AU600566B2 - Transparent soap bar - Google Patents

Description

i~l~~s.~ep9

'V

AUSTRALIA

PATENTS ACT 1952 6 o5 6 6 Form COMPLETE SPECIFICATION

(ORIGINAL)

FOR OFFICE USE Short Title: Int. Cl: Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification-Lodged: Accepted: Lapsed: Published: Priority: Related Art:

C.

St C C C t C 1 TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: UNILEVER PLC UNILEVER HOUSE

BLACKFRIARS

LONDON EC4

ENGLAND

V Ir I II C e. C t cC C CC

CC

Actual Inventor: Address for Service: CLEMENT HACK CO., 601 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.

Complete Specification for the invention entitled: TRANSPARENT SOAP BAR.

The following statement is a full description of this invention including the best method of performing it known to me:c C c C C C C CC C C C C CC 0' A- C. 6030 TRANSPARENT SOAP BAR .o BACKGROU' OF THE INVENTION i. Field of the Invention The invention relates to a transparent soap bar of exceptional clarity.

2. The Prior Art Toilet soap is a mixture of long chain fatty acid salts and solvent, normally water, which together form three phases: solid crystal, liquid crystal and solution.

Opacity as found with most soap bars results from the scattering of light at the interfaces between the several phase domains. In particular, the presence of many small solid crystals within the amorphous continuum of a toilet bar causes incident light to pass through many interfaces.

Since the several phases have different refractive indices, light will be scattered rather than pass through .the bar. It should be noted that the solid crystals are by nature anisotropic. They have a refractive index that is dependent upon orientation. Consequently, the 2 C.6030 refractive index of the liquid phases cannot be simultaneously matched to the refractive indices of all orientations of the solid crystals.

One approach to improve the transparency of toilet soap is to reduce the size of the solid crystals.

Reduction minimizes or even eliminates light scattering due to these crystals. For instance, U.S. Patent 4,517,107 (Clarke et al.) reports a soap-containing formulation becoming transparent through shear working between two mutually displaceable surfaces in an apparatus known as a cavity transfer mixer.

Solid crystals have also been avoided by 15 crystallizing the soap mixture from a solution containing an evaporatable solvent such as ethanol. The procedure 1 results in limiting the size of any solid crystals that might form. Illustrative is U.S. Patent 4,504,433 (Inui et al.) wherein tallow/palm oil was saponified with aqueous sodium hydroxide in the presence of 20% ethanol.

To the combination was added white sugar, polyethylene .o glycol and glycerine which resultant composition was poured into casts for cooling and drying. The presence of sugar served to match the refractive indices of the 25 several phases and to produce a transparent bar.

Another approach is that described by U.S. Patent 3,926,828 (O'Neill et al.) which indicates that saturated S free fatty acids of branched chain structure provide the 30 key to obtaining soap bars that retain transparency and initial glossy appearance after repeated usage. The O'Neill composition is typical of bars containing free Si triethanolamine.

ff 35 U.S. Patent 2,820,768 (Fromont) is the classic transparent soap bar disclosure first coining the term I 3 C.6030 "neutrogenous" indicating the presence of a substantial quantity acid neutralizing material, i.e. triethanolamine.

The resultant bars contain a mixture of 35-40% each of sodium and triethanolammonium soaps including substantial amounts of free triethanolamine. Starting fats and oils are reported to preferably contain 30% castor oil for improving transparency and ricinoleates, derived from saponified castor oil, as aids for dissolving higher fatty acid salts. The ricinoleates are said to inhibit crystallization of the higher fatty acid salts inside the final soap on cooling. It should be noted that ricinoleates and castor oil are expensive components desirably absent from soap products for cost reasons.

a 9.

15 U.S. Patent 4,206,069 (Borrello) notes the cost ,....problems and further indicates stickiness difficulties with prior art transparent bars. Under high humidity, it was recognized that known transparent bars are substantially hygroscopic whereupon transparency becomes lost. The patent suggests incorporating 10 to 65% of certain synthetic detergent components to harden the bar, reduce cost and improve transparency. Mixtures of sodium and triethanolammonium soaps are combined with the S'synthetic detergent. Included therein must be 10 to of a non-volatile solvent such as an alkylene glycol or .I triethanolamine.

f 1 4a a^ 1 B 1 1 1 a a.

An approach combining the "neutrogenous" idea with physical shearing is found in U.S. Patents 4,474,683 and 30 U.S. 4,397,760 both to Story et al.. Therein, a fatty acid. mixture including glycerine and triethanolamine is combined with a caustic soda mixture in an intensive countercurrent mixing process providing vigorous shear.

The resultant soap was said to be slightly filmy but became virtually crystal clear when wet. The bar was said to contain a mixture of sodium and triethanolamine (TEA)

LI

T 7 3 .~~a~*laRlxmrraa~ 5r*a la; 4 C.6030 soaps in an amount of 30.5 and 25.9%, respectively; there was also stated to be 22.1% free TEA and 6.3% water present.

Many of the prior art bars, especially those produced by the "neuitrogenous" triethanolamine type processes, have substantial color problems. Although transparent, most of the known materials survive processing in the form of a dark brown color. U.S. Patent 4,468,338 (Lindberg) notes such difficulty with respect to mixed sodium and triethanolammonium fatty acid soaps. Additives such as combinations of citrate and alkali metal metabisulfite must be incorporated therein to control darkening and loss of transparency.

It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a transparent soap bar of substantially improved clarity, such clarity being maintained during use of the bar.

I 1r 414 Icrr C CC

C

4 I rCCC 3 I C P C30 ,1: :~Sp i: n i It is another object of the present invention to provide a soap bar not requiring expensive fats and oils such as castor oil and ricinoleates to obtain adequate clarity.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a transparent soap bar substantially less colored than that described by the prior art.

Finally, it is an object of the present invention to provide a transparent soap bar of improved hardness which avoids the stickiness associated with previously known bars.

Other objects and advantages will be discussed in the further description of the present invention.

f: i I:I1I i. IILI~"IIII~_I 5 SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION C.6030 A transparent bar is provided comprising: a mixture of alkanolammonium and alkali metal C12-C22 atom fatty acid salts, the mole ratio of alkanolammonium to alkali metal fatty acid salt ranging from about 0.1 to less that (ii) a liquid solvent system including an amount of water and free alkanolamine in a weight ratio ranging from greater than 0.25 to less than 1.0; and ii :1 4 @Qor 4 15 4 4 o~ 44 44 4I wherein the weight ratio of total fatty acid salt to solvent ranges from greater than 0.02 to less than DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention is a composition for a I. t transparent bar that predominantly, and preferably exclusively, contains one isotropic phase. The bar comprises a mixture of alkanolammonium and alkali metal soaps in a solvent primarily comprising free alkanolamine E t and water. These components have, as noted above, been S 25 known as elements of transparent soap bars. It has,

C

t Ce however, now been found that there are three critical ratios lying within a narrow range of values which permits c substantial improvement of product clarity and color.

S Additionally, the bars of this invention do not require 4- 30 nor desirably contain special branched chain fatty acids, castor oil, ricinoleates, or other additives to achieve a transparent bar. The critical ratios found by this invention are as follows: The weight ratio of total fatty acid salt to solvent must range from greater than 0.02 to less than

-V

I-

K

101- -pp ~7il 6 C.6030 preferably between 0.25 and 0.75, optimally between and 0.6. The ratio must be sufficiently low to prevent formation of solid crystals. However, the ratio must also be high enough to permit formation of a rigid bar at ambient temperature.

The weight ratio of water to free alkanolamine should be from greater than 0.25 to less than 1.0, preferably from 0.35 to 0,6, optimally from 0.4 to 0.5. These values reflect sufficient amounts of these components to have the solvent dielectric constant high enough to prevent the soaps from becoming insoluble in the solvent system.

Growth of solid crystals is thereby avoided. However, the ratio of water to alkanolamine must also be low enough so that the solvent dielectric constant is sufficiently low to prevent the large alkanolammonium counter-ion from dissociating. This counterion greatly increases the head size of the soap molecules. As a result, isotropic cubic liquid crystals form consisting of packed sphere-like 20 micelles, rather than the anisotropic lamellar or hexagonal liquid crystal phases.

I

*1

I

j- It C C I C t

C

t VE c For purposes of this invention, "free" alkanolamine tt ft refers to any molar excess alkanolamine beyond that which is required for neutralization of any acid present in the bar composition. Alkanolamine and alkanolammonium terms used throughout this disclosure are intended to include C-C mono-, di- and tri-alkanolamine and ammonium FC C C 1- 3 species. For example, mono, di- and/or tri-ethanolamine S* 30 and ammonium ions are suitable for the present invention.

Particularly preferred, however, is triethanolamine and triethanolammonium cation.

The mole ratio of alkanolammonium to alkali metal soap should range from about 0.1 to less than preferably between 0.5 and 0.9, optimally between 0.6 and 6 i

V

ii i 7 C.6030 0.7. This range insures that cubic liquid crystal forms.

With a ratio that is too low, the small head size of the soap anions will permit anisotropic liquid crystals to form. However, if the ratio is too large, steric hinderance will impede micellar formation. This reduces soap solubility and gives rise to solid crystals.

The optimum values for the three ratios are interdependent. For example, it is possible to compensate for a higher ratio of soap to solvent by increasing the ratio of water to alkanolamine, provided that this does not raise the dielectric constant of the solvent to the point where there is sufficient dissociation of the trialkanolammonium counterion. If this occurs, an 15 anisotropic liquid crystal phase would arise.

i Additionally, the desired values for these ratios will depend upon the particular chain length distribution and degree of unsaturation of the soaps present. For example, decreasing the average chain length or increasing the degree of unsaturation will increase the solubility of the soaps. A higher ratio of soap to solvent is thereby permitted. However, this also increases the tendency of the alkanolammonium counterion to dissociate, which then requires a lower ratio of water to alkanolamine in the solvent. Adjusting the ratios in accord with the ranges outlined above permits a composition containing virtually no unsaturated soaps. It has been suggested that unsaturated soaps give transparent bars having a 30 characteristic yellow color.

Minor amounts of organic materials such as saccharides or antioxidants may be added to the solvent system without the loss of transparency, provided that the dielectric constant of the solvent mixture is not radically changed. These additives should not cause i) -7, pi r_ I 1 4 I 8 C.6030 crystallization of solid soap crystals or dissociation of the alkanolammonium cation. Moreover, the concentration of any such materials should not reduce the level of free alkanolamine to below 10% of the total composition.

Care should also be taken to avoid the addition of electrolytes to the solvent system. Electrolytes serve both to reduce solubility of the soaps and increase the tendency to form anisotropic liquid crystals.

Each of the foregoing ratios have been explained in terms of physical phenomena. It is to be noted, however, that these are merely theories and the discoveries of the present invention are not so bound.

t e C 't I C 'r i C p C( A liquid solvent system is an essential component of the present invention. For purposes of definition, the solvent system must comprise components liquid at room temperature. Water and free alkanolamine will always be components of the solvent. However, additional water-miscible organic liquid materials when incorporated in the formulation must also be considered in calculating the amount of solvent present. Thus, under the heading of solvent must be considered monohydric and polyhydric alcohols such as ethanol, alkylene glycols, glycerine and the like; alkyl and aryl ethers such as diethyl ether, phenylethyl ether and the like; alkyl and aryl esters such as diethyl phthalate, ethyl acetate, isopropyl palmitate, diethyl succinate, and the like; alkyl and aryl ketones such as methylethyl ketone, acetone and the like; and mixtures thereof.

The composition described herein is prepared by heating and mixing the components until they dissolve.

Thereafter, the composition is allowed to cool and solidify. The mixture should be quiescent during this 9 C.6030 solidification. Nevertheless, the mixture may be poured into individual molds before cooling and solidification, if desired. It may be particularly desirable for these molds to be transparent.

High shear processing is neither necessary for the solidified material to become transparent nor desirable once solidification has begun as it causes a loss of rigidity in the material. It should also be appreciated that this composition does not require drying or maturation time to achieve optimal clarity.

The term "transparent" as used in this specification is intended to connote its usual dictionary definition.

15 Thus, a transparent soap, like glass, allows ready viewing of objects behind it. By contrast, a translucent soap although allowing light to pass through, causes the light to be so scattered, as by a very small proportion of S, crystals or insolubles, that it will be impossible to clearly identify objects behind the translucent soap.

Within the context of this invention, a soap bar is deemed to be transparent if the maximum transmittance of light of any wavelength in the range of 200 to 800 nm through a sample 10 cm thick is at least A bar is deemed translucent if the maximum transmittance of such light through the sample is between 0.01% and 1%.

Finally, a bar is deemed opaque if the maximum r transmittance of such light is below 0.01%. This S[ 30 transmittance can be easily measured by placing a solid 0 a S Lsoap sample of the required thickness in the light beam Ipath of UV-VIS Spectrophotometer such as the Hewlett-Packard 8451A Diode Array Spectrophotometer. The advantage of this method of assessing transparency over 35 previously published methods is that it is highly sensitive to optical clarity while independent of color.

'I

10 C.6030 The term "soap" is used herein in its popular sense, the alkali metal or alkanolammonium salt of aliphatic alkane- or alkene monocarboxylic acids. The term alkanolammonium refers to one, two or three C1-C 4 hydroxyalkyl groups substituted onto a nitrogen cation, triethanolammonium cation being the species of choice.

Suitable alkali metal cations are those or potassium and sodium, the latter being much preferred.

Soaps useful herein are the well known salts of natural or synthetic aliphatic (alkanoic or alkenoic) acids having about 12 to 22 carbon atoms, preferably about 12 to 18 carbon atoms. Soaps having the fatty acid distribution of coconut oil may provide the lower end of o o o 15 the broad molecular weight range. Those soaps having the fatty acid distribution of peanut or rapeseed oil, or their hydrogenated derivatives, may provide the upper end 6446 of the broad molecular weight range.

It is preferred to use soaps having the fatty acid distribution of coconut oil or tallow, or mixtures thereof, since these are among the more readily available fats. The proportion of fatty acids having at least 12 1carbon atoms in coconut oil soap is about 85%. This proportion will be greater when mixtures of coconut oil A t' and fats such as tallow, palm oil, or non-tropical nut oils or fats are used, wherein the principle chain lengths are C 1 6 and higher.

Coconut oil employed for the soap may be substituted in whole or part by other "high-lauric" oils, that is, oils or fats wherein at least 50% of the total fatty acids are composed of lauric or myristic acids and mixtures thereof. These oils are generally exemplified by the 35 tropical nut oils of the coconut oil class. For instance, they include: palm kernel oil, babassu oil, ouricuri oil, t^ I I 11 C.6030 tucum oil, cohune nut oil, murmuru oil, jaboty kernel oil, khakan kernel oil, dika nut oil, and ucuhuba butter.

A preferred alkali metal soap is a mixture of about 15% to about 20% coconut oil and about 80% to about tallow. These mixtures contain about 95% fatty acids having about 12 to about 18 carbon atoms. The soap may be prepared from coconut oil, in which case the fatty acid content is about 85% of C1-C8 chain length.

The soaps may contain unsaturation in accordance with commercially acceptable standards. Excessive unsaturation is normally avoided.

Small amounts of sulfite salts may also be desirably present. These salts may be selected from the group consisting of bisulfite, hydrosulfite, metabisulfite, sulfite and mixtures thereof. Suitable salt counter-ions include alkali metal, alkaline earth metal, ammonium, alkyl or hydroxyalkyl ammonium cations and mixtures thereof. When present, the salts can constitute from about 0.03 to less than 3.0 preferably from 0.03 to less than optimally from 0.03 to 0.06%. The transparent toilet bars of this invention, as previously stated, have the potential for exceptionally low color provided suitable color reducing agents are present. In known transparent bars, color reducing agents are not as effective as with the present compositions.

S. 30 Adjunct materials including germicides, perfumes, and colorants may also be present. For cost and performance reasons it is, however, undesirable to include castor oil, ricinoleates, branched chain saturated fatty acids and amounts of soap greater than 50% of the total bar.

I

i i^ i%-_ii i-i yC PIPI~_IITPi~L~IY Wl~iy 12 C.6030 The following examples will more fully illustrate the embodiments of this invention. All parts, percentages and proportions referred to herein and in the appended claims are by weight of the total composition unless otherwise stated.

t t tI I t r t ft t I C Q C c t tT C I C t tC

SCC

CC(

tf C C

ECC

C C E C If 7. ji r i'* l

I-

I

-13 C.6030 EXAMPLE 1 Illustrative of the transparent compositions of the present invention are those listed in Tables I-A through I-E. These formulations were all prepared in the same manner as here outlined. Fatty acid, sod-.um metabisulfite, sodium borohydride and butyl hydroxyanisole (where present) and a small portion of the water were dissolved in triethanolamine. The mixture was then heated to approximately 80 0 C for 10 minutes. Solvents, including the balance of the water, propylene glycol, Polyol A-625, and ethanol (where present), glycerine, and the sodium soap were than added. A condenser was used to avoid loss Sof volatiles. Subsequent to combining the components, the r' 15 mixture was stirred at 80 0 C until all components were dissolved. Perfume, if present, was added last. This mixture was then poured into molds and allowed to cool.

The resulting soap bars were firm and clear.

I r.

St I

IS

-z

V

0 5 S S 0 5 *0 wo 0 0 0 a 4 e S 0*0 vao TABLE I-A COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN WEIGHT RATIO OF TOTAL SOAP TO SOLVENT Experiment 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 12 13

TEA

62.6 58.2 56.2 51.1 48.8 45.4 45.0 46.5 49.6 48.6 41.5 40.0 38.7 E-132 Fatty Acid 0.6 1.7 3.2 7.0 9.2 5.8 11.6 11.9 6.4 12.5 14.1 15. 2 16.2 E- 625 Fatty Acid 4.3 4.7 Glycerine 8.3 12.2 11.6 10.1 8.3 8.3 4.3 7.3 6.9 6.5 Propylene Glycol 8.4 Added Water 27.3 24. 8 23.2 19.3 17.3 14 .9 14.7 15.3 16.3 16.0 14.0 13.0 12.1 SoapR 1. 1 3.0 5.7 12.4 16.3 20. 7 20.4 21.1 22.6 22.0 23.1 24. 9 26.4 T Moist. NaHSO3 NaBH4 12.0 12.0 12.0 12. 0 12.0 12.0 11.8 11.8 12.0 11.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 0. 05 0.06 0. 05 0.05 0. 05 0.04 0.04 0.0 4 0. 04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0. 03 .0017 .0019 .0018 .0016 .0017 .0013 .0013 .0013 .0014 .0014 .0011 .0011 .0010 Perf ume 0. 4 0.9 0.4 0.9

I

o r I, e~

N

~e TABLE I-B COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN WEIGHT RATIO OF WATER TO FREE TEA Experimnent TEA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 44. 8 44.7 44.7 44.6 44.6 45.3 42.8 44.6 44.6 36. 9 34.3 29. 1 E-132 Fatty Acid 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.4 11.4 8.7 11.0 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 E- 625 Fatty Acid Glycerinle Polyol Propylene Glycol 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 2.1 8.4 8.0 4.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 14.7 7.4 5.0 8.3 Added Water 0 7.4 9.8 14. 6 14.6 14. 8 19.5 18. 7 24.4 23.9 25.6 31.6 Soap 20.2 20.2 20.2 20. 2 20.2 20. 6 17.9 20. 2 18.7 18.7 20. 3 18.7 T Moist. NaHSO3 NaBH4 Perfume BHA 12.0 12.0 11.8 11.8 11.8 12.0 4.6 11.8 4.6 4.6 12.0 4.6 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.04 .0013 .0013 .0013 .0012 .0013 .0013 .0013 .0017 .0013 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.2

I

ftA Cn An A .4 .4 V. A V~ A A A .4 A A A 44V ~4 V.A A .4±4 C. A A .4 A Ann ±4 .4 *4 A .4 TABLE I-C COMPOS ITIONS VARYING IN MOLAR RATIO OF TEA SOAP TO SODIUM SOAP Experintent TEA E-132 Fatty Acid G lycerine 26 27 28 29 31 32 33 34 36 37 39.0 39. 1 40.9 44.2 44.5 45. 6 46.1 46.1 46.5 47.8 45.7 49. 2 0 3.0 6.2 9.4 11. 4 12.0 12.6 13.0 13.6 14.4 15.0 22.5 8.3 9.8 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.2 8.1 11.7 Added Ethanol Water 12.3 12.0 2.6 13.3 14.3 14.7 14.8 14.4 15.2 15.2 15.2 2.6 15.0 16.5 Per- Soap T Moist. NaHS03 NaBH4 fume BHA 40.3 36. 1 28.5 23.7 20. 2 19. 2 18.4 17.3 16.3 14.3 13.2 12.0 12.0 11.8 12. 0 11.2 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 2. 0 12.0 11.8 12.0 0 .05 0.05 0 20 0.05 0.04 0.05 0 .05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0. 25 0.04 .0017 .0015 .0017 .0013 .0017 .0017 .0017 .0017 .0016 .0012 0.8 0.2 0.2

I

41 a 0 0 a a a C 0a S Ca a a as a a a a a a baa a a S S a a a C as. OaO TABLE I-D COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN ALL THREE RATIOS WITHIN THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE Experiment TEA 38 39 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 49 40.8 41.1 44.6 45.8 30.9 46.6 44.7 44.6 48.3 48.7 40.0 43.1 34.5 E-132 Fatty Acid 11. 1 10 .5 11.4 11.8 6.4 11.9 11.5 11.4 12.4 12.5 12.4 12.9 13.5 E-625 Fatty Acid 7.4 7.6 20.6 8.6 8.3 8.9 7.8 9.8 Prcpylene Glycol Ethanol Glycerine Polyol 7.4 8.3 8.3 2.1

A

V

A-

a a a a a Ca a a a a a a -a a a a 400 sac TABLE I-D (Cont'd) COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN ALL THREE RATIOS WITHIN THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE Experiment 51 52 53 54 56 57 58 59

TEA

42.6 36.4 37.1 35.5 33.7 32.9 32.7 35.4 32.9 33. 7 E-132 Fatty Acid 14.2 8.8 8.1 8.1 8.8 E-625 F atty Acid 8.6 8.8 8.4 8.4 8.1 Glycerine Polyol Propylene Glycol Ethanol 11.5 8.5 6.2 6.1 6.1 6.4 6.1 6.2

I

i tz~ I I' II 3 l~i~iLIICL! n 1 o n ?-,rr In r r r 14 ii nn TABLE I-D (CONT'D) COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN ALL THREE RATIOS WITHIN THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE Experiment 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Added Water 24.3 22.7 14.7 15.0 9.9 11.8 7.4 14.6 8.6 16.1 17.5 15.0 19.1 18.1 8.2 Soap 16.3 17.2 20.1 18.9 29.6 21.0 20.2 20.2 21.8 21.9 20.2 21.1 22.1 25.1 33.6 T Moist. NaHSO3 NaBH4 Perfume BHA 1 1 2 3 1 4 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 12.0 4.6 11.2 4.5 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 11.8 11.8 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.21 0.04 0.20 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03 .0015 .0012 .0013 .0013 .0013 .0013 .0014 .0014 .0014 .0012 .0015 .0016 0.8 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.9 0.9 A j TABLE I-D (CONT'D) COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN ALL THREE RATIOS WITHIN THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE Experiment 53 54 56 57 58 59 Added Water 8.3 10.6 12.1 12.1 12.1 10.6 12.1 12.1 Soap 34.4 35.0 36.7 38.7 38.6 37.2 38.7 36.7 Moist.

11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 11.8 NaHSO3 0.20 0.20 0.20 NaBH4 Perfume BHA 0.2 0.2 0.2

I.

I 7 ft ft ft .,m 0 9 9 ft. 9 0 Oft 0 C C Jo 4 S 9 90 0 9) 9 C 90 i S S S 9 CC.) 9 ft S C J 8 0 049 S 905 nO 0$) TABLE I-E COMPOSITIONS VARYING IN ALL THREE RATIOS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE Experiment TEA E-132 Fatty Acid E-625 Fatty Acid Glycerine Eth- Polyol anol Added WterT Moist. NaHSO3 NaBH4 BHA 61 62 63 64 66 67 68 69 47.7 48.5 52.3 44.8 50.1 7.5 32.6 33.1 33.1 11.6 11.5 11.5 11.5 1 I1L. ~1 3.5 12.3 5.2 12.1 .0.4 12.1 8.3 9.3 .0.0 Z7. 5 8.4 6.4 .3.8 10.0 .3.8 12.9 13.7 13.7 14.7 0 6.8 27.5 17.5 2.0 10.6 2.9 7.0 10.0 2.9 7.0 12.0 9.0 20.2L 20.9 10.0 40. 0 33.3 33.3 7.5 7.5 12.0 11.8 4.3 11.8 11.8 11. 8 11.8 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.2 0.04 .0013 .0013 .0013 .0014 0.2

J

22 C.6030 Several items listed in Tables I-A through I-E require further explanation. Fatty acid E-132 represents a lily stearic acid which is a mixture containing palmitic and 45% stearic acids, obtainable commercially from the Emery Chemical Co. under the trademark Emersol 132. Likewise, E-625 is a partially hardened coconut fatty acid having 49% lauric and 19% myristic acid available as Emery 625 from the Emery Chemical Co. Soap, I in all the experiments, refers to opaque toilet soap, a mixture of sodium tallowate and sodium cocoate, where the ratio of tallowate to cocoate is specifically indicated by e •the term Thus, the tallow:coconut ratio indicated by the numerals 1, 2, 3 and 4 are 82/18, 64/36, 40/60 and 0/100, respectively. Moisture refers to the water in y r 15 the opaque toilet soap. Polyol refers to a hydrogenated starch hydrosylate containing 70% solids and 30% water, j obtainable commercially from the Imperial Chemical Industries of America under the trademark Polyol A-625.

j BHA is butylhydroxyanisole, an antioxidant.

r c

V

4 I' c

T

23 C.6030 EXAMPLE 2 This Example illustrates the improved performance obtainable by adherence to the aforedescribed critical ratios of soap to solvent, water to free triethanolamine, and triethanolammonium to sodium soaps.

TABLE II-A VARIATIONS IN WEIGHT RATIO OF TOTAL SOAP TO SOLVENT 0* to, V Vt C t C CC Ct C Experiment t ~~gi? L

J

.I

i a i i ij 9 i Weight Soap/ Solvent 0.02 0.06 011 0.28 0.40 0.53 0.56 0.59 0.61 0.63 0.78 0.90 1.01 Weight Water/TEA 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.45 0.45 0.45 Molar TEA Soap/ Na Soap 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.66 0.68 0.67 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.68 0.68 Hard ness 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clarity 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 9. 9 c c c C "i V I 24 C.6030 TABLE II-B VARIATIONS IN WEIGHT RATIO OF WATER TO FREE TEA crrr r c Ct t V r re Experiment 14 16 17 18 19 21 22 23 24 Weight Soap/ Solvent 0.56 0.56 0.59 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.52 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 Weight Water/TEA 0.06 0.25 0.36 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.55 0.55 0.66 0.81 1.00 1.42 Molar TEA Soap/ Na Soap 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Hard ness 1 1 Clarity 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 rr c r c i r g.

i i ii V 7 9~99 25 C.6030 TABLE II-C VARIATIONS IN MOLAR RATIO OF TEA SOAP TO SODIUM SOAP *s C C S a CC

.CC.C*

It I I I It c I It I I I Cr I

II

Experiment 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 Weight Soap/ Solvent 0.55 0.57 0.54 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.56 0.55 0.55 0.54 0.54 0.53 Weight Water/TEA 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.44 0.42 0.44 0.45 Molar TEA Soap/ Na Soap 0.00 0.10 0.26 0.48 0.64 0.75 0.81 0.90 1.00 1.20 1.35 Hard ness 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 Clarity 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 ccc Ic Ce C L i

C,

-r r rse a 26 C.6030 TABLE II-D VARIATIONS IN ALL THREE RATIOS WITHIN THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE o a o a.

15 *I 20 *4 4 I 44 I 4 4 I 4 4* t t Experiment 38 39 41 42 43 44 46 47 48 49 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 Weight Soap/ Solvent 0.46 0.49 0.55 0.57 0.57 0.59 0.61 0.61 0.62 0.63 0.63 0.67 0.72 0.79 0.80 0.83 0.83 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.90 0493 0.94 Weight Water/TEA 0.76 0.66 0.44 0.40 0.49 0.36 0.31 0.51 0.27 0.44 0.55 0.44 0.74 0.61 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.57 0.59 0.59 0.51 0.62 0.63 Molar TEA Soap/ Na Soap 0.81 0.67 0.64 0.61 0.26 0.54 0.68 0.67 0.54 0.64 0.67 0.68 0.67 0.67 0.40 0.32 0.38 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.35 0.33 0.29 Hard ness 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Clarity 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t 4 C

I

I.

II~ nm 27 C.6030 TABLE II-E VARIATIONS IN ALL THREE RATIOS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS IDENTIFIED ABOVE Experiment Weight Soap/ Solvent 0.54 0.54 0.55 0.67 0.63 0.48 1.00 1.13 1,35 Weight Water/TEA 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.18 0.21 00 0.56 0.47 0.61 Molar TEA Soap/ Na Soap 1,23 1.87 0.68 0.58 1.57 0.33 0.52 0.52 Hard ness Clarity C C t ft C

CC

t C C C Jj-- i With regard to Tables II-A through II-E, hardness of the bar is designated either as indicating firm or "2" indicating liquid. Only firm bars are acceptable within the context of this invention. Clarity is identified with a numeral 1, 2 or 3 indicating the resultant bar to be transparent, translucent or opaque, respectively. Only transparent bars are acceptable.

It should be noted that in the calculation of these ratios, the weight of soap refers to the total anhydrous weight of both triethanolammonium and sodium soaps. The weight of solvent refers to t;,e total weight of free triethanolamine, watcr, and all water-miscible organic liquids. The weight of water refers to the total weight I .1 c i 28 C.6030 of water from all sources, including opaque toilet soap, Polyol, and added water.

Table II-A investigates the effect of varying the weight ratio of total fatty acid soap to solvent. The weight ratio of water to triethanolamine and molar ratio of triethanolamine soap to sodium soap were kept constant within this series of experiments. Experiment 1 demonstrates that when the weight of total soap to solvent was 0.02 the bar hardness was unacceptably liquid, although the clarity was transparent. Above 0.02 weight So ratio up to 1.00, bars of acceptable hardness and 0' transparency were obtainable. Experiment 13 delineates 9 the outer limit of the weight ratio total soap to solvent S 15 as being below 1.01. At 1.01, the bar was no longer transparent but only translucent.

Table II-B investigates the variation in weight ratio of water to free triethanolamine. Here the weight ratio S 20 of total soap to solvent and molar ratio of TEA soap to 0. sodium soap were kept constant. At 0.06 weight ratio water to free TEA as shown in experiment 14, hardness was Sacceptable but the bar was opaque. At 0.25 weight ratio water to free TEA as shown in experiment 15, hardness was acceptable but the bar was translucent. Experiments 16 lt through 23 illustrate weight ratios that provide accephable hardness and clarity. Experiments 24 and demonstrate that at 1.00 and 1.42 ratio, the bars become translucent.

j Table II-C investigates the variation in molar ratio S-of TEA soap to sodium soap. For this series, the weight ratio of total soap to solvent and water to free

T

EA were kept constant. Experiment 26 indicates that there must be at least some TEA soap present; i.e. the molar ratio of TEA soap to sodium soap must be greater than zero to obtain transparency. Experiments 27 to 33 define the 'I I- i ~-ui lul* 29 C.6030 acceptable range of the aforementioned molar ratio. Firm and transparent bars were obtained in this region, Experiments 34 through 37 show that molar ratios of 1.00 or higher result in opaque bars, and at very high ratios cause the composition to be liquid.

Table II-D investigates random variations in all three ratios within the limits identified by Tables II-A through II-C. All compositions within this Table provide bars of both acceptable hardness and clarity.

0 #44444 0 0 Table II-E investigates variations in the three ratios which are outside the limits defined by Tables II-A 9 o through II-C. All compositions listed within this Table 44,4 15 have either or both a hardness and clarity problem.

9444 4 0 The foregoing description and Examples illustrate selected embodiments of the present invention. In light thereof, various modifications will be suggested to one 20 skilled in the art all of which are within the spirit and t purview of this invention.

ri I I t c 1 I I I II II

Claims (14)

1. A transparent bar comprising: i) a mixture of alkanolammonium and alkali metal C 12-C22 atom fatty acid salts, the mole ratio of alkanolammonium to alkali metal fatty acid salt ranging from about 0.1 to less than ii) a liquid solvent system including an amount of water and free alkanolamine in a weight ratio ranging from "Oq greater than 0.25 to less than 1.0; and 0 0 9 o wherein the weight ratio of total fatty acid salt to 4 15 solvent ranges from greater than 0.02 to less than S*

2. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the alkanolamine is triethanolamine and the alkanolammonium ion is triethanolammonium.

3. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of alkanolammonium to alkali metal fatty acid salt ranges from 0.5 to 0.9.

4. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of alkanolammonium to alkali metal fatty acid salt ranges sofao from 0.6 to 0.7. Sa 4

5. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of total fatty acid salt to solvent ranges between 0.25 to 0.75.

6. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of total Sfatty acid salt to solvent ranges from 0.5 to 0.6.

7. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of water t to free alkanolamine ranges from 0.35 to 0.6. aaurnrrrp r^l 31 C.6030 t. pd 0tO p*C) pr, 0 0*

8. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of water to free alkanolamine ranges from 0.4 to

9. A bar according to claim 1 wherein said fatty acid salts are a mixture of tallow and coconut fatty acid salts.

A bar according to claim 9 wherein the ratio of tallow to coconut ranges from 90:10 to 30:70.

11. A bar according to claim 1 further comprising a compound selected from the group consisting of the salts of bisulfite, hydrosulfite, metabisulfite, sulfite and mixtures thereof.

12. A bar according to claim 11 wherein the concentration of the compound ranges from 0.03 to 0.2 wt.%.

13. A bar according to claim 11 wherein the concentration of the compound ranges from 0.03 to 0.06 wt.%.

14. A bar according to claim 1 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of water, trialkanolamine, mono- and poly-hydric alcohols, alkyl and aryl ethers, alkyl and aryl esters, alkyl and aryl ketones, and mixtures thereof. .4 p 0l e up t- 0 1 I LC C- 1~. :c i l.~l"lI: B DATED THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH 1988 UNILEVER PLC By Its Patent Attorneyst CLEMENT HACK CO, Fellows Institute of Patent Attorneys of Australia -rr~ahr x Y; -i :i it u