CA1327995C - Fluxgate sensor - Google Patents

Fluxgate sensor

Info

Publication number
CA1327995C
CA1327995C CA 615298 CA615298A CA1327995C CA 1327995 C CA1327995 C CA 1327995C CA 615298 CA615298 CA 615298 CA 615298 A CA615298 A CA 615298A CA 1327995 C CA1327995 C CA 1327995C
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
core
coil
sensor
sensors
gradiometer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
CA 615298
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Fred Maroske
Giuseppe Brandolino
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to CA 615298 priority Critical patent/CA1327995C/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1327995C publication Critical patent/CA1327995C/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01RMEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R33/00Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
    • G01R33/02Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
    • G01R33/04Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux using the flux-gate principle

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Measuring Magnetic Variables (AREA)

Abstract

Title: FLUXGATE SENSOR HAVING ADJUSTABLE
CORE EXTENDING BEYOND A COIL WINDING
AND A GRADIOMETER INCORPORATING A
PAIR OF SENSORS

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

A fluxgate sensor has a coil body defining a bore and an axis. A coil is wound on the coil body around the axis. A ferromagnetic core is located in the bore and extends beyond either end of the coil, to improve the sensitivity of the sensor. The core may be elongate and have a non-circular profile such as a zig zag pattern. In a gradiometer, the core configuration facilitates balancing of two sensors by either radial or axial adjustment of the core.

Description

- ~ 1327995 FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention relates to a fluxgate sensor, and more particularly relates to a parallel fluxgate sensor.
, BACRGRQU~D OF TE~E INVENTION
Magnetic field sensors can be realized in many forms. A variety of magnetic fiel~ sensors have been developed, many of them employing various wound-coil configurations. Other sensors rely on different physical principles. Thus, Hall-effect sensors, Xagnetoresistive sensors and Magnetic wire sensors, as well as a version of an electron tube have been used. The present invention is concerned with wound-coil sensors.
A fluxgate sensor is used to detect and measure a magnetic field. Early fluxgate sensors consisted of a length of wire wound on a hollow tubular bobbin with a magnetically sensitive material placed in the centre of the bobbin, to form the core of the sensor. When the sensor is driven into saturation by alternate positive and negative pulses, the response of the sensor coil is a measure of the magnetic field strength parallel to the sensor~s axis. Consequently, this type of sensor is referred to as a ~parallel fluxgate sensor~. Sensors can be configured to provide an llorthogonal fluxgate sen60r".
Such sensors are u~ed in a ~'magnetometer~, which is a device that measures the strength of a magnetic field, and a "gradiometer" which is a device that measures the difference in magnetic field strength or gradient of the magnetic field.
There are several practical design considerations when using a sensor of the type ~ust described. Principal considerations are sensitivity and balance. Balance i8 the most critical design consideration for a gradiometer, since several sensors are used to determine the strength of the magnetic field gradient.
Sensitivity i8 also important, but it is much more easily ' ~ controlled. If the sensors of a magnetic gradiometer are ' ~
:. . -:
., . -. ' , . . .
,., :
: : :
., 13279~5 not exactly balanced, then the gradiometer can give a false output, i.e. it can indicate that there is a difference in the magnetic field when no such difference exists, or alternatively fail to detect if a magnetic difference does occur. Similarly, a device must be sensitive enough for its intended use.
In all known conventional sensors, a sensor has a coil wound about a bobbin and a core located in the bobbin. The core entirely fills the core of the bobbin and ` 10 does not extend beyond the ends of the core. The core cannot be manipulated, and it is conventional to provide balance and compensation coils to achieve a balance between the sensor coils.

SUMMARY OF THE_PRESENT INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a parallel fluxgate sensor, which comprises:
a coil wound on the body around the axis; and an ' adjustable core formed from an elongate strip of .i ferromagnetic material, said strip being generally rectangular and of uniform thickness and said core having ~ a generally zig zag profile; wherein said core is located !,j in said bore and said core extends along the bore axis beyond either end of said coil, and wherein the position of said core relative to said coil can be adjusted to j~ 25 balance the sensor relative to another similar sensor.
;i It has been discovered that, by increasing the i length of the core material so that it extends out beyond ;I the ends of the coil, sensitivity of the sensor to a magnetic field is greatly increased. It is believed that this is because the coil's magnetic field pattern lines are more easily perturbed, as compared to a standard fluxgate sensor where the core material does not extend i beyond the ends of the coil.
' A further advantage of the core shape of the present invention is that in a preferred form described below, it can be used to balance a pair of fluxgate C~,' '' ., .

,: , .
i7 : . :
'.'"; , ' ', ' - '~': ' ' ~ ` ' ' - 2a -sensors. In a gradiometer, one has two separate sensors, fordetermining the magnetic field gradient.

.

', /

-`, ` C

.~ . .. .
'' ~. : ` - ' 132799~

Known fluxgate sensors employ multiple windings around the core material. In general, there is a drive winding, a sense winding and a balance winding, which `~makes for a complex structure. The drive winding is used -5 to saturate the core material in a periodic fashion. The sense winding is used to detect the response of the core material to the excitation by the drive winding and the external magnetic field. The balance winding is used to match the sensor characteristics of the two sensors, to ensure that no incorrect reading is given in the complete gradiometer. If the balance winding was not used, then almost certainly due to usual tolerances etc., the two ;sensors would detect a difference in magnetic field even where one did not exist.
15In a preferred form of the present invention, ~ the core is formed from a non-circular section strip and ; is mounted in the bore 80 as to be rotatable about its axis. Then a small twist of the core can be used to ad~ust each sensor. As well, the cores can be mounted for longitudinal or axial ad~ustment. Consequently, the sensors according to the present invention do not require balance winding and a minor physical mechanical ad~ustment ~ of each or one core will enable the two sensors of the `~ device to be matched perfectly.
~ 25Additionally, it is possible for the sensor of f~ the present invention to have ~ust a single winding, ' rather than separate sense and drive windings. When combined with appropriate circuitry, one can still obtain the nece~sary detection of magnetic fields etc.

3 0 BRIE~ 5C~IpTION OF THE p~AWIN~S
For a better understanding of the present invention and to show more clearly how it may be carried into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
35Figure 1 is a perspective view of a tip of a gradiometer in accordance with the present invention;

.~
, - . .

~.: : ' ' : ' ' ' : . ' :

132799~

Figures 2a and 2b are perspective views of a ~ conventional fluxgate sensor and a fluxgate sensor in - accordance with the present invention showing the magnetic field patterns;
5Figures 3a and 3b are perspective views of the cores of the two sensors of the gradiometer of Figure l;
and Figure 4 is a schematic view of a circuit for use with sensors of the present invention.
:: `
D~SCRIPTION OF TE~ PREFERR~D EMBODIMENT
In Figure 1, there is shown the tip of a gradiometer device, the tip being indicated at 1. The rest of the device can be largely conventional, and hence is not shown in detail. In the tip 1, there are two parallel fluxgate sensors indicated at 2 and 4. The sensors 2, 4 are aligned along a common axis 6.
Referring to Figures 2a and 2b, Figure 2a shows a conventional sensor indicated at 10. This ~ensor 10 includes a coil body 12 which is generally cylindrical, and on which a coil 14 is wound. A core 16, which is in the form of a generally rectangular slab is located within the body 12. It i8 to be noted that the core 16 does not extend beyond the ends of the coil 14, and indeed is of substantially the same length as the coil 14.
25The magnetic field line pattern for this conventional sensor 10 are indicated at 18. It can be seen that the field line pattern is relatively dense at the ends of the core 16 so that it is not overly sensitive to , external influences.
j 30Figure 2b show~ one form of a sensor in ,` accordance with the present invention. The ~ensor 20 again ' ha8 a coil body 22 and a coil 24 mounted on it. Here, a ~ core 26 is again generally rectangular but the core 26 tl extends beyond the ends of the coil 24 as indicated by portions 28 outside of the coil 24.

, .
1,. .

,~ . . . .

., ' , ' .

~ .

' 132799~
:`

:~:
This gives a field pattern 29 as ~hown. The - field pattern is not so concentrated at the ends of the core 26, and hence is more susceptible to influence by an external magnetic field.
Referring to Figures 3a and 3b, there are shown two profiles for the sensors 2 and 4 of Figure 1, respectively.
For the first sensor, sensor 2, a core 30 is formed from a rectangular strip material. The core 30 includes tips 31 and 32 which are at 90 degrees relative to one another. Extending from the tip 31, there are a series of zig zag or V-shaped portions 34.
The core for the sensor 4 is shown in Figure 3b and indicated at 36. It corresponds closely to the core 30. It has tips 37, 38 which are at right angles to one another and arranged at 45 to an axis of the device 1 and ` ~ hence at 45 to the tips 31, 32 of the core 30. Again, various zig zag or ~-shaped portions 39 are provided between the tips 37, 38.
Whilst the pairs of tips of each core 30 or 36 need not be at 90 to one another, it has been discovered this angle gives the best benefits for balancing.
Similarly, the angle of 45 between the tips of the two sensor cores is not essential, but it has been found to be optimum.
The zig-zag profile provides for economic manufacture, whilst providing a core that is uniformly distributed on either side of the axis. The core can be ' mounted in the coil body and manipulated both axially and radially. An alternative arrangement would be to provide -I a holder for the core in the form of a tube located within the bore of the coil body, so that the holder and core are manipulated together. Then, the core could be, for example, a flat strip.
In use, the cores are manipulated by twisting each core, or one of the cores, slightly to achieve a balanced condition in certain strategic directions. As .
.

'' ' ,:' , ' ' ' '- ,' " ~ :
, : . .

, , . ~- ,. : . . .

well, the cores can be adjusted longitudinally or axially.
The cores are then secured in position by adhesive or some mechanical securing means.
Reference will now be made to Figure 4 which shows a schematic block diagram of a circuit, indicated generally at 50, for a gradiometer in accordance with the present invention. One end of each of the coils of the sensors 2, 4 is connected through to ground, as indicated at 52. The other ends of the coils of the sensors 2, 4 serve as inputs and are connected to the outputs of drivers 54, which in turn are driven by an oscillator 56.
The inputs of the sensors are also connected through rectifier and average units 58, 59. The rectifier and average unit 58 for the first sensor 52 is connected - 15 directly through to an adder 60. The other unit 59 is ~ connected through an inverting amplifier 62 to the adder - 60. Consequently, the adder serves to determine the difference between the signal at the inputs of the two sensors 2, 4. This in turn is related to the difference in the magnetic field sensed by the two sen~ors which gives a determination of the gradient in the magnetic field.
~ he output of the adder 60 is connected through an absolute value unit 64 through to a voltage controlled oscillator 66. The voltage controlled oscillator 66 in turn i8 connected to an audio amplifier 68 which drives an audio transducer 70. Thus, the output of the audio transducer 70 is dependent upon the gradient of the magnetic field sensed by the sensors 2, 4.
Each sensor when coupled to the electronic drive and sense circuitry will have a unique zero offset and gain characteristic. Electrically, the sensor(s) are matched at various Inulll directions to ensure the response from both sensors under all conditions are the same. The electrical nulling does not effect the sensors directly; it ad~usts the electronic circuits to compensate for a difference in sensor response.
' '~b ;:. ~ - . .
. ~ . .

-`132799~

The electrical balance circuits are standard, and hence are not described here. They compensate for both the sensor differences as well as the circuit component deviations. The mechanical balance provided by the cores ` 5 compensates for the true mechanical differences between the two sensors. The sensors must be aligned as closely as possible in all three cartesian directions in order to cancel common fields correctly.
A common fluxgate sensor requires that the core be forced into alternate positive and negative saturation.
This fact makes a squarewave excitation voltage ideal since saturation will ~e obtained swiftly and completely.
However, several different waveforms have been used - including a sinewave, triangle wave and some very complex compo~ite waves. For the present invention, a square wave is suggested, although this i8 not essential.
When the sensor core reàches saturation, the response of the sen~or will include a component from the ambient magnetic field present. The phenomenon is well known, although the fluxgate mechanism i8 not completely - understood.
It has been found that contrary to conventional i teaching, it is not essential for the sensor cores to be fully saturated during their operation.
25In the present cores 26, there is not complete saturation, particularly at the tips. This behaviour has been established by observing the responqe of the sensor to the driving waveform. If the sensors were saturated, then the response waveform would not resemble the driving ; 30 waveform since it would be translated by the non-linear portion of the B-H curve of the sensor. Some saturation does occur, but it is not complete.
The present sensor 20 must be driven close, if Inot completely, into saturation for proper operation. The ,f35 circuit 50 exploits the fact that saturation in the entire core is not required for proper fluxgate operation. For an instrument of this class, the sensitivity gained by "'~5 ., ~ . ~ , - 132799~

extending the core exceeds the fact that the entire core is not saturated perfectly and does not provide an ideal response.
It is not presently known if there is an ideal ratio of sensor core length to sensor coil length. It has been found, mainly through experimentation, that extending the core does increase the sensitivity of the sensor when - driven and detected in the same manner as the equivalent core with a coil-sized core. For sen~ors tested, it has 10 been determined that having a core-to-coil ratio of 2:1 i6 optimum given the drive/~ense circuitry, frequency, etc.
employed.
It is known to use the drive winding as the sense winding as well. A separate sense winding exists in 15 most sensors to increase sensitivity and optimise coil characteristics. The drive winding can be optimised for saturating the sensor core and requiring a small amount of power *o achieve this. The sense winding can be optimised to inçrease the sensed signal by its turns ratio with 20 respect to the drive winding, and at the same time, have good impedance characteristic6 60 circuitry interface is simple.
However, it i~ conventional to provide ~eparate ;~ balance and compensating windings. The present invention s 25 eliminates the need for a "balance" winding and a ~compensating" windlng which are commonly used for the matching or balancing of two fluxgate sensors in a gradiometer. Our matching is accomplished mainly through the mechanical matchLng o the senoor~ a~ descrLbed above.

.

: . . : , . .

, .; ~ .;: ' ' ~ .
!' ' ~,.` ~ .

Claims (12)

1. A fluxgate sensor comprising: a coil body defining a bore and an axis; a coil wound on the body around the axis; and an adjustable core formed from an elongate strip of ferromagnetic material, said strip being generally rectangular and of uniform thickness and said core having a generally zig zag profile; wherein said core is located in said bore and said core extends along the bore axis beyond either end of said coil, and wherein the position of said core relative to said coil can be adjusted to balance the sensor relative to another similar sensor.
2. A sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the tips of the core are at 90° relative to one another.
3. A sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein said core is adjustable both axially and radially.
4. A sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein said core of ferromagnetic material is located in an adjustable holder that fits within the bore of said coil body and extends along said axis beyond either end of the coil.
5. A gradiometer including a pair of spaced apart sensors, each sensor comprising: a coil body defining a bore and an axis; a coil wound on the body around the axis; and an adjustable core formed from an elongate strip of ferromagnetic material, said strip being generally rectangular and of uniform thickness and said core having a generally zig zag profile; wherein said core is located in said bore and said core extends along the bore axis beyond either end of said coil, and wherein the cores of the two sensors are separate and spaced apart from one another.
6. A gradiometer as claimed in claim 5, wherein the tips of each core are at 90° relative to one another.
7. A gradiometer as claimed in claim 6, wherein the tip of one core facing the tips of the other core are at 45° to one another.
8. A gradiometer as claimed in claim 5, which includes an oscillator and a pair of drivers having outputs connected to respective inputs of the coils of the two sensors, the oscillator being connected to inputs of the drivers, and wherein outputs of the two sensors are connected to ground.
9. A gradiometer as claimed in claim 8, which includes a pair of rectifier and averaging units connected to respective inputs of the inputs of the two sensors, and an adder unit connected to outputs of the rectifier and averaging units being connected to the adder unit by an inverting amplifier, whereby the adder produces at an output thereof a signal corresponding to the difference between the responses of the two sensors.
10. A device as claimed in claim 9, which includes:
an absolute value unit having an input connected to the output of the adder and an output; a voltage controlled oscillator having an input connected to the output of the absolute value unit and a respective output; and an audio amplifier and an audio transducer connected to the output of the voltage controlled oscillator.
11. A gradiometer as claimed in claim S, wherein said core is adjustable both axially and radially.
12. A gradiometer as claimed in claim 5, wherein said core of ferromagnetic material is located in an adjustable holder that fits within the bore of said coil body and extends along said axis beyond either end of the coil.
CA 615298 1989-09-29 1989-09-29 Fluxgate sensor Expired - Fee Related CA1327995C (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA 615298 CA1327995C (en) 1989-09-29 1989-09-29 Fluxgate sensor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA 615298 CA1327995C (en) 1989-09-29 1989-09-29 Fluxgate sensor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1327995C true CA1327995C (en) 1994-03-22

Family

ID=4140895

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA 615298 Expired - Fee Related CA1327995C (en) 1989-09-29 1989-09-29 Fluxgate sensor

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1327995C (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU181523U1 (en) * 2017-04-18 2018-07-17 Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет" INSTALLATION FOR RESEARCH OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD INSIDE THE TUBULAR CONDUCTOR

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
RU181523U1 (en) * 2017-04-18 2018-07-17 Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Национальный исследовательский Томский политехнический университет" INSTALLATION FOR RESEARCH OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD INSIDE THE TUBULAR CONDUCTOR

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6698299B2 (en) Magnetoelastic torque sensor
US7365535B2 (en) Closed-loop magnetic sensor system
US5115197A (en) Fluxgate sensor having adjustable core extending beyond a coil winding and a gradiometer incorporating a pair of sensors
EP0067974B1 (en) Torque sensor
US4920806A (en) Strain gage
US4107606A (en) Non-contacting electromagnetic thickness gauge for sheet measurement having improved small distance sensitivity
US4674331A (en) Angular rate sensor
US5952819A (en) Auto-zeroing current sensing element
CA1295023C (en) Current ratio device
JP2009512856A (en) Sensor system including a magnetized shaft
US7320255B2 (en) Torque sensor magnetometer
US20060179959A1 (en) Magnetostrictive torque sensor
CA1037121A (en) Magnetic locator having improved sensors
US3800213A (en) Three axis toroidal fluxgate type magnetic sensor
Ripka et al. Pulse excitation of micro-fluxgate sensors
JPH0257991A (en) Magnetic flux gate magnetic meter having wide temperature range accuracy and adjustement of magnetic flux gate for temperature compensation
CA1327995C (en) Fluxgate sensor
US5560115A (en) Gimbaled magnetometer with inductive coupling
EP0146382A2 (en) Torque sensor of noncontact type
US7148679B2 (en) Transformer probe
JP3085651B2 (en) Magnetic field sensor
Zakrzewski Combined magnetoelastic transducer for torque and force measurement
WO1995002807A1 (en) Electromagnetic sensor
JPH1038714A (en) Torque measuring apparatus and paper currency feeding mechanism employing it
JPH0743105A (en) Position transducer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKLA Lapsed