EP0795192B1 - Metallization of phosphor screens - Google Patents

Metallization of phosphor screens Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0795192B1
EP0795192B1 EP95937127A EP95937127A EP0795192B1 EP 0795192 B1 EP0795192 B1 EP 0795192B1 EP 95937127 A EP95937127 A EP 95937127A EP 95937127 A EP95937127 A EP 95937127A EP 0795192 B1 EP0795192 B1 EP 0795192B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
film
poly
phosphor screen
aluminium
screen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP95937127A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0795192A1 (en
Inventor
Adelaide Titilayo Oluronke Morenike Adebayo
Warren Li
Alison Mary Wagland
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Vesuvius Holdings Ltd
Original Assignee
Cookson Group PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cookson Group PLC filed Critical Cookson Group PLC
Publication of EP0795192A1 publication Critical patent/EP0795192A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0795192B1 publication Critical patent/EP0795192B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J29/00Details of cathode-ray tubes or of electron-beam tubes of the types covered by group H01J31/00
    • H01J29/02Electrodes; Screens; Mounting, supporting, spacing or insulating thereof
    • H01J29/10Screens on or from which an image or pattern is formed, picked up, converted or stored
    • H01J29/18Luminescent screens
    • H01J29/28Luminescent screens with protective, conductive or reflective layers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process of metallizing phosphor screens, in particular for cathode ray tubes (CRTs).
  • CRTs cathode ray tubes
  • the electron permeable, light reflecting aluminium film on the target side of the phosphor screen of a CRT is formed by the evaporation of aluminium onto a smooth film of an organic material formed over the surface of a phosphor screen. This smooth film is subsequently burnt out to leave a mirror-like film of aluminium "tenting" across the top of the phosphor screen.
  • the phosphor layer is first wetted with an aqueous based pre-wet and a solvent based lacquer, comprising an approximately 2% solution of a polymer such as poly(iso-butylmethacrylate) in a solvent such as toluene, is floated on the top of the pre-wet.
  • a solvent based lacquer comprising an approximately 2% solution of a polymer such as poly(iso-butylmethacrylate) in a solvent such as toluene, is floated on the top of the pre-wet.
  • the water and solvent are removed by heating leaving a film of the polymeric material approximately 1 ⁇ m in thickness.
  • Aqueous based systems are described in US-A-3067055, US-A-3582389 and US-A-3582390 in which a water-based emulsion of a water insoluble, film forming resin such as an acrylate resin copolymer is coated onto the phosphor screen, the coating is dried, the coated layer is metallized, and the coating of the resin film volatilized by heating at a temperature of up to about 450°C.
  • the emulsion contains about 5 to 20 weight percent of the resin.
  • hydrogen peroxide is added to the emulsion, whereby it is stated that the tendency of the metal layer to blister over the phosphor screen area during the baking-out step is reduced.
  • aqueous based system One disadvantage of the aqueous based system is that the dispersion fills all of the spaces between the phosphor strips or dots and is thus a thicker layer than in the solvent based system. Accordingly, the amount of polymer left on the screen is greater than utilized in solvent based processes and is therefore more difficult to remove. Consequently, increased energy requirements may result from the application of extended or even multiple burn out steps.
  • the polymer film solution and the aluminium are applied to the phosphor screen and then the funnel of a CRT is attached to the screen with a glass frit in an organic binder. It is possible to remove both the polymer film and the organic binder in one heating cycle.
  • the quantities of polymer to be removed are such as to generally necessitate the bake out of the polymer film before the addition of the funnel of a CRT. Therefore two heating cycles are required with increased energy costs, and greater investment required in the number of ovens and thus also the space required on the manufacturing site.
  • an oxygen rich environment may be used to bake out the polymer in one heating cycle. This approach involves increased equipment costs and the requirement of oxygen.
  • DE-A-3321396 discloses the application of an organic layer to a phosphor screen followed by an aluminium layer with removal of the organic layer by heating.
  • EP-A-0382554 discloses a method for forming a metal backed layer using a metal film transferring sheet. The method involves forming a metal film on a mold-releasable sheet and either transferring the metal film to a phosphor screen, or forming a phosphor screen on the metal film and then transferring the composite onto a face plate with subsequent removal of the mold-releasable sheet.
  • the present invention provides a process for the metallization of a phosphor screen which process comprises the steps of: either
  • the films described in (a) above can be applied with the aluminium layer directly in contact with the phosphors on the TV screen, or, with the polymer layer directly in contact with the phosphors on the TV screen.
  • the advantage of the first approach is that there is no polymer layer between the aluminium layer and the phosphors. As a result, the aluminium layer is directly in contact with the phosphors and there is a much reduced chance of the aluminium film blistering during the burn out step. Additionally, since the polymer burns out above the aluminium layer a thicker and hence mechanically stronger polymer backing layer can be used to transfer the delicate aluminium layer to the phosphor screen. This facilitates the ease of application of the pre-formed aluminised film to the phosphor screen.
  • step (b) the polymeric material used on either side of the aluminium layer may be the same or different.
  • the film of the polymeric material which is used in the process of the invention preferably has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 10 ⁇ m, or a film area density of from 0.1 to 10 mg/cm 2 or more preferably 0.1 to 3.0 mg/cm 2 .
  • a conventional solvent based lacquer will give a film in the order of one micrometre thickness.
  • the polymeric film is a film which decomposes and/or volatilizes at a temperature of below 450°C.
  • Suitable polymeric films comprise poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate) poly(hydroxyalkanoate) poly(carbonate), poly(ethyleneoxide)-poly(propyleneoxide) block copolymer, poly(alpha-methylstyrene), hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, alginic acid or an associative thickener, such as Rheox (Registered Trade Mark) from Rohm and Haas and Rheovis from Allied Colloids.
  • Rheox Registered Trade Mark
  • the preferred polymeric film material for use in the present invention comprises a film of a poly(hydroxyalkanoate), preferably poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), poly(3-hydroxyvalerate), or a copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 3-hydroxyvaleric acid.
  • Suitable copolymers may comprise, for example 60 to 90% by weight of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 40 to 10% by weight of 3-hydroxyvaleric acid.
  • Suitable poly(hydroxyalkanoates) for use in the present invention are supplied in granular form or in the form of a latex under the Trade Name Biopol (Zeneca Specialities).
  • Biopol films are available from Goodfellow Limited, or can be prepared from Biopol in granular form such as by the methods as disclosed in WO94/00163, EP-A-0226439, WO91/13207 and DE-A-4040158. They can also be formed from a Biopol latex.
  • the following materials can be formulated into the polymeric film; hydrogen peroxide, ammonium oxalate or the boric acid complex of poly(vinyl alcohol). These materials are used to prevent blisters on the metal film caused by the evaporation of the polymer during the burn out cycle. Additionally, appropriate plasticisers such as phthalates and glycolates may be incorporated to reduce the brittleness of the polymer film.
  • a metal layer may be deposited onto the film coated screen according to techniques known in the art.
  • the metal layer is aluminium which is preferably deposited onto the phosphor screen by vacuum evaporation.
  • the aluminium layer preferably has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 0.3 ⁇ m.
  • the film of the polymeric material may be metallized on one side thereof to form a laminate which is applied to the phosphor screen to form a composite, or the film of the polymeric material may be metallised on one side and an additional polymeric film applied to form a three layered laminate which is applied to the phosphor screen in the form of a composite.
  • the application of the preformed film or the metallized polymeric film to the phosphor screen may be carried out by any suitable technique. It may be advantageous to pre-wet the phosphor screen, for example with a sodium silicate based aqueous solution, in order to assist in the even and uniform application of the film on the phosphor screen.
  • step (a) or step (b) of the method of the invention is then heated to a temperature above the decomposition and/or volatilization temperature of the polymeric film to burn out the polymeric film.
  • the preferred polymeric films for use in the present invention will decompose on heating to leave no residue, preferably at a temperature of below 350°C.
  • the heating of the composite in step (c) may be combined with the step of sealing the funnel of a cathode ray tube to the phosphor screen, i.e. a separate baking step to volatilise the polymeric film coating becomes unnecessary.
  • the sealing of a cathode ray tube funnel to a metallized phosphor screen is well known in the art, the seal generally being effected by using a frit sealing process in which a glass frit in an organic binder is used to seal the components together.
  • the oxygen which is present in the cathode ray tube is generally sufficient to assist in the burn out of the polymeric film coating, although it will be understood that additional air or oxygen-enriched air may be introduced into the cathode ray tube, as necessary.
  • the frit sealing of the metallized phosphor screen to the cathode ray tube will generally occur at a temperature of about 450°C.
  • the conventional temperature profile for the sealing cycle is termed a Lehr cycle.
  • the present invention also includes within its scope a phosphor screen which has been metallized by the process of the invention and a cathode ray tube which includes at least one phosphor screen which has been metallized by the process of the invention.
  • the Lehr cycle used in the following Examples is as follows: heat from room temperature to 450°C at 10°C/min, hold at 450°C for 45 minutes and then cool to room temperature.
  • Aluminised refers to the vapour deposition of a 1 inch piece of 99.99% pure aluminium wire (0.58 mm diameter) at 1.5 x 10 -5 mbar using an Edwards coating system E306A (Registered Trade Mark) to produce an aluminium coating on the substrate.
  • a 7.6cm x 7.6cm (3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds.
  • ca 10 ml of 29% solids containing Biopol latex supplied by Zeneca Specialities, Batch Number: BPL No. 505/1001
  • the glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess latex and to leave a thin even thickness wet latex coat on the glass slide.
  • the plastic film was aluminised and then peeled off the slide ready for further use.
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as made in Example 1 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing away from the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as made in Example 1 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a 7.6cm x 7.6cm (3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds.
  • ca 10 ml of 41% solids containing Biopol latex supplied by Zeneca Specialities, Batch Number: BPL No. 510/0301
  • the glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess latex and to give a thin even thickness wet latex coat on the glass slide.
  • the polymeric film was then aluminised and peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use.
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as made in Example 4 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a 7.6cm x 7.6cm(3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds.
  • ca 10 ml of a 5% w/w solution of poly(propylene carbonate) (supplied by PAC Polymers Inc., grade 40 M, lot number 20507-72-21) in dichloromethane was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide.
  • the glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess liquid and to leave a thin even thickness wet polymeric coat on the glass slide.
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised poly(propylene carbonate) film as made in Example 6 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a 7.6cm x 7.6cm(3" x 3") piece of Mylar sheet was spin coated with 10 ml of the following aqueous stock solution: 40g of 5wt% hydroxypropylcellulose (supplied by Hercules Ltd, Aqualon division under the trade name Klucel (viscosity type L) in water containing 5 drops of BYK024 wetting agent, supplied by BYK).
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised cellulose film as made in Example 9 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminium side of the film facing away from the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main part an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised cellulose film as made in Example 9 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminium side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main part an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a piece of pre-aluminised Biopol film as made in Example 4 whilst adhered to its glass backing slide, was spin coated (160 rpm, 20 seconds) with 10ml of a 5% w/w solution of Elvacite (PIBMA) in toluene (slurried on). The slide was re-spun (160 rpm, 20 seconds). The resulting film was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, then the whole film sandwich was peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density 3.1mg/cm 2 ).
  • a piece of TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA sandwich as made in Example 12 was placed onto the phosphors with the PIBMA side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
  • a pre-aluminised poly(propylene carbonate) film as made in Example 6 whilst still on its glass backing side was spin coated (160 rpm, 20 seconds) with 10ml of a 5% w/w solution of Elvacite (PIBMA) in toluene (slurried on). The slide was re-spun (160 rpm, 20 seconds). The resulting film was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, then the film sandwich was peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density 1.08mg/cm 2 ).
  • a piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whist the screen was still wet, a piece of poly(propylene carbonate)/aluminium/PIBMA film as made in Example 14 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the PIBMA side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried in air at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main an aluminium film adhered to the phosphors.

Description

The present invention relates to a process of metallizing phosphor screens, in particular for cathode ray tubes (CRTs).
The electron permeable, light reflecting aluminium film on the target side of the phosphor screen of a CRT is formed by the evaporation of aluminium onto a smooth film of an organic material formed over the surface of a phosphor screen. This smooth film is subsequently burnt out to leave a mirror-like film of aluminium "tenting" across the top of the phosphor screen.
Various processes for metallizing phosphor screens have been proposed in the prior art and these can generally be classified as solvent based systems and aqueous based systems.
In the solvent based system, the phosphor layer is first wetted with an aqueous based pre-wet and a solvent based lacquer, comprising an approximately 2% solution of a polymer such as poly(iso-butylmethacrylate) in a solvent such as toluene, is floated on the top of the pre-wet. The water and solvent are removed by heating leaving a film of the polymeric material approximately 1µm in thickness.
The major disadvantage of this approach is that it involves the use of large quantities of volatile organic solvents, such as toluene, with all the associated environmental concerns.
Aqueous based systems are described in US-A-3067055, US-A-3582389 and US-A-3582390 in which a water-based emulsion of a water insoluble, film forming resin such as an acrylate resin copolymer is coated onto the phosphor screen, the coating is dried, the coated layer is metallized, and the coating of the resin film volatilized by heating at a temperature of up to about 450°C. The emulsion contains about 5 to 20 weight percent of the resin. In the latter patent specification hydrogen peroxide is added to the emulsion, whereby it is stated that the tendency of the metal layer to blister over the phosphor screen area during the baking-out step is reduced.
One disadvantage of the aqueous based system is that the dispersion fills all of the spaces between the phosphor strips or dots and is thus a thicker layer than in the solvent based system. Accordingly, the amount of polymer left on the screen is greater than utilized in solvent based processes and is therefore more difficult to remove. Consequently, increased energy requirements may result from the application of extended or even multiple burn out steps.
In the solvent based system as described generally above the polymer film solution and the aluminium are applied to the phosphor screen and then the funnel of a CRT is attached to the screen with a glass frit in an organic binder. It is possible to remove both the polymer film and the organic binder in one heating cycle.
In the aqueous based systems the quantities of polymer to be removed are such as to generally necessitate the bake out of the polymer film before the addition of the funnel of a CRT. Therefore two heating cycles are required with increased energy costs, and greater investment required in the number of ovens and thus also the space required on the manufacturing site. Alternatively, an oxygen rich environment may be used to bake out the polymer in one heating cycle. This approach involves increased equipment costs and the requirement of oxygen.
Another approach described in the prior art for metallizing phosphor screens is described in US-A-3910806. In the method as disclosed a thin layer of a metal such as aluminium is applied to the phosphor screen of a cathode ray tube by the transfer of a metal layer formed on a substrate directly to the phosphor layer on the phosphor screen. The metal layer is adhered to the phosphor layer by means of a pressure sensitive adhesive and the substrate which is releasably attached to the metal layer is then removed.
DE-A-3321396 discloses the application of an organic layer to a phosphor screen followed by an aluminium layer with removal of the organic layer by heating.
EP-A-0382554 discloses a method for forming a metal backed layer using a metal film transferring sheet. The method involves forming a metal film on a mold-releasable sheet and either transferring the metal film to a phosphor screen, or forming a phosphor screen on the metal film and then transferring the composite onto a face plate with subsequent removal of the mold-releasable sheet.
We have now developed a process of metallizing phosphor screens which is more energy efficient than the aqueous based systems of the prior art which does not involve the use of organic solvents, as in the solvent lacquers, and which does not involve the use of a pressure sensitive adhesive and the complicated transfer mechanism described in the prior art.
Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for the metallization of a phosphor screen which process comprises the steps of:
   either
  • a) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed film of a polymeric material which volatilizes at a temperature of below 450°C, the preformed film having a layer of metal deposited on one side thereof, to form a composite;
  •    or
    • b) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed sandwich of aluminium between two layers of a polymeric material;
       and
    • c) heating the composite formed in step (a) or step (b) to a temperature above the decomposition temperature of the polymeric film in order to decompose and/or volatilise the polymeric film coating.
    The films described in (a) above can be applied with the aluminium layer directly in contact with the phosphors on the TV screen, or, with the polymer layer directly in contact with the phosphors on the TV screen. The advantage of the first approach is that there is no polymer layer between the aluminium layer and the phosphors. As a result, the aluminium layer is directly in contact with the phosphors and there is a much reduced chance of the aluminium film blistering during the burn out step. Additionally, since the polymer burns out above the aluminium layer a thicker and hence mechanically stronger polymer backing layer can be used to transfer the delicate aluminium layer to the phosphor screen. This facilitates the ease of application of the pre-formed aluminised film to the phosphor screen.
    The advantage of using the sandwich approach (b) is that the important aluminium layer is fully protected. In step (b) the polymeric material used on either side of the aluminium layer may be the same or different.
    The film of the polymeric material which is used in the process of the invention preferably has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 10µm, or a film area density of from 0.1 to 10 mg/cm2 or more preferably 0.1 to 3.0 mg/cm2.
    A conventional solvent based lacquer will give a film in the order of one micrometre thickness.
    The polymeric film is a film which decomposes and/or volatilizes at a temperature of below 450°C. Suitable polymeric films comprise poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate) poly(hydroxyalkanoate) poly(carbonate), poly(ethyleneoxide)-poly(propyleneoxide) block copolymer, poly(alpha-methylstyrene), hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, alginic acid or an associative thickener, such as Rheox (Registered Trade Mark) from Rohm and Haas and Rheovis from Allied Colloids.
    The preferred polymeric film material for use in the present invention comprises a film of a poly(hydroxyalkanoate), preferably poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), poly(3-hydroxyvalerate), or a copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 3-hydroxyvaleric acid. Suitable copolymers may comprise, for example 60 to 90% by weight of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 40 to 10% by weight of 3-hydroxyvaleric acid. Suitable poly(hydroxyalkanoates) for use in the present invention are supplied in granular form or in the form of a latex under the Trade Name Biopol (Zeneca Specialities).
    Biopol films are available from Goodfellow Limited, or can be prepared from Biopol in granular form such as by the methods as disclosed in WO94/00163, EP-A-0226439, WO91/13207 and DE-A-4040158. They can also be formed from a Biopol latex.
    Optionally the following materials can be formulated into the polymeric film; hydrogen peroxide, ammonium oxalate or the boric acid complex of poly(vinyl alcohol). These materials are used to prevent blisters on the metal film caused by the evaporation of the polymer during the burn out cycle. Additionally, appropriate plasticisers such as phthalates and glycolates may be incorporated to reduce the brittleness of the polymer film.
    A metal layer may be deposited onto the film coated screen according to techniques known in the art. For the production of CRTs the metal layer is aluminium which is preferably deposited onto the phosphor screen by vacuum evaporation. The aluminium layer preferably has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 0.3µm.
    Alternatively, the film of the polymeric material may be metallized on one side thereof to form a laminate which is applied to the phosphor screen to form a composite, or the film of the polymeric material may be metallised on one side and an additional polymeric film applied to form a three layered laminate which is applied to the phosphor screen in the form of a composite.
    The application of the preformed film or the metallized polymeric film to the phosphor screen may be carried out by any suitable technique. It may be advantageous to pre-wet the phosphor screen, for example with a sodium silicate based aqueous solution, in order to assist in the even and uniform application of the film on the phosphor screen.
    The composite formed either in step (a) or step (b) of the method of the invention is then heated to a temperature above the decomposition and/or volatilization temperature of the polymeric film to burn out the polymeric film. The preferred polymeric films for use in the present invention will decompose on heating to leave no residue, preferably at a temperature of below 350°C.
    In putting the process of the present invention into practice, the heating of the composite in step (c) may be combined with the step of sealing the funnel of a cathode ray tube to the phosphor screen, i.e. a separate baking step to volatilise the polymeric film coating becomes unnecessary. The sealing of a cathode ray tube funnel to a metallized phosphor screen is well known in the art, the seal generally being effected by using a frit sealing process in which a glass frit in an organic binder is used to seal the components together. The oxygen which is present in the cathode ray tube is generally sufficient to assist in the burn out of the polymeric film coating, although it will be understood that additional air or oxygen-enriched air may be introduced into the cathode ray tube, as necessary. The frit sealing of the metallized phosphor screen to the cathode ray tube will generally occur at a temperature of about 450°C. The conventional temperature profile for the sealing cycle is termed a Lehr cycle.
    The present invention also includes within its scope a phosphor screen which has been metallized by the process of the invention and a cathode ray tube which includes at least one phosphor screen which has been metallized by the process of the invention.
    The present invention will be further described with reference to the following Examples in which the following definitions are used.
    Lehr Cycle
    The Lehr cycle used in the following Examples is as follows: heat from room temperature to 450°C at 10°C/min, hold at 450°C for 45 minutes and then cool to room temperature.
    Aluminised
    Aluminised refers to the vapour deposition of a 1 inch piece of 99.99% pure aluminium wire (0.58 mm diameter) at 1.5 x 10-5 mbar using an Edwards coating system E306A (Registered Trade Mark) to produce an aluminium coating on the substrate.
    EXAMPLE 1 The preparation of pre-formed aluminised from 1µm mean particle size Biopol latex
    A 7.6cm x 7.6cm (3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds. During this time, ca 10 ml of 29% solids containing Biopol latex (supplied by Zeneca Specialities, Batch Number: BPL No. 505/1001) was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide. The glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess latex and to leave a thin even thickness wet latex coat on the glass slide. The slide was dried at room temperature to leave a translucent plastic coating on the slide (film area density = 0.34 mg/cm2). The plastic film was aluminised and then peeled off the slide ready for further use.
    The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed aluminised and non-aluminised Biopol films made from 1µm mean particle size Biopol latex EXAMPLE 2
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as made in Example 1 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing away from the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    EXAMPLE 3
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as made in Example 1 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    EXAMPLE 4 The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films from 0.5µm mean particle size Biopol latex
    A 7.6cm x 7.6cm (3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds. During this time, ca 10 ml of 41% solids containing Biopol latex (supplied by Zeneca Specialities, Batch Number: BPL No. 510/0301) was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide. The glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess latex and to give a thin even thickness wet latex coat on the glass slide. The slide was dried at room temperature to leave a translucent polymeric coating on the slide (film area density = 2.83 mg/cm2). The polymeric film was then aluminised and peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use.
    The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed aluminised Biopol films made from 0.5µm mean particle size Biopol latex EXAMPLE 5
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-formed aluminised film as made in Example 4 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    EXAMPLE 6 The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films from poly(propylene carbonate)
    A 7.6cm x 7.6cm(3" x 3") square piece of glass plate was spun horizontally on its axis at a rate of 160 rpm for 20 seconds. During this time, ca 10 ml of a 5% w/w solution of poly(propylene carbonate) (supplied by PAC Polymers Inc., grade 40 M, lot number 20507-72-21) in dichloromethane was slurried directly onto the spinning glass slide. The glass slide was spun again for a further 20 seconds at 160 rpm to remove any excess liquid and to leave a thin even thickness wet polymeric coat on the glass slide. The slide was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, aluminised and peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density = 0.65mg/cm2).
    The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed aluminised poly(propylene carbonate) films EXAMPLE 7
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised poly(propylene carbonate) film as made in Example 6 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminised side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films made from poly(isobutyl methacrylate)(PIBMA) EXAMPLE 8
    A stock solution was made by dissolving 5g of poly(isobutyl methacrylate) [PIBMA] (supplied by ICI Acrylics, under the trade name Elvacite, grade 2045) in 45g of toluene. To this stock solution was added 10 drops of di-n-butylphthalate as plasticizer and 10 drops of Disperbyk 164 as wetting agent (supplied by BYK). 2ml of this stock solution was coated onto a Teflon tile covering ca. 40 cm2 of the Teflon. The tile was left to dry in an oven at 45°C for 3 hours, then, ca. 30 cm2 of the resulting plastic film was peeled off the Teflon backing tile, placed flat onto a glass slide and aluminised. (Film area density = 5.2mg/cm2).
    The preparation of pre-formed aluminised films made from hydroxypropylcelluose EXAMPLE 9
    A 7.6cm x 7.6cm(3" x 3") piece of Mylar sheet was spin coated with 10 ml of the following aqueous stock solution: 40g of 5wt% hydroxypropylcellulose (supplied by Hercules Ltd, Aqualon division under the trade name Klucel (viscosity type L) in water containing 5 drops of BYK024 wetting agent, supplied by BYK). The sheet was dried in an oven for 2 days at 45°C, aluminised and peeled off its Mylar backing sheet ready for further use. (Film area density = 1.7mg/cm2).
    EXAMPLE 10
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised cellulose film as made in Example 9 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminium side of the film facing away from the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main part an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    EXAMPLE 11
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of pre-aluminised cellulose film as made in Example 9 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the aluminium side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main part an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    EXAMPLE 12 The formation of pre-formed Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches
    A piece of pre-aluminised Biopol film as made in Example 4 whilst adhered to its glass backing slide, was spin coated (160 rpm, 20 seconds) with 10ml of a 5% w/w solution of Elvacite (PIBMA) in toluene (slurried on). The slide was re-spun (160 rpm, 20 seconds). The resulting film was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, then the whole film sandwich was peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density = 3.1mg/cm2).
    The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches EXAMPLE 13
    A piece of TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whilst the screen was still wet, a piece of Biopol/Aluminium/PIBMA sandwich as made in Example 12 was placed onto the phosphors with the PIBMA side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave an aluminium film adhering to the phosphors.
    EXAMPLE 14 The preparation of pre-formed poly(propylene carbonate) aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches
    A pre-aluminised poly(propylene carbonate) film as made in Example 6 whilst still on its glass backing side was spin coated (160 rpm, 20 seconds) with 10ml of a 5% w/w solution of Elvacite (PIBMA) in toluene (slurried on). The slide was re-spun (160 rpm, 20 seconds). The resulting film was dried in an oven at 55°C for 1 hour, then the film sandwich was peeled off the glass backing slide ready for further use. (Film area density = 1.08mg/cm2).
    The aluminisation of TV screens using pre-formed poly(propylene carbonate)/Aluminium/PIBMA film sandwiches EXAMPLE 15
    A piece of colour TV screen was pre-wetted using an aqueous sodium silicate based pre-wet. Whist the screen was still wet, a piece of poly(propylene carbonate)/aluminium/PIBMA film as made in Example 14 was placed onto the phosphor screen with the PIBMA side of the film facing towards the phosphors. The screen was dried in air at room temperature and heated under the conditions of the Lehr cycle to leave in the main an aluminium film adhered to the phosphors.

    Claims (14)

    1. A process for the metallization of a phosphor screen which process comprises the steps of:
         either
      a) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed film of a polymeric material which volatilizes at a temperature of below 450°C, the preformed film having a layer of metal deposited on one side thereof, to form a composite;
         or
      b) applying to a phosphor screen a preformed sandwich of aluminium between two layers of a polymeric material;
         and
      c) heating the composite formed in step (a) or step (b) to a temperature above the decomposition temperature of the polymeric film in order to decompose and/or volatilise the polymeric film coating.
    2. A process as claimed in claim 1 wherein the film of polymeric material has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 10µm.
    3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the film of polymeric material has a film area density of from 0.1 to 10 mg/cm2.
    4. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the polymeric film comprises a film of a poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate), poly(hydroxy-alkanoate), poly(carbonate), poly(ethyleneoxide), poly(propyleneoxide) block copolymer, poly(alpha-methylstyrene)hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, alginic acid or an associative thickener.
    5. A process as claimed in claim 4 wherein the poly(hydroxyalkanoate) is a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate), a poly(3-hydroxyvalerate) or a copolymer of 3-hydroxybutyric acid and 3-hydroxyvaleric acid.
    6. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the phosphor screen is pre-wetted before step (a) or (b).
    7. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the metal which is deposited upon the film coated screen or upon the polymeric film is aluminium.
    8. A process as claimed in claim 7 wherein the layer of aluminium is deposited by vacuum evaporation.
    9. A process as claimed in claim 8 wherein the layer of aluminium has a thickness in the range of from 0.1 to 0.3µm.
    10. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the decomposition and/or volatilisation of the polymeric film is effected at a temperature of below 350°C.
    11. A process claimed in any one of the preceding claims wherein the heating of the composite in step (c) is effected during the sealing of the funnel of a cathode ray tube to the phosphor screen.
    12. A process as claimed in claim 11 wherein the maximum temperature reached during the sealing step is about 450°C.
    13. A phosphor screen which has been metallized by a process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims.
    14. A cathode ray tube which includes at least one phosphor screen which has been metallized by a process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12.
    EP95937127A 1994-11-30 1995-11-27 Metallization of phosphor screens Expired - Lifetime EP0795192B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    GB9424162 1994-11-30
    GB9424162A GB9424162D0 (en) 1994-11-30 1994-11-30 Metallization of phosphor screens
    PCT/GB1995/002769 WO1996017371A1 (en) 1994-11-30 1995-11-27 Metallization of phosphor screens

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP0795192A1 EP0795192A1 (en) 1997-09-17
    EP0795192B1 true EP0795192B1 (en) 1998-07-29

    Family

    ID=10765206

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP95937127A Expired - Lifetime EP0795192B1 (en) 1994-11-30 1995-11-27 Metallization of phosphor screens

    Country Status (6)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP0795192B1 (en)
    JP (1) JPH10510092A (en)
    AU (1) AU3933195A (en)
    DE (1) DE69503804T2 (en)
    GB (1) GB9424162D0 (en)
    WO (1) WO1996017371A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (3)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    JP2003346647A (en) * 2002-05-22 2003-12-05 Sony Corp Manufacturing method of phosphor panel and intermediate film sheet for forming phosphor panel
    AU2002953440A0 (en) 2002-12-19 2003-01-09 Unisearch Limited A method of treating a stiffened vessel
    US8529993B2 (en) 2006-05-01 2013-09-10 Zetta Research andDevelopment LLC—RPO Series Low volatility polymers for two-stage deposition processes

    Family Cites Families (2)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    DE3321396A1 (en) * 1983-06-14 1984-12-20 Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-Gmbh, 6000 Frankfurt Process for producing a fluorescent screen
    EP0382554A3 (en) * 1989-02-10 1992-09-30 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method of forming a metal-backed layer and a method of forming an anode

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    DE69503804D1 (en) 1998-09-03
    JPH10510092A (en) 1998-09-29
    GB9424162D0 (en) 1995-01-18
    EP0795192A1 (en) 1997-09-17
    AU3933195A (en) 1996-06-19
    WO1996017371A1 (en) 1996-06-06
    DE69503804T2 (en) 1999-04-15

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    US5853446A (en) Method for forming glass rib structures
    US5985460A (en) Insulator composition, green tape, and method for forming plasma display apparatus barrier-rib
    US4187340A (en) Method of forming patterned transparent electro-conductive film on the substrate of liquid crystal display
    US3067055A (en) Metallized phosphor screens and method of making same
    US4122213A (en) Method for metallizing a phosphor screen for a cathode ray tube
    US5980347A (en) Process for manufacturing plasma display panel
    EP1557855A2 (en) Laminate sheet, method of producing back substrate for plasma display panel, back substrate for plasma display panel, and plasma display panel
    US4339475A (en) Method of forming a fluorescent screen for cathode-ray tube
    JP2000053444A (en) Glass paste composition, transfer film and plasma display panel
    EP0795192B1 (en) Metallization of phosphor screens
    EP1605491A1 (en) Laminate sheet, method of producing back substrate for plasma display panel, back substrate for plasma display panel, and plasma display panel
    EP0795190B1 (en) Process of metallizing phosphor screens
    US3910806A (en) Method for metalizing a cathode ray tube screen
    WO2002037522A1 (en) Fluorescent material layer with metal back, method of forming the fluorescent material layer, and image display device
    EP0313448B1 (en) Process for the metalisation of a luminescent screen
    US7052353B2 (en) Method of forming a phosphor screen and an image display unit containing the phosphor screen
    KR860001673B1 (en) Formation of fluorescent screen for cathode-ray tube
    US5178906A (en) Method of manufacturing a phosphor screen for a CRT using an adhesion-promoting, blister-preventing solution
    KR20060042969A (en) Glass powder-containing resin composition, transfer film and plasma display panel production process using the same
    JPH10310453A (en) Glass paste composition
    US4382980A (en) Magnesium compositions and process for forming MGO film
    US5326588A (en) Cathode ray tube
    JP4187294B2 (en) Method for forming barrier rib of plasma display panel
    US2906639A (en) Method of improving adherence of luminescent screens
    JP3746420B2 (en) Method for manufacturing plasma display panel

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 19970602

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB IE IT NL

    GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 19971028

    GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: B1

    Designated state(s): DE FR GB IE IT NL

    ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

    Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO ROMA S.P.A.

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 69503804

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 19980903

    ET Fr: translation filed
    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed
    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20001006

    Year of fee payment: 6

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IE

    Payment date: 20001012

    Year of fee payment: 6

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20001019

    Year of fee payment: 6

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20001117

    Year of fee payment: 6

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Payment date: 20001130

    Year of fee payment: 6

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20011127

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20011127

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: IF02

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: NL

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20020601

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20020702

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20011127

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20020730

    NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

    Effective date: 20020601

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: IE

    Ref legal event code: MM4A

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

    Effective date: 20051127