critical. For example, when moiety A is a .
siloxane, moiety B can be a substituent of any one or more of the tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene, trisubstituted silyl, and trisubstituted siloxy groups which may be present.
Those having ordinary skill in the art, upon determin-ing the characteristic or characteristics desired for any given additive, will know what functional group or groups may be required for moiety B. In other words, the selection of functional groups is well within the abilities and understanding of one having ordinary skill in the art in view of the teaching herein. In order to illustrate the principle involved, though, a preferred embodiment for moiety B when the desired characteristic is water wett-ability will be described in detail.
To obtain a filament having a surface which is water wettable, moiety B preferably is a poly(oxyalkylene) moiety. More preferably, the alkylene- portion of such moiety will contain from 2 to about 6 carbon atoms. Most preferably, moiety B is a poly(oxyalkylene) moiety in which the oxyalkylene repeating units are oxyethylene or oxypropylene or a mixture thereof.
References which disclose polysiloxanes containing one or more poly(oxyalkylene) moieties suitable for use as the additive include, among others, U.S. Patent Nos.
2,836,748, 2,917,480, 2,991,300, 2,991,301, 3,168,543, 3,172,899, 3,236,252, 3,278,485, 3,280,160, 3,299,113, 3,356,758, 3,402,192, 3,480,583, 3,505,377, 3,509,192, 3,530,159, 3,600,418, and Re. 27,541; Belgian Patent No.
627,281; British Patent Nos. 892,819, 954,041, 963,437, 981,811, 981,812, 1,073,368, and 1,098,646; French Patent Nos. 1,259,241, 1,356,962, 1,411,757, 1,413,125, 1,482,133, 1,511,661, 1,520,444, and 1,179,743; German Published Specification (Offenlegungschrift) Nos. 1,495,927, 1,570,656, 1,595,730, 2,045,360, and 2,555,053; German Patent Nos.1,235,594, 1,257,433, 1,301,576, 1,570,647, and 1,195,953 By way of illustration only, three types of additives for imparting water wettability to the surfaces of fila-ments, referred to hereinafter as types A, B, and C, respectively, are described below with reference to the plurality of preferred groups described earlier. In each case, moiety B is an oxyalkylene-containing moiety which is represented by the following general formula:

- (CH2 ) x-- (C2H40) y (C3H60) z~R

in which R26 is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen and lower alkyl; x represents an integer from 0 to about 3; and each of y and z independently represents an integer from o to about 70 which indicates only the quantity of the respective group present in the additive without indicating or requiring, in instances when an integer is greater than 1, that such plurality of the respective group are connected to one another to form an oligomer or polymer.
Type A Additives The first type, which is most preferred, consists of groups of formulae 1, 2, and 7, in which each of Rg and R1o independently is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; R26 is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; a is in the range of from 3 to about 60; x is 0; y is in the range of from about 5 to about 25; and z .is in the range of from about 0 to about 25.
Specific examples of type A additives, by way of illustration only, include materials having the following general formula:

Bg~O~(~Si~o~)g~B9 ~ 334 78 1 in which Bg is -(C3H6O)htC2H40)i-R27 and R27 is hydrogen or a lower alkyl group.
Commercially available additives of this type include *TEGOPREN BC-1781, in which g has an average value of 5.5, R27 is _-butyl, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in Bg is 40/60; TEGOPREN D-985, in which g has an average value of 4.3, R27 is methyl, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in Bg is 70/30; and TEGOPREN V-337, in which g has an average 10 value of 4, R27 is methyl, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in Bg is 100/0.
Type A additives in general are prepared by heating silicon with, e.g., chloromethane in the presence of a copper catalyst at about 300~ C to give dichlorodimethyl silane (see, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 2,380,995 to E. G.
Rochow) which, when reacted with water, gives a polymer having the following general formula:

Cl-Si-O-(Si-o-)j-Si-Cl, where j is an integer representing the number of repeating units in the molecule. See, for example, B. B. Hardman and A. Torkelson, "Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,"
3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982, pp.
922-962. The polymer then is reacted in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid with an oxyalkylene-containing compound having the general formula, HO-(c3H6o)y(c2H4o)z-R26 in which R26, y, and z are as already defined, to give the additive. See U.S. Patent No. 2,836,748. See also U.S.
Patent No. 2,917,480, U.S. Patent No. 3,505,377, and German Patent No. 1,259,241.

* - Trade-mark ,~,.

Type B Additives The second type of additives consists of groups of formulae 5-8, inclusive, in which each of R3-R11, in-clusive, independently is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; R26 is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; a is in the range of from about 3 to about 30; b is in the range of from about 1 to about 10; x is 3; y is in the range of from about 5 to about 25; and z is in the range of from about 0 to about 25.
Specific examples of type B additives, also by way of illustration only, include materials having the following general formula:

H3C-S i-o- ( -s i-o- ) k-(-S i-o- ) l-s i-CH3 CH3 CH3 B1o CH3 in which Blo is ~(cH3)3-o-(c2H4o)m(c3H6o)nR28 and R28 is hydrogen or a lower alkyl group.
Commercially available examples of this type include *SILWET L-77, SILWET L-7500, and SILWET L-7602 (Union Car-bide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut). Other commer-cially available examples include TEGOPREN 5843, in which the k/l value is 13/5, R28 is hydrogen, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in Blo is 100/0;
TEGOPRENr 5847, in which the k/l value is 0/1, R28 is hydrogen, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in B1o is 80/20; TEGOPREN 5852, in which the k/l value is 20/5, R28 is hydrogen, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in B1o is 20/80;
TEGOPREN 5863, in which R28 is hydrogen and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in B1o is 40/60;
TEGOPREN 5873, in which the k/l value is 20/5, R28 is 35 hydrogen, and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide weight percent ratio in Blo is 35/65; and TEGOPREN 5878, in which R28 is hydrogen and the ethylene oxide/propylene oxide A * Trade-mark 1 334~8 1 , weight percent ratio in Blo is 100/0 (Th. Goldschmidt AG, Essen, Federal Republic of Germany).
The synthesis of the type B additives begins with a reactive silicon fluid, prepared by known methods, such as 5 that represented by the following formula:

fH3 fH3 fH3 fH3 H3C-Si-o-(-Si-o-) k-(-Si--)l-Si-CH3 in which k and 1 are as already defined. The fluid is reacted with a compound having the general formula, CH2=cHcH2-o-(c2H4o)m(c3H6o)nR28 in which R28, m and n are as already defined, to give the additive. The reaction is carried out in the presence of a platinum/r-aluminum oxide catalyst at a temperature of 20 the order of 150 C. See, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 3,280,160, U.S. Patent No. 3,172,899, and U.S. Patent No.3,505,377.
The compound which is reacted with the silicone fluid is obtained by the condensation of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide with allyl alcohol in the presence of a catalytic 25 amount of potassium hydroxide, a well-known reaction.
Type C Additives The third, and last, type of additives consists of groups of formulae 2, 4, and 7, in which each of R2, Rg, and R1o independently is an alkyl group containing from 1 30 to 3 carbon atoms; R26 is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; a is in the range of from 0 to about 50; x is 0; y is in the range of from about 5 to about 25;
and z is in the range of from about 0 to about 25.
Specific examples of type C additives, again by way of illustration only, include materials having the following general formula:

.

R 9-si~(-o-si-)g-(oc2H4)p(oc3H6)q-oR3o]3 in which R29 and R30 are lower alkyl groups, g is as already defined, and each of p and q represents an integer from 0 to about 70.
A specific commercially availabIe example is SILWET
L-720 (Union Carbide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut).
When the desired characteristic of the additive is ultraviolet light absorption, moiety B is a chromophore, especially a chromophore having a sufficiently high efficiency for the absorption of ultraviolet radiation.
Preferably, moiety B is a benzotriazolyl group, most preferably a 2-(substituted-phenyl)benzotriazolyl group.
Moiety B is a degradation inhibitor when the desired characteristic of the additive is light stabilization.
Preferably, such inhibitor contains a piperidyl group. Most preferably, such inhibitor contains a polyalkyl-substituted piperidyl group.
When a nonstaining or low surface energy filament is desired, i.e., a filament having a hydrophobicity which is higher than that of the virgin polymer component of the composition, moiety B conveniently can be a perfluoro-hydrocarbon group, any number of which are known to those having ordinary skill in the art. Also known to those having ordinary skill in the art are groups which can be use as moiety B in order to impart a buffering capacity to the filament, such as a buffering capacity against hydrogen ions. In view of the teachings herein, other possible characteristics of moiety B will be readily apparent.
In general, the weight ratio of polymer to additive can vary from about 10 to about 100. That-is, the amount of additive in the surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition of the present invention can range from about 10 percent by weight to about 1 percent by weight.
The thermoplastic composition can be prepared by any number of methods known to those having ordinary skill in the art. For example, the polymer in chip or pellet form and the additive can be mixed mechanically to coat the polymer particles with additive. If desired, the additive can be dissolved in a suitable solvent to aid the coating process, although the use of a solvent is not preferred.
The coated polymer then can be added to the feed hopper of the extruder from which the filaments will emerge. Alterna-tively, the coated polymer can be charged to a heated compounder, such as a heated twin-screw compounder, in order to disperse the additive throughout the bulk of the polymer. The resulting thermoplastic composition typically is extruded as rods which are fed to a chipper. The resulting chips then serve as the feed stock for a melt-processing extruder. In another method, the additive can be metered into the throat of the hopper which contains the polymer in particulate form and which feeds the ex-truder. In yet another method, the additive can be metered directly into the barrel of the extruder where it is blended with the molten polymer as the resulting mixture moves toward the die.
The present invention is further described by the examples which follow. Such examples, however, are not to -be construed as limiting in any way either the spirit or scope of the present invention, especially since the experimental work concentrated on (but is not limited to) imparting wettability to polyolefin filaments. In the ex-amples, all temperatures are in degrees Celsius and all parts are by weight unless stated otherwise.
.

, Examples For convenience, the examples are divided into six sections describing (1) the additives and polymers employed;
(2) the preparation ofsurface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic compositions; (3) the preparation of melt-pressed films from the thermoplastic compositions; (4) the preparation of fibers from the thermoplastic compositions;
(5) evaluation of a known material as an additive by way of comparison; and (6) a hot-stage microscope study of a composition described in U.S. Patent No. 4,070,218.
I. Descriptions of Additives and Polymers A. Additives Each of the additives employed in the examples was a type A, B, or C additive. The structures imparting water wettability are identified in Tables 1, 3! and 5 ("MW"
represents molecular weight); if an additive were commer-cially available, the material designation or catalog number is given in the column labeled "I.D." and a manufac-turer code is given in the column labeled "Source". Theproperties of the additives identified in Tables 1, 3, and 5 are summarized in Tables 2, 4, and 6, respectively.
The structures of additives imparting characteristics other than water wettability are given in Table 7 and their properties are summarized in Table 8.

Table 1 Type A Additives Imparting Water Wettability 30R27-o-(c2H4o)i(c3H6o)h-(-si-o-)g-(c3H6o)h(c2H4o)i R27 Additive R27_ q h i MW I.D. Source A01 CH3 3 0 3 516 V-363 Ga A02 CH3 3 o 3 516 V-360 G

A04 CH3 3 0 4 604. V-336 G
A05 CH3 4 0 4 678 KC-V2b G

A07 CH3 3 1.5 3 690 V-362 G

A09 CH3 3 1.5 4 778 V-338 G
A10 CH3 4 1 4 794 KC-V3b G
All CH3 4 1.5 4 852 T-3004 G
A12 CH3 4 1.5 4 852 V-339 G
A13 CH3 4 1.5 4 852 V-335 G

A15 CH3 4.31.5 5 1023 D-985 G
A16 CH3 5.71.5 5 1127 D-984 G
A17 CH3 4.31.5 7.5 1130 D-979 G
A18 NAc NA 0 NA 1200 PS-071 ucd Al9 CH3 5.51.5 7.5 1200 D-978 G
A20 B-C4Hg 5.5NA NA 1450 BC-1781 G

A22 CH3 6 NA NA NA . V-284 G

aTh. Goldschmidt AG, Essen, Federal Republic of Germany.
bSynthesis utilized a purer polyether.
CNot available.
dUnion Carbide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut.

Table 2 Properties of the Type A Additives of Table 1 Cloud Surface Code Viscositya Pointb TensionC
A01 7 NAd 24.9 A02 10 1 24.4 A03 11 1 22.5 A04 16 7 24.2 A05 13 <0 23.5 A06 15 2 23.4 A07 18 7 26.0 A08 15 <0 NA
A09 17 4 25.2 A10 24 <0 24.3 All 23 <3 25.2 A12 16 2 22.8 A13 18 2 24.3 A14 22 15 23.9 A17 58 45 25.8 Al9 59 40 24.0 A20 40 0 24.9 A22 38 4 22.8 A23 44 4 24.3 A24 2400 Te 21.0 aIn centistokes at 25 C.
bIn degrees C, of a 1 percent by weight aqueous solution.
CIn dynes/cm, + 1.5, of a 1 percent by weight aqueous solution.
dNot available.
eTurbid Table 3 Type B Additives Imparting Water-Wettability H3c-7i-o-(-7i-o-)k-(-si-o-)l-7i-cH3 (CH3)3-o-(c2H4o)m(c3H6o)nR28 Additive Code R28- k 1 _m n MW I.D. Source B01 CH3 NAaNA NA NA 600 L-77 UCb B02 H 0 1 10 2 836 T-5847Gc B05n-C4Hg NA NA NA NA 3000 L-7500UC

Bll H 43 5 22 23 15,444 T-5863 G
aNot available.
bUnion Carbide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut.
CTh. Goldschmidt AG, Essen, Federal Republic of Germany.
Table 4 - Pro~erties of the Ty~e B Additives of Table 3 CloudRefractive Surface 30 Code Viscositya Pointb IndexC Tension B01 20 10 NAd 2le B02 100 45 NA 23f B03 25 Tg 1.446 20f B04 100 0 NA 22e B05 175 Ih NA NA
B06 560 80 1.450 30f B07 290 10 1.444 NA
B08 430 65 1.450 30f B09 580 84 1.449 28f B10 440 30 1.449 28f B11 2700 42 1.450 30f aIn centistokes at 25 C.
bIn degrees C, of a 1 percent by weight aqueous solution.
cAt 20 C, i 0.005-dNot available.
eIn dynes/cm, i 1.5, of a 0.1 percent by weight aqueous solution.
fIn dynes/cm, i 1.5, of a 1 percent by weight aqueous solution.
gTurbid .
hInsoluble.

Table 5 TY~e C Additive Imparting Water WettabilitY

R29~sit(~~Si~)g~(OC2H4)p(OC3H6)q~OR30]3 Add.
25 CodeR29- R30_ q p g MW I.D. Source C01n-C4Hg NAa NA NA NA 8000 L-720 ucb aNot available.
bUnion Carbide Corporation, Danbury, Connecticut.

Table 6 Properties of the Type C Additive of Table 3 Cloud Refractive Surface Code ViscositYa Pointb IndexC Tensiond C01 1100 42 NAe 29 aIn centistokes at 25 C.
bIn degrees C, of a 1 percent by weight aqueous solution.

cAt 20 C, + 0-005-dIn dynes/cm, + 1.5, of a 0.1 percent by weight aqueous solution.
eNot available.

Table 7 Additives Imparting Characteristics Other Than Water Wettability 10 Additive Code Structure Source W 1a,b (CH3)3Si-(o-si-)4-o-si-o-si(cH3)3 Ex. 1 CH3 (1CH2)3 CHOH

Do2c,d (CH3)3Si-(o-si-)4-o-si-o-si(cH3)3 Ex. 2 CH3 (1CH2)3 CHOH

D03e (CH3)3Si-o-(si~-)4-si(cH3)3 Gf (CH2)3 O

CH-CH2-N[CH(cH3)2]2 OH

fH3 D04g (CH3)3Si-o-(si-o-)32-si(cH3)3 ph I

Do5i (CH3)3si-o-(si-o-)l22-si(cH3)3 Pi aImparts ultraviolet radiation absorption.
bR31 is 2-(2-hydroxy-3-t-butyl-5-methylphenyl)-2H-benzo-triazol-5-yl, lithium salt.
CImparts light stabilization by deactivating excited oxygen molecules or terminating free radicals.
dR32 is poly(N-~-hydroxyethyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-hydroxypiperidyl succinate) covalently coupled through an ether linkage via the 4-hydroxy group of the terminal piperidyl moiety.
eImparts buffering capacity against hydrogen ions.
fD-1059, Th. Goldschmidt AG, Essen, Federal Republic of Germany.
gImparts a low surface energy.
hPS-182, Petrarch Systems, Bristol, Pennsylvania.
- iA control additive which lacks a moiety B.
iPS-042, Petrarch Systems, Bristol, Pennsylvania.

Table 8 Properties of the Additives of Table 7 Refractive Surface Code Viscositya Indexb TensionC
35 D01 NAd NA NA

~ 1 334781 D04 1,000 1.382 NA
D05 500 1.403 21.1 aIn centistokes at 25 C.
bAt 20 C, + 0.005.
cIn dynes/cm~ + 1-5-dNot available.

Example 1 Preparation of Additive DO1 A 100-ml, three-necked, round-bottomed flask was fitted with a pressure-equalized side arm addition funnel, condenser, and rubber septum. The addition funnel and 15 condenser also were fitted with rubber septa. The flask was purged continuously with dry nitrogen (Matheson extra dry grade) which was introduced via a syringe needle inserted through the rubber septum fitted on one of the three necks of the flask; the nitrogen exited via another 20 syringe needle inserted through the condenser-mounted rubber septum. Using a syringe, the flask was charged with 0.5 g (1.56 mmole) of 2-(2-hydroxy-3-t-butyl-5-methyl-phenyl)-5-chlorobenzotriazole (*TINUVIN 326, Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Hawthorne, New York) dissolved in 30 ml of 25 dry tetrahydrofuran (THF)(*Gold Label, 99.9 percent, Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc., Milwaukee, Wisconsin). The result-ing solution was cooled in a dry ice/acetone bath to a temperature of about -78 while being stirred with a magnetic stirrer. To the cold solution was slowly added 30 dropwise 0.48 g of lithium diisopropylamine (Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc.) in approximately 5 ml of THF which had been added via a syringe to the addition funnel. The resulting mixture was stirred for one hour, after which time 0.91 g (1.56 mmole) of a compound having the following formula (TEGOPREN 3010, Th. Goldschmidt AG, Essen, Federal Republic of Germany), dissolved in about 5 ml of THF, was * - Trade-marks added dropwise by means of the addition funnel (charged by syringe injection), over a 20-minute period:

(CH3)3Si- (o-si-) 4-o-si-o-si (CH3)3 CH3 (1CH2)3 HC~

The resulting mixture was allowed to warm to ambient temperature, with stirring. The mixture was allowed to stir for four hours, after which time the solvent was removed under reduced pressure by means of a rotating 15 evaporator (*Buchi RotovaprModel RE 120). The residue was a pale yellow wax. Infrared analysis of the material showed absorption maxima at 3600 and 3100 cm~1.

Example 2 Preparation of Additive D02 The procedure of Example 1 was repeated, except that the 2-(2-hydroxy-3-t-butyl-5-methylphenyl)-5-chlorobenzo-triazole was replaced with 10 g (4 mmole) of poly(N-~-25 hydroxyethyl-2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-4-hydroxypiperidylsuccin-ate) having a molecular weight of approximately 2300 (TINW IN 622 LD, Ciba-Geigy Corporation, Ardsley, New York), the lithium diisopropylamine was replaced with 0.26 g (4 mmole) of butyl lithium (Aldrich Chemical Cbmpany, Inc.), and the amount of TEGOPREN 3010 was increased to 2. 4 g (4 mmole). The yield of additive was 9.6 g (77 percent).
B. Polymers The polymers employed are summarized in Table 9 which is based on data supplied by the manufacturers. In the table, the melt flow rate is given in the column labeled * - Trade-mark "MFR" and was determined in accordance with ASTM Test Method D1238-82, "Standard Test Method for Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion Plastometer." The polydisper-sity, PD, is the ratio of the weight-average molecular 5 weight, Mw, to the number-average molecular weight, Mn.

Table 9 Summary of Polymers Employed 10 Polymer Temp.
Code MFR PD Mn- M~ Ranqea ppAb 35 2.7 52,000 140,000 293-316 ppBc 400 4.0 17,000 68,000 254-304 ppcd 400 4.0 17,000 68,000 254-304 PPDe 60 4.0 30,000 NAf NA
PPEg NA NA NA NA 204-260 ppFh NA NA NA NA NA
PEAi NA NA NA NA NA
PEBj NA NA NA NA NA
20 psAk NA NA NA NA 245 aDegrees C.
bType PC-973 polypropylene, Himont Incorporated, Wilm-ington, Delaware.
CType PF-441 polypropylene, Himont Incorporated.
dType PF-015 polypropylene, Himont Incorporated; the polymer is type PF-441 to which has been added 500 ppm of Lubrizol 101 (Lubrizol, Inc., Wickliffe, Ohio).
eType PF-444 polypropylene, Himont Incorporated.
fNot available.
gType 5A08 polypropylene, Shell Chemical Co., Houston, Texas; melt index, 3.0 g/10 min.; and specific gravity, 0.903.
hType WRS-5-144 polypropylene, Shell Chemical Co., Houston, Texas.
iType 61800.06 low density polyethylene, Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Michigan.

Type 3404 low density polyethylene, Norchem, Inc., Rolling Meadows, Illinois; melt index, 1.8 g/10 min.;
and density, 0.922 g/cm3.
kType PET 7352 poly(ethylene terephthalate), Eastman Chemical Products, Inc., Kingsport, Tennessee; melt index, 1.2 g/10 min.; and specific gravity, 1.4.
lRecommended melt processing temperature.

II. Preparation of Compositions Surface-segregatable thermoplastic, melt-extrudable compositions as provided by the present invention were prepared by several methods. However, only those methods are described below which permitted isolation of the composition prior to a melt-processing step; i.e., a bench-scale method and a pilot-scale method. The prepara-tions of compositions simultaneously with melt-processing are described in conjunction with such melt-processing.

Examples 3-49 A. Bench-Scale Method Approximately 10 g of a polymer in pellet form was mixed in a beaker with the desired amount of additive.
The resulting mixture was poured into the hopper of a small compounding unit (Max Mixing Extruder, No. CS-194-FA-093, Custom Scientific Instruments, Inc., New York, New York). The mixture was heated in the extruder of the compounder to a temperature of 180 and extruded through a die having a single, approximately 4-mm diameter, orifice.
The extruded composition was collected either on aluminum foil or in a glass evaporating dish. The cooled material was cut manually into approximately 6-mm long pieces.
The compositions prepared are summarized in Table 10.

Table 10 Summary of Bench-Scale Prearations of Comositions CompositionPolymer Additive(s) 5 Example Code Code Code(s) Wt. Percent 27 PE08-1. PEA B05 3 34 PE10-l PEA C01 3 PEll-l PEA D01 38 PEl4-1 PEA D03 3 41 PP22-2 PPA B02 1.5 Bll 1.5 42 PP23-2 PPA B06 1.5 B10 1.5 43 PP24-2 PPA B10 1.5 Bll 1.5 44 PP25-3 PPA B04 0.33 B05 0.33 C01 0.33 46 PP27-3 PPA B04 1.67 B05 1.67 C01 1.67 47 PE15-3 PEA B04 0.33 B05 0.33 C01 0.33 49 PE17-3 PEA B04 1.67 B05 1.67 C01 1.67 Examples 50-130 B. Pilot-Scale Method To a weighed amount of polymer, typically from about 5 13 to about 45 kg, in a plastic-lined fiber drum was added the desired amount of additive. The components then were mixed mechanically in a paddle mixer (Banbury, Ann Arbor, Michigan). The hopper of a twin-screw compounding unit (Egan Machinery Company, Sommerville, New Jersey) was 10 charged with the resulting mixture. The mixture was gravity-fed to the compounding screws. Compounding was accomplished at a temperature of from about 180 to about 250, depending on the polymer employed. The resulting composition was extruded though a die having six orifices 15 with diameters of about 3 mm. The extruded filaments were passed through a ten-foot water bath and then a forced-air blower. The dried filaments were pelletized in a rotary pelletizer (Cumberland Company, New York, New York) and stored in 23-kg lots in plastic-lined boxes.
20 The resulting compositions are summarized in Table 11. In some cases, an elemental analysis was carried out on the composition by Galbraith Laboratories, Inc., Knoxville, Tennessee. The results of the elemental analyses are summarized in Table 12.
Table 11 - Summary of Pilot-Scale Pre~arations of Com~ositions Composition Polymer Additive(s) 30 Example Code Code Code(s) Wt. Percent PEl9-1 PEA A21 3 PP54-1 PPA B07 . 3 102 PP71-1 PPA Bll 3 103 PP72-1 PPA Bll 5 104 PP73-1 PPC Bll 3 105 PP74-1 PPC Bll 5 Bll 116 PP82-2 PPA B02 1.5 Bll 1.5 118 PP84-2 PPA B06 1.5 B10 1.5 Bll 120 PP86-2 PPA B10 . 1.5 ` Bll 1.5 Bll 123 PP89-3 PPA B09 0.67 B10 0.67 Bll 0.67 124 PP90-3 PPA B04 0.33 B05 0.33 C01 0.33 125 PP91-3 PPA B04 0.67 B05 0.67 C01 0.67 127 PP93-3 PPA B04 1.67 B05 1.67 C01 1.67 128 PE30-3 PEA B04 0.33 B05 0.33 C01 0.33 130 PE32-3 PEA B04 1.67 B05 1.67 C01 1.67 Table 12 Elemental Analyses of Selected Compositions Composition Elemental Analysis 5 Example Code % C % H % Si % F
PP28-1 85.60 13.96 0.23 52 PP30-1 84.28 13.54 0.77 PP38-1 84.36 13.83 0.50 74 PP47-1 84.44 13.50 0.47 78 PP49-1 84.51 13.47 0.36 81 PP50-1 84.90 13.79 0.77 93 PP62-1 83.56 13.39 0.42 98 PP67-1 84.49 13.65 0.47 102 PP71-1 83.86 13.55 0.42 108 PP77-1 84.05 13.58 0.38 112 PP78-1 83.83 13.49 1.06 0.93 121 PP87-3 84.30 13.70 0.45 122 PP88-3 82.70 13.50 0.64 123 PP89-3 84.36 13.74 0.33 124 PP91-3 85.04 13.58 0.27 126 PP92-3 85.11 13.59 0.52 It is evident from the data in Table 12 that each composition analyzed contained additive. However, the effectiveness of the additive remained to be demonstrated.
C. Hot-Stage Microscope StudY
-- A hot-stage microscope study was conducted on several polymer-additive combinations in an effort to gain an insight into the compatibility aspect of the additive with the polymer. Although the study actually was done later in the program, it is reported here for convenience, except for one part which will be described in Section VI.
Briefly, polymer, either in the form of small granules or fibers, both with and without additives, was observed - 35 under a hot-stage microscope at two temperatures-, 160 and 220, at a magnification of 350x. The equipment consisted of a Mettler hot-stage and a Zeiss Universal optical microscope equipped with transmitted light optics. The presence of additive globules at either temperature was an indication of the incompatibility of the additive with the 5 polymer at the temperature of observation. The study was conducted by Ricerca, Inc., Painesville, Ohio.
The first material studied was the web of Example 327 which was prepared from a composition of the present invention consisting of polymer PPA and 3 percent by 10 weight of additive All. Figure 2A is a representation of the photomicrograph at 160 and Figure 2B is a representa-tion of the photomicrograph at 220. In Figure 2A, additive globules 21 clearly are present. Also present are what appear to be a few particles 22 of debris or foreign 15 matter. At 220, as seen in Figure 2B, a few additive globules 21 seem to be present, but they appear to be slightly smaller in size. Again, some debris particles 22 are present.
The existence of a large number of additive globules 20 at 160 demonstrates that the additive is incompatible with the polymer at that temperature. Moreover, the fact that the number of globules decreases significantly at 220 indicates that additive compatibility with the polymer has increased substantially. Since melt-extrusion tempera-25 tures for polymer PPA typically are in the range of fromabout 250 to about 300, the additive clearly will be compatible with the polymer at melt extrusion temperatures.
The second material consisted of polymer PPA alone as a negative control. Figures 3A and 3B are representations of the hot-stage photomic~G~Laphs at 160 and 220, respect-ively. In Figure 3A, crystallites 31 are seen. While not apparent from the Figures, such crystallites 31 differ in appearance and are distinguishable from additive globules, such as additive globules 21 in Figure 2A. Upon heating to 220, as shown by Figure 3B, most of the crystallites 31 have disappeared; some debris 32 is present.

As a positive control, composition PP21-1 from Example 40 was studied under the same conditions. Representations of the photomi~LG~Laphs are shown as Figures 4A and 4B.
In both figures, numerous globules 41 of additive D05 are 5 apparent. Some of such globules apparently have coalesced at the higher temperature to form droplets 43 (Figure 4B).
At least one debris particle 42 is seen in Figure 4A.
The incompatibility of additive D05 in polymer PPA at both 160 and 220 is striking, especially when Figure 4B
10 is compared with Figure 2B. Moreover, it is clear that the additive becomes less compatible with the polymer as the temperature of the polymer increases.
This discussion of the hot-stage microscope study concludes with the results obtained with composition PP26-15 3 from Example 45. That composition, it will be recalled,consists of polymer PPA and a mixture of additives having molecular weights of 3,000, 3,000, and 8,000, respectively.
The presence of additive globules 51 is seen in Figure 5A
which represents the hot-stage photomicrograph at 160.
20 Such globules appear to be nearly gone at 220 (Figure 5B).
Thus, Figures 5A and 5B are similar to Figures 2A and 2B, respectively, and demonstrate that the additive mixture changes from incompatible to compatible as the temperature of the polymer is raised from 160 to 220.
Several other compositions of the present invention were included in the hot-stage microscope study with results similar to those shown in Figures 2A, 2B, 5A, and 5B.
From the foregoing, it is apparent that the use of the 30 hot-stage microscope as just described can be used as a simple method for determining whether or not any given additive or additive mixture is likely to segregate in a controlled manner to the surface of a fiber or film as described herein. If the additive or additive mixture forms globules which remain at both 160 and 220, the probability is that such additive or additive mixture will not segregate to one or more of the interfacial surface, effective surface, and subsurface. In addition, the melt-processing of a composition incorporating therein such additive or additive mixture probably will not be 5 successful. On the other hand, if the additive or additive mixture does not form globules at 160, the additive or additive mixture is compatible with the polymer at tempera-tures below melt-extrusion temperatures and probably will remain distributed throughout the bulk of the resulting 10 fiber or film without any controlled segregation toward the surface.
III. Pre~aration of Melt-Pressed Films Examples 131-176 As an initial screening method, films were pressed from various of the compositions prepared and described in Section II, above. The apparatus employed was a Carver Laboratory Press, Model 2518 (Fred S. Carver, Inc., Meno-20 monee Falls, Wisconsin) having heated plates. From about1 to about 10 g of a composition was placed between two sheets of aluminum foil and the resulting assembly was placed on the bottom plate of the press, the plates having been preheated to about 180. Pressure up to about 10,000 25 psig was applied and maintained for no more than about 5 seconds. The pressure was released and the foil sandwich was removed from the press. The foil was removed and the film thus obtained was stored in a plastic bag. Film thicknesses of from about 1 to about 5 microns typically 30 were obtained. The wettability of each film made with a type A, B, or C additive was qualitatively estimated by simply placing a drop of water on the surface and observing whether or not the drop wet the surface of the film. The films obtained and the results of the wettability screen are summarized in Table 13.

Table 13 Summary of Melt-Pressed Films Pre~ared from Compositions Prepared in Section II

Composition Example ExamDle CodeWettabilit 131 3 PP01-1Positive 132 4 PP02-1Positive 133 5 PP03-1Positive 134 6 PP04-1Positive 135 7 PP05-1Positive 136 8 PS01-1Positive 137 9 PS02-1Positive 138 10 PP06-1Positive 139 11 PP07-1Positive 140 12 PE01-1Positive 141 13 PE02-1Positive 142 14 PS03-1Positive 143 15 PP08-1Positive 144 16 PP09-1Positive 145 17 PP10-1Positive 146 18 PE03-1Positive 147 19 PE04-1Positive 148 20 PPll-lPositive 149 21 PP12-1Positive 150 22 PE05-1Positive - 151 23 PE06-1Positive 152 24 PP13-1Positive 153 25 PP14-1Positive 154 26 PE07-1Positive 155 27 PE08-1Positive 156 28 PP15-1Positive 157 29 PP16-1Positive 158 30 PP17-1Positive 159 31 PP18-1Positive 160 32 PP19-1Positive 161 33 PE09-1 Positive 162 34 PE10-1 Positive 163 35 PEll-l N/Aa 169 41 PP22-2 Positive 170 42 PP23-2 Positive 171 43 PP24-2 Positive 172 44 PP25-3 Positive 173 45 PP26-3 Positive 174 46 PP27-3 Positive 175 47 PE15-3 Positive 176 48 PE16-3 Positive 177 49 PE17-3 Positive aNot applicable, since the additive was not designed to impart water wettability.
In an effort to obtain some indication of the prefer-ential segregation of additive(s) to the surface of the melt-pressed films, a sample of the film of Example 173 was subjected to scanning electron microscopy in conjunction with a silicon x-ray probe (Si-SEM) in accordance with standard procedures. The scanning electron microscope was -manufactured by Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, England, and the x-ray probe was manufactured by Princeton Gamma Tech, Princeton, California.
30The sample of the film of Example 173 is represented diagrammatically by Figure 6, in which film sample 60 has top surface 61 and front end surface 62. Figure 7 is the diagrammatic representation of Figure 6 on which has been superimposed the results of the Si-SEM. In Figure 7, film 35sample 70 has top surface 71 and front end surface 72.
Each of dots 73 represents the presence of silicon atoms.

.
It is clear that the additives included in the compo-sition from which the film of Example 1?3 was prepared have segregated preferentially to the surface region of the film. The absence of silicon in the core region of the 5 film is striking. The irregular distribution of silicon along top surface 71 (Figure 7) is believed to have resulted from the irregularities present in the surf~ce of the top plate of the press. Such irregularities include the generally streaked orientation of silicon atoms along 10 surface 71.
Water contact angles were measured for several of the melt-pressed films. The apparatus employed was an NRL
Goniometer, Model No. 100-00-115 (Ramé-Hart, Inc., Mountain Lakes, New Jersey. The water used was HPLC Grade water (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). The results of the measurements are summarized in Table 14.

Table 14 Water Contact Angles for Selected 20Melt-Pressed Films Film Exam~le Contact Angle.
131 <2 144 <2 Controla 98 168b 115 aFilm pressed from virgin polymer (PPA) without any additive.
bFilm pressed from the composition consisting 35of polymer PPA and additive D05 as a positive control.

1 334~8 1 The presence of either an additive intended to impart water wettability or an additive intended to increase the surface energy of the film clearly changed the contact angle measurement of the film relative to the control film 5 which did not contain additive. Additives of the former type decreased the contact angle, as expected, and the additive of the latter type increased the contact angle, also as expected.
With respect to the two films which contained an 10 additive which absorbed ultraviolet radiation, i.e., the films of Examples 163 and 164, they showed a broad, strong absorption band from 220 to 360 nm when analyzed on a ultraviolet spectrophotometer.
Samples of both films were subjected to electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA). The ESCA data were collected by Surface Science Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, California, using a Hewlett-Packard 5950 B
spectrometer with a monochromatic aluminum K-alpha x-ray source. The scans were done with the open aperture setting for high sensitivity (low resolution). The x-ray power setting was 600-800 watts and charge neutralization was accomplished with a flood gun setting of 13 electron volts. The vacuum utilized was lo~8 Torr. The area analyzed was about 1 x 4 mm and the sampling depth was about 100 A.
In addition, each film was subjected to bulk elemental analysis. The ESCA data and the results of the elemental analyses are summarized in Table 15.

.
Table 15 SummarY of ESCA Data and Elemental AnalYses on Melt-Pressed Films Containinq a W Absorber ESCA Data Bulk Elemental Analyses Example % C % O ~ N % Si % C % H % N % Si 163 64 12 12 6 85.30 14.10 0.13 0.26 164 61 11 14 7 85.10 14.37 0.10 0.33 Because ESCA analyses are limited to a depth of about loo A, two film samples were submitted for analysis by Rutherford back scattering (RBS) spectrometry. The analyses were carried out by Charles Evans & Associates, Redwood City, California. The apparatus employed was a General Ionics Model 4110 Tandem Accelerator (General Ionics Corporation, Newburyport, Massachusetts) using an Evans End Station (Charles Evans & Associates). A 2.275 MeV
He++ ion probe was used, with a detection angle of 160 degrees. Typical beam currents were 1-20 nanoamps. Ions were detected by surface barrier detectors. Data analysis involved the TOS source code written by Charles Evans &
Associates and owned by General Ionics Corporation. The energy losses of the scattered helium nuclei give informa-tion on the nature and depth of the target atoms in the polymer matrix. The results are summarized in Table 16.

- Table 16 SummarY of RBS AnalYses on Melt-Pressed Films Atomic Concentration Atom %
Example De~th, A C o si Ti 144 0-500 30 0.3 o.og <0.01a >500 30 0.1 0.03 <0.01a 173 0-500 30 1.0 0.56 <O.Ola - 500-1000 30 0.6 0.15 <O.O1a >1000 30 0.1 0.04 <O.01a aThis concentration was at or near the detection limit; the actual concentration may be considerably lower.

The RBS data from Table 16 for the film of Example 173 were plotted as the atomic concentration of silicon 10 in atom percent (y-axis) versus depth in A (x-axis); the plot is shown as Figure 8. In this and all subsequent plots of RBS data, the silicon concentrations were drawn parallel to the x-axis as lines which correspond to the depth field and the midpoints of such lines then were 15 connected to obtain the curve shown in the plot. It is evident from Figure 8 that most of the additives have segregated to the interfacial surface, effective surface, and subsurface of the film. Below a depth of around 1000-1250 A, the concentration of silicon is very low, i.e., 20 no more than about 0.04 atom percent.
The films from Examples 144 and 173 also were submitted for ESCA and bulk elemental analyses. The results of these analyses are shown in Table 17.

Table 17 Summarv of ESCA Data and Elemental Analyses -- for the Films of Examples 144 and 172 ESCA Data Bulk Elemental Anal.
Example% C % 0 % Si % C % H % Si 144 94 4.4 1.3 84.21 13.32 0.24 173 62 25 12 85.11 13.59 0.52 .
It is apparent that the ESCA data and the RBS data cannot be correlated, partly because of the differences in the depths of measurements and partly because of the 1 3347&1 nonlinear concentration gradient which exists from the interfacial surface to the core of the film. Taken togeth-er, however, the data clearly establish the controlled segregation of additive toward the surface of the film.
The evaluation of the film from Example 165 which contained additive D02 consisted of an accelerated ultravio-let radiation exposure trial. A sample of film measuring 3.8 x 10 cm, along with a control film pressed from virgin polymer, was suspended 0.91 m in front of a 400-watt mercury arc lamp (Hanovia 674A10). Both films were exposed continuously for 12 hours. The films then were moved to a distance of 0.30 m from the lamps and exposed continuously for an additional 8 hours. Upon examining both films, it was found that the film of Example 165 appeared to be un-changed, whereas the control film was brittle and could not be bent without breaking.
Before evaluating the film of Example 166 which contained buffering additive D03, the additive itself was examined for its buffering capabilities. This was done by charging a 50-ml beaker with 15 ml of deionized water and a small magnetic stirring bar. The beaker was placed on top of a magnetic stirrer and fitted with a calibrated pH
electrode. The beaker then was charged with 0.032 g (1 drop) of *TRITON X-102 (Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and the pH of the resulting solution measured.
To the solution in the beaker then was added 0.032 g (1 -drop) of additive D03, followed by the measurement of the solution pH. Three additional, equal amounts of additive D03 were added sequentially, with the solution pH- being measured after each addition. The results are presented in Table 18.

* - Trade-mark ~., "

Table 18 SummarY of pH Measurements of Aqueous Additive D03 Solutions Solution Composition Solution ~H
Water and 1 drop TRITON 5.50 Water, 1 drop TRITON, 1 drop D036.25 Water, 1 drop TRITON, 2 drops D038.30 Water, 1 drop TRITON, 3 drops D038.72 The solution containing 1 drop of TRITON X-102 and 3 drops of additive D03 (0.096 g) then was titrated with 0.01 N hydrochloric acid. That is, incremental volumes of hydrochloric acid were added, with the pH of the solution 15 being measured after each addition. The results are summarized in Table lg, which shows the cumulative volume of acid added.

Table 19 Titration of Additive D03 Solution Volume (ml) HCl Added Solution pH
- 8.72 0.2 6.55 0.5 6.91 1.0 6.73 -- 2.0 6.74 3.0 6.70 4.0 6.62 It is clear that additive D03 is capable of acting as a buffer. The sharp drop in pH with the first addition of acid was expected, since a buffer system consists of a weak acid or base and its salt; consequently, buffering 35 behavior could not be seen until acid had been added to form the salt of additive D03.

.
Having verified the buffering capability of additive D03,- the procedure which provided the data for Table 19 was repeated, except that the three aliquots of additive D03 were replaced with a sample of the film of Example 5 166 weighing 0.211 g and only three 0.5-ml additions of hydrochloric acid were done. The results are summarized in Table 20; again, the cumulative volume of acid is shown.

Table 20 Titration of 0.211-g Sample of Film 166 Volume (ml) HCl AddedSolution pH
None (sample absent) 5.71 None (sample present)5.91 0.5 5.90 1.0 5.90 1.5 5.75 The titration of a sample of the film of Example 166 20 was repeated, except that the film sample weighed 0.474 g.
The results are shown in Table 21 which shows the cumulative volume of acid added.

Table 21 Titration of 0.474-g Sample of Film 166 Volume (ml) HCl AddedSolution PH
None (sample absent) 5.60 None (sample present)6.70 0,5 6.69 1.0 6.69 1.5 6.69 2.0 6.60 2.5 6.40 3.0 4.60 1 33478`1 Additive D03 not only retains its buffering capability when incorporated into a composition from which a film is formed, but also clearly is on the interfacial surface;
otherwise, the additive could not buffer the solution in 5 which the film was placed since the solution could not swell the film under the conditions of the test.
While the additives clearly segregated to the surfaces of the melt-pressed films and in general were effective in imparting to the film surfaces the desired characteristics, 10 the critical test remained to be conducted; namely, the preparation of melt-processed fibers or films to determine whether or not additive segregation will occur under the conditions encountered during fiber and continuous film formation. Thus, the preparation of fibers is the subject 15 of the next section.
IV. Preparation of Fibers ExamDles 178-239 A. Meltblown Fibers from Bench-Scale Apparatus As a simple screening method, fibers were formed by means of a bench-scale apparatus having a single orifice in the die tip. The apparatus consisted of a cylindrical steel reservoir having a capacity of about 15 g. The 25 reservoir was enclosed by an electrically heated steel jacket. The temperature of the reservoir was thermo-statically controlled by means of a feedback thermocouple mounted in the body of the reservoir. The extrusion orifice had a diameter of 0.016 inch (0.41 mm) and a length 30 of 0.060 inch (1.5 mm). A second thermocouple was mounted near the die tip. The exterior surface of the die tip was flush with the reservoir body. Composition extrusion was accomplished by means of a compressed air piston in the reservoir. The extruded filament was surrounded and 35 attenuated by a cylindrical air stream exiting a circular 0.075-inch (l.9-mm) gap. Attenuating air pressures typical-ly were of the order of 5-90 psig. The forming distance was approximately 10 inches (25 cm). The attenuated extruded filament was collected on the clear plastic film of an 8.5 x 11 inch (21.6 x 27.9 cm) loose leaf protector 5 having a black paper insert.
In each case, the material extruded consisted of a simple mixture of a polymer and the desired additive(s) in the desired amount(s). The mixtures extruded (meltblown) are summarized in Table 22.
Table 22 Summary of Compositions Meltblown on Bench-Scale A~aratus Polymer Additive Example CodeCode Wt. Percent ~ 188 PPA A06 3 ,1334781 199 PPA All 3 200 PPA All 5 201 PPB All 3 202 PPB All 5 220 PPA Al9 3 221 PPC Al9 3 -. 224 PPB A20 3 229 PPA . A24 3 237 PPA B04 0.33 B05 0.33 C01 0.33 238 PPA B04 0.67 B05 0.67 C01 0.67 Meltblowing conditions for any given composition depended primarily on the polymer component. Consequently, standardized conditions were utilized for each of the three polymers as summarized in Table 23.

Table 23 Summary of Meltblowinq Conditions Using the Bench-Scale ApParatusa Polymer Die Air Code Temp... Temp., aThe conditions given are approximate only and typically may vary by as much as + 30.

The wettability of each web was estimated by placing a drop of water on a sample of the nonwoven material and measuring the time required for complete penetration of the water drop into the fabric (referred to hereinafter as "wetting time"). Each sample was tested with a minimum of five drops of water placed in five different locations.
If all of the drops wet the web within three seconds, the web was considered to be immediately wettable (i.e., wettable). If the wetting times of the drops were greater 5 than three seconds and equal to or less than 30 seconds, the web was considered to be slowly wettable. If wetting times were greater than 30 seconds, the web was considered to be nonwettable.
Of the webs obtained in Examples 178-239, inclusive, 10 those from Examples 178-227, 232-234, and 237-239, in-clusive, were immediately wettable, although in some cases wettability was dependent upon fiber diameter. Those from Examples 228-231, inclusive, 235, and 236 were nonwettable.
It is seen from Table 16 that Examples 228-231 employed 15 additive A24, Example 235 employed additive B04, and Example 236 employed additive Bll. According to Table 1, additive A24 has a molecular weight of about 7,900. From Table 3, it is seen that additive B04 has a molecular weight of about 3,000 and additive Bll has a molecular 20 weight of about 15,000. All three molecular weights are high enough to prevent the rapid segregation of the additive to the effective and/or interfacial surface region of the fibers. Consequently, the fibers were not wettable.
It should be noted, however, that webs made from a 25 composition containing a mixture of additives having molecular weights equal to or greater than about 3,000, -i.e., the webs of Examples 237-239, inclusive, were wett-able, while webs made from a composition containing any one of the additives used in the mixture were not wettable (i.e., the web of Example 235). This illustrates the apparent synergistic effect which can result from combining additives, even though such additives individually do not segregate under similar melt-processing conditions above the subsurface of the fibers or films.

Some qualitative observations on web quality and wettability as a function of fiber diameter are appropriate at this point, at least for webs made with polymer PPA.
Web quality was based on visual inspection or inspec-tion under a low-power optical microscope and was rated on a scale of from 1 to 4 as follows:
4 - fibers having uniform diameters with no shot present;
3 - fibers having a small amount of fiber diameter nonuniformity, with small amounts of shot present (fiber diameter nonuniformity refers to variations of fiber diameter, i.e., the presence of varying large and small fiber diameters);
2 - moderate fiber nonuniformity and a moderate amount of shot present; and 1 - substantial fiber nonuniformity and a large amount of shot present.
Fiber diameters also were estimated visually or under the microscope and were simply classed as small, medium, or large. As will be described in greater detail later, fiber diameter is a function of attenuating air pressure-the higher the pressure, the smaller the fiber diameters.
A number of the webs obtained in Examples 178-239, inclusive, were evaluated for web quality and fiber diame-ter. The results of this evaluation and the wettabilities of the webs evaluated are summarized in Table 24.

Table 24 Summary of Evaluations of 30Web Oualitv and Fiber Diameters Additive Cloud Primary Web Code MW Pointa AirbRating WettabilityC
A06 678 2 25-90 4 WS, WM, WL
35 All 852 3 25-90 4 WS, WM, WL
A13 852 2 25-90 4 WS, WM, WL

A20 1450 0 26-90 4 WS, WM, WL
A22 NAd 4 25-85 4 WS, WM, WL
A23 NA 4 25-90 4 WS, WM, WL
B01 600 10 30-90 4 WS, WM, WL

B05 3000 Ie 25 1 Nonwettablef B08 5962 65 25 1 SlowlyWett.f B11 15,444 42 25 1 Nonwettablef C01 8000 42 25 2 Nonwettablef aIn degrees C.
bIn psig.
CCode: WS = small diameter fibers wettable;
WM = medium diameter fibers wettable: and WL = large diameter fibers wettable.
dNot available.
eInsoluble.
fOnly large fibers were produced.

The data in Table 24 substantiate the already-observed decrease in wettability associated with increasing additive molecular weight. In addition, however, the data suggest that there is a correlation between web quality and additive cloud point. That is, when the cloud point of the additive - is above about 20O C, web quality declines significantly.
Thus, the cloud point of additives employed to impart water wettability to the surface of fibers or films prefer-ably will be no more than about 20 C and most preferablyno more than about 10 C.

Examples 240-261 In order to more fully understand the segregation phenomenon, three series of the bench-scale meltblowing experiments were repeated under somewhat more carefully controlled conditions. The first series employed either polymer PPA or PPB and additive levels of two percent by weight; the process and product details are summarized in Table 25. Fiber diameters were estimated from scanning electron photomicrographs taken by Surface Science Labora-tories, Inc., Mountain View, California. The instrument employed was a Camscan Series 4 Scanning Electron Micro-scope. The accelerating voltage was 24 keV, the working distance was 20 mm, and the spot size was 5. The instrument was calibrated with 0.76-micron diameter National Bureau of Standards latex spheres. Each sample was gold coated (loo-A thickness) to increase conductivity under the electron beam.
Table 25 Summary of First Series of Additional Bench-Scale Meltblowing Experiments Additive Air Fiber Examplea Code MW Press.b Dia.C

247 Al3 852 80 4 250d B04 3000 12 20 1 33478~

251d B04 3000 20 6 252d B04 3000 25 5 253d B04 3000 40 2-3 aPolymer PPA was employed in every case, except for Examples 250-253, inclusive, which utilized polymer PPB.
bIn psig.
CIn micrometers.
dThe polymer contained a mixture of all three addi-tives in equal concentrations; the total of all three additives still was two percent by weight.

In each case, a coherent web was obtained. Each web was subjected to ESCA analysis. Additionally, each web was subjected to bulk elemental analysis and the water drop test. The ESCA data and the results of the elemental analyses and water drop tests are summarized in Table 26.

Table 26 Summary of Analytical Data And Water DroP Test -- for Webs from Experiments 240-253. Inclusive Additive Fiber ESCA Bulk 30 Exam~le MW Dia a sib SicWettabilitY
240 600 15 1.80.006Wettable 241 600 3 2.00.007Wettable 242 836 12 1.90.017Wettable 243 836 3 1.50.018Wettable 244 850 12 2.60.008Wettable 245 850 4 1.70.009Wettable 246 852 12 4.3 0.011Wettable 247 852 4 4.5 0.011Wettable 248 3000 12 13.0 0.017Nonwettable 249 3000 5 6.3 0.016Nonwettable 2503-8 x 103d 20 8.5 0.010Wettable 2513-8 x 103d 6 5.8 0.010Slowly Wett.
2523-8 x 103d 5 5.9 0.010Slowly Wett.
2533-8 x 103d 2-3 4.8 0.010Slowly Wett.
aIn micrometers.
bAverage concentration in atom-percent to a depth of approximately 100 A.
CAverage concentration in atom-percent throughout the bulk of the fibers.
dThe polymer contained three additives having molecular weights of 3,000, 3,000, and 8,000, respectively.

From Table 26, it is seen that only two webs were not wettable; both webs were made with additive B04 which has a molecular weight of about 3,000. Interestingly, the 20 fibers of both webs had higher bulk silicon concentrations and higher surface silicon concentrations than any of the webs which were wettable. Indeed, the fibers of the web from Example 248 had from three to nine times as much silicon in the top loo-A layer of the surface as the fibers of webs which were wettable. Notwithstanding such high concentrations, it is evident that there was insuffi---cient additive in the effective surface to render the webs wettable. Thus, while the higher molecular weight additives will segregate to some extent, additive molecular weights 30 of less than about 3,000 are required in order for additive to migrate to the interfacial surface or effective surface in concentrations sufficient ~o impart wettability to the fibers, at least for fibers having diameters in the 3-15 micrometer range.
- 35 In order to demonstrate the effect of fiber diameter on surface silicon concentration, a second series of ~ 3 ~ 3 ~

bench-scale meltblowing experiments was carried out. In this series, the polymer was PPB and the additive was A10 at a level of two percent by weight (the additive molecular weight is 794 - see Table 1). ESCA analyses were carried 5 out on the webs, all of which were wettable. The results are summarized in Table 27.

Table 27 Summary of Second Series of Additional Bench-Scale Meltblowing Ex~eriments Air Fiber ESCA DataC
Example Press.a Dia.b % C ~ Si 254 40 6 84 4.7 255 50 4 87 4.1 256 60 2 88 3.9 aIn psig.
bIn micrometers, estimated from scanning electron photomi~LG~Laphs as already described.
CAverage concentration in atom-percent to a depth of approximately 100 A; the bulk silicon concen-tration as determined by elemental analysis was 0.01 atom-percent.

From the discussion earlier regarding the factors influencing the segregation of the additive, it is apparent -that there are two competing factors in the segregation of additive during fiber formation. First, as the diameter of the fiber is diminished, the distance to the surface 30 also is diminished, thereby contributing to higher additive concentrations in the surface region. Second, as the diameter of the fiber is diminished, the time the fiber remains in a molten state also is diminished, thereby shortening the time during which the additive can migrate 35 toward the surface. From the data in Table-27, it is evident that the second factor was controlling since the additive concentration was reduced as the fiber diameter decreased.
As already pointed out, the higher molecular weight additives segregate toward the surface of the fiber or 5 film, but typically do not reach either the interfacial surface or the effective surface. In cases where the additive has segregated to the subsurface and is sufficient-ly close to the effective surface, the additive can be "coaxed" to the effective surface by the application of 10 relatively mild heating conditions. This phenomenon is illustrated by a third series of bench-scale meltblowing experiments.
The third series of experiments involved the incorpor-ation of two weight percent of an additive in PPA polymer 15 essentially as described in Examples 178-239, inclusive.
An ESCA and elemental analysis was obtained for each web.
The wettability of each web also was estimated by the water drop test. A sample of each web then was heated in an oven at 120 degrees for 20 seconds. An ESCA analysis 20 was obtained on the heated web and its wettability estimated as before. The results are summarized in Tables 28 and 29.

Table 28 SummarY of Third Series of Additional 25Bench-Scale Meltblowing Experiments - Additive Bulk Example Code MW % Sia 257 A15 1023 0.005 258 A18 1200 0.014 259 A20 1450 0.014 260 A23 NAb 0.008 261 Bll 15,444 0.006 aAverage concentration in atom-percent throughout the bulk of the fibers.
bNot available.

1 33~781 Table 29 - SummarY of ESCA Data and Wettability Testing for Third Series of Bench-Scale Meltblowing ExPeriments Before and After Heatinq the Webs s Before Heating After Heating Example % Sia Wettability % Sia Wettability 257 3.2Nonwettable 5.8Slowly Wett.
258 1.9Nonwettable 2.7Wettable 259 6.9Wettable 7.4Wettable 260 4.3Nonwettable 3.3Nonwettable 261 4.7Nonwettable 5.3Nonwettable aAverage concentration in atom-percent to a depth of approximately 100 A.
While the heat treatment did not convert every nonwett-able web into a wettable one, the procedure was successful for the two lowest molecular weight additives. Whether or not such treatment can be used depends, at least in part, on whether or not the additive has segregated to the subsurface sufficiently close to the effective surface to permit a gentle heat treatment to move the material into the effective surface region. Such segregation in turn is in part dependent upon the diameter of the fibers, i.e., 25 the time the fibers remain in a molten state. Thus, the choice of additive and heat treatment conditions is, of -necessity, somewhat empirical.
The ability of additive to be moved from the subsurface to either the effective surface or the interfacial surface, or both, expands the types of products based on nonwoven webs prepared in accordance with the present invention. A
few examples in the area of household and industrial wipes will serve by way of illustration:
(1) a wipe consisting of a single polyolefin nonwoven web prepared in accordance with the present invention, in which additive is present in either or both of the effective surfaces and the interfacial surfaces of the fibers - the wipe is hydrophilic or water wettable and is suited for washing or cleaning tasks using aqueous cleaning solutions;
(2) a wipe consisting of a single polyolefin nonwoven 5 web prepared in accordance with the present invention, in which additive is present in the subsurface of the fibers-the web is hydrophobic or oleophilic and is suited for cleaning oily surfaces, but on washing the wipe is converted to a hydrophilic wipe because the heat of the washing or 10 drying environment causes additive to migrate from the fiber subsurface to either or both of the fiber effective surface and interfacial surface, which conversion aids in the removal of oily residues from the wipe; and (3) a wipe consisting of two polyolefin nonwoven 15 layers, one prepared from virgin polymer and the other consisting of a web as described in either (1) or (2) above - in the first instance, the wipe will be effective for both water-soluble or water dispersible substances and oily substances, depending on which layer is used as the 20 wiping layer, and in the second instance, the wipe can be converted to a wipe of the first instance by laundering.
B. Meltblown Fibers from Pilot-Scale ApParatus ExamPles 262-297 Since the above bench-scale meltblowing experiments in general were successful, meltblowing trials were conducted on a pilot-scale meltblowing apparatus essentially as described in U.S. Patent No. 4,663,220. Briefly, such 30 meltblowing was accomplished by extruding a composition (or a simple mixture) through a 0.75-inch (19mm) diameter - Brabender extruder and then through a meltblowing die having nine extrusion capillaries per linear inch (approximately 3.5 capillaries per linear cm) of die tip.
Each capillary had a diameter of about 0.0145 inch (about 0.37 mm) and a length of about 0.113 inch (about 2.9 mm). The process variables in general were as follows:
polymer extrusion rate, 2.5-3.5 g per capillary per minute;
polymerextrusiontemperature,250-300, depending upon the polymer employed;
extrusion pressure, 490-510 psig;
die tip temperature, 270-275;
attenuating air temperature, 304-310;
attenuating air pressure, 8-11 psig; and forming distance, 20-40 cm.
The collecting arrangement consisted of a rotating 15.2-cm wide drum having a diameter of 76.2 cm. The surface of the drum was a screen.
The polymer and additive typically were mixed by one of several methods before introducing the mixture to the feed hopper of the extruder. In the first (method A), a standard portable cement mixer was charged with 50 pounds of the polymer in pellet form. The mixer then was started and charged with the desired amount of additive. Mixing was allowed to continue for 20 minutes, after which time the mixture was removed from the mixer and stored in plastic-lined boxes. In a variation of that method, the additive was used in an amount higher than that intended for melt-processing to give a stock mixture. The stock mixture then was mixed in a similar fashion with additional ~polymer in a ratio calculated to give the desired final additive concentration (method B). In the third (method C), a metered stream of additive was pumped into the feed hopper about 15 cm above the feed screws as polymer pellets flowed downward by gravity into the screws. All three methods worked equally well, although method C was used with only one additive.
In each case, a coherent web was obtained which had a - 35 basis weight in the range of from about 20 to about 50 g/m2. Wettability was estimated by means of the water drop test. The trials are summarized in Table 30, along with the results of the water drop test.

Table 30 SummarY of Pilot-Scale Meltblowing Trials PolYmer Additive Exam~le Code Code Wt. % Wettability 262 PPA All 2 Wettable 263 PPA All 3 Wettable 264 PPA All S Wettable 265 PPB All 2 Wettable 266 PPB All 3 Wettable 267 PPB All 5 Wettable 268 PPA A18 1 Wettable 269 PPA A18 3 Wettable 270 PPA A18 5 Wettable 271 PPB A18 1 Wettable 272 PPB A18 3 Wettable 273 PPB A18 5 .Wettable 274 PPA A21 1 Wettable 275 PPA A21 3 Wettable 276 PPA A21 5 Wettable 277 PPC A21 1 Wettable 278 PPC A21 3 Wettable 279 PPC A21 5 Wettable - 280 PPA B01 1 Wettable 281 PPA B01 3 Wettable 282 PPA B01 5 Wettable 283 PPB B01 1 Wettable 284 PPB B01 3 Wettable 285 PPB B01 5 Wettable 286 PPC B01 1 Wettable 287 PPC B01 3 Wettable 288 PPC B01 5 Wettable 289 PPA B04 1 Nonwettable 1 3347~i 290 PPA B04 3 Nonwettable 291 PPA B04 5 Nonwettable 292 PPA B05 1 Nonwettable 293 PPA B05 3 Nonwettable 294 PPA B05 5 Nonwettable 295 PPA C01 1 Nonwettable 296 PPA C01 3 Nonwettable 297 PPA C01 5 Nonwettable The results obtained are consistent with the bench-scale meltblowing experiments. Single additives having molecular weights of the order of 3,000 or higher do not segregate to the interfacial surface or effective surface when fiber diameters are relatively small, as they are in typical meltblowing processes.
C. Spunbonded Fibers from Pilot-Scale APparatus Examples 298-365 Spunbonded trials were conducted on a pilot-scale apparatus essentially as described in U.S. Patent No.
4,360,563.
The polymer and additive typically were mixed by one of the methods described above with respect to Examples 262-297, inclusive.
In each case, a web was obtained which had a basis - weight in the range of from about 14 to about 60 g/m2. In some cases, webs of different basis weights were made during a trial by changing the velocity of the forming wire. Typical basis weights thus prepared were 14, 19, 36, 47, and 59 g/m2. Wettability was estimated by means of the water drop test.
Unlike the meltblown trials, however, it was dis-covered that when the additive level was greater than 1 percent by weight, there was no web integrity;- that is, the web simply fell apart upon attempting to remove it .
from the forming wire, even when excellent fiber formation was obtained. The problem was overcome by running the web under a heated compaction roll before removing it from the forming wire. Thus, all of the spunbonded examples in which additive levels were greater than 1 percent by weight utilized a heated compaction roll. While a compac-tion roll temperature of about 66 was employed, lower or higher temperatures can be used.
The trials are summarized in Table 31, along with the results of the water drop test; because wettability was independent of web basis weight, the latter is not included in the table.

Table 31 Summary of Pilot-Scale S~unbonding Trials Polymer Additive Example Code Code Wt. % Wettability 298 PPA A05 1 Wettable 299 PPA A05 3 Wettable 300 PPC A05 1 Wettable 301 PPC A05 3 Wettable 302 PPD A05 1 Wettable 303 PPD A05 3 Wettable 304 PPA A080.75 Wettable 305 PPA A08 1 Wettable ~306 PPA A08 3 Wettable 307 PPD A080.75 Wettable 308 PPD A08 1 Wettable 309 PPD A08 3 Wettable 310 PPE A08 1 Wettable 311 PPE A08 - 3 Wettable 312 PPA A10 0.5Slowly Wett.
313 PPA A100.75 Wettable 314 PPA A10 1 Wettable 315 PPA A10 1.5 Wettable 316 PPA A10 2 Wettable 317 PPA A10 3 Wettable 318 PPE A10 0.5Slowly Wett.
319 PPE A100.75Wettable 320 PPE A10 1 Wettable 321 PPE A10 1.5Wettable 322 PPE A10 2 Wettable 323 PPE A10 3 Wettable 324 PPE All 0.5Slowly Wett.
325 PPE All0.75Wettable 326 PPE All 1 Wettable 327 PPE All 1.5Wettable 328 PPA All 2 Wettable 329 PPA A11 3 Wettable 330 PPD All 0.5Slowly Wett.
331 PPD All0.75Wettable 332 PPD A11 1 Wettable 333 PPD A11 1.5Wettable 334 PPD All 2 Wettable 335 PPD All 3 Wettable 336 PPE All 0.5Slowly Wett.
337 PPE All0.75Wettable 338 PPE A11 1 Wettable 339 PPE A11 1.5Wettable 340 PPE A11 2 Wettable 341 PPE A11 3 Wettable -- 342 PPA A14 1 Wettable 343 PPA A14 3 Wettable 344 PPD A14 1 Wettable 345 PPD A14 3 Wettable 346 PPA B01 1 Wettable 347 PPA B01 3 Wettable 348 PPA B01 5 Wettable 349 PPD B01 0.5Wettable - 35 350 PPD B01 1 Wettable 351 PPD B01 2 Wettable 352 PPD B01 3 Wettable 353 PPD B01 5 -Wettable 354 PPA B04 1 Wettable 355 PPA B04 3 Wettable 356 PPA B04 5 Wettable 357 PPA B05 1 Wettable 358 PPA B05 3 Wettable 359 PPA B05 5 Wettable 360 PPA C01 1Nonwettable 361 PPA C01 3Nonwettable 362 PPA C01 5Nonwettable 363a PPA B04 0.33Wettable B05 0.33 C01 0.33 364a PPA B04 0.67Wettable B05 0.67 C01 0.67 365b PPA B04 1 Wettable aThe composition also contained 2.5 percent by weight titanium dioxide.
bThe composition also contained 2 percent by weight titanium dioxide.
Because spunbonded fibers typically have larger diameters on the average than meltblown fibers, the spun-bonded webs were wettable or slowly wettable with additives having molecular weights up to about 3,000. However, the 30 use of an additive having a molecular weight of about 8,000 did not produce a wettable web.
In order to further investigate the ability of a gentle post-formation heat treatment to bring additive to the effective surface and/or interfacial surface, ESCA
35 analyses were carried out on three of the spunbonded webs.
The webs then were heated at 110 for 1 minute in a labora-tory oven and the heated webs were subjected to ESCA
analyses. The results of the ESCA analyses before and after heating are summarized in Table 32.

Table 32 Summary of ESCA Analyses Before and After Heatinq ESCA AnalYses Before and After Heatinga Before Heating After Heatinq %
Example % C % O ~ Si % C % O % Si Inc.b 325 95 3.2 1.6 91 6.6 2.8 75 326 95 3.9 1.6 79 15 6.5 306 327 ~34 11 5.0 76 17 7.4 48 aIn atom percent.
bPercent silicon increase in first 100 A of surface.

The data in Table 32 clearly show the remarkable increase in silicon concentration within the first 100 A
of the surface upon exposing a web to a mild heat treat-ment, especially at an additive level of 1 percent by weight.
Because spunbonded webs commonly are employed as liners in disposable diapers, the mild heat treatment phenomenon was investigated by two different methods in conjunction with a simple diaper run-off test. The diaper run-off test involved removing the liner from a standard *KIMBEE diaper. The linerless diaper was mounted on a plate which was inclined at a 45 angle, the back edge of the diaper being at the top of the plate. The test fabric was laid over the diaper. A reservoir containing 100 ml of 0.85 percent (weight per volume) saline (cat. no. SS-442-lo, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) at 37O was located at the top of the plane 2 inches (5.1 cm) above the uppermost edge of the diaper's absorbent~pad. The saline then was allowed to run out of the reservoir in a _99 _ ~ ~ * - Trade-mark ~, .
steady stream. Fluid which was not retained by the diaper was collected and measured, the volume of which was the run-off value.
In the first method, samples of a spunbonded nonwoven S web made from a composition of the present invention and having a basis weight of 27 g/m2 were heated in an oven at two different temperatures. Run-off measurements were made on samples which had not been heat treated and those which had. In every case, the additive was All and the 10 polymer was PPE. The results are summarized in Table 33.

Table 33 SummarY of Results of Run-Off Test After First Heat Treatment Method Web Add. Oven Heating Run-Off Exam~le Levela Temp... Time Test ml 324 0.5 - - loob 0.5 80 3 min. 20-30 0.5 110 30 sec. 30-40 325 0.75 - - 70-80b 0.75 80 3 min. 0-1 0.75 110 30 sec. 40-50 326 1 - - 20-30b 1 80 3 min. 0 1 110 30 sec. 0 aIn weight percent.
bControl .

The efficacy of the heat treatment in each case is readily apparent. It appears that 80 for 3 minutes is more effective than 110 for 30 seconds, at least for the webs having the two lowest concentrations of additive.
Either temperature treatment, however, converts the web containing 1 percent by weight of additive into a highly wettable, highly efficient transfer layer.

In the second method, samples in continuous roll form of the same webs used in the first method were passed over two steam cans in series which were heated by steam at a pressure of 5 psig. The surfaces of the cans were at 5 about 85. Each sample was passed over the cans at two different line speeds, after which the run-off test was performed. The results are summarized in Table 34.

Table 34 Summary of Results of Run-Off Test After Second Heat Treatment Method Web Add. Line Run-Off Example Levela Speed. m/minTest. ml 324 0.5 - loob 0.5 9 80-90 0.5 4.5 80-90 325 0.75 - 70-80b 0.75 9 50 326 1 - 20-30b 1 4.5 0-5 aIn weight percent.
bControl.

- The results from the second method were similar to those of the first method in that the concentration of additive leading to the most efficient transfer layer was 1 percent by weight; the slower line speed gave slightly better results at that concentration.
Because of the success with the Si-SEM procedure with a melt-pressed film, a similar effort was carried out with spunbonded fibers prepared from a composition containing a 35 mixture of additives in polymer PPA, i.e., Example 365.
In this case, a bundle of fibers was collected before they reached the forming wire. The bundle was cut and inserted into a small plastic tube about 19 mm long and having an inside diameter of about 3 mm, thereby packing the tube with fibers. The packed tubing was placed in liquid 5 nitrogen, removed, and cut with a razor blade. The sample was placed on the SEM mount and sputtered with carbon before carrying out the analysis. A diagrammatic represen-tation of the results of the analysis is shown by Figure 9. In Figure 9, the fibers 50 are bilobal in cross-section.
10 As with the film analysis, each of dots 51 represents the presence of silicon atoms.
It is clear that the additives included in the compo-sition from which the fibers of Example 365 were prepared have segregated preferentially to the surface region of the 15 film. While the core region is not as devoid of silicon as was the core region of the film, there clearly is a lower concentration of the additives in the core region than in the area at or near the surfaces of the fibers.
This result was expected, however, because of the relatively 20 rapid formation of the fibers as compared to the film formation time. That is, the fibers remained in a molten state for a time which was much shorter than the time the film remained in a molten state. The fact that the addi-tives segregated to the surfaces of the fibers in such a 25 short time is, as already pointed out, a result of the influence of shear during the extrusion process.
- Two samples of fibers from the spunbonded trials were submitted for analysis by RBS. The results are summarized in Table 35.

. , Table 35 SummarY of RBS Analyses on Spunbonded Fibers Atomic Concentration. Atom %
ExamPleDePth, A C O Si Ti 329 0-1000 30 0.7 0.28 O.01a 1000-3000 30 0.2 0.06 0.02 >3000 30 0.2 0.03 0.03 329b 0-1000 29 0.3 0.13 O.01a 1000-2000 29 0.1 0.02 0.02 >2000 30 0.1 0.02 0.02 364 0-250 28 3.6 1.94 0.02 250-900 28 2.2 0.90 0.02 900-1600 29 1.5 0.45 0.05 1600-2900 29 1.0 0.37 0.05 2900-4900 29 0.8 0.26 0.05 >4900 29 0.8 0.12 0.05 aThis concentration was at or near the detection limit; the actual concentration may be considerably lower.
bA second analysis was carried out on the same sample.

From the data for the two analyses on the same sample, 25 it appears that the RBS procedure causes some loss of additives as evidenced by the decreased silicon concentra-tion values. Thus, it is probable that the concentration values are lower than the actual concentrations. Neverthe-less, the procedure is helpful because it gives at least a 30 qualitative view of the segregation of the additives in the surface region and the core region adjacent thereto.
The RBS data from Table 35 for the webs of Examples 329 and 364 were plotted as already described. The plots for the two analyses of the web of Example 329 are shown 35 as Figures lOA and lOB. The plot for the analysis of the web of Example 364 is shown as Figure 11.

The plots are similar to that for the RBS analysis of the film of Example 173. Figures 8 and lOA are especially similar, although in the latter the concentration of silicon diminishes to the minimum concentration at around 2,000 A, rather than at around 1,000 A. In Figure 11, it is seen that the silicon concentration diminishes more slowly with depth, although all of the plots resulted in curves having similar shapes.
The webs from Examples 329 and 364 also were submitted for ESCA and bulk elemental analyses. The results of these analyses are shown in Table 36.

Table 36 Summary of ESCA Data and Elemental AnalYses for the Webs of Exam~les 329 and 364 ESCA Data Bulk Elemental Anal.
Example % C % 0 % Si % C % H % Si 329 77 17 6.6 83.84 13.23 0.35 364 62 27 11 82.23 13.40 0.89 D. Meltblown Fibers from Pilot-Scale Coformin~
Apparatus Examples 366-439 - A number of larger-scale meltblowing runs were carried out on a coforming apparatus of the type described in U.S.
Patent Nos. 4,100,432 and 4,663,220, in regard to Examples 262-297, inclusive.
Meltblowing was accomplished by extruding the composition from a 1.5-inch (3.75-cm) Johnson extruder and through a meltblowing die having 15 extrusion capillaries per linear inch (about 5.9 extrusion capillaries per linear cm) of die tip. Each capillary had a diameter of about 0.018 inch (about 0.46 cm) and a length of about 0.14 inch (about 3.6 mm). The composition was extruded through the capillaries at a rate of about 0.5 g per capillary per minute at a temperature of about 184. The extrusion pressure exerted on the composition in the die tip was in the range of from about 180 to about 200 psig. The composi-tion viscosity in the die tip under these conditions was about 500 poise. The die tip configuration was adjusted to have a positive perpendicular die tip distance of about 0.01 inch (about 0.25 mm). The air gaps of the two attenu-ating air passageways were adjusted to be about 0.067 inch (about 1.7 mm). Forming air for meltblowing the composi-tion was supplied to the air passageways at a temperature of about 209 and a pressure of about 2 psig. The fibers thus formed were deposited on a forming screen drum which was approximately 18 inches (46 cm) below and 20 inches (51 cm) back from the die tip.
The more significant process variables generally were as follows:
barrel temperature, 280-300;
die temperature, 285-316;
melt temperature in die, 275-316;
barrel pressure, 220-570 psig;
die pressure, 55-130 psig;
primary air temperature, 235-349;
primary air pressure, 3-4.5 psig;
throughput, 7-360 g per cm of die width per hour;
forming distance, 36 cm; and basis weight, 27-85 g/m2, with the more typical basis weights being 27, 51, and/or 85 g/m2.
The compositions which were meltblown were prepared by melt-blending polymer and additive(s) as described in Examples 50-130, inclusive. Coherent webs were formed in each case. As with previous trials, wettability of the formed webs was estimated by the water drop test as appro-priate. The compositions meltblown and the results of the water drop test are summarized in Table 37.

Table 37 Summary of Meltblowinq Trials on Pilot-Scale Coforming Apparatus Comp. Polymer Additive(s) Exam~le Code Code Codefs) Wt. % Wettability 366 PP28-1 PPA A21 1 Wettable 367 PP29-1 PPA A21 3 Wettable 368 PP30-1 PPA A21 5 Wettable 369 PP31-1 PPA A21 12 Wettable 370 PE18-1 PEA A21 1 Wettable 371 PE19-1 PEA A21 3 Wettable 372 PE20-1 PEA A21 5 Wettable 373 PP32-1 PPA B01 3 Wettable 374 PP33-1 PPA B01 5 Wettable 375 PP34-1 PPB B01 3 Wettable 376 PP35-1 PPB B01 5 Wettable 377 PP36-1 PPC B01 3 Wettable 378 PP37-1 PPC B01 5 Wettable 379 PE21-1 PEA B01 3 Wettable 380 PE22-1 PEA B01 5 Wettable 381 PP38-1 PPA B02 3 Wettable 382 PP39-1 PPA B02 5 Wettable 383 PP40-1 PPC B02 3 Wettable 384 PP41-1 PPC B02 5 Wettable 385 PP42-1 PPA B03 3 Wettable 386 PP43-1 PPA B03 5 Wettable 387 PP44-1 PPC B03 3 Wettable 388 PP45-1 PPC B03 5 Wettable 389 PP46-1 PPA B04 3Nonwettable 390 PP47-1 PPA B04 5Nonwettable 391 PE23-1 PEA B04 3Nonwettable 392 PE24-1 PEA B04 5Nonwettable 393 PP48-1 PPA B05 3Nonwettable 394 PP49-1 PPA B05 5Nonwettable 395 PE25-1 PEA B05 3Nonwettable 396 PE26-1 PEA B05 5Nonwettable 397 PP50-1 PPA B06 3Nonwettable 398 PP51-1 PPA B06 5Nonwettable 399 PP52-1 PPC B06 3Nonwettable 400 PP53-1 PPC B06 5Nonwettable 401 PP54-1 PPA B07 3Nonwettable 402 PP55-1 PPA B07 5Nonwettable 403 PP56-1 PPC B07 3Nonwettable 404 PP57-1 PPC B07 5Nonwettable 40S PP58-1 PPA B08 3Nonwettable 406 PP59-1 PPA B08 5Nonwettable 407 PP60-1 PPC B08 3Nonwettable 408 PP61-1 PPC B08 5Nonwettable 409 PP62-1 PPA B09 2Nonwettable 410 PP63-1 PPA B09 3Nonwettable 411 PP64-1 PPA B09 5Nonwettable 412 PP65-1 PPC B09 3Nonwettable 413 PP66-1 PPC B09 5Nonwettable 414 PP67-1 PPA B10 3Nonwettable 415 PP68-1 PPA B10 5Nonwettable 416 PP69-1 PPC B10 3Nonwettable 417 PP70-1 PPC B10 5Nonwettable 418 PP71-1 PPA Bll 3Nonwettable ~. 419 PP72-1 PPA B11 5Nonwettable 420 PP73-1 PPC Bll 3Nonwettable 421 PP74-1 PPC Bll 5Nonwettable 422 PP75-1 PPA C01 1Nonwettable 423 PP76-1 PPA C01 3Nonwettable 424 PP77-1 PPA C01 5Nonwettable 425 PE27-1 PEA C01 1Nonwettable 426 PE28-1 PEA C01 3Nonwettable 427 PE29-1 PEA C01 5Nonwettable 428 PP78-1 PPA D03 3Wettable - 1 3:~4781 429 PP79-1 PPA D04 3 N/Aa 431 PP82-2 PPA B02 1.5 Wettable Bll 1.5 432 PP84-2 PPA B06 1.5 Wettable B10 1.5 433 PP86-2 PPA B10 1.5 Wettable Bll 1.5 434 PP90-3 PPA B04 0.33 Wettable B05 0.33 C01 0.33 435 PP92-3 PPA B04 1 Wettable 436 PP93-3 PPA B04 1.67 Wettable B05 1.67 C01 1.67 437 PE30-3 PEA B04 0.33 Wettable B05 0.33 C01 0.33 438 PE31-3 PEA B04 1 Wettable 439 PE32-3 PEA B04 1.67 Wettable B05 1.67 C01 1.67 aNot applicable.

The results of the meltblowing trials on the coforming 30 apparatus with additives which impart water wettability to the surfaces of the fibers were consistent with those of the previous meltblowing trials.
In order to verify the presence of additive D04 on the surfaces of the fibers, ESCA and bulk elemental analyses -35 were run on the web from Example 429. Similar analyses were carried out with the web from Example 430 as a control.
The results of these analyses are summarized in Table 38.

Table 38 sSummary of ESCA and Bulk Analyses on the Webs from Exam~les 429 and 430 ESCA Data Bulk Elemental AnalYses Example % C % F % Si % C % F % Si 429 73 11 6.9 83.66 0.99 0.50 430 69 - 16 84.72 - 1.06 Controla 100 - - 98 aPolymer PPA which did not contain any additive.

According to the analytical data for the web from Example 429, it is evident that additive D04 has segregated to the surface region; i.e, the first 100 A of the surface as measured from the interfacial surface. The web from Example 430 also contained a substantial amount of additive, in this case D05, in the same surface region.
As already pointed out, however, additive D05 moved to the surface of the fibers because it is incompatible with the polymer. Such incompatibility resulted in poor web formation; that is, the web was characterized by nonuniform fiber diameters, an unusually high proportion of discontinuous fibers, and a substantial amount of shot.
The process was characterized by a frequent, almost ex-plosive, expulsion of polymer from the die orifices which is potentially hazardous to the operators.
E. Coformed Webs from Pilot-Scale Coforming Apparatus Exam~les 440 and 441 Two fibrous coformed nonwoven webs were formed by 35 meltblowing a composition of the present invention and incorporating polyester staple fibers therein.

Meltblowing was accomplished as described for Examples 366-439, inclusive. In each case, the polymer was PPA and the additive was B01 at a level of 3 percent by weight.
The more significant meltblowing process conditions were approximately as follows:
die tip temperature, 296O;
primary air temperature, 2840;
primary air pressure, 3.5 psig;
throughput, 179 g per cm of die width per hour;
horizontal forming distance, 51 cm; and vertical forming distance, 43 cm.
Following the procedure illustrated by Figure S of said U.S. Patent No. 4,663,220 and described therein, 3-inch (7.6-cm) long, 40 denier per filament polyester staple (type 125, E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., Wilmington, Delaware) was incorporated into the stream of meltblown fibers prior to deposition upon the forming drum. The polyester fibers were first formed by a Rando Webber mat-forming apparatus into a mat having a basis weight of about 100 g/m2. The mat was fed to the picker roll by a feed roll which was positioned about 0.13 mm from the picker roll surface. The picker roll was rotating at a rate of about 3,000 revolutions per minute and fiber transporting air was supplied to the picker roll at a pressure of about 2.5 psig. While actual measurement of the position of the nozzle of the coform apparatus with respect to the stream of meltblown fiber was not made, it was estimated to be about 5.1 cm below and about 5.1 cm away from the die tip of the meltblowing die.
Two coformed webs were prepared, both of which had a width (cross-machine direction) of about 51 cm. The first web was composed of about 70 percent by weight of the polyester staple fibers and about 30 percent by weight of the meltblown fibers and the second web was composed of 3s-about 50 percent by weight of each of the two types-of fibers. Each web had a basis weight of about 100 g/m2 and wet immediately when subjected to the water drop test.
Although not described in detail here, other coformed webs were similarly prepared with staple fiber:meltblown fiber ratios of 85:15, 75:25, 65:35, and 15:85. In addi-tion, webs utilizing other sources of polyester staple fibers were prepared at each of the foregoing ratios.
Such other polyester staple fibers were as follows:
3.25-inch (8.3-cm) x 25 denier (Eastman Chemical Products, Inc., Kingsport, Tennessee);
type ES 1.5-inch (3.8-cm) x 1.5 denier (Chisso Corporation, Tokyo, Japan); and type 41-D 1.5-inch (3.8-cm) x 1.5 denier (Eastman Chemical Products, Inc.).
Example 441 The procedure of Examples 440 and 441 was repeated, except that the composition was 3 percent by weight of additive B01 in polymer PEA, the secondary fibers were wood pulp fibers, and a dual meltblowing die/center secon-dary fiber duct arrangement was employed. Thecomposition was meltblown through one die at a throughout of either 179 or 894 g per cm per hour. In either case, the melt 25 temperature was about 288. The die tip pressure was either 90 or 220 psig, depending upon the throughput.
Polymer PPC was meltblown through the other die at a throughput of from about 179 to about 716 g per cm per hour. The melt temperature was in the range of from about 246 to about 274 and the primary air temperature was in the range of from about 280 to about 302. The primary air pressure was in the 2-5 psig range.
Coformed webs containing pulp:polymer ratios of 70:30 and 90:10 were prepared. The webs wet immediately and the 35 composition did not impede the absorbency of the web.

V. Evaluation of Known Material In conclusion, an additive of the type described in U.S. Patent No. 4,659,777 was evaluated both in melt-pressed films and fibers from the bench-scale meltblowing 5 apparatus. The additive was a poly(2-ethyloxazoline)-polydimethylsiloxane-poly(2-ethyloxazoline)blockcopolymer, each of the blocks having a molecular weight of about 3,000.

Example 446 A melt-pressed film was prepared successfully as described for Examples 131-176, inclusive. The material contained 10 percent by weight of the additive in polymer PPA.
The surface energy of the film was estimated by means of Pillar wetting agents (Pillar Corporation, West Allis, Wisconsin) to be 34-35 dynes per cm. The value for virgin polymer is about 30. The film then was subjected to ESCA
analysis. None of the additive was found to be in the 20 first 100 A below the interfacial surface.

Example 447 Meltblown fibers were prepared with a bench-scale 25 apparatus as described for Examples 178-239, inclusive.
The composition consisted of 3 percent by weight of the -additive in polymer PPA. Meltblowing was conducted at an air pressure of 35 psig and melt temperatures of 264, 285, and 308. Although webs were obtained in each case, web 30 quality was poor and decomposition of the additive occurred at each melt temperature. Decomposition was especially severe at the highest temperature. No analyses of the webs were attempted since the additive obviously is unsuited for melt-processing procedures and does not segregate to - 35 the surface.

VI. Hot-Stage Microscopy StudY of a Composition Described in U.S. Patent No. 4 070.218 One last hot-stage microscope analysis needs to be described. The composition consisted of polymer PPA with 5 3 percent by weight of Triton X-102 (Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), a surfactant which is commonly used to make polypropylene wettable by means of the blooming technique already described. The representations of the photomicLGyLaphs are shown in Figures 12A and 12B. Globules 121 of the surfactant are seen in both Figures; some debris 122 in Figure 12A also is apparent. The most noteworthy fact about the two Figures is that the surfactant not only is incompatible with the polymer at 160, but is even less compatible at about 220. In view of Figures 15 12A and 12B, it is easy to understand why a blooming process is required to bring the surfactant to the surface of the fiber or film and why the material migrates back into the polymer.
It now should be evident that the additives described 20 herein and the compositions of the present invention function in a manner which is different from the materials previously added to thermoplastic polymers to alter the surface characteristics of shaped articles, such as fibers and films, made therefrom. Moreover, the compositions of 25 the present invention permit the control of the segregation phenomenon, which control was not possible with prior art procedures. Thus, the method of the present invention is, in reality, very different from that of said U.S. Patent No. 4,070,218. Moreover, HLB terminology is not applicable 30 to the additives employed in the present invention.
Having thus described the invention, numerous changes and modifications thereof will be readily apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. For example, 35 the compositions useful in the present invention also can contain fillers, colorizers, stabilizers, and the like.

Claims (54)

1. A method of forming a nonwoven web from a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic compo-sition which comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one siloxane-containing additive having at least two moieties, A and B, which method comprises the steps of:
(A) forming fibers by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition through a die;
(B) drawing said fibers;
(C) collecting said fibers on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fibers, which fibers have less than about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers, of solvent-extractable additive at their interfacial surfaces and have surface properties charac-teristic of said at least one thermoplastic polymer; and (D) heating said web at a temperature of from about 27 to about 95° C for a period of time sufficient to provide at least about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers, of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of the fibers, which fibers have a surface property characteristic of said at least one additive as a consequence of said heating;
in which:
(1) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at tempera-tures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of said moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion temperatures;

(2) moiety B has at least one functional group which imparts to said additive said at least one characteristic;
(3) the molecular weight of said additive is in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000; and (4) said additive is present in said thermoplastic composition at a level of from about 0.5 to about 2 percent by weight, based on the weight of said polymer.

2. The method of claim 1, in which said polymer is a polyolefin.

3. The method of claim 1, in which said polymer is a polyester.

4. The method of claim 1, in which said heating provides at least about 0.75 percent by weight of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of said fibers.

5. The method of claim 1, in which said heating provides at least about 1 percent by weight of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of said fibers.

6. The method of claim 1, in which said additive has a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 1,000.

7. The method of claim 1, in which said moiety A
comprises at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene group, optionally associated with one or more groups selected from the group consisting of trisubstituted silyl and trisubstituted siloxy groups, the substituents of all such groups being independently selected from the group consisting of monovalent alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and moiety B.

8. The method of claim 7, in which said sub-stituents independently are selected from the group consist-ing of monovalent alkyl groups having from 1 to 3 carbon atoms and said moiety B.

9. The method of claim 1, in which said additive contains a plurality of groups selected from the group consisting of the following general formulae:
(1) B1-, (2) B2-O-(3) R1-, (4) R2-Si?, (5) (R3)(R4)(R5)Si-, (6) (R6)(R7)(R8)Si-O-, (7) [-Si(Rg)(R10)-O-]a, and (8) [-Si(R11)(B3)-O-]b;
in which each of R1 and R2 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of R3-R5, inclusive, independently is a mono-valent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and B4; each of R6-R11, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted; each of a and b independently represents an integer from 0 to about 70 which indicates only the quantity of the respective group present in the additive without indicating or requiring, in instances when an integer is greater than 1, that such plurality of the respective group are connected to one another to form an oligomer or polymer or that all of such groups have identical sub-stituents; and each of B1-B4, inclusive, independently is a moiety which imparts to the additive at least one desired characteristic; with the proviso that such plurality of groups results in at least one tetrasubstituted disilox-anylene group.

10. The method of claim 1, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R12 and R13 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of B5 and B6 independently is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and c represents an integer from 2 to about 70.

11. The method of claim 10, in which said additive has a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 1,000.

12. The method of claim 1, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R14-R22, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B7 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; d represents an integer from 0 to about 70; and e represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

13. The method of claim 1, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R23-R25, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B8 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and f represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

14. The method of claim 1, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is hydrophilicity.

15. The method of claim 1, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is ultraviolet radiation absorption.

16. The method of claim 1, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is degradation stabilization.

17. The method of claim 1, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is high hydrophobicity.

18. The method of claim 1, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is a buffering capacity.

19. A method of forming a nonwoven web from a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic compo-sition which comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one siloxane-containing additive having at least two moieties, A and B, which method comprises the steps of:
(A) forming fibers by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition through a die;
(B) drawing said fibers;
(C) collecting said fibers on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fibers, which fibers have at least about 0.35 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers, of solvent-extractable additive at their interfacial surfaces and have a surface property charac-teristic of said at least one additive; and (D) heating said web at a temperature of from about 27 to about 95° C for a period of time sufficient to increase the amount of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of the fiber to at least about 0.75 percent by weight, based on the weight of said fibers;
in which:
(1) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at tempera-tures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of said moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion temperatures;
(2) moiety B has at least one functional group which imparts to said additive said at least one characteristic;
(3) the molecular weight of said additive is in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000; and (4) said additive is present in said thermoplastic composition at a level of from about 0.5 to about 2 percent by weight, based on the weight of said polymer.

20. The method of claim 19, in which said polymer is a polyolefin.

21. The method of claim 19, in which said polymer is a polyester.

22. The method of claim 19, in which said heating provides at least about 0.75 percent by weight of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of said fibers.

23. The method of claim 19, in which said heating provides at least about 1 percent by weight of solvent-extractable additive at the interfacial surfaces of said fibers.

24. The method of claim 19, in which said additive has a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 1,000.

25. The method of claim 19, in which said moiety A
comprises at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene group, optionally associated with one or more groups selected from the group consisting of trisubstituted silyl and trisubstituted siloxy groups, the substituents of all such groups being independently selected from the group consisting of monovalent alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and moiety B.

26. The method of claim 25, in which said sub-stituents independently are selected from the group consist-ing of monovalent alkyl groups having from 1 to 3 carbon atoms and said moiety B.

27. The method of claim 19, in which said additive contains a plurality of groups selected from the group consisting of the following general formulae:
(1) B1-, (2) B2-O-(3) R1-, (4) R2-Si?, (5) (R3)(R4)(R5)Si-, (6) (R6)(R7)(R8)Si-O-, (7) [-Si(Rg)(R10)-O-]a, and (8) [-Si(R11)(B3)-O-]b:
in which each of R1 and R2 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of R3-R5, inclusive, independently is a mono-valent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and B4; each of R6-R11, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted; each of a and b independently represents an integer from 0 to about 70 which indicates only the quantity of the respective group present in the additive without indicating or requiring, in instances when an integer is greater than 1, that such plurality of the respective group are connected to one another to form an oligomer or polymer or that all of such groups have identical sub-stituents; and each of B1-B4, inclusive, independently is a moiety which imparts to the additive at least one desired characteristic; with the proviso that such plurality of groups results in at least one tetrasubstituted disilox-anylene group.

28. The method of claim 1, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R12 and R13 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of B5 and B6 independently is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and c represents an integer from 2 to about 70.

29. The method of claim 28, in which said additive has a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 1,000.

30. The method of claim 19, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R14-R22, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B7 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; d represents an integer from 0 to about 70; and e represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

31. The method of claim 19, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R23-R25, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B8 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and f represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

32. The method of claim 19, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is hydrophilicity.

33. The method of claim 19, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is ultraviolet radiation absorption.

34. The method of claim 19, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is degradation stabilization.

35. The method of claim 19, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is high hydrophobicity.

36. The method of claim 19 in which a characteristic of said moiety B is a buffering capacity.

37. A method of forming a nonwoven web comprising the steps of:
(A) forming continuous filaments by extruding a molten thermoplastic composition through a die;
(B) quenching said continuous filaments to a solid state;
(C) drawing said filaments;

(D) collecting said continuous filaments on a moving foraminous surface as a web of entangled fila-ments; and (E) passing said web between a pair of compacting rolls, at least one of which is heated, before removing said web from said moving foraminous surface, said compacting rolls applying heat and pressure to said web sufficient to impart coher-ency thereto;
wherein said thermoplastic composition comprises a surface-segregatable, melt-extrudable thermoplastic composition which comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and at least one additive having at least two moieties, A and B, in which:
(1) said additive is compatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures but is incompatible at temper-atures below melt extrusion temperatures, but each of moiety A and moiety B, if present as separate compounds, would be incompatible with said polymer at melt extrusion temperatures and at temperatures below melt extrusion temperatures;
(2) moiety B has at least one functional group which imparts to said additive at least one desired character-istic;
(3) said additive is a siloxane-containing compound;
(4) the molecular weight of said additive is in the range of from about 400 to about 10,000; and (5) the weight ratio of said polymer to said additive is in the range of from about 10 to about 100.

38. The method of claim 37, in which said polymer is a polyolefin.

39. The method of claim 37, in which said polymer is a polyester.

40. The method of claim 37, in which said additive has a molecular weight of from about 500 to about 1,000.

41. The method of claim 37, in which said moiety A
comprises at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanylene group, optionally associated with one or more groups selected from the group consisting of trisubstituted silyl and trisubstituted siloxy groups, the substituents of all such groups being independently selected from the group consisting of monovalent alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and moiety B.

42. The method of claim 41, in which said sub-stituents independently are selected from the group consist-ing of monovalent alkyl groups having from 1 to 3 carbon atoms and said moiety B.

43. The method of claim 37, in which said additive contains a plurality of groups selected from the group consisting of the following general formulae:
(1) B1-, (2) B2-O-(3) R1-, (4) R2-Si?, (5) (R3)(R4)(R5)Si-, (6) (R6)(R7)(R8)Si-O-, (7) [-Si(Rg)(R10)-O-]a, and (8) [-Si(R11)(B3)-O-]b;
in which each of R1 and R2 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of R3-R5, inclusive, independently is a mono-valent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted, and B4; each of R6-R11, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which is substituted or unsubstituted; each of a and b independently represents an integer from 0 to about 70 which indicates only the quantity of the respective group present in the additive without indicating or requiring, in instances when an integer is greater than 1, that such plurality of the respective group are connected to one another to form an oligomer or polymer or that all of such groups have identical sub-stituents; and each of B1-B4, inclusive, independently is a moiety which imparts to the additive at least one desired characteristic; with the proviso that such plurality of groups results in at least one tetrasubstituted disiloxanyl-ene group.

44. The method of claim 37, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R12 and R13 independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubsti-tuted; each of B5 and B6 independently is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and c represents an integer from 2 to about 70.

45. The method of claim 37, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R14-R22, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B7 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; d represents an integer from 0 to about 70; and e represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

46. The method of claim 37, in which said additive is a compound having the general formula, in which each of R23-R25, inclusive, independently is a monovalent group selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, cycloalkyl, aryl, and heterocyclic groups, each of which, except for hydrogen, is substituted or unsubstituted; B8 is a monovalent group having a desired characteristic; and f represents an integer from 1 to about 70.

47. The method of claim 37, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is hydrophilicity.

48. The method of claim 37, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is ultraviolet radiation absorption.

49. The method of claim 37, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is degradation stabilization.

50. The method of claim 37, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is high hydrophobicity.

51. The method of claim 37, in which a characteristic of said moiety B is a buffering capacity.

52. The method of claim 1, in which said thermoplas-tic composition comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and a mixture of two or more additives.

53. The method of claim 19, in which said thermoplas-tic composition comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and a mixture of two or more additives.

54. The method of claim 37, in which said thermoplas-tic composition comprises at least one thermoplastic polymer and a mixture of two or more additives.