AU2018408876B2 - Kaapaali bowls and tunnels - the Tsunami diverter - Google Patents

Kaapaali bowls and tunnels - the Tsunami diverter Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2018408876B2
AU2018408876B2 AU2018408876A AU2018408876A AU2018408876B2 AU 2018408876 B2 AU2018408876 B2 AU 2018408876B2 AU 2018408876 A AU2018408876 A AU 2018408876A AU 2018408876 A AU2018408876 A AU 2018408876A AU 2018408876 B2 AU2018408876 B2 AU 2018408876B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
tsunami
underwater
rebound
construction
tunnels
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
AU2018408876A
Other versions
AU2018408876A1 (en
Inventor
Senthilkumaran KUMARAVEL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of AU2018408876A1 publication Critical patent/AU2018408876A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2018408876B2 publication Critical patent/AU2018408876B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B3/00Engineering works in connection with control or use of streams, rivers, coasts, or other marine sites; Sealings or joints for engineering works in general
    • E02B3/04Structures or apparatus for, or methods of, protecting banks, coasts, or harbours
    • E02B3/06Moles; Piers; Quays; Quay walls; Groynes; Breakwaters ; Wave dissipating walls; Quay equipment
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02BHYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
    • E02B3/00Engineering works in connection with control or use of streams, rivers, coasts, or other marine sites; Sealings or joints for engineering works in general
    • E02B3/02Stream regulation, e.g. breaking up subaqueous rock, cleaning the beds of waterways, directing the water flow

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Revetment (AREA)
  • Cultivation Receptacles Or Flower-Pots, Or Pots For Seedlings (AREA)

Abstract

The Idea is about a durable, efficient manual underwater construction that can check the Tsunami and help nullify the damage caused by it at shore. While the traditional and existing methods try to defend the shore cities with walls and jetty, facing the full threshold of Tsuanmi, the patent is about is more efficient and durable underwater manual construction that would absolve of all the energy from Tsunami and also averts creating rebound Tsunami and as well withstands it for life time, in such a way that current cities which are affected by Tsunami will become risk free even in case of the event. We need to identify Crucial point in the ocean bed for that shore city and based on topography of the land scape under water at Crucial point we can design customized placement of KAAPAALI bowls. There is no specific geometry as topography is bound to vary and this eases up construction, as well it is sidelined with main theme of this construction, disorient the Tsunami, absolve the energy and create downfall of Tsunami underwater and as well restrict the rebound of Tsunami again as there will be no geometry but chaos in the rebound of Tsunami too. Thus both onward Tsunami and rebound Tsunami both can be checked. The main theme is to run the Tsunami into trenches and smash it against the land releasing all the potential of Tsunami underwater itself, the construction mentioned in patent is about more durable easily constructible version of it, which method would be more efficient again depends on the Topography.

Description

KAAPAALI BOWLS AND TUNNELS - THE TSUNAMI DIVERTER
Introduction
This idea is about how to divert a Tsunami wave that is shot by underwater Earth quake in deep Ocean and protect the shore cities from damage. Once we understand the intricacies, mechanics in formation of a powerful Tsunami, then I can address the idea that I would present here .
Please refer the hand drawn pictures, representation that illuminates the mechanics of Tsunami with jargons that would be used in that to make this presentation easily understandable.
REFER PICTURE ON PAGE 4, Diagram I, II.
Source point - Underwater Tectonic plate earthquake junction.
High pressure head - The pressure caused on ocean bed and Tsunami by upper layers of Oceanic water due to gravity, which is greater at deep Ocean and reduces progressively proceeding towards shore with
reduction in depth.
Wall of Tsunami - The Frontal part of live Tsunami wave.
Core of Tsunami - The parabolic Core of the live Tsunami wave.
Rebound Tsunami - The reverse Tsunami caused by bounce of Original Tsunami on constraining structures .
Crucial point - The junction from where the tapered gradient land starts to ascend from deep oceanic floor to beach above.
HKTB - Horizontal Kaapaali Tunnel and Bowl.
VKTB - Vertical Kaapaali Tunnel and Bowl.
TSUNAMI FORMATION AND ATTACK MECHANICS -
It is necessary to reiterate this, to make the patent idea
understandable. Tsunami is formed, Whenever there is a strong
underwater earthquake which is caused by opposing or moving tectonic plates which move with respect to other and suddenly spurts it mass against the deep ocean water, it packs a powerful thrust into water mass, which ideally should have straightly/diagonally shoot up to the layer of the ocean, however the tectonic spurt surface area is comparatively negligible to surface area of the ocean above the spot which is filled with fluid, which constantly gets attracted towards the ocean bed due to gravity creating a strong restraint for this straight upward shoot up, as well sometimes the tectonic plates would be transferring the energy side wards into the water rather than upward thrust. Any direction all the above factors are valid. The energy transfer is from Solid to Fluid and in a way Fluid is trying to restrain the thrust because of High pressure head. If the quake is powerful enough then the energy transferred by quake finds restrain from High pressure head, hence it finds expression as a Tsunami and lands on the ocean bead and starts rolling on either side of the source point. It is under constant High pressure head so as it rolls towards beach it slowly loses energy but enlarges the Core of Tsunami and Wall of Tsunami, where the energy lost in transition and constrain by gravity is very negligible as far as the energy of Tsunami is considered. As well as, as the Tsunami rolls on the ocean bed and moves towards beach the size of the wall and core of tsunami keeps on increasing as the High pressure head from deep ocean to beach keeps on decreasing progressively. Once the Tsunami hits the beach there is complete transformation of potential (semi kinetic) energy to complete kinetic energy of tall vast and devastative Tsunami on shore cities . Typically all the existing methods of Tsunami and related protection is all about withstanding the power of Tsunami at this END POINT which is very much futile. Hence the Idea for patent which deals the wave in different spot with a different and comparatively very easy synthetic arrangement to the existing ones.
Hence the Kaapaali Bowls and Tunnels.
PROPOSED IDEA FOR PATENT:
My idea for patent proposes diverting the Tsunami in depth of oceans itself. Tsunami would always run on the ocean bed in its compressed form. Once it goes past the crucial point, there is no stopping it due to its sheer power. So while Tsunami is reeling under heavy High pressure head in depth of ocean, it can be diverted to hit the land and rebound back towards Source point losing all the energy and orientation in the process in the underwater. More specific design would absorb maximum thrust from Tsunami and cause a substantial disorientation in the Rebound Tsunami.
Ideally the thrust given by quake is absorbed by water and as it start moving due to fluidic nature of water and dynamics caused by High pressure head and kinetic energy, Tsunami grows its CORE and WALL, progressively as it runs towards the beach.
Though ocean bed offers resistance it is negligible to power of
Tsunami. However when we introduce trenches in the floor bed, Wall of Tsunami is diverted and pushed to hit the floor harder due to High pressure head and weaken thoroughly. Refer page 5 and diagram III.
Slightly improvising the Idea with stepper block (KAAPAALI BOWLS) would disorient the Tsunami wave that hits on it and Rebound would be just disoriented COREless and weakened with varied WALL height
Tsunami, Refer page 5 and diagram IV. Where we eliminate both onward journey of Tsunami as well absolve of all its power on Rebound.
The structures thus placed might get damaged in due course of Oceanic water movement or after successful diversion of Tsunami for few times.
Hence, further improvised method Bowls in Tunnels (KAAPAALI BOWLS AND TUNNELS) exactly well placed on and around crucial point in the deep ocean bed. The Tunnels are to be the regular steel reinforced cement concrete that would be used for under water transport conduits and same material can be used for the Stepper blocks called bowls, Refer page 6 diagram V, VI and Page 7 Diagram VII.
The Bowls to Tunnel conduits and conduits to ocean beds and walls are supposed to be strongly packed around with ocean soil in such a way that it should be reinforced like natural tunnels in rock, soil package around should be rigid and firm such that there is no change in position or orientation after absorbing the impact of Tsunami.
Page 7 and diagram VII is simplistic hand drawn representation of KAAPALI BOWLS AND TUNNELS, while tunnels are regular conduits used in under water transport system.

Claims (1)

  1. LETTER OF CLAIM OF PATENT
    I hereby claim that the best possible solution to restrain a Tsunami wave has to be done underwater with wedge/stepper/trench shaped structures oriented with Land (Ocean bed) which would absolve of the energy of tsunami by taking a straight impact and remain in its place for a life time.
    The Tunnels with stepper blocks tightly packed at Floor (Ocean bed) and walls (Crucial point raising gradient in land underwater) disoriented in direction and size with each other not only absolves the energy of Onward tsunami but dismantles the direction and orientation of rebound Tsunami as well, which causes crumpling of Tsunami (onward, rebound) to crumple under HIGH PRESSURE HEAD underwater.
    Thus I wish to patent the Underwater strategy, easily constructible and maintainable Crucial point tunnels with stepper blocks (Kaapaali bowls with Tunnels) with different orientation without a clean geometry (by purpose) . This base Idea can understandably be easily improvised depending on the underwater land's topography at the
    CRUCIAL POINT.
AU2018408876A 2018-02-16 2018-02-16 Kaapaali bowls and tunnels - the Tsunami diverter Active AU2018408876B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/IB2018/050965 WO2019158980A1 (en) 2018-02-16 2018-02-16 Kaapaali bowls and tunnels - the tsunami diverter

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2018408876A1 AU2018408876A1 (en) 2020-09-24
AU2018408876B2 true AU2018408876B2 (en) 2024-05-02

Family

ID=67618517

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2018408876A Active AU2018408876B2 (en) 2018-02-16 2018-02-16 Kaapaali bowls and tunnels - the Tsunami diverter

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20200370259A1 (en)
JP (1) JP7025793B2 (en)
AU (1) AU2018408876B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2019158980A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3875750A (en) * 1974-01-04 1975-04-08 Herbert Campbell Modular erosion control device
US4896996A (en) * 1989-01-23 1990-01-30 Mouton William J Wave actuated coastal erosion reversal system for shorelines
JPH07113219A (en) * 1993-10-15 1995-05-02 Shimizu Corp Multistage tsunami breakwater
JPH10331128A (en) * 1997-05-30 1998-12-15 Tetra Co Ltd Tidal wave damping block for submerged breakwater and submerged breakwater
KR101373031B1 (en) * 2012-07-05 2014-03-11 한국건설기술연구원 Method for Protecting Tsunami
JP2014040759A (en) * 2012-08-21 2014-03-06 Hiroshi Igawa Tsunami recurved parapet
WO2014068649A1 (en) * 2012-10-30 2014-05-08 株式会社日立製作所 Device for reducing tsunami wave force acting on building
WO2017106518A1 (en) * 2015-12-15 2017-06-22 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Elastic wave damping structures

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2021514436A (en) 2021-06-10
JP7025793B2 (en) 2022-02-25
US20200370259A1 (en) 2020-11-26
WO2019158980A1 (en) 2019-08-22
AU2018408876A1 (en) 2020-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN103334404A (en) Detachable flexible floating breakwater unit body
US11535997B2 (en) Modular building block apparatus
JP5719128B2 (en) Flood control method and dike
AU2018408876B2 (en) Kaapaali bowls and tunnels - the Tsunami diverter
CN106939581A (en) A kind of the interception net and its construction method of the mouth that inrushed for dykes and dams
JP2013221310A (en) Foundation structure and method for constructing foundation
JP2017110385A (en) Breakwater toughening construction method
CN210797424U (en) Floating breakwater
CN113089571A (en) Assembled water-permeable energy-dissipating tetrahedral embankment plugging member and construction method thereof
JP4305872B2 (en) Tsunami breakwater
Hazarika et al. Model testing on resilient solution for breakwater protection against tsunami
CN210507492U (en) Cofferdam structure
CN111021401B (en) Extensible grouting type anchoring foundation and construction method thereof
US8931976B2 (en) Tsunami breakwater wall of multilayered steel pipe pile structure and its construction method
Ishikawa et al. Collapse mechanism of seawall protective structure by huge tsunami
JP6749571B2 (en) Tsunami attenuation groove structure
JP5923825B2 (en) Rubble layer protection structure of gravity caisson breakwater
JP2014202016A (en) Reinforcement structure of caisson type hybrid bank and construction method of reinforcement structure
Tobita et al. Over-turning of a building with pile foundation-combined effect of liquefaction and tsunami
JP5370901B1 (en) Submarine
JP2015063806A (en) Seashore levee
JP6524602B2 (en) Self-supporting movable breakwater using combined triple power
JP6251491B2 (en) Construction method for coastal structures
CN115853551A (en) Air bag structure for preventing tunnel water filling and collapse and using method thereof
Pattipawaej et al. Two-Dimensional Submerged Rubble-Mound Breakwater Model using Tetrapod at Armor Layer