CA1118932A

CA1118932A - Stabilization of high resilience polyurethane foam

Info

Publication number: CA1118932A
Application number: CA000321912A
Authority: CA
Inventors: Kiran B. Chandalia; Henry G. Barnowski
Original assignee: Olin Corp
Current assignee: Olin Corp
Priority date: 1978-02-27
Filing date: 1979-02-20
Publication date: 1982-02-23
Also published as: GB2015010A; ES478078A1; GB2015010B; FR2418246B3; DE2907449A1; AU4453679A; SE7901719L; NL7901567A; IT7948145A0; IT1116850B; FR2418246A1

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Polyol compositions containing effectively dispersed particulate material featuring critical dispersion characteristics are used to stabilize foam reaction in high resilience polyurethane foam.

Description

STABILIZATION OF HIGH RESILIENCE POLYURETHANE ~OAM

Polyurethane foams commonly are prepared b~ raacting a polyether polyol with an organi~ poly~socyanate in the Rresence o~ a blowing agent and a reaction catalyst. ~:
Various polyether polyols have been employed in making:
such ~oams; ~he resulti~y ~oam can range in physical properties fr~m very flexible to fully rigid dependi~g on the hyaroxyl number of the chosen polyol.
In the art of making flexibl~ polyure~hane oamr it is known that by utilizing foam-forming formulation~
incorporating a highly reactive organic po~yisocyanate and a high molecular weight polyol having a certai~ ~`
level of primary hydroxyl content, a foam wi~h ~ roved resilience and o~her ~esirable physical properties ca~
be accomplished. Such resulting foams ha~e come ~o be re~erred ~o i~ the axt as "high resilience" foams.
Resilience is defined as ~he ability to return ~o or~gi- ..
nal shape and dimensions after a aeforming force has .
be~n applied and removed from a boay. In poIyurethane 20 . foam technology, the industry generally con~iaers ~SAC
factor~ to ~e the different~a~ing characteristic betwee~ high xesilience and conventional foams. This,~ .
SAC factor, a measure of support pro~i~ed by cushioning ~:
, ' ;' . ' :

: ` , Z

material, is the ratio of indent load deflection at 65% deflection to that of indent load deflection at 25% deflection (per ASTM D-1564-64T). According to SPI standards, conventional foams exhibit a SAC factor of about 1.7 to 2.2; high resilience foams have a factor above about 2.2 to about 3.2.
High resilience foams have found widespread application as cushioning material in furniture and bedding. Most significantly, these foams have been utilized in the automotive industry for making molded auto seats. The acceptance of these relatively new foams can be attributed to the fact that most already established polyurethane foam techniques can be readily applied to high resilience foams. However, foam stabilization and collapsing, one particular area of technology, has been found to be markedly non-transferable. Due to the highly reactive nature of the reaction mixture from which the high resilience foams are prepared, such foams have been found to exhibit characteristic pre-cure shrinkageO Conven- ;
tional foam reaction mixture components which serve to stabilize the composition as it reacts, foams, and solidifies, are ineffective to prevent shrin]~age or collapse in high resilience foaming reactions.
Moreover, conventional stabilizers actually tend to cause severe voids, splits and shrinkage of the oam product.
` Several approaches have been developed to meet the stabilization requirements of high resilience foams.
For example, U.S. Patent No. 3,880,780 teaches the use ~ -of a stabilized foam formulation comprising a select polyether polyol and polyisocyanate mixture, and an aromatic amine curing agent. In U.S. Patent No.
3,931,066, a select blend of main and supplemental polyether polyols is taught to result in a stabilized foam product. Select methylene-bridged diaryl polyisocyanates are described in U.S. Patent No.
~` 3,933,701 as being useful to stabilize high resilience ``~ foam from pre-cure collapse shortly after foaming.

~` -2-In order to achieve foaming stability and enhanced load bearing characteristics, it also has become popular to employ "polymer-polyol" processing systems - in high resilience foam production. Such polymer-polyols, produced from ethylenically unsaturated monomers and polyols, are exemplified by the materials described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,383,351, 3,652,639 and 3,823,201. These polymer-polyols commonly are mixed with conventional polyether polyols and used as the starting polyol reactant.
Another reference, U.S. Patent No. 4,108,791, discloses that high resilience polyurethane foams with improved foam properties can be accomplished by preparing the foam from polyols containing an inorganic filler, having an adjusted pH value of 6-8.5.
It has now been discovered, according to the present in~ention, that by incorporating a small proportion of effectively dispersed select fine particulate material into the foam reaction mixture, high resilience polyurethane foam can be stabilized ;
against pre-cure collapse or shrinkage, while main-taining other desirable foam properties.
It has previously been known in the polyurethane foam art to employ fine particulate matter in foam formulations, either as a filler, for economic reasons, or to impart certain physical characteristics to the foam product. For example, it is taught in U.S. Patent No. 3,640,920 that rigid, low density insulating foam `
compositions featuring favorable "freezer stability"
can be prepared from a reaction mixture containing about 0.05 to about 0.5 percent by weight of fine particles, ranging from 0 n 01 to about 250 microns in size.
~:.

`.:

`- . . ' . ': . ' ' ~L8~Z

Another patent, U.S. Patent No. 3,441,523, describes the use of at least 5 percent by weight of particulate filler materials, in the size range of about 2 to 25 microns, to prepare filled, flexible, cellular urethanes without depreciation of important physical characteristics.
Use of a filler substance commonly results in inferior physical properties which offsets the economic advantages of its utility. U.S. Patent No. 3,150,109 discloses another approach to relieving this problem.
By coating common filler pigment materials with an amine alcohol composition, it is disclosed that an appreciable amount of filler can be used without significantly affecting the physical propexties of low density, open-celled foams.
As mentioned above, U.S. Patent No. 4,108,791 describes the use of select inorganic filler particles to improve high resilience flexible polyurethane foam properties. This reference teaches that in order to effectively overcome certain foam deficiencies, the inorganic filler employed must have a pH of from about 6.5 to about 8.5 and an effective particle size of less than about 7 microns. Various suitable inorganic fillers are listed, including amorphous fumed silica.
In order to prepare effective filler material, com-mercially available fillers, such as fumed silica, having the specified particle size, are treated with a suitable base or acid, as each situation may dictate, in order to adjust the pH of the material to between 6.5 and 8.5. When untreated filler materials, having ~ a pH outside the specified range, are used in pro-c~ ducing high xesiliency foams, it is demonstrated that inferior foams are formed which exhibit unacceptable problems, such as shrinkage.

:, . , .- .

4 ~

. .

'33~2 .

Surprisingl~, it has now been discovered that rather khan pH or initial primary particle size, the degree of dispersion of the particulate material ; in the reaction mixture is a critical factor in s stabilization affectiveness. Upon being blended into a polyol composition, fine particulate material undergoes agglomeration, forming clusters of particles markedly larger than the individual particles them-- selves. Particle agglomerates in a blended polyolcomposition commonly have been found to exhibit effective sizes more than 100 times greater than the initial size of the individual particles. High resilience foam reaction formulations containing fine particulate material which has not been selectively blended to ensure a reduced effective dispersed particle size within the critical limits, as presently defined, fail to avoid unacceptable shrinkage.
According to the present invention, high resilience foam reaction stabilization is accomplished by using a polyol reactant composition containing a small propor-tion of effectivel~ dispersed fine particulate material.
Practicing the method of the present invention, suitable ` fine particulate material is dispersed in the polyol composition to form a dispersion in which the fineness ; 25 or effective maximum size of the particles, or particle ` agglomerates, in the dispersion is less than about 75 microns (e.g., per ASTM D-1210-64). Such a dispersion can be accomplished by using high shear mixers or other blending equipment which effectively eliminates agglomerates or reduces the particle agglomerate size to -;. form a polyol composition featuring dispersed particla characteristics within the specified critical range.
Preferably, the effective particle size in dispersion is l~ss than about S0 microns; most preferably about 25 microns or less. An effective maximum particle size in dispersion ranging between about 10 to about 20 microns has been found to be particularly preferred~

:
. ~- , , .
. .

~8~3~

; The particulate materials that are utilized according to the present invented method are select, finely divided, solid particles that are compatible with, but insoluble in, the foam reaction mixture.
Preferably, the particles have an average primary particle size of less ~han about 75 microns, a surface area of at least about 30 m2/g, and exhibit a bulk density of from about 1 to about 65 lbs./ft.3.
Naturally occurring materials meeting such physical criteria are not commonly available, but suitable parti-culate material can be synthetically prepared by known methods. Illustrative of particulate materials that can be used are: non-metal oxides based on non-metals such as silicon and phosphorus, for example, silicon dioxide, phosphates and phosphites; metal oxides, metal silicates and metal salts, based on metals such as magnesium, calcium, titanium, barium, aluminum, iron, copper, and zinc; solid organic polymers, such as polystyrene, polyacrylonitrile, polyvinylalcohols, polyvinylchloride and copolymers thereof; solid inorganic polymers, such as polymeric metal alkoxides including polyorganosiloxanometalloxanes (e.g., polytriethylsiloxanoaluminoxane, and ; polytrimethylsiloxanotitanoxane), and silicones;
graphite; carbon; and organic pigments, such as common paint pigments, including phthalocyanines. Particulate carbon (e.g., channel black) and inert metal and non-metal oxide particles, such as can be produced by hydrolysis of metal and non-metal chlorides in an 3~ oxygen-hydrogen flame (e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 3,083,115, ~ 3,086,851 and 3,103,495), are preferred stabilizing i agents. Particularly preferred are silicon dioxides (e.-g., synthetic amorphous silica, hydrophilic or modified hydrophobic), titanium dioxides and aluminum oxides, such as are commercially available under the - trademark "AEROSIL" from Degussa Corporation, under the trademark "CAB-O-SIL" from Cabot Corporation and under trademark "SYLOID" from W. R. Grace Co. Such inert I

.. ... ..

oxides featuring an average primary particle size of about 0.007 to about lO microns, having a surface area of about 50 to about 400 m2/g, having a pH ranging from about 3 to about 5, and with a bulk density of from about l to about lO lbs./ft.3 are most preferred.
According to the present invention, at any step in the preparation of the foam ingredients, a small propor- -tion of select fine particulate materials is blended into the polyol reactant composition in a manner to effectively disperse the particles as specified.
This stabilizing agent may be added in any proportion effective to achieve the degree of stabilization desired for a particular formulation. It has been found prefer-able to employ the particulate agent in an amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 5.0 percent, based on the total polyol weight. Most preferably, about 0.25 to about l.0 percent of the stabilizing agent is used.
In preparing polyurethane foam pursuant to the present invention, except for the inclusion of a sta-bilizing proportion of effectively dispersed fine ;~` particulate material as defined above, any prior art `
` high resilience foam formulation may be employed.
Such ormulations comprise various combinations o~
polyether polyols, organic polyisocyana~es, foaming agents and reaction catalysts.
The polyether polyol is one that is characterized by (l) a molecular weight of at least about 1,500, ` (2) a polyfunctional alcohol nucleus, (3) polyoxy-alkylene chain segments attached through one end thereof to the nucleus~ and (4) a ratio of primary to secondary hydroxyl end groups ranging from about 1.5:1 to about 5.5:1. This polyether can be prepared by methods generally well known in the art wherein a polyfunctional : alcohol initiator is condensed, in the presence of an ` 35 alkaline catalyst, first with an alkylene oxide having 3 or more carbon atoms and then with ethylene oxide.
~, ;

8~

The alcohol initiator which is used to prepare the polyether polyol can be any compound having 2-8 hydroxyl groups. Illustrative are ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, the butylene glycols such as 1,3-butylene glycol, the pentane diols such as 1,5 pentane diol, the hexane diols such as 1,6-hexane diol, glycerol, trimethylolpropane, sorbitol, pentaerythritol, methyl glucoside, sucrose, mixtures thereof and the like.
i It is preferred, however, to employ an aliphatic polyol `: 10 having 2-4, and more preferably 3-4, hydroxyl groups, such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, trimethylolpropane, sorbitol, and the like. The most : :
preferred initiators are the aliphatic triols such as : glycerol and trimethylolpropane.
In preparing the polyether polyol, a polyhydric . alcohol initiator as described above is sequentially condensed, in the presence of an alkaline catalyst such as potassium hydroxide, first with an alkylene oxide having 3-8, and preferably 3-4, carbon atoms and then ethylene oxide. Illustrative of the alkylene oxides which are first condensed with the alcohol initia-tor are propylene oxide, butylene oxide, pentylene oxide, mixtures thereof and the like, propylene oxide being A' '''~
. most preferred. In carrying out the sequential condensa-tion reactions, such amounts of ethylene oxide and higher alkylene oxide are employed as to provide a poly-ether having a molecular weight of at least about 1,500, and preferably from about 4,000 to about 7,000, and in which polyether the ratio..of primary to secondary hydroxyl groups is from about 1.5:1 to about 5.5:1 and `` preferably from about 2:1 to about 5:1. :
In accordance with a particularly preferred embodi-ment of the invention, the polyether polyol which is employed in preparing the polyurethane foam is an oxypropylated, oxyethylated aliphatic triol having a molecular weight of about 4,500-6,600 and a ratio of primary to secondary hydroxyl groups from about 3:1 to about 4.5:L.

3'~;

In preparing the foams of the invention, any suit-able organic polyisocyanate, or a mixture of polyisocya-nates, may be employed as the isocyanate reactant.
Illustrative are toluene diisocyanate, such as the 80:20 and the 65:35 mixtures of the 2,4- and 2,6-isomers, ethylene diisocyanate, propylene diisocyanate, methylenebis (4-phenyl) isocyanate, 3,3'-ditoluene-4,4' diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, naphthalene-1,5-diisocyanate, polymethylene polyphenyl isocyanate, mixtures thereof, and the like. In accordance with a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, an isomeric mixture of 2,4- and 2,6-toluene diisocyanate is employed in which the weight ratio of the 2,4-isomer to the 2,6-isomer is from about 60:40 to about 90:10 and more preferably from about 65:35 to about 80:20.
The total amount of polyisocyanates that is employed should generally be sufficient to provide at --; least 0.7 NCO group per hydroxyl group in the reaction system, which includes the polyether polyol, as well as ~o any additional material and/or foaming agent present in ~`;
the system. In practice a total amount of isocyanate reactant is usually employed as to provide no more than about 1.25, and preferably about 0.9-1.15 NCO groups per each hydroxyl group. ;~
Any suitable foaming agent, or mixture of foaming - agents, may be employed in preparing the polyurethane foam. These include inor~anic foaming agents r such as water, and organic foaming agents containing up to 7 carbon atoms, such as the halogenated hydrocarbons and ~" 30 the low molecular weight alkanes, alkenes, and ethers.
Illustrative organic foaming agents include monofluoro-trichloromethane, dichlorofluoromethane, dichlorodi-fluoromethane, 1,1,2-trichloro-1,2,2,-trifluoroethane, methylene chloride, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, methane, ethane, ethylene, propylene, hexane, ethyl ~, ' , ~

.

~ . ~9~
, , ~

~ 3Z

ether and diisopropyl ether. Water and the low molecu-lar weight polyhalogenated alkanes, such as monofluoro-trichloromethane and dichlorodifluoromethane, are preferred. The amount of foaming agent may be varied ` 5 within a reasonably wide range as is well known in the art. Generally, however, the halogenated alkanes, for example, are employed in an amount of about 2~20 parts per 100 parts by weight of the polyether polyol; and water is employed in an amount of about 1-6 parts per 100 parts by weight of the polyether polyol.
The catalyst employed in preparing the foams of ~' the invention may be any of the catalysts known to be useful for this purpose, including tertiary amines, organo-metallic salts, and mixtures of an organo-metallic salt with 1 or more tertiary amine, the latter ~i being preferred. Typical tertiary amines include, for example, triethylamine, triethylene diamine, trimethyl-; amine, tetramethylene diamine, tetramethylbutane `~ diamine, N-methylmorpholine, N-ethylmorpholine, dimethylpiperazine, trimethylaminoethylpiperazine, dimethylcyclohexylamine, mixtures of bis(dimethylamino-ethylether) and dipropylene glycol such as the 7:3 weight ratio mixture which is available commercially under the trademark "Niax A-l", methyldicyclohexylamine, N-cyclohexylmorpholine, dimethylcyclohexylamine, methyl-diethanolamine, mixtures of dimethylcyclohexylamine and

2(3-pentyl)-1-dimethylaminocyclohexane such as may be purchased commercially under the trademark "Polycat", bis(dimethylaminoethylpropylether), mixtures o~
triethylene diamine and dipropylene glycol such as the 1:2 and 1:4 weight ratio mixtures which may be purchased commercially under the trademarks "Dabco 33LV" and "Dabco 8020", respectively, bi~(dimethylaminopropyl-ether), and mixtures of these catalysts. The preferred tertiary amina catalysts are triethylene diamine, mixtures of bis(dimethylaminoethylether) and dipropylene , glycol, dimethylcyclohexylamine alone or as a mixture thereof with 2(3-pentyl)-l-dimethylaminocyclohexame.
The tertiary amine catalyst is used in a proportion of about 1.0-1.5, and preferably about 0.25-0.75, parts per lO0 parts by weight of the total polyol which is employed in preparing the foam.
~ypical organo-metallic salts include, for example, the salts of tin, titanium, antimony, aluminum, cobalt, zinc, bismuth, lead, and cadmium, the tin salts, i.e., stannic and stannous salts, being preferred. Illustra-tively, such salts include the octoates, dilaurates, diace~ates, dioctoates, olea~es, and neodeconates of these metals, the octoates being preferred. The organo-metallic salt catalyst is used in a proportion of about 0-0.5, and preferably about 0.05-0.2 parts per lO0 ` parts by weight of total polyol which is employed in the preparation of the foam.
` It is preferred in the preparation of the polyuEe-`~ thane foams of the invention to employ minor amount of 2`0 a conventional surfactant in order to further improve the cell structure of the polyurethane foam. Suitable such surfactants include, for example, the silicon-based ; surfactants such as the silicones and the siloxaneoxy-alkylene block copolymers, all of which are commercially available materials.
Generally, the silicones are employed in a propor-tion of up to about 0.1 parts per lO0 parts by weight of ; the polyether polyol; and the siloxaneoxyalkylene block copolymers are employed in a proportion of up to about 2 parts per lO0 parts by weight of the polyether polyol. ¦
If desired, a curing agent, such as a conventional amine curing agent, may be included in the foam-forming reaction mixture. However, pursuant to the present invention, the use of curing agents is not necessary and therefore it is preferable to exclude such materials from the reaction mixture.

.

-a3z Various additives can also be employed to provide different properties in the polyurethane foam, e.g., fill~rs such as cl~y, calcium sulfate, or ammonium phos-phate may be added to lower cost and improve physical properties. Ingredients such as dyes may ~e added for color, and fibrous glass, asbes~os, or synthetic fibers ; may be added for strength. In addition, plasticizers, deodorants, antioxidants and flame retardants may be added.
. 10 Foams prepared in accordance with the principles of , the present invention are characterized by favorable processing characteristics and physical properties. The foams are substan~,ially open-celled and become tack-free within a relatively short period of time after foaming cessation. Generally ranging in densi~y from about 1.0 to about 5.0, preferably rom about 1.7 to about 3.0, pounds per cub~c foot, the cured foams feature a SAC
factor in excess of 2.2, generally ranging from about 2.3 to about 3.0, and a ball rebound generally greater than about 55 percent. These high resilience foams are flexible and soft and exhibit li~tle or no tendency to bottom out. In combination with good tear strength, tensile strength and elongation, the physical proper~
ties of the foams of the invention make them desirable ~' for a variety of cushioning utilities.
The following examples are provided ~,o further illustrate the inventionO

~'' ,:

. , .

3~

, .

Example 1 Preparation of Polyol Containing Particulate Dispersion ' 30 Grams of synthe~ic fumed silica was added to 600 grams of a polyether polyol and mixed for about lO minutes using a high shear blender having a blade ! tip speed of about 4,000 ft./min. to about 8,000 ft./min. The silica, obtained commercially under the ~` trademark Cab-O-Sil Grade M-5 from Cabot Corporation, is reported to have a pH of 3.5-4.2 and a primary particle size of 14 millimicrons. The polyether ` polyol had a molecular weight of about 4,675 and was . prepared by end capping a propoxylated glycerine precursor with 15 moles of ethylene oxide to a final hydroxyl number of about 36. The efective maximum ` size of the particles and/or particle agglomerates in dispersion was measured, usinig a grind gauge, per AST~l D-1210-64, to be about 25 microns.

Comparative Example A

To demonstrate the criticality of the degree of dispersion in regard to stabilization effectiveness, a second dispersion was prepared, using the same -components and proportions as in Example 1. In this comparative preparation, however, a conventional low `~ 25 shear blender, with a blade tip speed of less than i;

4,000 ft./min~, was used to mix the dispersion for about 10 minutes. The effective maximum size of the `
particles and/or particle agglomerates in dispersion was measured to be greater than 100 microns.

: '`, ~, -;
"~

.

-~;
z Example 2 and Comparative Example B
:' High resiliency polyurethane foams were prepared, S using standard foam formulations, but including a proportion of the dispersed silica-polyol concen-trates prepared according to Example 1 and Comparative Example A. Table I outlines the reaction mixture components and proportions employed. The reported processing results (pre-cure shrinkage) clearly indicate the stabilizing ef~ect of employing effec-tively dispersed silica according to the present invention, while conventionally dispersed ~ilica fails to accomplish foam stability.

~.
`: ' :.~
,-:

.. "
:' .
~:.
;~ 14-'i ~' . ' .. ~ . ~

." .~:

.

, , .
TABLE I

Example 2 Comparative Example B
Polyol ~ 86.5 86.5 Product of Ex. 1 10 --

- 5 Product of Comp. Ex. A ~~ 10 - Supplemental Polyol ~ 3.5 3.5 Diethanolamine 0.4 0.4 'Triethylene Diamine ~ 0.53 0.53 Water 2.4 2.4 Surfactant ~ ' 1.0 1.0 Toluene Diisocyanate ~
Index 10~ 109 Dibutyltin Dilaurate 0.1 0.1 -- ~ :
Foam ProcessingGood, Open Foam Shrinks - 15 Foam - No Shrinking A polyether triol having a molecular weight of 4,500, prepared by ROH catalyzed oxyalkylation of glycerin first with propylene oxide and then with 10 moles of ethylena oxide.

~ A polyether polyol having a molecular weight of 673, p~repared by KOH catalyzed propoxylation of a 3/1 blend of dextrose/glycerin~ .
~.

. ~ Commercially available under the trademark "DABCO 33LV", consisting primarily of triethylene diamine tl/3) and , - dipropylene glycol (2/3). ~' .
:. ~ Commercially available polysiloxane surfactant sold under the trademark "Q2-5043" from Dow Corning.

A mixture of'toluene diisocyanate isomers ~80:20 mixture of 2,4/2,6-isomers~. ;

` ' :: ~ :

393~:

:' ~ Examples 3-8 .
A standard gauge of foam stabilizing effectiveness ; is the "tin range", defined as the range over which the amount of tin catalyst in the foaming formulation can be varied while maintaining acceptable foam processing.
The tin catalysts, such as dibutyltin dilaurate, are ; used to force the reaction between isocyanate and polyether at such a rate that viscosity is rapidly increased and the blowing gas is trapped and held.
However, too much of an increase in viscosity growth results in a closed cell-foam with relatively thic]~ ;
strong cell membranes, and exhibiting a very low air flow and accompanying pre-cure shrinkage. Too little of a rate of viscosity growth would cause extensive thinning of the cell membranes, cell rupture, loss of blowing gas and resultant foam collapse, settling or -~ splitting.
To permit practical utility, a foam formulation --must feature an acceptable "tin range" to avoid frequent foam product failure due to routine minor fluctuations in the pumped flow rate of the tin catalyst feed stream.
A series of examples were conducted to demonstrate the effect of dispersed particle size on foam stabili-zation as represented by tin range evaluations. Five - percent dispersions of Cab O-Sil Grade M-5 were prepared as outlined in Example 1, using mixers of ~`
varying shear to achieve the desired range of dispersed particle sizes. These dispersed silica-polyol concen-trates were blended with additional polyol to produce 0.5% concentrations by weight of the silica, based on - the total polyol weight. Free rise, high resilient ` foams were prepared, according to the foxmulations reported below in Table II, using standard hand-mix techniques. The amounts of dibutyltin dilaurate was - . ~

33~:

: varied with each formulation to determine the "tin range", representa~ive of the foam stability achieved through use of each of the silica dispersions. The reported results illustrate that effective dispersion is a critical factor in foam processing stability. `
The narrow tin range evidenced by dispersed particle sizes greater than 100 microns is impractical and unsatisfactory. .:~
.

" ' ' 't' '~' , , , : . ~ . ... , .;:

3~

.: .
.

o ~ o .
o ~ o o _i ~ o o .: :.

6~ ,:;i ,^ ' x ~u -~ N :.
a u~ :;

o a ~ h ~ -O
a ~) 8 a a ~1 ~ 5~ S:0 S:: ~ h g~
~ h ~ ~1 o S~ U~ a . . . ~
' '' .
i` .:

-18- ~

,- . : ,: ,, ~ :: ; . ,:.

.
,, .
~1 .
o ~ ,~,, ~ ~ ~a ~ o X ~ --I ILO

U ~ U ~ ~ D~
~ ~ o ~" e ' R ~ q ~ ~
' O O
~, Ei ~ u ~~ S ~ X ,~
ZO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
E~~.7 3'9 ,L: 8 ~ u~ o ;
8~ ~ o ~~ .,, ~.
_~ .s o~ ~ ~. . o H ~ .C 'I ,~ ) U
'.C S
. ` ~3 ~ ~3 o h -X ~ X S~ ~ a "
rl X ~ .
u a ,, ~, .c ~
o~ ., a 0 :~, . ~ o ~ ~ ù
' Q~ ' : , -~; 3 ~ a o ~ ~ qOj~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~.
u .~ I a 'I :~
'i; ~ h ~ X

~ ~u ~ g oi ~
,¢ O ~ :

, :` :
.; ~' ; ''`' , ' ~

3~

.:

Example 9 and Comparative Example C
, Dispersed particle-polyol concentrates were prepared, using the general procedure of Example l and Comparative Example A, but employing fine particulate carbon rather than silica. The carbon, obtained commercially under the trademark Channel Black, Grade FW 200 from Degussa Corporation, is reported to have an average primary particle size of :
13 millimicrons, a surface area of 460 m /g and a pH
of about 2.
Free rise high resilient foams were prepared, : according to the general method of Example 2, using -..... 15 the particulate carbon dispersions within and outside the scope of the present invention. The formulations and results are tabulated below in Table III. ` ~

:~:

., .
~: ' :

.~ .
. . ', ~ `
".

3;Z
.

, TABLE III

.
Example 9 Com~arative Example C
Polyol ~ ~ 96 96 1, Supplemental Polyol 3.5 3.5 Channel Black FW 200 0.5 0.5 Water ~ 2.0 2.0 Triethylene Diamine 0.44 0.44 Diethanolamine 0.33 0-33 Surfactant ~ 1.0 1.0 Toluene Diisocyanate ~ , Index 109 109 ~;
Dibutyltin Dilaurate 0.1 0.1 Dispersed Phase Particle Size, Microns 55 ~100 - , Foam Processing Good, Open Foam Shrinks A polyether triol having a molecular welght of 4,500, prepared by KOH catalyzed oxyalkylation of glycerin first with propylene oxide and then with 10 moles of ethylene oxide.

~ A polyether polyol having a molecular weight of 673, prepared by KOEI catalyzed propoxylation of a 3/1 blend of dextrose/glycerin. -Commercially available under the trademark "DABCO 33LV", consisting primarily of triethylene diamine (1~) and I -dipropylene glycol (2/3).

Commercially available polysiloxane surfactant sold under the trademark "Q2-5043" from Dow Corning.

' ~ A mixture of toluene diisocyanate isomers ~80:20 mixture of 2,4/2,6-isomers).

. `

' ' ' 3~

Examples 10 and 11 Two dispersed particle-polyol concentrates were prepared, using the general procedure of Example 1, but employing titanium dioxide as the fine particulate material. The titanium dioxide used was obtained commercially from Degussa Corporation under the designation Grade P25. This material is reported to have an average primary particle size of 15-40 millimicrons, a surface area of about 50 m2/g and a pH
value of 3-4.
Free rise high resilient foams were prepared, using standard procedures, from the ~ormulations reported below in Table IV. Non-shrinking foams were accomplished.

. ~ , , .. ...

;

-23~

TAEiLE IV

Example 10 Example 11 Polyol ~ ~ 95-75 95 75 Supplemental Polyol 3.50 3.50 . 5 Titanium Dioxide, P25 0.75 0.75 Water 2.0 2.0 Triethylene Diamine ~ 0.44 0.44 Diethanolamine 0.33 0.33 Surfactant ~ 1.0 1.0 Toluene Diisocyanate ~ , Index 109 109 Dibutyltin Dilaurate 0.1 0.1 . ~ -.
Dispersed Phase Particle Size, Microns 60 30 Foam Processing . Good, Open Good, Open Foam Foam A polyether triol having a molecular weight of 4,500.
prepared by KOH catalyzed oxyalkylation of glycerin first with propylene oxide and then with 10 moles of ~:
ethylene oxide.

, 20 ~ A ~olyether polyol having a molecular weight of 673, prepared by ROH catalyzed propoxylation of a 3/1 blend o :~
dextrose~glycerin.

Commercially available unaer the trademark "DABCO 33LV", . . consisting prLmarily of triethylene diamine ~1~3) and .
dipropylene glycol (2/3).

`~ ~ Commercially available polysiloxane surfactant sold under the trademark "Q2-5043" from ~ow Corning.

A mixture of toluene diisocyanate isomers (;30:20 mixture of 2,4/2,6-isomers). .. ;
~; -;i.~ '~ . . ~:

f ~ :
`: ::

~ ~8~3~

Example 12 A dispersed particle-polyol concentrate was prepared, using the general procedure of Example 1, but employing aluminum oxide as the fine particulate material. The aluminum oxide used was obtained ; commercially from Degussa Corporation under the designation "Grade C". This material is reported to have an average primary particle size of 5 to ~0 millimicrons, a surface area of 100 m /g and a pH
value of 4-5.
A free rise high resilient oam was prepared, using standard procedures, from the formulation outlined in Table V below. A stable, non-shrinking foam was obtained.
':

.

` ' '.

; ` ':
. .

3~

TABLE V

Example 12 Polyol ~ ~ 95.75 - i , Supplemental Polyol 3.50 Aluminum oxide C 0.75 Water ~ 2.0 Triethylene Diamine 0.44 Diethanolamine 0.33 Surfactant ~ ~ 1.0 Toluene Diisocyanate , Index 109 Dibutyltin Dilaurate 0.1 Dispersed Phase Particle Size, Microns 15 I .
Foam Processing Good, Open I -Foam ~ :

15 ~ A polyether triol having a molecul æ weight of 4,500, prepared by KOH catalyzed oxyalkylation of glycerin first with propylene oxide and then with 10 moles of ~; ethylene oxide.

~ A polyether polyol having a molecular weight of 673, prepared by KOH catalyzed propo~ylation of a 3/1 blend of dextrose/glycerin. ~

` ~ Commercially available under the trademark "DABCO ~;
33LV", consisting primarily of triethylene diamine l/3) and dipropylene glycol (2/3).
.~ , ` ' 25 ~ Commercially available polysiloxane surfactant sold under the trademark "Q2-5043" from Dow Corning.
., . :" ~
~` ~ A mixture of toluene diisocyanate isomers (80:20 ~ mixture of 2,4/2,6-isomers?.

.~, , ' :

93~

Examples 13-17 A dispersion of a siynthetic amorphous silica was prepared by mixing 30 g of the silica with 500 g of a polyether polyol, using a high shear mixer. The silica, obtained commercially under the trademark "SYLOID 244" from W. R. Grace ~o., had a bulk density of about 7 lbs./ft.3, an average primary particle size of about 4 microns, and a surface area of about 310 m2/g. The polyether polyol had a molecular weight of about 4675 and was prepared by end-capping a propoxylated glycerine precursor with 15 moles of ~ ethylene oxide. The resulting dispersion, a silica-polyol concentrate was turbid in appearance and had a viscosity, cps @ 250C, of 2,000.
High resilience, flexible polyurethane foams were `
prepared using standard foam formulations, but including a proportion of the silica-polyol concen-.
trate, described above. Table VI outlines the ingredients and proportions utilized. Comparative ~0 Example D exemplifies a foam prepared without any stabilizing agent; Comparative Example E exemplifies the prior art stabilization method of including a polymer-polyol component, as discussed in the specification.
In each example, the ingredients were mixed ;-together and poured inko a square cardboard box.
A foam product was obtained which was observed for ` shrinkage or collapse during-room temperature curing. ;
After measuring the core density of each foam, its physical properties were determined - compression set, tensile strength, elongation, tear strength, ball rebound, air flow, and SAC factor ~per ASTM
. D-1564-64T). The results of the physical property testing is tabulated in Table VII, below.

. :
' ... .

.

; -26-, 3;~:

a~
,1 ~ ~ ~ a o ,~ l ~ ~CO I I I ~i ~ Z
C~
I~
_I _ ~ O N CO O ~1 O
~ .~ O I O O O I ~-i O ~`1 O o N
X _ ,_ U:\ Ir~
~I ,~ O I O O O I ~I ~ ' In ~1 1i3 .
~1 al ~ ~ ~ o ~ o co o ~1 q~ ,~, O , OO O , ,, O N O ~1 1~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ o I ~o l l ~ .
: ~ ~ ~o I ~ o I ,i 1 o ~ o ~ u~ æ ; :

a~ ~ ~ o , co o ~1 :' :. ~ ~, o I ~i I o ~ o ~ o ~ ::
~' ~ _ ~, ` ~:
, .
~ Q -~ ~
o _l Ul O I I o I I ~ o ~ o O ~o ~ ~ ~1 ~1 '~

~ O ~
,`'` ~ ~ r~ ~ ~:
., S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::
H ~ 1 C .~ .
~01 (~ ~ `
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 u .x O ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ a ~
æ o ~ _ ~, ~ s~ c ~ O ~ a X u ~ -:
.. O r ~ I C -1 0 a)O ~ :
~1 ~ a~ d U U (d ~ ~ ~a u~ :~
;` ~ ~ ~, u ~ a _ y ~I r l _I ~rl ~ $~1 h o ~ ,4 ~l --I a.
~` ~ ~ ~ 'U~ 3 't~ ~

, ~

--2~-- :
, O ~ O I ~ ~

o ,,,, o ' e ~ D 9 .

:~ r ~ ~ o ~ ~,i s e ~

~ X ~ ' & ~ ,~ 15 O ~ ~ ~ .1 s ~ . s a ~ u ~ a ~ a ;
~ . ''" `' ~ j . .

'`' `' '' `'' ' .' ~ . . :`. ~

.,~ U) ,_ ~ ,~
h ~ O O ~ ~ ~1-- ~ .--1 Il~ N

.. ~1 I` ~ O ~ O
~4 o o ~ ~ ~o~ o o Ir) t~J
6d N ~D

~D
C~ r7 ~ O
O O ~ ~ ~~ O ~i ~ ~1 X
W
U~
~r a~ I` ~
r~ I` ~ O~D ~` O O
~ O O ~
H ~1 :>
: ~ ~r C~ Q) ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ O
` ~ .
,j~ f`7 . ' ., '`:
- ~ ~ CD ~ r` ~
~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ 7 ~ ~r ~1 6 ~1(`~ Ll'l ' a U~ ~ ' :
~1 ~ ~ u~ O 1~1~ a~ O
o o ~ ~ ~r ~D ~ O ~ ~
6P~ x ~ ~ ~:
~ to~ ~

~: :
.i ~ :
~ O
u~ C~
~ o o - ~ ~ ~ ~
o o ~0 o ~ ~ o 4 ;: h 5 Q~ 0 ` S~
~ a Q ~,~ 4 0 ~rl O
co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R 3 ~` O ~ D V ~ --I 0 ~ ~ ~ k~ o td ~ s~
.~ ~ .C ~ m '~

`t~
, ~B932 Example 18 The following mixture of foaming ingredients was poured in an aluminum mold (6" x 6" x 6") and heated to 120F. At the end of foam rise, the mold was S placed in an oven at 300F for 6 minutes. The foams . were then removed and cut in two pieces - to observe ; its structure. The foam containing dispersed particu-late stabilizer did not exhibit any shrinkage, while the comparative example without any stabilizer shrank quite considerably and would be considered not acceptable.

... . ..
. . , ' .. :
, ., ~ .~.

` ~

.

~ 3~

TABLE VIII

Comparative Example 18 Example F
(pbw) (pbw) Polyether Polyol ~ 100 100 Particulate Silica ~0.75 -- I
Water 2~5 - 2.5 !
Catalyst ~ 0.27 0.27 Catalyst ~ 0.09 0,09 Diethanolamine 0.8 0.8 Surfactant ~ 1.0 1.0 Dibutyltin Dilaurate0.1 0.1 r Toluene Diisocyanate ~ , Index109 109 . -: ' Foam StabilizationNo ShrinkageShri~kage ., ' I
~ A polyether triol having a molecular weight of 4,500, '- prepared by XOH c`atalyzed oxyalkylation of glycerin first with propylene oxide and then with 10 moles of I
ethylene oxide.

Q Commercially available under the trademark ~CAB-O-SIL M-5" I
from Cabot Corporation.

Commercially available under the trademark "DABCO 33LV", ,; ~;
consisting primarily of triethyiene diamine ~1/3) and -` dipropylene glycol (2~3).
~' ~
~ Commercially a~ailable under the trademark "NIAX A-l"
from Union Carbide Corporation. ¦, _, !
Commercially available polysiloxane surfactant sold under the trademark "Q2-5043" from Dow Corning.

A mixture of toluene d~isocyanate isomers (80:20 mixture of 2,4~2,6-isomers).
` ' ~ ` '.
-;~
...

' 1' ' ~, .

Claims

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:-

1. A polyol composition comprising a polyether polyol including a proportion of an effectively dispersed finely divided solid particulate material having an effective maxi-mum particle size in dispersion of less than about 75 microns, said polyol being a polyether polyol having a molecular weight of at least about 1,500, a polyhydroxy alcohol nucleus having a functionality from about 2 to about 8, polyoxyalkylene chain segments attached to said nucleus, and a ratio of primary to secondary hydroxyl end groups ranging from about 1.5:1 to about 5.5:1.

2. The polyol composition of claim 1 wherein said particulate material is dispersed to an effective particle size in dispersion of less than about 50 microns.

3. The polyol composition of claim 2 wherein said particulate material is dispersed to an effective particle size in dispersion of less than about 25 microns.

4. The polyol composition of claim 1 wherein said finely divided solid particulate material is selected from the group consisting of non-metal oxides, metal oxides, metal silicates, metal salts, solid organic polymers, solid inor-ganic polymers, carbon, organic pigments, and mixtures there-of.

5. The polyol composition of claim 4 wherein said particulate material is selected from the group consisting of synthetic silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, aluminum oxide, and mixtures thereof.

6. The polyol composition of claim 5 wherein said particulate material is a synthetic amorphous silica.

7. The polyol composition of claim 6 wherein said particulate material is a synthetic hydrophobic amorphous silica.

8. The polyol composition of claim 7 wherein, prior to dispersion into said polyol, said particulate material has an average primary particle size of about 0.007 to about 10 microns, a pH ranging from about 3 to about 5, a surface area of about 50 to about 400 m2/g, and a bulk density of about 1 to about 10 lbs./ft.3, dispersed to an effective maximum par-ticle size in dispersion ranging from about 10 to about 20 microns.

9. A process for preparing a polyol composition as defined in claim 1 comprising blending (a) a polyether polyol having a molecular weight of at least about 1,500, a polyhydroxy alcohol nucleus having a functionality from about 2 to about 8, polyoxyalkylene chain segments attached to said nucleus, and a ratio of pri-mary to secondary hydroxyl end groups ranging from about 1.5:1 to about 5.5:1; with (b) finely divided particulate material;
to form a dispersion wherein said finely divided solid particulate material having an effective maximum particle size in dispersion of less than about 75 microns.

10. In a process for preparing a high resilience poly-urethane foam from a reaction mixture comprising:
(a) a polyether polyol having a molecular weight of at least about 1,500, a polyhydroxy alcohol nucleus having a functionality from about 2 to about 8, polyoxyalkylene chain segments attached to said nucleus, and a ratio of primary -to secondary hydroxyl end groups ranging from about 1.5:1 to about 5.5:1;
(b) an organic polyisocyanate;
(c) a foaming agent; and (d) a reaction catalyst;
the improvement characterized by including in said reaction mixture a polyol containing a proportion of an effectively dispersed finely divided solid particulate material having an effective maximum particle size in dispersion of less than about 75 microns.

11. The process of claim 10 wherein said particulate material is dispersed to an effective particle size in dis-persion of less than about 50 microns.

12. The process of claim 11 wherein said particulate material is dispersed to an effective particle size in dis-persion of less than about 25 microns.

13. The process of claim 10 wherein said particulate material is added in a stabilizing amount ranging from about 0.1 to about 5.0 percent, by weight, based on total polyol weight.

14. The process of claim 13, wherein said stabilizing amount ranges from about 0.25 to about 1.0 percent.

15. The process of claim 10 wherein said finely di-vided solid particulate material is selected from the group consisting of non-metal oxides, metal oxides, metal sili-cates, metal salts, solid organic polymers, solid inorganic polymers, carbon, organic pigments, and mixtures thereof.

16. The process of claim 15 wherein said particulate material is selected from the group consisting of synthetic silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, aluminum oxide, and mix-tures thereof.

17. The process of claim 16 wherein said particulate material is a synthetic amorphous silica.

18. The process of claim 17 wherein said particulate material is a synthetic hydrophobic amorphous silica.

19. The process of claim 15 wherein, prior to disper-sion into said polyol, said particulate material has an aver-age primary particle size of about 0.007 to about 10 microns, a pH ranging from about 3 to about 5, a surface area of about 50 to about 400 m2/g, and a bulk density of about 1 to about 10 lbs./ft.3.

20. The process of claim 10 wherein said polyether polyol reactant has a molecular weight of about 4,000 to about 7,000, and a ratio of primary to secondary hydroxyl end groups ranging from about 2:1 to about 5:1.

21. The process of claim 20 wherein said polyether polyol reactant is a triol having a molecular weight of about 4,500 to about 6,000, and a ratio of primary to sec-ondary hydroxyl end groups ranging from about 3:1 to about 4.5:1.

22. The process of claim 20 including about 0.1 to about 5.0 percent of said particulate material selected from silicon dioxide, titanium dioxide, aluminum oxide, and mix-tures thereof, having, prior to dispersion in said polyol, an average primary particle size of about 0.007 to about 10 mi-crons, a pH of about 3 to about 5, a surface area of about 50 to about 400 m2/g, and a bulk density of about 1 to about 10 lbs./ft.3, dispersed to an effective maximum particle size in dispersion in the range of about 10 to about 20 mi-crons.

23. A high resilience polyurethane foam when prepared according to the process of claim 10.

24. A high resilience polyurethane foam when prepared according to the process of claim 11, 12 or 13.

25. A high resilience polyurethane foam when prepared according to the process of claim 14, 15 or 16.

26. A high resilience polyurethane foam when prepared according to the process of claim 17, 18 or 19.

27. A high resilience polyurethane foam when prepared according to the process of claim 20, 21 or 22.