CA1070088A - Catalytic oxidation of c2-c4 halogenated hydrocarbons - Google Patents

Catalytic oxidation of c2-c4 halogenated hydrocarbons

Info

Publication number
CA1070088A
CA1070088A CA268,892A CA268892A CA1070088A CA 1070088 A CA1070088 A CA 1070088A CA 268892 A CA268892 A CA 268892A CA 1070088 A CA1070088 A CA 1070088A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
catalyst
cobalt
oxide
cobalt oxide
vinyl chloride
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA268,892A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Edward J. Sare
Jerome M. Lavanish
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PPG Industries Inc
Original Assignee
PPG Industries Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US05/742,045 external-priority patent/US4065543A/en
Application filed by PPG Industries Inc filed Critical PPG Industries Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1070088A publication Critical patent/CA1070088A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/74Iron group metals
    • B01J23/75Cobalt
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A62LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
    • A62BDEVICES, APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR LIFE-SAVING
    • A62B9/00Component parts for respiratory or breathing apparatus
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/46Removing components of defined structure
    • B01D53/68Halogens or halogen compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8659Removing halogens or halogen compounds
    • B01D53/8662Organic halogen compounds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8668Removing organic compounds not provided for in B01D53/8603 - B01D53/8665

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure C2-C4 halogenated, e.g., chlorinated and brominated, hydro-carbons, such as vinyl chloride, present in a gas stream are removed therefrom, e.g., incinerated, by contacting the gas stream with an oxygen-containing gas in the presence of cobalt oxide catalyst at relatively low temperatures, e.g., 100°C. Commonly, the halogenated hydrocarbon is present in the gas stream to be treated in small amounts, e.g., less than 0.05 weight percent. The temperature of treatment can vary, e.g., from 20°C. to 500°C., and can be adjusted within said range depending on the relative humidity of the gas stream treated to maintain catalytic activity. Preferably, treatment occurs under conditions of low relative humidity, e.g., less than 5 percent, and the catalyst is a hydrated cobalt oxide catalyst.

Description

'~èscrlption_of,the _ vention C2-C4 halogenated, e.g., chlorinated and brominated hydrocarbons are used commercially in many applications. I~or example, vinyl cl~loride and vinylidene chloride are used to prepare useful polymers and copolymers.
Other chlorinated C2-hydrocarbons, such as methyl chloroform (l,l,l-trichloroethane), and trichloroethylene are useful as solvents and are employed in metal degreasing. Ethylene dichloride and ethylene dibromide are used in gasoline as part of lead anti-knock formulations.
Recently, vinyl chloride has been reported to be a suspected carcinogen and consequently human exposure levels have been severely restricted. In areas where vinyl chloride is made or used, e.g., poly-merized, gas process streams may be produced containing rel,atively small but still objectionable quantities of vinyl chloride which cannot be recovered economically. Such process streams may include vents connected to process equipment, such as reactor stripper, condenser and drier vents, storage vessel vents, and area vents, e.g., reactor building vents. Thus, a need exists for a method for destroying or reducing significantly the vinyl chloride content of such gas streams. A similar need may exist for gas process streams containing other C2, C3 and C4 chlorinated and brominated hydrocarbons.
It has been reported that certain chlorinated hydrocarbons such as methyl chloroform, vinyl:Ldene chloride, trichloroethene, tetra- ~
chloroethene, and chloroform are susceptible in varying degrees to Hopcalite-cataly~ed decomposition with humidified air (about 50 percent relative humidity) at temperatures in excess of 300C., e.g., 305C.-415C.
See, for example, the articles "Catalytic Combustion of Atmospheric Contaminants Over Hopcalite" by J. G. Christian et al, Int. J. Air Wat.
Poll. Pergamon Press 1965, Vol. 9, pp. 1-10, and "Catalytic Decomposition of Halogenated Hydrccarbons over Hopcalit~ Catalyst" by J. K. Musick et
- 2 -.

~7~

al, Ind. Eng. Chem~, Prod. Res. Develop., Vol. 13, No. 3, 1974, pp. 175-179.
It has now been discovered that the C2-C4 halogenated, e.g., chlorinated and brominated, hydrocarbon, e.g., C2-chlorinated and brominated hydrocarbon, content of gas streams, e.g., air streams, containing same, can be reduced substantially by contacting such halogenated hydrocarbon with oxygen-containing gas in the presence of cobalt oxide catalyst at temperatures of from 20C. to 500C., e.g., 80-100C. Temperatures in the lower portion of the range, e.g., from room temperature, i.e., 20-23C.
to 80C. have been found effective for short periods of time. Temperatures higher than 100C., e.g., 100C.-300C., are especially useful. ~ore particularly, it has been found that C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons, such as vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, methyl chloroform and trichloroethylene, can be removed from gas streams, e.g., air, containing same at relatively mild temperatures in the presence of hydrated cobalt oxide catalyst and under conditions of low relative humidity, e.g., less than 5 percent (mea-sured at 23C.). The exact mechanism by which the C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon is removed from the gas stream is not known with absolute certainty; but, from the evidence at hand, it is believed that oxidative decomposition (incineration) is a principal mechanism. Other mechanisms, e.g., dehydrochlorination, may also play a part in the removal of such halogenated hydrocarbons from the gas stream.
The temperature at which the process of the present invention is conducted can vary within the aforesaid range of 20C.-500C. and, typically will be regulated within said range depending on the relative humidity of the gas streams in contact with the catalyst, i.e., the , the relative humidity of the reaction zone, e.g., incineration zone, to achieve significant catalytic activity. Under conditions of low relative humidity, temperatures on the low side of the aforesaid range, e.g., 20-110C. can be used. For example, at a relative humidity of less than 2 weight percent, the vinyl chloride content of a synthetic gas stream can be reduced substantially, e.g., from about a 50 ppm level to non-detectable levels (0.5 ppm), at temperatures of 100-110C., e.g., 104~C., when using a hydrated cobalt oxide catalyst and a synthetic gas flow rate over the catalyst of 9 liters per hour. When the relative humidity of the gas stream is higher than 5 weight percent, temperatures higher than 110C. may be required to maintain catalytic activity under similar conditions.

Detailed Description C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbons to which the process of the present invention can be applied are chlorinated and brominated hydro-carbons containing from two to four carbon atoms and from 1 to ~, preferably 1 to 3, more preferably no more than 2, halogen atoms per -~
molecule. Examples of such halogenated hydrocarbons include: vinyl chloride, viny:Lidene chloride, methyl chloroform (l,l,l-trichloroethane) 1,1,2-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene, vinyl bromide, vinylidene bromide, dichloroethane, ethylene dichloride, ethylene dibromide, propyl chloride, propyl bromide, isopropyl chloride, r~ ,2-, and 3-chloro-propene, 1,2- and 2,3-dichloro-propene,~ y~-epichlorohydrin, chloroprene, butylene dichloride, etc. Pre-ferably, the ratio of hydrogen to halogen atoms in the halogenated hydrocarbon is at least one. Preferred are unsaturated C2-halogenated hydrocarbons, i.e., vinyl compounds and incompletely halogenated derivatives of ethylene. The process described herein is deemed particularly applicable to C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons such as vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, methyl chloroform, and trichloroethylene.
As the cobalt oxide used in the present process there can be mentioned cobaltous oxide, cobaltic oxide, cobaltic hydroxide and mixtures of such oxides. Such oxides can also be referred to as cobalt (II) oxide (CoO), cobalt (III) oxide (Co203), and cobalt (II, I[I) oxide (Co304). Preferably cobalt oxide in the higher oxida,tion state, ~~
i.e., cobalt (III) oxide or the mixed oxidation state, i.e., cobalt (II, III) oxide, is used. The term "cobalt oxide", as used in this specification and claims, (unless other~ise indicated) is intended to mean and include any one of the aforementioned oxides or combinations of such oxides.
The cobalt oxide content of the active portion of the catalyst is typically at least 70 or 75 weight percent, disregarding catalyst supports, preferably at least 80, e.g., 85 weight percent. The remainder of the catalyst can be minor amounts of other metal compounds, e.g., metal oxide impurities that do not interfere significantly with the catalytic function of the catalyst, and water of hydration> Metal oxide impurities can be incorporated during preparation of the catalyst or be present in the reactants used to prepare the catalyst.
It is believed from the evidence at hand that some water of hydration associated with the cobalt oxide catalyst is beneficial vis a vis, the catalytic activity of the catalyst in the process described herein. For example, it has been observed that a cobalt oxide catalyst which had little, if any water of hydration was catalytically less active than a cobalt oxide catalyst having significant water of hydra--tion. The presence or absence of water of hydration is related to the temperature seen by the surface of the cobalt oxide catalyst during its preparation or use. For example, cobalt oxides prepared by thermal decomposition of a cobalt salt at temperatures greater than 500C., e.g., 530~C., can have little water of hydration associated with the resulting cobalt oxide and hence would be expected to have little cataly~ic activity at the lower temperatures utilized in the present process.
The total quantity o water associated with the cobalt oxide ~~
as water of hydration can vary depending on the particular cobalt oxide or mixtures oE cobalt oxldes used, and ~he method of cobalt oxide preparation. In particular, the drying conditions used in the cobalt oxide preparation can vary and thereby effect the amount of water of hydration present. It has been found that cobalt oxide catalyst having an amount oE water of hydration at least as high as that obtained by drying an aqueous filter cake of precipitated cobalt oxide or cobalt oxide mixture at 200C. for a time.sufficient to reach equilibrium is a satisfactory hydrated cobalt oxide catalyst. Such a temperature is sufficient to remove substantially all of the phase water present in the filter cake without excessive loss of water of hydration. Higher drying temperatures can be used; however, care should be exercised at higher temperatures to prevent significant loss of water of hydration and avoid loss of the beneficial effect obtained by its presence.
The effect of the water of hydration of the cobalt oxide catalyst can be determined best by utilizing the cobalt oxide as an incineration catalyst, e.g.l a vinyl chloride incineration catalyst, and observing the catalyst's activity as evidenced by reductlon of the halogenated hydrocarbon content of the gas stream treated, a simple expedient for one skilled in the art. As used herein, particularly useful hydrated cobalt oxide catalys~s are those that are capable of removing at least 70, e.g., 80, percent of the vinyl chloride present in an air stream containing about 50 ppm vinyl chloride under conditions of less than one percent relative humidity (measured at 23C.), a reactor temperature of 104C. a gas flow rate over the catalyst of 9 liters per hour, a catalyst bed L/D ratio (depth of catalyst bed/diameter ~~
of catalyst bed) of at least two, and an average residence time in contact with the catalyst of 10 seconds. The average residence time is tle value obtained by dividing the volume of catalyst by the volumetric rate of flow through the catalyst. Preferably, at least 90 percent and most preferably substantially all, i.e., non-detectable levels in the gas effluent, of the vinyl chloride is removed from the air stream under such conditions.
The cobalt oxide catalyst can be used in an unsupported form or can be supported on an inert substrate. By "inert" is meant that the substrate is chemically inert to the cobalt oxide catalyst deposited thereon and chemically resistant to the components of the halogenated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream, e.g., vinyl chloride-containing gas stream, and the oxidation products resulting therefrom. Examples of suitable inert substrates include: asbestos, pumice, activated charcoal, silica gel, colloidal silica, fumed silica, activated alumina, and clays.
The activity of the supported cobalt oxide catalyst can vary depending ..

on the method of preparation. For example, a mechanical mixture of cobalt oxide and the support is commonly more active than a support impregnated with catalyst. Heating of the supported catalyst to high temperatures can deactivate the catalyst by sintering the cobalt oxide, sintering the support to Eorm a mass transfer barrier, or cause reaction between the catalyst and the support. For example, heating cobalt oxide supported on alumina to 850C. is reported to result in the formation of the catalytically inactive cobalt aluminate (CoA1204).
See, "The Oxidation of Hydrocarbons and CO over Metal. III Co304" by Yung-Fang Yu Yao, Journal of Catalysis, 33, pp 108-122 (1974). When _~
used in a supported form, the amount of catalyst placed on the support should be sufficient to cataly~e incineration of the C2-C~ halogenated hydrocarbon, i.e., a catalytic amount. The catalytic amount of catalyst and inertness of the support on which the catalyst is placed can be determined by one skilled in the art by routine experimentation.
The cobalt oxide catalyst can be prepared in any number of ways well-known to those skilled in the art of catalyst preparation.
For example, cobalt oxide catalyst can be prepared by precipitating the hydroxide from a solution of cobalt salt. The precipitate is then dried to remove phase water and partially dehydrate the hydroxide and form the oxide. Typically, drying is performed at temperatures of from 100-200C. When a catalyst support is used, the cobalt hydroxide can be precipitated directly onto the support. In addition, the cobalt oxide catalyst can be prepared by thermal decomposition of other suitable oxygen-containing anion salts of cobalt, e.g., nitrates, carbonates and oxalates. Preferably, thermal decomposition should not be conducted at temperatures which dehydrate completely the cobalt oxide. The surface area of the cobalt oxide catalyst prepared can vary; but, as in most catalyst applications, relatively high surface areas are preferred.
In the event the cobalt oxide catalyst becomes deactivated through use (but not permanently poisoned), it is possibl~ to regenerate the catalyst by passing a dehumidified, i.e., less than 5, preferably less than about 2, e.g., less than 1, percent relative hu~idity gas stream containing oxygen, e.g., as provided by air, oxygen, or oxygen-enriched air, in intimate contact with the catalyst at elevated temperatures~
e.g., about 150 to 200C., in the substantial absence of co~taminating gases, e.g., hydrogen halide (hydrogen chloride), C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbons (vinyl chloride) and high levels of water vapor. The catalyst is contacted with oxygen for a period of time suEficient to regenerate the catalyst, e.g., from 0.5-10 hours. The ex~ct amount of time will of course be dependent on the amount of catalyst, its level of deactivation, temperature of treatment, and volumetric rate of f low through the catalyst bed. The totally regenerated catalyst appears from the data at hand to be as efficient as freshly prepared catalyst.
The process described herein results in the removal of C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbons, e.g., C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons, from a gas stream containing same. The extent to which the aforesaid halogenated compounds are removed from the gas stream is dependent on ~he conditions of treatment and the particular halogenated compound(s) to be removed.
From the evidence at hand, removal appears to be accomplished principally by oxidative decomposition (incineration). Adsorption may play a part in the removal at temperatures significently below the boiling point of ' _ g _ ~70~

the halogenated hydrocarbon. Dehydrochlorination may also be a mechanism which is occuring in the reaction zone. It is not known for certain at this time to what extent the latter two mechanisms may participate in the removal process. Therefore, the term "incineration", as used in tllis specification and claims, is intended to mean and include oxidative decomposition alone or in combination with one or both of the other two aforementioned mechanisms.
In accordance with the present process, C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbons, e.g., chlorinated hydrocarbons such as vinyl chloride, are catalytically oxidized at temperatures between about 20C. ~nd about 500C., e.g., 20C.-300C. Temperatures less than 300C., e.g., from 50C.
to 250C. are suitable. At the lower temperatures, e.g., 20C.-50C., catalytic activity falls off rapidly with time; however, in applications such as in gas masks, even a few moments of activity can be important.
Temperatures between about 80C., or 100C. and about 250C., e.g., between about 100C. and 150C. or 200C., are deemed to be particularly economically desirable. The use of such fairly moderate temperatures, e.g., temperatures of about 100C.-115C., to achieve incineration of the described halogenated hydrocarbons is surprising since significantly ;
higher temperatures are commonly used to incinerate such materials by a non-catalytic process. Consequently, use of moderate incineration tem-peratures can represent a significant savings in heat energy. Further, an incineration process that operates at about 100C. can utilize low pressure waste steam which is readily available in chemical process plants; and, therefore, such process offers significant further economic advantages. Temperatures in the range of about 100C.-150~C. or 200C., .. ..

~[)7~

are preferred because such temperatures assist in the removal of the products of oxidation, e.g., hydrogen chloride, carbon dioxide and water, from the surface of the catalyst.
The aforesaid temperatures are reactor temperatures as described in the Examples following9 i.e., the temperatur,e of the gas stream above the catalyst bed. The temperatures of the catalyst surface are believed to be slightly higher than the reactor temperature because of the heat of incineration produced by oxidative decomposition of the halogenated hydrocarbons on the catalyst surface.
The particular incineration temperature selected may depend on the relative humidity of the gas streams entering the reactor containing the cobalt oxide catalyst. Although from the evidence at hand, cobalt oxide appears to be moderately resistant to inhibition by water, water vapor, i.e., the humidity of the gas streams contacting the catalyst does tend to diminish the activity of the cobalt oxide catalyst. This lowering of activity is more pronounced at low temperatures, e.g., 20C.~110C.
Therefore, higher temperatures are required to obtain a particular level of catalyst activity with a humidiied gas stream than when operating with a substantially dry gas, i.e., a gas stream having low relative humidity.
As used herein, the relative humidity of a gas stream is the value reported as measured at room temperature (23C.) and ambient pressure (745 millimeters of mercury). By low relative humidity is intended to mean less than about 5, e.g., less than 2, percent.
The activity of the cobalt oxide catalyst used in the present process can be expressed in terms of its efficiency at the conditions of incineration, i.e., the percent of C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon removed from the gas stream after conditions become constant. The efficiency of the catalyst can be determined by the expression:

(Ci Cf) 100 Ci wherein Ci is the initial concentration of the halogenated hydrocarbon in the gas stream and Cf is the final concentration. Thus, the higher the eficiency of the catalyst, the higher is its "activity".
As indicated, the extent of inhibition of the activity of the cobalt oxide catalyst by water vapor is temperature dependent.
The lower the temperature of incineration, the more pronounced the lowering of catalyst activity. Consequently, for any desired level of catalyst activity, it is possible to either regulate the relative humidity of the gas stream to be treated or the temperature at which treatment is conducted. Thus, the reactor temperature is maintained at a level within the aforesaid described range to inhibit reduction or loss of the cobalt oxide catalyst activity by the moisture content of the gas streams contacting the catalyst. The level of catalyst activity may vary depending on the halogenated hydrocarbon to be removed from the stream, the initial concentration of the halogenated hydro-carbon and the final concentration thereof in the treated stream required by subsequent process treatment, government regulation, etc. It is therefore impossible to set a minimum acceptable level of catalyst activlty since such a level is determined by the desires and needs of the - 12 ~

. .

~87~

operator. ~owever, one skilled in the art, with the information provided herein, can select those operating conditions required to provide tile catalyst activity desired.
Generally, the higher the incineration temperature and the lower the relative humidity of the entering gas streams, the higher the catalyst's activity. Therefore, when the amount of heat energy available for incineration or materials of construction limit the incineration temperature to a particular range, the relative humidity of the combined gas streams contacting the catalyst is maintained at a level within said range which will maintain catalyst actiyity at the _~
desired level. On the other hand, if available heat energy or materials of construction do not limit the incineration temperature, the incinera-tion temperature can be ad~usted (usually upwards) to offset the adverse effect of moisture on the catalyst activity. Thus, within the temperature range of 20C.-500C., e.g., 50C.-300C., either the temperature of incineration or relative humidity of the treated gas streams or both are regulated or maintained at a level at which the degree of catalyst activity reaches the desired magnitiude. ~or example, when the incineration temperature is less than about 110C. it is expected that the relative humidity will be kept at less than 5 percent, e.g., 2 percent and pre-ferably less than 1 percent.
The above-described effect that water vapor has on the activity of the catalyst can be described as a reversible poisoning or inhibition to distinguish the effect from an irreversible poisoning, such as the effect of sulfur compoundis on noble metal catalysts, reaction oE the catalyst surface, etc. In those cases, the effect on the catalyst is not generally reversible without reworking the catalyst. As the data presented in the Examples show, the reduced efficiency of the catalyst due to an increase in the level of water vapor in the ga~ stream is reversed by lowering the relative humidity of ;the gas stream to its former level.
In one embodiment of the present process, the gas stream to be treated is dehumidified to a desired relative humidity level and then incinerated at temperatures within the range described herein-before. The C2~C4 halogenated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream can be dehumidified, if necessary, by passing it through a drying column containing a desiccant. Either solid or liquid desiccants can be used to remove water vapor from the gas stream. Examples include: silica gel, activated alumina, fused anhydrous calcium sulfate, lime, magnesium perchlorate, calcium chloride, potassium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, lithium chloride solutions and ethylene glycol. The drying of gases is well-known7 for example, in the chemical process industry. Thus, use of solid desiccants in gas masks to take up water vapor is well known also.
The means for achieving such drying is not critical to the practice of the present invention.
The amount of oxygen used in the oxidation of the C2-C~
halogenated hydrocarbons in accordance with the present process should be in an amount that is sufficient to incinerate (oxidize) that quantity of C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon contained in the gas stream, i.e., an incinerating (oxidizing) amount, that is necessary to reduce the halogenated h~drocarbon content of the gas stream to the desired level. The amount ' .

oxygen should be at least stoichiometrically sufficient to oxidize substantially all of the carbon content of the halogenated hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide and preferably sufficient to oxidize both the carbon content and available hydrogen content of the halogenated hydrocarbon to carbon dioxide and water, respectively. With respect to vinyl chloride, the stoichiometric amount of oxygen is obtained from the following balanced equation:

CH = CHCl + 2.5 0 -~ 2CO + H 0 ~ HCl .
The calculated heat of reaction for the reaction represented by the reaction of the aforesaid equation is about 270 kilocalories per mole of vinyl chloride~
Generally the amount of oxygen used will be far in excess of the stoichiometric amounts required in order to insure substantially complete oxidative decomposition of the halogenated hydrocarbon compound. The amount of oxygen used is not critical provided that sufficient quantities are made available to accomplish the aforesaid described degree of oxida-tion. The oxygen can be provided by utilizing air, oxygen, or oxygen-enriched air. The oxygen-containing stream, if separate from the C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon-containing stream, can also be dehumidified (in the manner described) to a low relative humidity before being mixed with the aforesaid halogenated hydrocarbon containing stream.
In carrying out one preferred embodiment of the process of the present invention~ the C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon~containing gas stream is dehumidified, if necessary, and mixed with dehumidified oxygen-containing .

gas (if used) and introduced into a preheater. In the event the C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon-containing gas stream is sufficlently dry or already contains sufficient quantities of oxygen, no addltional drying or mixing with an oxygen-containing stream is required. This may well be the situation in the latter case where an area in which the C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon may be present is well ventilated and the exhausted vent gas process stream is to be treated in accordance with the present invention. The dehumidified oxygen-containing process stream that also contains C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon is preheated, if necessary, and the heated gas stream introduced into a catalytic reactor -~
in which the cobalt oxide catalyst has been placed, e.g., as a fixed or fluid bed. Preheating should be conducted to the approximate temperature at which incineration is to be conducted, i.e., the reactor temperature.
While preheating can be performed before dehumidification, this is not desirable economically.
According to known techniques, the catalyst bed diameter in an integral fixed-bed flow-type catalytic reactor should be at least six times, and bed depth at least ~0 times the effective catalyst particle diameter to keep the bed edge and end effect suitably small. The pre-heated gas stream is maintained in contact with the cobalt oxide catalyst for a time sufficient for the incineration reaction to occur. Contact times of from about 2 to 10 seconds at 10~C. and under conditions of low relative humidity have been found to be sufficient. The gas stream exiting from the catalytic reactor~s) is reduced in its C2-C~ halogenated hydrocarbon content. Preferably, the gas stream exiting from ~he reactor I

.. . . . . . . . .
: , . .:
, U8~
-' .

or reactors contains less than 10 ppm, e.g., less -than 5 ppm, and, more preferably, less than 1 ppm of C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon, and is cooled prior to disposal. It is advantageous to pass the reactor effluent stream through, for example, a caustic scrubber to remove hydrogen halide, e.g., hydrogen chloride or hydrogen bromide which are oxidation or dehydrohalogena-tion products before disposing of the other innocuous gas products. While only one catalyst bed has been described more than one such bed can be used.
For example, multiple separate beds in sequence can be used. Such beds can be in one unit, e.g., stacked bed~, or in separate units.
Apparatus in contact with the C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon gas stream and incineration products thereof is constructed typically from acid resistant construction materials to minimize corrosion problems. Examples of metallic construction materials include monel*, nickel, and s-tainless steel.
Acid resistant engineering plastics, such as TeElon (a trade mark of E.I. duPont deNemours and Company for polytetraEluoroethylene) and Ryton (a trade mar]c of Phillips Petroleum Company for polyphenylene sulfide resins) can be used in the construction of the apparatus as a result of the low temperatures that can be used in the practice of the oxidation process described herein.
The present process is more particularly described in the following Examples which are intended as illustrative only since numerous modifications :.
and variations therein will be apparent to those skilled in the art.

* metal alloy containing nickel and copper `.

.

~' ; . , ~ ' - . .
..

EX~ LE

A solution of 70.5 grams of cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate dissolved in 200 grams of distilled water was added slowly to a solution of 35 grams of anhydrous sodium hydroxide dissolved in 70 grams of distilled water with vigorous stirring. After addition of approximately 25 grams of distilled water to reduce the viscosity of the paste-like precipitated reactant mass, 10.9 grams of a 35 weight percent aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide was added slowly in approxirnately 0.5 ml aliquots to the still viscous, hydrous cobalt oxide suspension with vigorous stirring. Ater completing the add:ition of the hydrogen peroxide solutionJ
the reactant mixture was stirred Eor a period of approximately 15 minutes.
The precipitate was then washed thoroughly with distilled water using a centrifuge and isolated by filtration. The wet filter cake was pressed between felt pads using a hydraulic press. The pressed ilter cake was then dried at a temperature of approximately 50C. for a period of approximately 2-2/3 days. The partially dried filter cake was broken up with a mortar and pestle to a minus 4 mesh particle size and dried at approximately 200C. for a period of 7 hours. The dried product was then screened to remove the minus 20 mesh fines and the minus 4, plus 20 mesh particle size fraction was then redried at approximately 200C. for a period o 6 hours. The cobalt content was determined to be 83.3 percent as cobalt (II) oxide by elemental X-ray analysis. X-ray diffraction analysis of the oxide indicated that a crystalline phase was present which was identi~ied as hydrated cobalt (III) oxide. Thermogravimetric analysis of a sample of the oxide to 400C. indicated a total weight loss of 9.0 weight percent. This is due to loss of water of hydration to form cobalt (}I, III) oxid e.

, ~ :
. ~ . . - . . : . .
". , ' ., , , ~ ~ . ' .

~07~

~X~MPL~ II
Nitrogen containing about 52 parts per million of vinyl chloride and about 4.5 parts per million of vinyl:idene chloride was mixed with oxygen to produce a stream with the approximate composition of air, i.e., about an 80 volume percent/20 volume percent nitrogen/
oxygen gas stream. This synthetic air stream had a dew point of less than -25C. (relative humidity of less than 2 percent). The small r ~ ~ cA /or;~es amount of vinyl and vinylidene~(hereinafter referred to collectively as vinyl chloride~ in the nitrogen was disregarded in calculating the 80/20 volume percent nitrogenloxygen mixture. Iiumidification of the -synthetic air stream was accomplished by passing a portion of the stream through a simple water bubbler. The degree of humid:ification was cOIlerolled by proportioning the relative amo~snt of the gas stream wllich passed through the bubbler.
The vinyl chloride-containing synthetic air stream was intro-duced into a preheater, which consisted of a tightly wound coil approximately 2.5 inches in diameter and 2.5 inclles in height which was fabricated from 0.25 inch diameter stainless steel tu~ing. The coil was placed in a 700 watt electric furnace and heated to tlle temperature desired as tlle inlet gas stream temperature to the reactor. The preheated synthetic air stream was introduced into the bottom of a vertical catalytic reactor, which was constructed of 0.75 inch diameter 316 stainless steel and which measured approximately 8 inches in length. The catalyst was supported on a 35 mesh stainless steel screen which was located approximately 1.5 inches above the synthetic air stream inlet. A second screen was placed on the top of the catalyst bed to prevent the possible ejection of catalyst particles. Two .. : ~. . . . .

d~8B

thermocouples were inserted lnto the reactor approximately 0.5 inch above and below the catalyst bed to monitor the synthetic air stream temperatures.
These thermocouples were positioned such that the junction was located in the center of the reactor. The reactor was insulated with asbestos tape to minimize heat loss and was heated by means of a heating tape. The thermocouple located approximately 0.5 inch above the catalyst bed was utilized as the catalyst bed temperature reference.
The reactor gas effluent was cooled to ambient temperature by means of an approximately 40 inch U-shaped section of 0.25 inch diameter stainless steel tubing. The cooled reactor gas effluent was exhausted to ~
a laboratory hood. At various times during the period in which the synthetlc air stream which contained vinyl chloride, was introduced into the reactor, samples were taken of the gas stream inlet to the preheater and of the reactor gas stream effluent exiting the cooler in order to assess the vinyl chloride concentration of the gas stream before and after the catalytic reactor, i.e., the catalyst bed. The vinyl chloride concentra-tion of such gas streams was measured by gas-liquid chromotography utilizing flame ionizaLion detectors. The total.gas flow rate to the reactor was m~asured as was the inlet and outlet temperatures to the reactor.
About 10.~ grams of the cobalt oxide cata]yst clescribed in Example I was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and testecl as a vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst. The reactor temperature was maintained at 104C. The data accumulated is found in Table I.

- . . . . . . .
.

~L~)7~
Z P~
-- o ~ cr) ~I a~ ~n .~ ~ ~ 1_ 0 3 .
? ~ (D O P) O O O O O O O O O O O 3 ~~
1~ )-- O ~h O ~ n 1~ U~ Pl ~' (T> 3 <~
O OEi ~ C 1'` tD O (~
C o ~ ~ ~ p~ I_
3 $~ J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~0 (D ~D O ~ O P- ~ ~ E3 rt ~ ~ y~
O n 3rr (~ h rt o ~ ~ o 1~ ~ ;~
3 i~ rtu~ c w ~ w w w w w . c 3 C P~ rr ~~ O rt ~ CO 3 C rt ~ ,t rt r~ ~D
rt ~ O OP) r h ~t P~ ~ ~' W ~D W CO 1~ .
~D (n Hl n P r~ P) rt ~ , ~, n U~ O Oq rr p,r h ~a Pn p ~ P' ~D
~hrt tD
rtrD rt P ~ U~ p 1~ C
tDrt p~ rt ~ C rt r~ n ~ r~ Ct~ r ~ rJ~ r~ ::~ O
rt rt rt 3 (O rt 1-- . . . . . . . . . . ~
P) fD n) i'~ r~ O O O O O O ~ tD
0 rt ~ 3 rt O rt g u) n O Z r~ rt n n O P n P~ P) n O P Y~ t~ Hh rt ~ rt (D
P rt rt O O O Pl rt IJ, ~ H~ rt 1~ ~ 1~ rt CL (D W rt ~: rt P Crt rt tD U~ P~
C 1'~ ~D ~ P rt ~ rt ~ rt p oq ~ ) rr ~D r~' Z 1~ ~ rt ~ ~Z ~Z 7 C O
c~ n oq n n a o w a ~ o n a a a a rt ~
1~ n P u~ rD - ,- p.
p ,rt O) Dl C (D
p n P 3 3 1l~ rt nrt rt ~ o ~ rr' p ~t ~D O rr r~
rD P' rt (D rt o P) (/) C ~D P.
O~ ~D t~ D , ~D ~ æ ~ rt LL (D ~ :1 ~D i~ P. rD r~ p) V ~ tJ
~ rt rt H. S~
p) rt C P) ~D ~O CO ~O ~D ~ ~X) ~o ~ ~ ~ ~Q r h rt ~ a IJ Pt . ~
< ~D ~ ~3 (D ~ ~D r tD rt P~ n t~
~ rr P~
3 C ~D n (D
C 3 1~ ~D ~ 1--1 I'~ P .
J. ~ oq ~ ~t rr ~ p H ~ ~ ~ ~ '') . ~ I~' I ' '`) r`' p aC
~t`<:: rt O ~ n ~_ ~D rt rt ~D
G)rt ~D U~ r' rt g r~ 8 rPt 2~ n O tn O r' ~D
rJ ~ p i~) iD t rt rt ~ ~ P) tt~D ~ rc) ~D rt rD rD ~ rt . . . ,~J. O
oq o P
U~ ~ O ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~ . CO .
l_ ~h a ~ ~ a a t~ ~_ rt C rt . . . . . . . ~D
P~ Y
3 C ~D
~D
rt O C t'~
P
rt t:~ C
O~ ~D rt t~ ~D O
rt ~D I~
O rt ~n .S~ ~ W W W 1~ ~ O rt 3 ~ . . . . . . . . . . . D~ ~D
O P~ 1-- W 1~ n W ~ a~ W ~ rt rt O ~n O ~n 0 0 0 ~n ~n O ~Jl ~ O
:) O ~h r :~7~

The data of Table I shows tl;at the cobalt oxide catalyst prepared in Example I exhibits a high level of catalytic activity as a vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst at low relative humidity, i.e., less than 5 percent, e.g., 1.5 percent. More significantly, the catalytic activity of this cobalt oxide catalyst exhibits resistance to inhibition by water vapor, see for example Sample Nos. 3-7.
Thus, only an approximately 2 percent breakthrough of the vinyl chloride occurred after 69 minutes of operation with a 53 percent relative humiclity atmosphere (see Sample No. 6). Moreover, the activity of the cobalt oxide was regenerated by passage of a low relative humidity atmosphere through the catalyst. Thus, only 9 minutes after decreasing the relative humi(lity of the gas stream from 53 percent to approximately 1 percent an experimentally significant increase in activity was found (compare Sample No. 7 with Sample No. 8). The data shows further that when the relative humidity was increased again to about 25 percent the short "regeneration"
used previously (about 25 minutes) was not sufficient to completely restore the catalytic activity to its initial level.

EX~MPLE III
The cobalt oxide catalyst utilized in Example II was permitted to dry overnight in the reactor at 104C. by passing continuously a synthetic air gas stream~ i.e., a 80/20 nitrogen/oxygen gas mixture, ~containing no vinyl or vinylidene chloride) having a relative humidity of about 0.5 percent through the catalyst bed at a total flow rate of ~4 liters per hour.
The experimental procedure of Example II was repeated except that the nitrogen tank used to form the synthetic air mixture contained from 10-50 parts per million of vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, methyl chloroform, 1,1,2-trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene. The reactor temperature was maintained at 104C. and t:he total chlorinated hydrocarbon-containing synthetic air gas stream flow rate through the reactor was 44 liters per hour. The small amount of chlorinated hydro- ~
carbon in the nitrogen was disregarded in calculating the 80/20 volume percent nitrogen/oxygen mixture. Data collected appears in Table II.

w ~ ~ ~ ~
o ~
.
3~ ~ rD
C ~ ~
X ~'' X n ~ o c U) P~ O ~ ID 3 ,_ rt ~t I'~ p :~ . .
U~ (D P rt C:
r~~I ~ ~ g ~D 0 ~3 rt ~
g P~ J O rt H I_ ~-- H
1- n 1- ~ ~ o o o P c ~ o U~ . . . I_ ~
P It ~ ~ ~ o o o rD 3:
~ ~ O ~ ~ ~?9 r~
o o ~
Ort ~a ~ ~ ~ ;z ~ n ~ C ~ rt .
O~_ tl oq ~ t~
rr rl ~D 11 . U) P~ -- ~ ~
O(D P ~ p~ H
P ~ ~(D g O O O P
3- ~. o P~ n (D ~C
1~ P~ r~ rt rt t11 tD ~ w g ~ ~ rt n o n tD 1~ ~3 ~ Z C
tD t~ O ~ ~ rr n n ~tD P) t1 ~ t~
rt ::1 1.. r- n . . tD
rt OtD tn tD rt o~t .-r~
rt tOD ~ P~
rt n n ~ 3 t co t ~
::r tD El ~ . . . 1--~~ :' tD P' tD
OtD ~ n t~ ~3 IJ~ ~ t~
p ~-t~ n r P~ n ~D O t~
rt ~ p P
~ O o Z Z ~ c n H
~ ~ O ~ ~ rt rr-~h . . . tD
t~ ;?1~ rt n o P) ~ ~
g ~ ~ ~ H 1~3 r3 0 0 0 P It tn 1-- . . . . 1--1 ~n ~n ~n tD n C rt rt tD ~l ~ 1--p n ~ o tJq ~ .
o ~ I_ o n ~ ~ C o U) tD tD ` I~ n ~D rt O~ . ~D .
P ~ ~ rt cr-" rt p O
1 - tD C
. P , ~~ P
p.
. ~ tD H ~:1 . ~ ~D ~ P ~
t' O O O rt 3 ~n O

F3 ~ ~D ; C On O ~n ~n rt ~
~- n rt ~
0~3 1~ 0 0 tD
OD ~ 1~
~n O ,ot~ o P
: n _ 2b, --.
.

~7~

The data of Table II shows that the cobalt oxide catalyst of Example I exhibits a high level of catalytic activity at incineratio conditions of low relativ~ humidity and at 104C. with respect to vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride and methyl chloroform. While initial high catalytic activity was shown with respect to incineration of trichloro- -ethylene, such activity diminished after about 1-2/3 hours operation. Tlle initial partial activity with respect to perchloroethylene incineration decreased rapidly.

EXAMPLE IV
A solution of 141 grams oE cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate in 450 graals o~ distilled water was aclded slowly to a solution of 70 grams of anllydrous sodium hydroxide dissolved :in 140 grams of distilled water Witl vigorous stirring. Thereafter 22 grams of a 35 weight percent aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide was added slowly in approximately 0.5 ml aliquots over a period of about 25 minutes. ~fter completing the addition --of the hydrogen peroxide solution, the reactant mixture was stirred for about 15 minutes. The precipitate was washed with distilled water using a centrifuge and isolated by filtration. The wet filter cake was pressed between felt pads and the pressed filter cake dried at about 50C. for about 5 hours. The partially ~ried filter cake was ground with a mortar and pestle and the minus 8, plus 30 mesh particle size fraction of this product dried at about 200C. for about 5-1~2 hours. A 27 inch mercury vacuum was used during the final hour of the drying period.
The cobalt content of the product was found to be about 81.2 weight percent, as cobalt (II) oxide (CoO), by elemental ,Y-ray spectroscopic . .

8~3 analysis. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that a crystalline phase was present, and this crystalline phase was identified as hydrated cobalt (III) oxide (CoO0~). Thermogravimetric analysis to 400C. indicated that there was a total weight loss of about 11.8 weight percent.
About 11 grams of this catalyst was tested as a vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst at a reactor temperature of 104C. in essentially the same manner as the cobalt oxide catalyst of Example I was tested, as described in Example II. Testing was performed for a total of 3.75 hours during which period a maximum relative humidity of about 27 percent was used (about 1.85 hours). The results of this testing were similar to the results obtained for the catalyst of Example I.

EX~MPLE V

5.1 grams of the cobalt oxide catalyst used as the catalyst bed in Examples II and III were mixed with 5.2 grams of the cobalt oxide catalyst used as the catalyst bed in Example IV. The catalyst mixture was dried at about 185C. for about 1 hour under a 26 inch mercury vacuum. The dried cobalt oxide mixture was then charged to the reactor described in Example II
as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride incinera~.ion catalyst using the procedure described in Example II. ~xperi-mental results are tabulated in Table III.

il 07(1 ~
4~
o U~ O O U) ~ O O U~ o o u~ u~ o ~ ~ o O ~ ~ ~ o ~ I~ ~ ~r 1~ ~ f~l ~ In 1~ ~ ~ ~ u o o o o ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ u~ o ~, ~ o ~c ~ a a a a a a ~ a Ln u- ~ a a a a a a a o ,1 z z z z z z z z o o o z Z ,~ z; z z Z ~r o J
'x ~a) ooooooooooooooooo~

o a) . ~o ~ a~ ~ o Lr u~ u~ ~ o u~ n o o a~ ~ ~

~ ~ a ~ a ~ a a a O O u~ u~ m ~ O ~ ~o O a ,ol ~ z z z z Z Z Z r~ r~ r~ Z ' O '~ r`~ r`~ '~ 'J d E~ ~ O
O ~D ~r ~ ~ .1 \ ~ o rl) )-I h H O o ~ ~ rd H U ~ 11~ u ) In Ul U~ In 11') U~ Lrl Lr~ u ) In U~ In 11~ Lr7 ul O ~ C~ O
H~ ~D ~ ~ ~ r~ r~ rrl r~ rr~ r~ rr~ r~ ~ r~ ~ 0 r ~1 ~ . ~ ~ ~ OE~ o rn rn o ~ 0 o o O O O O O O O O ~ O ,~
-1~ rd h ht) rD ~ v Q ~ rd rd -~
3 rD ~ 3 o ~) ~ ~ ~ rD ~D ~1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ '0 ~ a a rD

rlJ ~D Lr~ ~-- 1~ r~ r~l r~l rr) ~ r~ ~ r~o r~ r,~l ~ W rX) ro ~ rd r~) ,1 ~
~ r~ O ~ r U~ Ul ~) r~ r~ N r~ ~ ~ SJ ~ ~ r~ O ~ ~J r~ 0 rrJ O '~ ~ iD $ ~D
~ rD a a a a) ~ ~ ~ s ~ ,, ~ . .. ., a o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ rD ~ ~
~ ,D ,~ ,j rD ~ 0 0 Q/ $ ,~ r~l r~ ro r~ O ,~ r~l r~ ~ u~ ro ~ ~a) rn U~ U~
rd U~ Z ~ rrJ ,4 tn S

:

~L~7~

The data of Table III indicate that the catalyst mixture exhibited a relatively high level of catalytic activity at low relative humidity in the temperature range of from about 23C. to about 104C.
Although the catalytic activity at 23C. was found to decrease by approximately S0 percent over about 2 hours, the level of activity was still significant after this period of time. The activity of the catalyst toward vinylidene chloride incineration was found to be similar to that exhibited toward vinyl chloride.

EX~MPLE VI
A solution of 100 grams of cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate dissolved in 320 grams of distilled water was added slowly with vigorous stirring to a solution of 50 grams of anhydrous sodium hydroxi~e dissolved in 100 grams of distilled water. After addition of the cobalt sulfate solution, the reactant mass was stirred for approximately 10 minutes. The precipitated product was thoroughly washed with distilled water by decantation utilizing a centrifuge. The precipitate was washed a total of four times.
After washing, the precipitated product was isolated by filtration. The wet filter cake was then dried at approximately 50C. for about 20 hours.
AEter drying, the filter cake was granulated using a mortar and pestle into a minus 8 mesh particle size product. The minus 8, plus 30 mesh particle size fraction of this product was then dried at approximately 200C. for about 5.5 hours. A 27 inch mercury vacuum was used during the final hour oE the drying period. The cobalt content of the oxide was found to be about 94.8 weight percent as cobalt (II, III) oxide by elemental X-ray spectroscopic analysis. X-ray diffractlon analysis indicated that a crystal-line phase was present, and that this phase was cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co304). Thermogravimetric analysis to 400C. indicated a total weightloss of about 3.1 percent.
Utilizing the apparatus and experimental procedure of Example II, about 12.5 grams of this cobalt oxide catalyst was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl chloride-vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst. Results are tabulated in Table IV.

. - 29 -P) ~]

I- O O O O O O O O ' ~
~ ~ cn o ~ ~ ~ ~ O r rD
C
O ~ ~D

p Hl ~; IJ
O Oq rD
U) I_ p, ~0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o U) rt P
rr , ~D ~
O rt Cl~ ~ ~D 1'~ IT) h 1~) ~I n ~ tu rDU) .
~:1 h h) h W h ~) ~) h W 1:1 t~ ~3 ~D ~ O O O O O O O O O ~ ~D
~t O ~0 tr~
~ ~ n H
p)U~ ~ ¢
t P~t U h) ~ ~ t~ tl U t~l U
o . . . . rt ,!~
~' .
~ct C Y ~/ \/ \~ V \/ V V ~ I'~
oq ~ C) I't~
& .
rt l_ ~n rt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 U
P~ ~ ~ ~n ~J) Ul ~ V) ~Jl ~Jl rt rt , O

rt ~Z ~ Z ~ ~ ~Z ~ rCOt P~t trDt ~~

O ~ 11 1-- 1-- 0 0 0 0 tt .
O ~I ~ ~ 1-~ rt (D
Ul ~ Jl O O ~rl O (./1 C) O O

The data of Table IV show that the cobalt oxide catalyst tested exhibited a high level of catalytic activity with respect to incineration of vinyl chloride and vinylidene cllloride at the 104C.
reactor temperature and under conditions of high and low relative humidity.
This oxide sample exhibited excellent resistance to inhibition of catalytic activity by water vapor. Thus, even after about l-1/2 hours operation at approximately 60 percent relative humidity, les~ than 0.5 parts per million of vinyl chloride was found in the effluent gas from the reactor and no vinylidene chloride concentration was detectablP. ~s in the case of the cobalt oxide catalyst of Example I, the los,s in activity after prolonged contact with a higher humidity atmosphere was restored by passage of low relative humidity air through the heated catalyst bed.

EX~MPLE VII
Approximately 20 cc of a commercial cobalt oxide on alumina catalyst was dried in a vacuum oven at a temperature of approximately 200C.
and a vacuum of about 27 inches of mercury for a period of about 2-1/2 hours. The cobalt content of this catalyst was about 18 weight percent as cobalt (II) oxide (CoO) and had a B.E.T. surface area of 49 square meters per grarn. 19.3 grams oE the drled catalyst was charged to the reactor described in Example II and tested as an incineration catalyst for vinyl chloride. The catalyst was charged to the reactor with the reactor temper-ature at 104C. and with an 80t20 nitrogen/oxygen gas stream passing through the reactor. This gas stream was preheated to about 108C. during the loading.
The catalyst showed no activity witll respect to incineration of vinyl chloride or vinylidene chloride at a gas flow rate of 44 liters/hour, inlet temperature of about 108C. and a relative humidity of about 1.5 ~'7~8~

percent. X-ray spectroscopic analysis of this commercial catalyst indicated that the cobalt was present as a highly crystalline form of cobalt (II, III) oxide and differed from the cobalt oxide samples prepared in accordance with Examples I, IV and VI.
EX~MPLE VIII
Using the experimental procedure of Example VI, cobalt ox:Lde was prepared using 93 grams of cobalt (II? sulfate heptahydrate disso:Lved in 300 grams of distilled water, and 47 grams of anhydrous sodium hydroxide dissolved in 94 grams of distilled water. The final drying of the product was performed at approximately 200C. for a period of about 7 hours. A 27 inch mercury vacuum was used during the final two hours of the drying period.
The cobalt content of the oxide was found to be about 93.7 weight percent as cobalt (II, III) oxide by elemental X-ray spectroscopic analysis. X-ray diffraction analysis indlcated that a crystalline phase was present, and this phase was identified as cobalt (II, III) oxide (CO3O4). Thermogravi-metric analysis indicated a total weight loss of about 3.6 weight percent at a temperature of 400C.
Utilizing the apparatus and procedure of E~ample II, about 7 grams of this cobalt oxide catalyst was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl chloride-vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst at temperatures in the range of 23C. to 104C. Results are tabulated in Table V .

J o~ rr~ 2: ~n 1~ ~ 3 0 ~C~ ro~J rf~ Ul ~ W ~ ~ iJ ~) ~ 3 g ~ ~ tt rD
rD (D ~tt ~ rt Cr~ ~ ~ P~ C(~
rt rt rt rr ~-- 3 ti) ~ p~ ~. U~ fD H
C ~ rt ~1 ~ ',~
~ ~D 3 t-~ ~I 1~) ~ ~ 'P ~ W W ~Jl U1 ~ fD
rt 3 C ~ r~ ~1 ,r,o 1-- 3 u) rt rD
g 3 ~ o rt ~
. g 1 . rJ- C rt rt rt tt C
C C ~ (D O tt rt rt C ~ C (~
n) (~ rt ~ rt O O ~J ~J ~ ~ ~ t~ O O
U~ i'J t~. P ~ W W ~ ~ O W W P P ~D
rD tD tD i~ rt th th tD tD tD
rt rt th n th 1~
tD tD rt rt rt tD
tt tt tD O tD rt tt tt tt rt rD ~ o p r-~ p p p p p p p ~ ~ p p tD ,~
. t ~ tD tD P P .P P P P P trDt rt o (n ~ r~
~D tD ~'~ i~ t~
rt rt tD tD ~
~'~ ~. rt ~ t~ O
~q t~q :~1 rt Z rCt ~q ~ 1--~: tD O O O O O o O O O ~ . o o C
tJ tD n o rt . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 tt tttD o ~ ' a~ Co O r,~ r~ IJ~ tD
g a tt 0 th . t~
c ~ c '~ ~4 o n ~ rt tt rJ
O O O tD
t h ~t, 0 tD n t h tl) g n~
tD tD tt J' tD
0 n)tD ~. rt 1-- W W W W W W W W W W W W t-l .
n n P~ tD J ~C t t r,~o t ~ P :~
rt rt n ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . . . . . ~ 1--~
0 O rt rt rt O O O O ~n ~.n ~n ~ ~ n O O tD ._ tt tt r~ rJ rt t~ ~

rt rt tD tt tD ~ D
O O rt 3 O t ~ n w O ~ C tD
1~ `J tD rr~ Y ::~ t~
O W -P tt ~J ~ ,rtt C
o t~ o rt t~ o ~ 1~ æ z c tD
t.~ ~ t~ c rD t~ æ z o o ~ w w ~ ~ r,o rt rt (D n tl tl ~ n O ~ ~n O O rJ tJ t rt ~n rt rJ' tD
t~ .
0 V V ~" ~ tJ
tX~ D th ~!
tD ~ ~ ~O ~ O O O O Ul ~ D th t~ tD
~J.
rt rDt ~ w w w w w w w w w w ~ ~ 1 ~ u i~ O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~n ~D 3 1~. rt rt r.
tt g u, n rD
O rt C . O rt æ ~ ;z æ z Z Z ~ ~ ~ c rrDt rt ~ tl J ~ ~ J J ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ O
r~.
t ~C

P~ O
rt ~) t~1 rD (D ~.
O O O rt 3 . . . . . . . . . . . , n) rD
a~ ~n W ~ ~ ~~ .r~ i-- rr O ~ ~n O ~ n O ~ O O O I'~ O

~ ~h _ 33 ~

~0~7[D~81~3 The data of Table V show that the cobalt oxide catalyst tested exhibited an experimentally significant level of catalytic activity with respect to incineration of vinyl chloride and viny]idene chloride at temperatures from about 23C. to 104C. and at conditions of low relative humidity.
EX~LE IX

The cobalt oxide utilized as the catalyst bed in Example VIII
was heated in the reactor at about 104C. for approximately 1-3/4 days.
The cobalt oxide was then tested as an incineration catalyst for a mixture of C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons using the same procedure described in Example II~. The total C2-chlorinated hydrocarbon-conta:ining synthetic air gas stream flow through the reactor was 44 liters per hollr. Tlle data obtained is tabulated in Table VI.

~C~7~
~h 1~ ~ P) ~ U~
n GO ~ ~, 3 1-- ~ ~ U~ ~ 1--(D
rt rt r~ ID
r~ rt rr ~3 ~D ~D (D J
3 3 3 r~' ~1 ;~
~ ~ ~1 ~ O O O O O O O O C
3 ~
p) P~ P~ ~1 ~h th rh ID (D (D (D l:L ~, I_ rt r~ rt C C C ~ D~
~ ~ ~t (D tD
O O O
~ ~h ~h 1--~ C
' ~ 1- O O O rt n O O O o n ~ n ~
~, ll ~
D~ ~ rr ~O ~ O
oo ~ ~ ~ Z ~: C
n . . . . . . . . rt r~
1l ~-`' '-~1~ . . . . . . . . (D O
P~ rr ~:1 P)P~n rr rt ~ P. O
(DtDrt ~ C
rtrt~ O O O (1) 3 O OID rt n P~ o rtrtrt . ~
(DrDC n (D rt rt~tO O ~t P~ h C n) rtrt ~ Z ~ Z ~ Y Z. Z n rt ~tCtO ~ t) ~ ~ t~ ~ ~D O
~D(D~ . . . . . . . . rr r~r O O
t-h~h ~3 ~D,~ r~ a~ n ~ ~ n ~D ~ . . . . . . . . 1--O O ~ ~ n ~
rt 0~ ~
n ~
r~ r~
O ~n ~
O O rr o o ~t n n o ~
Z Z ~ ~ Z ræ Z rr rr t~ n ~ O
rt rl' J t (11 n ~n ~n O O O O O O rt 5 rt o æ ~ ~ Y O ~: ~ Ic ~
C) tl O ~ ~ tJ tD r~
rr oo co 1~ o 1~ o o o ~ n (Jl ~n O O O O O O rt I_ . . O

o~ .~ o ~ ~ w I-- ~ l crt n O O ~ n O O ~VI ¦ fl~ rJ~

~3o ~3 n~ ~ ~ IV ~ O O ~t 3 W W W ~ ~I o rt ~'~ O
~On~h ~7~138 The data of Table VI show that the cobalt oxide catalyst of Example VIII exhibits a high level of catalytic activity a~: conditions of low relative humidity in the temperature range of 104C.-190C. with respect to vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, methyl chloroform, and trichloroethylene. While relatively high catalytic activity was ini-tially shown with respect to perchloroethylene at both 150C. and 190C., the activity diminished relatively rapidly at both temperatures.

EX~MPLE X

7.5 grams of the cobalt oxide prepared in Example V~II was heated for a period oE about two hours in a muffle Eurnace at a tem-perature of about 500C. After heating" the cobalt content oE the heat-treated oxide was determined and found to be about 96.2 weight percent as cobalt (II,III) oxide by elemental X-ray spectroscopic analysis. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that a highly crys-talline phase was present, and this phase was identified as cobalt (II,III) oxide. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated a total weight loss of 0.5 weight percent at a temperature of 400C.
Utili~ing the apparatus and procedure of Example II, about 6.7 grams of this heat-treated oxide catalyst was char~ed to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl ch}oride-vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst. Results obtained are tabulated in Table VII.

~ oq p, ~ ~
rt t~ W 1~ a 3 n P~ nP rJ rJ
u~ 3 u~ n IJ
p~ rt p~ n~ tt tD
rr ~- n < Pt 1' t~
n g ~ P~
'I:J 0~ r~
t~
3 3' n n, r~ ~ ~ n I~ rr 1_ 1-- 0 I~ O O ~t rr p) nt O ~ O ~D ~D rt n P~ ~ O ~t rr ~ r~ (D
rr P~
P) p) pt rr r~ ~
o n n rr tt P~
I_ ~ p, ~ U~ rt ~ tn n~
~- ~t ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ rr 0 ~ ~ r~
rt ~-.
P) Z V) rrl~) n n~ ~ t 0~ rr ~1 ~
~h ~ t o o o w o o 3 p~ rt C CO 00 Co ~ ~ ~ n) rt g ~q ~I O n '.'C ~J.
I~. O
.1 ~I n P~ t rt ~C n C
' ~ ~ rD Cl~ 1--X
1~ C rt rDr ~ 5 ~ rnD ~
rt n rt 0 ~n P~ rD ~ 1-- W r~ C ~t H
~ I~ Vl 1-- n O ~ z r~ rt ~t ~ rDt . rJ~

nD I'~
r~ rr n rt W ~ V ¦ -h ~n IJ. U) ~n O O O O ~ ~h rD
~ t P~ rD
rt l_ O Ul ~ n :3 n J nD

X ~ I~ O O O ~ r rt 3 tl o ul u- ~ ~ n rr O

I~
i~ ~ W ~~ O ~ rt ~n O ~n ~ IJ o 1 ~h~h ~L07~

The data of Table VII show that the heat-treated cobalt oxide sample exhibited significantly greater sensitivity to inhibition of catalytic activity at increased relative humidity levels than did similarly prepared, non-highly heated oxide samples, e.g. see Example VL.
Comparison of the elemental analysis and thermogravimetric analysis results of this highly heated cobalt oxide with the analytical results obtained with the cobalt oxide of Example VIII indicates that the heating of the cobalt oxide at about 500C. significantly reduced the amount of water of hydration present in the catalyst.

EXAMPLL Xl A commercial sample of cobalt oxide was formed into pellets of about 0.25 inch diameter and 0.25 inch Iength using a manual press.
The pellets were dried at about 200C. for about twenty hours. During the final approximately 3.5 hours of the drying period, a 26 inch mercury vacuum was used. Elemental analysis by X-ray spectroscopy indicated that the cobalt content of the resultant oxide was about 92.9 weight percent as Co304. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated tllat a crystal-line phase was present, and that this phase was cobalt (II,III) oxide, Co304. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated a total wei~ht loss of about 0.3 weight percent at a temperature of 400C.
Utili~ing the apparatus and procedure of Example II, about 14.5 grams of this oxide was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl chloride-vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst at a reactor temperature of 104C. Results are tabulated in Table VIII.

3~137C3~8~3 r It r I ~n .P w ~ ~ c ~ P) r~
p) rt ~D ~ (D
rt (~
J. U7 ~ P
(D g P~

C ~ (D rD
1' O H :~
p, ~ . 1-- 1-- 1-- 1--rt 0 0 I~
Oq C rt tD
) p) rt r; ~ ~ ~
(~ ~ P) I~
~ ) ~ ~ r 0~
05 oa C ~:
,_ rt C
rt ~ ~ ~ ~ 15' ~
--` ~ `J IJ- ~D
O 1-- ~ ~ 1-- . :
O U) r It ~D
D~ p) r 3 W W W W W ~ C

C ¦ rt 0 3>
0~ :i t~l o t~
r~ ~ ~
rt O r H
p) ~ W W ~ J` rCt rt H
rt O ~ O rt o P, t-h ~ U
W .~ ~ ~'~
I~ O ~ ~n O ~A t h i~

1-- ~h ~. tD
rt tD
o~
P) H C
rt n ~ n rt tt O~
X, ~
rt trtt 1_ 0 1-- ~ ~ rCt rt . . . . . l_ ~
.n O ~n Ul (~ O
1~ rt ~

~0 ~
I_ o o o o t g ~n O O O ~n rt ~O ~h . .

81!3 Comparison of the data of Table VIII with the data of the previous Examples shows that this commercial cobalt oxide sample ex-hibited a lower, but experimentally significant level of catalytic activity with respect to the incineration of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride. The data also shows that this cobalt oxide cata- ~
lyst exhibited a high level of sensitivity to inhibition of activity by water vapor relative to that of the cobalt oxides of Examples I-VI.
Both the cobalt oxide of this Example and Example X contained relatively low amounts of water of hydration, as indicated by the thermogravimetric analysis results. ~

EXAMPLE XII

~ commercial sampLe of cobalt oxide to which about 2.5 weight percent of distilled water was added, as a binder, was formed into pellets using the procedure of Example XI. The pellets were dried at about 200C. for about eight hours. During the final approximately three hours of drying, a 26 inch mercury vacuum was used. Elernental analysis by X-ray spectroscopy indicated that the cobalt content of the resul~
tant oxide was about 95.5 weight percent as cobalt (II) oxide. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the oxide was predominantly crys-talline cobalt (II) oxide. Thermogravimetric analysis indicated a total weight loss of less than about 0.2 weight percent at a temperature of 350C.
Utilizing the apparatus and procedure of Example II, about 15 grams of this oxide was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl chloride-vinylidene chloride incineration catalyst.

~esults are tabulated in Table IX.

.

~ D~ C P~
t~ n ~ W 1~ ~. 3 (D 1--~D tt rt 3 ~t H

I rt ,~ t C O ~
C (D
W W W O rt p P) O ~) 1~ ~ ~ rt (D
rt ~
rt ~ I_ O ~ D ~ r~

o r ~H
W WJ~ CO --I Cb 1--p~

rt ¦ H X
r ~ ~ C~
O ~_ O~ t~ O ¦ rr rt OO O I r3 O

O ~n ~.n O ~n ~h ~!
.

w ww w w 1 o oo o o ¦ ~ 3 rt r rt U~ UlO O ~ ' ~ ~ ' n3 ~
0 0 ~ -I
O W 1~ rt n O OVt ~ ~' th th 8~;1 The data oE Table IX show that this commercial cobalt o~ide sample exhibited a low, but experimentally significant level of catalytic activity with respect to the incineration of viny] chloride and vinyli-dene chloride.

EXA~PLE XIII
-A commercial sample of cobalt oxide, to which about 5 weight percent of distilled water was adde~ as a binder, was formed into pellets as in Example XI. The pellets were dried at about 200C. for about seven hours. During the final approximately three hours of drying,-a 26 inch mercury vacuum was used. Elemental analysis by X-ray spectroscopy indicated that the cobalt content o~ the resultant oxide was about 95.3 weight percent as cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co304). X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the oxide was predominantly crystalline cobalt (II, III) oxide. Thermogra~imetric analysis indicated a total weight loss of about 0.1 weight percent at a temperature o~ 400C.
Utilizing the apparatus and procedure of Example II, about 17.6 grams of this oxide was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested at a reactor temperature of 104C. Results are tabulated in Table X.

_ . _ . .

p~ w ~ ~ ~ ~
o ~
u, n~
n rD ~
H ~I ~J ~I ~ rD
. ,~ .

~O ~O ~D rt O
(D~

:r 0 E~
(D
r, ~ ~ I H ~
~n ~ ~ ~D ~
r~ g ~ 1~
o P~ 1 c ~n O ~ ~ ~

¦ ~h h ~3 O ItD

o o z 1 ~ ~, r~ 1~, tD ~0 r~

~ ~3 O O O ~
1~
I'~ O
1 0 ~Jl O ~h '. , ~h .

The data of Table X show ~hat this commercial cobalt oxide sample exhibited a significant level of activity with respect to the incineration of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride. The data also indicates that this low water of hydration sample apparently shows a relatively rapid decrease in activity with time.

EX~M~L~ XIV

A cobalt oxide was prepared using the experimental procedure of Example I. The amount of each reactant used was 141 grams of cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate dissolved in 450 grams of distilled water, 70 grams of anhydrous sodium hydroxide dissolved in 140 grams of distilled water, and 22 grams of 35 wei~ht percent aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide. ~ter drying at about 50C. for a period of about
5 hours, the filter cake was granulated with a mortar and pestle.
The minus 30 mesh particle size fraction of this cobalt oxide sample was formed into pellets as in Example XI,and then dried at about ~00C.
for a period of about 3 hours under a 27 inch mercury vacuum.
Utili~ing the apparatus and procedure of Example II, about 3.6 grams of this oxide was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested at a reactor temperature of 104C. The synthesi~ed air mixture used in the evaluation contained 37.5 ppm of vinyl chloride and 3 ppm of vinylidene chloride, and the inlet temperature to the reactor was 108C. At a total flow rate of about ~ liter/hour, and a relative humidity of about 2.5 percent, only about 0.5 ppm of vinyl chloxide and no detectable quantity of vinylidene chloride was - 4~ -found in the exhaust from the reactor. At a total flow rate of about 44 liter/hour and a relative humidity oE about 1.2 percent, about 9.5 ppm of vinyl chloride and 0.5 ppm of vinylidene chloride was found in the effluent gas from the reactor. These results, which were obtained using a relatively small quantity of oxide, demonstrate that the lower activity of the commercial oxide samples of Examples XI-XIII was not due to tlle pelleti~ed shape of the catalyst.

rX~MPLI~ XV

Using the experimental procedure of Example VI, a.cobalt oxide sample was prepared. The reactants used were 93 grams of cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate dissolved in 300 grams of distilled water and 47 grams of anhydrous sodium hydroxide dissolved in 94 grams of distilled water. After washing, about one-fourth of the wet centrifuge cake was slurried with about twice its volume of commercial fumed silica in distilled water. After isolation by filtration, the wet filter cake was dried at about 50C. for about 2-3/4 days. After drying, the Eilter cake was granulated using a mortar and pestle into a minus 8 mesh particle si~e product. The minus 8, plus 30 mesh particle si~e fraction oE this product was then dried at about 200C.
for a period of about 7 hours. A 26 inch mercury vacuum was used during the final 4.5 hours of drying. The cobalt content of the resultant oxide was found to be about 57.9 weight percent as cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co304) by elemental X-ray spectroscopic analysis.
X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that a crystalline phase was present, and this phase was identified as cobalt (II, III) oxide.

Thermogravimetric analysis indicated a total weight loss of 3.8 weight percent at a temperature of 400C.
Utilizing the apparatus and procedure of ~xample II, about 7.8 grams of this oxide was charged to the reacl:or as the catalyst bed and tested at a reactor temperature of 104C. Results obtained are tabulated in Table XI.

81~

I-h W ~ 1-- 0 O ~
ID
~t ~ p~
p, oq (D o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 ~--C ~ It ~ B
C r~
U~
o C` .P ~ ~ ~ ~ .P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~
'<: p~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~' ~
p) h ~D ~ ~q ...... ~,,~ c~ o . E~
P~ O O O
O `~

W W W W W W W W W W W r-1 C
~D ~O ~O ~D ~ ~O ~D ~O ~D ~D ~D ~D ~O
OOOOOOOOOOOOO ID
~ r~
rr n (D rt t ~ W t~ I~ O ~ 1- 1~ ~~CO Cl~ æ o P~ ~c rt ~n O O~n ~n t~ . . O O tJ tJ r~ tl~ H
O O O (D ~
C rt p~

rt V
P~ ~D ~0 ~0 ~D ~0 ~0 ~J~ D ~D 1'~
~`-- O O ~ D ~D O (Jl . O O ~ D I-h r h rr Pl r ,~ ~ ~ ~ W W W W W W W

O Irt 1:;3 ~0 r~ n rt rt w z z æ z æ æ o æ æ ~ z æ æ o ,t g J J J J ~ ~ ~n J J Jt1 ~ J r~ r~
., . . . . . . . . . . . . l_ O
(D ~
r~ . rt Cb ~D
rt O
'~
~ . rD
~ ~ W W W W t~ t,~ o ~t g X O ~1 ~n W t~ CO W O ~1 ~ ~ t~ rt 3~ o O O ~n O O ~n O O O ~ O o O' I-h pl . ~
rr ~h .

The data of Table XI sllow that the cobalt oxide-fumed silica samples exhibited a high level of catalytic activity with respect to the removal of both vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride at conditions of high and low relative humidity. As in the case of several of the previous cobalt oxide samples (see Examples II and VI), the small loss in activity after prolonged contact with the higher humidity atmosphere was restored by passage of low relative humidity air through the heated catalyst bed.

EIX~PLE XVI

After waslllng with distilled water and drying overnigllt at about 70C. under a 26 inch mercury vacuum, 20 grams of a commercial 8-14 mesh activated alumina was impregnated under vacuum with a solution of 20 grams of cobalt (II) sulfate heptahydrate dissolved in 20 grams of distilled water. After decanting off the excess cobalt (II) sulfate solution, the alumina particles were dried at about 70C. under a 26 inch mercury vacuum for about 2 hours. The dried alumina particles were then reacted with a solution of 5 grams of anhydrous sodium hydroxide dissolved in 20 grams of distilled water for a period of about 1 hour at about 70C. After decanting off the excess caustic solution, the alumina particles were then washed with distilled water.
The alumina particles were dried at about 70DC. for about 2 hours, and then at about 200C. for about 18 hours. During the final 2.5 hours of the latter drying period, a 26 inch mercury vacuum was used. The cobalt content was detennined to be 7.9 weight percent as cobalt (II, III) oxide (Co3O4), by elemental X-ray spectroscop:ic analysis.
Utilizing the apparatus and procedure of Example II, about 17 grams of this cobalt oxide on an activated alumina sample was charged to the reactor as the catalyst bed and tested at a reactor temperature of 104C. Results are tabulated in Table XII.

_ ~9 _ ~ oa D~ r,~ ~n ~ W ~ I~ l o 3 I rtJ
r~ 3 rJ~ u~
tl) l~ tl) tD
3 ::1 3 tD
r ~) tD t tt) t ~ ~ ~ tD ~
o o 1-- o o o o o o 3 1--~ tl) IJ' (D ~ ~n W ~ ~ ~n rc tD
r~ r~ rt ~ Oq rt t tl~ ~ D~
tD r~ tD
rt D~ tD D~
r- rt ~ ~i rD ~h rD ~ ~ ~O ~ ~ ~ t~
1-- ~ ~ ~ rr O
O rD X
~0 t~
rn ~ ~n U~ ro tn 1'~ rt ~' oa Oq Z ~ t'` 1-- 1-- 0 0 C . ~ . . , . C:
,~ ~ 3 ~J ~ ~ ~ ~D 3 ~;d r.~ r~ W r~ 1--0 . .
r~
O rD rt, r~.
rn ~ Oq r~ O 1 rD ~ (~ ~ ~ W W W ~1 r~ rn ~ n ::J r,~
3 D~ rr . . . . . . I_ ~ ~ O O ~ (D
r~ tl rD rr r~
w,3 r~o c 3 r- tD
Oq ;-. ~ ~
r~ r~ r- ~ w ~ r~ ~ ~ o r r- rrn 'J ~ o O rr l~ t~
t ~ O O ~n rD ~ X
rn r. r. rt r l.
rt r~ I--~
rD ~ rn r. r~ rt rD
tD ~1 rl- t~
rt - rD ~ l ~l r~
~ r~ o i O O ~n ~n ~
tD O I ~h t~ tD .
r~ ~/ r~ rD
o rt tD
D~
~h O
l_ X
o 3 tD ~ n tD
tD rD rt rt ~ O
tD ~ O
O ~n r~
~h O rD
~ J
rt t rD ~ ~ o z 11 o r~ rt rt tD ~n O Dl~ ~ O ~n r- O
rD ~j, rD
~t rt r tD

O ~
b IJ~
o,~. o t S rt ~1 ~ rD IJ.
r,o r~ 1~ 0 0 0 ~t 3 rh ~ . . . . . . P) rD
r3~0 r t O ~n O O lo~ h t~~ ~
rrl ~h rD
rn .

The data of Table XII indicate that this cobalt oxide on an activated alumina sample showed a significant :Level of activity with respect to the incineration of the vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride at low relative humidity.

Example XVII

About twenty grams of commercially available cobalt (II) hydroxide was slurried with 150 grams of distilled water. The slurry was filtered and the filter cake dried at about 70C. for about two days. The dried filter cake was pulveri~ed with a mortar-and pestle.
The minus 8, plus 30 mesh particle size fraction was then dried at about 200C. for 5-1/4 hours. During the last three hours of this dry:Lng period, a 26.5 inch mercury vacuum was applied to the samp:le. The cobalt content of the dried product was determined to be g3.6 weight percent cobalt (II, III) oxide, as Co304. X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that a crystalline phase was present, which was identified as cobalt (II,III) oxide. The surface area of the cobalt oxide product was found to be 115 m /gram.
About 10 grams of this cobalt oxide was charged to the reactor described in Example II as the catalyst bed and tested as a vinyl chloride incineration catalyst. The catalyst bed occupied a volume of about 13 cubic centimeters. The procedure of Example II was followed except that vinyl chloride was supplied to the system by means of a standard gas cylinder of nitrogen containing an analytically measured 2.5 weight percent of vinyl chloride. The amount of vinyl chloride introduced into the reactor was controlled by the amount of vinyl chloride-containing nitrogen allowed to bleed into the system. The synthetic air stream was introduced into the reactor at a rate of 44 liters per minute. The conditions under which the test was performed and the results thereof are tabulated in Table XIII.

a~ " O O O O O O ~
~ ~ ~ ~ A C ~ ~C~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ OD ~ (D
3 ~ 3 ~3 ~ ~ O ~ r~
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ O P~
~ ~~1~ ~ o o n rrrrU) ~DrD~D (D X C ~ O 1~ 0r~
Y~ ~ P
r~r~' J' ri' 3 3 a (D rr rt rr r rt r~ rr ~S P X
O r~ 1: 3 P P P P rr ~ p p~ 3 ~ r~ t~
o ~ rr ~p~
~ C r~ rJ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
1~ ~ 1~ ~h ~'C ~ ~ r~
o r~ O ~h rt ~t P) ~ O
rt ~ O IJ~ ~-- n rt .
3 3 3 3 ~ tt p ~ C r~
3 ~ ~ ~.
P P P P ~D p rc~ p rr rt rCt rt o ~ t~ o rt (D t~ 3 ~ O
O p ~ ~J, ~ C ~ P P
t~ t~ t~ t~ ~ rt p~ . rt i--rt rt rt rt tt ~ I_ tJ ~ ~D
n C ~D rt ~:
tt tl tt tt rt ~D rt rt O O O C O O O O O 3 i~
p ~ p ~ p P v p n o ~ 1l n n n n ~ n 1-- o P~ n . .
tt Iq tt t: 1~.rt O rt 11~ P) n p, n n P o n tt rr tl)U~ u~ p :J p ~l O
I'~rD ~D Oq o ~ ~ ~ P' P c a o u, Oq p. p. ~ t~ o rt rt r~ .~ .P ~ ~1 oo H C
C t1tt 1~ C (DtrtrrJ ~ 1~ n ~Jl ~ ~I g g ~
~ ~(D n r~ P r~ (D
P)Pl O rt ~ ~ rt n n n p ~D n 3 ~J~ t~ ~3 O r~rr n ~ ~ r~ ~ P O ~i n rr ot ~ rt o P t~
:~rtrt tt n 1~7 -tt 3 3 rr 1-- C ~ ' 'Z ~ 1~ r H
rt(D~D O tD ~ C . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt rt H
. tttt P P ~ ~D tJ ~ ~ o o o O ~n 1--o P rtrt rr 3 ~ O 1~ P
C C P~ rt P.
tttt r O

~O ~O O O ~n O O ~O j~

0 ~3 Y O O O O rD 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ p, tD
O O O O O O ~ ~n O rt O
loJ~
Pt~

.

'7~(~8~3 The data of Table XIII show that at a reactor temperature of 104C., the catalyst activity appears to drop rapidly and then stabilizes.
When the reactor temperature is raised, there is a significant increase in catalyst activity.
Further testing with the catalyst of Example XVII showed that when the apparent capacity of the catalyst to incinerate vinyl chloride was exceeded, other C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons were observed in the product gas leaving the reactor. For example, when a synthetic air stream of 20 percent relative humidity and containing 2960 ppm vinyl chloride was passed through the catalyst bed at a rate of 9 liters per.hour ~apparent residence time of about 5 seconds) and a temperature of 188C., the reactor outlet was determined to have 680 ppm vinyl chloride, 23 ppm vinylidene chloride, 190 ppm 1,2-dichloroethylene, about ll ppm of trichloroethylene and 280 ppm of trichloroethane. This result indicates that under conditions of excessive residence time and excess vinyl chloride (beyond the capacity of the catalyst), side reactions occur.
When the relative humidity of the gas stream was lowered to about 0.9 percent, there was a significant-lowering in the concentrations of by-products formed. Thus, the relative concentration of by-products depends ~!~
on the operating conditions, e.g., the vinyl chloride concentration in the feed to the reactor, relative humidity of the feed gases, temperature of the reactor, residence timeJ activity of the catalyst, etc.
After extensive testing at the 188C. reactor temperature in the presence of vinyl chloride concentrations as high as 3300 ppm, the surface area of the cobalt oxide catalyst was found to be 42 m2/gram. The reduction in surface area is consistent with the initial decrease of activity observed in Table XIII.

The above examples demonstrate that hydrated cobalt oxides exhibit high catalytic activity at temperatures of from about 20C., e.g., 23C., to about 190C., e.g., 188C., under conditions of low and high relative humidity respecting incineration o~ C2 halogenated, e.g., chlorinated, hydrocarbons such as vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, methyl chloroform and trichloroethylene, especially vinyl and vinylidene chloride. The above examples show also that cobalt oxide catalysts that do not have a significant level of water of hydration, e.g., greater than 1, preferably greater than 2 or 3 weight percent (as determined by thermogravimetric analysis to 400C.), are useful under conditions of low relative humidity.
The hydrated cobalt oxide catalysts are preferred. Further, the examples demonstrate that the C2-halogenated hydrocarbon content of the gas stream containing same can be reduced from the concentrations present in the gas stream to lower levels, preferably to less than 10 ppm, e.g., less than 0.5 ppm (when the initial concentrations are higher than the preferred reduced level).
The above described catalysts will find particular application in reducing C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons, e.g., vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride, in air streams containing same. Thus, it is contemplated that vent discharges from enclosed work areas in polyvinyl chloride producing facilities, vinyl chloride storage tank facilities, C2-chlorinated hydro-carbon production facilities, etc. can be treated to reduce the concen-tration of such C2-chlorinated hydrocarbons appreciahly by the process of the present invention.
The concentration of C2-C~ halogenated, e.g., chlorinated, hydrocarbons in gas streams containing same, e.g., air streams can vary.

Commonly, the concentratlQn in air streams will be below or above the explosive range. For example, the concentration of vinyl chloride in air streams is typically maintained below 4 weight percent. It is con-templatecl therefore that the present process will find application to air streams that contain less than 4, e.g., less than 1 weight percent vinyl chloride. Further, the present process is useful for incineration of vinyl chloride at even low concentration levels, e.g., less than 0.05 weight percent (500 ppm) and even less than 0.01 weight percent (100 ppm).
As the Examples illustrate, incineration of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride occurs even at concentrations less than 100 ppm, e.g., 50 ppm and 10 ppm. Thus the range of vinyl chloride concentrations can vary from about 0.0005 (5 ppm) to 4 weight percent, e.g., from about 0.001 (10 ppm) to 0.1 (1000 ppm), more usually from 0.001 to 0.05 weight percent. With goocl ventilation, a range of from 0.001 to 0.01 (100 ppm) weight percent vinyl chloride in the gas stream can be obtained. The aforesaid levels are considered applicable to the other C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbons described herein or combinations of such halogenated hydrocarbons in gas streams.
In one application of t~e present invention, it is contemplated tha, vent gas streams containing C2-C4 halogenated, e.g., chlorinated, hydroearbons such as vinyl chloride, e.g., vinyl chloride-containing air streams9 will be dried to a low relative humidity, i.e., less than 5 percent, preferably less than about 2 percent, by absorption, adsorbtion, compression, eooling or compression and cooling. A simple and effective means for drying such a gas stream is to pass the gas through a drying olumn containing a solid or liquid desiccant, examples of which were previously described. The dried gas stream is then preheated to about 100C. - 200C. by low pressure waste steam and introduced into a catalyst ., , : ., , :
.

~Q7~

bed, e.g., fixed or fluid, containing the cobalt oxide catalyst of the present invention along with an oxldizing amount of oxygen. The bed can also be heated by the low pressure waste steam. The effluent gas from the reactor can be scrubbed by conventional techniques to remove by-product hydrogen chloride gas, e.g., in a caustic scrubber, and the innocuous effluent gas from the scrubbing means utilized discharged in an environmentally acceptable manner.
It is also contemplated that the metal oxides of the present invention can be used in protective breathing devices for individuals, e.g., a gas mask. The activity of the cobalt oxide of the present invention at ambient temperature, at least for short periods of time, may provide the time required for an individual to leave safely a contaminated area and reach a safety zone, i.e., a non-contaminated area. It is contem-plated that any conventional gas mask can be modified to include an additional layer of the cobalt oxide of the present invention or such oxide can replace a catalytic material already contained in the gas mask, but not needed for the aforesaid application.
Typically, a gas mask comprises a cannister assembly (cylirldrical or rectangular) having side walls, a lower lid and an upper lid at opposi~e ends of the cannistcr which are sealed to the cannister assembly by O-rings or other suitable sealing means. The lids contain air inlet and outlet means. Within the cannister are a plurality of spaced, parallel screen assemblies between which are layers of adsorbents and catalysts to remove objectionable vapors from the air passing through the cannister. Typically the first layer with which the incoming air is contacted is an activated charcoal followed by at least one layer of desiccant, e.g., '~ ' .' :

caustic soda fused on pumice stone, fused calcium chloride, etc. Next, there can be placed the cobalt oxide of the present invention for the catalytic oxidation of C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon followed by a protective layer of desiccant to protect the oxide against moisture reaching it from above. Typically the individual layers of adsorbents and catalysts are separated by parallel wire screens which often contain filters, e.g., cotton wool filters. The air inlet conduit contains a check valve to allow air to pass in one direction, i.e., inwardly, and a filter to remove suspended solids included in the air intake. The air outlet is connected to a mouthpiece by means of hose means The mouth piece can also be provided with one way air discharge means for removing exhaled air from the wearer of the mask.
Although the present process has been described with reference to specific details Gf certain embodiments thereof, it is not intended that such details should be regarded as limitations upon the scope of the invention except as and to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.

: - - . . . : . . . . :

Claims (24)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method for treating a C2-C4 halogenated hydrocarbon containing gas stream, said halogenated hydrocarbon being selected from the group consisting of chlorinated and brominated hydrocarbons, which comprises contacting the halogenated hydrocarbon with an oxidizing amount of oxygen-containing gas in the presence of cobalt oxide catalyst at temperatures within the range of from 20°C. to 500°C., for a time sufficient to reduce the halogenated hydrocarbon content of the gas stream, said temperature being such as to inhibit water-induced loss of catalyst activity.
2. The method of Claim l wherein the halogenated hydrocarbon is vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, ethylene dichloride, 1,1,1-trichloro-ethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene or mixtures of such halogenated hydrocarbons.
3. The method of Claim 1 wherein the gas stream is an air stream.
4. The method of Claim 3 wherein the gas stream contains from 0.0005 to 4 weight percent halogenated hydrocarbon.
5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the temperature is from 50°C. to 300°C.
6. The method of Claim 1 wherein the cobalt oxide is hydrated cobalt oxide and is selected from the group consisting of cobalt (II) oxide, cobalt (III) oxide and cobalt (II, III) oxide.
7. The method of Claim 1 wherein the relative humidity of the combined gas streams contacting the catalyst is less than 5 percent.
8. The method of Claim 7 wherein the relative humidity is less than about 2 percent.
9. The method of Claim 6 wherein the hydrated cobalt oxide contains water of hydration in an amount at least as high as that ob-tained by drying an aqueous filter cake of the precipitated cobalt oxide at 200°C.
10. A method for treating a C2-chlorinated hydrocarbon containing air stream, which comprises contacting the chlorinated hydrocarbon with an oxidizing amount of oxygen at temperatures within the range of from 20°C. to 500°C. in the presence of cobalt oxide catalyst for a time sufficient to reduce the C2-chlorinated hydrocarbon content of the air stream, said temperature being such as to inhibit water-induced loss of catalyst activity.
11. The method of Claim 10 wherein the chlorinated hydrocarbon is vinyl chloride, vinylidene chloride, ethylene dichloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, 1,1,2-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, perchloro-ethylene, or mixtures of such chlorinated hydrocarbons.
12. The method of Claim 10 wherein the chlorinated hydrocarbon contains from 2 to 3 chlorine atoms.
13. The method of Claim 11 wherein the cobalt oxide is hydrated cobalt oxide.
14. The method of Claim 13 wherein the relative humidity of the combined gas streams contacting the catalyst is less than 5 percent.
15. The method of Claim 14 wherein the temperature is within the range of 20°C.-300°C.
16. The method of Claim 14 wherein the hydrated cobalt oxide catalyst is cobalt (II) oxide, cobalt (III) oxide or cobalt (II, III) oxide.
17. A method for reducing the vinyl chloride content of a vinyl chloride-containing gas stream which comprises contacting the vinyl chloride of the gas stream with an oxidizing amount of oxygen-containing gas in the presence of cobalt oxide catalyst selected from the group consisting of cobalt (II) oxide, cobalt (III) oxide and cobalt (II, III) oxide at temperatures within the range 20°C. to 300°C. for a time sufficient to reduce the vinyl chloride content of the gas stream, said temperature being such as to inhibit water-induced loss of catalyst activity.
18. The method of Claim 17 wherein the cobalt oxide is hydrated cobalt oxide.
19. The method of Claim 18 wherein the relative humidity of the combined gas streams contacting the catalyst is less than 5 percent.
20. The method of Claim 17 wherein the vinyl chloride-containing gas stream is an air stream and the air stream has a relative humidity of less than 5 percent before contacting the cobalt oxide catalyst.
21. The method of Claim 20 wherein the relative humidity of the air stream is less than 2 percent and the cobalt oxide catalyst is hydrated cobalt oxide.
22. The method of Claim 21 wherein the temperature is within the range of from 80°C to 250°C.
23. The method of Claim 17 wherein the total amount of oxygen-containing gas is at least that amount which is required to oxidize the carbon and hydrogen content of the vinyl chloride to carbon dioxide and water.
24. The method of Claim 17 wherein the vinyl chloride content of the gas stream is from 0.001 to 0.1 weight percent.
CA268,892A 1976-01-09 1976-12-30 Catalytic oxidation of c2-c4 halogenated hydrocarbons Expired CA1070088A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US64768776A 1976-01-09 1976-01-09
US05/742,045 US4065543A (en) 1976-01-09 1976-11-15 Catalytic oxidation of C2 -C4 halogenated hydrocarbons

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1070088A true CA1070088A (en) 1980-01-22

Family

ID=27095220

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA268,892A Expired CA1070088A (en) 1976-01-09 1976-12-30 Catalytic oxidation of c2-c4 halogenated hydrocarbons

Country Status (9)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS5287106A (en)
CA (1) CA1070088A (en)
DE (1) DE2700236C3 (en)
ES (1) ES454902A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2337707A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1543001A (en)
IT (1) IT1082502B (en)
NL (1) NL7700118A (en)
NO (1) NO770055L (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2976041B2 (en) * 1989-03-06 1999-11-10 工業技術院長 How to remove organic halides
JP4909473B2 (en) * 2001-08-31 2012-04-04 三井造船株式会社 Exhaust gas treatment catalyst
WO2018098450A1 (en) * 2016-11-28 2018-05-31 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Oxidation catalysts
CN110560063A (en) * 2019-09-09 2019-12-13 上海纳米技术及应用国家工程研究中心有限公司 High-temperature stable supported cobaltosic oxide catalyst with core-shell structure and preparation method and application thereof
CN112007648A (en) * 2020-07-29 2020-12-01 合肥皖科凌霄环境科技合伙企业(有限合伙) Catalyst for low-temperature catalytic degradation of straight-chain alkane and preparation method thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE2700236C3 (en) 1979-01-18
DE2700236B2 (en) 1978-05-03
DE2700236A1 (en) 1977-07-21
JPS5287106A (en) 1977-07-20
NL7700118A (en) 1977-07-12
IT1082502B (en) 1985-05-21
FR2337707A1 (en) 1977-08-05
NO770055L (en) 1977-07-12
GB1543001A (en) 1979-03-28
ES454902A1 (en) 1977-12-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1071846A (en) Catalytic oxidation of vinyl chloride
EP0033424B1 (en) Removal of sulfur and/or sulfur compound from industrial process streams using metal alumina spinel
US4059677A (en) Catalytic oxidation of C2 -C4 halogenated hydrocarbons
Windawi et al. Catalytic destruction of halogenated volatile organic compounds
KR100384349B1 (en) Catalytic oxidation catalyst and method for controlling voc, co and halogenated organic emissions
AU600076B2 (en) A process for regenerating a monofunctional large-pore zeolite catalyst having high selectivity for paraffin dehydrocyclization
CA1067883A (en) Ozonization catalyst and process
RU1836312C (en) Method of decreasing content of unsaturated impurities in saturated fluoro-halogen-carbons
CA1312324C (en) Process for regenerating sulfur contaminated reforming catalysts
CA1075881A (en) Catalytic oxidation of c2-c4 halogenated hydrocarbons
US4059675A (en) Decomposition of halogenated organic compounds
CA1066876A (en) Decomposition of halogenated organic compounds
JP3626196B2 (en) Chromium catalyst and catalytic oxidation method
US4421533A (en) Method of removing ozone and composition therefor
Lee et al. Fluorination of CF3CH2Cl over Cr–Mg fluoride catalyst: the effect of temperature on the catalyst deactivation
CA1070088A (en) Catalytic oxidation of c2-c4 halogenated hydrocarbons
KR100376899B1 (en) Process and Apparatus for Removing Metal Carbonyls and Moisture from a Gas
US4065543A (en) Catalytic oxidation of C2 -C4 halogenated hydrocarbons
JP4264856B2 (en) Method for removing halogen compounds contained in a gas or liquid using a composition based on at least one metal element
GB2054544A (en) Method for purifying boron trichloride
EP0625368A1 (en) Process for cleaning harmful gas
JPS6241488B2 (en)
KR20020047145A (en) Guard Bed Containing Lead Compounds Upstream of a Bed of Copper-Containing Catalyst to Prevent Its Contamination by Chlorine and Sulphur Contaminants
EP3334691B1 (en) Composition and process for removing chlorides from a gaseous stream
JPH0687943B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry