AU2007276712B2 - Antifouling coating - Google Patents

Antifouling coating Download PDF

Info

Publication number
AU2007276712B2
AU2007276712B2 AU2007276712A AU2007276712A AU2007276712B2 AU 2007276712 B2 AU2007276712 B2 AU 2007276712B2 AU 2007276712 A AU2007276712 A AU 2007276712A AU 2007276712 A AU2007276712 A AU 2007276712A AU 2007276712 B2 AU2007276712 B2 AU 2007276712B2
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
coating
constituents
fouling
roughness
substance
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
AU2007276712A
Other versions
AU2007276712A1 (en
Inventor
Anisul Afsar
Timothy Charlton
Peter David Steinberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from AU2006903921A external-priority patent/AU2006903921A0/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of AU2007276712A1 publication Critical patent/AU2007276712A1/en
Assigned to CHARLTON, TIMOTHY, AFSAR, ANISUL, STEINBERG, PETER reassignment CHARLTON, TIMOTHY Request for Assignment Assignors: NEWSOUTH INNOVATIONS PTY LIMITED
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2007276712B2 publication Critical patent/AU2007276712B2/en
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09DCOATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERIALS THEREFOR
    • C09D5/00Coating compositions, e.g. paints, varnishes or lacquers, characterised by their physical nature or the effects produced; Filling pastes
    • C09D5/16Antifouling paints; Underwater paints
    • C09D5/1606Antifouling paints; Underwater paints characterised by the anti-fouling agent
    • C09D5/1637Macromolecular compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09JADHESIVES; NON-MECHANICAL ASPECTS OF ADHESIVE PROCESSES IN GENERAL; ADHESIVE PROCESSES NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE; USE OF MATERIALS AS ADHESIVES
    • C09J191/00Adhesives based on oils, fats or waxes; Adhesives based on derivatives thereof
    • C09J191/06Waxes
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L2205/00Polymer mixtures characterised by other features
    • C08L2205/02Polymer mixtures characterised by other features containing two or more polymers of the same C08L -group
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L2666/00Composition of polymers characterized by a further compound in the blend, being organic macromolecular compounds, natural resins, waxes or and bituminous materials, non-macromolecular organic substances, inorganic substances or characterized by their function in the composition
    • C08L2666/02Organic macromolecular compounds, natural resins, waxes or and bituminous materials
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L91/00Compositions of oils, fats or waxes; Compositions of derivatives thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08LCOMPOSITIONS OF MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS
    • C08L91/00Compositions of oils, fats or waxes; Compositions of derivatives thereof
    • C08L91/06Waxes

Abstract

Disclosed herein is a method for treating a surface to inhibit fouling of the surface. The method comprises the steps of forming a coating on the surface and exposing the coating to conditions whereby the surface topography of the coating changes to a surface topography that inhibits the fouling of the surface. Also disclosed are antifouling compositions.

Description

WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 ANTIFOULING COATING TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to methods for treating a 5 surface to inhibit fouling of the surface, for example, by aquatic organisms. The invention also relates to antifouling and self-cleaning coating compositions. BACKGROUND ART 10 Many industries suffer from problems associated with the fouling of surfaces. For example, in the maritime industry, when artificial surfaces (such as ships' hulls, aquaculture cages or pens, wharf pilings, filters, cooling pipes, etc.) are exposed to seawater, they are rapidly 15 colonised ("fouled") by marine organisms. Such fouling can result in substantial costs to the maritime industry, for example, because of loss of hydrodynamic efficiency of ships resulting in increased fuel costs, blockage of flow of water in pipes, anhd c6rroali6n. Similarly, in aquatic 20 (freshwater) environments, fouling on boats, water pipes, wharves, and infrastructure generally is a major problem. Microbial fouling on the walls of buildings can also cause major damage to structures. 25 A common way of combating fouling is to coat surfaces with antifouling coatings such as paints that release a toxin or inhibitor which kills fouling organisms as they settle on the surface, or soon after. However, many of these coatings are very toxic and have undesirable environmental 30 effects. Another way of combating fouling is to coat surfaces with "non-stick" coatings-based on~silicone elastomers, which reduce the ability of fouling drganisms to initially stick 35 to a surface and, if attached, prevent strong attachment. In the maritime industry, such coatings are primarily suited for ships or other surfaces which are exposed to fast flowing water, for example, vessels which spend relatively little time in port and operate at speeds of greater than 15 knots. These coatings are therefore not suitable for use in many contexts, for example, on stationary underwater structures, aquaculture, and most recreational and coastal commercial vessels. DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method of forming an anti-fouling coating on a surface, the method comprising the steps of applying a pair of constituents to said surface such that exposure of said coating to water causes differential degradation thereof such that a first constituent degrades to have a nano scale roughness from I nm to I 000nm and said second constituent degrades to have a micro-scale roughness of between I im to 1000 pm. According to a second aspect of the invention there is provided a method of forming an antifouling coating on a surface, the method comprising the steps of: forming a coating on said surface wherein said coating includes a pair of constituents comprising a polymetric substance having two or more phases; and exposing said coating to water such that said pair of constituents differentially degrade wherein one constituent degrades to have a nano-scale roughness from 1 nm to I 000nm and said other constituent degrades to have a micro-scale roughness of between 1 pm to 1000 rm. According to a third aspect of the invention there is provided a method of forming an antifouling coating on a surface, the method comprising the steps of: forming a coating on said surface wherein said coating includes a pair of constituents comprising a polymetric substance having two or more phases; and exposing said coating to water such a differentially degradation of said constituents undergoes a change in the surface topography of the coating is caused by the preferential biodegradation of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase degrade wherein one constituent degrades to have a nano-scale roughness from 1 nm to 1 000nm and said other constituent degrades to have a micro-scale roughness of between I ptm to 1000 pm. 5301A According to a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided a method for inhibiting the fouling of a surface by aquatic organisms, the method comprising the step of forming a coating on the surface, the coating comprising a polymeric substance having an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase, wherein, after immersion in water, the surface of the coating is caused to differentially degrade in response to microbacteria inhibiting settlement a growth of macro-fouling organisms thereon changes to form a coating that inhibits fouling by aquatic organisms. According to a fifth aspect of the invention there is provided an antifouling surface coating composition including a pair of constituents comprising a polyimetric substance having or configured to have two or more phases, such that upon immersion in water said coating is configured to degrade differentially such that a first phase degrades to have a nanoscale roughness from 1 nm to 1000 nm and said other phase degrades to have a microscale roughness between 1 pim in 1000 jim. According to another aspect of the invention there is provided an antifouling surface coating composition including two or more constituents such that two of said constituents are different substances or different phases of the same substance, such that upon immersion in water said coating is configured to degrade differentially such that a first constituent substance or phase degrades to have a first roughness and said second constituent substance or phase degrades to have a second roughness wherein said first roughness is between 10 to 1000 times less than said second roughness. In the context of the present invention, the term "fouling" refers to the attachment of biological organisms (e.g. aquatic organisms) or organic or inorganic materials (e.g. dirt or grease) to a surface. The phrase "inhibit fouling of the surface", and the like, refers to inhibiting .the attachment of biological organisms or organic or inorganic materials to the surface. This encompasses both 'inhibiting biological organisms or organic or inorganic materials from becoming attached to the surface, as well as inhibiting or 5301A reducing the adherence of any biological organisms or organic or inorganic materials that do become attached to the surface. By inhibiting or reducing the adherence of biological organisms or organic or inorganic materials to the surface, any biological organisms or organic or inorganic materials attached to the surface are relatively easily removed (this is referred to as a foul release effect). For example, the coating may comprise a polymeric substance having an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase). In such preferred embodiments, the change in surface topography may be caused by the preferential degradation of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase. The degradation may, for example, be caused by bacteria present in water to which the coating is exposed (e.g. immersed). In some preferred embodiments, the polymeric substance is a macrocrystalline wax, for example, a paraffin wax. In some embodiments, the paraffin wax is a paraffin wax with a melting point within the range of about 48 0 C to about 65 0 C. In some preferred embodiments, the coating comprises a mixture of polymeric substances, for example, a mixture of paraffin waxes or a mixture of paraffin wax(es) and a silicone oil. Preferrably, the surface is treated to inhibit fouling by aquatic organisms when the surface is submerged in water. However, in some embodiments, surfaces such as building walls, which are only occasionally wetted or which are merely moist, can also be treated. In some preferred embodiments, the step of treating the coating comprises exposing the coating to conditions that change the surface topography of the coating to a surface topography that inhibits fouling of the surface (e.g. by aquatic organisms). In some preferred embodiments, the polymeric substance has an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase. In such preferred embodiments, step (b) may comprise immersing the coated surface in water, wherein a change in the surface topography of the coating is caused by the preferential biodegradation of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase. The biodegradation may, preferrably, be caused by bacteria in the water. 5301A The methods of preferred embodiments the present invention may be used to inhibit the fouling of submerged surfaces by marine organisms. The surface may, for example, be a surface of an underwater pylon, pipe or pen, or a submerged surface of a buoy or boat. Alternatively, the methods of preferred embodiments of the present invention may be used to inhibit the fouling of medical devices, heat exchanger systems or buildings, by biological, organic or inorganic foulants. Preferably, the polymeric substance is capable of forming an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase. When the antifouling coating composition comprising such a polymeric substance is applied to a surface to form a coating on the surface, the polymeric substance preferably has an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase in the resultant coating. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described below, by way of example only, with reference to the following Figures, in which: Figure I shows a graph depicting the results of 5301A WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 -6 experiments described in Example 1, the graph showing the percentage of the surface of various samples that was fouled (mean ± SE) after 2, 4 and 6 months immersion; 5 Figure 2 shows a graph depicting the results of experiments described in Example 1, the graph showing the percentage of the surface of the samples of Figure 1 that was fouled (mean ± SE) after 6 months immersion, both before and after washing the surface with a waterjet; 10 Figure 3 shows a graph depicting the results of experiments described in Example 1, the graph showing the percentage of the surface of the samples of Figure 1 that was fouled (mean ± SE) after 12 months immersion, both 15 before and after washing the surface with a waterjet; Figure 4 shows a graph depicting the results of experiments described in Example 1 (at Port Stephens), the graph showing the percentage of the surface of various 20 samples that was fouled (mean ± SE) after 8 weeks immersion following washing of the surface with a waterjet; Figure 5 shows a graph depicting the results of experiments describediin Examyle 1 (at Kirribilli, Sydney 25 Harbour), the graph showing the percentage of the surface of various samples that was fouled (mean ± SE) after 8 weeks immersion following washing of the surface with a waterjet; 30 Figure 6 shows a graph depicting the results of experiments described in Example 2, the graph showing the percentage of the bryozoan larvae (Bugula neritina) that had settled on the surface of various samples after 24 hours; 35 Figure 7 shows an image obtained from confocal scanning laser microscopy, which depicts the initial surface WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 -7 topography of a cross section of the paraffin wax sample described in Example 1; Figure 8 shows an image obtained from confocal scanning 5 laser microscopy, which depicts the surface topography of the paraffin wax sample of Figure 7 after 9 weeks immersion in seawater; Figure 9 shows the spectra obtained from X-Ray Diffraction 10 (glancing angle) analysis of a sample of paraffin wax which has not been exposed to seawater; Figure 10 shows the, spectra obtained from X-Ray Diffraction (glancing angle). analysis of a sample of 15 paraffin wax following immersion in seawater for 8 weeks; Figure 11 shows the spectra obtained from X-Ray Diffraction (glancing angle) analysis of a sample of paraffin wax which has not been exposed to seawater; 20 Figure 12 shows the spectra obtained from X-Ray Diffraction (glancing angle) analysis of a sample of paraffin wax which has been exposed to seawater containing antibiotics; and 25 Figure 13 shows the spectra obtained from X-Ray Diffraction (glancing angle) analysis of a sample of paraffin wax which has which thas been exposed to seawater. 30 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION As discussed above, the first aspect of the present invention provides a method for treating a surface to inhibit fouling of the surface. The method comprises the steps of forming a coating on the surface and exposing the 35 coating to conditions that change the surface topography of the coating to a surface topography that inhibits the fouling of the surface.
WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 -8 Once the coating is formed, .the coating is exposed to conditions such that the surface topography changes to a surface topography that inhibits fouling of the surface. 5 The change in surface topography may be caused by any process that results in the surface having an appropriate topography. Typically, the process is a degradative process (e.g. in which the coating is degraded such that it has a surface topography that inhibits fouling of the 10 surface). The degradative process can be biological (e.g. biodegradation), chemical (e.g. etching) or physical (e.g. erosion through currents and flow or wind). The coating may, for example, be subjected to enzymatic degradation, photo-degradation, or chemical degradation to change the 15 surface topography of the coating to a surface topography that inhibits fouling of Lhe surface. Combinations of biological, chemical and'physical degradative processes can occur (e.g. where a physical process aids the process of biological or chemical degradation by removing the 20 degradation products from the surface thereby exposing non-degraded material for subsequent biological or chemical degradation). Typically, the surface topography that inhibits fouling is a surface topography having a roughness on a micro- and/or nano-scale, that is, a 25 roughness at the microscale (i.e. between 1 and 1000 microns) and/or at the nanoscale (i.e. between 1 and 1000 nanometres). In some embodiments, the coating is exposed to conditions 30 whereby the surface topography changes to a surface topography that inhibits fouling af the surface by exposing the coating to an artificial environment, or by a person applying a chemical (e.g. a solvent or enzyme) or biological organism to the coating. In other 35 embodiments, the coating is exposed to ambient conditions (e.g. the atmosphere or immersion in an aquatic environment) whereby the surface topography changes to a WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 -9 surface topography that inhibits fouling of the surface. The second aspect of the present invention provides a method for treating a surface, to inhibit fouling of the 5 surface by aquatic organisms.. The method comprises the step of forming a coating! on the surface wherein the surface topography of the coating changes after immersion in water to a surface topography that inhibits the fouling of the surface by aquatic organisms. 10 These methods of the first and second aspects of the present invention advantageously achieve their antifouling properties by virtue of the surface topography of the coated surface changing after the coating is formed (e.g. 15 after the surface has been immersed in water) . As the antifouling property is provided by the surface topography, it is not necessary to include toxins in the composition which may leach into the environment, which makes this method especially useful in applications where 20 the surface is in clbse pi'okimity to food, for example, in aquaculture. The surface topography of the coating may be changed upon immersion in water via any mechanism which causes the 25 surface topography to change to form a surface topography that inhibits the attachment of aquatic organisms to the surface (i.e. which inhibits fouling) . The change in surface topography need not be instantaneous upon immersion in water but, in some embodiments, may occur 30 over a period of time. For example, the surface topography of the coating may change when exposed to environmental micro-organisms present in water which biodegrade the coating to change its surface topography. 35 The coating may, forexample na6mprise a mixture of phases (such as a crystalline and amorphous phase, as is discussed in detail below) or a mixture of different WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 10 components, where the different phases or components differentially degrade (e.g. when immersed in water) such that the surface topography of the coating changes. For example, the surface topography of the coating may change 5 when exposed to a solvent because of factors such as the different solubilities, reactivity or melting points of phases or components of the coating. In the second aspect ,,of the present invention, the change 10 in surface topography occurs after immersion of the coating in water. Without wishing to be bound by theory, whilst the mechanism by which the change in surface topography upon immersion in water inhibits fouling has not yet been completely ascertained, the inventors 15 consider that the antifouling property occurs because the coating is degraded upon immersion in the water (e.g. biodegraded by bacteria present in the water) such that the topography of the coating has a roughness on a number of scales, including a roughness on at least micro- and/or 20 nano-scale. A coating having a roughness on micro- and/or nano-scales provides an extremely uneven surface which deters aquatic organisms with a large-rangeiofisizes from attaching to 25 the surface. Further, even 'shbuld the organisms become attached to the surface, the roughness results in the attachment being weaker than would be the case on a smooth surface, and the organisms can therefore be relatively easily removed from the surface (e.g. by movement of the 30 water past the surface or by other organisms), thus providing a coated surface having both antifouling and foul release properties. For example, a surface having a micro-scale roughness may 35 deter a barnacle larva with a diameter of -0.5 mm from binding to the surface, however, such a level of roughness is unlikely to deter algal spores with a diameter of WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - l'l -0.005 mm from binding to the surface. However, a nano scale roughness overlaying a micro-scale roughness inhibits binding of both the barnacle larva and algal spores to the surface. 5 The inventors also note it is at least possible that, in embodiments where the coating is degraded by bacteria, the bacteria may persist on the surface of the coating and contribute to the antifouling effect (i.e. in addition to 10 the surface roughness) by secreting chemical substances which inhibit the subsequent colonisation by aquatic organisms, or the bacteria may leave a residue on the surface which inhibitP subsequent colonisation by aquatic organisms. Other factors which the inventors note might 15 contribute to the antifouling effect include changes in the wettability and hydrophobicity of the coating. Typically, the coating comprises a polymeric substance having an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase, as 20 described below. In such embodiments, the change in surface topography is typically caused by the preferential degradation (e.g. biodegradation) of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase, resulting in a surface topography that has a roughness on both micro- and nano 25 scales. The third aspect of the present invention provides a method for treating a surface" to inhibit fouling of the surface. The method comprises: the steps of (a) forming a 30 coating on the surface, the coating comprising a polymeric substance having two or more phases, and (b) treating the coating such that the coating is capable of inhibiting fouling of the surface. 35 In this aspect, the coating is treated in such a way that the physical or physicochemical properties of the surface have an antifouling effect.
WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 12 Typically, the treatment in step (b) changes the surface topography of the coating to a surface topography that inhibits fouling of the surface, as discussed above. it 5 is envisaged that the surface could be treated, for example, by enzymatic degradation, photo-degradation or chemical degradation to change the surface topography of the coating to a surface topography that inhibits fouling of the surface. However, the coated surface may 10 alternatively, or in addition, be treated in other ways to provide an antifouling effect. For example, the surface may be treated by exposing the surface to bacteria which colonise the surface and act as a deterrent "living layer" against subsequent colonisation by aquatic organisms by 15 secreting natural antifouling substances. The coated surface may also be treated in a manner whereby the wettability or hydrophobicity of the surface is changed in a way to inhibit fouling. 20 The method of the third aspect may be performed in order to treat the surface to inhibit fouling by aquatic organisms when the surface -is, submerged in water. In such embodiments, the treatment in step (b) typically changes the surface topography of the coating to a surface 25 topography that inhibits fouling of the surface by aquatic organisms. In such cases, the treatment in step (b) may, for example, comprise immersing the coating in water, wherein the surface topography of the coating changes to a surface topography that inhibits fouling as referred to 30 above in relation toEthe secind.aspect of the present invention. However, step' (bY of the third aspect need not involve immersion in water, and it is envisaged that the surface could be treated, for example, by exposing the coated surface to enzymatic degradation prior to immersing 35 the surface in water. As such, antifouling properties may be imparted to the surface prior to the surface ever making contact with water. For example, step (b) may WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 13 comprise treating the coating to enzymatic degradation, photo-degradation, or chemical degradation to change the surface topography of the coating to a surface topography that inhibits fouling of the surface by aquatic organisms. 5 In some embodiments, the coating comprises a polymeric substance that has an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase. The resultant surface may inhibit fouling because the treatment in step (b) causes the surface topography to 10 change because of the preferential degradation of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase (or vice versa) . The amorphous and crystalline phases may differentially degrade because of differing biological, chemical (e.g. pH, solubility, reactivity) or physical 15 (e.g. melting point) characteristics of the phases. The rates of degradation may be affected by the phases of the polymeric substance (e.g. .crystalline/amorphous/semi crystalline) and arrangements within each of these phases 20 (e.g. type of crystal, structure) . Typically, amorphous regions degrade at a faster iate than crystalline regions. In preferred embodiments of this aspect of the invention, the treatment in step (b) involves immersing the surface 25 in water such that bacteria in the water preferentially biodegrade the amorphous phase of the coating over the crystalline phase. The polymeric substance is preferably a macrocrystalline 30 wax such as a paraffin wax. However, there are many examples of polymeric substances which have amorphous and crystalline phases and that could be used as a coating for use in the methods of the present invention. 35 Examples of biodegradable.polyteric substances which have amorphous and crystallinelphases are listed below: WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 14 - polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), such as PHA co-polymers and blends, and polyhydroxy alkanoates; - poly-hydroxy butyrate and epichlorhydrin elastomer blends; 5 - poly(lactic acid) and related polymers, such as poly lactic acid and polyglycolic acid co-polymers, poly (L-lactide)-Ti02 composites, blends of poly(lactic acid) and poly(ethylene glycol), poly lactic acid and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), multiblock 10 copolymers of L-lactide and trimethylene carbonate, blends of polylactide and poly(methyl methacrylate), poly((L)-lactide-co-RS-beta-malic acid), poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(L-lactic acid) (PELA) multiblock, and poly(ether-ester-urethane)s; 15 - poly(caprolactone), such as multiblock copolyesters prepared from epsilon-caprolactone, L-lactide, and trimethylene carbonate, poly(pentadecalactone-co-oxo crown ether), multiblock copolymer consisting of poly(propylene fumarate) and poly(epsilon 20 caprolactone), and poly(epsilon-caprolactone); - poly(terephthalate/alkylene and succinate/adipate) and related copoiyesters, such as poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and its copolyesters, poly(butylene adipate), poly(alkylene succinate) blends, 25 poly(butylene terephthalate/succinate/adipate), poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(butylene adipate co-terephthalate), poly(butylene adipate-co-butylene terephthalate), poly(butylene adipate), poly(ethylene succinate), and poly(butylene succinate); 30 - block-copolyesterurethanes, such as poly(ester urethanes) based on levoglucosan monoacetate; WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 15 - chitosan/chitin, such as poly(epsilon-caprolactone) with alpha-chitin and chitosan, and chitosan/ synthetic polymer; - polyvinyl alcohol, such as poly(vinyl butyral)/ 5 poly(vinyl alcohol) /nylon6 (N6), poly(L-lactide) and poly(vinyl alcohol) blends; and - cellulose, such as cellulose diacetate-graft-poly(L lactide) s. 10 It is expected that any of these polymers could be used in the methods of the present invention. In embodiments where the polymeric substance is one or more paraffin waxes, the coating may further comprise 15 silicone oil. Experiments conducted by the inventors have shown that the addition of silicone oil can enhance the foul release properties of the resultant coating. The fourth aspect of the present invention provides a 20 method for inhibiting the fouling of a surface by aquatic organisms. The method comprises the step of forming a coating on the surface, the coating comprising a polymeric substance having an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase, wherein, after immersion in water, the surface of 25 the coating changes to form a coating that inhibits fouling by aquatic organisms. Whilst this invention- is primarily intended for use in marine applications, it will be appreciated that fouling 30 also occurs in other aquatic systems and the present invention may therefore also be used in such systems. For example, the methods of the present invention could be used to inhibit fouling in freshwater systems (e.g. lakes or rivers) or to coat medical devices to prevent the 35 build-up of harmful bacteria, for example, on catheters or in dialysis machines. The methods of the invention could WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 16 also be used, for example, to coat air-conditioners or cooling heat exchangers in power plants to prevent the build-up of biofilm etc. 5 Examples of marine applications of the invention include on ships' hulls, aquaculture cages, nets or pens, buoys, wharf pilings, underwater pylons, pipes, filters, etc. Examples of non-marine applications include in medical 10 devices (e.g. catheters, stents, dialysis machines), heat exchanger systems in cooling plants, water piping in general, cooling towers and other water storage systems, freshwater boats, pilings, wharves and other infrastructure or on buildings exposed to conditions where 15 fouling is common. The present invention:.also provides an antifouling coating composition. The antifouling coating composition comprises a polymeric substance capable of forming two or 20 more phases (e.g. an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase) when the composition is applied to a surface to form a coating on the surface. When the antifouling coating is applied to a surface to form a coating on the surface, the polymeric substance has two or more phases in 25 the resultant coating. For example, the coating may have crystalline/amorphous/semi-crystalline phases. The polymeric substance in the antifouling composition may be any of the polymeric substances described above. The 30 antifouling composition may additionally comprise other components which facilitate the application of the polymeric substance(s) tozthe surface. For example, the composition may also include an adherent or preservant. 35 The invention also provides an article, such as any of those described above, which has been coated by an antifouling coating composition of the invention.
WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 17 Coating the surface In the methods of the present invention, a coating is formed on the surface. Typically, the entire surface is 5 coated, however, in some circumstances it may only be necessary to coat a portion of the surface to achieve an acceptable level of antifouling. For marine applications, the coating may be applied to a surface or part of the surface intended to be submerged in water. 10 The coating may be formed on the surface by methods known in the art for applying coating compositions to a surface to form a coating on the surface. The coating may be formed by applying a coating composition of the present 15 invention to the surface. In some embodiments, the coating composition is sprayed or painted onto the surface to form a coating on the surface. Alternatively, the coating composition could be applied to the surface by dip coating. 20 The methods of the present invention may also involve additional steps, for example, in some embodiments the coating may be heated prior to application to the surface (as is the case for the embodiments described below where 25 the coating comprises paraffin waxes). When the coating comprises a polymeric substance, the coating composition may further comprise additional compounds, for example, an adherent to increase the 30 adhesion of the coating to the surface, or a preserving compound to prolong the life of the coating. The coating may be applied directly to the surface on its own, or as a top coat on, for example, a sealant coat or 35 an anticorrosion coat. Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 18 described below. In these embodiments, a coating is formed on a surface by applying to the surface a composition comprising a paraffin wax, or a mixture of paraffin waxes, and the antifouling properties occur 5 because of the changed surface topography of the coating following immersion of the coated surface in water. Any paraffin wax that biodegrades when placed in water which contains a normal contingent of aquatic/marine 10 bacteria may be used. The inventors have found that coatings comprising fully refined paraffin waxes have excellent antifouling characteristics, are well suited as coatings for a wide range of surfaces, persist on surfaces in typical aquatic environments, are very economical, and 15 are not toxic or otherwise environmentally unsound. Fully refined paraffin waxes are, for example, used in candle making and in food applications such as sealants for the top of jams and other preserves. 20 Paraffin waxes are composed of straight-chain saturated hydrocarbons (n-alkanes) . Fully refined paraffin waxes include a mixture of n-alkanes and the melting point ranges of the fully refined paraffin waxes indicates which n-alkanes are presents in the :wax. Although n-alkanes 25 make-up the bulk of- fullylrefined paraffin waxes, fully refined paraffin waxes may also contain other hydrocarbons such as branched chain, cyclic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons or other compounds usually found in paraffinic fractions from crude petroleum. These 30 impurities may contribute to the antifoul effect as they can mediate crystallization (i.e. the rate of crystallisation and the size of crystals formed) of the n alkanes. 35 Suitable paraf fin waxes typically have melting points between about 48 0 C and about 70 0 C, preferably between about 55 0 C and about 65 0 C. If the melting point is lower WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 19 than 480C, then coatings formed from the waxes are not durable, and may not set properly upon application to a surface. If the melting point is higher than 700C, then the wax may be more difficult for bacteria to biodegrade. 5 Preferably, the paraffin wax has a melting point of about 600C, for example, a melting point range of about 58 to about 620C. In preferred embodiments, the composition comprises one or 10 more paraffin waxes (eg. a fully refined paraffin wax containing a range of n-alkanes). The antifouling coating may be' formed on the surface by applying the paraffin wax' to the surface in a liquid (i.e. 15 hot) form. As the wax cools to form a solid coating on the surface, two phases are formed; an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase. The amorphous phase forms preferentially on the exposed surface of the coating because the wax cools most rapidly at the surface. The 20 inventors believe, however, that the wax cools more slowly underneath the surface and the wax molecules underneath the surface are able to become more ordered such that a more crystalline phase is formed. 25 Without wishing to be bound by theory, the inventors believe that, when such coating is exposed to water, the outer layer (i.e. the amorphous phase) of the coating is removed relatively quickly and easily by bacteria in the water, thereby exposing the crystalline phase. The 30 crystalline phase, however, is either unaffected by bacterial action, or is more slowly degraded than the amorphous phase. The exposed surface of the crystalline phase present at the biodegraded surface consists of crystals having various shapes and sizes, and provides a 35 surface topography with a roughness in both the micro- and nano-scales. For the reasons discussed above, this topography inhibits the fouling of the coated surface by a WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 20 broad range of fouling organic sms. The inventors have also performed experiments which show that antifouling coatings comprising waxes prepared 5 according to the methods of the present invention are effective for a considerable length of time (exceeding I year) . The inventors believe that even the crystalline phase of the waxes is biodegraded, albeit at a slower rate. Thus, the surface topography of the coating formed 10 from waxes is continually changing, even after the rough crystalline phase has been exposed. As such, the roughness of the surface is maintained throughout the lifetime of the coating, and the roughness does not become overlaid by other components in the water over time, which 15 would decrease the effectiveness of the coating as an antifoulant. In some embodiments, the composition may comprise a mixture of a paraffin wax and silicone oil. The inventors 20 have found that coating compositions comprising about 1% w/w silicone oil and a paraffin wax result in antifouling coatings with enhanced properties over coatings formed from only paraffin wax. The inventors postulate that the silicone oil may contribute to the surface roughness of 25 the degraded coating, as well as providing a degree of hydrophobicity to the surface. EXAMPLES Examples of preferred embodiments of the invention in 30 which the coating comprises -a fully refined paraffin wax will now be described . It will be appreciated that these examples are merely illustrative of the present invention and are not intended to be limiting in any respect. 35 Example 1 - Preparation and antifouling activity of coatings comprising paraffin waxes The effects of paraffin wax based antifouling coatings on WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 21 initial settlement/colonisation by a number of fouling organisms were investigated in both the laboratory and the sea. Two invertebrate species (one barnacle, Balanus amphitrite and one, bryozoan, Bugula neritina) and one 5 algal species (Polysiphonia sp.) were chosen as representative test organisms for the laboratory fouling trials. Antifouling waxes 10 The antifouling properties of the fully refined paraffin waxes listed below were tested in the experiments described below. The paraffin waxes are distinguished by the range of melting points of the waxes and the nomenclature used to identify these waxes in the 15 experiments described below is as follows: (P1) - Paraffin wax: MP 58-60*C (P2) - Paraffin wax: MP 55-57 0 C (P3) - Paraffin wax:-- MP 61-63*,C 20 (P4) - Paraffin wax:. NIrP 57-59, (PS) - Paraffin wax:- MP 56-58*C (P6) - Paraffin wax: MP 60-62 0 C (P7) - Paraffin wax: MP 68-71'C (P8) - Paraffin wax: MP 52-54*C 25 (P9) - Paraffin wax: MP 47-49 0 C The antifouling activity of a number of non-paraffin waxes having similar melting points were also tested. The nomenclature used to identify these waxes in the 30 experiments described below is as follows: B(10) - Beeswax: MP 64-66 0 C M(11) - Microcrystalline wax: MP 64-67 0 C Pal(12) - Palm wax: MP 50-52*C: 35 Method for preparing sample surfaces Wax disks (5.4 cm diameter) were prepared using plastic WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 22 Petri dishes. The sides of the Petri dishes were cut down to a height of 1.8 mm and prior to addition of the wax they were placed on a heated metal tray or oven (ca. 80oC) to facilitate an even spread of the wax. The wax was 5 melted and 12 ml was transferred to the Petri dish with a heated plastic syringe. This resulted in an even film of wax with a depth of about 2 mm in the Petri dish. Field test sites 10 The field trials were conducted in Sydney Harbour, at Kirribilli (New South Wales, Australia) and Port Stephens (New South Wales, Australia) . Tidal action, water currents and wave energy were minimal at both sites. 15 At Kirribilli, the cages were suspended in the sea at a fixed depth (with the top of the cage 0.4 m underwater). At Port Stephens, the trays were fixed to the seafloor. Cages 20 Cages were used for all trials at Kirribilli to protect any settled propagules from predator and grazers. The cages were approximately 90 x 75 x 30 cm 3 in size and made from 2 cm 2 plastic mesh. A total of 30 wax disks were placed in randomly assigned positions within each cage. 25 The Port Stephens trial used an enclosed oyster tray with the wax disks fixed to the underside of the tray tops. The wax surfaces were face down and immersed for other than the lowest tides. 30 Fouling assessment Photos of each sample disk were taken using a digital camera (every fortnight for the field trial in Sydney Harbour and less frequently for the field trial at Port 35 Stevens). Fouling cover was measured as a proportion of the disk area (% fouling cover) . The percent of fouling cover on the disks was assessed by analysing the images WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 23 using the 'Image J' software (National Institutes of Health, USA). The relative adhesion strength of soft fouling organisms 5 (slime, algae, bryozoans etc.) was measured by exposing the test disks to a waterjet (with a head pressure of about 50 kPa). Sample disks were prepared with each of the paraffin waxes 10 P(1) to P(9), and the other waxes B(10), M(11) and Pal(12). A 5.4 cm disk of Perspex with no coating was also included in all of the experiments as a control sample (this is referred to as "Plastic" in the figures). 15 The samples were immersed in the sea and the % fouling was measured at periodic intervals, as described above. Figure 1 shows the proportion of three sample disks (the control sample and samples M(11) and P(1)) which was 20 covered after 2, 4 and 6 months immersion. As can clearly be seen, the paraffin wax coating has significantly less fouling than the control and the microcrystalline wax coating. 25 Figure 2 shows the same three samples after 6 months immersion, both before and after the surfaces were sprayed with a waterjet to remove any loosely bound foulants. Again, the paraffin wax coating has significantly less fouling than the control and the microcrystalline wax 30 coating, both before and after the surfaces were sprayed with a waterjet. The results indicate that even when fouling organisms do colonise the surface of the paraffin wax coating, they are bound more weakly than when bound to a normal plastic surface or an alternate wax coating. 35 Figure 3 shows the same three samples after 12 months immersion, both before and after the surfaces were sprayed WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 -24 with a waterjet to remove any loosely bound foulants. Again, the paraffin wax coating has significantly less fouling than the control and microcrystalline wax coating. Further, even after 12 months, the foulants are more 5 readily removed from the paraffin wax surfaces than for control and microcrystalline wax surfaces. Figures 4 and 5 show the results of similar experiments using the other waxes referred to above (P(2) to P(9)) 10 following immersion for 8 weeks at Port Stephens (Figure 4) and Kirribilli (Figure 5) and after the surfaces were sprayed with a waterjet to remove any loosely bound foulants. As can clearly be seen, all of the paraffin wax coatings have significantly less fouling than the controls 15 or the other wax coatings. These experiments suggest that not only are paraffin waxes excellent antifoulants for stationary objects, being resistant to initial fouling, they would also be effective 20 for use an as antifoulant on moving objects, as any foulants which do colonise the surface are readily removed from the paraffin wax surface. The other waxes, which are not macrocrystalline waxes, are 25 clearly less effective at inhibiting antifouling than the paraffin waxes. Additional experiments performed by the inventors (results not shown) in which the paraffin wax samples contained 1% 30 silicone oil demonstrated that the presence of the silicone oil enhances the foul'release properties of the resultant coating. Example 2 - Effect of antibiotics on antifouling activity 35 The role that bacteria play in enhancing the antifouling activity of compositions comprising paraffin waxes was tested by immersing paraffin wax coatings in the seawater WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 25 systems described below. Seawater treatment involved immersion of samples for 4 or 8 weeks in flow or static conditions. Antibiotics were 5 added to one of the static seawater treatments so bacteria would not be present in this system. The antifouling activity of surfaces treated in systems where the seawater contained an antibiotic was compared with the activity of surfaces in systems containing just seawater. 10 Samples in the form of Petri dishes coated with paraffin wax (P(l)) were immersed in the laboratory systems described below for 4 and 8 weeks. An uncoated control Petri dish (referred to as "Plastic" in Figure 6) was not 15 immersed in the seawater. Once removed from the system, the samples (i.e. the coated Petri dishes) were dried and later used for settlement inhibition bioassays> 'These:asaays were conducted under 20 static flow conditions iby adding 15 - 25 bryozoan larvae (Bugula neritina) in each'Petri dishes with 5ml of 0.2pm filtered sea water. After 24 hours the numbers and percentage of settled (metamorphosed) larvae was determined using a stereo microscope. 25 Replicates of the samples were exposed to one of the following kinds of seawater treatment: (Flow): Recirculating seawater: 8 L, replaced every -2.7 minutes (flow rate -50 ml/ 30 second); (Stat. -AB) Static seawater: 8 L, replaced every 7 days; and (Stat. +AB): Static filtered seawater (0.2 pm) plus antibiotics (ampicillin, 300 ppm, 35 polymixin B sulphate, 30 ppm, and gentamicin sulphate, 60 ppm) : 8 L, replaced every 7 days.
WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 26 A control experiment, in which the samples were not subjected to any seawater treatment, but were stored in air for 4 and 8 weeks, was also conducted. All treatments 5 were aerated with filtered (0.2 pm) air. The results are shown in Figure 6 and demonstrate that the presence of antibiotics in the seawater significantly reduces the antifouling properties of the paraffin wax. 10 These results indicate that bacteria present in seawater plays a significant role in enhancing the antifouling property of the surface coating formed from paraffin wax. These results also show that there appears to be little 15 difference in the activity of bacteria in degrading the paraffin wax under either flow or static conditions. Example 3 - Characterisation of topography of a paraffin wax surface 20 The surface topography of a paraffin wax coating P(1) was imaged by a Leica Inverted Confocal Microscope (magnified 630x) and analysed using Leica Confocal Software both before immersion in the sealand after 9 weeks immersion. The surface topography of a bss section of the non 25 immersed P(1) wax coating and the surface topography of a cross section of the same wax coating after 9 weeks immersion is shown in Figures 7 and 8 respectively. As can clearly be seen, the surface topography of the paraffin wax coating that has been exposed to seawater is 30 significantly rougher than that of the surface before immersion. These results demonstrate that the surface topography of coatings formed from paraffin waxes do change upon immersion in seawater and are consistent with the postulation that bacteria degrade the wax to expose 35 the rough crystalline phase. Figures 9 and 10 show the spectra obtained from X-Ray WO 2008/009067 PCT/AU2007/001013 - 27 Diffraction (glancing angle) experiments conducted on non aged P(6) paraffin wax (i.e. paraffin wax which has not been exposed to seawater) and aged paraffin wax (i.e. paraffin wax which has been exposed to seawater for 8 5 weeks in the laboratory seawater aquarium), respectively. Amorphous surfaces are known to attenuate x-ray intensity, and at small angles the degree of attenuation increases. The surfaces of the wax samples were therefore analysed by 10 grazing incidence X-ray diffraction configured for 20 scan. Intensity of the (0-20). beam in, the range (15-30 degrees, arc) was recorded for incident angles of 0.4, 0.5, 0.8 and 1.2 degrees (non-aged wax) and 0.2, 0.5 and 1.2 degrees (aged wax). Penetration depth of the x-ray is estimated 15 to'be about 15 pm. A low intensity, broad peak was detected in the spectrum shown in Figure 9 (non-aged wax), which is characteristic of an amorphous phase. The intensity the peaks for the 20 non-aged wax is also less than the peaks for the aged wax. The greater signal intensity for the peaks in the spectrum shown in Figure 10 (aged wax) indicates a much greater proportion of crystalline phase paraffin at the surface 25 than for the non-aged wax.' Signal intensity is known to be proportional to crystallinity using this technique. Referring now to Figures 11 to 13, these spectra show XRD data from three treatments; non-aged wax (Figure 11), aged 30 wax treated with antibiotics (Figure 12, i.e. no bacteria present), and aged wax without antibiotics (Figure 13, i.e. bacteria may be present). The crystalline signal from the later sample (i.e. Figure 13) is much stronger than either of the first two, which supports the 35 hypothesis that aging removes the amorphous layer, and the presence or not of antibiotics implies that bacteria are responsible for aging the paraffin wax samples.
In the claims which follow and in the preceding description of the invention, except where the context requires otherwise due to express language or necessary implication, the word "comprise" or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising" is used in an inclusive sense, i.e. to specify the presence of the stated features but not to preclude the presence or addition of further features in various embodiments of the invention. The foregoing describes only one embodiment of the present invention and modifications, obvious to those skilled in the arts, can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the present invention. The term "comprising" (and its grammatical variations) as used herein is used in the inclusive sense of "including" or "having" and not in the exclusive sense of "consisting only of'. 5301A

Claims (23)

1. A method of forming an anti-fouling coating on a surface, the method comprising the steps of applying a pair of constituents to said surface such that exposure of said coating to water causes differential degradation thereof such that a first constituent degrades to have a nano-scale roughness from 1 nm to 1000nm and said second constituent degrades to have a micro-scale roughness of between 1 pm to 1000 pm.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the degradative process is a physical, chemical or biological process.
3. The method as claimed in claim I or 2, wherein said constituents are formed from the same substance with two or more phases, preferably a polymetric material having two or more phases; or said constituents are formed from different substances.
4. The method according to any one of claims I to 3 such that the degradative change in surface topography of said coating is caused by: degradation of an exposed phase of the coating; or the preferential degradation of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase where said constituents are the same substance but having different phases; or bacteria present in water to which the coating is exposed.
5. The method as claimed in claim I or 2, wherein said constituents are comprises a polymeric substance are having an amorphous phase and the other a crystalline phase.
6. The method as claimed in any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein said polymeric substance is macrocrystalline wax.
7. The method as claimed in any one of claims 3 to 6, wherein the polymeric substance is a paraffin wax; preferably the polymetric substance is a paraffin wax having a melting point within the range of about 48*C to, about 65 C.
8. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said constituents include paraffin waxes such as that said constituents include mixture of two or more paraffin waxes.
9. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said constituents include a mixture of one or more paraffin wax(es) and a silicone oil. 530 1A
10. A method of forming an antifouling coating on a surface, the method comprising the steps of: forming a coating on said surface wherein said coating includes a pair of constituents comprising a polymetric substance having two or more phases; and exposing said coating to water such that said pair of constituents differentially degrade wherein one constituent degrades to have a nano-scale roughness from Inm to 1000nm and said other constituent degrades to have a micro-scale roughness of between Ipm to 1000 pm.
11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the surface is treated to inhibit fouling by aquatic organisms when the surface is submerged in water.
12. The method as claimed in claims 10 or 11, wherein the polymeric substance has an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase.
13. A method of forming an antifouling coating on a surface, the method comprising the steps of: forming a coating on said surface wherein said coating includes a pair of constituents comprising a polymetric substance having two or more phases; and exposing said coating to water such a differentially degradation of said constituents undergoes a change in the surface topography of the coating is caused by the preferential biodegradation of the amorphous phase over the crystalline phase degrade wherein one constituent degrades to have a nano-scale roughness from I nm to 1 000nm and said other constituent degrades to have a micro-scale roughness of between 1pm to 1000 pm.
14. The method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the biodegradation is caused by bacteria in the water.
15. The method as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 14, wherein the polymeric substance is: a macrocrystalline wax; or is a mixture of paraffin waxes.
16. The method as claimed in any one of claims 10 to 15, wherein the constituents include a mixture of one or more paraffin wax(es) and a silicon oil.
17. A method for inhibiting the fouling of a surface by aquatic organisms, the method comprising the step of forming a coating on the surface, the coating 5301A-AU 31 comprising a polymeric substance having an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase, wherein, after immersion in water, the surface of the coating is caused to differentially degrade in response to microbacteria inhibiting settlement a growth of macro-fouling organisms thereon changes to form a coating that inhibits fouling by aquatic organisms.
18. The method as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the surface is a surface of a pylon, pipe, pen, buoy, boat, medical device, heat exchanger system or building
19. An antifouling surface coating composition including a pair of constituents comprising a polyimetric substance having or configured to have two or more phases, such that upon immersion in water said coating is configured to degrade differentially such that a first phase degrades to have a nanoscale roughness from 1 nm to 1000 nm and said other phase degrades to have a microscale roughness between 1 pm in 1000 pm.
20. The antifouling coating composition as claimed in claim 19, wherein the polymeric substance is capable of forming an amorphous phase and a crystalline phase.
21. An antifouling surface coating composition including two or more constituents such that two of said constituents are different substances or different phases of the same substance, such that upon immersion in water said coating is configured to degrade differentially such that a first constituent substance or phase degrades to have a first roughness and said second constituent substance or phase degrades to have a second roughness wherein said first roughness is between 10 to 1000 times less than said second roughness.
22. An article having a surface which has been coated by an antifouling coating composition according to any one of claims 19 to 21.
23. A method for treating a surface to inhibit fouling , or inhibiting fouling of a surface by aquatic organisms; or antifouling coating composition the method or coating being substantially as herein described with reference to any one or more of the accompanying drawings and/or described examples. Dated this 2 6 h day of March 2013 New South Innovations Pty Limited By: FRASER OLD & SOHN 5301A-AU
AU2007276712A 2006-07-20 2007-07-20 Antifouling coating Ceased AU2007276712B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2006903921A AU2006903921A0 (en) 2006-07-20 Antifouling coating
PCT/AU2007/001013 WO2008009067A1 (en) 2006-07-20 2007-07-20 Antifouling coating

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2007276712A1 AU2007276712A1 (en) 2008-01-24
AU2007276712B2 true AU2007276712B2 (en) 2013-05-16

Family

ID=38956443

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2007276712A Ceased AU2007276712B2 (en) 2006-07-20 2007-07-20 Antifouling coating

Country Status (2)

Country Link
AU (1) AU2007276712B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2008009067A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITUB20155019A1 (en) * 2015-11-03 2017-05-03 Univ Della Calabria Antifouling composition for the protection of submerged structures.

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1489698A (en) * 1974-03-04 1977-10-26 Rasmussen O Anti-fouling coating for marine structures
US4098925A (en) * 1976-02-26 1978-07-04 Rasmussen Oeystein Method for protecting ships against fouling
US4410363A (en) * 1981-07-21 1983-10-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Underwater applicable antifoulant paint composition
US4631303A (en) * 1985-06-28 1986-12-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Underwater formulation and method for cleaning and waxing simultaneously
WO2000016623A1 (en) * 1998-09-23 2000-03-30 Phycogen, Inc. Antifouling agents
AU2003262507A1 (en) * 2002-11-21 2004-06-10 Blue Lagoon Pearls Pty Ltd A Method for Treating Molluscs

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1489698A (en) * 1974-03-04 1977-10-26 Rasmussen O Anti-fouling coating for marine structures
US4098925A (en) * 1976-02-26 1978-07-04 Rasmussen Oeystein Method for protecting ships against fouling
US4410363A (en) * 1981-07-21 1983-10-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Underwater applicable antifoulant paint composition
US4631303A (en) * 1985-06-28 1986-12-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Underwater formulation and method for cleaning and waxing simultaneously
WO2000016623A1 (en) * 1998-09-23 2000-03-30 Phycogen, Inc. Antifouling agents
AU2003262507A1 (en) * 2002-11-21 2004-06-10 Blue Lagoon Pearls Pty Ltd A Method for Treating Molluscs

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008009067A1 (en) 2008-01-24
AU2007276712A1 (en) 2008-01-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Xie et al. Dynamic surface antifouling: mechanism and systems
Ciriminna et al. Ecofriendly antifouling marine coatings
Ferrari et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces for applications in seawater
Grozea et al. Approaches in designing non-toxic polymer surfaces to deter marine biofouling
Callow et al. Substratum location and zoospore behaviour in the fouling alga Enteromorpha
Telegdi et al. Smart anti-biofouling composite coatings for naval applications
Kumar et al. Functional nanomaterials, synergisms, and biomimicry for environmentally benign marine antifouling technology
US20110104452A1 (en) Block copolymer morphology trapping in thin films using low temperature treatment and annealing for inhibition of marine organism attachment to surfaces
Wang et al. Fabricating bionic ultraslippery surface on titanium alloys with excellent fouling-resistant performance
López-Ortega et al. Development of a superhydrophobic and bactericide organic topcoat to be applied on thermally sprayed aluminum coatings in offshore submerged components
Getachew et al. The slip agents oleamide and erucamide reduce biofouling by marine benthic organisms (diatoms, biofilms and abalones)
Wanka et al. Synthesis and characterization of dendritic and linear glycol methacrylates and their performance as marine antifouling coatings
Li et al. Designing a MOF-based slippery lubricant-infused porous surface with dual functional anti-fouling strategy
Chapman et al. Phthalate doped PVC membranes for the inhibition of fouling
JP5161201B2 (en) Antifouling fiber coating for offshore construction.
Seo et al. Eco-friendly erucamide–polydimethylsiloxane coatings for marine anti-biofouling
Xie et al. Non-silicone elastic coating with fouling resistance and fouling release abilities based on degradable hyperbranched polymer
Wang et al. Preparation and properties of environmentally friendly marine antifouling coatings based on a collaborative strategy
AU2007276712B2 (en) Antifouling coating
Durand et al. Combining topography and chemistry to produce antibiofouling surfaces: a review
CN107177050B (en) A kind of micro-structure cooperates with anti-fouling material and preparation method thereof with antifouling activity substance
Soleimani et al. Prevention of marine biofouling in the aquaculture industry by a coating based on polydimethylsiloxane-chitosan and sodium polyacrylate
Si et al. Hydrophobic Biodegradable Hyperbranched Copolymers with Excellent Marine Diatom Resistance
Gupta et al. Advances in Nanotechnology for Marine Antifouling
Liu et al. Antifouling Slippery Surface against Marine Biofouling

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PC1 Assignment before grant (sect. 113)

Owner name: AFSAR, ANISUL; CHARLTON, TIMOTHY; STEINBERG, PETER

Free format text: FORMER APPLICANT(S): NEWSOUTH INNOVATIONS PTY LIMITED

FGA Letters patent sealed or granted (standard patent)
MK14 Patent ceased section 143(a) (annual fees not paid) or expired