CA1172516A - Security barrier structure and method of making the same - Google Patents
Security barrier structure and method of making the sameInfo
- Publication number
- CA1172516A CA1172516A CA000404848A CA404848A CA1172516A CA 1172516 A CA1172516 A CA 1172516A CA 000404848 A CA000404848 A CA 000404848A CA 404848 A CA404848 A CA 404848A CA 1172516 A CA1172516 A CA 1172516A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- sheet
- structure according
- corrugated sheet
- corrugations
- layer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E05—LOCKS; KEYS; WINDOW OR DOOR FITTINGS; SAFES
- E05G—SAFES OR STRONG-ROOMS FOR VALUABLES; BANK PROTECTION DEVICES; SAFETY TRANSACTION PARTITIONS
- E05G1/00—Safes or strong-rooms for valuables
- E05G1/02—Details
- E05G1/024—Wall or panel structure
Landscapes
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
- Building Environments (AREA)
- Containers Having Bodies Formed In One Piece (AREA)
- Securing Of Glass Panes Or The Like (AREA)
- Special Wing (AREA)
- Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Processing And Handling Of Plastics And Other Materials For Molding In General (AREA)
- Support Of Aerials (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
- Road Signs Or Road Markings (AREA)
- Length-Measuring Instruments Using Mechanical Means (AREA)
- Endoscopes (AREA)
- Wrappers (AREA)
- Panels For Use In Building Construction (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
A barrier structure for the walls and/or doors of a safe or other security enclosure comprises a corrugated planar element of copper or other tough and heat-resistant metal disposed in intimate relation within a matrix eg of cast aluminium or concrete containing elements of very hard and refractory material. The corrugations in the copper or like element are formed so as to ensure that a cutting tool of selected diameter which is applied to that element will inevitably encounter some of the hard material behind that element, so that the tool is blunted, before the element can be completely penetrated.
A barrier structure for the walls and/or doors of a safe or other security enclosure comprises a corrugated planar element of copper or other tough and heat-resistant metal disposed in intimate relation within a matrix eg of cast aluminium or concrete containing elements of very hard and refractory material. The corrugations in the copper or like element are formed so as to ensure that a cutting tool of selected diameter which is applied to that element will inevitably encounter some of the hard material behind that element, so that the tool is blunted, before the element can be completely penetrated.
Description
! t725~6 Security Barrier Structure and ~ethod of Making the Same The present invention relates to barrier structures for use eg in the walls and/or doors of safes, strongrooms and the like security enclosures. Barrier structures provided for this purpose must have a high degree of resistance to the various forms of burglarious attack to which the enclosure may be subjected and it is an aim of the invention to provide an improved security barrier structure in which materials resistive to different classes of burglary tools can be combined in a particularly effective manner.
There is no known single material which can be employed on a practical basis in the construction of such enclosures to resist all types of tool currently at the disposal of the criminal. Various materials are known which provide excellent resistance to specified classes of tool when used in isolation, but for the same barrier structure to be effective against a range of different tool types a combination of different materials is required. Moreover, these materials should be integrated structurally in such a way as to resist the penetration of the overall barrier by "multiple" attacks, w~ere t 1 7?J5~ ~
concerted use is made of a range of different tools, but without significant sacrifice to the resistance of the structure to "single-tool" attac]cs. In particular, it should not be possible readily to penetrate the barrier by the successive penetration of each material encountered with appropriately selected tools, as might be the case with a barrier structure made up with simple discrete layers of the different materials.
In seeking to provide a security barrier structure which is capable of resisting both "single-tool" and "multiple"
attacks as aforesaid the invention is characterised by a corrugated sheet of tough, heat conductive metal resistant to penetration by percussive and thermal tools and extending substantially continuously throughout the structure; and a layer consisting of or containing hard material resistant to penetration by mechanical cutting and drilling tools which layer is disposed in intimate relationship with said corrugated sheet at least on the remote side of said sheet as viewed from the external face of the structure, with portions of said hard material lying within the depressions of the corrugations of said corrugated sheet on said remote side thereof;
the distribution of said hard material, and the spacing and amplitude of the corrugations in said corrugated sheet, being such as to provide that a burglarious attempt to cut a generally cylindrical aperture through said corrugated sheet with a diameter in the range of about 40-125mm, from substantially any position on the near side of the structure as viewed from the external face of the structure and in a direction generally . , 1 1 725 ' ~
perpendicular to the structure, will result in the simultaneous encountering by the tool of both the material of said corrugated sheet and aportion of said hard material disposed on the aforesaid remote side of the sheet.
A particularly preferred material from which the aforesaid corrugated sheet may be made is copper, alternatives including stainless steel, aluminium and 10 cast iron.
The aforesaid cutting and drilling resistant layer which is in intimate relationship with the corrugated sheet preferably contains, (at least in that portion which is 15 disposed on said remote side of the corrugated sheet in relation to an attack from outside the enclosure), at least 10~ by volume of a material whose hardness is in excess of 1000 kg/mm2. Suitable materials for this purpose therefore include security-formulation concretes 20 containing hard aggregates such as quartzite, fused alumina or the like (and which may also be reinforced with steel or polypropylene fibres), and composites such as cast aluminium or copper containing nuggets of fused alumina or the like.
! 1725~
By virtue of its rapid heat-dissipating ability the copper or ot'ner said corrugated metal sheet can confer upon a barrier structure according to the invention good resistance to attack by oxy-acetylene, oxy-arc and the like thermal tools, and can also provide good resistance to power percussion tools by virtue of its ability to deform without fragmentation under the action of such tools (ie its toughness). On the other hand, being relatively soft this type of element would be, in isolation, vulnerable to attack by "sharp edge"
mechanical cutting tools such as drills, holesaws and chisels, but these can be resisted in a structure according to the invention by the hard material in the surrounding matrix. It is in this respect that the corrugated form of the sheet is of particular advantage. As more fully discussed below, this sheet is appropriately shaped such that any such tool adapted to cut a hole of the above-specified diameter which is applied to the corrugated element will inevitably encounter some of the hard material in the layer behind the corrugated sheet before that sheet is completely penetrated. This action will of course rapidly blunt the tool edge, and once blunted cutting tools become very inefficient against ductile metals. In this way the structure can offer high resistance even to multiple attacks which attempt to penetrate the barrier structure firstly by removing a portion of the hard layer in front of the corrugated sheet by one class of tool to which that layer is more vulnerable than the corrugated sheet, and then attacking the exposed corrugated sheet with another class of tool to which that element is percieved to be more vulnerable than the hard layer. The corrugated shape of the internal metal element may indeed g 1725~
also assist in resisting the first stage of such an attack as considerably more difficulty may be experienced in removing the hard layer material which is lodged in the troughs or other depressions in the surface oE the corrugated element than in the case of, say, an equivalent material provided as a flat layer.
The copper or like metal sheet is also of advantage in resisting another class of tool, namely diamond core drills and the like abrasive tools which depend for their operation on the continual wearing down of the tool tip to expose new abrasive particles; when such a tool encounters the corrugated element in a structure according to the invention it will rapidly become clogged by the ductile metal. A structure in accordance with the invention may also offer high resistance to attacks using explosives as the internal metal element can act effectively to retain the integrity of the barrier when subjected to shock loading, and such a structure can furthermore provide the appropriate combination of hard and tough materials for resisting ballistic projectiles and the like.
If it is to be ensured that a cutting tool is blunted by
There is no known single material which can be employed on a practical basis in the construction of such enclosures to resist all types of tool currently at the disposal of the criminal. Various materials are known which provide excellent resistance to specified classes of tool when used in isolation, but for the same barrier structure to be effective against a range of different tool types a combination of different materials is required. Moreover, these materials should be integrated structurally in such a way as to resist the penetration of the overall barrier by "multiple" attacks, w~ere t 1 7?J5~ ~
concerted use is made of a range of different tools, but without significant sacrifice to the resistance of the structure to "single-tool" attac]cs. In particular, it should not be possible readily to penetrate the barrier by the successive penetration of each material encountered with appropriately selected tools, as might be the case with a barrier structure made up with simple discrete layers of the different materials.
In seeking to provide a security barrier structure which is capable of resisting both "single-tool" and "multiple"
attacks as aforesaid the invention is characterised by a corrugated sheet of tough, heat conductive metal resistant to penetration by percussive and thermal tools and extending substantially continuously throughout the structure; and a layer consisting of or containing hard material resistant to penetration by mechanical cutting and drilling tools which layer is disposed in intimate relationship with said corrugated sheet at least on the remote side of said sheet as viewed from the external face of the structure, with portions of said hard material lying within the depressions of the corrugations of said corrugated sheet on said remote side thereof;
the distribution of said hard material, and the spacing and amplitude of the corrugations in said corrugated sheet, being such as to provide that a burglarious attempt to cut a generally cylindrical aperture through said corrugated sheet with a diameter in the range of about 40-125mm, from substantially any position on the near side of the structure as viewed from the external face of the structure and in a direction generally . , 1 1 725 ' ~
perpendicular to the structure, will result in the simultaneous encountering by the tool of both the material of said corrugated sheet and aportion of said hard material disposed on the aforesaid remote side of the sheet.
A particularly preferred material from which the aforesaid corrugated sheet may be made is copper, alternatives including stainless steel, aluminium and 10 cast iron.
The aforesaid cutting and drilling resistant layer which is in intimate relationship with the corrugated sheet preferably contains, (at least in that portion which is 15 disposed on said remote side of the corrugated sheet in relation to an attack from outside the enclosure), at least 10~ by volume of a material whose hardness is in excess of 1000 kg/mm2. Suitable materials for this purpose therefore include security-formulation concretes 20 containing hard aggregates such as quartzite, fused alumina or the like (and which may also be reinforced with steel or polypropylene fibres), and composites such as cast aluminium or copper containing nuggets of fused alumina or the like.
! 1725~
By virtue of its rapid heat-dissipating ability the copper or ot'ner said corrugated metal sheet can confer upon a barrier structure according to the invention good resistance to attack by oxy-acetylene, oxy-arc and the like thermal tools, and can also provide good resistance to power percussion tools by virtue of its ability to deform without fragmentation under the action of such tools (ie its toughness). On the other hand, being relatively soft this type of element would be, in isolation, vulnerable to attack by "sharp edge"
mechanical cutting tools such as drills, holesaws and chisels, but these can be resisted in a structure according to the invention by the hard material in the surrounding matrix. It is in this respect that the corrugated form of the sheet is of particular advantage. As more fully discussed below, this sheet is appropriately shaped such that any such tool adapted to cut a hole of the above-specified diameter which is applied to the corrugated element will inevitably encounter some of the hard material in the layer behind the corrugated sheet before that sheet is completely penetrated. This action will of course rapidly blunt the tool edge, and once blunted cutting tools become very inefficient against ductile metals. In this way the structure can offer high resistance even to multiple attacks which attempt to penetrate the barrier structure firstly by removing a portion of the hard layer in front of the corrugated sheet by one class of tool to which that layer is more vulnerable than the corrugated sheet, and then attacking the exposed corrugated sheet with another class of tool to which that element is percieved to be more vulnerable than the hard layer. The corrugated shape of the internal metal element may indeed g 1725~
also assist in resisting the first stage of such an attack as considerably more difficulty may be experienced in removing the hard layer material which is lodged in the troughs or other depressions in the surface oE the corrugated element than in the case of, say, an equivalent material provided as a flat layer.
The copper or like metal sheet is also of advantage in resisting another class of tool, namely diamond core drills and the like abrasive tools which depend for their operation on the continual wearing down of the tool tip to expose new abrasive particles; when such a tool encounters the corrugated element in a structure according to the invention it will rapidly become clogged by the ductile metal. A structure in accordance with the invention may also offer high resistance to attacks using explosives as the internal metal element can act effectively to retain the integrity of the barrier when subjected to shock loading, and such a structure can furthermore provide the appropriate combination of hard and tough materials for resisting ballistic projectiles and the like.
If it is to be ensured that a cutting tool is blunted by
2~ the hard-layer material before penetration of the internal metal sheet can be completed by that tool then the corrugated form of the sheet must be related to the tool size and direction of advance such as to provide that parts of the tool tip will at one and the same time encounter a portion of the metal element and a portion of the hard material. A simple type of corrugation comprising parallel rows of alternate peaks and troughs can be provided by relatively inexpensive sheet or plate forming techniques and can be effective , .
1 1~25~
by appropriate selection of the dimensions of the corrugations, to ensure that the above-mentioned blunting effect takes place for a wide range of the tool sizes and directions of attack that would be likely to be met in practice. In this respect tests indicate that the amplitude of the corrugations (that is the peak-to-trough height measured at the same aurface) is preferably 5-15mm more than the thickness of the metal in the corrugated sheet, so that for a sheet made from, say, a lOmm thick material the amplitude may be about 20mm. Larger amplitudes do not in general detract from security but are likely to be impractical in safes for example where the wall thickness is limited. It has also been found that the pitch of the corrugations (that is the peak-to-peak or trough-to-trough distance) preferably lies in the range between one half and twice the diameter of the typical penetration which the barrier is intended to resist. For resisting a 125mm diameter "handhole"
penetration a corrugation pitch of between 60 and 250mm may be best, therefore, or for resisting a 40mm diameter penetration the preferred pitch may be between 20 and 80mm. A pitch of about 70mm might therefore be chosen for optimum resistance to the whole range of penetration diameters from 40-125mm. The pitch and amplitude will in general be interrelated such that the angle subtended to the plane of the barrier by an imaginary straight line drawn between an adjacent peak and trough is in the range of 5-60.
However, other more complex corrugated forms may be provided instead of the parallel peak-and-trough form indicated above, for example where there are ridges running in two or more different directions or where there are a plurality of discrete depressions or ~,J' ,~
1 1 ~2~1~
obtrusions distributed over the surface of the metal sheet - such an element could be described as being generally of "eggbox" shape - and the term "corrugated"
is accordingly to be interpreted broadly. Metal elements of these shapes may be more appropriately produced by casting from the molten metal than by sheet-forming.
Structures according to the invention may be produced eg in the form of flat slabs for incorporation into the walls and doors of safes or strongrooms. Alternatively, in the construction of safe bodies it is of advantage if the barrier structure is of "monolithic" form including a suitably interconnected series of the metal sheets (eg one each for the back, top, bottom and two side walls of the safe) disposed within a single "bell" of cast hard layer material. In addition to the main corrugated metal sheet(s) in any such structure it is also possible to incorporate specially formed strips or plates of the same or similar metal into the same structure to give even greater resistance to penetration in particularly important areas of a security enclosure door or body.
In practice the barrier structure will generally be built up on a backing plate which supports and locates the structure in relation to the completed enclosure, (that is the backing plate is located behind the aforesaid hard-layer and corrugated sheet, and may define the inner skin of a safe body for example). The overall structure may then comprise anchors secured to the backing plate and extending into the mass of the hard layer to secure the latter to the plate. Preferably such anchors extend through apertures in the corrugated sheet and are interconnected in front of that element b~ a network of rods or the like. The combination of these rods and - ! 1725~.~
-7~-anchors, (which will resist the corrugated element being pulled away from the backing plate), and the disposition of that element within the hard :Layer can offer excellent resistance to "delamination" of the barrier structure as a whole from the plate, w~ich might be attempted eg through use of explosives or other gross force.
As a further feature of a barrier structure accordiny to the invention it may be of advantage to have the internal metal sheet coated with an electrically insulating and/or fume-generating substance; one substance which couLd provide both properties is bitumen, for example, but others are possible. If the internal metal sheet can be electrically insulated in this way from the usual steel skins or other metal constituents of the security enclosure then it will be very difficult to penetrate the barrier using tools such as the oxy-arc torch - which ! 17253L6 depend for their operation on striking an arc. The ability of such a coating to produce fumes when heated will be of value in hindering thermal attacks in general.
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention will now be more particularly described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-Figure 1 is a section through part of a slab or "bell"barrier structure according to one embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 shows a detail of the structure of Figure l;
Figure 3 is a horizontal section through the door/body junction of a safe incorporating barrier structures according to the invention; and Figure 4 is a view similar to Figure 1 of a further embodiment of the invention.
Referring to Figure 1 there is shown a high strength steel backing plate 1 to which is secured an integral barrier structure comprising a corrugated wrought copper plate 2 disposed in intimate relation within a matrix of cast alumihium alloy 3 containing also nuggets of fused alumina 4 (eg ALOXITE - Registered Trade Mark) or the like very hard, refractory material. In one specific example of a structure as shown in Figure 1 the thickness a of the copper plate was 13mm, the minimum thickness b of matrix material between the copper plate 2 and backing plate 1 was 25mm, the amplitude c of the corrugations in plate 2 was 24mm, the pitch d of the corrugations was in the region of 100-150mm, and the overall thickness e of 1 1725~
the integral barrier was 65mm- As explained previously, a structure of this type has a high resistance to attack by a wide range of thermal and mechanical tools, and the corrugated form of the copper plate 2 in this embodiment is such as to ensure that the tip of any mechanical cutting tool which is adapted to form a "handhole" size aperture in the plate and which is advanced through the barrier from the outside (that is the side remote from the plate 1) will encounter hard elements 4 in the matrix behind the plate 2 before that plate can be completely penetrated.
To produce a structure of the type shown in Figure 1 the ollowing procedure may be adopted. Rows of "L" anchors 5 (Figure 2) are welded to the backing plate 1 and the preformed plate 2 is fitted over these anchors, the plate 2 first having been prepared with appropriately spaced holes 6 in the troughs of selected corrugations (as illustrated), or elsewhere, for this purpose. Cross rods 7 are introduced to run over the surface of the plate 2 and beneath the respective anchors 5 in each row, and the assembly of rods 7 and anchors 5 is welded together. The rods 7 and anchors 5 serve accurately to define the position of the plate 2 in relation to the remainder of the structure during the subsequent steps of manufacture and, most importantly, offer high resistance to separation of the completed security barrier from the backing plate.
. .
After welding up the rods and anchors the plate 1 is assembled with a re-usable mould structure to define an appropriate mould cavity around the plate 2, and the ALOXITE or like nuggets 4 are introduced into the resulting volume. The whole is then preheated and molten aluminium alloy is poured into the cavity to form the 1 l 72~16 matrix 3, the aluminium completely filling the interstices between the nuggets 4 and plates 1 and 2.
The aluminium flows around both sides of the copper plate 2 and through the holes 6 and further pepared holes 8 in the plate so that the plate is intimately embedded in the resultant matrix. Finally, when the casting has cooled the plate l is removed from the mould structure to leave a security barrier of the form shown in Figures 1 and 2.
10 Turning now to Figure 3 this shows one example of the practical application to a security enclosure of barrier structures according to the invention. In this, the door 9 and body 10 of a safe incorporate, respectively, slab and "bell" type barrier structures comprising copper 15 plates 2 in aluminium/alumina matrices 3/4 as previously described, the corrugations in the door plate 2 being shown running vertically and the corrugations in the body plate 2 being shown running horizontally. In addition, wrought copper strips 11 and 12 are integrated into the 20 respective barrier structures at positions adjacent to the junction between the door edge and safe body. These strips 11 and 12 are especially useful in protecting against a torch attack on the door bolts 13 and their detentions 14 in the safe body - in particular they will 25 resist attempts to widen the gap 15 between the door and body in an effort to direct a torch at the bolts 13/detentions 14 at a favourable angle through that gap.
In Figure 4 there is shown another embodiment of a 30 barrier structure in accordance with the invention-There is a corrugated wrought copper plate 2' anchored to a backing plate 1' generally as described before, but in this case the plate 2' is disposed within a matrix 3' of hard security concrete of a total thickness of, say, 35 150mm. The plate 2' is secured to the plate 1' by - i 172516 --ll--anchors S' and rods 7' functionally equivalent to the anchors 5 and rods 7 previously described, additional anchors 16 and rods 17 also being provided to increase resistance to separation of the concrete 3' from the plate 2'. An outer finishing skin is indicated at 18.
The concrete 3' is preferably a fibre-reinforced concrete and contains a high proporation of quartzite or other selected very hard aggregate.
1 1~25~
by appropriate selection of the dimensions of the corrugations, to ensure that the above-mentioned blunting effect takes place for a wide range of the tool sizes and directions of attack that would be likely to be met in practice. In this respect tests indicate that the amplitude of the corrugations (that is the peak-to-trough height measured at the same aurface) is preferably 5-15mm more than the thickness of the metal in the corrugated sheet, so that for a sheet made from, say, a lOmm thick material the amplitude may be about 20mm. Larger amplitudes do not in general detract from security but are likely to be impractical in safes for example where the wall thickness is limited. It has also been found that the pitch of the corrugations (that is the peak-to-peak or trough-to-trough distance) preferably lies in the range between one half and twice the diameter of the typical penetration which the barrier is intended to resist. For resisting a 125mm diameter "handhole"
penetration a corrugation pitch of between 60 and 250mm may be best, therefore, or for resisting a 40mm diameter penetration the preferred pitch may be between 20 and 80mm. A pitch of about 70mm might therefore be chosen for optimum resistance to the whole range of penetration diameters from 40-125mm. The pitch and amplitude will in general be interrelated such that the angle subtended to the plane of the barrier by an imaginary straight line drawn between an adjacent peak and trough is in the range of 5-60.
However, other more complex corrugated forms may be provided instead of the parallel peak-and-trough form indicated above, for example where there are ridges running in two or more different directions or where there are a plurality of discrete depressions or ~,J' ,~
1 1 ~2~1~
obtrusions distributed over the surface of the metal sheet - such an element could be described as being generally of "eggbox" shape - and the term "corrugated"
is accordingly to be interpreted broadly. Metal elements of these shapes may be more appropriately produced by casting from the molten metal than by sheet-forming.
Structures according to the invention may be produced eg in the form of flat slabs for incorporation into the walls and doors of safes or strongrooms. Alternatively, in the construction of safe bodies it is of advantage if the barrier structure is of "monolithic" form including a suitably interconnected series of the metal sheets (eg one each for the back, top, bottom and two side walls of the safe) disposed within a single "bell" of cast hard layer material. In addition to the main corrugated metal sheet(s) in any such structure it is also possible to incorporate specially formed strips or plates of the same or similar metal into the same structure to give even greater resistance to penetration in particularly important areas of a security enclosure door or body.
In practice the barrier structure will generally be built up on a backing plate which supports and locates the structure in relation to the completed enclosure, (that is the backing plate is located behind the aforesaid hard-layer and corrugated sheet, and may define the inner skin of a safe body for example). The overall structure may then comprise anchors secured to the backing plate and extending into the mass of the hard layer to secure the latter to the plate. Preferably such anchors extend through apertures in the corrugated sheet and are interconnected in front of that element b~ a network of rods or the like. The combination of these rods and - ! 1725~.~
-7~-anchors, (which will resist the corrugated element being pulled away from the backing plate), and the disposition of that element within the hard :Layer can offer excellent resistance to "delamination" of the barrier structure as a whole from the plate, w~ich might be attempted eg through use of explosives or other gross force.
As a further feature of a barrier structure accordiny to the invention it may be of advantage to have the internal metal sheet coated with an electrically insulating and/or fume-generating substance; one substance which couLd provide both properties is bitumen, for example, but others are possible. If the internal metal sheet can be electrically insulated in this way from the usual steel skins or other metal constituents of the security enclosure then it will be very difficult to penetrate the barrier using tools such as the oxy-arc torch - which ! 17253L6 depend for their operation on striking an arc. The ability of such a coating to produce fumes when heated will be of value in hindering thermal attacks in general.
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention will now be more particularly described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-Figure 1 is a section through part of a slab or "bell"barrier structure according to one embodiment of the invention;
Figure 2 shows a detail of the structure of Figure l;
Figure 3 is a horizontal section through the door/body junction of a safe incorporating barrier structures according to the invention; and Figure 4 is a view similar to Figure 1 of a further embodiment of the invention.
Referring to Figure 1 there is shown a high strength steel backing plate 1 to which is secured an integral barrier structure comprising a corrugated wrought copper plate 2 disposed in intimate relation within a matrix of cast alumihium alloy 3 containing also nuggets of fused alumina 4 (eg ALOXITE - Registered Trade Mark) or the like very hard, refractory material. In one specific example of a structure as shown in Figure 1 the thickness a of the copper plate was 13mm, the minimum thickness b of matrix material between the copper plate 2 and backing plate 1 was 25mm, the amplitude c of the corrugations in plate 2 was 24mm, the pitch d of the corrugations was in the region of 100-150mm, and the overall thickness e of 1 1725~
the integral barrier was 65mm- As explained previously, a structure of this type has a high resistance to attack by a wide range of thermal and mechanical tools, and the corrugated form of the copper plate 2 in this embodiment is such as to ensure that the tip of any mechanical cutting tool which is adapted to form a "handhole" size aperture in the plate and which is advanced through the barrier from the outside (that is the side remote from the plate 1) will encounter hard elements 4 in the matrix behind the plate 2 before that plate can be completely penetrated.
To produce a structure of the type shown in Figure 1 the ollowing procedure may be adopted. Rows of "L" anchors 5 (Figure 2) are welded to the backing plate 1 and the preformed plate 2 is fitted over these anchors, the plate 2 first having been prepared with appropriately spaced holes 6 in the troughs of selected corrugations (as illustrated), or elsewhere, for this purpose. Cross rods 7 are introduced to run over the surface of the plate 2 and beneath the respective anchors 5 in each row, and the assembly of rods 7 and anchors 5 is welded together. The rods 7 and anchors 5 serve accurately to define the position of the plate 2 in relation to the remainder of the structure during the subsequent steps of manufacture and, most importantly, offer high resistance to separation of the completed security barrier from the backing plate.
. .
After welding up the rods and anchors the plate 1 is assembled with a re-usable mould structure to define an appropriate mould cavity around the plate 2, and the ALOXITE or like nuggets 4 are introduced into the resulting volume. The whole is then preheated and molten aluminium alloy is poured into the cavity to form the 1 l 72~16 matrix 3, the aluminium completely filling the interstices between the nuggets 4 and plates 1 and 2.
The aluminium flows around both sides of the copper plate 2 and through the holes 6 and further pepared holes 8 in the plate so that the plate is intimately embedded in the resultant matrix. Finally, when the casting has cooled the plate l is removed from the mould structure to leave a security barrier of the form shown in Figures 1 and 2.
10 Turning now to Figure 3 this shows one example of the practical application to a security enclosure of barrier structures according to the invention. In this, the door 9 and body 10 of a safe incorporate, respectively, slab and "bell" type barrier structures comprising copper 15 plates 2 in aluminium/alumina matrices 3/4 as previously described, the corrugations in the door plate 2 being shown running vertically and the corrugations in the body plate 2 being shown running horizontally. In addition, wrought copper strips 11 and 12 are integrated into the 20 respective barrier structures at positions adjacent to the junction between the door edge and safe body. These strips 11 and 12 are especially useful in protecting against a torch attack on the door bolts 13 and their detentions 14 in the safe body - in particular they will 25 resist attempts to widen the gap 15 between the door and body in an effort to direct a torch at the bolts 13/detentions 14 at a favourable angle through that gap.
In Figure 4 there is shown another embodiment of a 30 barrier structure in accordance with the invention-There is a corrugated wrought copper plate 2' anchored to a backing plate 1' generally as described before, but in this case the plate 2' is disposed within a matrix 3' of hard security concrete of a total thickness of, say, 35 150mm. The plate 2' is secured to the plate 1' by - i 172516 --ll--anchors S' and rods 7' functionally equivalent to the anchors 5 and rods 7 previously described, additional anchors 16 and rods 17 also being provided to increase resistance to separation of the concrete 3' from the plate 2'. An outer finishing skin is indicated at 18.
The concrete 3' is preferably a fibre-reinforced concrete and contains a high proporation of quartzite or other selected very hard aggregate.
Claims (14)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A security barrier structure for safes and other security enclosures which structure comprises:
a corrugated sheet of tough, heat-conductive metal resistant to penetration by percussive and thermal tools and extending substantially continuously throughout the structure; and a layer consisting of or containing hard material resistant to penetration by mechanical cutting and drilling tools which layer is disposed in intimate relationship with said corrugated sheet at least on the remote side of said sheet as viewed from the external face of the structure, with portions of said hard material lying within the depressions of the corrugations of said corrugated sheet on said remote side thereof;
the distribution of said hard material, and the spacing and amplitude of the corrugations in said corrugated sheet, being such as to provide that a burglarious attempt to cut a generally cylindrical aperture through said corrugated sheet with a diameter in the range of about 40-125mm, from substantially any position on the near side of the structure as viewed from the external face of the structure and in a direction generally perpendicular to the structure, will result in the simultaneous encountering by the tool of both the material of said corrugated sheet and a portion of said hard material disposed on the aforesaid remote side of the sheet.
a corrugated sheet of tough, heat-conductive metal resistant to penetration by percussive and thermal tools and extending substantially continuously throughout the structure; and a layer consisting of or containing hard material resistant to penetration by mechanical cutting and drilling tools which layer is disposed in intimate relationship with said corrugated sheet at least on the remote side of said sheet as viewed from the external face of the structure, with portions of said hard material lying within the depressions of the corrugations of said corrugated sheet on said remote side thereof;
the distribution of said hard material, and the spacing and amplitude of the corrugations in said corrugated sheet, being such as to provide that a burglarious attempt to cut a generally cylindrical aperture through said corrugated sheet with a diameter in the range of about 40-125mm, from substantially any position on the near side of the structure as viewed from the external face of the structure and in a direction generally perpendicular to the structure, will result in the simultaneous encountering by the tool of both the material of said corrugated sheet and a portion of said hard material disposed on the aforesaid remote side of the sheet.
2. A structure according to claim 1 wherein said metal is selected from the group comprising copper, stainless steel, aluminium and cast iron.
3. A structure according to claim 1 wherein at least that portion of said layer which is disposed on said remote side of the corrugated sheet contains at least 10% by volume of a material whose hardness is inexcess of 1000kg/mm2.
4. A structure according to claim 1 wherein the material of said layer is selected from the group comprising concrete of which the aggregate includes quartzite or fused alumina, and cast aluminium or copper containing nuggets of fused alumina.
5. A structure according to claim 1 wherein said corrugated sheet is formed with parallel rows of alternate peaks and troughs.
6. A structure according to claim 5 wherein the amplitude of the corrugations in said sheet is 5-15mm greater than the thickness of the metal therein.
7. A structure according to claim 5 wherein the pitch of the corrugations in said sheet lies in the range of 60-250mm.
8. A structure according to claim 5 wherein the pitch of the corrugations in said sheet lies in the range of 20-80mm.
9. A structure according to claim 5 wherein an imaginary straight line drawn between an adjacent peak and trough of said sheet subtends an angle in the range of 5-60° to the plane of the barrier.
10. A structure according to claim 1 wherein said corrugated sheet is formed with a plurality of discrete depressions or obstrusions distributed over its surface.
11. A structure according to claim 1 which is secured to a backing plate there being anchors extending from the backing plate into the mass of said layer.
12. A structure according to claim 11 wherein said anchors extend through apertures in the corrugated sheet and are interconnected on the near side of that sheet by a network of rods or the like.
13. A structure according to claim 1 wherein the corrugated sheet is coated with al electrically insulating and/or fume-generating substance.
14. A structure according to claim 1 wherein said layer has been formed by being cast around the corrugated sheet.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB8117969 | 1981-06-11 | ||
| GB8117969 | 1981-06-11 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1172516A true CA1172516A (en) | 1984-08-14 |
Family
ID=10522446
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000404848A Expired CA1172516A (en) | 1981-06-11 | 1982-06-10 | Security barrier structure and method of making the same |
Country Status (16)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (1) | EP0067616B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPS58583A (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE19128T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU547616B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1172516A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3270377D1 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK258982A (en) |
| ES (1) | ES275058Y (en) |
| FI (1) | FI822008A0 (en) |
| HK (1) | HK80385A (en) |
| IE (1) | IE52730B1 (en) |
| MY (1) | MY8600237A (en) |
| NO (1) | NO821935L (en) |
| NZ (1) | NZ200895A (en) |
| PT (1) | PT75037B (en) |
| ZA (1) | ZA824029B (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JPS6022677U (en) * | 1983-04-06 | 1985-02-16 | 株式会社 熊平製作所 | safe protection wall |
| EP0150665B1 (en) * | 1984-01-25 | 1989-01-11 | Hügli Ingenieurunternehmung | Concrete security wall |
| FR2716232B1 (en) * | 1994-02-15 | 1996-04-26 | Haffner Tech Sa | Shielded wall for safes or other enclosures to be protected. |
| FR2730520B1 (en) * | 1995-02-15 | 1997-04-11 | Haffner Tech Sa | ARMORED WALL FOR BOXES OR OTHER ENCLOSURES TO BE PROTECTED |
| DE20010647U1 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2001-10-31 | Burg-Wächter KG Alfred Lüling, 58540 Meinerzhagen | Backup cabinet |
| ES2299296B1 (en) * | 2005-07-15 | 2009-10-08 | Talleres Bou, S.L. | CABINET FOR TOXIC, DANGEROUS AND FLAMMABLE PRODUCTS. |
Family Cites Families (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GB891520A (en) * | 1960-12-12 | 1962-03-14 | Platforadling Ab | Improvements in or relating to wall structures for safes and the like |
| FR1427488A (en) * | 1965-03-24 | 1966-02-04 | Improvement in the construction of safes | |
| FR2367898A1 (en) * | 1976-10-13 | 1978-05-12 | Fichet Bauche | High security armour plating for e.g. bank vault - is of composite construction with copper sheet and corundum particles embedded in aluminium body |
| ZA784277B (en) * | 1978-07-27 | 1979-11-28 | Abercom Africa Ltd | Security enclosures |
-
1982
- 1982-06-02 AT AT82302830T patent/ATE19128T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1982-06-02 EP EP82302830A patent/EP0067616B1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-02 DE DE8282302830T patent/DE3270377D1/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-03 IE IE1343/82A patent/IE52730B1/en unknown
- 1982-06-07 FI FI822008A patent/FI822008A0/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1982-06-08 ZA ZA824029A patent/ZA824029B/en unknown
- 1982-06-08 AU AU84670/82A patent/AU547616B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1982-06-09 ES ES1982275058U patent/ES275058Y/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-09 DK DK258982A patent/DK258982A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1982-06-09 PT PT75037A patent/PT75037B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1982-06-09 NZ NZ200895A patent/NZ200895A/en unknown
- 1982-06-10 CA CA000404848A patent/CA1172516A/en not_active Expired
- 1982-06-10 NO NO821935A patent/NO821935L/en unknown
- 1982-06-11 JP JP57100539A patent/JPS58583A/en active Pending
-
1985
- 1985-10-17 HK HK803/85A patent/HK80385A/en unknown
-
1986
- 1986-12-30 MY MY237/86A patent/MY8600237A/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| PT75037B (en) | 1983-12-23 |
| IE821343L (en) | 1982-12-11 |
| AU8467082A (en) | 1982-12-16 |
| EP0067616A2 (en) | 1982-12-22 |
| NO821935L (en) | 1982-12-13 |
| JPS58583A (en) | 1983-01-05 |
| ZA824029B (en) | 1983-04-27 |
| DE3270377D1 (en) | 1986-05-15 |
| MY8600237A (en) | 1986-12-31 |
| DK258982A (en) | 1982-12-12 |
| FI822008A0 (en) | 1982-06-07 |
| EP0067616B1 (en) | 1986-04-09 |
| ES275058U (en) | 1984-05-16 |
| HK80385A (en) | 1985-10-25 |
| NZ200895A (en) | 1984-12-14 |
| AU547616B2 (en) | 1985-10-27 |
| ES275058Y (en) | 1984-12-16 |
| ATE19128T1 (en) | 1986-04-15 |
| PT75037A (en) | 1982-07-01 |
| EP0067616A3 (en) | 1983-05-18 |
| IE52730B1 (en) | 1988-02-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US5007326A (en) | Cast single plate P900 armor | |
| US7026045B2 (en) | Multilayer composite armour | |
| US20090229453A1 (en) | Ceramic multi-hit armor | |
| CA1172516A (en) | Security barrier structure and method of making the same | |
| US4593627A (en) | Burglary attack resistant money safe high fiber concrete reinforced metal encased wall and door construction and manufacture | |
| US7000550B1 (en) | Ablative blast resistant security door panel | |
| GB2101173A (en) | Security barrier structure and method of making the same | |
| US20110260128A1 (en) | Fence panel | |
| US4489663A (en) | Light weight vault door | |
| CN215413393U (en) | Polyurea dispersion infiltration polyhedral ceramic block protective structure | |
| Jouri et al. | The impact behaviour of aluminium alloy and mild steel double-shear specimens | |
| US4926761A (en) | Armor particularly for a safe and a safe thus produced | |
| EP0048030B1 (en) | Protective filling, particularly for safe walls | |
| AU741792B2 (en) | Improvements in shaped charge liners | |
| US4696240A (en) | Safety container | |
| EP0316577A1 (en) | An armor plate wall structure for safes, security spaces at banks, and the like | |
| JPH047354Y2 (en) | ||
| WO2008097375A2 (en) | Encapsulated ceramic composite armor | |
| JPH047355Y2 (en) | ||
| US4139237A (en) | Breaker bar | |
| Cheng | Investigation on anti-penetration performance of reinforced concrete targets based on ANSYS/LS-DYNA | |
| CN221524589U (en) | Waterproof cutting reinforced safe wall and vault wall structure | |
| EP3384226B1 (en) | Shock absorption panel | |
| JPS61254781A (en) | Cdre material for safe, etc. | |
| CN221524588U (en) | Safe wall and vault wall structure |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEC | Expiry (correction) | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |