JP2016194898A - Report creation system, method of controlling report creation system, and program - Google Patents

Abstract

PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide a mechanism that prevents, during an input of a result of reading a medical image in an inspection, an incorrect input of a result of reading a medical image in another inspection.SOLUTION: When determining that a combination of a result of reading input through a report input screen and additional information on a medical image of an object of reading is not correct, a report creation system notifies a user of the fact.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 6

Description

  The present invention relates to a report creation system, a control method for the report creation system, and a program. In particular, when an interpretation result for a medical image of a certain examination is input, an interpretation result for a medical image of another examination is erroneously input. It relates to a mechanism that prevents this.

  In the medical field, for example, the digitization of medical images of patients taken with modalities (also called medical image generation devices) such as CT (Computed Tomography) and MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) has been realized. Stored on the server and saved.

  Usually, medical images stored in a server are interpreted by a specialist who can interpret the medical image (hereinafter also referred to as an interpreting physician). A remote interpretation system is widely used in which a medical image is requested to be interpreted by an out-of-hospital interpretation doctor via a network.

  In such a remote interpretation system, the interpretation doctor interprets the viewer displaying the medical image of the examination and the medical image displayed on the viewer, and inputs the findings and the diagnosis result (hereinafter also referred to as the interpretation result) to generate a report. The application to create is often a separate system.

  Therefore, the interpreting physician displays the application screen for inputting findings and diagnosis results and the viewer screen for displaying medical images on separate displays, and the interpreting physician views the medical images displayed on the viewer screen. On the other hand, the findings and diagnosis results are input on the screen of the application for inputting the findings and diagnosis results.

  By the way, since the interpretation doctor often performs a plurality of interpretation operations continuously when using the above-described usage, medical images (hereinafter referred to as the examination A) of the past examinations for which report creation has already been completed. Reading of a new medical image (hereinafter referred to as a medical image of examination B) may be started while the medical image is displayed.

  Then, when the findings and diagnosis results of the medical image of examination B are created as a report, the medical image of examination A is erroneously displayed on the viewer screen, and the findings and diagnosis results for the medical image of examination A are reported. There is a risk of filling in.

  As a method for solving the above-mentioned problem, Patent Document 1 includes identification information of a report and identification information of a key image attached to the report by an interpretation doctor (such as an image obtained as a result of interpretation or a lesion). A technique is disclosed for determining whether or not a notification is made and notifying if they do not match.

JP 2012-243102 A

  However, in a situation where an interpreting doctor actually interprets a medical image, when no abnormality is found as a result of the interpretation, an operation is often performed in which a key image is not attached to a report.

  Therefore, even if the technique described in Patent Document 1 is used, if there is no abnormality in the medical image of examination A, the examination A and the diagnosis result are still input erroneously while inputting the findings and diagnosis results. There is a risk of inputting findings and diagnosis results for the medical image.

  An object of the present invention is to provide a mechanism capable of notifying a user that an interpretation result for a medical image of another examination is erroneously inputted while inputting an interpretation result for a medical image of a certain examination. To do.

  The present invention provides a display control means for displaying a report input screen for inputting an interpretation result of a medical image, an interpretation result input via the report input screen controlled by the display control means, and an object of the interpretation A determination unit configured to determine whether the combination with the supplementary information of the medical image is correct; and a notification unit configured to notify the user when the determination unit determines that the combination is not correct. And

  The present invention is also a control method of a report creation system comprising a display control means for displaying a report input screen for inputting a result of interpretation of a medical image, wherein the determination means of the report creation system is displayed by the display control means. A determination step of determining whether a combination of the interpretation result input via the controlled report input screen and the incidental information of the medical image to be interpreted is correct; and the notification means of the report creation system, And a notification step of notifying the user of the fact when it is determined that the combination is not correct in the determination step.

  Further, the present invention is a program that is read and executed by a report creation system including a display control unit that displays a report input screen for inputting a result of interpretation of a medical image, and the report creation system is displayed on the display control unit. A determination unit that determines whether the combination of the interpretation result input via the controlled report input screen and the supplementary information of the medical image to be interpreted is correct, and the combination by the determination unit is incorrect When it is determined, it functions as a notification means for notifying the user of that fact.

  According to the present invention, when an interpretation result for a medical image of a certain examination is input, it is possible to notify a user (interpretation doctor) that an interpretation result for a medical image of another examination is erroneously entered. .

The system block diagram which shows an example of a structure of a remote interpretation system. The hardware block diagram of the computer as an information processing apparatus applicable to the request terminal 109, the image interpretation terminals 112-114, and each server 101-107,116. The figure which shows an example of the warning word registration screen 300 displayed on PC301. The figure which shows an example of the warning word database 400 managed by the database 108. FIG. The figure which shows an example of the report input screen 500 displayed on the display 210 of PC301. The figure which shows an example of the screen displayed on the display 210 of PC301, when the warning column is contained in the observation column in the report input screen 500 displayed on the display 210 of PC301, or the diagnostic result column. The figure which shows an example of the report data 700 managed by the database 108. FIG. The figure which shows an example of the flowchart which registers a warning word in PC301. The figure which shows an example of the flowchart in which an interpretation doctor inputs an interpretation result via a report input screen in PC301. The figure which shows an example of the flowchart in which an interpretation doctor inputs an interpretation result via a report input screen in PC301. The figure which shows an example of the flowchart in which an interpretation doctor inputs an interpretation result via a report input screen in PC301. The figure which shows an example of the flowchart which implements discrimination | determination of the key image which an image interpretation doctor pastes on a report in PC301. The figure which shows an example which determines a site | part from the feature-value of a key image in PC301. It is a figure which shows the error message displayed on the report input screen 500 currently displayed on the display 210 of PC301.

  Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. The embodiment described below shows an example when the present invention is specifically implemented, and is one of the specific embodiments having the configurations described in the claims.

FIG. 1 is a system configuration diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a remote interpretation system (also referred to as a report creation system).
The remote interpretation system according to the present embodiment distributes the requested interpretation request to the medical doctor (hospital facility) such as a hospital which is the side requesting the interpretation, and interprets the interpretation result input by the medical doctor. And a data center serving as an intermediary between the medical institution (request facility) and the interpretation center, and terminals (information processing devices) in the respective institutions.

Terminals in the respective institutions are connected to a network 117 such as the Internet, and can perform data communication with each other via the network 117 (communicable).
First, the equipment in the requested facility will be described.

  Reference numeral 109 denotes a request terminal used by a doctor at a request facility requesting interpretation. The interpretation request person in charge at the requested facility uses the request terminal 109 to input interpretation request information. The input request information is processed by the remote interpretation server 101, and the request information is stored in the database 108.

Specifically, as request information, examination information (examination contents) such as patient information such as sex of patient (subject), age information, modality information obtained by taking a medical image related to examination performed on the patient, and imaging part by modality In addition, information on an interpretation center to be requested for interpretation is included.
That is, the person in charge of the request specifies an examination of the patient and makes an interpretation request to the interpretation center.

  Image data used for remote interpretation is acquired by a modality 111 such as CT (Computed Tomography) or MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging), and is transmitted from the modality 111 to the terminal device 110. The terminal device 110 is transmitted from the modality 111. After the image data is archived, it is transmitted to the receiving server 107 in the data center.

  The image data transmitted from the modality 111 is received by the receiving server 107 and sent from the receiving server 107 to the storage management server 105.

  The storage management server 105 issues a unique ID for the image data, and stores the image data in the external storage device 115.

Next, the interpretation center will be described.
112 and 113 are interpretation terminals, and the interpretation doctors at the interpretation center that have received the interpretation request from the requested facility are the interpretation images downloaded from the external storage device 115 using the distribution server 106 at the interpretation terminals 112 and 113. The report of the interpretation result is created using a report input application (also called a report client) that operates on the interpretation terminals 112 and 113. The created report is processed by the report server 103 and stored in the database 108. The interpreting doctor can also use the system from the interpretation terminal 114 at the interpreting doctor's home.

The report created by the interpreting doctor includes the findings of the interpreting doctor for the medical image requested for interpretation, the diagnosis results by the interpreting doctor, and thumbnails of images (also called key images and representative images) that are important for interpretation. included.
In the description after FIG. 3, the request terminal 109 and the interpretation terminals 112 to 114 are collectively referred to as a PC 301.

  In this interpretation system, when an access request from the request terminal 109 and the interpretation terminals 112 to 114 is received in accordance with an instruction of a user who uses the remote interpretation system, the authentication of the user is performed by the authentication server 116 in the data center via the network 117. Done.

  After passing the authentication, the interpretation status provided by the portal server 102 and the portal screen with the main menu are displayed on the screens of the request terminal 109 and the interpretation terminals 112 to 114.

  In addition, the interpretation doctor accesses the SNS (so-called social networking service, which is a WEB site where users can exchange messages) server 104 from the interpretation terminals 112 to 114, When creating a report, the interpretation terminal 113 can exchange opinions with other interpretation doctors and exchange messages such as requests to the interpretation center clerk.

  In the requested facility, image data (medical image data) used for remote interpretation is captured by the modality 111, which is an imaging device, and then transmitted to the terminal device 110. Examples of the image data include DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine) format image data.

  The terminal device 110 archives the image data transmitted from the modality 111 and then transmits it to the receiving server 107 arranged in the data center. The reception server 107 transmits the image data transmitted from the requested facility to the storage management server 105. The storage management server 105 issues a unique ID (identification information) for each image data and stores it in the external storage device 115.

  The person in charge who performs the interpretation request work of the requested facility inputs information (request information) necessary for the interpretation request using the request terminal 109, and the request information is transmitted to the data center together with the image data. Each request information is stored in the database 108 on the data center side. In the embodiment of the present application, image data is associated with request information including examination information, and when the request information is assigned (sorted) to the interpreting doctor, the interpreting doctor responds to the request information. Interpretation work can be performed with reference to image data to be read.

  The image interpretation doctor who performs image interpretation uses the image interpretation terminal 113 arranged at the image interpretation center (or the image interpretation terminal 114 arranged at home) to transmit image data for image interpretation corresponding to the assigned image interpretation request to the distribution server 106. Download from, refer to and interpret.

  At that time, the interpreting physician displays an application screen for inputting findings and diagnosis results and a viewer screen for displaying medical images on separate displays, and the interpreting physician displays the medical images displayed on the viewer screen. While browsing, the findings and diagnosis results are input on the screen of the application for inputting the findings and diagnosis results.

  When there are a plurality of interpretation requests assigned to the interpretation doctor, a plurality of image data for interpretation corresponding to the plurality of interpretation requests are downloaded from the distribution server 106 and referred to using the interpretation terminal 113. Then, it interprets sequentially.

  Thereafter, the interpretation doctor creates a report of the interpretation result using an application (not shown) that operates on the interpretation terminal 113. The created report is transmitted to the report server 103 and stored in the database 108. Here, an example of the interpretation center and the interpretation doctor's home is shown as the interpretation terminal. However, the interpretation terminal may be placed in any location, and may be referred to using a mobile terminal or the like.

  The servers related to the present invention are the portal server 102, the report server 103, and the database 108.

  In this embodiment, the server for managing images and the server for managing reports are separate servers. However, as another embodiment, the processing performed by each of the servers 101 to 107 and 116 is performed by one server. May be.

  Up to this point, the remote interpretation system according to the present embodiment has been described. However, when such a remote interpretation system is used by an interpretation doctor, the following problems may occur.

  As described above, when there are a plurality of interpretation requests assigned to the interpretation doctor, a plurality of image data for interpretation corresponding to the plurality of interpretation requests are downloaded from the distribution server 106 using the interpretation terminal 113. In order to perform sequential interpretation, a new medical image (hereinafter referred to as examination) is displayed with the medical image (hereinafter referred to as medical image of examination A) used for the previous examination for which report generation has already been completed being displayed. (Hereinafter referred to as “B medical image”).

  Then, when the findings and diagnosis results of the medical image of examination B are created as a report, the medical image of examination A is erroneously displayed on the viewer screen, and the findings and diagnosis results for the medical image of examination A are reported. There is a risk of filling in.

  Therefore, in the embodiment of the present invention, a warning word is registered in advance in association with the examination information, and when the interpretation doctor enters findings and diagnosis results on the report input screen of FIG. Is displayed under a certain condition, a warning is displayed to the interpreting doctor, and a medical image unrelated to the examination is displayed and the interpretation error of the interpreting doctor due to the interpretation of the medical image is performed. It becomes possible to prevent in advance.

Next, with reference to FIG. 2, an example of a hardware configuration of a computer as an information processing apparatus that can be applied to the request terminal 109, the interpretation terminals 112 to 114, and the servers 101 to 107 and 116 will be described with reference to the block diagram of FIG. 2. I will explain.
The configuration illustrated in FIG. 2 is an example, and any configuration may be adopted as long as each configuration described below can be realized.

  In FIG. 2, reference numeral 201 denotes a CPU that comprehensively controls each device and controller connected to the system bus 204. Further, the ROM 202 or the external memory 211 is necessary to realize a BIOS (Basic Input / Output System) or an operating system program (hereinafter referred to as an OS), which is a control program of the CPU 201, or a function executed by each server or each PC. Various programs to be described later are stored.

  A RAM 203 functions as a main memory, work area, and the like for the CPU 201. The CPU 201 implements various operations by loading a program or the like necessary for execution of processing from the ROM 202 or the external memory 211 into the RAM 203 and executing the loaded program.

  An input controller 205 controls input from a keyboard (KB) 209 or a pointing device such as a mouse (not shown). A video controller 206 controls display on a display device such as a CRT display (CRT) 210. The display device is not limited to the CRT, and may be another display device such as a liquid crystal display. These are used by the administrator as needed.

  A memory controller 207 is provided in an external storage device (hard disk (HD)), flexible disk (FD), or PCMCIA card slot for storing a boot program, various applications, font data, user files, editing files, various data, and the like. Controls access to an external memory 211 such as a compact flash (registered trademark) memory connected via an adapter.

  A communication I / F controller 208 is connected to and communicates with an external device via a network (for example, the network 117 shown in FIG. 1), and executes communication control processing on the network. For example, communication using TCP / IP is possible.

  Note that the CPU 201 enables display on the display 210 by executing outline font rasterization processing on a display information area in the RAM 203, for example. Further, the CPU 201 enables a user instruction with a mouse cursor (not shown) on the display 210.

  Various programs to be described later for realizing the present invention are recorded in the external memory 211 and executed by the CPU 201 by being loaded into the RAM 203 as necessary. Furthermore, definition files and various information tables used when executing the program are also stored in the external memory 211, and a detailed description thereof will be described later.

  Next, each screen (FIGS. 3, 5, and 6) displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301, a data table (FIGS. 4 and 7) managed by the database 108, and each of the screens displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 The flowcharts (FIGS. 8 to 10) for displaying the screen will be described.

  The screen of FIG. 3 shows a warning word to notify the interpretation doctor as shown in the screen of FIG. 6 when a warning word is included in the report inputted by the interpretation doctor via the screen of FIG. The warning word registered through the screen of FIG. 3 is stored in the data table of FIG. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a process flow for registering the warning word in FIG.

  The screen in FIG. 5 is a screen for the interpretation doctor to input the interpretation result for the medical image of the examination, and the examination information displayed on the screen in FIG. 5 is displayed based on the data table in FIG. Then, when a warning word is included in the diagnosis result input by the interpretation doctor via the screen of FIG. 5, the notification displayed is the notification shown in the screen of FIG. 6. Further, FIGS. 9 and 10 are flowcharts showing the flow of the process of inputting the diagnosis result of FIG. 5 and the process of notifying when the warning result is included in the diagnosis result.

  FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the warning word registration screen 300 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 in the present invention. The interpretation staff of the interpretation center who has logged in to the remote interpretation system (interpret the interpretation request from the requesting hospital). According to the operation of the user who operates this system such as distributing to a doctor), the portal screen provided by the portal server 102 transitions to the warning word registration screen 300, and the clerk uses the warning word registration screen 300 to display the warning word Register.

  The warning word here is a word that should probably not be used when entering the findings and diagnostic results of the examination that the interpretation doctor is currently interpreting, as shown in FIG. For example, if an interpreting doctor is currently interpreting a medical image of a patient whose patient attribute information is “male”, words such as “uterus” and “ovary” that are used only for women are used. Since it is not a word that should be, it can be said that it should be registered as a warning word.

  As described above, in the present invention, the warning word is registered in the storage means in advance in association with the examination information including the patient attribute information and the examination contents of the examination (the supplementary information of the medical image in the present invention). This is a mechanism for notifying the interpretation doctor when it is determined that the warning word is used on the report input screen when findings or diagnosis results are entered on the report input screen.

  Specifically, if the patient's attribute information (gender) is “male”, the words “uterus” and “ovary” that should not be used by men should be registered as warning words. If the inspection content (inspector) of the inspection is “CT”, it can be said that the word “high signal” that should not be used in the case of a CT image should be registered as a warning word.

  If such a warning word is registered, for example, when an interpreting doctor inputs a report for an interpretation request associated with a CT image, the interpretation operation is erroneously performed while the MR image is displayed on the viewer, and the MR image is interpreted. Even if the word "high signal" used is entered in the findings or diagnosis results entry field (report entry field), a warning will be displayed, so a medical image unrelated to the examination is displayed and interpreted. Can be notified to the interpretation doctor.

  302, 303, and 306 provided on the warning word registration screen 300 are columns in which, for example, an office worker inputs and registers a warning word, conditions, and the like. The word column 306 and the condition column 302 can be input by an office worker by operating a keyboard or the like. The inspection type 303 is a pull-down list, and an office worker can select inspection information from the list. Items that can be selected in such a pull-down can be managed in advance in the database 108, and are transmitted from the portal server 102 to the PC 301 together with the warning word registration screen 300 and displayed as a pull-down list.

  An operation in which the clerk registers a word as a warning word in association with examination information including patient attribute information and examination contents, first selects the examination type in the examination type 303, and sets the condition of the examination type in the condition column 302. By setting, examination information consisting of patient attribute information and examination contents is specified. Then, a word is input to the word field 306 (corresponding to the warning word described above) with the examination information specified in this manner, and the registration button 305 is pressed by operating the clerk's mouse or the like, whereby 302 , 303 and 306 are stored in a warning word database (FIG. 4) managed by the database 108, and the word is registered as a warning word in the examination information input in the condition field 302.

  More specifically, for example, “gender” is selected as the patient attribute information from the examination type 303, “male” is entered in the condition field 302, and “uterus” is entered in the word field 306 as the “word name”. If the clerk is registered by pressing the registration button 305, and the gender that is the patient attribute information is male, the interpretation doctor will indicate “uterus” on the report input screen as the findings and diagnosis results. When it is input, a warning is displayed and the interpretation doctor is notified.

  In this embodiment, examination information refers to attribute information (for example, gender and age of a patient) indicating information for identifying an individual patient, and examination contents (examination type indicating the type of modality in which a medical image is taken) Or a body part indicated by a medical image).

  The warning word registration screen 300 also displays a warning word 304 that has already been registered. The registered warning word 304 is stored in a warning word database (FIG. 4 to be described later) managed by the database 108, and is transmitted to the PC 301 from the portal server 102 together with the warning word registration screen 300. It will be displayed on the word registration screen.

  This is the end of the description of FIG.

  In this embodiment, the explanation was given using an example in which an interpretation center clerk registers a warning word. However, as another embodiment, an interpretation request person in charge of a requested facility or an interpretation doctor registers a warning word. Also good. When an interpreting doctor registers a warning word, the warning word is managed as a warning word database associated with the interpreting doctor, and used to warn a report input by the registered interpreting doctor. It may be.

In addition, when the interpretation request person in charge at the requesting facility registers a warning word, the warning word is registered in the warning word database of FIG. 4 after being processed by an interpretation center office worker. May be.
Next, a database for managing the warning word registered by the office worker in FIG. 3 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an example of the warning word database 400 managed by the database 108, and is an example of a storage unit that stores words in association with any of the supplementary information of medical images in the present invention.

  The warning word database 400 manages warning words registered by the clerk of the interpretation center via the screen of FIG. 3 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301.

  401 corresponds to the information input in 301 of FIG. 3, 402 corresponds to the information input in 302 of FIG. 3, and 403 corresponds to the information selected in 303 of FIG.

  As can be seen from the example in FIG. 4, in addition to the example given as the registered warning word 304 in FIG. 3, “attached” as the word 401 and “no attached image” as the condition are registered. In the report that summarizes the interpretation results created by the interpreting physician, even though there is no attached image in the column to attach the medical image used to fill in the findings and diagnosis results, `` Attach to the findings and diagnosis results '' It is also possible to warn when “” is entered.

In addition, although not shown in FIG. 4, “is” is entered in the findings and diagnosis results despite being registered as “Issima-chosen recommendation” as a column for entering the findings in the report. It is also possible to warn if
This is the end of the description of FIG.

  Next, a report input screen displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 on which the interpretation doctor inputs findings and diagnosis results will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a report input screen 500 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 in the present invention.

  The interpretation doctor inputs the interpretation result for the medical image of the examination for which the interpretation doctor is requested to interpret via the report input screen 500 of FIG.

  The information in the frame of the area 501 is an area indicating the examination information such as the attribute information and examination contents of the patient who is the subject of the examination requested to be interpreted. Note that the leftmost icon in the frame of the area 501 represents gender, and in the case of the icon on the report input screen 500, it indicates that the man is male.

  The detailed inspection content 502 indicates more detailed information on the inspection content included in the area 501.

  An observation 503 is a field for inputting an observation when the interpretation doctor diagnoses a medical image.

  The diagnosis result 504 is a column in which the interpretation doctor inputs a diagnosis result based on the findings 503.

  The key image attachment column 505 is a column to which the interpretation doctor attaches an image (hereinafter referred to as a key image) used when inputting a diagnosis result in the medical image.

  When the interpreting doctor presses the save button 506, the findings 503 and the diagnosis result 504 that have been input so far are transmitted to the database 108 and temporarily stored in the database 108. That is, by pressing the save button 506, the temporary findings 503 and the diagnosis results 504 can be saved, and the findings and diagnosis results can be input again by the interpretation doctor.

Also. When the interpretation button 507 is pressed by the interpretation doctor, the findings 503 and the diagnosis result 504 inputted so far are transmitted to the database 108 as the final interpretation result, stored in the database 108, and via the data center. Sent to the requesting facility. At this time, it is determined whether or not a warning word is included in the findings 503 and the diagnosis results 504. If it is determined that the warning words are included, the findings 503 and the diagnosis results 504 are stored in the database 108. Without being transmitted to the screen, the screen transitions to a screen display notifying that there is a possibility that an inappropriate word for the image interpretation doctor in FIG.
This is the end of the description of FIG.

  Next, the screen displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 when a warning word is included in the findings 503 or the diagnosis result 504 when the confirming button 507 is pressed by the interpretation doctor will be described with reference to FIG. To do.

  6, in the present invention, in the screen of FIG. 5 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301, it is determined whether or not a warning word is included when the confirming button 507 is pressed by the interpretation doctor. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 when the warning word shown in FIG.

  In the present embodiment, when a warning word is included in the findings 503 and the diagnosis result 504, the warning word and examination information such as patient attribute information or examination contents corresponding to the warning word are respectively framed. Further, by displaying a warning display pop-up indicating that the warning word is included, the interpretation doctor is notified that the warning word exists in the findings 503 and the diagnosis result 504.

  Note that the notification method is not limited as long as the interpretation doctor can recognize (identify) that the warning 503 is included in the findings 503 and the diagnosis result 504, and the warning word blinks or the color of the warning word is changed. Alternatively, a method of displaying a warning without surrounding with a frame or a method of surrounding with a frame without displaying a warning may be used.

  In the example of FIG. 6, although the examination type is CT (601) among the examination contents included in the area 501, there are warning words such as T1 emphasis (602) and high signal (603) used in MR. Since it is used for the findings 503, the frames 601 to 603 are highlighted by surrounding them with a frame.

  Furthermore, in the example of FIG. 6, the warning word “head (605, 606)” is used for the findings 503 and the diagnosis results 504, although the region is the chest abdomen (604) in the examination contents of the region 501. Therefore, 604 to 606 are highlighted by surrounding them with a frame.

  Further, as shown in a region 607, when a finding word 503 or a diagnosis result 504 includes a warning word, the interpretation doctor is notified of this, and the interpretation doctor is informed whether to delete all the findings and diagnosis results. You can also display a pop-up to ask.

  As described above, the reason why the pop-up display is performed in the area 607 and whether all the findings and diagnosis results are deleted is as follows. Since it is often the case that findings and diagnosis results for unrelated medical images are entered, it is considered that all documents will be deleted, not part of the document, and that all documents will be deleted. This is because the report can be easily re-input.

  When the “yes” button 608 is pressed by the interpretation doctor, the document input to the findings 503 or the diagnosis results 504 is deleted.

  When the “No” button 609 is pressed by the interpretation doctor, the document input to the finding 503 or the diagnosis result 504 is not deleted. Therefore, when it is desired to correct a part of the findings or diagnosis results, the image interpretation doctor selects the “No” button 609 and manually corrects the corrected part of the findings or diagnosis results using a keyboard or the like. Become.

In this way, when a warning word is included in the findings or diagnosis results, the interpretation doctor is notified and the findings and diagnosis results for the medical images of the examination that are not related to the examination information contained in the report are input to the report. It is possible to reduce the possibility of being lost.
This is the end of the description of FIG.

  Next, report data managed by the database 108 will be described with reference to FIG.

FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of report data 700 managed by the database 108.
The report data 700 is created by assigning an interpretation request to an interpretation doctor at the interpretation center when the interpretation request arrives at the interpretation center from the requested facility.

The report data 700 includes a “report ID” 701 that is information for identifying the report, a “requested facility name” 702 that indicates the name of the requested facility that requested the interpretation, and a “request number” 703 that identifies the interpretation request. “Patient name” 704 indicating the patient who is the subject of the interpretation request, “Status” 705 indicating the status of the current interpretation, “707” indicating the examination images (one to a plurality) associated with the request, Then, “in-charge interpreting doctor” 706 indicating the interpreting doctor in charge of interpretation of the interpretation request (examination) is linked and stored.
Above, description of FIG. 7 is complete | finished.

  Next, a process for registering a warning word in accordance with an instruction from an interpreting doctor or a clerk will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of a flowchart for registering a warning word in the PC 301 in the present invention.

  8 is realized by loading the program stored in the external memory 211 into the RAM 203 and executing it by the CPU 301 of the PC 301 or the portal server 102. In the flowchart, “S” in “S80” is a step.

  In step S <b> 801, the PC 301 activates a browser installed in the PC 301 and displays it on the display 210 in accordance with the operation of the office worker's mouse or the like.

  In step S <b> 802, the PC 301 requests the portal server 102 to obtain the top screen of the remote interpretation system.

  Before executing the processing of S802, input of information (user ID, password, etc.) for logging in to the remote interpretation system is input via the login screen of the remote interpretation system displayed on the PC 301. It is assumed that login processing to the remote interpretation system is performed using the information received from the employee.

  In step S <b> 803, the portal server 102 generates a top screen and transmits it to the PC 301.

  In step S804, the PC 301 displays the top screen received from the portal server 102 on the browser.

  In step S <b> 805, the PC 301 determines whether a user operation such as a mouse has been received on the screen displayed on the browser. If an operation by a user operation is accepted, the process proceeds to S806, and if not accepted, the process waits as it is. Here, the screen displayed on the browser is the top screen displayed in step S804 when the process proceeds from step S804 to step S805, and the warning word is registered when the process proceeds from step S811 to step S805. It is a screen (for example, FIG. 3).

  In step S806, the PC 301 transmits the operation content received from the user in step S805 to the portal server 102.

  In S807, the portal server 102 determines whether the operation content transmitted from the PC 301 in S806 is a warning word registration screen acquisition request. If it is a warning word registration screen acquisition request, the process proceeds to S808, and if not, the process proceeds to S812.

  In step S <b> 808, the portal server 102 determines whether there is an already registered warning word in the warning data table (for example, FIG. 4) registered in the external memory 211 of the portal server 102. If there is a registered warning word in the warning data table, the process proceeds to S809, and if not, the process proceeds to S810.

  In S809, the portal server 102 adds a warning word (for example, 304 in FIG. 3) registered in the warning word table to the warning word registration screen.

  In S810, the portal server 102 generates a warning word registration screen (for example, FIG. 3) and transmits it to the PC 301.

  In S811, the PC 301 receives the warning word registration screen and displays it on the browser of the PC 301.

  Step S811 is an example of a registration screen display unit that displays a registration screen for registering words in association with any of the supplementary information of the medical image in the present invention.

  In step S812, the portal server 102 determines whether the operation content transmitted from the PC 301 in step S806 is a warning word registration request. If it is a warning word registration request, the process proceeds to S813, and if not, the process proceeds to S815. The warning word registration request here refers to, for example, an operation in which the registration button 305 is pressed by an operation of the office worker using a mouse or the like after 301 to 303 in FIG. It is.

  In S813, the portal server 102 registers the warning word input by the clerk through the warning word registration screen in the warning data table (for example, FIG. 4).

  In S814, the portal server 102 regenerates the warning word registration screen in which the warning word registered in S813 is displayed in the already registered warning word column (for example, 304 in FIG. 3) of the warning word registration screen. Send to.

  In S815, the portal server 102 transmits an end instruction to the PC 301, and in S816, the PC 301 ends the browser.

  FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of a flowchart in which the interpretation doctor inputs the interpretation result via the report input screen in the PC 301 in the present invention.

  The processing of each step shown in the flowchart of FIG. 10 which is a subflow of FIG. 9 and FIG. 9 is realized by loading the program stored in the external memory 211 into the RAM 203 and executing it by the CPU 201 of the PC 301 or the report server 103. Is done.

  Before executing the processing of FIG. 9, the PC 301 accepts input of information (user ID, password, etc.) for logging in to the remote interpretation system from the interpretation doctor, and performs login processing using the information. Shall.

  In step S901, the PC 301 activates a report input system that cooperates with the remote interpretation system. At this time, it is assumed that the user has logged in to the report input system using information (user ID, password, etc.) for logging in to the remote interpretation system.

  In step S <b> 902, the PC 301 transmits a report assigned to the image interpretation doctor who has logged into the report input system and a warning word acquisition request to the report server 103.

  In step S <b> 903, the report server 103 receives from the PC 301 a report assigned to the image interpretation doctor who has logged in to the report input system and a warning word acquisition request.

  In S904, the report server 103 displays the report assigned to the interpreting doctor who has logged in to the report input system, and the interpreting doctor in the column of the interpreting doctor 706 in the report data 700 (FIG. 7) logs in to the report input system. The warning word (including conditions and inspection information) is acquired from the warning word database 400 (FIG. 4) and transmitted to the PC 301.

  Note that the report transmitted from the report server 103 to the PC 301 in step S904 is information on a report input screen in which patient information and examination details are input in advance.

  In step S <b> 905, the PC 301 receives the report assigned to the image interpretation doctor who has logged into the report input system and the warning word, and stores them in the external memory 211 of the PC 301.

  In step S <b> 906, the PC 301 displays a report list screen (work list) on the display 210 of the PC 301 based on the information received in step S <b> 905.

  In step S <b> 907, the PC 301 determines whether an operation by the image interpretation doctor is accepted via the screen displayed on the PC 301. If an operation by the image interpretation doctor is accepted, the process proceeds to S908.

  Here, the screen displayed on the PC 301 is the report list screen (not shown) displayed in S906 when the process proceeds from S906 to S907, and when the process proceeds from S909, S911, and S913 to S907. Is a report input screen (for example, FIG. 5).

  S909 is an example of display control means for displaying a report input screen for inputting the interpretation result of a medical image in the present invention.

  In step S <b> 908, the PC 301 determines whether the operation received from the interpretation doctor in step S <b> 907 is an operation for selecting a report for inputting an interpretation result from the report list screen. If it is an operation for selecting a report, the process proceeds to S909; otherwise, the process proceeds to S910.

  In step S909, the PC 301 displays a report input screen for the report selected by the radiogram interpreter from the report list screen.

  In step S910, the PC 301 determines whether the operation content received in step S907 is a report confirmation operation. If it is a report confirmation operation (for example, 507 in FIG. 5), the process proceeds to S911; otherwise, the process proceeds to S912.

  S910 is an example of a registration request accepting unit that accepts a request for registering an interpretation result input via the report input screen whose display is controlled by the display control unit of the present invention.

  In step S911, the PC 301 performs report confirmation processing. Details of the processing of S911 will be described with reference to FIG.

  In step S912, the PC 301 determines whether the content of the operation received from the image interpretation doctor in step S907 is an end instruction. If it is an end instruction, the process proceeds to S914; otherwise, the process proceeds to S913.

  In step S <b> 913, the PC 301 performs processing such as reception of a diagnosis result input instruction to a report, report search, and various settings.

In S914, the PC 301 ends the report system.
Above, description of FIG. 9 is complete | finished.
Next, details of the processing of S911 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 10 is an example of a flowchart in which the interpretation doctor inputs an interpretation result via the report input screen 500 in FIG. 5 in the PC 301 in the present invention, and shows details of the report confirmation process in S911 in FIG. is there.

  In step S <b> 1001, the PC 301 adds a document input from the image interpretation doctor to a field for inputting the findings on the report input screen 500 (for example, 503 in FIG. 5) and a field for inputting the diagnosis result field (for example, 504 in FIG. 5). Search for warning words.

  In step S <b> 1002, the PC 301 determines whether a warning word is included in the document input from the interpretation doctor in the field for inputting the findings on the report input screen 500 or the field for inputting the diagnosis result field. If the warning word is included, the process proceeds to S1003, and if not included, the process proceeds to S1006.

  S1002 is a determination unit that determines whether or not the combination of the interpretation result input via the report input screen whose display is controlled by the display control unit and the supplementary information of the medical image to be interpreted is correct in the present invention. It is an example.

  In step S1003, the PC 301 displays a warning pop-up (for example, 607 in FIG. 6), and highlights a warning word included in a column for inputting a finding on the report input screen or a column for inputting a diagnosis result (for example, 601 in FIG. 6). ~ 606).

  S1003 is an example of a notification means for notifying the user of the fact when the determination means determines that the combination is not correct in the present invention.

  The processing of the PC 301 in S1001 to S1003 will be described more specifically. First, a warning word (for example, 401 in FIG. 4) stored in the external memory 211 of the PC 301 in the PC 301 is a column for inputting findings on the report input screen (for example, It is searched whether it is included in the field (503 in FIG. 5) and the field for inputting the diagnosis result field (for example, 504 in FIG. 5).

  Next, when the warning word stored in the external memory 211 of the PC 301 is included in the column for inputting the findings on the report input screen or the column for inputting the diagnosis result column, the examination information corresponding to the warning word (for example, 403) in FIG. 4, it is determined whether the examination information is patient attribute information corresponding to the warning word or examination contents (for example, 402 in FIG. 4).

  When the inspection information corresponding to the warning word is a condition corresponding to the warning word, a warning pop-up is displayed as shown in FIG. Highlight the warning word contained in the input field.

  In step S1004, the PC 301 determines whether an interpretation result deletion request has been accepted. If an observation deletion request is accepted, the process proceeds to S1005. If not, the process of FIG. 10 is terminated, and the process proceeds to S907.

  In step S1005, the PC 301 deletes all the interpretation results input by the interpretation doctor.

  In step S <b> 1006, the PC 301 transmits a report registration request including the interpretation result input by the interpretation doctor to the report server 103.

  In S1007, the report server 103 receives the report registration request including the interpretation result transmitted from the PC 301 in S1006, and registers it in the report data 700 (FIG. 7).

  In the present embodiment, when a report confirmation operation (for example, 507 in FIG. 5) is performed by an interpreting doctor, the processing of S1001 to S1005 in FIG. 10 is executed. However, as another embodiment, the interpreting doctor Thus, the processes from S1001 to S1005 may be executed in real time from the start of the input of findings and diagnosis results until the report is confirmed (that is, the report input by the force instruction receiving means). It may be determined whether or not it is correct in response to receiving an instruction to input an interpretation result via the screen).

  However, even in that case, the processing of S1006 and S1007 is the timing at which the report interpretation operation (for example, 507 in FIG. 5) is performed.

  By performing the processing from S1001 to S1005 in real time from the start of the input of findings and diagnosis results by the interpreting physician until the report is confirmed, medical images of other examinations are sent to the interpreting physician. It is possible to notify at an early stage that the interpretation result for is erroneously input.

  In this embodiment, the processing of S1001 and S1002 in FIG. 10 is performed by the PC 301. However, as another embodiment, the processing of S1001 and S1002 may be performed by the report server 103.

  In this case, if it is determined in S910 of FIG. 9 that the report is confirmed, the PC 301 selects a document input from the interpretation doctor in the field for inputting the findings on the report input screen 500 and the field for inputting the diagnosis result field. The data is transmitted to the report server 103, and the report server 103 executes the processing of S1001 and S1002.

  If it is determined in S1002 that a warning word is included, a warning pop-up (for example, 607 in FIG. 6) is displayed, and a field for inputting findings on the report input screen 500 and a diagnosis result are input. The report server 103 generates a report input screen 500 in which warning words included in the column to be highlighted are displayed (for example, 601 to 606 in FIG. 6), and transmits the report input screen 500 to the PC 301.

  This is the end of the description of FIG.

  Next, with reference to FIG. 11, a second embodiment of a flowchart in which an interpretation doctor inputs an interpretation result via the report input screen 500 of FIG. 5 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 according to the present invention will be described.

  FIG. 11 is a diagram showing an example of a flowchart in which an interpretation doctor inputs an interpretation result via the report input screen 500 of FIG. 5 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 in the present invention.

  The flowchart of FIG. 11 includes processing (S1112 described later) for determining whether or not the operation accepted from the user in S1107 (corresponding to S907 in FIG. 9) is an operation for pasting a key image, unlike FIG. Yes.

  The processing of each step shown in the flowchart of FIG. 12 which is a sub-flow of FIGS. 11 and 11 is realized by loading the program stored in the external memory 211 into the RAM 203 and executing it by the CPU 301 of the PC 301 or the report server 103. The

  The processing of each step from S1101 to S1111 in FIG. 11 is the same as the processing of each step from S901 to S911 in FIG.

  In step S <b> 1112, the PC 301 determines whether the operation content received from the interpretation doctor in step S <b> 1107 is an operation to paste the key image (interpretation result in the present invention) used for interpretation on the report input screen 500. If it is an operation of pasting a key image, the process proceeds to S1113; otherwise, the process proceeds to S1114.

  The instruction to paste the key image in S1112 is, for example, an operation of attaching the image displayed on the viewer screen by the image interpretation doctor to the key image attachment field 505 of the report input screen 500 in FIG.

  In step S <b> 1113, the PC 301 executes an operation of pasting a key image on the report input screen 500. Details of the processing of S1113 will be described later with reference to FIG.

  The processing of each step from step S1114 to step S1116 is the same as the processing of each step from S912 to step S914 in FIG.

  This is the end of the description of FIG. Next, details of the processing of S1113 in FIG. 11 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an example of a flowchart for explaining details of S1113 in the present invention.

  In S1201, before pasting the key image from S1113 to the key image attachment field 505 in the report input screen 500 of FIG. 5, based on the feature amount of the key image, the region of the patient imaged by the key image is selected. Identify.

  In this embodiment, the reason why the DICOM information of the key image is not used is that when the key image is determined from the medical images displayed on the viewer screen and attached to the report, the key image data is once stored in the clipboard. This is because the DICOM information is not copied because only the image is copied.

  Therefore, a part is specified from the DICOM information of the key image, and it is determined whether or not the specified part and the part of the area 501 in the report input screen 500 are the same.

  In S1202, the part obtained as a result of the specific step S1201 is determined as the part of the patient imaged by the key image, and the information on the determined part is stored in the external memory 211 of the PC 301 and can be used on the report input screen 500. To be prepared.

  In step S1203, it is determined whether the part determined in step S1202 is the same as the part of the area 501 in the report input screen 500. If it is the same part, the PC 301 moves the process to S1204, and if not, the PC 301 moves the process to S1205.

  S1203 is an example of determination means for determining whether or not the combination of the part of the human body to be imaged in the key image and the part of the human body included in the supplementary information of the medical image is correct in the present invention. .

  In step S1204, the PC 301 pastes the key image in the key image attachment field 505 in the report input screen 500, and the process proceeds to step S1113.

  In step S1205, an error message is displayed on the report input screen 500 displayed on the PC 301 in order to notify the interpretation doctor that the determination result in step S1203 is a different part.

  In step S1205, the error message displayed on the report input screen 500 displayed on the PC 301 is, for example, an error message 1401 in FIG.

  Here, the error message displayed on the report input screen 500 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 in step S1205 will be described with reference to FIG.

  FIG. 14 is a diagram showing an error message displayed on the report input screen 500 displayed on the display 210 of the PC 301 in step S1205.

  Reference numeral 1401 in FIG. 14 denotes an error message. The error message 1401 includes a message that the part determined in S1202 is different from the part of the area 501 in the report input screen 500, an image (1402) pasted as a key image, and the key as it is, ignoring the error message. A paste button 1403 for accepting an instruction to paste an image and a delete button 1404 for accepting an instruction to delete a key image are included.

  The case where the paste button 1403 is pressed by the image interpretation doctor means that the result of the process of identifying the patient part taken by the key image performed by the PC 301 in S1201 is incorrect, that is, the image is taken by the key image. This is a case where the part of the patient and the part of the area 501 in the report input screen 500 match. This is the end of the description of FIG. 14, and the description returns to FIG.

  In step S1206, it is determined whether a result correction instruction has been received from an interpreting doctor. If the result correction instruction is received from the interpretation doctor, the PC 301 proceeds to step S1204. If the result correction instruction is not received from the interpretation doctor, the PC 301 proceeds to step S1207.

  The case where it is determined in S1206 that a result correction instruction has been received from the interpretation doctor is a case where an operation of pressing the paste button 1403 in FIG. 14 is received from the interpretation doctor. In S1206, the result correction instruction is received from the interpretation doctor. The case where it is determined that it has not been received is a case where an operation for pressing the delete button 1404 has been received from an interpretation doctor.

  In step S <b> 1207, the PC 301 deletes the key image for which the interpretation doctor has instructed pasting, and proceeds to step S <b> 1113. Above, description of FIG. 12 is complete | finished.

  FIG. 13 shows a photograph of the key image based on the feature amount of the key image before pasting the key image in S1201 of the present invention from S1113 to the key image attachment field 505 in the report input screen 500 of FIG. It is a figure which shows the image of the process which specifies the site | part of the patient currently performed.

  Reference numeral 1300 denotes a sample image of each part of the human body stored in advance in the external memory 211 of the PC 301.

  The PC 301 is an image stored in the sample image 1300 and the examination image 707 of the report data 700 (FIG. 7) distributed from the report server 103 and stored in the external memory 211 of the PC 301. The feature values of the key images that have been instructed are compared, and the nearest image is searched to determine the part.

  As an example of the feature determination method, the sample image 1300 for each part is superimposed on the key image (in the example of FIG. 13, the image B of the examination image 707) on which the interpretation doctor instructed the pasting in S1107. Judgment is made as to whether they are the same or different in bit units. From the result of all the bit strings, the part of the sample image 1300 having the same number of bits is determined as the part of the key image.

  When the sample image 1300 is an image taken by CT or the like, the number of sample images 1300 is usually 100 or more. In this case, the interpretation doctor gives an instruction to paste the first one of the sample images 1300 and S1107. It compares with the performed key image and determines whether a site | part corresponds.

If it is determined that the parts match, the other sample images of the matched part sample image 1300 are compared with the key image for which the interpreting doctor instructed the pasting in S1107 to determine whether the parts match. By making the determination, it becomes possible to specify the part of the key image to which the interpretation doctor instructed the pasting in S1107 with higher accuracy.
This is the end of the description of FIG.

  As described above, according to the present invention, a warning word associated with examination information is registered in advance, and interpretation is performed when a warning word corresponding to patient examination information is included in the findings or diagnosis results during the report confirmation operation. By adopting a mechanism for notifying a doctor, it is possible to prevent erroneously inputting an interpretation result for a medical image of another examination while inputting the interpretation result for a medical image of a certain examination.

  In addition, the word to be registered in advance linked to the examination information is not limited to the form of the warning word, but the necessary word linked to the examination information is registered in advance, and the patient examination is included in the findings and diagnosis results during the report confirmation operation. When the necessary word corresponding to the information is not included, the interpretation doctor may be notified. Even if it is confirmed that a necessary word that must be used is used in this way, the interpretation result for the medical image of another examination is erroneous when inputting the interpretation result for the medical image of one examination. Can be notified to the interpretation doctor.

  The present invention can be implemented as a system, apparatus, method, program, storage medium, or the like, and can be applied to a system including a plurality of devices. You may apply to the apparatus which consists of one apparatus.

  Note that the present invention includes a software program that implements the functions of the above-described embodiments directly or remotely from a system or apparatus. The present invention also includes a case where the system or the computer of the apparatus is achieved by reading and executing the supplied program code.

  Accordingly, since the functions of the present invention are implemented by computer, the program code installed in the computer also implements the present invention. In other words, the present invention includes a computer program itself for realizing the functional processing of the present invention.

  In that case, as long as it has the function of a program, it may be in the form of object code, a program executed by an interpreter, script data supplied to the OS, or the like.

  Examples of the recording medium for supplying the program include a flexible disk, hard disk, optical disk, magneto-optical disk, MO, CD-ROM, CD-R, and CD-RW. In addition, there are magnetic tape, nonvolatile memory card, ROM, DVD (DVD-ROM, DVD-R), and the like.

  As another program supply method, a browser on a client computer is used to connect to an Internet home page. The computer program itself of the present invention or a compressed file including an automatic installation function can be downloaded from the homepage by downloading it to a recording medium such as a hard disk.

  It can also be realized by dividing the program code constituting the program of the present invention into a plurality of files and downloading each file from a different homepage. That is, a WWW server that allows a plurality of users to download a program file for realizing the functional processing of the present invention on a computer is also included in the present invention.

  In addition, the program of the present invention is encrypted, stored in a storage medium such as a CD-ROM, distributed to users, and key information for decryption is downloaded from a homepage via the Internet to users who have cleared predetermined conditions. Let It is also possible to execute the encrypted program by using the downloaded key information and install the program on a computer.

  Further, the functions of the above-described embodiments are realized by the computer executing the read program. In addition, based on the instructions of the program, an OS or the like running on the computer performs part or all of the actual processing, and the functions of the above-described embodiments can also be realized by the processing.

  Further, the program read from the recording medium is written in a memory provided in a function expansion board inserted into the computer or a function expansion unit connected to the computer. Thereafter, the CPU of the function expansion board or function expansion unit performs part or all of the actual processing based on the instructions of the program, and the functions of the above-described embodiments are realized by the processing.

  The above-described embodiments are merely examples of implementation in carrying out the present invention, and the technical scope of the present invention should not be construed as being limited thereto. That is, the present invention can be implemented in various forms without departing from the technical idea or the main features thereof.

102 Portal server 103 Report server 108 Database 301 PC

Claims (10)

Display control means for displaying a report input screen for inputting a result of interpretation of a medical image;
A determination unit that determines whether or not a combination of an interpretation result input via the report input screen whose display is controlled by the display control unit and incidental information of the medical image to be interpreted is correct;
A report generating system comprising: a notification unit configured to notify a user when the determination unit determines that the combination is not correct.   The report creation system according to claim 1, wherein the supplementary information of the medical image is examination information including attribute information and examination contents of a patient who is a subject of the medical image.   The notification means displays the report input screen so that information of an interpretation result whose combination with the supplementary information of the medical image is not correct can be identified. Report creation system described in. Storage means for storing words in association with any of the accompanying information of the medical image,
The determination unit determines whether the combination of the incidental information stored in the storage unit corresponding to the word input on the report input screen and the incidental information of the medical image to be interpreted is correct. The report creation system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the report creation system includes: A registration screen display means for displaying a registration screen for registering a word in association with any of the accompanying information of the medical image;
5. The report creation system according to claim 4, wherein the storage unit stores the word registered via the registration screen displayed by the registration screen display unit. The interpretation result input to the report input screen includes a key image,
2. The determination unit according to claim 1, wherein the determination unit determines whether or not a combination of a human body part to be imaged with a key image and a human body part included in the supplementary information of the medical image is correct. 6. The report creation system according to any one of items 1 to 5. A registration request receiving means for receiving a request for registering an interpretation result input via the report input screen whose display is controlled by the display control means;
7. The report creation according to claim 1, wherein the determination unit determines whether or not it is correct when a request for registering an interpretation result is received by the registration request reception unit. system. An input instruction receiving means for receiving an instruction to input an interpretation result via the report input screen displayed by the display control means;
With
7. The determination unit according to claim 1, wherein the determination unit determines whether or not the input instruction reception unit is correct in response to receiving an instruction to input an interpretation result via the report input screen by the input instruction reception unit. The report creation system according to item 1. A control method of a report creation system comprising a display control means for displaying a report input screen for inputting a result of interpretation of a medical image,
Whether the combination of the interpretation result input through the report input screen whose display is controlled by the display control unit and the incidental information of the medical image to be interpreted is determined by the determination unit of the report creation system. A determination step for determining;
A report creation system control method comprising: a notification step of notifying a user of a notification when the notification means of the report creation system determines that the combination is not correct in the determination step. A program that is read and executed by a report creation system including a display control means for displaying a report input screen for inputting a result of interpretation of a medical image,
The reporting system,
A determination unit that determines whether or not a combination of an interpretation result input via the report input screen whose display is controlled by the display control unit and incidental information of the medical image to be interpreted is correct;
When the determination unit determines that the combination is not correct, the program functions as a notification unit that notifies the user to that effect.

Images