AU2002217737A1 - Implant for reconstruction of joints - Google Patents

Implant for reconstruction of joints

Info

Publication number
AU2002217737A1
AU2002217737A1 AU2002217737A AU2002217737A AU2002217737A1 AU 2002217737 A1 AU2002217737 A1 AU 2002217737A1 AU 2002217737 A AU2002217737 A AU 2002217737A AU 2002217737 A AU2002217737 A AU 2002217737A AU 2002217737 A1 AU2002217737 A1 AU 2002217737A1
Authority
AU
Australia
Prior art keywords
implant according
joint
implant
spacer member
bones
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
AU2002217737A
Other versions
AU2002217737B2 (en
Inventor
Bengt Edberg
Anders Nilsson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Artimplant AB
Original Assignee
Artimplant AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from SE0100127A external-priority patent/SE525131C2/en
Application filed by Artimplant AB filed Critical Artimplant AB
Publication of AU2002217737A1 publication Critical patent/AU2002217737A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of AU2002217737B2 publication Critical patent/AU2002217737B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

TITLE
Implant for reconstruction of joints
TECHNICAL FIELD The present invention relates to an implant for reconstruction of joints, preferably of the hands and feet.
PRIOR ART
Primary wear, arthrosis, of the joints of the hands and feet, for example the carpometacarpal joints of the thumb, is a common condition, especially in middle-aged women. Investigations show that about 12% of all women and
8% of men in their fifties complain of pain at the base of the thumb. The incidence of wear of the big toe, hallux rigidus, is probably even greater.
These conditions cause pain at rest and also load-related pain and they reduce mobility. In the hand, this leads to pain in various types of grips and thereby reduces the gripping strength.
In the foot, wear causes pain when walking, with reduced mobility and freedom of movement in the persons affected.
Today, arthrosis of the base of the thumb is initially treated with anti- inflammatory agents, local cortisone injections and various types of supports. At a more developed stage of arthrosis of the base of the thumb, surgical methods are employed. In younger men, and in middle-aged men in work, wear of the joints is preferably treated by an operation stiffening the joint.
Today, in middle-aged and older women, the surgical method employed involves some form of bridging graft with a tendon. However, tendoplasty requires a long period of rehabilitation. The reduction in pain and the increase in mobility are only achieved after 6 to 9 months. Moreover, the persons involved have to live with a permanent loss of strength in the thumb grip. Various types of prostheses have also been produced, for example for treating arthrosis of the base of the thumb. They are made of titanium, steel, plastic, carbon or silicone. However, they fail after a short time on account of luxation of the joint. It has also been found that when carbon is used, the carbon fibre structure breaks down mechanically over time and the carbon fibre fragments tend to migrate within the body. US 4,411 ,027 proposes surrounding the carbon fibre structure with a shell of a bioabsorbable polymer for the purpose of protecting the structure from external mechanical action and keeping the fragments in place, at least in the early stage of healing. However, it has been found that carbon fibre fragments from the prosthesis still migrate within the body.
SE-B-457,962 describes an implantable prosthesis for completely or partially replacing a tendon, a ligament or a cruciate ligament. US 6,007,580 further describes a prosthesis made of a biodegradable material, which prosthesis is intended to connect two bones.
However, no suitable implant for reconstruction of joints has hitherto been proposed. Preconditions for such an implant to be able to function well are, first, that it must have properties, such as the requisite strength and mobility, allowing it to replace the functions of the damaged joint, and, second, that it is biocompatible, i.e. that the body is not poisoned or otherwise harmed by the implant. Joints are particularly complicated since they involve joint capsules, ligaments, cartilage and synovial fluid in order to permit natural joint movements.
It has been stated above that joint damage at the base of the thumb is extremely common and represents a major problem and causes suffering and impaired function in those concerned. Another common problem is hallux rigidus, which is a form of arthrosis of the base of the big toe and which mainly affects men and entails restricted mobility of the metatarso-phalangeal joint of the big toe. This means that the foot cannot be deployed in the normal way when walking, and that the person affected suffers pain when walking and an altered gait pattern with loss of speed.
The abovementioned method with a bridging tendon graft means, in the case of treating arthrosis of the base of the thumb, that a bone, namely the trapezoid bone, is removed in its entirety, which means that the thumb is shortened by the order of 1 cm and that the short thumb muscles have an altered range of functioning. Moreover, the proximal end of the metacarpal loses its stability. In order to reduce the instability and avoid conflict with the navicular bone, a bridging graft is formed from a tendon. However, the technique does not mean that the metacarpal is completely stable. This, together with the shortening of the thumb, leads to permanent loss of thumb strength both in the key grip and the three-point grip.
As has been mentioned above, the prostheses which have hitherto been produced are not entirely satisfactory either. One reason is that known prostheses do not stabilize the proximal metacarpal, which means that the prosthesis dislocates.
There has therefore long been a need for a solution to the abovementioned problems which would allow satisfactory reconstruction of damaged joints in humans and animals.
The present invention makes available an implant which is of the type set out in the introduction and which completely eliminates the abovementioned problems. The implant according to the invention is characterized in that least one spacer member is intended to be placed between the ends of the bones which are to be connected, one end of the spacer member being designed to form a joint surface against one of said bone ends, a joint-stabilizing connection is arranged to connect said bones,the spacer member is made of at least one tissue-compatible material, and the joint-stabilizing connection is intended, upon use of the implant, to extend in the longitudinal direction across the joint and in over at least one side of the two bones which are connected by the joint.
Since the implant comprises a spacer member, direct contact between adjacent bones is avoided, and thus also the occurrence of pain caused by bone rubbing against bone.
By means of the arrangement of said spacer member and a joint-stabilizing connection it is possible to ensure that during the period of growth of new tissue the implant has the correct form and also appropriate strength and mobility.
According to one embodiment of the invention the material is porous, entirely or partly. This, in combination with a pore size permitting ingrowth of new biological tissue means that the implant according to the invention substantially recreates a functioning joint.
According to one preferred embodiment, the spacer member and the joint stabilizing connection are made of degradable material.
According to a further embodiment the joint-stabilizing connection is made in one piece with the spacer member.
According to one embodiment the degradable material consists of polyurethane urea. According to another embodiment the degradable material consists of poly-L- lactide.
According to a further embodiment the degradable material consists of polydiaxone (PDS).
According to another embodiment the degradable material consists of poly-β- hydroxybutyrate (PHB).
According to another embodiment the degradable material consists of chitin or chitosan or polysaccharide.
According to a further embodiment the degradable material consists of collagen or protein.
According to a further embodiment the material consists of polyuretan.
According to a further embodiment the material consists of silicone.
According to a further embodiment the material consists of polyethylene terephtalate (PET).
According to another embodiment the inventiontion is characterized in that the implant in its entirety in cross-section mainly has the form of a T, where the stem is said spacer member.
According to one embodiment the invention is characterized in that the spacer member includes a film-like element which is intended to serve as said joint surface.
One embodiment of the invention is characterized in that the spacer member comprises a degradable and tissue-compatible material in the form of foam, fibre or thread, which material is cast, knitted or woven or in some other way formed to give the desired three-dimensional structure.
According to one embodiment, said connection consists of flexible thread-like elements.
According to one embodiment, the invention is characterized in that the joint- stabilizing connection consists of flexible thread-like elements, that said thread-like elements have at least one portion on both sides of the centre line of the two bones, that opposite ends of each of said portions are anchored in the respective bone, and that said portions span the joint and are designed to prevent mutual pivoting of the bones in the lateral direction.
According to a further embodiment, the invention is characterized in that said thread-like elements comprise two portions which each connect the two bones, and that said portions are designed to intersect each other across the joint, as a result of which movements in more than one plane are permitted. When an implant according to this embodiment is arranged for reconstruction of a joint at the base of the thumb, the thumb can be moved in a more natural way during the healing process, which in turn means that growth of new tissue is stimulated, permitting an improved joint function for the thumb.
Further preferred embodiments are set out in the attached patent claims.
The invention will be described in more detail below with reference to illustrative embodiments which are shown in the attached drawing, where:
Figure 1 shows a perspective diagrammatic view of a first illustrative embodiment of an implant according to the invention. Figure 2 shows a cross section through an implant according to
Figure 1 arranged in a joint between two bones.
Figure 3 shows a section along the line Ill-Ill in Figure 2.
Figure 4 shows a cross section of an implant according to Figure
1 arranged in a joint between two bones, in a modified way compared to Figure 2.
Figure 5 shows a perspective view of the bones in a hand and wrist.
Figure 6 shows a portion of the hand shown in Figure 5, with an implant according to Figure 1 arranged in a joint at the base of the thumb.
Figure 7 shows a second illustrative embodiment of an implant according to the invention arranged in a joint between two bones.
Figure 8 shows a side view of the implant and bones according to
Figure 7.
Figure 9 shows a view similar to Figure 7 with an implant according to a third illustrative embodiment, slightly modified in relation to the embodiment according to Figure 7.
Figure 10 shows a side view of the implant and bones according to Figure 9. Figure 11 shows a fourth illustrative embodiment of an implant according to the invention arranged in a joint between two bones.
Figure 12 shows a side view of the illustrative embodiment according to Figure 11.
Figures 13 and 14 show two sizes of spacer bodies which are included in the implant according to the illustrative embodiments in Figures 7-12 and which are intended to form articular heads in a joint.
Figures 15 and 16 show two sizes of spacer bodies which are included in the implant according to the illustrative embodiments in Figures 9 and 10 and which are intended to form articular sockets in a joint.
Figures 17 and 18 show the structure of a spacer member in an implant according to a fifth embodiment.
Figures 19 and 20 show, in longitudinal section, the structure of a spacer member in an implant according to a sixth embodiment.
Figures 21 and 22 show the structure of a spacer member in an implant according to a seventh embodiment.
The implant in the illustrative embodiment according to Figure 1 has a T- shaped cross section with a spacer member 1 and two connection branches 2, 3 which, during use of the implant, are intended to form a joint-stabilizing connection. In the illustrative embodiment shown, the implant is cast in one piece. Suitable materials for the implant are polymers comprising urethane groups with hydrolyzable ester groups or polymers comprising urea and urethane groups with ester links which are hydrolyzable. A suitable starting material for the implant is linear block polymers comprising urea and urethane groups with hydrolyzable ester groups. Material of this type is described in Swedish Patent 505,703. The material according to this publication can be cast into forms of the type shown in Figure 1 or spun into fibres which are then knitted or woven and shaped to give the desired finished product. Another suitable material is a network polymer which essentially lacks urea groups. Material of this type is described in Swedish Patent 510,868. Implants made of said materials can also be formed by a combination of casting and knitting or weaving. For example, a spacer member can be formed by casting the polymer in question on a reinforcement of the same material, which reinforcement can be designed as a hose or the like and intended to be engaged on a bone end. By choosing their structure and the molecular chains involved, and by adding various substances, the materials of said types described in said Swedish Patents 505,073 and 510,868 can be controlled with respect to their mechanical properties and also with respect to their degradation time.
The implant according to the invention is intended to be used in the reconstruction of damaged joints in humans and animals. The geometric design and the mechanical properties are chosen in accordance with the intended purpose. The implant will temporarily replace the damaged joint and the time of degradation of the implant must exceed the time for formation of cartilage-like tissue in the spacer member and joint-stabilizing connective tissue for forming a joint-stabilizing connection. The implant is designed so that, during the rehabilitation period, it fulfils the intended joint functions with sufficient strength and mobility. This, in combination with the fact that the spacer member is porous and has a pore size permitting ingrowth of new biological tissue, means, as has been mentioned above, that the implant according to the invention stimulates recreation of a functioning joint, at the same time as the implant is degraded. Material according to SE 505,703 and SE 510,868 is broken down by hydrolysis and thereafter eliminated from the body.
In Figure 2, the implant according to Figure 1 has been arranged in a damaged joint, for example a finger joint, between two bones 4, 5. The spacer member 1 is arranged between the bone ends 6, 7 of the respective bones, by which means direct contact between adjacent bone ends is prevented and pain caused by bone rubbing against bone is avoided. Before the implant has been fitted, recesses 8 have been formed in the bones 4, 5 and are intended to accommodate the joint-stabilizing connection formed by the branches 2, 3. The bone end 7 serves as an articular socket and the bone 5, in the position shown in Figure 2, is pivotable in the direction of the arrow A about the temporary joint surface which is formed by the spacer member 1. The implant is flexible but substantially non-stretchable during normal use, i.e. under the forces which occur when a finger joint is bent in a natural manner. The bone 5 can thus be bent from the position shown in Figure 2 by the order of magnitude of 90° and back, but not clockwise from the position shown in Figure 2. The opposite surface of the spacer member is in contact with a bone end 6 serving as an articular head on the bone 4, and the bone 4 can pivot correspondingly in relation to the bone 5 in the direction of the arrow B. The spacer member, like the rest of the implant, is porous with a pore size which permits ingrowth of new cartilage tissue for continuous re-formation of a permanent joint. The pore size also permits ingrowth of joint-stabilizing connective tissue in the branches 2, 3 of the implant, for continuous replacement of the temporary joint-stabilizing connection. Reformation of new cartilage tissue for the spacer body takes something in the region of VΛ to 2 years and the total degradation time for the temporary spacer body must therefore exceed this period of time. The connective tissue which replaces the temporary connection is re-formed in a shorter time than cartilage tissue, and it takes something in the region of six months to VΛ years for connective tissue to completely re-form. In the illustrative embodiment shown in Figures 2 and 3, the implant has been secured in the bones 4, 5 by means of suture threads 9 which, as is shown in Figure 3, connect the branches 2, 3 of the implant to the respective bones.
In the illustrative embodiment shown in Figure 4, details corresponding to similar ones in the illustrative embodiment according to Figures 2 and 3 have been provided with the same reference numbers. Compared to Figures 2 and 3, Figure 4 shows an alternative means of securing the implant according to Figure 1. Instead of the recess 8, grooves 10 for the branches 2, 3 have been formed in the bones 4 and 5, as can be seen from Figure 4. These branches, which form a joint-stabilizing connection, have been secured in the bones 4 and 5, respectively, by means of continuous screws 9'. In the method according to Figure 4, an uninterrupted hard outer bone surface is obtained on both the bones 4 and 5.
As was stated in the introduction, primary wear, for example in the carpometacarpal joints of the thumb, is a common type of condition which causes degradation and attrition of joint cartilage. Figure 5 shows the bones of the hand from above, i.e. the back of the hand. In the drawing, the 1st metacarpal has been indicated by 12 and the trapezoid bone by 13. Said joint condition, namely arthrosis of the base of the thumb, occurs in the joint between the 1st metacarpal 12 and the trapezoid bone 13.
Figure 6 shows how an implant according to Figure 1 can be arranged between said bones 12 and 13. In the example shown, a worn portion of the trapezoid bone 13 has been removed and the spacer member 1 has been arranged between this sectioned bone and the 1 st metacarpal 12. The spacer member 1 bears tightly on the surface of the sectioned bone. The branches 2, 3 have been connected by means of suture threads 9 to the respective bones 12 and 13 in order to form a joint-stabilizing connection at the base of the thumb. Figures 7 and 8 show a second illustrative embodiment of an implant according to the invention arranged in a joint between two bones 4 and 5, for example in a finger or a toe. A spacer member 14 is arranged in the joint between the two bones. This spacer member 14 is preferably made of the same material as the implant according to the first embodiment. The spacer member 14 of the type included in the implant according to Figures 7 and 8 is~ shown separately in Figures 13 and 14. A spacer member of this type can be produced in different sizes and thicknesses. Figure 13 shows a very thin spacer member 14, and Figure 14 shows a very thick spacer member 14. For joints in the hands and feet, the necessary thickness of the spacer member varies in the range of 0.5 to 7 mm. For joints in animals, the thickness of spacer bodies of the type shown in Figures 13 and 14 can preferably vary within wider limits. The spacer bodies 14 are provided with securing portions 15 which are expediently made of the same material as the rest of the spacer body. The securing portions 15 according to Figure 13 are made for example as woven or knitted ligaments. Alternatively, the securing portions can consist of suture threads or some other degradable, preferably bio-erodable material. The securing portions 15 are used for anchoring the spacer member 14 on one of the bones. Figure 7 shows diagrammatically how the securing portions 15 have been connected to the bone 4 by means of suture threads 9. The implant according to Figures 7 and 8 includes a flexible thread-like element 16 which is intended to serve as a temporary joint- stabilizing connection. As can be seen from Figures 7 and 8, the thread-like element has a portion 17, 18 on both sides of the centre line of the two bones, which portions extend in the longitudinal direction of the bone and over the joint. In this illustrative embodiment, the thread-like element is made in one piece and extends with portions 19 and 20 through holes in the bones 4, 5, respectively.
As in the embodiment according to Figures 2 and 3, the bones 5 and 4 can be bent from the position shown in Figure 8 in the direction of the arrows A and B, respectively. The thread-like element is made of a degradable, preferably bio-erodable material, preferably of a linear block polymer of the type which has been described above, and has further been designed with mechanical properties similar to a natural ligament within its natural range of movement. This means that the thread-like element has, at least within a normal ligament's range of functioning, similar mechanical properties but that beyond this range of functioning it may be overdimensioned compared to a normal ligament. The thread-like element 16 is flexible but substantially non- stretchable, which means that the bones 4, 5 in the position shown in Figure 8 cannot be bent about the joint in the direction counter to the arrows A and B, respectively.
A third illustrative embodiment according to Figures 9 and 10 corresponds to a large extent to the embodiment according to Figures 7 and 8. Corresponding details in said embodiments have been provided with the same reference numbers. What distinguishes the implant according to Figures 9 and 10 from the embodiment described in connection with Figures 7 and 8 is that a further spacer member 21 has been arranged against the bone end 7 of the bone 5. Spacer members of this type and designed as an articular socket are shown separately in Figures 15 and 16. In the same way as has been described in connection with Figure 13 and 14, the thickness of the spacer member can be varied within the same limits. Moreover, the spacer members designed as articular sockets are provided with securing members 15 which are intended to anchor the spacer body 21 on the bone 5 by means of suture threads 9, as shown in Figures 7 and 8.
Figures 11 and 12 show a fourth illustrative embodiment of an implant according to the invention. This fourth embodiment differs from the illustrative embodiment shown in Figures 7 and 8 only with respect to the thread-like element. This has been arranged with thread portions 22, 23 intersecting across the joint between two bones 4, 5, as can be seen from Figures 11 and 12. The thread-like element is made in one piece 16 and has portions 24, 25 which extend through holes in the bones 4 and 5. Since the thread portions 22 and 23 run more freely on one side of the bone compared to the embodiments described in connection with Figures 7 to 10, where respective thread portions 17 and 18 run on both sides of the longitudinal centre line of the bones and prevent mutual pivoting of the bones in the lateral direction, the bones 4 and 5 can, in addition to the possibility of pivoting in the direction of the arrows A and B in Figure 12, also be pivoted in another plane, such as is indicated by the arrows C in Figure 11.
Figure 17 shows a knitted or otherwise formed network structure 26 made of a degradable material, preferably from said linear block polymers according to SE 505,703. Said structure has the shape of a hood and is intended to serve as reinforcement in an implant. The latter is formed by means of a degradable material, preferably in the form of polyurethane with hydrolyzable ester groups, being cast from outside onto the top of the hood. Said material is described in SE 510,868.
Figure 18 shows the finished spacer member after casting, intended to serve as an articular head in a joint, for example a finger joint. The cast-on material has been indicated by 27 in Figure 18. The network structure 26 forms a hose which strengthens the spacer body from the inside, and the network portion 28 protruding from the cast body 27 forms a hose portion which is intended to be engaged on a bone which is to be connected to an adjacent bone via the joint. A further purpose of the network structure, besides that of serving as a strengthening means, is to create a high degree of friction against the bone and facilitate growth therein. The network structure 26 is also stable for sewing in upon fixation to the bone.
Figure 19 shows, in a similar way to Figure 17, a knitted or otherwise formed network structure 29 which is intended to form an outer reinforcement for a spacer member, which is intended to serve as an articular socket, i.e. as a complement to a spacer member of the type which has been described in connection with Figures 17 and 18.
The network structure 29 is provided with one or more securing portions 30 which are intended to be secured on the outside of a bone by means of suture thread or the like. The securing portion 30 can go all the way round or be made up of one or more securing portions.
An illustrative embodiment with two securing portions 30 is shown in the drawing.
A degradable material, preferably in the form of polyurethanes with hydrolyzable ester groups, is cast onto the inside of the network structure, as can be seen from Figure 20, for forming an articular socket. The cast-on material has been indicated by 31 in Figure 20. The purpose of the network structure according to Figure 20 is the same as has been described in connection with Figure 18, i.e. to serve as reinforcement in the spacer member, create friction against the bone and facilitate growth in the bone.
Figures 17 to 21 show relatively thin spacer members corresponding to the spacer members shown in Figures 13 and 15.
Figures 21a and 21b show a knitted or otherwise formed network structure
32 of the type which has been described in connection with Figure 17 above. The network structure 32 differs from that shown in Figure 17 in that the top
33 of the structure is condensed and in that the reinforcement in the top 33 has a depth which will substantially correspond to the thickness of the degradable material 34, see Figure 22, which is cast from the outside and in across the depth of the network structure in the top 33. The cast material 34 like the network structure is expediently made of polyurethanes with hydrolyzable ester groups. The actual spacer member in the embodiment according to Figure 22 has a thickness which substantially exceeds the thickness of the spacer member according to Figure 18. In principle, the difference arises in the same way as the difference in size which has been described in connection with Figures 13 and 14 above. The network structure 32 fulfils the same purposes as have been described above in connection with Figures 17 to 20.
However, the network structure 32 has a substantial depth at the top 34 and in this area it will serve also as internal reinforcement in the cast-on material. It is important that the spacer member in a joint does not collapse under the pressures which arise during natural use of the joint, and instead the temporary spacer member must hold adjacent bone ends at a distance from each other. It is of course also important that the temporary spacer members are resistant to wear.
The different embodiments of the spacer members shown in Figures 17 to 22 are combined with a joint-stabilizing connection, for example in the form of flexible thread-like elements which have been described in connection with Figures 7 to 12.
The invention is not limited to the illustrative embodiments described above, and instead it can be modified in a number of ways within the scope of the attached patent claims.
The spacer member, which can consist of a cast or spun and thereafter knitted or woven structure or an otherwise formed structure, can be provided, as has been described above, with strengthening threads of the same material as the rest of the structure or of another degradable and tissue- compatible material.
Said strengthening threads can be arranged to form a reinforcement skeleton which is intended to give the structure stability without locking it. The strengthening threads can for example be arranged in a defined direction in order to afford increased strength in this direction.
The reinforcement skeleton can consist of a shell which surrounds the rest of the structure. In addition to said shell, the reinforcement structure can also comprise strengthening threads in one or more defined directions.
In the above described embodiment have been mentioned suitable examples of materials for a degradable implant. Further examples of degradable materials for the implant in accordance with the invention are defined in the following patent claims.
The invention is not restricted to implants of degradable materials. Examples of non-degradable materials are silicone and polyethylene terephtalate.
The implant according to the invention can have different forms than have been described above. All corners of the in the figures schematically shown T-shaped implant are preferably rounded.
The implant can be shaped as a plate with integrated fastening members or joint-stabilizing connections. The implant can have a sponge-like shape with integrated stabilizing connections.
Within the scope of protection is an implant arranged such that the shape of the implant is adapted to the anatomic shape when exposed to load.
The joint-stabilizing connection can be designed in a different way than has been described above.
The material of the spacer member can consists of polytetrafluoro ethylene (PTFE). Also the joint-stabilizing connection can be made in the same material. This material is generally known under the trade name TEFLON®.

Claims (33)

PATENT CLAIMS
1. Implant for reconstruction of joints, preferably of the hands and feet, characterized in that
at least one spacer member (1 ) is intended to be placed between the ends of the bones which are to be connected, one end of the spacer member being designed to form a joint surface against one of said bone ends (6, 7),
a joint-stabilizing connection (2, 3) is arranged to connect said bones,
the spacer member (1 ) is made of at least one tissue-compatible material, and
the joint-stabilizing connection (2, 3) is intended, upon use of the implant, to extend in the longitudinal direction across the joint and in over at least one side of the two bones (4, 5) which are connected by the joint.
2. Implant according to claim 1 , characterized in that the material of the spacer member (1 ) is porous, entirely or partly.
3. Implant according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the spacer member (1 ) and the joint-stabilizing connection are made of degradeable material
4. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the joint-stabilizing connection is made in one piece with the spacer member (1 ).
5. Implant according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the degradable material consists of polyurethane urea.
6. Implant according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the degradable material consists of poly-L-lactide
7. Implant according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the degradable material consists of polydiaxone (PDS).
8. Implant according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the degradable material consists of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate (PHB).
9. Implant according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the degradable material consists of chitin or chitosan or polysaccharide.
10. Implant according to claim 3 or 4, characterized in that the degradable material consists of collagen or protein.
11. Implant according to claim 1 ,2 or 4, characterized in that the material consists of polyuretan.
12. Implant according to claim 1 ,2 or 4, characterized in that the material consists of silicone.
13. Implant according to claim 1 ,2 or 4, characterized in that the material consists of polyethylene terephthalate (PET).
14. Implant according to claim 1 ,2 and 4 characterized in that the material consists of polytetrafluouro ethylene (PTFE).
15. Implant according to any of the preceding claim, characterized in that the implant in its entirety in cross-section mainly has the form of a T, where the stem is said spacer member (1 ).
16. Implant in accordance with claim 15, characterized in that a suture or other fastening members are integrated with the implant.
17. Implant according to claim 15 or 16, characterized in that all corners of the three dimensional T are rounded.
18. Implant according to any of claim 1-14, characterized in that the implant is formed as a plate with integrated fastening means or joint-stabilizing connection.
19. Implant according to any of claim 1-14, characterized in that the implant is mainly sponge-formed with integrated joint-stabilizing connection.
20. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the implant is arranged when exposed to pressure to take the anatomical shape with integrated joint-stabilizing function.
21. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the spacer member (1 ) includes a film-like element which is intended to serve as said joint surface.
22. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that the spacer member (1 ) comprises a degradable and tissue-compatible material in the form of foam, fibre or thread, which material is cast, knitted or woven or in some other way formed to give the desired three- dimensional structure.
23. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that said connection consists of flexible thread-like elements (16).
24. Implant according to Claim 23, characterized in that said thread-like elements (16) have mechanical properties similar to a natural ligament within its natural range of functioning.
25. Implant according to Claim 23 or 24, characterized in that the material of said thread-like elements (16) consists of linear block polymers comprising urea and urethane groups with hydrolyzable ester groups.
26. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that said joint-stabilizing connection (2, 3, 16) is designed to prevent luxation of the joint.
27. Implant according to Claim 26, characterized in that the joint-stabilizing connection consists of flexible thread-like elements (16),
said thread-like elements have at least one portion (17, 18) on both sides of the centre line of the two bones,
opposite ends of each of said portions (17, 18) are anchored in the respective bone (4, 5), and
said portions (17, 18) span the joint and are designed to prevent mutual pivoting of the bones in the lateral direction.
28. Implant according to any of Claims 23-25, characterized in that said thread-like elements (16) comprise two portions (22, 23) which each connect the two bones (4, 5), and in that said portions are designed to intersect each other across the joint, as a result of which movements in more than one plane are permitted.
29. Implant according to Claim 22, characterized in that the cast, knitted, woven or otherwise formed structure which constitutes said spacer member includes strengthening threads of the same material as the rest of the structure or of another degradable tissue-compatible material.
30. Implant according to Claim 22, characterized in that said strengthening threads are designed to form a reinforcement skeleton which is intended to give the structure sufficient stability without locking it.
31. Implant according to any of the preceding claims, characterized in that said strengthening threads are arranged in a defined direction.
32. Implant according to either of Claims 30 or 31 , characterized in that said reinforcement skeleton consists of a shell which surrounds the rest of the structure.
33. Implant according to Claim 32, characterized in that the reinforcement skeleton comprises, in addition to said shell, strengthening threads in one or more defined directions.
AU2002217737A 2001-01-15 2002-01-11 Implant for reconstruction of joints Ceased AU2002217737B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0100127A SE525131C2 (en) 2001-01-15 2001-01-15 Implants for reconstruction of joints
SE0100127-0 2001-01-15
PCT/SE2002/000038 WO2002054992A1 (en) 2001-01-15 2002-01-11 Implant for reconstruction of joints

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
AU2002217737A1 true AU2002217737A1 (en) 2003-02-06
AU2002217737B2 AU2002217737B2 (en) 2006-09-21

Family

ID=20282644

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
AU2002217737A Ceased AU2002217737B2 (en) 2001-01-15 2002-01-11 Implant for reconstruction of joints

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (2) US7037342B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1351630B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4156924B2 (en)
CN (1) CN1248662C (en)
AR (1) AR032791A1 (en)
AT (1) ATE321508T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002217737B2 (en)
DE (1) DE60210271T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1351630T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2261668T3 (en)
PT (1) PT1351630E (en)
SE (1) SE525131C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2002054992A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (69)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8088060B2 (en) 2000-03-15 2012-01-03 Orbusneich Medical, Inc. Progenitor endothelial cell capturing with a drug eluting implantable medical device
US9522217B2 (en) 2000-03-15 2016-12-20 Orbusneich Medical, Inc. Medical device with coating for capturing genetically-altered cells and methods for using same
US7537603B2 (en) * 2002-07-22 2009-05-26 Acumed Llc Bone fusion system
DE602004025030D1 (en) * 2003-06-27 2010-02-25 Abs Corp FUSSGELARTARTHROPLASTIE SYSTEM
US7507253B2 (en) * 2003-10-22 2009-03-24 Nordquist William D Implantable brace for a fracture and methods
US9504583B2 (en) * 2004-06-10 2016-11-29 Spinal Elements, Inc. Implant and method for facet immobilization
FR2875398B1 (en) * 2004-09-21 2007-07-06 Newdeal Sa Sa JOINT IMPLANT OF INTERPOSITION
ES2387194T3 (en) * 2005-01-19 2012-09-17 Nexgen Spine, Inc. Fastening elastomer to rigid structures
JP4975013B2 (en) 2005-03-11 2012-07-11 ウエイク・フオレスト・ユニバーシテイ・ヘルス・サイエンシズ Manufacture of heart valves with engineered tissue
US8728463B2 (en) * 2005-03-11 2014-05-20 Wake Forest University Health Science Production of tissue engineered digits and limbs
US20060204539A1 (en) 2005-03-11 2006-09-14 Anthony Atala Electrospun cell matrices
US20060204445A1 (en) * 2005-03-11 2006-09-14 Anthony Atala Cell scaffold matrices with image contrast agents
CA2602029C (en) * 2005-03-11 2014-07-15 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Tissue engineered blood vessels
US7931680B2 (en) * 2005-03-31 2011-04-26 Depuy Products, Inc. Plate for lengthening the lateral column of the foot
FR2884406B1 (en) 2005-04-14 2008-10-17 Memometal Technologies Soc Par INTRAMEDULAR OSTEOSYNTHESIS DEVICE OF TWO BONE PARTS, IN PARTICULAR HAND AND / OR FOOT
JP2009505762A (en) 2005-08-31 2009-02-12 ツィンマー・ゲーエムベーハー Implant
US8403985B2 (en) * 2005-11-02 2013-03-26 Zimmer, Inc. Joint spacer implant
EP1973498B1 (en) 2005-11-09 2014-04-23 Zimmer GmbH Implant
US20090048679A1 (en) * 2006-02-09 2009-02-19 Zimmer Gmbh Implant
US7901431B2 (en) * 2007-01-17 2011-03-08 Arthrex, Inc. Lisfranc repair using suture-button construct
US20110093084A1 (en) * 2007-02-09 2011-04-21 Morton Troy N Artificial joint preserving tendon and/or sesamoid bone structure
US8292966B2 (en) * 2007-02-09 2012-10-23 Morton Ballard Arthrotechnology, LLC. Artificial toe joint
US9814581B2 (en) 2007-02-26 2017-11-14 Marvin Schwartz Mobile prosthesis for interpositional location between bone joint articular surfaces and method of use
US8506637B2 (en) 2007-02-26 2013-08-13 Marvin Schwartz Mobile prosthesis for interpositional location between bone joint articular surfaces and method of use
US7670381B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-03-02 Marvin Schwartz Prosthesis for interpositional location between bone joint articular surfaces and method of use
FR2913876B1 (en) 2007-03-20 2009-06-05 Memometal Technologies Soc Par OSTEOSYNTHESIS DEVICE
US20080255664A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Mdesign International Percutaneously deliverable orthopedic joint device
US20080255501A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Michael Hogendijk Percutaneous delivery and retrieval systems for shape-changing orthopedic joint devices
US9427494B2 (en) 2008-01-21 2016-08-30 International Life Sciences, Llc Fibre-based surgical implant and method of manufacture
FR2935601B1 (en) 2008-09-09 2010-10-01 Memometal Technologies INTRAMEDULLARY IMPLANT RESORBABLE BETWEEN TWO BONE OR TWO BONE FRAGMENTS
FR2936700B1 (en) 2008-10-02 2012-04-13 Memometal Technologies ORTHOPEDIC IMPLANT IN THE FORM OF A PLATE TO BE FIXED BETWEEN TWO BONE PARTS
US10278692B2 (en) 2008-10-23 2019-05-07 CMC Group LLC Sling suspension system for supporting the thumb of a patient after basal joint arthroplasty
US20100106254A1 (en) 2008-10-23 2010-04-29 Delsignore Jeanne L Surgical implantable stabilizer sling for basal joint arthroplasty
US10258473B2 (en) 2008-11-19 2019-04-16 Softjoint Corporation Device and method for restoring joints with artificial cartilage
US8100983B2 (en) * 2008-11-25 2012-01-24 Schulte Robert C Intra-osseus fusion system
US20110295379A1 (en) * 2009-02-06 2011-12-01 Ortho-Space Ltd. Expandable joint implant
FR2944426A1 (en) * 2009-04-20 2010-10-22 Xavier Renard Intra-articular implant for reconstruction of joint between ends of bones of hand and leg, has integration unit integrating interleaved sheet with bone ends, where unit has connection wire connecting point of sheet with point of capsule
US20120150309A1 (en) * 2009-04-29 2012-06-14 Roelof Marissen Hinge structure
EP2427147A1 (en) * 2009-05-08 2012-03-14 Tornier, Inc. Joint reconstruction system and method
WO2010151589A1 (en) * 2009-06-23 2010-12-29 Replication Medical, Inc. Trapezium prosthesis
US8292954B2 (en) 2009-09-11 2012-10-23 Articulinx, Inc. Disc-based orthopedic devices
FR2951072B1 (en) * 2009-10-13 2011-11-18 Biotech Internat SCAPHO-LUNAR STABILIZATION IMPLANT
US8551107B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2013-10-08 Biomet, C.V. Bending tool and method for reshaping a bone plate
US8535355B2 (en) * 2009-10-15 2013-09-17 Biomet C.V. Dorsal midfoot bone plate system and method
US8834568B2 (en) * 2010-02-04 2014-09-16 Paul S. Shapiro Surgical technique using a contoured allograft cartilage as a spacer of the carpo-metacarpal joint of the thumb or tarso-metatarsal joint of the toe
US9498273B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2016-11-22 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Orthopedic implant kit
US9724140B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2017-08-08 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Tapered, cylindrical cruciform hammer toe implant and method
US8608785B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2013-12-17 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Hammer toe implant with expansion portion for retrograde approach
US9345493B2 (en) * 2011-05-10 2016-05-24 Peter Nakaji Cranial plating and bur hole cover system and methods of use
US8945232B2 (en) 2012-12-31 2015-02-03 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Ball and socket implants for correction of hammer toes and claw toes
US9724139B2 (en) 2013-10-01 2017-08-08 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Hammer toe implant and method
US10092679B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2018-10-09 Wake Forest University Health Sciences Laminous vascular constructs combining cell sheet engineering and electrospinning technologies
US9474561B2 (en) 2013-11-19 2016-10-25 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Two-wire technique for installing hammertoe implant
US11484301B2 (en) 2014-01-14 2022-11-01 Simparo Inc. Suture-locking washer for use with a bone anchor, and method for supporting the thumb of a patient after basal joint arthroplasty, and other novel orthopedic apparatus and other novel orthopedic procedures
US9545274B2 (en) 2014-02-12 2017-01-17 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Intramedullary implant, system, and method for inserting an implant into a bone
US9498266B2 (en) 2014-02-12 2016-11-22 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Intramedullary implant, system, and method for inserting an implant into a bone
WO2016043751A1 (en) 2014-09-18 2016-03-24 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Hammertoe implant and instrument
CN105960211B (en) 2014-12-19 2019-01-11 瑞特医疗技术公司 For anchor log in the marrow of interphalangeal arthrodesis of toe
US9757168B2 (en) 2015-03-03 2017-09-12 Howmedica Osteonics Corp. Orthopedic implant and methods of implanting and removing same
US10653467B2 (en) * 2015-05-06 2020-05-19 Treace Medical Concepts, Inc. Intra-osseous plate system and method
AU2016400080B2 (en) * 2016-03-28 2019-10-17 Wright Medical Technology, Inc. Anterior resurfacing talar plate
US10470807B2 (en) 2016-06-03 2019-11-12 Stryker European Holdings I, Llc Intramedullary implant and method of use
US11364128B2 (en) * 2017-06-12 2022-06-21 Medline Industries, Lp Arthritis plate
CN111683625A (en) * 2017-12-22 2020-09-18 宝利诺沃生物材料有限公司 Soft tissue implant bag
US11076964B2 (en) 2018-08-29 2021-08-03 Zimmer, Inc. Metarsophalangeal joint replacement device and methods
US20220233324A1 (en) * 2019-07-25 2022-07-28 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implants for mid-foot
AU2020348594B2 (en) * 2019-09-16 2023-05-11 Cartiva, Inc. Hydrogel implant procedure
US20210282823A1 (en) * 2020-03-10 2021-09-16 Arthrex, Inc. Internal beam plates and associated instrumentation for performing surgical methods
US11123196B1 (en) * 2020-05-07 2021-09-21 Thomas Zink Stand alone metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint fusion device

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2133859A (en) * 1938-03-31 1938-10-18 Louis J Padula Bone setting
US3593342A (en) * 1969-01-27 1971-07-20 Cutter Lab Prosthetic joint
US3681786A (en) * 1970-07-13 1972-08-08 Medical Eng Corp Solid human prosthesis of varying consistency
US4502161A (en) * 1981-09-21 1985-03-05 Wall W H Prosthetic meniscus for the repair of joints
US4475972A (en) * 1981-10-01 1984-10-09 Ontario Research Foundation Implantable material
US4599086A (en) * 1985-06-07 1986-07-08 Doty James R Spine stabilization device and method
SE457692B (en) * 1987-03-09 1989-01-23 Astra Meditec Ab IMPLANT PROTECTION PROVIDES WHOLE OR PARTIAL REPLACEMENT OF A SENA, A LIQUOR OR A CROSS BAND
US4916193A (en) * 1987-12-17 1990-04-10 Allied-Signal Inc. Medical devices fabricated totally or in part from copolymers of recurring units derived from cyclic carbonates and lactides
US4892545A (en) * 1988-07-14 1990-01-09 Ohio Medical Instrument Company, Inc. Vertebral lock
US4955915A (en) * 1989-06-02 1990-09-11 Swanson Alfred B Lunate implant and method of stabilizing same
FI101933B (en) * 1995-06-13 1998-09-30 Biocon Oy Joint prosthesis
FR2747034B1 (en) * 1996-04-03 1998-06-19 Scient X INTERSOMATIC CONTAINMENT AND MERGER SYSTEM
US5824095A (en) * 1996-04-26 1998-10-20 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Anatomically neutral joint
FR2753080A1 (en) * 1996-09-09 1998-03-13 Boom Annemarieke V D Spacer implant, for use especially in joint prosthesis surgery
US6017366A (en) * 1997-04-18 2000-01-25 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Resorbable interposition arthroplasty implant
DE69840171D1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2008-12-11 Osteobiologics Inc FIBER REINFORCED, POROUS, BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT DEVICE
EP0984748A4 (en) * 1997-05-30 2008-06-25 College Park Ind Inc Prosthetic foot assembly having improved resilient cushions and components
US6113640A (en) * 1997-06-11 2000-09-05 Bionx Implants Oy Reconstructive bioabsorbable joint prosthesis
GB9713330D0 (en) * 1997-06-25 1997-08-27 Bridport Gundry Plc Surgical implant
US6165217A (en) * 1997-10-02 2000-12-26 Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc. Self-cohering, continuous filament non-woven webs
US6206883B1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2001-03-27 Stryker Technologies Corporation Bioabsorbable materials and medical devices made therefrom
US6562073B2 (en) * 2001-02-06 2003-05-13 Sdgi Holding, Inc. Spinal bone implant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1351630B1 (en) Implant for reconstruction of joints
AU2002217737A1 (en) Implant for reconstruction of joints
US3886600A (en) Joint prosthesis
CA2288135C (en) Resorbable interposition arthroplasty implant
US3879767A (en) Prosthesis for articulating body structures
US5458648A (en) Great toe joint implant and method of implantation
Volz Total Wrist Arthroplasty A Clinical Review
CA2764495C (en) Tissue integration design for seamless implant fixation
Swanson et al. Flexible Implant Arthroplasty of the Radiocarpal Joint Surgical Technique and Long-term Study.
US20050278025A1 (en) Meniscus prosthesis
US7128763B1 (en) Joint treating method
WO2005110291A1 (en) Trapezium implant for thumb and method
JPS6194650A (en) Apparatus for fixing permanent implant for joint
US20080255665A1 (en) Anchored prosthetic meniscus device
US8343228B2 (en) Arthroplastic implant with anchor peg for basilar joint and related methods
US8167952B2 (en) Arthroplastic implant with shield for basilar joint and related methods
Shepherd et al. Design considerations for a wrist implant
SwANSON et al. Reconstruction of the Thumb Basal Joints Development and Current Status of Implant Techniques.
Allcock et al. Early failure of a carbon-fiber composite femoral component
HERNDON Trapeziometacarpal Arthroplasty A Clinical Review
CN103561688A (en) Unicondylar meniscal bearing knee replacement
SWANSON et al. Arthroplasty of the thumb basal joints.
Calnan et al. Artificial finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis: I. Development and experimental assessment
Eiken et al. Lunate implant arthroplasty: evaluation of 19 patients
RU2061442C1 (en) Finger articulation endoprosthesis