EP1725997A1 - Warning system through detection of movements of protected object - Google Patents
Warning system through detection of movements of protected objectInfo
- Publication number
- EP1725997A1 EP1725997A1 EP04714821A EP04714821A EP1725997A1 EP 1725997 A1 EP1725997 A1 EP 1725997A1 EP 04714821 A EP04714821 A EP 04714821A EP 04714821 A EP04714821 A EP 04714821A EP 1725997 A1 EP1725997 A1 EP 1725997A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- detector
- alarm
- circuit
- movement
- remote control
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
- G08B13/14—Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles
- G08B13/1427—Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles with transmitter-receiver for distance detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
- G08B13/14—Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles
- G08B13/1436—Mechanical actuation by lifting or attempted removal of hand-portable articles with motion detection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B25/00—Alarm systems in which the location of the alarm condition is signalled to a central station, e.g. fire or police telegraphic systems
- G08B25/008—Alarm setting and unsetting, i.e. arming or disarming of the security system
Definitions
- This invention is in the field of personal alarms by detection of movements and vibrations and more particularly of the category of portable alarms for the punctual or permanent protection of the personal property of the individual, living space and objects requiring in certain circumstances extra security.
- one of the personal protection systems for a handbag triggers the alarm by removing a rod from the case which restores the electronic power supply circuit when the vandal takes hold of the object carried by the victim.
- the weakness of this system has two aspects; on the one hand, the shrill cry that comes from the case hidden in the bag can only stop when the rod or the pin retained by a string to the person carrying the object, is returned to its original location; and on the other hand, it is enough for the temporarily trapped vandal to remove from the bag the case easily identifiable by its size to quickly move away with its booty while the alarm continues to sow panic in people who do not arrive more to identify the perpetrator and obviously the victim.
- a second portable system which is used to detect the slightest movement of the object in which it is placed has the disadvantage of being unable to activate only if the on-board power supply circuit has previously been actuated by a switch of any type: key, button, etc. To ensure constant protection, this system must therefore be activated at all times, namely until the batteries are exhausted. And as an emergency of this type cannot be predicted with certainty ...
- this system which operates from a ball detector placed in a small bipolar tube, triggers the alarm integrated into the set placed in or attached to the object if the batteries still have energy in reserve.
- the behavior of the vandal will be almost identical to the previous example in severing the strap linking the safety box to the luggage leaving behind the alarm which is running out or which the victim can alone neutralize.
- Mercury switches are very similar in function to the ball switch but their positive and stable contact is easier to manage. Thus, less sensitive to oxidation, these so-called wetted components are more suitable for angle modification.
- the magnet switch it is preferably suitable for bringing together or spacing between two parts of a whole than for detecting the resulting movement.
- This type of component also has the disadvantage of requiring in addition the presence of a magnetic accessory which attracts or repels the mini contact strips which has the disadvantage of being able, once located, to be fairly easily neutralized.
- Our invention proposes a miniaturized security system, very light, completely autonomous, without limit and restriction due to the type of detectors used, with maximum energy saving, without constraint of functionality because of its adaptability, for multi-use. and easy to use.
- Our invention is a new concept of exceptional portability, without constraint in the positioning of the motion detector, a unique feature which makes the system undetectable and capable of easily adapting to the different situations to which the systems described above respond.
- the system that we are proposing seeks to secure the individual and his personal property but also to dissuade intruders caught in the act letting him go away discreetly by abandoning his project without any other effect for the victim. He also seeks to monitor his permanent or temporary living space as well as the personal objects that are close to his heart, ranging from important documents to the equipment that enlivens his daily life such as the bicycle and the simple wallet. Adaptable, durable and exceptionally solid, our invention can also meet specific needs in the environment. institutional and industrial development.
- the detector / alarm system had to be miniaturized to the point of being more or less the size of a credit card or a shape specially adapted to the contours. of the object to be secured, being able to adapt to all circumstances which can suddenly threaten the tranquility and security of the person and his property, easily attach to any object that one wishes to secure, contain a circuit capable of ensuring an exceptional lifetime for the batteries supplying the system and offering different levels of detection that can suit the most diverse protection needs.
- This system also had to be supplemented by a coded radio frequency transmitter / receiver exclusive to each unit for activating and deactivating the selected detector from a remote control.
- the protection system had to have the quality of being able to remain inert for long periods of time, without the possibility of electronic tracking, without consuming energy but on simple detection of a movement of the protected object.
- the circuit should immediately trigger the integrated piezo which would have the capacity to interrupt itself a few seconds later if no new vibration was perceived by the detector. Otherwise, the alarm would have the distinction of resetting itself consecutively until the vibrations stop. From the remote control the owner would have the possibility, if he deemed it necessary, to continuously activate the alarm placed on the stolen object in order to track or have the thief track and to locate the abandoned object in pursuit. (This last feature would require a transceiver with wave reception scanner to be ready to react to orders from the remote control.
- the circuit which is part of our invention had to exclude the scanner which has the disadvantage of being a nuisance in certain environments (for example, hospitals) and for certain individuals whose physical condition is sensitive to radio wave emissions (for example, patients suffering from cardiac arrhythmias and those having to wear a pacemaker).
- this protection system that is our invention seeks to solve the daily concern of beach attendants, inattentive vacationers, travelers in a hurry and everything an individual suddenly needing temporary protection for his person, his property and even his property.
- the protection system goes into motion standby position from the remote control and according to the type of detector selected: mode (a) high sensitivity; (b) reduced sensitivity; (c) protection of handbag and wallet.
- the system is started automatically with the transceiver with wave scanner or requires a slight shaking of the object containing the detector if the radio controlled receiver is without wave scanner.
- the present invention is a system which, in response to the descriptive approach protocol (see FIG. 1), here takes the size of a credit card in the form of a thin plate (1) made of a very resistant composite material and hermetic which holds in under seal two powerful batteries in wristwatch format (2 - 3), a piezo of size corresponding to high resonance (4), three detection units (5 - 6 - 7), a vibration sensor for the activation of the start-up circuit (8), a pre-programmed microchip (9) integrated into the printed circuit (10) connecting all the components together and a manual switch button (11).
- radio wave receiver at a good distance (12) which serves as a link with the key fob remote control made of very resistant composite material (13) completely waterproof and which includes the following basic elements: a long-life battery (14), a radio-controlled transmitter and three press buttons corresponding to detectors A, B and C (15 - 16 -17) on the board and a STOP press button to deactivate the security system without the need for access to the hidden detector / alarm (18).
- the reduced size of the assembly and the attachment facilities allow this detector to be used in all situations where the safety of an object or a person can be called into question.
- the use of the system is long-term, maintenance-free, does not require any change of batteries and the mounting and molding technique ensures the watertightness of the two units, namely the plate and particularly the remote control.
- this small discreet plate containing all the components which are at the origin of our invention can, for example, secure the luggage of the traveler and the beach bags which are left unattended during a swim.
- This same plate can later be found in the handbag of the lady or the wallet of the man by selecting the appropriate detector.
- the same plate can be placed where security seems reduced (window too easily accessible from the outside, door without real lock, etc.).
- This system can also be useful at home when you want to leave a door or window ajar or leave the system the task of monitoring a part of the house.
- This system that is our invention can even be used to protect for a very long time a sealed document placed in a personal safe.
- Our invention can protect heavy or bulky objects left outside the house by simply attaching the motion detection plate to the article (garden furniture, barbecue, etc.).
- the detector / alarm can also be attached to a bicycle or moped, skis, car trunk, radio ...
- this system can also be of public utility for the discreet protection of objects of art and worship. Hospitals and other institutions can also take advantage of this autonomous system to manage access to certain cabinets, cabinets and fridges prohibited without authorization.
- Our invention is the solution to the problem of systems that are too bulky, too restrictive and dependent.
- One or more riveted pads in the right places are enough to deter the intruder if not to trap him.
- Figure I illustrates what is the form and the structural and electronic composition of our invention.
- Figures 2 to 8 are a representation of the essentials of the functionality of the electronic circuits which manage and make the particularity of the invention illustrated in Figure 1.
- Figure 2 'OFF system' briefly presents the configuration of the electronic circuit as it appears when it is completely neutralized, therefore in the OFF position.
- the doors (or the switches controlled by the pre-programmed microchip) 4-5-6 of detectors A, B and C are open while the directional doors (7, 3, 8 and 1) of the various circuits likely to be used are in possible completion position of networks. Only door 2, which also closes when the possibly selected detector (4, 5 or 6) closes, remains open.
- Figure 3 System ON' first shows the closed door 8 is goaded towards the sensor, which makes it possible, by shaking the assembly very slightly, to complete the circuit containing the 'start sensor' and door 1.
- This contact which engages the power supply, then allows the microchip to modify in a few hundredths of a second, the circuit route by opening door 8 and redirecting the route directly to door 1, avoiding or bypassing the sensor used to start up.
- This change then ensures for a few seconds a continuous energy supply of the circuit containing in addition the radio controlled receiver (thus 8 + C +1> becomes 8 + 1).
- This activated circuit then allows the remote control ( Figure 4) to transmit the coded frequency of the desired detector for a few seconds. (As an example, the detector A corresponding to door 4 is used in Figure 5).
- sensor A (example used) completes circuit 4 - 3 - 2, which immediately changes by bypassing detector A and goes to circuit 4-2 to trigger, during a duration predetermined by the microchip, the piezo which gives the alarm ( Figure 6 'Alarm system activated a few seconds'). If no vibration is subsequently perceived, the microchip restores the detector A to its initial circuit, namely its waiting position by returning the basic position to door 3 to restore the waiting circuit 4-3-2 ( Figure 7 'System - return waiting alarm').
- Setting the alarm in continuous mode does not change the electronic trace in progress but must be done while the alarm is active by pressing longer on the button on the remote control corresponding to the activated detector. It is the microchip which picks up the message from the remote control, records and interprets the request by modifying the duration of activation of the alarm.
- the STOP button on the remote control (8 - Fig. 1) must be pressed for a few seconds.
- the microchip by capturing through the receiver, the coded radio frequency of the button opens all the doors of the different electronic circuits thus neutralizing the different ABC detectors, keeping only doors 8 and 1 closed and leaving the 'start-up sensor' 'in position to recreate the circuit 8 -1 ( Figure 3' System ON ') and give the possibility to the remote control ( Figures 4 and 5) to reactivate the protection system that is our invention.
- the detector which in addition to being the subject of an independent patent application is also the essential element of the system that is our invention, makes possible the electronic tracing which saves battery energy, ensures long life and efficiency of the whole and makes the system 'put on hold' undetectable.
- This electronic trace by itself cannot, on the other hand, be used without the type detector which is an integral part of our invention.
- the circuit requires little change of route if it is decided to expand the detection capacity by giving the system the quality of remotely picking up the stolen object.
- This capacity nevertheless means the use of a radio control transceiver which must be able to emit, at short notice, a recognition signal to allow it to scan any command from the remote control without the tag attached to the stolen object having need to be jostled to remotely reactivate the circuit of one or other of the detectors integrated in the wafer.
- the only difference to the basic circuit is that the 'start-up sensor' is removed from the circuit as well as door 8 for an uninterrupted layout ( Figure 8 'ON system' - see door 8 and the 'sensor' which are highlighted) while the transceiver of the motion detection pads come with wave reception scanner.
- This circuit although partially actuated allows as long as there is no command issued by the remote control, the placement in peace of the plate on the object to be protected.
- our invention can instantly put the protection system in 'surveillance' phase from the remote control without having to access the plate now discreetly in position.
- the start-up sensor International request n ° PCT / FR 02/03830 - internal filing date 07/11/2002
- the start-up sensor which works like the other detectors used in our invention (except ball contact ) by bringing a suspended metal rod into contact with another metallized end of the component for a brief instant sufficient to complete the circuit, a characteristic which benefits this security system which is intended first of all to be dissuasive.
- the selection of a detector using a button on the remote control can then be made within a few seconds of available radio broadcasts, which immediately places the selected detector in the standby position (Fig. 5- 6-7).
- This second phase using the remote control is only done when a need for protection arises. Thanks to this specific circuit, no misplaced manipulation becomes obvious when an emergency requires discreet but immediate protection.
- the detection system is discreetly armed (apart from a slight beep) often without the knowledge of potential criminals by first gently shaking the potentially threatened object and then selecting the detector from the remote control.
- the circuit is completed by very gently shaking the object to which the plate which contains all of the detection mechanisms is attached. This shaking animates the start-up sensor (8 - Fig. 1) which then makes it possible to complete and activate for a few seconds the printed circuit associating radio controlled receiver, pre-programmed microchip and secondary power supply battery (Fig. 'System ON 'doors 8-1).
- the receiver thus activated allows the transmitter of the remote control (18 - Fig. 1 and Fig. 4) to communicate with the programmed chip of the board (9 - Fig. 1) and to activate, the detection mode suiting the best suited to the situation (eg detector A - Fig.
- the detector can be left at the starting point if it has to be reactivated in a more or less short space of time. Otherwise, the system will be completely stopped by accessing the discreetly concealed plate and pressing the manual OFF button (therefore return to Figure 2 'System - OFF' doors 8-1> 0).
- the protective unit (s) associated with the remote control cannot (can) be used or be triggered by equipment foreign to the assembly which can no longer verify whether the interception is valid when procuring the detector. This particularity becomes even more evident if the protection system uses a receiver without scanner for receiving waves.
- the angle or the position taken by the plate when fixed on the object to be secured is of no importance since the primary characteristic of the detector which distinguishes among others, our detection system which is our invention is its ability to be fully functional and efficient regardless of the location or movement of the object, the detector being active on a 360 ° axis.
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2004/000438 WO2005093677A1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2004-02-26 | Warning system through detection of movements of protected object |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1725997A1 true EP1725997A1 (en) | 2006-11-29 |
EP1725997B1 EP1725997B1 (en) | 2007-08-08 |
Family
ID=34957464
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04714821A Expired - Lifetime EP1725997B1 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2004-02-26 | Warning system through detection of movements of protected object |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1725997B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE369597T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602004008118D1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005093677A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2007110464A1 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2007-10-04 | 4Ts Finland Oy | Device for monitoring integrity of closed objects |
WO2007116211A1 (en) * | 2006-04-08 | 2007-10-18 | Angela Pietraszko | Dropped object warning device |
GB2450283B (en) * | 2006-04-08 | 2011-11-16 | Angela Pietraszko | Dropped object warning device |
RU197842U1 (en) * | 2019-10-23 | 2020-06-02 | Автономная некоммерческая организация высшего образования «Белгородский университет кооперации, экономики и права» | LOSS ALARM |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE9411934U1 (en) * | 1994-07-22 | 1995-05-11 | Waekon Ind Inc | Alarm device for portable device |
FR2777680A3 (en) * | 1998-04-20 | 1999-10-22 | Eric Mathis | Electrical alarm for use with bicycle or motorbike |
-
2004
- 2004-02-26 EP EP04714821A patent/EP1725997B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-02-26 WO PCT/FR2004/000438 patent/WO2005093677A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-02-26 AT AT04714821T patent/ATE369597T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-02-26 DE DE602004008118T patent/DE602004008118D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005093677A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2005093677A1 (en) | 2005-10-06 |
EP1725997B1 (en) | 2007-08-08 |
DE602004008118D1 (en) | 2007-09-20 |
ATE369597T1 (en) | 2007-08-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9922537B2 (en) | Wearable multi-sensory personal safety and tracking device | |
US8957774B2 (en) | Concealed personal alarm and method | |
CA2950603C (en) | Autonomous safety and security device on an unmanned platform under command and control of a cellular phone | |
US20120319842A1 (en) | Systems and methods to activate a security protocol using an object with embedded safety technology | |
EP3410884B1 (en) | Communicant article of smart clothing and method and apparatus for two-way communication with such an article of clothing | |
US9615235B2 (en) | Wireless personal safety device | |
US20120282886A1 (en) | Systems and methods for initiating a distress signal from a mobile device without requiring focused visual attention from a user | |
US20040075547A1 (en) | Commandable covert surveillance system | |
US10176693B2 (en) | Security and tracking systems and related methods | |
US9715805B1 (en) | Wireless personal safety device | |
US20130271277A1 (en) | Personal security device | |
US20140120872A1 (en) | Systems and methods for altering the properties of a mobile device in response to a make ready signal | |
CN110419212A (en) | Portable equipment with built-in security system | |
US20130234851A1 (en) | Systems and methods to track multiple devices for safety and monitoring purposes | |
US8994530B2 (en) | Systems and methods to activate a security protocol using an object with embedded safety technology | |
WO2002073947A2 (en) | Robot for remote supervision and remote manipulation via the internet | |
EP1725997B1 (en) | Warning system through detection of movements of protected object | |
WO2002065420A1 (en) | Commandable covert surveillance system | |
US7400245B1 (en) | Personal safety system for evidence collection and retrieval to provide critical information for rescue | |
US20200076956A1 (en) | Remote alert generation based on trigger events indicating attack | |
FR2776101A1 (en) | Surveillance system for detecting presence of objects within monitored zone around control | |
WO2017025783A1 (en) | A device for personal safety and security and methods to use thereof | |
JP2005135204A (en) | Cellular phone having crime prevention/urgent report functions | |
US20210227179A1 (en) | Mobilarm | |
Mehta et al. | Sensor Based Device System for Female Security & Safety Using Iot |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060926 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602004008118 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20070920 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071109 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071108 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20080213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071109 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080108 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071108 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20080509 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: BARBARIE, YVES Effective date: 20080228 Owner name: BRU, MICHEL PIERRE Effective date: 20080228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080229 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20100309 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20100225 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080209 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080226 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080229 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20110226 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 20071119 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20111102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110226 |