AU9118198A - Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade - Google Patents

Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU9118198A
AU9118198A AU91181/98A AU9118198A AU9118198A AU 9118198 A AU9118198 A AU 9118198A AU 91181/98 A AU91181/98 A AU 91181/98A AU 9118198 A AU9118198 A AU 9118198A AU 9118198 A AU9118198 A AU 9118198A
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
recited
density
level
neural blockade
blockade
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU91181/98A
Other versions
AU731669B2 (en
Inventor
Robert S. Greenberg
Wayne I. Sternberger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Johns Hopkins University
Original Assignee
Johns Hopkins University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/918,446 external-priority patent/US6002960A/en
Application filed by Johns Hopkins University filed Critical Johns Hopkins University
Publication of AU9118198A publication Critical patent/AU9118198A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU731669B2 publication Critical patent/AU731669B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1104Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb induced by stimuli or drugs
    • A61B5/1106Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb induced by stimuli or drugs to assess neuromuscular blockade, e.g. to estimate depth of anaesthesia
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/24Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
    • A61B5/316Modalities, i.e. specific diagnostic methods
    • A61B5/389Electromyography [EMG]
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B2562/00Details of sensors; Constructional details of sensor housings or probes; Accessories for sensors
    • A61B2562/18Shielding or protection of sensors from environmental influences, e.g. protection from mechanical damage
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/02Detecting, measuring or recording pulse, heart rate, blood pressure or blood flow; Combined pulse/heart-rate/blood pressure determination; Evaluating a cardiovascular condition not otherwise provided for, e.g. using combinations of techniques provided for in this group with electrocardiography or electroauscultation; Heart catheters for measuring blood pressure
    • A61B5/024Detecting, measuring or recording pulse rate or heart rate
    • A61B5/0245Detecting, measuring or recording pulse rate or heart rate by using sensing means generating electric signals, i.e. ECG signals
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/72Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/7203Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes for noise prevention, reduction or removal
    • A61B5/7207Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes for noise prevention, reduction or removal of noise induced by motion artifacts
    • A61B5/721Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes for noise prevention, reduction or removal of noise induced by motion artifacts using a separate sensor to detect motion or using motion information derived from signals other than the physiological signal to be measured
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/72Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/7203Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes for noise prevention, reduction or removal
    • A61B5/7217Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes for noise prevention, reduction or removal of noise originating from a therapeutic or surgical apparatus, e.g. from a pacemaker

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Anesthesiology (AREA)
  • Neurology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Dentistry (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Measuring And Recording Apparatus For Diagnosis (AREA)
  • Measuring Pulse, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure Or Blood Flow (AREA)
  • Measurement And Recording Of Electrical Phenomena And Electrical Characteristics Of The Living Body (AREA)

Description

WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 1 PASSIVE, NON-INVASIVE METHOD TO QUANTIFY OBJECTIVELY THE LEVEL AND DENSITY OF A NEURAL BLOCKADE CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION This application claims the benefit of prior filed copending U.S. provisional application serial no. 60/024,663, filed August 27, 1996. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The invention relates to the monitoring of the effectiveness of anesthetics in humans or animals and, more specifically, provides a method for passively, non-invasively and objectively quantifying the level and density of a neural blockade. Some qualitative and active response evaluations have been applied to the measurement of neural blockade; however, reliability, repeatability, and inter-patient correlation can be subject to large variation. Confounding difficulties exist when the patient cannot or will not respond to tests such as needle sticks, pinches, or cold stimuli to determine blockade effectiveness. Furthermore, an individual's perception of pain or cold cannot be correlated to a reference standard. There are limited reports on the effectiveness of using quantitative monitors as a measure of neural blockade while performing comparative studies of anesthetic agents. Studies have recognized the blockade of abdominal muscles using electromyography (EMG) during lumbar epidural analgesia. One such study required active participation from the subject. Others have examined the effect of different local anesthetics on motor blockade and EMG. Despite the above, it remains the case that there exists no method to quantify, passively and routinely, the anatomic level or density (completeness of block at a particular dermatomal level) of a neural blockade, e.g., local anesthetic WO99/09885 PCTIUS98/17529 2 epidural blockade, by non-invasive, objective, and automated means. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The invention solves the above-described problems by monitoring several physiological responses to neural blockade using a set of non-invasive monitors/sensors and related signal processing without active patient participation or response to quantify objectively the blockade's level and density. The invention is a method for passively, non-invasively, and objectively quantifying the level and density of a neural blockade in a patient, comprising the steps of: placing a non-invasive sensor for measuring a physiological response to the neural blockade at a site on the patient's body; and monitoring the changes in the physiological response to the neural blockade using the sensor without active participation or response by the patient to quantify the level and density of the neural blockade. The physiological responses that can be monitored and the methods for monitoring include muscle innervation using surface electromyography (EMG); skin temperature using a temperature sensing means; and heart rate using electrocardiography (EKG). It has been demonstrated that for muscle innervation the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor and a change in the signal amplitude of the surface EMG, wherein the density is inversely proportional to the signal amplitude. For skin temperature, the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor and a change in skin temperature, wherein the density of the neural blockade is directly proportional to skin temperature. Finally, for heart rate, the level and density of the neural blockade are quantified by a change in heart rate, wherein the WO99/09885 PCTIUS98/17529 3 density of the neural blockade is inversely proportional to heart rate. The method of the invention can be incorporated in an automated system to, for example, control drug delivery to a patient or advise the clinician about patient status including displaying the level and density of the neural blockade from onset to termination. The invention could also be used to monitor neural blockade in animals. The onset of neural blockade can be objectively monitored by placement of one or more sensors and quantifying a decrease in signal amplitude of a surface EMG; an increase in skin temperature; and changes in heart rate. Moreover, the blockade density determined by these objective means appears to compare favorably with the results of traditional subjective methods. Thus, the invention provides the anesthesiologist with positive information regarding the level and density of neural blockade in a non-invasive manner without requiring active patient participation or response. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Fig. 1, consisting of Figs. la and lb, illustrates, respectively, an example of a sensor array for collection of data for use in the method of the invention, and representative sites on the human body for placement of such sensor arrays and of other data collection devices. Fig. 2 shows a set of curves of the rms EMG signal amplitudes taken from seven patients who consented to be subjects in a study of the method of the invention. Fig. 3 shows average temperature data for the dermatomal levels for all seven study subjects. Fig. 4 shows the average heart rate for all seven study subjects. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The method of the invention uses non-invasive sensors placed at one or more sites on a patient's body to monitor primary and reference parameters, as follows: WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 4 Primary Muscle Innervation - spontaneous surface EMG Temperature - Peripheral - skin-mounted thermocouple Heart Rate (HR) and HR Variability - Lead-II electrocardiogram (EKG) Reference Ambient Temperature - in-air thermocouple Core Body Temperature - tympanic thermocouple A non-invasive sensor array that includes sensors for EMG, AMG (in the below-described study), and peripheral temperature (Fig. la) is placed at each monitor site; EKG and reference sensors are applied where and/or as appropriate (Fig. Ib). Splash-proof coverings can be used to protect each monitor site. To discriminate the cephalo-caudal spatial effect of the neural block it is preferable to use multiple monitor sites as shown in Fig. 1. In the clinical tests described below, three specific sites were identified for use: the fourth thoracic dermatome (nipple, T4) and tenth thoracic dermatome (umbilicus, T10) levels on the anterior axillary line and the anterior of the thigh, representing the second lumbar dermatome (L2). For muscle innervation the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor array and a change in the signal amplitude of the surface EMG, wherein the density is inversely proportional to the signal amplitude. For skin temperature, the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor array and a change in skin temperature, wherein the density of the neural blockade is directly proportional to skin temperature. Finally, for heart rate, the level and density of the neural blockade are quantified by a change in heart rate, wherein the density of the neural blockade is inversely proportional to heart rate. The invention was demonstrated in a study involving seven men (Table 1) who were all undergoing elective radical retropubic prostatectomy using lumbar epidural blockade.
WO 99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 5 Table 1 - Subject Demographics Age Weight ASA Epidural Time-to Subject (Years) (kg) Status Site Incision* Notes (min) 1 55 85.7 2 L4-5 N/A Combined GA and Regional due to history of apnea; epidural dosed after incision 2 42 83 2 L4-5 17.0 3 47 78 2 L2-3 17.7 4 63 104 2 L2-3 12.5 5 55 103 2 L3-4 15.0 6 65 110 2 L3-4 29.3 Converted to combined GA and Regional 7 60 88 2 L4-5 15.5 *Time from main epidural dose to start of incision Spontaneous surface electromyogram (EMG), acoustomyogram (AMG) and temperature (T) measurements were made along the anterior axillary line at T4, T10, and L2 dermatomal levels along with Lead-II electrocardiogram (EKG). Reference measurements included tympanic and ambient temperature, and ambient sound. As discussed below, time-series data were acquired before epidural dosing and at predefined intervals after dosing. A dedicated PC-based system provided system control and data storage. Based on the predicted temporal response to epidural dosing, data epochs were collected immediately prior to the main epidural dose (baseline) and at 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 minutes after dosing. The epochs were designed to have a minimum duration of 20 seconds. Temperature data records were time-continuous, starting immediately after the thermocouples were placed and ending approximately 2 minutes after the last EMG/AMG/EKG sampling epoch. Table 2 below summarizes the data acquisition conditions for the parameters of interest. SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 6 Table 2 - Data Acquisition Conditions for Monitored Parameters Parameter Passband(Hz) Sampling Rate No. of (sec -1) Channels AMG 0.5 - 100 1000 4 EKG 2 - 100 1000 1 EMG 10 - 500 2000 3 Temperature DC - 0.02 0.2 6 As discussed below, root-mean-square (rms) of EMG and AMG, average T, and average heart rate (R-R interval) were assessed for the levels as a function of time relative to epidural dosing. Changes in objectively monitored variables were compared to qualitative assessment (e.g., pinch test) of the block effectiveness. Both EMG and AMG are broadband signals that contain information in the time and frequency domains. What is needed is a single derived value that is descriptive of the instantaneous physiological condition of the patient. Typically, the power in the signal provides such an indication in the time domain. Power is proportional to the square of the amplitude of the signal. And, for a signal that has a non-constant (e.g., alternating current) component, it is necessary to average over a finite period of the signal in order to generate a meaningful value. EMG assessments have traditionally computed the average rectified EMG (AREMG) or the rectified integrated EMG (RIEMG), given by: AREMG = RIEMG = x I n The historical computation methods are clearly not power indicators, so the invention uses the root-mean-square (rms) estimator: nns = SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26) WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 7 (Note, other methods, e.g., spectral analysis, bi-spectral analysis, etc., may also be useful. The gradient of the signals may also provide useful information.) Regardless of the method used, selection of the integration interval (i.e., the value of n) is an important factor. The value of n is inversely proportional to the upper frequency response characterized by the computation. An integration interval was selected that retained as much of the passband information as is practical. EMG are integrated over 50 msec (n=100) and AMG signals are integrated over 250 msec (n=250). Many discrete rms computations are possible within 20 second sampling epochs. Running rms values are computed. The rms value at t = 0 includes the first n data points in a series. Subsequent rms values incrementally delete the earliest data point and add the next latest point of the series. The minimum value of the computed rms sequence is selected as representative of the muscle-only condition for any pre-defined sampling epoch. The time-series data from the study subjects demonstrated that EMG and AMG signals contained noise artifacts that correlated to the use of the electrocautery, suction, and other electronic systems. The slope and intercept of the frequency spectra of the data were used as acceptance criteria to validate that the rms data values were devoid of noise. The absolute value of EMG signals can be influenced by conditions such as skin conductance, skin temperature, electrode displacement, and site preparation. To mitigate discrepancies, the EMG data were normalized, which involved applying a gain factor that resulted in an expansion or compression of the histogram of the raw data sets. Based on a common time epoch for all study subjects, EMG data were normalized such that the basis histogram contained 50% of all data values between ±5 mV. Other epochs were scaled by the same gain factor calculated for the basis.
WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 8 It was apparent that AMG signal artifacts were correlated to motions directly induced by the surgeons or indirectly induced by movements near the patient. AMG data are compensated, on a sample-by-sample basis, for the presence of acoustically transmitted noise by subtraction of the ambient signal level. Changes in skin temperature are adversely influenced by changes in both body core temperature and ambient air temperature. To accommodate these conditions, the raw (tDLS i) dermatome temperature value is standardized (TDLSI) by the tympanic and ambient temperatures as in the following: TDL,S = tDL,Si - TnpnS Tmpank,o] - A ntS- Andet,0 where DL is the dermatome level and SI is the sampling interval. SI=0 correlates to the data epoch before the main epidural dose. Standardized temperature data were then parsed into 20-second segments that correlated with the EMG/AMG/EKG sampling epochs. The average of each of the normalized epochs was computed as a simple arithmetic mean of the data. Each study subject's average heart rate was determined from the lead-II EKG data sets. The average for the 20-second data intervals was computed as a simple arithmetic mean of the related R-to-R intervals. The occurrence of the leading edge of the R peak was determined by an automated algorithm. The data revealed three notable aspects of the EMG signals. First, EMG signal amplitude decreased at a rate inversely related to the number of dermatomal levels separating the monitor site and the epidural catheter. That is, the signals at the more cephalad dermatomal levels decreased later than the more caudal levels. Second, after a period of time (between 15 and 30 minutes), all EMG signal amplitudes assumed a generally constant and lower level than at initiation of the primary dose. Third, the constant level WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 9 at the L2 dermatomal level was approximately 30% lower than that of the T4 and T10 dermatomal levels, perhaps indicating that effective block was created at this discrete level simply by the test dose. Average temperature trends for the tympanic- and ambient compensated data all showed a gradual increase as a function of time; longer onset was noted at more rostral dermatomal levels. Heart rate increased by an average of 7.8 ± 9.2 bpm to 10 minutes following initiation of the primary dose, then decreased an average of 19.0 ± 10.8 bpm in the following 15 minutes. In sum, temporal changes in EMG, skin surface temperature, and heart rate were associated with adequate blockade and correlated to the clinical assessment of the level and density of the block. During block onset the rms EMG signal level decreased >15 mV, temperature increased >1 0 C, and EKG decreased >7 beats per minute (bpm). AMG showed primary correlation to external influences; response to the block was not evident in the presence of noise. Figure 2 shows a set of curves of the rms EMG signal amplitudes for all seven subjects. The data are fifth-order polynomial curves fit to the normalized signal amplitudes for the seven study subjects at each of three monitor levels. The plot also indicates the typical dermatomal level of blockage achieved, according to pinch tests administered by the attending anesthesiologist. Time is referenced to the administration of the main epidural dose (t=0) and the baseline data set is plotted at t=-l minute. The traces are normalized to the baseline by subtracting the respective baseline value from each successive data point. The time between the main dose and the surgical incision was 17±6 minutes. Lower amplitude limits of the L2 and T10 signals are reached sooner (t=15 minutes) than the T4 signal (t=30 minutes). This suggests that the L2 and T10 levels achieve onset before the T4 level, as expected.
WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 10 Figure 3 presents average temperature data for the dermatomal levels for all seven subjects. All levels exhibit the same upward trend as a function of time; they approach a relative increase of approximately 3.500 over the 90-minute data collection period. The changes in temperature reflect the effect of sympathectomy upon administration of local anesthetic. These changes also suggest differences in the contribution of blood volume changes and vascular relaxation at each dermatomal level. The average heart rate for all seven subjects is shown in Figure 4. These data conform to the previously reported effect of local anesthetic on the cardiac accelerator fibers in the T1-T4 spinal segments. The use of passive and non-invasive monitors to objectively distinguish the level and density of neural blockade as a function of time, and as related to the administration of local anesthetic, has been examined. The data from the EMG, temperature, and EKG monitors, combined with the clinical assessment provided by the anesthesiologist and the conditions of the operative procedure, confirm that an objective measure of block level and density can be performed in the clinical setting. A universal neural blockade monitor must be fully functional regardless of when it is applied, relative to the administration of the anesthetic agent. The rate of change, or gradient, of the absolute signals presents salient information. The most compelling indicator is the change in EMG signal level between the time of zero minutes and 10 minutes, as shown in Figure 2. Level L2 decreases approximately 1.5 times that of T10 and 2.5 times that of T4. Using the monitored parameters in combination rather than singly will enhance the utility of a universal monitor. The weighted summation of EMG and temperature will likely satisfy the basic requirement for a level-discriminating determination of block density.
WO99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 11 The method of the invention can be integrated into an automated system for controlling drug delivery to the patient or simply notifying the physician or nurse about patient status, e.g., during post-op recovery. The invention is also applicable to use with animal patients. The onset of neural blockade can be objectively monitored by placement of one or more sensors and quantifying a decrease in signal amplitude of a surface EMG; an increase in skin temperature; and changes in heart rate. Moreover, the blockade density determined by these objective means appears to compare favorably with the traditional subjective method of pinch-tests. The invention provides the anesthesiologist with a passive, objective tool for real-time, non-invasive monitoring of the level and density of neural blockade.

Claims (20)

1. A method for passively, non-invasively and objectively quantifying the level and density of a neural blockade in a patient, the method comprising the steps of: placing a non-invasive sensor for measuring a physiological response to the neural blockade at a site on the patient's body; and monitoring the changes in the physiological response to the neural blockade using the sensor without active participation or response by the patient to quantify the level and density of the neural blockade.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, the physiological response comprising muscle innervation.
3. The method as recited in claim 2, the monitoring step comprising the step of monitoring muscle innervation using surface electromyography (EMG).
4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor and a change in the signal amplitude of the surface EMG.
5. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the density of the neural blockade is inversely proportional to the signal amplitude of the surface EMG.
6. The method as recited in claim 4, wherein the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor and a change in the root-mean-square (rms) EMG signal power.
7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein the density of the neural blockade is inversely proportional to the rms EMG signal power.
8. The method as recited in claim 5, the physiological response further comprising skin temperature.
9. The method as recited in claim 8, the monitoring step further comprising the step of monitoring skin temperature using a means for sensing temperature. WO 99/09885 PCT/US98/17529 13
10. The method as recited in claim 9, wherein the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by, respectively, the placement of the sensor and a change in skin temperature.
11. The method as recited in claim 10, wherein the density of the neural blockade is directly proportional to skin temperature.
12. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein the skin temperature is standardized by the tympanic and ambient temperatures.
13. The method as recited in claims 5 or 11, the monitoring step further comprising the step of monitoring heart rate using electrocardiography (EKG).
14. The method as recited in claim 13, wherein the level and density of the neural blockade is quantified by a change in heart rate.
15. The method as recited in claim 14, wherein the density of the neural blockade is inversely proportional to heart rate.
16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the heart rate is averaged over the R-R intervals.
17. The method as recited in claim 15, further comprising the step of automatically controlling the delivery of an anesthetic to the patient using the quantified level and density of the neural blockade.
18. The method as recited in claim 15, further comprising the step of displaying the level and density of the neural blockade.
19. The method as recited in claim 18, further comprising the step of providing automatic notification of the level and density of the neural blockade.
20. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein the neural blockade is a local anesthetic epidural blockade.
AU91181/98A 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade Ceased AU731669B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/918446 1997-08-26
US08/918,446 US6002960A (en) 1996-08-27 1997-08-26 Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade
PCT/US1998/017529 WO1999009885A1 (en) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU9118198A true AU9118198A (en) 1999-03-16
AU731669B2 AU731669B2 (en) 2001-04-05

Family

ID=25440400

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU91181/98A Ceased AU731669B2 (en) 1997-08-26 1998-08-25 Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1009279A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2001513386A (en)
AU (1) AU731669B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2298828C (en)
WO (1) WO1999009885A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5221086B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2013-06-26 フクダ電子株式会社 Biological information monitor and biological information monitor control program
DE102009003897A1 (en) * 2009-01-03 2010-07-15 Andreas Dr. Penno Apparatus and method for monitoring the success of spinal anesthesia
KR101232492B1 (en) * 2011-02-10 2013-02-12 성균관대학교산학협력단 Anaesthsia depth and facial nerve monitoring apparatus using emg signal and method thereof
KR101658680B1 (en) * 2011-02-23 2016-09-21 사회복지법인 삼성생명공익재단 Apparatus and method for monitoring facial nerve
CN113729644A (en) * 2021-09-06 2021-12-03 中山大学 Method for detecting regional nerve block anesthesia effect by using temperature sensing array

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4570640A (en) * 1981-08-06 1986-02-18 Barsa John E Sensory monitoring apparatus and method
US5131401A (en) * 1990-09-10 1992-07-21 Axon Medical Inc. Method and apparatus for monitoring neuromuscular blockage
US5195531A (en) * 1991-03-01 1993-03-23 Bennett Henry L Anesthesia adequacy monitor and method
US5320109A (en) * 1991-10-25 1994-06-14 Aspect Medical Systems, Inc. Cerebral biopotential analysis system and method
US5772591A (en) * 1995-06-06 1998-06-30 Patient Comfort, Inc. Electrode assembly for signaling a monitor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1009279A1 (en) 2000-06-21
CA2298828C (en) 2003-11-18
JP2001513386A (en) 2001-09-04
EP1009279A4 (en) 2004-05-12
WO1999009885A1 (en) 1999-03-04
CA2298828A1 (en) 1999-03-04
AU731669B2 (en) 2001-04-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP4399712B2 (en) Evaluation system and method for arousal level, pain sensitivity and stress level during anesthesia and sedation
EP1618840B1 (en) Monitoring subcortical responsiveness of a patient
EP2575608B1 (en) Detector for identifying physiological artifacts from physiological signals and method
US6091973A (en) Monitoring the occurrence of apneic and hypopneic arousals
US6571124B1 (en) Apparatus and method for monitoring skin conductance and method for controlling a warning signal
US5269302A (en) Electroconvulsive therapy apparatus and method for monitoring patient seizures
US20050148895A1 (en) Method and apparatus for ECG derived sleep monitoring of a user
US20080051669A1 (en) Diagnosis of sleep apnea
US6002960A (en) Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade
EP1757226A2 (en) Measurement of responsiveness of a patient under anaesthesia
US20100331711A1 (en) Method and device for deriving and evaluating cardiovascular information from curves of the cardiac current, in particular for applications in telemedicine
US20130204155A1 (en) Anesthesia Monitoring Systems and Methods of Monitoring Anesthesia
HU215658B (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring depth of anesthesia
JPH08501713A (en) How to measure the effects of joints and related muscles
US8219187B2 (en) Method and apparatus for providing improved assessment of a physiological condition of a patient
US7509161B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining the cerebral state of a patient using generalized spectral entropy of the EEG signal
CN216535266U (en) Be arranged in backbone operation patient's nerve electrophysiology monitoring system
US11980461B2 (en) Method and system for monitoring depth of muscle relaxation of a patient
US20030097075A1 (en) Automated and remote controlled method and system for assessing function of autonomic nervous system
EP0512577A2 (en) Electroconvulsive therapy apparatus and method for monitoring patient seizures
AU731669B2 (en) Passive, non-invasive method to quantify objectively the level and density of a neural blockade
CN115633969B (en) Anesthesia pain nociception assessment method based on electroencephalogram signals and pulse signals
Kikta et al. Comparing methods of ECG respiration signals derivation based on measuring the amplitude of QRS complexes
AU743765B2 (en) Monitoring the occurence of apneic and hypopneic arousals
Foo et al. Relations between physiologic parameters and pulse transit time during loaded breathing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)