AU594466B2 - Animal feed block and packaging method - Google Patents

Animal feed block and packaging method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU594466B2
AU594466B2 AU73609/87A AU7360987A AU594466B2 AU 594466 B2 AU594466 B2 AU 594466B2 AU 73609/87 A AU73609/87 A AU 73609/87A AU 7360987 A AU7360987 A AU 7360987A AU 594466 B2 AU594466 B2 AU 594466B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
mold
supplement
plastic
weight percent
feed supplement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU73609/87A
Other versions
AU7360987A (en
Inventor
John Findley
J. Wallace Sawhill
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Pacific Kenyon Corp
Original Assignee
Pacific Kenyon Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US06/869,222 external-priority patent/US4731249A/en
Priority claimed from US06/877,214 external-priority patent/US4729896A/en
Application filed by Pacific Kenyon Corp filed Critical Pacific Kenyon Corp
Publication of AU7360987A publication Critical patent/AU7360987A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU594466B2 publication Critical patent/AU594466B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K40/00Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K40/20Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs by moulding, e.g. making cakes or briquettes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K20/00Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/20Inorganic substances, e.g. oligoelements
    • A23K20/22Compounds of alkali metals
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/20Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin
    • A23K10/24Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin from blood
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/20Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin
    • A23K10/26Animal feeding-stuffs from material of animal origin from waste material, e.g. feathers, bones or skin
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/40Mineral licks, e.g. salt blocks
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K20/00Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10Organic substances

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)

Description

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA 4 4 6 PATENTS ACT 1952 Form COMPLETE SPECIFICATION FOR OFFICE USE Short Title: Int. Cl: Application Number: Lodged: Complete Specification-Lodged: Accepted: Lapsed: Published: Priority: Related Art: This docurnentt cont,t tl'( t msade v ection 49 and is cjriet L 4 printing.
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Name of Applicant: Address of Applicant: Actual Inventor: Address for Service: PACIFIC KENYON CORPORATION 1280 E. 13th Street, Long Beach, CALIFORNIA, U.S.A.
John Findley and J. Wallace Sawhill GRIFFITH HASSEL FRAZER 71 YORK STREET SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
Complete Specification for the invention entitled: ANIMAL FEED BLOCK AND PACKAGING METHOD The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us:- 7636A:rk
I
1 4 X 0000 0 0o 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o oo o o 0 00' oc c 00 0 0 0 0 00 15 S00 0 0 0 00 0b r o «a a 1 66
S
0 1 ANIMAL FEED BLOCK AND PACKAGING METHOD BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of Invention This invention relates to an animal feed supplement and, in particular, to a preservative coating for a solid animal feed supplement, and a method of packaging the solid supplement.
Brief Statement of the Prior Art Molasses has been used for many years as an animal feed supplement together with additives such as phosphoric acid and feed nutrients such as urea, fats, and the like. Solid materials such as cottonseed meal have also been suspended in the molasses; however, difficulties have been experienced with maintaining a stable suspension of solid materials. The liquid supplements have been fed by application to fodder or by free choice feeding on lick-wheels.
Feed supplements have also been manufactured and marketed as solid blocks.. The earliest blocks were pressed blocks which were formed by compressing mixtures of molasses and dry ingredients. Poured blocks, in which the ingredients are mixed with molasses and poured into containers where they solidify, are more recent developments. The earliest commercial poured block was prepared by evaporative heating of molasses similar to candy manufacturing as described in U.S.
Patent 3,961,081. This block lacked water resistance, and melted at elevated storage temperatures.
L The most recent advances in supplement blocks have been the poured chemical blocks, in which additives are used to gel molasses and form water-resistance solids. Large amounts of calcium oxide or magnesium oxide have been added to molasses and the mixtures have been heated to form solid supplements in the manner described in New Zealand Patent Specification No.
170,505.
Entirely chemically gelled and hardened poured blocks and their manufacture are described in U.S. Patents 4,027,043, 4,160,041 and 4,431,675. These blocks are prepared by the reaction of molasses, a soluble phosphate and the oxide or 00 0 o 0 soluble salt of calcium and/or magnesium. No heating is required and the liquid mixture is poured into cardboard S° containers for solidification. Maximum hardness is attained °150, by using both calcium and magnesium oxides.
Another method of manufacture of a poured block is 00 described in U.S. Patents 4,171,385 and 4,171,386 in which the 0 00 6 0 0 *0 molasses is gelled with clay which is added with high shear agitation. Magnesium oxide is added to the liquid mixture and the hardness of the block can be increased by the addition of :ferrous sulfate, as described in U.S. Patent 4,265,916.
These prior products have been used for free choice feeding of cattle on ranges or in pastures and are too hard for feeding cows in a dairy or to beef cattle in a feed lot.
Also feed ingredients such as sodium carbonate or bicarbonate cannot be included in these blocks without affecting their quality.
L Y Unfortunately, all the aforementioned supplement blocks are affected to some degree by the environment. Usually the blocks lose from 1 to about 5 weight percent moisture in the few days immediately following their manufacture. In hot, dry climates, further loss of water can occur, to the extent that the blocks shrink and crack, resulting in an unattractive appearance. When exposed to elevated storage temperatures and high humidity, mold can also develop on the surface of the blocks, usually starting at the surface interface between the cardboard box and the block.
BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method of preparing an animal feed supplement in solid block form which comprises: admixing an aqueous feed solution selected from the group consisting of aqueous solutions of sugars, proteins and mixtures thereof, with solidifying and nutrient ingredients to prepare an aqueous supplement liquid which contains from 10 to 35 weight percent water and from 90 to weight percent of said sugars, proteins, solidifying and nutrient ingredients and having the property of solidifying upon storage; placing a plastic bag formed of a water soluble, edible plastic film having a thickness from 0.5 to 10 mils and formed of a plastic selected from the group consisting essentially of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, ethylenevinyl acetate copolymers and alkyl cellulose esters, into a vertical-walled mold; S 30 pouring the aqueous feed supplement liquid mixture into the plastic bag; and storing the mold containing the feed supplement to permit its contents to solidify; and stripping the vertical-walled mold from the resultant solid block to recover a solid block entirely covered by said plastic film.
The preformed bag preferably has a wall thickness of s/as -3k'<-NT 01 from 1 to about 5 mils. The size of the mold can be varied over wide limits but is preferably from 1 to about 750 pounds, to prepare the most convenient feeding size for the particular application. Small, individual blocks, each weighing from 1 to about 5 pounds can be prepared for a single day feeding of an individual animal. Alternatively, large blocks from 20 to about 750 pounds can be prepared for free-choice feeding by a number of animals. The block market is typically supplied with blocks of 40 to 60 pounds, 250 pounds, and 500 pounds, each, and such sizes are also preferred when using the plastic film packaging of this invention.
Preferably, the mold is a cylindrical mold with a longitudinal split and is joined along the longitudinal split, and the step of stripping the mold from the solid block comprises the steps of separating the joined longitudinal edges to spread the mold and remove it from the block.
This invention also includes preparation of a buffer-containing, solid, animal feed supplement which has the proper hardness and palatibility to achieve a daily animal consumption of 0.2 0.5 pound of sodium carbonate or bicarbonate and 0.07 0.15 pound of magnesium oxide with free choice feeding. The feed supplement is a solidified mixture of various feed ingredients with a feed solution of sugars or proteins, and mixtures thereof. The supplement is o solidified by sodium carbonate, bicarbonate, or a mixture thereof, and magnesium oxide. The latter additives thus serve the dual purposes of solidifying the feed supplement and providing the desired buffer for the animal. The concentration of these additives is from 8 to 25 weight percent sodium carbonate, bicarbonate, or mixtures thereof, and from 2 to about 5 weight percent magnesium oxide. Other feed ingredients can also be included, such as from 1 to about 35 weight percent natural protein feeds or equivalent proteins such as urea, biurea and ammonium salts. Fat from either animal or plant sources can be included in an amount 'i from 1 to about 20 weight percent. Calcium and/or phosphorus additives can be included such as calcium carbonate, dicalcium phosphate, defluorinated NT0 8s/as -4iphosphate rock, etc., in amounts sufficient to provide from to 1.5 weight percent calcium and from 0.5 to 1.5 weight percent phosphorus in the final product. Vitamins and trace minerals can also be included.
When the buffered supplement block is provided to animals which are not fed a high volume grain and forage diet, it may be necessary to increase the hardness of the block to limit consumption. The hardness of the block can be adjusted to any desired value by the inclusion of either, or both, phosphoric acid and lime (or calcium hydroxide) in amounts from 0.5 to weight percent, each.
Other feed ingredients can be included in the liquid ^r mixture before it is poured into the plastic film container.
4 0 4 t tog* Examples of these feed ingredients include a source of protein I in an amount from 1 to about 35 weight percent. Protein sources include natural protein feeds such as soybean meal, oao cottonseed meal, rape seed meal, sunflower seed meal, corn o 0o 4 O\o gluten meal, etc. which contain proteins at relatively high concentrations, from 10 to about 35 weight percent.
Lower grade protein sources such as ground rice hulls, ground oat hulls, ground almond shells, ground walnut shells, etc.
O can also be used, as well as ground or cracked grains, e.g., cracked corn, oats, etc. For ruminants, equivalent protein sources can be used such as urea, biurea, and ammonium salts, alone, or in admixture with the aforementioned natural proteins. Also, products rich in "by-pass" protein can also be used such as bloodmeal, feather meal, etc. These are relatively high in protein content, from about 75 to percent protein and are used at lower contents in the block mixture, from about 1 to about 10 weight percent.
THE FEED SUPPLEMENT The feed supplements which are used for practice of this invention, in general, have the composition set forth in the following table: Table 1 Ingredient Concentration in Final Product (Weight Percent) Broad Preferred 0 LO1S Feed Solution 30-90 50-80 Sodium carbonate(l) 8-25 12-18 S. Magnesium oxide 2-5 3.5-5 Protein or non-protein nitrogen( 2 1-35 5-20 o Fat 1-20 2-8 SVitamins 0-3 0.1-2 SMinerals 0-4 0.1-2 Phosphorus source 0-8 1-3 Calcium source 0-8 1-3 15 Hardening agents( 3 0-10 0-6 o 0, 1)sodium carbonate, bicarbonate,or mixture thereof 3 2 expressed as equivalent protein j calcium oxide or hydroxide, and/or phosphoric acid These supplements contain from 10 to 35 percent water, Sf2,. preferably from 15 to 28 percent water. Water is a component of the above ingredients such as the feed solutions. Where necessary, water can also be added as an ingredient to obtain the desired watercontent in the final supplement.
The content of minerals, phosphorus and calcium, as well as other ingredients such as drugs, vitamins, etc., can be varied as desired for specific applications. Examples of T 6 I various minerals are manganese, iodine, zinc, copper, cobalt and iron compounds. In some specific applications, a high content mineral supplement is desirable, containing from 6 to 10 percent phosphorus, 5 to 8 percent calcium and from 0.1 to 2 percent of mineral salts, added as finely divided powders. These salts can be water insoluble salts such as dicalcium and tricalcium phosphate or can be water soluble salts such as monammonium phosphate. Examples of vitamins include Vitamin A, Vitamin D, and Vitamin E.
Examples of useful drugs are: growth promoting food additives or drugs such as monensin and sodium monensin, commercially available under the designation Rumensin from Eli Lilly Co.; chlortetracyline and sulfamethiazine; and mixtures of chlortetracycline afd sulfamethiazine; etc. Other useful 1ao.. drugs include antiblat and antihelmintic agents as well as insect control agents. The aformentioned materials are used 0° in effective concentrations for the desired result, e.g., S0 0 oo drugs are used at concentrations from 0.5 to about 1.0 weight So°° percent. The minerals are usually used in similar concentrations, but are often expressed in amounts from 3 to about 500 milligrams per pound and vitamins are frequently expressed from 10 to about 50,000 units per pound.
THE FILM COATING The blocks are surrounded by a film of a water soluble plastic such as polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, and alkyl cellulose esters.
These films are edible. Of the aforementioned, films of 7 L. W r p.- ~1
'I
~_ii.i _i i 0
',A
IT
*B
2 0 \L 3 fl -o LNr *-2 polyvinyl alcohol are preferred as these are generally recognized as safe packaging materials for food products. As desired, or necessary, the polyvinyl alcohol can be strengthened by the inclusion of from 5 to about 40 weight percent glycerol. Films of polyvinyl alcohol will slowly dissolve in water at ambient temperatures and will rapidly dissolve at temperatures of 150°F or greater. Despite this solubility, we have found that the aqueous mixture of ingredients can be poured into and retained in containers of the plastic at elevated temperatures. This permits the use of these containers to package the supplements which are poured into the containers at the elevated temperatures experienced during their preparation, which for most supplement formulations, is from 110* to 135°F. Although the supplement mixtures are aqueous suspensions and are poured into the plastic containers at such elevated temperatures, the plastic containers will retain the supplements. After the supplements solidify, the plastic film containers protect the supplement by retaining moisture and preventing growth of mold.
A microcide and/or insecticide ingredient can be included in the plastic film. This can be an ingredient having a specific activity for the particular microorganism which is to be controlled, including bactericides and fungicides. The microcide is included at an effective concentration which is preselected for each specific microcide and is generally from about 0.0001 to about 2 weight percent.
The plastic film has a thickness from about 0.1 to about mils, preferably from about 0.5 to about 5 mils, and most 8 preferably from 1 to about 3 mils. This film is preformed into a bag and the bag is preferably supported in a rigid mold to impart uniform size and shape to the finished block products.
THE FEED SOLUTION The animal feed supplement is preared from a commercial aqueous feed solution. Generally, this will be a sugar solution, and a variety of sugar solutions can be used; however, molasses is a preferred source. The feed solution 3o100°o should be present in the feed supplement at a concentration of from 30 to about 95, preferably from 50 to about 80, weight percent. The preferred moltsses source is commercially available with a sugar content from about 65 to 85 Brix and a 0 0 consistency that varies from a thin to a thick syrup. The 15 water content of these solutions is from 5 to about 30 weight a 0 percent. The molasses can be any sugar containing molasses o 0 o I 0 such as cane or Blackstrap Molasses, beet molasses, converted molasses wood sugar molasses, hydrosyrup, citrus molasses and the like.
0,1O Another sugar solution that can be used is whey, a by- I" product of the dairy industry. The whey is a dilute sulution of lactoalbumin, lactose, some fats, and the soluble inorganics from the parent milk. This whey solution is condensed and spray dried to a powder or is condensed to about 40 to 60 percent solids and preserved. A typical analysis is as follows: L ci, Table 2 0 a 0 0 oo aQ 0 0 0 o o o o" o ao 00 000 0 Composition of a Typical Dried Whey Protein 12.0% Fat 0.7% Lactose 60.0% Phosphorous 0.79% Calcium 0.87% Ash 9.7% A third source of a useful sugar solution is the pulp and paper industry which produces large quantities of by-product lignin sulfonates from wood during the sulfite pulping process. After the separation of lignin, the acidity of the resultant solution is neutralized with an ammonium or alkali metal bisulfite compound or base to form the following organic salts: Ammonium lignin sulfonate; Sodium lignin sulfonate; and Magnesium lignin sulfonate.
A typical analysis of a commercially available ammonium lignin sulfonate solution is as follows: Table 3 Typical Analysis of Ammonium Lignin Sulfonate Percent Solids Specific gravity pH, 10% solution Sugars expressed as glucose Tannin content Available ammonia Sulfur Ash 1.237 16.0% 45.0% 1.0%
L
The sugar solution is the energy ingredient of the supplement. Sources of other metabolizable organic values can be used to replace a portion of the sugar solutions. Examples of such other useful energy ingredients sources include condensed and dehydrated molasses solubles which are obtained from the fermentation of molasses to produce chemicals such as ethanol, citric acid, glutamic acid, etc. A material rich in metabolizable values, known as condensed molasses solubles, is obtained by evaporation of the residue from this fermentation.
This material can also be dehydrated to dryness and the resultant dry solid is also a useful additive. Another very useful feed solution is a condensed or concentrated fermented corn 6 i extract, which is sometimes referred to as corn steep liquor or mazoferm. This material is obtained by concentrating the liquid remaining after steeping corn in an aqueous sulfur dioxide solution and allowing it to ferment. These materials 0o can have from 40 to 100 percent solids and contain, on a dry weight basis, from 1 to 15 percent sugar and contain signi- I o ficant contents of protein, from 5 to about 25 percent.
All, or any portion of the aforementioned sugar solutions can S' be replaced with these feed solutions, depending on the amount of natural protein which is desired in the final supplement.
THE BUFFER INGREDIENTS The buffer ingredients, which also serve to solidify the feed supplement, are sodium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and mixtures thereof, and magnesium oxide. The carbonate is the preferred carbonate source as it is readily available and less costly than the bicarbonate. Also, the alkaline carbonate 11 neutralizes the acids commonly present in molasses and is thereby converted to a mixture of bicarbonate and carbonate.
Other sources of the buffer include sodium sesquicarbonate, which is a hydrated carbonate and bicarbonate double salt.
Carbonate ores such as trona ore, which can contain up to weight percent impurities, can also be used provided they are of sufficient concentration and do not contain any toxic impurities. The carbonate/bicarbonate ingredient is used in an amount from 8 to 25, preferably from 12 to 18, weight percent of the supplement.
i The second buffer ingredient which ca-n be used is magnesium oxide. Preferably the magnesium oxide has a o oo moderate to high reactivity, as measured by the time required %o to neutralize a standard citric acid solution. Acceptable magnesium oxides exhibit neutralization times in this standard oo test which are from 10 to about 150 seconds, preferably from o 10 to about 90 seconds. The magnesium oxide can be used in an .amount from 2 to 5, preferably from 3.5 to 5, weight percent 0o o of the supplement. It is also preferred that the weight 20 proportion of magnesium oxide to the carbonate/bicarbonate be 44 from 1/4 to 1/2, preferably about 1/3. When used in these 4 i proportions, the buffer ingredients have the most desirable pH value, and are the most effective as a rummen buffer.
THE PHOSPHATE AND CALCIUM INGREDIENTS When the supplement blocks are free-choice fed to animals on a high volume diet, their hardness as measured by a laboratory durometer should be about 20 to 45 units. When the i supplement should also contain dietary amounts of phosphorus and/or calcium, suitable sources are dicalcium phosphate, defluorinated phosphate rock, calcium carbonate, gypsum, etc., all having limited water solubility. When the blocks should have a hardness of 60 units or greater (as may be required when fed to animals on low to moderate volume diets which would overconsume the softer block), water soluble and reactive sources of phosphate and/or calcium ran be used as hardening additives.
The phosphates which can be employed as hardening agents in the feed supplement block can be phosphoric acid or any soluble salt thereof, with the acid being preferred. Examples of useful phosphates include the alkali metal and ammonium salts, sodium phosphate, potassium phosphate, or ammonium phosphate. The preferred hardening agent is phosphoric acid which can be of any commercially available grade from 50 to 98 percent acid. When necessary to increase 4 04 hardness, the phosphate is employed in the supplement at a concentration from about 0.5 to about 5.0, preferably from to about 3.0 weight percent, expressed as P 2 0 Calcium sources which can be used as hardening agents can be calcium oxide or hydroxide. Commercially available lime, ,i calcium oxide, is useful in finely subdivided form, typically weight percent or more passing a 125 mesh screen. The more finely subdivided the lime, the faster that it will hydrate and participate in the solidification of the supplement. The lime can be slaked by mixing with water prior to addition to the sugar solution, or if desired, can be added directly to 13
IJ
the aqueous sugar solution, depending on the process equipment and controls. When necessary to increase hardness, the amount of the calcium oxide or hydroxide ingredient which is employed can be from 0.5 to about 5.0 weight percent, expressed as the oxide, and preferably is from about 0.5 to about 3.0 weight percent based on the weight of the sugar solution.
THE PROTEIN SOURCE The feed supplement can also contain a nitrogen source for the animal's protein requirements. The nitrogen can be in proteins which are commonly found in various sources such as: dried blood and meat meal from rendering plants, cottonseed meal, soy meal, rape seed meal, sunflower seed meal, dehydrated alfalfa, dried and sterilized animal and poultry manure, fish meal, liquid or powdered egg, fish solubles, cell cream and rabbit pellets. When the feed supplement is intended 444 for consumption by ruminants, a non-protein nitrogen compound such as ammoniacal compounds, urea, biuret or mono- or di- ammonium phosphates can be used to supplement the protein requirements. The preferred non-protein nitrogen source is urea which can be added in an amount from 2 to about 15 weight percent, preferably from 5 to 12 weight percent, based on the supplement. In some applications, it is preferred to use all natural protein, and in such instances, a vegetable meal such as cottonseed meal, soy meal, rape seed meal, corn gluten meal, etc. can be used.
14 The following examples illustrate practice of the invention and will serve to demonstrate results obtainable therewith.
Example 1 Buffer-containing feed supplement samples are prepared by mixing together the following ingredients: Content (Weight Parts) Ingredient No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 1. Molasses 470 470 470 470 470 2. Urea 20 20 20 20 3. Water 100 100 100 100 100 4. Sodium Carbonate 150 150 Sodium Sesquicarbonate 150 6. Sodium Bicarbonate 150 7. Magnesium oxide 50 50 50 50 8. Corn gluten 80 80 80 80 9. Feather meal 50 50 50 50 Dicalcium phosphate 50 50 50 50 0o 11. Fat (soy oil) 30 30 30 30 The supplements are prepared by stirring the mixture of co molasses, water and urea and adding the selected carbonate Do1 0 6 buffer (Ingredient 4, 5 or 6) while continuing to stir the mixture. After the carbonate is completely dispersed, the magnesium oxide is added and the mixture is stirred. The remaining ingredients are then added, the mixture is stirred 2u to disperse these ingredients, and the liquid mixture is poured into small cardboard boxes.
All of the mixing of the ingredients is done at ambient temperature A slight increase in temperature is observed and the temperatures of the final mixure, before pouring, are also recorded and presented below. The boxes are placed in a laboratory oven maintained at 120°F. to simulate the temperature expected in plant practice of the invention.
k- Mod- After 24 hours, the samples are removed from the oven and the following hardness values are observed, when measuring the surface hardness with a durometer having a small diameter pin: No.1 No.2 No.3 No.4 Pour Temperature 108 106 100 90 86 Hardness 60 40 20 12 <2 Samples 4 and 5 were too soft for application as even well-fed cattle would be expected to overconsume supplement blocks having these hardness values. These blocks were sufficiently soft that one could easily push one's fingers into the product.
Sample 2 had acceptable hardness for free choice feeding.
Sample 1 would be acceptable, however, it may have limited o consumption if fed to animals on a high'volume diet of other feeds. Sample No. 3 would be marginally acceptable, however, over-consumption could be expected in many applications.
o 0 The direct relationship between hardness and percent of o the carbonate added as bicarbonate, which is apparent from a comparison of Samples 1-3, provides a control useful for final adjustment of the hardness to fit a particular feeding It situation. Thus, if the animals do not consume sufficient quantities of the block formulated with sodium carbonate as sample No. 1, some of the sodium carbonate can be replaced with sodium bicarbonate, softening the block.
Example 2 The procedure of Example 1 was repeated to prepare seven additional samples. These samples had the following compositions: 1 Content (Weight Parts) No. No. No. No. No. No.
7 8 9 10 11 12 Ingredient No.
13 Molasses 470 470 470 470 470 470 470 Water 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Urea 20 20 20 20 20 20 Sodium carbonate 150 150 100 100 75 75 Magnesium oxide 40 30 50 35 50 25 Di Calcium phosphate 50 50 50 50 50 50 Corn gluten 80 80 80 80 80 80 Feather meal 50 50 50 50 50 50 Fat 30 30 30 30 30 30 The pour temperatures, contents of sodium carbonate and magnesium oxide, and the hardness values of the blocks after 24 hours storage at 120 0 F. are as follows: No. No.
7 8 No. No. No. No. No.
9 10 11 12 13 Sample o ogo ao ap Pour temperature, 95 Sodium Carbonate 15 Magnesium oxide 4 Hardness 40 96 103 15 10 3 5 106 10 3.5 96 7.5 5 93 30 40 20 25 <2 <2 Samples 12 and 13 are unacceptable, and samples 10 and 11 are marginally acceptable for free choice feeding.
.1- Example 3 The procedure was repeated with the formulation of Sample No. 13, however, limited amounts of lime and phosphoric acid were included. The formulation was as follows: Content (Weight Parts) Ingredient No. 14 water 100 lime molasses 470 urea phosphoric acid sodium carbonate magnesium oxide corn gluten feather meal dicalcium phosphate fat The water and lime are mixed to hydrate the lime, and the
SI
molasses and urea are then added. After these ingredients are Ia mixed by stirring, the phosphoric acid is added and after it is neutralized, sodium carbonate is added and the mixture is o oo I stirred. Magnesium oxide is then added. After stirring the 0 o magnesium oxide into the liquid, the remaining ingredients are 0. o added. The pour temperature of the liquid is 106°F.
After 24 hours at 120°F. the laboratory sample is inspected and observed to have a hardness value of 20, thus indicating that the lime and phosphoric acid significantly increased the hardness from that observed for sample No. 13.
L Example 4 A feed supplement is produced in commercial quantities in a commercial plant mixer. The following ingredients are mixed into the supplement: Ingredient Content (Weight Percent) Water 10.0 Molasses 47.6 Urea 1.3 Sodium Carbonate 15.0 Magnesium Oxide Corn gluten Feather meal Dicalcium phosphate Fat (Soy oil) Vitamin mix The formulation provided the following nutrients: Crude Protein 14.0 NPN not more than 3.8 Calcium 1.2 Phosphorus 1.1 Carbonate buffer* 17.0 Magnesium oxide Fat *a mixture of carbonate-bicarbonate hydrated salt °nO The ingredients were mixed in a plant batch mixer using o the procedure of addition of Example 1. After all the ingredients had been added, the temperature of the final mixture was 102 0 F. The mixture was poured into 250-pound cardboard molds which were lined with bags of polyvinyl alcohol film having a thickness of 0.002 inch. After filling, the plastic film was folded across the top surface of the supplement, and the molds were covered and moved into a warehouse. During storage av i-g9ht, the temperature of the supplement mixture in the molds reached a maximum value of 165 0 F. After overnight storage, the cardboard molds were AT removed and the solid supplement block was entirely sealed in 19 the plastic film. The solid supplement had a hardness value of The resultant blocks were fed, free-choice, to a test group of high producing Holstein cows, milked three times daily and on a full feeding program. Six pens of cows were provided with the supplement block; one pen contained 80-90 fresh cows; another pen contained 100 cows with at least 100 days in lactation; three pens contained 78 mature milking cows each; and two pens contained 78 first-calf-heifers each. A wooden fruit bin 4 feet X 4 feet and 3 feet high was placed in t91 .each pen and four to five supplement blocks were placed in each bin, and replenished as consumed.
The cows consumed the supplement blocks at a rate adequate to supply from 0.2 to 0.3 pounds of the buffer ingredients per day to each cow. The lowest consumption was I 0o0 o by the fresh cows which consumed the block at an average rate o: of 0.84 pounds per head per day. This was expected, as during the progress of the test cows were moved from this pen to the other test pens, and fresh cows,, unfamiliar with the supplement, were added to the fresh cow pen. The three pens of mature cows consumed the supplement block at a rate of 1.44 pounds per head per day; the pen of 100-lactation-day cows consumed the supplement block at the rate of 1.36 pounds per head per day, and the cows in the remaining pens consumed the supplement blck at a rate of 1.21 pounds per head per day.
The feeding test was continued for one month.
Since the cows were under a full feeding program with an average of eight feedings per day of silage, hay and grain, it was not expected that they would consume the block at the necessary rate of about 1.2 to 1.6 pounds per head per day.
Contrary to expectations, the aforementioned consumption rate was unexpectedly high and was sufficient to supply the cows with the necessary quantity of buffers. The daily feeding regimen was as follows: Time Ration Quantity per head 0600 0630 grain mix 12.5 pounds corn silage 15.0 0730 1200 alfalfa 4.5 1400 1700 grain mix 12.5 corn silage 15.0 2100 alfalfa 4.5 Ssilage to excess of consumption 4 1 The grain mix contained cottonseed meal, whole cottonseed, shredded beet pulp, wet corn gluten, liquid supplement and mineral mix.
In addition to the above feedings, the cows were also fed a total of 10 pounds of steam rolled barley, consumed during o a0 0 0 0 the three milkings each day. The average daily consumption of 2u these feeds was 79 pounds per cow per day.
The formulation and hardness of the suppement block provided the proper palatability to insure adequate consumption on a free-choice basis under the most critical situation, with cows which were fed all they could eat of other feeds.
L I Example A feed supplement is prepared by preheating molasses to a temperature of 150*F. The preheated molasses is introduced into a mixing vessel and stirred while adding urea, magnesium oxide, calcium phosphate, salt and corn gluten meal at the followin, proportions: Table 6 Weight Ingredinet Percent Molasses Calcium Phosphate Salt 3 Corn gluten meal Magnesium oxide 12 The supplement is maintained at 150*F during mixing of
C
the ingredients and is then poured directly into bottomless Se 0 S cylindrical molds lined with plastic bags formed from a film o o with a thickness of 0.002 inch.
Each mold is formed of two halves which join along the 0D "'o a ,o longitudinal midline of the assembled form. The joined edges have continuous edge flanges which are clamped together to assemble the form. The forms are made of fiberglass reinforced plastic and are surrounded by an outer jacket of polystyrenefem insulation approximately 1 inch thick.
The forms rest on a smooth surface pallet and the plastic bags are placed, one each within each form, with the top of each bag extending above the top of its form. Four molds are placed on each pallet and the pallet is moved to the packaging station of the block plant.
After each bag is filled, the upper end of each bag is folded closed, against the top surface of the liquid contents L in the bag, and an adhesivly backed label is applied over the folds.
Each pallet, which supports four filled molds, each containing 500 pounds of block ingredients, is moved into a heated storage room, maintained at 135 0 F. The next morning, the blocks are moved into the warehouse, the mold clamps are released and the molds are removed, leaving four glossy surfaced molasses blocks, each weighing 500 pounds', on each pallet. The blocks are completely finished and ready for i0 shipment.
Example 6 A feed supplement is prepared by mixing water and lime to prepare a slurry containing 33 weight percent calcium, expressed as lime. The hydration of the lime raises the OoO slurry temperature to 190F., and cane molasses is then added to prepare a mixture ontaining about 84 percent cane molasses.
Dry urea and salt are then added, followed by magnesium oxide, corn gluten, and fat. The mixture is stirred for ten minutes and is then poured into bottomless molds lined with plastic bags having a 2 mil thickness. The molds have an octagonal cross section. The molds are approximately 20 inches tall and 22 inches in width, and each mold is filled with 250 pounds of supplement. The molds are stacked on a pallet with four molds on the pallet, filled and the top edges of the plastic bag in each mold are folded against the surface of the liquid contents and an adhesive label is placed over the folded edges. A plywood divider is placed over the molds and a second layer of plastic-bag-lined molds is stacked on the plywood divider and filled in the same manner.
The pallets are moved into an unheated warehouse and the temperature of the supplements monitored. When the temperatures of the supplements in the molds reach 165°F, the insulaing jackets are removed fromthe molds. The following morning the molds are removed, leaving pallets, each supporting two layers of supplement blocks, four blocks in each layer. The blocks have a glossy appearance and appear I0 dark brown through the transparent plastic covering.
The blocks have the following ingredients: Table 8 Weight Ingredient Percent Cane Molasses 54.2 Corn Gluten Meal 14.0 Water Urea Fat 4.6 Salt Magnesium Oxide Phosphoric acid 4.0 Lime Vitamins and Trace Minerals 0.2 The blocks are ready for shipment into the feed distribution system without any further treatment. They are supplied for free choice feeding by placing one or more blocks at selected locations on catte ranges, and the outer plastic film is stripped from the blocks when they are placed on the range.
Since the blocks are highly weather resistant, they withstand rains without any significant loss.
The blocks also have an extended storage life in the L i
I
distribution system. The plastic outer covering is impermeable to oxygen and the blocks can be stored under high humidity conditions without developing any mold. Since the plastic outer covering also resists moisture transfer, particularly at low humidity conditions, the blocks can also be stored under hot and/or dry conditions without experiencing any significant loss of moisture and without cracking.
The invention has been described with reference to the presently preferred and illustrated embodiments. It is not o0° intended that the invention be unduly limited by the disclosure of the preferred embodiments. Instead, it is intended that the invention be defined by the method steps, o a c and ingredients, and their obvious equivalents set forth in Q f the following claims: 3 0 0o Ir 0 j3

Claims (8)

1. The method of preparing an animal feed supplement in solid block form which comprises: admixing an aqueous feed solution selected from the group consisting of aqueous solutions of sugars, proteins and mixtures thereof, with solidifying and nutrient ingredients to prepare an aqueous supplement liquid which contains from 10 to weight percent water and from 90 to 65 weight percent of said sugars, proteins, solidifying and nutrient ingredients S and having the property of solidifying upon storage; oo placing a plastic bag formed of a water sol uble, edible plastic film having a thickness from 0.5 to 10 mils and formed of a plastic selected from the group consisting essentially of polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl acetate, ethylene- vinyl acetate copolymers and alkyl cellulose esters, into a vertical-walled mold; pouring the aqueous feed supplement liquid mixture into the plastic bag; and storing the mold containing the feed supplement to permit its contents to solidify; and stripping the vertical-walled mold from the resultant solid block to recover a solid block entirely covered by said plastic film. -26-
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said feed supplement is poured into said plastic bag at a temperature from 110° to 1350 F.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said film also includes a microcide in an effective concentration from 0.0001 to about 2 weight percent.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein said mold is bottomless and is placed on a pallet and said plastic bag is placed within said mold.
The method of claim 1 wherein said mold is a cylindrical mold with a longitudial split and is joined along the longitudinal split, and said step of stripping said mold from said solid block comprises the steps of separating the joined longitudinal edges to spread the mold and remove it from the block.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein said plastic is polyvinyl alcohol.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein said plastic has a thickness from 0.001 to about 0.005 inch. -27- -0J UVT 1i
8. The method of preparing an animal feed supplement as claimed in claim 1 substantially as herein described with reference to the examples. DATED this 15th day of December, 1989 PACIFIC KENYON CORPORATION By their Patent Attorneys GRIFFITH HACK CO. 04l8s/as -28- ,i
AU73609/87A 1986-06-02 1987-05-27 Animal feed block and packaging method Ceased AU594466B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/869,222 US4731249A (en) 1985-09-03 1986-06-02 Animal feed block package and method
US869222 1986-06-02
US877214 1986-06-23
US06/877,214 US4729896A (en) 1986-06-23 1986-06-23 Buffered animal feed supplement block

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU7360987A AU7360987A (en) 1987-12-03
AU594466B2 true AU594466B2 (en) 1990-03-08

Family

ID=27128101

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU73609/87A Ceased AU594466B2 (en) 1986-06-02 1987-05-27 Animal feed block and packaging method

Country Status (3)

Country Link
AU (1) AU594466B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1300421C (en)
GB (1) GB2191379B (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB8718969D0 (en) * 1987-08-11 1987-09-16 Pentlands Scotch Whisky Resear Foodstuffs compositions
GB8822245D0 (en) * 1988-09-22 1988-10-26 Tate & Lyle Ind Ltd Feed blocks for animals
US5264227A (en) * 1992-03-10 1993-11-23 Cooperative Federee De Quebec Feed supplements for ruminant animals
US6261609B1 (en) 1994-05-24 2001-07-17 Cates, Ii Thomas Gerald Range mineral
US20050042335A1 (en) * 2003-08-22 2005-02-24 Stock Robert H. Packaged livestock ingestible
ITRN20080042A1 (en) * 2008-07-17 2010-01-17 N C T New Chemical Technology Srl USE OF POLYVINYL ALCOHOL IN ALL ITS FORMS IN SOLUTIONS AND WATER DISPERSIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ANIMAL FEEDS WITH MEDICATIONS, SPICES AND SOAP ADDITIVES.
GB2485964A (en) * 2010-02-06 2012-06-06 Rumenco Ltd Animal feed supplement with edible support structure
BR102013001992A2 (en) * 2013-01-28 2014-09-09 Flavio Roberto Mota Ferreira WATER SOLUBLE PLASTIC COMPOSITION AND OBTAINING PROCESS

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB377330A (en) * 1931-05-08 1932-07-28 Manbre & Garton Ltd Improvements in packing of invert sugar and like substances for transport
GB404407A (en) * 1932-09-22 1934-01-18 Eustace Albert Berry Improvements in packing of invert sugar and like sugars
SE331253B (en) * 1967-11-15 1970-12-14 Akerlund & Rausing Ab
US4027043A (en) * 1975-10-28 1977-05-31 Jack J. Schroeder Solid animal feed supplement
US4160041A (en) * 1977-02-14 1979-07-03 Jack J. Schroeder Method of preparing a solid animal feed supplement
US4171386A (en) * 1978-04-05 1979-10-16 Ralston Purina Company Animal feed block containing ferrous sulfate and magnesium oxide

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB2191379A (en) 1987-12-16
GB2191379B (en) 1991-03-06
GB8712689D0 (en) 1987-07-01
AU7360987A (en) 1987-12-03
CA1300421C (en) 1992-05-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4729896A (en) Buffered animal feed supplement block
US4731249A (en) Animal feed block package and method
US5260089A (en) Feed supplement composition and method of manufacturing
US4171386A (en) Animal feed block containing ferrous sulfate and magnesium oxide
US4171385A (en) Animal feed block containing magnesium oxide
US6168803B1 (en) Process for preparing rigid animal feedblocks
US4800088A (en) Animal feed supplement with filler and method of preparing the same
US5908634A (en) Animal feed containing molasses bentonite and zeolite
US4234608A (en) Process of manufacturing feed blocks and products thereof
US5264227A (en) Feed supplements for ruminant animals
US4735809A (en) Animal feed blocks containing dietary supplements
US4803085A (en) Preservative coating for hard solid animal feed supplement
EP0016832A1 (en) Animal feed supplement package
US4333956A (en) Calcium ammonium lactate and solidified fermented ammoniated condensed whey
US20090130291A1 (en) Dried Citrus Peels as an Absorbent Carrier for Commercial Animal Feed Additives
AU594466B2 (en) Animal feed block and packaging method
US5185174A (en) Method of making non-hygroscopic sugar and protein solids
JPH06500473A (en) Animal feed containing molasses, bentonite and zeolites
USRE31804E (en) Animal feed block containing ferrous sulfate and magnesium oxide
US4937082A (en) Thixotropic feed supplement suspensions
EP0303477A2 (en) Foodstuffs compositions
USRE31763E (en) Animal feed block containing magnesium oxide
US20030118690A1 (en) High-fat animal feed tub
US4009263A (en) Energized cobalt-containing animal feed
US4420636A (en) Calcium ammonium lactate

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired