AU2015207855B2 - Power line proximity sensing and warning system - Google Patents

Abstract

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes 13730827 SMITH ET AL. BB Examiner Art Unit JULIE LIEU 2684 CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED Class Subclass Date Examiner SEARCHNOTES Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL EAST 4/16/15 JL EAST 11/20/15 JL EAST 7/9/16 JL INTERFERENCESEARCH US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol G08G 1/0962 7/10/16 JL H02H 5/12 "1 "1 G01V 3/10, 15 "_ "_ G01 R 19/145; 28/085 "1 "1 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patentand Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexadria, Virginia 22313-1450 ww -upto.gov APPLICATION NO. ISSUE DATE PATENT NO. ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/730,827 11/22/2016 9501930 20600.0001USU1 8263 52835 7590 11/02/2016 HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. 45 South Seventh Street Suite 2700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 ISSUE NOTIFICATION he projected patent number and issue date are specified above. Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b) (application filed on or after May 29, 2000) he Patent Term Adjustment is 0 day(s). Any patent to issue from the above-identified application will include m indication of the adjustment on the front page. f a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) was filed in the above-identified application, the filing date that determines Patent Term Adjustment is the filing date of the most recent CPA. Applicant will be able to obtain more detailed information by accessing the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) WEB site (http://pair.uspto.gov). Any questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the )ffice of Patent Legal Administration at (571)-272-7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee >ayments should be directed to the Application Assistance Unit (AAU) of the Office of Data Management ODM) at (571)-272-4200. APPLICANT(s) (Please see PAIR WEB site http://pair.uspto.gov for additional applicants): tephen L. Smith, Kalispell, MT; dark C. Olson, Racine, WI; Zyan W. Johnson, Bigfork, MT; JNITED SAFETY, INC., Kalispell, MT he United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world and is an unparalleled location or business investment, innovation, and commercialization of new technologies. The USA offers tremendous esources and advantages for those who invest and manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation vorks to encourage and facilitate business investment. To learn more about why the USA is the best country in he world to develop technology, manufacture products, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA.gov. EAST Search History EAST Search History (Prior Art) Ref Hits Search Query 0Bs DIefault IPurais Time #__ ___ _____________perator ____Stamp S194 1 1/387US-PGPUB; ~ADJ ION 2016/07/09 ___ ____1373027USPAT;EEEPO 14:42 ___ ____ ~~~~ JPO; DERWENTj___j__I___ !S195] 1 ]S194 and user near6 adjust$4 US-PAT;EB; ADO j12/70 'distnce)USPAT;EPO; 14:55 !S196 4599 power line with (proxim$3 or US-PGPUB; ~ ADJ ION J2016/07/09 ___ ___ I________________ JPO; DERWENT _ _ I _____ S19 114 S96and (exceed$3 or higher or US-PGPUB; ADIN 21/70 S19]114 above or larger) with level USPAT;EPO; AD21:55~4o/o ___ ____I___________________JPO;DERWENT ____I______ S198 I44(GO8G1/0962 OR H02H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 21/70 ___ ___ GO1V3/10,15 0R G01R19/145 or USPAT;EEEPO [21: 5 80/ ___ ____GO1R29/085 or HO2H5/12).cpc. JPO;DERWENT ___I_______ S199 11 S197 AND5S198 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 USPAT; EPO1:5 JPO; DERWENT S200 7 [S199 an dutbeUS-PGPUB; IADJ [ON 21/70 anddjstaleUSPAT;EPO; 220 S2123849 loop antenna US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 S225659 sensitivity near10 adjustable US-PGPUB; ADJ ON r201/70 USPAT;EPO; 122:12 JPO; DERWENT S203 3 S196 and S01 and S02 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 USPAT;EEPO 22:13 ___ ____JPO; DERWENT S204 61236 (level or sensitivity or threshold) US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2016/07/09 near10 adjustable USPAT;EEPO 22:14 ___ ~~~~~JPO; DERWENT____ __ I___ S205 3 S196 and S01 and S04 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 S261057 nstiitothesol) US-PAT; PO A2:1 I~lvelJPO;DERWENT S206 10537 (level or sensitivity or threshold) US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2016/07/0 I near10 adjustableclm. USPAT; EPO2:1 S207 I00loop anen~l.US-PGPUB; 1ADJ ON 21/70 ~350USPAT;EPOC2:1 EATSearch History (Interference) Ref [Hits [Search Query DBs [Default IPlurals ime # ~ IOpeator ~ xtamp ~~7~777 16 - 1 O G 1R19/145or IFOGPUB .. ... ................. 21 ____ zIM FD_ Gi29/085 or H02H5/i2).cp. [USPAT ____ _______ opantennaci.U- 'D 0 [S21 1053 (level or sensitivity or threshold) nearO0 zU- AJ O 21/70 adj ustablecm. PPUB; z2:1 8211 I08 and S209 and S210 US- AJr079 _ _ _ _ I.....I................. 1. 7/10/201633059PM... . . .. ......... C:\Uersjlie\Doumens\EST\orksace\137082.ws S/N13/730827 Remarks Reconsideration is requested in view of the above amendments and the following remarks. Claims 1-11, 14, 17, and 19-26 are pending Claims 1-11 15, 17 and 19-22are rejected under 35 USC 112 first paragraph Claims 1, 10 and 17 are amended todelete the language about the difference being user adjustable. Withdrawal of the rejection is requested. All claims should now be in conditionfor allowance. Favorable reconsideration in the form of a notice of allowance is requested, Any questions concerning this paper can be directed to the attention of the undersigned at (612) 455-3805. Respectfilly submitted, HAMRE, SCHUMANN,MUELLER & LARSONg.C. 45 South 7 St. Suite 2700 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800 Dated May 2. 2016 By: _lames A, Larson! James A. Larson Reg No. 40443 9 IN lTE UNI TED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No,: 20600.00OIUSUI Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNIN(I SYSTEM CERIFICA11 OF'YRANSM ISS ION Ih-ere bycertzify ththtpapalrskbeingrnsiteby EyS Wb o C lnn siowe fr;?mw, s.F0Box i450hAlemandnia VA. 22313-1430 o May 2, 2016, By: ... e Ahi~ lA s Nauie: twrxne±A. Larson AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE Mail Stop: AMENDMENT Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 Dear Sir: In response to the office action miailed December 2, 2015, Applicant provides the following. Amendments to the claims begin on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on. page 9 of this paper. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 A1x dria, Virginia 22313-1450 wwwusptogov NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE AND FEE(S) DUE 52835 7590 08/04/2016 EXAMINER AMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC 5 South Seventh Street quite 2700 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER INNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 2684 DATE MAILED: 08/04/2016 APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATIONNO. 13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 OF INVENTION: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM PPLN. TYPE ENTITY STATUS ISSUE FEE DUE PUBLICATION FEE DUE PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE TOTAL FEE(S) DUE DATE DUE >nprovisional SMALL $480 $0 $0 $480 11/04/2016 APPLICATION IDENTIFIED ABOVE HAS BEEN EXAMINED AND IS ALLOWED FOR ISSUANCE AS A PATENT. SECUTION ON THE MERITS IS CLOSED. THIS NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS. i APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO WITHDRAWAL FROM ISSUE AT THE INITIATIVE OF THE OFFICE OR UPON [TION BY THE APPLICANT. SEE 37 CFR 1.313 AND MPEP 1308. ISSUE FEE AND PUBLICATION FEE (IF REQUIRED) MUST BE PAID WITHIN THREE MONTHS FROM THE LING DATE OF THIS NOTICE OR THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE REGARDED AS ABANDONED. THIS TUTORY PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED. SEE 35 U.S.C. 151. THE ISSUE FEE DUE INDICATED ABOVE DOES REFLECT A CREDIT FOR ANY PREVIOUSLY PAID ISSUE FEE IN THIS APPLICATION. IF AN ISSUE FEE HAS VIOUSLY BEEN PAID IN THIS APPLICATION (AS SHOWN ABOVE), THE RETURN OF PART B OF THIS FORM L BE CONSIDERED A REQUEST TO REAPPLY THE PREVIOUSLY PAID ISSUE FEE TOWARD THE ISSUE FEE NOW V TO REPLY TO THIS NOTICE: view the ENTITY STATUS shown above. If the ENTITY STATUS is shown as SMALL or MICRO, verify whether entitlement to that status still applies. ENTITY STATUS is the same as shown above, pay the TOTAL FEE(S) DUE shown above. ENTITY STATUS is changed from that shown above, on PART B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL, complete section number 5 titled nge in Entity Status (from status indicated above)". urposes of this notice, small entity fees are 1/2 the amount of undiscounted fees, and micro entity fees are 1/2 the amount of small entity RT B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL, or its equivalent, must be completed and returned to the United States Patent and Trademark Office TO) with your ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). If you are charging the fee(s) to your deposit account, section "4b" rt B - Fee(s) Transmittal should be completed and an extra copy of the form should be submitted. If an equivalent of Part B is filed, a st to reapply a previously paid issue fee must be clearly made, and delays in processing may occur due to the difficulty in recognizing paper as an equivalent of Part B. 11 communications regarding this application must give the application number. Please direct all communications prior to issuance to Stop ISSUE FEE unless advised to the contrary. ORTANT REMINDER: Utility patents issuing on applications filed on or after Dec. 12, 1980 may require payment of tenance fees. It is patentee's responsibility to ensure timely payment of maintenance fees when due. Page 1 of 3 mplete and send this form, together with applicable fee(s), to: Mail Mail Stop ISSUE FEE Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 or Fax (571)-273-2885 JUCTIONS: This form should be used for transmitting the ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). Blocks 1 through 5 should be completed where riate. All further correspondence including the Patent, advance orders and notification of maintenance fees will be mailed to the current correspondence address as ted unless corrected below or directed otherwise in Block 1, by (a) specifying a new correspondence address; and/or (b) indicating a separate "FEE ADDRESS" for nance fee notifications. Note: A certificate of mailing can only be used for domestic mailings of the Fee(s) Transmittal. This certificate cannot be used for any other accompanying RENT CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS (Note: Use Block 1 for ay change of address) papers. Each additional paper, such as an assignment or formal drawing, must have its own certificate of mailing or transmission. Certificate of Mailing or Transmission 52835 7590 08/04/2016 I hereby certify that this Fee(s) Transmittal is being deposited with the United AMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. States Postal Servicewith sufficientnpostage for first class mail inan envelope addressed to the Mail Stop ISSUE FEE address above, or being facsimile > South Seventh Street transmitted to the USPTO (571) 273-2885, on the date indicated below. quite 2700 INNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 (Depositor'nae) (Signature) (Date) APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 OF INVENTION: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM ,PPLN. TYPE ENTITY STATUS ISSUE FEE DUE PUBLICATION FEE DUE PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE TOTAL FEE(S) DUE DATE DUE provisionall SMALL $480 $0 $0 $480 11/04/2016 EXAMINER ART UNIT CLASS-SUBCLASS LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC 2684 340-901000 nge of correspondence address or indication of "Fee Address" (37 2. For printing on the patent front page, list .363). (1) The names of up to 3 registered patent attorneys I Change of correspondence address (or Change of Correspondence or agents OR, alternatively, ress form PTO/SB/122) attached. (2) The name of a single firm (having as a member a 2 "Fee Address" indication (or "Fee Address" Indication form registered attorney or agent) and the names of up to )/SB/47; Rev 03-02 or more recent) attached. Use of a Customer 2 registered patentattorneysoragents.Ifnonameis 3 mber is required. listed, no name will be printed. IGNEE NAME AND RESIDENCE DATA TO BE PRINTED ON THE PATENT (print or type) EASE NOTE: Unless an assignee is identified below, no assignee data will appear on the patent. If an assignee is identified below, the document has been filed for )rdation as set forth in 37 CFR 3.11. Completion of this form is NOT a substitute for filing an assignment. NAME OF ASSIGNEE (B) RESIDENCE: (CITY and STATE OR COUNTRY) check the appropriate assignee category or categories (will not be printed on the patent) : UIndividual UCorporation or other private group entity UGovernment e following fee(s) are submitted: 4b. Payment of Fee(s): (Please first reapply any previously paid issue fee shown above) Issue Fee A check is enclosed. Publication Fee (No small entity discount permitted) UPayment by credit card. Form PTO-2038 is attached. Advance Order - # of Copies Ll The director is hereby authorized to charge the required fee(s), any deficiency, or credits any overpayment, to Deposit Account Number - (enclose an extra copy of this form). nge in Entity Status (from status indicated above) Applicant certifying micro entity status. See 37 CFR 1.29 NOTE: Absent a valid certification of Micro Entity Status (see forms PTO/SB/15A and 15B), issue fee payment in the micro entity amount will not be accepted at the risk of application abandonment. Applicant asserting small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27 NOTE: If the application was previously under micro entity status, checking this box will be taken to be a notification of loss of entitlement to micro entity status. Applicant changing to regular undiscounted fee status. NOTE: Checking this box will be taken to be a notification of loss of entitlement to small or micro entity status, as applicable. , This form must be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 1.31 and 1.33. See 37 CFR 1.4 for signature requirements and certifications. horized Signature Date ed or printed name Registration No. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 A1x dria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/730,827 12/28/2012 StephenL.Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 52835 7590 08/04/2016 EXAMINER AMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC 5 South Seventh Street quite 2700 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER INNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 2684 DATE MAILED: 08/04/2016 Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b) (Applications filed on or after May 29, 2000) Office has discontinued providing a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) calculation with the Notice of Allowance. ion 1(h)(2) of the AIA Technical Corrections Act amended 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3)(B)(i) to eliminate the irement that the Office provide a patent term adjustment determination with the notice of allowance. See sions to Patent Term Adjustment, 78 Fed. Reg. 19416, 19417 (Apr. 1, 2013). Therefore, the Office is no longer iding an initial patent term adjustment determination with the notice of allowance. The Office will continue to ide a patent term adjustment determination with the Issue Notification Letter that is mailed to applicant oximately three weeks prior to the issue date of the patent, and will include the patent term adjustment on the nt. Any request for reconsideration of the patent term adjustment determination (or reinstatement of patent term stment) should follow the process outlined in 37 CFR 1.705. questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the Office of nt Legal Administration at (571)-272-7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee payments should be :ted to the Customer Service Center of the Office of Patent Publication at 1-(888)-786-0101 or (571)-272-4200. Page 3 of 3 OMB Clearance and PRA Burden Statement for PTOL-85 Part B The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to obtain Office of Management and Budget approval before requesting most types of information from the public. When OMB approves an agency request to collect information from the public, OMB (i) provides a valid OMB Control Number and expiration date for the agency to display on the instrument that will be used to collect the information and (ii) requires the agency to inform the public about the OMB Control Number's legal significance in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b). The information collected by PTOL-85 Part B is required by 37 CFR 1.311. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. Privacy Act Statement The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is 35 U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or patent. If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination of proceedings or abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent. The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses: 1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these records is required by the Freedom of Information Act. 2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in the course of settlement negotiations. 3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record. 4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m). 5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty. 6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 218(c)). 7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that agency's responsibility to recommend improvements in records management practices and programs, under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals. 8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either publication of the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 151. Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public if the record was filed in an application which became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which application is referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspection or an issued patent. 9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulation. Application No. Applicant(s) 13/730,827 SMITH ET AL. Notice of Allowability Examiner Art Unit AA(First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status No -- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- -laims being allowable, PROSECUTION ON THE MERITS IS (OR REMAINS) CLOSED in this application. If not included with (or previously mailed), a Notice of Allowance (PTOL-85) or other appropriate communication will be mailed in due course. THIS TICE OF ALLOWABILITY IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS. This application is subject to withdrawal from issue at the initiative he Office or upon petition by the applicant. See 37 CFR 1.313 and MPEP 1308. 1This communication is responsive to amendment filed May 02, 2016. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on . ]An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. SThe allowed claim(s) is/are 1-11,14,17 and 19-26. As a result of the allowed claim(s), you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see http://www.uspto.gov/patents/initevents/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov. ]Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) E All b) E Some *c) M None of the: 1. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._ . 3. Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this national stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). * Certified copies not received:_. applicant has THREE MONTHS FROM THE "MAILING DATE" of this communication to file a reply complying with the requirements )ted below. Failure to timely comply will result in ABANDONMENT of this application. HIS THREE-MONTH PERIOD IS NOT EXTENDABLE. ]CORRECTED DRAWINGS (as "replacement sheets") must be submitted. E including changes required by the attached Examiner's Amendment / Comment or in the Office action of Paper No./Mail Date_. Identifying indicia such as the application number (see 37 CFR 1.84(c)) should be written on the drawings in the front (not the back) of each sheet. Replacement sheet(s) should be labeled as such in the header according to 37 CFR 1.121(d). ] DEPOSIT OF and/or INFORMATION about the deposit of BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL must be submitted. Note the attached Examiner's comment regarding REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEPOSIT OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL. achment(s) M Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 5. E Examiner's Amendment/Comment M Information Disclosure Statements (PTO/SB/08), 6. E Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance Paper No./Mail Date ]Examiner's Comment Regarding Requirement for Deposit 7. [ Other_ . of Biological Material ]Interview Summary (PTO-413), Paper No./Mail Date_. lie Lieu/ mary Examiner Unit: 2684 Patent and Trademark Office )L-37 (Rev. 08-13) Notice of Allowability Part of Paper No./Mail Date 60710 EAST Search History EAST Search History (Prior Art) Ref IHits Search Query [DBs Default Piurais Time # ............ "'l Operatorj Stamp S176 369 (power line or high voltage) with US- IADJ zON 2015/11/20z (proxim$3 or distance) same (warn$3 PGPUB; 23:53 or alert$3 or alarm$3) USPAT; z EPO; JPO ___ _______________________DERWENT___I______ S177 502358 (threshold or predetermined or US- ADJ ON 21/12 sensitivity) with adjust$4 PGPUB; 23:53 USPA z ~EPO; JPO; DERWENT S178 34 S176sand S177 US- ADJ ION 2015/11/20 PGPUB; 23:53 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT_ z _z S17921 (US-20100214094-$ orUS- US- ADJ ON 2015/11/23 20100286845-$orUS-20070018841$ PGPUB; 13:55 or US-20100090863-$orUS- USPAT; 20020067286-$orUS-20090237263$ DERWENT or US-20060271263-$ or US 20100052929-$ or US-20090108840-$ or US-20030011484-$ or US 20100289662-$).did. or (US-5252912-$ orUS-3786468-$ or US-6600426-$ or US-6170607-$orUS-5592092-$ or US 3907136-$ or US-6515588-$ or US 3745549-$or US-5859597-$).did or z___ _____ (EP 2479735-$).did. o_____ zz S180 5 S179 anduserwithadust$4 US- jADJ jON 2015/11/23 USPAT; S181 21 (US-20100214094-$ or US- US- ADJ ON 2015/11/24 20100286845-$ or US-20070018841-$ PPUB; 12:51 orUS-20100090863-$ or US- USPAT 20020067286-$ or US-20090237263-$ DERWENT orUS-20060271263-$ - or US 20100052929-$ or US-20090108840-$ or US-20030011484-$ or US 20100289662-$).did. or (US-5252912-$ or US-3786468-$ or US-6600426$or US-6170607-$ or US-5592092-$ or US 3907136-$ or US-6515588-$ or US 3745549-$ or US-5859597-$).did. or (EP-2479735-$).did. zz S182 6 S181 and remote$2 near control$3 US- ADJ zON 2015/11/24 PGPUB; 12:51 USPAT EPO; JPO DERWENT same warn$e PGPUB; 13:14 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT T S184 2 S181 and remote$2 near6 control$3 US- ADJ ON 2015/11/24 same warn$3 PGPUB; 13:15 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S185 30985 loop near3 antenna US- ADJ zON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:45 USPAT; z z ~ ~ EPO; JPO; DERWENTI z z S186 21 (US-20100214094-$ or US- US- ADJ ON 2015/11/25 20100286845-$ or US-20070018841-$ PGPUB; 14:45 or US-20100090863-$ or US- USPAT; 20020067286-$ or US-20090237263-$ DERWENTz or US-20060271263-$ or US 20100052929-$ or US-20090108840-$ or US-20030011484-$ or US 20100289662-$).did. or (US-5252912-$ or US-3786468-$ or US-6600426-$ or US-6170607-$ or US-5592092-$ or US '3907136-$ or US-6515588-$ or US 3745549-$ or US-5859597-$).did. or z__ __ _ (EP-2479735-$).did. z z S187 1 S186 and S185 US- ADJ [ON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:45 USPATI DERWENT____ _______ !S188 424 power line with (proxim$3 or distance) US- IADJ ION 2015/11/25 j4284 PGPUB; 14:47 z USPAT; I z EPO; JPO; z z__ ._ _ _DERWENT [ z z S189 428137 (strength or magnitude or level) with US- zADJ zON 2015/11/25 field PUB; z 14:47 z USPAT; z z z EPO; JPO; z z z__ I _ _ _DERWENT _ z z S190 360422 s189 and (exceed$3 or higher orabove US- zADJ ON 2015/11/25 I ~ ~USPAT; I ~EPO; JPO; ___I____ ____________________DERWENT___ I______ S191 21 S185 and S188 and5190 US- IADJ ON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:47 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S192 S185 and188and189and warn$3 US- ADJ ON 2015/11/25 S(useroroperatororworker) PGPUB; 14:51 USPAT z z EPO; JPO; z DERWENTI, z S19360 S185 and S188 [US- [ADJ [ON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:52 EPO; JPO; DERWENT EAST Search History (Interference) <This search history is empty> 11/ 25/ 2015 3:40:20 PM C:\ Users\ jlieu\ Documents\ EAST\ Workspaces\ 13730827.wsp S/N13/730827 Amendments to the claims L (Currently amended) Apower ine proximity sensing and warning systemfor use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage powerline comprising a loop antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loopantennaand receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor that interprets the received field strength signals and compares thereceived field strength signals to first and second preset, user-adjustable sensitivity levels, generates a proximity signal, graphically displays the proximity signal on a color display, causes an audible signal to be generated to audibly wam theoperator when the proximity signalexceedsthefirst preset sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the second preset sensitivity level, wherein the second preset sensitivity level exceeds the first preset sensitivity level, and each of the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustableratldie difference between the fist preset sensitivity level and the sen t si level 2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the microcontroller, the/o module configured for communicating with external devices, 3.(Original) The systemaccording to claim furtherr comprising an event loggerin communication wth the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustnients, received fieldstrength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated system cable connectionspower loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time. 2 S/N13/730827 4(Original) The system according to claiIIfurther comprising radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices. 5.(PreviouslyPresented) The system according to claim 4 further comprising a remote controller incommunication with the system via the radio transceiver, theremote controller configured for wireless control of the system 6. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power line. 7 (Previously Presented) The systemaccording to claim 1, further comprising a memordevice in commcatmi theM i controilefor storing omp program instructions and data. 8. (Previously presented) The system according to claim I further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting the first and second preset sensitivity levels and external communications. 9. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim. wherein the userinterface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings, 10. (Currently amended) A method forremotely alerting an operator of machinery when a structure ofthe machinery is moved near high voltage power line, the method comprising: installingan antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line theantenna generating field strength signals based on proxintity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proxiimity signals based on the field strength signals; 3 S/N13/730827 warning the operator when the structures moved a firstwaning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signalgeneratedfromthefield strength signal exceeds a first presetfield sensitivity; automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first waning distance exceeds the second warning distance; and allowing the operator to adjust each of the first warning distance and the second second warning distance. seeenavamng itanee. 11 (Previously presented) The method according to claim 10, wherein installing the antenna on the structure comprises installinga loop antennaabout the structure; sending a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal; and graphically displaying each proximity signal on a color display, and warning the operator comprises audibly warning the operator. 12-13 (Canceled) 14.(Previously presented) The method according to clan 10, further comprising using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown themachinery when the panic button is pressed. 15-16 (Canceled) 17 (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning systemfor use with machinery operating near a high-votage power line.comprising an antenna disposed onasnetare ofthe machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; 4 S/N13/730827 the signal processorisincommnicationwith the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in connmnication with the signal processor and interprets thereceivedfieldstrengthsignalsandcompares thereceived field strength signalsto first and second preset; user-adjustable sensitivity levels, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; tie first preset sensitivity level represents a first waring distance from the power line, and the micro-controller generates at least one of an audible warning anda visual warning when the field strength signal exceeds the first preset sensitivity level the second preset sensitivity level represents a second shut down distance from the power line that is less than the first warning distance, and the icrocontroller shuts down the machinery when the field strength signal exceeds the second preset sensitivity levelandeachofthefirstwarning distanceand the second warning distance is user adj ustab 1t, and the difference b nte 4Fi wainemf gdbance and the ;ccondf 4huM dawn distance is wcer adj, 18.(Canceled) 19 (Previously presented) The systemaccording to claim 17, wherein the control sstem~ further comprisesan inputoutput (1/O) module in coununication with the micro controller that can communicate with external devices. 20. (Previously presented) The system accordingto claim17, wherein the control system further comprises an event logger in communication with the micro-controller 21. (Previously presented) The system according toclaim 17, further comprising a radio transceiver module i communicationwith thenmcrocntrolier theradio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices 5 S/N13/730827 22. (Previously presented) 'he system according to claim 21, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module. 23 (Previously presented) A power line proximitysensingand warning systemfor use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: anantenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor andamicro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processorand interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signalstoa user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automaticallyshuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices a remote controller in communication with. the control system via the radio transceiver module; and the remotecontroller further comprises a button that when pressed results in generation of a warming to an operator of the machinery that the structure of the machinery is close to the power line. 24 (Previously presented) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further includes a button that when pressed causes the machinery to shutdown 25 (Previousy presented) A power line proximity ensing and warning system foruse with machinery operating near ahigh-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; 6 S/Nm3/730827 a control system that includes a signal processor and amicro ontroler; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices; a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module; the control systemincludesa first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includesasecond link buttoned ani nfrared receiverand the control system and the remote controller are configured so that the remote controller is linked to the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button, the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller uses the received code to establish alink with the control system. 26 (Previouslypresented) A method for remotely alerting an operatorof machinery when a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the stature of the machinerythat is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals; warning the operator when the structure is moved a first waning distancefron the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first presetfield sensitivity; '7 S/N13/30827 automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved asecond warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds asecond preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance; using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed; a control system that can automatically shut down the machinery; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and establishing a link between the remote controller and the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button so that the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controllerand the remote controller receives the received code to establish the link with the controlsystem. 8 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No.: 20600.0001USU1 Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION I hereby certify that this paper is being transmitted by EFS Web to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on July 20, 2015. By: /Megan Jachim/ Name: Megan Jachim AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE AFTER FINAL Mail Stop: AF Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 Dear Sir: In response to the office action mailed April 21, 2015, Applicant provides the following. Amendments to the claims begin on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on page 9 of this paper. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 Ale rria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 52835 7590 12/02/2015 EXAMINER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. P.O. BOX 2902 LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2684 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 12/02/2015 ELECTRONIC lease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. Fhe time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the ollowing e-mail address(es): 3TOMail@hsml.com l 3/ /3U,02l / IVi I I- I -AL. Office Action Summary Examiner Art Unit AIA (First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status No -- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- Briod for Reply A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF COMMUNICATION. - Extensions of time maybe available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). status 1)Z Responsive to communication(s) filed on July 20, 2015. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on . 2a) This action is FINAL. 2b) This action is non-final. 3) An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. 4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213. sposition of Claims* 5) Claim(s) 1-11,14,17 and 19-26 is/are pending in the application. 5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration. 6) Claim(s)23,25 and26 is/areallowed. 7) Claim(s) 1-11,14,17,19-22 and 24 is/are rejected. 8) Claim(s) is/are objected to. 9) Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. f any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a rticipating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see Qp://www. ustO.ov/patents/init events/pph/index.isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedbackSusPto.aov. application Papers 10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 11) The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) accepted or b) objected to by the Examiner. Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). iority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) All b) Some** c) None of the: 1.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._. 3.1 Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. tachment(s) 1Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 3) Interview Summary (PTO-413) Paper No(s)/Mail Date.__._ 1Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b) 4 ater___ Dt Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 4) []Other: . Patent and Trademark Office I -O /D... 11 I iQ\ 'f A ntianO.mm D -r _f D___r lKl_ /lulil 1- n -A .1R 1 OQ Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 2 Art Unit: 2684 DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AA first to invent provisions. 2. This Office action is in response to Applicant's amendment filed December 23, 2014. Claims 1, 8, 10, 11, and 14 were amended. Claims 12, 13, 15, 16, and 18 were canceled. 3. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 4. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.-The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor orjoint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 5. Claims 1-11, 15, 17, and 19-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 3 Art Unit: 2684 reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The specification only discloses user adjustable sensitivity of each sensitivity level but does not disclose that the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustable. Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 23, 25, and 26 are allowed. 7. Claims 1-11, 14, 17, and 19-22 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Response to Arguments 8. In response to Applicant's argument regarding the adjustable difference between two sensitivity levels , the argument is moot because of new grounds of rejection necessitated by the amendment. Also, this newly added claimed feature raises new matter. If Applicant contends that it is not new matter, a particular pages and lines in the specification where it is disclosed should be pointed out. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 4 Art Unit: 2684 Conclusion 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIE LIEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2978. The examiner can normally be reached on Increased Flex. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached on 571-272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Julie Lieu/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2684 Nov 25, 2016 Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes 13730827 SMITH ET AL. BB Examiner Art Unit JULIE LIEU 2684 CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED Class Subclass Date Examiner SEARCH NOTES Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL EAST 4/16/15 JL INTERFERENCESEARCH US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol S/N 13/730827 Remarks Reconsideration is requested in view of the above amendments and the following remarks. The amendments to claims 1, 8, 10, 11 and 17 are supported by the original disclosure, for example paragraph [0016], line 3-5; paragraph [0021], lines 9-10; paragraph [0032]; Figure 2; and Figure 4, elements 408, 414 and 416. Claim 18 is canceled without prejudice or disclaimer as a result of the amendments to claim 17. Allowable claims 23, 25, and 26 have been rewritten into independent form. No new matter has been added. Claims 1-11, 14, 17, and 19-26 are pending. With respect to the non-considered references in the Information Disclosure Statement, Applicant disagrees that information is material to patentability only if it qualifies as prior art. As is explicitly indicated in MPEP 2001.04, materiality is not limited to prior art, but embraces any information that a reasonable examiner would be substantially likely to consider important in deciding whether to allow claims. Materiality is explicitly defined in 37 CFR 1.56(b) and discussed at MPEP 2001.05, and does not state that the must be prior art. There are certain situations when a date of information being submitted is simply not known. Applicant submits that it has satisfied is duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56 regardless of whether or not the information was considered. Claims 1-4, 7-9, and 17-21 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over US 2012/0214094 to Givens in view of US 3786468 to Moffitt. In addition, claims 5, 6 and 24 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens and Moffitt, and further in view of US 2010/0286845 to Rekow. In addition, claims 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens and Moffitt, and further in view of US 3907136 to Christides. In addition, claim 14 is rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens, Moffitt and Christides, and further in view of Rekow. In addition, claims 22 and 24 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens and Moffitt, and further in view of Rekow. 9 S/N 13/730827 Applicant traverses the rejections. Givens, Moffitt, Rekow and Christides do not teach or suggest a system as recited in claim 1 where each of the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is adjustable, and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is adjustable; a method as recited in claim 10 that includes allowing the operator to adjust each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance and to adjust the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance; and a system as recited in claim 17 where each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance is user adjustable, and the difference between the first warning distance and the second shut down distance is user adjustable. The ability to allow adjustment of two sensitivity levels and the difference between the two sensitivity levels, which results in adjustment of the warning distances and the difference between the warning distances, provides a number of advantages. For example, the actual voltage running through the power line(s) of concern may vary from the expected or nominal voltage. Therefore, the system can be adjusted depending upon the actual voltage. In addition, environmental conditions, such as snow, rain, humidity, etc., can impact the shape of the electrical field being sensed. By being able to adjust the difference between the two sensitivity levels, the user can factor in environmental conditions when using the system. In addition, if the equipment upon which the system is installed in carrying a load, the size of the load being carried may need to be factored in. For example, the load may extend far from the equipment, so that even though the equipment may not be dangerously near a power line, the load being carried by the equipment may be. So the user may want to adjust the sensitivity levels to account for the load. The speed of the equipment on which the system is installed is also a factor. For equipment that moves very slowly, the difference between the two sensitivity levels can be made smaller compared to equipment that moves relatively fast in which case the difference between the two sensitivity levels should be increased. If the equipment moves slowly, the user has time when the initial warning is given to take corrective 10 S/N 13/730827 action prior to shut-down occurring if the equipment moves too close. In contrast, if the equipment moves relatively fast, once the initial warning is given, the equipment could come into contact with the power line before shut-down actually takes place. Allowing the user to increase the difference between the two sensitivity levels increases the time the user will have to take corrective action once the initial warning is given. Still another factor impacting sensing capability is variations in antenna sensitivity. Although one may know the nominal sensitivity of the antenna, in actual practice the sensitivity may vary. Therefore, adjusting the difference between the two sensitivity levels allows the user to factor in antenna variations. Givens discloses a power line proximity warning system. Paragraph [0022]. Givens discloses providing a number of visual or audible warnings when equipment gets too close to a power line. Paragraphs [0022], [0027], [0036]. Givens does not disclose user adjustment of a sensitivity level, nor adjustment of two sensitivity levels or a difference between two sensitivity levels. Paragraph [0030] of Givens refers to automatic adjustment of sensitivity settings based on location of the equipment. This is automatic adjustment of a single sensitivity level, not user adjustment or adjustment of a difference between two sensitivity levels. Automatic adjustment is deficient because it does not allow the user to factor in site specific variables that may not be accounted for in the automatic settings. Paragraph [0028] of Givens refers to adjusting sensitivity of a wireless receiver, but this is not adjustment of the sensitivity of the sensor. Paragraph [0028] of Givens also refers to control of "base alarm levels". What is meant by "base alarm levels" is not explicitly clear from Givens. Does this refer to the sensor? Or does this refer to sound levels as discussed later in paragraph [0028]? Regardless of the meaning, since Givens does not disclose both a pre-warning followed by shut-down, at best the disclosure in Givens refers to adjustment of a single sensitivity level, and does not disclose adjusting two sensitivity levels or a difference between two sensitivity levels. Moffitt also discloses a power line proximity warning system. Abstract. Moffitt discloses that the system includes a potentiometer 30 that allows a user to adjust sensitivity. Column 3, lines 24-25; 42-45; and 61-64. The adjustment disclosed in Moffitt is of a single sensitivity level. Moffitt does not disclose a pre-warning followed 11 S/N 13/730827 by shut-down, and thus does not disclose the ability to adjust first and second sensitivity levels or adjustment of a difference between the two levels. Rekow is characterized as teaching the use of a remote control. Rekow does not teach pre-warning followed by shut-down, first and second sensitivity levels, and adjustment of a difference between the sensitivity levels. Christides discloses a system for sensing underground power lines. Abstract. Christides discloses that a first threshold can be used to provide a warning signal and a second threshold can be used to automatically shut down the equipment. Column 3, lines 10-15. Christides does not disclose user adjustment of the two thresholds or adjustment of the difference between the two thresholds. Rather, the system in Christides appears to assume that the voltage of the power line is known or constant, that environmental conditions do not impact the ability to detect the power line, that the equipment on which the system is mounted is the same, and that the antenna sensitivity is known/constant. As Applicant indicates above, each of these assumptions by Christides is incorrect and can lead to catastrophic results. None of Givens, Moffitt, Rekow and Christides teach or suggest a system where first and second sensitivity levels can be adjusted, and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is adjustable; allowing the operator to adjust the first and second warning differences as well as the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance; and where the first and second warning distances are user adjustable as is the difference between the first warning distance and the second shut down distance. Nor do Givens, Moffitt, Rekow and Christides recognize the advantages that arise from being able to adjust the first and second preset sensitivity levels and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level or adjusting the first and second warning distances and the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance. For at least these reasons, claims 1, 10 and 17 are patentable over Givens, Moffitt, Rekow, and Christides. Claims 2-9, 11, 14, 19-22 and 24 depend from claims 1, 10 and 17 and are patentable therewith for that reason alone and need not be separately distinguished. Applicant does not concede the rejections to the dependent claims. 12 S/N 13/730827 Allowable claims 23, 25 and 26 have been rewritten into independent form and should be in condition for allowance along with the remainder of the claims. Favorable reconsideration in the form of a notice of allowance is requested. Any questions concerning this paper can be directed to the attention of the undersigned at (612) 455-3805. Respectfully submitted, HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & 52835 LARSON, P.C. PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. Box 2902 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800 Dated: July 20, 2015 By: /James A. Larson/ James A. Larson Reg. No. 40,443 JAL/mbj 13 Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes 13730827 SMITH ET AL. BB Examiner Art Unit JULIE LIEU 2684 CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED Class Subclass Date Examiner SEARCH NOTES Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL EAST 4/16/15 JL EAST 11/20/15 JL INTERFERENCESEARCH US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol S/N 13/730827 Amendments to the claims 1. (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: a loop antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor that interprets eeffigured for interpretigthe received field strength signals and compareseemaring the received field strength signals to [[a]] first and second preset, user-adjustable sensitivity levels -e4, generates genefating a proximity signal, graphically displays displaying the proximity signal on a color display, easing causes an audible signal to be generated to audibly warn the operator when the proximity signal exceeds the first preset levels-ef-fie sensitivity level, and automatically shuts sht4inig down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the second preset tsefr-adjustabe sensitivity level, wherein the second preset sensitivity level exceeds the first preset sensitivity level, each of the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustable, and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustable. 2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the I/O module configured for communicating with external devices. 3. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time. 2 S/N 13/730827 4. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices. 5. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. 6. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power line. 7. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data. 8. (Currently amended) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting the first and second preset sensitivity levels field-seisiivity and external communications. 9. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 8, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings. 10. (Currently amended) A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals; 3 S/N 13/730827 warning the operator when the structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first preset field sensitivity; [[and]] automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance and allowing the operator to adjust each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance and to adjust the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance. 11. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 10, wherein installing the antenna on the structure comprises installing a loop antenna about the structure; sending a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal; the first and second preset field sensitivities are user adjustableand graphically displaying each proximity signal on a color display, and warning the operator comprises audibly warning the operator. 12-13. (Canceled) 14. (Previously presented) The method according to claim 10, further comprising using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed. 15-16. (Canceled) 17. (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; 4 S/N 13/730827 the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to [[a]] first and second preset, user-adjustable sensitivity levels -e, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; the first preset sensitivity level represents a first warning distance from the power line, and the micro-controller generates at least one of an audible warning and a visual warning when the field strength signal exceeds the first preset sensitivity level; the second preset sensitivity level represents a second shut down distance from the power line that is less than the first warning distance, and the micro-controller shuts down the machinery when the field strength signal exceeds the second preset sensitivity level, each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance is user adjustable, and the difference between the first warning distance and the second shut down distance is user adjustable. 18. (Canceled) 19. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro controller that can communicate with external devices. 20. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an event logger in communication with the micro-controller. 21. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 17, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices. 5 S/N 13/730827 22. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 21, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module. 23. (Currently amended) The system according to claim 22, v hei~inApower line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices; a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module; and the remote controller further comprises a button that when pressed results in generation of a warning to an operator of the machinery that the structure of the machinery is close to the power line. 24. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further includes a button that when pressed causes the machinery to shutdown. 25. (Currently amended) The systcm efclaim 22, whercinApower line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: 6 S/N 13/730827 an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power linL the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices; a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and the control system and the remote controller are configured so that the remote controller is linked to the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button, the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller uses the received code to establish a link with the control system. 26. (Currently amended) The method ofclaim 14, further compisingA method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals; 7 S/N 13/730827 warning the operator when the structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first preset field sensitivity; automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance; using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed; a control system that can automatically shut down the machinery; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and establishing a link between the remote controller and the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button so that the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller receives the received code to establish the link with the control system. 8 S/N 13/730827 Remarks Reconsideration is requested in view of the above amendments and the following remarks. The amendments to the claims are supported by the original disclosure, for example paragraphs [0017] and [0032]. New claims 17-24 are supported by the original disclosure, for example original claims 1-9. New claims 25-26 are supported by, for example, paragraphs [0023] and [0024] of the original disclosure. No new matter has been added. Claims 12-13 and 15-16 are canceled without prejudice or disclaimer. Claims 1-11, 14, and 17-26 are pending. Any excess claims fees can be charged to Deposit Account No. 50-3478 Applicant notes that certain non-patent citations submitted by Applicant in an Information Disclosure Statement appear to have been cross-off as not being considered. However, no explanation has been provided as to why the citations have not been considered. Copies of the citations were submitted by Applicant so the citations should be considered. To the extent that the citations were not considered because a date was not provided for each citation, Applicant submits that this is not a valid reason for not considering a citation. Applicant has submitted the crossed-off citations in compliance with 37 CFR 1.56. There is nothing in 37 CFR 1.56 that requires Applicant to provide a date in order for the information that Applicant is aware of and cites in an Information Disclosure Statement to be considered. Applicant submits that it has fully complied with 37 CFR 1.56. Claims 1-4 and 7-9 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. (US Publication No. 2012/0214094). In addition, claims 5, 6 and 10-16 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. in view of Rekow et al. (US Publication No. 2010/0286845). Applicant traverses the rejections. Givens and Rekow do not teach or suggest a micro-controller that automatically shuts down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user 8 S/N 13/730827 adjustable sensitivity level (claim 1), automatically shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance (claim 10), or a micro-controller that automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line (new claim 17). Givens discloses a power line proximity warning system. Paragraph [0022]. Givens discloses providing a number of visual or audible warnings when equipment gets too close to a power line. Paragraphs [0022], [0027], [0036]. However, Givens does not disclose automatically shutting down the machinery if the machinery gets too close to the power line. Givens does describe "in the event that the control box (1005) senses a roll over, the control line (1050) could automatically turn off the equipment". Paragraph [0073]. However, this is limited to roll over of the machinery. Givens does not teach or suggest that the machinery should be automatically shut down when it is sensed that the machinery is too close to the power line. Rekow is characterized as teaching a system with a remote controller with an emergency stop button that when pressed stops a vehicle. Rekow requires that a user push a button to stop the vehicle. In the event that the user is distracted at some moment in time, the stop button may not be pushed in time to stop the vehicle. However, Rekow does not teach a micro-controller that automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line. For at least these reasons, claims 1, 10 and 17 are patentable over Givens and Rekow. Claims 2-9, 11, 14 and 18-24 depend from claims 1, 10 and 17 and are patentable therewith for that reason alone and need not be separately distinguished. Applicant does not concede the rejections to dependent claims 2-9, 11 and 14. 9 S/N 13/730827 Favorable reconsideration in the form of a notice of allowance is requested. Any questions concerning this paper can be directed to the attention of the undersigned at (612) 455-3805. Respectfully submitted, 283 5 HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & 52835LARSON, P.C. PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. Box 2902 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800 Dated: December 23, 2014 By: /James A. Larson/ James A. Larson Reg. No. 40,443 JAL/mbj 10 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No.: 20600.0001USU1 Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION I hereby certify that this paper is being transmitted by EFS Web to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on December 23, 2014. By: /Megan Jachim/ Name: Megan Jachim AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE Mail Stop: AMENDMENT Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 Dear Sir: In response to the office action mailed June 23, 2014, Applicant provides the following. Amendments to the claims begin on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on page 8 of this paper. Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination 13/730,827 SMITH ET AL. Notice of References Cited Examiner ArtUnit JULIE LIEU 2684 Page 1 of 1 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Name Classification A US-3,907,136 A 09-1975 Christides et al. 414/694 B US-5,592,092 A 01-1997 Mechler, Mark V. 324/326 C US-2006/0271263 Al 11-2006 Self et al. 701/050 D US-2009/0237263 Al 09-2009 Sawyer et al. 340/686.6 E US F US G US H US I US j US K US L US M US FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Country Name Classification N EP 2 479 735 A2 07-2012 YANO 0 P Q R S T NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS Include as applicable: Author, Title Date, Publisher, Edition or Volume, Pertinent Pages) U V W X opy of this reference is not being furnished with this Office action. (See MPEP § 707.05(a).) s in MM-YYYY format are publication dates. Classifications may be US or foreign. Patent and Trademark Office )-892 (Rev. 01-2001) Notice of References Cited Part of Paper No. 20150415 PTO/SB/08a (07-09) Approved for use through 07/3112012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number. Substitute for form 1449/PTO Complete if Known Application Number 131730,827 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date December 28, 2012 First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith STATEMENT BY APPLICANT Art Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name Sheet 1 of 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP U. S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Document Number Publication Date Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Where Initials* No.' MM-DD-YYYY Applicant of Cited Document Relevant Passages or Relevant Number-Kind Code 2 (ifknown) Figures Appear JL/ Us- 6,104,305 08-15-2000 Beckmann US- 6,133,841 10-17-2000 Beckmann US- 6,170,607 B1 01-09-2001 Freeman et al. US- 6,252,513 B1 06-26-2001 Beckmann US- 6,600,426 B1 07-29-2003 Sacks et al. US- 7,081,812 B2 07-25-2006 Hastings, Sr. US US- 2004/0066284 Al 04-08-2004 Hastings, Sr. US- 2007/0018841 Al 01-25-2007 Nickerson US- 2010/0214094 Al 08-26-2010 Givens et al. US US US US US US US US US FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Foreign Patent Document Publication Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Initials* No.' Date Applicant of Cited Document Where Relevant Passages Country Code-Number Kind Code° (ifknown) MM-DD-YYYY Or Relevant Figures Appear To Examiner Date Signature Considered 06/15/2014 *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 1 Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 See Kinds Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at www.smqov or MPEP 901.04. 3 Enter Office that issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO Standard ST.3). 4 For Japanese patent documents, the indication ofthe yearofthe reign ofthe Emperor must precede the serial numberofthe patent document. 5 Kind ofdocument by the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. 6Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount oftime you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Ifyou need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2. PTO/SB/08b (07-09) Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons ar required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number. Substitute for form 1449/PTO Complete if Known Application Number 13/730,827 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date December 28, 2012 STATEMENT BY APPLICANT First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith Art Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name sheet 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate), title of Initials* No.' the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc.), date, page(s), volume-issue -2 number(s), publisher, city and/or country where published. /JL/ Installation Procedure for the ASE 2200 High Voltage Proximity Warning Device, Allied Safety Engineering, February 21, 2006. Proxyvolt PV5007 Brochure, Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, 1717 Ipswich Road, Rocklea Qld Australia4106, date unknown. Sigalarm Model 110 Lattice Boom Manual, Sigalarm, 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, 2010. Wire-Watcher Brochure, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, date unknown. http://www.alliedsafetyeng.com/proximitywarningdevice.html, Allied Safety L Systems, Inc., 4380 St. Johns Parkway, Suite 100 Sanford, FL 32771, 2009. http://www.siqalarminc.com/index.html. Siqalarm 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, date unknown. http://www.wirewatcher.co.uk/wwprd.html, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, /JL/ Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, 2005. xaminer / ;Ulle LieU/ Date -0/521 Signature Considered 0/521 *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 1 Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2. Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes 13730827 SMITH ET AL. BB Examiner Art Unit JULIE LIEU 2684 CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED Class Subclass Date Examiner SEARCH NOTES Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL INTERFERENCESEARCH US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol S/N 13/730827 Amendments to the claims 1. (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near a high-voltage power line 4mes, comprising: a loop antenna disposed abeu on a structure of the machinery that is movabled-4he structure configured formovementnear the power line 4mes; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line mes; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, [[and]] graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, [[and]] causing an audible signal to be generated to audibly warn [[warning]] the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity, and automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user-adjustable sensitivity level. 2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the I/O module configured for communicating with external devices. 3. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time. 4. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices. 2 S/N 13/730827 5. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. 6. (Currently amended) The system according to claim 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power line ines. 7. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data. 8. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. 9. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 8, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings. 10. (Currently amended) A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an-extended a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line limes, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals; providing a power line proxmity sensing anRd warning system anRd a wireles remoete conftroller; installing the system on the mnachinef' pe4rifig a system check of the system;+ 3 S/N 13/730827 adjutsting field sensitivity of the system;+, remoitely conftrollinig the systems ufsing the remoite conftroller; warning the operator when the extended structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds within a first preset field sensitivity; and automatically shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second presetwi4thin-another pr-esent field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance. 11. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 10, wherein installing the antenna on the structure comprises installing a loop antenna about the structure; the powv er line pr~oximfit-y sensing and warning system, copiss a loop antennfa disposed abot the exEtentded structure of the mfachintef, th Arturette conffigurfed for mofevemfent near the power liness, a signal proessor in communications 'With the looP anftennfa, the signal processor configurfed to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strFength signals ffrom the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the pow er: lines; an sendin a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal; the first and second preset field sensitivities are user-adjustable, and a mficr~o controller: in commuanication with the signal processors: adaptedfo inftefpreting the received field strFength signals and comparing the received field strFength signals to a utser adjustable sentsitivit-y level, genierating a proxiit-y signal, anid graphically displaying each the proximity signal on a color display, and warning the operator comprises audibly warning the operatorwhen the proximity' signal exceeds preset levls offield sensitivity. 12-13. (Canceled) 4 S/N 13/730827 14. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 10, further comprising using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed.whereinthe remote controller has a panic btton configured t wirelessly sh-utdown the mnaehinfef to prevent the exitenfded stmcIture fromn corning infto conftact with the pow er: lines. 15-16. (Canceled) 17. (New) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line. 18. (New) The system according to claim 17, wherein the micro-controller also generates proximity signals based on the received field strength signals, causes display of the proximity signals on a color display, and causes an audible warning to be generated when one of the generated proximity signals exceeds a preset level of field sensitivity. 19. (New) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller that can communicate with external devices. 5 S/N 13/730827 20. (New) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an event logger in communication with the micro-controller. 21. (New) The system according to claim 17, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices. 22. (New) The system according to claim 21, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module. 23. (New) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further comprises a button that when pressed results in generation of a warning to an operator of the machinery that the structure of the machinery is close to the power line. 24. (New) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further includes a button that when pressed causes the machinery to shutdown. 25. (New) The system of claim 22, wherein the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and the control system and the remote controller are configured so that the remote controller is linked to the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button, the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller uses the received code to establish a link with the control system. 26. (New) The method of claim 14, further comprising a control system that can automatically shut down the machinery; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and 6 S/N 13/730827 establishing a link between the remote controller and the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button so that the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller receives the received code to establish the link with the control system. 7 EAST Search History EAST Search History (Prior Art) Ref Hits Search Query DoBs IDefault IPlurais Time #_ Operator Stamp Li 106317 event with log$4 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/16 USPAT; 01:46 ____ ____________________ DERWENTi_ __I______ L2 3712 power line with (proxim$3 ordistance) IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/61 ~USPAT 01:47 [2 18 L~ndiEPO;JPO; DERWENT ___I___ ___ L3 11 L2 nd 1US-PGPUB ADJ ON 21/61 USPAT; 01:47 EPO; JPO; DERWENT L4 2783 (340/901,686.6,657).mLS. US-PGPUB; OR OFF 2014/06/16z USPAT; 01:47 USOCR L5 1553 (324/72)CLS. US-PGPUB OR OFF 2014/06/16 ____ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __USPAT_ _ __ _____ _ __ 01:47 USOCR L6 3729 L4or L5 US- PPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/16 USPAT;0:4 _____1L4 ~~~~~ PO; JPZO; ___ 14 DERWENT L7 463 (G01Ri9/145 or G01R29/085 or IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/16 H02H5/12).cpc. USPAT;0:4 z ~~ EPO; JPO;zz DERWENT L8 340 (340/685).CCLS. US-PPUB; OR OF 21/61 ____ _________________ USPAT ____~F RX:7~22 L9 4008 L6 or L8 US-PGPUB; IADJ ON 2014/06/16 USPAT 01:47 EPO;JPO; DERWENT _______I___ LiO 4440 L7 or L9 IUS-FPGPUB; IADJ [ON 21/61 jUSPAT;0:4 z____ DERWENT zz z Lii 4 [3andLiO IUS-PGPUB;IADJ ION 2014/06/16 I ~USPAT; 01:47 ____ I____________________DERWENTI_ __I______ S3 2070 (340/901,686.6).CCLS. US-PGPUB; OR OFF 2014/06/15 USPAT 20:10 _USOCR I 3with ordistance) US-PGP A ON 2014/06/15 z z USPAT 20:11 z US~PO; JPO01:4 zz Z~~ERWENT z USPAT; 20:12 EPO; JPO DERWENT S7 381324 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15z field USPAT; 20:13 EPO; JPO; DERWENT S8 321348 S7 and (exceed$3 or higher or above US-PGPUB; zADJ jON 2014/06/15 or larger) USPAT; 20:14 DERWENT ____I____ __ S9 __3 S4and86 and8S8 USPGPUB; ADJ__ ON 2014/06/1 z ~~ EPO; JPO;zzz DERWENT S10 2783 ~(340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. US-PGPUB; OR OF 20:17/61 S1 211 ~tn ea3 oo USPAT; IOF r20:17161 S11 21 S3 andtS n lo US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15 USPAT; 20:18 EPO; JPO DERWENT S12 0 S9adS1US-PGPUB; ADJ jON 21/61 ~S~ndSand1USPAT; 20:18 DERWENT SiS14 0 S4 an andnd S11US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2014/06/15 USPAT 20:19 ____ _____________________ DERWENT I___I______ S14 53 S41 and S11 IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/61 USPAT ~2:19 ____ _____________________ DERWENT ____I______ 155 14 (S14/72) S. IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ~ O 2014/06/15 ~USPAT j20:19 S160 46 SG11 and r01R9S65r US-PGPUB IADJ ION 2014/06/15 H025/1).ccUSPAT; 20:48 z ~~ EPO; JPO;zzz z____ ___IDERWENT _ _ Izz S18 1 (3240/6).CCLS. U UBOR FF 204/06/15 USPAT 20:36 USOCR zz S19 4008 1S10 or 218 US-PGPUB; 1ADJ ION 2014/06/15 ~~USPAT; 20:36 z ~~ EPO; JPO;zzz z M~~ERWENT z S1 30 (340/685).CCLS US-PGPUB; OR OFFM 2014/06/15z ~~USPAT; 20:48 z z USOCR S223 008 S19 ord S21n S US-PGPUB; zzADJ zzON 2014/06/1 5z 1EPO; JPO; . DERWEN T S23 4440 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15 USPAT; 20:48 EPO;JPO; ..........................z DERW ENT S24 2 S23 and S4 and S6 and S8 US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2014/06/15 (gUSPAT; 20:49 8262567 Ireot with cntrol$4sesivt with 4o IUS-PGPUB;IADJ ION 2014/06/15 vay3ozaid EPO; JPO;zzz ~shut$4 or turn$3 off$1) with (vehicle or USPAT 20:53 machine or crane or lift or forklift) EPO; JPO; z_____ I____DERWENT zz z z S2 5 S26 and S4 and S7 iUS-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15 USPAT; 20:53 EP;JPO; ____ I_____________________DERWENT ____I______ S28 1 825 and S4 US-PGPUB ADJ ON 21/61 USPAT; 20:54 EPO;JPO; DERWENT S29 6 1826 and S4 IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ~ ON 21/61 I USPAT; 20:54 S30 385 remote with control$4 with (stop$4 or US-PGPUB ADJ ON 2014/06/15 shut$4 or turn$3 off$1) with (vehicle or USPAT 20:55 machine or crane or lift or forklift) EPO;JPO same (urgentorurgencyor DERWENT ____emergency or danger$3) _____ S31 273 remote with control with (stop$4 or | US-PGPUB ADJ ON 2014/06/15 shut$4orturn$3off$1)with(vehicleor|USPAT 21:10 machineorcraneorliftorforklift) EPO;JPO z same (urgentorurgencyoremergencyDERWENT I z ____ or danger$3)I_________I___ .____ S32 9 (20040066284" |"20070018841" | IUS-FPGPUB ADJ ION 21/61 "20100214094" |"6104305" |USPAT Ij21:2015 "6133841" "6170607" |"6252513" "____6600426" |7081812")PN. _________ ___ ____ S33 82 G0R29/08.cpc US-PGPUB ADJ ON 2014/06/15 z __ _ __ _ __USPAT; 21:2 zcc.EP; JC;2PO1:2 DERWENT S34 1 US-PGPUB; OR OFF 2014/06/15 z ~USPAT; 22:22 USOC EAST Search History (Interference) <This search history is empty> 6/116/12014 2:14:25 AM C:\ Users\ jlieu\ Document s\ EAST\ Workspaces\ 13730827.wsp EAST Search History EAST Search History (Prior Art) RefHits [Search Query DOBs Default Piurais[Time #_ lOperatorStamp S46 1i ("20140184425").PN. US-PGPUB; OR OFF 015/04/13 USPAz 22:27 !S47 1 846 and automatic$4 ~ US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/13 USPAT; 2:28 USOCR; EPO JPO; DERWENT !S48 (US-20100214094-$orUS- US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/13 K 20100286845-$ or US-20070018841- USPAT 2 :2913 $).did.or (US-5252912-$ or USI 3786468-$ or US-6600426-$ or US 6170607-$).did. _____I____I__ ____ 850 1 ~ S48 and automatic$4with(shut$4or US-GPUB ADJ ON 2015/04/13 power$3 or turn$3adj2off) :USPAT; 22:30 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S51_ 4013 power line with (proxim$3 or US-PPUB; ADJ ON 21/44 '~1 ~ distance) USPAT;EPO; 0O 0:35 852 408796 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/14 field USPAT;EPOC0:3 DERWENT S53 343799 852 and (exceed$3 or higher or US-PPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/14 ,above or larger) USPAT;EPO; 00:35 ___ ___ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___DERWENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ !S54 29371 ant enna near3 loop US- PGPUB; IADJ ~ ON 2015/04/14 USPAT;EEC; 00:35 JPO; DERWENT i___I______ !S55 18 851 and853 and8S54 US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/14 I USPAT;EPO; 00:35 ___ I____________________DERWENT I_____ ___ !S56 4768 GO8G1/0962 OR H02H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/41 G01R29/085 OR GO1V3/10,15 USPAT;EPO; 0:38 DERWENT ____I______ 572473 (GO8G1/0962 OR H02H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/41 G01R29/085 OR GO1V3/10,15).CPC. USPAT;EPO; 0:39 DERWENT S58 1 857 and851 and8 52 US-PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/14 E [USPAT E 00:39 zJPO; z zJzCz S59 2978- (340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. US-PGPUB; ORFF 2015/04/14 USPAT; 00:40 USOCR zz S60 496 (G1R19/145 or G01R29/085 or US-PGPUB; zADJ ON 2015/04/14 H02H5/12).cpc. USPAT; EPO; 00:40 DERWENT iS61 5539 857 or860 or5S59 US-PGPUB; IADJ ON 2015/04/14 USPAT;EPO; [00:40 JPO; z DERWENT _______I___ 862 19 861 and8S53 and 851 US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/41 *USPAT;EEC; j 00:40 z Z~~ERWENT zzz 863 19 S62 and (shut$4 or power$3or US-PGPUB; IADJ zON 2015/04/14 turn$3 adj2 off) USPAT; 00:41 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT Izz S64 S62 and (shut$4 or power$3or US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/14 turn$3) adj2 (off or down) USPAT; 0:50 z ~ ~~~USOC; EPO;zz0:4 z ~~JPO; z M~~ERWENT z S65 9 (20040066284" "20070018841" US-PPUB ADJ ON 2015/04/15 "20100214094" |"6104305" USPAT 14:35 "6133841" |"6170607" |"6252513" "6600426" |"7081812").PN. __________ S66 0 S65 and (different or multiple or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 multi) adj2 (distanceorlevel) USPAT; 14:35 1 USOCR; EPO; ___ _______________________DERWENT I_ __I______ 867 243 (GO8G1/0962 OR HO2H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/15 G01R29/085 OR GO1V3/10,15).CPC USPAT; EPO4:3 z ~~ JPO; z ~~ DERWENT zzz S868 2978 (340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. US-PGPUB; OR 10FF 21/41 USPAT; 214:35 USOCR !S69 496 (G1R19/145 or G01R29/085 or ~US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 HO2H5/12).cpc. 'USPAT;EPO; [14:35 DERWENT _______I___ S70 5539 S67 or S69 or 868 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT;EPOC4:3 DERWENT 871 434 870 and (different or multiple or US-PGPUB; IADJ ~ ON 2015/04/15 multi) adj2 (distance or level) USPAT zEP;014:35 ortrn$orUSOCR; EPO JPO; z M~~ERWENT z S72 19 7 ( different84 or multiple88or US-PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/1 5z multi)adj2 (distance orlevel) with USPAT 14:36 (down or off) poer3)it S73 978 (340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. US-PGPUB; 43FF 2015/04/15 USPAT; 14:38 USOCR S74 1101 S73 and (shut$4 or turn$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 power$3) with (down or off) USPAT; 14:38 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S75 1983 (different or multiple or multi) adj2 US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/15z (distance or level) with (warning or USPAT; z14:38 alert) USOCR; EPO; DERWENT zz z !S76 16 S74 and S75 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 z16 USPAT; 14:39 z USOCR; EPO; JPO; z__ IZ__ _ _DERWENT S77 2371 (different or multiple or multi) adj2 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (distance or level or threshold) with USPAT; 14:47 (warning or alert) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT z S78 17 S74 and S77 US-PGPUB; zADJ [ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 1 14:47/1 USOCR; EPO; !S79 1 S8not S76 US-PPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/15 USPAT; 14:47 JPO; DERWENT SB0 72 S70 and (shut$4orturn$3or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 power$3)with(downoroff)with USPAT; 14:48 z (machine or tool) USOCR; EPOA zN L5 z JPO; DERWENT 81 32 S0 and S77 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 S84 83an877USPAT; 15:17 USOCR;EPO; ___I________________________DERWENT power$3) with (down or off) with USPAT 14:49 z (machine or tool) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT zz 814 34 S83 and S77 US- PGPUB; zADJ zzON 2015/04/15z z ~USPAT; 15:17 z ~~ USOCR; EPO;' z ~~ JPO; z M~~ERWENT z USPAT; 15:38 USOCR S86 2298 S85 or S69 US- PGPUB ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 15:39 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT 88 3P15675 ((shut$4 or turn$3 or power$3) adj4 US- PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (down or off) or stop$4) with USPAT; 15:40 (machine or tool) USOCR; EPO; __ I____ _______ _______DERWENT I_ _ I_ _ _ _ US-zPUB !S89 12 886 and 887 US-PAT; ADJ ~ ON j2015/04/15~ eJPOPO; ___ ______________________DERWENT 892 01 pow1alne7 wt(poi$or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 dsac)USPAT; EO15:43 JPO; DERWENT 893 11 S9 and (Shut$4 oUS-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15z p USPAT; 15:41 19 0 !93andthshodsmstp$US-PGPUB; ADJ ~ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; '15:43 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT zz z z !S5 1 94ndowrlneUSPAT; 16:01 USOCR;EO 8941 86932 00n 0thshosme sop41 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 2000109""6030"USPAT 19:24 distance) ~ ~ USOC; EPO;zz154 z JPO; DERWENT z 897 1 896 and autp r lne US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 19:4 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT 898 1 896 and adst l US-PGPUB ADJ zON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 19:24 USOCR; EPO; J 2JPO015/4/1 98 0 9 an colo wit diply$ US- PGPUB; AD ON 2015/04/15z z ~USPAT; 20:02 z ~USOCR; EPO .......... ............ ............JP O.. S94z 1 S93 nd hreholdsam stpDERWENTUB distance) USPAT; EPO 20:02 JPO; DERWENT ..... [.... S100 29371 antenna near3 loop US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15z USPAT; EPO; r20 :02 JPO; z DERWENT S101 110 99 and S100 and color with US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 display$3 USPAT; 20:02 USOCR; EPO; JPO DERWENT S102 408796 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PGPUB; zADJ ZON 2015/04/15 field USPAT; EPO; 20:04 JPO; DERWENT ___ I___ ___ 1S103 343799 5102 and (exceed$3 or higher or US-PPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/15 z JPO; z__ Z__ _ _DERWENT i _ I _z S104 432 S99 and Si03 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 20:04 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT 18105 3 S10 and ol US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 z USPAT; 20:04 z ~~ USOCR; EPO;zzz DERWENT above7 or larger) USPAT;EPO; 20:05 JPO; DERWENT ____I______ S107 110 899 and8S106 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/41 USPAT;EPO; 20:05 JPO; DERWENT 1083 107andcolorwithdisplay$3 USP ; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 8109 0167 clor$2withlrthdisplay$3 US- PGPUB; AD ON 205041 (snorit USPAT; 20:06 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S109 167 clor2 with dis$3 rageror US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 Hane or rox) iy USPAT;EEC; 20:07 8109 ~ ~~~DERWENT I______I___ S51109 (Gn1R19/4o01.c~r510)o US-PGPUB; ADJ [ON 2015/04/15 HUSPAT; E20:07 JPO; z DERWENT zz z z S111079 S 29 and isp40"$3 or stanceUS-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/15 USPAT;EOz 20:07 JPO; DERWENT z S11 7969 l 7 n color with display$3 t dsac US- PGPUB; AD ON 205041 USOR; EPO ___ _______________________ DERWENT __________ S113 1 S112 and S110 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; j20:07 USOCR; EPO; DERWENT WS114 433 Sll2 and Slll US-PGPUB; ADJ ON ~2015/04/15 USPAT; 20:07 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S115 10 S112 and 340/686.6.ccls. US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 20:08 z ~~ USOCR; EPO, S5116 89 crane orbo)with power (line or US-PPUB; ADJ [ON ~2015/04/15 cable) with (proxim$3 or close or USPAT; 215 near$1) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT ___I___ ___ S5117 408796 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/15 field USPAT;EPO; 21:55 I ~JPO; DERWENT i_ _zz S118 28 S117 with power(lineorcable)with US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (proxim$3orcloseornear$1) USPAT; 21:55 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT zz z [ S119 o7ra53 dislera with rwith (warn$3 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 oale) USPAT; 21:57 z nUSOCR; EPO; JPO z__ IM__ _ _DERWENT S11 20167 c r$nthd s7 US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/15 (ieldinm USPAT; 21:57 ~496 H2H5/12.cpc.USPATER; O z JPO; z__ IDERWENT S1217 20 colr$ with 5 a dpl3or52) e US-PGPUB; IADJ ON 2015/04/15 z (distance or proximity)r$1 USPAT; 21 :57 USOCR; EPO; ___ L ._________________DERWENT I________ 5JPOU [ z Z~~ERWENT z S12 10 79 12 dipand wt ("4"cls. ort S122) US-PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/1 5z or let)USPAT; 21 :57 USOCR; EPO;zzz JPO; DERWENT z S1 2043 S1209 and S1237 US- PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/15z z ~~ USPAT; 21 :57 z z ~~ ~ SOCR; EPO;zzz DERWENT S125 9 ("20040066284" | "20070018841 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 z 20100214094" | "6104305" USPAT 00:25 z 6133841" | "6170607" | "6252513" z__ I"6600426" | "7081812").PN. S126 0 S125 and remote control$4 same US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/16 (warn$3 or alert) USPAT; 00:25 USOCR; EPO; z JPO; DERWENT z !S127 21 remote control$4 with (warn$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 alert) with operator with (machine or USPAT; 00:26 DERWENT _______[___ S181800 pair$3 with (remote or wireless) adj4 US-PPUB; ADJ ~ON 2015/04/16 (controller or controlling) USPAT; [17:02 z boom o crane)USOCR; EPO; JPO; __ I___DERWENT S129 4014 power linewith (proxim$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 distance) USPAT; EPO 17:02 JPO; O 70 DERWENT S130 78 5129 and ((shut$4 or turn$3 or US-PPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 78 power$3) adj4 (down or off) or USPAT; [17:02 so$)with (machine or tool) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT US-zPUz S131 78 S130 and "1" US-PT; ADJ ON 7201/41 USOCR; EPO; z ~~ JPO; DERWENT S132 0 S130 ande 128 US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/16 d USPAT; 17:0 USOCR; EPO; 5129 ~ ~~~DERWENT ___I _____ !S133 0 S19same (alarm or alert) and US-PPUB; ADJ ON 21/46 S128 USPAT;1:0 I USOCR;EPO; DERWENT !S134 2 S129 and (alarm or alert) and5128 US-PPUB; ~ADJ ON 21/46 USPAT r7:08 JPO; DERWENT S135 21 remote control$4 with(warn$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16z alert) withoperatorwith (machine or USPAT; 17:09 boom or crane) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT iS136 11 S135 and code US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/41 USPAT; 1 7:09 USOCR;EEPO WJPO; z Z~ERWENT zz (machine or boom or crane) USPAT; 17:23 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S138 1800 pair$3 with (remote or wireless) adI4 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 13 (controller or controlling) USPAT; 19:52 USOCR; EPO JPO; DERWENT ___I___ ___ S139 26 remote control$4 with5S138 with US- PPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 (machine or boom or crane) USPAT; [19:52 jUSOCR; EPO; JPO; z Z~~ERWENT z S141 1148 remote control with (r38 o US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/16z (a)ith ortor or usner) USPAT; 9:52 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT zz I S141 2 S141 emtcnt hin rn$or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 cae)wUSPAT; 20:39 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT 118 141wicnro4wth~ hineoromor US-FOPUB; ADJ O 050/ z124 aclan) wih(prto rue)USPAT; z 0:40 z ~JPO; z z z_ I___ZERWENT z EAST Search History (Interference) <This search history is empty> 4 161 2015 10:13:30 PM C:\ Users\ jlieu\ Document s\ EAST\ Workspaces\ 13730827.w sp S/N 13/730827 REMARKS The above preliminary amendment is made to correct the claim numbering and claim dependencies. Applicants respectfully request that the preliminary amendment described herein be entered into the record prior to calculation of the filing fee and prior to examination and consideration of the above-identified application. If a telephone conference would be helpful in resolving any issues concerning this communication, please contact Applicants' primary attorney-of record, James A. Larson (Reg. No. 40,443), at (612) 455.3805. Respectfully submitted, 283 5 HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & 52835LARSON, P.C. PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. Box 2902 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800 Dated: March 26, 2014 By: _/James A. Larson/ James A. Larson Reg. No. 40,443 JAL/mbj 6 Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination 13/730,827 SMITH ET AL. Notice of References Cited Examiner ArtUnit JULIE LIEU 2684 Page 1 of 1 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Name Classification A US-3,786,468 A 01-1974 Moffitt, Melville M. 340/515 B US-5,252,912 A 10-1993 Merritt et al. 324/72 C US-6,600,426 B1 07-2003 Sacks et al. 340/664 D US-2010/0286845 Al 11-2010 Rekow et al. 701/2 E US F US G US H US I US j US K US L US M US FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Country Name Classification N 0 P Q R S T NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS Include as applicable: Author, Title Date, Publisher, Edition or Volume, Pertinent Pages) U V W X opy of this reference is not being furnished with this Office action. (See MPEP § 707.05(a).) s in MM-YYYY format are publication dates. Classifications may be US or foreign. Patent and Trademark Office -892 (Rev. 01-2001) Notice of References Cited Part of Paper No. 20140615 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 Ale rria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 52835 7590 04/21/2015 EXAMINER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. P.O. BOX 2902 LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2684 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 04/21/2015 ELECTRONIC lease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. Fhe time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the ollowing e-mail address(es): 3TOMail@hsml.com l 3/ / 3U,02l / bIViI I--zI AL. Office Action Summary Examiner Art Unit AIA (First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status -- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- Briod for Reply A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF COMMUNICATION. - Extensions of time maybe available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely fied after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). atus 1)Z Responsive to communication(s) filed on 23 December 2014. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on . 2a) This action is FINAL. 2b) This action is non-final. 3) An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. 4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213. sposition of Claims* 5) Claim(s) 1-11,14 and 17-26is/are pending in the application. 5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration. 6) Claim(s) is/are allowed. 7) Claim(s) 1-11,14,17-22 and 24 is/are rejected. 8)Z Claim(s)23,25 and26 is/are objected to. 9) Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. f any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a rticipating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see p://wvw.uLsptO.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedbackSusptoaov. application Papers 10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 11) The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) accepted or b) objected to by the Examiner. Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). iority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) All b) Some** c) None of the: 1.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._. 3.D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. tachment(s) Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 3) Interview Summary (PTO-413) Paper No(s)/Mail Date.__._ DInformation Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b) 4) Other-__ Dt Paper No(s)/Mail Date . -th Patent and Trademark Office I QO9/0- 11/ I Q\ r44i Atinn Q mm De- of n I li, I ~/A.;i n - On i R A IR Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 2 Art Unit: 2684 DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. 2. This Office action is in response to Applicant's amendment filed December 23, 2014. Claims 1, 10, 11, and 14 were amended. Claims 12, 13, 15, and 16 were canceled. New claims 17-26 were added. 3. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 4. Claims 1-4, 7-9, and 17-21 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. (US 2012/0214094 Al) (hereinafter as Givens) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468). Regarding claim 1, Givens disclose a power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising: a loop antenna 300 (see para. 0056]) disposed on a structure 130 of the machinery (Fig. 2, 200-202), the structure configured for movement near the power line (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and paragraphs [0027] and [0031]); Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 3 Art Unit: 2684 a signal processor 725 (Fig. 7) in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line (para. 0056]); and a micro-controller (in base station 1000, Fig. 10 and paragraph [0072]) in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, causing an audible signal to be generated to audibly warn the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (see paragraph [0027] and [0036]). Givens fails to specifically state "a micro-controller". However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized that since the base station can communicate with the signal processor 725 of the sensor, is capable of interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (paragraph [0027]), it is inherent that there is a microcontroller or an equivalent thereof to perform the stated functions. Givens fails to disclose automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user adjustable sensitivity. However, Moffitt teaches the concept of shutting down the machinery when the signal strength and distance from a power line exceeds user's sensitivity level. See abstract. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 4 Art Unit: 2684 skill in the art to readily recognize adding this old and well known concept in the Givens system because the use of known techniques taught in Moffitt would improve the Givens system in that it further enhance the safety feature. Regarding claim 2, it is inherent that the Givens system includes an input/output (/0) module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/O module configured for communicating with external devices because 1/O are needed for signals to be input and output to the microcontroller for processing and for outputting alarms signals. Regarding claim 3, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp. Para. [0098]. As for the claimed an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to record or log all events as desired depending on the designer's discretion. This feature would not be considered an inventive step because what data to be logged is only up to the system implementer and only constitute a choice in design. Regarding claim 4, with reference to Fig. 2, Givens inherently discloses a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices because the base station receives the wireless signal from the sensor. Regarding claim 7, though not clearly disclosed, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that a memory device is included in the micro-controller in the Givens system for storing computer program instructions and data to carry out the functions involved. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 5 Art Unit: 2684 Regarding claim 8, base station 210 includes a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. See paragraphs [0027]-[0028]. Regarding claim 9, the user interface of Givens's system further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings (paragraph [0052] states that the range and position data could be displayed in a graphical format on a base receiver). Regarding claim 17, Given discloses a power line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna 300 (see para. 0056]) disposed on a structure of the machinery 130 that is movable near the power line; a control system 725 (Fig. 7) that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level (para. [0030]). Givens fails to specifically state "a micro-controller". However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized that since the base station can communicate with the signal processor 725 of the sensor, is capable of interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 6 Art Unit: 2684 proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (paragraph [0027]), it is inherent that there is a microcontroller or an equivalent thereof to perform the stated functions. Givens fails to disclose automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line. Givens fails to disclose automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user adjustable sensitivity. However, in a same field of endeavor, Moffitt teaches shutting down the machinery when the field strength and distance from a power line exceeds user's adjustable sensitivity level. See abstract. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to readily recognize adding this old and well known concept in the Givens system because the use of known techniques taught in Moffitt would improve the Givens system in that it further enhance the safety feature. Regarding claim 18, Given discloses that the micro-controller generates proximity signals based on the received field strength signals, causes display of the proximity signals. Givens also disclose a display for displaying the range and position in graphical format (see Fig. 13 and para. [0052]) and audio warning (via speaker 902, see Fig. 9], see para. [0068]) when the generated proximity signals exceeds a preset level of field sensitivity. Givens fails to discuss in details whether the display graphically displays the proximity signal on a color display. However, the concept of using graphical display of different colors to depict data is conventional in the art. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized employing this concept in the Givens system because it would provide the advantage of clearly indicating the data on the user interface making it easily comprehensible to the user. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 7 Art Unit: 2684 Regarding claim 19, it is inherent that the Givens system includes an input/output (/0) module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/0 module configured for communicating with external devices because 1/0 are needed for signals to be input and output to the microcontroller for processing and for outputting alarms signals. Regarding claim 20, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp (para. [0098]) inherently in communication with the micro-controller. Regarding claim 21, with reference to Fig. 2, Givens inherently discloses a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices because the base station receives the wireless signal from the sensor. 5. Claims 5, 6, and 24 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468) and further in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 Al) (hereinafter as Rekow). Regarding claim 5, Givens fails to disclose a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its functions when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 8 Art Unit: 2684 art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the purpose of increasing the safety feature of the system. Regarding claim 6, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button, which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]). Regarding claim 24, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button, which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]). 6. Claims 10 and 11 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468) and further in view of Christides et al. (US Patent No. 3,907,13) (hereinafter as Christides). Regarding claim 10, Givens discloses a method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, the method comprising: installing an antenna 300 on the structure of the machinery 130 that is movable near the high voltage power line 150 (Fig. 1), the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals (para. [0046]); Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 9 Art Unit: 2684 warning the operator when the extended structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first preset field sensitivity (para. [0036]). See Figs. 1-4. Givens fails to disclose automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user adjustable sensitivity. However, in a same field of endeavor, Moffitt teaches shutting down the machinery when the field strength and distance from a power line exceeds user's adjustable sensitivity level. See abstract. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to readily recognize adding this old and well known concept in the Givens system because the use of known techniques taught in Moffitt would improve the Givens system in that it enhance the safety feature. Neither Givens nor Moffitt discloses shutting the machine down when the structure is moved to a second warning distance less than the first distance. Nonetheless, Christides teaches this concept. See col. 5, line 57 to col. 6 line 5. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to applying the known technique taught by Christides in the modified system of Givens and Moffitt for improvement to yield predictable results because this combined system would warn the operator before shutting down granting more awareness and perhaps control for the operator. Regarding claim 11, Givens discloses that installing the antenna on the structure comprises installing a loop antenna about the structure. Givens also discloses that warning the operator comprises-audibly warning the operator (see para. [0067]). Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 10 Art Unit: 2684 Givens fails to disclose sending a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal. However, Moffitt teaches the concept of providing a test function to allow the operator to determine that working condition of system. See abstract, col. 1 lines 20-27, and col. 4 lines 33-36. In light of this teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate this feature in the Givens system because it would further enhance safety feature of the system. Regarding the first and second preset field sensitivities are user-adjustable, Moffitt also teaches adjustable preset distance (col. 4 lines 33-36). Moffitt does not teach the second sensitivity. However, Christides teaches this concept. See col. 5, line 57 to col. 6 line 5 in Christides. Therefore, would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate this feature in the Givens system because it would further enhance safety feature of the system and increase the operator's awareness before shutting down the machine. Givens disclose a display for displaying the range and position in graphical format (see Fig. 13 and para. [0052]). Givens fails to discuss in details whether the display graphically displays the proximity signal on a color display. However, the concept of using graphical display of different colors to depict data is conventional in the art. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized employing this concept in the Givens system because it would provide the advantage of clearly indicating the data on the user interface making it easily comprehensible to the user. 7. Claim 14 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468) and Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 11 Art Unit: 2684 Christides et al. (US Patent No. 3,907,13) (hereinafter as Christides) and further in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 Al). Regarding claim 14, Givens fails to disclose a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its functions when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of the system. The remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button, which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]). 8. Claims 22 and 24 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468) and further in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 Al). Regarding claim 22, Givens and Moffitt fails to disclose a remote controller. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its functions when an operator Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 12 Art Unit: 2684 presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front-page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of the system. One of ordinary skill in the art would have also readily recognized modifying the Givens system and Moffitt to include a wireless radio communication module to communicate with the remote controller. Regarding claim 24, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button, which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement (paragraph [0003]). Allowable Subject Matter 9. Claims 23, 25, and 26 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments 10. Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1, 10, and 17 have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the current rejection. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 13 Art Unit: 2684 In response to Applicant's argument regarding the automatic machine shut down, the argument is moot because of new grounds of rejection necessitated by the amendment. Regarding Applicant's argument that the citations should be considered, the examiner submits that 37 CFR 1.56 states the "duty to disclose...all information known...to be material to patentability" (of the pending claims of the current application). Such information would be material to patentability only if it qualifies as prior art, and without a publication date of a piece of IDS document (at least the publication year for NPL if it is a year that is earlier than the earliest effective filing year of the application), no determination could be made as to prior art qualification and thus patentability based on such a document. Therefore, each document submitted in an IDS must be provided with its publication date (at least the publication year for NPL if it is earlier than the year of the earliest effective filing year of the application) to satisfy the full requirements of 37 CFR 1.56. Since the dates of the cited documents in the previous IDS were not provided, they cannot be considered and were crossed out. Conclusion 11. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 14 Art Unit: 2684 the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this final action. 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIE LIEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2978. The examiner can normally be reached on Increased Flex. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached on 571-270-1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Julie Lieu/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2684 Apr 16, 15 CLAIMS What is claimed is: 1. A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising: loop antenna disposed about a structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity. 2. The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (1/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/O module configured for communicating with external devices. 3. The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time. 4. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices. 13 7. The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. 8. The system according to claim 8, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines. 9. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data. 10. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. 11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings. 12. A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, the method comprising: providing a power line proximity sensing and warning system and a wireless remote controller; installing the system on the machinery; performing a system check of the system; adjusting field sensitivity of the system; wirelessly linking the remote controller to the system; remotely controlling the system using the remote controller; warning the operator when the extended structure is moved within a preset field sensitivity; and 14 shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved within another present field sensitivity. 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the power line proximity sensing and warning system, comprises: aloop antenna disposed about the extended structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor adapted for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity. 13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the remotely controlling the system using the remote controller, comprises a remote user viewing the extended structure of the machinery from outside of the machinery and wirelessly controlling the system using the remote controller. 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the remote user is a spotter. 15. The method according to claim 12, wherein the remote controller has a panic button configured to wirelessly shutdown the machinery to prevent the extended structure from coming into contact with the power lines. 16. The method according to claim 12, further comprising providing a wireless system logger configured for wirelessly connecting to the system and downloading data stored by an event logger. 15 17. The method according to claim 12, wherein the graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display comprises a red-yellow-green bar graph. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No.: 20600.0001USU1 Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION. I hereby certify that this paper is being transmitted by EFS Web to the United States Patent & Trademark Office on March 26, 2014. By: /MeanJachim/ Name: Megan Jachim PRELIMINARY AMENDMENT Mail Stop: AMENDMENT Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 In connection with the above-identified application, please enter the following preliminary amendment. Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of the claims which begins on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on page 6 of this paper. S/N 13/730827 Amendments to the Claims: This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the application. Listing of Claims: 1. (Original) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising: a loop antenna disposed about a structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity. 2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the I/O module configured for communicating with external devices. 3. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time. 2 S/N 13/730827 4. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices. [[7]] 5. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. [[8]] 6. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim [[8]] 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines. [[9]] 7. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data. [[10]] 8. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. [[11]] 2. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim [[10]] 8, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings. [[12]] 10. (Currently Amended) A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, the method comprising: providing a power line proximity sensing and warning system and a wireless remote controller; installing the system on the machinery; 3 S/N 13/730827 performing a system check of the system; adjusting field sensitivity of the system; wirelessly linking the remote controller to the system; remotely controlling the system using the remote controller; warning the operator when the extended structure is moved within a preset field sensitivity; and shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved within another present field sensitivity. [[13]]11. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]]i0, wherein the power line proximity sensing and warning system, comprises: a loop antenna disposed about the extended structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor adapted for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity. [[13]]12. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]]i0, wherein the remotely controlling the system using the remote controller, comprises a remote user viewing the extended structure of the machinery from outside of the machinery and wirelessly controlling the system using the remote controller. [[14]] 13. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[13]] 12, wherein the remote user is a spotter. 4 S/N 13/730827 [[15]] 14. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]] ., wherein the remote controller has a panic button configured to wirelessly shutdown the machinery to prevent the extended structure from coming into contact with the power lines. [[16]] 15. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]] L, further comprising providing a wireless system logger configured for wirelessly connecting to the system and downloading data stored by an event logger. [[17]] 16. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]] L, wherein the graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display comprises a red-yellow green bar graph. 5 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 Aledria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 52835 7590 06/23/2014 EXAMINER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. P.O. BOX 2902 LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2684 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 06/23/2014 ELECTRONIC lease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. Fhe time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the ollowing e-mail address(es): 3TOMail@hsml.com l 3/ /3U,02l / IVi I I- I -AL. Office Action Summary Examiner Art Unit AIA (First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status No -- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- Briod for Reply A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF COMMUNICATION. - Extensions of time maybe available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b). status 1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on March 26, 2014. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on . 2a) This action is FINAL. 2b) This action is non-final. 3) An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. 4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213. sposition of Claims* 5) Claim(s) 1-16 is/are pending in the application. 5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration. 6) Claim(s) is/are allowed. 7) Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected. 8) Claim(s) is/are objected to. 9) Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. f any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a rticipating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see Qp://www. ustO.ov/patents/init events/pph/index.isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedbackSusPto.aov. application Papers 10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 11) The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) accepted or b) objected to by the Examiner. Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d). iority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) All b) Some** c) None of the: 1.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._. 3.1 Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received. tachment(s) Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 3) Interview Summary (PTO-413) Paper No(s)/Mail Date.__._ Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b) 4 ater___ Dt Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 4) []Other: . Patent and Trademark Office I -O /D... 11 I iQ\ 'f A ntianO.mm D -r _f D___r lKl_ /lulil 1- n -1 1-IA 1i Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 2 Art Unit: 2684 DETAILED ACTION 1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. 2. This Office action is in response to Applicant's preliminary amendment filed March 26, 2014. Claims 7-17 have been amended and renumbered to 5-16. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 3. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of pre AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g) prior art under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a). Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 3 Art Unit: 2684 4. Claims 1-4 and 7-9 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. (US 2012/0214094 A]) (hereinafter as Givens) (cited by Applicants). Regarding claim 1, Givens disclose a power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising: a loop antenna 300 (720 in one of the embodiments) (see para. 0056]) disposed about a structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, andparagraphs [0027] and [0031]); a signal processor 725 (Fig. 7) in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines (para. 0056]); and a micro-controller (in base station 1000, Fig. 10 and paragraph [0072]) in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (see paragraph [0027]). Givens fails to disclose a micro-controller. However, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized that since the base station can communicate with the signal processor 725 of the sensor, is capable of interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 4 Art Unit: 2684 signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (paragraph [0027]), it is inherent that there is a microcontroller or an equivalent thereof to perform the stated functions. Regarding claim 2, it is inherent that the Givens system includes an input/output (/0) module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/0 module configured for communicating with external devices because 1/0 are needed for signals to be input and output to the microcontroller for processing and for outputting alarms signals. Regarding claim 3, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp. Para. [0098]. As for the claimed an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to record or log all events as desired depending on the designer's discretion. This feature would not be considered an inventive step because what data to be logged is only up to the system implementer and only constitute a choice in design. Regarding claim 4, with reference to Fig. 2, Givens inherently discloses a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices because the base station receives the wireless signal from the sensor. Regarding claim 7, though not clearly disclosed, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art that a memory device is included in the micro-controller in the Givens system for storing computer program instructions and data to carry out the functions involved. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 5 Art Unit: 2684 Regarding claim 8, base station 210 includes a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. See paragraphs [0027]-[0028]. Regarding claim 9, the user interface of Givens's system further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings (paragraph [0052] states that the range and position data could be displayed in a graphical format on a base receiver). 5. Claims 5, 6, and 10-16 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. (US 2012/0214094 A]) (hereinafter as Givens) (cited by Applicants) in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 A) (hereinafter as Rekow). Regarding claim 5, Givens fails to disclose a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its functions when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of the system. Regarding claim 6, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button, which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]). Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 6 Art Unit: 2684 Regarding claim 10, Givens discloses a method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, the method comprising: providing a power line proximity sensing and warning system; installing the system on the machinery; adjusting field sensitivity of the system level (paragraph [0030]); warning the operator when the extended structure is moved within a preset field sensitivity. See Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 Givens fails to disclose including a remote controller to remotely control the machine and shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved within another present field sensitivity. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its function when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of the system. Regarding claim 11, see the rejection of claim 1. Regarding claim 12, in the combined system of Givens and Rekow, an operator would view the extended structure of the machinery, i.e. boom 130, and remotely controlling the system using the remote controller to wirelessly controlling the system using the remote controller. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 7 Art Unit: 2684 Regarding claim 13, Givens discloses a supervisor carrying a wireless device who monitors the power line safety from a location remote and outside of the machinery. The supervisor can make a call to the operator using two way radio or the base station itself. Therefore, the reference suggests that a spotter watching communicate with the operator regarding the safety condition. Regarding claim 14, see the rejection of claim 6. Regarding claim 15, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp. Paragraph [0098]. As for the claimed wireless system logger configured for wirelessly connecting to the system and downloading data stored by an event logger, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to provide this method because it would allow the system user to download the event to wireless device as desired. Regarding claim 16, the user interface of Givens's system further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings (paragraph [0052] states that the range and position data could be displayed in a graphical format on a base receiver). Givens fails to discuss in details whether the display graphically displays the proximity signal on a color display comprises a red-yellow- green bar graph. However, the concept of using bar graph of different colors to depict data is conventional in the art. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized employing this concept in the Givens system because it would provide the advantage of clearly indicating the data on the user interface making it easily comprehensible to the user. Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 8 Art Unit: 2684 6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIE LIEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2978. The examiner can normally be reached on Increased Flex. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached on 571-272-3021. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Julie Lieu/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2684 Jun 15, 14 PTOISB/08a (07-09) Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number. Substitute for form 1449/PTO Complte if Known Application Number 13/730,827 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date December 28, 2012 First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith STATEMENT BY APPLICANT Arl Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name Sheet 1 of 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP U. S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Document Number Publication Date Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Where Initials* No. 1 MM-DD-YYYY Applicant of Cited Document Relevant Passages or Relevant Number-Kind Code (irknown) Figures Appear Us- 6,104,305 08-15-2000 Beckmann US- 6,133,841 10-17-2000 Beckmann Us- 6,170,607 BI 01-09-2001 Freeman et al. Us- 6,252,513 B1 06-26-2001 Beckmann US- 6,600,426 BI 07-29-2003 Sacks et al. Us 7,081,812 B2 07-25-2006 Hastings, Sr. US Us- 2004/0066284 Al 04-08-2004 Hastings, Sr. US- 2007/0018841 Al 01-25-2007 Nickerson US- 2010/0214094 Al 08-26-2010 Givens et al. US US US US US US US US US FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Foreign Patent Document Publication Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Initials* No.' Date Applicant of Cited Document Where Relevant Passages CountryGode umber 4 -ind Code 5 (ifkown) MM-DD-YYYY Or Relevant Figures Appear T 6 Examiner Date Signature Considered *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 'Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 See Kinds Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at y isgg or MPEP 901.04. Enter Office that issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO Standard ST.3). 4 For Japanese patent documents, the indication of the year of the reign of the Emperor must precede the serial number of the patent document. 5 Kind of document by the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. 6 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2. PTO/SB/08b (07-09) Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons ar required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number. Substitute for form 1449/PTO Complete if Known Application Number 13/730,827 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date December 28, 2012 STATEMENT BY APPLICANT First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith Art Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name sheet 2 of 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate), title of Initials* No.' the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc.), date, page(s), volume-issue T2 number(s), publisher, city and/or country where published. Installation Procedure for the ASE 2200 High Voltage Proximity Warning Device, Allied Safety Engineering, February 21, 2006. Proxyvolt Instruction Manual PV500711, Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, date unknown. Proxyvolt PV5007 Brochure, Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, 1717 Ipswich Road, Rocklea QId Australia 4106, date unknown. Proxyvolt Quick Start Guide (Label), Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, date unknown. Sigalarm Model 110 Lattice Boom Manual, Sigalarm, 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, 2010. Wire-Watcher Brochure, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, date unknown. http://www.alliedsafetyeng.com/proximitywarningdevice.html, Allied Safety Systems, Inc., 4380 St. Johns Parkway, Suite 100 Sanford, FL 32771, 2009. http://www.sigalarminc.com/index.html, Sigalarm, 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, date unknown. http://www.wirewatcher.co.uk/wwprd.html, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, 2005. E xaminer Date Signature Considered *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 1 Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.

Description

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes BB 13730827

Examiner JULIE LIEU SMITH ET AL.

Art Unit 2684

CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED

Class Subclass Date Examiner

SEARCHNOTES

Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL EAST 4/16/15 JL EAST 11/20/15 JL EAST 7/9/16 JL

INTERFERENCESEARCH

US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol G08G 1/0962 7/10/16 JL H02H 5/12 "1 "1 G01V 3/10, 15 "_ "_ G01 R 19/145; 28/085 "1 "1

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patentand Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexadria, Virginia 22313-1450 ww -upto.gov

APPLICATION NO. ISSUE DATE PATENT NO. ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

13/730,827 11/22/2016 9501930 20600.0001USU1 8263

52835 7590 11/02/2016 HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. 45 South Seventh Street Suite 2700 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683

ISSUE NOTIFICATION

he projected patent number and issue date are specified above.

Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b) (application filed on or after May 29, 2000)

he Patent Term Adjustment is 0 day(s). Any patent to issue from the above-identified application will include m indication of the adjustment on the front page.

f a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) was filed in the above-identified application, the filing date that determines Patent Term Adjustment is the filing date of the most recent CPA.

Applicant will be able to obtain more detailed information by accessing the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) WEB site (http://pair.uspto.gov).

Any questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the )ffice of Patent Legal Administration at (571)-272-7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee >ayments should be directed to the Application Assistance Unit (AAU) of the Office of Data Management ODM) at (571)-272-4200.

APPLICANT(s) (Please see PAIR WEB site http://pair.uspto.gov for additional applicants):

tephen L. Smith, Kalispell, MT; dark C. Olson, Racine, WI; Zyan W. Johnson, Bigfork, MT; JNITED SAFETY, INC., Kalispell, MT

he United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world and is an unparalleled location or business investment, innovation, and commercialization of new technologies. The USA offers tremendous esources and advantages for those who invest and manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation vorks to encourage and facilitate business investment. To learn more about why the USA is the best country in he world to develop technology, manufacture products, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA.gov.

EAST Search History

EAST Search History (Prior Art)

Ref Hits Search Query 0Bs DIefault IPurais Time #__ ___ _____________perator ____Stamp

S194 1 1/387US-PGPUB; ~ADJ ION 2016/07/09 ___ ____1373027USPAT;EEEPO 14:42 ___ ____ ~~~~ JPO; DERWENTj___j__I___

!S195]1 ]S194 and user near6 adjust$4 US-PAT;EB; ADO j12/70 'distnce)USPAT;EPO; 14:55 !S196 4599 power line with (proxim$3 or US-PGPUB; ~ ADJ ION J2016/07/09 ___ ___ I________________ JPO; DERWENT _ _ I _____ S19 114 S96and (exceed$3 or higher or US-PGPUB; ADIN 21/70 S19]114 above or larger) with level USPAT;EPO; AD21:55~4o/o ___ ____I___________________JPO;DERWENT ____I______

S198 I44(GO8G1/0962 OR H02H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 21/70 ___GO1V3/10,15 0R G01R19/145 or ___ USPAT;EEEPO [21: 5 80/ ____GO1R29/085 or HO2H5/12).cpc. ___ JPO;DERWENT ___I_______

S199 11 S197 AND5S198 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 USPAT; EPO1:5 JPO; DERWENT S200 7 [S199 an dutbeUS-PGPUB; IADJ [ON 21/70 anddjstaleUSPAT;EPO; 220

S2123849 loop antenna US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 ~~7~777 S225659 sensitivity near10 adjustable US-PGPUB; ADJ ON r201/70 USPAT;EPO; 122:12 JPO; DERWENT S203 3 S196 and S01 and S02 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70 USPAT;EEPO 22:13 ___ ____JPO; DERWENT S204 61236 (level or sensitivity or threshold) US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2016/07/09 near10 adjustable USPAT;EEPO 22:14 ___ ~~~~~JPO; DERWENT____ __ I___ S205 3 S196 andS01 and S04 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/70

S261057 nstiitothesol) US-PAT; PO A2:1 I~lvelJPO;DERWENT S206 10537 (level or sensitivity or threshold) US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2016/07/0

I near10 adjustableclm. USPAT; EPO2:1 S207 I00loop anen~l.US-PGPUB; ON 21/70 1ADJ ~350USPAT;EPOC2:1

EATSearch History (Interference)

Ref [Hits [Search Query DBs [Default IPlurals ime # ~ IOpeator ~ xtamp

16 - 1 O G 1R19/145or IFOGPUB .. .................... 21 ____ zIM FD_ Gi29/085 or H02H5/i2).cp. [USPAT ____ _______

opantennaci.U- 'D 0

zU- AJ O 21/70

[S21 1053 (level adj or sensitivity or threshold) nearO0 ustablecm. PPUB; z2:1

8211 I08 and S209 and S210 US- AJr079 _ _ _ _ I.....I................. 1. C:\Uersjlie\Doumens\EST\orksace\137082.ws 7/10/201633059PM... . . .. .........

S/N13/730827

Remarks Reconsideration is requested in view of the above amendments and the following remarks. Claims 1-11, 14, 17, and 19-26 are pending

Claims 1-11 15, 17 and 19-22are rejected under 35USC 112 first paragraph Claims 1, 10 and 17 are amended todelete the language about the difference being user adjustable. Withdrawal of the rejection is requested.

All claims should now be in conditionfor allowance. Favorable reconsideration in the form of a notice of allowance is requested, Any questions concerning this paper can be directed to the attention of the undersigned at (612) 455-3805.

Respectfilly submitted, HAMRE, SCHUMANN,MUELLER

& LARSONg.C. 45 South 7 St. Suite 2700 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800

Dated May 2. 2016 By: _lames A, Larson! James A. Larson Reg No. 40443

IN lTE UNI TED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No,: 20600.00OIUSUI Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNIN(I SYSTEM

CERIFICA11 OF'YRANSM ISS ION Ih-ere bycertzify ththtpapalrskbeingrnsiteby EyS Wb o C lnn siowe fr;?mw, s.F0Box i450hAlemandnia VA. 22313-1430 o May 2, 2016, By: ... e Ahi~ lA s Nauie: twrxne±A. Larson

AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE

Mail Stop: AMENDMENT Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

Dear Sir:

In response to the office actionmiailed December 2, 2015, Applicant provides the following. Amendments to the claims begin on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on. page 9 of this paper.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 A1x dria, Virginia 22313-1450 wwwusptogov

NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE AND FEE(S) DUE

08/04/2016 EXAMINER 52835 7590 AMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC South Seventh Street quite 2700 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER INNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 2684

DATE MAILED: 08/04/2016

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATIONNO.

13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 OF INVENTION: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM

PPLN. TYPE ENTITY STATUS ISSUE FEE DUE PUBLICATION FEE DUE PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE TOTAL FEE(S) DUE DATE DUE

>nprovisional SMALL $480 $0 $0 $480 11/04/2016

APPLICATION IDENTIFIED ABOVE HAS BEEN EXAMINED AND IS ALLOWED FOR ISSUANCE AS A PATENT. SECUTION ON THE MERITS IS CLOSED. THIS NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS. i APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO WITHDRAWAL FROM ISSUE AT THE INITIATIVE OF THE OFFICE OR UPON

[TION BY THE APPLICANT. SEE 37 CFR 1.313 AND MPEP 1308. ISSUE FEE AND PUBLICATION FEE (IF REQUIRED) MUST BE PAID WITHIN THREE MONTHS FROM THE LING DATE OF THIS NOTICE OR THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE REGARDED AS ABANDONED. THIS TUTORY PERIOD CANNOT BE EXTENDED. SEE 35 U.S.C. 151. THE ISSUE FEE DUE INDICATED ABOVE DOES REFLECT A CREDIT FOR ANY PREVIOUSLY PAID ISSUE FEE IN THIS APPLICATION. IF AN ISSUE FEE HAS VIOUSLY BEEN PAID IN THIS APPLICATION (AS SHOWN ABOVE), THE RETURN OF PART B OF THIS FORM L BE CONSIDERED A REQUEST TO REAPPLY THE PREVIOUSLY PAID ISSUE FEE TOWARD THE ISSUE FEE NOW

V TO REPLY TO THIS NOTICE:

view the ENTITY STATUS shown above. If the ENTITY STATUS is shown as SMALL or MICRO, verify whether entitlement to that status still applies. ENTITY STATUS is the same as shown above, pay the TOTAL FEE(S) DUE shown above. ENTITY STATUS is changed from that shown above, on PART B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL, complete section number 5 titled nge in Entity Status (from status indicated above)". urposes of this notice, small entity fees are 1/2 the amount of undiscounted fees, and micro entity fees are 1/2 the amount of small entity

RT B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL, or its equivalent, must be completed and returned to the United States Patent and Trademark Office TO) with your ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). If you are charging the fee(s) to your deposit account, section "4b" rt B - Fee(s) Transmittal should be completed and an extra copy of the form should be submitted. If an equivalent of Part B is filed, a st to reapply a previously paid issue fee must be clearly made, and delays in processing may occur due to the difficulty in recognizing paper as an equivalent of Part B.

11 communications regarding this application must give the application number. Please direct all communications prior to issuance to Stop ISSUE FEE unless advised to the contrary.

ORTANT REMINDER: Utility patents issuing on applications filed on or after Dec. 12, 1980 may require payment of tenance fees. It is patentee's responsibility to ensure timely payment of maintenance fees when due.

Page 1 of 3 mplete and send this form, together with applicable fee(s), to: Mail Mail Stop ISSUE FEE Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 or Fax (571)-273-2885 JUCTIONS: This form should be used for transmitting the ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). Blocks 1 through 5 should be completed where riate. All further correspondence including the Patent, advance orders and notification of maintenance fees will be mailed to the current correspondence address as ted unless corrected below or directed otherwise in Block 1, by (a) specifying a new correspondence address; and/or (b) indicating a separate "FEE ADDRESS" for nance fee notifications. Note: A certificate of mailing can only be used for domestic mailings of the Fee(s) Transmittal. This certificate cannot be used for any other accompanying RENT CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS (Note: Use Block 1 foray change of address) papers. Each additional paper, such as an assignment or formal drawing, must have its own certificate of mailing or transmission.

Certificate of Mailing or Transmission 52835 7590 08/04/2016 I hereby certify that this Fee(s) Transmittal is being deposited with the United AMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. States Postal Servicewith sufficientnpostage for first class mail inan envelope addressed to the Mail Stop ISSUE FEE address above, or being facsimile > South Seventh Street transmitted to the USPTO (571) 273-2885, on the date indicated below. quite 2700 (Depositor'nae) INNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 (Signature)

(Date)

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263 OF INVENTION: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM

,PPLN. TYPE ENTITY STATUS ISSUE FEE DUE PUBLICATION FEE DUE PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE TOTAL FEE(S) DUE DATE DUE

provisionall SMALL $480 $0 $0 $480 11/04/2016

EXAMINER ART UNIT CLASS-SUBCLASS

LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC 2684 340-901000

nge of correspondence address or indication of "Fee Address" (37 2. For printing on the patent front page, list .363). (1) The names of up to 3 registered patent attorneys I Change of correspondence address (or Change of Correspondence or agents OR, alternatively, ress form PTO/SB/122) attached. (2) The name of a single firm (having as a member a 2 "Fee Address" indication (or "Fee Address" Indication form registered attorney or agent) and the names of up to )/SB/47; Rev 03-02 or more recent) attached. Use of a Customer 2 registered patentattorneysoragents.Ifnonameis 3 mber is required. listed, no name will be printed. IGNEE NAME AND RESIDENCE DATA TO BE PRINTED ON THE PATENT (print or type) EASE NOTE: Unless an assignee is identified below, no assignee data will appear on the patent. If an assignee is identified below, the document has been filed for )rdation as set forth in 37 CFR 3.11. Completion of this form is NOT a substitute for filing an assignment. NAME OF ASSIGNEE (B) RESIDENCE: (CITY and STATE OR COUNTRY)

check the appropriate assignee category or categories (will not be printed on the patent) : UIndividual UCorporation or other private group entity UGovernment e following fee(s) are submitted: 4b. Payment of Fee(s): (Please first reapply any previously paid issue fee shown above) Issue Fee A check is enclosed. Publication Fee (No small entity discount permitted) UPayment by credit card. Form PTO-2038 is attached. Advance Order - # of Copies Ll The director is hereby authorized to charge the required fee(s), any deficiency, or credits any overpayment, to Deposit Account Number - (enclose an extra copy of this form).

nge in Entity Status (from status indicated above) Applicant certifying micro entity status. See 37 CFR 1.29 NOTE: Absent a valid certification of Micro Entity Status (see forms PTO/SB/15A and 15B), issue fee payment in the micro entity amount will not be accepted at the risk of application abandonment. Applicant asserting small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27 NOTE: If the application was previously under micro entity status, checking this box will be taken to be a notification of loss of entitlement to micro entity status. Applicant changing to regular undiscounted fee status. NOTE: Checking this box will be taken to be a notification of loss of entitlement to small or micro entity status, as applicable. , This form must be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 1.31 and 1.33. See 37 CFR 1.4 for signature requirements and certifications.

horized Signature Date

ed or printed name Registration No.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 A1x dria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

13/730,827 12/28/2012 StephenL.Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263

08/04/2016 EXAMINER 52835 7590 AMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC South Seventh Street quite 2700 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER INNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1683 2684

DATE MAILED: 08/04/2016

Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b) (Applications filed on or after May 29, 2000)

Office has discontinued providing a Patent Term Adjustment (PTA) calculation with the Notice of Allowance.

ion 1(h)(2) of the AIA Technical Corrections Act amended 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3)(B)(i) to eliminate the irement that the Office provide a patent term adjustment determination with the notice of allowance. See sions to Patent Term Adjustment, 78 Fed. Reg. 19416, 19417 (Apr. 1, 2013). Therefore, the Office is no longer iding an initial patent term adjustment determination with the notice of allowance. The Office will continue to ide a patent term adjustment determination with the Issue Notification Letter that is mailed to applicant oximately three weeks prior to the issue date of the patent, and will include the patent term adjustment on the nt. Any request for reconsideration of the patent term adjustment determination (or reinstatement of patent term stment) should follow the process outlined in 37 CFR 1.705.

questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the Office of nt Legal Administration at (571)-272-7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee payments should be :ted to the Customer Service Center of the Office of Patent Publication at 1-(888)-786-0101 or (571)-272-4200.

Page 3 of 3

OMB Clearance and PRA Burden Statement for PTOL-85 Part B The Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to obtain Office of Management and Budget approval before requesting most types of information from the public. When OMB approves an agency request to collect information from the public, OMB (i) provides a valid OMB Control Number and expiration date for the agency to display on the instrument that will be used to collect the information and (ii) requires the agency to inform the public about the OMB Control Number's legal significance in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b).

The information collected by PTOL-85 Part B is required by 37 CFR 1.311. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.

Privacy Act Statement The Privacy Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-579) requires that you be given certain information in connection with your submission of the attached form related to a patent application or patent. Accordingly, pursuant to the requirements of the Act, please be advised that: (1) the general authority for the collection of this information is U.S.C. 2(b)(2); (2) furnishing of the information solicited is voluntary; and (3) the principal purpose for which the information is used by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is to process and/or examine your submission related to a patent application or patent. If you do not furnish the requested information, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may not be able to process and/or examine your submission, which may result in termination of proceedings or abandonment of the application or expiration of the patent.

The information provided by you in this form will be subject to the following routine uses: 1. The information on this form will be treated confidentially to the extent allowed under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C 552a). Records from this system of records may be disclosed to the Department of Justice to determine whether disclosure of these records is required by the Freedom of Information Act. 2. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, in the course of presenting evidence to a court, magistrate, or administrative tribunal, including disclosures to opposing counsel in the course of settlement negotiations. 3. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Member of Congress submitting a request involving an individual, to whom the record pertains, when the individual has requested assistance from the Member with respect to the subject matter of the record. 4. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a contractor of the Agency having need for the information in order to perform a contract. Recipients of information shall be required to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(m). 5. A record related to an International Application filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the International Bureau of the World Intellectual Property Organization, pursuant to the Patent Cooperation Treaty. 6. A record in this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to another federal agency for purposes of National Security review (35 U.S.C. 181) and for review pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act (42 U.S.C. 218(c)). 7. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the Administrator, General Services, or his/her designee, during an inspection of records conducted by GSA as part of that agency's responsibility to recommend improvements in records management practices and programs, under authority of 44 U.S.C. 2904 and 2906. Such disclosure shall be made in accordance with the GSA regulations governing inspection of records for this purpose, and any other relevant (i.e., GSA or Commerce) directive. Such disclosure shall not be used to make determinations about individuals. 8. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to the public after either publication of the application pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 122(b) or issuance of a patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 151. Further, a record may be disclosed, subject to the limitations of 37 CFR 1.14, as a routine use, to the public if the record was filed in an application which became abandoned or in which the proceedings were terminated and which application is referenced by either a published application, an application open to public inspection or an issued patent. 9. A record from this system of records may be disclosed, as a routine use, to a Federal, State, or local law enforcement agency, if the USPTO becomes aware of a violation or potential violation of law or regulation.

Application No. Applicant(s) 13/730,827 SMITH ET AL. Notice of Allowability Examiner Art Unit 2684 AA(First Inventor to File) Status JULIE LIEU No

-- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- -laims being allowable, PROSECUTION ON THE MERITS IS (OR REMAINS) CLOSED in this application. If not included with (or previously mailed), a Notice of Allowance (PTOL-85) or other appropriate communication will be mailed in due course. THIS TICE OF ALLOWABILITY IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS. This application is subject to withdrawal from issue at the initiative he Office or upon petition by the applicant. See 37 CFR 1.313 and MPEP 1308. 1This communication is responsive to amendment filed May 02, 2016. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on

. ]An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.

SThe allowed claim(s) is/are 1-11,14,17 and 19-26. As a result of the allowed claim(s), you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see http://www.uspto.gov/patents/initevents/pph/index.jsp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.gov.

]Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) E All b) E Some *c) M None of the: 1. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2. Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._

. 3. Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this national stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). * Certified copies not received:_.

applicant has THREE MONTHS FROM THE "MAILING DATE" of this communication to file a reply complying with the requirements )ted below. Failure to timely comply will result in ABANDONMENT of this application. HIS THREE-MONTH PERIOD IS NOT EXTENDABLE. ]CORRECTED DRAWINGS (as "replacement sheets") must be submitted. E including changes required by the attached Examiner's Amendment / Comment or in the Office action of Paper No./Mail Date_. Identifying indicia such as the application number (see 37 CFR 1.84(c)) should be written on the drawings in the front (not the back) of each sheet. Replacement sheet(s) should be labeled as such in the header according to 37 CFR 1.121(d).

] DEPOSIT OF and/or INFORMATION about the deposit of BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL must be submitted. Note the attached Examiner's comment regarding REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEPOSIT OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL.

achment(s) M Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 5. E Examiner's Amendment/Comment M Information Disclosure Statements (PTO/SB/08), 6. E Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance Paper No./Mail Date ]Examiner's Comment Regarding Requirement for Deposit 7. [ Other_ .

of Biological Material ]Interview Summary (PTO-413), Paper No./Mail Date_. lie Lieu/ mary Examiner Unit: 2684

Patent and Trademark Office )L-37 (Rev. 08-13) Notice of Allowability Part of Paper No./Mail Date

EAST Search History

EAST Search History (Prior Art)

Ref IHits Search Query [DBs Default Piurais Time # ............"'l Operatorj Stamp S176 369 (power line or high voltage) with US- IADJ zON 2015/11/20z (proxim$3 or distance) same (warn$3 PGPUB; 23:53 or alert$3 or alarm$3) USPAT; z EPO; JPO ___ _______________________DERWENT___I______ USPA S177 502358 (threshold z or predetermined ~EPO; or US- JPO; ADJ ON 21/12 sensitivity) with adjust$4 PGPUB; 23:53

DERWENT S178 34 S176sand S177 US- ADJ ION 2015/11/20 PGPUB; 23:53 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT_ z _z S17921 (US-20100214094-$ orUS- US- ADJ ON 2015/11/23 20100286845-$orUS-20070018841$ PGPUB; 13:55 or US-20100090863-$orUS- USPAT; 20020067286-$orUS-20090237263$ DERWENT or US-20060271263-$ or US 20100052929-$ or US-20090108840-$ or US-20030011484-$ or US 20100289662-$).did. or (US-5252912-$ orUS-3786468-$ or US-6600426-$ or US-6170607-$orUS-5592092-$ or US 3907136-$ or US-6515588-$ or US 3745549-$or US-5859597-$).did or z___ _____ (EP 2479735-$).did. o_____ zz S180 5 S179 anduserwithadust$4 US- jADJ jON 2015/11/23

USPAT;

S181 21 (US-20100214094-$ or US- US- ADJ ON 2015/11/24 20100286845-$ or US-20070018841-$ PPUB; 12:51 orUS-20100090863-$ or US- USPAT 20020067286-$ or US-20090237263-$ DERWENT orUS-20060271263-$ - or US 20100052929-$ or US-20090108840-$ or US-20030011484-$ or US 20100289662-$).did. or (US-5252912-$ or US-3786468-$ or US-6600426$or US-6170607-$ or US-5592092-$ or US 3907136-$ or US-6515588-$ or US 3745549-$ or US-5859597-$).did. or (EP-2479735-$).did. zz S182 6 S181 and remote$2 near control$3 US- ADJ zON 2015/11/24 PGPUB; 12:51 USPAT EPO; JPO DERWENT same warn$e PGPUB; 13:14 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT T S184 2 S181 and remote$2 near6 control$3 US- ADJ ON 2015/11/24 same warn$3 PGPUB; 13:15 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S185 30985 loop near3 antenna US- ADJ zON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:45 USPAT; z z ~ ~ EPO; JPO; DERWENTI z z S186 21 (US-20100214094-$ or US- US- ADJ ON 2015/11/25 20100286845-$ or US-20070018841-$ PGPUB; 14:45 or US-20100090863-$ or US- USPAT; 20020067286-$ or US-20090237263-$ DERWENTz or US-20060271263-$ or US 20100052929-$ or US-20090108840-$ or US-20030011484-$ or US 20100289662-$).did. or (US-5252912-$ or US-3786468-$ or US-6600426-$ or US-6170607-$ or US-5592092-$ or US '3907136-$ or US-6515588-$ or US 3745549-$ or US-5859597-$).did. or z__ __ _ (EP-2479735-$).did. z z S187 1 S186 and S185 US- ADJ [ON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:45 USPATI DERWENT____ _______

!S188 424 power line with (proxim$3 or distance) US- IADJ ION 2015/11/25 j4284 PGPUB; 14:47 z USPAT; I z EPO; JPO; z z__ ._ _ _DERWENT [ z z S189 428137 (strength or magnitudeor level) with US- zADJ zON 2015/11/25 field PUB; z 14:47 z USPAT; z z z EPO; JPO; z z z__ I _ _ _DERWENT _ z z S190 360422 s189 and (exceed$3 or higher orabove US- zADJ ON 2015/11/25

I ~ ~USPAT; I ~EPO; JPO; ___I____ ____________________DERWENT___ I______ S191 21 S185 and S188 and5190 US- IADJ ON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:47 USPAT; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S192 S185 and188and189and warn$3 S(useroroperatororworker) US- PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/11/25 14:51 USPAT z z EPO; JPO; z DERWENTI, z S19360 S185 and S188 [US- [ADJ [ON 2015/11/25 PGPUB; 14:52

EPO; JPO; DERWENT

EAST Search History (Interference)

<This search history is empty>

11/ 25/ 2015 3:40:20 PM C:\ Users\ jlieu\ Documents\ EAST\ Workspaces\ 13730827.wsp

S/N13/730827

Amendments to the claims

L (Currently amended) Apower ine proximity sensing and warning systemfor use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage powerline comprising a loop antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that ismovable near the power line; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loopantennaand receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor that interprets the received field strength signals and compares thereceived field strength signals to first and second preset, user-adjustable sensitivity levels, generates a proximity signal, graphically displays the proximity signal on a color display, causes an audible signal to be generated to audibly wam theoperator when the proximity signalexceedsthefirst preset sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the second preset sensitivity level, wherein the second preset sensitivity level exceeds the first preset sensitivity level, and each of the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustableratldie difference between the fist preset sensitivity level and the sen t si level

2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the microcontroller, the/o module configured for communicating with external devices,

3.(Original) The systemaccording to claim furtherr comprising an event loggerin communication wth the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustnients, received fieldstrength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated system cable connectionspower loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time.

S/N13/730827

4(Original) The system according to claiIIfurther comprising radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices.

5.(PreviouslyPresented) The system according to claim 4 further comprising a remote controller incommunication with the system via the radio transceiver, theremote controller configured for wireless control of the system

6. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power line.

7 (Previously Presented) The systemaccording to claim 1, further comprising a memordevice incommcatmi theM i controilefor storing omp program instructions and data.

8. (Previously presented) The system according to claim I further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting the first and second preset sensitivity levels and external communications.

9. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim. wherein the userinterface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alertsand warnings,

10. (Currently amended) A method forremotely alerting an operator ofmachinery when a structure ofthe machinery is moved near high voltage power line, the method comprising: installingan antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line theantenna generating field strength signals based on proxintity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proxiimity signals based on the field strength signals;

S/N13/730827

warning the operator when the structures moved a firstwaning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signalgeneratedfromthefield

strength signal exceeds a first presetfield sensitivity; automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first waning distance exceeds the second warning distance; and allowing the operator to adjust each of the first warning distance and the second

second warning distance. seeenavamng itanee.

11 (Previously presented) The method according to claim 10, wherein installing the antenna on the structure comprises installinga loop antennaabout the structure; sending a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal; and graphically displaying each proximity signal on a color display, and warning the operator comprises audibly warning the operator.

12-13 (Canceled)

14.(Previously presented) The method according to clan 10, further comprising using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown themachinery when the panic button is pressed.

-16 (Canceled)

17 (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning systemfor use with machinery operating near a high-votage power line.comprising an antenna disposed onasnetare ofthe machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller;

S/N13/730827

the signal processorisincommnicationwith the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in connmnication with the signal processor and interprets thereceivedfieldstrengthsignalsandcompares thereceived field strength signalsto first and second preset; user-adjustable sensitivity levels, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; tie first preset sensitivity level represents a first waring distance from the power line, and the micro-controller generates at least one of an audible warning anda visual warning when the field strength signal exceeds the first preset sensitivity level the second preset sensitivity level represents a second shut down distance from the power line that is less than the first warning distance, and the icrocontroller shuts down the machinery when the field strength signal exceeds the second preset sensitivity levelandeachofthefirstwarning distanceand the second warning distance is user adj ustab 1t, and the difference b nte 4Fi wainemf gdbance and the ;ccondf 4huM dawn distance is wcer adj,

18.(Canceled)

19 (Previously presented) The systemaccording to claim 17, wherein the control sstem~ further comprisesan inputoutput (1/O) module in coununication with themicro controller that can communicate with external devices.

20. (Previously presented) The system accordingto claim17, wherein the control system further comprises an event logger in communication with themicro-controller

21. (Previously presented) The system according toclaim 17, further comprising a radio transceiver module i communicationwith thenmcrocntrolier theradio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices

S/N13/730827

22. (Previously presented) 'he system according to claim 21, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module.

23 (Previously presented) A power line proximitysensingand warning systemfor use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: anantenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor andamicro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processorand interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signalstoa user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automaticallyshuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices a remote controller in communication with. the control system via the radio transceiver module; and the remotecontroller further comprises a button that when pressed results in generation of a warming to an operator of the machinery that the structure of the machinery is close to the power line.

24 (Previously presented) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further includes a button that when pressed causes the machinery to shutdown

(Previousy presented) A power line proximity ensing and warning system foruse with machinery operating near ahigh-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line;

S/Nm3/730827

a control system that includes a signal processor and amicro ontroler; the signal processor is incommunication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices; a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module; the control systemincludesa first link button and aninfrared transmitter; the remote controller includesasecond link buttoned aninfrared receiverand the control system and the remote controller are configured so thatthe remote controller is linked to the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button, the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller uses the received code to establish alink with the control system.

26 (Previouslypresented) A method for remotely alerting an operatorof machinery when a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the stature of the machinerythat is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals; warning the operator when the structure is moved a first waning distancefron the high voltage power line such that afirstproximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first presetfield sensitivity;

'7

S/N13/30827

automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved asecond warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds asecond preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance; using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed; a control system that can automatically shut down the machinery; the control system includes a first link button and aninfrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and establishing a link between the remote controller and the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button so that the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controllerand the remote controller receives the received code to establish the link with the controlsystem.

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No.: 20600.0001USU1 Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM

CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION I hereby certify that this paper is being transmitted by EFS Web to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on July 20, 2015. By: /Megan Jachim/ Name: Megan Jachim

AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE AFTER FINAL

Mail Stop: AF Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

Dear Sir:

In response to the office action mailed April 21, 2015, Applicant provides the following. Amendments to the claims begin on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on page 9 of this paper.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 Ale rria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263

52835 7590 12/02/2015 EXAMINER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. P.O. BOX 2902 LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER

2684

NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE

12/02/2015 ELECTRONIC

lease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

Fhe time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.

notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the ollowing e-mail address(es): 3TOMail@hsml.com l 3/ /3U,02l/ IVi I I- I -AL.

Office Action Summary Examiner Art Unit AIA (First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status No -- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- Briod for Reply A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF COMMUNICATION. - Extensions of time maybe available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).

status 1)Z Responsive to communication(s) filed on July 20, 2015. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on

. 2a) This action is FINAL. 2b) This action is non-final. 3) An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. 4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213. sposition of Claims* ) Claim(s) 1-11,14,17 and 19-26 is/are pending in the application. 5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration. 6) Claim(s)23,25 and26 is/areallowed. 7) Claim(s) 1-11,14,17,19-22 and 24 is/are rejected. 8) Claim(s) is/are objected to. 9) Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. f any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a rticipating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see Qp://www.ustO.ov/patents/init events/pph/index.isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedbackSusPto.aov.

application Papers 10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 11) The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) accepted or b) objected to by the Examiner. Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).

iority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) All b) Some** c) None of the: 1.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._. 3.1 Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.

tachment(s) 1Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 3) Interview Summary (PTO-413) Paper No(s)/Mail Date.__._ 1Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b) 4 ater___ Dt Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 4) []Other: .

Patent and Trademark Office I -O /D... 11 I iQ\ 'f A ntianO.mm D -r _f D___r lKl_ /lulil 1- n -A .1R 1 OQ

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 2 Art Unit: 2684

DETAILED ACTION

1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AA first to invent provisions.

2. This Office action is in response to Applicant's amendment filed December 23, 2014.

Claims 1, 8, 10, 11, and 14 were amended. Claims 12, 13, 15, 16, and 18 were canceled.

3. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found

in a prior Office action.

Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112

4. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a):

(a) IN GENERAL.-The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor orjoint inventor of carrying out the invention.

The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AA 35 U.S.C. 112:

The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention.

5. Claims 1-11, 15, 17, and 19-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112

(pre-AIA), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The

claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 3 Art Unit: 2684

reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for

pre-AIA the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed

invention.

The specification only discloses user adjustable sensitivity of each sensitivity level but

does not disclose that the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second

preset sensitivity level is user adjustable.

Allowable Subject Matter

6. Claims 23, 25, and 26 are allowed.

7. Claims 1-11, 14, 17, and 19-22 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome

the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA), 2nd paragraph, set forth in

this Office action.

Response to Arguments

8. In response to Applicant's argument regarding the adjustable difference between two

sensitivity levels , the argument is moot because of new grounds of rejection necessitated by the

amendment. Also, this newly added claimed feature raises new matter. If Applicant contends

that it is not new matter, a particular pages and lines in the specification where it is disclosed

should be pointed out.

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 4 Art Unit: 2684

Conclusion

9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIE LIEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2978. The examiner can normally be reached on Increased Flex. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached on 571-272-2963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.

/Julie Lieu/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2684

Nov 25, 2016

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes BB 13730827

Examiner JULIE LIEU SMITH ET AL.

Art Unit 2684

CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED

Class Subclass Date Examiner

SEARCH NOTES

Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL EAST 4/16/15 JL

INTERFERENCESEARCH

US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol

S/N 13/730827

Remarks Reconsideration is requested in view of the above amendments and the following remarks. The amendments to claims 1, 8, 10, 11 and 17 are supported by the original disclosure, for example paragraph [0016], line 3-5; paragraph [0021], lines 9-10; paragraph [0032]; Figure 2; and Figure 4, elements 408, 414 and 416. Claim 18 is canceled without prejudice or disclaimer as a result of the amendments to claim 17. Allowable claims 23, 25, and 26 have been rewritten into independent form. No new matter has been added. Claims 1-11, 14, 17, and 19-26 are pending.

With respect to the non-considered references in the Information Disclosure Statement, Applicant disagrees that information is material to patentability only if it qualifies as prior art. As is explicitly indicated in MPEP 2001.04, materiality is not limited to prior art, but embraces any information that a reasonable examiner would be substantially likely to consider important in deciding whether to allow claims. Materiality is explicitly defined in 37 CFR 1.56(b) and discussed at MPEP 2001.05, and does not state that the must be prior art. There are certain situations when a date of information being submitted is simply not known. Applicant submits that it has satisfied is duty of disclosure under 37 CFR 1.56 regardless of whether or not the information was considered.

Claims 1-4, 7-9, and 17-21 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over US 2012/0214094 to Givens in view of US 3786468 to Moffitt. In addition, claims 5, 6 and 24 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens and Moffitt, and further in view of US 2010/0286845 to Rekow. In addition, claims 10 and 11 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens and Moffitt, and further in view of US 3907136 to Christides. In addition, claim 14 is rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens, Moffitt and Christides, and further in view of Rekow. In addition, claims 22 and 24 are rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens and Moffitt, and further in view of Rekow.

S/N 13/730827

Applicant traverses the rejections.

Givens, Moffitt, Rekow and Christides do not teach or suggest a system as recited in claim 1 where each of the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is adjustable, and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is adjustable; a method as recited in claim 10 that includes allowing the operator to adjust each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance and to adjust the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance; and a system as recited in claim 17 where each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance is user adjustable, and the difference between the first warning distance and the second shut down distance is user adjustable. The ability to allow adjustment of two sensitivity levels and the difference between the two sensitivity levels, which results in adjustment of the warning distances and the difference between the warning distances, provides a number of advantages. For example, the actual voltage running through the power line(s) of concern may vary from the expected or nominal voltage. Therefore, the system can be adjusted depending upon the actual voltage. In addition, environmental conditions, such as snow, rain, humidity, etc., can impact the shape of the electrical field being sensed. By being able to adjust the difference between the two sensitivity levels, the user can factor in environmental conditions when using the system. In addition, if the equipment upon which the system is installed in carrying a load, the size of the load being carried may need to be factored in. For example, the load may extend far from the equipment, so that even though the equipment may not be dangerously near a power line, the load being carried by the equipment may be. So the user may want to adjust the sensitivity levels to account for the load. The speed of the equipment on which the system is installed is also a factor. For equipment that moves very slowly, the difference between the two sensitivity levels can be made smaller compared to equipment that moves relatively fast in which case the difference between the two sensitivity levels should be increased. If the equipment moves slowly, the user has time when the initial warning is given to take corrective

S/N 13/730827

action prior to shut-down occurring if the equipment moves too close. In contrast, if the equipment moves relatively fast, once the initial warning is given, the equipment could come into contact with the power line before shut-down actually takes place. Allowing the user to increase the difference between the two sensitivity levels increases the time the user will have to take corrective action once the initial warning is given. Still another factor impacting sensing capability is variations in antenna sensitivity. Although one may know the nominal sensitivity of the antenna, in actual practice the sensitivity may vary. Therefore, adjusting the difference between the two sensitivity levels allows the user to factor in antenna variations. Givens discloses a power line proximity warning system. Paragraph [0022]. Givens discloses providing a number of visual or audible warnings when equipment gets too close to a power line. Paragraphs [0022], [0027], [0036]. Givens does not disclose user adjustment of a sensitivity level, nor adjustment of two sensitivity levels or a difference between two sensitivity levels. Paragraph [0030] of Givens refers to automatic adjustment of sensitivity settings based on location of the equipment. This is automatic adjustment of a single sensitivity level, not user adjustment or adjustment of a difference between two sensitivity levels. Automatic adjustment is deficient because it does not allow the user to factor in site specific variables that may not be accounted for in the automatic settings. Paragraph [0028] of Givens refers to adjusting sensitivity of a wireless receiver, but this is not adjustment of the sensitivity of the sensor. Paragraph [0028] of Givens also refers to control of "base alarm levels". What is meant by "base alarm levels" is not explicitly clear from Givens. Does this refer to the sensor? Or does this refer to sound levels as discussed later in paragraph [0028]? Regardless of the meaning, since Givens does not disclose both a pre-warning followed by shut-down, at best the disclosure in Givens refers to adjustment of a single sensitivity level, and does not disclose adjusting two sensitivity levels or a difference between two sensitivity levels. Moffitt also discloses a power line proximity warning system. Abstract. Moffitt discloses that the system includes a potentiometer 30 that allows a user to adjust sensitivity. Column 3, lines 24-25; 42-45; and 61-64. The adjustment disclosed in Moffitt is of a single sensitivity level. Moffitt does not disclose a pre-warning followed

S/N 13/730827

by shut-down, and thus does not disclose the ability to adjust first and second sensitivity levels or adjustment of a difference between the two levels. Rekow is characterized as teaching the use of a remote control. Rekow does not teach pre-warning followed by shut-down, first and second sensitivity levels, and adjustment of a difference between the sensitivity levels. Christides discloses a system for sensing underground power lines. Abstract. Christides discloses that a first threshold can be used to provide a warning signal and a second threshold can be used to automatically shut down the equipment. Column 3, lines -15. Christides does not disclose user adjustment of the two thresholds or adjustment of the difference between the two thresholds. Rather, the system in Christides appears to assume that the voltage of the power line is known or constant, that environmental conditions do not impact the ability to detect the power line, that the equipment on which the system is mounted is the same, and that the antenna sensitivity is known/constant. As Applicant indicates above, each of these assumptions by Christides is incorrect and can lead to catastrophic results. None of Givens, Moffitt, Rekow and Christides teach or suggest a system where first and second sensitivity levels can be adjusted, and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is adjustable; allowing the operator to adjust the first and second warning differences as well as the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance; and where the first and second warning distances are user adjustable as is the difference between the first warning distance and the second shut down distance. Nor do Givens, Moffitt, Rekow and Christides recognize the advantages that arise from being able to adjust the first and second preset sensitivity levels and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level or adjusting the first and second warning distances and the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance. For at least these reasons, claims 1, 10 and 17 are patentable over Givens, Moffitt, Rekow, and Christides. Claims 2-9, 11, 14, 19-22 and 24 depend from claims 1, 10 and 17 and are patentable therewith for that reason alone and need not be separately distinguished. Applicant does not concede the rejections to the dependent claims.

S/N 13/730827

Allowable claims 23, 25 and 26 have been rewritten into independent form and should be in condition for allowance along with the remainder of the claims.

Favorable reconsideration in the form of a notice of allowance is requested. Any questions concerning this paper can be directed to the attention of the undersigned at (612) 455-3805.

Respectfully submitted, HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER 52835

& LARSON, P.C. PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. Box 2902 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800

Dated: July 20, 2015 By: /James A. Larson/ James A. Larson Reg. No. 40,443 JAL/mbj

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes BB 13730827

Examiner JULIE LIEU SMITH ET AL.

Art Unit 2684

CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED

Class Subclass Date Examiner

SEARCH NOTES

Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL EAST 4/16/15 JL EAST 11/20/15 JL

INTERFERENCESEARCH

US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol

S/N 13/730827

Amendments to the claims

1. (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: a loop antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor that interprets eeffigured for interpretigthe received field strength signals and compareseemaring the received field strength signals to [[a]] first and second preset, user-adjustable sensitivity levels -e4, generates genefating a proximity signal, graphically displays displaying the proximity signal on a color display, easing causes an audible signal to be generated to audibly warn the operator when the proximity signal exceeds the first preset levels-ef-fie sensitivity level, and automatically shuts sht4inig down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the second preset tsefr-adjustabe sensitivity level, wherein the second preset sensitivity level exceeds the first preset sensitivity level, each of the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustable, and the difference between the first preset sensitivity level and the second preset sensitivity level is user adjustable.

2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the I/O module configured for communicating with external devices.

3. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time.

S/N 13/730827

4. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices.

5. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system.

6. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power line.

7. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data.

8. (Currently amended) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting the first and second preset sensitivity levels field-seisiivity and external communications.

9. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 8, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings.

10. (Currently amended) A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals;

S/N 13/730827

warning the operator when the structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first preset field sensitivity; [[and]] automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance and allowing the operator to adjust each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance and to adjust the difference between the first warning distance and the second warning distance.

11. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 10, wherein installing the antenna on the structure comprises installing a loop antenna about the structure; sending a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal; the first and second preset field sensitivities are user adjustableand graphically displaying each proximity signal on a color display, and warning the operator comprises audibly warning the operator.

12-13. (Canceled)

14. (Previously presented) The method according to claim 10, further comprising using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed.

-16. (Canceled)

17. (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller;

S/N 13/730827

the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to [[a]] first and second preset, user-adjustable sensitivitylevels -e,and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; the first preset sensitivity level represents a first warning distance from the power line, and the micro-controller generates at least one of an audible warning and a visual warning when the field strength signal exceeds the first preset sensitivity level; the second preset sensitivity level represents a second shut down distance from the power line that is less than the first warning distance, and the micro-controller shuts down the machinery when the field strength signal exceeds the second preset sensitivity level, each of the first warning distance and the second warning distance is user adjustable, and the difference between the first warning distance and the second shut down distance is user adjustable.

18. (Canceled)

19. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro controller that can communicate with external devices.

20. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an event logger in communication with the micro-controller.

21. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 17, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices.

S/N 13/730827

22. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 21, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module.

23. (Currently amended) The system according to claim 22, v hei~inApower line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power

line the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices; a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module; and the remote controller further comprises a button that when pressed results in generation of a warning to an operator of the machinery that the structure of the machinery is close to the power line.

24. (Previously presented) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further includes a button that when pressed causes the machinery to shutdown.

25. (Currently amended) The systcm efclaim 22, whercinApower line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising:

S/N 13/730827

an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power linL the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line; a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices; a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and the control system and the remote controller are configured so that the remote controller is linked to the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button, the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller uses the received code to establish a link with the control system.

26. (Currently amended) The method ofclaim 14, further compisingA method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals;

S/N 13/730827

warning the operator when the structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a first preset field sensitivity; automatically shutting down the machinery when the structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance; using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed; a control system that can automatically shut down the machinery; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and establishing a link between the remote controller and the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button so that the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller receives the received code to establish the link with the control system.

S/N 13/730827

Remarks Reconsideration is requested in view of the above amendments and the following remarks. The amendments to the claims are supported by the original disclosure, for example paragraphs [0017] and [0032]. New claims 17-24 are supported by the original disclosure, for example original claims 1-9. New claims 25-26 are supported by, for example, paragraphs [0023] and [0024] of the original disclosure. No new matter has been added. Claims 12-13 and 15-16 are canceled without prejudice or disclaimer. Claims 1-11, 14, and 17-26 are pending. Any excess claims fees can be charged to Deposit Account No. 50-3478

Applicant notes that certain non-patent citations submitted by Applicant in an Information Disclosure Statement appear to have been cross-off as not being considered. However, no explanation has been provided as to why the citations have not been considered. Copies of the citations were submitted by Applicant so the citations should be considered. To the extent that the citations were not considered because a date was not provided for each citation, Applicant submits that this is not a valid reason for not considering a citation. Applicant has submitted the crossed-off citations in compliance with 37 CFR 1.56. There is nothing in 37 CFR 1.56 that requires Applicant to provide a date in order for the information that Applicant is aware of and cites in an Information Disclosure Statement to be considered. Applicant submits that it has fully complied with 37 CFR 1.56.

Claims 1-4 and 7-9 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. (US Publication No. 2012/0214094). In addition, claims 5, 6 and 10-16 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens et al. in view of Rekow et al. (US Publication No. 2010/0286845). Applicant traverses the rejections. Givens and Rekow do not teach or suggest a micro-controller that automatically shuts down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user

S/N 13/730827

adjustable sensitivity level (claim 1), automatically shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second preset field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance (claim 10), or a micro-controller that automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line (new claim 17). Givens discloses a power line proximity warning system. Paragraph [0022]. Givens discloses providing a number of visual or audible warnings when equipment gets too close to a power line. Paragraphs [0022], [0027], [0036]. However, Givens does not disclose automatically shutting down the machinery if the machinery gets too close to the power line. Givens does describe "in the event that the control box (1005) senses a roll over, the control line (1050) could automatically turn off the equipment". Paragraph [0073]. However, this is limited to roll over of the machinery. Givens does not teach or suggest that the machinery should be automatically shut down when it is sensed that the machinery is too close to the power line. Rekow is characterized as teaching a system with a remote controller with an emergency stop button that when pressed stops a vehicle. Rekow requires that a user push a button to stop the vehicle. In the event that the user is distracted at some moment in time, the stop button may not be pushed in time to stop the vehicle. However, Rekow does not teach a micro-controller that automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line. For at least these reasons, claims 1, 10 and 17 are patentable over Givens and Rekow. Claims 2-9, 11, 14 and 18-24 depend from claims 1, 10 and 17 and are patentable therewith for that reason alone and need not be separately distinguished. Applicant does not concede the rejections to dependent claims 2-9, 11 and 14.

S/N 13/730827

Favorable reconsideration in the form of a notice of allowance is requested. Any questions concerning this paper can be directed to the attention of the undersigned at (612) 455-3805.

Respectfully submitted,

283 5 52835LARSON, HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER

& P.C. PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. Box 2902 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800

Dated: December 23, 2014 By: /James A. Larson/ James A. Larson Reg. No. 40,443 JAL/mbj

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No.: 20600.0001USU1 Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM

CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION I hereby certify that this paper is being transmitted by EFS Web to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on December 23, 2014. By: /Megan Jachim/ Name: Megan Jachim

AMENDMENT AND RESPONSE

Mail Stop: AMENDMENT Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

Dear Sir:

In response to the office action mailed June 23, 2014, Applicant provides the following. Amendments to the claims begin on page 2 of this paper. Remarks begin on page 8 of this paper.

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination 13/730,827 SMITH ET AL. Notice of References Cited Examiner ArtUnit 2684 Page 1 of 1 JULIE LIEU U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Name Classification

A US-3,907,136 A 09-1975 Christides et al. 414/694 B US-5,592,092 A 01-1997 Mechler, Mark V. 324/326 C US-2006/0271263 Al 11-2006 Self et al. 701/050 D US-2009/0237263 Al 09-2009 Sawyer et al. 340/686.6 E US F US G US H US I US j US K US L US M US FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Country Name Classification

N EP 2 479 735 A2 07-2012 YANO 0 P Q R S T NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS Include as applicable: Author, Title Date, Publisher, Edition or Volume, Pertinent Pages)

U V W X

opy of this reference is not being furnished with this Office action. (See MPEP § 707.05(a).) s in MM-YYYY format are publication dates. Classifications may be US or foreign. Patent and Trademark Office )-892 (Rev. 01-2001) Notice of References Cited Part of Paper No. 20150415

PTO/SB/08a (07-09) Approved for use through 07/3112012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number.

Substitute for form 1449/PTO Complete if Known Application Number 131730,827 December 28, 2012 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith STATEMENT BY APPLICANT Art Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name

Sheet 1 of 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP U. S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Document Number Publication Date Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Where No.' Initials* MM-DD-YYYY Applicant of Cited Document Relevant Passages or Relevant 2 Number-Kind Code(ifknown) Figures Appear JL/ Us- 6,104,305 08-15-2000 Beckmann

US- 6,133,841 10-17-2000 Beckmann US- 6,170,607 B1 01-09-2001 Freeman et al. US- 6,252,513 B1 06-26-2001 Beckmann US- 6,600,426 B1 07-29-2003 Sacks et al. US- 7,081,812 B2 07-25-2006 Hastings, Sr. US

US- 2004/0066284 Al 04-08-2004 Hastings, Sr. US- 2007/0018841 Al 01-25-2007 Nickerson US- 2010/0214094 Al 08-26-2010 Givens et al. US US US US US US US US US

FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Foreign Patent Document Publication Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, No.' Initials* Date Applicant of Cited Document Where Relevant Passages MM-DD-YYYY Or Relevant Figures Appear To Country Code-Number Kind Code° (ifknown)

Examiner Date Signature Considered 06/15/2014 *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance 1 with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in 2conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). See Kinds Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at www.smqov or MPEP 901.04. 3 Enter Office that issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO Standard ST.3). 4 For 5 Japanese patent documents, the indication ofthe yearofthe reign ofthe Emperor must precede the serial numberofthe patent document. Kind ofdocument by the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. 6Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount oftime you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. Ifyou need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.

PTO/SB/08b (07-09) Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons ar required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number. Complete if Known Substitute for form 1449/PTO Application Number 13/730,827

INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date December 28, 2012 STATEMENT BY APPLICANT First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith Art Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name

sheet 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP

NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate), title of -2 No.' Initials* the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc.), date, page(s), volume-issue number(s), publisher, city and/or country where published.

/JL/ Installation Procedure for the ASE 2200 High Voltage Proximity Warning Device, Allied Safety Engineering, February 21, 2006.

Proxyvolt PV5007 Brochure, Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, 1717 Ipswich Road, Rocklea Qld Australia4106, date unknown.

Sigalarm Model 110 Lattice Boom Manual, Sigalarm, 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, 2010.

Wire-Watcher Brochure, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, date unknown.

http://www.alliedsafetyeng.com/proximitywarningdevice.html, Allied Safety L Systems, Inc., 4380 St. Johns Parkway, Suite 100 Sanford, FL 32771, 2009.

http://www.siqalarminc.com/index.html. Siqalarm 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, date unknown. http://www.wirewatcher.co.uk/wwprd.html, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, /JL/ Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, 2005.

xaminer / ;Ulle LieU/ Date -0/521

Signature Considered 0/521 *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 1 Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination Search Notes BB 13730827

Examiner JULIE LIEU SMITH ET AL.

Art Unit 2684

CPC-SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

CPC COMBINATION SETS- SEARCHED Symbol Date Examiner

US CLASSIFICATION SEARCHED

Class Subclass Date Examiner

SEARCH NOTES

Search Notes Date Examiner EAST,CPC 6/15/14 JL

INTERFERENCESEARCH

US Class/ US Subclass / CPC Group Date Examiner CPC Symbol

S/N 13/730827

Amendments to the claims

1. (Currently amended) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near a high-voltage power line4mes, comprising: a loop antenna disposed abeu on a structure of the machinery that is movabled-4he structure configured formovementnear the powerline 4mes; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line mes; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, [[and]] graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, [[and]] causing an audible signal to be generated to audibly warn [[warning]] the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity, and automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field strength signal exceeds the user-adjustable sensitivity level.

2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the I/O module configured for communicating with external devices.

3. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time.

4. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices.

S/N 13/730827

5. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system.

6. (Currently amended) The system according to claim 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power line ines.

7. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data.

8. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications.

9. (Previously Presented) The system according to claim 8, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings.

10. (Currently amended) A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an-extended a structure of the machinery is moved near a high voltage power line limes, the method comprising: installing an antenna on the structure of the machinery that is movable near the high voltage power line, the antenna generating field strength signals based on proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line; generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals; providing a power line proxmity sensing anRd warning system anRd a wireles remoete conftroller; installing the system on the mnachinef' pe4rifig a system check of the system;+

S/N 13/730827

adjutsting field sensitivity of the system;+,

remoitely conftrollinig the systems ufsing the remoite conftroller; warning the operator when the extended structure is moved a first warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds within a first preset field sensitivity; and automatically shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved a second warning distance from the high voltage power line such that a second proximity signal generated from the field strength signal exceeds a second presetwi4thin-another pr-esent field sensitivity, the first warning distance exceeds the second warning distance.

11. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 10, wherein installing the antenna on the structure comprises installing a loop antenna about the structure; the powv er line pr~oximfit-y sensing and warning system, copiss a loop antennfa disposed abot the exEtentded structure of the mfachintef, th Arturette conffigurfed for mofevemfent near the power liness, a signal proessor in communications 'With the looP anftennfa, the signal processor configurfed to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strFength signals ffrom the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the pow er: lines; an sendin a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the test signal; the first and second preset field sensitivities are user-adjustable, and a mficr~o controller: in commuanication with the signal processors: adaptedfo inftefpreting the received field strFength signals and comparing the received field strFength signals to a utser adjustable sentsitivit-y level, genierating a proxiit-y signal, anid graphically displaying each the proximity signal on a color display, and warning the operator comprises audibly warning the operatorwhen the proximity' signal exceeds preset levls offield sensitivity.

12-13. (Canceled)

S/N 13/730827

14. (Currently amended) The method according to claim 10, further comprising using a remote controller with a panic button to shutdown the machinery when the panic button is pressed.whereinthe remote controller has a panic btton configured t wirelessly sh-utdown the mnaehinfef to prevent the exitenfded stmcIture fromn corning infto conftact with the pow er: lines.

-16. (Canceled)

17. (New) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising: an antenna disposed on a structure of the machinery that is movable near the power line; a control system that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller; the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, and automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is close to the power line.

18. (New) The system according to claim 17, wherein the micro-controller also generates proximity signals based on the received field strength signals, causes display of the proximity signals on a color display, and causes an audible warning to be generated when one of the generated proximity signals exceeds a preset level of field sensitivity.

19. (New) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller that can communicate with external devices.

S/N 13/730827

20. (New) The system according to claim 17, wherein the control system further comprises an event logger in communication with the micro-controller.

21. (New) The system according to claim 17, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module is capable of wireless communication with external wireless devices.

22. (New) The system according to claim 21, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the control system via the radio transceiver module.

23. (New) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further comprises a button that when pressed results in generation of a warning to an operator of the machinery that the structure of the machinery is close to the power line.

24. (New) The system according to claim 22, wherein the remote controller further includes a button that when pressed causes the machinery to shutdown.

25. (New) The system of claim 22, wherein the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and the control system and the remote controller are configured so that the remote controller is linked to the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button, the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller uses the received code to establish a link with the control system.

26. (New) The method of claim 14, further comprising a control system that can automatically shut down the machinery; the control system includes a first link button and an infrared transmitter; the remote controller includes a second link button and an infrared receiver; and

S/N 13/730827

establishing a link between the remote controller and the control system by pressing the first link button and the second link button so that the control system transmits a code via the infrared transmitter to the infrared receiver of the remote controller, and the remote controller receives the received code to establish the link with the control system.

EAST Search History

EAST Search History (Prior Art)

Ref Hits Search Query DoBs IDefault IPlurais Time #_ Operator Stamp Li 106317 event with log$4 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/16 USPAT; 01:46

____ ____________________ DERWENTi_ __I______ L2 3712 power line with (proxim$3 ordistance) IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/61 ~USPAT 01:47

[2 18 L~ndiEPO;JPO; DERWENT ___I___ ___

L3 11 L2 nd 1US-PGPUB ADJ ON 21/61 USPAT; 01:47 EPO; JPO; DERWENT L4 2783 (340/901,686.6,657).mLS. US-PGPUB; OR OFF 2014/06/16z USPAT; 01:47 USOCR L5 1553 z (324/72)CLS. ~~ EPO; JPO;zz US-PGPUB OR OFF 2014/06/16 ____ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __ _ __USPAT_ _ __ _____ _ __ 01:47 USOCR L6 3729 L4or L5 US- PPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/16 USPAT;0:4 _____1L4 ~~~~~ PO; JPZO; 14___

DERWENT L7 463 (G01Ri9/145 or G01R29/085 or IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/16 H02H5/12).cpc. USPAT;0:4

RX:7~22 DERWENT L8 340 (340/685).CCLS. US-PPUB; OR OF 21/61 ____ _________________ USPAT ____~F

L9 4008 L6 or L8 US-PGPUB; IADJ ON 2014/06/16 USPAT 01:47 EPO;JPO; USPAT 20:11 DERWENT z _______I___ z z US~PO;JPO01:4 LiO 4440 L7 or L9 jUSPAT;0:4 zz IUS-FPGPUB; Z~~ERWENT z IADJ [ON 21/61

z____ DERWENT z z Lii 4 [3andLiO IUS-PGPUB;IADJ ION 2014/06/16 I ~USPAT; 01:47 ____ I____________________DERWENTI_ __I______ S32070 (340/901,686.6).CCLS. US-PGPUB; OR OFF 2014/06/15 USPAT 20:10 _USOCR I 3with ordistance) US-PGP A ON 2014/06/15

USPAT; 20:12 EPO; JPO DERWENT S7 381324 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15z field USPAT; 20:13 EPO; JPO; DERWENT S8 321348 S7 and (exceed$3 or higher or above US-PGPUB; zADJ jON 2014/06/15 or larger) USPAT; 20:14

DERWENT ____I____ __

S9 __3 z S4and86 and8S8 ~~ EPO; JPO;zzzADJ__ USPGPUB; ON 2014/06/1

DERWENT S10 2783 ~(340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. US-PGPUB; OR OF 20:17/61 S1 211 ~tn ea3 oo USPAT; IOF r20:17161 S11 21 S3 andtS n lo US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15 USPAT; 20:18

EPO; JPO DERWENT S12 0 S9adS1US-PGPUB; ADJ jON 21/61 ~S~ndSand1USPAT; 20:18 z ~~ EPO; JPO;zzz

DERWENT USPAT 20:36 SiS14 0 S4 an andnd S11US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2014/06/15 USPAT 20:19

____ _____________________ ~~USPAT; DERWENT I___I______ 20:36 S14 53 S41 and S11 IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/61 USPAT ~2:19 z ~~ EPO; JPO;zzz z M~~ERWENT z ____ _____________________ DERWENT ____I______

S1 30 155 14 (S14/72)(340/685).CCLS S. US-PGPUB; ADJ IUS-PGPUB; ~~USPAT; OR ~ OFFM O 2014/06/15z 2014/06/15 20:48 z z USOCR

S223 008 S19 ord S21n S ~USPAT z____ ___IDERWENT _ _ US-PGPUB; zzADJ Izz zzON j20:19 2014/06/1 5z S18 1 (3240/6).CCLS. U UBOR FF 204/06/15 S160 46 SG11 and r01R9S65r US-PGPUB USOCR IADJ ION zz 2014/06/15 H025/1).ccUSPAT; 20:48 S19 4008 1S10 or 218 US-PGPUB; 1ADJ ION 2014/06/15

1EPO; JPO;

. DERWEN T S23 4440 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15 USPAT; 20:48 EPO;JPO; ..........................z DERW ENT S24 2 S23 and S4 and S6 and S8 US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2014/06/15 (gUSPAT; 20:49

vay3ozaid EPO; JPO;zzz

8262567 Ireot with cntrol$4sesivt with 4o IUS-PGPUB;IADJ ION 2014/06/15

~shut$4 or turn$3 off$1) with (vehicle or USPAT 20:53 machine or crane or lift or forklift) EPO; JPO; z_____ I_ _ DERWENT zz z z S2 5 S26 and S4 and S7 iUS-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2014/06/15 USPAT; 20:53 EP;JPO; ____ I_____________________DERWENT ____I______

S28 1 825 and S4 US-PGPUB ADJ ON 21/61 USPAT; 20:54 EPO;JPO; DERWENT S29 6 1826 and S4 IUS-PGPUB; ADJ ~ ON 21/61 I USPAT; 20:54

S30 385 remote with control$4 with (stop$4 or US-PGPUB ADJ ON 2014/06/15 shut$4 or turn$3 off$1) with (vehicle or USPAT 20:55 machine or crane or lift or forklift) EPO;JPO same (urgentorurgencyor DERWENT ____emergency or danger$3) _____

S31 273 remote with control with (stop$4 or | US-PGPUB ADJ ON 2014/06/15 shut$4orturn$3off$1)with(vehicleor|USPAT 21:10 machineorcraneorliftorforklift) EPO;JPO z same (urgentorurgencyoremergencyDERWENT z ~USPAT; zI 22:22 USOC ____ or danger$3)I_________I___ .____ S32 9 (20040066284" |"20070018841" | IUS-FPGPUB ADJ ION 21/61 "20100214094" |"6104305" |USPAT Ij21:2015 "6133841" "6170607" |"6252513" "____6600426" |7081812")PN. _________ ___ ____

S33 82 G0R29/08.cpc US-PGPUB ADJ ON 2014/06/15 z __ _ __ _ __USPAT; 21:2 zcc.EP; JC;2PO1:2

DERWENT S34 1 US-PGPUB; OR OFF 2014/06/15

EAST Search History (Interference) <This search history is empty> 6/116/12014 2:14:25 AM C:\ Users\ jlieu\ Document s\ EAST\ Workspaces\ 13730827.wsp

EAST Search History

EAST Search History (Prior Art)

RefHits [Search Query DOBs Default Piurais[Time #_ lOperatorStamp S46 1i ("20140184425").PN. US-PGPUB; OR OFF 015/04/13 USPAz 22:27

!S47 1 846 and automatic$4 ~ US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/13 USPAT; 2:28 USOCR; EPO JPO; DERWENT !S48 KI (US-20100214094-$orUS- 20100286845-$ or US-20070018841- USPAT $).did.or (US-5252912-$ or US 3786468-$ or US-6600426-$ or US US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/13 2 :2913

6170607-$).did. _____I____I__ ____

850 1 ~ S48 and automatic$4with(shut$4or US-GPUB ADJ ON 2015/04/13 power$3 or turn$3adj2off) 22:30 :USPAT; USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S51_ 4013 power line with (proxim$3 or US-PPUB; ADJ ON 21/44 '~1 ~ distance) USPAT;EPO; 0:35 0O

852 408796 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/14 field USPAT;EPOC0:3

DERWENT S53 343799 852 and (exceed$3 or higher or US-PPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/14 ,above or larger) USPAT;EPO; 00:35 ___ z___ ___ ____ ___ ____ ___DERWENT _ _ _ _ _ _ _ zJzCz _

!S54 29371 ant enna near3 loop US- PGPUB; IADJ ~ ON 2015/04/14 USPAT;EEC; 00:35 JPO; DERWENT i___I______ !S55 18

___ II____________________DERWENT 851 and853 and8S54 US-PGPUB; USPAT;EPO; IADJ ION

I_____ 2015/04/14 00:35 ___

!S56 4768 GO8G1/0962 OR H02H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/41 G01R29/085 OR GO1V3/10,15 USPAT;EPO; 0:38

DERWENT ____I______

572473 (GO8G1/0962 OR H02H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 21/41 G01R29/085 OR GO1V3/10,15).CPC. USPAT;EPO; 0:39

DERWENT S58 1 857 and851 and8 52 US-PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/14 EE [USPAT 00:39 zJPO;

S59 2978- (340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. US-PGPUB; ORFF 2015/04/14 USPAT; 00:40 USOCR zz S60 496 (G1R19/145 or G01R29/085 or US-PGPUB; zADJ ON 2015/04/14 H02H5/12).cpc. USPAT; EPO; 00:40

DERWENT iS61 5539 857 or860 or5S59 US-PGPUB; IADJ ON 2015/04/14 USPAT;EPO; [00:40 JPO; z z DERWENT Z~~ERWENT zzz _______I___

862 19 861 and8S53 and 851 US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/41 *USPAT;EEC; j 00:40 JPO;

863 19 S62 and (shut$4 or power$3or US-PGPUB; IADJ zON 2015/04/14 turn$3 adj2 off) USPAT; 00:41 z ~ ~~~USOC; EPO;zz0:4 USOCR; EPO; z ~~JPO; z DERWENT M~~ERWENT z Izz S64 S62 and (shut$4 or power$3or US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/14

turn$3) adj2 (off or down) USPAT; 0:50

S65 9 (20040066284" "20070018841" US-PPUB ADJ ON 2015/04/15 "20100214094" |"6104305" USPAT 14:35 z "6133841" ~~ |"6170607" |"6252513" JPO; z "6600426" ~~ |"7081812").PN. DERWENT __________ zzz S66 0 S65 and (differentor multipleor US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 multi) adj2 (distanceorlevel) USPAT; 14:35 1 USOCR; EPO;

___ _______________________DERWENT I_ __I______ 867 243 (GO8G1/0962 OR HO2H5/12 OR US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/15 G01R29/085 OR GO1V3/10,15).CPC USPAT; EPO4:3

JPO; S868 2978 (340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. z US-PGPUB; M~~ERWENT z OR 10FF 21/41 USPAT; 214:35 S72 19 7 ( different84 or multiple88or US-PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/1 5z USOCR !S69 496 (G1R19/145 or G01R29/085 or ~US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 HO2H5/12).cpc. 'USPAT;EPO; [14:35

DERWENT _______I___

S70 5539 S67 or S69 or868 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT;EPOC4:3

DERWENT 871 434 870 and (different or multiple or US-PGPUB; IADJ ~ ON 2015/04/15 multi) adj2 (distanceor level) USPAT zEP;014:35 ortrn$orUSOCR; EPO

multi)adj2 (distance orlevel) with USPAT 14:36

(down or off) poer3)it

43FF 2015/04/15 US-PGPUB; USPAT; 14:38 S73 978 (340/901,686.6,657).CCLS. USOCR S74 1101 S73 and (shut$4 or turn$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 power$3) with (down or off) USPAT; 14:38 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S75 1983 (different or multiple or multi) adj2 US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/15z (distance or level) with (warning or USPAT; z14:38 alert) USOCR; EPO;

DERWENT z z !S76 16 S74 and S75 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 z16 USPAT; 14:39 z USOCR; EPO;

S77 z__ 2371 IZ__ _ _DERWENT

(different or multiple or multi) adj2 JPO;

US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (distance or level or threshold) with USPAT; 14:47 (warning or alert) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT z S78 17 S74 and S77 US-PGPUB; zADJ [ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; USOCR; EPO; 1 14:47/1

!S79 1 S8not S76 US-PPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/15 USPAT; 14:47 JPO; DERWENT SB0 72 S70 and (shut$4orturn$3or US-PGPUB; JPO; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 power$3)with(downoroff)with USPAT; 14:48 z (machine or tool) USOCR; EPOA zN L5 z

DERWENT 81 32 S0 and S77 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15

(machine or tool) USOCR; EPO;

JPO; power$3) with (down or off) with USPAT DERWENT zz 14:49 z 814 34 S83 and S77 US- PGPUB; zADJ zzON 2015/04/15z S8483an877USPAT; z ~USPAT; 15:17 15:17 z ~~ USOCR; EPO;' USOCR;EPO; z ~~ JPO; z ___I________________________DERWENT M~~ERWENT z

USPAT; 15:38 USOCR S86 2298 S85 or S69 US- PGPUB ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 15:39 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT 88 3P15675 ((shut$4 or turn$3 or power$3) adj4 US- PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (down or off) or stop$4) with USPAT; 15:40 (machine or tool) USOCR; EPO;

__ I____ _______ _______DERWENT US-zPUB I_ _ I_ _ _ _

!S89 12 886 and 887 US-PAT; ADJ ~ ON j2015/04/15~ eJPOPO;

DERWENT 893 11 ___ ______________________DERWENT S9 and (Shut$4 oUS-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15z 892 01 pow1alne7 wt(poi$or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 p USPAT; 15:41 dsac)USPAT; EO15:43 JPO;

distance) ~ USOC; EPO;zz154 ~ z USOCR; EPO; JPO; JPO; DERWENT z 19 0 DERWENT z ADJ ~ !93andthshodsmstp$US-PGPUB; z ON 2015/04/15 z USPAT; '15:43

8941 86932 00n 0thshosme sop41 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 !S5 1 94ndowrlneUSPAT; 16:01 USOCR;EO

897 1 896 and autp r lne US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 2000109""6030"USPAT 19:24 19:4 USOCR; EPO; 98 0 9 an colo wit diply$ JPO;PGPUB; AD US- ON 2015/04/15z z DERWENT ~USPAT; 20:02 z ~USOCR; EPO .......... ............ JPO.. ............ S94z 1 S93 nd hreholdsam stpDERWENTUB

898 1 896 and adst l US-PGPUB ADJ zON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 19:24 USOCR; EPO; J 2JPO015/4/1 distance) USPAT; EPO 20:02 JPO; DERWENT ..... [. . S100 29371 antenna near3 loop US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15z USPAT; EPO; r2 0:0 2 JPO; z DERWENT S101 110 99 and S100 and color with US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 display$3 USPAT; 20:02 USOCR; EPO; JPO DERWENT S102 408796 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PGPUB; zADJ ZON 2015/04/15 field USPAT; EPO; 20:04 JPO; DERWENT ___ I___ ___

1S103 343799 5102 and (exceed$3 or higher or US-PPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/15 z JPO;

z__ _ _DERWENT Z__ i _ I _z S104 432 S99 and Si03 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 20:04 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT 18105 3 z S10 and ~~ ol USOCR; EPO;zzz US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 z USPAT; 20:04

DERWENT above7 or larger) USPAT;EPO; 20:05 JPO; DERWENT ____I______

S107 0167 8109 110 899 and8S106 clor$2withlrthdisplay$3 US-PGPUB; US- PGPUB; ADJ AD ON 21/41 205041 USPAT;EPO; 20:05 JPO; DERWENT 1083 107andcolorwithdisplay$3 USP ; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (snorit USPAT; 20:06 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S109 167 clor2 with dis$3 rageror US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 Hane or rox) iy USPAT;EOz USPAT;EEC; 20:07 JPO; DERWENT z S11 7969 l 7 n color with display$3 t dsac US- PGPUB; AD ON 205041 HUSPAT;8109 ~ ~~~DERWENTE20:07 JPO; I______I___ z ADJ S51109 (Gn1R19/4o01.c~r510)o US-PGPUB; [ON 2015/04/15 DERWENT z z z S111079 S and 29 isp40"$3 or stanceUS-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/15

USOR; EPO ___ _______________________ DERWENT __________

S113 1 S112 and S110 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 USPAT; j20:07 USOCR; EPO; DERWENT

WS114 433 Sll2 and Slll US-PGPUB; ADJ ON ~2015/04/15 USPAT; 20:07 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT z ~~ USOCR; EPO, S115 10 S112 and 340/686.6.ccls. US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/15 USPAT; 20:08

S5116 89 crane orbo)with power (line or US-PPUB; ADJ [ON ~2015/04/15 cable) with (proxim$3 or close or USPAT; 215 near$1) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT ___I___ ___

S5117 408796 (strength or magnitude or level) with US-PPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/15 field USPAT;EPO; 21:55 I ~JPO; DERWENT i_ _zz S118 28 S117 with power(lineorcable)with US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 (proxim$3orcloseornear$1) USPAT; 21:55 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT z z [ S119 o7ra53 dislera with rwith (warn$3 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/15 oale) USPAT; 21:57 z nUSOCR; EPO;

z__z IM__ (distance _ or proximity)r$1 _DERWENT JPO USPAT; 21 :57 S11 20167 c r$nthd s7 US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/15 (ieldinm USPAT; 21:57

z JPO; z__ S12 1079 z IDERWENT Z~~ERWENT 12 dipand wt ("4"cls. ort S122) US-PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/1 5z z

S1217 20 colr$ with 5 a dpl3or52) e US-PGPUB; IADJ ON 2015/04/15 or let)USPAT; 21 :57 ~496 H2H5/12.cpc.USPATER; USOCR; EPO;zzz O USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT z S1 2043 S1209 and S1237 US- PGPUB; zADJ zON 2015/04/15z z ~~ USPAT; 21 :57 z z ~~ ~ SOCR; EPO;zzz 5JPOU [ ___ L ._________________DERWENT I________

DERWENT S125 9 ("20040066284" | "20070018841 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 z 20100214094" | "6104305" USPAT 00:25 z 6133841" | "6170607" | "6252513" z__ I"6600426"| "7081812").PN. S126 0 S125 and remote control$4 same US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 2015/04/16 (warn$3 or alert) USPAT; 00:25 USOCR; EPO; z JPO; DERWENT z !S127 21 remote control$4 with (warn$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 alert) with operator with (machine or USPAT; 00:26

DERWENT _______[___ z o crane)USOCR; boom EPO; S181800 pair$3 with (remote or wireless) adj4 US-PPUB; ADJ ~ON 2015/04/16 (controller or controlling) USPAT; [17:02 JPO; __ I___DERWENT S129 4014 power linewith (proxim$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 distance) USPAT; EPO 17:02 JPO; US-zPUz O 70 DERWENT S130 78 5129 and ((shut$4 or turn$3 or US-PPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 78 power$3) z adj4 (down or off) ~~ or USPAT; JPO; [17:02 so$)with (machine or tool) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S131 78 S130 and "1" US-PT; ADJ ON 7201/41

USOCR; EPO;

DERWENT S132 0 S130 ande 128 US-PGPUB; IADJ ION 2015/04/16 d USPAT; 17:0 USOCR; EPO;

5129 ~ ~~~DERWENT ___I _____ !S133 0 S19same (alarm or alert) and US-PPUB; ADJ ON 21/46 S128 USPAT;1:0 I USOCR;EPO; z Z~ERWENT DERWENT zz !S134 2 S129 and (alarm or alert) and5128 US-PPUB; ~ADJ ON 21/46 USPAT r7:08 JPO; DERWENT S135 21 remote control$4with(warn$3 or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16z alert) withoperatorwith (machineor USPAT; 17:09 boom or crane) USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT iS136 11 S135 and code US-PGPUB; ADJ ION 21/41 USPAT; 17:09 USOCR;EEPO WJPO;

(machine or boom or crane) USPAT; 17:23 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT S138 1800 pair$3 with (remote or wireless) adI4 US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 13 (controller or controlling) USPAT; 19:52 USOCR; EPO JPO; DERWENT ___I___ ___

S139 26 remote control$4 with5S138 with US- PPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 (machine or boom or crane) USPAT; [19:52 jUSOCR; EPO; JPO; z Z~~ERWENT z S141 1148 remote control with (r38 o US-PGPUB; ADJ zON 2015/04/16z (a)ith ortor or usner) USPAT; 9:52 USOCR; EPO; JPO; DERWENT z I S141 2 S141 emtcnt hin rn$or US-PGPUB; ADJ ON 2015/04/16 cae)wUSPAT; 20:39 USOCR; EPO; 118 141wicnro4wth~ hineoromor US-FOPUB; JPO; ADJ O 050/ z124 aclan) wih(prto rue)USPAT; DERWENT z 0:40 z ~JPO; z z z_ I___ZERWENT z

EAST Search History (Interference) <This search history is empty> 4 161 2015 10:13:30 PM C:\ Users\ jlieu\ Document s\ EAST\ Workspaces\ 13730827.w sp

S/N 13/730827

REMARKS The above preliminary amendment is made to correct the claim numbering and claim dependencies. Applicants respectfully request that the preliminary amendment described herein be entered into the record prior to calculation of the filing fee and prior to examination and consideration of the above-identified application. If a telephone conference would be helpful in resolving any issues concerning this communication, please contact Applicants' primary attorney-of record, James A. Larson (Reg. No. 40,443), at (612) 455.3805.

Respectfully submitted,

283 5 52835LARSON, HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER

& P.C. PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. Box 2902 Minneapolis, MN 55402-0902 (612) 455-3800

Dated: March 26, 2014 By: _/James A. Larson/ James A. Larson Reg. No. 40,443 JAL/mbj

Application/Control No. Applicant(s)/Patent Under Reexamination 13/730,827 SMITH ET AL. Notice of References Cited Examiner ArtUnit 2684 Page 1 of 1 JULIE LIEU U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Name Classification

A US-3,786,468 A 01-1974 Moffitt, Melville M. 340/515 B US-5,252,912 A 10-1993 Merritt et al. 324/72 C US-6,600,426 B1 07-2003 Sacks et al. 340/664 D US-2010/0286845 Al 11-2010 Rekow et al. 701/2 E US F US G US H US I US j US K US L US M US FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Document Number Date Country Code-Number-Kind Code MM-YYYY Country Name Classification

N 0 P Q R S T NON-PATENT DOCUMENTS Include as applicable: Author, Title Date, Publisher, Edition or Volume, Pertinent Pages)

U V W X

opy of this reference is not being furnished with this Office action. (See MPEP § 707.05(a).) s in MM-YYYY format are publication dates. Classifications may be US or foreign. Patent and Trademark Office -892 (Rev. 01-2001) Notice of References Cited Part of Paper No. 20140615

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 Ale rria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov

APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263

52835 7590 04/21/2015 EXAMINER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. P.O. BOX 2902 LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER

2684

NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE

04/21/2015 ELECTRONIC

lease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

Fhe time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.

notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the ollowing e-mail address(es): 3TOMail@hsml.com l 3/ / 3U,02l/ bIViI I--zI AL.

Office Action Summary Examiner Art Unit AIA (First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status

-- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- Briod for Reply A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF COMMUNICATION. - Extensions of time maybe available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely fied after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).

atus 1)Z Responsive to communication(s) filed on 23 December 2014. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on

. 2a) This action is FINAL. 2b) This action is non-final. 3) An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. 4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213. sposition of Claims* ) Claim(s) 1-11,14 and 17-26is/are pending in the application. 5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration. 6) Claim(s) is/are allowed. 7) Claim(s) 1-11,14,17-22 and 24 is/are rejected. 8)Z Claim(s)23,25 and26 is/are objected to. 9) Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. f any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a rticipating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see p://wvw.uLsptO.gov/patents/init events/pph/index.isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedbackSusptoaov.

application Papers 10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 11) The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) accepted or b) objected to by the Examiner. Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).

iority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) All b) Some** c) None of the: 1.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._. 3.D Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.

tachment(s) Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 3) Interview Summary (PTO-413) Paper No(s)/Mail Date.__._ DInformation Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b) 4) Other-__ Dt Paper No(s)/Mail Date . -th Patent and Trademark Office I QO9/0- 11/I Q\ r44i Atinn Q mm De- of n I li,I n ~/A.;i- On i R A IR

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 2 Art Unit: 2684

DETAILED ACTION

1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions.

2. This Office action is in response to Applicant's amendment filed December 23, 2014.

Claims 1, 10, 11, and 14 were amended. Claims 12, 13, 15, and 16 were canceled. New claims

17-26 were added.

3. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found

in a prior Office action.

Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103

4. Claims 1-4, 7-9, and 17-21 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being

unpatentable over Givens et al. (US 2012/0214094 Al) (hereinafter as Givens) (cited by

Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468).

Regarding claim 1, Givens disclose a power line proximity sensing and warning system

for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising:

a loop antenna 300 (see para. 0056]) disposed on a structure 130 of the machinery (Fig.

2, 200-202), the structure configured for movement near the power line (Fig. 2, Fig. 3, and

paragraphs [0027] and [0031]);

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 3 Art Unit: 2684

a signal processor 725 (Fig. 7) in communication with the loop antenna, the signal

processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength

signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line (para.

0056]); and

a micro-controller (in base station 1000, Fig. 10 and paragraph [0072]) in communication

with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and

comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph

[0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color

display, causing an audible signal to be generated to audibly warn the operator when the

proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (see paragraph [0027] and [0036]).

Givens fails to specifically state "a micro-controller". However, it would have been

obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized that since the base station

can communicate with the signal processor 725 of the sensor, is capable of interpreting the

received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user

adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically

displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the

proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (paragraph [0027]), it is inherent that

there is a microcontroller or an equivalent thereof to perform the stated functions.

Givens fails to disclose automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field

strength signal exceeds the user adjustable sensitivity. However, Moffitt teaches the concept of

shutting down the machinery when the signal strength and distance from a power line exceeds

user's sensitivity level. See abstract. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 4 Art Unit: 2684

skill in the art to readily recognize adding this old and well known concept in the Givens system

because the use of known techniques taught in Moffitt would improve the Givens system in that

it further enhance the safety feature.

Regarding claim 2, it is inherent that the Givens system includes an input/output (/0)

module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/O module configured for

communicating with external devices because 1/O are needed for signals to be input and output

to the microcontroller for processing and for outputting alarms signals.

Regarding claim 3, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp. Para. [0098].

As for the claimed an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording

user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength

signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and

system status, all as a function of time, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the

art to record or log all events as desired depending on the designer's discretion. This feature

would not be considered an inventive step because what data to be logged is only up to the

system implementer and only constitute a choice in design.

Regarding claim 4, with reference to Fig. 2, Givens inherently discloses a radio

transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module

configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices because the base station

receives the wireless signal from the sensor.

Regarding claim 7, though not clearly disclosed, it would have been obvious to one of

ordinary skill in the art that a memory device is included in the micro-controller in the Givens

system for storing computer program instructions and data to carry out the functions involved.

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 5 Art Unit: 2684

Regarding claim 8, base station 210 includes a user interface having buttons for

controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. See paragraphs

[0027]-[0028].

Regarding claim 9, the user interface of Givens's system further comprises a graphical

display of field strength, alerts and warnings (paragraph [0052] states that the range and position

data could be displayed in a graphical format on a base receiver).

Regarding claim 17, Given discloses a power line proximity sensing and warning

system for use with machinery operating near a high-voltage power line, comprising:

an antenna 300 (see para. 0056]) disposed on a structure of the machinery 130 that is

movable near the power line;

a control system 725 (Fig. 7) that includes a signal processor and a micro-controller;

the signal processor is in communication with the antenna and receives field strength signals

from the antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power line; and

the micro-controller is in communication with the signal processor and interprets

the received field strength signals and compares the received field strength signals to a

user-adjustable sensitivity level (para. [0030]).

Givens fails to specifically state "a micro-controller". However, it would have been

obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized that since the base station

can communicate with the signal processor 725 of the sensor, is capable of interpreting the

received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user

adjustable sensitivity level (paragraph [0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically

displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 6 Art Unit: 2684

proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity (paragraph [0027]), it is inherent that

there is a microcontroller or an equivalent thereof to perform the stated functions.

Givens fails to disclose automatically shuts down the machinery when the structure is

close to the power line. Givens fails to disclose automatically shutting down the machinery

when a received field strength signal exceeds the user adjustable sensitivity. However, in a same

field of endeavor, Moffitt teaches shutting down the machinery when the field strength and

distance from a power line exceeds user's adjustable sensitivity level. See abstract. Therefore, it

would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to readily recognize adding this old

and well known concept in the Givens system because the use of known techniques taught in

Moffitt would improve the Givens system in that it further enhance the safety feature.

Regarding claim 18, Given discloses that the micro-controller generates proximity

signals based on the received field strength signals, causes display of the proximity signals.

Givens also disclose a display for displaying the range and position in graphical format (see Fig.

13 and para. [0052]) and audio warning (via speaker 902, see Fig. 9], see para. [0068]) when the

generated proximity signals exceeds a preset level of field sensitivity.

Givens fails to discuss in details whether the display graphically displays the proximity

signal on a color display. However, the concept of using graphical display of different colors to

depict data is conventional in the art. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill

in the art to have readily recognized employing this concept in the Givens system because it

would provide the advantage of clearly indicating the data on the user interface making it easily

comprehensible to the user.

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 7 Art Unit: 2684

Regarding claim 19, it is inherent that the Givens system includes an input/output (/0)

module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/0 module configured for

communicating with external devices because 1/0 are needed for signals to be input and output

to the microcontroller for processing and for outputting alarms signals.

Regarding claim 20, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp (para. [0098])

inherently in communication with the micro-controller.

Regarding claim 21, with reference to Fig. 2, Givens inherently discloses a radio

transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module

configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices because the base station

receives the wireless signal from the sensor.

5. Claims 5, 6, and 24 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable

over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No.

3,786,468) and further in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 Al) (hereinafter as Rekow).

Regarding claim 5, Givens fails to disclose a remote controller in communication with

the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the

system. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a

vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches

a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its

functions when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front

page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 8 Art Unit: 2684

art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the purpose of increasing the safety

feature of the system.

Regarding claim 6, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button,

which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the

machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]).

Regarding claim 24, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button,

which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the

machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]).

6. Claims 10 and 11 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable

over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No.

3,786,468) and further in view of Christides et al. (US Patent No. 3,907,13) (hereinafter as

Christides).

Regarding claim 10, Givens discloses a method for remotely alerting an operator of

machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines,

the method comprising:

installing an antenna 300 on the structure of the machinery 130 that is movable near the

high voltage power line 150 (Fig. 1), the antenna generating field strength signals based on

proximity of the antenna to the high voltage power line;

generating proximity signals based on the field strength signals (para. [0046]);

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 9 Art Unit: 2684

warning the operator when the extended structure is moved a first warning distance from

the high voltage power line such that a first proximity signal generated from the field strength

signal exceeds a first preset field sensitivity (para. [0036]).

See Figs. 1-4.

Givens fails to disclose automatically shutting down the machinery when a received field

strength signal exceeds the user adjustable sensitivity. However, in a same field of endeavor,

Moffitt teaches shutting down the machinery when the field strength and distance from a power

line exceeds user's adjustable sensitivity level. See abstract. Therefore, it would have been

obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to readily recognize adding this old and well known

concept in the Givens system because the use of known techniques taught in Moffitt would

improve the Givens system in that it enhance the safety feature.

Neither Givens nor Moffitt discloses shutting the machine down when the structure is

moved to a second warning distance less than the first distance. Nonetheless, Christides teaches

this concept. See col. 5, line 57 to col. 6 line 5. Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of

ordinary skill in the art to applying the known technique taught by Christides in the modified

system of Givens and Moffitt for improvement to yield predictable results because this combined

system would warn the operator before shutting down granting more awareness and perhaps

control for the operator.

Regarding claim 11, Givens discloses that installing the antenna on the structure

comprises installing a loop antenna about the structure. Givens also discloses that warning the

operator comprises-audibly warning the operator (see para. [0067]).

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 10 Art Unit: 2684

Givens fails to disclose sending a test signal through the loop antenna and detecting the

test signal. However, Moffitt teaches the concept of providing a test function to allow the

operator to determine that working condition of system. See abstract, col. 1 lines 20-27, and col.

4 lines 33-36. In light of this teaching, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the

art to incorporate this feature in the Givens system because it would further enhance safety

feature of the system.

Regarding the first and second preset field sensitivities are user-adjustable, Moffitt also

teaches adjustable preset distance (col. 4 lines 33-36). Moffitt does not teach the second

sensitivity. However, Christides teaches this concept. See col. 5, line 57 to col. 6 line 5 in

Christides. Therefore, would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate

this feature in the Givens system because it would further enhance safety feature of the system

and increase the operator's awareness before shutting down the machine.

Givens disclose a display for displaying the range and position in graphical format (see

Fig. 13 and para. [0052]). Givens fails to discuss in details whether the display graphically

displays the proximity signal on a color display. However, the concept of using graphical

display of different colors to depict data is conventional in the art. Thus, it would have been

obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized employing this concept in

the Givens system because it would provide the advantage of clearly indicating the data on the

user interface making it easily comprehensible to the user.

7. Claim 14 is rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Givens

(US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No. 3,786,468) and

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 11 Art Unit: 2684

Christides et al. (US Patent No. 3,907,13) (hereinafter as Christides) and further in view of

Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 Al).

Regarding claim 14, Givens fails to disclose a remote controller in communication with

the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the

system. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a

vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches

a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its

functions when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front

page figure and paragraph [0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the

art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of

the system.

The remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button, which is an emergency

stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement

closer to the power lines (paragraph [0003]).

8. Claims 22 and 24 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable

over Givens (US 2012/0214094 Al) (cited by Applicants) in view of Moffitt (US Patent No.

3,786,468) and further in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 Al).

Regarding claim 22, Givens and Moffitt fails to disclose a remote controller. However,

the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a vehicle in the case of

an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches a system wherein a

remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its functions when an operator

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 12 Art Unit: 2684

presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front-page figure and paragraph

[0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate this

teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of the system. One of

ordinary skill in the art would have also readily recognized modifying the Givens system and

Moffitt to include a wireless radio communication module to communicate with the remote

controller.

Regarding claim 24, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button,

which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the

machinery to stop movement (paragraph [0003]).

Allowable Subject Matter

9. Claims 23, 25, and 26 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but

would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base

claim and any intervening claims.

Response to Arguments

10. Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1, 10, and 17 have been considered but are

moot because the arguments do not apply to any of the references being used in the current

rejection.

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 13 Art Unit: 2684

In response to Applicant's argument regarding the automatic machine shut down, the

argument is moot because of new grounds of rejection necessitated by the amendment.

Regarding Applicant's argument that the citations should be considered, the examiner

submits that 37 CFR 1.56 states the "duty to disclose...all information known...to be material to

patentability" (of the pending claims of the current application). Such information would be

material to patentability only if it qualifies as prior art, and without a publication date of a piece

of IDS document (at least the publication year for NPL if it is a year that is earlier than the

earliest effective filing year of the application), no determination could be made as to prior art

qualification and thus patentability based on such a document. Therefore, each document

submitted in an IDS must be provided with its publication date (at least the publication year for

NPL if it is earlier than the year of the earliest effective filing year of the application) to satisfy

the full requirements of 37 CFR 1.56. Since the dates of the cited documents in the previous IDS

were not provided, they cannot be considered and were crossed out.

Conclusion

11. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this

Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a).

Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).

A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE

MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO

MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after

Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 14 Art Unit: 2684

the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period

will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37

CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event,

however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the date of this

final action.

12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JULIE LIEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2978. The examiner can normally be reached on Increased Flex. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Benjamin Lee can be reached on 571-270-1210. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.

/Julie Lieu/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2684

Apr 16, 15

Claims (1)

1. CLAIMS What is claimed is:

   1. A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising: loop antenna disposed about a structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity.

   2. The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (1/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/O module configured for communicating with external devices.

   3. The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time.

   4. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices.

   7. The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system.

   8. The system according to claim 8, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines.

   9. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data.

   10. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications.

   11. The system according to claim 10, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings.

   12. A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, the method comprising: providing a power line proximity sensing and warning system and a wireless remote controller; installing the system on the machinery; performing a system check of the system; adjusting field sensitivity of the system; wirelessly linking the remote controller to the system; remotely controlling the system using the remote controller; warning the operator when the extended structure is moved within a preset field sensitivity; and shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved within another present field sensitivity.

   13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the power line proximity sensing and warning system, comprises: aloop antenna disposed about the extended structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor adapted for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity.

   13. The method according to claim 12, wherein the remotely controlling the system using the remote controller, comprises a remote user viewing the extended structure of the machinery from outside of the machinery and wirelessly controlling the system using the remote controller.

   14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the remote user is a spotter.

   15. The method according to claim 12, wherein the remote controller has a panic button configured to wirelessly shutdown the machinery to prevent the extended structure from coming into contact with the power lines.

   16. The method according to claim 12, further comprising providing a wireless system logger configured for wirelessly connecting to the system and downloading data stored by an event logger.

   17. The method according to claim 12, wherein the graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display comprises a red-yellow-green bar graph.

   IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE Inventorship: SMITH Examiner: LIEU Serial No.: 13/730827 Group Art Unit: 2684 Filed: December 28, 2012 Docket No.: 20600.0001USU1 Title: POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM

   CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION. I hereby certify that this paper is being transmitted by EFS Web to the United States Patent & Trademark Office on March 26, 2014.

   By: /MeanJachim/ Name: Megan Jachim

   PRELIMINARY AMENDMENT

   Mail Stop: AMENDMENT Commissioner for Patents P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450

   In connection with the above-identified application, please enter the following

   preliminary amendment.

   Amendments to the Claims are reflected in the listing of the claims which

   begins on page 2 of this paper.

   Remarks begin on page 6 of this paper.

   S/N 13/730827

   Amendments to the Claims:

   This listing of claims will replace all prior versions, and listings, of claims in the application.

   Listing of Claims:

   1. (Original) A power line proximity sensing and warning system for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising: a loop antenna disposed about a structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity.

   2. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an input/output (I/O) module in communication with the micro-controller, the I/O module configured for communicating with external devices.

   3. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time.

   S/N 13/730827

   4. (Original) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a radio transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices.

   [[7]] 5. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 4, further comprising a remote controller in communication with the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the system.

   [[8]] 6. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim [[8]] 5, wherein the remote controller further comprises a panic button for use by a remote user to warn the operator or optionally shutdown the machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines.

   [[9]] 7. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a memory device in communication with the micro-controller for storing computer program instructions and data.

   [[10]] 8. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim 1, further comprising a user interface having buttons for controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications.

   [[11]] 2. (Currently Amended) The system according to claim [[10]] 8, wherein the user interface further comprises a graphical display of field strength, alerts and warnings.

   [[12]] 10. (Currently Amended) A method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, the method comprising: providing a power line proximity sensing and warning system and a wireless remote controller; installing the system on the machinery;

   S/N 13/730827

   performing a system check of the system; adjusting field sensitivity of the system; wirelessly linking the remote controller to the system; remotely controlling the system using the remote controller; warning the operator when the extended structure is moved within a preset field sensitivity; and shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved within another present field sensitivity.

   [[13]]11. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]]i0, wherein the power line proximity sensing and warning system, comprises: a loop antenna disposed about the extended structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines; a signal processor in communication with the loop antenna, the signal processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines; and a micro-controller in communication with the signal processor adapted for interpreting the received field strength signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level, generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity.

   [[13]]12. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]]i0, wherein the remotely controlling the system using the remote controller, comprises a remote user viewing the extended structure of the machinery from outside of the machinery and wirelessly controlling the system using the remote controller.

   [[14]] 13. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[13]] 12, wherein the remote user is a spotter.

   S/N 13/730827

   [[15]] 14. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]] ., wherein the remote controller has a panic button configured to wirelessly shutdown the machinery to prevent the extended structure from coming into contact with the power lines.

   [[16]] 15. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]] L, further comprising providing a wireless system logger configured for wirelessly connecting to the system and downloading data stored by an event logger.

   [[17]] 16. (Currently Amended) The method according to claim [[12]] L, wherein the graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display comprises a red-yellow green bar graph.

   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box1450 Aledria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov

   APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO.

   13/730,827 12/28/2012 Stephen L. Smith 20600.0001USU1 8263

   52835 7590 06/23/2014 EXAMINER HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. P.O. BOX 2902 LIEU, JULIE BICHNGOC MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0902 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2684

   NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE

   06/23/2014 ELECTRONIC

   lease find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.

   Fhe time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.

   notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the ollowing e-mail address(es): 3TOMail@hsml.com l 3/ /3U,02l/ IVi I I- I -AL.

   Office Action Summary Examiner Art Unit AIA (First Inventor to File) JULIE LIEU 2684 Status No -- The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address- Briod for Reply A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE 3 MONTHS FROM THE MAILING DATE OF COMMUNICATION. - Extensions of time maybe available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication. - Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133). Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).

   status 1) Responsive to communication(s) filed on March 26, 2014. A declaration(s)/affidavit(s) under 37 CFR 1.130(b) was/were filed on

   . 2a) This action is FINAL. 2b) This action is non-final. 3) An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on _; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action. 4) Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Exparte Quayle, 1935 C.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213. sposition of Claims* ) Claim(s) 1-16 is/are pending in the application. 5a) Of the above claim(s) _ is/are withdrawn from consideration. 6) Claim(s) is/are allowed. 7) Claim(s) 1-16 is/are rejected. 8) Claim(s) is/are objected to. 9) Claim(s) are subject to restriction and/or election requirement. f any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway program at a rticipating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see Qp://www.ustO.ov/patents/init events/pph/index.isp or send an inquiry to PPHfeedbackSusPto.aov.

   application Papers 10) The specification is objected to by the Examiner. 11) The drawing(s) filed on is/are: a) accepted or b) objected to by the Examiner. Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a). Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121(d).

   iority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 12) Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f). Certified copies: a) All b) Some** c) None of the: 1.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received. 2.1 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No._. 3.1 Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)). See the attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.

   tachment(s) Notice of References Cited (PTO-892) 3) Interview Summary (PTO-413) Paper No(s)/Mail Date.__._ Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08a and/or PTO/SB/08b) 4 ater___ Dt Paper No(s)/Mail Date . 4) []Other: .

   Patent and Trademark Office I -O /D... 11 I iQ\ 'f A ntianO.mm D -r _f D___r lKl_ /lulil 1- n -1 1-IA 1i

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 2 Art Unit: 2684

   DETAILED ACTION

   1. The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions.

   2. This Office action is in response to Applicant's preliminary amendment filed March 26,

   2014. Claims 7-17 have been amended and renumbered to 5-16.

   Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103

   3. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all

   obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:

   (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.

   This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the

   claims under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a), the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the

   various claims was commonly owned at the time any inventions covered therein were made

   absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to

   point out the inventor and invention dates of each claim that was not commonly owned at the

   time a later invention was made in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of pre

   AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(c) and potential pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(e), (f) or (g) prior art under pre-AIA

   U.S.C. 103(a).

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 3 Art Unit: 2684

   4. Claims 1-4 and 7-9 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable

   over Givens et al. (US 2012/0214094 A]) (hereinafter as Givens) (cited by Applicants).

   Regarding claim 1, Givens disclose a power line proximity sensing and warning system

   for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines, comprising:

   a loop antenna 300 (720 in one of the embodiments) (see para. 0056]) disposed about a

   structure of the machinery, the structure configured for movement near the power lines (Fig. 2,

   Fig. 3, andparagraphs[0027] and [0031]);

   a signal processor 725 (Fig. 7) in communication with the loop antenna, the signal

   processor configured to send test signals through the loop antenna and receive field strength

   signals from the loop antenna generated by an electromagnetic field from the power lines (para.

   0056]); and

   a micro-controller (in base station 1000, Fig. 10 and paragraph[0072]) in

   communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength

   signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level

   (paragraph[0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity

   signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds

   preset levels of field sensitivity (see paragraph[0027]).

   Givens fails to disclose a micro-controller. However, it would have been obvious to one

   of ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized that since the base station can communicate

   with the signal processor 725 of the sensor, is capable of interpreting the received field strength

   signals and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable sensitivity level

   (paragraph[0030]), generating a proximity signal, and graphically displaying the proximity

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 4 Art Unit: 2684

   signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds

   preset levels of field sensitivity (paragraph[0027]), it is inherent that there is a microcontroller

   or an equivalent thereof to perform the stated functions.

   Regarding claim 2, it is inherent that the Givens system includes an input/output (/0)

   module in communication with the micro-controller, the 1/0 module configured for

   communicating with external devices because 1/0 are needed for signals to be input and output

   to the microcontroller for processing and for outputting alarms signals.

   Regarding claim 3, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp. Para. [0098].

   As for the claimed an event logger in communication with the micro-controller for recording

   user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength

   signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and

   system status, all as a function of time, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the

   art to record or log all events as desired depending on the designer's discretion. This feature

   would not be considered an inventive step because what data to be logged is only up to the

   system implementer and only constitute a choice in design.

   Regarding claim 4, with reference to Fig. 2, Givens inherently discloses a radio

   transceiver module in communication with the micro-controller, the radio transceiver module

   configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices because the base station

   receives the wireless signal from the sensor.

   Regarding claim 7, though not clearly disclosed, it would have been obvious to one of

   ordinary skill in the art that a memory device is included in the micro-controller in the Givens

   system for storing computer program instructions and data to carry out the functions involved.

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 5 Art Unit: 2684

   Regarding claim 8, base station 210 includes a user interface having buttons for

   controlling power, adjusting field sensitivity and external communications. See paragraphs

   [0027]-[0028].

   Regarding claim 9, the user interface of Givens's system further comprises a graphical

   display of field strength, alerts and warnings (paragraph[0052] states that the range and

   position data could be displayed in a graphical format on a base receiver).

   5. Claims 5, 6, and 10-16 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being

   unpatentable over Givens et al. (US 2012/0214094 A]) (hereinafter as Givens) (cited by

   Applicants) in view of Rekow et al. (US 2010/0286845 A) (hereinafter as Rekow).

   Regarding claim 5, Givens fails to disclose a remote controller in communication with

   the system via the radio transceiver, the remote controller configured for wireless control of the

   system. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a

   vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches

   a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its

   functions when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front

   page figure and paragraph[0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the

   art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of

   the system.

   Regarding claim 6, the remote controller taught by Rekow comprises a panic button,

   which is an emergency stop button, for use by a remote user to optionally shutdown the

   machinery to stop movement closer to the power lines (paragraph[0003]).

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 6 Art Unit: 2684

   Regarding claim 10, Givens discloses a method for remotely alerting an operator of

   machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines,

   the method comprising:

   providing a power line proximity sensing and warning system;

   installing the system on the machinery;

   adjusting field sensitivity of the system level (paragraph[0030]);

   warning the operator when the extended structure is moved within a preset field

   sensitivity.

   See Fig. 1 and Fig. 2

   Givens fails to disclose including a remote controller to remotely control the machine and

   shutting down the machinery when the extended structure is moved within another present field

   sensitivity. However, the concept of providing a remote controller to allow a person to control a

   vehicle in the case of an emergency is well known in the art as taught by Rekow. Rekow teaches

   a system wherein a remote controller is used to stop an autonomous vehicle and all of its

   function when an operator presses an emergency stop button on a remote control unit (see front

   page figure and paragraph[0003]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one skilled in the

   art to incorporate this teaching in the Givens system for the same purpose increasing the safety of

   the system.

   Regarding claim 11, see the rejection of claim 1.

   Regarding claim 12, in the combined system of Givens and Rekow, an operator would

   view the extended structure of the machinery, i.e. boom 130, and remotely controlling the system

   using the remote controller to wirelessly controlling the system using the remote controller.

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 7 Art Unit: 2684

   Regarding claim 13, Givens discloses a supervisor carrying a wireless device who

   monitors the power line safety from a location remote and outside of the machinery. The

   supervisor can make a call to the operator using two way radio or the base station itself.

   Therefore, the reference suggests that a spotter watching communicate with the operator

   regarding the safety condition.

   Regarding claim 14, see the rejection of claim 6.

   Regarding claim 15, Givens discloses using a data logger with time stamp. Paragraph

   [0098]. As for the claimed wireless system logger configured for wirelessly connecting to

   the system and downloading data stored by an event logger, it would have been obvious to one of

   ordinary skill in the art to provide this method because it would allow the system user to

   download the event to wireless device as desired.

   Regarding claim 16, the user interface of Givens's system further comprises a graphical

   display of field strength, alerts and warnings (paragraph[0052] states that the range and

   position data could be displayed in a graphical format on a base receiver). Givens fails to discuss

   in details whether the display graphically displays the proximity signal on a color display

   comprises a red-yellow- green bar graph. However, the concept of using bar graph of different

   colors to depict data is conventional in the art. Thus, it would have been obvious to one of

   ordinary skill in the art to have readily recognized employing this concept in the Givens system

   because it would provide the advantage of clearly indicating the data on the user interface

   making it easily comprehensible to the user.

   Application/Control Number: 13/730,827 Page 8 Art Unit: 2684

   6. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the

   examiner should be directed to JULIE LIEU whose telephone number is (571)272-2978. The

   examiner can normally be reached on Increased Flex.

   If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's

   supervisor, Steven Lim can be reached on 571-272-3021. The fax phone number for the

   organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.

   Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent

   Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications

   may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished

   applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR

   system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR

   system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would

   like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated

   information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.

   /Julie Lieu/ Primary Examiner Art Unit 2684

   Jun 15, 14

   PTOISB/08a (07-09) Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and TrademarkOffice; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number.

   Substitute for form 1449/PTO Complte if Known Application Number 13/730,827 December 28, 2012 INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith STATEMENT BY APPLICANT Arl Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name

   Sheet 1 of 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP

   U. S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Initials* Cite 1 Document Number Publication Date Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Where No. MM-DD-YYYY Applicant of Cited Document Relevant Passages or Relevant Number-Kind Code(irknown) Figures Appear

   Us- 6,104,305 08-15-2000 Beckmann US- 6,133,841 10-17-2000 Beckmann Us- 6,170,607 BI 01-09-2001 Freeman et al. Us- 6,252,513 B1 06-26-2001 Beckmann US-6,600,426 BI 07-29-2003 Sacks et al. Us 7,081,812 B2 07-25-2006 Hastings, Sr. US

   Us- 2004/0066284 Al 04-08-2004 Hastings, Sr. US- 2007/0018841 Al 01-25-2007 Nickerson US- 2010/0214094 Al 08-26-2010 Givens et al. US

   US US US

   US US US

   US US

   FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Foreign Patent Document Publication Name of Patentee or Pages, Columns, Lines, Initials* No.' Date Applicant of Cited Document Where Relevant Passages 6 4 5 Or Relevant Figures Appear T CountryGode umber -ind Code (ifkown) MM-DD-YYYY

   Examiner Date Signature Considered

   *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not 2 considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 'Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). See Kinds Codes of USPTO Patent Documents at y isgg or MPEP 901.04. Enter Office that issued the document, by the two-letter code (WIPO Standard ST.3). 4 For 5 Japanese patent documents, the indication of the year of the reign of the Emperor must precede the serial number of the patent document. Kind of document by 6 the appropriate symbols as indicated on the document under WIPO Standard ST.16 if possible. Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.

   PTO/SB/08b (07-09) Approved for use through 07/31/2012. OMB 0651-0031 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons ar required to respond to a collection of information unless it contains a valid OMB control number. Complete if Known Substitute for form 1449/PTO Application Number 13/730,827

   INFORMATION DISCLOSURE Filing Date December 28, 2012 STATEMENT BY APPLICANT First Named Inventor Stephen L. Smith Art Unit (Use as many sheets as necessary) Examiner Name

   sheet 2 of 2 Attorney Docket Number 5010.USI.NP

   NON PATENT LITERATURE DOCUMENTS Examiner Cite Include name of the author (in CAPITAL LETTERS), title of the article (when appropriate), title of No.' Initials* the item (book, magazine, journal, serial, symposium, catalog, etc.), date, page(s), volume-issue T2 number(s), publisher, city and/or country where published.

   Installation Procedure for the ASE 2200 High Voltage Proximity Warning Device, Allied Safety Engineering, February 21, 2006. Proxyvolt Instruction Manual PV500711, Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, date unknown.

   Proxyvolt PV5007 Brochure, Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, 1717 Ipswich Road, Rocklea QId Australia 4106, date unknown. Proxyvolt Quick Start Guide (Label), Proxyvolt Pty Ltd, date unknown.

   Sigalarm Model 110 Lattice Boom Manual, Sigalarm, 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, 2010. Wire-Watcher Brochure, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, date unknown. http://www.alliedsafetyeng.com/proximitywarningdevice.html, Allied Safety Systems, Inc., 4380 St. Johns Parkway, Suite 100 Sanford, FL 32771, 2009. http://www.sigalarminc.com/index.html, Sigalarm, 5224 West State Road 46 PMB 405, Sanford, FL 32771, date unknown. http://www.wirewatcher.co.uk/wwprd.html, The Wire-Watcher Co. Ltd, Gigg Mill, Old Bristol Rd, Nailsworth GL6 OJP, United Kingdom, 2005.

   Date E xaminer Signature Considered *EXAMINER: Initial if reference considered, whether or not citation is in conformance with MPEP 609. Draw line through citation if not in conformance and not considered. Include copy of this form with next communication to applicant. 1 Applicant's unique citation designation number (optional). 2 Applicant is to place a check mark here if English language Translation is attached. This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.98. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 2 hours to complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.

   If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 (1-800-786-9199) and select option 2.

   POWER LINE PROXIMITY SENSING AND WARNING SYSTEM

   Field

   [0001] This description relates generally to proximity sensors. More particularly, this description relates to power line proximity sensing and warning systems, for enhanced safety of operators and their machinery around high voltage power lines. The embodiments disclosed herein may be configured as standalone power line warning device (PWD) systems or may be used in conjunction with each other or with other conventional PWD systems.

   Background

   [0002] Conventional power line proximity alarms are electronic radio units designed to detect the electromagnetic field that surround active high voltage power lines. This electromagnetic field is detected or sensed, thereby generating warning sounds to alert the operator of the machinery equipped with the power line warning device (PWD) that a high voltage has been detected within the vicinity of the machine.

   [0003] Currently, the PWD market offers products that are analog based (fused). Such systems are purchased individually and perform a simple and single function of warning when an equipped piece of machinery is approaching a high voltage power line.

   [0004] References to prior art in this specification are provided for illustrative purposes only and are not to be taken as an admission that such prior art is part of the common general knowledge in Australia or elsewhere.

   Summary

   [0005] The embodiments described herein provide a user-friendly approach to power line safety through a full line of completely digital and highly technical products that are interactive, collective, supportive of each other, simple to operate and ancillary to a base/main unit that can be configured in an array of combinations to accommodate any articulating, overhead boomed or extending mobile equipment type. The embodiments disclosed herein are believed to be more accurate, dependable than conventional systems and include a wider range of options and features that no other PWD on the market offers.

   [0006] A number of innovative features are described that can be used individually or in any combination to enhance the operation of the described PWD. In one embodiment, a wireless power line sensing device can include an external antenna port that permits connection of an external, initially separate loop antenna to the wireless power line sensing device. The external loop antenna can be used in place of the integral loop antenna of the wireless power line sensing device which can be disabled when the external loop antenna is connected to the external antenna port. In one embodiment, the external loop antenna can extend substantially linearly so that in use the external loop antenna extends longitudinally over a length of a structure to which it is attached to define a non-spherical sensing field.

   [0007] In another embodiment, a wireless sensing device, such as a wireless power line sensing device, can include an ultracapacitor that provides power to the wireless sensing device. Unlike conventional rechargeable batteries, an ultracapacitor can be recharged in low temperature environments. In addition, an ultracapacitor can withstand a large number of charge cycles, and can be charged more quickly than a rechargeable battery. These advantages, and others, are beneficial when the sensing device is used in a remote or difficult to access location, such as with a wireless power line sensing device.

   [0008] In another embodiment, a wireless sensing device, such as a wireless power line sensing device, can include a curved solar panel. The curved solar panel maximizes the solar input over a wide range of angles, providing power over a longer period of time compared to a flat solar panel.

   [0009] In one embodiment, a wireless power line sensing device includes a housing having a base, a first end, and a second end. A power source is disposed in the housing, and a controller in the housing is connected to the power source so that it is powered thereby. An integral loop antenna that senses an electromagnetic field is connected to the controller. A wireless communication mechanism in the housing provides communication between the sensing device and a remote location, such as with a base unit or a remote control unit. In addition, an external antenna port on the housing permits connection of an external loop antenna to the housing to permit a change in the sensing field of the wireless power line sensing device.

   [0010] In another embodiment, a wireless sensing device is provided. The wireless sensing device can be configured to perform any sensing function(s). One example of the wireless sensing device includes, but is not limited to, configuration as a wireless power line sensing device. The sensing device includes a housing, an ultracapacitor disposed in the housing that stores electrical energy, a solar panel mounted on an exterior of the housing and electrically connected to the ultracapacitor to electrically charge the ultracapacitor, a sensing mechanism connected to the housing that senses a condition external to the housing, a controller in the housing that is connected to and controls the sensing mechanism, and a radio frequency transceiver in the housing and connected to the controller that provides communication between the sensing device and a remote location, such as with a base unit or a remote control unit.

   [0011] In another embodiment of a wireless sensing device that can be configured to perform any sensing function(s), for example a wireless power line sensing function, the wireless sensing device can include a housing, a power source disposed in the housing that stores electrical energy, and a solar panel mounted on an exterior of the housing and electrically connected to the power source to electrically charge the power source. The solar panel can be curved to maximize the solar input over a wide range of angles. The sensing device can also include a sensing mechanism connected to the housing that senses a condition external to the housing, a controller in the housing that is connected to and controls the sensing mechanism, and a radio frequency transceiver in the housing and connected to the controller.

   The present invention provides a wireless power line sensing device, comprising: a housing having a base, a first end, and a second end; a power source disposed in the housing; a controller in the housing that is connected to the power source and is powered thereby; an integral loop antenna that senses an electromagnetic field generated by a power line, the integral loop antenna is connected to the controller; a wireless communication mechanism in the housing and connected to the controller, the wireless communication mechanism is electrically connected to the power source so as to be electrically powered thereby; an external antenna port on the housing, the external antenna port is electrically connected to the controller and permits connection of an external loop antenna to the housing; and an external loop antenna connected to the external antenna port, the external loop antenna senses the electromagnetic field generated by a power line, the external loop antenna is substantially linear so that in use the external loop antenna extends longitudinally over a length of a structure to which it is attached to define a non-spherical electromagnetic sensing field.

   The present invention further provides a wireless power line warning system, comprising: the wireless power line sensing device of claim 3; and a base unit that includes a radio frequency transceiver that can communicate with the radio frequency transceiver of the wireless power line sensing device.

   The present invention still further provides a wireless power line sensing device, comprising: a housing; an ultracapacitor disposed in the housing that stores electrical energy; a solar panel mounted on an exterior of the housing and electrically connected to the ultracapacitor to electrically charge the ultracapacitor; a sensing mechanism including a loop antenna that senses an electromagnetic field generated by a power line, the loop antenna extending from and outside of the housing, the sensing mechanism is electrically connected to the ultracapacitor so as to be electrically powered thereby; a controller in the housing that is connected to and controls the sensing mechanism, the controller is electrically connected to the ultracapacitor so as to be electrically powered thereby; and a radio frequency transceiver in the housing and connected to the controller, the radio frequency transceiver is electrically connected to the ultracapacitor so as to be electrically powered thereby.

   The present invention also provides a wireless sensing device, comprising: a housing including a base with a first side and a second side; a power source disposed in the housing that stores electrical energy; a solar panel mounted on an exterior of the housing and electrically connected to the power source to electrically charge the power source, the solar panel includes a first edge that contacts the first side of the base and a second edge that contacts the second side of the base, and the solar panel is continuously curved from the first edge to the second edge; a sensing mechanism connected to the housing that senses a condition external to the housing, the sensing mechanism is electrically connected to the power source so as to be electrically powered thereby; a controller in the housing that is connected to and controls the sensing mechanism, the controller is electrically connected to the power source so as to be electrically powered thereby; and a radio frequency transceiver in the housing and connected to the controller, the radio frequency transceiver is electrically connected to the power source so as to be electrically powered thereby.

   Throughout the specification, unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise" or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers. Likewise the word "preferably" or variations such as "preferred", will be understood to imply that a stated integer or group of integers is desirable but not essential to the working of the invention.

   Drawings

   [0012] Figure 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a power line proximity sensing and warning system described herein.

   [0013] Figure 2 is an embodiment of a user interface for use with the power line proximity sensing and warning system shown in Figure 1, as described herein.

   [0014] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of an environment in which the power line proximity sensing and warning system shown in Figure 1 might be used, as described herein.

   [0015] Figure 4 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, as described herein.

   [0016] Figures 5A, 5B and 5C are perspective views of an embodiment of a wireless power line sensing device described herein.

   [0017] Figures 6A-G are end views of an embodiment of a curved solar panel used on the wireless power line sensing device of Figures 5A-C, showing solar input to the curved solar panel over different angles.

   [0018] Figure 7 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a power control system used on the wireless power line sensing device of Figures 5A-C.

   [0019] Figure 8 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a linking scheme used with the wireless power line sensing device of Figures 5A-C for linking the wireless power line sensing device with a remote device.

   [0020] Figure 9A illustrates the sensing field generated by integral loop antennas of a plurality of the wireless power line sensing devices of Figures 5A-C disposed along an extendable boom.

   [0021] Figure 9B illustrates the sensing field generated by an external loop antenna that is connected to the wireless power line sensing device of Figures 5A-C, with the external loop antenna disposed along an extendable boom.

   [0022] Figure 10 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a power line sensing control scheme used with the wireless power line sensing device of Figures 5A-C for sensing a power line.

   [0023] Figure 11 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of a power control scheme used with the wireless power line sensing device of Figures 5A-C.

   Detailed Description

   [0024] This application describes a novel suite of power line proximity sensing and warning systems, having a base or general configuration that may be upgraded with various enhanced feature embodiments and still other embodiments which may be incorporated into existing PWD systems. The embodiments disclosed herein may be configured as standalone PWD systems or may be used in conjunction with each other or with other conventional PWD systems.

   [0025] The various embodiments described herein provide a user-friendly approach to power line safety by manufacturing a full line of completely digital and highly technical products that are interactive, collective, supportive of each other, simple to operate and ancillary to a base/main unit that can be configured in an array of combinations to accommodate any articulating, overhead boomed or extending mobile equipment type. We believe our designs are more accurate, dependable and offer a wider range of options and features that no other PWD on the market offers. The following is a description of various embodiments of power line proximity sensing devices, accessories and enhancements.

   [0026] Figures 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a power line proximity sensing and warning system 100 for use by an operator of machinery operating near high-voltage power lines. A commercial embodiment of system 100 is known as Voltek NSTM is available from United Safety, Inc., Kalispell, Mont. System 100 may include a loop antenna 102 disposed about a structure (not shown) of the machinery (not shown). The structure, e.g., a crane boom, is generally configured for movement near the power lines. Antenna 102 runs along the boom of the machinery. The antenna is a loop of wire with both ends connected to the signal processor 104 input. One embodiment of the signal processor 104 processes and filters the incoming signal and includes the following features, 60 band-pass filter, dynamics compression (apply a specific response curve), gain, and read signal amplitude.

   [0027] The loop antenna 102 may be in communication with a signal processor 104. Signal processor 104 may be a digital signal processor or any other suitable signal processor capable of sending test signals through the loop antenna 102 and receiving those test signals to confirm proper antenna operation. Signal processor 104 may also be configured for receiving field strength signals from the loop antenna 102 generated by an electromagnetic field generated by the power lines (not shown, but see FIG. 3 and related discussion) proximate to the loop antenna 102.

   [0028] The system periodically performs an antenna self-test: Normally, both ends of the antenna wire are connected to the DSP Input. For self-test mode, a set of relays disconnects one end from the DSP Input and connects it to the DSP Output. The DSP outputs a 60 Hz sine wave test signal. If the antenna 102 is in working condition, the test signal will go through the antenna wire into the DSP Input. If the test signal can be detected, the test is Passed.

   [0029] System 100 may also include a micro-controller 106 in communication with the signal processor configured for interpreting the received field strength signals from the loop antenna and comparing the received field strength signals to a user-adjustable, sensitivity level. Sensitivity adjustments allow the operator to set a warning distance based on the strength of the electromagnetic field surrounding the power line. Micro-controller 106 may further be configured for generating a proximity signal based on the received field strength signal. Micro controller 106 may further be configured for graphically displaying the proximity signal on a color display, and audibly warning the operator when the proximity signal exceeds preset levels of field sensitivity.

   [0030] The micro-controller 106 may be configured to read the signal amplitude and calculates a value based on the user-adjustable sensitivity level. The reading is displayed on a color-coded display meter. The three levels displayed are:

   [0031] GREEN--Safe Zone: the equipment is operating in at a safe distance from power lines.

   [0032] YELLOW--Warning Zone: the equipment is operating closer to power lines than the set safe distance. The Warning indicator turns on and the horn emits a pulse tone, reminding the operator to back the equipment away from the power lines until it is in the Safe Zone.

   [0033] RED--Danger Zone: the equipment is dangerously close to power lines. The shutdown indicator turns on, the horn emits a solid tone, and the equipment is forced to shut down by engaging the Emergency Stop system, (e.g., emergency shutdown button 206, FIG. 2).

   [0034] System 100 may further include an input/output (I/O) module 108 in communication with the micro-controller 106. The I/O module 108 may be configured for communicating with external devices, e.g., other computers or computer peripherals for retrieving data from the system 100 or for programming system 100. Communications through the I/O module 108 may be according to any known serial or parallel synchronous or asynchronous interface standard, e.g., universal serial bus (USB). Such computer data communications interfaces are well-known to those skilled in the art and, thus, will not be further elaborated herein.

   [0035] System 100 may further include an event logger 110 in communication with the micro controller 106 for recording user interface button presses, user interface sensitivity adjustments, received field strength signals, alerts generated, alarms generated, system cable connections, power loss, errors and system status, all as a function of time. According to one embodiment, an integrated event logger is capable of generating a record of these events. These records can be accessed by any suitable computer (external device, shown at dotted box 114) installed with an appropriately coded software program, referred to herein as Voltek SystemsTM CoreTM software (not shown). The event logger 110 may include an internal date/time clock with a battery power backup to keep it running even when the system 100 is disconnected from power. Whenever such an external computer running Voltek SystemsTM CoreTM software downloads events from system 100, it automatically synchronizes the event logger 110 clock with the computer's clock.

   [0036] System 100 may further include a radio transceiver module 112 in communication with the micro-controller 106. The radio transceiver module 112 may be configured for wireless communication with external wireless devices. System 100 may further include memory 118 in communication with micro-controller 106. Memory 118 may be configured to store data from the event logger 110 or software programming code (program 120) with instructions for operating the micro-controller 106. According to one embodiment, a USB wireless adapter allows an external computer running Voltek SystemsTM CoreTM to wirelessly download events and perform other actions without having to connect a USB cable directly to system 100, however the option of doing so is available through I/O module 108.

   [0037] Figure 2 is an embodiment of a user interface 122 for use with the power line proximity sensing and warning system 100 shown in Figure 1. User interface 122 may include a power button 202 used to turn the system 100 on and off. User interface 122 may also include a wireless link button 204 for wirelessly linking the system 100 with one or more remote wireless devices. According to one embodiment, a two-way digital messaging system allows communication with remote wireless accessories over the radio transceiver module 112. User interface 122 may also include an emergency shutdown button 206 that stops the machinery from further movement. User interface 122 may also include sensitivity adjust up 208A and down 208B buttons for manually configuring the sensitivity of system 100. User interface 122 may also include a graphical display using a red-yellow-green field strength bar 210. The graphical display may further include "shutdown" and "warning" indicators that flash or illuminate, according to the illustrated embodiment.

   [0038] The Voltek Shadow TM , available from United Safety, Inc., Kalispell, Mont. (the assignee of this application) is a remote control (see Figure 3, 314) for system 100, an embodiment known as Voltek NSTM is also available from United Safety, Inc. The Voltek ShadowTM is a battery powered remote controller (see FIG. 3, 314) for system 100, also referred to herein as Voltek NSTM or the Voltek NSTM Powerline Proximity Alarm. The Voltek ShadowTM uses two-way radio communication (radio transceiver 112) to allow remote operation and view the status of the main unit while operating the equipment from outside the cab or when a spotter needs to monitor power line safety from an outside viewpoint.

   [0039] Unlike many conventional remote control devices, any The Voltek ShadowTM can be easily linked to any Voltek NS TM (system 100) without the hassle of connecting a cable, shipping the units to the manufacturer to be reprogrammed, or entering codes. Simply turn on both devices, press the link button on each device, and point the Voltek ShadowTM at the Voltek NSTM. The units instantly recognize each other and establish a radio link. This is very useful in situations where you have multiple units in charging cradles. Simple grab any one of them, take it to the equipment you will be using for that day, and link the devices together. According to one embodiment, the Voltek ShadowTM has the exact same controls as the Voltek NSTM with the addition of a "panic button" that lets a spotter either warn the operator of a hazard or shutdown the machine remotely to prevent an accident. The Voltek ShadowTM also alerts the user when radio communication has been lost or the battery is low. Voltek ShadowTM has a serial number, so each main unit can establish a link with a specific remote unit without interfering with other nearby units. A proprietary messaging system sends messages between units to communicate button presses, sensor readings, status changes, event log data, etc. The Link button 204 on user TM interface 122 of system 100 may include an Infrared LED under it. The Voltek Shadow enclosure may include an Infrared receiver under an infrared-passing window in the front of the enclosure.

   [0040] The remote unit links to the main unit like this:

   [0041] Turn on both units;

   [0042] press the Link button on each unit;

   [0043] point the remote at the main unit. The main unit transmits an ID code to the remote unit via an Infrared transmitter.

   [0044] The remote uses the ID code to establish a digital radio link with the main unit. The ID code tells the remote what "address" to send messages to when transmitting messages over the radio.

   [0045] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of an environment in which the power line proximity sensing and warning system 100 shown in Figure 1 might be used. As shown in Figure 3, a machinery 300 operated by an operator 302 may have an extended structural member, simply structure 304. System 100 once installed, includes the loop antenna 102 disposed about the surface of the structure 304, where it can sense invisible electromagnetic fields from power lines (three shown generally at arrow 306). In the configuration shown in Figure 3, the operator 302 has access to the user interface 122 of system 100, typically in the cab of the machinery. From that position, operator 302 can control the system 100 directly. Alternatively, a remote user 310 can control system 100 using a wireless remote controller 314, e.g., the Voltek ShadowTM Remote user may also be holding a wireless computer 316 running Voltek SystemsTMCoreTM software.

   [0046] Figure 4 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a method for remotely alerting an operator of machinery when an extended structure of the machinery is moved near high voltage power lines, according to the present invention.

   [0047] An upgraded feature referred to herein as "VoltsenseTM", may be added to the "Voltek NSTM" embodiment in order to form a wireless antenna sensor PWD system. Another embodiment, referred to herein as "Voltek ShadowTM"is a hand held remote for use with the general "Voltek NSTM" embodiment, with or without the "VoltsenseTM" upgrade,forspotters or operators controlling machinery remotely. Another upgrade embodiment, referred to herein as "Line Defense WLTM", replaces the wired sensor antenna of the "Voltek NSTM" embodiment with access to the load cable as a wireless sensor antenna by way of a novel connector referred to herein a "Pour Cap LinkTM". Still another upgrade embodiment, referred to herein as "Line Defense WDTM", extends the wired sensor antenna of the "Voltek NSTM" embodiment with access to the load cable as a sensor antenna by way of the "Pour Cap LinkTM connector. Yet another embodiment, referred to herein as "Voltek ScribeTM"is an upgrade for use with any of the above PWD embodiments and may also be used with other conventional PWDs as an event logger and data recorder. Finally, the "Voltek PDTM" embodiment is disclosed. The "Voltek

   PDTM"is a completely standalone PWD device for use on a single person, e.g., first responders, tree trimmers, lineman, etc.

   [0048] Voltek NS TM

   [0049] A general PWD embodiment, referred to herein as "Voltek NSTM", includes a wired antenna sensor. In its most general embodiment, the Voltek NSTM is a PWD for heavy machinery and motorized equipment that warns the operator, spotter, ground crew and by standers when the machinery is approaching active high voltage power lines. According to one embodiment, the Voltek NSTMdetects both 50 Hz and 60 Hz without re-programming or manual setting. U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/747,187 filed on Dec. 28, 2012, titled "VOLTEK NS SYSTEM", the contents of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein, discloses engineering drawings, schematics and bills of materials for a presently preferred embodiment of a power line proximity sensing and warning system, according to the present invention.

   [0050] To detect electrostatic, or electromagnetic fields, an antenna wire must be connected and placed in or near the field lines emanating from the electromagnetic field source, e.g., high voltage power lines. To ensure that the antenna wire is completely intact, the antenna is looped. Both ends are connected to a control board so that a continuity check can be performed. If there is a break in the wire, an error indicator on the control panel alerts the operator. All basic Voltek NSTM units come with the hard wire antenna. However, this embodiment is configured to be equipped with wireless capability should the owner choose to upgrade to a wireless sensor in the future.

   [0051] Voltek NSTM utilizes the most modem technologies. Digital signal processors and microprocessors ensure precise and reliable operation of the Voltek NSTM. Updatable firmware allows features and behavior to be modified on-site without changing hardware, should the need arise. According to one embodiment, the Voltek NSTM may be configured to operate on 12V or 24V power systems without any changes or need for external converter. Self-resetting circuit protection eliminates the need to replace fuses. Modem digital radio transceivers are utilized for wireless communication with various accessories.

   [0052] The Voltek NSTM is typically mounted inside the cab of the machine where the operator can interact with the system. Sensitivity adjustments allow the operator to set a warning distance based on the strength of the electrostatic field surrounding the high voltage power line. When the equipment moves inside the set distance, audible and visual alerts are activated. If the operator continues to move toward the power line, the Voltek NSTM can automatically shut down the machinery to prevent contact with the power line. A light emitting diode (LED) bar graph on the control panel indicates the detected field strength and whether the warning or auto-shutdown thresholds have been exceeded.

   [0053] All Voltek NS units come equipped with an internal "event logger/data recorder" (Voltek ScribeTMtechnology as described below). Software implementing the method embodiments of the present invention through computer instructions for execution in a microprocessor or other specialized hardware, may be provided at the point of purchase. The software may be loaded onto owner computer (e.g., Windows 7TM or newer). The computer then, by Voltek NSTM

   universal serial bus (USB) connection, downloads the stored data into the pre-loaded software program for interpretation of the owner as well as view diagnostics, error information, change options and/or upload new firmware and upgrades.

   [0054] Voltek Shadow TM

   [0055] The Voltek ShadowTMis a wireless hand held remote and alert unit providing the same adjustments and status indicators as the main unit (Voltek NSTM). The Voltek ShadowTM is synchronized with the main unit at all times. This wireless remote is useful when the operator is remotely controlling the machinery (e.g., concrete pumps, conveyors, trucks, etc.) or when a spotter needs to observe operation from a ground position.

   [0056] Voltek ShadowTMhas override capabilities to shut down the machinery before or when power line contact is eminent or the operator is maneuvering the machinery blind (cannot see the load). Voltek ShadowTM uses the latest in advanced technology available in wireless, microprocessing and re-chargeable LI battery technology.

   [0057] VoltSense TM

   [0058] The VoltSenseTM feature incorporates wireless remote sensors to the system (Voltek NSTM) in order to ensure complete coverage of the machinery without the need of a hard wire antenna. Wireless sensors can be powered by various sources and may be provided in various detecting configurations, according to embodiments of the present invention.

   [0059] Due to the nature of existing wireless antenna sensing, the sensing or detecting field is typically radial or round in shape. By addition of an external micro-antenna to the wireless sensor and continuing it to a given point, the sensing field becomes linear or elongated, thus, eliminating the need for additional sensors to cover a linear area or object such as a boom or extension as described further below in Figures 9a and 9B.

   [0060] According to one embodiment, mounting of VoltSenseTMmay be achieved by magnetic coupling to metallic structure of the machine to which it is attached. According to other embodiments, the VoltSenseTM may be mechanically mounted to the machine structure. According to one embodiment, the power source for VoltSenseTMmay be the latest lithium (LI) battery technology with solar backup and recharge options. However, any suitable power source may be used with the embodiments of the invention described herein.

   [0061] To establish a wireless link between the main unit (Voltek NSTM) and the wireless remote units and sensors, a link cable is connected between the units. Once the link has been established and the units synchronized, the cable is unplugged and the devices will communicate with each other within their own wireless network without interference from other nearby Voltek NSTM systems. If any associated device loses its communication link, an error indicator will alert the operator at the Voltek NSTM and Volt ShadowTMcontrol panels.

   [0062] Line Defense WL T M

   [0063] The Line Defense WLTM is a wireless load line sensor. Again, utilizing the same wireless technology as with Voltek NSTM, Voltek ShadowTM and VoltSenseTM, this wireless utility is the first of its kind in the world. Never before has any PWD manufacturer been able to protect the load line of a crane or mobile machinery. By attaching a proprietary connection (referred to herein as Pour Cap LinkTM and discussed further below), wireless sensor, microprocessor and additional hardware to either end of the load line (lifting cable) of a crane, the sensor utilizes the load line as an extension of itself though that connection by unconventional (never realized) means. Thus the cable not only is protected but becomes part of the sensor itself. Line Defense WLTM is powered by the latest in LI technology and solar back-up and re-charge.

   [0064] Line Defense WD T M

   [0065] The Line Defense WDTM is a wired load line sensor. Line Defense WDTM is a method of load line protection that is directly attached to the cable/load line through the Pour Cap LinkTM connection at either end of the cable/load line of a crane with the Voltek NSTM hard wire antenna. Before now, the load line has been considered a single strand conductor (wire) due to way a cable is made. Therefore, a loop cannot be obtained to complete the continuity of the antenna. The inventors have designed a connection (Pour Cap LinkTM) that allows Voltek NSTM system to utilize the cable/load line as an extension of the sensor/antenna. Line Defense WD is a method of sensing the electrostatic field through the load line/cable powered by the main unit Voltek NS TM .

   [0066] Voltek Scribe

   [0067] The Voltek ScribeTM is an event logger and data recorder. The Voltek ScribeTM utilizes the same technology as described above and utilized internally within Voltek NSTM. The Voltek ScribeTM may be used to time and date stamp the events of any PWD. The Voltek ScribeTM comes with software for Microsoft Windows XPTM and is compatible with newer versions of operating systems and computers/laptops. According to one embodiment, the Voltek ScribeTM may be configured to store up to 3500 events. The Voltek ScribeTM may be configured to download events, view diagnostics, change options and upload new firmware to computer though an external USB port. The Voltek ScribeTM may be powered by direct connection to the battery of the machine to which it is attached or installed.

   TM

   [0068] Voltek PD

   [0069] The Voltek PDTM is smaller personally worn power line sensing and warning device. The Voltek PDTM may be thought of as a condensed version of the Voltek NSTM. The Voltek PDTM may be worn on the body with various carry or attachment options (clip, pouch, etc.). The Voltek PDTM may be configured with all the same features (with exception of "event logger") as Voltek NS TM with the freedom of Voltek Shadow TM . The Voltek PD T M may be configured with the following features: compact (2 way radio size), audio alert, LED warning and function indicators, back-lit control panel (for night/dark conditions), waterproof, impact resistant , re chargeable LI battery technology with charging cradle.

   [0070] Pour Cap Link TM

   [0071] The Pour Cap LinkTM is a novel connector that is monolithically attached to the end of the machine load cable. Once the Pour Cap LinkTM is attached to the load line cable, either one of the Line Defense WLTM or the Line Defense WDTM can then be attached to the Pour Cap LinkTM in order to utilize the load cable as part of the system sensor. Pour Cap LinkTM is a "hyper-link" that magnifies or amplifies the system sensor at the load cable end. The Pour Cap LinkTM is unique in that it amplifies the signal and makes a single wire/conductor (the load cable) into a closed loop sensing system.

   [0072] Referring now to Figures 5-11, embodiments and features of a wireless power line sensing device 500 are illustrated. In one embodiment, the sensing device 500 is configured to detect 50-60Hz AC power lines with an integral antenna or optional external, initially separate loop antenna and sends sensor readings to a remote device, such as the user interface 122 (also referred to as a base unit or master device) and/or with the remote controller 314, through two way digital radio communication. The remote device can communicate with multiple ones of the sensing devices 500 at the same time via radio communication. As described above, the remote device takes into account the sensitivity level (for example set by the operator) and calculates the alert level based on the maximum sensor reading from all of the connected remote sensing devices 500 as well as possibly the remote device's own integral sensor.

   [0073] The various embodiments and features of the wireless power line sensing device 500 described with respect to Figures 5-11 can be used individually or in any combination with one another, and can be used individually or in any combination with any of the embodiments described above and illustrated in Figures 1-4. In one embodiment, the wireless power line sensing device 500 can be used together with the user interface 122 (also referred to as a base unit) and/or with the remote controller 314 to form a wireless power line warning system. The sensing device 500 is designed to be mounted to a boom structure of a machine, such as an excavator, crane, concrete pump, or the like, to detect proximity to a power line and remotely send signals to a remote location, for example to the user interface 122 (also referred to as a base unit) and/or to the remote controller 314.

   [0074] Although the sensing device 500 is described herein for sake of convenience as being configured for power line sensing, the sensing device 500, and the embodiments and features thereof, can be used in other types of sensing devices as well.

   [0075] With reference to Figures 5A-C, the sensing device 500 includes a housing 502 having a base 504, a top wall 506, a first end 508, and a second end 510. The housing 502 houses various electronic components of the sensing device 500. The housing 502 and its individual elements can be made of any suitable material including plastic and/or metal. The base 504 includes a generally planar base plate 512 and a pair of opposite side walls 514a, 514b that extend upwardly from the base plate 512 at first and second sides, respectively, thereof. The top wall 506 includes a first edge 516a connected to the side wall 514a and extending upwardly from the base plate 512, and a second edge 516b connected to the side wall 514b and extending upwardly from the base plate 512. The portions of the top wall 506 facing the side walls 514a, 514b, including the edges 516a, 516b, are generally straight, i.e. linear or not curved. The remaining portion of the top wall 506 between the upper edges of the side walls 514a, 514b is generally continuously curved or upwardly convex so that the majority of the upper portion of the housing 502 is curved upwardly. The ends 508, 510 comprise plates that are secured to the base 504 and to the top wall 506 to close the ends of the housing 502. Preferably the housing 502 is sealed so that it is watertight and contaminant tight to prevent ingress of water and other contaminants into the interior of the housing 502.

   [0076] A solar panel 520 is secured to the top wall so as to follow the curvature of the top wall 506 from the side wall 514a to the side wall 514b. The solar panel 520 is adhered or otherwise secured to the top wall 506, and includes a first edge that is disposed between the side wall 514a and the top wall 506 so that the first edge is connected to the base 504, and a second edge that is disposed between the side wall 514b and the top wall 506 so that the second edge is connected to the base 504. In addition, since the solar panel 506 follows the curvature of the top wall 506, the solar panel is generally continuously curved or upwardly convex from the first edge to the second edge so that the majority or all of the solar panel is curved.

   [0077] In use, the solar panel 520 is used to electrically recharge one or more rechargeable energy storage devices of the sensing device 500 as discussed further below. The solar panel 520 forms the majority of the upper surface of the device 500 to help maximize exposure to sunlight for electricity generation. In addition, as shown in Figures 6A-G, the curved shape of the solar panel 520 permits solar input over a wide range of angles, providing power over a longer period of time compared to if the solar panel were simply flat. Figures 6A-G schematically depict a sequence of angles between the sun and the solar panel 520 over the course of a day, with Figure 6A showing morning and Figure 6G showing late in the day. The curved solar panel 520 is continuously exposed to sunlight over the course of the day, thereby maximizing exposure to the sunlight. In one embodiment, the solar panel 520 can capture direct sunlight over a range of approximately 225 degrees.

   [0078] The sensing device 500 also includes a suitable communication antenna (not shown) that is used for sending and receiving radio frequency communications, for example with the user interface 122 and/or with the remote controller 314 described previously. Further details on the radio frequency communications of the sensing device 500 is described below.

   [0079] Returning to Figures 5A-C, the first end 508 is illustrated as including a loop antenna 522 for sensing the electromagnetic field generated by the power lines, similar to the loop antenna 102 described above. The loop antenna 522 is integral to the sensing device 500 so that the antenna 522 is intended to be an integral part of the sensing device 500 and travel with the sensing device 500 and the antenna 522 is not intended to be easily removable from the sensing device 500. In the illustrated example, the loop antenna 522 is shown as extending longitudinally from the first end 508 of the housing 502. However, the ends of the loop antenna 522 are connected to the sensing electronics inside the housing 502.

   [0080] The first end 508 further includes an external charge port 524 that is electrically connected to the rechargeable power source discussed below for externally charging the power source through the charge port 524 separately from the solar panel 520. A plug of a recharging device can plug into the charge port 524 to conduct recharging. The port 524 includes a power pin that is two-way: power can go in (from the external charger or auxiliary power system 542 described below to the ultracapacitor 540 described below), or out (from the solar panel 520 to the auxiliary power system 542 described below). In one embodiment, the auxiliary power system 542 described below does not draw current from the ultracapacitor 540, but only draws current from the solar panel 520. When not in use, the charge port 524 can be closed via a suitable cap or closure device. The first end 508 also includes an external antenna port 526 that permits connection of an external loop antenna to the sensing device 500 as discussed further below. When not in use, the antenna port 526 can be closed via a suitable cap or closure device.

   [0081] With continued reference to Figures 5A-C, the second end 510 includes an indicator light 528 that indicates a power level of the power source in the housing 502 and a status of any linking of the sensing device 500 to an external device, such as the user interface 122 and/or the remote controller 314. An optional carrying handle 530 can be formed on one of the ends 508, 510, for example the end 510, to aid a user in carrying the sensing device 500. In some embodiments, the handle 530 can also be used to help secured the sensing device 500 to the structure it is being attached to.

   [0082] Figure 5C shows that the base 502 can include a power button 532 that turns the sensing device 500 on and off, a status button 534 that can change color to indicate a status of the sensing device 500, and a charge indicator 536 that indicates a charge level of the power source of the sensing device 500. In addition, the base 502 can include at least one magnet 538 fixed thereto that can be used to attach the sensing device 500 to a metallic structure such as a boom arm. Other forms of attaching the sensing device 500 to a structure can be used instead of magnets, especially when the structure the sensing device 500 is to be attached to is not metallic.

   [0083] As discussed above, the sensing device 500 includes a suitable rechargeable power source disposed within the housing 502. In one embodiment as illustrated in Figure 7, the rechargeable power source can be one or more ultracapacitors 540. In another embodiment, the sensing device 500 can also include an auxiliary power system 542, such as one or more rechargeable batteries, additional ultracapacitor(s), or solar panel(s), as a back-up power source to the ultracapacitor 540. In still another embodiment, the sensing device 500 can include one or more rechargeable batteries as a sole power source without an ultracapacitor 540. An ultracapacitor (sometimes referred to as a supercapacitor) is defined herein as a high-capacity electrochemical capacitor with high capacitance values or devices with similar performance. An example of a suitable ultracapacitor is the Model RSCZR7308LR, 2.7 V, 300F ultracapacitor available from Ioxus, Inc. of Oneonta, New York. The use of the ultracapacitor 540 provides a number of advantages, such as it can be recharged in low temperature environments, it can withstand a large number of charge cycles, and it can be charged more quickly than a rechargeable battery.

   [0084] The ultracapacitor 540 and/or the auxiliary power system 542 are part of a power control system 550 illustrated in Figure 7. The ultracapacitor 540 is charged by the solar panel 520. A high-efficiency switching charger 544 with maximum power point tracking maximizes the amount of energy extracted from the solar panel 520 to charge the ultracapacitor 540. In addition, a high current external power supply 546 can be connected to the charge port 524 to quickly charge the ultracapacitor 540 via a fast charge circuit 548. The fast charge circuit 548 is a current-limited voltage regulator circuit that can charge the ultracapacitor 540 with high current (for example, 3-5 Amps or more), eventually reducing to a trickle current as a maximum voltage is reached. The high current external power supply 546 (for example, an AC to DC adapter or a cigarette lighter adapter) can plug into the charge port 524 to power the fast charge circuit 548. Also, in one embodiment, the charge port 524 can have 2 data pins to communicate with external power systems. Therefore, it is also possible to connect an external battery pack, extra solar panel and ultracapacitor, etc. The data pins of the charge port 524 allow the external charger or the auxiliary power system 542 to communicate with the main processor 552 described below to enable or disable charging (or receiving a charge) as necessary. The data pins can also be used to update the firmware of the main processor 552.

   [0085] A high-efficiency switching buck/boost voltage regulator 550 maximizes the amount of energy that can be extracted from the ultracapacitor 540 as the voltage drops linearly when being discharged. The main processor 552 that includes a micro-processor, EEPROM and firmware, controls the sensing device 500 and is monitored by a watchdog and brownout detector 554 that resets the main processor 552 in the event of a firmware lockup. If the main processor 552 is not running (such as during boot-up, a brownout condition, firmware error, or hardware malfunction), the indicator light 528 illuminates to indicate an "offline" condition. While the main processor 552 is running, the indicator light 528 is off.

   [0086] The main processor 552 monitors power system status including solar panel 520 input voltage and current, ultracapacitor 540 voltage and charge/discharge current via a voltage monitor 556, main voltage regulator 550 voltage and current, external charging status, and ambient temperature via an ambient or external temperature monitor 558. The firmware running on the main processor 552 can use this data for power-conserving and diagnostic features. The main processor 552 can turn power on and off for subsystems 560 via a subsystems power control 562 to conserve power. The subsystems 560 can be circuits that the main processor 552 can communicate with through digital IO. Examples of subsystems 560 can include, but are not limited to, the power line sensing control scheme illustrated in Figure 10, voltage or current or temperature monitors, radio communications, serial communications, infrared receivers, and

   LED controllers. The subsystems power control 562 provides the ability to control power consumption of each subsystem. Depending on the design of each subsystem, this could include, but is not limited to, controlling MOSFETs to turn power on or off for each subsystem, or putting subsystems to sleep via sleep control pins.

   [0087] The ultracapacitor 540 is put under increasing stress as the charge voltage and temperature increases, which can greatly reduce the lifespan of the ultracapacitor 540. To prolong the lifespan of the ultracapacitor 540, the main processor 552 can determine the maximum allowed voltage as the temperature increases, and can disable charging via charge cutoff logic 564 if the ultracapacitor 540 voltage exceeds the calculated maximum allowed voltage.

   [0088] The "status" button 534 on the bottom of the sensing device 500, when pressed, causes the charge indicator 536, which in one embodiment can be an LED bar graph, to indicate the approximate charge level of the ultracapacitor 540 for a period of time, for example a few seconds. If the external power supply 546 is connected via the charge port 524, the charge indicator 536 turns on automatically to display charging progress.

   [0089] As indicated above, the sensing device 500 communicates with an external master device 570, such as the user interface 122 and/or the remote controller 314, through digital two-way radio communication, which in one embodiment is configured before operation of the sensing device 500. Figure 8 illustrates an example of a linking scheme for linking the sensing device 500 with the master device 570 to configure the sensing device 500. As illustrated in Figure 8, the sensing device 500 includes a wireless communication mechanism 572, such as a radio frequency (RF) transceiver, and an infrared receiver 574. The status button 534 on the sensing device 500 also forms a "link" button that is used to initiate communication configuration of the sensing device 500. The master device 570 also includes wireless communication mechanism 576, such as an RF transceiver, an infrared transmitter 578, and a "link" button 580.

   [0090] Configuration of the RF communication between the sensing device 500 and the master device 570 is accomplished by putting the master device 570 and the sensing device 500 into

   "linking mode" by pressing the "link" buttons 534, 580 on both devices, then orienting the sensing device 500 and the master device 570 relative to one another in such a position that the infrared receiver 574 can read configuration data from the master device's 570 infrared transmitter 578. Link configuration firmware 582 is the part of the firmware that handles the infrared linking process and radio transceiver configuration. Link configuration data includes, but is not limited to, a network ID, the master device's 570 address, and the sensing device's 500 address. During the linking process, this data is stored in the EERPOM and used to send configuration commands to the radio transceiver module. This data originates from the master device 570. Once the sensing device 500 receives the configuration data, the sensing device 500 begins communicating with the master device 570, for example by two-way RF communications using the RF transceivers 572, 576. The two-way communication allows the master device 570 and the remote device 500 to communicate status, commands, error codes, or other data. Also, once the sensing device 500 begins communicating with the master device 570 via the communication mechanism 572, the master device 570 obtains the serial number of the newly linked sensing device 500 for logging purposes.

   [0091] With reference now to Figures 9A, 9B and 10 together with Figure 3, the operation of the sensing device 500 configured as a power line sensing device is explained. The sensing device 500 is configured to detect electromagnetic fields around AC power lines, and transmit sensor readings to the master device 570 via RF or other wireless communication technology. One or more of the sensing devices 500 are mounted at a suitable location(s) on an extendable boom 590 of a machine 592 such as an excavator, crane, concrete pump, cherry picker, or the like. In one embodiment, a single sensing device 500 can be mounted to the boom 590. In another embodiment, a plurality of the sensing devices 500 can be mounted to the boom 590 at spaced locations along the length to form a sensing field 594 along the majority of the length thereof as illustrated in Figure 9A. In still another embodiment, a single sensing device 500 can be mounted to the boom 590, and an external loop antenna 596 can be connected to the sensing device 500 and arranged along the remaining length of the boom 590 to extend the coverage of the sensing device 500, to form the sensing field 594 along the majority of the length of the boom 590 as illustrated in Figure 9B.

   [0092] With reference to Figure 10, a sensing control scheme of the sensing device 500 is illustrated. The sensing device 500 includes the integral loop antenna 522. In addition, the external loop antenna 596 can optionally be used with the sensing device 500 by plugging the external loop antenna into the external antenna port 526. When the sensing device 500 is first turned on, it tests for the presence of the external loop antenna 596. If found, the external loop antenna 596 is used and the integral loop antenna 522 is temporarily disabled. If the external loop antenna 596 is not found, the integral loop antenna 522 is used. Whichever antenna 522, 596 is currently in use, it is tested periodically. Test signal generators 602, 604, one for the integral loop antenna 522 and one for the external loop antenna 596, send either a test signal through the integral loop antenna 522 (using the test signal generator 602) if the external loop antenna 596 is not connected or sends an external test signal 604 through the external loop antenna 596 (using the external test signal generator) if the external loop antenna is connected. In one embodiment, each test signal generator 602, 604 can include a software (micro-controller) square wave frequency generator whose output is connected to a simple capacitor/resistor circuit that conditions the signal to approximate a sine wave. The frequency can be changed to test both passing and blocking of various frequencies. The main processor 552 verifies that the entire sensor signal path is functional. If the test fails, an error code 608 is transmitted by the sensing device 500 to the master device 570 and tests can be performed continuously until the test passes, then the sensing device 500 will resume normal operation again. Once the external antenna 596 is in use, if it is removed without rebooting the sensing device 500, an antenna failure is assumed. To resume operation with the integral loop antenna 522, the sensing device 500 must be rebooted after disconnecting the external antenna 596.

   [0093] The sensing control scheme in Figure 10 also includes a bandpass filter 610 that requires no calibration and is not greatly affected by temperature which ensures accurate filtering of unwanted frequencies. In one embodiment, the bandpass filter 610 can be configured for 45Hz Hz so that it is equally sensitive to U.S. or international power lines without modification. However, configuration of the bandpass filter 610 for other frequencies is possible. An amplifier 612 with digitally-controlled gain automatically reduces gain if the signal is strong enough to cause clipping. An accurate RMS-to-voltage converter 614 read by an analog to digital converter (ADC) 616 obtains an accurate power measurement of the incoming signal. The main processor

   552 processes the ADC samples and calculates a final sensor reading by applying an expansion/compression/limiting curve and an averaging algorithm 618, which is calibrated to have desired dynamic behavior.

   [0094] The sensing device 500 then transmits an output 620 to the master device 570 that is indicative of the strength of the electromagnetic field detected by the sensing device 500. As described above with respect to Figures 1-4, the sensitivity level 622 of the master device 570 can be adjusted. Antenna selection and testing logic 623 is the part of the firmware that monitors sensing device 500 output and calculated alert level and decides when to perform a test or detect the presence of the external antenna 596. The logic 623 controls an antenna switch 624 and the software frequency generators for the test signals by the test signal generators 602, 604. The logic 623 can also output a status/error code, which is sent to the master device 570 along with an output value of the sensing device. The antenna switch 624 can be an analog SPDT switch controlled by the micro-controller that selects one of two inputs (i.e. the input from the integral loop antenna 522 or the input from the external loop antenna 596) to be output to the rest of the sensing device circuit. A transient voltage protection circuit 625, such as a diode array, can also be provided to protect the circuit in Figure 10 from electrostatic discharge.

   [0095] Returning to Figures 9A and 9B, when using the integral loop antenna 522, the individual sensing field 594 generated by the antenna 522 is generally in the shape of a sphere. This shape of the sensing field 594 is believed to be adequate for some smaller equipment permitting a single one of the sensing devices 500 to be used. However, in certain applications, such as on cranes or concrete pumps with long and/or extendable boom sections, a plurality of the sensing devices 500 may be necessary to achieve adequate coverage of the boom 590. Figure 9A illustrates a plurality of the sensing devices 500 along the boom 590, with the individual sensing fields of each sensing device 500 creating recesses 630 in the overall sensing field 594 due to the spherical shape of each sensing field. The recesses 630 may allow parts of the boom 590 to get closer to power lines than intended without triggering a warning or shutdown. In addition, if the sensing devices 500 are spaced too far apart from one another on the boom 590, the recesses 630 become larger and more pronounced and, if spaced far enough apart, gaps in the overall sensing field 594 can be created thereby leaving portions of the boom 590 uncovered by the sensing devices 500 and exposed to possible contact with the power lines. The use of multiple sensing device 500 also increases costs by requiring the user to purchase and maintain the multiple sensing devices 500.

   [0096] However, the ability to plug in the external loop antenna 596 to the sensing device 500 alleviates the above-noted concerns regarding multiple sensing devices 500. As illustrated in Figure 9B, the external loop antenna 596 can be attached to the sensing device 500 which disables the integral loop antenna 522. The external loop antenna 596 can be run linearly along the entire length of the boom 590 or just along a boom section. By extending the external loop antenna 596 linearly along the boom 590, a more consistent sensing field 594 is generated around the boom 590 without the recesses 630. In addition, use of the external loop antenna 596 reduces the number of sensing devices 500 that need to be purchased and maintained.

   [0097] In power line sensing applications where the sensing device 500 is mounted on the boom 590, the sensing device 500 is not easily or readily accessible. In addition, all power for operating the sensing device 500 comes from its internal power supply such as the ultracapacitor 540. Therefore, power should be conserved as much as possible.

   [0098] Figure 11 illustrates an example of a power control scheme that can be implemented to conserve power use by the sensing device 500. In Figure 11, solar panel current going from the solar panel 520 into the ultracapacitor charger 544 is monitored by a monitor 632, solar panel voltage monitored by a monitor 634, ultracapacitor current going into (positive value) or out of (negative value) the ultracapacitor 540 monitored by a monitor 636, and ultracapacitor voltage monitored by the monitor 556 are used to determine how important it is to conserve power. A calculated alert level circuit 638 and a master device awake status circuit 640 determine when power needs to be used to perform a function. The solar panel voltage monitor 634 indicates if the solar panel 520 is receiving too little, enough, or an excess amount of sunlight, and is affected by how much current is going into the ultracapacitor 540. The fuller the ultracapacitor 540 gets, the less current is accepted and the higher the solar panel voltage may climb in direct sunlight. The ultracapacitor current monitor 636 indicates whether or not the solar panel 520 is able to provide enough current to overcome demand current and charge the ultracapacitor 540.

   The ultracapacitor voltage monitor 556 provides a fairly accurate representation of how fully charged the ultracapacitor 540 is. Power saving logic 642 considers these inputs to maximize charging rate or reduce discharging rate whenever possible while providing quick sensor response time whenever necessary.

   [0099] The control scheme provides the sensing device 500 with an active mode and a standby mode via active/standby logic 644. In active mode, the sensing device 500 is active and the sensing device 500 can communicate with the master device 570. If the master device 570 stops communicating with the sensing device 500 after a timeout period, the sensing device 500 turns off the power line sensor circuit shown in Figure 10 via on/off logic 646 and goes into a low power state. In this state, the RF transceiver 572 is monitored much less frequently than when in active mode. If the master device 570 tries to communicate again, the sensing device 500 will return to active mode again. In addition, radio communications on/off logic 650 can turn on/off the RF transceiver 572, for example corresponding to when the sensing device 500 is turned on/off by the on/off logic 646.

   [0100] The control scheme can also include radio communication wake/sleep timing logic 652. The logic 652 can place the radio communications of the sensing device 500 in a wake or sleep mode. The sensing device 500 can sleep to minimize power consumption, be woken up periodically to transmit and/or receive data, and then be put back into sleep mode. With the logic 652, the RF transceiver 572 sleeps between communication cycles. The interval between these communication cycles is determined by the ultracapacitor and solar panel voltage/current, and what "alert level" the system is in. To determine the alert level, the sensing device 500 predicts what the master device 570 would display on the "field strength bar" 210 (see Figure 2) by plugging the current sensor output 620 into the same formula the master device 570 uses to calculate the field strength. This alert level calculation only affects power saving logic. It does not affect what sensor reading is transmitted to the master device 570. To additionally save power, the control scheme can also include processor clock speed control logic 654. The logic 654 can change the clock speed of the main processor 552 to minimize power consumption.

   [0101] The master device 570 takes the values from all linked sensing devices 500 and, in some embodiments, its own integral sensor and compares them to find the maximum value. This maximum value and the current sensitivity level go into a formula to calculate the final field strength value, which is displayed on the field strength bar 210. The antenna selection and testing logic 623 needs to know when it is safe to perform an antenna test. If a test is performed while the equipment is near a power line, it would interrupt the ability to detect the power line. Similarly, the power saving logic 642 needs to know when response time is a high priority (operating near a power line) versus a low priority (far away from a power line) in order to conserve power whenever possible.

   [0102] Returning to Figure 10, the sensing device 500 needs to know how close it is to a power line, or in other words, it needs to know if it is currently in the green, yellow, or red zone. There is no way to determine the remote sensor's distance from the power line by the sensor output 620 itself, because it only represents field strength, which varies greatly with different power line voltages, antenna configurations, etc. For example, in one situation, a measured field strength could represent 10 feet from a power line, while in another situation that same measured field strength could mean 100 feet from a power line.

   [0103] So the circuit in Figure 10 includes calculated alert level logic 648. Periodically, the master device 570 transmits its current sensitivity level to the sensing device 500. The sensing device 500 then predicts what the master device 570 would display on the field strength bar 210 based on its current sensor output value 620 and master device sensitivity level 622. This predicted value is referred to as the "alert level". If the alert level is below a certain value (bottom of the green zone), a test may be performed. The higher the alert level (for example, the top of the green zone, or in the yellow or red zone), the more frequently the sensing device 500 transmits sensor values to the master device 570. If there are multiple sensing devices 500 on a long boom arm of a large machine, the sensing devices 500 further away from power lines will be "quiet" most of the time so that sensing devices 500 closest to the power lines will be able to transmit more frequently with less interference.

   [0104] If the calculation predicts the field strength bar 210 would be near the top of the green (safe), in the yellow (warning), or red (shutdown) zone, then the sensing device 500 is placed in a high alert level, meaning that response time takes priority over power conservation, so the sensing device 500 will transmit every time the sensor reading changes at all, or on a predetermined timer interval if the sensor reading of the sensing device 500 does not change. If the calculation predicts the field strength bar 210 would be below the top of the green (safe) zone, then the sensing device is placed in a low alert level, meaning that power conservation takes priority over response time, so the sensing device 500 will transmit sensor readings only if the sensor reading changes more than a predetermined amount or on a longer predetermined timer interval. If the alert level is near or at the bottom of the green (safe) zone, a sensor self-test may be performed periodically.

   [0105] The examples disclosed in this application are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not limitative. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description; and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.

   1. A wireless power line sensing device, comprising: a housing having a base, a first end, and a second end; a power source disposed in the housing; a controller in the housing that is connected to the power source and is powered thereby; an integral loop antenna that senses an electromagnetic field generated by a power line, the integral loop antenna is connected to the controller; a wireless communication mechanism in the housing and connected to the controller, the wireless communication mechanism is electrically connected to the power source so as to be electrically powered thereby; an external antenna port on the housing, the external antenna port is electrically connected to the controller and permits connection of an external loop antenna to the housing; and an external loop antenna connected to the external antenna port, the external loop antenna senses the electromagnetic field generated by a power line, the external loop antenna is substantially linear so that in use the external loop antenna extends longitudinally over a length of a structure to which it is attached to define a non-spherical electromagnetic sensing field.

   2. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, wherein the power source comprises an ultracapacitor.

   3. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, wherein the wireless communication mechanism comprises a radio frequency transceiver.

   4. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, wherein the power source is a rechargeable power source, and further comprising a solar panel mounted on an exterior of the housing and electrically connected to the power source to electrically charge the power source.

   5. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, further comprising at least one magnet fixed to the base of the housing that attaches the housing to a metallic structure.

   6. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, further comprising a charge indicator on the base of the housing that indicates a charge level of the power source.

   7. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, further comprising at least one indicator light on the first end or the second end of the housing.

   8. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, further comprising a power button on the base of the housing that turns the wireless power line sensing device on and off, and a status button on the base of the housing that can change color to indicate a status of the wireless power line sensing device.

   9. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, wherein the controller disables the integral loop antenna.

   10. The wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, wherein the base of the housing is substantially flat, and the housing further includes a top wall extending from the base, at least a portion of the top wall is curved.

   11. A wireless power line warning system, comprising: the wireless power line sensing device of claim 3; and a base unit that includes a radio frequency transceiver that can communicate with the radio frequency transceiver of the wireless power line sensing device.

   12. The wireless power line warning system of claim 11, further comprising a remote control unit that interfaces with the wireless power line sensing device and with the base unit.

   13. The wireless power line warning system of claim 12, wherein the remote control unit determines an alert level based on a current sensor output value transmitted by the wireless power line sensing device and a current sensitivity level, and the remote control unit automatically shuts down a machine to which the wireless power line sensing device is attached when the alert level exceeds an auto-shutdown threshold.

   14. A wireless power line sensing device of claim 1, wherein the integral loop antenna extends from and outside of the housing.

   EDITORIAL NOTE

   2015207855 2015207855

   - There are 13 pages of Drawings which are not page numbered