US20200142025A1 - Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator - Google Patents
Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20200142025A1 US20200142025A1 US16/736,954 US202016736954A US2020142025A1 US 20200142025 A1 US20200142025 A1 US 20200142025A1 US 202016736954 A US202016736954 A US 202016736954A US 2020142025 A1 US2020142025 A1 US 2020142025A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- prs
- arrival
- null
- target
- aoa
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S5/00—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
- G01S5/02—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
- G01S5/08—Position of single direction-finder fixed by determining direction of a plurality of spaced sources of known location
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01Q—ANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
- H01Q3/00—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system
- H01Q3/26—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture
- H01Q3/30—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture varying the relative phase between the radiating elements of an array
- H01Q3/34—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture varying the relative phase between the radiating elements of an array by electrical means
- H01Q3/36—Arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern of the waves radiated from an antenna or antenna system varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture varying the relative phase between the radiating elements of an array by electrical means with variable phase-shifters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W64/00—Locating users or terminals or network equipment for network management purposes, e.g. mobility management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01S—RADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
- G01S5/00—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations
- G01S5/02—Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more direction or position line determinations; Position-fixing by co-ordinating two or more distance determinations using radio waves
- G01S5/10—Position of receiver fixed by co-ordinating a plurality of position lines defined by path-difference measurements, e.g. omega or decca systems
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to wireless communication systems, and more particularly to determining angles of arrivals of position reference signals for determining a wireless user equipment location.
- a user equipment such as a cellular phone
- a 911 emergency call center When a user equipment (UE), such as a cellular phone, is used to dial a 911 emergency call center, government regulations call for an ability to determine the location of the UE so that the location may automatically be sent to the 911 emergency call center.
- UEs are equipped with a global positioning system (GPS) receiver that can accurately determine the UE location.
- GPS global positioning system
- the link to GPS satellites is weak or the UE does not have GPS capability, then another method of position determination is called for.
- OTDA observed time difference of arrival
- This technique operates by transmitting a special physical channel called a position reference signal (PRS) to the UE from 3 or more base stations such as evolved node Bs (eNBs) in a long term evolution (LTE) communication network.
- PRS position reference signal
- the PRS includes precise timing information.
- the UE observes the relative arrival times of the signals from nearby eNBs and reports the reference signal time difference (RSTD) observations to a particular serving eNB to which the UE is actively attached.
- the serving eNB conveys the report of observations to a location server which computes the position estimate of the UE using triangulation.
- RSTD reference signal time difference
- the OTDOA mechanism relics upon accurate knowledge of the antenna locations of the cNBs, an eNB time reference relative to the other eNBs, and the observed time of arrival of a PRS signal at the UE. An error in any of these parameters degrades the position estimate of the UE.
- the time of arrival (TOA) of the PRS is presumed to be received from a line of sight (LOS) direction, i.e., a direct path from an antenna of an eNB.
- LOS line of sight
- the LOS path may be attenuated due to an obstruction, such that a relatively stronger signal from the antenna may arrive from the eNB at the UE via a path that includes a reflection. This signal may drown out the LOS signal and may convey inaccurate TOA information.
- the accuracy of the estimate of the location of the UE by the location server may be adversely affected by non-LOS propagation of the PRS received at the UE such as may result from reflected multipath signals.
- a location server for a wireless communication system.
- the location server includes a memory and a processor.
- the memory is configured to store reference signal time differences (RSTD), received from a user equipment (UE). Each RSTD is based on a position reference signal (PRS) received by the UE from a different one of a plurality of base stations.
- RSTD reference signal time differences
- PRS position reference signal
- the memory is also configured to store observed angles of arrival received from the UE, each observed angle of arrival corresponding to a different one of the RSTDs.
- the processor is in communication with the memory and is configured to determine a first estimated UE location based on the RSTDs and the known locations of the plurality of base stations.
- the processor For each RSTD, the processor is configured to determine an estimated angle of arrival based on the first estimated UE location and known locations of the base stations. The processor is also configured to compare an observed angle of arrival with the estimated angle of arrival corresponding to the RSTD, and to weight the RSTD based on the comparison. The processor may also be configured to determine a second estimated UE location based on at least some of the weighted RSTDs and known locations of the plurality of base stations.
- the location server is located at one of the plurality of base stations.
- a magnitude of the weight assigned to an RSTD is inversely proportional to a difference between the estimated angle of arrival and the observed angle of arrival.
- a set of three RSTDs with the highest weights is used to estimate the location of the UE.
- the second estimated UE location is based on a least squares operation applied to the RSTDs.
- the processor is further configured to send an instruction to the UE to suppress a particular one of the PRSs from the plurality of base stations.
- the PRS to be suppressed may be associated with an RSTD that has a weight that is lower than a threshold.
- a UE capable of observing angles of arrival of a plurality of position reference signals (PRS).
- the UE includes a plurality of antennas and a phase shifter to adjust a relative phase between at least two of the plurality of antennas.
- a transceiver of the UE is configured to receive and process signals from the antennas, the signals including at least one position reference signal. PRS.
- a memory is configured to store an angle of arrival of each of the at least one PRS.
- a processor coupled to the phase shifter, the transceiver, and the memory is configured, for each of the at least one PRS, to adjust the phase shifter to adjust a phase between antennas to steer a null in a signal processed by the transceiver until the PRS is suppressed.
- the processor is further configured to determine an angle of arrival of the PRS as being the angle to which the null is steered when the PRS is suppressed, and is further configured to cause transmission, via the transceiver, of the determined angle of arrival to a location server.
- the PRS that is suppressed is selected by a location server as being received from a direction other than along a line of sight between the UE and a base station from which the PRS is transmitted.
- the processor is further configured to, after suppressing the indicated PRS from the non-line of sight direction, detect the PRS received at a different angle of arrival from the base station from which the suppressed PRS is received.
- a sensor is configured to enable determination of a spatial orientation of the UE.
- the sensor establishes a reference plane for determining an angle to which the null is steered.
- the UE determines angles of arrivals of multiple PRS, each PRS received from a different one of a plurality of base stations.
- a method of estimating a position of a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system includes receiving from the UE reference signal time differences (RSTDs), each RSTD being based on a position reference signal (PRS) received by the UE from a different base station.
- the method also includes receiving from the UE observed angles of arrival, each observed angle of arrival corresponding to a different one of the RSTDs.
- a first estimate of the position of the UE is determined based on the RSTDs and known locations of the base stations corresponding to the RSTDs.
- the method For each RSTD, the method includes determining an estimated angle of arrival based on the first estimated position of the UE and the known locations of the base stations; comparing an observed angle of arrival to the estimated angle of arrival; and weighting the corresponding RSTD based on the comparison. The method also includes performing a second estimate of the position of the UE based on the weighted RSTDs and the known locations of the base stations corresponding to the RSTDs.
- the second estimate is performed based on three weighted RSTDs having highest weights.
- the weighted RSTD corresponds to a line-of-sight angle of arrival.
- the method further includes sending an instruction to the UE to suppress a particular PRS arriving at an observed angle of arrival based on a determination that the particular PRS corresponds to an observed angle of arrival that differs from its corresponding estimated angle of arrival by more than a threshold.
- a magnitude of a weight is inversely proportional to a difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival corresponding to the RSTD to which the weight is applied.
- a method of generating observed angles of arrival of signals from a plurality of base stations and received by a user equipment includes scanning for position reference signals, PRSs, by adjusting a phase difference between antennas to cause a null of a beam of the UE to be incremented through an angular sector.
- the method also includes determining, for each of the plurality of base stations: an angle of arrival at which the null is steered when a PRS is suppressed by the null; and a reference signal time difference, RSTD.
- the method also includes transmitting each angle of arrival and corresponding RSTD to a location server.
- the method includes determining a spatial orientation of the UE to determine a reference plane for the scanning.
- the method includes receiving from the location server an indication of a particular one of the PRSs to be suppressed, the PRS to be suppressed being determined to be received from a non-line-of-sight direction.
- the indication includes a target angle of arrival at which the PRS to be suppressed is received, and the method further comprises steering a null to the target angle of arrival.
- the method includes scanning the null to determine if more than one minima of the PRS is encountered, more than one minima indicating that the PRS is received via multiple paths.
- FIG. 1 is a diagram of a system for determining location of a user equipment according to principles of the present disclosure
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a communication system having a base station, a user equipment and a location server arranged to estimate UE position in accordance with principles of the present disclosure
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process for determining and reporting angles of arrival of position reference signals (PRS) at a UE;
- PRS position reference signals
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a process for calculating a first estimate of UE position based on angles of arrival determined by the UE and transmitted to the location server;
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart for calculating a second estimate of UE position based on weighted RSTDs
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a process for determining when to discard an RSTD and instruct a UE to suppress the PRS corresponding to the discarded RSTD;
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a process for suppressing a PRS received from a non-LOS angle of arrival.
- relational terms such as “first” and “second,” “top” and “bottom,” and the like, may be used solely to distinguish one entity or element from another entity or element without necessarily requiring or implying any physical or logical relationship or order between such entities or elements
- AOA data associated with a received position reference signal is collected at the user equipment (UE) and sent to a location server along with corresponding reference signal time difference (RSTD) observations.
- the location server uses this information along with knowledge of radiating antenna coordinates of antennas of the neighboring base stations to establish an estimated angle of arrival.
- AOAs at the UE can be established using the phase relationship between two or more receive antenna elements of the UE.
- the location server uses this estimate to establish a likelihood that one of many PRS arrive by way of a line of sight (LOS) propagation from a given radiating antenna. Based on this likelihood, a weight is applied to the RSTD of each set of observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA) data.
- LOS line of sight
- a null occurs when the output of individual antenna elements are summed with a specific phase offset applied to each element. Because the null response can be made quite sharp, the null response has good qualities for establishing an AOA.
- the angle of arrival of a given PRS may be established with good accuracy at a UE with a limited number of antenna elements by phasing antennas at the UE to null out the PRS signal.
- the angle of arrival of the PRS is determined to be the angle at which the null is steered when the received PRS signal strength is a minimum. Calculation of the angle of arrival may be made relative to a known planar orientation of the UE's antenna elements. Accelerometers used as orientation sensors are commonly installed in UE devices and may be used to establish the planar orientation of the UE's antenna elements.
- FIG. 1 a diagram of a configuration 10 of neighboring base stations 12 a , 12 b , 12 c and 12 d , referred to collectively herein as base stations 12 , or, in long term evolution (LTE) networks, eNBs 12 .
- Each base station 12 transmits a PRS to a UE 14 .
- the base stations 12 b , 12 c and 12 d transmit to the UE using a line of sight (LOS), i.e., a direct path from the base station antenna to the UE.
- LOS line of sight
- the signal from the base station 12 a arrives from a line of sight that has an obstacle 16 a that attenuates the transmitted signal.
- the signal from the base station 12 a also arrives from a non-LOS direction via a reflection from an obstacle 16 b .
- a signal from a non-LOS direction may be stronger than the same signal from a LOS direction.
- a location server 18 which may be part of a base station 12 , may be in direct communication with the UE 14 or may receive OTDOA signal measurement information from the UE 14 indirectly via a base station 12 .
- the location server 18 communicates a determined location of the UE via communication network 20 to a 911 call center 22 .
- the UE 14 observes PRS from the various base stations and determines their angles of arrival.
- the UE also determines, for each PRS, an RSTD based on a time of flight of the PRS.
- the angles of arrival and the corresponding RSTDs obtained from the PRS are sent to the location server 18 .
- the location server 18 determines the location of the UE 14 based on the RSTDs and the known locations of the base stations 12 . Further, for each RSTD, the location server 18 compares an estimated angle of arrival, computed based on known locations of the base stations 12 , to an angle of arrival observed at the UE 14 , to determine a weight to be applied to an RSTD. A greater weight may be assigned to an RSTD when the estimated angle of arrival is close to the observed angle of arrival, and a lesser weight may be assigned to the RSTD when the estimated angle of arrival differs substantially from the observed angle of arrival. Then, in some example embodiments, the location server 18 computes a more accurate estimation of the position of the UE 14 using some or all of the weighted RSTDs. This is described in more detail below with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. 4A and 4B .
- FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of a communication system 10 having the base station 12 , the user equipment 14 and the location server 18 .
- the location server 18 may, in some embodiments, be located at the base station 12 , and in some embodiments, may communicate only indirectly with the UE 14 via a base station 12 .
- the UE 14 has at least two antennas 24 for receiving PRS and for transmitting OTDOA signal measurement information, which includes RTSD and AOA, and may also include LOS quality data.
- a phase shifter 26 enables shifting of the relative phase between signals received by the antennas 24 in order to sweep a null signal through an angular sector.
- a transceiver 28 of the user equipment 14 transmits the radio frequency (RF) signals carrying the OTDOA signal measurement information to the location server 18 , and receives PRS from a plurality of base stations 12 .
- RF radio frequency
- the UE 14 includes a memory 30 and a processor 32 .
- the memory 30 stores observed angles of arrival 34 .
- the memory may also be configured to store computer code that, when executed by the processor 32 , causes the processor 32 to perform UE functions described herein.
- the processor 32 when executing software, includes functionality to cause null steering 42 and to determine observed angles of arrival 44 . In particular, the processor may perform operations that include adjusting a phase value 40 , measuring a PRS magnitude, continuing to adjust phase until a minimum in the PRS magnitude occurs, and determining the angle of the null at which the minimum occurs to be the angle of arrival for the particular PRS.
- the processor 32 may cause suppression of a PRS signal received at a particular angle, while searching fir a minimum of the PRS signal occurring at another angle. Where multiple PRS minimums occur, the processor 32 may determine the angle of arrival of the PRS 44 , having a least RSTD.
- the UE 14 may also include a sensor such as an accelerometer 46 to ascertain an orientation of the UE 14 to ensure that the UE is in a particular orientation, such as vertical, for determining an observed angle of arrival with respect to a reference plane.
- a PRS arriving from a particular angle that is determined by the location server 18 to be from a direction other than a line of sight may be suppressed.
- the non-LOS signal from the particular angle may be suppressed by steering a null to the particular angle at the UE 14 .
- the processor 32 of the UE 14 is further configured, after suppressing the indicated PRS from the non-line of sight direction, to detect the PRS received from a different angle of arrival.
- the UE 14 may perform any one or more of at least two major functions: (1) determining observed angles of arrival and corresponding RSTDs to be used by the location server 18 to determine UE position, and (2) suppressing PRS from non-line of sight directions and detecting the PRS at another angle of arrival. Suppressing a PRS from a non-LOS angle of arrival of a PRS can improve reception of the PRS arriving at a LOS angle of arrival.
- the OTDOA information may be sent to the location server 18 directly from the UE 14 .
- the OTDOA information may be sent by the UE 14 to the base station 12 from which it is forwarded to the location server 18 .
- the location server 18 may be located at a base station 12 .
- the base station 12 includes at least one antenna 48 , a transceiver 50 , a memory 52 and a processor 54 .
- the transceiver 50 operates to prepare data to be transmitted and to convert received data to baseband for processing by the processor 54 .
- the memory 52 stores position reference signals (PRS) 56 and a location 58 of the base station 12 .
- PRS position reference signals
- the memory 52 may also be configured to store computer code that, when executed by a processor 54 , causes the processor 54 to perform base station functions described herein.
- the processor 54 when executing software, generates, via a PRS generator 60 , the PRS for transmission to the UE 14 by the transceiver 50 of the base station 12 .
- the location server 18 includes at least one antenna 62 and a transceiver 64 to receive OTDOA measurement information from the UE 14 .
- the location server 18 also includes a memory 66 and a processor 68 .
- the memory 66 stores observed and estimated angles of arrival 70 , RSTDs 72 , base station locations 74 , and estimated UE locations 76 .
- the memory 66 may also be configured to execute computer code that, when executed by a processor 68 , causes the processor 68 to perform location server functions described herein.
- the processor 68 when executing computer code, functions to perform UE location estimation 78 , angle of arrival (AOA) estimation 80 , AOA comparison 82 , and weight assignment 84 .
- AOA angle of arrival
- the processor 68 of the location server 18 computes estimated UE locations based on RSTDs and known base station locations, and computes estimated UE locations based on the observed angles of arrival and known base station locations via trilateration, i.e., by determining an intersection of lies extending from the base stations at the observed angles of arrival.
- the processor 68 may also compute angles of arrival based on the UE location estimate and known base station locations, and compare these computed angles of arrival to angles of arrival observed at the UE 14 .
- the processor 68 may eliminate RSTDs from the computation of UE location when the difference between the observed and estimated AOA corresponding to the RSTD is large, i.e., greater than a predetermined amount.
- the processor 68 may also assign a weight to an RSTD that depends upon a magnitude of a difference between the estimated angle of arrival and the observed angle of arrival.
- the location server 18 may perform any one or more of at least three major functions: (1) comparing an observed angle of arrival to an estimated angle of arrival to determine a weight to be assigned to a corresponding RSTD, (2) computing an estimated UE position based on the weighted RSTDs and (3) instructing the UE 14 to suppress a particular one of the PRS corresponding to an RSTD determined to be from a non-line-of-sight.
- the processor 68 of the location server 18 is in communication with the memory 66 and is configured to determine a first estimated UE location based on the RSTDs and the known locations 74 of the plurality of base stations 12 . For each RSTD, the processor 68 is configured to determine an estimated angle of arrival 70 based on the first estimated UE location 76 and known locations of the base stations 74 . The processor 68 is also configured to compare an observed angle of arrival with the estimated angle of arrival corresponding to the RSTD, and to weight the RSTD based on the comparison. In some embodiments, the processor 68 is also configured to determine a second estimated UE location 100 based on at least some of the weighted RSTDs and 74 known locations of the plurality of base stations.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process performed by the UE 14 for determining and reporting angles of arrival of position reference signals at a UE 14 .
- an optional initial step of determining UE orientation is an optional initial step of determining UE orientation.
- the orientation sensors 46 of the UE 14 may be used to determine if the UE 14 has a specific planar orientation that is acceptable for determining angles of arrival. For example, the sensors 46 may determine whether the UE 14 is oriented vertically plus or minus 30°.
- a null value is reported with the OTDOA signal measurement information from the UE 14 to the location server 18 if a suitable orientation of the UE 14 is not found within a pre-determined amount of time, the null value indicating that an angle of arrival has not been detected for a particular PRS.
- the signals received at each of at least two antennas 24 of the UE 14 are phased with respect to each other to sweep a null in a beam formed by the antennas 24 through an angular sector such as 360° (block S 104 ).
- a phase shifter 26 for varying the phase between the signals may be incremented according to pre-determined increments.
- the angle of arrival for a particular PRS is determined as the angle at which the PRS minimum occurs. In other words, the angle to which the null is steered to suppress the PRS signal is the observed angle of arrival of the PRS signal (block S 106 ).
- the beam null may optionally be scanned so as to determine whether more than one minima of a particular PRS being scanned is encountered, thereby indicating that the PRS is received by multiple paths.
- One of the angles of arrival for example, the angle of arrival from a base station to which the UE is attached, may be used as a reference angle against which the other angles of arrival are measured.
- Each determined angle of arrival is associated with an RSTD determined by the UE (block S 108 ).
- Each observed angle of arrival and corresponding RSTD is transmitted from the UE 14 to the location server 18 (block S 110 ).
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a process performed by the location server 18 for calculating the estimated position of a UE 14 based on angles of arrival determined by the UE 14 and transmitted to the location server 18 .
- OTDOA signal measurement information is received by the location server 18 (block S 112 ).
- the OTDOA signal measurement information includes at least two UE observations for each of a plurality of base stations 12 .
- the at least two UE observations include an RSTD and an observed angle of arrival.
- a first estimated UE location is calculated using multilateration based on the received RSTDs observed at the UE 14 and knowledge of the locations of the eNBs 12 possessed by the location server 18 (block S 114 ).
- An estimated angle of arrival from a particular cNB 12 is calculated based on the estimated UE location and physical locations of the eNBs 12 (block S 116 ).
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a process for weighting RSTDs and computing a second estimate of UE position. For each RSTD, the estimated angle of arrival is compared to the observed angle of arrival (block S 118 ).
- a weight may be assigned to the RSTD based on the difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival (block S 120 ).
- a magnitude of a weight assigned to an RSTD may be inversely proportional to a difference between the estimated angle of arrival and the observed angle of arrival, so that a larger weight is applied when the difference between the estimated AOA and the observed AOA is small, and a smaller weight is applied when the difference is large.
- a second estimate of the UE may be calculated using the highest weighted RSTDs and the known base station locations (block S 122 ).
- the UE location may be estimated using multilateration and the weighted RSTDs.
- RSTDs corresponding to a difference between the observed angle of arrival and an estimated angle of arrival that is not as small as the threshold may be discarded.
- trilateration based on the 3 RSTDs having the highest quality may be performed.
- more than three RSTDs may be employed in a weighted formula, such as a least squares method, to compute the UE location.
- This second estimate of UE location is, in some embodiments, provided by the location server 18 to the 911 call center 22 via the network 20 .
- the embodiments of FIGS. 4 and 5 contemplate the possibility of using a non-line-of-sight PRS in a least squares calculation of estimated UE position. For example, some RSTDs that are less than the threshold may correspond to non-LOS PRS. This may result from a non-LOS path being very short or from a condition where many non-LOS PRS signals are received from abase station.
- FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a process for making a determination to discard an RSTD and optionally instruct the UE to suppress the corresponding PRS arriving from the corresponding observed angle of arrival.
- the location server 18 compares, for each RSTD, an observed angle of arrival to an estimated angle of arrival (block S 118 ). If the difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival exceeds the threshold, the corresponding RSTD is discarded (block S 124 ).
- the method includes sending an instruction to the UE to suppress a particular PRS arriving at an observed angle of arrival corresponding to the discarded RSTD, which is considered to be from a non-line-of-sight direction (block S 126 ).
- FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an example process for suppressing PRS received from the non-LOS angles of arrival.
- the UE 14 receives the instruction from the location server 18 to suppress a PRS at a target angle of arrival from the location server (block S 128 ).
- the PRS to be suppressed is one that is deemed to arrive by a non-LOS direction, based on the observed angle of arrival differing from the estimated angle of arrival by an amount exceeding the threshold.
- the UE 14 may scan a null in the beam to the target angle of arrival to suppress the particular PRS (block S 130 ). Suppressing a high power non-LOS version of the PRS enables better detection of a lower power LOS version of the PRS that arrives earlier than the suppressed PRS arriving at the target angle. Thus, a first null may be steered to the angle of arrival of the high power non-LOS version of the PRS and a second null may be swept to determine an angle of arrival for one or more versions of the PRS signal that has a smaller RSTD value.
- the UE 14 may scan its beam to find the PRS arriving at a different angle of arrival (block S 132 ). This angle and a corresponding RSTD may be sent to the location server 18 (block S 134 ).
- a value may be assigned to another parameter called “LOS quality” or “RSTD quality” measured by the UE and included within the OTDOA signal measurement information.
- a large LOS quality rating may be assigned to strongly received PRS and small LOS quality rating may be assigned to weakly received PRS.
- the location server may weight a corresponding RSTD based at least in part on the received LOS quality rating, where signals having a large LOS quality rating are weighted more heavily than signals having lower LOS quality rating.
- the LOS quality rating may be based on the PRS signal strength and may be affected by signal to noise ratio of the PRS, signal to noise ratio of a reference PRS, detected orientation of the UE 14 , and the number of UE antennas.
- embodiments may provide improved accuracy of position estimates of a UE by assigning weights to RSTDs measured by the UE based on a comparison of an angle of arrival observed by the UE to an estimated angle of arrival computed by a location server.
- Non-LOS PRSs received by the UE may be nulled to enable better detection of a PRS received from a LOS direction or a stronger PRS received from a non-LOS direction.
- the present invention can be realized in hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. Any kind of computing system, or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein, is suited to perform the functions described herein.
- a typical combination of hardware and software could be a specialized computer system, having one or more processing elements and a computer program stored on a storage medium that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.
- the present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which, when loaded m a computing system is able to carry out these methods.
- Storage medium refers to any volatile or non-volatile storage device.
- Computer program or application in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
- Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present disclosure relates to wireless communication systems, and more particularly to determining angles of arrivals of position reference signals for determining a wireless user equipment location.
- When a user equipment (UE), such as a cellular phone, is used to dial a 911 emergency call center, government regulations call for an ability to determine the location of the UE so that the location may automatically be sent to the 911 emergency call center. Many UEs are equipped with a global positioning system (GPS) receiver that can accurately determine the UE location. However, if the link to GPS satellites is weak or the UE does not have GPS capability, then another method of position determination is called for.
- One such method is a technique called observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA). This technique operates by transmitting a special physical channel called a position reference signal (PRS) to the UE from 3 or more base stations such as evolved node Bs (eNBs) in a long term evolution (LTE) communication network. The PRS includes precise timing information. The UE observes the relative arrival times of the signals from nearby eNBs and reports the reference signal time difference (RSTD) observations to a particular serving eNB to which the UE is actively attached. The serving eNB conveys the report of observations to a location server which computes the position estimate of the UE using triangulation. The OTDOA mechanism relics upon accurate knowledge of the antenna locations of the cNBs, an eNB time reference relative to the other eNBs, and the observed time of arrival of a PRS signal at the UE. An error in any of these parameters degrades the position estimate of the UE.
- The time of arrival (TOA) of the PRS is presumed to be received from a line of sight (LOS) direction, i.e., a direct path from an antenna of an eNB. Depending on the propagation environment, the LOS path may be attenuated due to an obstruction, such that a relatively stronger signal from the antenna may arrive from the eNB at the UE via a path that includes a reflection. This signal may drown out the LOS signal and may convey inaccurate TOA information.
- The accuracy of the estimate of the location of the UE by the location server may be adversely affected by non-LOS propagation of the PRS received at the UE such as may result from reflected multipath signals.
- Methods and systems for determining a UE location based on signal angle of arrival observations are disclosed. According to one aspect, there is provided a location server for a wireless communication system. The location server includes a memory and a processor. The memory is configured to store reference signal time differences (RSTD), received from a user equipment (UE). Each RSTD is based on a position reference signal (PRS) received by the UE from a different one of a plurality of base stations. The memory is also configured to store observed angles of arrival received from the UE, each observed angle of arrival corresponding to a different one of the RSTDs. The processor is in communication with the memory and is configured to determine a first estimated UE location based on the RSTDs and the known locations of the plurality of base stations. For each RSTD, the processor is configured to determine an estimated angle of arrival based on the first estimated UE location and known locations of the base stations. The processor is also configured to compare an observed angle of arrival with the estimated angle of arrival corresponding to the RSTD, and to weight the RSTD based on the comparison. The processor may also be configured to determine a second estimated UE location based on at least some of the weighted RSTDs and known locations of the plurality of base stations.
- According to this aspect, in some embodiments, the location server is located at one of the plurality of base stations. In some embodiments, a magnitude of the weight assigned to an RSTD is inversely proportional to a difference between the estimated angle of arrival and the observed angle of arrival. In some embodiments, a set of three RSTDs with the highest weights is used to estimate the location of the UE. In some embodiments, the second estimated UE location is based on a least squares operation applied to the RSTDs. In some embodiments, the processor is further configured to send an instruction to the UE to suppress a particular one of the PRSs from the plurality of base stations. In some embodiments, the PRS to be suppressed may be associated with an RSTD that has a weight that is lower than a threshold.
- According to another aspect, there is provided a UE capable of observing angles of arrival of a plurality of position reference signals (PRS). The UE includes a plurality of antennas and a phase shifter to adjust a relative phase between at least two of the plurality of antennas. A transceiver of the UE is configured to receive and process signals from the antennas, the signals including at least one position reference signal. PRS. A memory is configured to store an angle of arrival of each of the at least one PRS. A processor coupled to the phase shifter, the transceiver, and the memory is configured, for each of the at least one PRS, to adjust the phase shifter to adjust a phase between antennas to steer a null in a signal processed by the transceiver until the PRS is suppressed.
- According to this aspect, in some embodiments, the processor is further configured to determine an angle of arrival of the PRS as being the angle to which the null is steered when the PRS is suppressed, and is further configured to cause transmission, via the transceiver, of the determined angle of arrival to a location server. In some embodiments, the PRS that is suppressed is selected by a location server as being received from a direction other than along a line of sight between the UE and a base station from which the PRS is transmitted. In some embodiments, the processor is further configured to, after suppressing the indicated PRS from the non-line of sight direction, detect the PRS received at a different angle of arrival from the base station from which the suppressed PRS is received. In some embodiments, a sensor is configured to enable determination of a spatial orientation of the UE. The sensor establishes a reference plane for determining an angle to which the null is steered. In some embodiments, the UE determines angles of arrivals of multiple PRS, each PRS received from a different one of a plurality of base stations.
- According to another aspect, there is provided a method of estimating a position of a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system. The method includes receiving from the UE reference signal time differences (RSTDs), each RSTD being based on a position reference signal (PRS) received by the UE from a different base station. The method also includes receiving from the UE observed angles of arrival, each observed angle of arrival corresponding to a different one of the RSTDs. A first estimate of the position of the UE is determined based on the RSTDs and known locations of the base stations corresponding to the RSTDs. For each RSTD, the method includes determining an estimated angle of arrival based on the first estimated position of the UE and the known locations of the base stations; comparing an observed angle of arrival to the estimated angle of arrival; and weighting the corresponding RSTD based on the comparison. The method also includes performing a second estimate of the position of the UE based on the weighted RSTDs and the known locations of the base stations corresponding to the RSTDs.
- According to this aspect, in some embodiments, the second estimate is performed based on three weighted RSTDs having highest weights. In some embodiments, the weighted RSTD corresponds to a line-of-sight angle of arrival. In some embodiments, the method further includes sending an instruction to the UE to suppress a particular PRS arriving at an observed angle of arrival based on a determination that the particular PRS corresponds to an observed angle of arrival that differs from its corresponding estimated angle of arrival by more than a threshold. In some embodiments, a magnitude of a weight is inversely proportional to a difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival corresponding to the RSTD to which the weight is applied.
- According to another aspect, there is provided a method of generating observed angles of arrival of signals from a plurality of base stations and received by a user equipment. UE. The method includes scanning for position reference signals, PRSs, by adjusting a phase difference between antennas to cause a null of a beam of the UE to be incremented through an angular sector. The method also includes determining, for each of the plurality of base stations: an angle of arrival at which the null is steered when a PRS is suppressed by the null; and a reference signal time difference, RSTD. The method also includes transmitting each angle of arrival and corresponding RSTD to a location server.
- According to this aspect, in some embodiments, the method includes determining a spatial orientation of the UE to determine a reference plane for the scanning. In some embodiments, the method includes receiving from the location server an indication of a particular one of the PRSs to be suppressed, the PRS to be suppressed being determined to be received from a non-line-of-sight direction. In some embodiments, the indication includes a target angle of arrival at which the PRS to be suppressed is received, and the method further comprises steering a null to the target angle of arrival. In some embodiments, for a particular base station and PRS, the method includes scanning the null to determine if more than one minima of the PRS is encountered, more than one minima indicating that the PRS is received via multiple paths.
-
FIG. 1 is a diagram of a system for determining location of a user equipment according to principles of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a communication system having a base station, a user equipment and a location server arranged to estimate UE position in accordance with principles of the present disclosure; -
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process for determining and reporting angles of arrival of position reference signals (PRS) at a UE; -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a process for calculating a first estimate of UE position based on angles of arrival determined by the UE and transmitted to the location server; -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart for calculating a second estimate of UE position based on weighted RSTDs; -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a process for determining when to discard an RSTD and instruct a UE to suppress the PRS corresponding to the discarded RSTD; and -
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a process for suppressing a PRS received from a non-LOS angle of arrival. - Before describing in detail example embodiments that are in accordance with the present disclosure, it is noted that the embodiments reside primarily in combinations of apparatus components and processing steps related to determining position of a UE. Accordingly, the system and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present disclosure so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
- As used herein, relational terms, such as “first” and “second,” “top” and “bottom,” and the like, may be used solely to distinguish one entity or element from another entity or element without necessarily requiring or implying any physical or logical relationship or order between such entities or elements
- In embodiments discussed herein, AOA data associated with a received position reference signal (PRS) is collected at the user equipment (UE) and sent to a location server along with corresponding reference signal time difference (RSTD) observations. The location server uses this information along with knowledge of radiating antenna coordinates of antennas of the neighboring base stations to establish an estimated angle of arrival. AOAs at the UE can be established using the phase relationship between two or more receive antenna elements of the UE. In some embodiments, the location server uses this estimate to establish a likelihood that one of many PRS arrive by way of a line of sight (LOS) propagation from a given radiating antenna. Based on this likelihood, a weight is applied to the RSTD of each set of observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA) data. Due to a finite dynamic range of the UE receiver in detecting the PRS, detection of a weak line of sight PRS that is impaired by some attenuating obstruction may be degraded in the presence of a strong non-line of sight PRS originating from the same radiating antenna. If this is determined to be the case, a null can be applied in the direction of the stronger non-line of sight signal in order to improve reception of the line of sight signal which can be identified by its faster arrival time.
- A null occurs when the output of individual antenna elements are summed with a specific phase offset applied to each element. Because the null response can be made quite sharp, the null response has good qualities for establishing an AOA. In particular, the angle of arrival of a given PRS may be established with good accuracy at a UE with a limited number of antenna elements by phasing antennas at the UE to null out the PRS signal. The angle of arrival of the PRS is determined to be the angle at which the null is steered when the received PRS signal strength is a minimum. Calculation of the angle of arrival may be made relative to a known planar orientation of the UE's antenna elements. Accelerometers used as orientation sensors are commonly installed in UE devices and may be used to establish the planar orientation of the UE's antenna elements.
- Referring now to the drawing figures in which like reference designators denote like elements, there is shown in
FIG. 1 a diagram of aconfiguration 10 of neighboringbase stations base stations 12, or, in long term evolution (LTE) networks,eNBs 12. Eachbase station 12 transmits a PRS to aUE 14. In the example ofFIG. 1 , thebase stations FIG. 1 , the signal from thebase station 12 a arrives from a line of sight that has an obstacle 16 a that attenuates the transmitted signal. The signal from thebase station 12 a also arrives from a non-LOS direction via a reflection from anobstacle 16 b. Thus, in the example ofFIG. 1 , it is possible that a signal from a non-LOS direction may be stronger than the same signal from a LOS direction. - A
location server 18, which may be part of abase station 12, may be in direct communication with theUE 14 or may receive OTDOA signal measurement information from theUE 14 indirectly via abase station 12. In some example embodiments, thelocation server 18 communicates a determined location of the UE viacommunication network 20 to a 911call center 22. In operation, theUE 14 observes PRS from the various base stations and determines their angles of arrival. The UE also determines, for each PRS, an RSTD based on a time of flight of the PRS. The angles of arrival and the corresponding RSTDs obtained from the PRS are sent to thelocation server 18. - The
location server 18 determines the location of theUE 14 based on the RSTDs and the known locations of thebase stations 12. Further, for each RSTD, thelocation server 18 compares an estimated angle of arrival, computed based on known locations of thebase stations 12, to an angle of arrival observed at theUE 14, to determine a weight to be applied to an RSTD. A greater weight may be assigned to an RSTD when the estimated angle of arrival is close to the observed angle of arrival, and a lesser weight may be assigned to the RSTD when the estimated angle of arrival differs substantially from the observed angle of arrival. Then, in some example embodiments, thelocation server 18 computes a more accurate estimation of the position of theUE 14 using some or all of the weighted RSTDs. This is described in more detail below with reference to the flowcharts ofFIGS. 4A and 4B . -
FIG. 2 is a more detailed block diagram of acommunication system 10 having thebase station 12, theuser equipment 14 and thelocation server 18. Note that thelocation server 18 may, in some embodiments, be located at thebase station 12, and in some embodiments, may communicate only indirectly with theUE 14 via abase station 12. TheUE 14 has at least two antennas 24 for receiving PRS and for transmitting OTDOA signal measurement information, which includes RTSD and AOA, and may also include LOS quality data. Aphase shifter 26 enables shifting of the relative phase between signals received by the antennas 24 in order to sweep a null signal through an angular sector. Atransceiver 28 of theuser equipment 14 transmits the radio frequency (RF) signals carrying the OTDOA signal measurement information to thelocation server 18, and receives PRS from a plurality ofbase stations 12. - The
UE 14 includes amemory 30 and aprocessor 32. Thememory 30 stores observed angles ofarrival 34. RSTDs 36 andphase values 40 for adjusting thephase shifter 26. The memory may also be configured to store computer code that, when executed by theprocessor 32, causes theprocessor 32 to perform UE functions described herein. Theprocessor 32, when executing software, includes functionality to causenull steering 42 and to determine observed angles ofarrival 44. In particular, the processor may perform operations that include adjusting aphase value 40, measuring a PRS magnitude, continuing to adjust phase until a minimum in the PRS magnitude occurs, and determining the angle of the null at which the minimum occurs to be the angle of arrival for the particular PRS. - Further, the
processor 32 may cause suppression of a PRS signal received at a particular angle, while searching fir a minimum of the PRS signal occurring at another angle. Where multiple PRS minimums occur, theprocessor 32 may determine the angle of arrival of thePRS 44, having a least RSTD. Note that theUE 14 may also include a sensor such as anaccelerometer 46 to ascertain an orientation of theUE 14 to ensure that the UE is in a particular orientation, such as vertical, for determining an observed angle of arrival with respect to a reference plane. - In some embodiments, a PRS arriving from a particular angle that is determined by the
location server 18 to be from a direction other than a line of sight, may be suppressed. The non-LOS signal from the particular angle may be suppressed by steering a null to the particular angle at theUE 14. In some embodiments, theprocessor 32 of theUE 14 is further configured, after suppressing the indicated PRS from the non-line of sight direction, to detect the PRS received from a different angle of arrival. Thus, theUE 14 may perform any one or more of at least two major functions: (1) determining observed angles of arrival and corresponding RSTDs to be used by thelocation server 18 to determine UE position, and (2) suppressing PRS from non-line of sight directions and detecting the PRS at another angle of arrival. Suppressing a PRS from a non-LOS angle of arrival of a PRS can improve reception of the PRS arriving at a LOS angle of arrival. - Note that the OTDOA information may be sent to the
location server 18 directly from theUE 14. Alternatively, the OTDOA information may be sent by theUE 14 to thebase station 12 from which it is forwarded to thelocation server 18. In some embodiments, thelocation server 18 may be located at abase station 12. Thebase station 12 includes at least oneantenna 48, atransceiver 50, amemory 52 and aprocessor 54. Thetransceiver 50 operates to prepare data to be transmitted and to convert received data to baseband for processing by theprocessor 54. Thememory 52 stores position reference signals (PRS) 56 and alocation 58 of thebase station 12. Thememory 52 may also be configured to store computer code that, when executed by aprocessor 54, causes theprocessor 54 to perform base station functions described herein. Theprocessor 54, when executing software, generates, via aPRS generator 60, the PRS for transmission to theUE 14 by thetransceiver 50 of thebase station 12. - The
location server 18 includes at least oneantenna 62 and atransceiver 64 to receive OTDOA measurement information from theUE 14. Thelocation server 18 also includes amemory 66 and aprocessor 68. Thememory 66 stores observed and estimated angles of arrival 70,RSTDs 72,base station locations 74, and estimatedUE locations 76. Thememory 66 may also be configured to execute computer code that, when executed by aprocessor 68, causes theprocessor 68 to perform location server functions described herein. Theprocessor 68, when executing computer code, functions to performUE location estimation 78, angle of arrival (AOA)estimation 80,AOA comparison 82, andweight assignment 84. - In operation, the
processor 68 of thelocation server 18 computes estimated UE locations based on RSTDs and known base station locations, and computes estimated UE locations based on the observed angles of arrival and known base station locations via trilateration, i.e., by determining an intersection of lies extending from the base stations at the observed angles of arrival. Theprocessor 68 may also compute angles of arrival based on the UE location estimate and known base station locations, and compare these computed angles of arrival to angles of arrival observed at theUE 14. Theprocessor 68 may eliminate RSTDs from the computation of UE location when the difference between the observed and estimated AOA corresponding to the RSTD is large, i.e., greater than a predetermined amount. Theprocessor 68 may also assign a weight to an RSTD that depends upon a magnitude of a difference between the estimated angle of arrival and the observed angle of arrival. Thus, thelocation server 18 may perform any one or more of at least three major functions: (1) comparing an observed angle of arrival to an estimated angle of arrival to determine a weight to be assigned to a corresponding RSTD, (2) computing an estimated UE position based on the weighted RSTDs and (3) instructing theUE 14 to suppress a particular one of the PRS corresponding to an RSTD determined to be from a non-line-of-sight. - The
processor 68 of thelocation server 18 is in communication with thememory 66 and is configured to determine a first estimated UE location based on the RSTDs and the knownlocations 74 of the plurality ofbase stations 12. For each RSTD, theprocessor 68 is configured to determine an estimated angle of arrival 70 based on the first estimatedUE location 76 and known locations of thebase stations 74. Theprocessor 68 is also configured to compare an observed angle of arrival with the estimated angle of arrival corresponding to the RSTD, and to weight the RSTD based on the comparison. In some embodiments, theprocessor 68 is also configured to determine a second estimated UE location 100 based on at least some of the weighted RSTDs and 74 known locations of the plurality of base stations. Thus, improved accuracy in determining the position of a UE may be achieved in some embodiments by assigning higher weighting to LOS data and lower weighting to non-LOS data. Thelocation server 18 may optionally instruct the UE to suppress a PRS determined to be from a non-line of sight directionFIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process performed by theUE 14 for determining and reporting angles of arrival of position reference signals at aUE 14. Not shown inFIG. 3 is an optional initial step of determining UE orientation. Thus, theorientation sensors 46 of theUE 14 may be used to determine if theUE 14 has a specific planar orientation that is acceptable for determining angles of arrival. For example, thesensors 46 may determine whether theUE 14 is oriented vertically plus or minus 30°. In some embodiments, a null value is reported with the OTDOA signal measurement information from theUE 14 to thelocation server 18 if a suitable orientation of theUE 14 is not found within a pre-determined amount of time, the null value indicating that an angle of arrival has not been detected for a particular PRS. - If the orientation of the
UE 14 is acceptable, then, for each of a plurality of PRSs, the signals received at each of at least two antennas 24 of theUE 14 are phased with respect to each other to sweep a null in a beam formed by the antennas 24 through an angular sector such as 360° (block S104). Aphase shifter 26 for varying the phase between the signals may be incremented according to pre-determined increments. The angle of arrival for a particular PRS is determined as the angle at which the PRS minimum occurs. In other words, the angle to which the null is steered to suppress the PRS signal is the observed angle of arrival of the PRS signal (block S106). Additionally, the beam null may optionally be scanned so as to determine whether more than one minima of a particular PRS being scanned is encountered, thereby indicating that the PRS is received by multiple paths. One of the angles of arrival, for example, the angle of arrival from a base station to which the UE is attached, may be used as a reference angle against which the other angles of arrival are measured. Each determined angle of arrival is associated with an RSTD determined by the UE (block S108). Each observed angle of arrival and corresponding RSTD is transmitted from theUE 14 to the location server 18 (block S110). -
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a process performed by thelocation server 18 for calculating the estimated position of aUE 14 based on angles of arrival determined by theUE 14 and transmitted to thelocation server 18. OTDOA signal measurement information is received by the location server 18 (block S112). The OTDOA signal measurement information includes at least two UE observations for each of a plurality ofbase stations 12. The at least two UE observations include an RSTD and an observed angle of arrival. A first estimated UE location is calculated using multilateration based on the received RSTDs observed at theUE 14 and knowledge of the locations of theeNBs 12 possessed by the location server 18 (block S114). An estimated angle of arrival from aparticular cNB 12 is calculated based on the estimated UE location and physical locations of the eNBs 12 (block S116). -
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a process for weighting RSTDs and computing a second estimate of UE position. For each RSTD, the estimated angle of arrival is compared to the observed angle of arrival (block S118). - A weight may be assigned to the RSTD based on the difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival (block S120). A magnitude of a weight assigned to an RSTD may be inversely proportional to a difference between the estimated angle of arrival and the observed angle of arrival, so that a larger weight is applied when the difference between the estimated AOA and the observed AOA is small, and a smaller weight is applied when the difference is large. After all the RSTDs have been weighted, a second estimate of the UE may be calculated using the highest weighted RSTDs and the known base station locations (block S122).
- Thus, if the difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival is sufficiently small as compared to a threshold for each of at least three RSTDs, then the UE location may be estimated using multilateration and the weighted RSTDs. RSTDs corresponding to a difference between the observed angle of arrival and an estimated angle of arrival that is not as small as the threshold may be discarded. When the total number of non-discarded RSTDs, including the RSTD of the
reference eNB 12, is greater than two, then trilateration based on the 3 RSTDs having the highest quality may be performed. Also, more than three RSTDs may be employed in a weighted formula, such as a least squares method, to compute the UE location. This second estimate of UE location is, in some embodiments, provided by thelocation server 18 to the 911call center 22 via thenetwork 20. Note that the embodiments ofFIGS. 4 and 5 contemplate the possibility of using a non-line-of-sight PRS in a least squares calculation of estimated UE position. For example, some RSTDs that are less than the threshold may correspond to non-LOS PRS. This may result from a non-LOS path being very short or from a condition where many non-LOS PRS signals are received from abase station. -
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a process for making a determination to discard an RSTD and optionally instruct the UE to suppress the corresponding PRS arriving from the corresponding observed angle of arrival. As mentioned above with reference toFIG. 5 , thelocation server 18 compares, for each RSTD, an observed angle of arrival to an estimated angle of arrival (block S118). If the difference between the observed angle of arrival and the estimated angle of arrival exceeds the threshold, the corresponding RSTD is discarded (block S124). In some embodiments, the method includes sending an instruction to the UE to suppress a particular PRS arriving at an observed angle of arrival corresponding to the discarded RSTD, which is considered to be from a non-line-of-sight direction (block S126). -
FIG. 7 is a flowchart of an example process for suppressing PRS received from the non-LOS angles of arrival. TheUE 14 receives the instruction from thelocation server 18 to suppress a PRS at a target angle of arrival from the location server (block S128). The PRS to be suppressed is one that is deemed to arrive by a non-LOS direction, based on the observed angle of arrival differing from the estimated angle of arrival by an amount exceeding the threshold. - The
UE 14 may scan a null in the beam to the target angle of arrival to suppress the particular PRS (block S130). Suppressing a high power non-LOS version of the PRS enables better detection of a lower power LOS version of the PRS that arrives earlier than the suppressed PRS arriving at the target angle. Thus, a first null may be steered to the angle of arrival of the high power non-LOS version of the PRS and a second null may be swept to determine an angle of arrival for one or more versions of the PRS signal that has a smaller RSTD value. Once the PRS from the non-LOS direction is suppressed, theUE 14 may scan its beam to find the PRS arriving at a different angle of arrival (block S132). This angle and a corresponding RSTD may be sent to the location server 18 (block S134). - Note that in some embodiments, a value may be assigned to another parameter called “LOS quality” or “RSTD quality” measured by the UE and included within the OTDOA signal measurement information. A large LOS quality rating may be assigned to strongly received PRS and small LOS quality rating may be assigned to weakly received PRS. When this information is received by the location server, the location server may weight a corresponding RSTD based at least in part on the received LOS quality rating, where signals having a large LOS quality rating are weighted more heavily than signals having lower LOS quality rating. Thus, the LOS quality rating may be based on the PRS signal strength and may be affected by signal to noise ratio of the PRS, signal to noise ratio of a reference PRS, detected orientation of the
UE 14, and the number of UE antennas. - Thus, embodiments may provide improved accuracy of position estimates of a UE by assigning weights to RSTDs measured by the UE based on a comparison of an angle of arrival observed by the UE to an estimated angle of arrival computed by a location server. Non-LOS PRSs received by the UE may be nulled to enable better detection of a PRS received from a LOS direction or a stronger PRS received from a non-LOS direction.
- The present invention can be realized in hardware, or a combination of hardware and software. Any kind of computing system, or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein, is suited to perform the functions described herein. A typical combination of hardware and software could be a specialized computer system, having one or more processing elements and a computer program stored on a storage medium that, when loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein. The present invention can also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which, when loaded m a computing system is able to carry out these methods. Storage medium refers to any volatile or non-volatile storage device.
- Computer program or application in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
- It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described herein above. In addition, unless mention was made above to the contrary, it should be noted that all of the accompanying drawings are not to scale. A variety of modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings without departing from the scope of the following claims.
Claims (19)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US16/736,954 US20200142025A1 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2020-01-08 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2014/060272 WO2015145217A1 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2014-03-28 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
US201615129268A | 2016-09-26 | 2016-09-26 | |
US16/736,954 US20200142025A1 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2020-01-08 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
Related Parent Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/129,268 Division US10557919B2 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2014-03-28 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
PCT/IB2014/060272 Division WO2015145217A1 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2014-03-28 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20200142025A1 true US20200142025A1 (en) | 2020-05-07 |
Family
ID=50549368
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/129,268 Active 2035-05-17 US10557919B2 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2014-03-28 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
US16/736,954 Abandoned US20200142025A1 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2020-01-08 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/129,268 Active 2035-05-17 US10557919B2 (en) | 2014-03-28 | 2014-03-28 | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US10557919B2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015145217A1 (en) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2021228400A1 (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2021-11-18 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method for obtaining positioning and orientation of ues with multiple antenna panels from minimal set of network nodes |
US20220014335A1 (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2022-01-13 | Vivo Mobile Communication Co.,Ltd. | Method for reporting positioning measurement information, terminal, and network device |
US20220390546A1 (en) * | 2021-06-08 | 2022-12-08 | Nokia Technologies Oy | USING ANGLE ERROR GROUP (AEG) TO IMPROVE ANGLE OF ARRIVAL (AoA) POSITIONING |
WO2024033566A1 (en) * | 2022-08-10 | 2024-02-15 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Weighting positioning measurements |
Families Citing this family (30)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107431525B (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2020-07-28 | 三菱电机株式会社 | Receiving apparatus and receiving method |
US10225686B2 (en) * | 2016-02-03 | 2019-03-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Passive positioning based on directional transmissions |
GB2551347B (en) * | 2016-06-13 | 2020-04-15 | Toshiba Kk | Indoor localisation using received signal quality weights |
US11122535B2 (en) * | 2016-07-15 | 2021-09-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Techniques for locating devices using narrowband positioning reference signals |
EP3282276A1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2018-02-14 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Position detection of user equipment within a network |
EP3306337A1 (en) * | 2016-10-10 | 2018-04-11 | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Angewand | User equipment localization in a mobile communication network |
EP3321709A1 (en) * | 2016-11-11 | 2018-05-16 | Fraunhofer Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Angewand | User equipment localization in a mobile communication network based on delays and path strengths |
EP3545329A1 (en) * | 2016-11-23 | 2019-10-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhancements to observed time difference of arrival positioning of a mobile device |
US10901096B2 (en) * | 2016-12-12 | 2021-01-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Antenna phase variation correction |
CN110036307A (en) * | 2016-12-14 | 2019-07-19 | 华为技术有限公司 | A kind of localization method, system and relevant device |
US10440570B2 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2019-10-08 | Silicon Laboratories Inc. | Systems and methods for initial authentication of wireless communication |
US10120060B2 (en) | 2017-02-02 | 2018-11-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Location determination using user equipment preconfigured with positioning reference signal information |
US10420063B2 (en) * | 2017-02-02 | 2019-09-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | On-demand user equipment positioning |
US11022673B2 (en) * | 2017-03-10 | 2021-06-01 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Terminal apparatus, location server, location measurement method, and program |
WO2019161975A1 (en) * | 2018-02-22 | 2019-08-29 | Eaton Intelligent Power Limited | Location services using a light fixture |
US11483793B2 (en) * | 2018-04-23 | 2022-10-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Optimized observed time difference of arrival (OTDOA) in licensed-assisted access (LAA) |
US11442135B2 (en) | 2018-05-31 | 2022-09-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Positioning methods for wireless networks that utilize beamformed communication |
WO2019245234A1 (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2019-12-26 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method and device for reporting measurement result for location determination in wireless communication system |
CN110726969B (en) * | 2018-07-16 | 2022-03-15 | 刘勉志 | Firefighter positioning system |
US20210318407A1 (en) * | 2018-08-07 | 2021-10-14 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | User equipment and control method |
US11726164B2 (en) | 2018-09-26 | 2023-08-15 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Wireless device positioning |
CN112956136A (en) * | 2018-11-01 | 2021-06-11 | 上海诺基亚贝尔股份有限公司 | Beam pattern switching for positioning reference signal measurements |
KR102617035B1 (en) * | 2019-01-11 | 2023-12-27 | 소니그룹주식회사 | Method and device for positioning using beam information |
US11445464B2 (en) | 2019-01-11 | 2022-09-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Group reporting of user equipment measurements in multi-round trip time positioning |
TWI717736B (en) * | 2019-05-15 | 2021-02-01 | 財團法人工業技術研究院 | Multi-antenna system and channel calibration method thereof |
US11582621B2 (en) * | 2019-10-30 | 2023-02-14 | Zebra Technologies Corporation | Sensor-assisted technique for RF power normalization in locationing applications |
US11350293B2 (en) | 2019-11-26 | 2022-05-31 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Systems and methods for estimating locations of signal shadowing obstructions and signal reflectors in a wireless communications network |
WO2022152370A1 (en) * | 2021-01-13 | 2022-07-21 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Apparatus and methods for downlink positioning |
US11971499B2 (en) | 2021-09-17 | 2024-04-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Distributed device management for positioning |
WO2024096806A1 (en) * | 2022-11-04 | 2024-05-10 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Positioning reports based on machine learning model monitoring |
Family Cites Families (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4443801A (en) | 1981-06-15 | 1984-04-17 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Direction finding and frequency identification method and apparatus |
GB2162693A (en) | 1984-07-11 | 1986-02-05 | British Aerospace | Antenna systems |
US4975710A (en) | 1989-08-01 | 1990-12-04 | Baghdady Elie J | Methods and apparatus for direction of arrival measurement and radio navigation aids |
US5477230A (en) | 1994-06-30 | 1995-12-19 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | AOA application of digital channelized IFM receiver |
FI974153A (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 1999-05-07 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | Procedure and arrangement for determining the location of a mobile station |
US6658258B1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2003-12-02 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for estimating the location of a mobile terminal |
US6901264B2 (en) | 2001-04-25 | 2005-05-31 | Makor Issues And Rights Ltd. | Method and system for mobile station positioning in cellular communication networks |
US6700536B1 (en) | 2001-10-25 | 2004-03-02 | Richard J. Wiegand | System and method for determining a direction of incident electromagnetic signals |
US8280412B2 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2012-10-02 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method for enhanced mobile assisted positioning |
US7711375B2 (en) * | 2002-08-06 | 2010-05-04 | Hang Liu | Method and system for determining a location of a wireless transmitting device and guiding the search for the same |
JP4247019B2 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2009-04-02 | 京セラ株式会社 | Wireless communication device |
US10091616B2 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2018-10-02 | Polte Corporation | Angle of arrival (AOA) positioning method and system for positional finding and tracking objects using reduced attenuation RF technology |
US10281557B2 (en) * | 2005-12-15 | 2019-05-07 | Polte Corporation | Partially synchronized multilateration/trilateration method and system for positional finding using RF |
US7933610B2 (en) * | 2007-05-21 | 2011-04-26 | Andrew Llc | Method and apparatus to select an optimum site and/or sector to provide geo-location data |
DE102007027141A1 (en) | 2007-06-13 | 2008-12-18 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Device for determining a device position |
US8326324B2 (en) * | 2008-01-08 | 2012-12-04 | Wi-Lan, Inc. | Systems and methods for location positioning within radio access systems |
EP2436217B1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2019-04-17 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) | Signalling measurements for positioning in a wireless network |
EP2282574B1 (en) | 2009-08-07 | 2017-08-09 | Intel Deutschland GmbH | Arrangement and method for estimating network traffic based on angle of arrival determination in a cellular network |
US20110124347A1 (en) | 2009-09-15 | 2011-05-26 | Byron Hua Chen | Method And Apparatus for UE Positioning in LTE Networks |
CA2679673A1 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2011-03-18 | John Nielsen | Handheld synthetic antenna array |
EP2664200A1 (en) * | 2011-01-13 | 2013-11-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL) | Enhanced angle-of-arrival positioning |
US8903415B2 (en) * | 2011-01-19 | 2014-12-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | User equipment, a positioning node and methods therein |
WO2013020122A2 (en) | 2011-08-03 | 2013-02-07 | Felix Markhovsky | Multi-path mitigation in rangefinding and tracking objects using reduced attenuation rf technology |
US20130033999A1 (en) * | 2011-08-05 | 2013-02-07 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Node and methods therein for enhanced positioning with complementary positioning information |
US9807560B2 (en) * | 2012-06-20 | 2017-10-31 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Method and network node for enabling position determination of a user equipment measurement |
CN104412622A (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2015-03-11 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, device and system for locating user equipment |
US20150011238A1 (en) * | 2013-07-05 | 2015-01-08 | Broadcom Corporation | Unilateral Geolocation for Mobile Terminals |
US10045324B2 (en) * | 2015-05-15 | 2018-08-07 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Methods and nodes for managing RSTD reports |
US10859595B2 (en) * | 2017-04-04 | 2020-12-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for improving location accuracy for a mobile device using sensors |
US10736074B2 (en) * | 2017-07-31 | 2020-08-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods to facilitate location determination by beamforming of a positioning reference signal |
US10567905B2 (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2020-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for locating a mobile device using angle of arrival and inertial sensor measurements |
-
2014
- 2014-03-28 WO PCT/IB2014/060272 patent/WO2015145217A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-03-28 US US15/129,268 patent/US10557919B2/en active Active
-
2020
- 2020-01-08 US US16/736,954 patent/US20200142025A1/en not_active Abandoned
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20220014335A1 (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2022-01-13 | Vivo Mobile Communication Co.,Ltd. | Method for reporting positioning measurement information, terminal, and network device |
WO2021228400A1 (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2021-11-18 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method for obtaining positioning and orientation of ues with multiple antenna panels from minimal set of network nodes |
US20220390546A1 (en) * | 2021-06-08 | 2022-12-08 | Nokia Technologies Oy | USING ANGLE ERROR GROUP (AEG) TO IMPROVE ANGLE OF ARRIVAL (AoA) POSITIONING |
WO2022258878A1 (en) * | 2021-06-08 | 2022-12-15 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Using angle error group (aeg) to improve angle of arrival (aoa) positioning |
US11892553B2 (en) * | 2021-06-08 | 2024-02-06 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Using angle error group (AEG) to improve angle of arrival (AoA) positioning |
WO2024033566A1 (en) * | 2022-08-10 | 2024-02-15 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Weighting positioning measurements |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US10557919B2 (en) | 2020-02-11 |
US20170108579A1 (en) | 2017-04-20 |
WO2015145217A1 (en) | 2015-10-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20200142025A1 (en) | Observed time difference of arrival angle of arrival discriminator | |
US11051267B2 (en) | Channel latency determining method, positioning method, and related device | |
EP3005581B1 (en) | A localization-based beamforming scheme for systems with multiple antennas | |
US9467803B2 (en) | Detecting multipath and determining positioning measurement uncertainty | |
EP1445970B1 (en) | A method and system for locating a mobile radio receiver in a radio system with multiple tranmitters | |
CN106792508B (en) | Method, readable medium and apparatus for calculating ranging values in a cellular communication network | |
US20220271818A1 (en) | Non-Line-of-Sight Path Detection for User Equipment Positioning in Wireless Networks | |
US20140274160A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for positioning user equipment | |
US20200088869A1 (en) | Accurate localization of client devices for wireless access points | |
EP3404440B1 (en) | Positioning system and method with multipath mitigation | |
US10349214B2 (en) | Localization using access point | |
US10222451B2 (en) | Improving accuracy when determining positions in a wireless network | |
US10547964B2 (en) | Method and device for estimating accuracy of a position determination | |
KR101342215B1 (en) | Method and system for determining position based on radio frequency identification | |
US20240155537A1 (en) | Methods for positioning a wireless device, a related wireless node and a related location network node | |
KR102315024B1 (en) | Beam tracking method at the time of terminal movement and terminal including the same | |
WO2020088785A1 (en) | Apparatus and method to estimate ue position | |
US9883342B2 (en) | Localization using access point | |
JP2011089886A (en) | Radar apparatus | |
WO2023186299A1 (en) | Methods and apparatuses relating to wireless communications | |
Qasem et al. | Real time nonlinear indoor positioning with trilateration based on microwave backscatter |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., LTD, CHINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL);REEL/FRAME:051475/0738 Effective date: 20190403 Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL), SWEDEN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:IRVINE, GARRY;DEANE, PETER;REEL/FRAME:051475/0703 Effective date: 20140325 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: EXPRESSLY ABANDONED -- DURING EXAMINATION |