CN112446521B - Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety - Google Patents

Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN112446521B
CN112446521B CN201910820084.6A CN201910820084A CN112446521B CN 112446521 B CN112446521 B CN 112446521B CN 201910820084 A CN201910820084 A CN 201910820084A CN 112446521 B CN112446521 B CN 112446521B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
planning
line
power flow
power plant
access system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN201910820084.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN112446521A (en
Inventor
王宝华
王冰冰
蒋海峰
张曼
李铭
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing University of Science and Technology filed Critical Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN201910820084.6A priority Critical patent/CN112446521B/en
Publication of CN112446521A publication Critical patent/CN112446521A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN112446521B publication Critical patent/CN112446521B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Electricity, gas or water supply

Abstract

The invention discloses a wind power plant access system multi-target planning method considering economy and safety, which comprises the following steps: acquiring system parameters and planning information; constructing a multi-target planning model of the wind power plant access system, wherein the multi-target planning model comprises an economic target, a safety target and planning constraint conditions; solving the multi-target planning model by adopting an NSGA-II algorithm, performing probability load flow calculation on the generated planning scheme and calculating a target function value; and after the algorithm reaches a termination condition, determining the optimal scheme of the wind power plant access system by using an entropy weight method and a TOPSIS strategy. The method simultaneously considers the economy and the safety of the wind power plant access system in the planning process, and compared with the situation of only considering the economy, the obtained planning scheme has stronger adaptability to uncertain factors of the system; when the method is applied to practical problems, more reasonable schemes can be provided from different angles, and reference is provided for planning decision-making personnel.

Description

Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of power system planning, in particular to a wind power plant access system multi-target planning method considering economy and safety.
Background
Due to energy crisis and environmental pollution problems in countries around the world, new environmentally-friendly renewable energy sources are being vigorously developed and utilized, and new energy power generation, including wind power generation, accounts for an increasingly higher proportion of power grids. Due to the characteristics of intermittence, randomness, volatility and the like of wind power, more uncertainty is injected into a system by high-proportion wind power access, and the influence is caused on the safe and stable operation of the system. Therefore, the uncertain factors need to be considered in the initial planning stage of the wind power plant access system, so that the operation and maintenance cost can be reduced, and the basis for ensuring the safe and efficient operation of the system is provided.
Aiming at the characteristic of random fluctuation of output of the wind power plant, the current wind power plant access system planning research is mainly started from investment cost, and an economic optimal planning scheme meeting operation constraint conditions is sought. The common planning method comprises random planning and multi-scenario planning, uncertainty in a power system is expressed in a probability mode, and opportunity constraint planning for representing line overload constraint by using a confidence degree is also applied to wind power planning containing random variables. For the safety problem of the planning scheme, more methods mainly divide the planning model into a main investment problem and a sub-operation problem, and perform static safety verification or reliability analysis on the obtained planning scheme. Still other methods add load shedding or wind curtailment power as a penalty to the economic objective to minimize the overall investment of the project. However, these methods check the planning scheme on the premise of optimal economy, and do not comprehensively evaluate the safety index of the planning scheme. In actual operation, random factors of the power system cannot be predicted, and when the extreme end operation conditions such as power imbalance or large wind power output fluctuation are faced, the adaptability of the planning schemes is insufficient, and the safe operation of the system is possibly threatened.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a wind power plant access system multi-target planning method which reasonably and effectively considers the economy and the safety, so that the obtained planning scheme has stronger adaptability.
The technical solution for realizing the purpose of the invention is as follows: a wind power plant access system multi-target planning method considering economy and safety comprises the following steps:
step 1, acquiring parameters and planning information of an access system of a wind power plant;
step 2, constructing a multi-target planning model of the wind power plant access system, wherein the multi-target planning model comprises an economic target, a safety target and planning constraint conditions;
step 3, solving the multi-objective planning model by adopting an NSGA-II algorithm, carrying out probability direct current power flow calculation on a planning scheme generated randomly and calculating an objective function value;
and 4, after the algorithm reaches a termination condition, determining the optimal scheme of the wind power plant access system by using an entropy weight method and a TOPSIS strategy.
Further, the system parameters in the step 1 comprise the existing grid structure, branch parameters, generator data and load level of the wind power plant grid-connected region; the planning information comprises the grid-connected point, installed capacity and random output data of the wind power plant which is planned to be accessed.
Further, the step 2 is a multi-objective planning model of the wind farm access system, which specifically comprises:
planned economic objective function f 1 The sum of the investment cost, the network loss cost and the load shedding penalty cost of a newly-built line is as follows:
Figure BDA0002187287700000021
planned safety objective function f 2 The product of the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value power flow entropy is as follows: min f 2 =J 2max ·J 2a ·s。
In the above objective function: i is the index of the line corridor, c i For the construction cost of the line corridor i, n i The number of newly-built lines of the line corridor i is N, the total number of the line corridors to be selected is N, alpha is unit network loss cost, and l is an index of the lines; r is l Is the resistance of the line l, I l Is the current of line l, t is the running time, N l Is the total number of lines; gamma is the unit load shedding penalty cost, E loadcut The total load is cut for the system; j. the design is a square 2max Is the maximum value of the beta horizontal load factor in all lines, J 2a The mean value of beta horizontal load rates of all lines is obtained, and s is the power flow entropy of the system;
the planned constraint conditions comprise a power flow equation constraint, a branch power flow constraint, an opportunity constraint of line overload, an upper limit constraint and a lower limit constraint of variables and a network connectivity constraint, and specifically comprise the following steps:
P=Bθ (2)
-Bθ+P G +P W +P cut =P D
Pr{|P l |≤P l.max }≥β
P G.min ≤P G ≤P G.max
θ min ≤θ≤θ max
0≤P cut ≤P D
0≤n i ≤n i.max
N netbranch =1
among the above constraints: p is branch flow vector, B is node admittance matrix, theta is node voltage phase angle vector, P G 、P W 、P cut 、P D Respectively a conventional unit output vector, a wind power plant output vector, a cut load vector and a node load power vector; p l For branch active power flow variables, P l.max An upper limit of line power flow; beta is the probability that the transmission line is not overloaded in the opportunity constraint; p G.min 、P G.max The output limit is the upper and lower limit of the conventional generator set; theta min 、θ max The upper limit and the lower limit of a node voltage phase angle are set; n is i Number of new lines, n, for line corridor i i.max The maximum allowable loop number of the line corridor i; n is a radical of netbranch Is the number of networks included in the system.
Further, the step 3 of solving the multi-objective planning model by using the NSGA-II algorithm, performing probability dc power flow calculation on the generated planning scheme, and calculating an objective function value specifically includes the following steps:
step 3-1, randomly generating an initial population by taking the number of newly-built lines as a control variable and the maximum allowable loop number of a line corridor as an upper limit;
step 3-2, judging whether the network is connected or not for each individual in the population, if so, performing step 3-3, and if not, returning and performing judgment on the next individual;
3-3, performing probability direct current power flow calculation to obtain the probability distribution of the line active power flow, judging whether constraint conditions are met or not according to the power flow result, if so, performing the step 3-4, and if not, returning and performing judgment on the next individual;
step 3-4, respectively calculating the investment cost, the network loss cost and the load shedding punishment cost of the newly-built line according to the load flow calculation result to obtain an economic objective function value f 1
Step 3-5, calculating the expected load rate and the beta horizontal load rate of the line, specifically:
the expected load rate for branch l is: j. the design is a square 1l =|E(P l )/P l.max |
The beta horizontal load rate of branch l is: j. the design is a square 2l =|P l.β /P l.max |
In the formula: p l Active power flow variable, P, for branch l l.max At the upper limit of its transmission capacity, E (P) l ) Representing expected value of power flow, P, of branch l l.β Representing branch current | P l |≤P l.β The probability of (a) is the confidence level β that the line is not overloaded;
step 3-6, respectively obtaining the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value power flow entropy according to the results of the step 3-5, and calculating a safety objective function value f 2 The method specifically comprises the following steps:
maximum value of β horizontal load rate: j. the design is a square 2max =max J 2l
Average value of β horizontal load rate:
Figure BDA0002187287700000031
expected value power flow entropy:
Figure BDA0002187287700000032
wherein: r ═ ln10, a constant; setting an equal difference load rate sequence J ═ J 1 ,j 2 ,…,j n ]The interval of the load rate is taken as [0, 1 ]]Tolerance of 0.05, p 1k Is J 1l Is located at (j) k ,j k+1 ]The ratio of the number of branches to the total number of branches, then f 2 =J 2max ·J 2a ·s。
And 3-7, after selecting a parent population, crossing and mutating to obtain a child population, calculating child adaptive values according to the steps 3-2 to 3-6, combining the children and the parent to obtain an intermediate population, performing rapid non-dominant sorting, calculating crowding distances, selecting a new population as the parent, and repeating the steps 3-7 until the maximum iteration number is reached.
Further, the step 4 of determining the optimal scheme of the wind farm access system by using the entropy weight method and the TOPSIS strategy specifically comprises the following steps: and obtaining weights of two target functions by using an entropy weight method, and sequencing Pareto optimal solution sets obtained by using a TOPSIS strategy through an NSGA-II algorithm to obtain an optimal planning scheme.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following remarkable advantages: (1) taking the product of the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value tidal current entropy as a safety objective function, and comprehensively reflecting the safety of the planning scheme in the face of extreme operation conditions; (2) the economy and the safety are considered simultaneously during planning, and compared with the planning only considering the economy, the obtained planning scheme has stronger adaptability.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a wind farm access system multi-objective planning method considering economy and safety.
Fig. 2 is a diagram of an IEEE18 node system configuration modified in an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of Pareto optimal leading edge distribution in an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
With reference to fig. 1, a wind farm access system multi-objective planning method considering economy and safety specifically includes the following steps:
step 1, system parameters and planning information are obtained.
The system parameters comprise the existing grid structure of the wind power plant grid-connected region, branch parameters, generator data and load level; the planning information comprises the grid-connected point, installed capacity and random output data of the wind power plant which is planned to be accessed.
And 2, constructing a multi-target planning model of the wind power plant access system, wherein the multi-target planning model comprises an economic target, a safety target and planning constraint conditions.
The multi-target planning model of the wind power plant access system specifically comprises the following steps:
planned economic objective function f 1 Investment cost, network loss cost and cut for newly-built lineThe sum of the three parts of the load penalty cost:
Figure BDA0002187287700000041
planned safety objective function f 2 The product of the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value power flow entropy is as follows: min f 2 =J 2max ·J 2a ·s。
In the above objective function: i is an index of the line corridor; c. C i For the construction cost of the line corridor i, n i The number of newly built lines of the line corridor i is N, and the N is the total number of the line corridors to be selected; alpha is unit network loss cost, and l is the index of the line; r is l Is the resistance of the line l, I l Is the current of line l, t is the running time, N l Is the total number of lines; gamma is the unit load shedding penalty cost, E loadcut The total load is cut for the system; j. the design is a square 2max Is the maximum value of the beta horizontal load factor in all lines, J 2a The mean value of beta horizontal load rates of all lines is obtained, and s is the power flow entropy of the system;
the planned constraint conditions comprise power flow equation constraint, branch power flow constraint, opportunity constraint of line overload, upper and lower limit constraint of variables and network connectivity constraint, and specifically comprise the following steps:
P=Bθ (3)
-Bθ+P G +P W +P cut =P D
Pr{|P l |≤P l.max }≥β
P G.min ≤P G ≤P G.max
θ min ≤θ≤θ max
0≤P cut ≤P D
0≤n i ≤n i.max
N netbranch =1
among the above constraints: p is branch power flow vector, B is node admittance matrix, theta is node voltage phase angle vector, P G 、P W 、P cut 、P D Respectively is the output vector of the conventional unit, the output vector of the wind power plant and the cut-off loadA load vector and a node load power vector; p l For branch active power flow variable, P l.max An upper limit of line power flow; beta is the probability that the transmission line is not overloaded in the opportunity constraint; p G.min 、P G.max The output limit is the upper and lower limit of the conventional generator set; theta min 、θ max The upper limit and the lower limit of a node voltage phase angle are set; n is i Number of new lines, n, for line corridor i i.max The maximum allowable loop number of the line corridor i; n is a radical of hydrogen netbranch Is the number of networks included in the system.
And 3, solving the multi-objective planning model by adopting an NSGA-II algorithm, performing probability direct current power flow calculation on the randomly generated planning scheme and calculating an objective function value.
The method comprises the following steps of solving a multi-objective planning model by adopting an NSGA-II algorithm, carrying out probability direct current power flow calculation on a generated planning scheme and calculating an objective function value, and specifically comprises the following steps:
step 3-1, randomly generating an initial population by taking the number of newly-built lines as a control variable and the maximum allowable loop number of a line corridor as an upper limit;
step 3-2, judging whether the network is connected or not for each individual in the population, and if so, performing the step 3-3;
3-3, performing probability direct current power flow calculation to obtain probability distribution of line active power flow, judging whether constraint conditions are met according to power flow results, and performing the step 3-4 if the constraint conditions are met;
step 3-4, respectively calculating the investment cost, the network loss cost and the load shedding punishment cost of the newly-built line according to the load flow calculation result to obtain an economic objective function value f 1
Step 3-5, calculating the expected load rate and the beta horizontal load rate of the line, specifically:
the expected load rate for branch l is: j. the design is a square 1l =|E(P l )/P l.max |
The beta horizontal load rate of branch l is: j. the design is a square 2l =|P l.β /P l.max |
In the formula: p l Active power flow variable, P, for branch l l.max To the upper limit of its transmission capacity, E (P) l ) Representing expected value of power flow, P, of branch l l.β Represents the branch current | P l |≤P l.β The probability of (c) is a confidence that the line is not overloaded.
Step 3-6, respectively obtaining the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value power flow entropy according to the results of the step 3-5, and calculating a safety objective function value f 2 . The method specifically comprises the following steps:
maximum value of β horizontal load rate: j. the design is a square 2max =max J 2l
Average value of β horizontal load rate:
Figure BDA0002187287700000061
expected value power flow entropy:
Figure BDA0002187287700000062
wherein: r ═ ln10, a constant; setting an equal difference load rate sequence J ═ J 1 ,j 2 ,…,j n ]The interval of the load rate is taken as [0, 1 ]]Tolerance of 0.05, p 1k Is J 1l Is located at (j) k ,j k+1 ]The ratio of the number of branches to the total number of branches,
f is then 2 =J 2max ·J 2a ·s。
And 3-7, after selecting a parent population, crossing and mutating to obtain a child population, calculating child adaptive values according to the steps 3-2 to 3-6, combining the children and the parent to obtain an intermediate population, performing rapid non-dominant sorting, calculating crowding distances, selecting a new population as the parent, and repeating the steps 3-7 until the maximum iteration number is reached.
And 4, after the algorithm reaches a termination condition, determining the optimal scheme of the wind power plant access system by using an entropy weight method and a TOPSIS strategy.
The method for determining the optimal scheme of the wind power plant access system by using the entropy weight method and the TOPSIS strategy specifically comprises the following steps: and (3) obtaining weights of the two target functions by using an entropy weight method, and sequencing the Pareto optimal solution set obtained by the NSGA-II algorithm by using a TOPSIS strategy to obtain an optimal planning scheme.
The invention is described in further detail below with reference to the figures and specific embodiments.
Examples
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a wind farm access system multi-objective planning method considering economy and safety.
Step 1, system parameters and planning information are obtained. As shown in fig. 2, an IEEE18 node system is used as a grid-connected area grid structure, 100 fans are respectively connected to nodes 5, 6, 11 and 14, the total installed capacity of wind power is 600MW, and random output data of a wind power plant is simulated according to actual wind speed distribution in a certain area. The upper limit of the number of each branch of the system is 4, the power grid loss price is 0.35 yuan/(kW & h), and the load shedding penalty cost is 0.7 yuan/(kW & h).
And 2, constructing a multi-target planning model of the wind power plant access system, wherein the multi-target planning model comprises an economic target, a safety target and planning constraint conditions, and setting the confidence coefficient beta to be 0.95.
And 3, solving the multi-objective planning model by adopting an NSGA-II algorithm, performing probability direct current power flow calculation on the randomly generated planning scheme and calculating an objective function value. The population scale of the algorithm is 100, the iteration number is 100, and fig. 3 is a Pareto optimal leading edge schematic diagram obtained by the NSGA-II algorithm.
Step 4, after the algorithm reaches a termination condition, determining the optimal scheme of the wind power plant access system by using an entropy weight method and a TOPSIS strategy; the weight values of the two objective functions are obtained by using an entropy weight method, wherein the weight values are 0.4022 and 0.5978, respectively, and then the Pareto optimal solution set obtained by the NSGA-II algorithm is sequenced by using a TOPSIS strategy, so that an optimal planning scheme can be obtained, as shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 planning preferences
Figure BDA0002187287700000071
The multi-objective planning proposed by the present invention is compared with a single-objective planning considering only economic objectives, and the results are shown in table 2.
TABLE 2 Multi-objective planning vs. Single-objective planning scheme
Figure BDA0002187287700000081
The planning scheme obtained by single-target planning has poor safety, higher probability of line overload and more unbalanced load rate, and the planning scheme obtained by considering the economy and the safety has higher safety index and is not easy to cause line out-of-limit. By comparison, the rationality and effectiveness of the planning method provided by the invention are verified.

Claims (4)

1. A wind power plant access system multi-objective planning method considering economy and safety is characterized by comprising the following steps:
step 1, acquiring parameters and planning information of an access system of a wind power plant;
step 2, constructing a multi-target planning model of the wind power plant access system, wherein the multi-target planning model comprises an economic target, a safety target and planning constraint conditions; the method specifically comprises the following steps:
planned economic objective function f 1 The sum of the investment cost, the network loss cost and the load shedding penalty cost of a newly-built line is as follows:
Figure FDA0003719785310000011
planned safety objective function f 2 The product of the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value power flow entropy is as follows: minf 2 =J 2max ·J 2a ·s;
In the above objective function: i is an index of the line corridor; c. C i For the construction cost of line corridor i, n i The number of newly built lines of the line corridor i is N, and the N is the total number of the line corridors to be selected; alpha is unit network loss cost, and l is the index of the line; r is a radical of hydrogen l Is the resistance of the line l, I l Is the current of line l, t is the running time, N l Is the total number of lines; gamma is the unit load shedding penalty cost, E loadcut The total load is cut for the system; j is a unit of 2max Is the maximum value of the beta horizontal load rate in all lines, J 2a The mean value of beta horizontal load rates of all lines is obtained, and s is the power flow entropy of the system;
the planned constraint conditions comprise a power flow equation constraint, a branch power flow constraint, an opportunity constraint of line overload, an upper limit constraint and a lower limit constraint of variables and a network connectivity constraint, and specifically comprise the following steps:
P=Bθ (1)
-Bθ+P G +P W +P cut =P D
Pr{|P l |≤P l.max }≥β
P G.min ≤P G ≤P G.max
θ min ≤θ≤θ max
0≤P cut ≤P D
0≤n i ≤n i.max
N netbranch =1
among the above constraints: p is branch power flow vector, B is node admittance matrix, theta is node voltage phase angle vector, P G 、P W 、P cut 、P D Respectively a conventional unit output vector, a wind power plant output vector, a cut load vector and a node load power vector; p l For branch active power flow variable, P l.max An upper limit of line power flow; beta is the probability that the transmission line is not overloaded in the opportunity constraint; p G.min 、P G.max The output limit is the upper and lower limit of the conventional generator set; theta min 、θ max The upper limit and the lower limit of a node voltage phase angle are set; n is a radical of an alkyl radical i Number of new lines, n, for line corridor i i.max The maximum allowable loop number of the line corridor i; n is a radical of netbranch The number of networks included in the system;
step 3, solving the multi-objective planning model by adopting an NSGA-II algorithm, performing probability direct current power flow calculation on the generated planning scheme and calculating an objective function value;
and 4, after the algorithm reaches a termination condition, determining a preferred scheme of the wind power plant access system by using an entropy weight method and a TOPSIS strategy.
2. The multi-objective planning method for the wind power plant access system considering the economy and the safety as claimed in claim 1, wherein the system parameters in the step 1 comprise an existing grid structure, branch parameters, generator data and load level of a wind power plant grid-connected region; the planning information comprises the grid-connected point, installed capacity and random output data of the wind power plant which is planned to be accessed.
3. The wind farm access system multi-objective planning method considering economy and safety as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step 3 of solving the multi-objective planning model by using the NSGA-II algorithm, performing probability DC power flow calculation on the generated planning scheme and calculating objective function values specifically comprises the following steps:
step 3-1, randomly generating an initial population by taking the number of newly-built lines as a control variable and the maximum allowable loop number of a line corridor as an upper limit;
step 3-2, judging whether the network is connected or not for each individual in the population, if so, performing step 3-3, otherwise, returning and performing judgment on the next individual;
3-3, performing probability direct current power flow calculation to obtain the probability distribution of the line active power flow, judging whether constraint conditions are met or not according to the power flow result, if so, performing the step 3-4, and if not, returning and performing judgment on the next individual;
step 3-4, respectively calculating the investment cost, the network loss cost and the load shedding punishment cost of the newly-built line according to the load flow calculation result to obtain an economic objective function value f 1
Step 3-5, calculating the expected load rate and the beta horizontal load rate of the line, specifically:
the expected load rate for branch l is: j. the design is a square 1l =|E(P l )/P l.max |
The beta horizontal load rate of branch l is: j. the design is a square 2l =|P l.β /P l.max |
In the formula, P l Active power flow variable, P, for branch l l.max For its transmission capacityUpper limit, E (P) l ) Representing expected value of power flow, P, of branch l l.β Representing branch current | P l |≤P l.β The probability of (a) is the confidence level β that the line is not overloaded;
step 3-6, respectively obtaining the maximum value and the average value of the beta horizontal load rate of the line and the expected value power flow entropy according to the results of the step 3-5, and calculating a safety objective function value f 2 The method specifically comprises the following steps:
maximum value of β horizontal load rate: j. the design is a square 2max =maxJ 2l
Average value of β horizontal load factor:
Figure FDA0003719785310000031
expected value power flow entropy:
Figure FDA0003719785310000032
wherein: r ═ ln10, a constant; setting an equal difference load rate sequence J ═ J 1 ,j 2 ,…,j n ]The interval of the load rate is taken as [0, 1 ]]Tolerance of 0.05, p 1k Is J 1l Is located at (j) k ,j k+1 ]The ratio of the number of branches to the total number of branches,
f is then 2 =J 2max ·J 2a ·s;
And 3-7, after selecting a parent population, crossing and mutating to obtain a child population, calculating child adaptive values according to the steps 3-2 to 3-6, combining the children and the parent to obtain an intermediate population, performing rapid non-dominant sorting, calculating crowding distances, selecting a new population as the parent, and repeating the steps 3-7 until the maximum iteration number is reached.
4. The method for multi-objective planning of a wind farm access system with consideration of economy and safety according to claim 1, wherein the step 4 of determining the preferred scheme of the wind farm access system by using an entropy weight method and a TOPSIS strategy specifically comprises the following steps:
and obtaining weights of two target functions by using an entropy weight method, and sequencing Pareto optimal solution sets obtained by using a TOPSIS strategy through an NSGA-II algorithm to obtain an optimal planning scheme.
CN201910820084.6A 2019-08-31 2019-08-31 Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety Active CN112446521B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910820084.6A CN112446521B (en) 2019-08-31 2019-08-31 Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201910820084.6A CN112446521B (en) 2019-08-31 2019-08-31 Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN112446521A CN112446521A (en) 2021-03-05
CN112446521B true CN112446521B (en) 2022-09-16

Family

ID=74735357

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN201910820084.6A Active CN112446521B (en) 2019-08-31 2019-08-31 Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN112446521B (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102545258A (en) * 2012-01-12 2012-07-04 西安交通大学 Power grid optimal planning method of large-scale grid-connected wind farm
JP2016163353A (en) * 2015-03-04 2016-09-05 富士通株式会社 Planning method and planning device of radio network
CN106487005A (en) * 2016-11-14 2017-03-08 国网浙江省电力公司经济技术研究院 A kind of Electric power network planning method considering T-D tariff

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102545258A (en) * 2012-01-12 2012-07-04 西安交通大学 Power grid optimal planning method of large-scale grid-connected wind farm
JP2016163353A (en) * 2015-03-04 2016-09-05 富士通株式会社 Planning method and planning device of radio network
CN106487005A (en) * 2016-11-14 2017-03-08 国网浙江省电力公司经济技术研究院 A kind of Electric power network planning method considering T-D tariff

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
考虑风速相关性的多目标电网规划;刘学等;《电力自动化设备》;20151031;第35卷(第10期);第87-94页 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112446521A (en) 2021-03-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN106487005B (en) A kind of Electric power network planning method considering T-D tariff
CN112217202B (en) Distributed new energy, energy storage and power distribution network planning method considering flexibility investment
CN109523060A (en) Ratio optimization method of the high proportion renewable energy under transmission and distribution network collaboration access
CN106532778B (en) Method for calculating maximum access capacity of distributed photovoltaic grid connection
CN107316113B (en) Power transmission network planning method and system
CN107316125A (en) A kind of active distribution network economical operation evaluation method based on economical operation domain
CN104037765B (en) The method of active power distribution network service restoration scheme is chosen based on improved adaptive GA-IAGA
CN104866919A (en) Multi-target planning method for power grid of wind farms based on improved NSGA-II
CN111146821A (en) DSTATCOM optimal configuration method considering photovoltaic uncertainty
CN105207253A (en) AGC random dynamic optimization dispatching method taking wind power and frequency uncertainty into consideration
CN105512472A (en) Large-scale wind power base power influx system topology composition layered optimization design and optimization design method thereof
CN113437756B (en) Micro-grid optimization configuration method considering static voltage stability of power distribution network
CN112561273B (en) Active power distribution network renewable DG planning method based on improved PSO
CN107959307A (en) A kind of DG Optimal Configuration Methods of meter and power distribution network operation risk cost
CN116187165A (en) Power grid elasticity improving method based on improved particle swarm optimization
CN105654224A (en) Provincial power-grid monthly electricity purchasing risk management method considering wind power uncertainty
Kamalinia et al. A combination of MADM and genetic algorithm for optimal DG allocation in power systems
CN111193295A (en) Distribution network flexibility improvement robust optimization scheduling method considering dynamic reconfiguration
CN111697607B (en) Multi-terminal flexible direct-current transmission receiving-end power grid access method and system
CN116415708B (en) Power grid robust planning method considering confidence level
CN112446521B (en) Multi-objective planning method for wind power plant access system considering economy and safety
CN111404163A (en) Electromagnetic looped network open-loop method
CN110751328A (en) High-proportion renewable energy power grid adaptive planning method based on joint weighted entropy
CN110601233A (en) Peak regulation scheduling method for energy storage power station in power system
Doagou-Mojarrad et al. Probabilistic interactive fuzzy satisfying generation and transmission expansion planning using fuzzy adaptive chaotic binary PSO algorithm

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB03 Change of inventor or designer information

Inventor after: Wang Baohua

Inventor after: Wang Bingbing

Inventor after: Jiang Haifeng

Inventor after: Zhang Man

Inventor after: Li Ming

Inventor before: Wang Bingbing

Inventor before: Wang Baohua

Inventor before: Jiang Haifeng

Inventor before: Zhang Man

Inventor before: Li Ming

CB03 Change of inventor or designer information
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant