JP3225762B2 - Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system - Google Patents

Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system

Info

Publication number
JP3225762B2
JP3225762B2 JP28370994A JP28370994A JP3225762B2 JP 3225762 B2 JP3225762 B2 JP 3225762B2 JP 28370994 A JP28370994 A JP 28370994A JP 28370994 A JP28370994 A JP 28370994A JP 3225762 B2 JP3225762 B2 JP 3225762B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
delivery
delivery instruction
parts
instruction
company
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP28370994A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH08147383A (en
Inventor
敏貴 高橋
和之 山倉
博文 国本
秀一 玉田
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Toyota Motor Corp
Original Assignee
Toyota Motor Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Toyota Motor Corp filed Critical Toyota Motor Corp
Priority to JP28370994A priority Critical patent/JP3225762B2/en
Publication of JPH08147383A publication Critical patent/JPH08147383A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP3225762B2 publication Critical patent/JP3225762B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • General Factory Administration (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、生産工場における必要
部品の納入指示方法及び納入指示システム、特に同種類
の部品を複数の部品工場に対して納入指示をする場合の
複社納入指示管理方法及び複社納入指示管理システムに
関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a delivery instruction method and a delivery instruction system for necessary parts in a production factory, and in particular, a multi-company delivery instruction management method for issuing a delivery instruction of the same kind of parts to a plurality of parts factories And a multi-company delivery instruction management system.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来より、工場における製品生産管理の
効率化の重要な要素として、部品調達の管理がある。生
産工程において、必要な部品が不足すると、その生産が
行えなくなるため、部品の欠品は極力避けなければなら
ない。一方、部品を必要以上に在庫として持つことは、
余分な在庫スペースを必要とするなどの問題を生じる。
そこで、これらの両方を満足して、最小の在庫で、欠品
を生じないような部品調達が望まれる。特に自動車のよ
うに、千差万別の多数の部品を用いて生産される製品で
は、その部品の調達を効率的に行うことが非常に重要で
ある。
2. Description of the Related Art Hitherto, as an important factor for improving the efficiency of product production management in a factory, there is management of parts procurement. In the production process, if the necessary parts are insufficient, the production cannot be performed. Therefore, the shortage of the parts must be avoided as much as possible. On the other hand, having parts unnecessarily in stock
Problems arise, such as the need for extra inventory space.
Therefore, it is desirable to procure parts that satisfy both of these requirements and that do not cause stockouts with minimum inventory. In particular, in the case of products manufactured using a large number of different parts, such as automobiles, it is very important to efficiently procure the parts.

【0003】このような部品調達方式として、「かんば
ん」方式といわれる調達方法がある。この方式では、消
費した部品は再度消費されるという前提の下に、予め、
例えば、1か月単位で部品計画使用量に基づいて各部品
工場に納入指示された部品に対して、納入タイミングを
指示する納入タイミング指示カード(以下、かんばんと
いう)によって納入指示が行われる。すなわち、部品と
共に生産工場に納入されたかんばん(通常の場合、部品
は箱詰めされており、部品箱1つと1枚のかんばんが対
応している)は、その部品が使用されることによって、
部品箱から外される。そこで、この外れかんばんを回収
し、所定の頻度で納入指示便に乗せ、部品工場(納入指
先)に運ぶ。ここで、納入指示便は、通常納入便の帰
り便が利用される。そして、このかんばんにより納入指
示された部品が部品工場から生産工場に納入便で納入さ
れる。つまり、使用されただけの部品が補充される循環
が繰り返される。
[0003] As such a parts procurement method, there is a procurement method called a "kanban" method. In this method, on the premise that consumed parts are consumed again,
For example, a delivery instruction is given to a part instructed to be delivered to each parts factory on a monthly basis based on the planned usage of the parts by using a delivery timing instruction card (hereinafter referred to as a kanban) for instructing a delivery timing. That is, the kanban delivered to the production factory together with the parts (normally, the parts are packed in a box, and one part box and one kanban correspond), by using the parts,
Removed from parts box. Therefore, the lost Kanban is collected, put on a delivery instruction flight at a predetermined frequency, and sent to a parts factory ( delivery order).
Carry to indicate the destination). Here, the return flight of the normal delivery flight is used as the delivery instruction flight. Then, the parts ordered by the kanban are delivered from the parts factory to the production factory by delivery service. That is, the cycle of replenishing only used parts is repeated.

【0004】一方、生産工場が部品工場から部品の供給
を受ける場合、生産工場の経営戦略上の理由や部品工場
の供給能力上の理由等から複数の部品工場(例えば、A
社、B社、C社、D社)から納品を受けることがよくあ
る。生産工程で部品を使用する場合、各部品工場の部品
が均一に使用されるとは限らず、偏って使用される場合
がある。この場合、使用された部品の外れかんばんをそ
のまま同じメーカーに戻して、納入指示を行うと部品の
使用状況によって著しい納入指示量のばらつきが発生
し、納入指示が月前半はA社のみ、月後半はC社のみと
いう事態が発生したり、全く使用されず納入指示が事実
上中止されてしまう部品工場が出てくるという問題が発
生する。そこで、部品納入指示担当者は定期的に作成さ
れる生産計画及び部品工場の能力等を加味して、経験側
から部品納入指示比率を決定し、その納入指示比率を基
準に外れかんばんの振り分けを行い各部品工場に部品納
入の指示を行っていた。
On the other hand, when a production factory receives parts from a parts factory, a plurality of parts factories (for example, A
Company, Company B, Company C, Company D). When parts are used in the production process, parts in each parts factory are not always used uniformly, but may be used unevenly. In this case, if the parts used are returned to the same manufacturer as they are and delivery instructions are given, the amount of delivery instructions will vary significantly depending on the usage of the parts. However, there arises a problem that a situation occurs in which only the company C is used, or there is a parts factory in which the delivery instruction is practically canceled because it is not used at all. Therefore, the person in charge of the parts delivery instruction determines the parts delivery instruction ratio from the experienced side, taking into account the production plan and the capabilities of the parts factory that are regularly created, and sorts out kanbans based on the delivery instruction ratio. They instructed each parts factory to deliver parts.

【0005】図6に示す処理テーブルを用いて従来行わ
れている振分けを説明する。例えば、納入指示先A社は
1枚のかんばんで納品する部品個数(収容数)が10
個、設定された納入指示比率が10であり、納入指示先
B社は収容数が5個、納入指示比率が12である。以
下、C社、D社に関しても同様に設定が行われている。
外れかんばんが発生すると、納入指示比率と比較個数
(初期の比較個数は全て0である)とによって決定され
る振分比率(比較個数/納入指示比率)の最も小さい納
入指示先に外れかんばんの振分けが行われる。なお、振
分比率が同じ場合、(比較個数/収容数)の大きい方に
振り分けられ、それでも等しい時には納入指示比率の大
きい方に振分けが行われる。また、比較個数はかんばん
振り分けが行われると収納数が加算され、(比較個数/
納入指示比率)で表示される振分比率は更新される。
[0005] A conventional distribution will be described with reference to a processing table shown in FIG. For example, the delivery destination company A has 10 pieces of parts (the number of pieces) to be delivered with one kanban.
The set delivery instruction ratio is 10, and the delivery instruction destination company B has a capacity of 5 and the delivery instruction ratio is 12. Hereinafter, the same setting is performed for Company C and Company D.
When an out-of-order kanban occurs, the out-of-order kanban is distributed to the delivery instruction destination with the smallest distribution ratio (comparison number / delivery instruction ratio) determined by the delivery instruction ratio and the comparison number (the initial comparison number is all 0). Is performed. If the distribution ratios are the same, the distribution is performed to the larger (comparison number / accommodation number). If the distribution ratios are still the same, the distribution is performed to the larger delivery instruction ratio. When the kanban distribution is performed, the number of stored items is added to the number of comparisons.
The distribution ratio displayed in (delivery instruction ratio) is updated.

【0006】図6に示すように1枚目の外れかんばんが
発生すると振分比率の比較が行われる。1枚目の場合、
比較個数が全社共0であるので、納入指示比率の最も大
きなB社に振分先が決定され、B社の比較個数に5が加
算され、振分比率が更新される。2枚目の外れかんばん
が発生すると、振分比率が0であるA,C,D社間で比
較が行われ、納入指示比率の最も大きなA社に振分先が
決定され、A社の比較個数の10が加算され、振分比率
が更新される。以下同様にD社、C社に振り分けられ
る。5枚目の外れかんばんの発生時には振分比率の比較
が可能であり、振分比率が最も小さなB社に振分先が決
定される。8枚目の外れかんばんの発生時にはB社、D
社の振分比率が最小で同じであるが(比較個数/収容
数)の大きなB社に振分先が決定される。このように、
順次振分先が決定される。例えば、A社のみ10枚の外
れかんばんが発生した場合でも、C社のみ10枚発生し
た場合でも、A社に2枚、B社に5枚、C社に1枚、D
社に2枚の振分が行われ、納入指示比率に側した外れか
んばんの振分が実行され、納入指示が月前半はA社の
み、月後半はC社のみという事態が発生することを回避
することができる。
As shown in FIG. 6, when the first piece of kanban is generated, the distribution ratio is compared. In the case of the first one,
Since the number of comparisons is 0 for all companies, the distribution destination is determined for the company B having the largest delivery instruction ratio, 5 is added to the comparison number of the company B, and the distribution ratio is updated. When the second piece of kanban occurs, a comparison is made between companies A, C, and D with a distribution ratio of 0, and the distribution destination is determined to be the company A with the highest delivery instruction ratio, and the comparison of company A is performed. The number 10 is added, and the distribution ratio is updated. The same applies to D and C companies. At the time of the occurrence of the fifth outlying kanban, the distribution ratio can be compared, and the distribution destination is determined to the company B having the smallest distribution ratio. Company B, D at the time of the 8th outlying kanban
The distribution destination is determined for Company B, which has the same distribution ratio at the minimum but has the same (comparison number / accommodation number). in this way,
The distribution destination is determined sequentially. For example, even if only company A has 10 outbreaks, or if only company C has 10 outbreaks, company A has two, company B has five, company C has one, and company C has one.
The company distributes two sheets and distributes out-of-order kanbans in accordance with the delivery instruction ratio, thereby avoiding the situation where the delivery instruction is only for company A in the first half of the month and only for company C in the second half of the month. can do.

【0007】[0007]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】しかし、従来の複社納
入指示管理方法では、外れかんばんの枚数を基準に納入
指示の振分を行っているため、100個の部品が使用さ
れA社のかんばんが10枚外れた場合も、50個の部品
が使用されB社のかんばんが10枚外れた場合も上述の
ようなかんばん振分が行われ、新たに納入指示される部
品総数は65個になり、実際に生産工程で使用された部
品数が納入指示に反映されず、部品の過不足が発生する
という問題があった。
However, in the conventional multi-company delivery instruction management method, since the delivery instructions are distributed based on the number of out-of-order kanbans, 100 parts are used and the kanban of company A is used. If 10 pieces are missing and 50 pieces are used and 10 pieces of KANBAN of Company B are removed, the kanban distribution is performed as described above, and the total number of parts newly ordered is 65 pieces. However, the number of parts actually used in the production process is not reflected in the delivery instruction, and there is a problem that the number of parts is excessive or insufficient.

【0008】本発明は、このような問題点を解決するこ
とを課題としてなされたものであり、複社納入先に納入
指示を行う場合、納入指示比率に即し、実際に生産工程
で使用された部品数を反映し、納入指示量のばらつきの
少ない効率的な複社納入指示を行うことのできる複社納
入指示管理方法及び複社納入指示管理システムを提供す
ることを目的とする。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention has been made to solve such a problem, and when a delivery instruction is given to a multi-company delivery destination, the delivery instruction ratio is actually used in the production process in accordance with the delivery instruction ratio. It is an object of the present invention to provide a multi-company delivery instruction management method and a multi-company delivery instruction management system capable of giving an efficient multi-company delivery instruction with less variation in the delivery instruction amount by reflecting the number of parts.

【0009】[0009]

【課題を解決するための手段】このような目的を達成す
るために、本発明の複社納入指示管理方法は、複数の部
品工場に所定の納入指示比率に従って同種部品の納入指
示をコンピュータにより行う複社納入指示管理方法であ
って、前記コンピュータの記憶部には、複数の部品工場
に対する納入に関する納入指示データを格納した複社納
入指示マスタファイルと、少なくとも複社納入指示可能
な部品工場のグループと納入タイミング指示カードとを
関連付けた納入タイミング指示カードマスタファイル
と、納入タイミング指示カードから読み取られた記載内
容を格納する納入タイミング指示カード読取実績ファイ
ルと、を含み、前記コンピュータは、部品の消費に基づ
いて提供され、複数個の部品を1グループとして納入す
るタイミングを指示する前記納入タイミング指示カード
読み取り前記納入タイミング指示カード読取実績ファ
イルに格納するカード読取りステップと、読み取った納
入タイミング指示カードの中から複数社に振分納入指示
可能な納入タイミング指示カードを前記複社納入指示マ
スタファイルに基づき選択するカード選択ステップと、
選択された納入タイミング指示カードに記載された納入
予定部品個数を納入タイミング指示カード読取実績ファ
イルを用いて認識する部品個数認識ステップと、今回納
入予定の納入予定部品個数から前回納入指示における余
剰個数を減算し必要部品個数を算出する必要個数算出ス
テップと、前記複社納入指示マスタファイルに格納され
た納入指示データを用いて、各社納入指示比率に基づく
出現傾向値を基本とする更新可能な納入指示傾向値群を
算出する傾向算出ステップと、前記必要部品個数が0よ
り大きい時に、納入指示傾向値群の中で最大のものを納
入指示先とする納入指示先決定ステップと、必要部品個
数から前記納入指示先決定ステップで決定した納入指示
先の決定済み部品個数を減算し、必要部品個数を更新す
る必要個数更新ステップと、前記納入指示傾向値群のそ
れぞれに出現傾向値を加算し、前記納入指示先決定ステ
ップで決定された納入指示先の納入指示傾向値から出現
傾向値の総和を減算して新たな納入指示傾向値群とする
傾向値群更新ステップと、納入指示先決定ステップと必
要個数更新ステップと傾向値群更新ステップとを繰り返
し行い前記複社納入指示マスタファイルの更新を行う
返しステップと、前記必要部品個数が0以下になり、か
つ所定の納入指示タイミングになったら納入指示先決定
ステップで決定した納入指示先に納入指示する納入指示
ステップの各ステップを実行し、前記コンピュータによ
って、各社納入指示比率と必要部品個数とに基づいて納
入指示先を決定することを特徴とする。
In order to achieve the above object, a multi-company delivery instruction management method of the present invention provides a computer with instructions for delivery of the same kind of parts to a plurality of parts factories according to a predetermined delivery instruction ratio. A method for managing a multi-company delivery instruction, wherein a storage unit of the computer includes a plurality of component factories.
-Company delivery that stores delivery instruction data related to delivery to
Input instruction master file and at least multi-company delivery instruction possible
Parts factory group and delivery timing instruction card
Delivery Timing Instruction Card Master File Associated
And the description read from the delivery timing instruction card
Delivery timing instruction card reading record file
Wherein Le and, wherein the computer is provided on the basis of the consumption of components, read the delivery timing instruction card reading the delivery timing indication card to indicate the timing for delivery a plurality of components as a group record file
And a delivery timing instruction card which can be distributed and delivered to a plurality of companies from the read delivery timing instruction cards .
A card selection step of selecting based on the star file ,
Read the delivery timing instruction card reading results file
A part number recognition step of recognizing using the file, a necessary number calculation step of subtracting the surplus number in the previous delivery instruction from the number of parts scheduled to be delivered this time to calculate the required number of parts, and Stored
Calculating a renewable delivery instruction tendency value group based on an appearance tendency value based on each company's delivery instruction ratio , using the delivery instruction data obtained, and providing the delivery instruction tendency when the required number of parts is greater than zero. The delivery instruction destination determining step in which the largest one of the value groups is the delivery instruction destination, and the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined in the delivery instruction destination determination step is subtracted from the required number of parts to determine the required number of parts. The required quantity updating step to be updated and the appearance tendency value are added to each of the delivery instruction tendency value groups, and the sum of the appearance tendency values is subtracted from the delivery instruction tendency value of the delivery instruction destination determined in the delivery instruction destination determination step. a trend value group updating step of a new delivery instructions trend value group, have repeatedly rows and delivery instructions destination determining step and the required number updating step and trend value group updating step the Fukusha paid by And Repetitive <br/>-back step to update the instruction master file, the necessary parts number is 0 or less, and to deliver instructions to the delivery instructions destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determining step if reaches a predetermined delivery command timing Execute each step of the delivery instruction step , and execute
Thus, the delivery instruction destination is determined based on the delivery instruction ratio of each company and the required number of parts.

【0010】また、本発明の複社納入指示管理システム
は、複数の部品工場に所定の納入指示比率に従って同種
部品の納入指示を行う複社納入指示管理システムであっ
て、部品の消費に基づいて提供され、複数個の部品を1
グループとして納入するタイミングを指示する納入タイ
ミング指示カードを読み取るカード読取り手段と、読み
取った納入タイミング指示カードの中から複数社に振分
納入指示可能な納入タイミング指示カードを選択するカ
ード選択手段と、選択された納入タイミング指示カード
に記載された納入予定部品個数を認識する部品個数認識
手段と、今回納入予定の納入予定部品個数から前回納入
指示における余剰個数を減算し必要部品個数を算出する
必要個数算出手段と、各社納入指示比率に基づく出現傾
向値を基本とする更新可能な納入指示傾向値群を算出す
る傾向算出手段と、納入指示傾向値群の中で最大のもの
を納入指示先とする納入指示先決定手段と、前記必要部
品個数から前記納入指示先決定手段で決定した納入指示
先の決定済み部品個数を減算し、必要部品個数を更新す
る必要個数更新手段と、必要部品個数が0より大きい時
に、納入指示傾向値群の中で最大のものを納入指示先と
する納入指示先決定手段と、必要部品個数から前記納入
指示先決定手段で決定した納入指示先の決定済み部品個
数を減算し、必要部品個数を更新する必要個数更新手段
と、前記納入指示傾向値群のそれぞれに出現傾向値を加
算し、前記納入指示先決定手段で決定された納入指示先
の納入指示傾向値から出現傾向値の総和を減算して新た
な納入指示傾向値群とする傾向値群更新手段と、納入指
示先決定手段と必要個数更新手段と傾向値群更新手段と
における処理を繰り返し行う繰返し手段と、前記必要部
品個数が0以下になり、かつ所定の納入指示タイミング
になったら納入指示先決定手段が決定した納入指示先に
納入指示する納入指示手段と、を含み、各社納入指示比
率と必要部品個数とに基づいて納入指示先を決定するこ
とを特徴とする。
Further, the multi-company delivery instruction management system of the present invention is a multi-company delivery instruction management system for issuing a delivery instruction of the same kind of parts to a plurality of parts factories in accordance with a predetermined delivery instruction ratio. Provided, multiple parts
Card reading means for reading a delivery timing instruction card for instructing the timing of delivery as a group, card selection means for selecting a delivery timing instruction card that can be distributed to multiple companies from among the read delivery timing instruction cards, and selection Part number recognition means for recognizing the number of parts to be delivered described in the delivered delivery timing instruction card, and the required number of parts to calculate the required number of parts by subtracting the surplus number in the previous delivery instruction from the number of parts to be delivered this time Means, a tendency calculating means for calculating a renewable delivery instruction tendency value group based on an appearance tendency value based on each company delivery instruction ratio, and a delivery to which a delivery instruction destination is the largest among the delivery instruction tendency value groups Instruction destination determining means and determined parts of the delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determining means from the required number of parts A required number updating means for subtracting the number and updating the required number of parts; a delivery instruction destination determining means for setting the largest one of the delivery instruction tendency value groups to the delivery instruction destination when the required number of parts is larger than 0; Subtract the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determination means from the required number of parts, and update the required number of parts by the required number updating means, and update the appearance tendency value to each of the delivery instruction tendency value groups. A tendency value group updating means for adding and subtracting the sum of the appearance tendency values from the delivery instruction tendency value of the delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determining means to form a new delivery instruction tendency value group; The repetition means for repeating the processing in the determination means, the required quantity update means and the tendency value group update means, and the delivery instruction destination determination means when the required number of parts becomes 0 or less and a predetermined delivery instruction timing comes. Was includes a delivery instruction means for delivery instructing the delivery pointee, a, and determines the delivery instruction destination based on the company delivery instruction proportions and necessary parts number.

【0011】[0011]

【作用】本発明における複社納入指示管理方法及び複社
納入指示管理システムの構成によれば、部品消費に伴っ
て提供される納入タイミング指示カードの内容を読み取
り、その中から複数社に振分納入指示可能な納入タイミ
ング指示カードを選択し、選択された納入タイミング指
示カードに記載された納入予定部品個数を認識する。そ
して、今回納入予定部品個数から前回納入指示における
余剰部品個数を減算し、今回の納入で実際必要とされる
必要部品個数を算出する。一方、各社納入指示比率に基
づく出現傾向値を基本とする更新可能な納入指示傾向値
群を算出し、必要部品個数が0より大きい場合、前記納
入指示傾向値群の中で最大のものを納入指示先として決
定する。次に、必要部品個数から先に決定した納入指示
先の決定済み部品個数を減算し、必要部品個数を更新す
ると共に、前記納入指示傾向値群のそれぞれに出現傾向
値を加算し、先に決定された納入指示先の納入指示傾向
値から出現傾向値の総和を減算して新たな納入指示傾向
値群とする。そして、更新された納入指示傾向値群に基
づいて、納入指示先決定処理と必要個数更新処理と傾向
値群更新処理とを繰り返し実行し納入指示先を順次決定
していく。そして、前記必要部品個数が0以下になり、
かつ、所定の納入タイミングになったら、既に決定され
た納入指示先に部品の納入指示を行う。従って、部品消
費に伴って提供される納入タイミング指示カードに記載
された部品数に基づく必要部品個数と各社納入指示比率
とに応じて納入指示先が決定され、部品納入指示の偏り
や極端な部品納入指示量の過不足を防止することができ
る。
According to the multi-company delivery instruction management method and the multi-company delivery instruction management system of the present invention, the contents of the delivery timing instruction card provided with the consumption of parts are read and distributed to a plurality of companies. A delivery timing instruction card that can be delivered is selected, and the number of parts to be delivered described in the selected delivery timing instruction card is recognized. Then, the number of surplus parts in the previous delivery instruction is subtracted from the number of parts to be delivered this time, and the number of parts actually required in this delivery is calculated. On the other hand, a renewable delivery instruction tendency value group based on the appearance tendency value based on each company delivery instruction ratio is calculated, and if the required number of parts is greater than 0, the largest one of the delivery instruction tendency value groups is delivered. Determined as the instruction destination. Next, the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined earlier is subtracted from the required number of parts, the required number of parts is updated, and the appearance tendency value is added to each of the delivery instruction tendency value groups, and the number is determined first. Then, the sum of the appearance tendency values is subtracted from the delivery instruction tendency value of the delivery instruction destination, thereby obtaining a new delivery instruction tendency value group. Then, based on the updated delivery instruction tendency value group, the delivery instruction destination determination process, the required number update process, and the tendency value group update process are repeatedly executed to sequentially determine the delivery instruction destination. And the required number of parts becomes 0 or less,
Further, when the predetermined delivery timing comes, the delivery instruction of the parts is performed to the delivery destination already determined. Therefore, the delivery instruction destination is determined according to the required number of parts based on the number of parts described in the delivery timing instruction card provided with the parts consumption and the ratio of each company's delivery instruction. Excess or deficiency of the delivery instruction amount can be prevented.

【0012】[0012]

【実施例】以下、本発明の好適な実施例を図面に基づき
説明する。
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.

【0013】本実施例で使用する納入タイミング指示カ
ード(以下、「かんばん」という)は納入指示先(部品
工場)、納入先(生産工場)、品名、品番、後述するか
んばんサイクルや収容数等の部品調達に関する情報が全
て記載されたたシート状のもので、部品工場はこのかん
ばんに従って納品準備を行い、部品と共にかんばんを部
品運搬箱等に付して納入する。そして、生産工程で部品
が使用されると前記かんばんは部品運搬箱等から外さ
れ、複社納入指示処理の入力情報シートとなる。
The delivery timing instruction card (hereinafter, referred to as “kanban”) used in the present embodiment includes a delivery instruction destination (parts factory), a delivery destination (production factory), a product name, a product number, a kanban cycle described later, a number to be accommodated, and the like. The parts factory prepares the delivery in accordance with the kanban, and delivers the kanban together with the parts to a parts transport box or the like. When the parts are used in the production process, the kanban is removed from the parts transport box or the like and becomes the input information sheet for the multi-company delivery instruction processing.

【0014】図1はコンピュータの処理により実現され
複社納入指示管理システムの構成を説明する説明図で
あり、この管理システムには、部品工場毎の生産能力や
納品サイクル等のデータや複社納入指示処理を行う場合
の処理テーブルとなる複社納入指示ファイル(後述す
る)を格納している複社納入指示マスタ10、納入指示
を実際に行うかんばん2の様式(例えば、部品の品番の
種類や収容数に関するデータ)や複社納入指示可能なか
んばん2のグループ等のデータが格納されているかんば
んマスタ12が設けられている。複社納入指示マスタ1
0やかんばんマスタ12は複社納入指示対象部品のデー
タが追加されるごとに更新可能なデータベースである。
また、前記管理システムには、部品が使用され部品運搬
箱等から外されたかんばん2、いわゆる「外れかんば
ん」に基づいて入力される入力情報や複社納入指示処理
が完了し、新たなかんばん2を作成する際に提供する出
力情報等を格納するかんばん読取実績ファイル14が設
けられている。
FIG. 1 is realized by computer processing .
That Fukusha an explanatory diagram for explaining a configuration of a delivery instruction management system, double this in the management system, which is a processing table for performing data or Fukusha delivery instruction processing such as production capacity and delivery cycle for each parts plant A multi-company delivery instruction master 10 that stores a company delivery instruction file (to be described later), a kanban 2 format that actually performs the delivery instruction (for example, data on the part number type and the number of parts to be stored), and a multi-company delivery instruction is possible. A kanban master 12 in which data such as the group of the kanban 2 is stored is provided. Multi-company delivery instruction master 1
The zero and kanban master 12 is a database that can be updated each time data of a part to be instructed to be delivered by multiple companies is added.
Further, in the management system, the input information input based on the kanban 2 in which the part is used and removed from the parts transport box or the like, that is, the so-called “outside kanban” and the multi-company delivery instruction processing are completed, and the new kanban 2 is completed. A kanban reading result file 14 is provided for storing output information and the like provided when creating a.

【0015】図2に前記複社納入指示マスタ10内の複
社納入指示ファイル16の一例を示す。複社納入指示フ
ァイル16は、複数社に納入指示可能な同種類の部品
(部品工場毎に品番が異なり、形状やスペックが多少異
なるが同一部品として使用可能で、納入指示先を問わな
い部品)が1グループとしてまとめられ、「納入指示
先」、「収容数」、「かんばん回転枚数」、「かんばん
サイクル」、「納入指示比率」、「出現傾向値」、「納
入指示傾向値」、「納入余剰」、「必要部品個数」、
「振分枚数」等が記載されている。前記納入指示先はA
社、B社、C社、D社等の部品工場を示し、収容数は1
枚のかんばん2で納品される部品の個数を示す。また、
かんばん回転枚数は納入指示先と納入先とを循環してい
るかんばん枚数を示し、かんばんサイクルはかんばんの
機能を示すものである。かんばんサイクルa−b−cの
場合、a日間にb回の納入指示があり、納入指示から数
えてc便後の荷物で部品が納品されることを示す。前記
かんばん回転枚数Mは以下の式で算出することができ
る。
FIG. 2 shows an example of the multi-company delivery instruction file 16 in the multi-company delivery instruction master 10. The multi-company delivery instruction file 16 is of the same type of parts that can be delivered to multiple companies (part numbers differ for each part factory, shapes and specifications are slightly different, but they can be used as the same part, regardless of the delivery destination) Are grouped together as a group, and the "delivery instruction destination", "accommodation number", "kanban number of rotations", "kanban cycle", "delivery instruction ratio", "appearance tendency value", "delivery instruction tendency value", "delivery instruction value""Surplus","necessary number of parts",
"Distribution number" and the like are described. The delivery instruction destination is A
Shows the parts factories of Company B, Company C, Company D, etc.
The number of parts to be delivered in one kanban 2 is shown. Also,
The number of kanban rotations indicates the number of kanbans circulating between the delivery destination and the delivery destination, and the kanban cycle indicates the function of the kanban. In the case of the kanban cycle abc, it indicates that there are b delivery instructions in a day a, and that parts are delivered after the c flight counted from the delivery instruction. The kanban rotation number M can be calculated by the following equation.

【0016】 M={N・h/m}・{a(c+1)/b} ・・・(式1) ここで、Nは日当たり必要数、hは日当たり必要数に対
する比率設定であり、N個の日当たり必要数の内、h%
を特定の部品工場に対して納入指示することを意味す
る。また、mは部品の収容数である。なお、日当たり必
要数Nや比較設定h等は所定期間、例えば1か月毎に作
成される生産計画に基づいて決められる値であり、上記
(式1)で(c+1)としたのは、部品がc便後に納品
されるが納品場所から実際に部品が使用されるライン側
に運搬されるまでのリードタイムを考慮して(c+1)
としたものである。
M = {N · h / m} · {a (c + 1) / b} (Equation 1) Here, N is a required number per day, h is a ratio setting to the required number per day, and N is set. H% of the required number per day
Means delivery to a specific parts factory. M is the number of stored parts. The required number N per day, the comparison setting h, and the like are values determined based on a production plan created every predetermined period, for example, every month. Is delivered after c flights, but taking into account the lead time from the delivery location to the line where the parts are actually used (c + 1)
It is what it was.

【0017】また、1日当たり所定の部品工場に納入指
示のために発行されるかんばん枚数の比率を表す納入指
示比率Hは、以下の式で算出することができる。
The delivery instruction ratio H representing the ratio of the number of kanbans issued per day to a predetermined parts factory for delivery instructions can be calculated by the following equation.

【0018】 H=N・h/m =M・b/{a(c+1)} ・・・(式2) 出現傾向値は納入指示先グループにおいて総和が1に成
るように納入指示比率の表現を変えたものであり、納入
指示傾向値は1枚のかんばんが振分けられる毎に出現傾
向値に基づいて更新可能な値であって、この納入指示傾
向値の最も大きい部品工場にかんばん2が振分けられ
る。なお、納入指示傾向値の総和も常に1に成るように
更新される。納入余剰は1回前の納入で余分に納入指示
した部品個数であり、通常、部品の欠品を防ぐために、
納入余剰≧0に成るように納入調整が行われる。また、
必要部品個数は納入余剰を考慮して現在納入が必要とさ
れている部品個数を表すものであり、振分枚数は納入指
示先グループにおいて最終的な納入指示振分け状態を示
すものである。
H = N · h / m = M · b / {a (c + 1)} (Equation 2) The appearance tendency value represents the expression of the delivery instruction ratio such that the sum total becomes 1 in the delivery instruction destination group. The delivery instruction tendency value is a value that can be updated based on the appearance tendency value each time one kanban is assigned, and the kanban 2 is assigned to the parts factory having the largest delivery instruction tendency value. . Note that the sum of the delivery instruction tendency values is also updated so as to always be 1. Delivery surplus is the number of parts that were ordered to be delivered extra in the previous delivery. Usually, to prevent parts shortages,
Delivery adjustment is performed so that the delivery surplus ≧ 0. Also,
The required number of parts indicates the number of parts currently required to be delivered in consideration of the surplus of delivery, and the number of distributions indicates the final delivery instruction distribution state in the delivery destination group.

【0019】以下、図3のフローチャート及び図4の処
理テーブル、図2、図5の複社納入指示ファイルを用い
て実際の複社納入指示管理システムを説明する。
An actual multi-company delivery instruction management system will be described below using the flowchart of FIG. 3, the processing table of FIG. 4, and the multi-company delivery instruction file of FIGS.

【0020】図3(a)のメインフローチャートに示す
ように工場の生産工程で部品が使用され、外れかんばん
2が発生すると、順次、システムは前記外れかんばん2
に記載されている各種データを読取り前記かんばん読取
実績ファイル14に保管する(S1:カード読取りステ
ップ)。前記かんばん2には各種データが表示されると
共に、同一のデータがバーコード等の記号でも表示さ
れ、これを読取り装置で読取ることによって容易に認識
することができる。また、外れかんばん2の読取りは、
外れかんばんの発生毎に行っても、所定時間毎にまとめ
て行ってもよい。実際に振分け処理が始まると、読み取
ったかんばん2の中から複数社に振分納入指示可能なか
んばん2が選択され、複社納入指示の対象となるかんば
ん枚数を確定する(S2:カード選択ステップ)。
As shown in the main flowchart of FIG. 3A, when a part is used in a production process of a factory and a departure kanban 2 occurs, the system sequentially operates the departure kanban 2.
Are read and stored in the kanban reading record file 14 (S1: card reading step). Various data are displayed on the kanban 2 and the same data is also displayed by a symbol such as a bar code, which can be easily recognized by reading it with a reading device. In addition, reading of Kanban 2
It may be carried out every time an outlying kanban occurs or may be carried out collectively every predetermined time. When the sorting process is actually started, the kanbans 2 which can be distributed and delivered to a plurality of companies are selected from the read kanbans 2 and the number of kanbans for which the multi-company delivery is to be instructed is determined (S2: card selection step). .

【0021】次に、確定したかんばん2が含まれる複社
納入指示可能グループをかんばんマスタ12から検索し
(S3)、検索した複社納入指示可能グループに対応す
る複社納入指示ファイル16を複社納入指示マスタ10
から読み込む(S4)。そして、前記カード選択ステッ
プ(S2)で選択されたかんばん2に記載された部品個
数の総数、すなわち納入予定部品個数の算出を行う(S
5:部品個数認識ステップ)。例えば、生産計画の変更
後初回の振分け処理の場合、収容数10個のA社のかん
ばんが2枚、収容数5個のB社のかんばんが2枚選択さ
れると、納入予定部品個数は30個となる。納入予定部
品個数の算出が完了すると、図3(b)に示す振分計算
サブルーチンに入る(S6)。該振分計算サブルーチン
では、前記納入予定部品個数から前回の納入指示で余分
に納入された部品個数を減算し、実際に納入が必要な部
品数(必要部品個数)を算出する(S6−1:必要個数
算出ステップ)。ただし、初回の納入指示処理の場合納
入余剰は0である。次に、必要部品個数が0より多いか
否かの判断を行い(S6−2)、0より多い場合、部品
の納入指示先を決定するために各社の納入指示傾向値の
比較を行う。1枚目のかんばん2の振分先を決める場
合、納入指示傾向値は納入指示比率に基づく出現傾向値
をそのまま使用し(傾向算出ステップ)、各社の納入指
示傾向値によって納入指示傾向値群を形成する。例え
ば、1枚目のかんばん2の振分先決定に使用される納入
指示傾向値群は図4の(第1群)に示す0.36,0.
43,0.07,0.14である。この納入指示傾向群
の中で最大の納入指示傾向値の部品工場、すなわち納入
指示傾向値0.43のB社にかんばん2を1枚振分け、
B社の振分枚数を更新する(S6−3:納入指示先決定
ステップ)。
Next, a kanban master 12 is searched for a multi-company delivery instruction possible group including the determined kanban 2 (S3), and a multi-company delivery instruction file 16 corresponding to the retrieved multi-company delivery instruction possible group is searched for by the multi-company delivery. Delivery instruction master 10
(S4). Then, the total number of parts described in the kanban 2 selected in the card selecting step (S2), that is, the number of parts to be delivered is calculated (S2).
5: part number recognition step). For example, in the case of the first sorting process after the change of the production plan, if two kanbans of company A with a capacity of 10 are selected and two kanbans of company B with a capacity of 5 are selected, the number of parts to be delivered is 30. Individual. When the calculation of the number of parts to be delivered is completed, a distribution calculation subroutine shown in FIG. 3B is entered (S6). In the distribution calculation subroutine, the number of parts additionally delivered in the previous delivery instruction is subtracted from the number of parts to be delivered, and the number of parts actually required to be delivered (the number of required parts) is calculated (S6-1: Required number calculation step). However, in the case of the first delivery instruction processing, the delivery surplus is zero. Next, it is determined whether or not the required number of parts is larger than 0 (S6-2). If it is larger than 0, the delivery instruction tendency values of the respective companies are compared to determine the parts delivery instruction destination. When determining the distribution destination of the first kanban 2, the delivery instruction tendency value uses the appearance tendency value based on the delivery instruction ratio as it is (trend calculation step), and the delivery instruction tendency value group is determined by the delivery instruction tendency value of each company. Form. For example, the delivery instruction tendency value group used to determine the distribution destination of the first kanban 2 is 0.36,0 .0 shown in (first group) in FIG.
43, 0.07, and 0.14. One kanban 2 is sorted to the parts factory having the largest delivery instruction tendency value among the delivery instruction tendency groups, that is, Company B having the delivery instruction tendency value of 0.43.
The distribution number of the company B is updated (S6-3: delivery instruction destination determination step).

【0022】かんばん2の振分け先が決定した後、各納
入指示傾向値にそれぞれの出現傾向値を加算すると共
に、前記納入指示先決定ステップで決定された部品工場
(B社)の納入指示傾向値から出現傾向値の総和、すな
わち1を減算して新たな納入指示傾向値群とする(S6
−4:傾向値群更新ステップ)。つまり、図4の(第2
群)に示す0.72,−0.14,0.14,0.28
が新たな納入指示傾向値群となる。また、前記必要部品
個数から前記納入指示先決定ステップで決定した納入指
示先(B社)の決定済み部品個数を減算し、新たな必要
部品個数とする(S6−5:必要個数更新ステップ)。
すなわち、新たな必要部品個数は25個となる。そし
て、(S6−2)に戻って、必要部品個数が0より多い
か否かの判断を行い、納入指示先決定ステップ(S6−
3)、傾向値群更新ステップ(S6−4)、必要個数更
新ステップ(S6−5)を実行し、順次かんばん2の振
分け先を決定し、必要部品個数が0以下に成るまで繰り
返す(S6−2〜S6−5:繰り返しステップ)。
After the distribution destination of the kanban 2 is determined, each appearance tendency value is added to each delivery instruction tendency value, and the delivery instruction tendency value of the parts factory (company B) determined in the delivery instruction destination determination step is determined. Is subtracted from the total, ie, 1 to obtain a new delivery instruction tendency value group (S6).
-4: trend value group updating step). That is, (second
0.72, -0.14, 0.14, 0.28
Becomes a new delivery instruction tendency value group. Further, the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination (company B) determined in the delivery instruction destination determination step is subtracted from the required number of parts to obtain a new required number of parts (S6-5: required number update step).
That is, the new required number of parts is 25. Then, returning to (S6-2), it is determined whether or not the required number of parts is greater than 0, and the delivery instruction destination determination step (S6-
3) Execute the tendency value group updating step (S6-4) and the required number updating step (S6-5), determine the allocation destination of the kanban 2 sequentially, and repeat until the required number of parts becomes 0 or less (S6- 2 to S6-5: repeated steps).

【0023】必要部品個数が0以下、つまり、納入指示
量が所望の数だけ行われたか、所望の数より多くなった
場合、納入余剰として認識され、複社納入指示ファイル
16の納入余剰のデータが更新される(S6−6)。本
実施例の場合、4枚目のかんばん振分け時点で、納入指
示個数は25個であり、残り5個の納入指示が必要にな
る。そこで、(S6−2〜S6−5)の繰り返しステッ
プを実行すると、(第5群)に示すように、A社にかん
ばん振分けが行われ、10個の納入指示が行われる。従
って、35個の納入指示が行われたことになり、5個の
納入余剰が発生し、複社納入指示ファイル16の納入余
剰のデータが次回の複社納入指示処理に備えて更新され
る。このときの複社納入指示ファイル16が図5(a)
である。納入余剰の更新が実行されると振分計算サブル
ーチンは終了し、図3(a)のメインフローチャートに
戻り、今回の複社納入指示処理のかんばんの振分け結果
の基づいて、かんばん実績ファイル14の書き替えを行
い(S7)、1回目の複社納入指示処理を終了する。そ
の後、所定の納入指示タイミングが来たら各部品工場に
対して振分けられたかんばんに基づいて納入指示を行う
(納入指示ステップ)。
When the required number of parts is 0 or less, that is, when the delivery instruction amount is performed by a desired number or exceeds the desired number, it is recognized as a delivery surplus, and the delivery surplus data of the multi-company delivery instruction file 16 is recognized. Is updated (S6-6). In the case of this embodiment, the number of delivery instructions is 25 at the time of distribution of the fourth kanban, and the remaining five delivery instructions are required. Then, when the repetition steps of (S6-2 to S6-5) are executed, as shown in (fifth group), kanban distribution is performed to Company A, and ten delivery instructions are performed. Therefore, 35 delivery instructions have been issued, and five delivery surpluses are generated, and the data on the surplus delivery in the multi-company delivery instruction file 16 is updated in preparation for the next multi-company delivery instruction process. FIG. 5A shows the multi-company delivery instruction file 16 at this time.
It is. When the delivery surplus is updated, the distribution calculation subroutine ends, and the process returns to the main flowchart of FIG. 3A, and the kanban result file 14 is written based on the kanban distribution result of the present multi-company delivery instruction processing. Is performed (S7), and the first double-company delivery instruction process ends. After that, when a predetermined delivery instruction timing comes, a delivery instruction is issued to each parts factory based on the distributed kanban (delivery instruction step).

【0024】また、1回目の複社納入指示処理の後、新
たに収容数10個のA社のかんばんが1枚、収容数5個
のB社のかんばんが2枚、収容数5個のD社のかんばん
が1枚選択され(S2)、前記(S3〜S4)を経て、
前述した複社納入指示ファイル16が読み込まれ、かん
ばん振分け処理が開始されると、納入予定部品個数は2
5個となり(S5)、振分け計算サブルーチン(S6)
が実行される。1回目の複社納入指示処理で納入余剰が
5個あるので、必要個数算出ステップ(S6−1)で
は、納入予定部品個数25個から納入余剰5個が減算さ
れ、実際に納入指示が必要な必要部品個数20個が算出
される。
After the first multi-company delivery instruction processing, one new kanban of Company A with 10 accommodations, two Kanbans of Company B with 5 accommodations, and a new kanban of 5 Company B One kanban from the company is selected (S2), and through (S3 to S4),
When the multi-company delivery instruction file 16 described above is read and the kanban distribution process is started, the number of parts to be delivered becomes two.
There are five (S5), and the assignment calculation subroutine (S6)
Is executed. In the first multi-company delivery instruction process, there are five delivery surpluses, so in the required number calculation step (S6-1), five delivery surpluses are subtracted from 25 parts to be delivered, and the actual delivery instruction is required. The required number of parts 20 is calculated.

【0025】以下、1回目の複社納入指示処理と同様に
必要部品個数が0以下に成るまでかんばん2の振分を行
う。2回目の複社納入指示処理の結果を示す複社納入指
示ファイル16が図5(b)である。なお、図5(b)
は1回目の複社納入指示処理で各社に納入指示が出さ
れ、かんばんの振分枚数は2回目の複社納入指示処理の
結果のみを示したものである。1回目で納入指示が出さ
れなかった場合は振分枚数は1回目の結果に2回目の結
果が加算されて表示される。以下、前述と同様に、かん
ばん実績ファイル14の書き換えが行われ、納入指示ま
たは3回目の複社納入指示処理開始を待つ。
In the same manner as in the first multi-company delivery instruction processing, the distribution of the kanbans 2 is performed until the required number of components becomes 0 or less. FIG. 5B shows a multi-company delivery instruction file 16 showing the result of the second multi-company delivery instruction process. In addition, FIG.
In the first multi-company delivery instruction process, a delivery instruction is issued to each company, and the number of kanbans to be distributed shows only the result of the second multi-company delivery instruction process. If the delivery instruction is not issued in the first time, the number of sorted sheets is displayed by adding the result of the second time to the result of the first time. Thereafter, the kanban performance file 14 is rewritten in the same manner as described above, and waits for the delivery instruction or the start of the third multi-company delivery instruction processing.

【0026】このように、本実施例においては、部品消
費に伴って提供される納入タイミング指示カードに記載
された部品数に基づく必要部品個数と各社納入指示比率
とに応じて納入指示先が決定され、部品納入指示の偏り
や極端な部品の納入指示量の過不足を防止することがで
きる。
As described above, in this embodiment, the delivery instruction destination is determined in accordance with the required number of parts based on the number of parts described in the delivery timing instruction card provided with the consumption of parts and the ratio of each company's delivery instruction. In addition, it is possible to prevent a bias in parts delivery instructions and an excessively short or excessive amount of parts delivery instructions.

【0027】[0027]

【発明の効果】以上説明したように、本発明における複
社納入指示管理方法及び複社納入指示管理システムの構
成によれば、部品消費に伴って提供される納入タイミン
グ指示カードの内容を読み取り、その中から複数社に振
分納入指示可能な納入タイミング指示カードを選択し、
選択された納入タイミング指示カードに記載された納入
予定部品個数を認識する。そして、今回納入予定部品個
数から前回納入指示における余剰部品個数を減算し、今
回の納入で実際必要とされる必要部品個数を算出する。
一方、各社納入指示比率に基づく出現傾向値を基本とす
る更新可能な納入指示傾向値群を算出し、必要部品個数
が0より大きい場合、前記納入指示傾向値群の中で最大
のものを納入指示先として決定する。次に、必要部品個
数から先に決定した納入指示先の決定済み部品個数を減
算し、必要部品個数を更新すると共に、前記納入指示傾
向値群のそれぞれに出現傾向値を加算し、先に決定され
た納入指示先の納入指示傾向値から出現傾向値の総和を
減算して新たな納入指示傾向値群とする。そして、更新
された納入指示傾向値群に基づいて、納入指示先決定処
理と必要個数更新処理と傾向値群更新処理とを繰り返し
実行し納入指示先を順次決定していく。そして、前記必
要部品個数が0以下になり、かつ、所定の納入タイミン
グになったら、既に決定された納入指示先に部品の納入
指示を行う。従って、部品消費に伴って提供される納入
タイミング指示カードに記載された部品数に基づく必要
部品個数と各社納入指示比率とに応じて納入指示先が決
定され、部品納入指示の偏りや極端な部品納入指示量の
過不足を防止し、効率的な部品の納入指示を行うことが
できる。
As described above, according to the multi-company delivery instruction management method and the configuration of the multi-company delivery instruction management system of the present invention, the contents of the delivery timing instruction card provided with the consumption of parts are read. From among them, select a delivery timing instruction card that can direct distribution delivery to multiple companies,
The number of parts to be delivered described in the selected delivery timing instruction card is recognized. Then, the number of surplus parts in the previous delivery instruction is subtracted from the number of parts to be delivered this time, and the number of parts actually required in this delivery is calculated.
On the other hand, a renewable delivery instruction tendency value group based on the appearance tendency value based on each company delivery instruction ratio is calculated, and if the required number of parts is greater than 0, the largest one of the delivery instruction tendency value groups is delivered. Determined as the instruction destination. Next, the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined earlier is subtracted from the required number of parts, the required number of parts is updated, and the appearance tendency value is added to each of the delivery instruction tendency value groups, and the number is determined first. Then, the sum of the appearance tendency values is subtracted from the delivery instruction tendency value of the delivery instruction destination, thereby obtaining a new delivery instruction tendency value group. Then, based on the updated delivery instruction tendency value group, the delivery instruction destination determination process, the required number update process, and the tendency value group update process are repeatedly executed to sequentially determine the delivery instruction destination. Then, when the required number of parts becomes 0 or less and a predetermined delivery timing comes, the delivery instruction of the parts is performed to the delivery instruction destination which has been determined. Therefore, the delivery instruction destination is determined according to the required number of parts based on the number of parts described in the delivery timing instruction card provided with the parts consumption and the ratio of each company's delivery instruction. It is possible to prevent excess or deficiency of the delivery instruction amount and to efficiently issue the delivery instruction of the parts.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明に係る複社納入指示管理方法の複社納入
指示管理システムの構成を説明する説明図である。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram illustrating the configuration of a multiple company delivery instruction management system of a multiple company delivery instruction management method according to the present invention.

【図2】本発明に係る複社納入指示管理方法及び管理シ
ステムに使用する複社納入指示ファイルの一例である。
FIG. 2 is an example of a multi-company delivery instruction file used in the multi-company delivery instruction management method and management system according to the present invention.

【図3】本発明に係る複社納入指示管理方法及び管理シ
ステムの複社納入指示処理を説明するフローチャートで
ある。
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a multi-company delivery instruction process of the multi-company delivery instruction management method and the management system according to the present invention.

【図4】本発明に係る複社納入指示管理方法及び管理シ
ステムの複社納入指示処理に使用する処理テーブルの一
例を説明する説明図である。
FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a processing table used for a multi-company delivery instruction process of the management method and the multi-company delivery instruction management method according to the present invention.

【図5】本発明に係る複社納入指示管理方法及び管理シ
ステムに使用する複社納入指示ファイルの複社納入指示
処理後の状態を説明する説明図である。
FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram for explaining a state after the multi-company delivery instruction processing of the multi-company delivery instruction file used in the multi-company delivery instruction management method and the management system according to the present invention.

【図6】従来の複社納入指示管理方法の処理テーブルを
説明する説明図である。
FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram illustrating a processing table of a conventional multi-company delivery instruction management method.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

2 かんばん、外れかんばん 10 複社納入指示マスタ 12 かんばんマスタ 14 かんばん実績ファイル 16 複社納入指示ファイル 2 Kanban, off-kanban 10 Multi-company delivery instruction master 12 Kanban master 14 Kanban performance file 16 Multi-company delivery instruction file

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 玉田 秀一 愛知県豊田市トヨタ町1番地 トヨタ自 動車株式会社内 (56)参考文献 特開 平2−262603(JP,A) 特開 平5−89154(JP,A) (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.7,DB名) G06F 17/60 B23Q 41/08 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuation of the front page (72) Inventor Shuichi Tamada 1 Toyota Town, Toyota City, Aichi Prefecture Inside Toyota Motor Corporation (56) References JP-A-2-262603 (JP, A) JP-A-5-89154 (JP, A) (58) Field surveyed (Int. Cl. 7 , DB name) G06F 17/60 B23Q 41/08

Claims (2)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 複数の部品工場に所定の納入指示比率に
従って同種部品の納入指示をコンピュータにより行う複
社納入指示管理方法であって、前記コンピュータの記憶部には、複数の部品工場に対す
る納入に関する納入指示データを格納した複社納入指示
マスタファイルと、少なくとも複社納入指示可能な部品
工場のグループと納入タイミング指示カードとを関連付
けた納入タイミング指示カードマスタファイルと、納入
タイミング指示カードから読み取られた記載内容を格納
する納入タイミング指示カード読取実績ファイルと、を
含み、 前記コンピュータは、 部品の消費に基づいて提供され、複数個の部品を1グル
ープとして納入するタイミングを指示する前記納入タイ
ミング指示カードを読み取り前記納入タイミング指示カ
ード読取実績ファイルに格納するカード読取りステップ
と、 読み取った納入タイミング指示カードの中から複数社に
振分納入指示可能な納入タイミング指示カードを前記複
社納入指示マスタファイルに基づき選択するカード選択
ステップと、 選択された納入タイミング指示カードに記載された納入
予定部品個数を納入タイミング指示カード読取実績ファ
イルを用いて認識する部品個数認識ステップと、 今回納入予定の納入予定部品個数から前回納入指示にお
ける余剰個数を減算し必要部品個数を算出する必要個数
算出ステップと、前記複社納入指示マスタファイルに格納された納入指示
データを用いて、 各社納入指示比率に基づく出現傾向値を基本とする更新
可能な納入指示傾向値群を算出する傾向算出ステップ
と、 前記必要部品個数が0より大きい時に、納入指示傾向値
群の中で最大のものを納入指示先とする納入指示先決定
ステップと、 必要部品個数から前記納入指示先決定ステップで決定し
た納入指示先の決定済み部品個数を減算し、必要部品個
数を更新する必要個数更新ステップと、 前記納入指示傾向値群のそれぞれに出現傾向値を加算
し、前記納入指示先決定ステップで決定された納入指示
先の納入指示傾向値から出現傾向値の総和を減算して新
たな納入指示傾向値群とする傾向値群更新ステップと、 納入指示先決定ステップと必要個数更新ステップと傾向
値群更新ステップとを繰り返し行い前記複社納入指示マ
スタファイルの更新を行う繰返しステップと、 前記必要部品個数が0以下になり、かつ所定の納入指示
タイミングになったら納入指示先決定ステップで決定し
た納入指示先に納入指示する納入指示ステップの各ステ
ップを実行し、 前記コンピュータによって、 各社納入指示比率と必要部
品個数とに基づいて納入指示先を決定することを特徴と
する複社納入指示管理方法。
1. A multi-company delivery instruction management method in which a computer issues a delivery instruction of the same kind to a plurality of parts factories in accordance with a predetermined delivery instruction ratio, wherein a storage unit of the computer stores a plurality of parts factories.
Multi-company delivery instruction that stores delivery instruction data related to delivery
Master file and at least parts that can be ordered for multi-company delivery
Associate factory group with delivery timing instruction card
Delivery timing instruction card master file and delivery
Stores the contents read from the timing instruction card
The delivery timing instruction card reading record file
Wherein said computer is provided on the basis of the consumption of components, the delivery timing instruction card reading the delivery timing indication mosquitoes that instructs when to deliver a plurality of components as a group
Card reading steps and said double multiple company to the distribution delivery steerable delivery timing instruction cards from the delivery timing instruction card read to be stored in the over-de reading record file
Card selection step to select based on the company delivery instruction master file, and the delivery timing instruction card reading result file
A part number recognition step of recognizing using the file, a necessary number calculation step of calculating the required number of parts by subtracting the surplus number in the previous delivery instruction from the number of parts scheduled to be delivered this time, and Stored delivery instructions
A trend calculating step of calculating a renewable delivery instruction tendency value group based on an appearance tendency value based on each company's delivery instruction ratio using the data; and It is necessary to update the number of required parts by subtracting the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined in the step of determining the number of required parts from the number of required parts. A quantity update step, adding an appearance tendency value to each of the delivery instruction tendency value groups, and subtracting a sum of appearance tendency values from the delivery instruction tendency value of the delivery instruction destination determined in the delivery instruction destination determination step to newly generate a trend value group updating step of the Do delivery instruction trend value group, delivery instructions destination determining step and the required number updating step and trend value group updating step and repeat row have the Fukusha delivery instruction Ma a
And a delivery instruction step for instructing the delivery destination determined in the delivery destination determination step when the required number of parts becomes 0 or less and at a predetermined delivery instruction timing.
A delivery instruction destination is determined by the computer based on the delivery instruction ratio of each company and the required number of parts.
【請求項2】 複数の部品工場に所定の納入指示比率に
従って同種部品の納入指示を行う複社納入指示管理シス
テムであって、 部品の消費に基づいて提供され、複数個の部品を1グル
ープとして納入するタイミングを指示する納入タイミン
グ指示カードを読み取るカード読取り手段と、 読み取った納入タイミング指示カードの中から複数社に
振分納入指示可能な納入タイミング指示カードを選択す
るカード選択手段と、 選択された納入タイミング指示カードに記載された納入
予定部品個数を認識する部品個数認識手段と、 今回納入予定の納入予定部品個数から前回納入指示にお
ける余剰個数を減算し必要部品個数を算出する必要個数
算出手段と、 各社納入指示比率に基づく出現傾向値を基本とする更新
可能な納入指示傾向値群を算出する傾向算出手段と、 納入指示傾向値群の中で最大のものを納入指示先とする
納入指示先決定手段と、 前記必要部品個数から前記納入指示先決定手段で決定し
た納入指示先の決定済み部品個数を減算し、必要部品個
数を更新する必要個数更新手段と、 必要部品個数が0より大きい時に、納入指示傾向値群の
中で最大のものを納入指示先とする納入指示先決定手段
と、 必要部品個数から前記納入指示先決定手段で決定した納
入指示先の決定済み部品個数を減算し、必要部品個数を
更新する必要個数更新手段と、 前記納入指示傾向値群のそれぞれに出現傾向値を加算
し、前記納入指示先決定手段で決定された納入指示先の
納入指示傾向値から出現傾向値の総和を減算して新たな
納入指示傾向値群とする傾向値群更新手段と、 納入指示先決定手段と必要個数更新手段と傾向値群更新
手段とにおける処理を繰り返し行う繰返し手段と、 前記必要部品個数が0以下になり、かつ所定の納入指示
タイミングになったら納入指示先決定手段が決定した納
入指示先に納入指示する納入指示手段と、 を含み、 各社納入指示比率と必要部品個数とに基づいて納入指示
先を決定することを特徴とする複社納入指示管理システ
ム。
2. A multi-company delivery instruction management system for issuing a delivery instruction of the same kind of parts to a plurality of parts factories in accordance with a predetermined delivery instruction ratio, wherein the system is provided based on the consumption of parts and a plurality of parts are grouped as one group. A card reading means for reading a delivery timing instruction card for instructing a delivery timing; a card selecting means for selecting a delivery timing instruction card capable of distributing delivery instructions to a plurality of companies from the read delivery timing instruction cards; A part number recognition means for recognizing the number of parts to be delivered described in the delivery timing instruction card, and a necessary number calculating means for calculating the required number of parts by subtracting the surplus number in the previous delivery instruction from the number of parts to be delivered this time to be delivered. There is a tendency to calculate a renewable delivery instruction tendency value group based on the appearance tendency value based on each company's delivery instruction ratio. Calculating means, delivery instruction destination determining means for setting the largest one of the delivery instruction tendency value groups as the delivery instruction destination, and the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determining means from the required number of parts Required number updating means for updating the required number of parts by subtracting the required number; and a delivery instruction destination determining means for setting the largest one of the delivery instruction tendency value groups to the delivery instruction destination when the required number of parts is greater than 0; Subtract the determined number of parts of the delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determination means from the number of parts, and update the required number of parts by the required number update means, and add the appearance tendency value to each of the delivery instruction tendency value groups A tendency value group updating means for subtracting the sum of the appearance tendency values from the delivery instruction tendency value of the delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determining means to form a new delivery instruction tendency value group; Means and must A repetition means for repeating the processing in the number updating means and the tendency value group updating means; and a delivery instruction destination determined by the delivery instruction destination determining means when the required number of parts becomes 0 or less and a predetermined delivery instruction timing comes. A multi-company delivery instruction management system comprising: a delivery instruction means for issuing a delivery instruction; and determining a delivery instruction destination based on each company's delivery instruction ratio and the required number of parts.
JP28370994A 1994-11-17 1994-11-17 Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system Expired - Fee Related JP3225762B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP28370994A JP3225762B2 (en) 1994-11-17 1994-11-17 Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP28370994A JP3225762B2 (en) 1994-11-17 1994-11-17 Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH08147383A JPH08147383A (en) 1996-06-07
JP3225762B2 true JP3225762B2 (en) 2001-11-05

Family

ID=17669072

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP28370994A Expired - Fee Related JP3225762B2 (en) 1994-11-17 1994-11-17 Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP3225762B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004026741A1 (en) * 2002-09-19 2004-04-01 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Parts inventory control device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH08147383A (en) 1996-06-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU692929B2 (en) Priority queue filtering system and method of operation
US7590461B2 (en) Large scale supply planning
US6119102A (en) MRP system with viewable master production schedule
US6477660B1 (en) Data model for supply chain planning
MXPA97002050A (en) Filter system of priority row and metodode operac
CN112561253A (en) Order assignment method, system, platform and storage medium based on production plan
CN112396322A (en) Production plan-based process technology unit productivity assessment method and system
CN112396323A (en) Production plan-based process sheet distribution method and system
JPH0798741A (en) Integrated management method for production sales article
JP3225762B2 (en) Multi-company delivery instruction management method and multi-company delivery instruction management system
JP2002304452A (en) Device and method for managing commodity distribution
JPH1087036A (en) Stock allocating method, and deciding method of distribution mode and stocking position, in physical distribution system
JPH1080842A (en) Production plan preparing device
JPH05324685A (en) Stock controlling system for anticipative product
Pinto et al. Joint lot-sizing and scheduling for multi-stage multi-product flow shops
CN114091994A (en) Data processing method and device for goods
US20040128213A1 (en) Material requirement planning system and method for re-scheduling purchase orders of materials
US20040122724A1 (en) System and method for generating priorities of manufacturing orders
JP3475794B2 (en) Parts ordering system
JP2001100829A (en) Method and device for processing product delivery answer and information recording medium
JP2847276B2 (en) Delivery management system for coiled products
JP4325825B2 (en) Production plan control method, production plan system, and recording medium
JP2002288295A (en) Simulation unit for distribution inventory, storage medium and program
JP3196209B2 (en) Production planning system
JP2001125622A (en) Method for process consideration type required material amount calculation and recording medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees