CN111464591A - Method and system for processing disputes between nodes in block chain - Google Patents
Method and system for processing disputes between nodes in block chain Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN111464591A CN111464591A CN202010155382.0A CN202010155382A CN111464591A CN 111464591 A CN111464591 A CN 111464591A CN 202010155382 A CN202010155382 A CN 202010155382A CN 111464591 A CN111464591 A CN 111464591A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- block chain
- node
- voting
- nodes
- processing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1095—Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/27—Replication, distribution or synchronisation of data between databases or within a distributed database system; Distributed database system architectures therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a system for processing disputes among nodes in a block chain, which solve the disputes among the nodes in the user block chain by adopting a mode of matching a user block chain and a voting block chain, wherein the nodes in the voting block chain are generated by passing a full ticket of the nodes in the user block chain, the nodes in the user block chain send processing requests to the voting block chain according to the content of the disputes, each node in the voting block chain provides processing opinions aiming at the processing requests of the disputes, and the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion are broadcasted to the user block chain for execution. If the other party node of the dispute disagrees the processing opinion, the processing opinion is not executed when the processing result execution forward voting blockchain node initiates the reverse voting. The invention arbitrates and gives a dispute processing mode by the voting blockchain node approved by the user blockchain node, thereby ensuring the fairness and fairness of the processing result and maintaining the benefits of the user blockchain node.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of block chains, in particular to a method for processing disputes among nodes in a block chain.
Background
The block chain is a chain data structure formed by combining data blocks in a sequential connection mode according to the time sequence, and is a distributed accounting system which is cryptographically guaranteed to be not falsifiable and counterfeitable. The block structure generally includes a head (head) and a body (body). The block header is used to link to the previous block, and the transaction information recorded by the block is all value exchange activities that occurred after the last block was formed and before the block was created, which feature ensures the integrity of the database. Each piece of transaction data on the block chain can be traced through the structure of the block chain, and can be verified at one stroke. The block chain better solves the problems of decentralization and distrust through a distributed accounting mode, and each transaction is effective only when an account-taker is counted in the block chain (hereinafter referred to as uplink).
Due to the above characteristics and advantages of the blockchain, transactions based on the blockchain system are generally accepted and widely popularized. However, since the transaction necessarily involves interaction between two nodes or between multiple nodes, various disputes cannot be avoided in the process, with the increase of nodes participating in the transaction in the blockchain system and the continuous expansion of the number and scale of the transactions, the storage amount required by the blockchain data is continuously increased, which results in the continuous increase of the analysis and calculation costs of the transaction data.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problem to be solved by the present invention is to provide a method and a system for processing disputes between nodes in a block chain, which solve the disputes between nodes in a user block chain by matching a user block chain and a voting block chain, wherein the nodes in the voting block chain are generated by passing a full ticket through the nodes in the user block chain, the nodes in the user block chain issue processing requests to the voting block chain according to the contents of the disputes, each node in the voting block chain proposes processing opinions for the processing requests of the disputes, and broadcasts the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain for execution. If the other party node of the dispute disagrees the processing opinion, the processing opinion is not executed when the processing result execution forward voting blockchain node initiates the reverse voting. The invention judges and gives the dispute processing mode by the voting blockchain node approved by the user blockchain node, thereby ensuring the fairness and justice of the processing result and maintaining the benefits of the user blockchain node.
The technical scheme adopted for solving the technical problem of the invention is as follows: a method for processing disputes between nodes in a block chain comprises the following steps:
102, establishing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using real-name nodes;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all the nodes to the user block chain and the voting block chain;
step 106, a first node in the user block chain broadcasts a dispute end processing request to the voting block chain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at the dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain;
and step 112, automatically executing the over-scale processing opinions in the user block chain.
By adopting the technical scheme, the user block chain and the voting block chain are formed by real-name nodes, and based on the characteristic that the block chain is public and transparent, convenience is provided for subsequent tracing and rechecking programs, the vulnerability of operation can be checked, and related responsibilities can be traced, so that the authenticity of corresponding operation of each node in the chain is guaranteed; the dispute end is processed by the nodes which are irrelevant to the dispute end and are positioned on the voting block chain, the number of the voting nodes is multiple, the processing opinions which are consistent with most of the nodes are adopted and executed, the objective and the justice of the final processing result of the dispute end of the node are ensured, and the benefits of the nodes involved by the dispute end are maintained.
Further preferably, each node in the voting block chain is required to be passed by the full ticket of the user block chain node.
By adopting the technical scheme, because the nodes in the voting block chain have the right of providing the processing opinions for the dispute content, the nodes have certain professionality and authority, and the nodes are passed through by the user block chain nodes, the fact that the user block chain nodes, namely the potential dispute request nodes, approve the professionality and authority of providing the processing opinions by each node in the voting block chain is shown, on one hand, the objectivity and fairness of the processing opinions are ensured, on the other hand, the processing opinions are conveniently received and approved by each node related to the dispute, and further can be smoothly executed, so that the dispute is timely processed, and the benefits of each node related to the dispute are maintained.
Further preferably, a specific reason for name removal is set in the consensus algorithm of the user block chain, and if the reason for name removal is satisfied, the nodes meeting the condition are automatically removed.
By adopting the technical scheme, extremely serious situations are preset in the block chain consensus algorithm, when the situations occur, the system directly starts a name removal program once being identified, processing opinions do not need to be provided by all nodes in the voting block chain, and by saving judgment and analysis programs before node name removal, the processing time of node disputes is shortened, the loss of nodes involved in the disputes is avoided as much as possible, and the benefits of the nodes are maintained.
Further preferably, the processing opinion in step 108 includes: aborting the transaction, terminating the transaction, forcing a transfer of property, blacklisting any node in the user blockchain, and de-naming any node in the user blockchain.
By adopting the technical scheme, the contents of the dispute processing opinions, namely the contents and results of the final dispute solution are determined, and convenience is provided for the processing opinions of the voting area block chain node. Meanwhile, various punishment modes of the over-wrong party node related to the dispute are determined, and the warning is given to other nodes in the user block chain, so that the behavior of adding the nodes in the user block chain is restrained, and the safety of a block chain system is maintained and ensured.
Further preferably, the property to be forcibly transferred includes: deposit, network recharge, and electronic account.
By adopting the technical scheme, the type of the property which is forcedly transferred is further definitely agreed, namely the property is not limited to physical money, but also comprises virtual money such as electronic money, digital money and the like, and the property is in track of the era, so that the performability of the property which relates to the forced transfer in dispute handling opinions is improved.
Further preferably, the name of any node in the user block chain is automatically removed after the number of times of being included in the blacklist within a set time exceeds an upper limit.
By adopting the technical scheme, before extreme punishment treatment such as name removal occurs, the times that specific time is combined and included in a blacklist in the period are considered uniformly, the opportunity of modifying and correcting the dispute error-passing party node is given, and humanized understanding and processing of the dispute error-passing party node, particularly the non-subjective malicious error-passing party node are reflected. The nodes which have errors in disputes for many times in a specific time and are included in the blacklist are removed from the user block chain, which is a serious punishment on the severe behaviors which are frequently taught and changed and is also a heavy warning on other nodes in the user block chain, so that the safety and the cleanness of a block chain system are further maintained and ensured, and the safety and the smoothness of transactions in the block chain are favorably ensured.
Further preferably, the present invention further comprises the steps of:
a step 1101, a second node in the user block chain being a relative node of the first node, the second node being capable of initiating a reverse vote into the voting block chain for the processing opinion in the step 108;
step 1102, voting each node in the voting block chain aiming at the reverse vote;
step 1103, when the negative vote voting pass rate exceeds a certain ratio, the processing opinion does not enter the step 112.
By adopting the technical scheme, the second node gives the statement opportunity and the answer right of the dispute item, and the judgment of the answer content are still completed by the voting area block chain node which receives the dispute processing request of the first node and gives the processing opinion, so that the objective, fair and fair processing results are ensured.
Further preferably, the number of nodes in the voting block chain is not less than a specific value.
By adopting the technical scheme, the number of the nodes with the authority of issuing the treatment opinions is definitely required to be not too small, namely the number of the treatment opinions is required to be not too small, so that the cost and the difficulty of artificially treating the opinions by the nodes involved in the dispute by adopting illegal means are increased, and the justice of the treatment results of the dispute is further ensured.
Further preferably, the user block chain node may broadcast and initiate a rename vote for any node of the voting block chain into the user block chain, and when the rename vote is passed by more than two thirds of the user nodes, the voted voting node is automatically renamed.
By adopting the technical scheme, the method belongs to the strike right of a user block chain link point on a voting block chain node, firstly, the authority and the specialty of the node are used for selecting the node to be added into the voting block chain to pay a weight, and the node provides fair and objective treatment opinions to a dispute end so as to reasonably and effectively treat the dispute end.
The invention discloses a processing system for disputes between nodes in a block chain, which is characterized by comprising the following steps:
at least one processor;
at least one memory for storing at least one program;
when the at least one program is executed by the at least one processor, the at least one processor implements the method for processing inter-node disputes in a blockchain as described above.
By adopting the technical scheme, the process is realized through the execution of the computer program, and the execution efficiency of the processing method for disputes among the nodes in the block chain is ensured.
In summary, in the method and system for processing disputes between nodes in a block chain, disputes between nodes in a user block chain are solved by matching the user block chain with a voting block chain, and selection and name removal of the nodes in the voting block chain are determined by the user block chain nodes, so that objectivity and justice of processing opinions issued by the nodes in the voting block chain are guaranteed; the opportunity of statement and answer of each node related to the dispute is given respectively, and the evaluation and judgment of the statement or answer are finished by the nodes in the voting area block chain, so that the objectivity and fairness of the dispute processing result are further guaranteed; an extreme situation is preset in the block chain consensus algorithm as a reason for node name removal, so that a program for voting block chain node arbitration is omitted, the time for dispute handling is shortened, and the dispute resolution efficiency is improved; and (3) the nodes which make mistakes many times in a specific time are punished for name removal, the environment of the user block chain is cleared, and other nodes in the chain are warned and warned.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention and not to limit the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method for handling disputes between nodes in a block chain according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Detailed Description
The technical solution in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention.
A method for processing disputes between nodes in a block chain comprises the following steps:
102, establishing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using real-name nodes;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all the nodes to a user block chain and a voting block chain;
step 106, a first node in the user block chain broadcasts a dispute processing request to the voting block chain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at a dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain;
the over-scaled processing opinion is automatically performed in the user blockchain, step 112.
In this embodiment, the specific ratio may be set by itself, for example, the ratio is set to two thirds, that is, the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain are counted, and more than two thirds of the processing opinions are broadcast to the user block chain.
By adopting the implementation mode, the user block chain and the voting block chain are formed by real-name nodes, and based on the characteristic that the block chain is public and transparent, convenience is provided for a subsequent retrospective program, the vulnerability of operation can be ensured to be checked, and related responsibilities can be traced, so that the authenticity of corresponding operation of each node in the chain is ensured; the dispute end is processed by the nodes which are irrelevant to the dispute end and are positioned on the voting block chain, the number of the voting nodes is multiple, the processing opinions which are consistent with most of the nodes are adopted and executed, the objective and the justice of the final processing result of the dispute end of the node are ensured, and the benefits of the nodes involved by the dispute end are maintained.
In a preferred embodiment, each node in the voting block chain needs to be passed through by the user block chain link point.
In this embodiment, the nodes in the voting block chain may be formed by third-party nodes specialized in inter-mediate work, and such nodes include, but are not limited to, the following: lawyer personal nodes, judge personal nodes, court official nodes, official nodes of notarization departments, official nodes of authentication institutions and the like, wherein the nodes are added after being approved by voting through user block chain nodes to form a voting block chain; the voting block chain can also be formed by jointly promoting a group of nodes with authority in the user block chain by the nodes in the user block chain, for example, all members in a certain industry association in a folk jointly promote a plurality of reason member units to form the voting block chain, and the reason member units judge disputes among the members in the industry association and give processing opinions.
By adopting the implementation mode, because the nodes in the voting block chain have the right of providing the processing opinions for the dispute content, the nodes have certain professionality and authority, and the nodes are passed through by the user block chain nodes, the fact that the user block chain nodes, namely the potential dispute request nodes, approve the professionality and authority of providing the processing opinions by each node in the voting block chain is shown, on one hand, the objectivity and the correctness of the processing opinions are ensured, on the other hand, the processing opinions are conveniently received and approved by each node related to the dispute, and further can be smoothly executed, so that the dispute is timely processed, and the benefits of each node related to the dispute are maintained.
In a preferred embodiment, a specific reason for name removal is set in the consensus algorithm of the user block chain, and if the reason for name removal is satisfied, the nodes meeting the condition are automatically removed.
In this embodiment, the default reason for name removal should correspond to an extremely serious situation, such as that the user node declares bankruptcy, the user node loses the main qualification and no subsequent adopter or subsequent adopter loses the inheritance right, and the like.
By adopting the implementation mode, extremely serious situations are preset in the block chain consensus algorithm, when the situations occur, the system directly starts the name removal program once being identified, processing opinions do not need to be provided by all nodes in the voting block chain, the processing time of the node dispute is shortened by saving the judgment and analysis program before the node name removal, the loss of the nodes involved in the dispute is avoided as much as possible, and the benefits of the nodes are maintained.
As a preferred embodiment, the processing opinion in step 108 includes: aborting the transaction, terminating the transaction, forcing a transfer of property, blacklisting any node in the user blockchain, and de-naming any node in the user blockchain.
By adopting the embodiment, the content of the dispute handling opinions, namely the content and the result of the final dispute solution, is determined, and convenience is provided for the processing opinions of the voting area block chain node. Meanwhile, various punishment modes of the over-wrong party node related to the dispute are determined, and the warning is given to other nodes in the user block chain, so that the behavior of adding the nodes in the user block chain is restrained, and the safety of a block chain system is maintained and ensured.
In a preferred embodiment, the property to be forcibly transferred includes: deposit, network recharge, and electronic account.
The network recharge and electronic accounts in the embodiment include electronic money accounts such as WeChat change and Payment balance, financial accounts such as stock accounts and fund accounts which can be directly discounted, and other accounts such as online shop accounts and game accounts which can be discounted indirectly.
By adopting the embodiment, the type of the property which is forcedly transferred is further definitely agreed, namely the property is not limited to physical money, but also comprises virtual money such as electronic money, digital money and the like, and the feasibility of executing the property which is forcedly transferred in dispute handling opinions is improved.
In a preferred embodiment, the name of any node in the user block chain is automatically removed after the number of times of being included in the blacklist within the set time exceeds the upper limit.
In this embodiment, the specific time and the number of times of the black list may be set by itself, and if the specific time T is set to six months and the number of times of incorporating the black list in the six months is set to 10 times, that is, in six months, after the number of times of incorporating the black list into a certain node of the user blockchain is accumulated to exceed 10 times, the name of the certain node of the user blockchain is automatically removed from the user blockchain.
By adopting the embodiment, before extreme punishment treatment such as name removal occurs, the times that specific time is combined and included in the blacklist in the period are considered uniformly, the opportunity of modifying and correcting the dispute error-passing party node is given, and humanized understanding and processing of the dispute error-passing party node, particularly the non-subjective malicious error-passing party node are reflected. The nodes which have errors in disputes for many times in a specific time and are included in the blacklist are removed from the user block chain, which is a serious punishment on the severe behaviors which are frequently taught and changed and is also a heavy warning on other nodes in the user block chain, so that the safety and the cleanness of a block chain system are further maintained and ensured, and the safety and the smoothness of transactions in the block chain are favorably ensured.
As a preferred embodiment, the present invention further comprises the steps of:
step 1101, a second node in the user block chain is a relative node of the first node, and the second node can initiate a reverse vote to the voting block chain aiming at the processing opinion in the step 108;
step 1102, voting each node in the voting block chain aiming at the reverse voting;
in step 1103, when the vote-back pass rate exceeds a specific ratio, the processing of the opinion does not proceed to step 112.
In this embodiment, the specific ratio may be set by itself, for example, the ratio is set to two thirds, that is, when the vote-reversal passage rate exceeds two thirds, the processing opinion does not enter the step 112.
By adopting the implementation mode, the second node is given the statement opportunity and the answer right of the dispute item, and the judgment of the answer content are still completed by the voting area block chain node which receives the dispute processing request of the first node and gives the processing opinion, thereby ensuring the objectivity, justice and fairness of the processing result.
As a preferred embodiment, the number of nodes in the voting block chain is not less than a specific value.
In this embodiment, the specific value may be set by itself, and if the specific value is set to 50, the number of nodes in the voting block chain is not less than 50.
By adopting the implementation mode, the number of the nodes with the authority of issuing the treatment opinions is definitely required to be not too small, namely the number of the treatment opinions is required to be not too small, so that the cost and the difficulty of artificially treating the opinions by the nodes involved in the dispute by adopting illegal means are increased, and the justice of the treatment results of the dispute is further ensured.
In a preferred embodiment, the user block chain node can broadcast and initiate a rename vote for any node of the voting block chain into the user block chain, and when the rename vote is passed by more than two thirds of the user nodes, the voted voting nodes are automatically renamed.
By adopting the embodiment, the method belongs to the strike right of the user block chain link point to the voting block chain node, the authority and the specialty of the node are the first choice of the node to be added into the voting block chain and the node provides fair and objective treatment opinions to the disputed end, so that the disputed end can be reasonably and effectively treated, when the authority and the specialty are questioned and then overturned, the node loses the meaning and the value existing in the voting block chain.
The invention discloses a processing system for disputes between nodes in a block chain, which is characterized by comprising the following steps:
at least one processor;
at least one memory for storing at least one program;
when the at least one program is executed by the at least one processor, the at least one processor implements the method for processing disputes between nodes in the blockchain as described above.
By adopting the embodiment, the process is realized through the execution of the computer program, and the execution efficiency of the processing method for disputes among nodes in the block chain is ensured.
Example 1:
referring to fig. 1, a block chain based transaction method includes the following steps:
102, establishing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using real-name nodes;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all the nodes to a user block chain and a voting block chain;
step 106, a first node in the user block chain broadcasts a dispute processing request to the voting block chain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at a dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting more than two thirds of the processing opinions to the user block chain;
if the second node in the user block chain is the opposite node of the first node and the second node has no objection to the processing in step 110, then step 112 is executed;
at step 112, processing comments in excess of two-thirds of the scale are automatically performed in the user block chain.
If the second node in the user block chain is a relative node of the first node and the second node disagrees the processing opinion in step 110, executing step 1101, step 1102 and step 1103;
step 1101, a second node in the user block chain is a relative node of the first node, and the second node can initiate a reverse vote to the voting block chain aiming at the processing opinion in the step 108;
step 1102, voting each node in the voting block chain aiming at the reverse voting;
in step 1103, when the vote-back pass rate exceeds two thirds, the processing of the opinion does not proceed to step 112.
In summary, in the method and system for processing disputes between nodes in a block chain, disputes between nodes in a user block chain are solved by matching the user block chain with a voting block chain, and selection and name removal of the nodes in the voting block chain are determined by the user block chain nodes, so that objectivity and justice of processing opinions issued by the nodes in the voting block chain are guaranteed; the opportunity of statement and answer of each node related to the dispute is given respectively, and the evaluation and judgment of the statement or answer are finished by the nodes in the voting area block chain, so that the objectivity and fairness of the dispute processing result are further guaranteed; an extreme situation is preset in the block chain consensus algorithm as a reason for node name removal, so that a program for voting block chain node arbitration is omitted, the time for dispute handling is shortened, and the dispute resolution efficiency is improved; and (3) the nodes which make mistakes many times in a specific time are punished for name removal, the environment of the user block chain is cleared, and other nodes in the chain are warned and warned.
The described embodiments are only some embodiments of the invention, not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims (10)
1. A method for processing disputes between nodes in a block chain, comprising:
102, establishing a user block chain and a voting block chain by using real-name nodes;
104, broadcasting the identity information of all the nodes to the user block chain and the voting block chain;
step 106, a first node in the user block chain broadcasts a dispute end processing request to the voting block chain;
step 108, each node in the voting block chain broadcasts a processing opinion aiming at the dispute processing request in the voting block chain;
step 110, counting the processing opinions of each node in the voting block chain, and broadcasting the processing opinions exceeding a specific proportion to the user block chain;
and step 112, automatically executing the over-scale processing opinions in the user block chain.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein each node in said block chain to be voted is passed through by a full vote of a node in said user block chain.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the method further comprises: and setting a specific name removal reason in the consensus algorithm of the user block chain, and automatically removing the name of the node meeting the condition if the name removal reason is established.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said processing comments in step 108 include: aborting the transaction, terminating the transaction, forcing a transfer of property, blacklisting any node in the user blockchain, and de-naming any node in the user blockchain.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said forcibly transferring property comprises: deposit, network recharge, and electronic account.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein any node in the user blockchain is automatically de-named after a number of blacklists included in the blacklist exceeds an upper limit within a predetermined time.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising: a step 1101, a second node in the user block chain being a relative node of the first node, the second node being capable of initiating a reverse vote into the voting block chain for the processing opinion in the step 108;
step 1102, voting each node in the voting block chain aiming at the reverse vote;
step 1103, when the negative vote voting pass rate exceeds a certain ratio, the processing opinion does not enter the step 112.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of nodes in the block chain is not less than a predetermined value.
9. The method as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the user blockchain node can broadcast and initiate a rename vote for any node of the voting blockchain into the user blockchain, and when the rename vote is passed by more than two thirds of user nodes, the voted voting node is automatically renamed.
10. A system for handling disputes between nodes within a blockchain, comprising:
at least one processor;
at least one memory for storing at least one program;
when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to implement a method for handling inter-node disputes within a blockchain as recited in any one of claims 1-9.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010155382.0A CN111464591B (en) | 2020-03-04 | 2020-03-04 | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010155382.0A CN111464591B (en) | 2020-03-04 | 2020-03-04 | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN111464591A true CN111464591A (en) | 2020-07-28 |
| CN111464591B CN111464591B (en) | 2023-07-04 |
Family
ID=71680054
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202010155382.0A Active CN111464591B (en) | 2020-03-04 | 2020-03-04 | Method and system for processing disputes among nodes in block chain |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN111464591B (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112202552A (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2021-01-08 | 建信金融科技有限责任公司 | Method, device, medium and electronic equipment for monitoring quality of block chain data |
Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106445711A (en) * | 2016-08-28 | 2017-02-22 | 杭州云象网络技术有限公司 | Byzantine-fault-tolerant consensus method applied to block chain |
| CN108182635A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-06-19 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Block chain common recognition method, system and computer readable storage medium |
| WO2019182202A1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2019-09-26 | 김용태 | Blockchain system to which proof-of-transaction consensus algorithm is applied, and method therefor |
| CN110391911A (en) * | 2019-07-23 | 2019-10-29 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Block chain votes anonymously system and method |
-
2020
- 2020-03-04 CN CN202010155382.0A patent/CN111464591B/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN106445711A (en) * | 2016-08-28 | 2017-02-22 | 杭州云象网络技术有限公司 | Byzantine-fault-tolerant consensus method applied to block chain |
| CN108182635A (en) * | 2017-12-18 | 2018-06-19 | 深圳前海微众银行股份有限公司 | Block chain common recognition method, system and computer readable storage medium |
| WO2019182202A1 (en) * | 2018-03-23 | 2019-09-26 | 김용태 | Blockchain system to which proof-of-transaction consensus algorithm is applied, and method therefor |
| CN110391911A (en) * | 2019-07-23 | 2019-10-29 | 中国工商银行股份有限公司 | Block chain votes anonymously system and method |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN112202552A (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2021-01-08 | 建信金融科技有限责任公司 | Method, device, medium and electronic equipment for monitoring quality of block chain data |
| CN112202552B (en) * | 2020-09-24 | 2022-12-13 | 中国建设银行股份有限公司 | Method, device, medium and electronic equipment for monitoring quality of block chain data |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN111464591B (en) | 2023-07-04 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN109639837B (en) | Block chain DPoS (distributed denial of service) consensus method based on trust mechanism | |
| CN110580653B (en) | Block chain consensus mechanism based on transaction | |
| Mattoo et al. | Currency undervaluation and sovereign wealth funds: a new role for the World Trade Organization | |
| CN110188137B (en) | Integrity-based block chain consensus mechanism | |
| Fraidin et al. | Toward unlocking lockups | |
| CN109816532B (en) | Asset digital anchoring system based on block chain technology | |
| Dean | The incomplete global market for tax information | |
| Dominguez | The role of international organizations in the Bretton Woods system | |
| CN112767091A (en) | Method, device and medium for processing supervisable bid and privacy based on block chain | |
| CN112632186A (en) | Block chain consensus method, computer equipment and block chain system | |
| CN109919736A (en) | A kind of bid purchasing method, apparatus, system and storage medium | |
| CN111464591A (en) | Method and system for processing disputes between nodes in block chain | |
| CN110288348B (en) | Block chain consensus method and system based on propagation liveness and asset certification | |
| CN110930158A (en) | Block chain DPoS common recognition method based on reward and punishment mechanism | |
| Marchant et al. | Bringing technological transparency to tenebrous markets: the case for using blockchain to validate carbon credit trading markets | |
| CN113568975A (en) | Method for chaining carbon emission big data and transaction blocks | |
| Farrar | Business judgment and defensive tactics in hostile takeover bids | |
| CN114154980B (en) | Multi-party bidding digital asset transaction system and method based on intelligent contract | |
| Boskey | A History of Commercial Arbitration in New Jersey-Part I | |
| CN115630959A (en) | Energy safety transaction method and system based on block chain intelligent contract | |
| Duke | Institutions and land-use conflicts: Harm, dispute processing, and transactions | |
| CN112651833A (en) | Securities processing method, computer equipment and storage device | |
| CN111738860A (en) | Multi-object transaction method based on block chain and digital currency or digital credit | |
| Engel | On Waiving Class Action Waivers: A Critique and Defense of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's Proposed Regulations | |
| Lang | The Legislative History of the Federal Trade Commission Act |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |