CA1076421A - Catalytic fume incineration - Google Patents

Catalytic fume incineration

Info

Publication number
CA1076421A
CA1076421A CA288,553A CA288553A CA1076421A CA 1076421 A CA1076421 A CA 1076421A CA 288553 A CA288553 A CA 288553A CA 1076421 A CA1076421 A CA 1076421A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
catalyst
gas
bed
further characterized
inch
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA288,553A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
William K. Hunter
Leslie C. Hardison
Edward J. Dowd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
AIR RESOURCES
Original Assignee
AIR RESOURCES
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by AIR RESOURCES filed Critical AIR RESOURCES
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1076421A publication Critical patent/CA1076421A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23GCREMATION FURNACES; CONSUMING WASTE PRODUCTS BY COMBUSTION
    • F23G7/00Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals
    • F23G7/06Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases
    • F23G7/07Incinerators or other apparatus for consuming industrial waste, e.g. chemicals of waste gases or noxious gases, e.g. exhaust gases in which combustion takes place in the presence of catalytic material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/72Organic compounds not provided for in groups B01D53/48 - B01D53/70, e.g. hydrocarbons

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Devices And Processes Conducted In The Presence Of Fluids And Solid Particles (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas Treatment By Means Of Catalyst (AREA)
  • Incineration Of Waste (AREA)

Abstract

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

Industrial fumes or waste gases containing combustible noxious materials are preheated and passed upwardly through a bed of particulate oxidation catalyst comprising chromic oxide on alumina or other suitable inert support. Catalytic com-bustion of the combustible materials is effected, and the pollutant-free gas is discharged to the atmosphere. The particle size or the catalyst is relatively coarse, and the gas velocity is sufficient to agitate or fluidize the bed.
The hardness of the catalyst is such that only limited attrition occurs, which assists in keeping the catalyst surface clean, and the catalyst loss in the effluent gas is less than one pound per million standard cubic feet of gas treated.

Description

~076~Z~
This invention relates to a novel and improved process for the catalytic incineration of fumes and waste gases containing combustible noxious materials, particularly organic pollutants such as hydrocarbons and the like.
Various processes are known for treating industrial fumes and waste gases to effect oxidation of combustible materials. For example, fixed bed catalytic incineration has been widely used to control organic emissions by means of precious metal catalyst elements prepared bydépositlngplatinum and/or palladium on heat resistant alloy ribbons, as disclosed in the Suter et al. U.S. Patent Nos. 2,658,742 and 2,720,494.
Other fixed catalysts have been used in which the precious metal is supported on a ceramic carrier. However, the precious metal catalysts heretofore used have serious limitations because of their high susceptibility to suppression of catalytic action by halogen, phosphorus, silicon, and sulfur compounds as well as to poisoning by heavy metals and other deleterious materials commonly found in industrial fumes and waste gases.
Moreover, such catalysts are prone to fouling, as by coatings of heavy hydrocarbons or tars, which necessitates costly shutdowns for catalyst replacement or regeneration.
To avoid such catalyst problems, those skilled in the art have often resorted to thermal incineration in spite of the higher temperatures required and the higher fuel costs ~-as compared with catalytic incineration. The higher tempera-tures necessary for thermal incineration also entail serious design problems and often require the use of more costly materials of construction.
The present invention overcomes the aforementioned problems by utilizing an agitated or fluidized bed of a relatively coarse particulate o~idation catalyst which does not , ' , , .

~0~

contain a precious metal. As will appear hereinafter, the non-precious metal catalyst is physically rugged and thermally stable over a broad range of operating conditions. In addition, because the use of precious metals is avoided, the catalyst has superior resistance to catalyst suppressants and poisons with excellent stability and catalyst life. The agitated or fluidized condition of the catalyst bed also minimized deactivation problems due to fouling or coating of the catalyst. The activity of the catalyst bed can be main-tained during operation of the process by addition of fresh catalyst and removal of used catalyst without costly shut-down of the system.
In the accompanying drawing, Fig. 1 is a vertical sectional view of an illustrative apparatus for practicing the invention; and Figs. 2 and 3 are horizontal cross-sectional views taken along the lines 2-2 and 3-3 of Fig. 1, respectively.
As shown in the drawing, the apparatus comprises an elongated vertical reactor 10 comprising an exterior metal shell 11 of circular cross-section and an internal heat-resistant lining 12 of refractory material. The reactor 10 has a lower preheat zone 13 and an upper catalyst zone 14.
In the lower portion of the zone 14 a bed 16 of particulate solid catalyst issupportedon a gas distribution and support grid shown schematically at 17. The grid 17 may have any suitable construction well known in the catalytic conversion art for preventing the movement of catalyst particles down-wardly therethrough into the zone 13 while at the same time permitting gas to flow upwardly through the grid and dis-tributing the gas flow uniformly through the catalyst bed.
An inlet 18 for the waste gas to be treated is provided in the zone 13, and a burner 19 having a nozzle 20 is
2 --':
, .. . .

~7~42~ .
mounted adjacent the inlet 18 so that the waste gas introduced through the inlet 18 commingles with and is preheated by the hot combustion gases from the burner nozzle 20. The burner 19 is supplied with fuel and air from a blower 21 through a conduit 22. An access opening 23 with a removable door is pro-vided in the lower preheat zone 13, and a similar access opening 24 is provided in the upper zone 14 immediately ahove the catalyst bed 16.
An external catalyst supply hopper 26 is connected to zone 14 of the reactor for gravity feed of fresh catalyst through an inclined supply line 27 having an outlet above the catalyst bed 16. A slide valve or gate shown schematically at 28 controls the rate of catalyst feed. Used catalyst is removed from the bottom of the bed 16 through an outlet pipe 29 having a control valve shown schematically at 31. The outlet pipe 29 communicates with an external cyclone separator 32 having an upper gas outlet 33 and a lower solids outlet 34.
A conical transition section 36 is mounted at the upper end of the zone 14 and connects to a stack 37 through which the pollutant-free effluent gases are discharged to the atmosphere.
The non-precious metal oxidation catalyst used in the present invention comprises a mixture of a minor portion by weight of chromic oxide (Cr2O3) and a major portion by weight of a suitable carrier or support which is substantially inert at normal operating temperature. The preferred carrier or support is alumina, but other well known carriers or supports may be used such as silica and silica-alumina mixtures. In some cases, especially in the case of a silica carrier or support, the addition of a suitable clay binder may be desirable, e.g., kaolin, bentonite, attapulgite, or the like. Preferably, the ca~alystconsists essentially of from about 15% to about 25% by weight chromic oxide, the balance being alumina or ~'764~

other carrier or support. For purposes of the present invention, it is desired that the catalyst have a relatively coarse particle size so as to avoid the need for cyclone separators or other separating means for recovering catalyst fines while at the same time permitting a high gas velocity and flow rate through the catalyst bed. In general, the particle size of the catalyst may be within the range of from about 500 microns up to about 1/4 inch, and preferably the particle size should be substantially uniform.
Although the catalyst can be prepared by any of the conventional techniques well known in the hydrocarbon con-version catalyst art, it is preferred to provide the catalyst in relatively large preformed shapes, e.g., by pelletizing or extruding the carrier or support to form spheres, tablets, pell~ts, extrudate, or the like, and then impregnating with aqueous chromic acid, drying and calcining. Alternatively, an extrudable mixture of the carrier or support in aqueous chromic acid may be extruded, followed by drying and calcining.
Preferably, the catalyst particles have a substantially uniform composi~ion throughout. Particularly good resu~lt-sare obtained with the extruded catalyst, and although somewhat smaller or larger dimensions can be used, an extrudate of about 1/8 inch diameter is preferred with the length of the extruded pieces being from about 1/8 inch to about 3/8 inch. ~
An important characteristic of the catalyst for ~ ;
purposes of the present invention is that it is hard, mech-anically strong, and highly resistant to abrasion so that it undergoes only a limited but beneficial degree of attrition during normal use in the process. One test commonly used in the catalyst art to measure strength and attrition resistance is the Humble Erosion test, and values of less than 3~ are regarded as generally satisfactory for fluid bed use. Another : ' ' ~ . . . :.

1~3t~

test which may be used is the Standard Oil of Indiana test, and attrition vallles of less than 12~ are considered satis-factory under this test. The catalyst used in the present invention meets either of these laboratory criteria but also satisfies a much stricter practical requirement in commercial use, as described below.
In the customary fluidized bed catalyst operation the catalyst particles have a size distribution ranging from relatively fine to relatively coarse, and the gas or vapor upward velocity is such tha~ a lower turbulent dense phase is formed which resembles a boiling liquid with an upper light or disperse phase containing the smallest size particles.
Under these conditions cyclone separators, electrostatlc pre-cipitators, or other suitable separation devices must be provided to separate the fine catalyst particles from the light phase for return to the system, thereby avoiding e~cessive catalyst loss from the system. In the present invention, however, the catalyst particle size is relatively coarse to begin with, and because of the hardness and attrition resistance of the catalyst, there is a minimum degree of forma-ation of fines such that cyclone separators or the like are unnecessary and the catalyst loss from the system is restricted to less than one pound of catalyst per million standard cubic feet of gas treated. The limited amount of catalyst attrition that occurs during the process is beneficial in that ~ ;
the self-abrading action of the moving catalyst particles in the bed keeps the surfaces of the particles relatively clean thereby providing protection against fouling or deactivation of the catalyst due to surface deposits, e.g., coatings of heavy hydrocarbons. When the catalyst particles have a substantially uniform composition throughout, the catalyst activity remains substantially unchanged as the particles 1~7i~ Z~

are abraded and worn away to expose new surface areas.
With the relatively coarse particle size of the catalyst in the present invention, fluidization o~ the catalyst bed in the strict sense of a turbulent dense phase resembling a boiling liquid is not always achieved and, in act, is not necessary. Instead, an upward gas velocity suffi-cient to lift or agitate the catalyst particles at the point of incipient fluidization is adequate, so that the bed may be described as agitated or fluidized. Thus, the gas velocity is preferably at or slightly above the threshold velocity for fluidization with only a moderate pressure drop across the bed. It has been found that a relatively shallow bed of catalyst is desirable so that the pressure drop across the bed is less than one pound per square inch and preferably from about 2 to about 10 inches water column. More specifically, a static bed depth of from about 2 to about 24 inches, prefer-; ably from about 6 to about 12 inches, is used with the facevelocity of the gas being from about 1 to about 10 standard cubic feet per second per square foot, preferably from about ~ ;~
2.5 to about 5 standard cubic feet per second per square foot. The gas hourly space velocity may range from about 1000 to about 50,000, with 18,000 being a typical value.
In the preheat zone 13 the inlet waste gas containing ;
combustible materials is heated by the burner 19 and raised to ; the required temperature to initiate catalytic combustion of the combustible components, e.g., from about 500 to about 1000F. Although not shown in the drawing, the inlet gas to the reactor 10 may be preheated, if desired, by heat exchange with the effluent stream from the stack 37 in order to reduce the load on the burner. Also, if desired, the burner 19 may be operated solely with secondary air in the waste gas stream being treated when the latter contains sufficient oxygen. The : . ;, . . . . .

pressure in the reactor 10 is ordinarily at about atmosphere pressure, but higher or lower pressures may be used.
The heated gases pass upwardly through the grid support 17 and the catalyst bed 16, the gas velocity being sufficient to agitate or fluidize the bed. However, as discussed above, fluidization in the strict sense is not required as long as the gas velocity is sufficient to lift and agitate the catalyst particles. Combustion of the combustible components is effected in the catalyst bed 16 and continues in the zone 14. The pollutant-free gaseous products of the process are discharged to the atmosphere through the stack 37, the loss of catalyst fines from the system being less than one pound per million standard cubic feet of gas treated, as previously explained. The reactor is designed such that at the required gas velocity, the residence time of the gas at operating temperature normally exceeds one second. This higher residence time provides conversion efficiencies for most hydrocarbons at operating temperatures 100 to 150F. lower than are required in a standard thermal afterburner with a 0.3 to 0.5 second residence chamber. However, when desired for any reason, the reactor 10 may be operated as a thermal incinerator, in which case the grid support 17 functions as an effective gas distributiGn element to promote complete combustion.
In order to maintain the catalyst activity and to `
compensate for the slight catalyst loss, fresh catalyst may be added to the system from the supply hopper 26 and used catalyst may be removed through the cyclone separator 32.
The addition and removal of catalyst may be accomplished inter-mittently or continuously, as desired, without interrupting the operation of the process.
Thus, the invention permits the control of organic 7~i421 emissions at lower temperatures and with lower fuel cost than conventional thermal or flame incineration techniques. The catalyst and process conditions overcome the problems of fouling, activity suppression, and poisoning associated with the precious metal catalysts heretoEore used in catalytic incineration. The non-precious metal catalyst used in the present invention has sufficient activity to compete favorably with commercially available precious metal catalysts but its cost is low enough to permit the catalyst to be discarded when depleted. The invention i5 useful in the treatment of a wide variety of industrial fumes or waste gases containing noxious combustible materials, particularly hydrocarbons or other organic materials, but the invention finds particular application in food processing operations, coating and other solvent handling processes, and chemical manufacture. The process is particularly useful in the oxidation of halogenated organic compounds, such as vinyl chloride, because of the unique immunity of the non-precious metal catalyst to halogen suppression.
The following specific examples are presented for purposes of further illustrating the invention but not by wa~ oflimitation.

Example 1 An extruded chromic oxide-alumina catalyst is prepared as follows:
Dried alumina (A12O3) is prepared by any one of a number of techniques well known in the industry. For example, sodium aluminate is reacted with a suitable reagent to cause precipitation with the resultant formation of aluminum hydroxide gel. Alternatively, a suitable alkali such as ammonium hydroxide is added to an aluminum salt such as .. , 1~7~4~1 .

sulfate or aluminum chloride in an amount sufficient to form aluminum hydroxide. Upon drying and calcining, the aluminum hydroxide is converted to alumina.
The alumina is mulled with the slow addition of water until the moisture content is approximately 50% and the consistency of the mulled alumina is appropriate for extrusion. The alumina is then extruded through a 1/8 inch die and the extruded pieces about 1/8 to 3/8 inch long are dried on a tray or belt dryer followed by calcination of from 1=4 hours at a temperature of between 900F. and 1400F.
The calcined extrudate is characterized by high surface area and high porosity.
The extruded particles are impregnated with a 50%
aqueous solution of chromic acid at a temperature of about 120F. The impregnated extrusions are then dried at 250F.
followed by calcining at 1300F. in a rotary kiln to form chromium oxide in a concentration of between 15 and 25~ by weight of the final product.

Example 2 The catalyst prepared according to Example 1 was used inthe pilot plant treatment of fumes from a vinegar manu-facturing plant containing ethyl alcohol, acetic acid, and related organic emission~. The apparatus was substantially like that shown in the drawing, and the catalyst bed containing 225 pounds of catalyst was about 3 feet in diameter with a static bed depth of about 8 inches.
The heated gas was passed through the catalyst bed at a velocity of about 1001 standard cubic feet per minute and the pressure drop across the bed was about 7.9 inches water column. The face velocity through the bed was about 2.45 standard cubic feet per second per square foot which was suf-_ g _ .

1~7~

ficient to agitate the bed. The catalyst bed temperature was typically about 640F.
Using a combustible detector, the concentration of organic materials in the inlet and outlet gas was 330 parts per million and 28 parts per million, respectively, which corresponds to a conversion efficiency of 91.5%. The outlet gas was substantially odor-free, and in a series of twelve tests over a six week period the catalyst loss was negligible.

~ ' i '.

: .:

Claims (12)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION FOR WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A process for the catalytic incineration of a gas containing combustible material, comprising passing the gas upwardly at an oxidizing temperature through a reaction zone containing a bed of coarse, attrition-resistant, particulate oxidation catalyst comprising chromic oxide and a carrier or support, said catalyst having a particle size within the range of from about 500 microns to about 1/4 inch and said bed having a static depth of from about 2 to about 24 inches, regulating the upward flow of said gas through said bed so as to lift or agitate the catalyst particles, and discharging the treated gas from said reaction zone without separation of catalyst therefrom, the hardness and attrition resistance of said catalyst being such that the loss of catalyst fines in the treated gas discharged from said reaction zone is less than one pound per million standard cubic feet of gas treated.
2. The process of claim 1 further characterized in that said catalyst comprises from about 15% to about 25% by weight chromic oxide.
3. The process of claim 2 further characterized in that the balance of said catalyst comprises an alumina carrier or support.
4. The process of claim 1 further characterized in that said catalyst is in the form of preformed shaped particles having a substantially uniform composition.
5. The process of claim 4 further characterized in that said catalyst is an extrudate.
6. The process of claim 5 further characterized in that said extrudate has a diameter of about 1/8 inch and the length of the extruded pieces is from about 1/8 to about 3/8 inch.
7. The process of claim 1 further characterized in that the static depth of said bed is from about 6 to about 12 inches.
8. The process of claim 1 further characterized in that the pressure drop across said bed is less than 1 pound per square inch.
9. The process of claim l further characterized in that the velocity of said gas through said bed is substantially at or slightly above the threshold fluidization velocity.
10. The process of claim 1 further characterized in that the face velocity of said gas is from about 1 to about 10 standard cubic feet per second per square foot.
11. The process of claim 10 further characterized in that said face velocity is from about 2.5 to about 5 standard cubic feet per second per square foot.
12. A process for the catalytic incineration of a gas containing combustible materials, comprising:
passing the gas upwardly at an oxidizing temperature through a reaction zone containing a bed of coarse, attrition-resistant, particulate oxidation catalyst comprising from about 15% to about 25% by weight chromic oxide and an alumina carrier or support, said catalyst having a particle size within the range of from about 500 microns to about 1/4 inch and said bed having a static depth of from about 2 to about 24 inches, regulating the upward flow of said gas through said bed so as to lift or agitate the catalyst particles with a face velocity of from about 1 to about 10 standard cubic feet per second per square foot and a pressure drop across said bed of less than 1 pound per square inch, and discharging the treated gas from said reaction zone without separation of catalyst therefrom, the hardness and attrition-resistance of said catalyst being such that the loss of catalyst fines in the treated gas discharged from said reaction zone is less than one pound per million standard cubic feet of gas treated.
CA288,553A 1976-10-13 1977-10-12 Catalytic fume incineration Expired CA1076421A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US73198776A 1976-10-13 1976-10-13

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1076421A true CA1076421A (en) 1980-04-29

Family

ID=24941730

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA288,553A Expired CA1076421A (en) 1976-10-13 1977-10-12 Catalytic fume incineration

Country Status (5)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5348074A (en)
CA (1) CA1076421A (en)
DE (1) DE2745100C2 (en)
GB (1) GB1586314A (en)
NL (1) NL7710924A (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2126493A (en) * 1982-09-08 1984-03-28 Inst Kataliza Sibirskogo Otdel Fluidised catalytic combustion
DE3243969A1 (en) * 1982-11-27 1984-05-30 Viessmann Werke Kg, 3559 Allendorf Process for flue gas desulphurisation and heating boiler therefor
GB8605308D0 (en) * 1986-03-04 1986-04-09 Boc Group Plc Combustion method
DE19511645A1 (en) * 1995-03-30 1996-10-02 Das Duennschicht Anlagen Sys Process and device for cleaning pollutant-containing exhaust gases by chemical reaction in a flame and on hot surfaces
DE19939390B4 (en) * 1999-08-19 2007-08-30 Steinbrecht, Dieter, Prof. Dr.-Ing.habil. Process for the thermal utilization and disposal of landfill gas with high to low methane concentrations
CN1300507C (en) * 2002-11-04 2007-02-14 刘福华 Smoke removing stove
DE10340074B4 (en) * 2003-08-30 2006-08-24 Pro2 Anlagentechnik Gmbh Process and plant for lean gas disposal
DE102005019000A1 (en) 2005-04-22 2006-10-26 Degussa Ag Catalytically coated support, process for its preparation and thus equipped reactor and its use

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3102778A (en) * 1963-01-30 1963-09-03 Whirlpool Co Apparatus for preserving animal and plant materials
US3469947A (en) * 1965-01-12 1969-09-30 Whirlpool Co Atmosphere generator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE2745100C2 (en) 1986-10-30
GB1586314A (en) 1981-03-18
DE2745100A1 (en) 1978-04-20
JPS5348074A (en) 1978-05-01
NL7710924A (en) 1978-04-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4330513A (en) Catalytic fume incineration
US7235706B2 (en) Process for preparing light olefins by dehydrogenation of the corresponding paraffins
US4088568A (en) Catalytic cracking of hydrocarbons
US3893812A (en) Regeneration apparatus with external regenerated-catalyst recycle means
CA2241226C (en) Process for obtaining light olefins by the dehydrogenation of the corresponding paraffins
US4222856A (en) Method for promoting regeneration of a catalyst in a fluidized regenerator
CA1076421A (en) Catalytic fume incineration
US5145826A (en) Fluid bed incineration catalyst
US4443419A (en) Moving bed gas treating process
US4473658A (en) Moving bed catalytic cracking process with platinum group metal or rhenium supported directly on the cracking catalyst
AU686937B2 (en) Process for catalyst regeneration
US4292288A (en) Catalyst for CO removal from flue gas
US5101743A (en) Fluid bed incineration
US2701785A (en) Method for catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons
CA2215913C (en) Process for catalyst regeneration
RU2156233C1 (en) Method of preparing olefin hydrocarbons
CA1207514A (en) Moving bed gas treating process
IE43943B1 (en) Catalyst regeneration by coke oxidation in a dense phase bed and catalyzed carbon monoxide conversion in a dilute phase transport riser
BR8600707A (en) PROCESS TO OPERATE A FLUID CATALYTIC CRACKING UNIT AND PROCESS FOR CATALYTIC CRACKING OF A HYDROCARBON FEEDING MATERIAL
NO841308L (en) PROCEDURE FOR CLEANING GAS FLOWERS.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry