US20080248773A1 - APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION IN multiple-antenna COMMUNICATION SYSTEM - Google Patents

APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR INTERFERENCE CANCELLATION IN multiple-antenna COMMUNICATION SYSTEM Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080248773A1
US20080248773A1 US12/098,068 US9806808A US2008248773A1 US 20080248773 A1 US20080248773 A1 US 20080248773A1 US 9806808 A US9806808 A US 9806808A US 2008248773 A1 US2008248773 A1 US 2008248773A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
interference
signal
type
transmitter
receiver
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/098,068
Other versions
US8355474B2 (en
Inventor
Elisabeth de Carvalho
Muhammad Imadur Rahman
David Mazzarese
Yang Tang
Jin-Kyu Koo
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Samsung Electronics Co Ltd filed Critical Samsung Electronics Co Ltd
Assigned to SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. reassignment SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DE CARVALHO, ELISABETH, KOO, JIN-KYU, MAZZARESE, DAVID, RAHMAN, MUHAMMAD IMADUR, TANG, YANG
Publication of US20080248773A1 publication Critical patent/US20080248773A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8355474B2 publication Critical patent/US8355474B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/08Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/08Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station
    • H04B7/0837Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station using pre-detection combining
    • H04B7/0842Weighted combining
    • H04B7/0848Joint weighting
    • H04B7/0854Joint weighting using error minimizing algorithms, e.g. minimum mean squared error [MMSE], "cross-correlation" or matrix inversion
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B1/00Details of transmission systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04B3/00 - H04B13/00; Details of transmission systems not characterised by the medium used for transmission
    • H04B1/06Receivers
    • H04B1/10Means associated with receiver for limiting or suppressing noise or interference
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B15/00Suppression or limitation of noise or interference
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/022Site diversity; Macro-diversity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0667Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of delayed versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0669Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of delayed versions of same signal using different channel coding between antennas

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus and method for interference cancellation in a multiple-antenna communication system. More particularly, the present invention relates to interference cancellation in which a multiple-symbol processing scheme or a single-symbol processing scheme is selected according to a type of an interference signal in a receiver of an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA)-based multiple-antenna communication system.
  • OFDMA Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • wireless telecommunication systems provide data services in addition to voice services.
  • To provide a data service with excellent performance it is necessary to develop a high-speed data communication technology.
  • a system channel capacity can significantly increase in a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) communication system in which both a transmitter and a receiver use multiple antennas.
  • MIMO Multiple Input Multiple Output
  • STBC Space Time Block Coding
  • a receiver i.e., Mobile Station (MS)
  • MS Mobile Station
  • a signal received by the receiver includes an undesired signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter as interference. Since the communication system experiences performance deterioration in the presence of interference, the interference has to be canceled in order to improve the performance of the communication system.
  • a receiver using multiple antennas receives an undesired signal (i.e., a signal received from an undesired transmitter), interference occurs to a desired signal (i.e., a signal received from a desired transmitter).
  • the interference has to be canceled in order to prevent performance deterioration.
  • a transmitter i.e., BS located in each cell may optionally use either multiple antennas or a single antenna.
  • a receiver using multiple antennas may receive a signal in two manners. First, the receiver receives a desired signal from a transmitter using a single antenna. Second, the receiver receives the desired signal from a transmitter using multiple antennas. In either case, it may not be effective to use the same interference cancellation scheme if an undesired signal is received from the transmitter using the single antenna and located in a neighboring cell (i.e., in the case of using one logical stream), as for the first case, and if the undesired signal is received from the transmitter using the multiple antennas and located in the neighboring cell, as for the second case.
  • interference becomes a big problem if several symbols are correlated, for example, when interference signals (i.e., undesired signals) received from the transmitter located in the neighboring cell are in association with multiple logical streams (e.g., Space-time Block Code (STBC) signals) transmitted from a transmitter having multiple antennas.
  • interference signals i.e., undesired signals
  • multiple logical streams e.g., Space-time Block Code (STBC) signals
  • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating a system performance of a receiver using multiple antennas in the presence of one-logical-stream type interference and multiple-logical-stream type interference.
  • the graph shows that the performance deteriorates in the presence of the multiple-logical-stream type interference.
  • the communication system is a Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) system including a transmitter using one antenna and a receiver using five antennas.
  • SIMO Single Input Multiple Output
  • STBC a case where a transmitter located in a neighboring cell uses one antenna
  • STBC a case of using multiple antennas.
  • Symbols are detected by using Minimum Mean Squared Error (MMSE) scheme.
  • MMSE Minimum Mean Squared Error
  • an apparatus and method for canceling interference caused by an undesired signal are required whereby, when a receiver using multiple antennas is located in an edge of a cell in a communication system, the interference is canceled if a desired signal is received from a transmitter located in the cell.
  • the cancellation technique differs between a case where the undesired signal is received from a transmitter located in a neighboring cell using one antenna from and a case where the undesired signal is received from a transmitter located in the neighboring cell using multiple antennas.
  • an apparatus and method for canceling interference caused by an undesired signal are required, whereby, when a receiver using multiple antennas is located in an edge of a cell in a communication system, the interference is canceled.
  • the cancellation technique differs between a case where a desired signal is received from a transmitter located in the cell using one antenna and a case where the desired signal is received from a transmitter located in the cell and using multiple antennas.
  • An aspect of the present invention is to address at least the above-mentioned problems and/or disadvantages and to provide at least the advantages described below. Accordingly, an aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for effectively canceling interference generated upon receiving an undesired signal from an undesired transmitter located in a neighboring cell when a receiver using multiple antennas receives a desired signal from a desired transmitter in a communication system.
  • Another aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for effectively canceling interference by performing a different signal processing scheme according to an interference type of a signal output from an undesired transmitter located in a neighboring cell when a receiver using multiple antennas receives a desired signal from a desired transmitter in a communication system.
  • a receiver includes multiple antennas for receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters; a channel estimator for estimating channel coefficients by using the signals received through the multiple antennas; and an interference cancellation and signal processing unit for canceling the signals received through the plurality of second transmitters by using the channel coefficients according to a predetermined interference cancellation scheme, and for outputting the signal received from the first transmitter.
  • a method of receiving data in a receiver using multiple antennas includes receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters; estimating an interference signal covariance matrix for interference signals received from the second transmitters; determining whether an interference type is a Space Time Block Coded (STBC) type by using the estimated interference signal covariance matrix; and if the interference type is the STBC type, canceling interference according to a multiple-symbol processing scheme.
  • STBC Space Time Block Coded
  • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating a system performance of a receiver using multiple antennas in the presence of one-logical-stream type interference and multiple-logical-stream type interference;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a receiver in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an interference cancellation and signal processing unit of FIG. 2 ;
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an interference cancellation scheme in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a process of estimating an interference signal covariance matrix in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating performance when multiple-logical-stream type interference is canceled using a multiple-symbol processing scheme in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • the present invention may apply to all communication systems using a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) scheme, a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) scheme, a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) scheme, or an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA)/Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) scheme.
  • FDMA Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • TDMA Time Division Multiple Access
  • CDMA Code Division Multiple Access
  • OFDMA Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access
  • OFDMA-based communication system will be described as an example.
  • a receiver of an OFDMA-based multiple-antenna communication system cancels interference caused by an undesired signal received together with a desired signal by selecting from one of two schemes (i.e., a multiple-symbol processing scheme and a single-symbol processing scheme) according to a type of the undesired signal.
  • a type of the desired signal is detected to select an interference cancellation scheme.
  • a Receive (Rx) symbol processing scheme is determined.
  • a signal is also referred to as a symbol.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a receiver in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention.
  • the receiver includes a number of Rx antennas (among which the first antenna 210 and the P th antenna 220 are shown), a channel estimator 230 , an interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 , a detector 250 , a parallel-to-serial converter 260 , and a demodulator 270 .
  • Signals are received respectively through the first Rx antenna 210 to the P th Rx antenna 220 , and are output to the channel estimator 230 and the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 .
  • a pilot signal is output to the channel estimator 230 .
  • a data signal is output to the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 .
  • the channel estimator 230 estimates channel coefficients indicating channel gains from the signals respectively received through the first Rx antenna 210 to the P th Rx antenna 220 , and outputs the estimated channel coefficients to the detector 250 and the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 .
  • the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 combines the signals respectively received through the first Rx antenna 210 to the P th Rx antenna 220 with the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator 230 according to a predetermined rule, and then outputs Rx symbols. Further, the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 cancels interference received from a transmitter located in a neighboring cell.
  • An interference cancellation scheme of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to FIG. 3 .
  • the detector 250 generates hypothesis symbols by multiplying the symbols received from the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 by the channel coefficients provided from the channel estimator 230 , calculates decision statistics for all available symbols that can be transmitted by the transmitter, and thereafter detects symbols transmitted by the transmitter by performing threshold detection.
  • the parallel-to-serial converter 260 converts parallel data received from the detector 250 into serial data.
  • the demodulator 270 demodulates symbols provided from the parallel-to-serial converter 260 according to a predetermined demodulation scheme, thereby restoring originally transmitted information data bits.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 of FIG. 2 .
  • the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 cancels interference and then outputs Rx symbols.
  • the Interference cancellation process is to cancel an interference signal transmitted from another transmitter located in a neighboring cell that is included in a data signal.
  • a received signal covariance matrix estimator 3 10 first estimates a covariance matrix for data signals respectively received through the first Rx antenna 210 to the P th Rx antenna 220 . Then, an interference signal covariance matrix estimator 320 estimates an interference signal covariance matrix by using the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator 230 and the received signal covariance matrix output from the received signal covariance matrix estimator 310 .
  • an interference cancellation and signal combination unit 330 determines an interference type by using the interference signal covariance matrix estimated by the interference signal covariance matrix estimator 320 , and cancels interference by selecting an interference cancellation scheme according to the interference type.
  • Interference generated from transmitters located in the neighboring cell is classified into a single-signal interference type and a multiple-signal interference (i.e., STBC interference) type.
  • the single-signal interference type one logical stream is transmitted.
  • the multiple-signal interference type multiple logical streams are simultaneously transmitted similar to the case where a plurality of signals are simultaneously transmitted by using multiple antennas. The reason of distinguishing the two types is that the number of logical streams has a significant effect as interference.
  • interference is canceled using one of a single-symbol processing (or symbol by symbol processing) scheme in the case of single-signal interference, and is canceled using a multiple-symbol processing scheme in the case of multiple-signal interference.
  • a predetermined threshold is used to determine the interference type. If the determination is difficult, the multiple-symbol processing scheme is selected.
  • the interference cancellation and signal combination unit 330 After canceling interference in the signals received from the Rx antennas, the interference cancellation and signal combination unit 330 combines the interference-free signal with the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator 230 according to a predetermined rule, and then outputs Rx symbols.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an interference cancellation scheme in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention.
  • an interference signal covariance matrix is estimated in step 410 .
  • the interference signal covariance matrix is estimated by using a channel coefficient and a received data signal covariance matrix, each of which is obtained through estimation.
  • the received data signal covariance matrix is estimated for a received data signal.
  • the received data signal covariance matrix is added to the interference signal covariance matrix to obtain a covariance matrix of a received signal including an interference signal.
  • an interference type is an STBC type by using the interference signal covariance matrix in step 420 .
  • the STBC type represents interference when multiple logical streams are simultaneously transmitted similar to the case where a transmitter located in a neighboring cell simultaneously transmits a plurality of signals by using multiple antennas. This is different from interference in association with one logical stream (or multiple physical streams in the case where the same data is transmitted through multiple antennas even if multiple antennas are used) similarly to the case where the transmitter located in the neighboring cell transmits signals by using one antenna.
  • the interference type is classified into the STBC type (the multiple-signal interference type) and the single-signal interference type.
  • the reason of classifying the interference type is to select a different interference cancellation scheme according to the interference type because the number of logical streams has a significant effect as interference.
  • the interference signal covariance matrix may be calculated to determine whether the interference type is the STBC type.
  • the interference signal covariance matrix is a correlation matrix of an Rx signal ZR(t) received at time t and an Rx signal ZR(t+1) received at time t+1. If an off-diagonal element of the interference signal covariance is zero, it is determined that the STBC-type interference does not exist; otherwise, if the off-diagonal element thereof is not zero, it is determined that the STBC-type interference exists.
  • the covariance matrix is computed as follows.
  • (•)*, (•) T , and (•) H respectively denote conjugate, transpose, and conjugate-transpose operations.
  • a signal received by a receiver can be expressed as Equation (1) below.
  • P 0 is a power for an desired transmit signal
  • P 1 is a transmit power for an interference signal
  • H 0 is a channel matrix for an desired transmit signal
  • H i is a channel matrix for an interference signal
  • m 0 is desired signal
  • m i is an interference signal
  • v is a additive white Gaussian noise.
  • a first scenario will now be described in which an interference signal is not an STBC signal.
  • the first scenario includes the following two cases.
  • a desired signal transmitted from a desired transmitter is a Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) signal.
  • SIMO Single Input Multiple Output
  • a channel matrix in a time duration between t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • H 0 [ h 0 ⁇ ( t ) 0 0 h 0 ⁇ ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • h 0 (t) is a 1 ⁇ P channel matrix at time t, where P the number of Rx antennas and h 0 (t+1) is a 1 ⁇ P channel matrix at time t+1, where P the number of Rx antennas.
  • the desired signal transmitted from the desired transmitter is an STBC signal.
  • the channel matrix in the time duration between t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • H 0 1 2 ⁇ [ h 01 ⁇ ( t ) h 02 ⁇ ( t ) - h 02 * ⁇ ( t + 1 ) h 01 * ⁇ ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • h 01 (t) is a channel for a signal received from a first antenna of the desired transmitter at time t
  • h 01 (t+1) is a channel for a signal received from a first antenna of the desired transmitter at time t+1
  • h 02 (t) is a channel for a signal received from a second antenna of the desired transmitter at time t
  • h 02 (t+1) is a channel for a signal received from a second antenna of the desired transmitter at time t+1.
  • a channel matrix for an undesired Transmit (Tx) signal i received from an undesired transmitter located in a neighboring cell is expressed as:
  • H i [ h i ⁇ ( t ) 0 0 h i ⁇ ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • h i (t) is a 1 ⁇ P channel matrix at time t, where P the number of Rx antennas and h i (t+1) is a 1 ⁇ P channel matrix at time t+1, where P the number of Rx antennas.
  • a signal transmitted from the desired transmitter at times t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • m 0 [ X 0 ⁇ ( t ) X 0 ⁇ ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • X 0 (t) is a signal transmitted from the desired transmitter at times t
  • X 0 (t+1) is a signal transmitted from the desired transmitter at times t+1.
  • An interference signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter is expressed as:
  • m i [ X i ⁇ ( t ) X i ⁇ ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • X i (t) is an interference signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter at times t
  • X i (t+1) is an interference signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter at times t+1.
  • variances of symbols are ⁇ X 2 , v is a Gaussian noise (v ⁇ CN(0,N 0 ,I Q )), and P i is Tx power of a signal transmitted from an i th transmitter.
  • Equation (2) A result of linear MMSE estimation on the symbols for two consecutive durations is expressed as Equation (2) below.
  • Equation (2) P 0 is a power for an desired transmit signal
  • H 0 is a channel matrix for an desired transmit signal
  • ⁇ 2 X is variances of symbols
  • R zz is a covariance matrix
  • Z is a received signal.
  • Equation (3) The covariance matrix R zz of an Rx signal including an interference signal is expressed as Equation (3) below.
  • Equation (3) P 0 is Tx power, H 0 is a channel matrix for a desired signal, H i is a channel matrix for an interference signal, N 0 is a Gaussian noise, ⁇ X is a variance, and I 2P is a unit vector, where P is the number of Rx antennas.
  • an interference signal is an STBC signal
  • a desired signal is not the STBC signal. If the interference signal received from a desired transmitter is the STBC signal, a channel matrix in a time duration between t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • H k [ h k ⁇ ( t ) 0 0 h k ⁇ ( t + 1 ) ] ,
  • h k (t) is a 2 ⁇ P channel matrix of a channel between a receiver and a k th receiver generating the interference signal.
  • An Rx signal is defined as Equation (4) below.
  • Equation (4) Re(z) is a real part of z, Im(z) is a imaginary parts of z, H i is i th channel matrix, m i is i th transmit signal, v is a additive white Gaussian noise.
  • Equation (5) A result of linear MMSE estimation for the Rx signal is expressed as Equation (5) below.
  • Equation (5) P 0 is a power for an desired transmit signal
  • H 0 is a channel matrix for an desired transmit signal
  • ⁇ 2 X is variances of symbols
  • R zz is a covariance matrix
  • z 0 is a received signal.
  • R represents a real part.
  • a covariance matrix of the Rx signal including the interference signal is expressed as Equation (6) below.
  • Equation (6) P 0 is Tx power, H 0 is a channel matrix for a desired signal, H i is a channel matrix for an interference signal, N 0 is Gaussian noise, ⁇ X is a variance, I 2P is a unit vector (where P is the number of Rx antennas), E(•) is an averaging operation, and (•) R is a real part operation.
  • interference is canceled according to the multiple-symbol processing scheme in step 430 .
  • the inference is canceled according to the single-symbol processing (or symbol by symbol processing) scheme in step 440 .
  • the multiple-symbol processing scheme is initially set in the communication system, it is also possible to allow the interference to be canceled according to the single-symbol processing scheme in the case of the single-signal interference type and according to the multiple-symbol processing scheme in the case of the multiple-signal interference type.
  • hypothesis symbols are generated by multiplying the Rx symbols by the channel coefficients, and symbols transmitted by the transmitter are detected by using the hypothesis symbols in step 460 .
  • the detected parallel symbols (or data) are converted into serial symbols (or data) in step 470 .
  • serial symbols are demodulated according to a predetermined demodulation scheme, and thus originally transmitted information data bits are restored in step 480 .
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a process of estimating an interference signal covariance matrix in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • a pilot signal is output to the channel estimator 230 to estimate channel coefficients indicating channel gains in step 510 .
  • a data signal is output to estimate a received data signal covariance matrix in step 520 .
  • the estimation on the received data signal covariance matrix may be performed prior to or simultaneously with the estimation on the channel coefficients.
  • an interference signal covariance matrix is estimated by using the estimated channel coefficients and the received data signal covariance matrix in step 530 .
  • FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating performance obtained when multiple-logical-stream type interference is canceled using a multiple-symbol processing scheme in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • the communication system is an SIMO system having a transmitter using one antenna and a receiver having five antennas.
  • a transmitter located in a neighboring cell uses two antennas.
  • a symbol is detected using an MMSE scheme.
  • a receiver of a multiple-antenna communication system cancels interference by selecting either a multiple-symbol processing scheme or a single-symbol processing scheme depending on a signal type, thereby improving performance of the communication system.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Radio Transmission System (AREA)
  • Noise Elimination (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

An apparatus and method for interference cancellation in multiple-antenna communication system is disclosed. Accordingly, a receiver of a multiple-antenna communication system cancels interference by selecting either a multiple-symbol processing scheme or a single-symbol processing scheme depending on a signal type, thereby improving performance of the communication system.

Description

    PRIORITY
  • This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(a) to a Korean patent application filed in the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Apr. 4, 2007 and assigned Serial No. 2007-33081, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for interference cancellation in a multiple-antenna communication system. More particularly, the present invention relates to interference cancellation in which a multiple-symbol processing scheme or a single-symbol processing scheme is selected according to a type of an interference signal in a receiver of an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA)-based multiple-antenna communication system.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • In general, wireless telecommunication systems provide data services in addition to voice services. To provide a data service with excellent performance, it is necessary to develop a high-speed data communication technology. A system channel capacity can significantly increase in a Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) communication system in which both a transmitter and a receiver use multiple antennas.
  • Various well-known conventional technologies are used where both the transmitter and the receiver use multiple antennas. Examples of the techniques include Space Time Block Coding (STBC) which is performed by the transmitter to transmit signals through the multiple antennas, whereas the receiver detects the signals received through the multiple antennas according to a multiple-symbol processing scheme, and an interference cancellation technique.
  • In a communication system, a receiver (i.e., Mobile Station (MS)) may receive a signal from not only a desired transmitter (i.e., a Base Station (BS) located in a serving cell in which the receiver is located), but also an undesired transmitter (i.e., a BS located in a cell neighboring to the serving cell). In this case, a signal received by the receiver includes an undesired signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter as interference. Since the communication system experiences performance deterioration in the presence of interference, the interference has to be canceled in order to improve the performance of the communication system.
  • That is, in the communication system, when a receiver using multiple antennas receives an undesired signal (i.e., a signal received from an undesired transmitter), interference occurs to a desired signal (i.e., a signal received from a desired transmitter). In this case, the interference has to be canceled in order to prevent performance deterioration.
  • On the other hand, in a cellular communication system, when a receiver (i.e., MS) uses multiple antennas, a transmitter (i.e., BS) located in each cell may optionally use either multiple antennas or a single antenna.
  • A receiver using multiple antennas may receive a signal in two manners. First, the receiver receives a desired signal from a transmitter using a single antenna. Second, the receiver receives the desired signal from a transmitter using multiple antennas. In either case, it may not be effective to use the same interference cancellation scheme if an undesired signal is received from the transmitter using the single antenna and located in a neighboring cell (i.e., in the case of using one logical stream), as for the first case, and if the undesired signal is received from the transmitter using the multiple antennas and located in the neighboring cell, as for the second case.
  • In particular, interference becomes a big problem if several symbols are correlated, for example, when interference signals (i.e., undesired signals) received from the transmitter located in the neighboring cell are in association with multiple logical streams (e.g., Space-time Block Code (STBC) signals) transmitted from a transmitter having multiple antennas.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating a system performance of a receiver using multiple antennas in the presence of one-logical-stream type interference and multiple-logical-stream type interference. The graph shows that the performance deteriorates in the presence of the multiple-logical-stream type interference. Herein, the communication system is a Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) system including a transmitter using one antenna and a receiver using five antennas. In the graph, a case where a transmitter located in a neighboring cell uses one antenna is indicated by SIMO, and a case of using multiple antennas is indicated by STBC. Symbols are detected by using Minimum Mean Squared Error (MMSE) scheme.
  • Accordingly, an apparatus and method for canceling interference caused by an undesired signal are required whereby, when a receiver using multiple antennas is located in an edge of a cell in a communication system, the interference is canceled if a desired signal is received from a transmitter located in the cell. The cancellation technique differs between a case where the undesired signal is received from a transmitter located in a neighboring cell using one antenna from and a case where the undesired signal is received from a transmitter located in the neighboring cell using multiple antennas.
  • In addition, an apparatus and method for canceling interference caused by an undesired signal are required, whereby, when a receiver using multiple antennas is located in an edge of a cell in a communication system, the interference is canceled. The cancellation technique differs between a case where a desired signal is received from a transmitter located in the cell using one antenna and a case where the desired signal is received from a transmitter located in the cell and using multiple antennas.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An aspect of the present invention is to address at least the above-mentioned problems and/or disadvantages and to provide at least the advantages described below. Accordingly, an aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for effectively canceling interference generated upon receiving an undesired signal from an undesired transmitter located in a neighboring cell when a receiver using multiple antennas receives a desired signal from a desired transmitter in a communication system.
  • Another aspect of the present invention is to provide an apparatus and method for effectively canceling interference by performing a different signal processing scheme according to an interference type of a signal output from an undesired transmitter located in a neighboring cell when a receiver using multiple antennas receives a desired signal from a desired transmitter in a communication system.
  • According to an aspect of the present invention, a receiver is provided. The receiver includes multiple antennas for receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters; a channel estimator for estimating channel coefficients by using the signals received through the multiple antennas; and an interference cancellation and signal processing unit for canceling the signals received through the plurality of second transmitters by using the channel coefficients according to a predetermined interference cancellation scheme, and for outputting the signal received from the first transmitter.
  • According to another aspect of the present invention, a method of receiving data in a receiver using multiple antennas is provided. The method includes receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters; estimating an interference signal covariance matrix for interference signals received from the second transmitters; determining whether an interference type is a Space Time Block Coded (STBC) type by using the estimated interference signal covariance matrix; and if the interference type is the STBC type, canceling interference according to a multiple-symbol processing scheme.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The above and other aspects, features and advantages of certain preferred embodiments of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating a system performance of a receiver using multiple antennas in the presence of one-logical-stream type interference and multiple-logical-stream type interference;
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a receiver in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of an interference cancellation and signal processing unit of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an interference cancellation scheme in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention;
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a process of estimating an interference signal covariance matrix in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention; and
  • FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating performance when multiple-logical-stream type interference is canceled using a multiple-symbol processing scheme in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail since they would obscure the invention in unnecessary detail.
  • The present invention may apply to all communication systems using a Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA) scheme, a Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) scheme, a Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) scheme, or an Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (OFDMA)/Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) scheme. Hereinafter, an OFDMA-based communication system will be described as an example.
  • In the following descriptions, a receiver of an OFDMA-based multiple-antenna communication system cancels interference caused by an undesired signal received together with a desired signal by selecting from one of two schemes (i.e., a multiple-symbol processing scheme and a single-symbol processing scheme) according to a type of the undesired signal. In addition, a type of the desired signal is detected to select an interference cancellation scheme.
  • That is, it is determined whether the type of the undesired signal is in association with a signal (i.e., one logical stream) received from a transmitter having a single antenna or signals (i.e., multiple logical streams such as Space Time Block Coded (STBC) signals) received from a transmitter having multiple antennas. According to the determination result, a Receive (Rx) symbol processing scheme is determined. Herein, a signal is also referred to as a symbol.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of a receiver in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention. The receiver includes a number of Rx antennas (among which the first antenna 210 and the Pth antenna 220 are shown), a channel estimator 230, an interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240, a detector 250, a parallel-to-serial converter 260, and a demodulator 270.
  • Signals are received respectively through the first Rx antenna 210 to the Pth Rx antenna 220, and are output to the channel estimator 230 and the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240. A pilot signal is output to the channel estimator 230. A data signal is output to the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240.
  • The channel estimator 230 estimates channel coefficients indicating channel gains from the signals respectively received through the first Rx antenna 210 to the Pth Rx antenna 220, and outputs the estimated channel coefficients to the detector 250 and the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240.
  • The interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 combines the signals respectively received through the first Rx antenna 210 to the Pth Rx antenna 220 with the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator 230 according to a predetermined rule, and then outputs Rx symbols. Further, the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 cancels interference received from a transmitter located in a neighboring cell. An interference cancellation scheme of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to FIG. 3.
  • The detector 250 generates hypothesis symbols by multiplying the symbols received from the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 by the channel coefficients provided from the channel estimator 230, calculates decision statistics for all available symbols that can be transmitted by the transmitter, and thereafter detects symbols transmitted by the transmitter by performing threshold detection.
  • The parallel-to-serial converter 260 converts parallel data received from the detector 250 into serial data.
  • The demodulator 270 demodulates symbols provided from the parallel-to-serial converter 260 according to a predetermined demodulation scheme, thereby restoring originally transmitted information data bits.
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a structure of the interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 of FIG. 2.
  • The interference cancellation and signal processing unit 240 cancels interference and then outputs Rx symbols.
  • The Interference cancellation process is to cancel an interference signal transmitted from another transmitter located in a neighboring cell that is included in a data signal.
  • In the interference cancellation process, a received signal covariance matrix estimator 3 10 first estimates a covariance matrix for data signals respectively received through the first Rx antenna 210 to the Pth Rx antenna 220. Then, an interference signal covariance matrix estimator 320 estimates an interference signal covariance matrix by using the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator 230 and the received signal covariance matrix output from the received signal covariance matrix estimator 310.
  • Thereafter, an interference cancellation and signal combination unit 330 determines an interference type by using the interference signal covariance matrix estimated by the interference signal covariance matrix estimator 320, and cancels interference by selecting an interference cancellation scheme according to the interference type.
  • Interference generated from transmitters located in the neighboring cell is classified into a single-signal interference type and a multiple-signal interference (i.e., STBC interference) type. In the single-signal interference type, one logical stream is transmitted. When same data is transmitted through multiple antennas, it is also included in the single-signal interference type because the number of logical streams is one even if there are multiple physical streams. In the multiple-signal interference type, multiple logical streams are simultaneously transmitted similar to the case where a plurality of signals are simultaneously transmitted by using multiple antennas. The reason of distinguishing the two types is that the number of logical streams has a significant effect as interference.
  • According to the interference type, interference is canceled using one of a single-symbol processing (or symbol by symbol processing) scheme in the case of single-signal interference, and is canceled using a multiple-symbol processing scheme in the case of multiple-signal interference. A predetermined threshold is used to determine the interference type. If the determination is difficult, the multiple-symbol processing scheme is selected.
  • After canceling interference in the signals received from the Rx antennas, the interference cancellation and signal combination unit 330 combines the interference-free signal with the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator 230 according to a predetermined rule, and then outputs Rx symbols.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating an interference cancellation scheme in a multiple-antenna communication system according to the present invention.
  • First, an interference signal covariance matrix is estimated in step 410. The interference signal covariance matrix is estimated by using a channel coefficient and a received data signal covariance matrix, each of which is obtained through estimation. The received data signal covariance matrix is estimated for a received data signal. In practice, the received data signal covariance matrix is added to the interference signal covariance matrix to obtain a covariance matrix of a received signal including an interference signal.
  • Next, it is determined whether an interference type is an STBC type by using the interference signal covariance matrix in step 420.
  • The STBC type represents interference when multiple logical streams are simultaneously transmitted similar to the case where a transmitter located in a neighboring cell simultaneously transmits a plurality of signals by using multiple antennas. This is different from interference in association with one logical stream (or multiple physical streams in the case where the same data is transmitted through multiple antennas even if multiple antennas are used) similarly to the case where the transmitter located in the neighboring cell transmits signals by using one antenna.
  • That is, the interference type is classified into the STBC type (the multiple-signal interference type) and the single-signal interference type. The reason of classifying the interference type is to select a different interference cancellation scheme according to the interference type because the number of logical streams has a significant effect as interference.
  • The interference signal covariance matrix may be calculated to determine whether the interference type is the STBC type. The interference signal covariance matrix is a correlation matrix of an Rx signal ZR(t) received at time t and an Rx signal ZR(t+1) received at time t+1. If an off-diagonal element of the interference signal covariance is zero, it is determined that the STBC-type interference does not exist; otherwise, if the off-diagonal element thereof is not zero, it is determined that the STBC-type interference exists.
  • The covariance matrix is computed as follows.
  • Hereinafter, (•)*, (•)T, and (•)H respectively denote conjugate, transpose, and conjugate-transpose operations.
  • A signal received by a receiver can be expressed as Equation (1) below.
  • z = P 0 H 0 m 0 + i = 1 l P i H i m i + v ( 1 )
  • In Equation (1), P0 is a power for an desired transmit signal, P1 is a transmit power for an interference signal, H0 is a channel matrix for an desired transmit signal, Hi is a channel matrix for an interference signal, m0 is desired signal, mi is an interference signal, v is a additive white Gaussian noise.
  • A first scenario will now be described in which an interference signal is not an STBC signal. The first scenario includes the following two cases.
  • In the first case, a desired signal transmitted from a desired transmitter is a Single Input Multiple Output (SIMO) signal. In this case, a channel matrix in a time duration between t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • H 0 = [ h 0 ( t ) 0 0 h 0 ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • Herein, h0(t) is a 1×P channel matrix at time t, where P the number of Rx antennas and h0(t+1) is a 1×P channel matrix at time t+1, where P the number of Rx antennas.
  • In the second case, the desired signal transmitted from the desired transmitter is an STBC signal. In this case, the channel matrix in the time duration between t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • H 0 = 1 2 [ h 01 ( t ) h 02 ( t ) - h 02 * ( t + 1 ) h 01 * ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • Herein, h01(t) is a channel for a signal received from a first antenna of the desired transmitter at time t, h01(t+1) is a channel for a signal received from a first antenna of the desired transmitter at time t+1, h02(t) is a channel for a signal received from a second antenna of the desired transmitter at time t, and h02(t+1) is a channel for a signal received from a second antenna of the desired transmitter at time t+1.
  • A channel matrix for an undesired Transmit (Tx) signal i received from an undesired transmitter located in a neighboring cell is expressed as:
  • H i = [ h i ( t ) 0 0 h i ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • Herein, hi(t) is a 1×P channel matrix at time t, where P the number of Rx antennas and hi(t+1) is a 1×P channel matrix at time t+1, where P the number of Rx antennas.
  • A signal transmitted from the desired transmitter at times t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • m 0 = [ X 0 ( t ) X 0 ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • wherein X0(t) is a signal transmitted from the desired transmitter at times t, X0(t+1) is a signal transmitted from the desired transmitter at times t+1.
  • An interference signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter is expressed as:
  • m i = [ X i ( t ) X i ( t + 1 ) ] .
  • wherein Xi(t) is an interference signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter at times t, Xi(t+1) is an interference signal transmitted from the undesired transmitter at times t+1.
  • It is assumed hereinafter that variances of symbols are σX 2, v is a Gaussian noise (v˜CN(0,N0,IQ)), and Pi is Tx power of a signal transmitted from an ith transmitter.
  • A result of linear MMSE estimation on the symbols for two consecutive durations is expressed as Equation (2) below.

  • {circumflex over (m)} 0 =√{square root over (P0)}σ2 X H 0 H R XX −1 Z   (2)
  • In Equation (2), P0 is a power for an desired transmit signal, H0 is a channel matrix for an desired transmit signal, σ2 X is variances of symbols, Rzz is a covariance matrix, Z is a received signal.
  • The covariance matrix Rzz of an Rx signal including an interference signal is expressed as Equation (3) below.
  • R zz = E ( zz H ) = σ X 2 P 0 H 0 H 0 H + σ X 2 i = 1 l P i H i H i H + N 0 I 2 P ( 3 )
  • In Equation (3), P0 is Tx power, H0 is a channel matrix for a desired signal, Hi is a channel matrix for an interference signal, N0 is a Gaussian noise, σX is a variance, and I2P is a unit vector, where P is the number of Rx antennas.
  • Now, a second scenario will be described in which an interference signal is an STBC signal, and a desired signal is not the STBC signal. If the interference signal received from a desired transmitter is the STBC signal, a channel matrix in a time duration between t and t+1 is expressed as:
  • H k = [ h k ( t ) 0 0 h k ( t + 1 ) ] ,
  • where hk(t) is a 2×P channel matrix of a channel between a receiver and a kth receiver generating the interference signal. In this case, an interference Tx signal is mk=└X1 X2 −X*2 X*1┘.
  • An Rx signal is defined as Equation (4) below.
  • z = [ Re ( z ) Im ( z ) ] = i = 0 l [ Re ( H i ) - Im ( H i ) Im ( H i ) Re ( H i ) ] [ Re ( m i ) Im ( m i ) ] + [ Re ( v ) Im ( v ) ] = i = 0 l H i R m i R + v R ( 4 )
  • In Equation (4), Re(z) is a real part of z, Im(z) is a imaginary parts of z, Hi is ith channel matrix, mi is ith transmit signal, v is a additive white Gaussian noise.
  • A result of linear MMSE estimation for the Rx signal is expressed as Equation (5) below.

  • {circumflex over (m)}0 R =√{square root over (P0)}σ2 X H 0 R T R Z R Z H −1 z 0 R   (5)
  • In Equation (5), P0 is a power for an desired transmit signal, H0 is a channel matrix for an desired transmit signal, σ2 X is variances of symbols, Rzz is a covariance matrix, z0 is a received signal. R represents a real part.
  • A covariance matrix of the Rx signal including the interference signal is expressed as Equation (6) below.
  • R z R z R = σ X 2 P 0 H 0 R H 0 R T + i = 1 I P i 2 H i R E ( m i R m i R T ) H i R T + 1 2 N 0 I 2 P ( 6 )
  • In Equation (6), P0 is Tx power, H0 is a channel matrix for a desired signal, Hi is a channel matrix for an interference signal, N0 is Gaussian noise, σX is a variance, I2P is a unit vector (where P is the number of Rx antennas), E(•) is an averaging operation, and (•)R is a real part operation.
  • Referring back to FIG. 4, if the multiple-signal interference is determined as the interference type, interference is canceled according to the multiple-symbol processing scheme in step 430.
  • In the case of the single-signal interference, the inference is canceled according to the single-symbol processing (or symbol by symbol processing) scheme in step 440.
  • Even when the multiple-symbol processing scheme is initially set in the communication system, it is also possible to allow the interference to be canceled according to the single-symbol processing scheme in the case of the single-signal interference type and according to the multiple-symbol processing scheme in the case of the multiple-signal interference type.
  • Next, signals obtained by canceling interference from the received signal are combined with estimated channel coefficients according to a predetermined rule, and as a result, Rx symbols are output in step 450.
  • Next, hypothesis symbols are generated by multiplying the Rx symbols by the channel coefficients, and symbols transmitted by the transmitter are detected by using the hypothesis symbols in step 460.
  • Next, the detected parallel symbols (or data) are converted into serial symbols (or data) in step 470.
  • Next, the serial symbols are demodulated according to a predetermined demodulation scheme, and thus originally transmitted information data bits are restored in step 480.
  • FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a process of estimating an interference signal covariance matrix in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • Among the signals received through multiple antennas, a pilot signal is output to the channel estimator 230 to estimate channel coefficients indicating channel gains in step 510.
  • Next, among the signals received through the multiple antennas, a data signal is output to estimate a received data signal covariance matrix in step 520.
  • The estimation on the received data signal covariance matrix may be performed prior to or simultaneously with the estimation on the channel coefficients.
  • Next, an interference signal covariance matrix is estimated by using the estimated channel coefficients and the received data signal covariance matrix in step 530.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating performance obtained when multiple-logical-stream type interference is canceled using a multiple-symbol processing scheme in a multiple-antenna system according to the present invention.
  • In the presence of the multiple-logical-stream type interference, a single-symbol processing scheme and a multiple-symbol processing (herein, two-symbol processing) scheme are compared in terms of performance. The comparison result shows that the multiple-symbol processing (herein, two-symbol processing) scheme has a better performance. Herein, the communication system is an SIMO system having a transmitter using one antenna and a receiver having five antennas. A transmitter located in a neighboring cell uses two antennas. A symbol is detected using an MMSE scheme.
  • According to the present invention, a receiver of a multiple-antenna communication system cancels interference by selecting either a multiple-symbol processing scheme or a single-symbol processing scheme depending on a signal type, thereby improving performance of the communication system.
  • While the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims and their equivalents. Therefore, the scope of the invention is defined not by the detailed description of the invention but by the appended claims and their equivalents, and all differences within the scope will be construed as being included in the present invention.

Claims (19)

1. A receiver comprising:
at least two antennas for receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters;
a channel estimator for estimating channel coefficients by using the signals received through the at least two antennas; and
an interference cancellation and signal processing unit for canceling interference in the signals received through the plurality of second transmitters by using the channel coefficients according to a predetermined interference cancellation scheme, and for outputting the signal received from the first transmitter.
2. The receiver of claim 1, wherein the first transmitter is a Base Station (BS) or a Mobile Station (MS) located in a serving cell, and the second transmitters are BSs or MSs located in one or more neighboring cells.
3. The receiver of claim 1, further comprising a detector for generating hypothesis symbols by multiplying the signals received from the interference cancellation and signal processing unit by the channel coefficients provided from the channel estimator, and for detecting symbols transmitted from the transmitters.
4. The receiver of claim 3, further comprising:
a parallel-to-serial converter for converting parallel symbols output from the detector into serial symbols; and
a demodulator for demodulating the symbols output from the parallel-to-serial converter according to a predetermined demodulation scheme to restore originally transmitted information data bits.
5. The receiver of claim 1, wherein the interference cancellation and signal processing unit comprises:
a received data signal covariance matrix estimator for estimating a covariance matrix of a data signal received through the multiple antennas;
an interference signal covariance matrix estimator for estimating a covariance matrix of an interference signal by using the channel coefficients output from the channel estimator and the estimated covariance matrix of the received data signal; and
an interference cancellation and signal combination unit for determining an interference type of the interference signal output from the plurality of second transmitters by using the estimated interference signal covariance matrix and for selecting an interference cancellation scheme according to the interference type.
6. The receiver of claim 5, wherein the interference type is classified into a single-signal interference type and a multiple-signal interference (i.e., STBC interference) type according to whether a transmitter located in a neighboring cell transmits one logical stream or simultaneously transmits multiple logical streams.
7. The receiver of claim 6, wherein, if an off-diagonal element of the estimated interference signal covariance matrix is zero, Space Time Block Coded (STBC)-type interference does not exist, and otherwise, if the off-diagonal element thereof is not zero, the STBC-type interference exists.
8. The receiver of claim 6, wherein interference is canceled by using a single-symbol processing scheme as for the single-signal interference type and a multiple-symbol processing scheme as for the multiple-signal interference (i.e., STBC interference) type.
9. The receiver of claim 1, wherein the signal received from the first transmitter is a signal of one logical stream.
10. A method of receiving data in a receiver using at least two antennas, the method comprising:
receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters;
estimating an interference signal covariance matrix for interference signals received from the second transmitters;
determining whether an interference type is a Space Time Block Coded (STBC) type by using the estimated interference signal covariance matrix; and
if the interference type is the STBC type, canceling interference according to a multiple-symbol processing scheme.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first transmitter is a Base Station (BS) or a Mobile Station (MS) located in a serving cell, and the second transmitters are BSs or MSs located in one or more neighboring cells.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the interference signal covariance matrix is estimated by using a channel coefficient and a received data signal covariance matrix for a received data signal, each of which are obtained through estimation.
13. The method of claim 10, wherein, if the interference type is the STBC type, the interference occurs when multiple logical streams are simultaneously transmitted by a transmitter that have multiple antennas located in a neighboring cell.
14. The method of claim 10, further comprising canceling interference according to a single-symbol processing scheme if the interference type is not the STBC type.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein, if the interference type is not the STBC type, the interference occurs when one logical stream is transmitted by a transmitter that have single antenna located in a neighboring cell.
16. The method of claim 10, further comprising:
combining the signals obtained by canceling interference from the received signals with the estimated channel coefficients according to a predetermined rule, and outputting Receive (Rx) symbols;
generating hypothesis symbols by multiplying the Rx symbols by the channel coefficients, and detecting symbols transmitted from the transmitters by using the hypothesis symbols;
converting the detected parallel symbols (or data) into serial symbols (or data); and
demodulating the serial symbols according to a predetermined demodulation scheme to restore originally transmitted information data bits.
17. The method of claim 10, wherein the signal transmitted from the first transmitter is a signal of one logical stream.
18. A receiver using multiple antennas, comprising:
means for receiving signals from a first transmitter and a plurality of second transmitters;
means for estimating an interference signal covariance matrix for interference signals received from the second transmitters;
means for determining whether an interference type is a Space Time Block Coded (STBC) type by using the estimated interference signal covariance matrix; and
means for, if the interference type is the STBC type, canceling interference according to a multiple-symbol processing scheme.
19. The receiver of claim 18, wherein the first transmitter is a Base Station (BS) or a Mobile Station (MS) located in a serving cell, and the second transmitters are BSs or MSs located in one or more neighboring cells.
US12/098,068 2007-04-04 2008-04-04 Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in multiple-antenna communication system Active 2031-11-16 US8355474B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR2007-0033081 2007-04-04
KR1020070033081A KR101003373B1 (en) 2007-04-04 2007-04-04 Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in multiple antenna telecommunication system
KR10-2007-0033081 2007-04-04

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080248773A1 true US20080248773A1 (en) 2008-10-09
US8355474B2 US8355474B2 (en) 2013-01-15

Family

ID=39827389

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/098,068 Active 2031-11-16 US8355474B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2008-04-04 Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in multiple-antenna communication system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US8355474B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101003373B1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100061494A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Yu Donghun Apparatus and methdo for canceling inter-antenna interference of orthogonally coded signals
US20110267937A1 (en) * 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference cancellation
US20120189083A1 (en) * 2011-01-25 2012-07-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Interference Cancellation Based On Interfering Link IL Signal Quality And Related Methods And Devices
WO2013015953A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for adaptive mitigation of noise interference
US20130114447A1 (en) * 2011-11-04 2013-05-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Incremental interference cancelation capability and signaling
US20140018121A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-16 Sungkyunkwan University Foundation Corporate Callaboration Apparatus and method for selecting d2d communication mode depending on signal interference
KR20140099271A (en) * 2011-11-08 2014-08-11 마벨 월드 트레이드 리미티드 Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
WO2016043356A1 (en) * 2014-09-17 2016-03-24 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and device for mitigating inter-cell interference
US9425915B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2016-08-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference cancellation
US20170245284A1 (en) * 2016-02-22 2017-08-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Restricted frequency band interference cancellation

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20180075190A (en) * 2016-12-26 2018-07-04 삼성전자주식회사 The method and apparatus for removing interference of a signal in the wireless communication system

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7061854B2 (en) * 2001-10-15 2006-06-13 Nortel Networks Limited Efficient OFDM communications with interference immunity
US20060153283A1 (en) * 2005-01-13 2006-07-13 Scharf Louis L Interference cancellation in adjoint operators for communication receivers
US20070030914A1 (en) * 2005-08-02 2007-02-08 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and system for channel estimation and interference cancellation in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access network
US20070153935A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Alcatel Lucent Method and device for cancelling interference in wireless communication system
US20070237268A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2007-10-11 Research In Motion Limited Method and receiver for estimating the channel impulse response using a constant modulus interference removal iteration
US20080192857A1 (en) * 2004-12-28 2008-08-14 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Wireless Receiving Apparatus, Wireless Transmitting Apparatus, and Interference Signal Removing Method
US7623563B2 (en) * 2004-12-09 2009-11-24 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for detecting space-time multi-user signal of base station having array antenna

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20050041348A (en) 2003-10-30 2005-05-04 엘지전자 주식회사 A apparatus of receiving signal for mimo antenna system
KR100633310B1 (en) 2005-06-08 2006-10-12 한국정보통신대학교 산학협력단 Method and apparatus for providing efficient interference cancellation of dsttd system

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7061854B2 (en) * 2001-10-15 2006-06-13 Nortel Networks Limited Efficient OFDM communications with interference immunity
US7623563B2 (en) * 2004-12-09 2009-11-24 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for detecting space-time multi-user signal of base station having array antenna
US20080192857A1 (en) * 2004-12-28 2008-08-14 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Wireless Receiving Apparatus, Wireless Transmitting Apparatus, and Interference Signal Removing Method
US20060153283A1 (en) * 2005-01-13 2006-07-13 Scharf Louis L Interference cancellation in adjoint operators for communication receivers
US20070030914A1 (en) * 2005-08-02 2007-02-08 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and system for channel estimation and interference cancellation in an orthogonal frequency division multiple access network
US20070153935A1 (en) * 2005-12-29 2007-07-05 Alcatel Lucent Method and device for cancelling interference in wireless communication system
US20070237268A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2007-10-11 Research In Motion Limited Method and receiver for estimating the channel impulse response using a constant modulus interference removal iteration

Cited By (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8199844B2 (en) * 2008-09-10 2012-06-12 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for canceling inter-antenna interference of orthogonally coded signals
US20100061494A1 (en) * 2008-09-10 2010-03-11 Yu Donghun Apparatus and methdo for canceling inter-antenna interference of orthogonally coded signals
US8737187B2 (en) * 2010-04-30 2014-05-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference cancellation
US20110267937A1 (en) * 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference cancellation
US9762426B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2017-09-12 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference cancellation
US9425915B2 (en) 2010-04-30 2016-08-23 Qualcomm Incorporated Interference cancellation
US20120189083A1 (en) * 2011-01-25 2012-07-26 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Interference Cancellation Based On Interfering Link IL Signal Quality And Related Methods And Devices
CN103493383A (en) * 2011-01-25 2014-01-01 瑞典爱立信有限公司 Interference cancellation based on interfering link il signal quality and related methods and devices
US8767895B2 (en) * 2011-01-25 2014-07-01 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Interference cancellation based on interfering link IL signal quality and related methods and devices
US8830972B2 (en) 2011-07-27 2014-09-09 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for adaptive mitigation of noise interference
CN103703690A (en) * 2011-07-27 2014-04-02 英特尔公司 Method and apparatus for adaptive mitigation of noise interference
WO2013015953A1 (en) * 2011-07-27 2013-01-31 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for adaptive mitigation of noise interference
US20130114447A1 (en) * 2011-11-04 2013-05-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Incremental interference cancelation capability and signaling
US9692539B2 (en) * 2011-11-04 2017-06-27 Qualcomm Incorporated Incremental interference cancelation capability and signaling
KR20140099271A (en) * 2011-11-08 2014-08-11 마벨 월드 트레이드 리미티드 Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
US20150326260A1 (en) * 2011-11-08 2015-11-12 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
KR102066187B1 (en) 2011-11-08 2020-01-14 마벨 월드 트레이드 리미티드 Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
US9479205B2 (en) * 2011-11-08 2016-10-25 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
EP2777190B1 (en) * 2011-11-08 2017-10-11 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
US10003365B2 (en) 2011-11-08 2018-06-19 Marvell World Trade Ltd. Methods and apparatus for mitigating known interference
US20140018121A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-16 Sungkyunkwan University Foundation Corporate Callaboration Apparatus and method for selecting d2d communication mode depending on signal interference
US10064223B2 (en) * 2012-06-29 2018-08-28 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for selecting D2D communication mode depending on signal interference
US10050753B2 (en) 2014-09-17 2018-08-14 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and device for mitigating inter-cell interference
WO2016043356A1 (en) * 2014-09-17 2016-03-24 엘지전자 주식회사 Method and device for mitigating inter-cell interference
US20170245284A1 (en) * 2016-02-22 2017-08-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Restricted frequency band interference cancellation
US10757712B2 (en) * 2016-02-22 2020-08-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Restricted frequency band interference cancellation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8355474B2 (en) 2013-01-15
KR20080090066A (en) 2008-10-08
KR101003373B1 (en) 2010-12-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8355474B2 (en) Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in multiple-antenna communication system
EP1802000B1 (en) Apparatus and method for cancelling interference from neighbor cells in broadband communication system
US8411802B2 (en) Iterative estimator and method of channel and noise variance for multiple input multiple output orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system
EP1895725A2 (en) Receiving apparatus and method in broadband wireless access system
US20040146024A1 (en) Method and system for interference reduction in a wireless communication network using a joint detector
US8036601B2 (en) Group LMMSE demodulation using noise and interference covariance matrix for reception on a cellular downlink
US20080310556A1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting signal in multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) wireless communication system
EP1755234A2 (en) Signal detection method for MIMO communication system employing spatial multiplexing
KR20090058740A (en) Apparatus and method for cancelling of interference in multi-antenna system
US20110069776A1 (en) Mimo detection method and system based on channel correlation
US9948483B2 (en) Base station apparatus, wireless communication system, and communication method for uplink coordinated multi-point transmission and reception with intra-phy split base station architecture
JP4381901B2 (en) Channel estimation and data detection method
US20090296863A1 (en) Interference Estimator
US7729458B2 (en) Signal decoding apparatus, signal decoding method, program, and information record medium
US20120263080A1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting signal in spatial multiplexing system
US9860019B2 (en) Base station apparatus, wireless communication system, and communication method
US7321564B2 (en) Hybrid IMMSE-LMMSE receiver processing technique and apparatus for a MIMO WLAN
EP2153540B1 (en) Reduced lattice demodulation method and apparatus
EP1978666B1 (en) Method for transmitting and estimating symbols coded with coding matrix, as well as corresponding receiver and transmitter
US20090088116A1 (en) Method and apparatus of successive interference cancellation for wireless communication system
KR20080059095A (en) Apparaus and method for estimating chnnale in multi antenna wireless communication system
US20080080642A1 (en) Apparatus and method for encoding/decoding data in multiple antenna communication system
Li et al. Multi-feedback successive interference cancellation with multi-branch processing for MIMO systems
US8068407B2 (en) Group MMSE-DFD with order and filter computation for reception on a cellular downlink
CN108199810B (en) SFBC transmission mode detection method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., KOREA, REPUBLIC OF

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DE CARVALHO, ELISABETH;RAHMAN, MUHAMMAD IMADUR;MAZZARESE, DAVID;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020789/0800

Effective date: 20080401

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8