CA1124679A - Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor - Google Patents

Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor

Info

Publication number
CA1124679A
CA1124679A CA344,809A CA344809A CA1124679A CA 1124679 A CA1124679 A CA 1124679A CA 344809 A CA344809 A CA 344809A CA 1124679 A CA1124679 A CA 1124679A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
platinum
exhaust gas
thimble
sensor
sputtering
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA344,809A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Terry J. Gold
Kurt D. Humphrey
Keith A. Penney
Robert J. Smith
Randy L. Voto
Ralph V. Wilhelm, Jr.
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Motors Liquidation Co
Original Assignee
Motors Liquidation Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US06/098,726 external-priority patent/US4253931A/en
Application filed by Motors Liquidation Co filed Critical Motors Liquidation Co
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1124679A publication Critical patent/CA1124679A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • G01N27/403Cells and electrode assemblies
    • G01N27/406Cells and probes with solid electrolytes
    • G01N27/407Cells and probes with solid electrolytes for investigating or analysing gases
    • G01N27/4075Composition or fabrication of the electrodes and coatings thereon, e.g. catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03CCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C17/00Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating
    • C03C17/06Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating with metals
    • C03C17/09Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating with metals by deposition from the vapour phase
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C14/00Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material
    • C23C14/06Coating by vacuum evaporation, by sputtering or by ion implantation of the coating forming material characterised by the coating material
    • C23C14/14Metallic material, boron or silicon
    • C23C14/18Metallic material, boron or silicon on other inorganic substrates
    • C23C14/185Metallic material, boron or silicon on other inorganic substrates by cathodic sputtering
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M4/00Electrodes
    • H01M4/86Inert electrodes with catalytic activity, e.g. for fuel cells
    • H01M4/90Selection of catalytic material
    • H01M4/9041Metals or alloys
    • H01M4/905Metals or alloys specially used in fuel cell operating at high temperature, e.g. SOFC
    • H01M4/9058Metals or alloys specially used in fuel cell operating at high temperature, e.g. SOFC of noble metals or noble-metal based alloys
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/30Hydrogen technology
    • Y02E60/50Fuel cells

Abstract

C-3,106 Abstract of the Disclosure A method of sputtering platinum onto a vitrified zirconia thimble to form an exhaust electrode for an electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensor. The electrode is sputtered under an atmosphere consisting essentially of more than about 50% oxygen and/or nitrogen by volume. Sensors having low symmetrical transition times are produced.

Description

C-3,106 D-4,166 ELECTRODE SPUTTERING PROCESS FOR
EXHAUST G~S OXYGEN SENSOR
Field of the Invention:
This invention relates to solid electrolyte electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensors. It more particularly relates to a sputtering process for depositing a platinum exhaust gas electrode onto vitrified zirconia thimbles for such sensors.
Background of the Invention:
A typical automotive-type solid electrolyte exhaust gas oxygen sensor is disclosed in Canadian patent l,Q04,731 surgett et al. It has a zirconia sens- ~`
ing element shaped as a tapered thimble. One thimble end is open and has a circumferential flange. The other end is closed and forms the most active part of the element The interior and exterior o~ the thimble have separate porous electrode coatings of platinum or the like. The inner electrode is exposed to a source of oxygen, such as air or mixed metal oxide, for establishing a reference potential. The electrode has generally been formed by painting a coating of platinum ink onto the zirconia thimble, drying the coating, and then firing the coated thimble at an elevated temperature. An improved technique by which it can be applied to the thimble is described and claimed in the copending Canadian patent application serial No. 342,129, entitled "Reference Elec~rode Process for Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor" that was filed December 18, 1979 ih the name of John Trevorrow and assigned to t~e assignee of this inVention.
The outer electrode is exposed to the exhaust gas for establishing a potential determined by exhaust gas oxygen concentration. The outer electrode could be a porous thick film of platinum, like the inner eIectrode. However, it is preferred that this outer electrode be a thin film, applied by evaporation, sputtering, chemical vapor deposition or other such thin film deposition techniques. On the other hand, it has been difficult to consistently reproduce desirable properties, such as porosity and electrical parameters in the thin film electrodes. As a result, yields of satisfactory electrode properties have been limited, and various ancillary treatments have been
2~ developed to improve them. For example, United States patent No. 3,978,006 Topp et al discloses heating the solid electrolyte body after electrode deposition, to form pores in the electrode coating if it is not porous as deposited. United States patent No. 4,136,000 Davis et al discloses treating the electroded sensor element chemically and electrolytically to enhance sensor properties. Canadian pate~t application ~L~.2~7~

serial No. 344,294, entitled "Exhaust Electrode ProcesS
for Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor", filed on January 24, 198 in the names of Terry J. Gold et al and assigned to the assi~nee of this invention, discloses an improved sputter-ing process for producing porous platinum electrodes asdeposited. Sensors having sputtered electrodes produced by the``latter process consistently exhibit substantially stable response times of less than 600 milliseconds, particularly if heated once or twice in pure nitrogen at atmospheric pressure to 800 C for about 45 minutes before they are used. This nitrogen aging treatment is disclosed in Canadian patent application serial No. 341,9~4, entitled "Aging Treatment for Exhaust Gas Oxygen Sensor", filed December 14,1979 in the names of Morris Ber~ et al and assigned to the assignee of this invention.
We have no~J found how to sputter platinum eIectrodes onto zirconia bodies in an even more improved way. ~e believe it provides improved consistency in electrode porosity and microstructure as deposited~
In any event, it provides sensors that are fast and substantially stable as formed. Post~electroding treatments for activation and/or aging are unnecessary to obtain fast acting sensors. Moreover, rich-to-lean and lean-to-rich transition times are more balanced as formed and the sensors exhibit improved controllability.
On the other hand, aging can still be beneficial, .~ .

67~

particularly in increasing the yield of fast acting sensors.
- Objects and Summary of the Invention:
An object of this invention is to provide an improved sputtering process for depositing a platinum exhaust electrode onto a zirconia solid electrolyte body or an electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensor.
The invention involves sputtering platinum onto zirconia thimbles in an atmosphere preferably consisting essentially of about 65 -- 75% by volume nitrogen and/or oxygen and the balance argon, at a pressure of about lQ - 20 millitorr. A wide target-thimble spacing of about 3.8 centimeters is used, along with a high sputtering power of about 13 - 22 watts/cm2 of target area. These latter conditions are the same as those described and claimed in the aforementioned Canad~ian patent application 344,2~4~
.. . . . ..
Description of the Preferred Embodiments:
This invention is an improvement over the sputtering process described and claimed in the afore-mentioned 344,:294. It differs primarily in that the discharge gas is chiefly nitrogen and/or oxygen.
Somewhere between 50% and 65% by volume nitrogen and/or oxygen is necessary in the discharge gas, to achieve the benefits of this invention. More than about 50%
nitrogen and/or oxygen is needed, and about 65% appears , . ~

~.2~79 to consistently provide the improved results of this invention. However, to insure that these results are consistently obtained, we prefer to employ about 75%
by volume nitrogen and/or oxygen and about 25~ by volume argon. Increasing the'n~trogen and/or oxygen proportion beyond the 75~ is unnecessary and may even be counter-productive. The'rate'of deposition will ',decrease. Also, film adhesion may decrease and/or .
strength of the underlying zirconia may not be optimum.
Nitrogen and oxygen appear to be equally effective in producing the'advantages of this invention.
However, using oxygen requires that the''apparatus, particularly the pumping system, be modified to accept it. Otherwise,' seals and the like can be'attacked, creating safety problems~ ~ccordingly, we prefer to use nitrogen instea`d of oxygen. ~nalogously, we expect that othèr inert gases could be`substituted for argon.
However, we do not consider it practical to do so.
We believe that the highe`r sputtering pressure 2Q of 10 - 2Q millitorr also insures consistent platinum porosity and microstructure. Below a pressure of about 10 millitorr in the deposition chamber, the coating appears to be less porous. Above about 20 millitorr, deposition rate decreases, deposition in unwanted areas commences, and formation of a desirab1e porous micro-structure may be suppressed.

-... .

~.2~

With the sputtering improvement of thisinvention over the sputtering process of the afore-mentioned 344,294, the neutral atmDsphere aging of Canadian S.N. 341,94~ can be omitted. On the other hand, for reasons hereinafter more fully explained, we may not prefer to omit such aging. One principal advantage of this invention over that of 344`,2~4 is an improved initial response time, regardless as to subsequent heat treatments. Another advantage is in that this invention generally provides a narro~er Variation in sensor properties within a given batch that is electroded.
This not only reduces mean response time but also reduces the standard deviation from it, which improves yields. It is to be understood, however, that this invention is not known to preclude a gradual sensor deterioration normally attendant to extended sensor use.
Solid eIectrolyte thimble-like sensing elements for an automotive-type exhaust gas oxygen ~ensor can be electroded in the following manner. The elements can be tapered thimbles of vitrified zirconia that is partially or fully stabilized in its cubic form by the inclusion o~ about 4 - 8 mole percent yttria.
Best results have been obtained using partially stabilized zirconia containing about 5 mole percent alumina and 5 mole percent yttria. The thimbles are o~
the same dimensions and interiorly electroded in the same manner as described in the aforementio~ed Canadian ~ .

~2~7~

~.N. 342~129. In general, they are about 3 - 5 cm long. Each thimble is preferably about 3.7 cm long and has a taper of about 3 degr~es and 38 minutes. Its wider end is open and surrounded by a circumferential shoulder having an outer diameter of about 1.32 cm.
Its closed naxrower end is rounded on its outer surface where it has a spherical radius of curvature of about
3 mm. Its diameter near the shoulder is about 0.82 cm.
Its diameter near the radius is about 0.4 cm. We believe it is most important to control the sputtering deposition on and near the rounded tip. This appears to be the most active part of the sensing element.
After the inner electrode is applied and fired to the thimble interior, the outer electrode i~s lS deposited. As is usual for any thin film deposition, the zirconia surface should be well cleaned before depositing the platinum electrode onto it. It is presumed that any of the normal and accepted cleaning procedures would work ~s pxeparation of the surface for sputtering in accordance with this invention. For example, the sensors can be initially cleaned in an ultrasonic degreaser with freon-based solvent and then heated in air to a temperature of at least about 6aoo C
for 1 hour. The sensors can then be heated again at a temperature of only about 150 C for about 45 minutes to 2 hours. The thus treated zirconia bodies can then ~e placed directly in a vacuum chamber for sputtering.

If the electrode is not sputtered within 72 hours after , the last-mentioned heating, the zirconia bodies should be heated again to 600 C and 150 C, as discussed.
We currently sputter the electrodes with a model MRC 902 DC magnetron sputtering apparatus obtained rom Materials Research Corporation of Orangeburg, New York. This apparatus has an elongated but fairly shallow vacuum chamber with provision for two fixed targets disposed over a single anode that is much larger lQ than the targets. The targets will hereinafter be more fully described. However, they essentially are two mutually spaced paraileI strips oxiented transverse to a rectangular stainless steeI anode. The anode ic about 35 cm wide, about 50 cm long, and about 2 - 3 cm thick. Water cooling of the anode is not necessary but may be beneficial for reduced cycle time. We presently choose to use only onè target in this apparatus. The targets and anode are`in a main chambex adjacent an antechamber having an elevator mechanism that can stack two pallets. We refer to the antechamber as a load-lock. A movable sealing means separates the antechamber from the main chamber. A special carrier is provided for shuttling pallets o~ substrates fxom the antechamber into the main chamber for sputtering and then back again. In sputtering, a discharge is first established between a taryet and the anode.
Then the carrier moves the pallet between them. It ~z~

continues to move in the same direction until out from under the target, whereupon the discharge is discontinued. Carrier speed is adjusted to attain the desired coating thickness.
r.~hile one batch of substrates is being coated in the main chamber, another is being removed from the antechamber, a new batch placed in the ante-chamber, and the antechamber returned to low pressure.
In using the aforementioned apparatus the targets are'substantially always maintained under sputtering atmosphere conditions or high vacuum, e~cept for apparatus servicing. To load the apparatus with substrates, a batch of the aforementioned zirconia thimbles are'placed on a pallet ln the antechamber ~hile the antechamber is sealed from the main chamber and is at ambien't pressure. The antechaTnber is then sealed to the`ambient and evacuated to about 100 millitorr. After sputtering in the main chamber is discontinued, the seal between ~t and the antecham~er is opened. The' pallet, if any, of workpiéces just previously sputtered is shuttled to one level of the antechamber elevator, which picks it off the carrier~
The elevator is moved to a next level, and the just-loaded pallet is placed on the pallet carrier. The' pallet carrier then moves into the main chamber far enough to close the antechaTnber-main chamber s~alO

.. .

~.2~

~ After the main chamber is sealed from the antechamber, the antechamber can be backfilled with dry nitrogen to atmospheric pressure and opened to the ambient for reloading. The main chamber is pumped down to below about 5 x 10 6 torr. ~ flow o~ 75% nitrogen -25% argon by volume is then introduced into the main chamber at a rate of about 75 - 100 cc per minute, while pumping continues. Pumping is then throttled at a sufficient rate to dynamically maintain a pressure in the main chamber at about 10 - 20 millitorr. Once pressure in the main chamber is stabilized, a discharge can be established between the target and anode.
Pressure is maintained at th~s level in this way during sputtering, as is usual.
We presently prefer to coat the thimbles in batches of about 280 thimbles. When the thimbIes are placed on the pallet, they are`all oriented vertically, and thus hàve paralleL axes. Their closed ends are upwardly disposed, with their wider ends resting in recesses directly on the pallet. The pallet we currently use is formed of two rectangular stainless steel plates about 32 cm long and about 32 cm wîde. The bottom plate is about .4 cm thick. The top plate is about .6 cm thick and has an array of holes in it for receiving and uniformly closely spacing the thimbles. These holes, if closely fitting around the thimbles, can also serve as a mask to limit platinum deposition on the thimble - ~

7~

flange radial surfaces. For example, the holes can be about 1.33 cm in diameter, preferably in a uniform array of columns and orthogonal rows~ both of which are spaced about 5 - .6 cm apart. In our apparatus we S presently use 15 apertures per row and 18 apertures per column. The lower plate also has a pluralit~ of parallel grooves in its upper surface registered with the rows. The grooves may heIp to better evacuate the thimble interiors. The two plates of the pallet rest on a U-shaped pallet holder, which is supported by five alumina cylinders, each of which is about 1.3 cm long and .6`cm in diameter, wh~'ch'c~linders we refer to as "stand-offs". The stand-offs are, in turn, supported on a wheèl'ed frame-like assembIy that serves as a pallet carrier. The pallet carrier supports the pallet about 0.5 - 1.5 cm above`the`sputterin~ anode. However, we do not know if any separation at all is needed.
The'pallet carr~er has metal wheels which roll directly on the'metal base plate of the sputtering chamber. Thè wheels of the carrier straddle the anode. The anode is 3.'01 cm above the chamber base plate and is supported on metal stand-offs which, in turn, are`supported on the chamber base plate.
~ fter the antechamber seal is opened, the pallet is transferred onto the pallet carrier and the pallet carrier shuttled to its initial position in front of the target. When so positioned, the thimble ~2~

closed ends are spaced about 3.8 cm below a planar platinum -target surface of a cathode and the pallet is spaced about 0.5 - 1.5 cm above its anode.
The sputtering target is a rectangular platinum sheet about 12 cm by 38 cm by 0.6 cm bonded to a supporting copper backing plate. The nature of the platinum target is no more critical to this invention than it is to any other sputtering of platinum. The target can be obtained by any commercial source, and preferably provides a high purity platinum surface. While we presently do not prefer it, we recognize thàt in some instances it may prove to be desirable to include minor amounts of other metals in the platinum target along with the pure platinum, as for example, up to about 5% by weight palladium and/or rhodium. Thè target is assembled WLth a cathode that includes water cooling means and a magnet array.
A DC voltage of about 5Q0 ~ 800 volts is applied between the target and the anode. The sputter-ing power supply is then adjusted to provide a DC powerbetweèn the target and the anode of approximately 13 -22 watts/cm2 of target area. No special means are u.sed in the pallet, pallet carrier ox anode to heat or cool the thimbles during sputtering. Also, no electrical bias or grounding is used on the pallet assembly. The pallet assembly is allowed to electrically float. After the plasma has stabilized, the pallet carrier moves the . . .

~.2~79 pallet through the plasma at a uniform rate of 4 to 5 cm/min. ~s previously mentioned, the carrier movement rate is adjusted to obtain the desired ~oating thickness.
Under the foregoing conditions, a porous platinum coating about 1.0 - 1.5 micrometers thick on the upper ends of the zirconia thimbles will be formed.
The thimble closed end will obviously get the greatest thickness of platinum deposit. Side walls on the element will get a correspondingly lesser platinum deposit. We prefer to sputter long enough to produce a coating thickness of about 0.65 - 1.0 micrometer thick at a point about 0.5 centimeter back from the thimble closed end, along with a coating thickr.ess of about Q.3 - 0.55 micrometer thick about 2 centimeters bac~ from the thimble closed end.
~ s mentioned in the process claimed in the aforementioned S.N. 344,294, we too prefer to heat the zirconia thimble after the platinum electrode has been sputtered, to increase electrode adhesion. Adhesion 2Q can be increased by heating the electroded thimble at 800 C in air at atmospheric pressure for about 1 hour.
This increase in adhesion can be obtained by heat treatments in air over a rather wide temperature range extending from 600 C to about 1200 C. However, it should be recognized that heat treatments above about 800 C tend to open large pores in the coating, about 0.5 - 5 micrometer in width. If extensive, such heating can sinter the electrode film to such an extent that ~.2~7~

1~ , isolated platinum islands are formed. This is obviously objectionable. Also, heat treating reduces apparent electrode surface area to a value much closer to its geometric surface area. By apparent area we mean surface area as determined by gas adsorption techniques. By yeometric surface area, we mean the surface area as calcula~ed from a drawing of the thimble. As discussed in the aforementioned S~N. 344l294 and S.N. 341~944, reducing the high apparent surface area to a lower value by a post~electroding heat treatment somehow does not destroy the advantages of the initial high apparent surface area, so long as the heat treatment is not severe.
Then a porous coating of magnesium-alumin~te spinel is flame sprayed onto the platinum electrode, leaving a portion of the electrode uncovered for making of a low resistance electrode connection. The thimble is then directly incorporated into a working sensor without any further treatment, and can be used as assembled.
It is recognized that the flame spraying of a ceramic overcoat onto the thin electrode may drastically alter the physical appearance of the thin film. On the other hand, it does not appear to deleteriously affect controllability of switching response times obtained by this invention. Electrical characteristics attributable to the nature of the electrode as it was initially deposited apparently still remain. The resultant sensor as assembled consistently exhibits fast switching transition times that are similar for rlch-to-lean and lean-to-rich and also exhibits a controllability closer to stoichiometry. For example, a rich-to-lean time response of less than 60Q milliseconds is re~ularly obtained in the sensors as assembled. Moreover, more than half of these sensors will consistently have an assembIed rich-to-lean time response of less than 2ao milliseconds. In recent tests, sensors were made that exhibited switching transition times having a mean value of 120 milliseconds as assembled. These sensors had rich-to-lean time responses no greater than about 1.5 times the lean-to-rich response times. This is generally equal. Controllability for example is regularly obtained to within less than 0.1 air/fuel ratios on the lean side`of stoichiometry. Stoichiometry is 14.55:1 under standard conditions. Hence, the sensors control at about 14.65 as assembled. Moreover, the sensor switching transition times and controllability do not appear to significantly change when the sensor is initially used. Accordingly, sensors produced in accordance with this invention do not need to be operationally or artifically aged in order to achieve stability, low response time or better controllability.
_ The benefits of this invention should be obtained whether or not the eIectroded thimble is heated in air to increase electrode adhesion and whether or not the electrode is given a porous overcoat. Still further, other porous overcoats can probably be used, as for example the gamma alumina coatings disclosed in USPN 4,116,~83 Rhodes. Also, it may be desirable to use a platinum cermet stripe on the outer surface of the zirconia thimble under the sputtered electrode, at least where the porous overcoat does not cover it, to improve durability. If so, the cermet stripe can be ~ired at the same time as the inner electrode. Then, ` our sputtered electrode would be applied.
Further, it is expected that the results of this invention should be obtainable regardless as to the nature'of the reference'electrode or its method of application. Analogously, they should be obtainable on partially or fully stabilized zirconia having othex stabilizing agents than hereinbefoxe described and even with other solid el'ectrolytes. Further, the principles of this invention should be equally applicable to RF sputtering and to DC sputtering other than magnetron '~ sputtering. Still further, the sputtering conditions of this invention should be'useful in a single batch type'apparatus having no antechamber, or in a continuous processing apparatus that would include one or more controlled atmosphere chambers before and after the` sputtering chamber.

~ :. . . .

~.2~'7~31 Still further, it was hereinbefore explained that this invention produces a higher yield of sensors having a lower average response time as formed, over sensors produced in accordance with the method of 344,294 On the`other hand, even faster average switching transition times and greater reproducibility may be available,` if sensors formed in accordance with this invention are also given a nitrogen aging treatment such as described and claimed in C~nadian S N. 341,~44.
In this latter connection, it should be recognized that when hundreds of elements are simul-taneously electroded in a hatch, some are not as good as others. The vast majority of elements will form very good sensors, but some will not. The afore-mentioned aging trea`tment of S.N. 3~1,944 will proba~ly help those sensors which are marginal, and may even improve those that are only slightly better than marginal. However, it is difficult to discern which sensors will benefit from such a treatment and which `
will not. Since the aging treatment is relatively inexpensive, we prefer to age all of them and insure that optimum characteristics are attained with all sensors.
We also have mentioned that the pallet is left electrically floating. We have not noticed any benefit in applying a special separate bias to it. On the other hand, we have noted that yields of improved ~ 17 ~.' 7~

devices decreased when stainless steel stand-offs were substituted for alumina stand-offs.
We also hereinbefore mentioned that we believe that the deposition conditions at the closed upper end of the zirconia thimble are most important. It appears that if the deposition conditions are adjusted to obtain a thin black deposit on the zirconia closed end, fastest sensors are obtained. We think the black deposit is or contains chemically reduced zirconia.
The deposit should only extend 2 ~ 4 mm back from the closed end and be only about 0.5 mm into the original zirconia surface. ~e are not yet sure of the effect this black layer has on long texm, i.e. 50,000 mile, durability. On the othe~ hand, we recognize that if the thimble is blackened completely through its thickness and/or completeIy along its length, poorer sensors are produced. Changing the stand-offs from ceramic to metal appears to cause too much of this black deposit to be ~ormed. This indicates that inherently there is a controlled amount of current leakage from the pallet during sputtering, notwithstanding the alumina stand-offs. Accordingly, for other apparatus than that disclosed herein, one may prefer to add a controlled resistance path to ground from the pallet, apply ~`~
electrical bias, or increase electrical isolation in _ order to attain just the right amount of blackened tip. In retrospect, it may be that the sputtering g conditions recited herein coincidentally produce a suitable but as yet undefined eIectrode micro-structure, artifically age the electrode in situ, and controllably reduce the zirconia just enough to improve device performance after the air anneal.

Claims (5)

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. In a method of sputtering platinum onto a solid electrolyte body to form an exhaust gas electrode for an electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensor, the improvement wherein the platinum is sputtered under an atmosphere consisting essentially of more than about 50% by volume of at least one member selected from the group consisting of nitrogen and oxygen and less than about 50% of an inert gas, in proportion effective to provide low sensor rich-to-lean and lean-to-rich switching response times of less than 600 milliseconds with the electrode as deposited.
2. In a method of sputtering platinum onto a vitrified zirconia body to form an exhaust gas electrode for an electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensor, the improvement wherein the sputtering is performed using an argon atmosphere that contains at least 65% by volume of one member selected from the group consisting of nitrogen and oxygen, whereby low sensor rich-to-lean switching response times of less than 600 milliseconds are obtained that are generally equal to lean-to-rich switching response times, without post-electroding treatments.
3. In a method of sputtering platinum onto a solid electrolyte body to form an exhaust gas electrode for a zirconia, solid-electrolyte exhaust gas oxygen sensor, the improvement wherein the platinum is sputtered under an atmosphere consisting predominantly of nitrogen, the remainder being an inert gas and a target spacing, deposition rate and chamber pressure sufficient to provide a highly porous platinum deposit and a partially blackened zirconia surface under the platinum deposit, whereby sensor switching response time is reduced to below 250 milliseconds as deposited.
4. In a method of sputtering a porous platinum exhaust gas electrode onto a vitrified zirconia thimble for an electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensor wherein a generally planar platinum target is oriented normal to the axis of a zirconia thimble, the target is spaced at least about 3.0 cm from a closed end on the thimble, and the target is sputtered under an argon atmosphere at a pressure of about 10 - 20 milli-torr and a power of about 13 - 22 watts/cm2 of target area, the improvement wherein the atmosphere contains more than about 65% by volume of at least one member selected from the group consisting of nitrogen and oxygen and the total pressure is about 10 - 20 millitorr, effective to increase sensor controllability and to reproducibly obtain sensor rich-to-lean and lean-to-rich switching response times below 250 milliseconds.
5. In a method of sputtering a porous platinum exhaust gas electrode onto a vitrified zirconia thimble for an electrochemical-type exhaust gas oxygen sensor wherein a generally planar platinum target is oriented normal to the axis of a zirconia thimble, the target is spaced about 3.0 - 5.0 cm from a closed end on the thimble, a thickness of at least about 0.65 micrometer is applied to the thimble end and the target is sputtered under argon at a pressure of about 10 - 20 millitorr and a DC power of about 13 - 22 watts/cm2 of target area, the improvement wherein the platinum is sputtered in an atmosphere consisting essentially of about 65 - 75% by volume nitrogen and the balance argon at a total pressure of about 10 - 20 millitorr, effective to increase sensor controllability and to reproducibly obtain low and symmetrical sensor rich-to-lean and lean-to-rich switching response times below 250 milli-seconds without post-electroding electrolytic or heat treatments.
CA344,809A 1979-04-17 1980-01-31 Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor Expired CA1124679A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US3074879A 1979-04-17 1979-04-17
US030,748 1979-04-17
US098,726 1979-11-30
US06/098,726 US4253931A (en) 1979-11-30 1979-11-30 Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1124679A true CA1124679A (en) 1982-06-01

Family

ID=26706416

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA344,809A Expired CA1124679A (en) 1979-04-17 1980-01-31 Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor

Country Status (5)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1124679A (en)
DE (1) DE3014871A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2454621A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2046799B (en)
IT (1) IT1145266B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060275647A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2006-12-07 Caine Finnerty Textile derived solid oxide fuel cell system
DE102013205037A1 (en) 2013-03-21 2014-09-25 Robert Bosch Gmbh Sensor element and exhaust gas sensor comprising a sensor element

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3978006A (en) * 1972-02-10 1976-08-31 Robert Bosch G.M.B.H. Methods for producing oxygen-sensing element, particularly for use with internal combustion engine exhaust emission analysis
US3844920A (en) * 1973-11-21 1974-10-29 Gen Motors Corp Air fuel ratio sensor
US4040929A (en) * 1975-09-15 1977-08-09 Universal Oil Products Company Oxygen sensor having thin film electrolyte
US4136000A (en) * 1978-03-13 1979-01-23 Bendix Autolite Corporation Process for producing improved solid electrolyte oxygen gas sensors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IT8048418A0 (en) 1980-04-15
FR2454621A1 (en) 1980-11-14
GB2046799B (en) 1983-04-20
GB2046799A (en) 1980-11-19
FR2454621B1 (en) 1982-07-30
DE3014871C2 (en) 1990-03-22
DE3014871A1 (en) 1980-11-06
IT1145266B (en) 1986-11-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4253931A (en) Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor
US4275126A (en) Fuel cell electrode on solid electrolyte substrate
US4725346A (en) Electrolyte assembly for oxygen generating device and electrodes therefor
US4354912A (en) Solid electrochemical sensor
US4400255A (en) Control of electron bombardment of the exhaust oxygen sensor during electrode sputtering
KR900008966B1 (en) Valve unit
CA1135035A (en) Aging treatment for exhaust gas oxygen sensor
EP0054813A2 (en) A capacitance humidity sensor and a method for preparation thereof
KR900009101B1 (en) Method for producing a thin film
US4521287A (en) High rate sputtering of exhaust oxygen sensor electrode
CA1124679A (en) Electrode sputtering process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor
US4244798A (en) Exhaust electrode process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor
CA1128128A (en) Electrochemical sensor, particularly for internal combustion engine exhaust gas composition determination, and method of its manufacture
KR920000590B1 (en) Method for producing thin film
JPS6255620B2 (en)
US4303490A (en) Exhaust electrode process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor
CA1124678A (en) Exhaust electrode process for exhaust gas oxygen sensor
JPS58204365A (en) O2 sensor
JPS6255621B2 (en)
JPH0234775A (en) Vacuum film-forming apparatus
JPS6431958A (en) Method for allowing thin metallic film to adhere to plastic film
JP3131077B2 (en) Manufacturing method of metal oxide film
JPH0211756A (en) Formation of thin film
JPH0146855B2 (en)
JPH04214899A (en) Insoluble electrode

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry