US20040260508A1 - System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear - Google Patents

System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040260508A1
US20040260508A1 US10/847,883 US84788304A US2004260508A1 US 20040260508 A1 US20040260508 A1 US 20040260508A1 US 84788304 A US84788304 A US 84788304A US 2004260508 A1 US2004260508 A1 US 2004260508A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
size
foot
input
shoe size
length measurement
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/847,883
Inventor
David Pattillo
Benjamin Simon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
PODO TECHNOLOGY LLC
Original Assignee
PODO TECHNOLOGY LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by PODO TECHNOLOGY LLC filed Critical PODO TECHNOLOGY LLC
Priority to US10/847,883 priority Critical patent/US20040260508A1/en
Assigned to PODO TECHNOLOGY, LLC reassignment PODO TECHNOLOGY, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PATTILLO, DAVID A., SIMON, BENJAMIN L.
Publication of US20040260508A1 publication Critical patent/US20040260508A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43FOOTWEAR
    • A43DMACHINES, TOOLS, EQUIPMENT OR METHODS FOR MANUFACTURING OR REPAIRING FOOTWEAR
    • A43D1/00Foot or last measuring devices; Measuring devices for shoe parts
    • A43D1/02Foot-measuring devices
    • A43D1/027Shoe fit indicating devices

Definitions

  • the invention relates to the field of foot measurement, and more specifically, a system for and method of automating the measurement of a foot using a foot pad and associated computing platform.
  • the Brannock Device designed in 1927, has been the standard foot measuring device employed in retail stores for over seventy-five years.
  • the Brannock Device measures heel-to-toe length, heel-to-ball length (“arch length”), and foot width to provide a recommended shoe size and width.
  • the Brannock Device comprises a pair of heel cups (right heel cup and left heel cup), a moveable arch length pointer, and a moveable width bar.
  • the Brannock Device is complex to use and if often improperly used by sales associates. The following illustration of the operation of the Brannock Device will demonstrate its complexity.
  • the width bar should be set to its widest position and the arch length indicator should be slid back, so the foot can be positioned easily on the device.
  • the customer removes his footwear and stands, placing his right heel into the right heel cup.
  • the customer should stand with equal weight on both feet to ensure that the foot being measured has elongated and spread to it's maximum size.
  • the heel is properly located against the back of the heel cup, by grasping the customer's ankle and device together.
  • the associate presses the customer's toes flat against the base of the device and looks straight down over the longest toe (not necessarily the first toe) to read toe length.
  • the associate places his thumb on the ball joint of the foot, and slides the moveable arch length pointer forward, so that the inside curve of the pointer fits the ball joint of the foot and two high ribs on the pointer come in contact with the associate's thumb.
  • the lower middle rib will be against the ball joint on the side of the foot. This yields the arch measurement.
  • the associate compares the arch length to the heel-to-toe length and uses the larger of the two measurements as the correct shoe size. If the arch length and heel-to-toe length are the same, this will be the shoe size. If the heel-to-toe length is larger than the arch length, then fit to the heel-to-toe size. If arch length is larger than heel-to-toe, then fit to arch length.
  • the Brannock Device is designed to provides appropriate shoe sized for dress shoes and not athletic footwear. In athletic footwear, the shoe size needs to by 1 ⁇ 2 size to a full size larger than in a dress shown. Also, as can be seen from the above description, few sales associates have been properly trained to used the Brannock Device and fewer still actually go through these complex steps.
  • the present invention is directed to overcoming the one or more problems or disadvantages associated with the prior art.
  • a method of recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad comprises: receiving a heel-to-toe length measurement into a computer, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size; receiving an arch length measurement into the computer, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size; if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size.
  • a system for recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad comprises: a display for displaying the recommended size of athletic foot wear; a memory; and a processor coupled to the memory and the display.
  • the processor is operable to: receive a heel-to-toe length measurement, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size; receive an arch length measurement, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size; if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention in its operating environment.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a gradiated platform for use in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of operational measurement of foot length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of operational measurement of arch length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a system diagram of hardware elements within the computing platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a foot measurement process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a foot length and arch length measuring process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of an athletic shoe size calculation process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • the measurement system operates by taking two or more foot measurements from one or more feet, for example right foot length and right arch length, and, utilizing a series of equations or lookup tables, provides a recommended athletic shoe size.
  • Athletic shoe sizes tend to run zero to a full size larger than dress shoe sizes.
  • the system uses an algorithm that recommends 0.5 to 1 size larger than dress shoe size if the foot length is larger than the arch length and 0 to 0.5 sizes larger than dress shoe size if the foot length is less than the arch length.
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention in its operating environment.
  • a customer 110 wishing to have measurements taken of her feet stands without shoes upon a gradiated platform 120 .
  • the gradiated platform 120 is in communication with a computing platform 130 .
  • Computing platform 130 in connection with gradiated platform 120 , measures the heel-to-toe length (“foot length”) and the length from the heel to the metatarsal-phalangeal joint (“mp joint”) (“arch length”) to compute a recommended athletic shoe size.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a gradiated platform for use in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • the gradiated platform 120 may be coupled to the computing platform 130 via Universal Serial Bus, USB2, Firewire, PCI, or serial connection, for example.
  • a gradiated platform utilized in an exemplary embodiment of the invention is the Medicapteurs PEL 38 Platform. This platform can acquire pressure data from a 32 ⁇ 32 sensor pad of sensors of 1 cm. ⁇ 1 cm. at over 100 images per second. Further advanced Medicapteurs platforms suitable for use with the invention feature a 48 ⁇ 48 sensor pad of sensors of 0.8 cm ⁇ 0.8 cm.
  • a pressure platform such as the Midcapteurs PEL 38 Platform
  • other non-output producing platforms can be used in conjunction with a text or mouse input device to replace the output producing functions of the pressure pad, with the non-output producing platform containing comparable markings and fittings.
  • Gradiated platform 120 may comprise a heel resting T-bar 210 , foot length gradiations 220 , arch length gradiations 230 , an input slider 240 , and input gradiations 250 .
  • foot length gradiations 220 indicate the length of the customer's feet.
  • Arch length gradiations 230 provide measurements of the arch length of the customer.
  • Input slider 240 slides up and down the central column of T-bar 210 and comprises a button 242 and a sight 244 .
  • sight 244 may be lined up with the foot length measurement taken from foot length gradiations 220 and button 242 pressed down upon the pad to indicate the foot length.
  • sight 244 may be aligned with arch length gradiations 230 and button 242 pressed down upon the pad to indicate arch length. While slider 240 and gradiated platform 120 are utilized to provide the inputs to computing platform 130 , those skilled in the art will appreciate that visual readings could be taken off gradiated platform 120 , with the data being entered by the customer or another directly into computing platform 130 without computing platform 130 receiving any direct, electrical input from gradiated platform 120 .
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate operation of the system with respect to only the right foot. The same procedure would apply to measurement of the left foot.
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of operational measurement of foot length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • her foot print 310 is shown on the gradiated platform 120 .
  • the foot length is measured from the longest portion of her foot 320 . In this example, this would indicate a length of 11 from the foot length gradiations 220 .
  • input slider 240 is slid along the central column of T-bar 210 until sight 244 aligns over the 11 on input gradiations 250 .
  • button 242 may be pressed providing a pressure input to gradiated platform 120 .
  • Gradiated platform 120 will provide this y coordinate to computing platform 130 which may use a lookup table or equation to determine that an 11 has been input as the right foot length.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of operational measurement of arch length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • Appropriate arch length gradiation 230 is selected based on which arch length gradiation 230 aligns with the customer's mp joint.
  • Slider 240 is slid along T-bar 210 until sight 244 aligns with this gradiation 230 .
  • button 242 is pressed providing a pressure input to gradiated platform 120 .
  • Gradiated platform 120 will provide this y coordinate to computing platform 130 which may use a lookup table or equation to determine the measured arch length of the right foot.
  • Computing platform 130 may provide visual or audio prompts to the operator of the measurement system to prompt for the series of inputs: right length, right arch, left length, left arch. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the system will function comparably with different ordered input or even with measurement being only taken for a single foot. Once the measurements are taken, computing platform 130 will provide a recommended athletic shoe size or range of athletic shoe sizes.
  • FIG. 5 is a system diagram of hardware elements within the computing platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • a system environment of the computing platform 130 may include a display 510 , a central processing unit 520 , an input/output interface 530 , a network interface 540 and memory 550 coupled together by a bus.
  • Computing platform 130 is adapted to include the functionality and computing capabilities to implement the described measuring and computing functions of the measurement system. The input, output, and monitoring of the system may be provided on display 510 for viewing.
  • Computing platform 130 may comprise a PC or mainframe computer for performing various functions and operations of embodiments of the invention.
  • Computing platform 130 may be implemented, for example, by a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer, or may be a specially constructed computing platform for carrying-out the features and operations of the present invention.
  • Computing platform 130 may be separate or integral to the platform 120 .
  • Computing platform 130 may also be implemented or provided with a wide variety of components or subsystems including, for example, one or more of the following: one or more central processing units 520 , a co-processor, memory 550 , registers, and other data processing devices and subsystems.
  • Computing platform 130 may also communicate or transfer customer records and reports via I/O interface 530 and/or network interface 540 through the use of direct connections or communication links to other elements of the measurement system. For example, a firewall in network interface 540 , prevents access to the platform by unpermitted outside sources.
  • communication between computing platform 130 and modules 510 , 530 , and 540 can be achieved through the use of a network architecture (not shown).
  • the network architecture may comprise, alone or in any suitable combination, a telephone-based network (such as a PBX or POTS), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a dedicated intranet, and/or the Internet. Further, it may comprise any suitable combination of wired and/or wireless components and systems.
  • a telephone-based network such as a PBX or POTS
  • LAN local area network
  • WAN wide area network
  • I/O interface 530 of the system environment shown in FIG. 3 may be implemented with a wide variety of devices to receive and/or provide the data to and from the measurement system and platform.
  • I/O interface 530 may include an input device, a storage device, and/or a network.
  • the input device may include a keyboard, a mouse, a disk drive, video camera, magnetic card reader, or any other suitable input device for providing records to the measurement system.
  • Network interface 540 may be connected to a network, such as a Wide Area Network, a Local Area Network, or the Internet for providing read/write access to records.
  • a network such as a Wide Area Network, a Local Area Network, or the Internet for providing read/write access to records.
  • Memory device 550 may be implemented with various forms of memory or storage devices, such as read-only memory (ROM) devices and random access memory (RAM) devices. Memory device 550 may also include a memory tape or disk drive for reading and providing records on a storage tape or disk as input to the measurement system. Memory device 550 may comprise: an operating system 552 , a fitting module 554 for measuring and calculating foot size and recommended athletic footwear size; and a platform interface module 356 for reading information from platform 120 .
  • ROM read-only memory
  • RAM random access memory
  • Memory device 550 may comprise: an operating system 552 , a fitting module 554 for measuring and calculating foot size and recommended athletic footwear size; and a platform interface module 356 for reading information from platform 120 .
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a foot measurement process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • a customer stands upon the gradiated platform or pad.
  • the first foot e.g., the right foot, heel-to-toe, or foot length
  • the first foot arch length reading is taken.
  • the second foot foot length reading is taken.
  • the second foot arch reading is taken.
  • the recommended athletic shoe size is calculated and provided to the customer.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a foot length and arch length measuring process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • the user places her foot on the pad.
  • the user views the length of the foot, from the foot length gradiations, and enters this length into the system using, for example, the input slider at stage 730 .
  • the user views the position of the mp joint, follows the arch length gradiations from the input joint to the input gradiations on the pad, and, at stage 750 , enters the mp joint position into the system using, for example, the input slider.
  • a similar process may be repeated for the second foot.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of an athletic shoe size calculation process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.
  • the calculation process 650 begins.
  • the first foot foot length is compared to the first foot arch length. If the first foot foot length is greater than the first foot arch length, then, at stage 830 , the recommended first foot athletic shoe size is set to the first foot foot length plus another one-half to full size. If the first foot foot length is less than the first foot arch length, then, at stage 840 , the recommended first foot athletic shoe size is set to the first foot arch length plus another zero to one-half size.
  • the second foot foot length is compared to the second foot arch length. If the second foot foot length is greater than the second foot arch length, then, at stage 870 , the recommended second foot athletic shoe size is set to the second foot foot length plus another one-half to full size. If the second foot foot length is less than the second foot arch length, then, at stage 860 , the recommended second foot athletic shoe size is set to the second foot arch length plus another zero to one-half size.
  • the recommended athletic shoe size is set to the larger of the first foot recommended athletic shoe size and the second foot recommended athletic shoe size.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)
  • Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

A method of recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad. The method comprises: receiving a heel-to-toe length measurement into a computer, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size; receiving an arch length measurement into the computer, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size; if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • This patent application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/472,133, entitled “System and Method for Foot Measurement for Athletic Footwear”, filed May 21, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.[0001]
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The invention relates to the field of foot measurement, and more specifically, a system for and method of automating the measurement of a foot using a foot pad and associated computing platform. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND
  • Proper foot measurement is critical to providing appropriately sized footwear. Unfortunately, few people realize that one's shoe size is not the same across various types of footwear. For example, in an athletic shoe, one will often wear a size to a size and a half larger shoe than in a dress shoe. This is due to the fact that when placing repeated stress on the foot, for example when running, the foot will spread out. While various shoe sizing devices exist, none provide sizing directed at the athletic shoe market. [0003]
  • The Brannock Device, designed in 1927, has been the standard foot measuring device employed in retail stores for over seventy-five years. The Brannock Device measures heel-to-toe length, heel-to-ball length (“arch length”), and foot width to provide a recommended shoe size and width. The Brannock Device comprises a pair of heel cups (right heel cup and left heel cup), a moveable arch length pointer, and a moveable width bar. The Brannock Device is complex to use and if often improperly used by sales associates. The following illustration of the operation of the Brannock Device will demonstrate its complexity. [0004]
  • To use the device, the width bar should be set to its widest position and the arch length indicator should be slid back, so the foot can be positioned easily on the device. Next, the customer removes his footwear and stands, placing his right heel into the right heel cup. The customer should stand with equal weight on both feet to ensure that the foot being measured has elongated and spread to it's maximum size. The heel is properly located against the back of the heel cup, by grasping the customer's ankle and device together. The associate presses the customer's toes flat against the base of the device and looks straight down over the longest toe (not necessarily the first toe) to read toe length. [0005]
  • Next, the associate places his thumb on the ball joint of the foot, and slides the moveable arch length pointer forward, so that the inside curve of the pointer fits the ball joint of the foot and two high ribs on the pointer come in contact with the associate's thumb. When the pointer is properly located, the lower middle rib will be against the ball joint on the side of the foot. This yields the arch measurement. [0006]
  • Finally, the associate compares the arch length to the heel-to-toe length and uses the larger of the two measurements as the correct shoe size. If the arch length and heel-to-toe length are the same, this will be the shoe size. If the heel-to-toe length is larger than the arch length, then fit to the heel-to-toe size. If arch length is larger than heel-to-toe, then fit to arch length. Unfortunately, even if used properly, the Brannock Device is designed to provides appropriate shoe sized for dress shoes and not athletic footwear. In athletic footwear, the shoe size needs to by ½ size to a full size larger than in a dress shown. Also, as can be seen from the above description, few sales associates have been properly trained to used the Brannock Device and fewer still actually go through these complex steps. [0007]
  • Others have attempted to overcome the deficiencies of the Brannock Device, but, as is evident from their lack of commercial success, they have failed to gain a toe hold in the market. In general, a great deal of their effort has been in making electronic or optical gradiated platforms intended to take measurements of the foot through pressure readings or light sensor readings, respectively. However, these systems are inadequate because pressure readings from the feet may fail to account for curved areas of the foot that do not place pressure on the pad, yet may result in additional, unaccounted for length and width of the foot. In addition, none of these efforts have been directed at sizing feet for athletic footwear. [0008]
  • The present invention is directed to overcoming the one or more problems or disadvantages associated with the prior art. [0009]
  • SUMMARY
  • A method of recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad is disclosed. The method comprises: receiving a heel-to-toe length measurement into a computer, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size; receiving an arch length measurement into the computer, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size; if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size. [0010]
  • 7. A system for recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad is further disclosed. The system comprises: a display for displaying the recommended size of athletic foot wear; a memory; and a processor coupled to the memory and the display. The processor is operable to: receive a heel-to-toe length measurement, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size; receive an arch length measurement, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size; if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size. [0011]
  • The foregoing summarizes only a few aspects of the invention and is not intended to be reflective of the full scope of the invention as claimed. Additional features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following description, may be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practicing the invention. Moreover, both the foregoing summary and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed. [0012]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate a system consistent with the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. [0013]
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention in its operating environment. [0014]
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a gradiated platform for use in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. [0015]
  • FIG. 3 is an illustration of operational measurement of foot length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. [0016]
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of operational measurement of arch length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. [0017]
  • FIG. 5 is a system diagram of hardware elements within the computing platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. [0018]
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a foot measurement process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. [0019]
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a foot length and arch length measuring process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. [0020]
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of an athletic shoe size calculation process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention.[0021]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Reference will now be made in detail to the present exemplary embodiments consistent with the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. [0022]
  • In general, the measurement system according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention operates by taking two or more foot measurements from one or more feet, for example right foot length and right arch length, and, utilizing a series of equations or lookup tables, provides a recommended athletic shoe size. Athletic shoe sizes tend to run zero to a full size larger than dress shoe sizes. The system uses an algorithm that recommends 0.5 to 1 size larger than dress shoe size if the foot length is larger than the arch length and 0 to 0.5 sizes larger than dress shoe size if the foot length is less than the arch length. [0023]
  • FIG. 1 is an illustration of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention in its operating environment. A [0024] customer 110 wishing to have measurements taken of her feet stands without shoes upon a gradiated platform 120. The gradiated platform 120 is in communication with a computing platform 130. Computing platform 130, in connection with gradiated platform 120, measures the heel-to-toe length (“foot length”) and the length from the heel to the metatarsal-phalangeal joint (“mp joint”) (“arch length”) to compute a recommended athletic shoe size.
  • FIG. 2 is an illustration of a gradiated platform for use in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. The [0025] gradiated platform 120 may be coupled to the computing platform 130 via Universal Serial Bus, USB2, Firewire, PCI, or serial connection, for example. A gradiated platform utilized in an exemplary embodiment of the invention is the Medicapteurs PEL 38 Platform. This platform can acquire pressure data from a 32×32 sensor pad of sensors of 1 cm.×1 cm. at over 100 images per second. Further advanced Medicapteurs platforms suitable for use with the invention feature a 48×48 sensor pad of sensors of 0.8 cm×0.8 cm. As will be seen from the following description, a pressure platform, such as the Midcapteurs PEL 38 Platform, is not necessarily required to practice the present invention; other non-output producing platforms can be used in conjunction with a text or mouse input device to replace the output producing functions of the pressure pad, with the non-output producing platform containing comparable markings and fittings.
  • [0026] Gradiated platform 120 may comprise a heel resting T-bar 210, foot length gradiations 220, arch length gradiations 230, an input slider 240, and input gradiations 250. As a customer stands on gradiated platform 120, resting her heels against T-bar 210, foot length gradiations 220 indicate the length of the customer's feet. Arch length gradiations 230 provide measurements of the arch length of the customer. Input slider 240 slides up and down the central column of T-bar 210 and comprises a button 242 and a sight 244. As a measurement needs to be entered into the measurement system, sight 244 may be lined up with the foot length measurement taken from foot length gradiations 220 and button 242 pressed down upon the pad to indicate the foot length. Similarly, where the customer's mp joint lines up with arch length gradiations 230, sight 244 may be aligned with arch length gradiations 230 and button 242 pressed down upon the pad to indicate arch length. While slider 240 and gradiated platform 120 are utilized to provide the inputs to computing platform 130, those skilled in the art will appreciate that visual readings could be taken off gradiated platform 120, with the data being entered by the customer or another directly into computing platform 130 without computing platform 130 receiving any direct, electrical input from gradiated platform 120.
  • For illustrative purposes, FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate operation of the system with respect to only the right foot. The same procedure would apply to measurement of the left foot. FIG. 3 is an illustration of operational measurement of foot length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. As the customer stands upon [0027] gradiated platform 120, her foot print 310 is shown on the gradiated platform 120. To measure the foot length, the foot length is measured from the longest portion of her foot 320. In this example, this would indicate a length of 11 from the foot length gradiations 220. Once the foot length is determined, input slider 240 is slid along the central column of T-bar 210 until sight 244 aligns over the 11 on input gradiations 250. At this point, button 242 may be pressed providing a pressure input to gradiated platform 120. Gradiated platform 120 will provide this y coordinate to computing platform 130 which may use a lookup table or equation to determine that an 11 has been input as the right foot length.
  • FIG. 4 is an illustration of operational measurement of arch length using the gradiated platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. Appropriate [0028] arch length gradiation 230 is selected based on which arch length gradiation 230 aligns with the customer's mp joint. Slider 240 is slid along T-bar 210 until sight 244 aligns with this gradiation 230. At this point, button 242 is pressed providing a pressure input to gradiated platform 120. Gradiated platform 120 will provide this y coordinate to computing platform 130 which may use a lookup table or equation to determine the measured arch length of the right foot.
  • A similar process may be repeated for the left foot. [0029] Computing platform 130 may provide visual or audio prompts to the operator of the measurement system to prompt for the series of inputs: right length, right arch, left length, left arch. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the system will function comparably with different ordered input or even with measurement being only taken for a single foot. Once the measurements are taken, computing platform 130 will provide a recommended athletic shoe size or range of athletic shoe sizes.
  • FIG. 5 is a system diagram of hardware elements within the computing platform in an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 5, a system environment of the [0030] computing platform 130 may include a display 510, a central processing unit 520, an input/output interface 530, a network interface 540 and memory 550 coupled together by a bus. Computing platform 130 is adapted to include the functionality and computing capabilities to implement the described measuring and computing functions of the measurement system. The input, output, and monitoring of the system may be provided on display 510 for viewing.
  • As shown in FIG. 5, [0031] Computing platform 130 may comprise a PC or mainframe computer for performing various functions and operations of embodiments of the invention. Computing platform 130 may be implemented, for example, by a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer, or may be a specially constructed computing platform for carrying-out the features and operations of the present invention. Computing platform 130 may be separate or integral to the platform 120. Computing platform 130 may also be implemented or provided with a wide variety of components or subsystems including, for example, one or more of the following: one or more central processing units 520, a co-processor, memory 550, registers, and other data processing devices and subsystems. Computing platform 130 may also communicate or transfer customer records and reports via I/O interface 530 and/or network interface 540 through the use of direct connections or communication links to other elements of the measurement system. For example, a firewall in network interface 540, prevents access to the platform by unpermitted outside sources.
  • Alternatively, communication between [0032] computing platform 130 and modules 510, 530, and 540 can be achieved through the use of a network architecture (not shown). In the alternative embodiment (not shown), the network architecture may comprise, alone or in any suitable combination, a telephone-based network (such as a PBX or POTS), a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a dedicated intranet, and/or the Internet. Further, it may comprise any suitable combination of wired and/or wireless components and systems. By using dedicated communication links or shared network architecture, computing platform 130 may be located in the same location or at a geographically distant location from modules 510, 530, and 540.
  • I/[0033] O interface 530 of the system environment shown in FIG. 3 may be implemented with a wide variety of devices to receive and/or provide the data to and from the measurement system and platform. I/O interface 530 may include an input device, a storage device, and/or a network. The input device may include a keyboard, a mouse, a disk drive, video camera, magnetic card reader, or any other suitable input device for providing records to the measurement system.
  • [0034] Network interface 540 may be connected to a network, such as a Wide Area Network, a Local Area Network, or the Internet for providing read/write access to records.
  • [0035] Memory device 550 may be implemented with various forms of memory or storage devices, such as read-only memory (ROM) devices and random access memory (RAM) devices. Memory device 550 may also include a memory tape or disk drive for reading and providing records on a storage tape or disk as input to the measurement system. Memory device 550 may comprise: an operating system 552, a fitting module 554 for measuring and calculating foot size and recommended athletic footwear size; and a platform interface module 356 for reading information from platform 120.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of a foot measurement process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. Initially, a customer stands upon the gradiated platform or pad. At [0036] stage 610, the first foot, e.g., the right foot, heel-to-toe, or foot length, reading is taken. At stage 620, the first foot arch length reading is taken. At stage 630, the second foot foot length reading is taken. At stage 640, the second foot arch reading is taken. Finally, at stage 650, the recommended athletic shoe size is calculated and provided to the customer.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of a foot length and arch length measuring process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. At [0037] stage 710, the user places her foot on the pad. At stage 720, the user views the length of the foot, from the foot length gradiations, and enters this length into the system using, for example, the input slider at stage 730. At stage 740, the user views the position of the mp joint, follows the arch length gradiations from the input joint to the input gradiations on the pad, and, at stage 750, enters the mp joint position into the system using, for example, the input slider. A similar process may be repeated for the second foot.
  • FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of an athletic shoe size calculation process of an exemplary embodiment consistent with the present invention. At [0038] stage 810, the calculation process 650 begins. At stage 820, the first foot foot length is compared to the first foot arch length. If the first foot foot length is greater than the first foot arch length, then, at stage 830, the recommended first foot athletic shoe size is set to the first foot foot length plus another one-half to full size. If the first foot foot length is less than the first foot arch length, then, at stage 840, the recommended first foot athletic shoe size is set to the first foot arch length plus another zero to one-half size.
  • At [0039] stage 850, the second foot foot length is compared to the second foot arch length. If the second foot foot length is greater than the second foot arch length, then, at stage 870, the recommended second foot athletic shoe size is set to the second foot foot length plus another one-half to full size. If the second foot foot length is less than the second foot arch length, then, at stage 860, the recommended second foot athletic shoe size is set to the second foot arch length plus another zero to one-half size.
  • At [0040] stage 880, the recommended athletic shoe size is set to the larger of the first foot recommended athletic shoe size and the second foot recommended athletic shoe size.
  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that all or part of systems and methods consistent with the present invention may be stored on or read from other computer-readable media, such as: secondary storage devices, like hard disks, floppy disks, and CD-ROM; a carrier wave received from the Internet; or other forms of computer-readable memory, such as read-only memory (ROM) or random-access memory (RAM). [0041]
  • Furthermore, one skilled in the art will also realize that the processes illustrated in this description may be implemented in a variety of ways and include multiple other modules, programs, applications, scripts, processes, threads, or code sections that all functionally interrelate with each other to accomplish the individual tasks described above for each module, script, and daemon. For example, it is contemplated that these programs modules may be implemented using commercially available software tools, using custom object-oriented code written in the C++ programming language, using applets written in the Java programming language, or may be implemented as with discrete electrical components or as one or more hardwired application specific integrated circuits (ASIC) custom designed just for this purpose. [0042]
  • It will be readily apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications of an obvious nature may be made, and all such changes and modifications are considered to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims and their equivalents. [0043]

Claims (10)

What is claimed is:
1. A method of recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad, comprising:
receiving a heel-to-toe length measurement into a computer, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size;
receiving an arch length measurement into the computer, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size;
if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and
if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then using the computer to recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the foot-to-toe length is measured using the gradiated pad.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the arch length is measured using the gradiated pad.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the arch length measurement is based on the position of the mp joint.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the gradiated pad is a pressure pad and further wherein receiving a heel-to-toe length measurement further comprises:
receiving an input into the computer from the pressure pad, wherein the input comprises an x,y input from the pressure pad; and
translating, in the computer, the x,y input into a heel-to-toe length measurement.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the gradiated pad is a pressure pad and further wherein receiving an arch length measurement further comprises:
receiving an input into the computer from the pressure pad, wherein the input comprises an x,y input from the pressure pad; and
translating, in the computer, the x,y input into an arch length measurement.
7. A system for recommending an appropriate size of athletic foot wear utilizing a gradiated pad, the system comprising:
a display for displaying the recommended size of athletic foot wear;
a memory; and
a processor, coupled to the memory and the display, the processor operable to:
receive a heel-to-toe length measurement, wherein the foot-to-toe length measurement is a first shoe size;
receive an arch length measurement, wherein the arch length measurement is a second shoe size;
if the first shoe size is greater than the second shoe size, then recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to first shoe size plus an additional one-half to full size; and
if the first shoe size is less than the second shoe size, then recommend an athletic foot wear size equal to the second shoe size plus an additional zero to one-half size.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein the arch length measurement is based on the position of the mp joint.
9. The system of claim 7, wherein the gradiated pad is a pressure pad and further wherein the processor is operable to:
receive an input from the pressure pad, wherein the input comprises an x,y input from the pressure pad; and
translate the x,y input into a heel-to-toe length measurement.
10. The system of claim 7, wherein the gradiated pad is a pressure pad and further wherein the processor is operable to:
receiving an input into the computer from the pressure pad, wherein the input comprises an x,y input from the pressure pad; and
translate the x,y input into an arch length measurement.
US10/847,883 2003-05-21 2004-05-19 System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear Abandoned US20040260508A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/847,883 US20040260508A1 (en) 2003-05-21 2004-05-19 System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US47213303P 2003-05-21 2003-05-21
US10/847,883 US20040260508A1 (en) 2003-05-21 2004-05-19 System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040260508A1 true US20040260508A1 (en) 2004-12-23

Family

ID=33490488

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/847,883 Abandoned US20040260508A1 (en) 2003-05-21 2004-05-19 System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20040260508A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2004105535A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080083416A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2008-04-10 Bin Xia Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US20110161194A1 (en) * 2009-12-31 2011-06-30 Dumke Michael A Recommending a shoe size based on best fitting past shoe purchases
US9038482B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2015-05-26 Msd Consumer Care, Inc. Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US11134863B2 (en) 2015-10-05 2021-10-05 Scholl's Wellness Company Llc Generating orthotic product recommendations
US11854058B2 (en) 2017-10-13 2023-12-26 Scholl's Wellness Company Llc Footcare product dispensing kiosk

Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2942344A (en) * 1958-11-21 1960-06-28 Charles F Brannock Foot measuring device
US3757418A (en) * 1971-04-14 1973-09-11 Radex Corp Digital foot measuring instrument
US5025476A (en) * 1988-10-31 1991-06-18 Nathaniel Gould Diagnostics, Inc. Redotopography apparatus and method using moire fringe analysis to measure foot shapes
US5080109A (en) * 1991-02-15 1992-01-14 Arme Jr Joseph F Method and apparatus for analysis of postural abnormalities
US5164793A (en) * 1991-09-13 1992-11-17 Brown Group, Inc. Shoe size selection system and apparatus therefor
US5174052A (en) * 1991-01-03 1992-12-29 Schoenhaus Harold D Dynamic stabilizing inner sole system
US5659395A (en) * 1992-06-23 1997-08-19 Footmark, Inc. Method and apparatus for analyzing feet
US5671055A (en) * 1996-01-23 1997-09-23 Acushnet Company Apparatus, system and method for laser measurement of an object shape
US5790256A (en) * 1992-06-23 1998-08-04 Footmark, Inc. Foot analyzer
US5822223A (en) * 1997-08-05 1998-10-13 Genovation Inc. Electronic foot measuring apparatus
US6041521A (en) * 1995-10-16 2000-03-28 Fila Sport, Spa. Sports shoe having an elastic insert
US6163971A (en) * 1997-09-10 2000-12-26 Accura Design, Inc. Automatic foot sizing apparatus
US6170177B1 (en) * 1998-09-28 2001-01-09 John P. Frappier Footwear customization system and process
US6219929B1 (en) * 1998-06-27 2001-04-24 John Edwin Tasker Apparatus for assessing and measuring foot and lower limb abnormalities
US20010047246A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-11-29 Fullen Jeryl G. Method for computer aided orthotic inlay fabrication
US20020157266A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-10-31 Mark Dowdell Method for sizing feet
US20040081336A1 (en) * 2002-10-16 2004-04-29 Jeffrey S. Brooks, Inc. Foot scanning and measurement system and method

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR918752A (en) * 1945-12-12 1947-02-18 Brannock Fitting Device Ltd Device for taking measurements of the feet with a view to putting them on
WO2002007090A2 (en) * 2000-07-13 2002-01-24 Fitracks Inc. A method and system of purchasing goods

Patent Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2942344A (en) * 1958-11-21 1960-06-28 Charles F Brannock Foot measuring device
US3757418A (en) * 1971-04-14 1973-09-11 Radex Corp Digital foot measuring instrument
US5025476A (en) * 1988-10-31 1991-06-18 Nathaniel Gould Diagnostics, Inc. Redotopography apparatus and method using moire fringe analysis to measure foot shapes
US5174052A (en) * 1991-01-03 1992-12-29 Schoenhaus Harold D Dynamic stabilizing inner sole system
US5080109A (en) * 1991-02-15 1992-01-14 Arme Jr Joseph F Method and apparatus for analysis of postural abnormalities
US5164793A (en) * 1991-09-13 1992-11-17 Brown Group, Inc. Shoe size selection system and apparatus therefor
US5790256A (en) * 1992-06-23 1998-08-04 Footmark, Inc. Foot analyzer
US5659395A (en) * 1992-06-23 1997-08-19 Footmark, Inc. Method and apparatus for analyzing feet
US6041521A (en) * 1995-10-16 2000-03-28 Fila Sport, Spa. Sports shoe having an elastic insert
US5671055A (en) * 1996-01-23 1997-09-23 Acushnet Company Apparatus, system and method for laser measurement of an object shape
US5822223A (en) * 1997-08-05 1998-10-13 Genovation Inc. Electronic foot measuring apparatus
US6163971A (en) * 1997-09-10 2000-12-26 Accura Design, Inc. Automatic foot sizing apparatus
US6219929B1 (en) * 1998-06-27 2001-04-24 John Edwin Tasker Apparatus for assessing and measuring foot and lower limb abnormalities
US6170177B1 (en) * 1998-09-28 2001-01-09 John P. Frappier Footwear customization system and process
US20010047246A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2001-11-29 Fullen Jeryl G. Method for computer aided orthotic inlay fabrication
US20020157266A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-10-31 Mark Dowdell Method for sizing feet
US20040081336A1 (en) * 2002-10-16 2004-04-29 Jeffrey S. Brooks, Inc. Foot scanning and measurement system and method

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080083416A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2008-04-10 Bin Xia Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US8117922B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2012-02-21 Msd Consumer Care, Inc. Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US20120197161A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2012-08-02 Msd Consumer Care, Inc. Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US9038482B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2015-05-26 Msd Consumer Care, Inc. Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US9576311B2 (en) 2006-09-21 2017-02-21 Bayer Healthcare Llc Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US20110161194A1 (en) * 2009-12-31 2011-06-30 Dumke Michael A Recommending a shoe size based on best fitting past shoe purchases
US11134863B2 (en) 2015-10-05 2021-10-05 Scholl's Wellness Company Llc Generating orthotic product recommendations
US11854058B2 (en) 2017-10-13 2023-12-26 Scholl's Wellness Company Llc Footcare product dispensing kiosk

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004105535A3 (en) 2005-03-24
WO2004105535A2 (en) 2004-12-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2241209B1 (en) Foot measurement apparatus, method and computer program
US20040143452A1 (en) System and method of dynamically assessing foot characteristics
CA2811132C (en) Foot measurement apparatus
US9038482B2 (en) Footcare product dispensing kiosk
US7493230B2 (en) Method and apparatus for customizing insoles for footwear
US20140039657A1 (en) Orthopods and equipment to generate orthopedic supports from computerized data inputs
US7325323B2 (en) Foot tilt angle measuring method, method of selecting shoe or insole for shoe method of manufacturing shoe or insole for shoe, and foot unit tilt angle measuring device
US20060116589A1 (en) Weight scale having function of pulse rate meter or heartbeat rate meter
WO2005006905A1 (en) Shoe selection supporting system and method
US20070250287A1 (en) Orthopods and equipment to generate orthopedic supports from computerized data inputs
US11176738B2 (en) Method for calculating the comfort level of footwear
Guo et al. A shoe-integrated sensor system for long-term center of pressure evaluation
US20040260508A1 (en) System and method for foot measurement for athletic footwear
TWM545407U (en) Automatization foot testing analysis system
WO2003036413A3 (en) Method and system for matching shoes and insoles to feet
US20200245937A1 (en) Systems and methods to determine center of pressure
JP7132610B2 (en) Foot sole pressure distribution measuring system and foot sole pressure distribution measuring method
JP4452845B2 (en) Product compliance information provision system
TW202247197A (en) A method for processing foot sensing data
CN114080643A (en) Apparatus and method for performing image-based food quantity estimation
CN118105065A (en) Dynamic foot pronation monitoring method based on computer vision

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: PODO TECHNOLOGY, LLC, GEORGIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:PATTILLO, DAVID A.;SIMON, BENJAMIN L.;REEL/FRAME:015690/0771

Effective date: 20040812

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION