ZA200603404B - Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae-haemophilus parasuis vaccine and methods of using the same - Google Patents

Description

ERYSIPELOTHRIX RHUSIOPATHIAE-HAEMOPHILUS

PARASUIS VACCINE AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention is concerned with a vaccine for Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae (E. rhusiopathiae) and a vaccine for Haemophilus Parasuis (H. parasuis). More particularly, the present invention is concerned with a vaccine for conferring effective immunity against E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis and methods of making the same. Still more particularly, the present invention is concerned with a vaccine which can be administered in a single dose and provide a duration of immunity (DOI) of a desired length. Even more particularly, the present invention is concerned with a single dose vaccine which provides a DOI equivalent to the average life span of an animal receiving the vaccine.

Description of the Prior Art

E. rhusiopathiae is a gram-positive bacteria that is pathogenic to over 50 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals including swine, sheep, lambs, cattle, ducks, turkeys, and humans. H. parasuis is a gram-negative bacteria that is pathogenic to many animals, most notably swine. Vaccines against E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis are typically separate and consist of multiple doses given over the life span of an animal in order to confer effective immunity against

E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis. There currently exists a vaccine against H parasuis which can be administered in a single dose but a separate vaccination against E. rhusiopathiae must still be given. As is well known in the art, problems with vaccines that require more than one dose include the time and expense needed to track which animals have received first and/or second or subsequent doses, to track when the first dose was given, to do the actual vaccination, the increased size of the animals between first and subsequent doses, the increased risk of injury to the animal and to the person giving the subsequent doses of vaccine, and the expense associated with providing multiple doses.

What is needed in the art is a 1-dose regimen which confers effective immunity to an animal receiving the vaccination wherein the vaccine provides an extended DOI longer than is presently available through vaccines. What is further needed is a vaccine against E. rhusiopathiae that is administered in a single dose and provides a DOI of about six months. What is still further needed is a vaccine against E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis that provides a DOI of about six months after just a single dose of the vaccine.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the deficiencies of the prior art and provides a distinct advance in the state of the art. In particular, the present invention provides a vaccine which can be administered in a single dose and which provides one or more of the following: 1) confers effective immunity against E. rhusiopathiae; 2) decreases the risk of developing clinical signs of E. rhusiopathiae infection; 3) induces an immune response against E. rhusiopathiae; and 4) has a DOI of at least four months, more preferably at least about five months, and most preferably at least about six months. The present invention also provides a combination vaccine that provides one or more of the following: 1) confers effective immunity against E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis;, 2) decreases the risk of developing clinical signs of E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis through a single dose of vaccine; 3) induces an immune response against E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis;, and 4) provides a DOI against E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis of at least about four months, more preferably at least about 132 days, more preferably at least about 5 months, and most preferably at least about six months or at least about 162 days. Preferably, the combination vaccine can also be given as a single dose.

The E. rhusiopathiae vaccine includes a bacterial component of inactivated E. rhusiopathiae bacteria and a suitable adjuvant. The adjuvant can be selected based on the method of administration and may include mineral oil-based adjuvants such as Freund's complete and incomplete adjuvant, Montanide incomplete Seppic adjuvant such as ISA, oil in water emulsion adjuvants such as the Ribi adjuvant system, syntax adjuvant formulation containing muramyi dipeptide, or aluminum salt adjuvants. Preferably, the adjuvant is amineral oil-based adjuvant, most preferably ISA206 (SEPPIC, Paris, France). The composition may also include any one or combination of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or excipients including, but not limited to,

buffers, stabilizers, diluents, preservatives, and solubilizers. The vaccine is administered to animals susceptible to infection by E. Rhusiopathiae, preferably mammals, and still more preferably pigs, in any conventional manner, including oral, intranasal, intramuscular, intra-lymph node, intradermal, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, and combinations thereof, but most preferably through intramuscular (IM) injection. The amount of the dose for intramuscular administration is preferably up to about ml, still more preferably between 1 ml and 3 ml, and most preferably about 2 ml.

The combined E. rhusiopathiae-H. parasuis vaccine includes inactivated bacterial components of both E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis, together with a suitable adjuvant. Preferably, the adjuvant is mineral-oil based, most preferably ISA206. The vaccine is administered to animals susceptible to infection by E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis, preferably mammals, and still more preferably pigs, in any conventional manner, including oral, intranasal, intramuscular, intra-lymph node, intradermal, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, and combinations thereof, most preferably through intramuscular (IM) injection. The amount of the dose when IM injection is the selected administration route is preferably up to about 5 ml, still more preferably between 1 ml and 3 ml, and most preferably about 2 ml. The amount of E. rhusiopathiae antigen in each dose should be enough to confer effective immunity against and decrease the risk of developing clinical signs resulting from

E. rhusiopathiae infection to an animal receiving a vaccination therewith. Preferably the amount of E. rhusiopathiae antigen should be up to about 5 ml, more preferably between about 0.2 to 3ml, still more preferably between about 0.3 to 1.5 ml, more preferably between about 0.4 to 0.8 ml, and still more preferably about 0.6 ml. The amount of H. parasuis antigen in each dose should be up to about 5 ml, more preferably between about 0.1 to 3 ml, still more preferably between about 0.15 to 1.5 ml, more preferably between about 0.2 to 0.6 ml, and still more preferably about 0.4 ml. In a different form of measurement, the amount of H. parasuis antigen in each dose should contain at least 1.5 x 107 cfu/dose, more preferably between about 1.5 x 108 to 1.5 x 10" cfu/dose and still more preferably about 1.5 x 10° cfu/dose. In a particularly preferred 2 ml dose, approximately 0.6 ml is E. rhusiopathiae antigen, approximately 1.0 ml is the adjuvant and approximately 0.4 ml is the H. parasuis antigen. Preferably, the bacteria are inactivated by conventional inactivation techniques and especially conventional formalin inactivation techniques.

Vaccines and compositions of the present invention are generally useful for inducing immune responses in animals as immune response-stimulating therapeutics or prophylactic vaccines.

Preferably, administration of the compositions or vaccines of the present invention results in an immune response that protects the vaccinated animal in various ways including a lessening in the severity or delay in the onset of clinical signs of E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis infection. Still more preferably, administration of the compositions or vaccines results in a reduced risk of developing clinical signs of E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis infection, even after exposure or challenge by virulent forms of E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis. In particularly preferred forms, administration of the composition or vaccine results in a complete prevention of these clinical signs.

Various conventional methods can be used to determine if an immune response was induced in an animal. For example, the animal receiving the composition or vaccine can be challenged with a virulent form of E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis and observed for the development of clinical signs of infection for a period of time after challenge. An alternative method of determining if an immune response was induced by administration of the composition or vaccine would be to assay a biological sample from the animal for antibodies to one or more antigens of E. rhusiopathiae and/or H. parasuis. Such methods are common in the field and appropriate antibody assays could be determined by those of skill in the art.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

The following examples set forth preferred embodiments of the present invention. It is to be understood that these examples are provided by way of illustration and nothing therein should be taken as a limitation upon the overall scope of the invention.

EXAMPLE 1

This example provides data as to the efficacy and duration of immunity against virulent E. rhusiopathiae following a preferred single dose H. parasuis-E. rhusiopathiae vaccine.

Materials and Methods

A total of 37 pigs aged 3 to 4 weeks, none of which had been previously vaccinated with

Erysipelothrix bacterins or vaccines, were used for the study leading to this example. Throughout the study, the animals were provided food sufficient for their size, age and other physical characteristics.

Water was supplied ad libitum. The animals were housed in confinement swine facilities with full or partially slatted floors, mechanical ventilation, and supplemental heat and light appropriate for the age of the animals.

Two days prior to the study, all of the pigs were given a health exam and vaccinated for

Pseudorabies Virus. On day 1 of the study, the pigs were divided into two groups. Group 1 was composed of 23 pigs that received one 2mL intramuscular dose of H. parasuis-E. rhusiopathiae

Bacterin with adjuvant ISA 206 (“HPE”) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc., St. Joseph, MO) in the left neck on day 1. The E. rhusiopathiae antigen was included in each dose at the rate of 0.6mL volume of harvest antigen. Group 2, the control group, was composed of 14 pigs that received no treatment at all. On days 21, 54 and 161 of the study, all of the animals were bled to monitor seroconversion to vaccination.

On day 162 of the example, all of the pigs (except for 3 who had died from incidental causes prior to day 162) were challenged with a virulent strain of E. rhusiopathiae EL-6P. All of the pigs were then observed for seven days for general health and the clinical signs of E. rhusiopathiae. On day 7 following the challenge, all of the animals were euthanized and those showing persistent clinical signs and/or elevated body temperature for 2 consecutive days typical of E. rhusiophatiae as set forth in 9

CFR 113.67 were necropsied. A necropsy was also performed on all of the animals that died during the trial. Gross lesions were assessed and recorded, and tissues were collected and sent to a laboratory for bacterial culture.

A summary of the above protocol can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 [bw | mew

Group 2 received the non-vaccinated control treatment. post challenge. 160 |Endorww. 0

Results and Discussion:

All 13 of the pigs from Group 2 were affected and showed elevated body temperature greater than 106.5°F, clinical signs of infection by E. rhusiopathiae, or death after challenge with virulent

E. rhusiopathiae. E. rhusiopathiae was recovered from 9 of the 13 pigs from Group 2, and 6 of the 13 pigs from Group 2 died following the challenge. In contrast, 20 of the 21 pigs from Group 1 remained healthy and were protected from the virulent challenge of E. rhusiopathiae 162 days post vaccination. None of the pigs from Group 1 died following the challenge. There was no E. rhusiopathiae recovered from the single Group 1 pig that did not remain healthy following challenge. Table 2 contains morbidity results and analysis while Table 3 contains mortality results.

Table 2 - Morbidity # Pigs Affected by E. # Pigs Protected from E. Total # Pigs

Rhusiopathiae Rhusiopathiae

Gowp2 | 5 | 0 | wm chiSquare

Mantel-Haenszel: 2242 .0000022 19.71 000009

Table 3 - Mortality # Pigs Died After # Pigs Survived After Total # Pigs

Challenge Challenge

Goupr | 0 | ow [a

Gowpz | 6 | 1 | 0» chiSqure 1177

Mantel-Haenszel: 11.42 .0007 0029

Vaccinates challenged with virulent E. rhusiopathiae 162 days after vaccination were well protected when compared to controls. 100% of the non-vaccinated controls developed the disease and 46% died following the challenge. By contrast, a single does of the HPE protected 95% of the challen ged pigs and none of the pigs that received the vaccine died following challenge. The results of this study confirm the duration of immunity of at least 162 days for the HPE in a single dose regimen for prevention and control of erysipelas in nursery pigs aged 3 weeks of age or older. 7

SS

EXAMPLE 2

This example demonstrates the duration of immunity of a preferred single dose vaccine against virulent H. parasuis challenge after vaccination.

Materials and Methods:

The study for this example began with 36 pigs aged 3 to 4 weeks, none of which had been previously vaccinated using H. parasuis bacterin or vaccine. Throughout the example, the animals were provided food sufficient for their size, age and other physical characteristics. Water was supplied ad libitum.

On day 1 of the example, the pigs were divided into two groups. Group 1 was composed of 23 pigs that received one 2mL intramuscular dose of H. parasuis Bacterin with adjuvant ISA 206 (“HPB”) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmidica, Inc., St. Joseph, MO) on day 1. The H. parasuis antigen was included in each dose at the rate of 1.5 x 10° cfu/dose. Group 2, the control group, was composed of 13 pigs who received no treatment at all.

On day 132 of the example, 11 pigs from Group 2 and 17 of the pigs from Group 1 were healthy and suitable for challenge with a virulent strain of H. parasuis. The 8 pigs (6 from Group 1 and 2 from Group 2) that did not receive challenge were unhealthy or had died for reasons unrelated to vaccination. All of the pigs were then observed for seven days for general health and the clinical signs of H. parasuis. A necropsy was performed on all of the animals that died during the trial and tissues were taken for bacterial confirmation of the cause of death when deemed necessary. On day 7 following the challenge, all of the animals were euthanized and those showing persistent clinical signs and/or elevated body temperature for 2 consecutive days typical of H.

parasuis were necropsied. Gross lesions were assessed and recorded, and tissues were collected and sent to a laboratory for bacterial culture.

A summary of the above protocol can be found in Table 4.

Table 4 [oy | mew

Group 2 received the non-vaccinated control treatment. post challenge.

Results and Discussion:

Clinical signs of H. parasuis infection was shown by 8 of 11 pigs of the contro] group and necropsy showed that 7 of the 11 had post mortem lesions typical of H. parasuis. A total of 6 control pigs died after challenge, and 5 of these 6 had gross lesions typical of H. parasuis. Severe clinical signs resulting in terminal recumbency for two or more days developed in two more pigs.

These pigs also had lesions typical of H. parasuis at necropsy. Of the 8 affected control pigs, 6 were positive for H. parasuis on bacterial culture. The 3 remaining pigs did not show any signs of disease due to H. parasuis.

In contrast, 16 of the 17 pigs from Group 1 were protected from the virulent challenge of H. parasuis 132 days post vaccination. One of the pigs from Group 1 died following the challenge.

There was no H. parasuis recovered from the single Group 1 pig who died following challenge,

however, it did have post mortem lesions consistent with the occurrence of the disease. Table 5 contains morbidity results and analysis while Table 6 contains mortality results.

Table 5 - Morbidity # Pigs Affected by H. # Pigs Protected from Total # Pigs parasuis H. parasuis

Gow2 | ss [ow]

TT cwswawe | vase 13.68

Mantel-Haenszel: 13.19 0139

Table 6 - Mortality # Pigs Died After # Pigs Survived After Total # Pigs

Challenge Challenge

Growp2 | 6 | 0s | ow ol cuwseae | Va

Mantel-Haenszel:

Yotescorrected: | 604 | 0139

Vaccinates challenged with virulent H. parasuis 132 days after vaccination were well protected when compared to controls. 73% of the non-vaccinated controls developed the disease and 55% died following the challenge. By comparison, a single dose of the HPB protected 94% of the challenged pigs. The vaccinates also experienced statistically significant lower mortality than controls due to H. parasuis. The results of this example confirm the duration of immunity of at least 132 days for the HPB in a single dose regimen in nursery pigs aged 3 weeks of age or older.

EXAMPLE 3

This example describes a preferred method of preparing vaccine in accordance with the present invention.

Materials and Methods:

The composition of the E. rhusiopathiae-H. parasuis Bacterin includes strains SE-9 and Z- 1517 of E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis, respectively. These strains have been deposited with the

ATCC and have been assigned deposit numbers PTA-6261 and PTS-6262, respectively. The seed materials of each are identified by characteristic growth patterns, Gram’s stain reactions and biochemical tests. The virulence of the seed materials is determined by the ability to kill mice and/or produce clinical signs in susceptible swine.

The composition of the growth media for E. rhusiopathiae is found in Table 7. The composition of the growth media for H. parasuis is found in Table 8.

Table 7

Verswssomion emeoscdcmowone | ox

Tew Vegoomsume [ox] TromsmProptucMobmie [og]

I

I = Teowa as | omomw 25% Dextrosesotuton |__

I E RT

Teowme as | oeom

Ere I

Production Culture Media

I I RT leeosrepones | 0s [sodmPhowhmetoputye | 80g)

I = SE RY

I =

I ET rowme as | toom (note: to prepare the Production Seed and Production Culture Media, the pH should be adjusted to 8.6 by adding 10N NaOH or 5N HCI and it should also be heat sterilized.)

Table 8

I ES

—

Media ecommidcAdnincDimckeoide | 50g]

I [> NRT Teowaw as | oom

Msn | [ [rs eome Ames | neg] lrowsr es | seoom]

EE ial I

Media Tmopiesymon | sa sewsAGT0AmfomSawion | usm mows | seam

Fa I add: 7 a

Containing Non-Essential Amino Acids [as Serle Fresh Yeast BxmeeSolotion | om [seNapsouksomin | oem comfeaNewbomBovineCalfSenim | 380m [ordssowson | om] (note: 5% NAD Stock Solution should be filter sterilized through 0.2 micron filter and stored frozen. 2M Tris Solution should be heat sterilized and stored cool.)

The strains of both E. rhusiopathiae and H. parasuis seed cultures should be grown in 500 to 20,000 mL vessels. Their production cultures are grown in 20-1000 L vessels. Master and

Working Seeds of both strains should be stored frozen at < -60°C.

To prepare suspensions of E. rhusiopathiae for seeding or inoculation, the Master seed is returned to the liquid phase and 1 to 2 mL is inoculated into Working Seed Culture Media. The culture is then grown statically at 34 - 38°C for 6 to 24 hours. The cultures are then checked for purity by colony appearance on 5% sheep blood agar, cell morphology, and Gram’s stain. An equal volume of stabilizer is added and dispensed into cryotubes for storage.

To prepare suspensions of H. parasuis for seeding or inoculation, the Master seed is returned to the liquid phase and is inoculated into Working Seed Culture Media. The culture is then stirred at 34 - 38°C for 12 to 18 hours. The cultures are then checked for purity by colony appearance on 5% sheep blood agar, cell morphology, and Gram’s stain. An equal volume of stabilizer is added and dispensed into cryotubes for storage.

To inoculate E. rhusiopathiae, 1-12 mL of Working Seed are inoculated into a glass vessel containing 500 to 18,000 mL media to prepare Production Seed. Up to 5% (v/v) Production Seed is inoculated into 15 to 750 L of media in 20 to 1000 L vessels to prepare Production Culture.

Production Cultures are checked for purity by streaking on 5% sheep blood agar, incubating at 34 - 38°C for 24 - 48 hours and observing colony morphology.

To inoculate H. parasuis, 1-10 mL of Working Seed are inoculated into a glass vessel containing 500 to 18,000 mL media to prepare Production Seed. Up to 7% (v/v) Production Seed is inoculated into 14 to 750 L of media in 20 to 1000 L vessels to prepare Production Culture.

Production Cultures are checked for purity by streaking on 5% sheep blood agar, supplemented with

NAD streak, incubating at 34 - 38°C for 18 - 24 hours, and observing colony morphology.

For the incubation of E. rhusiopathiae, Seed Cultures are incubated at 34 - 38°C for 6 to 24 hours aerobically. Production Cultures are incubated at 34 - 38°C for 6 to 12 hours aerobically with

Claims (41)

We claim:

1. A composition comprising: an amount of antigen from Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae; an amount of antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis; and an adjuvant.

2. The composition of claim 1, said amount of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen in said composition being an amount effective at reducing the risk of developing clinical signs of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection when administered to an animal susceptible to Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection.

3, The composition of claim 2, said effective amount of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen being up to about 5 ml.

4. The composition of claim 1, said amount of antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis being an amount effective at reducing the risk of developing clinical signs of Haemophilus Parasuis infection when administered to an animal susceptible to Haemophilus Parasuis infection.

5. The composition of claim 4, said effective amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen being up to about 5 ml.

6. The composition of claim 4, said effective amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen containing at least 1.5 x 107 cfu/dose.

7. The composition of claim 1, said adjuvant having a mineral oil base.

8. The composition of claim 1, said composition being effective at inducing an immune response against infection from a pathogen selected from the group consisting of Haemophilus Parasuis, Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae, and combinations thereof.

9. A vaccine for reducing the risk of developing clinical signs of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection after a single administration of said vaccine, said vaccine comprising: an amount of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen; and an adjuvant.

10. The vaccine of claim 9, further comprising an amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen.

11. The vaccine of claim 9, said amount of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen being up to about 5 ml.

12. The vaccine of claim 10, said amount of antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis being an amount effective at reducing the risk of developing clinical signs of Haemophilus Parasuis infection.

13. The vaccine of claim 10, said amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen being up to about 5 ml.

14. The vaccine of claim 10, said effective amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen containing at least 1.5 x 107 cfu/dose.

15. The vaccine of claim 9, said adjuvant having a mineral oil base.

16. The vaccine of claim 9, said vaccine reducing the risk of developing clinical signs of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection for at least four months following administration.

17. The vaccine of claim 10, said vaccine reducing the risk of developing clinical signs of Haemophilus Parasuis infection for at least four months following administration.

18. The vaccine of claim 10, said vaccine being effective at inducing an immune response against infection from a pathogen selected from the group consisting of Haemophilus Parasuis, Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae, and combinations thereof.

19. A method of reducing an animal’s risk of developing clinical signs resulting from infection by a pathogen selected from the group consisting of Haemophilus Parasuis, Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae, and combinations thereof comprising the step of: administering a composition to an animal susceptible to Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection, said composition comprising an amount of antigen from Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae, an amount of antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis, and an adjuvant.

20. The method of claim 19, said administration step being via an intramuscular injection.

21. The method of claim 19, said amount of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen being up to about S ml.

22. The method of claim 19, said amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen being up to about 5 ml.

23. The method of claim 19, said amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen containing at least 1.5 x 10” cfu/dose.

24. The method of claim 19, said adjuvant having a mineral oil base.

25. The method of claim 19, said animal's reduction of risk of developing clinical signs of Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection lasting for at least 132 days.

26. The method of claim 19, said administering step reducing the animal’s risk of developing clinical signs from Haemophilus Parasuis and Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection.

27. The method of claim 19, further comprising the step of confirming the animal’s reduction of risk by challenging the animal with a virulent strain of Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae and monitoring said animal for the development of said clinical signs.

28. A method inducing an immune response to Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection comprising the step of: administering a composition to an animal susceptible to Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection, said composition comprising an amount of antigen from Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae, an amount of antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis, and an adjuvant.

29. The method of claim 28, said administration step being via an intramuscular injection.

30. The method of claim 28, said amount of Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen being up to about 5 ml.

31. The method of claim 28, said amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen being up to about 5 ml.

32. The method of claim 28, said amount of Haemophilus Parasuis antigen containing at least 1.5 x 107 cfu/dose.

33. The method of claim 28, said adjuvant having a mineral oil base.

34. The method of claim 28, said animal’s immune response to Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection lasting for at least 4 months.

35. The method of claim 28, said administering step inducing an immune response against Haemophilus Parasuis and Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae infection.

36. The method of claim 28, further comprising the step of confirming the animal’s immune response by challenging the animal with a virulent strain of Haemophilus Parasuis or Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae and testing for said immune response.

37. A method of preparing a composition comprising the steps of: preparing a mixture by combining an amount of antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis, an amount of antigen from Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae, and an adjuvant; and emulsifying said mixture.

38. The method of claim 37, said method further comprising the step of inactivating the source of said antigen from Haemophilus Parasuis and Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae.

39. The method of claim 37, said Haemophilus Parasuis antigen being derived from strain Z-1517.

40. The method of claim 37, said Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen being derived from strain SE-9.

41. The method of claim 37, further comprising the step of standardizing said composition to provide known effective amounts of Haemophilus Parasuis and Erysipelothrix Rhusiopathiae antigen.