CA1140003A - Dry, particulate, inorganic ultrafiltration membranes and production thereof - Google Patents
Dry, particulate, inorganic ultrafiltration membranes and production thereofInfo
- Publication number
- CA1140003A CA1140003A CA000321667A CA321667A CA1140003A CA 1140003 A CA1140003 A CA 1140003A CA 000321667 A CA000321667 A CA 000321667A CA 321667 A CA321667 A CA 321667A CA 1140003 A CA1140003 A CA 1140003A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- membrane
- coating
- support
- coating material
- liquid medium
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Landscapes
- Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
Abstract
DRY, PARTICULATE, INORGANIC ULTRAFILTRATION
MEMBRANES AND THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
Abstract of the Disclosure A coating is applied to a microporous support in the presence of a volatile liquid capable of drawing the coating into the support and of desolvating the coating.
The liquid is thereafter volatilized with the resulting dry ultrafiltration membrane being essentially crack-free and having desirable mechanical and chemical stability. The support may be pretreated with a volatile liquid, such as acetone, prior to the applying of the coating to the support. Alternately, the coating material can be dispersed in a volatile liquid, such as methanol, to form a coating suspension that is applied to the support. The coating material, preferably zirconia, will have a particle size within the range of from about 5 mu to about 10 u, with the coating having a thickness of up to about 20 u. The support, such as a porous carbon tube, will have a pore volume of about 5-60% and a pore size of about 5 mu - 40 u.
Stability is enhanced by firing the membrane at 25°C-1500°C, preferably at about 400°C-600°C.
S P F C I F I C A T I O N:
MEMBRANES AND THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
Abstract of the Disclosure A coating is applied to a microporous support in the presence of a volatile liquid capable of drawing the coating into the support and of desolvating the coating.
The liquid is thereafter volatilized with the resulting dry ultrafiltration membrane being essentially crack-free and having desirable mechanical and chemical stability. The support may be pretreated with a volatile liquid, such as acetone, prior to the applying of the coating to the support. Alternately, the coating material can be dispersed in a volatile liquid, such as methanol, to form a coating suspension that is applied to the support. The coating material, preferably zirconia, will have a particle size within the range of from about 5 mu to about 10 u, with the coating having a thickness of up to about 20 u. The support, such as a porous carbon tube, will have a pore volume of about 5-60% and a pore size of about 5 mu - 40 u.
Stability is enhanced by firing the membrane at 25°C-1500°C, preferably at about 400°C-600°C.
S P F C I F I C A T I O N:
Description
D~1487 ~ O 3 Back~round_of t~e Invention Field of ~he Invention The in~ntion rélates to ultrafiltration membranes.
More particularly, it relates to the production of dry, crack-free membranes having enhanced stability.
Description of the Prior Art The production and use of inorganic, semipermeable membranes for ultrafiltration purposes are well known in the art. Most such inorganic membranes are vf advantage in their resistance to temperature and solvent effects. In some instances, the membranes also possess molecular perm-selectivity and ion-exchange properties. Berger, US 3,497,394, thus disclosed an ion exchange membrane made by forcing a metal oxide gel into a porous support.
In the practical application of ultrafiltration membranes, high flux is an essential feature, and it has been found desirable to have a highly porous support and a thin, fine membrane. Colloidal particles thus should not be imbedded in depth into the filter body. In a dry, in-organlc, semipermeable filter disclosed in French patent No. 1,440,105, however, fine colloidal particles are said to create a thin membrane in the surface of a porous com-bined membrane - support formed from a suspension of coarse and eolloidal size particles of -A1203 by slip casting in a plaster mold.
Ultrafiltration membranes should also have good mechanical and chemical stability for use in practical commercial applications. Dehydration of ordinary particulate " ~
~ -2-.
D~11487 membranes always result, however, in "mud cracks" that ruin the membranes' semipermeable characteristics. In the pre~
paration of a support surface, the ormation of cracks can, of course, be tolerated. In the Thomas patent, US 3,926,799, for example, a membrane support is made by coating a zirconia slurry onto a porous substrate, followed by drying and fir-ing the resulting composite at high temperature to form a rugged precoat. Lar~e pores or cracks would be expected to form in this process and would be unacceptable in the form-ation of the membrane itself. Ultrafiltration membranes susceptible to such crack formation must be maintained wet at all times. Such membranes include those taught by the Trulson et. al. patent, US 3,977, 967, which discloses hollow tubular members having a well defined porosity and a substantially uniform, continuous, adherent, porous coating of preformed, aggregated inorganic metal sxide particles deposlted thereon through permeation means. The cohesiveness of membranes of this type is due to relatlvely weak physical forces, and the cohesive forces between the particles, and the stability of the particulate membrane, would be ~nhanced by the dehydration o the metal oxide particles. Such dehydration is precluded, however, by the necessity for maintalning the membranes wet at all times to avoid the formation of cracks that would destroy the semipermeable characteristics of the membrane.
Enhanced mechanical and chemical stability are, of course, desired characteristics for inorganic ultra-filtration membranes In addition,' enhanced flexibility would be achieyed by the development of ultrafiltration membranes that need not be maintained wet at all . .
_3_ -~ D-11487 oa3 times. Thus, the handling, transport and storage of mem-branes would be facilitated by the elimination of this require~ent.
It is an object of the invention, there~ore, to provide an improved ultrafiltration membrane.
It is another object of the invention to provide a process for t~e production of a dry, crack-free, inorganic ultrafiltration membrane.
It is another obJec~ of the invention to provide a crack-free, mechanically and chemically stable membrane.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a stable, crack-free, dry ultrafiltration membrane having good perselectivity and flux.
With these and other objects in mind, the inven^
tion is hereinafter described in detail, the novel features thereof being particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
Summa~y of the Invention The objects of the invention are accomplished by ~he coating of a microporous suppor~ with an inorganic membrane coating material in the pre.sence of a volatile liquid capable of drawing the coating material into the suppor~ and desolvating said coating. The desolvation of the coating, prior to the complete removal of the volatile liquid, results in a shrinking of the coating and the consequent filling of voids regulting from such shrinkage by the coating material. As a result, the development of cracks during desolvation of the coated membrane is avoided. The membrane thus produced is a dry, essentially '~
crack-free inorganic membrane of enhanced mechanical and ~hemical stability. The membrane support may be pretreated with the volatile liquid prior to application of the coat-ing or the coating material, preferably zirconia, can be dispersed in a suitable volatile liquid to form a suspen-sion that is coated onto the membrane support. Following removal of the volatile liquid from the treated mem~rane, as by air drying, firing to a desolvating temperature further enhances the stability of the membrane.
Detailed Descr ption_of the Inven~ion The ultrafiltration membrane of the invention comprises a crack-free, dry, inorganic coating anchored to a microporous support. The membrane has desirable mechanical and chemical stability, exhibiting good physical coherence, resistance to acid, alkali, soap and deter~ent washing and the ability to withstand ultrasonic stress and abrasion. Unlike prior art membranes that develop cracks tending to destroy their semipermeable characteristics when dry, the membrances of the invention remains essentially crack-free upon drying with their physical stability actually being improved by drying and firing.
In the process of the invention, a volatile liquid medium miscible with the membrane coating suspension is employed to draw the coating material into the membrane support and to desolvate said coating material. As a resul~
of such desolvation, a shrinking of the coating material occurs, accompanied by a consequent filling of the voids produced as a result of said shrinkage by said coating material. Such action, made possible by the desolvation of :~7 slY
~ 87 the coating material prior to complete removal of said liquid medium, avoids the development of microscopic cracks that otherwise occur upon desolvation of the coated membrane.
/ In one embodiment of the process of the invention, a microporous membrane support is pretreated with a volatile liquid medium non-solvating to the coating material and capable of drawing said material into the support and of desolvating said coating material. The pretreated ~upport is then contacted with a suspension of the coating material.
After draining excess suspension from the surface of the membrane, the thus-treated mem~rane is exposed to a temperature capable of volatilizing the liquid medium to remove said liquid from the microporous membrane support and said coating material~ As indicated above, the treated membrane may thereafter be fired, if desired, to a dehydra-tion or desolvation temperature to enhance the stability o~
the me~brane by sintering the coating material. The pre-treatment can be carried out by wetting the entire micro-poro~s ~upport with the volatile liquid medium until the support is saturated. This usually takes a very short time, e.g., less than a minute. While still wet, the support is contacted, on one surface, with the coating suspension, usually again for about`one minute. When the porous support is of convenient tubular shape t it is generally preferred to wet the inside surface with the support tube positioned in a vertical manner. The suspension can be fed conveniently through the bottom opening of the tubular support, by gravity, injection ~leans or vacuum .. .. ~
-~ D~11487 so entrapped air can be avoided. The tube is filled to the top with the coating suspension, and the supply of suspension is replenished as liquid is drawn into the porous support.
The coa~ing prooedure can be completed in about one minute.
In treating a number of tubes at one time, sufficient space should desirably be maintained between the tubes to assure that the volatile liquid medium vaporizes freely. After the support has been coated as indicated above, e~cess suspension can be drained therefrom in a few seconds time.
The treated tube is then air dried or otherwi~e exposed to a temperature capable of volatilizing the liquid medium while the tube is conveniently maintained in its vertical position.
Air drying is usually carried out for about an hour.
In another embodiment, the coating material is dispersed directly in the liquid medium that is non-solvating to said coating material and is capable of drawing the coat-ing material into the support and of de~ol~a~ing ~he coating material The resulting suspension is pplied to the membrane support withou~ pretreatment of the support. Excess suspension is drained away from ~he membrane, as in the previous embodiment, and the membrane is dried and, if de-sired, fired at a desolvation tempera~ure to enhance the stability of the membrane It will be understood that ~he desolvation of thP
- coating material by the volatile liquid medium includes not only the removal of a separate liquid employe.d to form a suspension of the coating material, as in the support prP-treatment embodiment described above, but the possible removal of ~ater of hydration associated with the coating material.
~L4~
Removal of such water by dehydration upon drying and/or firing of conventional membranes would result in shrinkage and of the development of cracks as noted above.
In the latter embodiment, the particles of coating material in the suspension are drawn into the porous surface as the solvent evaporates. The thickness of the membrane in-creases with contact time, however, so time control must be observed to avoid excess membrane thickness.
The membrane of the invention is formed from sus-pensions of inorganic refractory materials. Most such inorganic refractory materials are in the form of oxides 7 e.g., metal oxides. In particular, the oxides of metals of Groups III-A, III-B, IV-A, IV-B, V-A, V-B, VI-B, VII-B
and VIII and lanthanides and ac~inides, as described in the Berger patent, US 3,497,394, can be employed in the practice of the present invention. Zirconia is a particu-larly preferred coating material, as it is known to be chemically inert to strong and weak acids, alkalis and solvents, even at high temperature, and advantageous for practical commercial applications.
The finely dispersed colloidal oxides employed in the invention usually are solvated or have hydrous or hydroxyl surfaces. When deposited to form a filtration mem-brane, only weak van der Waals or hydrogen bonding inter-actions in close proximity are responsible for the cohesive force holding the membrane together. Upon heat treatment to a desolvating or dehydrating temperature, or to a sintering temperature, strong metal-oxygen-metal bonds can be formed, thus increasing the cohesion between the membrane coating particles. Unlike previous wet particulate membranes that ~,....
~ 3 D~ s~7 ~, developed macroscopic cracks due to shrinkage upon dehydra-tion, the present invention inherently overcomes the problem of shrinkage because most of the dehydration of the particu-late surface occurs by the use of said miscible,dehydrating liquid, i.e., solvent, during deposition o~ the mem~rane material. The desolvated particles are thus preshrunk and coating particles continue to fill the voids produced by solvent removal. The formation of cracks during the sub-sequent drying of the membrane is thereby avoided, resulting in the production of a heat-treated membrane composed mainly of dehydrated oxide, that is microporous in nature, and free of observable cracks.
The coating particles employed are in the particle size range that will form a good semipermeable filter.
Typically, such particles are in the range of from about 5 mu to about 10 u, with a range o from about 10 mu to a~out 1 u being generally preerred for ultrafiltration purposes, Wh~le it is generally preferred that the disper8ion be ~n an aqueous medium for convenlence ln handling and good stab~lity, it will be appreciated that other liquid ~edia can also be employed. When the support pretreatment embodiment is employed~ the suspension itself should be miscible with the pretreatment solvent. If the medium used for coating material dispersion is a volatile, nonsolvating liquid, comp~tible with said dispersion so as to preelude the flocculation thereof, then ~ ~he alternate embodimen~ can be employed with direct contact of the suspension with~the untreated microporou~ suppvrt. As ~, .
_g_ 114~003 D-11487 noted above, however, the contact time must be carefully controlled in this embodiment as such suspensions would continue to coat the support substrate as long as they main-tain contact with said substra~e. An undesired thickness can thereby be formed if contact of the suspension with the support substrate is unduly prolonged, The thickness of the membrane is also influenced by the concentration of eoating particles in the suspension. Concentrations of from about 0.5 to about 20% by weight based on the total weight of the suspension are generally satisfactory, depending on the type of coating material employed, with a concentration of about 6% by weight being generally preferred to form an optimum coating thickness. The membrane coating will generally be from submicron up to about 20- micron. i.e. 20 u. ~hickness .
The microporous support, or substrate, should consist of a material as chemically and thermally reslstant as the membrane itself. Sintered metal inorganic oxides, such as metal oxides, carbon and graphite are lllu~trative examples of suitable substrate materials. The substrate shouId have a high porosity with pore sizes that can support the colloidal particles used to form the membrane coating.
Thus, it is generally desirab~e that the substrate have a pore volume of from about 5 to about 60% with pore sizes of from about 5 mu to about 40 u, More preferably, the sub-strate should have a pore volume of from about 20% to about 40%, with pore sizes of from about 100 mu to about 2 u.
The microporous membrane support of the invention is not limited to any particular shape. Thus, the support can be flat, spiral, hollow-fiber, or any other convenient ~ D-11487 shape although tubular shapes are generally preferred.
Porous carbon ~ubing has been found to be particularly con-venient, having ex elle~t resistance to both chemicals and high temperature. When firing such tubing, appropriate care should be taken to avoid its oxidation or the r~duction of some metal oxide particles. A carbon tube having a pore .t , volume of about 0.19 ml/g with a pore size distribution peaked at abou~ 0.3 u has been found to constitute an espe-cially pre~erred membrane support material. In coating the support, the direction of flow of the coating suspension can be inside-out or outside-in depending on various design parameters such as hydraulic flows, pressure and the like.
The volatile liquid medium used to pre~reat the microporous support should be nonsolvating to the coating material and capable of drawing said material into the support and of de~olvat~ng the coating material. Said volatile liquid should thus be miscible with the coating suspension ~edium so as to draw the coating material in~o the support. It is also preferred tha~ said liquid be 2V volatile a~ a convenient temperature, such as from about 15C to about 100C. ) Most ketones and alcohols are suitable pretreatment liquids, wi~h acetone and methanol being preferred liquids, and with acetone being particul~rly preferred and highly suitable or use in conjunction with aqueous suspensions of the coatlng material. In the em-bodiment in which the coating material suspenslon medium is volatile and is a nonsolva~ing liquid to the particles, the coating operation can be carried ~ut directly without mem-brane support pretreatment, the suspension medium serving to draw the coating matsrial lnto the support and to desolvate ' -~ D-11487 ~ 3 said coating material particles. Methanol is a sui~able suspension medium for use in this em~odiment of the inven-tion, and can readily ~e employed as a suspension medium for the preferred zirconia coati.ng material without pretreatment of the supporting substrate.
The exposing of the treated membrane to a temper-ature capable o~ volatilizing the liquid medium to remove it from the membrane support and coating material can readily be accomplished in the atmosphere, i.e., by air drying as at from about 15C to about 100C. If prolonged and high temperature is required for an oxidizable material, such as carbon and metals, the baking can be carried out in an inert atmosphere. The temperature should be above the desolvation or dehydration temperature. Wh~n firing to enhance the stability of the membrane~ temperatures above that at which the particles will be sintered should advantageously be employed. Firing will generally be at a dehydration or desoluation temperature in the range of from about 25C to about 1500C, raore particularly from about 60C to about 1200C. Firing temperatures in the range o~ ~rom about 400C to about 600C, with firing ~imes on the order o~ thirty minutes, have been preferred. The furnace can be preheated to a desired temperature, or the temperature can be raised gradually while the membrane and support are in place. The temperature is usually brought gradually up to ~ preset maximum and then held for a period of from about ten minutes to a couple of hours. ~-Fired zirconia membranes prepared in accordance with the invention have been found to maintain the coating ......
0~3 after exposure to a circulating wash employing acid, base, detergent and soap was~es, and to abrasion and ultrasonic tests~ A conventional wet membrane as des-cribed above, on the other hand, was found to have only partial retention in acidic, base and detergent circulat-ing washes. The coating of the conventional membrane was found also ~o have sloughed off upon exposure to a cir-culating soap wash and upon exposure to abrasion and ultrasonic tests. Whereas the membrane of the inventlon had good rejection properties on drying, the conventional wet membrane had poor rejection properties when dry. Be-cause of its superior stability, a stable hydrous zirconia coating can be permanently deposited onto the membrane of this invention to provide it with a hyperfiltration charac-teris~ic that can be used for the retention of low molecular weight macromolecules. The invention is further illustrated by the following examples falling within the scope of the invention disclosed and claimed herein.
Example 1 A microporous carbon tube having a length of 63.5 cm, an inside dia. of 6 mm, an outside dia. of 10 mm, and a pore volume of 0.185 cm3/g was employed as a mem-brane support. 75% of the pores were between 0.1 mu and 1.0 mu, with the peak distribution at about 0.3 mu. About 0.025 cm3/g of the tube had pores of from about 2 to about 10 u. The air permeation rate of the tube was about 1500 cm3/min. at 25C and 0.68 atm. differential pressure.
Water flux was measured at about 200 ml/min. at 38C and ~L4~
6,8 atm. Th tube was tilted on one end, and sufficien~
acetone was ~ntroduced from the top opening untll the tube was full, with additional acetone belng supplied as the level decreased due to absorption, Upon saturatlon in about 30 secon~sJ the acetone was drained from the tube. A
suspension o zirconia was then quickly injected through the bottom cork seal until the tube was full~ The suspension was held in the tu~e in the vertical position for one minute with the level of the suspension maintained at the top opening continuously, after which the suspension was drained from the tube. The tube wa~ then air dried in a Yertical position for one hour. It was then fired in a furnace, starting at 25C and with the temperature increased to 650C in about 15 minutes and maintained a~ that temperature or an additional 15 minute~, The eoating suspenslon was a 6~/o weigh~/per volume aqueous suspension of zirconia (88%) ~tabilized wit~ yttria ~12~/o)~
The particle surface area was about 45 m2/g having an aggregate si~e of 3.1 ~o 1,0 u. The coated tube wa~
found to have about 1,7 mg/cm2 of zirconia on the carbon tube, The essentially crack-free membrane coating remained intact after washing or 10 minutes with circulat-ing water, then with 0.5% aqueous oxalie acid ~or 20 minutes, and then with 0,1 M Na~H or lO minutes, and finally again with water ~or 10 minutes. The coating likewise remained ln~act in an ultrasonic test in which ~, -14~
D-114~7 -a one inch piece of the coated tube was broken open, submerged in a 200 ml beaker half filled with water and subjected to an ultrasonic stress of 2 x 104 cps at about 70 watts for 15 minutes. After measuring the water flux which was 173 gfd (gallons per square foot per day) at 60 psi and 40C, the membrane was tested with a 1% soluble oil in water emulsion using cutting oil as a feed at a flux of 173 gfd at 60 psi and 40C, with 2.5 gpm circulation.
