CN111464591B - Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain - Google Patents
Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111464591B CN111464591B CN202010155382.0A CN202010155382A CN111464591B CN 111464591 B CN111464591 B CN 111464591B CN 202010155382 A CN202010155382 A CN 202010155382A CN 111464591 B CN111464591 B CN 111464591B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- blockchain
- node
- voting
- processing
- user
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1095—Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/27—Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a system for processing disputes among nodes in a blockchain, which solve the disputes among the nodes in the blockchain by adopting a mode of matching a user blockchain and a voting blockchain, wherein the nodes in the voting blockchain are generated by node complete tickets in the user blockchain, the nodes in the user blockchain send processing requests to the voting blockchain according to the dispute contents, and each node in the voting blockchain gives processing comments aiming at the dispute processing requests and broadcasts the processing comments exceeding a specific proportion to the user blockchain for execution. If the other node of the dispute does not agree with the processing opinion, the anti-voting can be initiated to the voting block chain node before the processing result is executed, and when the anti-voting passing rate exceeds a specific proportion, the processing opinion is not executed. The invention judges and gives out the dispute processing mode by the voting block chain node approved by the user block chain node, ensures the fairness and fairness of the processing result and maintains the benefit of the user block chain node.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of block chains, in particular to a method for processing disputes among nodes in a block chain.
Background
A blockchain is a distributed accounting system that combines blocks of data in a sequential manner in a time-sequential manner into a chain-like data structure, and that is cryptographically secured against tampering and counterfeiting. Blocks are generally composed of two parts, namely a block header (header) and a block body (body). The block header is used to link to the previous block and the transaction information recorded by the block is all value exchange activity that occurs after the last block is formed and before the block is created, which feature ensures the integrity of the database. Each transaction data on the blockchain can be traced by the structure of the blockchain, and can be verified by one stroke. The blockchain preferably solves the problem of decentralization and trust removal by means of distributed accounting, and each transaction is only counted by the billed person into the blockchain (hereinafter simply referred to as the uplink) to be effective.
Blockchain-based transactions are generally accepted and widely generalized due to the above-described characteristics and advantages of blockchains. However, since the transaction necessarily involves interaction between two nodes or between multiple nodes, various disputes are not avoided in the process, as the number of nodes participating in the transaction in the blockchain system increases and the number and scale of the transaction are continuously expanded, the storage amount required by the block data is continuously increased, so that the analysis and operation costs of the transaction data are continuously increased, and when one transaction being executed needs to be solved, the dispute is likely to be put aside due to the limitation of huge system but operation capability, and the corresponding transaction node is not timely damaged, so that huge loss is generated.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to solve the technical problems in the prior art, and provides a method and a system for processing disputes among nodes in a blockchain, which solve the disputes among the nodes in the blockchain by adopting a mode of matching a user blockchain and a voting blockchain, wherein the nodes in the voting blockchain are generated by node complete tickets in the user blockchain, the nodes in the user blockchain send processing requests to the voting blockchain about the dispute content, and each node in the voting blockchain gives processing comments aiming at the dispute processing requests and broadcasts the processing comments exceeding a specific proportion to the user blockchain for execution. If the other node of the dispute does not agree with the processing opinion, the anti-voting can be initiated to the voting block chain node before the processing result is executed, and when the anti-voting passing rate exceeds a specific proportion, the processing opinion is not executed. The invention judges and gives out the processing mode of the dispute by the voting block chain node approved by the user block chain node, ensures the fairness and fairness of the processing result and maintains the benefit of the user block chain node.
The technical scheme adopted for solving the technical problems of the invention is as follows: a method for processing disputes among nodes in a block chain comprises the following steps:
step 102, constructing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using nodes in a real-name system;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all nodes to the user block chain and the voting block chain;
step 106, broadcasting a dispute handling request to the voting blockchain by a first node in the user blockchain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at the dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain;
By adopting the technical scheme, the user blockchain and the voting blockchain are formed by the nodes in the real-name system, and based on the characteristic of transparent disclosure of the blockchain, convenience is provided for a subsequent retrospective program, and the leak of the operation is ensured to be found and relevant responsibility is tracked in the retrospective program, so that the authenticity of the corresponding operation of each node in the chain is ensured; the processing of the dispute provides processing opinions by the nodes which are irrelevant to the dispute and are positioned on the voting block chain, the number of the voting nodes is multiple, and the processing opinion which is consistent with a plurality of nodes is adopted and executed, so that the objective and fair final processing result of the dispute of the node is ensured, and the benefits of the nodes related to the dispute are maintained.
Further preferably, each node in the voting blockchain is required to be fully voted for by the user blockchain node.
By adopting the technical scheme, as the nodes in the voting blockchain have the right of providing the processing opinions for the content of the dispute, the nodes have certain specialization and authority, and the nodes are completely passed by the nodes of the user blockchain, namely the potential dispute requesting nodes, which indicate that the specialization and authority of providing the processing opinions by all the nodes in the voting blockchain are approved, on one hand, the objectivity and fairness of the processing opinions are ensured, on the other hand, the processing opinion is conveniently received and approved by all the nodes related to the dispute, and further, the processing opinion can be smoothly executed, so that the dispute can be processed in time, and the interests of all the nodes related to the dispute are maintained.
Further preferably, a specific reason for the naming is set in the consensus algorithm of the user blockchain, and if the reason for the naming is satisfied, the node meeting the condition is automatically named.
By adopting the technical scheme, extremely serious situations are preset into the block chain consensus algorithm, when the situations occur, once the system is identified, the naming program is directly started, processing comments are not required to be provided by each node in the voting block chain, the processing time of node disputes is shortened by saving the judging and analyzing program before node naming, the loss of nodes involved in the disputes is avoided as far as possible, and thus the benefits of the nodes are maintained.
Further preferably, the processing opinion in step 108 includes: aborting the transaction, terminating the transaction, forcing property transfer, blacklisting any node in the user blockchain, and renaming any node in the user blockchain.
By adopting the technical scheme, the content of the dispute handling opinion, namely the content and the result of the final dispute solution, which are mentioned in the invention, are clarified, and convenience is provided for the voting blockchain node to handle the opinion. Meanwhile, various punishment modes of the nodes of the fault party related to the dispute are defined, and the warning is given to other nodes in the user blockchain, so that the behavior of restricting the nodes in the user blockchain is facilitated, and the safety of a blockchain system is maintained and ensured.
Further preferably, the forcibly transferred property includes: deposit, network recharge, and electronic account.
By adopting the technical scheme, the property types of the forced transfer are further definitely agreed, namely, the property is not limited to the tangible currency, but also comprises virtual currency such as electronic currency, digital currency and the like, and the method is connected with the times, so that the performability of the property related to the forced transfer in dispute handling opinion is improved.
Further preferably, any node in the user blockchain is automatically renamed after the blacklist number of times included in the set time exceeds an upper limit.
By adopting the technical scheme, before the extreme punishment treatment such as name removal happens, the times of bringing the specific time into the blacklist in the period are unified considered, the opportunity of correcting and correcting the dispute node is given, and the humanized understanding and treatment of the dispute node, especially the non-subjective malicious node are reflected. Nodes which have errors in multiple disputes within a specific time and are included in a blacklist are renamed from the user blockchain, which is a serious punishment for frequent bad behaviors and is also a serious vigilance for other nodes in the user blockchain, so that the safety and the cleanliness of a blockchain system are further maintained and ensured, and the safety and the smoothness of transactions in the blockchain are favorably ensured.
Further preferably, the present invention further comprises the steps of:
step 1101, a second node in the user blockchain being a relative node to the first node, the second node being operable to initiate an anti-vote into the voting blockchain for the processing opinion in step 108;
step 1102, each node in the voting block chain performs voting for the inverse vote;
step 1103, when the anti-vote passing rate exceeds a specific proportion, the processing opinion does not enter the step 112.
By adopting the technical scheme, the second node is given statement opportunities and answering rights of the dispute matters, and the judgment and the arbitration of the answering contents are still completed by the voting block chain link points which accept the dispute processing request of the first node and give the processing comments, so that the objectivity, fairness and fairness of the processing results are ensured.
Further preferably, the number of nodes in the voting blockchain is not less than a specific value.
By adopting the technical scheme, the number of nodes with the permission to process the opinions cannot be excessively reduced, namely the number of the nodes with the permission to process the opinions cannot be excessively reduced, the cost and difficulty of manually processing the opinions left and right by the nodes involved in the dispute are increased, and the fairness of the processing result of the dispute is further ensured.
Further preferably, the user blockchain node may initiate a renaming vote for any node of the voting blockchain to a broadcast within the user blockchain, and when the renaming vote is passed by more than two-thirds of the user nodes, the voted voting node is automatically renamed.
By adopting the technical scheme, the node is selected to add authority and specialty of the node to the voting block chain to pay weight to the voting block chain node, the node provides fair and objective treatment opinion for the dispute so as to reasonably and effectively treat the dispute, and when the authority and specialty are questioned and then overturned, the node loses meaning and value existing in the voting block chain.
The invention relates to a processing system for disputes among nodes in a block chain, which is characterized by comprising the following components:
at least one processor;
at least one memory for storing at least one program;
the at least one program, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to implement a method of handling inter-node disputes within a blockchain as previously described.
By adopting the technical scheme, the process is realized through the execution of the computer program, and the execution efficiency of the method for processing the disputes among the nodes in the block chain is ensured.
In summary, the method and the system for processing the disputes among the nodes in the blockchain solve the disputes among the nodes in the blockchain by adopting the matching mode of the user blockchain and the voting blockchain, and the selection and the renaming of the nodes in the voting blockchain are determined by the nodes of the user blockchain, so that the objectivity and fairness of the processing opinion issued by the nodes in the voting blockchain are ensured; the opportunity of statement and answer of each node related to the dispute is given respectively, and the judgment and the arbitration of the statement or answer are completed by the nodes in the voting block chain, so that the objectivity and fairness of the dispute processing result are further ensured; the extreme situation is preset in the block chain consensus algorithm as a node naming reason, so that a program for judging the link points of the voting block is omitted, the time for processing the disputes is shortened, and the efficiency of dispute resolution is improved; the nodes with multiple mistakes in a specific time are subjected to renaming punishment, the environment of a user blockchain is cleared, and other nodes in the chain are warned and alerted.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate the invention and together with the embodiments of the invention, serve to explain the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for handling inter-node disputes in a blockchain in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention.
A method for processing disputes among nodes in a block chain comprises the following steps:
step 102, constructing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using nodes in a real-name system;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all nodes to a user block chain and a voting block chain;
step 106, broadcasting a dispute handling request to the voting blockchain by a first node in the user blockchain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at the dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain;
In this embodiment, the specific proportion may be set by itself, for example, the proportion is set to two thirds, that is, the processing opinion of each node in the voting blockchain is counted, and more than two thirds of the processing opinion is broadcast to the user blockchain.
By adopting the implementation mode, the user blockchain and the voting blockchain are formed by the nodes in the real-name system, the convenience is provided for the subsequent retrospective program based on the characteristic that the blockchain is transparent, and the operational loophole is ensured to be found and relevant responsibility is tracked in the retrospective program, so that the authenticity of the corresponding operation of each node in the chain is ensured; the processing of the dispute provides processing opinions by the nodes which are irrelevant to the dispute and are positioned on the voting block chain, the number of the voting nodes is multiple, and the processing opinion which is consistent with a plurality of nodes is adopted and executed, so that the objective and fair final processing result of the dispute of the node is ensured, and the benefits of the nodes related to the dispute are maintained.
As a preferred embodiment, each node in the voting blockchain is fully voted for by the user blockchain nodes.
In this embodiment, the nodes in the voting blockchain may be formed by third-party nodes that are professional in making intervening arbitration work, such nodes including, but not limited to, the following: lawyer individual nodes, judges individual nodes, court official nodes, notarization department official nodes, authentication organization official nodes and the like, wherein the nodes are added and form a voting blockchain after being voted and approved by a user blockchain node; the voting block chain can also be formed by a group of nodes with authority in the nodes in the user block chain to be added and formed, for example, all members in a civil industry association commonly select a plurality of reasonable member units to form the voting block chain, and the reasonable member units judge the disputes among the members in the industry association and give treatment comments.
With the implementation mode, since the nodes in the voting blockchain have the right of providing the processing opinions for the content of the disputes, the nodes have certain specialization and authority, and the nodes are completely passed by the nodes of the user blockchain, namely the potential dispute requesting nodes, so that the specialization and authority of providing the processing opinions by all the nodes in the voting blockchain are approved, on one hand, the objectivity and the correctness of the processing opinions are ensured, on the other hand, the processing opinion is conveniently received and approved by all the nodes related to the disputes, and the processing opinion can be smoothly executed, so that the disputes can be processed in time, and the interests of all the nodes related to the disputes are maintained.
In a preferred embodiment, a specific reason for the naming is set in the consensus algorithm of the user blockchain, and if the reason for the naming is satisfied, the nodes meeting the conditions are automatically renamed.
In this embodiment, the preset reason for the name removal should correspond to extremely serious situations, such as the user node declaring bankruptcy, the user node body losing qualification and no subsequent successor or subsequent successor losing the inheritance right.
By adopting the implementation mode, extremely serious situations are preset into the block chain consensus algorithm, when the situations occur, once the system is identified, the naming program is directly started, processing comments are not required to be provided by each node in the voting block chain, the processing time of node disputes is shortened by saving the judging and analyzing program before node naming, the loss of nodes involved in the disputes is avoided as far as possible, and thus the benefits of the nodes are maintained.
As a preferred embodiment, the processing opinion in step 108 includes: aborting the transaction, terminating the transaction, forcing property transfer, blacklisting any node in the user blockchain, and renaming any node in the user blockchain.
With this embodiment, the content of the dispute handling opinion referred to in the present invention, i.e., the content and results of the final dispute solution, is clarified, providing convenience for the voting blockchain node to handle the opinion. Meanwhile, various punishment modes of the nodes of the fault party related to the dispute are defined, and the warning is given to other nodes in the user blockchain, so that the behavior of restricting the nodes in the user blockchain is facilitated, and the safety of a blockchain system is maintained and ensured.
As a preferred embodiment, the property to be forcibly transferred includes: deposit, network recharge, and electronic account.
The network recharging and electronic account in this embodiment includes electronic money accounts such as WeChat change and treasured balance, financial accounts such as stock accounts and fund accounts that can be directly discounted, and other accounts such as online store accounts and game accounts that can be indirectly discounted.
By adopting the implementation mode, the property types of the forced transfer are further definitely agreed, namely the property is not limited to the tangible currency, but also comprises virtual currencies such as electronic currencies, digital currencies and the like, and the enforceability of the property related to the forced transfer in dispute handling is improved.
As a preferred embodiment, any node in the user blockchain is automatically renamed after the blacklisted number exceeds the upper limit within a set time.
In this embodiment, the specific time and the number of blacklists may be set by itself, for example, the specific time t=six months, and the number of times of blacklist inclusion in the six months n=10 times are set, that is, in the six months, a node of the user blockchain is automatically renamed on the user blockchain after the number of times of blacklist inclusion accumulated by the node exceeds 10 times.
By adopting the implementation mode, before the extreme punishment treatment such as name removal happens, the times that specific time is combined and included in the blacklist in the period are uniformly considered, the opportunity that the dispute node is changed and corrected is given, and humanized understanding and treatment of the dispute node, especially the non-subjective malicious node are reflected. Nodes which have errors in multiple disputes within a specific time and are included in a blacklist are renamed from the user blockchain, which is a serious punishment for frequent bad behaviors and is also a serious vigilance for other nodes in the user blockchain, so that the safety and the cleanliness of a blockchain system are further maintained and ensured, and the safety and the smoothness of transactions in the blockchain are favorably ensured.
As a preferred embodiment, the present invention further comprises the steps of:
step 1101, a second node in the user blockchain is a relative node to the first node, and the second node may initiate an anti-vote into the voting blockchain for the processing opinion in step 108;
step 1102, each node in the voting block chain performs voting against the anti-voting;
in step 1103, when the anti-vote passing rate exceeds a certain proportion, the processing opinion does not proceed to step 112.
In this embodiment, this particular ratio may be set by itself, for example, the ratio is set to two thirds, i.e., when the anti-vote passing rate exceeds two thirds, the process opinion does not proceed to step 112.
By adopting the implementation mode, the second node is given statement opportunities and answering rights of the dispute matters, and the judgment and the arbitration of the answering contents are still completed by the voting block chain link points which accept the dispute processing request of the first node and give out the processing comments, so that the objectivity, fairness and fairness of the processing results are ensured.
As a preferred embodiment, the number of nodes in the voting blockchain is not less than a particular value.
In this embodiment, this specific value may be set by itself, for example, the specific value may be set to 50, that is, the number of nodes in the voting blockchain is not less than 50.
By adopting the implementation mode, the number of nodes with the permission of processing the opinions cannot be required to be too small, namely the number of the opinions cannot be required to be processed too small, the cost and the difficulty of manually processing the opinions left and right by the nodes involved in the dispute are increased, and the fairness of the processing result of the dispute is further ensured.
As a preferred embodiment, the user blockchain node may initiate a rename vote for any node of the voting blockchain to a broadcast within the user blockchain, automatically renaming the voted voting node when more than two-thirds of the user nodes have passed the rename vote.
By adopting the implementation mode, the node belonging to the user blockchain node is used for avoiding the exercise of the voting blockchain node, the authority and the specialty of the node are added into the voting blockchain to see the weight of the node, the node is used for providing fair and objective treatment opinion for the dispute so as to reasonably and effectively treat the dispute, and when the authority and the specialty are questioned and then overturned, the node loses the meaning and the value existing in the voting blockchain.
The invention relates to a processing system for disputes among nodes in a block chain, which is characterized by comprising the following components:
at least one processor;
at least one memory for storing at least one program;
the at least one program, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to implement a method of handling inter-node disputes within a blockchain as previously described.
By adopting the implementation mode, the execution efficiency of the processing method for the disputes among the nodes in the block chain is ensured by implementing the process through the execution of the computer program.
Example 1:
referring to fig. 1, a transaction method based on blockchain includes the following steps:
step 102, constructing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using nodes in a real-name system;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all nodes to a user block chain and a voting block chain;
step 106, broadcasting a dispute handling request to the voting blockchain by a first node in the user blockchain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at the dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting more than two thirds of the processing opinions to the user block chain;
a second node in the user blockchain is a relative node to the first node, and the second node is not objection to the processing opinion in step 110, then step 112 is performed;
A second node in the user blockchain is a relative node of the first node, and the second node is opposite to the processing opinion in the step 110, and then step 1101, step 1102 and step 1103 are executed;
step 1101, a second node in the user blockchain is a relative node to the first node, and the second node may initiate an anti-vote into the voting blockchain for the processing opinion in step 108;
step 1102, each node in the voting block chain performs voting against the anti-voting;
in step 1103, when the anti-vote passing rate exceeds two-thirds, the processing opinion does not proceed to step 112.
In summary, the method and the system for processing the disputes among the nodes in the blockchain solve the disputes among the nodes in the blockchain by adopting the matching mode of the user blockchain and the voting blockchain, and the selection and the renaming of the nodes in the voting blockchain are determined by the nodes of the user blockchain, so that the objectivity and fairness of the processing opinion issued by the nodes in the voting blockchain are ensured; the opportunity of statement and answer of each node related to the dispute is given respectively, and the judgment and the arbitration of the statement or answer are completed by the nodes in the voting block chain, so that the objectivity and fairness of the dispute processing result are further ensured; the extreme situation is preset in the block chain consensus algorithm as a node naming reason, so that a program for judging the link points of the voting block is omitted, the time for processing the disputes is shortened, and the efficiency of dispute resolution is improved; the nodes with multiple mistakes in a specific time are subjected to renaming punishment, the environment of a user blockchain is cleared, and other nodes in the chain are warned and alerted.
The described embodiments are only some, but not all, embodiments of the invention. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for processing inter-node disputes within a blockchain, comprising:
step 102, constructing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using nodes in a real-name system;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all nodes to the user block chain and the voting block chain;
step 106, broadcasting a dispute handling request to the voting blockchain by a first node in the user blockchain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at the dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain;
step 112, automatically executing the oversubscription processing opinion in the user blockchain.
2. A method of processing inter-blockchain node disputes as in claim 1, wherein each node in the voting blockchain is required to be fully voted for passage by the user blockchain node.
3. The method for processing inter-node disputes within a blockchain of claim 1, wherein: setting a specific name removing reason in the consensus algorithm of the user block chain, and automatically removing names of nodes meeting the conditions when the name removing reason is met.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing opinion in step 108 comprises: aborting the transaction, terminating the transaction, forcing property transfer, blacklisting any node in the user blockchain, and renaming any node in the user blockchain.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the forcibly transferred property comprises: deposit, network recharge, and electronic account.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein any node in the user blockchain is automatically renamed after a blacklist is included for a set period of time beyond an upper limit.
7. The method of processing inter-node disputes within a blockchain of claim 1, further comprising: step 1101, a second node in the user blockchain being a relative node to the first node, the second node being operable to initiate an anti-vote into the voting blockchain for the processing opinion in step 108;
step 1102, each node in the voting block chain performs voting for the inverse vote;
step 1103, when the anti-vote passing rate exceeds a specific proportion, the processing opinion does not enter the step 112.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of nodes in the voting blockchain is not less than a specified value.
9. A method of processing inter-blockchain inter-node disputes according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the user blockchain node can initiate a rename vote for any node of the voting blockchain to a broadcast within the user blockchain, and when the rename vote is passed by more than two-thirds of the user nodes, the voted voting node is automatically renamed.
10. A system for processing inter-node disputes within a blockchain, comprising:
at least one processor;
at least one memory for storing at least one program;
the at least one program, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to implement the method of handling inter-node disputes within a blockchain as in any of claims 1-9.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010155382.0A CN111464591B (en) | 2020-03-04 | 2020-03-04 | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010155382.0A CN111464591B (en) | 2020-03-04 | 2020-03-04 | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111464591A CN111464591A (en) | 2020-07-28 |
| CN111464591B true CN111464591B (en) | 2023-07-04 |
Family
ID=71680054
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010155382.0A Active CN111464591B (en) | 2020-03-04 | 2020-03-04 | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111464591B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112202552B (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2022-12-13 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | Method, device, medium and electronic equipment for monitoring quality of block chain data |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106445711A (en) * | 2016-08-28 | 2017-02-22 | 杭州云象网络技术有限公司 | Byzantine-fault-tolerant consensus method applied to block chain |
| CN108182635A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-06-19 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Block chain common recognition method, system and computer readable storage medium |
| WO2019182202A1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2019-09-26 | 김용태 | Blockchain system to which proof-of-transaction consensus algorithm is applied, and method therefor |
| CN110391911A (en) * | 2019-07-23 | 2019-10-29 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Block chain votes anonymously system and method |
-
2020
- 2020-03-04 CN CN202010155382.0A patent/CN111464591B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106445711A (en) * | 2016-08-28 | 2017-02-22 | 杭州云象网络技术有限公司 | Byzantine-fault-tolerant consensus method applied to block chain |
| CN108182635A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-06-19 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Block chain common recognition method, system and computer readable storage medium |
| WO2019182202A1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2019-09-26 | 김용태 | Blockchain system to which proof-of-transaction consensus algorithm is applied, and method therefor |
| CN110391911A (en) * | 2019-07-23 | 2019-10-29 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Block chain votes anonymously system and method |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111464591A (en) | 2020-07-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Tarullo | Norms and institutions in global competition policy | |
| Mattoo et al. | Currency undervaluation and sovereign wealth funds: a new role for the World Trade Organization | |
| Jackson et al. | The role and effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism [with comments and discussion] | |
| Waller | Areeda, epithets, and essential facilities | |
| CN109816532B (en) | Asset digital anchoring system based on block chain technology | |
| Craswell | Insecurity, repudiation, and cure | |
| Garcia | Building a just trade order for a new millennium | |
| US20210216527A1 (en) | Parallel blockchain processing | |
| Conti | Legitimacy Chains: Legitimation of Compliance with International Courts Across Social Fields | |
| CN111464591B (en) | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain | |
| CN112597240A (en) | Federal learning data processing method and system based on alliance chain | |
| Salop | Strategy, predation, and antitrust analysis | |
| McIntyre et al. | Designing a Combined Report Regime for a State Corporate Income Tax: A Case Study of Louisiana | |
| CN110930158A (en) | Block chain DPoS common recognition method based on reward and punishment mechanism | |
| Schram stokke | Trade measures and climate compliance: institutional interplay between WTO and the Marrakesh Accords | |
| Purcell | The Public Right to Precedent: A Theory and Rejection of Vacatur | |
| Risch | The layered patent system | |
| Leslie | De Facto Detrebling: The Rush to Settlement in Antitrust Class Action Litigation | |
| Ehrenhaft | Judicialization of Trade Law | |
| Weiss | The Lead Plaintiff Provisions of the PSLRA After a Decade, or Look What's Happened to My Baby | |
| Lockie | Multiple Families, Multiple Goals, Multiple Failures: The Need for Limited Equalization as a Theory of Child Support | |
| Coccia | Settlement of Disputes in GATT Under the Subsidies Code: Two Panel Reports on EEC Export Subsidies | |
| Banner et al. | First-to-file, Mandatory Reexamination, and Mandatory Exceptional Circumstance: Ideas for Better-Or Worse | |
| Wood | Constitutional Challenges to State Education Finance Distribution Formulas: Moving from Equity to Adequacy | |
| Barczentewicz et al. | Blockchain Transaction Ordering as Market Manipulation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |