AU2006100870B4 - Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores - Google Patents
Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- AU2006100870B4 AU2006100870B4 AU2006100870A AU2006100870A AU2006100870B4 AU 2006100870 B4 AU2006100870 B4 AU 2006100870B4 AU 2006100870 A AU2006100870 A AU 2006100870A AU 2006100870 A AU2006100870 A AU 2006100870A AU 2006100870 B4 AU2006100870 B4 AU 2006100870B4
- Authority
- AU
- Australia
- Prior art keywords
- ore
- leaching
- leach
- saprolite
- nickel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 title claims description 68
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 54
- 229910001710 laterite Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims description 23
- 239000011504 laterite Substances 0.000 title claims description 23
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 106
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 85
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 claims description 78
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 54
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 52
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 49
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims description 48
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 claims description 47
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 33
- 238000006386 neutralization reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 claims description 23
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 23
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 23
- 229910052935 jarosite Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001376 precipitating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910000287 alkaline earth metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- -1 ammonium ions Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe3+ Chemical compound [Fe+3] VTLYFUHAOXGGBS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910001413 alkali metal ion Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000004679 hydroxides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000159 acid neutralizing agent Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000004649 carbonic acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940044175 cobalt sulfate Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000361 cobalt sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- KTVIXTQDYHMGHF-UHFFFAOYSA-L cobalt(2+) sulfate Chemical compound [Co+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O KTVIXTQDYHMGHF-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- LGQLOGILCSXPEA-UHFFFAOYSA-L nickel sulfate Chemical compound [Ni+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O LGQLOGILCSXPEA-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910000363 nickel(II) sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 description 70
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 68
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 43
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 34
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 33
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 24
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 20
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 17
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 17
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium oxide Chemical compound [Mg]=O CPLXHLVBOLITMK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 6
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 6
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 5
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- PMZURENOXWZQFD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Sulfate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O PMZURENOXWZQFD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007062 hydrolysis Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000006460 hydrolysis reaction Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000003472 neutralizing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052938 sodium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 235000011152 sodium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000395 magnesium oxide Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910020598 Co Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphur dioxide Chemical compound O=S=O RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000975 co-precipitation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000008733 Citrus aurantifolia Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910000863 Ferronickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 235000011941 Tilia x europaea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052783 alkali metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000001340 alkali metals Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052934 alunite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010424 alunite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001354 calcination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010908 decantation Methods 0.000 description 1
- ZOMNIUBKTOKEHS-UHFFFAOYSA-L dimercury dichloride Chemical class Cl[Hg][Hg]Cl ZOMNIUBKTOKEHS-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052595 hematite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011019 hematite Substances 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-M hydrogensulfate Chemical compound OS([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-] XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000002506 iron compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000014413 iron hydroxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(3+);oxygen(2-) Chemical compound [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Fe+3].[Fe+3] LIKBJVNGSGBSGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- NCNCGGDMXMBVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-L iron(ii) hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[Fe+2] NCNCGGDMXMBVIA-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000004571 lime Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000012245 magnesium oxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001813 natrojarosite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000001590 oxidative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002203 pretreatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001415 sodium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 150000003467 sulfuric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000011149 sulphuric acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- KPZTWMNLAFDTGF-UHFFFAOYSA-D trialuminum;potassium;hexahydroxide;disulfate Chemical compound [OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[OH-].[Al+3].[Al+3].[Al+3].[K+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O.[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O KPZTWMNLAFDTGF-UHFFFAOYSA-D 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
- Y02P10/20—Recycling
Landscapes
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
Description
AUSTRALIA
Patents Act 1990 COMPLETE SPECIFICATION INNOVATION PATENT Applicant: BHP MINERALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Invention Title: METHOD FOR LEACHING NICKELIFEROUS LATERITE ORES The following statement is a full description of this invention, including the best method of performing it known to me/us: O-2 (c METHOD FOR LEACHING NICKELIFEROUS LATERITE ORES 0 FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to the hydrometallurgical processing of nickeliferous ores and, Sin particular, to an improved method for leaching nickel Svalues from a high-magnesium or saprolite fraction of such ores in combination with high pressure and temperature leaching of a low-magnesium or limonite fraction of the ores.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The high pressure and temperature leaching of a limonite fraction of nickeliferous laterite ores with sulfuric acid is well known, having been practiced commercially at Moa Bay in Cuba since 1959 (Boldt and Queneau, "The Winning of Nickel," Longmans Canada Ltd., Toronto, pp. 437-449). The quantity of sulfuric acid required to leach the major portion (approx. 90%) of the contained nickel and cobalt and variable portions of several impurity elements in the ore, e.g. magnesium, manganese, iron, aluminum, chromium, is in excess of that required to form the corresponding water-soluble metal sulfate compounds. This is because sulfuric acid only dissociates to the single proton and the bisulfate (HS0 4 ion at the high temperature used in this leaching step, typically 200 0 C. The bisulfate ion dissociates on cooling of the leach slurry to sulfate (SO 4 ion, releasing an additional proton. Thus, the cooled leach slurry inevitably contains excess sulfuric acid in addition to the dissolved metal values and impurity elements. This excess acid must be neutralized before recovery of the dissolved nickel and cobalt values, as would be apparent to any one skilled in the art.
Hi\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 IN 3 ^c The cost of the excess sulfuric acid that must be added to the leaching step and the cost of neutralizing 0 agents required to neutralize excess sulfuric acid in the final leach liquor are significant disadvantages of this process.
Furthermore, the efficient recovery of nickel and cobalt in substantially pure form from the high pressure Sleach liquor often requires the prior removal of impurities such as ferric iron, aluminum, and chromium, Swhich dissolve to a greater or lesser extent during pressure leaching. These impurities may interfere in downstream nickel and cobalt recovery processes if not removed from the solution. The removal can be effected by raising the pH of the leach liquor to effect the hydrolysis and precipitation of these impurities as hydroxide or hydroxysulfate compounds. Unfortunately, when carried out at atmospheric pressure and temperatures below the solution boiling point, this hydrolysis often produces voluminous precipitates that are difficult to separate from the pregnant liquor by conventional settling and filtration techniques. A further disadvantage is the co-precipitation and subsequent loss of significant quantities of the nickel and cobalt values during this hydrolysis step.
A variety of methods have been developed to deal with the above-mentioned disadvantages and problems of the high pressure leaching process.
Taylor et al. Patent 3,720,749) teach precipitation and removal of iron and aluminum by the addition of a soluble neutralizing agent, e.g. magnesia, to a leach liquor at a temperature in excess of 130°C thereby precipitating the iron and aluminum in an easy to separate form.
Hi\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High g.doc 11/10/06 IND- 4 O-4c An improvement of the neutralization process was patented by Lowenhaupt et al. Patent No. 4,548,794) O This U.S. patent teaches the recovery of nickel and cobalt from laterite ore by using a low-pressure leach of high magnesium ore, after high pressure leaching of low magnesium ore, to precipitate aluminum and iron. A size separation of the laterite ore feed is made to produce low 00 and high magnesium ore fractions for the process. The finer, low magnesium fraction is leached at high temperature and pressure and, after separating the pressure leach liquor form the leach residue, contacting the liquor with the coarser, high magnesium fraction of the ore at greater than atmospheric pressure and high temperature such that iron and aluminum precipitate in crystalline forms, e.g. hematite, alunite. This aids the subsequent settling and filtration of the precipitated iron and aluminum, while also dissolving additional nickel units from the high magnesium fraction of the ore. The preferred temperature for the neutralization step ranges from 1400 to 200 0 C and requires the use of autoclaves to maintain the elevated temperature and pressure. The U.S.
patent also describes a method where high magnesium ore is contacted at atmospheric pressure and temperatures less than the boiling point, with the leach solution from the pressure leach step, before the low-pressure leach step.
Nickel extraction is very low in the atmospheric leach step (only 33-44 and the low-pressure leach is still required to achieve adequate nickel extraction and to precipitate iron and aluminum in an easy to settle and filter form.
Other methods for using the high magnesium fraction of an ore to neutralize the high-pressure leach liquor have been patented. U.S. Patent 3,991,159 teaches the use of high magnesium ore to neutralize acid resulting from the high-pressure acid leach of a low magnesium ore.
This is accomplished by coordinating the leaching of the H&\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 c low magnesium fraction with the leaching of the high omagnesium fraction at high temperature and pressure. In O this method, leaching of the high magnesium fraction is carried out at high temperature (150 0 -250 0 C) and pressure for effective iron and aluminum rejection, but with O relatively low nickel extraction from the high magnesium ore. Again, this process has the disadvantage of 00 requiring relatively high temperature and pressure for the neutralization step.
SIn U.S. Patent 3,804,613, a method to conduct high-pressure acid leaching of high magnesium ore at relatively low acid/ore ratios is disclosed. This is accomplished by preconditioning the high magnesium ore with leach liquor from the high-pressure leach step, before a high-pressure leach of the conditioned high magnesium ore. The high magnesium ore must still be submitted to a high pressure leaching step following the atmospheric pressure conditioning step.
U.S. Patent 4,097,575 teaches the use of high magnesium ore that has been previously roasted to neutralize acid present in a leach slurry resulting from the high-pressure acid leach of a low magnesium ore. The high magnesium ore is thermally treated at 500*-750 OC under oxidizing conditions prior to the neutralization step to increase the neutralization capacity of the ore.
The pH of the final liquor is taken above 2, but the neutralization residue containing unleached high magnesium ore is recycled to the autoclave to obtain higher nickel recovery. Furthermore, rejected iron and aluminum are in the form of hydroxides, which are difficult to deal with.
This process suffers from the high capital cost needed for roasting facilities and disadvantages associated with injection of high magnesium ore atmospheric leach slurry into the high pressure autoclave.
H3\jo1zik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\minara 1 Low-High Ng.doc 11/10/06 O 6 c< U.S. Patent 4,410,498 teaches a method to leach Shigh magnesium laterite ore with sulfuric acid at a O controlled pH of 1.5 to 3.0 while adding a reducing agent to maintain the redox potential between 200 and 400 mV (vs. saturated calomel reference electrode). The addition of a reducing agent increases the reactivity of the Sserpentine in the ore and results in maximum extraction of 00 Snickel consistent with minimum extraction of iron and magnesia and minimum acid consumption. The process has the disadvantages of the additional cost of the reducing agent, the need for electrochemical potential control, and the need for equipment to control the leaching atmosphere and prevent external discharges in the case of toxic, gaseous reductants such as sulfur dioxide.
US Patent 4,042,474 teaches a method to recover iron in the presence of nickel and cobalt. The ferronickel ore is smelted prior to processing and the iron is precipitated in the form of jarosites. During this process a metallurgical matte containing nicelt and a great quantity of iron is processed.
US Patent 4,541,868 teaches a method of pretreating laterite ores at substantially ambient temperature prior to subsequent heating. This pretreatment enhances the solubility of nicek and cobalt from the ore.
The above methods are aimed at utilizing both the high and low magnesium fractions of the nickeliferous laterite ore in order to fully utilize the ore body, maximize the nickel and cobalt extraction and minimize the iron and/or aluminum content of the final leach liquor.
All of these methods require the use of one of the following to leach the high magnesium ore effectively: a) elevated temperature and pressure; b) pretreatment by calcination or roasting, or; c) addition of a reducing H,\jo1zik\keep\Speci\BHP Billion\minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 IN 7 cg agent with controlled pH.
0 The discussion of the above methods is not to be taken as an admission that any one or more of the methods are part of the common general knowledge in Australia.
SSUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 00 The present invention provides a process for efficient leaching of both a low magnesium fraction and a Shigh magnesium fraction of nickel laterite ore. The low magnesium fraction of the ore is leached at high temperature and pressure, as in other processes previously described. No special reductants, pretreatment steps or high pressure steps are required to leach the high magnesium fraction of the ore, thereby representing substantial simplification over the prior art. The present invention also provides for the removal of iron by the formation of alkali metal jarosite, e.g. sodium jarosite, to produce a low iron solution suitable for nickel and cobalt recovery.
According to the present invention there is provided a hydrometallurgical sulfuric acid leaching process for the extraction of nickel and cobalt from nickeliferous laterite oxide ore comprises the steps of: a. providing an aqueous pulp of nickeliferous oxide ore having a low magnesium content; b. leaching the nickeliferous oxide ore in the aqueous pulp from step at a temperature of at least 200°C and at an elevated pressure with an addition of sulfuric acid at least sufficient stoichiometrically to effect leaching of contained nickel and cobalt and thereby provide a leach liquor of nickel sulfate, cobalt sulfate and a leach residue, wherein the leach liquor contains at H.\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 IN 8 (c least 76 g/L of sulfuric acid; 0 c. providing an aqueous pulp of nickeliferous oxide ore having a high magnesium content; d. leaching the nickeliferous oxide ore in the aqueous pulp from step at atmospheric pressure with 00 sulfuric acid; e. adding the aqueous pulp from step to the Sleach liquor from step at atmospheric pressure to yield a final neutralization slurry, wherein when added together, the aqueous pulp from step and the leach liquor from step are at temperatures of 80°C up to the atmospheric pressure boiling point of the neutralization slurry, (ii) agitation and time are provided to effect extraction of unleached nickel and cobalt from high magnesium containing nickeliferous oxide ore in the aqueous pulp from step and (iii) a reducing agent is not added to the neutralization slurry to control its oxidation/reduction potential; and f. adding a precipitating agent selected from the group consisting of alkali metal ions, ammonium ions, and mixtures thereof, to the pulp of step leach liquor of step or neutralization slurry of step to precipitate ferric iron as jarosite.
Preferably the leach liquor and the leach residue of step are not separated before step Preferably the process comprises adding to the H.\jolzik\keep\Speci\EMP Silliton\iMnara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 O 9 cg neutralization slurry a neutralization agent selected from the group consisting of alkali and alkaline earth oxides, 0 hydroxides, carbonates, and mixtures thereof.
Preferably the process comprises subjecting the neutralization slurry to a solid/liquid separation step to Sproduce a final pregnant leach liquor suitable for Srecovery of nickel and cobalt and a final leach residue.
Preferably the process comprises grinding the Shigh magnesium containing nickeliferous oxide ore before forming the aqueous pulp in step Preferably the pH of the neutralization slurry is not controlled during addition of the aqueous pulp from step containing nickeliferous ore.
Preferably the leach liquor of step contains between 76 g/L and 114 g/L of sulfuric acid.
Preferably the leach liquor of step contains 92 g/L and 114 g/L of sulfuric acid.
Preferably the leach liquor of step contains 102 g/L and 114 g/L of sulfuric acid.
Preferably the process comprises extracting at least 73% of the nickel present in the nickeliferous laterite oxide ore.
Preferably the process comprises extracting between 73 and 94% of the nickel present in the nickeliferous laterite oxide ore.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention is described hereinafter by Hs\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 \o 10 cq way of example with reference to the accompanying Sdrawings, of which: 0 FIG. 1 is a flow sheet of one embodiment of the process of the invention described and claimed in Australian patent application 779844, from which the Ssubject application has been divided; 00 O0 SFIG. 2 is a flow sheet of one, although not the
I
o 10 only, embodiment of the process of the present invention; FIG. 3 is a graph showing the rate of nickel extraction from high magnesium containing ore, or saprolite, as a function of sulfuric acid concentration; and FIG. 4 is a graph showing the rate of nickel extraction as a function of time during atmospheric leaching of saprolite ore with sulfuric acid at 90 0
C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION The present invention is a novel method for combining atmospheric pressure leaching of a high magnesium fraction of nickeliferous laterite ore with high pressure leaching of a low magnesium fraction of the ore, while maximizing extraction of nickel and cobalt.
As is indicated above, the flow sheet of Figure 1 is one embodiment of the process of the invention that is described and claimed in Australian patent application 779844, from which the subject application has been divided.
Referring to Figure 1, laterite ore is separated into two fractions 10. This separation can be based on selective mining or on size classification by, for H,\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 0 11c example, screening. One fraction is finer than the other and has a lower magnesium content. This low magnesium O laterite, or so-called limonite, is mixed with water to provide an aqueous pulp. This pulp is leached with sulfuric acid at elevated temperature (at least about 200 oC) and pressure in step 20. During this leaching process most metals in the ore are completely or partially 00 -solubilized.
Upon completion of the leaching reaction, Stypically within 30 to 45 minutes, a pressure leach slurry is discharged to atmospheric pressure and cooled to a temperature at or near the normal boiling point of the leach slurry. Steam is "flashed" off during this step.
The leach slurry, or leach liquor, after solid/liquid separation to remove the pressure leaching residue, is now contacted in step 30 at atmospheric pressure with the other laterite fraction. The other laterite fraction, i.e. a high magnesium laterite or saprolite, is used to neutralize the free acid in the leach liquor at a temperature of 800 to 98 0 C, preferably above 90 0 C. This temperature is conveniently the temperature of the low magnesium ore leach slurry after flashing to atmospheric pressure. The free sulfuric acid concentration in the pressure leach solution is typically to 100 g/L H 2
SO
4 The quantity of high magnesium ore or saprolite added is calculated based on the pre-determined acid consumption properties of the saprolite and the quantity of free acid in the pressure leach solution. It is not necessary to control the pH of the leach slurry, unlike the teaching of U.S. Patent 4,410,498. In fact, the relatively low pH, typically or high acidity of the pressure leach solution is advantageous in that the rate of saprolite leaching is higher at lower pH.
Surprisingly, it is also unnecessary to add a reducing agent to control the oxidation/reduction potential (see H.\Jo1zik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Lo.-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 12 SFigure 3 in U.S. Patent 4,410,498) of the slurry in order Sto effect rapid leaching of the saprolite at the higher O acid concentration prevailing in the pressure leach slurry or solution.
A high nickel extraction from the high magnesium ore is possible in this process, without the need of ore 00 Spretreatment or the use of any other reagents to increase Sthe reactivity of the ore.
I SReferring to Figure 2, in one embodiment of the present invention, the high magnesium fraction of the laterite ore is first leached 60 with additional sulfuric acid at atmospheric pressure.
The other steps of the process shown in Figure 2 are the same as the steps of the embodiment of the process described in relation to Figure 1 and the same reference numerals are used in both Figures 1 and 2 to describe the same steps.
The quantity of additional acid added in leach step 60 is calculated from the pre-determined acid consumption properties of the saprolite ore, the quantity of free acid in the pressure leach solution and the desired limonite to saprolite processing ratio. In this process, nickel and other metals are solubilized.
This embodiment of the present invention allows the ratio of limonite to saprolite ore to be varied while maintaining high overall nickel and cobalt extractions and minimal iron extraction.
Addition of additional sulfuric acid directly to hot, pressure leach slurry from step 20 prior to the addition of saprolite is undesirable because it causes redissolution of iron compounds that were precipitated H.\jo1zik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High M9.doc 11/10/06 IN 13 c during the pressure leaching step. The iron redissolution is largely avoided by mixing the additional acid with all O or a portion of the saprolite ore prior to mixing with the pressure leach slurry.
o The terminal acidity of the slurry after Sneutralization with saprolite in step 30 is advantageously 00 S5-10 g/L free sulfuric acid. If the free acid to saprolite ratio in the overall feed to the saprolite neutralization step is too low, the leach extraction will Sbe lowered. On the other hand, if the free acid to saprolite ratio is too high, there will be excess acid in the final neutralization slurry that requires neutralization prior to iron precipitation.
In another embodiment of the process of the present invention (not shown in the flow sheets), the saprolite neutralization step 30 is carried out continuously in a series of agitated tanks. The number and size of the tanks is chosen to maximize the rate of leaching and minimize the overall retention time required to achieve the desired nickel extraction from the saprolite. Multiple tanks are used in order to carry out the leaching process at the highest average acidity possible. This increases the rate of reaction because the leaching rate increases as the sulfuric acid concentration increases.
Referring to Figures 1 and 2, the leach slurry from the atmosphere pressure leach step 30 is treated to precipitate jarosite solution in a step 40. During any step prior to jarosite formation step 40, a precipitating agent selected from the group consisting of alkali metal ions, ammonium ions or mixtures thereof can be added to the process. Preferably, the precipitating agent is a source of sodium ions. One method is to recycle sodium sulfate solution from the downstream recovery process.
H.\1o1zik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara I Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 IN 14 C( This is a filtration product in the formation of a metal carbonate precipitate. The formation of iron jarosite is 0 advantageously carried out at temperatures of about 90 0
C
Sto 100°C under atmospheric pressure for at least two hours and at a pH of 1.6 to 2.0 (preferably at The acid that is produced from the iron hydrolysis can be neutralized with any neutralizing agent to maintain the 00 Sdesired pH. Examples of the neutralizing agent include Sbut are not limited to limestone, lime or magnesia.
Alternatively, more high magnesium laterite can be added c to neutralize the acid that is produced by the formation of jarosite. Jarosite precipitation occurs at much lower pH values than iron hydroxide precipitation and virtually eliminates the problem of co-precipitation of nickel and cobalt and their subsequent loss.
After the formation of jarosite, the leach slurry proceeds to a liquid/solid separation step 50. This is preferably a counter current decantation circuit, which produces a solids residue virtually void of nickel and cobalt, and a clear leach liquor to proceed to the metals recovery.
The following examples illustrate, but do not limit, the present invention. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are by weight.
EXAMPLE 1 This example illustrates atmospheric leaching of saprolite ore with sulfuric acid solutions at constant acid concentration and at temperatures between 800 and 0
C.
Saprolite ore was pulped at 15 solids in deionized water and agitated in a well-sealed kettle with sulfuric acid at either 800 or 90 0 C. The concentration of H,\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 S- 15 c< sulfuric acid was kept constant during the tests. Samples of liquid were taken at different times during the test O for analysis. The solids at the end of the tests were filtered, washed, dried and split for chemical analysis.
Table 1 shows the final leaching results for each test.
Table 1 00 SResults of saprolite atmospheric leach tests Sconducted at constant sulfuric acid concentration I
O-
0 Acid Composition Extraction consumption Acid Kg/ cone. Temp Sample Wt tonne Kg/Kg ID Ni Fe Mg Ni Fe Mg ore Ni 100 80 Ore 50 1.92 8.01 14.10 94 84.2 79.7 599 32.26 Residue 30.2 0.192 2.1 4.75 80 Ore 50 1.87 7.14 13.59 89.7 66.2 77.7 Residue 31.1 0.309 3.89 4.87 80 Ore 50 1.87 7.35 13.91 77.6 38.7 66.4 529.6 34.89 Residue 34.6 0.606 6.51 6.77 90 Ore 233.5 1.91 7.31 16.07 70.1 31.6 71.8 625.0 45.50 Residue 192.6 0.693 6.06 5.49__ These results show that saprolite ore is effectively leached with sulfuric acid at temperatures close to the boiling point at atmospheric pressure without the need of any ore pre-treatment or additional reagents during leaching.
The data also show that at lower acid concentrations the kinetics of iron dissolution lag behind those of nickel and magnesium dissolution resulting in a high nickel extraction and low iron extraction. This is an important criterion since iron poses a problem in the downstream recovery of nickel by means known to those skilled in the art. A process in which high nickel and Hi\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 0 16 cg low iron dissolution from saprolite ore can thus be devised by leaching the ore with acid concentrations below 0 about 50 g/1.
The nickel extraction as a function of time is illustrated in Figure 3, which shows that the rate of nickel extraction is a strong function of the sulfuric 00 Sacid concentration.
O
EXAMPLE 2 This example illustrates atmospheric leaching of saprolite ore with a fixed amount of sulfuric acid solution at 90 0
C.
Saprolite ore was pulped at 15 solids in deionized water and agitated in a well-sealed kettle with sulfuric acid at 90 0 C for 3 hours. The initial sulfuric acid concentration varied from 106 to 114 g/L in the 4 tests described. Samples of liquid were taken at different times during the test for analysis. The solids at the end of the tests were filtered, washed, dried and split for chemical analysis.
Table 2 shows the final leaching results for each test and Figure 4 shows the kinetics of nickel dissolution from saprolite ore.
Table 2 Results of saprolite atmospheric leach with sulfuric acid at 90 0
C
Test Initial Sample Wt Composition Extraction Acid No. [H 2
SO
4 ID consumption Ni Fe Mg Ni Fe Mg Kg/ Kg/Kg ton Ni 1 106 Ore 107.8 1.91 7.45 15.90 86.7 28.7 86.6 559 33.6 Hc\jo1zik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg 0 doc 11/10/06
O
O
i 17 Test Initial Sample Wt Composition Extraction Acid No. [H 2
SO
4 ID consumption Ni Fe Mg Ni Fe Mg Kg/ Kg/Kg ton Ni Residue 71.8 0.38 7.98 3.19 2 106 Ore 165.9 1.11 9.10 14.60 76.2 36.4 65.6 512 60.5 Residue 103.5 0.42 9.28 8.07 3 114 Ore 167 2.04 8.54 15.30 84.1 46.3 76.3 565 32.9 Residue 104.7 0.51 7.27 5.73 4 101 Ore 164 1.28 11.40 16.10 73.7 33.3 69.6 507 53.8 Residue 112.4 0.50 11.20 7.21 The variation of final nickel extraction between the various tests is due mostly to the different amount of acid used in each test and to the variation of composition of the samples. Metal and free acid concentrations in solution as a function of time are shown in Table 3.
Approximate metal extractions were calculated from the solution assays over time. These data show that most of the nickel dissolves within the first 15 minutes of leaching when the acid concentration is higher. After this time, saprolite continues to react at much slower rates until most of the acid is consumed. Since saprolite ore was leached at acid concentrations under 50 g/l for most of the test period, the final iron dissolution was relatively low.
Table 3 Solution composition as a function of atmospheric leaching of saprolite ore time during the at 90 0 C (Test 3) Time Solution concentration Extraction (min) Ni Fe Mg H2SO4 Ni Fe Mg 0 0 0 0 114 0 0 0 2.37 4.4 11.4 34.4 65.9 29.4 42.2 2.82 5.4 14.9 21.6 79.3 36.5 55.7 H,\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06
IND
0 0c i 1-( 18 Time Solution concentration Extraction (min) Ni Fe Mg H 2
SO
4 Ni Fe Mg 2.91 5.6 16.1 16.7 82.6 38.1 61.0 2.72 5.4 15.5 13.7 78.6 37.4 59.5 60 2.80 5.6 16.4 12.3 81.7 39.1 63.6 2.67 5.2 15.5 9.3 79.1 36.9 61.1 120 2.69 5.1 15.9 7.8 80.5 36.9 63.2 150 2.68 5.4 16.6 6.9 81.3 38.7 66.4 180 2.85 5.5 17.4 6.9 86.9 40.3 70.3 EXAMPLE 3 This example illustrates the atmospheric leaching of saprolite ore with the product leach slurry from pressure leaching of low magnesium, or limonite, ore.
Limonite ore was first leached in a titanium autoclave for 30 minutes at an acid to ore ratio of 0.38, 270 0 C and 40 wt solids. After leaching and pressure letdown, saprolite ore was added as a 50 wt slurry to neutralize the remaining free acid in the autoclave discharge that results from the bisulfate-sulfate shift at low temperatures. The saprolite to limonite ratio, when leaching saprolite in this manner, was about 0.17 (tests 1 and In some cases, concentrated sulfuric acid was added to the leach slurry in order to leach more saprolite ore and increase the saprolite to limonite ratio (tests 3- Saprolite leaching was carried out in an agitated tank at 90°C for 3 hours.
The results from each test are shown in Table 4.
Table 4 Results of saprolite atmospheric leaching with autoclave discharge at 90 0 C. Additional sulfuric acid was added to tests Hi\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 19 Test Sample Wt Composition Extraction No. ID Ni Fe Mg from Ni Mg Limonite ore 738 1.95 37.5 3.55 1 HPAL residue 650 0.13 43.7 0.9 Limonite 94.2 76.5 Saprolite ore 110 1.91 7.6 15.6 Saprolite 70.8 66.0 Final residue 722 0.20 40.1 1.7 Overall 91.2 72.3 Limonite ore 721 1.89 36.4 3.35 2 HPAL residue 634 0.09 44.1 0.9 Limonite 95.8 77.5 Saprolite ore 120 1.91 7.6 15.6 Saprolite 66.1 64.4 Final residue 724 0.19 40.1 1.7 Overall 91.5 71.8 Limonite ore 802 1.97 37.9 3.44 3 HPAL residue 705 0.11 41.0 1.0 Limonite 95.3 75.6 Saprolite ore 335 1.91 7.6 15.6 Saprolite 80.4 66.0 Final residue 897 0.22 33.8 2.7 Overall 91.0 69.3 Limonite ore 658 1.88 36.5 3.46 4 HPAL residue 579 0.13 41.7 0.9 Limonite 93.7 76.0 Saprolite ore 245 1.91 7.6 15.6 Saprolite 76.1 67.2 Final residue 741 0.26 34.6 2.4 Overall 88.9 70.5 Limonite ore 790 2 36.9 3.66 HPAL residue 695 0.14 41.60 0.96 Limonite 94.0 76.8 Saprolite ore 315 1.91 8.25 15.00 Saprolite 74.9 73.2 Final residue 927 0.27 32.90 2.09 Overall 88.7 74.6 These results demonstrate that saprolite ore can be used to neutralize the free acid in the autoclave discharge from a high-pressure acid leach of limonite ore, while obtaining high nickel extractions from this high magnesium ore fraction. The results also show that it is possible to vary the saprolite to limonite ratio by adding extra sulfuric acid to the autoclave discharge.
EXAMPLE 4 This example shows a method of iron control by precipitation of jarosite after leaching of limonite ore at high pressure and temperature and neutralization of the Hs\jolzik\keep\SpecI\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 ID 20 Ci remaining acid with saprolite ore at 90 0
C.
O Limonite ore was first leached in a titanium autoclave for 30 minutes at an acid to ore ratio of 0.38, 270 0 C and 40 wt solids. After leaching and pressure let down, saprolite ore was added as a 50 wt slurry to Sneutralize the remaining free acid in the autoclave 00 0 discharge slurry (ACD) at atmospheric pressure and 90 0
C.
SConcentrated sulfuric acid was also added to the ACD to be able to leach more saprolite ore and increase the saprolite to limonite ratio to 0.4. Sodium sulfate was added to the saprolite slurry before addition to the ACD to provide a source of alkali ions for jarosite formation.
The final step, after saprolite leaching, consisted of precipitating the iron in solution as natro-jarosite.
This was achieved by maintaining the free acid concentration at around 5 g/l H 2 SO4 (pH~1.5) and the temperature at about 95 0 C for an additional 3 hours. The free acid concentration was kept at the mentioned level by periodic additions of CaCO 3 slurry after 200 minutes of leaching.
Results from this test are shown in Tables 5 and 6.
Table Results of saprolite atmospheric leaching with autoclave discharge at 90 0 C followed by jarosite precipitation.
Test Sample Wt Composition Extraction ID ID Ni Fe Mg from Ni Mg Limonite ore 355 1.92 35.7 4.9 6 HPAL residue 312 0.13 40.7 1.4 Limonite 94.1 73.9 Saprolite ore 140 1.91 7.3 16.1 Saprolite 75.3 69.7 Final residue 448 0.24 32.6 2.5 Overall 88.8 71.5 H.\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 21 Table 6 Kinetics of saprolite atmospheric leaching with autoclave discharge at 90 0 C followed by jarosite precipitation.
Time Solution concentration Extraction (min) H 2 S0 4 Ni Fe Mg Na Ni Mg 0 76 0 0 0 4.2 0 0 46.6 7.42 3.66 15.9 4.15 33.5 24.6 15.7 7.96 4.82 21.4 3.87 63.5 56.9 120 10.3 7.75 4.52 22.1 3.97 57.9 62.0 180 10.1 7.48 3.70 22.1 4.03 49.6 63.5 230 3.0 7.78 1.00 22.8 3.93 68.0 69.1 280 5.2 7.81 0.92 23.4 3.81 73.5 73.8 330 4.4 7.83 0.56 22.6 3.78 76.5 70.8 These was effectively results, once again used to neutralize show that saprolite the acid in the high proportion of the autoclave discharge and to leach a nickel contained within the saprolite ore. At the end of the atmospheric leach step, iron in solution decreased from a maximum of about 5 g/l by the formation of jarosite until the iron concentration in solution reached about g/l. The low nickel assay of the final residue after jarosite precipitation was achieved despite the precipitation of approx. 5 g/L iron as jarosite.
EXAMPLE This example illustrates the continuous processing of limonite ore under high-pressure acid leach (HPAL) conditions followed by the processing of saprolite ore under atmospheric leach (AL) conditions.
A limonite ore slurry at 38.5 wt. solids was leached at high pressure and temperature (270 0 C and 820 psi) at an acid to ore ratio of 0.4 tonnes acid/tonne ore HM\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 ID 22 eC in a continuous autoclave. Limonite was processed at a rate of 0.8 dry tonnes/day yielding an autoclave retention 0 time of 30 minutes. The discharge from the autoclave consisted of HPAL residue and leach solution containing metals and free sulfuric acid (92 g/L).
00 l^ The compositions of the ore fed to the autoclave Sand the discharge residue, as well as the calculated metal extractions, are shown in Table 7.
0 Table 7 High pressure acid leaching (HPAL) results.
Al Co Cr Fe Mg Mn Ni Limonite feed 2.82 0.125 1.47 34.4 3.72 0.71 1.63 HPAL residue 2.62 0.000 1.54 39.5 0.93 0.17 0.075 Extraction 20.0% 100.0% 9.5% 1.1% 78.4% 79.7% 96.0% The autoclave discharge slurry was mixed with saprolite ore (at 46 wt. solids) in the proportion of 0.3 tonnes saprolite/tonne limonite. Sodium was added as sodium sulfate to the water used to prepare the saprolite ore slurry. Sulfuric acid was added to the mixture in the proportion of 0.46 tonnes concentrated acid/tonne saprolite. The concentrated acid combined with the residual acid from the HPAL yielded an acid to saprolite ratio of 0.96 tonnes acid/tonne saprolite. The overall concentrated acid to ore ratio was 0.41 tonnes acid/tonne ore (limonite plus saprolite).
The atmospheric leach circuit (AL) consisted of 3 tanks in series with an overall retention time of 4.2 hours (1.4 hours/tank). This circuit was followed by a jarosite precipitation circuit (JP) consisting of 2 tanks in series with an overall retention time of 5.9 hours (first tank 1.4 hours, second tank 4.5 hours). Limestone slurry was added to the jarosite precipitation tanks to H-\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 23 control the slurry pH.
Average conditions of these tanks over the test duration of approximately 70 hours are presented in Table 8: Table 8 Atmospheric Leach and Iron Precipitation Conditions Tank pH Free Acid Temperature AL1 37.7 97 AL2 33.5 92 AL3 27.1 94 JP1 1.5 10.5 94 JP2 1.9 5.9 92 The compositions of the residues resulting from the consecutive operations and the calculated metal extractions from saprolite in atmospheric leaching and the overall extractions from HPAL followed by atmospheric leaching are given in Table 9.
Table 9 Ore and Leach Residue Compositions and Metal Extractions for Each Stage Al Co Cr Fe Mg Mn Ni Limonite ore 2.82 0.125 1.47 34.4 3.72 0.71 1.63 Saprolite ore 1.58 0.085 0.85 11.4 14.83 0.48 1.31 HPAL residue 2.62 0.000 1.54 39.5 0.93 0.17 0.075 AL residue 2.45 0.027 1.38 32.9 2.00 0.23 0.13 JP residue 2.04 0.007 1.19 29.2 1.53 0.18 0.092 Extraction 17.6% 82.6% 13.9% 73.3% 38.8% 85.6% from saprolite Extraction 20.0% 97.5% 10.3% 0.6% 75.6% 72.8% 94.1% H.\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06
DO
c 0
O
1-( 24 from limonite and saprolite The solutions resulting from the leaching and precipitation stages show the increase in nickel and cobalt content as well as the decrease in free acidity.
5 The Fe content initially increased during the atmospheric leaching stage, but subsequently decreased during jarosite precipitation, as shown in Table Table 10 Solution Compositions after Each Stage Al Co Cr Fe Mg Mn Ni Free (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) Acid (g/L) HPAL 2741 695 491 2463 16847 3791 9826 92 solution AL 3728 825 768 13715 33066 4472 12084 27 solution JP 2819 820 587 1417 35663 4500 12591 5.9 solution EXAMPLE 6 This example illustrates the continuous processing of limonite ore under high pressure acid leach (HPAL) conditions followed by the processing of saprolite ore under atmospheric leach (AL) conditions.
A limonite ore slurry at 35 wt. solids was leached at high pressure and temperature (270°C and 820 psi) at an acid to ore ratio of 0.34 tonnes acid/tonne limonite in a continuous autoclave. Limonite was processed at a rate of 0.8 dry tonnes/day yielding an autoclave retention time of 30 minutes. The discharge from the autoclave consisted of HPAL residue and leach solution containing metals and free acid (102 g/L).
H.\Jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 ND 25 o The compositions of the ore fed to the autoclave 0 and the discharge residue, as well as the calculated metal extractions, are shown in Table 11.
Table 11 SHigh pressure acid leaching (HPAL) results
I
IND
Co Fe Mg Ni Limonite feed 0.11 40.33 2.79 1.66 HPAL residue 0.004 43.8 0.82 0.091 Extraction 96.1% 1.2% 70.5% 94.8% The autoclave discharge slurry was mixed with saprolite ore (at 51 wt. solids) in the proportion of 0.38 tonnes saprolite/tonne limonite. Sodium was added as sodium sulfate to the water used to prepare the saprolite ore slurry. Sulfuric acid was added to the mixture in the proportion of 0.23 tonnes concentrated acid/tonne saprolite. The concentrated acid combined with the residual acid from the HPAL yielded an acid to saprolite ratio of 0.59 tonnes acid/tonne saprolite. The overall concentrated acid to ore ratio was 0.31 tonnes acid/tonne ore (limonite plus saprolite).
The atmospheric leach circuit (AL) consisted of 4 tanks. Half the saprolite was added to the first tank (1 hour retention) along with the concentrated sulfuric acid, while the other half was added to the second tank (1.4 hour retention) along with the autoclave discharge slurry.
The first tank overflowed into the second tank, which then overflowed into 2 tanks in series (1.4 hour retention each). This circuit was followed by a jarosite precipitation circuit (JP) consisting of 2 tanks in series with an overall retention time of 5.9 hours (first tank 1.4 hours, second tank 4.5 hours). Limestone slurry was added to the jarosite precipitation tanks to control the H,\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 26 slurry pH.
Average conditions of these tanks over the test duration of approximately 82 hours are presented in Table 12: Table 12 Atmospheric Leach and Iron Precipitation Conditions Tank pH Free Acid Temperature ALl 54.4 71 AL2 21.5 92 AL3 20.3 91 AL4 14.7 91 JP1 1.7 7.6 94 JP2 2.1 6.5 93 The compositions of the residues resulting from the consecutive operations and the calculated metal extractions from saprolite in atmospheric leaching and the overall extractions from HPAL followed by atmospheric leaching are given in Table 13.
Table 13 Ore and Leach Residue and Metal Extractions Compositions for Each Stage Co Fe Mg Ni Limonite feed 0.11 40.33 2.79 1.66 Saprolite ore 0.088 11.4 14.2 1.30 HPAL residue 0.004 43.8 0.82 0.091 AL residue 0.016 36.7 1.83 0.147 JP residue 0.018 33.0 1.83 0.132 Extraction from saprolite 42.9% 62.7% 76.5% Extraction from limonite and saprolite 83.6% 0.6% 69.9% 91.8% HO\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-Hligh Mg.doc 11/10/06 IN 27 C The solutions resulting from the leaching and o precipitation stages show the increase in metals content 0 as well as the decrease in free acidity.
The Fe content initially increased during the o atmospheric leaching stage, but subsequently decreased Sduring jarosite precipitation, as shown in Table 14.
00 STable 14 Solution Compositions after Each Stage Free Al Co Cr Fe Mg Mn Ni Acid (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (g/L) HPAL 4391 764 719 3820 17220 4264 12030 102 solution AL 3261 698 640 6618 32628 3982 11228 14.7 solution JP 3343 757 547 1568 35399 4279 12185 solution While there have been described what are presently believed to be the preferred embodiments of the invention, those skilled in the art will realize that changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is intended to claim all such changes and modifications that fall within the true scope of the invention.
In the claims which follow and in the preceding description of the invention, except where the context requires otherwise due to express language or necessary implication, the word "compromise" or variations such as "compromises" or "compromising" is used in an inclusive sense, i.e. to specify the presence of the stated features but not to preclude the presence or addition of further features in various embodiments of the invention.
H.\jc1.ik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High mg.doc 11/10/06
Claims (5)
1. A hydrometallurgical sulfuric acid leaching process for the extraction of nickel and cobalt from nickeliferous laterite oxide ore comprises the steps of: o 00 0 a. providing an aqueous pulp of nickeliferous oxide Sore having a low magnesium content; O b. leaching the nickeliferous oxide ore in the aqueous pulp from step at a temperature of at least 200 0 C and at an elevated pressure with an addition of sulfuric acid at least sufficient stoichiometrically to effect leaching of contained nickel and cobalt and thereby provide a leach liquor of nickel sulfate, cobalt sulfate and a leach residue, wherein the leach liquor contains at least 76 g/L of sulfuric acid; c. providing an aqueous pulp of nickeliferous oxide ore having a high magnesium content; d. leaching the nickeliferous oxide ore in the aqueous pulp from step at atmospheric pressure with sulfuric acid; e. adding the aqueous pulp from step to the leach liquor from step at atmospheric pressure to yield a final neutralization slurry, wherein when added together, the aqueous pulp from step and the leach liquor from step are at temperatures of 80°C up to the atmospheric pressure boiling point of the neutralization slurry, (ii) agitation and time are provided to effect extraction of unleached nickel and cobalt from high H.\jolzik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Low-High Mg.doc 11/10/06 IN 29 pc magnesium containing nickeliferous oxide ore in the aqueous pulp from step and 0 (iii) a reducing agent is not added to the neutralization slurry to control its oxidation/reduction potential; and 00 f. adding a precipitating agent selected from the group consisting of alkali metal ions, ammonium ions, and mixtures thereof, to the pulp of step leach liquor of step or neutralization slurry of step to precipitate ferric iron as jarosite.
2. The process of claim 1 comprises adding to the neutralization slurry a neutralization agent selected from the group consisting of alkali and alkaline earth oxides, hydroxides, carbonates, and mixtures thereof.
3. The process of claim 1 or claim 2 comprises subjecting the neutralization slurry to a solid/liquid separation step to produce a final pregnant leach liquor suitable for recovery of nickel and cobalt and a final leach residue.
4. The process of any one of the preceding claims comprises grinding the high magnesium containing nickeliferous oxide ore before forming the aqueous pulp in step
5. The process of any one of the preceding claims comprises extracting at least 73% of the nickel present in the nickeliferous laterite oxide ore. H,\jo1lik\keep\Speci\BHP Billiton\Minara 1 Lo.-High Mg.dov 11/10/06
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2006100870A AU2006100870B4 (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2006-10-11 | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/433110 | 1999-11-03 | ||
| AU24697/01A AU779844B2 (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2000-10-25 | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores |
| AU2006100870A AU2006100870B4 (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2006-10-11 | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU24697/01A Division AU779844B2 (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2000-10-25 | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| AU2006100870A5 AU2006100870A5 (en) | 2006-11-02 |
| AU2006100870B4 true AU2006100870B4 (en) | 2006-11-02 |
Family
ID=37395748
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AU2006100870A Expired AU2006100870B4 (en) | 1999-11-03 | 2006-10-11 | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| AU (1) | AU2006100870B4 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112322909B (en) * | 2020-10-11 | 2022-11-08 | 四川顺应动力电池材料有限公司 | Method for extracting valuable metal elements from laterite-nickel ore by sulfuric acid leaching method and acid-base regeneration circulation |
| CN114606397B (en) * | 2022-03-11 | 2023-09-22 | 西安建筑科技大学 | Method for reducing iron and enriching valuable metals in limonite type laterite nickel ore |
| CN115029551B (en) * | 2022-05-07 | 2024-04-09 | 金川集团股份有限公司 | Method for leaching and reducing magnesium from high-magnesium low-nickel concentrate |
-
2006
- 2006-10-11 AU AU2006100870A patent/AU2006100870B4/en not_active Expired
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU2006100870A5 (en) | 2006-11-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| AU779844B2 (en) | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores | |
| US6261527B1 (en) | Atmospheric leach process for the recovery of nickel and cobalt from limonite and saprolite ores | |
| US4410498A (en) | Acid leaching of nickel from serpentinic laterite ores | |
| AU2011201786A1 (en) | Chloride assisted hydrometallurgical extraction of nickel and cobalt from sulphide or laterite ores | |
| AU751862C (en) | Selective precipitation of nickel and cobalt | |
| AU2006100870B4 (en) | Method for leaching nickeliferous laterite ores | |
| AU2011219678B2 (en) | Method for enhancing solid-liquid separation in conjunction with laterite leaching | |
| NO20130823A1 (en) | Method of separating nickel from low nickel material | |
| WO2002048042A1 (en) | Hydroxide solids enrichment by precipitate contact | |
| GB2086872A (en) | Acid Leaching of Lateritic Nickel Ores | |
| JP3407738B1 (en) | Method for recovering nickel and cobalt from oxide ore | |
| AU2002221333B2 (en) | Hydroxide solids enrichment by precipitate contact | |
| WO2009155634A1 (en) | Counter current atmospheric leach process | |
| AU2002221333A1 (en) | Hydroxide solids enrichment by precipitate contact | |
| KR20080058458A (en) | Process for leaching lateritic ore at atmospheric pressure |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGI | Letters patent sealed or granted (innovation patent) | ||
| CB | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: MINARA RESOURCES LIMITED |
|
| MK22 | Patent ceased section 143a(d), or expired - non payment of renewal fee or expiry |