AU2017203560A1 - Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation - Google Patents

Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2017203560A1
AU2017203560A1 AU2017203560A AU2017203560A AU2017203560A1 AU 2017203560 A1 AU2017203560 A1 AU 2017203560A1 AU 2017203560 A AU2017203560 A AU 2017203560A AU 2017203560 A AU2017203560 A AU 2017203560A AU 2017203560 A1 AU2017203560 A1 AU 2017203560A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
chamber
flotation
ultrasonic
graphite
natural graphite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
AU2017203560A
Inventor
Peter Barnes
Jens Berkan
Tah Nean Chan
Joseph Williams
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Syrah Resources Ltd
Original Assignee
Syrah Resources Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Syrah Resources Ltd filed Critical Syrah Resources Ltd
Priority to AU2017203560A priority Critical patent/AU2017203560A1/en
Publication of AU2017203560A1 publication Critical patent/AU2017203560A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)

Abstract

Natural graphite, which is mined from various geologic ores globally, must be extracted and concentrated for emerging or traditional market applications. Current mine beneficiation practice relies on comminution and flotation to concentrate material. This invention is directed to a method introducing ultrasonic wave agitation, using an ultrasonic sound wave generator, to a mixture comprising a plurality of natural graphite particles containing mineral matter and a surface active organic reactant comprising a hydrocarbon oil into a chamber. An apparatus comprising; a chamber; an ultrasonic wave generator coupled to the chamber; and a mixture comprising a plurality of natural graphite particles containing mineral matter and a surface active organic reactant comprising a hydrocarbon oil in the chamber. Hereby, recovery and process efficiency may be increased by greater than 10%. 68513064V.1

Description

NATURAL GRAPHITE CONCENTRATION DEVICE UTILIZING
ULTRASONIC AIDED FLOTATION
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] None.
BACKGROUND [0002] Some work has been done utilizing ultrasonic devices to facilitate the flotation of black coal during coal mining operations. There have been positive results for simultaneously improving the grade and yield of coal, particularly for smaller particle sizes.
[0003] Articles have been published on this coal processing related practice. Such articles include the following: “Investigation of mechanism of ultrasound on coal flotation” (Ozkan & Kuyumcu, 2006); “Improvement of the flotation selectivity in a mechanical flotation cell by ultrasound” (Cilek & Ozgen, 2010); “Effects of simultaneous ultrasonic treatment on flotation of hard coal slimes” (Ozkan, 2011); and “Design of a flotation cell equipped with ultrasound transducers to enhance coal flotation” (Ozkan & Kutumcu, 2007).
[0004] These processes have been applied to coal ores, and have also been tested using copper ores, but have not been tested with natural graphite ores, which is considerably different from the known state of the art. Natural graphite has a considerably different crystal structure, and different attachments and inclusions of mineral and organic impurities to that found in coal or coal slimes.
[0005] Coal is chemically and physically different than graphite. The composition of coal is amorphous with turbostratic carbon compound arrangements, meaning that there is no distinct or continuous order within coal. It also contains many contaminants, particularly ash content, which can occasionally make up over half of the coal by mass.
[0006] On the other hand, natural flake graphite is crystalline and ordered. It contains relatively few impurities. It also exhibits excellent metallic and non-metallic properties such as thermal and electrical conductivity and heat transfer parallel to its basal layering and good insulation properties at right angles to that layering. The crystallinity of flake graphite is defined
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017 by the ordering of aromatic carbon layers, or basal layer, stacked in a reoccurring hexagonal sequence ABAB, which is not a feature of coal, yet is a defining characteristic which embodies the value and potential application of graphite in industry. In contrast to usually highly contaminated coal ore, graphite is consistently and homogenously highly hydrophobic, which requires a considerably different flotation process including different froth agents etc.
[0007] Current research suggests that ultrasonic waves produce cavitation bubbles, which may act as particle scrubbers. When ultrasound is supplied within a liquid, the wave propagates through the medium and exerts a compression and expansion forces. The reaction of this pressure difference is accentuated at the interface between different phases, and cavitation bubbles form. The bubbles preferentially form at the interface between liquid and solid, due to weak interactions between the two phases. For this reason, a hydrophobic material, such as graphite, forms bubbles more readily than hydrophilic minerals such as many gangue species.
[0008] Once these bubbles have formed, they quickly collapse. This produces a strong vacuum which forces an impact between both liquid and solid. It is understood that this impact 15 can etch material from the solid, effectively eroding the mineral and sometimes increasing surface area. As the liquid impacts the mineral, reagents and collectors within the liquid are more likely to actively promote the flotation process. Meanwhile, deleterious particulate matter can be removed.
[0009] The energy density of the impact force between liquid and solid, produced by ultrasound induced expansion and compression, can be large and results in turbulence. In turn, the turbulence promotes interactions between the mineral, in this case graphite, and the collector and reagents within the active flotation chamber.
[0010] Therefore, the use of high power ultrasonic emitting devices in flotation systems can benefit the process and result in improved recovery rates and grades by: cleansing hydrophobic 25 mineral surfaces of gangue, thus allowing reagents and collectors to more effectively bond to the mineral surface; physically modifying the mineral surface area thereby improving the likelihood of collectors, such as air bubbles etc., to attach and float the mineral; improving the dispersal of the collector medium; and spreading the distribution and suspension of the reagent(s) within the cell.
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017
BRIEF SUMMARY [0011] One embodiment of the invention is directed to a method comprising: introducing a mixture comprising a plurality of natural graphite particles containing mineral matter and a surface active organic reactant comprising a hydrocarbon oil into a chamber; and applying ultrasonic sound waves to the mixture using an ultrasonic sound wave generator.
[0012] An apparatus comprising: a chamber; an ultrasonic wave generator coupled to the chamber; and a mixture comprising a plurality of natural graphite particles containing mineral matter and a surface active organic reactant comprising a hydrocarbon oil in the chamber.
[0013] These and other embodiments of the invention are described in further detail below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0014] Figure 1 includes an apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention. Figure 1 illustrates flotation in progress as the collector ‘bubbles’ (15) and interacting ultrasonic waves (20), which are produced by an ultra-sonic wave generation device (25), occur inside the flotation chamber (30) and act to efficiently separate the ore concentrate (10) from depleted ore (35).
[0015] Figure 2 illustrates various other apparatus embodiments. Three circuit configurations a), b) and c) are shown. Configuration a) illustrates an ultrasonic device (60) assisted flotation cell (65), while configuration b) shows ultrasonic devices (60) in a pathway unit (55) to treat material prior to flotation cell (65) treatment, in either a regular flotation unit, b), or an ultrasonic assisted flotation unit. Configuration c) illustrates the material inflow (40) that undergoes size reduction (45) and then various stages of beneficiation to produce the material concentrate (70)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION [0016] Graphite is the most stable form of carbon at the earth’s surface, and exhibits both metallic and non-metallic properties. It is an inert substance and is highly conductive, and is also a very good insulator. It has a very high melting temperature, acts as a lubricant and can effectively intercalate lithium ions within its crystal lattice.
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017 [0017] While synthetic graphite can be manufactured by thermally altering a carbonaceous precursor material such as refinery residues or coal derivatives, etc., the temperatures needed to fully graphitize such material at low pressures requires considerable energy demands. The high consumption of energy in manufacture increases the cost of the final product. Synthetic graphite 5 is not cost competitive with natural graphite that is extracted from the earth, which was formed in high energy metamorphic or hydrothermal terranes, usually over millions of years.
[0018] The issue that faces natural graphite is that of its purity. Contaminant minerals attach themselves to natural graphite during its formation. Hence, the contaminants present in natural graphite can vary significantly and are primarily defined by the graphite ore and deposits.
However, most of these gangue minerals can be removed during the commination and beneficiation stages of ore processing.
[0019] Graphite is concentrated naturally in three distinct styles of geologic deposit comprising different material specifications.
1. Disseminated style deposits - this is the most common deposit style, comprising various grades from amorphous to highly crystalline flake graphite, often voluminous, variable particle size, which is generally dispersed within a schist, or similar lithology
2. Bedded style deposits - this is the less common deposit style, typified by moderate to high grade, poor to high crystallinity, evidence of high temperature thermal alteration of bedded carbonaceous material into graphite through metamorphism.
3. Vein style graphite - this is very high grade, highly crystalline, and the largest particle size of hexagonal form but only occur in small quantity requiring labor intensive extraction, usually in Sri Lanka, by pick and shovel.
[0020] For the majority of industrial and technological applications, natural graphite requires a 25 high degree of purity comprising less than about 5% but ideally less than about 1%, by mass, gangue minerals within the concentrate. Considering typical disseminated natural graphite ore contains a total graphite content of usually much less than 20%, a sequence of commination and beneficiation, usually involving flotation cells, can be used to form a concentrate in embodiments of the invention.
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017 [0021] The concentration process for graphite can include unaided flotation or froth flotation, whereby a chemical reagent, often mineral oil based, is used as flotation reagent, creating a thin layer or coat on the surface of the graphite particles, aiding in collection and flotation, whereby the flotation itself is achieved by aeration. The graphite particles and the chemical reagent (e.g., the mineral or wood oil based reagent) can form a mixture, which may also comprise other additives such as frothing agents, dispersants, pH regulators etc. Air bubbles are blown and dispersed as small bubbles on the floor of the flotation cell as the particle collector. The rising bubbles create a foam, which loosely binds with the graphite particles, which are in turn lifted to the top surface of the floatation cell device where they can be mechanically removed. All loosely attached impurities such as minerals are separated by gravity as they do not form a floating foam and subsequently fall to the bottom of the flotation cell device.
[0022] This process can achieve typical purification rates of approximately 90%, with some 10% of impurities still remaining in the produced graphite concentrate with typical graphite recovery rates of 80% - 90%.
[0023] One objective of an embodiment of the invention is to significantly improve the purity of the flotation concentrate as well as the achievable recovery rate. For this, the floatation process can be extended by the addition of an ultrasonic wave generation device.
[0024] An alternative embodiment to the invention is to integrate ultrasonic treatment baths prior to the flotation cell within the flotation circuit. This addition acts to increase the rate of erosion, effectively weathering the ore and weakening its composition. This treatment facilitates the liberation of graphite flakes and the removal of gangue elements through physical etching and agitation caused by liquid-solid or solid-solid phase interactions. The arrangement of cells within a circuit can be described with respect to Figure 2a or Figure 2b.
[0025] Embodiments of the invention can utilize at least one submerged ultrasonic generation device to assist the flotation cell processing of natural graphite ore. An alternative embodiment to this invention contains an ultrasonic bath stage which is connected and prior to the flotation cell within a beneficiation circuit.
[0026] An embodiment of this invention can include the ultrasonic bath cell stage that is designed into the ‘plumbing’ architecture of the beneficiation system. Submersible ultrasonic
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017 transducers can be integrated into the plumbing, allowing for both an ease of access - facilitating maintenance and ease of use - and a continuous material flow. The continuous flow model facilitates constant, or pulsating, ‘cleaning’ or erosion of graphite particles which preconditions the product for flotation, either ultrasonic assisted or otherwise.
[0027] The ultrasonic plumbing stage can be specifically designed to facilitate the dispersal of particles within the slurry and inject the active reagent into the material flow. Ultrasonic waves assist with the dispersal of reagent and particles within the slurry to homogenize and optimize the downstream flotation. The dimensions of the plumbing system can be configured and optimized to the resonance frequency of the transducer waves. The produced ultrasonic wave’s 10 power and frequency can be dependent on the consistency of the slurry and the dimensions of the pathway or cell within which it is active.
[0028] As a highly hydrophobic mineral, micro-cavitation is more likely to occur on the surface of graphite than other mineral species present in the solution. Erosion induced by the collapse of cavitation bubbles acts to peel off gangue minerals and oxides, such as quartz, feldspars, micas, 15 clays and sulphides from the graphite flakes. These flakes, with their etched surfaces, more readily attach to collectors, thus facilitating the floating of graphite into the froth, meanwhile separating denser, less hydrophobic, gangue minerals.
[0029] A further embodiment of this invention is the use of emulsified hydrocarbon oils as nonionizing reagents within the ultrasonic assisted circuit. The flotation of graphite is naturally 20 quite efficient over a large pH range, hence various neutral organic frother additives and dispersants, such as sodium silicate, with or without regulators, may be employed, including branched chain aliphatic alcohols, such as Methyl Isobutyl Carbinol, or water-soluble polymers, such as polypropylene glycols. The purpose of the non-ionizing reagent, in this case hydrocarbon oil, is not to interact with mineral surfaces or water dipoles but to readily adhere to 25 minerals that are naturally hydrophobic. This adhesion may then agglomerate multiples of particles and increase the efficiency and likelihood that the hydrophobic minerals, natural graphite, are collected by interacting bubbles, and accumulate into the froth for collection.
[0030] The flotation cells can be arranged into a circuit, or set of circuits, where individual cells may be fitted with at least one ultrasonic generation device (Figure 2a). It is also potentially beneficial to utilize ultrasonic bath treatment in a cell prior to flotation to
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017 precondition the graphite concentrate and loosen the gangue components within the concentrate.
The ultrasonic bath cell is to be integrated into the circuit, and attached prior to a flotation cell unit (Figure 2b). The ultrasonic system can be integrated to the concentrate producing circuit at any combination of stages along the sequence, during pre-flotation, directly after particle size reduction (liberation), or during the rougher, cleaner or scavenger stages of the circuit.
[0031] Figure 2a) illustrates a material inflow 40 upstream of an introduction chamber (45) where the material inflow can undergo comminution. The introduction chamber (45) may be coupled to a chamber such as a flotation cell (65) via a fluid containing structure (50) such as a pipe. Ultrasonic devices 60 may be present within the flotation cell (65) and a material concentrate 70 may pass downstream of the flotation cell (65) via an outlet in the flotation cell (65).
[0032] Figure 2b) shows a similar configuration as Figure 2a), except that the use of ultrasonic devices 60 is optional in the flotation cell (64). In this example, a pathway unit 55 may contain the ultrasonic devices 60.
[0033] Figure 2c) shows a similar configuration as Figure 2b), except that ultrasonic devices are also present in the flotation cell (64).
[0034] The above description is illustrative and is not restrictive. Many variations of the invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art upon review of the disclosure. The scope of the invention can, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, 20 but instead can be determined with reference to the pending claims along with their full scope or equivalents.
[0035] One or more features from any embodiment may be combined with one or more features of any other embodiment without departing from the scope of the invention.
[0036] A recitation of a, an or the is intended to mean one or more unless specifically 25 indicated to the contrary.

Claims (4)

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1 17. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the chamber is a floatation cell, and
1 16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the chamber is a pathway unit.
68513064V.1
2017203560 26 May 2017
1 15. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the chamber is a flotation cell.
1 14. An apparatus comprising:
1 13. The method of any of claims 9-12,
1 12. The method of any of claims 9-11 wherein the ultrasonic sound wave
1 11. The method of any of claims 9-10 wherein the mixture further comprises:
1 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising:
1 9. A method comprising:
1 8. The process of one or more of the previous claims, whereby the ultrasonic
1 Ί. The process of one or more of the previous claims wherein sonication
1 6. The process of one or more of the previous claims wherein sonication
1 5. The process of one or more of the previous claims wherein sonication is
1 4. The process of one or more of the foregoing claims wherein the mass ratio
1 3. The process of one or more of the foregoing claims wherein the mass ratio
1 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrocarbon oil is preferably a
1 1.A method and process for separation and purification of natural graphite,
2 wherein the apparatus further comprises:
2 a chamber;
2 generator transmits ultrasonic sound waves with frequencies between 25kHz and 50 kHz.
2 an organic neutral frother and pH regulator agents.
2 agitating the mixture using a mechanical agitation device.
2 introducing a mixture comprising a plurality of natural graphite particles
2 transducers are physically separated from the flotation device, comprising a separate ultrasonic
2 power is produced and transmitted at frequencies between 25kHz and 50kHz.
2 power density is at least 20W per litre of active foam-emulsion fluid bath volume.
68513064V. 1
2017203560 26 May 2017
2 achieved by at least one ultra-sonic transducer that is immersed into the flotation device.
2 of foam-emulsion fluid to hydrocarbon oil is between 100:40 and 100:3.
2 of multi-phase-fluid to comminute graphite-containing mineral matter is between 3: 100 and
2 hydrocarbon fuel oil, preferably mineral oil based kerosene or diesel.
2 whereby the lipophilic surface tension of the graphite particles is modified by wetting with a
3 a pathway unit upstream of the flotation cell; and
3 an ultrasonic wave generator coupled to the chamber; and
4 a mixture comprising a plurality of natural graphite particles containing mineral
5 matter and a surface active organic reactant comprising a hydrocarbon oil in the chamber.
3 containing mineral matter and a surface active organic reactant comprising a hydrocarbon oil
4 into a chamber; and
5 applying ultrasonic sound waves to the mixture using an ultrasonic sound wave
6 generator.
3 treatment stage integrated into the process prior to the subsequent flotation device.
3 40:100
3 surface active organic reactant, and the wetted comminute graphite particles are dispersed in
4 aqueous dispersion medium, and whereby a gas is dispersed into the aqueous dispersion medium
5 to form gas bubbles, and whereby the gas bubbles attach to the surface modified graphite
6 particles, to form a multi-phase-fluid, and the effect of ultrasonic agitation is used to liberate the
7 graphite particles, at least partially, from non-graphitic material, and whereby the effect of
8 gravity is used within the floatation device to separate the, at least partially, liberated graphite
9 particles from the aqueous dispersion medium by means of flotation, comprising:
10 (la) comminute natural graphite containing mineral ore matter to gravimetrically
11 liberate at least a fraction of the graphite particles from the mineral matter;
12 (lb) the surface active organic reactant being a hydrocarbon oil;
13 (lc) a mechanical agitation device for the directed macroscopic movement,
14 chemical dispersant and stirring of the multi-phase-fluid;
15 (Id) an ultrasonic sound wave generator for the sonication of the multi-phase-
16 fluid directed to the local creation of micro-cavitation on the particle surfaces;
4 an introduction chamber upstream of the pathway unit.
AU2017203560A 2017-05-26 2017-05-26 Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation Abandoned AU2017203560A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2017203560A AU2017203560A1 (en) 2017-05-26 2017-05-26 Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2017203560A AU2017203560A1 (en) 2017-05-26 2017-05-26 Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2017203560A1 true AU2017203560A1 (en) 2018-12-13

Family

ID=64565299

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2017203560A Abandoned AU2017203560A1 (en) 2017-05-26 2017-05-26 Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2017203560A1 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109647630A (en) * 2018-12-28 2019-04-19 中建材蚌埠玻璃工业设计研究院有限公司 A kind of short route method of purification of graphite
CN111389595A (en) * 2020-04-01 2020-07-10 中国矿业大学 Preparation method and device of low-rank coal flotation reagent based on ultraviolet pretreatment
CN112206926A (en) * 2020-09-15 2021-01-12 凯盛石墨碳材料有限公司 Short-process beneficiation method for low-grade fine flake graphite
CN112718232A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-04-30 郑州大学 Method for protecting crystalline graphite flakes through graded grinding and floating
CN114713380A (en) * 2021-10-19 2022-07-08 中国矿业大学 Coarse particle flotation device and method based on coupling of ultrasonic waves and mechanical damping blocks

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120132571A1 (en) * 2005-02-08 2012-05-31 Filler Paul A Process and Composition for Froth Flotation
US20150090666A1 (en) * 2013-10-01 2015-04-02 Ecolab Usa Inc. Collectors for mineral flotation
WO2016205862A1 (en) * 2015-06-23 2016-12-29 Talga Resources Limited Mining method and use of mined material in production of graphene and graphitic material
WO2017013424A1 (en) * 2015-07-20 2017-01-26 Hilsonic Process Systems Ltd Ultrasonic processor

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120132571A1 (en) * 2005-02-08 2012-05-31 Filler Paul A Process and Composition for Froth Flotation
US20150090666A1 (en) * 2013-10-01 2015-04-02 Ecolab Usa Inc. Collectors for mineral flotation
WO2016205862A1 (en) * 2015-06-23 2016-12-29 Talga Resources Limited Mining method and use of mined material in production of graphene and graphitic material
WO2017013424A1 (en) * 2015-07-20 2017-01-26 Hilsonic Process Systems Ltd Ultrasonic processor

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Han, Choon, "Coal cleaning by froth flotation " (1983). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 8476, Iowa State University. Downloaded on 4 May 2018 from the internet. URL <http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/8476> *
LETMATHE et al. "Intensification of Froth Flotation through the Use of Ultrasound", Aufbereitungs Technik, 2002, vol. 43, iss. 4 pages 32-40 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109647630A (en) * 2018-12-28 2019-04-19 中建材蚌埠玻璃工业设计研究院有限公司 A kind of short route method of purification of graphite
CN109647630B (en) * 2018-12-28 2021-03-23 中建材蚌埠玻璃工业设计研究院有限公司 Short-process purification method of graphite
CN111389595A (en) * 2020-04-01 2020-07-10 中国矿业大学 Preparation method and device of low-rank coal flotation reagent based on ultraviolet pretreatment
CN111389595B (en) * 2020-04-01 2021-07-27 中国矿业大学 Preparation method and device of low-rank coal flotation reagent based on ultraviolet pretreatment
CN112206926A (en) * 2020-09-15 2021-01-12 凯盛石墨碳材料有限公司 Short-process beneficiation method for low-grade fine flake graphite
CN112718232A (en) * 2020-12-17 2021-04-30 郑州大学 Method for protecting crystalline graphite flakes through graded grinding and floating
CN112718232B (en) * 2020-12-17 2022-05-03 郑州大学 Method for protecting crystalline graphite flakes through graded grinding and floating
CN114713380A (en) * 2021-10-19 2022-07-08 中国矿业大学 Coarse particle flotation device and method based on coupling of ultrasonic waves and mechanical damping blocks
CN114713380B (en) * 2021-10-19 2022-12-27 中国矿业大学 Coarse particle flotation device and method based on coupling of ultrasonic waves and mechanical damping blocks

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2017203560A1 (en) Natural graphite concentration device utilizing ultrasonic aided flotation
Wang et al. Regulation of bubble size in flotation: A review
Barma Ultrasonic-assisted coal beneficiation: A review
JP4802305B2 (en) Floating separation apparatus and method, and manufacturing method of product using the same
Song et al. Magnetic separation of hematite and limonite fines as hydrophobic flocs from iron ores
Ma et al. Effect of collector, pH and ionic strength on the cationic flotation of kaolinite
Özkan et al. Design of a flotation cell equipped with ultrasound transducers to enhance coal flotation
AU2010289638B2 (en) Method for enhancing selectivity and recovery in the fractional flotation of particles in a flotation column
Li et al. Flotation kinetics and separation selectivity of coal size fractions
Wang et al. Enhancement of coal flotation using impact flow conditioning pulp
Li et al. Effect of polyethylene oxide on flotation of molybdenite fines
Yang et al. Hydrophobic agglomeration of mineral fines in aqueous suspensions and its application in flotation: A review
CN111902372A (en) Improved dewatering method and apparatus
Okawa et al. Effects of different ultrasound irradiation frequencies and water temperatures on extraction rate of bitumen from oil sand
Song et al. Hydrophobic flocculation flotation for beneficiating fine coal and minerals
CN105399171A (en) Air flotation device
Cao et al. Ultrasound-electrochemistry enhanced flotation and desulphurization for fine coal
Ozkan A review of simultaneous ultrasound-assisted coal flotation
Vasumathi et al. A mini review on flotation techniques and reagents used in graphite beneficiation
Filippov et al. Effect of ultrasound on flotation kinetics in the reactor-separator
Song et al. Parametric aspect of hydrophobic flocculation technology
CN110314767A (en) A kind of low order/oxidized coal slime floating agent and application method
Prasad et al. Reverse flotation of sedimentary calcareous/dolomitic rock phosphate ore—an overview
Gao et al. Natural Graphite Froth Flotation-An Overview
İlhan et al. Hidden graphite resources in Turkey: a new supply candidate for Europe?

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MK5 Application lapsed section 142(2)(e) - patent request and compl. specification not accepted