DE102008021766A1 - Optimal dose distribution producing method for tumor irradiation, involves directly estimating adjustment of plate structure of irradiation apparatus using optimization process e.g. direct Monte Carlo optimization - Google Patents
Optimal dose distribution producing method for tumor irradiation, involves directly estimating adjustment of plate structure of irradiation apparatus using optimization process e.g. direct Monte Carlo optimization Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- DE102008021766A1 DE102008021766A1 DE200810021766 DE102008021766A DE102008021766A1 DE 102008021766 A1 DE102008021766 A1 DE 102008021766A1 DE 200810021766 DE200810021766 DE 200810021766 DE 102008021766 A DE102008021766 A DE 102008021766A DE 102008021766 A1 DE102008021766 A1 DE 102008021766A1
- Authority
- DE
- Germany
- Prior art keywords
- optimization
- plate structure
- irradiation
- dose distribution
- monte carlo
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/103—Treatment planning systems
- A61N5/1031—Treatment planning systems using a specific method of dose optimization
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/103—Treatment planning systems
- A61N5/1031—Treatment planning systems using a specific method of dose optimization
- A61N2005/1034—Monte Carlo type methods; particle tracking
Abstract
Description
Die Bestrahlung von Tumoren bedarf wegen der hohen applizierten Dosen einer möglichst genauen Dosisberechnung mit einem geeigneten rechnergestützten Planungssystem. Die zumeist angewendeten, kommerziell verfügbaren Verfahren verwenden „by-trial-and-error”-Methoden, die einen erfahrenen und speziell ausgebildeten Medizinphysiker voraussetzen. Dies gilt auch für eine neuere Entwicklung mit automatischer Optimierung der Dosisverteilung, der sog. intensitätsmodulierten Radiotherapie (IMRT).The Radiation of tumors is required because of the high dose applied one possible accurate dose calculation with a suitable computer-aided planning system. The most widely used commercially available methods use "by-trial-and-error" methods that require a require experienced and specially trained medical physicists. This also applies to a recent development with automatic optimization of dose distribution, the so-called intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT).
Wir haben ein IMRT-Verfahren der 2. Generation entwickelt, das viele Nachteile vermeidet, die sog. direkte Monte-Carlo-Optimierung (DMCO). Im Gegensatz zu konventionellen Systemen werden keine Zwischenschritte durchgeführt, sondern die wesentlichen Parameter des Bestrahlungsgerätes (einige Tausend) werden direkt optimiert. Dies vermeidet die Verschlechterung des Ergebnisses konventioneller Systeme bei der Strahlenanwendung gegenüber dem Planergebnis. Die Optimierung unseres Systems erfolgt mit dem genauesten der bekannten Optimierungsalgorithmen, dem sog. „Simulated Annealing”. Dieser Code ist in der Lage, selbst bei kompliziertesten Fällen das beste Optimum zu finden.We have developed a 2nd generation IMRT process that has many Avoid disadvantages, the so-called direct Monte Carlo optimization (DMCO). Unlike conventional systems, there are no intermediate steps carried out, but the essential parameters of the irradiation device (some Thousand) are optimized directly. This avoids the deterioration the result of conventional systems in radiation application compared to the Ergebnis. The optimization of our system is done with the most accurate the known optimization algorithms, the so-called "simulated annealing". This Code is capable of doing that even in the most complicated cases to find the best optimum.
Ein besonderer Vorzug von DMCO ist der eingesetzte Dosisberechnungsalgorithmus. Auch dazu wird eine Methode herangezogen, die als die genaueste bekannt ist, das Monte-Carlo-Verfahren (MC). Das Verfahren wird üblicherweise wegen seiner langen Rechenzeiten nur in Sonderfällen eingesetzt. Wir konnten eine Methode entwickeln, die nach einmaliger Vorberechnung mit MC-Genauigkeit in kurzer Zeit eine Dosisberechnung mit variablen Bestrahlungsfeldern durchführen kann. Ein weiterer Vorteil von DMCO ist die Flexibilität gegenüber der stürmischen Flut von Neuentwicklungen von Bestrahlungsgeräten. Die Randbedingungen des Gerätes können direkt in die Optimierung eingegeben werden.One The particular advantage of DMCO is the dose calculation algorithm used. Again, a method is used which is the most accurate is known, the Monte Carlo method (MC). The procedure usually becomes because of its long computing time used only in special cases. We could develop a method that after one-time pre-calculation with MC accuracy in a short time a dose calculation with variable irradiation fields carry out can. Another advantage of DMCO is the flexibility over the stormy one Flood of new developments of radiation equipment. The boundary conditions of equipment can be entered directly into the optimization.
Zusammenfassend können die Vorzüge von DMCO wie folgt beschrieben werden.
- – höchste Präzision bei der Dosisberechnung
- – höchste Präzision bei der Optimierung
- – höchste Präzision bei der Anpassung an neue Bestrahlungsgeräte
- - highest precision in the dose calculation
- - highest precision in the optimization
- - Highest precision in the adaptation to new radiation equipment
Mit DMCO kann eine wesentliche Verbesserung der Qualität von Bestrahlungsplänen erzielt werden. Dies erhöht potentiell die komplikationsfreie Tumorheilung.With DMCO can achieve a significant improvement in the quality of treatment plans become. This increases potentially the complication-free tumor healing.
Das
Verfahren arbeitet folgendermaßen:
Die
in der Bestrahlungsapparatur vorgegebene Lamellenstruktur und die
tatsächlich
möglichen
Veränderungen
werden in Optimierungsverfahren simuliert. Im „Simulated Annealing”-Verfahren wird der „elementary
move”,
d. h. der elementare Einzelschritt durch eine random gewählte Veränderung
der Lamellenanordnung erzeugt. Die entsprechenden Übergangswahrscheinlichkeiten
zu der neuen Lamellenstellung werden berechnet. Der Move bzw. Einzelschritt
wird gegebenenfalls angenommen. Zur Berechnung der Übergangswahrscheinlichkeit
wird als Kostenfunktion die vereinbarte Dosisverteilung herangezogen.
Diese wird direkt durch die in der Forschung bekannten inversen
Monte-Carlo-Methoden berechnet. Die Dosisverteilung wird durch die
von den behandelnden Ärzten
angegebene Evaluations-Methode in die Kostenfunktion umgewandelt. Die
Kostenfunktion wird von den behandelnden Ärzten durch Festlegung der
Dosis-Randbedingungen vorgegeben. Andere analoge Vorgehensweisen
sind gegebenenfalls möglich.
Normalerweise wird eine möglichst
homogene Dosisverteilung innerhalb des Tumors bei möglichst
weitgehender Schonung der Risikoorgane verlangt. Das neue Verfahren
trägt genau
dieser Problemstellung und möglichen
Modifikationen Rechnung. Gerade diese Flexibilität erhöht die Erfolgsaussichten der
so berechneten Dosisverteilung aufgrund der Lamellenbestrahlung
beträchtlich.The procedure works as follows:
The lamellar structure specified in the irradiation apparatus and the actually possible changes are simulated in optimization methods. In the "simulated annealing" method, the "elementary move", ie the elementary single step is generated by a randomly selected change of the lamellar arrangement. The corresponding transition probabilities to the new slat position are calculated. The move or single step is accepted if necessary. To calculate the transition probability, the agreed dose distribution is used as the cost function. This is calculated directly by the inverse Monte Carlo methods known in research. The dose distribution is converted into the cost function by the evaluation method indicated by the treating physicians. The cost function is specified by the treating physicians by determining the dose boundary conditions. Other analogous approaches may be possible. Normally a homogeneous dose distribution within the tumor is required, as far as possible to protect the organs at risk. The new method takes exactly this problem and possible modifications into account. It is this flexibility that considerably increases the chances of success of the dose distribution thus calculated due to the lamella irradiation.
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE200810021766 DE102008021766A1 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2008-04-30 | Optimal dose distribution producing method for tumor irradiation, involves directly estimating adjustment of plate structure of irradiation apparatus using optimization process e.g. direct Monte Carlo optimization |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE200810021766 DE102008021766A1 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2008-04-30 | Optimal dose distribution producing method for tumor irradiation, involves directly estimating adjustment of plate structure of irradiation apparatus using optimization process e.g. direct Monte Carlo optimization |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
DE102008021766A1 true DE102008021766A1 (en) | 2009-11-05 |
Family
ID=41130935
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
DE200810021766 Withdrawn DE102008021766A1 (en) | 2008-04-30 | 2008-04-30 | Optimal dose distribution producing method for tumor irradiation, involves directly estimating adjustment of plate structure of irradiation apparatus using optimization process e.g. direct Monte Carlo optimization |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
DE (1) | DE102008021766A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102012002855A1 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2013-12-05 | Ingo Morgenstern | Method for using excess amounts of electricity for operating huge computer systems, involves proposing and calculating physical simulations of quantum chromodynamics and high-temperature superconductivity |
CN106902480A (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2017-06-30 | 西安体医疗科技有限公司 | A kind of parallel Quantum annealing target spot distribution calculation method |
-
2008
- 2008-04-30 DE DE200810021766 patent/DE102008021766A1/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102012002855A1 (en) | 2012-02-13 | 2013-12-05 | Ingo Morgenstern | Method for using excess amounts of electricity for operating huge computer systems, involves proposing and calculating physical simulations of quantum chromodynamics and high-temperature superconductivity |
CN106902480A (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2017-06-30 | 西安体医疗科技有限公司 | A kind of parallel Quantum annealing target spot distribution calculation method |
CN106902480B (en) * | 2017-03-07 | 2019-12-03 | 西安一体医疗科技有限公司 | A kind of parallel Quantum annealing target spot distribution calculation method |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP3103519B1 (en) | A method, a computer program product and a computer system for radiotherapy optimization | |
EP2158939B1 (en) | Method and device for selecting an irradiation plan and irradiation assembly | |
Stathakis et al. | Treatment planning and delivery of IMRT using 6 and 18 MV photon beams without flattening filter | |
CN103656877B (en) | Radiation therapy planning device | |
CN103394167A (en) | BED (biological effective dose)-based prediction method for complications caused by tumor radiotherapy | |
CN105031820A (en) | Intensity modulated radiation therapy reverse optimization method and device | |
US20180111005A1 (en) | Method of selecting beam geometries | |
WO2014009076A1 (en) | Method and device for determining an irradiation plan for a particle irradiation unit | |
EP2292298A1 (en) | Method for determining an irradiation plan, irradiation planning device and irradiation assembly | |
Cabrera et al. | Multi-objective optimisation of positively homogeneous functions and an application in radiation therapy | |
DE102008021766A1 (en) | Optimal dose distribution producing method for tumor irradiation, involves directly estimating adjustment of plate structure of irradiation apparatus using optimization process e.g. direct Monte Carlo optimization | |
CN107998519A (en) | A kind of molecular dynamics re-optimization algorithm for IMRT | |
DE102011007148A1 (en) | Method for radiation planning and radiation planning device | |
CN102136041B (en) | Treatment plan system | |
Richter et al. | Influence of a transverse magnetic field on the dose deposited by a 6 MV linear accelerator: A Monte Carlo study | |
CN105477789A (en) | Dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy method based on quadratic programming model suppressing total beam-out time | |
CN109248385B (en) | Radiation therapy plan optimization system based on Monte Carlo tree search | |
Wang et al. | Feasibility of using nonflat photon beams for whole‐breast irradiation with breath hold | |
Zhang et al. | The aperture shape optimization based on fuzzy enhancement | |
Nouranian et al. | Automatic prostate brachytherapy preplanning using joint sparse analysis | |
Flynn | Loss of radiobiological effect of imaging dose in image guided radiotherapy due to prolonged imaging‐to‐treatment times | |
EP2814572B1 (en) | Method and device for determining an irradiation plan for a particle irradiation unit | |
DE102012200297B3 (en) | Method for determining four dimensional-plan for carrying out intensity modulated therapeutic irradiation of target volume moving in irregular periods, involves moving radiation source of radiation therapy device around target volume | |
Furmanová et al. | Using multiple planning scans to predict organ shape variability during RT for prostate cancer | |
Mnejja et al. | Dose Distribution Prediction for Optimal Treamtment of Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
8122 | Nonbinding interest in granting licenses declared | ||
R119 | Application deemed withdrawn, or ip right lapsed, due to non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20111101 |