Rejection of emulsified oil by turbidity testing was 99.5%. Concentration was carried out until a 5%
oil concentration was reached. The flux at this point was 167 gfd at 60 psi and 40C with 2.5 gpm circulation. Rejection of emulsified oil, by turbidity test, was 99.7%. A separate zirconia membrane prepared in the same manner on the same type tube was tested with a 400,000 mol. wt hydro-lyzed starch. Rejection of better than 99% was observed.
Example 2 A membrane was prepared by the procedure of Example 1 except that the acetone pretreatment was omitted. The suspension was prepared by diluting one volume of a 30% aqueous zirconia suspension with methanol to a total of five volumes. Using the evaluation procedures and conditions of Example l, the crack-free membrane of the invention achieved the following results: water flux -180 gfd; flux at the ~ ~ ~a ~ Q 3 D-11487 beginning feed concentration of 1% oil - 177 gfd, with a rejection of 99.8%; and flux after concentration to 5% oil -173 gfd with a rejection of 99~8~/o~
Example 3 A fired zirconia membrane was prepared as in Example 1 except that an alumina tube was employed as ~he membrane support. The tube had an initial water-wetted bubble point pressure of 22 psi in air. Performance under the same conditions and procedures as in Example 1, for said 1% cutting oil, were: flux - 340 gfd; rejection -98.4%.
Example 4 A zirconia membrane was prepared on a carbon tube, as in Example 1, except that the maximum furnace temperature for firing was 1100C for one hour under a nitrogen atmo-sphere. Performance under the conditions and procedures of Example 1 give a water flux of 306 gfd and a flux ~or 1%
oil of 272 gfd) with a rejection of 99.4%.
, Example 5 The procedures of Example 1 were again employed, except tha~ the coating suspension was made from 5%
tantalum oxide. The particles had an initial surface area of 5.14 m2/g, and were ground with ceramic balls at a`p~
of 4 for 72 hours. Performance under the conditions and procedures of Example 1 were: water flu~ - 258 gfd; flux for 1% oil - 200 gfd, with a rejection of 96%.
In other applications of the invention, various other alternatives were employed, e.g., empLoying me~hyl ~ 0 3 ethyl ketone as the pretreatment volatile liquid in the preparation of a zirconia membrane in accordance with the procedures of Example 1 and, likewise employing said pro-cedures, except for the substitution of silica in p~ace of zirconia for the production of a silica membrane. In other applications,~zirconia membranes can be prepared ~n a variety of porous support materials, such as a porous sintered metal tube, a fiber glass tube, a paper tube and the like.
The ultrafiltration membrane of the invention, in its various embodiments, represents a ~ignificant advance in the art. In addition to having good flux and rejection properties, the membrane resists chemicals, detergents and extremes of pH and temperature and has a superior stability to previously available particulate membranes. By providing these advantages in a dry, crack-free membrane, the inventior overcomes the appreciable limitations and restrictions here-tofore encountéred and provides greatly enhanced flexibility in the handling, storage and application of lnorganic ultra-filtration membranes.
More particularly, it relates to the production of dry, crack-free membranes having enhanced stability.
Description of the Prior Art The production and use of inorganic, semipermeable membranes for ultrafiltration purposes are well known in the art. Most such inorganic membranes are vf advantage in their resistance to temperature and solvent effects. In some instances, the membranes also possess molecular perm-selectivity and ion-exchange properties. Berger, US 3,497,394, thus disclosed an ion exchange membrane made by forcing a metal oxide gel into a porous support.
In the practical application of ultrafiltration membranes, high flux is an essential feature, and it has been found desirable to have a highly porous support and a thin, fine membrane. Colloidal particles thus should not be imbedded in depth into the filter body. In a dry, in-organlc, semipermeable filter disclosed in French patent No. 1,440,105, however, fine colloidal particles are said to create a thin membrane in the surface of a porous com-bined membrane - support formed from a suspension of coarse and eolloidal size particles of -A1203 by slip casting in a plaster mold.
Ultrafiltration membranes should also have good mechanical and chemical stability for use in practical commercial applications. Dehydration of ordinary particulate " ~
~ -2-.
D~11487 membranes always result, however, in "mud cracks" that ruin the membranes' semipermeable characteristics. In the pre~
paration of a support surface, the ormation of cracks can, of course, be tolerated. In the Thomas patent, US 3,926,799, for example, a membrane support is made by coating a zirconia slurry onto a porous substrate, followed by drying and fir-ing the resulting composite at high temperature to form a rugged precoat. Lar~e pores or cracks would be expected to form in this process and would be unacceptable in the form-ation of the membrane itself. Ultrafiltration membranes susceptible to such crack formation must be maintained wet at all times. Such membranes include those taught by the Trulson et. al. patent, US 3,977, 967, which discloses hollow tubular members having a well defined porosity and a substantially uniform, continuous, adherent, porous coating of preformed, aggregated inorganic metal sxide particles deposlted thereon through permeation means. The cohesiveness of membranes of this type is due to relatlvely weak physical forces, and the cohesive forces between the particles, and the stability of the particulate membrane, would be ~nhanced by the dehydration o the metal oxide particles. Such dehydration is precluded, however, by the necessity for maintalning the membranes wet at all times to avoid the formation of cracks that would destroy the semipermeable characteristics of the membrane.
Enhanced mechanical and chemical stability are, of course, desired characteristics for inorganic ultra-filtration membranes In addition,' enhanced flexibility would be achieyed by the development of ultrafiltration membranes that need not be maintained wet at all . .
_3_ -~ D-11487 oa3 times. Thus, the handling, transport and storage of mem-branes would be facilitated by the elimination of this require~ent.
It is an object of the invention, there~ore, to provide an improved ultrafiltration membrane.
It is another object of the invention to provide a process for t~e production of a dry, crack-free, inorganic ultrafiltration membrane.
It is another obJec~ of the invention to provide a crack-free, mechanically and chemically stable membrane.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a stable, crack-free, dry ultrafiltration membrane having good perselectivity and flux.
With these and other objects in mind, the inven^
tion is hereinafter described in detail, the novel features thereof being particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
Summa~y of the Invention The objects of the invention are accomplished by ~he coating of a microporous suppor~ with an inorganic membrane coating material in the pre.sence of a volatile liquid capable of drawing the coating material into the suppor~ and desolvating said coating. The desolvation of the coating, prior to the complete removal of the volatile liquid, results in a shrinking of the coating and the consequent filling of voids regulting from such shrinkage by the coating material. As a result, the development of cracks during desolvation of the coated membrane is avoided. The membrane thus produced is a dry, essentially '~
crack-free inorganic membrane of enhanced mechanical and ~hemical stability. The membrane support may be pretreated with the volatile liquid prior to application of the coat-ing or the coating material, preferably zirconia, can be dispersed in a suitable volatile liquid to form a suspen-sion that is coated onto the membrane support. Following removal of the volatile liquid from the treated mem~rane, as by air drying, firing to a desolvating temperature further enhances the stability of the membrane.
Detailed Descr ption_of the Inven~ion The ultrafiltration membrane of the invention comprises a crack-free, dry, inorganic coating anchored to a microporous support. The membrane has desirable mechanical and chemical stability, exhibiting good physical coherence, resistance to acid, alkali, soap and deter~ent washing and the ability to withstand ultrasonic stress and abrasion. Unlike prior art membranes that develop cracks tending to destroy their semipermeable characteristics when dry, the membrances of the invention remains essentially crack-free upon drying with their physical stability actually being improved by drying and firing.
In the process of the invention, a volatile liquid medium miscible with the membrane coating suspension is employed to draw the coating material into the membrane support and to desolvate said coating material. As a resul~
of such desolvation, a shrinking of the coating material occurs, accompanied by a consequent filling of the voids produced as a result of said shrinkage by said coating material. Such action, made possible by the desolvation of :~7 slY
~ 87 the coating material prior to complete removal of said liquid medium, avoids the development of microscopic cracks that otherwise occur upon desolvation of the coated membrane.
/ In one embodiment of the process of the invention, a microporous membrane support is pretreated with a volatile liquid medium non-solvating to the coating material and capable of drawing said material into the support and of desolvating said coating material. The pretreated ~upport is then contacted with a suspension of the coating material.
After draining excess suspension from the surface of the membrane, the thus-treated mem~rane is exposed to a temperature capable of volatilizing the liquid medium to remove said liquid from the microporous membrane support and said coating material~ As indicated above, the treated membrane may thereafter be fired, if desired, to a dehydra-tion or desolvation temperature to enhance the stability o~
the me~brane by sintering the coating material. The pre-treatment can be carried out by wetting the entire micro-poro~s ~upport with the volatile liquid medium until the support is saturated. This usually takes a very short time, e.g., less than a minute. While still wet, the support is contacted, on one surface, with the coating suspension, usually again for about`one minute. When the porous support is of convenient tubular shape t it is generally preferred to wet the inside surface with the support tube positioned in a vertical manner. The suspension can be fed conveniently through the bottom opening of the tubular support, by gravity, injection ~leans or vacuum .. .. ~
-~ D~11487 so entrapped air can be avoided. The tube is filled to the top with the coating suspension, and the supply of suspension is replenished as liquid is drawn into the porous support.
The coa~ing prooedure can be completed in about one minute.
In treating a number of tubes at one time, sufficient space should desirably be maintained between the tubes to assure that the volatile liquid medium vaporizes freely. After the support has been coated as indicated above, e~cess suspension can be drained therefrom in a few seconds time.
The treated tube is then air dried or otherwi~e exposed to a temperature capable of volatilizing the liquid medium while the tube is conveniently maintained in its vertical position.
Air drying is usually carried out for about an hour.
In another embodiment, the coating material is dispersed directly in the liquid medium that is non-solvating to said coating material and is capable of drawing the coat-ing material into the support and of de~ol~a~ing ~he coating material The resulting suspension is pplied to the membrane support withou~ pretreatment of the support. Excess suspension is drained away from ~he membrane, as in the previous embodiment, and the membrane is dried and, if de-sired, fired at a desolvation tempera~ure to enhance the stability of the membrane It will be understood that ~he desolvation of thP
- coating material by the volatile liquid medium includes not only the removal of a separate liquid employe.d to form a suspension of the coating material, as in the support prP-treatment embodiment described above, but the possible removal of ~ater of hydration associated with the coating material.
~L4~
Removal of such water by dehydration upon drying and/or firing of conventional membranes would result in shrinkage and of the development of cracks as noted above.
In the latter embodiment, the particles of coating material in the suspension are drawn into the porous surface as the solvent evaporates. The thickness of the membrane in-creases with contact time, however, so time control must be observed to avoid excess membrane thickness.
The membrane of the invention is formed from sus-pensions of inorganic refractory materials. Most such inorganic refractory materials are in the form of oxides 7 e.g., metal oxides. In particular, the oxides of metals of Groups III-A, III-B, IV-A, IV-B, V-A, V-B, VI-B, VII-B
and VIII and lanthanides and ac~inides, as described in the Berger patent, US 3,497,394, can be employed in the practice of the present invention. Zirconia is a particu-larly preferred coating material, as it is known to be chemically inert to strong and weak acids, alkalis and solvents, even at high temperature, and advantageous for practical commercial applications.
The finely dispersed colloidal oxides employed in the invention usually are solvated or have hydrous or hydroxyl surfaces. When deposited to form a filtration mem-brane, only weak van der Waals or hydrogen bonding inter-actions in close proximity are responsible for the cohesive force holding the membrane together. Upon heat treatment to a desolvating or dehydrating temperature, or to a sintering temperature, strong metal-oxygen-metal bonds can be formed, thus increasing the cohesion between the membrane coating particles. Unlike previous wet particulate membranes that ~,....
~ 3 D~ s~7 ~, developed macroscopic cracks due to shrinkage upon dehydra-tion, the present invention inherently overcomes the problem of shrinkage because most of the dehydration of the particu-late surface occurs by the use of said miscible,dehydrating liquid, i.e., solvent, during deposition o~ the mem~rane material. The desolvated particles are thus preshrunk and coating particles continue to fill the voids produced by solvent removal. The formation of cracks during the sub-sequent drying of the membrane is thereby avoided, resulting in the production of a heat-treated membrane composed mainly of dehydrated oxide, that is microporous in nature, and free of observable cracks.
The coating particles employed are in the particle size range that will form a good semipermeable filter.
Typically, such particles are in the range of from about 5 mu to about 10 u, with a range o from about 10 mu to a~out 1 u being generally preerred for ultrafiltration purposes, Wh~le it is generally preferred that the disper8ion be ~n an aqueous medium for convenlence ln handling and good stab~lity, it will be appreciated that other liquid ~edia can also be employed. When the support pretreatment embodiment is employed~ the suspension itself should be miscible with the pretreatment solvent. If the medium used for coating material dispersion is a volatile, nonsolvating liquid, comp~tible with said dispersion so as to preelude the flocculation thereof, then ~ ~he alternate embodimen~ can be employed with direct contact of the suspension with~the untreated microporou~ suppvrt. As ~, .
_g_ 114~003 D-11487 noted above, however, the contact time must be carefully controlled in this embodiment as such suspensions would continue to coat the support substrate as long as they main-tain contact with said substra~e. An undesired thickness can thereby be formed if contact of the suspension with the support substrate is unduly prolonged, The thickness of the membrane is also influenced by the concentration of eoating particles in the suspension. Concentrations of from about 0.5 to about 20% by weight based on the total weight of the suspension are generally satisfactory, depending on the type of coating material employed, with a concentration of about 6% by weight being generally preferred to form an optimum coating thickness. The membrane coating will generally be from submicron up to about 20- micron. i.e. 20 u. ~hickness .
The microporous support, or substrate, should consist of a material as chemically and thermally reslstant as the membrane itself. Sintered metal inorganic oxides, such as metal oxides, carbon and graphite are lllu~trative examples of suitable substrate materials. The substrate shouId have a high porosity with pore sizes that can support the colloidal particles used to form the membrane coating.
Thus, it is generally desirab~e that the substrate have a pore volume of from about 5 to about 60% with pore sizes of from about 5 mu to about 40 u, More preferably, the sub-strate should have a pore volume of from about 20% to about 40%, with pore sizes of from about 100 mu to about 2 u.
The microporous membrane support of the invention is not limited to any particular shape. Thus, the support can be flat, spiral, hollow-fiber, or any other convenient ~ D-11487 shape although tubular shapes are generally preferred.
Porous carbon ~ubing has been found to be particularly con-venient, having ex elle~t resistance to both chemicals and high temperature. When firing such tubing, appropriate care should be taken to avoid its oxidation or the r~duction of some metal oxide particles. A carbon tube having a pore .t , volume of about 0.19 ml/g with a pore size distribution peaked at abou~ 0.3 u has been found to constitute an espe-cially pre~erred membrane support material. In coating the support, the direction of flow of the coating suspension can be inside-out or outside-in depending on various design parameters such as hydraulic flows, pressure and the like.
The volatile liquid medium used to pre~reat the microporous support should be nonsolvating to the coating material and capable of drawing said material into the support and of de~olvat~ng the coating material. Said volatile liquid should thus be miscible with the coating suspension ~edium so as to draw the coating material in~o the support. It is also preferred tha~ said liquid be 2V volatile a~ a convenient temperature, such as from about 15C to about 100C. ) Most ketones and alcohols are suitable pretreatment liquids, wi~h acetone and methanol being preferred liquids, and with acetone being particul~rly preferred and highly suitable or use in conjunction with aqueous suspensions of the coatlng material. In the em-bodiment in which the coating material suspenslon medium is volatile and is a nonsolva~ing liquid to the particles, the coating operation can be carried ~ut directly without mem-brane support pretreatment, the suspension medium serving to draw the coating matsrial lnto the support and to desolvate ' -~ D-11487 ~ 3 said coating material particles. Methanol is a sui~able suspension medium for use in this em~odiment of the inven-tion, and can readily ~e employed as a suspension medium for the preferred zirconia coati.ng material without pretreatment of the supporting substrate.
The exposing of the treated membrane to a temper-ature capable o~ volatilizing the liquid medium to remove it from the membrane support and coating material can readily be accomplished in the atmosphere, i.e., by air drying as at from about 15C to about 100C. If prolonged and high temperature is required for an oxidizable material, such as carbon and metals, the baking can be carried out in an inert atmosphere. The temperature should be above the desolvation or dehydration temperature. Wh~n firing to enhance the stability of the membrane~ temperatures above that at which the particles will be sintered should advantageously be employed. Firing will generally be at a dehydration or desoluation temperature in the range of from about 25C to about 1500C, raore particularly from about 60C to about 1200C. Firing temperatures in the range o~ ~rom about 400C to about 600C, with firing ~imes on the order o~ thirty minutes, have been preferred. The furnace can be preheated to a desired temperature, or the temperature can be raised gradually while the membrane and support are in place. The temperature is usually brought gradually up to ~ preset maximum and then held for a period of from about ten minutes to a couple of hours. ~-Fired zirconia membranes prepared in accordance with the invention have been found to maintain the coating ......
0~3 after exposure to a circulating wash employing acid, base, detergent and soap was~es, and to abrasion and ultrasonic tests~ A conventional wet membrane as des-cribed above, on the other hand, was found to have only partial retention in acidic, base and detergent circulat-ing washes. The coating of the conventional membrane was found also ~o have sloughed off upon exposure to a cir-culating soap wash and upon exposure to abrasion and ultrasonic tests. Whereas the membrane of the inventlon had good rejection properties on drying, the conventional wet membrane had poor rejection properties when dry. Be-cause of its superior stability, a stable hydrous zirconia coating can be permanently deposited onto the membrane of this invention to provide it with a hyperfiltration charac-teris~ic that can be used for the retention of low molecular weight macromolecules. The invention is further illustrated by the following examples falling within the scope of the invention disclosed and claimed herein.
Example 1 A microporous carbon tube having a length of 63.5 cm, an inside dia. of 6 mm, an outside dia. of 10 mm, and a pore volume of 0.185 cm3/g was employed as a mem-brane support. 75% of the pores were between 0.1 mu and 1.0 mu, with the peak distribution at about 0.3 mu. About 0.025 cm3/g of the tube had pores of from about 2 to about 10 u. The air permeation rate of the tube was about 1500 cm3/min. at 25C and 0.68 atm. differential pressure.
Water flux was measured at about 200 ml/min. at 38C and ~L4~
6,8 atm. Th tube was tilted on one end, and sufficien~
acetone was ~ntroduced from the top opening untll the tube was full, with additional acetone belng supplied as the level decreased due to absorption, Upon saturatlon in about 30 secon~sJ the acetone was drained from the tube. A
suspension o zirconia was then quickly injected through the bottom cork seal until the tube was full~ The suspension was held in the tu~e in the vertical position for one minute with the level of the suspension maintained at the top opening continuously, after which the suspension was drained from the tube. The tube wa~ then air dried in a Yertical position for one hour. It was then fired in a furnace, starting at 25C and with the temperature increased to 650C in about 15 minutes and maintained a~ that temperature or an additional 15 minute~, The eoating suspenslon was a 6~/o weigh~/per volume aqueous suspension of zirconia (88%) ~tabilized wit~ yttria ~12~/o)~
The particle surface area was about 45 m2/g having an aggregate si~e of 3.1 ~o 1,0 u. The coated tube wa~
found to have about 1,7 mg/cm2 of zirconia on the carbon tube, The essentially crack-free membrane coating remained intact after washing or 10 minutes with circulat-ing water, then with 0.5% aqueous oxalie acid ~or 20 minutes, and then with 0,1 M Na~H or lO minutes, and finally again with water ~or 10 minutes. The coating likewise remained ln~act in an ultrasonic test in which ~, -14~
D-114~7 -a one inch piece of the coated tube was broken open, submerged in a 200 ml beaker half filled with water and subjected to an ultrasonic stress of 2 x 104 cps at about 70 watts for 15 minutes. After measuring the water flux which was 173 gfd (gallons per square foot per day) at 60 psi and 40C, the membrane was tested with a 1% soluble oil in water emulsion using cutting oil as a feed at a flux of 173 gfd at 60 psi and 40C, with 2.5 gpm circulation.
Rejection of emulsified oil by turbidity testing was 99.5%. Concentration was carried out until a 5%
oil concentration was reached. The flux at this point was 167 gfd at 60 psi and 40C with 2.5 gpm circulation. Rejection of emulsified oil, by turbidity test, was 99.7%. A separate zirconia membrane prepared in the same manner on the same type tube was tested with a 400,000 mol. wt hydro-lyzed starch. Rejection of better than 99% was observed.
Example 2 A membrane was prepared by the procedure of Example 1 except that the acetone pretreatment was omitted. The suspension was prepared by diluting one volume of a 30% aqueous zirconia suspension with methanol to a total of five volumes. Using the evaluation procedures and conditions of Example l, the crack-free membrane of the invention achieved the following results: water flux -180 gfd; flux at the ~ ~ ~a ~ Q 3 D-11487 beginning feed concentration of 1% oil - 177 gfd, with a rejection of 99.8%; and flux after concentration to 5% oil -173 gfd with a rejection of 99~8~/o~
Example 3 A fired zirconia membrane was prepared as in Example 1 except that an alumina tube was employed as ~he membrane support. The tube had an initial water-wetted bubble point pressure of 22 psi in air. Performance under the same conditions and procedures as in Example 1, for said 1% cutting oil, were: flux - 340 gfd; rejection -98.4%.
Example 4 A zirconia membrane was prepared on a carbon tube, as in Example 1, except that the maximum furnace temperature for firing was 1100C for one hour under a nitrogen atmo-sphere. Performance under the conditions and procedures of Example 1 give a water flux of 306 gfd and a flux ~or 1%
oil of 272 gfd) with a rejection of 99.4%.
, Example 5 The procedures of Example 1 were again employed, except tha~ the coating suspension was made from 5%
tantalum oxide. The particles had an initial surface area of 5.14 m2/g, and were ground with ceramic balls at a`p~
of 4 for 72 hours. Performance under the conditions and procedures of Example 1 were: water flu~ - 258 gfd; flux for 1% oil - 200 gfd, with a rejection of 96%.
In other applications of the invention, various other alternatives were employed, e.g., empLoying me~hyl ~ 0 3 ethyl ketone as the pretreatment volatile liquid in the preparation of a zirconia membrane in accordance with the procedures of Example 1 and, likewise employing said pro-cedures, except for the substitution of silica in p~ace of zirconia for the production of a silica membrane. In other applications,~zirconia membranes can be prepared ~n a variety of porous support materials, such as a porous sintered metal tube, a fiber glass tube, a paper tube and the like.
The ultrafiltration membrane of the invention, in its various embodiments, represents a ~ignificant advance in the art. In addition to having good flux and rejection properties, the membrane resists chemicals, detergents and extremes of pH and temperature and has a superior stability to previously available particulate membranes. By providing these advantages in a dry, crack-free membrane, the inventior overcomes the appreciable limitations and restrictions here-tofore encountéred and provides greatly enhanced flexibility in the handling, storage and application of lnorganic ultra-filtration membranes.
Claims (28)
1. A process for the production of a dry, inorganic ultrafiltration membrane comprising:
(a) pretreating a microporous membrane support with a volatile liquid medium prior to the coating of said support with a membrane coating material, said liquid medium being non-solvating to said coating material and capable of drawing said coating material into said support and of desolvating said coating material;
(b) coating the surface of said pretreated microporous membrane support with said membrane coating material; and (c) exposing the thus-coating membrane to a temperature capable of volatilizing said liquid medium to remove said liquid medium from the micro-porous membrane support and said membrane coating material, whereby the desolvation of said coating material prior to completion of removal of said liquid medium results in a shrinking of the coating material and the con-sequent filling, by said coating material, of voids produced as a result of said shrinking, thus avoiding the development of microscopic cracks that otherwise occur upon desolvation of the coated membrane, thereby forming an essentially crack-free mechanically and chemically stable membrane.
(a) pretreating a microporous membrane support with a volatile liquid medium prior to the coating of said support with a membrane coating material, said liquid medium being non-solvating to said coating material and capable of drawing said coating material into said support and of desolvating said coating material;
(b) coating the surface of said pretreated microporous membrane support with said membrane coating material; and (c) exposing the thus-coating membrane to a temperature capable of volatilizing said liquid medium to remove said liquid medium from the micro-porous membrane support and said membrane coating material, whereby the desolvation of said coating material prior to completion of removal of said liquid medium results in a shrinking of the coating material and the con-sequent filling, by said coating material, of voids produced as a result of said shrinking, thus avoiding the development of microscopic cracks that otherwise occur upon desolvation of the coated membrane, thereby forming an essentially crack-free mechanically and chemically stable membrane.
2. The process of Claim 1 in which said pretreated membrane support is contacted with a suspension of said membrane coating material, said volatile liquid medium being miscible with said coating suspension.
3. The process of Claim 2 in which said coating suspension comprises an aqueous suspension.
4. The process of Claim 2 and including draining excess suspension from the surface of said membrane support, said exposing of the treated membrane to a temperature capable of volatilizing said liquid medium comprising air drying said membrane at a temperature of from about 15°C to about 100°C.
5. The process of Claim 4 and including firing the thus-treated membrane at a temperature of from about 25°C to about 1500°C, said firing enhancing the stability of said membrane.
6. The process of Claim 5 in which said firing temperature is from about 60°C to about 1200°C.
7. The process of Claim 6 in which said firing temperature is from about 400°C to about 600°C.
8. The process of Claim 6 in which said membrane coating material is taken from the group consisting of the oxides of the metals of Groups III-A, III-B, IV-A, IV-B, V-A, V-B, VI-B, VII-B and VIII, lanthanides and actinides.
9. The process of Claim 8 in which said coating material comprises zirconia.
10. The process of Claim 9 in which said zirconia has a particle size of from about 5 mu to about 10 u.
11. The process of Claim 10 in which said particle size is from about 10 mu to about 1 u.
12. The process of Claim 2 in which said liquid medium comprises an alcohol or ketone volatile at a temperature of from about 15°C to about 100°C.
13. The process of Claim 12 in which said liquid medium comprises acetone.
14. The process of Claim 9 in which said coating suspension comprises an aqueous suspension and said liquid medium comprises acetone.
15. The process of Claim 14 in which said mem-brane support has a pore size of from about 5 mu to about 40 u and a pore volume of from about 5% to about 60%,
16. The process of Claim 15 in which said support comprises a porous carbon tube having a pore size of from about 100 mu to about 2u and a pore volume of from about 20% to about 40%.
17. The process of Claim 14 in which said sup-port comprises a porous carbon tubing and said coating material is coated on the inner surface of said tube.
18. The process of Claim 3 in which said support comprises a porous carbon tube and said coat-ing material is coated on the inner surface of said tubing.
19. A dry, inorganic ultrafiltration membrane comprising:
(a) a microporous membrane support; and (b) a microporous, dehydrated inorganic coating essentially free of cracks, said coating compris-ing a dry, water insoluble oxide selected from the group consisting of the metals of Groups III-A, III-B, IV-A, IV-B, V-A, VI-B, VII-B, and VIII and lanthanides and actinides, the particles of said coating having a particle size within the range of from about 10 mu to about 1 u, said coating having a thickness of up to about 20 u, whereby said membrane has a dehydrated, essentially crack-free coating of enhanced mechanical and chemical stability.
(a) a microporous membrane support; and (b) a microporous, dehydrated inorganic coating essentially free of cracks, said coating compris-ing a dry, water insoluble oxide selected from the group consisting of the metals of Groups III-A, III-B, IV-A, IV-B, V-A, VI-B, VII-B, and VIII and lanthanides and actinides, the particles of said coating having a particle size within the range of from about 10 mu to about 1 u, said coating having a thickness of up to about 20 u, whereby said membrane has a dehydrated, essentially crack-free coating of enhanced mechanical and chemical stability.
20. The membrane of Claim 19 in which said coating comprises zirconia.
21. The membrane of Claim 20 in which said support has a pore volume of from about 5% to about 60% and a pore size of from about 50 mu to about 40 u.
22. The membrane of Claim 21 in which said support has a pore volume of from about 5% to about 40% and a pore size of from about 100 mu to about 2 u,
23. The membrane of Claim 22 in which said support comprises a porous carbon tube.
24. The membrane of Claim 23 in which said coating comprises zirconia.
25. The membrane of Claim 23 in which said coating has a particle size of from about 10 to about 30 mu.
26. The membrane of Claim 19 in which said coating particles comprise sintered particles.
27. The membrane of Claim 20 in which said zirconia particles comprise sintered zirconia.
28. The membrane of Claim 24 in which said zirconia particles comprise sintered zirconia.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US87939178A | 1978-02-21 | 1978-02-21 | |
| US879,391 | 1978-02-21 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1140003A true CA1140003A (en) | 1983-01-25 |
Family
ID=25374061
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000321667A Expired CA1140003A (en) | 1978-02-21 | 1979-02-16 | Dry, particulate, inorganic ultrafiltration membranes and production thereof |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CA (1) | CA1140003A (en) |
| IN (1) | IN153390B (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4808311A (en) * | 1986-11-03 | 1989-02-28 | Millipore Corporation | Crystal growth process for preparing inorganic dynamic membranes |
| US4946592A (en) * | 1986-10-10 | 1990-08-07 | Societe Des Ceramiques Techniques | Membrane filter |
| US5773103A (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 1998-06-30 | Media And Process Technology Inc. | Inorganic membranes using porous cordierite support |
-
1979
- 1979-02-16 CA CA000321667A patent/CA1140003A/en not_active Expired
- 1979-11-09 IN IN801/DEL/79A patent/IN153390B/en unknown
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4946592A (en) * | 1986-10-10 | 1990-08-07 | Societe Des Ceramiques Techniques | Membrane filter |
| US5059366A (en) * | 1986-10-10 | 1991-10-22 | Societe Des Ceramiques Techniques | Method of making a membrane filter |
| US4808311A (en) * | 1986-11-03 | 1989-02-28 | Millipore Corporation | Crystal growth process for preparing inorganic dynamic membranes |
| US5773103A (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 1998-06-30 | Media And Process Technology Inc. | Inorganic membranes using porous cordierite support |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| IN153390B (en) | 1984-07-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| EP0040282B1 (en) | Process for the production of a dry inorganic ultrafiltration membrane and membrane produced by such a method | |
| US4412921A (en) | Dry, particulate, inorganic ultrafiltration membranes and the production thereof | |
| US4981590A (en) | Composite ceramic micropermeable membrane, process and apparatus for producing such membrane | |
| US4711719A (en) | Process for the production of crack-free semi-permeable inorganic membranes | |
| KR0145711B1 (en) | Sintered coating for porous metallic filter surfaces | |
| JP2873293B2 (en) | Composite membrane and method for producing the same | |
| US5137634A (en) | Composite membrane | |
| US4861480A (en) | Organomineral semipermeable membrane and its production process | |
| US4078112A (en) | Coating modification process for ultrafiltration systems | |
| Melnikova et al. | Structure and mechanical properties of ultrafiltration membranes modified with Langmuir–Blodgett films | |
| Etienne et al. | A microporous zirconia membrane prepared by the sol—gel process from zirconyl oxalate | |
| CA1140003A (en) | Dry, particulate, inorganic ultrafiltration membranes and production thereof | |
| US4968426A (en) | Fine alpha alumina ultrafiltration membranes | |
| JPS63287504A (en) | Separation membrane | |
| KR100946821B1 (en) | Novel inorganic nanofiltration membranes | |
| Chu et al. | Microporous silica membranes deposited on porous supports by filtration | |
| Yazawa et al. | Preparation of water and alkali durable porous glass membrane coated on porous alumina tubing by sol-gel method | |
| CA1336151C (en) | Fine alpha alumina ultrafiltration membranes | |
| JPH0251658B2 (en) | ||
| CA1126455A (en) | Method of casting a reverse osmosis or ultrafiltration, tubular, polymeric membrane | |
| EP0242209B1 (en) | Composite membranes | |
| IE49758B1 (en) | Process for the production of a dry inorganic ultrafiltration membrane and membrane produced by such a process | |
| JPH05184889A (en) | Method for producing micro- or ultra-filtration ceramic membrane | |
| JPH01299607A (en) | Inorganic porous membrane | |
| Shih et al. | Polyvinyl alcohol plasma deposited nylon 4 membrane for hemodialysis |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |