CA1323734C

CA1323734C - Rotary brush with removable brush elements

Info

Publication number: CA1323734C
Application number: CA000569939A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Gerald R. Abrahamson; Ernest J. Duwell
Original assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co
Current assignee: 3M Co
Priority date: 1987-06-26
Filing date: 1988-06-21
Publication date: 1993-11-02
Anticipated expiration: 2010-11-02
Also published as: KR940006888Y1; EP0299636A1; EP0299636B1; DE3884301T2; KR890000207U; JPS6426155U; DE3884301D1

Abstract

ROTARY BRUSH WITH REMOVABLE BRUSH ELEMENTS

Astract of the Disclosure A rotary brush with removable brush elements is provided. The brush elements are disposed on a hub in a radial display. The brush elements include a resiliently flexible element which permits the brush to deflect at a greater angle from a rest position than the angle of deflection of the bristles of the brush from a normal position when the hub is rotated with the bristles in contact with the workpiece.

Description

-1- 132~7~'~
R~TARY BRUSH ~II TH REMOVABLE E~RUSH EL~:MENTS
ackground of the Invention 1. Field of the Invention The invention relates to rotary brushes, and in particular, to rotary brushes with removable brush elements.
Rotary brushes which employ an annular display of bristles have been utilized in a number of applications for the surface finishing of various objects. Such brushes have been used in industrial applications to deburr and/or otherwise provide a surface finish to various manufactured articles.

2. Description of the Prior Art Rotary brushes are known for surface finishing applications which include a circular hub onto which abrasive loaded filaments are adhered by a layer of cured resin which binds one end of each filament with the opposite end being displayed outward. While such brushes have found great commercial success, the process by which they are made provides certain limitations. First, the brushes are t~pically made by orienting the individual filaments in a flocking operation to stand erect with one end in a layer of liqu~d resin which is then cured to provide the brush element. The flocking operation generally llmits the trim length of the bristles to less than about 12 cm. Secondly, some of the cured resins used to hold the bristles degrade in the presence of solvents and hot aqueous solutions which may contain acidic or caustic agents, freeing or weakeninq the bond with the bristles. Finally, the adhered bristles, when deployed on a rotary hub, tencl to fail by flexural fatigue at the point where the bristle emerges from the cured resin, caused by repeated deflection and return to normal, as the individual bristles are contacted with the object being finished and such contact is broken as the wheel rotates. This is also a problem with the bristles of r~

brushes that are held on the surface of a hub by mechanical means.
U.S. Patent No. 4,646,479 and its United Kingdom counterpart U.R. Patent Application GB2 106 020 A, published April 7, 13B3, discloses a deburring cylindrical brush which includes a mandrel having attached to it a multiplicity of long abrasive bristles wherein the population density of bristle~ on the brush is such that the outwardly-extending ends can readily flex both in the plane of rotation and sideways along the lengthwise dimension of the brush.
Bristles at their midpoint are wrapped around a rod which is mechanically held in place on the mandrel peripheral surface by spaced flange elements. This results in a brushing surface wherein the bristles attach in fixed position at the face of the mandrel and are subject to flexural fati~ue as they deflect in use. After repeated such deflections, the bristles tend to break off at the point of attachment.
While various references disclose finishing wheels comprising a rotary hub having a slotted peripheral surface with abrasive packs inserted into each slot to provide an abrasive flap wheel, none are known to employ bristles in place of abrasive flaps. Each abrasive pack contains like oriented abrasive flaps and the collection of flap packs provide6 an annulus of abrasive flaps around the hub. Such flap wheels are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Patent Nos.

3,768,214, 4,217,737 and 4,285,171.

Summary of the Invention The invention provides a rotary finishing wheel which has a hub from which a radial display of bristles emanates. The bristles are attached in a unique manner to greatly red~ce flexural fatigue failure, thereby extending the useful life of the brush over brushes of the prior art which have their bristles attached in a conventional manner.
3 It is also possible to obtain brushes with bristles longer than 12 cm since the method of making the brushes of the present invention does not rely on a flocking process.

' 3 ~ 60s57-3~56 ~ ore specifically, the invention provides a removable brush element for installation on a rotary hub, said brush comprising: (a~ a brush comprising a plurality of resiliently flexible bristles and bristle holding means for holding said bristles in normal generally parallel outwardly projecting orientation relative to said bristle holding meansî (b) an elongate anchoring means mechanically engagable with a brush fastening means on said hub; and (c) a resiliently flexible element having a first end fastened to said anchoring means and an opposite end fastened to said holding means to position said holding means in a rest position relative to said hub, the relative flexibility of said bristles and said flexible element permitting said flexible element to deflect at a greater angle from said rest position than the angle of deflection of the bristles of said brush from said normal position when said hub is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece, wherein the angle of deflection of said resiliently flexible element varies from 0 in a rest position to about 55 as said rotary brush is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece and the angle of deflection of said bristles varies from 0 in said normal orientation to about 15 when said rotary brush is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece whereby bristle loss due to flexural fatigue failure is greatly reduced.
The invention also includes a rotary brush that includes a brush element as aforesaid having spaced brush fastening means.
A plurality of removable brush elements are fitted usually with one brush element being attached by one brush fastening means to provide a radial array of brushes. The preferred hub includes generally a cylindrical hub having a peripheral surface and lC

1J:: 2~73~
3a 60557 3456 opposite end surfaces. The hub has a plurality of axially extending circumferentially spaced slots opening through the peripheral surface with one brush element in each slot. The brush elements comprise a brush having a plurality of resiliently flexible bristles and a bristle holding means for holding the bristles in a normal generally parallel outwardly projecting orientation relative to the bristle holding means. Each of the brush elements also includes an elongate anchoring means adapted to be engaged in one of the brush fastening means. The brush elements also include a resiliently flexible element having a first end fastened to the anchoring means and an opposite end fastened to the holding means to position the holding means in a radial rest position relative to the hub. The relative flexibility of the bristles and the flexible element permits the flexible element to deflect at a greater angle from the rest position than the angle of deflection of the bristles of the brush from the normal position when the hub is rotated with the bristles in contact with an object being finished.
The preferred bristles are abrasive-loaded polymeric bristles.
Brief Description of the Drawinas Figure 1 is an end view of a rotary brush of the present invention.
Figure 2 is a fragmentary end view showing one brush element of the type depicted in Figure 1 in place on a hub which is partially broken away;
Figure 3 is a fragmentary end view which shows a conventional way of fastening filaments to a hub illustrative of that known in the prior art;

-4- ~2~134 Fig. 4 is a fragmentary end view of another embodiment of the rotary brush of the present invention, again showing a single brush element, with the hub being partially broken away;
Fig. 5 is a fragmentary end view of the brush element depicted in Fig. 1, except as it would appear in counter-clockwise rotation to show the relatlve deflection of the brush element and the bristles.
FigO 6 is an end view of some parts of one embodiment of a bristle holding means;
Fig. 7 is an end view of the parts of Fig. 6 after assembly;
Fig. 8 is an end view of the parts of a brush element in partial assembly; and Fig. g is an end view of the fully assembled brush element assembled from the parts shown in Fig. 8.

Detailed Description Referring now to Figs. 1 and 2 of the drawing, rotary bru6h 10 is shown having a cylindrical hub ll which has a slotted peripheral surface 12 to provide slots 13 through surface 12 for holding a plurality of brush elements 14 with one brush element 14 in each slot 13. Brush element 14 lncludes a brush 15 comprised of a plurality of resiliently flexible bristles 16 and a bristle holding means 17 for holding the bristles in a normal generally parallel outwardly projecting orientation relative to bristle holding means 17. Brush element 14 includes at the end opposite brush 15 an elongate anchoring means 20 adapted for engagement in one of slots 13. A resiliently flexible element 21 having a first end 22 fastened to anchoring means 20 and an opposite end 23 fa6tened to holding means 17 positions which holds holding means 17 in a radial rest position relative to the hub 11.
As shown in Fig. 5, the relative flexibility of bristles 15 and flexible element 21 permits flexible element 21 to deflect at the greater angle (A) from a rest position -5- ~2~3~

within A' than the angle ~8) of deflection of the bristles 16 of the brush 15 from a normal position B' as the hub 11 is rotated with bristles 16 (shown as a single bristle) in contact with a workpiece (not shown). This relative deflection substantially reduces bristle flexural fatigue.
Hub 11 is generally cylindrically shaped and adapted for rotation on a suitable arbor, not shown, and is made of a suitable material capable of withstanding the rotational forces and mechanical movement of brush elements 14 as rotary brush 10 is rotated under normal working conditions.
Suitable materials for forming hub 11 include any of various metals such as aluminum, iron and alloys of iron such as steel, brass, and the like, high modulus plastic materials 1~ such as nylon, and the like. The preferred material for making hub 11 is aluminum.
The dimensions of hub 11 will depend upon the particular application and may vary considerably~ The diameter of hub 11 typically is on the order of 5 to 30 centimeters. The length of hub 11 typically varies from 3 to 200 centimeters, although shorter and longer lengths are also contemplated.
The number of slots in peripheral surface will also vary, depending upon the diameter of the hub and upon the 2S size of the brush elements. With thicker brush elements and smallee diameter hubs, fewer brush elements are required while larger diameter hubs and thinner brush elements generally require the use of more brush elements. The number of brush elements should be sufficient to provide an adequate radial display of bristles for the particular application. Typically, the number of brush elements will be on the order of 12 for a 5 cm diameter hub to on the order of 60 for a 30 cm diameter hub. It is contemplated that not all of the slots need be fitted with brush elements. For example, alternate slots could be empty or they could contain other types of treating implements such as an element formed of low density abrasive products such as that available under the trade designation "Scotch Brite"
or they may be coated abrasive flaps or strips.

-6- 1~h3 13LI~
Additionally, while the typical deployment of slots is parallel to the axis of rotation, the deployment may be altered to obtain specific results. For example, the slots may be helical in nature as disclosed in aforementioned U.S.
Patent No. 4,285,171 or they may be angled with respect to the axis of rotation.
Slot 13 preferably is enlarged below peripheral surface 12 and open to at least one of the end surfaces of hub 11 so that an appropriately shaped anchoring element 20 (such as a metal rod) may be slipped in from the opening in the end ~urface to mechanically engage a loop of anchoring element 20 in hub 11 to prevent the loop from being dislodged from hub 11 as the abrasive wheel is rotated.
Alternatively, the enlarged portion of anchoring element 20 and re6iliently flexible element 21 may be molded a6 a unitary structure of a moldable material, e.g., nylon, or may be otherwise shaped into a unitary structure, e.g., by machining or by any other suitable means.
Other hub designs may also be useful and they need not have 610ts for attachment of the brush elements. For example, the hub disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,768,214 may be employed. This patent is incorporated herein by reference for lts teaching of the hub construction. It should be noted that, if such a hub is employed, a corresponding brush anchoring element also disclosed should be employed.
Resiliently flexible bristles 16 are preferably formed of polymeric material6 6uch a6 nylon which is preferably loaded with abrasive particles. Other materials may also be employed to form bristles 16, e.g., non-abrasive polymeric materials, abrasive or non-abrasive wires or the like. The abrasive particles which impregnate bristles 16 are preferably formed of silicon carbide or aluminum oxide although other known abrasive materials are also useful such as ceramic abrasive material (e.g., sold under the trade designation "Cubitron") and fused alumina-zirconia abrasive material such as that sold under the trade designation "NorZon". The fiber length preferably is at least 12 cm, -7- ~237~'~

but it may vary from about 2 cm t~ about 25 cm in lsngth.
Longer and shorter fiber lengths are also po~sible. The fiber diameter may also vary considerably but it typically is within the range of 0.5 to 1.5 mm.
Suitable abrasive fibers are readily commercially available. For example, the E. I. DuPont deNemours Company markets a nylon abrasive filament useful for this purpose under the trade designation "Tynex", such as Tynex A0376, 0378, and g376, filled with silicon carbide abras~ve, and Tynex A9336, filled with aluminum oxide abrasive. These fibers are commercially available in fiber diameters on the order of 18-60 mils (average diameter of about 0.5 to 1.5 mm) containing abrasive particles having a size of about 30 to 600 grade ~average particle size of about 20 to 600 micrometers) with a weight percent loading of abrasive on the order of 30-40%. The fibers are available on spools or in hanks in lengths of up to about 100 cm. Similar useful fibers are available from the Allied Fibers Company under the trade designation "Nybrad". Any of these fibers may be crimped.
The abrasive particle size which ~s loaded into the bristle 16 will vary in size, depending upon the diameter of the bristle 16, with smaller diameter particles being employed in smaller diameter filaments, but generally the abrasive grade size is in the range of about 30 to 600 grade. The loading of abrasive material in the fibers likewise may vary considerably, but it is preferably in the range of 10 to 20% by volume.
The fiber holding means is any convenient way to hold the bristles 16 in place in the proper orientation without undue bristle loss during rotation. Bristle holding means 17 may include a block of cured resin which holds a collection of previously deployed fibers. A preferred bristle holding means is provided as depicted in Figs. 6-9 by folding a plurality of filaments 32 at their midportion about a fiuitable element 30 and grasped between the opposed edges of a suitable metal channel 31 which is mechanically 2~3~
engaged over the folded end of the filaments to hold the same in place.
Fig. 4 discloses yet another method of holding the bristles 16 in place which employs spaced sheets 40 formed of any suitable material such as paper or cardboard having therebetween a bundle of filaments to provide a stack which is mechanically fastened by suitable means such as staples 41 and may be further reinforced by application of or immersion in a suitable curable resin.
Flexible element 21 can be provided by any of a variety of ways. For example, it may be a thin piece of plastic or metal which is sufficiently flexible yet somewhat rigid or it may be provided by a folded strip of metal or fabric 60 e.g., formed of nylon fibers, as depicted in Fig.
6-9. A particularly useful strip material is a polymer reinforced fabric made with nylon.
The angle (A) of deflection of resiliently flexible element 21 will typically vary from ~r in a rest position, to about 55, as the wheel is rotated with the bristles in contact with a workpiece. Similarly, the an~le (~) of deflection of the bristles 16 will typically vary from about 0 to about 15, with the bristles 16 in contact with the workpiece. Deflection will, of course, depend upon the degree of contact and the relative flexibility of each of the materlals but the angle (A) of deflection of the flexible element 21 will always exceed the angle ~B) of deflection of the bristles 16.
Examples The invention is further illustrated by the following examples wherein all parts are by weight, unless otherwise stated.
Example 1 A 20 brush, 20 inch (51 cm) outer diameter, 4 inch (10 cm) wide rotary brush wheel of the type depicted in Figure 1 was prepared. Although crimpinq of a folded collection of fibers within a metal channel can be achieved continuously with a series of crimping rolls, crimping of a 9 ~ ~ 2~ 73~

laid out series of fibers 10-12 fbers de~p was achieved in a table vise. The metal channel was formed of ASTM A366 18 gauge (0.046 inch, 1.2 mm) dead soft, cold rolled steel to provide a U-shaped cross section with a 1/2 inch (13 mm) base and 1/2 inch (13 mm) legs (approximate dimensions).
The fibers were 0.04 inch (1 mm) diameter abrasive-loaded crimped fibers containing 80 grade (average particle size of about 200 micrometers) Al2O3 abrasive granules, the fibers being commercially available as DuPont "Tynex" fibers.
Channel (31) was preformed in a sheet metal brake. ~ 31x32 basket weave, 7.4 oz./yd2 (251 g/m2), 17 mil (0.43 mm) thick nylon fabric which had been reinforced by saturating with about 21 grains per 4x6 lnch area (88 g/m2) and backsizing with about 30 grains per 4x6 inch area (125 g/m2) poly-urethane was folded, sewed to form loop (60), and adhesively bonded to the metal channel (as depicted in Figs. 7-9). The fiber loading was depressed into the metal channel using a core rod (30). Final crimping of the metal channel locked core rod (30) and the fiber mid portions inside the metal channel.
Example 2 A 15 brush, 9 inch ~23 cm) outer diameter, 2 inch ~5 cm) wide, rotary brush wheel having a 3 inch (7.6 cm) diameter hub of the type depicted in Fig. 4 wa8 prepared. A
collection of 2-1/2 inch (6.4 cm), 0.035 inch (0.89 mm) diameter uncrimped DuPont "Tynex" fibers (impregnated with 180 grade, about 80 micrometers in average particle cize, SiC abrasive grains) 10 to 12 fiber diameters deep was laid out to the desired length. One inch t2.5 cm~ of one end of the fiber collection was immersed in a 2-part curable thermosetting polyurethane resin to bond the fiber collection ends together. A second similarly prepared array of fibers was prepared and the two bundles were placed on either side of a reinforced nylon cloth of the type described in Example 1. Two exterior supportive panels of 20 mil (0.5 mm) thick fiber paper, commercially available as Vulcanized Fibre from NV~ Company, surrounded the two bundle6 and hinge end. The total composite a~sembly wa~
permanently combined by a series of metal staples. Other means of fastening that could have been employed include stitching, rivets, or similar devices.
Control Example A commercially available BrushlonTM 9 inch (23 cm) diameter brush band 2 inches (5 cm) wide with a 1 1/2 inch (3.8 cm) fiber trim length of 0.035 inch (0.89 mm) "Tynex"
fibers adhered thereon by polyurethane resin was held between flanges to provide a cylinder brush wheel.
Evaluation The brush of Example 1 was run continuously for 300 hours on a laboratory tester at 2~0 rpm in a 3/4 inch (about 19 mm) interference contact with a metal workpiece, with no bristle loss and no evidence of fiber fatigue. A control brush of similar size employing the method of attaching the brush element depicted in Fig. 3 run under the same conditions also had no fiber loss but exhibited fiber movement in use which would result in fiber fatigue and failure if the brush would have been run for a longer period of time.
The brush of Example 2 was run continuously for 12 hours on a laboratory tester at 1800 rpm in a 1/4 inch (about 6 mm) interference contact with a metal workpiece with no bristle los~ and no evidence of fiber fatigue. The brush o~ the Control Example was run on the same equipment under equivalent conditions but before 12 hours usage it had lo~t all of its bristles with failure by breakage at the fiber base near the point of attachment.
While the principle6 of the invention have been made clear in illustrative embodiments, there will be immediately obvious to those skilled in the art many modifications of structure, arrangement, proportions, the elements, materials, and components u~ed in the practice of the invention, and otherwise, whlch are particularly adapted for specific environments and operative requirements without departing ~rom those principles. The appended claims are 3 ~

intended to cover and embrace any and all such modifications, within the limits only of the true spirit and scope of the invention.
s

Claims

1. A rotary brush comprising:
(a) a hub having a plurality of circumferentially spaced brush fastening means; and (b) a plurality of removable brush elements, each of said brush elements comprising:
(i) a brush comprising a plurality of resiliently flexible bristles and bristle holding means for holding said bristles in normal generally parallel outwardly projecting orientation relative to said bristle holding means;
(ii) an elongate anchoring means mechanically engaged with one of said brush fastening means; and (iii) a resiliently flexible element having a first end fastened to said anchoring means and an opposite end fastened to said holding means to position said holding means in a rest position relative to said hub, the relative flexibility of said bristles and said flexible element permitting said flexible element to deflect at a greater angle from said rest position than the angle of deflection of the bristles of said brush from said normal position when said hub is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece, wherein the angle of deflection of said resiliently flexible element varies from 0° in a rest position to about 55° as said rotary brush is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece and the angle of deflection of said bristles varies from 0° in said normal orientation to about 15°
when said rotary brush is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece whereby bristle loss due to flexural fatigue failure is greatly reduced.

2. The rotary brush of claim 1 wherein the bristle holding means is provided by clamping bristles folded at their midpoints over an elongate element between the sides of a channel shaped ring over the folded part of the bristles.

3. The rotary brush of claim 1 wherein the bristle holding means is provided by stacking rows of bristles between peripheral supports and stapling the stack together.

4. The rotary brush of claim 1 wherein said bristles comprise abrasive filled polymer.

5. The rotary brush of claim 1 wherein said resiliently flexible element is provided by a flexible, fatigue-resistant reinforced fabric or a polymeric strip.

6. A removable brush element for installation on a rotary hub, said brush comprising:
(a) a brush comprising a plurality of resiliently flexible bristles and bristle holding means for holding said bristles in normal generally parallel outwardly projecting orientation relative to said bristle holding means;
(b) an elongate anchoring means mechanically engagable with a brush fastening means on said hub; and (c) a resiliently flexible element having a first end fastened to said anchoring means and an opposite end fastened to said holding means to position said holding means in a rest position relative to said hub, the relative flexibility of said bristles and said flexible element permitting said flexible element to deflect at a greater angle from said rest position than the angle of deflection of the bristles of said brush from said normal position when said hub is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece, wherein the angle of deflection of said resiliently flexible element varies from 0° in a rest position to about 55° as said rotary brush is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece and the angle of deflection of said bristles varies from 0° in said normal orientation to about 15°
when said rotary brush is rotated with said bristles in contact with a workpiece whereby bristle loss due to flexural fatigue failure is greatly reduced.

7. The rotary brush element of claim 6 wherein the bristle holding means is provided by clamping bristles folded at their midpoints over an elongate element between the sides of a channel shaped ring over the folded part of the bristles.

8. The rotary brush element of claim 6 wherein the bristle holding means is provided by stacking rows of bristles between peripheral supports and stapling the stack together.

9. The rotary brush element of claim 6 wherein said bristles comprise abrasive filled polymer.

10. The rotary brush of claim 6 wherein said resiliently flexible element is provided by a flexible fatigue-resistant reinforced fabric or a polymeric strip.