CA1315062C - Multilayer film containing very low density polyethylene - Google Patents

Abstract

ABSTRACT

A coextruded, heat shrinkable, thermo-plastic multilayer film for packaging fresh red meat cuts and processed meats. The film comprises a first layer comprising very low density polyethylene, a first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, and a second layer comprising very low density polyethylene. In another embodiment the first layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer and a first outer layer comprising a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer or copolymer. In a further embodiment the second layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer and a second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic polymer or copolymer.

Description

MULTILAYER FILM CONTAINING
VERY LOW DENSITY POLYETHYLENE

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a coextruded, heat shrinkable, thermoplastic multilayer film suitable for use in the manufacture of bags for packaging fresh red meats and processed meats. In particular, this invention relates to a coextruded heat shrinkable multilayer film having a first outer layer of very low density polyethylene, a core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, and a second outer layer of very low density polyethylene.

BACXGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The Meat Packing Industry may be commonly divided into three segments. They are ~resh meats, ~rozen meats and processed meats. This invention relates to fresh red meats, such as beef and pork, which is distinct from fresh white meat, such as poultry. This invention also relates to processed meats.

' ' " ~

In the Fresh Red Meat Industry, the cattle and swine are slaughtered and broken down into primal and subprimal meat cuts. The primal and subprimal meat cuts are large cuts of meat. They are smaller than a side of beef, for example, but larger than the ultimate cut which is sold at retail to the consumer. A primal cut comprises the entire section of a side of beef, such as the rib section or the rum~ roast section, while a subprimal cut comprises only a portion of such a section. Primal and subprimal cuts are prepared at the slaughter house and are then shipped to a retail meat store, or to an institution such as a hospital, hotel or restaurant, where they are butchered into small cuts of meat suitable for the individual consumer.
The Processed Meat Industry takes various portions of the animal carcasses and processes these portions under varying conditions to produce ~inished meat products which may be used directly by the consumer. Products may include ham, smoked picnics, smoked butts, corned beef, turkey breast, and various sausage products such as frankfurters, smoked sausage links, bologna, salami, and the like. These products may be packaged in consumer portions or they may be packaged in bulk for shipment to a retail meat store, restaurant or hotel~ Bulk shipments may include such items as ham chunks, cooked turkey breasts, bologna chubs, long bologna for delicatessen sale, rings of bologna, corned bee~ brisket, smoked picnics, smoked butts and linked products such a~ smoked sausage.
When fresh red meat cuts, such as roast or cib sections, and bulk processed meats are prepared :

-` 1 31 5n6~

for shipment or storage, they are usually packaged in such a way that air ti.e., oxygen) is prevented from contacting the meat and moisture is preven~ed from leaving the meat. This is done in order to minimize spoilage and discoloration during shipping and handling. One desirable way to package fresh red meats and processed meats so as to protect them fcom contact with air and from moisture loss is to shrin~ package them with a packaging material that has good oxygen and moisture vapor barrier properties. One such shrink packaging material that has good oxygen and moisture vapor barrier properties is polyvinylidene chloride film.
Vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymers are commonly referred to as PVDC.
While vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer film has excellent barrier properties, in actual practice, when PVDC is used as a monolayer film, it must be plasticized in order for the film to have adequate abrasion resistance and flexibility at storage temperatures of, for examele, 30 to 50F. Unfortunately, the addition of plasticizer sufficient to provide the requisite low temperature properties to the PVDC monolayer film has a significant adverse effect on the barrier properties of the film. While increasing the thickness of the film from the conventional thickness of 1.5 to 2.0 mils, to 5 mils or more, for instance, would improve the bacrier properties of the film, it would be economically undesirable to use a monolayer film of PVDC having a thickness of 5 or more mils. Also, if such thick films were employed, bag~ made from the ~ t 31 5n62 film would be difficult to gather and clip closed at the open end.
One approach to the provision o~ a f.ilm having barrier pro~erties which are better than those of the 1.5 to 2.0 mil monolayer PVDC f ilm previous~y used for shrink packaging meat, is to emeloy a multilayer f ilm, one layer of which is vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer having a minimum amount of plasticizer. The other layer or layers of such multilayer films are selected so as to provide the requisite low temperature properties and abrasion resistance which ~re lacking in the vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride layer containing little or no plasticizer.
In providing such a film, however, it must be recognized that good oxygen and moisture vapor barrier proeerties, abrasion resistance, and low temperature propertie~ are not the only requirements for a film that is to be used for shrink packaging erocessed meats and erimal and subprimal meat cuts.
The film mu~t have been biaxially stretched in order to produce shrinkage characteristics sufficient for the ~ilm to heat-shrink within a specified range of percentages, e.g., from about 15 to 60 percent at about 90C, in both the machine and the tran6verse directions. tConventionally, the term "MD" refers to machine direction and the term "TD" refers to transverse direction.) The film must be heat sealable in order to be able to fabricate bags from the film and in order to heat seal the oeen ends of the fabricated bags after insertion of the meat product. The heat sealed seams of the bags must not pull apart during the heat shrinking operation, and ., .

, I

.. . ..
. . . .

. ~ .
, `` t31 506~

the film must resist puncturing by shar~ bone edges during the heat shrinking oeeration.
Also, there must be adequate adhesion between the several layers of the film so that delamination does not occur, either during the heat shrinking operation or during exposure of the film to the relatively high temperatures that may be reached during shipping and storage of the film in the summertime. Delamination is the phenomenon where layers of the multilayer film are readily separable or easily pulled apart from face to face integrity with no tearing of t~e individual layers of film.
In order to overcome problems of delamination, it is known in the prior art to use adhesive layers between layers which do not otherwise adhere to each other with the required bonding strength under normal conditions of commercial use. For example, polyethylene and polypro~ylene are known to have poor lamination characteristics when in face to face relationship with the oxygen barrier layers conventionally used in bags o~ multilayer films used for packaging primal or subprimal meat cuts o~ fresh red meat, and in bags for packaging processed msats. Adhesive layers are often used in compensation for such poor lamination characteristics.
By way of illustrating multilayer film containing adhesive layers, Shirmer U.S. Patent No.
4,448,792 teaches a cook-in shrink bag fabricated from a multilayer film having a first heat sealing and food contacting layer composed of propylene homopolymer or copolymer; a second heat shrinkable , .
.1 layer comeosed of a blend of pcoeylene homopolymer or copolyme~ and butylene homopolymer or co~olymer:
a third adhesive layer comeosed of irradiatively cross-linkable ethylene co~olymer: a fourth oxygen barrier layer comerising vinylidene chloride copolymer; a fifth adhesive layer of irradiatively cross-linkable .ethylene copolymer: and a sixth optical clarity layer comerising propylene homopolymer or copolymer; wherein the entire six layer film has been irradiated either before or after the multilayer film has been biaxially stretched. Among the several keY benefits enumerated by Schirmer, the completely irradiated six layer film provides bags having structural integrity in that the bags resist delamination and their heat seals have high temperature resistance, while at the same time the bags are acceptable for food contact in terms of minimum levels of extractables. Cook-in bags made of this multilayer film will maintain seal integrity and will resist delamination when submerged in water at 80C for 12 hours.
While the use o~ adhesive layers, as taught in such prior art, is effective in avoiding problems of delamination, it i5 an undesirable solution.
~irst of all, additional equipment is required, and the process becomes more complex with the need for new extruders and extrusion dies. Additionally, the addition of adhesive layers will generally make the film thicker. The production of a thicker film may be avoided, however, by ~educing the thickness of the other film layers or by controlling the thickness of the adhesive layers so that they are ,' .

D-ZOOZO

.,, . .. .
, ' ' . -., ~ ' ' '-'" '. ' .: , , : . , `-" ` 1 31 5062 very thin. Since the oxygen barrier layer thickness may not be reduced without the los6 of barrier effectiveness, it becomes necessary to only reduce the thickness of the outer layers, and this can cause a reduction in heat sealability and/or a reduction in puncture resistance. Thus, it is ereferred not to reduce the thickness of the outer film layers, but to control the adhesive layers to a minimum thickness which is effective in bonding the layers sufficiently to avoid delamination problems.
This in turn requires sophisticated equipment, which is expensive, since the equipment must control the adhesive layer thickness generally to a range of from about 0.10 to about 0.15 mil. Moreover, the adhesives themselves are generally very expensive, and the cost of adhesive plus the cost of the new equipment generally cause~ an increase in the price of the bags produced from the multilayer film.
Thus, it is preferred to find a means for strongly bonding the other layers directly to the oxygen barrier layer without the use of prior art adhesive layers.
It should be noted that the aforementioned Shirmer U.S. Patent No. 4,448,792 teaches that both polypropylene and blends of proQylene with another polymer cegui~e an adhesive layer in order to bond these layers acceptably to the oxygen barrier layer of vinylidene chloride copolymer. ~owever, the prior art also teaches such a need for adhesive layers in regard to polyethylene.
Illustrative of a polyethylene, unblended with any other polymer, which requires an adhesive ~;
, ' D-20020 - :

: . . : ' , --`` 1315062 layer in order to acceptably bond to the oxygen barriar layer is U.S. Patent No. 4,640,856 to Ferguson et.al. This patent discloses bags for the packaging of fresh red meat (primal and subp~imal meat cuts), cheeses, eoultry and othe~ food and non-food products, wherein the bag is fabricated from a multilayer thermoplastic shrink film having a substrate layer of a very low density polyethylene which has been extrusion coated with at least a gas barrier layer comprising a copolymer of vinylidene chloride or a hydrolized ethylene vinyl acetate copolymec. This two layer film~ is then extrusion coated with another layer of a thermoplastic polymer to form at least a three laye! film having a core layer of the gas barrier layer. Ferguson e~.al.
teach that an ethylene vinyl acetate layer should be interposed between the surface layer of very low density polyethylene and the gas barrier core layer of vinylidene chloride coæolymer to promote adhesion between the layers and to lessen any tendency of the film to delaminate, since very low density poly-ethylene does not adhere to vinylidene chloride coeolymers as well as the ethylene vinyl acetate does. Additionally, thi~ patent teaches that for maximum delamination protection adhesive layers should be used to bond outer layers of very low density polyethylene to core layers of barrier film, both when the oxygen barrier layer is a copolymer of vinylidene chloride and when it is a hydrolyzed ethylene vinyl acetate.
Illustrative of a polyethylene blended with another polymer in one layer of a multilayer film, wherein an adhesive layer is required in order to ., , ,, .~ ~, , ` ' , . . .:

~`` l3lsn6~
_9_ acceptably bond the blend layer to ~he oxygen barrier layer. is U.S. 4,456,646 to Nishimoto et.al. This pasent teaches that a multilayer film for the packaging of meats and cheeses may be fabricated of a core layer of a vinylidene chloride copolymer with outer layers of a blend of ethylene vinyl acetate and a linear low densi~y polyethylene having a density of from 0.900 to 0.950 grams per cubic centimeter. Nishimoto et.al. teach that the linear low density polyethylene, which is a copolymer of ethylene with a~ alpha olefin having less than 18 carbon atoms, will not adhere to the core layer of vinylidene chloride copolymer so that the outer layers are apt to delaminate from the core layers, pa~ticularly in an elevated temperature environment. Acco~dingly, Nishimoto et.al. teach that it is necessary to provide an adhesive layer between the core layer of barrier film and each outer layer containing the blend of ethylene vinyl acetate and linear low density polyethylene.
We have found that not only are the multilayer film structures of Perguson et.al. U.S.
Patent No. 4,640,856 undesirable from the standpoint of the adhesive layer requirements, but in fact, contrary to the teachings of Ferguson et.al., we have discovered that a first outer layer of very low density polyethylene will bond directly to a core layer of oxygen bar~ier film comp~ising a vinylidene chloride copolymer without the use of any adhesive layer interposed the~ebetween, if the multilayer film is a coextruded film. This matter will be discussed more fully hereinafter.

.

1 ~ 1 5()62 We have also found that not only are the polyethylene blends of Nishimoto et.al. U.S. Patent No. 4,456.646 undesira~le from the stand~oint of the adhesive layer ~equirement, but they are also undesirable because they cause the optical pro~erties of the film to be unacceptably degraded.
Such polysthylene blends cause the haze value for the multilayer film to increase to an unacceptable level, and they cause the gloss value for the multilayer f ilm to decrease to an unacceptable level.
The haze value is imeortant because it is an indication of the ability of the film to transmit light. A low haze value indicates a very clear film which enables one to clearly see the contents of the package. We find that the haze value must not exceed 6.5% when packaging fresh red meat cuts and proce6sed meats. This value is particularly important in regard to the eackaging of processed meats, since it is the individual consumer who is viewing the package and deciding whether or not to ~ake a purcha~e.
The gloss value is important because it is a measure of the shiny a~pearance of the film. A
high gloss value indicates that the packaged meat product will have a very shiny highly attractive appearance. We ~ind that the glo6s value should not be below 70~ when packaging fresh red meat cuts and processed meats. This value is pa ticularly important in regard to the packaging of processed meats, since it is the individual consumer who is viewing the package at the point of purchase.
, ~ D-20020 :' . .... .. .. . . .

` 1 31 5062 Another important consideration in evaluating multilayer films is the type and degree of film curl which the film exhibits. Film curl is an indication of the ease or the difficulty which is experienced in opening a bag which has been fabricated from the multilayer film. In order for a multilayer film to be commercially acceptable. the film must be capable of producing bags which are easily opened by the bagging opeeator who place6 the meat product into the bag on the production line of the meat packing plant. 3ags which are difficult to open cause delays in the baggi~g operation and reeult in low production efficiency. The significance of film curl will be discussed more fully hereinafter.
In s~y thRn, it is an object of an a~t of the present invention to provide a multilayer film containing a core layer of an oxygen barrier and outer layers of polyethylene, wherein the outer layers are bonded directly to the core layer with no adhe~ive layer~ interpo~ed therebetween.
It ie an ob~ect of an a~t of the p~nt invention to provide such multilayer films, wherein the haze and gloss properties of the multilayer film are acceptable under conditions of commercial use.
It is an object of an aq~t of the present invention to provide such multilayer films, wherein the film~ are capable of fabrication into bags which ace ea~ily oeenable under conditions of commercial use, as indicated by the curl pro~erties of such multilayer film~.

A ~

It is an object of an aq~ of the present invention to provide such multilayer films, wherein no adhesive layers are employed tO bond the outer layers to the core layer, and wherein the outer layers provide imeroved strength characteristics and improved puncture resi~tance to the film SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The for-going ob3ectives of the present invention may be achieved by providing a coextruded, thermopla~tic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film wherein, (a) said multilayer film comerises a ~irst layer comprising very low density polyethylene, a core layer comprising vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, and a second layer compSising vory low density polyethylene; and wherein, (b) said fir~t lay-r is adhered directly to one side of said core lay~r and said second layer i~ adhered directly to th- oth-r ~id- of said cor- layer In on- pr-ferred emboai~ent, the present invention ~rovide~ this ~ultilayer film whorein the first and ~-cond layers of very low density polyethylen- are outer layers, and the core layer is aonfin-d between these outer layers to provide a thr-e layer fil~
In~another preferred embodiment, the core layer o~ vinylidene chlorid--m-thyl acrylate is a first cor- lay-r, and either the first layer or the econd layer of very low density polyethylene is a "i" ' ' ' ~ ' ~ ' ' , , . .
~ ~ .

.. . .
. ~ . .
.. . .

:: : ' '. ' ' .

-~ 1315062 second core layer confined between the first core layer and an outer layer of thermoplastic polymer or copolymer to provide a multilayer film having four or more layers.
- In a further preferred embodiment, both the first layer and the second layer of very low density polyethylene are core layers confined between the core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and two outer layers of thermoplastic polymer or copolymer to provide a multilayer f ilm having five or more layers.
Despite the foregoing~teachings of the prior art, we have now discovered that multilayer films having a core layer of an oxygen barrier of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer may contain layers of very low density polyethylene which are bonded directly to the core layer without the use of interposed adhesive layers. Further, we have discovered that the multilayer films of this invention will not have increased haze or diminished gloss i~ comparison to p~ior art multilayer films currently in commercial use. Additionally, we have found that the multilayer films of this invention have acceptable film curl, and that they have improved tensile strength and improved puncture resistance.
The multilayer films of the present invention may be further characterized by the fact that the first layer of very low density polyethylene and the second layer of very low density polyethylene will bond directly to the two sides of the core layer of vinylidene chloride-~''' '' .

methyl acrylate copolymer even though said first layer and said second layer both have substantial freedom from cross-linking bonds. However, it is also within the scope of the present invention for said first layer and said second layer to comprise very low density polyethylene which contains cross-linking bonds.
Other aspects of this invention are as follows:
A coextruded, thermoplastic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film wherein:
~a) said multilayer film comprises a first layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter, a core layer comprising vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer having a vinylidene chloride content of from about 85 to about 95 weight percent and a methyl acrylate content of from about 5 to about 15 weight percent all based on the weight of said copolymer, and a second layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter; and, (b) said first layer is adhered directly to one side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and said second layer is adhered directly to the other side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween.
A coextruded, thermoplastic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film wherein:
(a) said multilayer film comprising a first layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter, a core layer comprising vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer having a vinylidene chloride content of from about 85 to about 95 weight percent and a methyl acrylate content of from about 5 to about 15 weight percent all based on the weight of said copolymer, and a ~.1 .

:

`` 1 31 5062 14a second layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter;
(b) said first layer is adhered directly to one side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and said second layer is adhered directly to the other side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween; and (c) said first layer and said second layer have substantial freedom from cross-linking bonds.
A process of producing a thermoplastic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film suitable for use in packaging fresh red meats and processed meats, which comprises coextruding a core layer comprising a vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer having a vinylidene chloride content of from about 85 to about 95 weight percent and a methyl acrylate content of from about 5 to about 15 weight percent all based on the weight of said copolymer, a first layer adhered directly to one side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter, and a second layer adhered directly to the other side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
All embodiments of the present invention comprise a coextruded multilayer film, suitable for use in packaging fresh red meat cuts and processed meats, which comprises a core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, a first layer comprising very low density polyethylene, and a second layer comprising very low density polyethylene, wherein the first layer and . ".,; ^-..,,.... ,~.... .

.

14bthe second layer are bonded directly to the first and second surfaces of the core layer without the use of adhesive layers.
It must be emphasized at this point that our invention is directed to coextruded multilayer films, because we have discovered that high adhesion bonding of very low density polyethylene directly to the core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, without the use of interposed adhesive layers, can be achieved through coextrusion. This is because the coextruded multilayer film is produced by joining the several layers together while all layers are in the li~uid . - .
., ~5l315062 phase. This allows the various polyme~s at the layer-to-layer interface of liquid to intermingle slightly so ~hat when the liquids solidify, the layers ale strongly bonded to each other.
This explains why U.S. 4,640,856 to Ferguson et.al. teaches that adhesive layers are ~equired in order to bond very low density polyethylene to the vinylidene chloride copolymer.
The experimental runs which produce the multilayer film samples for the Examples iA this Patent, wherein the oxygen barrier layer was a copolymer of vinylidene chloride, were all produced by the extrusion coating process which is exemplified by U.S. Patent Ns. 3,741,253 to Brax et.al. In this extrusion coating ~rocess, a substrate layer is first extruded to provide a tubular film which will become the inner layer of the tubular multilayer film. After this base layer has been made, a melt of the oxygen barrier layer comprising the copolymer of vinylidene chloLide is extrusion coated on the outer surface o~ the tubular film. After this extrusion coating has solidified to provide a two layer substrate tubular film, a third layer of a melted polymer or copolymer is coated on the outer surface of the two layer tubular film to provide a three layer tubular film. Succeedinq layers of other polymers or copolymers may be extruded on this three layer tubular film to the extent that tubular multilayer films containing more than three layers are desired. It is due to the fact that the succeeding polymer melts are coated upon a solid film substrate in each instance, that causes the . ~ . ~, . . .

.

, . :

`-~. 1 31 5062 succeeding layers to have very poor bonding when very low density polyethylene and vinylidene chloride copolyme~s are extrusion coated to one another. The polymer melt is unable tO penetrate the solid surface of the film subst{ate sufficiently to allow the two layers to slightly intermingle at the layer-to-layer inte~face and thereby produce a strong interface bonding when the melted coating solidifies.
In all embodiments of the present invention, the core layer of oxygen barrier film comprises vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer. The vinylidene chloride content of the copolymer preferably should not exceed about 95 weight percent. This is because, when the vinylidene chloride content is greater ~han about 95 weight percent, the vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer is generally not extrudable in presently known coextrusion systems. However, the vinylidene chloride content p~eferably should not be less than about 85 weight percent of the vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer in order to maintain the level of methyl acrylate in the copolyme~ at not greater than 15 weight pe~cent, which is the maximum level of methyl acrylate cur~ently allowed by the United States Food and Drug ~dministration for ~ood contact applications.
It is within the scope of the p~esent invention for the core layer of oxygen barrier film to comprise vinylidene chloride- methyl acrylate copolymer. It is also within the scope of the p~esent invention for the oxygen '~' , . .

1 31 50h2 -~7-barrier co~e layer tO contain vinylidene chloride-metnyl acrylate copolymer blended with another oxygen barrier material, such as vinylidene chloride-vinyl chlocide copolymer. It should be noted, however, that multilayer films containing blends of ~inylidene chloride-methyl acrylate coeolymer with vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer, and having adjacent layers of thermo-plastic polymers in general, are not a part of this invention, but are a separate invention which is claimed in oqY~xjnq Canadian application Serial No.
567,067 filed May 18, 1988 in the name of J.M. Schuetz.

The vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer, which may be blended with the vinylidene chlocide-methyl acrylate coeolymer, will contain at least about 65 weiqht percent, and not more than about 95 weight percent, of polymerized vinylidene chloride because, when the vinylidene chloride content is less than about 65 weight percent, the oxygen and moisture barriec property of the copolymer is diminished. If che vinylidene chloride content is more than 95 weight percent, the vinylitene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer is generally not extcudable.
The vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate coeoly~er and the vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer each will preferably contain less than 5 weight percent of a plasticizer. the percentages being based on the weight of the total blend, i.e., including the copolymer and all additives such as the plasticizer. in order to maxi~ize the barrier .
, .

~ropertie6 of the film~ Conventional plasticizers such as dibutyl sebacate and eeoxidized soybean oil may be employed therein.
All embodiments of the present invention COntaiQ a ~irst layer comprising very low density eolyethylene and a second layer comecising very low density eolyethylene. Those skilled in the art recogni2e that this is a specific species of polyethylene. Several species of polyethylene are commercially available, and these species may be characte~ized as the product of a high pressure catalytic pcocess or the product of a low pressure catalytic process.
The high pressure process produces eolymers which are highly branched, with higher densities being an indication of shorter branches and~high cry~tallinity. Such polymers are conventionally classiried as low den~ity polyethylene, commonly called l~LDpel~ which has a~density below about 0.925 g~ams per CUbiC centimeter, and high density polyethylene, commonly called "HDPE", which has a density greater than about 0.940 gram~ per cubic centimeter. Polyethylenes having a den~ity in the range o~ ~rom about 0.925 to about 0.940 grams per cubic centimeter ac- commonly reterred to as medium density polyethylene.
The ethylene may also bs polymerized in the high pressure process with other monomers, such as vinyl acetate, ethyl acrylate, or acrylic acid. The copolymer with vinyl ac-tate is known as ethylene vinyl acetate and it is commonly referred to as A` ' ~ ~ . , "EVA".
~,~"

~ D-20020 :' ' ~ ~ : ' ' ' - - :
, , : , :

The low pressure process produces polymers which are more linear in structu~e. Such polymers are commonly classified as very low density polyethylene, commonly called "VLDPE", which has a density of from about 0.860 to about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter, and linear low density poly-ethylene, commonly called ~LLDPE~, which has a density greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.
Very low density polyethylene and linear low density eolyethylene are copolymers of ethylene with a higher alpha olefin. The higher alpha olefins which can be poly~e~ized with ethylene to produce the low modulus linear copolymers can contain from three to eight carbon atoms. These alpha olefins should not contain any branching on any of their carbon atoms closer than two carbon atoms removed from the double bond. Suitable alpha olefins include p~opylene, butene-l, pentene-l, hexene-l, 4-methylpentene-1, heptene-l and octene-l. The preferred alpha olefins are ropylene, butene-l, hexene-l, 4-methylpentene-1 and octene-l.
In some instances, one or more dienes, either conjugated or non-conjugated, may have been present in the polymerization reaction mixture.
Such dienes may include, for example, butadiene, 1,4-hexadiene, 1,5-hexadiene, vinyl norbornene, ethylidene norbornene and dicyclopentadiene.
The linear polyethylene produced by this low pressure ca~alytic copolymerization, typically has a melt index of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 .. , ~ . ': ~ ' .
:

"` 13t5062 decigrams per minute. When the melt index i9 below 0.5 decigrams per minute, the film is difficult to extrude, and resins having a melt index above 2.5 decigrams per minute are not film grade resins.
~ s previously noted hereinabove, those copolymers having a density in the range of f~om about 0.86 to about 0.9~5 grams per cubic centimeter are commonly referred to as a very low density polyethylene, while those having a density greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter are commonly referred to as linear low density polyethylene. ~
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the first layer of very low density polyethylene, which is bonded directly to the oxygen barrier core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, provides the heat sealing layer for the multilayer film. Where the film is produced by coextrusion to provide a tubular multilayer film, the first layer of very low density polyethylene will be the inner layer of ~he tubular film.
In another preferred embodiment of the pre~ent invention, the second layer of very low density polyethylene, which is bonded directly to the core layer Or vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer without the use of adhesives, provides the second outer layer of a three laye~
~ilm embodiment. It has been found that using a very low density eolyethylene in the second outer layer of the multilayer film provides the film with a puncture ~esistance which i9 improved over similar films containing outer layers o~ ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, and it also provides loading and ,:
. ~: ,,,, : , :

' shrink tunnel survival rates which are at least equal to, if not su~e~io~ to, the survival rates of those films which contain ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer outer laye~s.
In an alte~na~e embodiment of the present invention, however, the first layer of very low density polyethylene, which is bonded directly to the oxygen barrier core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer, provides a second core layer which is confined between the first core layer of oxygen barrier film and a first outer layer of a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer or copolymer. The heat sealable first outer layer may comprise such films as an ionomeL, an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, and the like. Also suitable is polypropylene blended with another polymer, such as polybutene-l. Thus, this embodiment contemplates a multilayer film having four layers, although more than rOur layers are also possible.
In another alternate embodiment of the present invention, the second layer of very low den~ity polyethylene, which is bonded directly to the oxygen barrier first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer without the use o~ adhesives, provides a second cora layer which is confined between the first core layer and a second outer layer which comprises a thermoplastic polymer or copolymer. Thus, this embodiment of the present invention also contemplates another multilayer film having four layers, although multilayer films having more than rOur layers are also possible.
,~
D-ZOOZO

.

~ 1315062 The addition of this fourth layer as a second outer layer for the multilayer film of this invention may be undertaken when it is desired to improve the abrasion resistance of the film. This can be accomplished by providing a second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic polymer or copolymer such as an ionomer resin, a propylene-ethylene copolymer, a high density polyethylene, a linear low density polyethylene, and the like, as well as blends thereof.
In one preferred embodiment, the second outer layer (the fourth layer)~comprises a blend of a high density polyethylene with a linear low density polyethylene or a very low density polyethylene. ~8 the level of high density polyethylene in the blend of the second outer layer is increased, the abrasion resistance of the film continues to increase. However, when the level of high density polyethylene in the second outer layer blend becomes greateL than about 5 weight percent, the haze value of the film becomes unacceptable for bags used in the packaging of processed meats.
Additionally, when the level of high density polyethylene is increased to greater than 30 weight percent of the second outer layer blend, the shrinkage property of the film becomes unacceptable for bags used in the packaging of fresh red meats and eeocessed meats. Thus, the amount of high density polyethylene in the blend should not exceed 30 weight percent in fresh red meat bags or 5 weight percent in proce~sed meat bags. The high density polyethylene useful in the ~econd outer layer has a melt index of from about 0.1 to about 1.0 decigram ., -`~ 1 31 506~

per minute, and a density of from about 0.94 to about 0.96 gram per cubic centimeter. Resins having a melt index below 0.1 are not extrudable, and those having a melt index above 1.0 produce films of diminished strength.
In summary then, the broadest aspect of the multilayer film of this invention contemplates a three layer film. However, it is contemplated that one or more layers may be added to the outer surface of either the first layer or the second layer of very low density polyethylene to erovide a multilayer film containing fou~ or more layers.
Moreover, it is also contemplated that one or more layers may be added to the outer surface of both the first layer and the second layer of very low density polyethylene to provide a multilayer film containing five or more layers.
The coextruded thermoplastic multilayer films of this invention can be produced by known techniques. For example, the multilayer films may be prepared by coextruding the film layers through an annular die to produce a primary tube, and then biaxially stretching the multilayer tubular film in accordance with the conventional "double-bubble~' technique disclosed in Pahlke U.S. Patent No.

3,456,044. ~lternatiYely, the coextruded multilayer film ~ay be slot cast and biaxially stretched by tentering before the resulting sheet is fabricated into bags.
When the coextruded, multilayer film of the present invention has been produced, it may be desirable to cross-link the multilayer film, although cross-linking is not required in order to ; ,............. .
.

' ~` 1 3 1 5062 achieve high adhesion bonding of the very low density polyethylene directly to the vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate core layer without the use of adhesive layers thereinbetween. Cross-linking may be undertaken in order to enhance the heat sealing characteristics of the first outer layer of very low den~ity eolyethylene, which is the inner layer of the tubular film embodiments. Cross-linking may also be undertaken in order to improve the puncture resistance of the multilayer film~
While chemical cross-linkinq is feasible, we prefer to crôss-link by irradiation. ,Chemical cross-linking may be achieved by means such as organic peroxide cross-linking, or by the addition of a silane to the very low density polyethylene and the subsequent reaction of the modified polyethylene with a silanol condensation catalyst and water. We prefer to cross-link by irradiation, since this technique is less complicated and it entails a lower cost than the chemical cross-linking methods.
Although the irradiation may be undertaken prior to the biaxial stretching step, we prefer to irradiate the multilayer film after biaxially stretching the film. The film is preferably irradiated with electrons at a dosage of from about 1 to about S
mega~ads, and more preferably at a dosage of f~om about 2 to about 3 megarads.
In summary then, the multilayer films of the pcesent invention may be characterized by the fact that the first layer of very low density polyethylene and the second layer of very low density polyethylene will bond directly to the two sides of the first core layer of vinylidene .
.

, ~

,~:

. .

~-` 13t5062 chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer even though said first layer and said second layer both have substantial freedom from cross-linking bonds.
However, it is also within the scope of the present invention for said first layer and said second layer to comprise verg low density polyethylene which contains cross-linking bonds. Those skilled in the art recognize that cross- linking, whether by irradiation or by chemical means, will cause the melt index o~ the cross-linked VLDPE layers to be below the melt index of the original VLDPE resins which are used respectively in~-the first layer of VLDPE and in the second layer of VLDPE. Thus, the term "contains cross-linking bondsl' means that the melt index of the VLDPE layers is significantly lowered during the pcocess of converting the respective resins of the two VLDPE layers into the multiIayer film products of this invention.
Similarly, the term "having substantial freedom from cross-linking bonds" means that the melt index of the VLDPR layers is not significantly lowered during the process of converting the respective resins of the two VLDPR layers into the multilayer film products of this invention.
In one ere~erred embodiment of the present invention, the coextruded multilayer film comprises a biaxially stretched thermoplastic three layer film hav~ing a total thickness of from about 1.75 mils to about 4.5 mils, and preferably from about 2.0 mils to about 3.0 mils. Films of less than about 1.75 mils thickness will generally not have the necessary puncture resistance, and films of greater than about 4.5 mils will produce bags which will be somewhat ...~ :........
. - :

. ' : ~
' ;

difficult to gather and clip closed or they may be difficult to heat seal closed at efficient speeds on heat sealing vacuum packaging machines. The heat sealing ficst outer layer of ve~y low density poly-ethylene will pceferably have a thickness of fcom about 1.~ mils to about 1.8 mils; the core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl accylate copolymer will preferably have a thickness of from about 0.25 mil to about 0.45 mil; and the second outer layer of very low density polyethylene will have a thickness of from about 0.35 mil to about 2.0 mils, but eceferablY from about 0.5 mil to about 1.0 mils.
In this three layer film embodiment, the thickness of the first outer layer is preferably within the aforementioned range in order to obtain good seal strength and acceptable film shrinkage.
The thickness of the first core layer is preferably within the aforementioned range in order to provide adeguate oxygen barrier without detracting from toughness properties, but the upper limit of 0.45 mil is based upon the extent of the barrier protection which is required for the intended use for the multilayer film. The thickness of the second outer layer is preferably within the aforementioned range in order to make up the total film thickness and to pcovide properties of abcasion resistance and puncture resistance.
As noted hereinabove, the present invention contemplates two alternate embodiments of multilayer ~ilm having four layecs. The first alternate embodiment comprises a coextruded multilayer film containing a first outer layec of a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer or copolymer; a first coce ~ .
'^'"''' "" ' ` ' layer of an oxygen barrier material comprising vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer; a second core layer comprising very low density p~lyethylene, confined between said first outer layer and said first core layer, and bonded directly to said ~irst core layer without the use of adhesives; and a second outer layer comprising ve~y low density eolyethylene bonded directly to said first core layer without the use of adhesives. The second alternate embodiment comprises a coextruded multilayer film containing a first core layer of oxygen barrier material comprising vinylidene chlocide-methyl acrylate coeolymer; a heat sealable fi~st outer laye~ comprising very low density eolyethylene bonded directly to said first core layer without the use of adhesives; a second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic eolymer or coeolymer; and a second core layer comprising very low density polyethylene. confined between said Sirst core layer and said second outer layer, and bonded directly to said ~irst core layer without the use of adhesives.
In said Sirst alternate embodiment of the pcesent invention, the coextruded multilayer film comerises a biaxially stretched thermoelastic four layer film having a total thickness of from about 2.0 mils to about 4.5 mils. The 2.0 mils lower Iimit is established by the total thickness achieved in adding the lower limit of thickness for the four individual layers. As 2reviously noted, films having a thickness greater than about 4.5 mils will produce bags which will be somewhat difficult to ~, `' ~
. : - - . , - - - , : ' \
1 31 50h2 -2~-gather and clip closed or they may be difficult to heat seal closed at efficient seeeds on heat sealing vacuum packaging machines. The heat sealing first outer layer of thermoplastic polymer or coeolymer will preferably have a thickness of from abol~t 1.1 mils to about 1.8 mils; the first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer will preferably have a thickness of from about 0.25 mil ~o about 0.45 mil; the second core layer of very low density ~olyethylene confined between said first outer layer and said first core layer will preferably have a thickness of-from about 0.35 mil to about 2.0 mils; and the second outer layer of very low density polyethylene will prefecably have a thickness of from about 0.35 mil to about 2.0 mils, but more pre~erably ~rom about 0.5 mil to about 1.0 mil.
In the second alternate embodiment of the present invention, the coextruded multilayer film comprises a biaxially stretched thermoplastic four layer film having a total thickness of from about 2.0 mils to about 4.5 mils. The 2.0 mils lower limit is established by the total thickness achieved in adding the lower limit of thicknesg for the four individual layers. A~ 2reviously noted, films having a thickness greater than about 4.5 mils will produce bags which will be somewhat difficult to gather and clip closed or they may be difficult to heat seal closed at efficient speeds on heat sealing vacuum packaging machines. The heat sealing first outer layer of very low density polyethylene will preferably have a thickness of from about 1.1 mils to about 1.8 mils; the first core layer of ---` 1 31 5062 vinylidene chlo~ide-methyl acrylate copolyme~ will p~eferably have a thickness of from about 0.25 mil to about 0.45 mil; the second core layer of very low density polyethylene confined between said f i~8t core layer and the second outer layer will preferably have a thickness of f~om about 0.35 mil to about 2.0 mils; and the second outer layer of thermoelastic polymer or coeolymer will preferably have a thickness of from about 0.35 mil to about 2.0 mils, but more preferably from about 0.5 mil to about 1.0 mil.
In both alternate embQdiments comprising coextruded four layer films, the thickness of the first outer layer is preferably within the afo~ementioned range in order to obtain good seal strength and acceptable film shrinkage. The thickness of the first core layer is preferably within the aforementioned range in order to provide adeguate oxygen barrier without detracting from toughness properties, but the ueper limit cf 0.45 mil is baset upon the extent of the barrier protection which i5 reguired or the intended use for the multilayer film. The thickness of the second core layer is preferably within the above-indicated range in order to enhance the puncture resistance of the film without being too costly. The thickness of the second outer layer is preferably within the aforementioned range in order to make up the total film thickness and to provide properties of abrasion resistance and puncture resistance.
In addition to providing good heat sealing when the film is fabricated into bags, multilayer .

;::
,, :

;.
., .
, -:~

films of the eresent invention have good shrink properties, good abrasion resistance and good toughness. Thus, these films have utility in many eackaging applications. However, in a preferred embodiment, these films are fabricated into bags ~or the packaging of primal and suberimal meat cuts of fresh red meat, and for the packaging of e~ocessed meats.
Such bags may be eroduced from the multilayer films of this invention by any suitable method, such as by heat sealing the side ant/or bottom edges. For instance, i~ the film of this invention is produced in the form of a tubular film, bags can be produced therefrom by heat sealing one end of a length of the tubular film, or by sealing both ends of the tube end and then slitting one edge to form the bag mouth. If the film of this invention is made in the form of flat sheets, bags can be formed therefrom by sealing three edges of two sueerimeosed sheets of film. When carrying out a heat sealing opelation, the surfaces which are heat sealed to each other to form seams are the said first outer layers of the films of this invention.
Thu~, for example, when forming a bag by heat sealing one edge of a length of tubular film, the inner surface of the tube, i.e., the surface which will be heat sealed to itself, will be the said first outer layer of the film. Accordingly, the first outer layer of the film becomes the inner surface Or the bag and the second outer layer of the ~ilm becomes the outer surface of the bag.
The invention is further illustrated by Examples which are eresented hereinafter.

;

, - ' :
. , - ~
. ' . ' .

``- 1315062 The resins which were used in making the multilayer films of the Examples are identified as follows:

EthYlene Vinvl Acetate (EVA) EVA-l: DQDA 6832 Vinyl Acetate 11 Wt.%
Melt Index 0.25 dg./min.
Union Carbide Corporation;
Danbury, CT

EVA-2: ELVAX 3135X _~
Vinyl Acetate 12 Wt.%
Melt Index 0.35 dg./min.
E. I. DuPont de Nemours ~ Co., Inc.; Wilmington, DE

EVA-3: ENRON 3507C
Vinyl acetate 5 Wt.S
~elt Index 0.25 dg./min.
USI Chemicals Company Cincinnati, OH

EVA-4: A blend of EVA-2 and EVA-3 75 Wt.t EVA-2. 25 Wt.% EVA-3 Contains about 9 Wt.% vinyl acetate VinYlidene~Chloride-Vinvl Chloride Co~olvmer(VC-VDC~
VC-VDC: Kureha F Resin Vinyl Chloride 29 Wt.%
Molecular Weight 125.000 Kureha Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Tokyo, Japan ;~
`
.

..
-. . .

- 1 31 50h2 Vinylidene Chloride-Methyl AcrYlate Co~olYmer(MA-VDC) MA-VDC: XU 32023 Methyl Acrylate B wt.%
Molecular Weight 105,000 Dow Chemical Co.; Midland, MI

VinYlidene Chloride CoPolvmer Blend Bl~nd: 75 Wt.% MA-VDC
25 Wt.~ VC-VDC

Linear Low DensitY Pol~eth~lene ~LLDPE~
LLDPE-l: ~S 7028 Melt Index l.O dg./min.
Density 0.918 gm.~cc.
Ethylene-Hexene Copolymer Union Carbide Corporation; Danbury, CT

LLDPE-2: Dowlex 2045 Melt Index l.O dg.~min.
Density 0.920 gm.~cc.
Ethylene-Octene Copolymer Dow Chemical Co.: Midland, MI

VerY Low Densit~ PolYethYlene (VLDPE~
VLDPE-l: DFDA 1137 Melt Index l.O dg./min.
Density 0.905 gm./cc.
Ethylene-Butene Copolymer Union Carbide Corpocation; Danbury, CT

:

, ~~ -~ " " ' .
.

-` 1 31 5062 IM
VLDPE - 2: Dowlex 4002 ~elt Index 2.5 dg./min.
Density 0.912 gm./cc.
Ethylene-Octene Copolymer Dow Chemical Co.; Midland, MI

VLDPE-3: Dowlex 4001 Melt Index 1.0 dg./min.
Den~ity 0.912 gm./cc.
Ethylene-Octene Coeolymer Dow Chemical Co.; Midland, ~$

VLDPE-2 and VLDPE-3 are commonly called "ultra low density eolyethylene~' or ~'ULDPE~ by the 9ew Chemical Company. Since these two resins have densities which are below 0.915 gms./cc., for purposes of this invention they are very low density polyethylene. There~ore, we have identified these resin~ as VLDPE-2 and VLDPE-3 for eurposes of clarity and consistency in the Examples whi~h follow.
The pcoperties of the resin~ and of the produced therefrom may be determined by the ~ollowing methods:

Den~ity:
ASTM D-1505 - Plaque is conditioned ~or one hour at 100C to aeproach equilibrium crystallinity - ~eeorted as gms/cm .
Melt Index (MI):
ASTM D-123~ - Condition E - measured at 190C.

'.,~, ~

' .
; . - . . :

, ''' , , .
, - . ~

Haze:
~STM D-1003, Procedure A.
Gloss:
~STM D-523, 45 Angle.
Tensile Strength and Elongation At Break:
ASTM D-882, Procedure A
Shrinkage Values:
Values are obtained by measuring unrestrained shrink at 90C for five seconds. Four test specimens are cut from a given sample o~ the film to be tested.
The specimens are cut~to 10 cm. in the machine direction by 10 cm. in the transverse direction. Each specimen is completely immersed for S seconds in a 90C
wate bath. The distance between the ends of the shrunken specimen is measured. The difference in the measured distance for the shrunken seecimen and the original 10 cm.
is multiplied by ten to obtain the percent of shrinkage $or the specimen. The shrink~ge for the four specimens is averaged for the MD shrinkage value of the given film sample, and the shrinkage for , the four specimens is averaged for the TD
shrinkage value.
Dynamic Puncture:
The dynamic puncture-impact test procedure is used to compare films for their resistance to bone puncture. It ~easures the energy required to puncture a test sample with a sharp triangular metal point .

. . . .

.
--`` 1 31 5062 made to simulate a sharp bone end. A
Dynamic Ball Burst Tester, Model No. 13-8, available from Testing Machines, Inc., Amityville, Long Island, New York, is used, and a 3/8 inch diameter conical tip is installed on the tester probe arm for use in this test erocedu~e. The conical tip has the configuration of a right circular cone, and the angle between the cone axis and an element of the conical surface at the vertex is about 65. Six te~t specimens approximately 4 inches square are prepared, a samele is placed in the sample holder, and the 2endulum is relea~ed. The puncture energy reading is recorded. The test is repeated until 6 samples have been evaluated. The results are calculated in cm-kg per mil of film thickness and are ave~aqed.
Hot Wat3r Puncture:
Hot water puncture values are obtained by perSorming the hot water puncture test as Sollows. Water is heated to 90 + 1C. A
3/8 inch round wooden dowel is sharpened on one end to a conical point. This sharpened point has the configuration of a right circulal cone, and the angle between the cone axis and an element of the conical surface at the vertex is about 60. This sharp point is then rounded to a spherical tip of about 1/16 inch diameter. The wooden dowel is fastened to a wooden block ,~ ' ~ D-20020 , ., .

, " " ' ' . :' ~ :
; . . - .
-` `' ~ ' ~

-" 1 31 506~

so that the rounded point projects 1-1/2 inches beyond the end of the wooden bloc~.
A specimen about 3 inches wide in the transverse direction (TD) and about ten inches long is cut from the test sample material. One end of the specimen is placed on the end of the wooden block opeosite the pointed dowel. The specimen is wrapped around the end of the shareened dowel and back to the wooden block on the oppo~ite side, where it is secured. The film thickness in the~area of contact with the sharpened dowel is measured in order to assure that the film specimen thickness is truly representative of the given test sample material. The specimen and pointed dowel are quickly immersed into the hot water and a timer is started. The timer is stopped when the wooden dowel point punctures the film specimen. The test procedure is repeated five more times with new 3 inch wide TD specimens from the given test sample material. The time required for penetration is recorded and then averaged for the six TD specimens.
Athesion And Curl:
~lthough the p~operties of adhesion and curl are separate and distinct properties of mul~ilayer films, they are both determined by a single test procedure. A
coextruded multilayer film in tubular form having a nominal length of about 2 feet is ......
. ' , .

-~ 1 31 5n6~

cut to provide a sample having a straight TD cut on one end and an arc TD cut on the other end. The two cuts simulate a straight bag mouth and an arcuate bag mouth. The film sample is inserted into a hot air circulating oven set at 120F.
After seven days at 120F, the sample is removed from the oven and it is inspected at both the straight and arcuate ends for curl and delamination. In general, both ends of the tubular sample will exhibit the same degree of curl a~d delamination.
Delamination is generally found or not found at the interface between the oxygen barrier core layer and the adjacent layer.
The extent of delamination is reported as "adhesion", and the adhesion is categorized as being poor, fair, good or excellent.
~ilms having an adhesion of poor and fair are unacceptable for packaging primal and subprimal meat cuts and processed meats.
Curl is an indication of the ease or difficulty which will be experienced when opening bags fabricated of the multilayer film of the given sample. An outward curl i5 an indication that the bags will be easily opened. An inward curl is an indication of the degree of difficulty in opening a bag. Curl is categorized as slightly inward, moderately inward, tightly inward, slightly outward, moderately outward and tightly ou~ward. Tubing ' ~

:

.~ , ' - - ' - . .
, .

.:

t 3~ 5062 samples showing a tightly inward curl are deemed unacceptable as p~oviding bags which are too difficult to open. Tubing samples which show a mode~ately inward curl, a slight inwaLd curl, or any degree of outward curl are deemed acceptable for the fab~i~ation of bags.

The invection is now described fu~ther in the followi~g Examples. In the Examples, all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwiee indicated.

This Exam~le illustrates the production of a first set of multilayer films under conventional coextrusion operating conditions.
A first series of coextrusion runs was made in ordec to produce three layer films containing an oxygen barrier layer comprising the vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer defined herein-above as VC-VDC. The first outer layer contained ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer identified herein-above as EVA-l, and the EVA-l was blended in eight of ten runs with other copolymers of ethylene identified hereinabove as LLDPE-1, VLDPE-l and VLDPE-Z. The second outer layer contained the blend of ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers which is identified hereinabove as EVA-4.
The melted resins were extruded from a multilayer annular die to produce the three layer ., `` 1 31 5n62 film in a tubular form, wherein the first outer layer was the inner layer of the tubular film. The tubular film was extruded from the annular die to form a pcimary tube which was then biaxially stretched in acco~dance with a conventional "double-bubble" technique similar to tha~ disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 3,456,044 to Pahlke. The biaxially stre~ched multilayer film was flattened and the~ reeled ~or storage and samele evaluation.
The film produced by these runs was not icradiated.
The comeosition of each multilayer film produced in these runs is set ~orth as Samples No.
~-1 through A-10 in Table 1. Note that all runs ~roduced films containing a core layer of VC-VDC and an outer layer of EVA-4. The inner layer contained blends of EVA-l with varying amounts of LLDPE-l, VLDPE-l, and VLDPE-2, exceet that Samele No. A-l was 100 wt.S EV~-l and Sample No. A-10 was 100 wt.%
VLDPE-2. Sample No. A-l is a control sample which i8 the equivalent of a film product which has been in commercial use for many years in the packaging of p~imal and suberimal meat cuts and processed meats, having been sold first by Union Carbide Corporation of Danbury, CT, and now being sold by Viskase Corporation of Chicago, IL, under the product identifications of PERFLEX ~ 52 8ag and PERFLEX ~ 62 Bag.
The films produced in this series of runs had a total thickness of 2.4 mils. The inner layer was 1.4 mils in thickness, the core layer of VC-VDC
was 0.3 mils th~ick, and the outer layer of EV~-4 was 0.7 mils thick.

' -`" 1 31 5062 E~AMPLE 2 This Example illustrates the production of a second set of multilayer films under conventional coextrusion operating conditions. These films include one embodiment of the present invention.
~ second series of coextrusion runs was made in order to eroduce three layeL films containing an oxygen barrier layer comprising the blend of vinylidene chlozide-vinyl chloride copolymer with vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer which is defined hereinabove. The blend comerised 75 wt.% of the methyl acrylate copolymer and 25 wt.% of the vinyl chloride copolymer which are both defined hereinabove. The process utilized was the same as that set forth in Example 1.

t31506~

ComPosition O~ Coextruded Films SamPle No. Inner Laver Co~e La~er Outer Laver A-l EVA-l VC-VDC EVA-4 A-2 15% LLDPE-l VC-VDC EVA-4 85S EVA-l A-3 25S LLDPE-l VC-VDC EVA-4 75% EVA-l A-4 15% VLDPE-l V~-VDC EVA-4 85% EVA-l A-5 25% VLDPE-1 VC-VDC EVA-4 75% EVA-l A-6 50% VLDPE-l VC-VDC EVA-4 50% EVA-l A-7 15% VLDPE-2 VC-VDC EVA-4 85S EVA-l 75% EVA-l 50% EVA-l B-l 50S LLDPE-2 Blend 50S LLDPE-2 50% EVA-l 50S EVA-4 B-2 VLDPE-3 Blend VLDPE-3 B-3 EVA-l Blend EVA-4 ,, . D-20020 ',:
, .

:~, ,,,, ,. .~ ,... .

-` 1 31 5062 The coextruded biaxially stretched films were reeled for storage and sample evaluation without irradiation of the films.
The composition of each multilayer film eroduced in these runs is set forth as Samples No.
B-l through B-3 in Table 1. Note that these runs produced multilayer films containinq an inner layer and an outer layer of the same com~osition in Samples No. B-l and B-2. Sample No. B-l had inner and outer layers of a blend containing resin LLDPE-2. which is defined hereinabove, and E~A-l in equal amounts. Sample No. B-2~had inner and outer layers of 100% VLDPE-3, which is defined hereinabove. and this Sample illustrates one embodiment of the present invention. Sample No. B-3 was a control sample similar to Sample No. A-l in that it was the equivalent of the prior art commercial product noted in Example 1.
The rilms produced in this series of runs had a total thickness of 2.4 mils. The inner layer had a thickness of l.g mils, the core layer was 0.3 mil thick. and the outer layer was 0.7 mil thick.

This example summarizes the key physical prope~ties of the unirradiated reel stock multilayer films produced in the series of coextrusion runs defined in Examples 1 and 2, in regard to film acceetability fo~ use in the packaging of primal and subp~imal meat cuts and processed meats.

----'` 1 31 5062 ~ I
. _~

L , o O O O O O O O O O O al a~
~E~ ~ z æ z æ z z z z z z ~ ~
C~ ~
O o 1~1 ~ o o ~ o o o o o ' o a~
_ I ~ :z z ~ z z æ z z ~ z ~ I
e ~ o N co O t~
r~ ~ co m e ~-~ I ~ o o a~ o o o o o ~ o V Ll ~ ~ ~ :Z Z ~ Z Z Z Z Z ~ Z
E r~ _ O ¦ _ ¦ ~ N N N U~ O t~ 0~ ~
N l ~ ` t` 0~i N

¦~ ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z

D 11 la ~ c c ~u ¢ c c c ¢ c C
_E ~ C C ~ C .C .¢ C C J C~
O rl ~ O .r~ O .~
1~
. IC ~ZZZZ~Z~ZZ~
.

5 u u u u C ~
1~ O ~O O O O O r~l O
IDS ~O O o O o ~ o X
.
Cl- O ~I N

~ ' ;'`:

.:
':~ '' .'' ~

---` 1315062 Specimens of the unirradiated reel stock for each sample were evaluated for layer adhesion, film cu~l. haze and gloss in ocder to determine the acceptability of the various films in each of these categories. The results are presented in Table 2.
Layer adhesion is a visual evaluation of the degree of delamination, if any, found at the interface between the core layer and the inner layer. Delamination may be exhibited by actual separation of the layers at the end cuts of the film specimen, or by the aepearance of blisters at the surface between the end cuts. ~The blisters are a sign of layer separation in the body of the film between the end cuts. Only the prior art control Samples No. A-l and B-3, and new film Samples No.
A-6, B-l and B-2 showed acceptable adhesion.
Note that the prior art films of Samples No. A-l and B-3, which contain inner and oute~
layers of EVA, showed an adhesion rating of Good, while the inventive film of Sample No. B-2, which contained inner and outer layers of VLDPE had an adhesion rating of Excellent. Thus, the film embodiment of this invention showed an adhesion rating which was improved over the adhesion rating of the prior art films. This is contrary to the teachings of Ferguson et.al. U.S. Patent No.
4,640,856 which states that VLDPE does not adhere as well as EVA does.
~ The evaluation of film curl showed that ; only the prior art commercial type films of Samples No. A-l and B-3 had an outward curl, which is the most desired type o~ curl for ease in opening the mouth of a bag made of the multilayer film. For the .

, :

, experimental multilayer films which were evaluated, only samples A-4, B-l and B-2 had an acceptable cu~l. Sample B-l had a slight inward curl, and Samples A-4 and B-2 had a moderate inward curl. All other samples had an unacceptable tight inward curl.
The differences in the direction o~ curl, inward or outward, and in the degree of the curl are caused by the differences that exist between the inner layer an~ the outer layer. When LLDPE or VLDPE is blended into the EVA-l of the inner layer, the balance between the inner layer and the outer layec becomes distorted and the film exhibits the unacceetable tight inward curl of Samples No. A-2, A-3 and A-5 through A-10.
Curl also has an influence on adhesion since it can impose stresses on the layers which may cause delamination. This is the probable reason why only those samples which had both acceptable adhesion and acceptable curl are Samples No. B-l and B-2, where the inner and outer layers both had the same composition.
The data in Table Z demonstrates that a ' multilayer film containing LLDPE or VLDPE in the ,' inner layer must also have the same composition in the outer layer in order to assure that the ilm will have acceptable adhesion and acceptable curl.
The data in Table 2 also shows that films which contain a blend of EVA-l with LLDPE or VLDPE
exhibit unacceptable optical characteristics. The only exception is Sample No. A-4 which showed acceptable haze and acceetable gloss, but this ' sample had a low VLDPE content of 15 wt.S in the 3 inner layer. Also, this sample had an unacceptable ,,~
"'1:
' D-20020 : ., .-j , ; , ' adhesion. Sample No. A-lO containing lO0 wt.
VLDPE-2 in the inner layer and Samele No. B-2 containing lO0 wt.~ ~LDPE-3 in both the inner and outer layers also had acceptable haze and acceptable gloss. (As noted hereinabove, haze value must not exceed 6.5% and gloss value must not be below 70%
for a film to be acceptable.) In order for a multilayer film to be acceptible for use in the packaging of fresh red meat cuts and processed meats, the film must be acceptable in all four catagories of adhesion, curl, haze and gloss, and the data show that only three of the film samples meet this standard. They are the prior art Samples No. A-l and B-3, and the new Sample No. B-2 which is an embodiment of our invention.
Sample No. B-2 is also noteworthy, not only for being the only new film meeting all standards for film acceptability, but also because it exhibits the best adhesion, the best curl, the best haze, and the best gloss for all of the new film samples.
The data in Table 2 also indicate that excellent adhesion and acceptable curl are obtained if the core layer is a blend of 1S wt.% MA-VDC and 25 wt.t VC-VDC with lO0 wt.% VIDPE in both the inner and outer layers. This blend demonstrates that the core layer may contain a substantial quantity of VC-VDC in the MA-VDC blend without adversely effecting the superioE physical characteristics of the multilayer films of this invention. A core layer of lO0 wt.% MA-VDC will also give acceptable adhesion and curl with inner and outer layers of lO0 wt.% V~DPE.

,;
:i :
: ,.....

~ 1315062 This Example illustrates that the embodiment of our invention which is represented by Sample No. B-2, not only has acceptable adhesion, curl, haze and gloss, but that it also has other eroperties which make it suitable for the packaging of erimal and subprimal meat cuts and processed meats.
The inventive multilayer film Sample No.
B-2 and the prior art multilayer film of Samples No.
A-l and B-3 were evaluated for tensile strength, elongation at break, shrinkage, hot water puncture, and dynamic puncture. The test results are given in Table 3.

, , ~ ' ~
, ~;, .

-` 1 3 1 5062 Properties Of Coextruded Unirradiated ~ultila~er Films SampLe Sample Sample No. A-l No. B-2 No. ~-3 Tensile stren8th. psi. 7,100/8,700 11,900~12,400 7,500~8,800 elOn~atiOn e Break, % 215/150 240/170 215/170 Shrinka~e @ 90'C, % 35/52 2~/32 37~53 Hot Water Puncture, sec.
@90-C 29 120+ 24 Dynamic Puncture, cm.-k~./mil 2.0 2.7 2.1 , ,~

:

,' ' ~
' ~` 13t5062 The inventive multilayer film Sample No.
B-2 had tensile strength, hot water puncture, and dynamic puncture values which were improved over the sameles of prior art film~ The shrinkage values were less ehan the values for the prior art film, but the shrinkage remained at an acceptable level.
Elongation at break was about the same for all three samples, and ~as acceptable.

Although certain embodiments of this invention have been described ~in detail, it is contemplated that modifications thereof may be made and some preferred features may be employed without others, all within the spi~it and sco~e of the broad invention. For example, although Sample B-2 had the same very low density ~olyethylene on both sides of the core layer of vinylidene chlorids-methyl acrylate copolymer, it is possible for two different VLDPE resins to be used, provided that their physical characteristics must not be so different that unacceptable curl or unacceptable adhesion results. Additionally, it is contemplated that the VLDPE of the first layer, or of the qecond layer, or of both the first and the second layers, may comprise a blend of VLDPE with one or more other polymers or copolymers, proviaed that such blends must not cau~e degradation of adhesion, curl, haze or gloss to such an extent that the multilayer film is rendered unacceptable. Further, those skilled in the art will recognize that the multilayer films of this invention may contain conventional additives ,~, , ~ 131~062 such as pigments. antiblock agents, slip agents, and the like.
The p~esent invention is now set ~orth with particularity in the claims which follow. ~s used in the claims. the term "polymer" includes homopolymezs and copolymers.

! D-20020 , .

... ... . .
- ' . ~ ' ' ~

:: ;

.. . .
'' '' ,

Claims (61)

1. A coextruded, thermoplastic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film wherein:
(a) said multilayer film comprises a first layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter, a core layer comprising vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer having a vinylidene chloride content of from about 85 to about 95 weight percent and a methyl acrylate content of from about 5 to about 15 weight percent all based on the weight of said copolymer, and a second layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter; and, (b) said first layer is adhered directly to one side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and said second layer is adhered directly to the other side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween.

2. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said first layer and said second layer are identical.

3. A multilayer film according to Claim 2 wherein said density is in the range of from about 0.86 to about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.

4. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a melt index in the range of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 decigrams per minute.

5. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a density of about 0.912 grams per cubic centimeter and a melt index of about 1.0 decigrams per minute.

6. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer are copolymers of ethylene and octene-1.

7. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said core layer comprises vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer blended with vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

8. A multilayer film according to Claim 7 wherein said blend comprises about 75 weight percent vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and about 25 weight percent vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

9. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said first layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and first outer layer comprising a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer.

10. A multilayer film according to Claim 9 wherein said first outer layer comprises a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer selected from the group consisting of an ionomer, an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, and ethylene-propylene copolymer, and a polypropylene blended with another polymer.

11. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said second layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic polymer.

12. A multilayer film according to Claim 11 wherein said second outer layer comprises a blend of high density polyethylene with linear low density polyethylene or very low density polyethylene.

13. A multilayer film according to Claim 12 wherein the amount of high density polyethylene in said blend is not greater than about 30 weight percent of the blend.

14. A multilayer film according to Claim 1 wherein said film contains cross-linking bonds.

15. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said film has been cross-linked by chemical means.

16. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said film has been cross-linked by irradiation.

17. A multilayer film according to Claim 16 wherein said film has been irradiated to a dosage level of from about l to about 5 megarads.

18. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said first layer and said second layer are identical.

19. A multilayer film according to Claim 18 wherein said density is in the range of from about 0.86 to about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.

20. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a melt index in the range of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 decigrams per minute.

21. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a density of about 0.912 grams per cubic centimeter and a melt index of about 1.0 decigrams per minute.

22. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer are copolymers of ethylene and octene-1.

23. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said core layer comprises vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer blended with vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

24. A multilayer film according to Claim 23 wherein said blend comprises about 75 weight percent vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and about 25 weight percent vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

25. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said first layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a first outer layer comprising a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer.

26. A multilayer film according to Claim 25 wherein said first outer layer comprises a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer selected from the group consisting of an ionomer, an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, and a propylene blended with another polymer.

27. A multilayer film according to Claim 14 wherein said second layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic polymer.

28. A multilayer film according to Claim 27 wherein said second outer layer comprises a blend of high density polyethylene with linear low density polyethylene or very low density polyethylene.

29. A multilayer film according to Claim 28 wherein the amount of high density polyethylene in said blend is not greater than about 30 weight percent of the blend.

30. A multilayer film according to any one of Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20 wherein said multilayer film is in the form of a bag.

31. A coextruded, thermoplastic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film wherein:
(a) said multilayer film comprising a first layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter, a core layer comprising vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer having a vinylidene chloride content of from about 85 to about 95 weight percent and a methyl acrylate content of from about 5 to about 15 weight percent all based on the weight of said copolymer, and a second layer comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter;
(b) said first layer is adhered directly to one side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and said second layer is adhered directly to the other side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween; and (c) said first layer and said second layer have substantial freedom from cross-linking bonds.

32. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said first layer and said second layer are identical.

33. A multilayer film according to Claim 32 wherein said density is in the range of from about 0.86 to about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.

34. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a melt index in the range of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 decigrams per minute.

35. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a density of about 0.912 grams per cubic centimeter and a melt index of about 1.0 decigrams per minute.

36. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer are copolymers or ethylene and octene-1.

37. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said core layer comprises vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer blended with vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

38. A multilayer film according to Claim 37 wherein said blend comprises about 75 weight percent vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and about 25 weight percent vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

39. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said first layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a first outer layer comprising a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer.

40. A multilayer film according to Claim 39 wherein said first outer layer comprises a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer selected from the group consisting of an ionomer, an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, and a propylene blended with another polymer.

41. A multilayer film according to Claim 31 wherein said second layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic polymer.

42. A multilayer film according to Claim 41 wherein said second outer layer comprises a blend of high density polyethylene with linear low density polyethylene or very low density polyethylene.

43. A multilayer film according to Claim 42 wherein the amount of high density polyethylene in said blend is not greater than about 30 weight percent of the blend.

44. A multilayer film according to any one of Claims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 or 43 wherein said multilayer film is in the form of a bag.

45. A process of producing a thermoplastic, heat shrinkable, multilayer film suitable for use in packaging fresh red meats and processed meats, which comprises coextruding a core layer comprising a vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer having a vinylidene chloride content of from about 85 to about 95 weight percent and a methyl acrylate content of from about 5 to about 15 weight percent all based on the weight of said copolymer, a first layer adhered directly to one side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0. 915 grams per cubic centimeter, and a second layer adhered directly to the other side of said core layer without adhesive material therebetween and comprising very low density polyethylene of density not greater than about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.

46. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said first layer and said second layer are identical.

47. A process according to Claim 46 wherein said density is in the range of from about 0. 86 to about 0.915 grams per cubic centimeter.

48. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a melt index in the range of from about 0.5 to about 2.5 decigrams per minute.

49. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer have a density of about 0.912 grams per cubic centimeter and a melt index of about 1.0 decigrams per minute.

50. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said very low density polyethylene of said first layer and said very low density polyethylene of said second layer are copolymers of ethylene and octene-1.

51. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said core layer comprises vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer blended with vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

52. A process according to Claim 51 wherein said blend comprises about 75 weight percent vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and about 25 weight percent vinylidene chloride-vinyl chloride copolymer.

53. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said first layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a coextruded first outer layer comprising a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer.

54. A process according to Claim 53 wherein said first outer layer comprises a heat sealable thermoplastic polymer selected from the group consisting of an ionomer, an ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, and a propylene blended with another polymer.

55. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said second layer is a second core layer confined between said first core layer of vinylidene chloride-methyl acrylate copolymer and a coextruded second outer layer comprising a thermoplastic polymer.

56. A process according to Claim 55 wherein said second outer layer comprises a blend of high density polyethylene with linear low density polyethylene or very low density polyethylene.

57. A process according to Claim 56 wherein the amount of high density polyethylene in said blend is not greater than about 30 weight percent of the blend.

58. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said coextrusion is by means of a slot die and said multilayer film is in sheet form.

59. A process according to Claim 45 wherein said coextrusion is by means of an annular die and said multilayer film is in tubular form.

60. A process according to any one of Claims 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 or 59 wherein said coextruded multilayer film is biaxially stretched.

61. A process according to any one of Claims 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58 or 59 wherein said coextruded multilayer film is biaxially stretched and including the step of fabricating said multilayer film into a bag.