ZA200509811B - Aqueous system containing additive pre-mixes and processes for forming the same - Google Patents

Description

TITLE

AQUEOUS SYSTEMS CONTAINING ADDITIVE PRE-MIXE=S AND

PROCESSES FOR FORMING THE SAME

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/467,802 filed May 2, 2003 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/470,762 filed May 15, 2003, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention generally relates to aqueous system s containing additive pree-mixes and processes for forming the same wherein tkhe additive for pigmented aqueous systems comprises a mixture of a cationic polymer and an ani onic particle, methods of forming an aqueous paper co ating color as well as a cellulose matrix coated therewith; and a processes for preparing stabilized gpre-mixes.

Description of Background and Other Information ‘For more than 100 years, pigmented coatings have been used to improve the optical properties and printability of paper. Pigments in the coatings, and the pore spaces they form, are known to increase gpaper opacity, bwrightness, ink receptivity, and gloss. The smooth surface formed by calenderirg the coated paper has higher gloss and is easier to p tint on than the relativ-ely rough uncoated base sheet.

Thee use of cationic polymers and cationic pigments in pagoer coating applicatio ns is known in the art. For example, articles such as LePoutre, P., “The structure of paper coatings: an update’, Progress in Organic Coating,

177, pages 89-106 (1989) and Lepoutre, P. et al., " The light-sc-attering efficiency of microvoids in paper coatings and filled papers," Jeurnal of Pulp and Paper Science, 15, #5, pages 183-185, September 1989, describe the u se of cationic polymers, amphoteric polymers, and a latex co=ntaining an amphoteric polymer at its surface in controlling the immobilization of coating solids and increasing the void fraction of the dried coating. These cationic additives interact strongly with the anionic coating pigments, creating a porous structure that scatters light more efficiently, and has more exposed pigment surface area, than a standard paper coating. Increasing light scattering increases the opacity and brightness of the coating . Increasing pigment surface area increases ink receptivity. However, pignnent shock problems (the formation of gels and hard aggregates) have bl ocked the commercial use of cationic polymer additives in paper coating applications. ‘The use of cationic pigments and cationic polymers in papermaking applications has been discussed in many articles and patentss for example, as described in U.S. Patent 2,795,545 (Gluesenkamp); U.S. Patent 3,804,656 (Kaliski et al.); U.S. Patent 5,718,756 (Mohler); U.S. Patent 4,738,726 (Pratt); won Raven A., Scritmatter, G., Weig|, J., "Cationic coating col ors - a new coating system, TAPPI Journal, December 1998, pages 141- 148; U.S.

Patent 4,874,466 (Savino); U.S. Patent 4,964,955 (Lamar); a nd U.S. Patent 5,169,441 (Lauzon). These articles and patents are limited to the direct addition of a cationic polymer or treatment of a large portion Of the aqueous pigment with a relatively low addition level of cationic polyme r followed by high shear mixing, which results in agglomeration.

The present invention addresses the need within the industry to provide a process(es), and additive(s) used therein, which ressults in reduced pigment shock, greater ease of use, and greater process flexibility.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to embodiments of a pigmented aqueous system comprising an additive pre-mix comprising a cationic polymer and an anionic particle (e.g. a high surface area, anionicallly charged inorganic mineral or synthetic particle and/or mixtures thereof).

The present invention further relates to fomming an aqueous system (e.g. aqueous paper coating color) comprising: (1) mixing the anionic particle and the cationic polymer; wherein an additive pre-mix is formed, (2) optionally filtering the additive pre-m ix; (3) optionally adding a stabilizing agent to the additive pre-mix; (4) optionally adding the additive pre-miix to a coating starch; (5) optionally adding a biocide to the ad ditive pre-mix; and (6) adding the additive pre-mix to an aq ueous system.

Still further, the present invention includes : coating a cellulose matrix in accordance with the process described above, as:= well as the coated cellulose matrix, further including the steps of (7) coating a cellulose matrix; and " (8) drying the cellulose matrix.

Still further, the present invention relates to embodiments of a process for preparing a stable pre-mix comprising: (a) forming a pre-mix comprising an anZonic particle and a cationic polymer, (b) adding a stabilizing agent to the pres-mix, wherein a stable pre- mix is formed; and (c) optionally adding a biocide to the st-able pre-mix.

Additionally the present invention relates teo a stable pre-mix produced using the above-noted process.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THIE DRAWINGS

Figure 1 depicts the relationship between cationic polymer concentration and pigment shock.

Figure 2 depicts the relationship between coating viscosity and the pre- mix addition concentration.

Figure 3 depicts the relationship between the coating weight and the opacity.

Figure 4 depicts the relationship between the coating weight and the brightness.

Figure 5 depicts the relationship between the pre-mix addition concentration and opacity.

Figure 6 depicts the relationship between the addition concentration and brightness.

Figure 7 depicts the relationship between the post dilution stirring time and pigment shock. :

Figure 8 depicts the relationship betweers the pre-mix addition level and the immobilization of solids.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

All references, particularly U.S. Patents, cited in this disclosure are specifically incorporated by reference herein i n their entirety.

Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the eradpoints thereof, and ali integers and fractions within the range. It is not intendled that the scope of the various embodiments of the invention be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range. Moreover, all ranges set forth herein are intended to include not only the particular ranges specifically described, but also any combination of values therein, including the minimum and maximum values recited.

.- -.WO02004/099321 PCT/US2004/013506

The embodiments of the pressent invention may be used in applications where the cationic modification of pigments is desired for the purpose of promoting a structured effect, for exxample an increased void volume, after drying. Thus the embodiments of thie present invention are useful in industrial 5 applications including, but not limitexd to, paper coatings, paper size press coatings, paper wet-end pigment rextention, adhesives, drilling muds and the : like.

The present invention gener-ally relates to aqueous systems containing additive pre-mixes and processes for forming the same wherein the additive - 10 comprises a cationic polymer mixed with an anionic particle, methods of forming an aqueous system (e.g. aaqueous paper coating color) containing the additive as well as a cellulose matrix coated therewith; and a process for preparing stabilized pre-mixes, wherein the anionic particle moderates the oo interaction of the cationic polymer with the anionic aqueous pigments and significantly reduces or eliminates pigment agglomeration. : : As used herein, the term “system(s)” or derivations thereof shall include, but is not limited to, paper coatings, paint mixtures that contain a pigment, paper wet-end pigment retention, adhesives, drilling muds, paper size press coatings, and the like.

As used herein, the term "anionic particle” is meant to include both a high surface area, anionically charged inorganic mineral and/or a high surface area, anionically charged synthetic inorganic particle(s) and/or mixtures thereof.

As used herein, the term "indirect addition" is meant to describe mixing of cationic polymer and an anionic particle before either is added to an aqueous system, thereby forming a pre-mix.

As used herein, the term "direct addition” is meant to describe the addition of the cationic polymer to an aqueous system, such that no pre-mix is formed.

As used herein, the term "(co) polymer” is meant to include both homopolymers and copolymers.

The present invention relates to a pigmented aqueous system comprising: (i) an additive pre-mix comprising a cationic polymer and an anionic particle (e.g. a high surfac e area, anionically charged inorganic mineral or synthetic particle).

The types of pigments for use in the aqueous system and the amounts of each that may be utilized vary wiclely, however, both of these aspects are 10: well known to skilled artisans.

Pre-mix addition levels to the pigmented aqueous system range from 0.01-2.0 dry parts per 100 parts of pigment are preferred, 0.05 to 1.0 parts per 100 parts of pigment are more preferred, and 0.1 to 0.5 parts per 100 - parts of pigment are most preferred . However, pre-mix addition levels will vary according to the charge densitwy of the polymer.

Typically, the pre-mix has a solids content ranging from about 5% to about 40%, preferably 15% to aboust 30%, based on the total weight of the pre-mix. -

Furthermore, in making the additive pre-mix the cationic polymer may be added into an anionic particle solution, wherein the cationic polymer may be quickly added, thereby resulting in a lower solids content solution.

However, also contemplated is the addition of the anionic particles to the cationic polymer solution, which ressults in a high solids solution that may be diluted and stirred prior to use.

The cationic polymer for use in the present invention may be linear or branched and have some level of water solubility. Water soluble is meant to indicate that the cationic polymers are soluble or dispersible in a pigment pre-. mix at an effective use concentration.

The cationic pol ymer may contain polar mer units, suchas (meth)acrylamide, acrylonitrile and the like, or less polar nonionic mer units, such as lower alkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid, for instance the Cy alkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid, provided such hydrophobic nature and density of such less polar mer units do not overly diminish the water solubility of the cationic polymer at use concentration.

Typical cationic polymers include those having a weight average molecular weight in a range from about 5,000 to about 3,000,000 daltons, preferably from about 10,000 to about 1,000,000 daltons, more preferably from about 20,000 to about 500,000 daltons. - Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the efficiency of the cationic polymer genezrally increases as the charge density increases. The cationic charge density of the cationic polymer of the present invention showild preferably be relatively high. The cationic polymer preferably has a charge density ranging from about 0.1 meq/gram to about 8 meg/gram, and more preferably from about 1 meg/gram to about 8 meg/gram, and most preferably ranging from about 2.0 meg/gram to about 6.5 meqg/gram. The charge density may be determined according to these conventional charge titration methods known within the art.

Suitable cationic polymers include those polymers used in water treatment or papermaking applications, including those described in U.S. patents 4,753,710; 5,246,548; 5,256,252; and 6,100,322, which are incorporated herein by reference. For example, representative cationic polymers described im U.S. patent 5,256,252 include (1) the quaternized sails of (co)polymers of N-alkylsubstituted aminoalkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid including, for example, poly(diethylaminoethyiacrylate) acetate, poly(diethylaminoethwyi-methyl acrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyimethacrylate) ("DMAEM.MCQ" as the methyl chloride quaternary salt) and the like; (2) the quaternized salts of reaction products of a polyamine and ar acrylate type compound prepared, for example, from methyl acrylate and ethylenediamine; (3) (co)polymers of (methacryloyloxyet-hyl)trimethyl ammonium chloride; (4) (co)polymers of acrylamide and quaternary ammonium compounds such as acrylam ide and diallyimethyl(beta-goropionamido)ammonium chloride, acrylamide(beta- methacryloyloxyetkyl)trimethylammonium methyl sulfate, and the like; (5) : quaternized vinyllaactam-acrylamide (co)polymers; (6) the quaternize=d salt of hydroxy-containing polyesters of unsaturated carboxylic acids such as poly-2- hydroxy-3-(methacryloxy)propylitrimethylammonium chloride; (7) the= quaternary ammonmium salt of polyimide-amines prepared as the reaaction

~ product of styrene—maleic anhydride (co)polymer and 3- dimethylaminoprogpylamine; (8) quaternized polyamines; (9) the quaaternized reaction products «of amines and polyesters; (10) the quaternized sauit of condensation (co) polymers of polyethyleneamines with dichloroethane; (11) the quaternized condensation products of polyaikylene-polyamines and epoxy : halides; (12) the ¢g uatermized condensation products of alkylene-pol yamines and polyfunctionall halohydrins, such as epichlorohydrin/dimethyl armine (co)polymers ("EFPI-DMA"); (13) the quaternized condensation products of alkylene-polyamirmes and halohydrins; (14) the quaternized condenssation

(co)polymers of ammmonia and halohydrins; (15) the quaternized sat t of polyvinylbenzyitriaalkylamines such as, for example, polyvinylbenzyltrirmethylammonium chloride; (16) quatemnized salt of (co)polymers of viinyl-heterocyclic monomers having a ring nitrogem, such as poly(1,2-dimethyl—5&-vinylpyridinium methyl sulfate), poly(2-vinyl-2-

imidazolinium chieoride) and the like; (17) polydialkyldiallylammoniurm salt including polydiaillyldimethyl ammonium chloride ("polyDADMAC"); (18) (co)polymers of vinyl unsaturated acids, esters and amides thereof and diallyldialkylammaonium salts including poly(acrylic acid- diallyldimethylamamonium chloride-hydroxypropylacrylate) ("polyAA—-DADMAC-

owe» WO 20047099321 Cn PCT/US2004/013506

HPAL"); (19) polymethacrylamidopropyitrimethylammonium chloride ("poRyMAPTAC"); (20) the quaternary ammonium salt of amamonia-ethylene dichYoride condensation (co)polymers; and (21) the quaternized salt of epoxy halide (co)polymers, such as the polyepichiorohydrin methy1 chloride, poly-epichlorohydrin methyl sulfate and the like. Mixtures comprising two or more of the above-identified polymers may also be utilized.

Preferred cationic polymers include (co)polymers of diall yldialkylammonium salts, (co)polymers of diallylamine, €co)polymers of dialkylalkylamine, polyethylene imine, (co)polymers of dialkylamine/epichlorohydrin, (co)polymers of polyamine/epsichlorohydrin, (co) polymers of polyamide/epichlorohydrin, (co)polymers of polyamideamine, (copolymers of polyamideamine/epichlorohydrin, (co)polynners and quaternized (co)polymers of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide a nd methacrylamide, and (co)polymers and quaternized (co)pok ymers of dial kylaminoalkyl acrylate and methacrylate esters. More preferred cationic polymers include (co)polymers of diallyldimethylammoniuma salts, (copolymers of polyamine/epichlorohydrin, polyethylene imine, (co)polymers of dlimethylamine/epichlorohydrin, and polyamideamine/epi chlorohydrin i (copolymers. The most preferred cationic polymers include (co)polymers of dial lyldimethylammonium salts and (co)polymers of dimmethylamine/epichlorohydrin. Mixtures comprising two or- more of the above-identified polymers may aiso be utilized.

It is preferred that the cationic polymer concentration in the pre-mix is } lesss than 2.5% when it is added to the aqueous system, meore preferably 1.5% or less, most preferably 1.0% or less.

Generally, the cationic polymers may be made according to any comventional method known within the art.

Generally, as noted above, the anionic particle for u se in the present invention comprises a high surface area, anionically charged inorganic mineral and/or high surface area anionically charged s-ynthetic inorganic particle and/or mixtures thereof.

Examples of suitable anionically charged inorgzanic minerals and synthetic inorganic particles of the present invention generally include swelling clays such as, for example, the smectite clayss, as well as silica- bassed particles (e.g. silica and alumino-silicate based particles).

The smectite clays that can be used are well kmown in the paper retexntion aid art and include the swellable clays and s ynthetic or semi- syrathetic equivalents thereof.

Suitable smectite clays include, but are mot limited to, those described in U.S. patent 4,753,710 which is incorporated herein by reference in iks entirety, as well as including for example, memb»ers of the dioctahedral sm ectite group (e.g. montmorillonite, bentonite, montrnorillinite, beidelite, and noritronite) and members of the trioctahedral group (e.g. hectorite and saponite), sepolite, sepialite and attapulgite.

Suitable bentonites and hectorites are disclosexd in U.S. patents 4,305,781; 4,753,710; 5,501,774; 5,876,563; EP 0235893 which is also pulblished as U.S. Patent 4,753,710 (e.g. the bentonite can be anionic swelling clays such as sepialite, attapuigite, or preferably montmoriilinite.

Be=ntonites broadly described in USP 4,305,781 are suitable. Suitable montmoriilonite include Wyoming bentonite or Fuller's earth. The clays may or may not be chemically modified, e.g. by alkali treatmeent to convert calcium be-ntonite to alkali metal bentonite.); and EP 0446205 which is also published as U.S. Patent 5,071,512, respectively, which are inccorporated herein by reference.

Itis preferred that the swelling clays are colloi-dal, i.e. having a particle size in the range of about 1 millimicron (1 hanometer-) to about 1 micron (1 micrometer). Moreover the swelling clays preferably have a surface area of at least 50 m?/g, more preferably a surface area of at lezast 100 m?/g, and most we «WO 2004/099321 PCT/US2004/013506 preferably a surface area of at least 200 m2lg. F or example, the surface area of the bentonite after swelling is preferably at least 400 m?/g. Typical coating clays and calcium carbonates have surface areas of 1-12 mg.

Preferably the swelling clays, most preferably bentonite, have a dry particle size of at least 60% below 50 microns (cry size), more preferably at least 90% below 100 microns, and most preferably at least 98% below 100 microns.

The silica-based particles that can be us-ed according to the present invention include those described in U.S Patents 5,167,766 and 5,274,055, for example, colloidal silica, colloidal aluminum-modified silica or aluminum silicate (compounds of this type are also referred to as polyaluminosilicates and polyaluminosilicate microgels, which are both encompassed by the terms colloidal aluminum-modified silica and aluminurmn silicate used herein), and mixtures thereof, either alone or in combinatiora with other types of anionic inorganic particles and the like that are used as retention aids as is well known in the art. Further suitable silica and alu mino-silicate based particles include those disclosed in U.S. Patents 4,388,150; 4,954,220; 4,961,825; 4,927,498; 4,980,025; 5,127,994; 5,176,891; 5 ,368,833; 5,447,604, : 5,470,435; 6,100,322; EP 0656872 which is also published as U.S. Patent 5,603,805, and WO 95/23021 which are all hereby incorporated herein by reference.

Suitable silica-based particles have a particle size preferably below about 50 nanometers, more preferably below about 20 nanometers and most preferably in the range of from about 1 to aboust 10 nanometers. The suitable silica-based particles have a specific surface area of at least 50 m? /g, preferably at least 100 m%g, and preferably at least 200 m? /g. The specific surface area can be measured by means of titration with NaOH according to the method described by Sears in Analytical C hemistry 28(1956):12, 1981-

ue JWO 2004/099321 } PCT/US2004/013506

Mixtures of silica and swelling clays (e.g. smectite clays, preferably natural sodium bentonite) may also be used in the present invention.

In general the ratio of anionic parti cle to the cationic polymer inthe additive pre-mix may range from about 95:5 to about 10:80 (about 95 wt-% to about 10 wt-% of the anionic particle and about 5 wt-%to about 80 wt-% of the cationic polymer), preferably about 90:108 to about 20:80 (about 90 wt-% to about 20 wt-% anionic particle and about: 10 wt-% to about 80 wt-% of the cationic polymer), more preferably 90:10 to about 40:60 (about 90 wt-% to about 40 wt-% of the anionic particle andl about 10 wt-% to about 60 wt-% of the cationic polymer), most preferably 85:15 to about 60:40 (about 85 wt-% to about 60 wt-% of the anionic particle anc about 15 wt-% to about 40 wt-% of the cationic polymer). However, the ratio- is dependent upon the polymer that is used, for example when using a mixtumre of bentonite and poly-DADMAC, - the ratio of bentonite:poly-DADMAC preferably ranges from about 92.5:7.5 to 60:40 and more preferably ranging from about 70:30 to about 85:15. : The present invention further relates to forming an aqueous system (e.g. aqueous paper coating color) comperising: : (1) ~~ mixing the anionic particle and the cationic polymer; wherein an : additive pre-mix is formed, (2) optionally filtering the additive pre-mix; (3) optionally adding a stabilizing agent to the additive pre-mix; (4) optionally adding the additive pre-mix to a coating starch; (5) optionally adding a biocide to the additive pre-mix; and (6) adding the additive pre-mix to an aqueous system.

Still further, the present invention includes coating a cellulose matrix in accordance with the process described above, as well as the coated cellulose matrix, further including the steps of (7) coating a cellulose matrix; and (8) drying the cellulose matrix (e.q. paper).

oe... WO 2004/099321 PCT/US2004/013506

The additive pre-mix may be a dded to the aqueous system at any point during the preparation of the coating. Preferably, however, the pre-mix is added to the coating starch or is added last. The coating starch is a component of many coating formulations, wherein the pre-mix is added to the coating starch in orer to dilute the pre-mix. The coating starch typically contains a high percentage of water €e.g. about 70% water versus the solids content), thereby allowing for the dilation of the pre-mix without introducing further amount of water to the overall aqueous system. However, in each case, the additive pre-mix is added Indirectly, wherein as shown above the additive pre-mix is formed prior to bering added to an aqueous system. Those anionic particles and cationic polymesrs described above may be used herein.

In general, the order of mixingg in step (1) is not critical to the performance when a non-swelling anionic particle is used, but typically, the oo anionic particle is added “as is" to the polymer solution. Although, when high solids pre-mixes (>5% solids) are being produced, the order of the steps in the process is important. If a swelling clay (e.g. bentonite or the like) is used, it is preferred that the anionic particle be added to an amount of water containing the cationic polymer versus adding the swelling clay to water and then adding the polymer.

The pre-mix may be optionally filtered to remove any grit formed, as shown in step (2), using those methods known in the art such as, for example using a Ronningen-Petter DCF-800 filter with a 100 micron slotted screen, where the filter automatically wipes the screen to prevent blinding of the screen.

The optional stabilizing agent that may be added to the pre-mix in step (3) is included to reduce any settling or stratification of the anionic particles in the pre-mix. The stabilizing agent may have either a high molecular weight or medium molecular weight and may koe either cationic or nonionic. Nonionic stabilizing agents include hydroxymesthylhydroxyethyl cellulose,

vee WO 2004/099321 PCT/US2004/013506 butylglycidylether modified hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, methylhydroxyethylcellulosse, methythydroxypropyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, poly-N-vinylpyrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene oxide, : polypropylene oxide, polyacrylamide, starch ethers (e.g. hydroxy ethyl starch), starch esters (e.g- alkyl succinic anhydride modified starch), oxidized starch, guar, pectin, carraageenan, locust bean gum, xanthan gum, water soluble proteins (e.g. soy) and hydrophobically associative paint thickeners.

Cationic stabilizing agents comprise cationic starch and Galactosol cationic guar (Hercules Inc., Wilmington, Delaware). Preferably the stabilizing agent is nonionic. Most preferably the stabilizing agent is hydroxypropyl guar or hydroxyethyl cellulose.

Generally, the stabilizing agent is utilized in amounts resulting in the viscosity of the aqueous system being at least 1000 cps (Brookfield viscosity : at 100 RPM), preferably a viscosity of at least 2000 cps, more preferably at least 3000 cps. Most preferably the viscosity is in the range of about 2000 to : -about 3500 cps. :

Typically the stabillizing agent is added in amounts ranging from about 0.1% to about 5%, based on the total weight of the pre-mix, however such amount are dependent ugpon the type of stabilizer and the pre-mix solids content. For example, with respect to hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl guar the p-referred amounts range from about 0.2% to about 1.0%, more preferably 0. 3% to about 0.7 %, based on the total weight of the pre-mix. Addition rates amd stirring of the stabilizing agent are well known in the art and should be adjusted to obtain a smooth mixture.

The optional bioci de of step (5) is typically used when it is desired to prevent bacteria from comsuming particular polymers such as, for example guar, which results in odors, stratification and a lack of storage stability. The aqueous system could b e prepared without the use of the biocide however, refrigeration, vacuum pa cking, or use within a short time period is typically required because of the negative effects of bacteria. Examples of suitable biocides include, for example AMA-35D-P biocide (Kemira Chemical Co.

Marietta, Georgia) and Proxel GXL (Avecia Inc., Wilmington DE.

With respect to step (6), the pre-mix is typically pumped or poured inteo the aqueous system without any particular restrictions on its method or rate «of addition. As noted aborve, it is preferred that the cationic polymer concentration in the pre-mix is less than 2.5% when it is added to the aqueous system, more preferably 1.5% or less, most preferably 1.0% or lesss.

The cellulose matrix can be coated according to those methods known in the art such as, for example, as described in Lehtinen, Esa; Pigment : - Coating and Surface Sizing of Paper, pages 415-594, Published by Fapet O»y (2000).

The drying of thie cellulose matrix can be performed according to those - methods known within the art, such as, for example, as described in Lehtinen,

Esa, Pigment Coating and Surface Sizing of Paper, pages 415-594,

Published by Fapet Ow (2000).

The present inwention further relates to a process for preparing stable pre-mixes of polymerss and anionic particles suitable for later use after periods of storage. More spec ffically, the process for preparing stabilized anionic particle/polymer pre-mixes, as well as the stabilizing agent, comprising: (a) forming a pre-mix comprising an anionic particle, preferably bentonite,and a cationic polymer; (b) adding a stabilizing agent (neutral or cationic) to the pre-mix; wherein a stable pre-mix is formed; and (c) optionalky adding a biocide to the pre-mix.

Examples of suitable bentonites include in addition to those describe-d above, for example, commercially available compositions such as sodium bentonite (Wyoming or Western), which has a high swelling capacity in wate=r.

The cationic polymer component of the present invention may be any cationic polymer used in conventional papermaking processes such as those describe d above. Similarly, the anionic particle and stabilizing agent describe-d above may also be used herein.

Generally, as noted above, the stabilizing agent is utilized in amounts resulting in the viscosity being at least 1000 cps (Brookfield vi scosity at 100 rpm), preferably a viscosity of at least 2000 cps, more prefera bly at least 3000 cps. Most preferably, the viscosity is in the range of about 2000 to about 3500 cps. In addition, the stabilizing agent is typically added in amounts ranging from about 0.2% to about 5%, based on the total weight of the pre-mix, : however such amounts are dependent upon the type of stabil izer and the pre- mix solicls content. For example, with respect to hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxy propyl guar the preferred amounts range from about O.2% to about 1.0%, more preferably 0.3% to about 0.7 %, based on the total weight of the pre-mix.

T he present invention further relates to the stabilized pre-mix resulting from the above-described process.

EXAMPLES

T he present invention is further defined in the following Examples, in which a Il parts and percentages are by weight. It should be understood that these E.xamples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these

Exampl es, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential ¢ haracteristics of this invention, and without departing from the spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usage and conditions.

Example 1 - Preparation of an 85:15 bentonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mix

A 5% solids 85:15 bentonite:poly-DADMAC cation ic polymer pre-mix was nade using the following method. 106.25 g of bento nite (Bentolite H from

Southwern Clay Products, Gonzalez, Texas) and 2346.88 g of water were loaded into a 5-L beaker, then mixed using an over-headl stirrer for 1-2 minutes until a uniform pre-mix was obtained (500 rpm). 46.88 g of PRP-4440 poly-DXADMAC (diallyldimethylammonium chloride polyrraer, 40% solids, available from Pearl River Polymers, Riceboro, Georgia) was then added drop~~wise over a 1-2 minute period with stirring. The mixture swelled and thickened, then re-dispersed during the poly-DADMAC addition. Once the addition was complete, the pre-mix was stirred for an adiditional two hours, sonicated for 10 minutes at setting #2 on a Branson Sonifier 450, and then . filtered through a 200-mesh screen to remove any grit. If necessary, the pH of the fi nished pre-mix was adjusted to pH 7-8 using 15% BH>SOa.

Exarnple 2 - Preparation of silica:Reten 203 pre-mixes 5% solids silica:Reten 203 cationic polymer pre-rmixes were made over the range of ratios shown in Table 1 using the following method. The desired amounts of silica (Ludox FM, Grace-Davison, Columbia; Maryland) and water were loaded into a 100 mL beaker, then mixed for 15 muinutes using an over- head stirrer (500 rpm). The required amount of Reten 2 03 (dialByidimethylammonium chloride polymer, M, = 2-300,000, 20% solids, availlable from Hercules Incorporated, Wilmington, DE) was then added dropewise with vigorous stirring (formation of a good vortex). The pre-mixes were then stirred for 2.5 hours, and sonicated for 3 mirutes at setting #8 on a

Brarson Sonifier 450. The dipsersions were then filterexd through a 200 mesh scre-en to remove any grit. If necessary, the pre-mixes wvere adjusted to pH 7- 8 with 15% H2S04.

Table 1

Fri Tom soks] 5 | [eTsorsweeson | 1002

Fagin] | 78 | [kTsorenson | 20d

Favouns | os || T | ]

IL I NS A A

Sica | Relen | % Sia |G aes | 9% Ren | 3 Role | §valr or eo 0 | fo | ss | 7m | ods | os | 7 0 |e [am [sao | wer | 20k | we ® | dw | ter | ae | am | as | w% [To [om | ame | aw | eo | wm

Example 3 - Preparation of kaolin clay/calciurm carbonate coating color

A kaolin clay/caicium carbonate based coating color was made using the following method. A detailed description of the formulation is given in

Table 2. The required amounts of dilution water and dispersant (Dispex

N40V, Ciba Specialty Chemicals, Sufolk VA) were added first. The

Hydrafine® #1 kaolin clay (available from the: J. M. Huber Corporation,

Edison, NJ) was then added slowly with vigorous stirring using a Cowles mixer. A good vortex was maintained throughout the clay addition. Once the clay was well dispersed, the Hydrocarb® 90 ground calcium carbonate (Omya, available from Pleuss-Staufer Incorporated, VT) and RPS TiO. slurry (available from E.|. duPont de Nemours and «Company, Wilmington, DE) were added slowly and with vigorous mixing. The slurry was then stirred for an additional 30 minutes using a Cowles mixer.

While the pigment slurry was being made, the Penford 290 starch (available from Penford Products Co. Cedar Rapids, lowa) was cooked at 95-

100°C for 45 minutes using a steam jac keted kettle. Starch concentration (30%) was adjusted to compensate for water loss during cooking. The hot starch solution (stored at 65°C ) was then added to the pigment slip with vigorous stirring. After the coating had cooled from the starch addition, the styrene butadiene latex (Dow 620, Lateex CP620NA, Dow U.S.A. Midland,

Michigan) was added and thoroughly mixed into the coating color. Calsan® 65 lubricant (BASF, North Mount Olive, NJ), Sequarez® 755 insolublizer (Omnova Solutions Corporation, Fairlawn, OH), and the Proxel GXL preservative (Avecia Inc.) were added sequentially with vigorous mixing.

Once the additives were well dispersed, the pH of the coating color was adjusted to 8.0 with ammonium hydrox ide. The coating color solids were adjusted to 68% with water prior to particle/cationic polymer mixture addition.

The bentonite/poly-DADMAC (Example 1), and silica/poly-DADMAC (Example 2) pre-mixes were added to the clay/carbonate coating color using : the following method. The required amount of particle/cationic polymer pre- mix was added dropwise to a well-stirreed sample of the coating color (68% solids). The bentonite and silica pre-mIxes were added at 5% total solids © unless otherwise noted. A good vortex: was maintained throughout the addition of the particle pre-mix. The required amount of water was then added to dilute the coating color to 62% total solids, unless otherwise noted. The treated sample was stirred for an additional 15-30 minutes prior fo testing (500 rpm).

Table 2 rr +r rr { ili Ml I A il grams added #1 Kaolin | Hydrafine | 58 | 1740 | 100% | 1740 rr — {tr tr rr |]

Hydrocarb IE 1230 | 100% 1230 Tio2 |RPsSwmy| 1 | 30 | 71% | 428

Dow620 | 9 | 270 | 50% | 540

Penford290] 3 | 90 | 30.36% 296.4

Calsan65 | 03 | © | 50% | 18 ld A A al 40 755

Proxel GXL 100% pal dH HN

Hydroxide rrr

TotaiDry Grams (33783 " TotalWetGrams [388565] lL] Final Solids 68% | [0000]

GramsAddedtoWater [108244] [1 FinalTotalWeight [406809]

Example 4 - Bentonite/poly-D.ADMAC pre-mix 663 g of water and 108.4 g of PRP-4440 poly-DADMAC (diallyldimethylammonium chloride polymer, 40% solids, Pearl River

Polymers, Riceboro, Georgia) were loaded into a stainless steel beaker and . stirred for five minutes at 500 rpm. 228.3 g of bentonite (as received, 92.7% solids, Bentolite H from Southern Clay Products, Gonzalez, Texas) was then mixed in over a five minute period. After the addition was complete, the pre- mix was stirred at 500 rpm fo r two hours. The temperature of the pre-mix was maintained at 20 °C throughout the process. The pre-mix was then filtered through a 200-mesh screen to remove any grit formed by aggregation of the anionic bentonite clay and the cationic polymer. Approximately 0.5 g of grit was isolated on the screen (0.2% of total solids).

Once the filtration was complete, 1.2 g of biocide (AMA-35D-P biocide,

Kemira Chemical Co. Marietta, Georgia) and then 6.0 g of hydroxypropyl guar (HPG, Galactasol 40H4FD1 ~ Hercules, Wilmington, Delaware) were sprinkled into the pre-nmix with continued mixing. The pre-mix was stirred for an additional three hours after the additions were complete (500 rpm). The temperature of the pre—mix was maintained at 20°C throughout the process.

The viscosity of the pre-mix increased rapidly for the first 30-60 minutes after the hydroxypropyl guar addition. The final product had a pH of 7.9 and a

Brookfield RV viscosity of 3000 cps (100 rpm, spindle #5).

Example 5 - Effect of pre-mix solids and HPG addition level on stratification

A screening experiment was carried out to determine the highest © 10 bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mix solids that can be made using the addition sequence described im Example 4. As shown in Table 3, fluid pre-mixes were made with total solids as high as 40%. Pre-mix Brookfield RV viscosity increased as % solids increased (100 rpm).

Table 3

I EE EL

The effect of HPG on settling stability was then measured at 21%, 24% 27%, and 30% pre-m ix solids. The method described in Example 4 was used to make the pre-mixe=s. The HPG addition levels were selected to give pre- mix viscosities rangirg from 500 cps to 3500 cps at each % solids.

Acceptable settling s&ability was defined as less than 5% solids stratification from the top to the bottom of the pre-mix with no hard-pack formation.

As shown im Table 4, pre-mix stability generally increased as % solids,

HPG addition level, and pre-mix viscosity increased. All 16 pre-mixes gave good 1-day settling stability. All of the pre-mixes with an initial viscosity of ak least 1500 cps (Brookfield RV, 100 rpm) gave at least one week of acceptable storage stability. All of the pre-mixes with an initial viscosity less than 1500 ~ cps failed the stability test after one week of storage. All of the pre-mixes wiith an initial viscosity” of at least 2200 cps gave at least four weeks of acceptable storage stability. And, all of the pre-mixes with an initial viscosity of at least 3000 cps showed no signs of stratification or hard pack formation after eighst weeks of storage . Testing of the pre-mixes that passed the four-week and . eight-week stabil ity tests showed that they gave the expected increase in coating viscosity without pigment shock when tested in the coating formulation described in Example 3. The pre-mixes were diluted to 5% totaal solids and stirred for 30 minutes before addition to the coating. The amourwt of grit retained on a 200-mesh screen from a 200 g sample of treated coating was used as a measure of pigment shock.

Example 6 - Preparation of a stable bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mix 255 gram s of bentonite (Bentonite H, available from Southern Clay

Products) and 1632.5 grams of water were loaded into a stainless steel beaker, then mixed for 1-2 minutes using an over-head stirrer (500 rpm). 112.5 grams of PPRP-4440 poly-DADMAC (diallyldimethylammonium chloride polymer, 40% solids, available from Pearl River Polymers, Riceboro, GA) “was added dropwise with vigorous stirring over a 1-2 minute period. The mixtu re swelled and thickened, then re-dispersed to a fluid pre-mix during the PRF- 4440 addition. Once the addition was complete, the mixture was stirred fosr an additional 90 mi nutes, then sonicated for 15 minutes at setting #2 on a

Branson Sonifiear 450.

A 200 mL aliquot of the cationic bentonite pre-mix was= then loaded into a glas s beaker. 1.0 gram of Natrosol 250 H4BR (Hydroxyethwl cellulose, availa ble from Hercules, Wilmington, DE) was added slowly to the pre-mix with v igorous mixing using an over-head stirrer. Once the ad«ition was complete, the mixture was stirred for an additional 30 minute s, then sonicated for 6 rminutes at setting #2 using a Branson Sonifier 450. After two weeks at room temperature, no signs of pre-mix settling or stratification were observed.

Examaple 7 - Effect of pre-mix dilution on pigment shock

The degree of pigment shack caused by direct addition of PC-1193 : (equiwalent to PRP-4440 from Pearl River Polymers, dially¥dimethylammonium chloride polymer, hereafter referre=d to as PRP- 4440") was measured at solution concentrations of 0.75% arad 2.25%. These . solution concentrations correspond to the concentrations of PRP-4440 in 5% and “85% total solids 85:15 bentonite:PRP-4440 pre-mixes, respectively. The bentonite pre-mixes were made using the method described in Example 6.

The evaluation was carried out in the clay/carbonate coating color described in Excample 3. The amount of grit retained on a 200 mesh screen from a 200 g sample of treated coating was used as a measure of pigmemt shock.

As shown in Figure 1, decreasing the solution concemtration of PRP- 4440 from 2.25% to 0.75% significantly reduced the degree= of pigment shock in thea clay/carbonate coating color. Reducing the concentraation of the 85:15 bentonite: PRP-4440 mixture from 15% (2.25% PRP-4440) &o 5% (0.75%

PRP~-4440) total solids also reduced pigment shock. A comparison of the degree of pigment shock caused by direct addition of PRP-4440 at 2.25% solids and addition of the 85:15 bentonite mixture at 156% total solids (also 2.25 9% PRP-4440) showed that pre-mixing the PRP-4440 with bentonite redu ced pigment shock by 85-90%. A similar comparison at a PRP-4440 solution concentration of 0.75% and a bentonite mixture co ncentration of 5%

total solids (also 0.75% PRP-4440) showed that pre-miximng (indirect addition) the PRP-4440 with bentonite reduced pigment shock by 98-99%. The 5% solids 85:15 bentonite mixture gave pigment shock comparable to an untreated coating control.

Example 8 - Effect of bentonite/poly-DADMAC dilution om coating viscosity 85:15 bentonite:PRP-4440 pre-mixes were made at total solids concentrations ranging from 2.5% to 20% by dilution of & 256% solids pre-mix made using the method described in Example 4. Each pere-mix was then tested for its effect on the Brookfield viscosity of the kao lin clay/calcium carbonate coating formulation described in Example 3. PPre-mix addition levels ranging from 0.35 to 0.55 parts based on coating pigme nt were tested. At a given pre-mix addition level, coating Brookfield viscosity (Brookfield LVT, 60 r.p.m.) increased as the addition concentration of the pr-e-mix decreased (See

Figure 2).

Example 9 - Effect of poly-DADMAC/bentonite ratio

Bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mixes were made using high (Ma = 2- 300,000, Reten 203, Hercules, Wilmington, DE) and low (M,, = 30,000, PRP- 4440, Pearl River Polymers, Riceboro, Georgia) molecular weight diallyldimethylammonium chloride polymers (poly-DADEBMAC). A high surface area bentonite clay (Bentolite H, Southern Clay Produc-ts) was used as the anionic particle of the pre-mixes. The cationic polymer content of the pre- mixes was varied from 5 to 50% of the total solids (Sees Tables 5 and 6, 95%- 50% bentonite). The pre-mixes were made using the method described in

Example 1.

Each of the bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mixes was then tested for its effect on Brookfield viscosity and pigment shock in the kaolin clay/ground calcium carbonate based coating described in Examplea 3. The addition concentration of the cationic polymer can have a significant effect on its performance (Examples 7 and 8). Therefore, each pre-mix addition concentration was selected to give the sanne cationic polymer addition concentration (0.75%) over the entire rang e of bentonite/poly-DADMAC ratios. As shown in Tables 5 and 6, the % total solids of each pre-mix, and therefore its addition concentration, varied with the ratio of poly-DADMAC to bentonite. In general, the increase in coati ng viscosity obtained at a given cationic polymer addition level increased as the percentage of cationic polymer in the pre-mix increased. Therefore, the addition level of each pre- mix was adjusted to give the same coating viscosity (approximately 2000 cps,

Brookfield RV, 100 rpm, spindle #4 or #5) - An untreated coating (the coating itself) was tested as a control. Direct additions of the high and low molecular weight poly-DADMAC cationic polymers vwere also tested in an effort to quantify the benefits of pre-forming the pre-mixes. The solution concentration of the cationic polymers was fixed at 0.75 % solids, the same addition concentration as the cationic polymers in the bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre- mixes.

Each of the treated coatings (coatings containing the additive pre-mix) was then checked for pigment shock. As described in Example 7, the amount of grit retained on a 200 mesh screen frorn a 200 g sample of the coating was used as a measure of pigment shock. The results are shown in Tables 5 and 6. Direct addition of either of the cationic poly-DADMAC polymers gave significant pigment shock. For both the hiigh and low molecular weight poly-

DADMAC's, the pre-mixes made at poly-IDADMAC concentrations between 15% and 30% (85%-70% bentonite) gave the best results. Pre-mixes made over this range of poly-DADMAC addition levels gave large increases in ) coating viscosity with much less pigment shock than direct addition of the corresponding cationic polymer. Lower and higher concentrations of poly-

DADMAC in the bentonite pre-mix gave reduced levels of performance. The

Z6 pre-mixes made at poly-DADMAC add ition levels between 7.5% and 15%, and at the 40% poly-DADMAC addition level, gave large increases in coating viscosity with intermediate levels of pigment shock. The pre-mixes made at the 5% and 50% poly-DADMAC addition levels gave pigment shock comparable to direct addition of the corresponding poly-DADMAC cationic polymer.

Based on these results, benton ite/poly-DADMAC pre-mixes containing between 7.5% and 40% poly-DADMACC (92.5%- 60% bentonite) are preferred.

Pre-mixes containing 15%-30% poly-DDADMAC (85%-70% bentonite) are more preferred.

Example 10 - Pilot coater evaluation im kaolin clay/calcium carbonate coating

An 85:15 bentonite:PRP-4440 pre-mix was evaluated for coating performance on a cylindrical lab coater (CLC) at Western Michigan University.

The pre-mix was made at 5% total solids using the method described in

Example 1. The clay/carbonate coatimg color and addition methods described : in Example 3 were used. The pre-mixc addition concentration was fixed at 5% : total solids. An uncoated groundwoodi base sheet was used as the substrate (38 g/m?). Coating speed was fixed at 925 meters/minute. The bentonite/PRP-4440 pre-mix was evaluated at 0.45 parts and 0.65 parts addition levels. An untreated coating was tested as a control. The gap spacing between the base sheet and the coating blade was adjusted to give coat weights ranging from 3-8 g/m? p er side for the control and bentonite:PRP-4440 treated coatingss The coated paper was calendered three times at 65°C and 1000 pounds per linear inch prior to testing. .

The results of opacity and brigghtness testing of the CLC coated paper are shown in Figures 3 and 4. When compared over the entire range of coat weights, the bentonite:PRP-4440 treated coatings had significantly higher opacity and brightness than the untreated control.

Example 11 - Effect of ben tonite/poly-DADMAC addition concentration

Bentonite/poly-DAD MAC pre-mixes were made at total solids concentrations ranging from 2.5% to 20% by dilution of a 25% solids pre-mix made using the method described in Example 4. Each pre-mix was then tested for its effect on coating opacity and brightness. The study was carried out on the Western Michig an University cylindrical lab coater (CLC) using the 62% solids clay/carbonate coating formulation described in Example 3 and the methods described in Examples 10. As shown in Figures 5 and 6 (best regression fits of data), the increases in opacity and brightness obtained by adding 0.5 parts of the bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mix dropped steadily as the addition concentration increased. Without wishing to be bound by theory, these results suggest that the increases in brightness and opacity obtained with the bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mix were related to the observed increases in Brookfield viscosity. Based on these results, addition concentrations as high as 10% total solids are preferred. Pre-mix addition concentrations less than 8% total solids are more preferred.

Example 12 - Effect of bentonite/poly-DADMAC stirring time

The amount of pigment shock (hard grit in the coating) formed by the addition of the bentonite/poly-DADMAC pre-mix describe in Example 4 was measured 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after dilution from 25% total solids to 5% total solids. The clay/carbonate coating formulation described in

Example 3 was used for the evaluation (64% solids). As shown in Figure 7, the amount of pigment sh ock formed by the addition of the bentonite/poly-

DADMAC pre-mix to the coating decreased steadily for the first 26 minutes of stirring after dilution. Longer stirring times had no beneficial effect on the amount of pigment shock formed in the paper coating. Based on these results, a stirring time of at least 25 minutes after dilution of a high solids pre-

mix is preferred. The work was carried out at room temperature. Shorter times may be sufficient at higher temperatures.

Example 13 - Immobilization of coating solids

Rapid immobilization of coating solids (immobilization at lower % solids as the coating dries) has been linked to increased coating brightness and opacity. The effect of the HPG stabilized bentonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mix described in Example-4 on the immobilization of coating solids was measured over a range of pre-mix addition levels. The clay/carbonate coating described in Example 3 was used for the study. The pre-mix was diluted to 5% solids, : and then stirred for 25 minutes before it was added to the coating formulation.

In each case, coating solids was adjusted to 64% after pre-mix addition. As shown in Figure 8, the coating im mobilization point decreased steadily as the pre-mix addition level increased. These results show that the bentonite:poly-

DADMAC pre-mix can be used to control the immobilization of coating solids.

Example 14 - Zeta potentials of »entonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mixes and treated _clay/carbonate coating }

The zeta potentials of the particles in a series of bentonite:PRP-4440 poly-DADMAC pre-mixes were measured using a Malvern Zeta Sizer and the method described by Lauzon (U. S. Patent 5,169,441, which is incorporated by reference herein). The pre-mixes were made using the method described in Example 1. As shown in Table» 7, the particles in all four pre-mixes carried a positive zeta potential. Untreated bentonite clay is well known to have a negative zeta potential. The positive zeta potentials measured in this study confirm that the cationic poly-DADMAC polymer is intimately associated with the bentonite clay particles.

An analysis of the pigment particles in an untreated sample of the clay/carbonate coating described in Example 3, showed that the particles carried a negative zeta potential between -25 and -28 millivolts. The pigment particles in the clay/carbonate coatimg still carried a negative zeta potential (- 24.8 millivolts) after the coating wass treated with 0.75 parts of the 85:15 bentonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mix. T hese results confirm that the addition of the bentonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mix does not create a "cationic" coating as described in the prior art. : Table 7 | :

Example 15 - Range of cationic polymers

Bentonite pre-mixes were made using a wide range of cationic polymers. The cationic polymers the at were tested included: Perform® 1279 (Hercules, a branched dimethylamine/ethylenediamine/epichiorohydrine polymer, My = 500,000, 5.8 milliequivalents/g positive charge), a low molecular weight (My = 75,000, 5.8 milliequivalents/gram positive charge) dimethylamine/ethylenediamine/epeichlorohydrin polymer available from , Aldrich, Kymene® 557 (Hercules, aa polyamideamine epichlorohydrin wet strength resin described in U.S. patent 2,926,154, 2.2 milliequivalents/gram positive charge at pH 8), Kymene® 736 (Hercules, a hexamethylenediamine/epichlorohydrin copolymer described in U.S. patents 3,655,506, 3,248,353, and 2,595,935, 4.0 milliequivalents/g positive charge at pH 8), polyethyleneimine (PEI, Mw, = 50,000, available from Aldrich, approximately 8 milliequivalents/g at pH 8), and an acrylamide/diallyldimethylammonium «chloride copolymer (available from

Aldrich, approximately 3 milliequivalerts/g positive charge). In each case, bentonite pre-mixes were made over za wide range of cationic polymer addition levels. A high surface area bentonite clay (Bentolite H, Southern Clay

Products) was used as the anionic paarticle of the pre-mix. The pre-mixes were made using the method described in Example 1. The polyethyleneimine sample was neutralized to pH 8 using 10% HCI prior to preparation of the pre- mix. The pre-mixes were not filtered after sonication.

Each of the bentonite/cationic polymer pre-mixes was then tested for its effect on Brookfield viscosity and pigment shock in the kaolin clay/ground calcium carbonate based coating described in Example 3. Direct addition of each of the cationic polymers was alsso tested in an effort to quantify the benefits of pre-forming the pre-mixess. An untreated coating was tested as a : control. As described in Examples 7 and 8, the addition concentration of the cationic polymer can have a significant effect on its performance. For direct addition of a cationic polymer, its solution concentration was fixed at 0.75% solids. Each pre-mix addition concerstration was selected to give the same cationic polymer addition concentration (0.75%) over the entire range of bentonite/cationic polymer ratios. Th-erefore, the % total solids of each pre- mix varied with the ratio of bentonite to cationic polymer (See Tables 8-11). In general, the increase in coating viscosity obtained at a given cationic polymer addition level increased as the percentage of cationic polymer in the pre-mix increased. Therefore, the addition le-vel of each pre-mix was adjusted to give a coating viscosity equal to or higher than the viscosity obtained by direct addition of the corresponding cationic polymer. The amount of pigment shock in each of the treated coatings was cletermined by measuring the amount of grit retained on a 200 mesh screen using the method described in Example 7.

The results obtained with each of thee cationic polymers is described below.

Perform 1279 dimethylamine/ethylenediamine/epichlorohydrin co-polymer pre-mixes

Bentonite/cationic polymer pre-mixes were made over Perform 1279 addition levels ranging from 10% to 70% (See Table 8, 90% to 30% bentonite).

Direct addition of Perform 1279 cationic polymer gave heavy pigment shock. All of the bentonite/ Perform 1279 pre-mixes gave less pigment shock than direct addition of Perform 1279, when compared at equal coating viscosity. The pre-mixes containing between 10% and 20% Perform 1279 10 . gave the best balance of increased coating viscosity and low levels of pigment shock. Based on these results, pre-mixes containing between 10% and 70% Perform 1279 (9 0%- 30% bentonite) are preferred. Pre-mixes containing 10%-20% Perform 1279 (80%-90% bentonite) are more preferred.

Dimethylamine/ethylenediamine/epichiorohydrin co-polymer {DMA-epi) pre- mixes

Bentonite pre-mixas were also made using a lower molecular weight branched, dimethylamineJethylenediamine/epichlorohydrin copolymer (Mw = 75,000 daltons, Aldrich,, Milwaukee, WI, approximately 5.8 milliequivalents per gram). As shown in Table 9, bentonite/cationic polymer pre-mixes were made at DMA-epi addition levels ranging from 10% to 90% (90% to 10% bentonite).

Direct addition of the low molecular weight DMA-epi cationic polymer gave heavy pigment shock. Ali of the bentonite/DMA-epi pre-mixes gave less pigment shock than direct addition of the cationic polymer, when compared at equal coating viscosity. The pre-mixes containing between 20% and 60% low molecular weight DMA-e pi cationic polymer gave the best balance of increased coating viscosity and low levels of pigment shock.

Based on these results, pre-mixes containing between 10% and 90%%

DMA-epi (90%- -10% bentonite) are preferred. Pre-mixes containing 20%-6€0%

DMA-epi (80%-40% bentonite) are more preferred. it should also be noted that the low molecular weight DMA-epi catiomic polymer gave larger increases in coating viscosity and less pigment shock than Perform 12279 (a high molecular weight DMA-epi cationic polymer).

Based on these results, and the results obtained for the low and high molecular weight poly-DADMAC's (PRP-4440 and Reten 203), cationic polymers having molecular weights from about 10,000 to about 1,000,000 daltons are pref-emred. Cationic polymers with molecular weights from abount 20,000 to about. 500,000 daltons are more preferred.

Kymene 557 poslyamideamine/epichlorohydrin pre-mixes

As showm in Table 10, bentonite/cationic polymer pre-mixes were made at Kymerme 557 addition levels ranging from 10% to 90% (90% to 10% bentonite).

Direct acidition of Kymene 557 to the coating gave moderate-to-heavy pigment shock. The degree of pigment shock increased as Kymene 557 addition level increased. When compared at equal coating viscosity, the pre- mixes made at Kymene 557 addition levels between 50% and 70% (50%- 30% bentonite) gave the best results. Pre-mixes made over this range of polymer additiosn levels gave increases in coating viscosity comparable to the increase obtairued by direct addition of Kymene 557 with much less pigment shock. Pre-mixees made at lower, and higher, Kymene 557 addition levels gave only slightly less pigment shock than direct addition of Kymene 557, when compared at equal levels of coating viscosity

Based o n these results, pre-mixes containing between 50% and 70%

Kymene 557 (50%-30% bentonite) are preferred. This range of Kymene 557 addition levels is much higher than the range preferred by Lauzon (7.6%

Kymene 557 on bentonite). Finally, it should be noted that the relatively” low charge density Kymene 557 cationic polymer did not increase coating viscosity as efficiently as the higher charge density poly-DADMAC and DMA- epi polymers. 5 .

Polyamine epsichlorohydrin (Kymene 736) cationic polymer/bentonite pare- mixes

As shown in Table 11, bentonite/cationic polymer pre-mixes wewe made at Kymsene 736 addition levels ranging from 10% to 90% (90% to 10% bentonite). D irect addition of Kymene 736 to the coating gave heavy pigment shock. The pre-mixes made at Kymene 736 concentrations between 30% and 70% (70%-30% bentonite) gave the best results. Pre-mixes made ove=r this range of Kyrmene 736 addition levels gave increases in coating viscos ity comparable ‘to the increase obtained by direct addition of Kymene 736 with much less pi gment shock. Pre-mixes made at lower Kymene 736 addition levels gave | ow levels of pigment shock, but were much less efficient at increasing coating viscosity than the pre-mixes made at 30%-70% Kysmene 736. The Ky mene 736/bentonite pre-mixes made at 80% and 90% Ky*mene 736 gave large increases in coating viscosity with somewhat less pigrment shock than direct addition of Kymene 736.

Base-d on these results, pre-mixes containing 10% to 80% Kynanene 736 (90%-1€0% bentonite) are preferred. Pre-mixes containing between 10% and 70% Kymene 736 (90%-30% bentonite) are more preferred. Pre—mixes containing between 30% and 70% Kymene 736 (70%-30% bentonite) are most preferwred.

Final ly, it should be noted that the relatively high charge density

Kymene 73% gave larger increases in coating viscosity than the lowe r charge density Kymene 557.

Acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer and PEl/bentonite pre-amixes

Cationic polymer/bentonite pre-mixes were made at acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer and PEI addition levels ranging from 10% to 90% (90% to 10% bentonite). None of the pre-mixes gawe the desired results. “The acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer gave flocced pre-rmixes that caused

Teavy pigment shock. The cause of the PEI pre-mixes' fooor performance is not understood at this time. Perhaps a lower molecular weight, less branched, or chemically modified version of the polymers would give the desired results.

As described in Example 17, better results were obtained when a high surface area silica was used as the anionic particle instead of bentonite.

Example 16 - Range of anionic inorganic particles

A series of pre-mixes was made using silica or a luminum-modified silica as the anionic particle. The pre-mixes were made using the method described in Example 2. The silicas that were used were: Ludox TM (22 nm particle size, 135 m?/g), Ludox HS (12 nm particle size, 220 m?/g), and Ludox

FM (5 nm particle size, 420 m?/g). All three silicas are available from Grace- . Davison (Columbia, Maryland). The aluminum-modified silicas that were used were: Ludox TMA (22 nm particle size, 140 m?/g) and L_udox AM (12 nm particle size, 220 m?g). Both are available from Grace~Davison (Columbia,

Maryland). In each case, PRP-4440 poly-DADMAC was used as the cationic polymer component of the pre-mix. The pre-mixes weree made over PRP-4440 addition levels ranging from 10% to 90% of total solids .

As shown in Tables 12-16, each of the pre-mixess was tested for its effect on Brookfield viscosity and pigment shock in the- kaolin clay/ground calcium carbonate based coating described in Example 3. An untreated coating with a viscosity of 450-500 cps (Brookfield RV, 100 rpm) was tested as a control. Direct addition of PRP-4440 poly-DADMAC was also tested in an effort to quantify the benefits of pre-forming the pre—mix.

As described in Examples 7 and 8, the addition concentration of the cationic polymer can have a significant effect on itss performance. For direct addition, the PRP-4440 solution concentration was fixed at 0.75% solids.

Each pre-mix addition concentration was selected to give the same PRP- 4440 poly-DADMAC addition concentration (0.75%%) over the entire range of anionic particle/cationic polymer ratios. Therefore, the % total solids of each pre-mix varied with the ratio of anionic particle to cationic polymer (See

Tables 12-16). As observed in previous Examples, the increase in coating viscosity obtained at a given cationic polymer addition level increased as the percentage of cationic polymer in the pre-mix increased. Therefore, the addition level of each pre-mix was adjusted to giv-e a coating viscosity equal to or higher than the viscosity obtained by direct addition of PRP-4440 (1500- 2000 cps, See Tables 12-16). The amount of pigrment shock in each of the treated coatings was determined by measuring tre amount of grit retained on a 200 mesh screen using the method described im Example 7. Direct addition of 0.075 parts PRP-4440 typically gave 5-15 mg «of grit per 200 g of coating (See Tables 12-16). The results obtained with eaach of the silica and . aluminum-maodified silica anionic particles is described below. ‘ 2.0 Ludox TM silica/PRP-4440 pre-mixes

The Ludox TM pre-mixes made at PRP-4=440 addition levels between 10% and 50% (See Table 12, 90%-50% Ludox T~M) gave the desired resuits.

The pre-mixes made over this range of addition Revels gave large increases in coating viscosity with much less pigment shock &han direct addition of PRP- - 4440. The best results were obtained at PRP-44-40 addition levels between : 15% and 50% (85%-50% Ludox TM). These pre=-mixes built coating viscosity efficiently with little or no pigment shock. Higher PRP-4440 addition levels in the Ludox TM pre-mixes gave heavy pigment shmock.

Based on these results, Ludox TM pre-mixes containing between 10% and 50% PRP-4440 (90%-50% Lud ox TM) are preferred. Ludox TM pre- mixes containing between 15% and 50% PRP-4440 (85%-50% Ludox TM) are more preferred.

Ludox HS silica/PRP-4440 pre-mixes

The Ludox HS pre-mixes made at PRP-4440 addition levels between 15% and 90% (See Table 13, 85%-10% Ludox HS) gave the desired results.

The pre-mixes made over this rang e of addition levels gave large increases in coating viscosity with much less pigment shock than direct addition of PRP- 4440. Lower PRP-4440 addition lewels (10%) gave poorly formed pre-mixes that formed grit in the coating.

Based on these results, Lud ox HS pre-mixes containing between 15% - and 90% PRP-4440 (85%-10% Ludox HS) are preferred.

Ludox FM silica/PRP-4440 pre-mixes

The Ludox FM pre-mixes made at PRP-4440 addition levels between 20% and 90% (See Table 14, 80% -10% Ludox HS) gave the desired results. :

The pre-mixes made over this range of addition levels gave large increases in coating viscosity with much less pigment shock than direct addition of PRP- 4440. Lower PRP-4440 addition levels (10%-15%) gave poorly formed pre- mixes that formed grit in the coatirag.

Based on these results, Ludox FM pre-mixes containing between 20% and 90% PRP-4440 (80%-10% Lu dox FM) are preferred. "it should be noted that Ludox HS and Ludox FM gave better results than Ludox TM, particularly at highh PRP-4440 addition levels. This difference in performance is believed to be caused by differences in anionic particle size and surface area. Based on these results, silica particle sizes less than 50 nm are preferred. Silica particles sizes less than 20 nm are more preferred.

Ludox TMA aluminum modified silic:a/PRP-4440 pre-mixes

The Ludox TMA pre-mixes rnade at PRP-4440 addition levels between 10% and 90% (See Table 15, 90% -10% Ludox TMA) gave the desired results. The pre-mixes made over this range of addition levels gave large increases in coating viscosity with less pigment shock than direct addition of

PRP-4440. The best results were obtained at PRP-4440 addition levels between 15% and 60% (85%-40% Ludox TMA). These pre-mixes built coating viscosity as efficiently as dlirect addition of PRP-4440 with little or no ~~ pigment shock. Higher PRP-4440 addition levels in the Ludox TMA pre-mixes gave slightly higher pigment shocls. Lower PRP-4440 addition levels (10%) gave poorly formed pre-mixes that formed slightly higher pigment shock. : Based on these results, Luclox TMA pre-mixes containing between : 10% and 90% PRP-4440 (90%-10% Ludox TMA) are preferred. Ludox TMA pre-mixes containing between 15% and 60% PRP-4440 (85%-40% Ludox : TMA) are more preferred.

Ludox AM aluminum modified silica/PRP-4440 pre-mixes

The Ludox AM pre-mixes nnade at PRP-4440 addition levels between 10% and 90% (See Table 16, 90%%-10% Ludox AM) gave the desired results.

The pre-mixes made over this range of addition levels gave large increases in coating viscosity with less pigment shock than direct addition of PRP-4440.

The best results were obtained at PRP-4440 addition levels between 15% and 60% (80%-40% Ludox AM). These pre-mixes built coating viscosity as efficiently as direct addition of PR P-4440 with litle or no pigment shock.

Higher PRP-4440 addition levels in the Ludox AM pre-mixes gave moderate pigment shock. Lower PRP-4440 addition levels (10%) gave poorly formed pre-mixes that formed moderate levels of grit in the coating.

Based on these results, Ludox AM pre-mixes containing between 10% and 90% PRP-4440 (90%-10% Ludox AM) are preferred. Ludox AM pre- mixes containing between 15% and 60% PRP-4440 (85%-40% Ludox AM) are more preferred .

Example 17 - Polyethyleneimine/silica pre-mixes

PEl/Ludox HS silica pre-mixes were made at PE! addition levels ranging from 10% to 50% using the method described in Example 2. Each pre-mix was then tested for its effect on Brookfield viscosity and pigment shock in the kaolin clay/ground calcium carbonate based coating described in . Example 3.

Direct addition of PEI to the paper coating gave very heavy pigment : shock (See Table 17). PEl/Ludox HS pre-mixes made at PEI addition levels - between 10% and 20% (90%-80% Ludox HS) gave the desired performance.

The pre-mixes made over this range of addition levels gave large increases im coating viscosity wsith much less pigment shock than direct addition of PEI.

Higher PEI addition levels gave heavy pigment shock. However, the pigment shock was still less than that caused by direct addition of PEI, when compared at equa coating viscosity.

Based on these results, Ludox HS pre-mixes containing between 10% and 50% PE! (90%4-50% Ludox HS) are preferred. Ludox HS pre-mixes containing between 10% and 20% PEI} (90%-80% Ludox HS) are more preferred.

Example 18 - Acrwiamide/DADMAC copolymer/silica pre-mixes

Acrylamide /DADMAC copolymer/Ludox HS silica pre-mixes were made at acrylamide/DADMAC addition levels ranging from 10% to 90% using the method described in Example 2. Each pre-mix was then tested for its effect on Brookfield viscosity and pigment shock in the kaolin clay/groumnd calcium carbonate based coating described in Example 3.

Direct addition of the acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer to the paper coating gave veary heavy pigment shock (See Table 18). Only the acrylamide/DADMAC copolymer/Ludox HS pre-mix made at the 70% aaddition level gave the desired performance. Lower acrylamide/DADMAC addition levels gave flocced pre-mixes that performed poorly. Higher acrylamide/DAIDMAC copolymer addition levels gave heavy pigment shock.

Based on these results, Ludox HS pre-mixes containing approximately” 70% acrylamide/DAIDMAC copolymer (30% Ludox HS) are preferred. Itis likely that other acryl amide/DADMAC copolymers made with different molar ratios of acrylamide and poly-DADMAC, or made at different molecular weights, will give better performance.

Example 19 - CLC evaluation of bentonite and silica pre-mixes : Based on the results of Examples 15 and 16, a series of pre-miixes was selected f-or evaluation on a cylindrical lab coater. PRP-4440, Retten 203, the 75,000 My, DMA-epi cationic polymer, Kymene 557, and Kymene “736 were tested ass the cationic polymer component of the pre-mixes. Bentonite, silica, and alurminum-modified silica were tested as the anionic particle component of the pre-mixes. The pre-mix formulations that were selected are shown in Table 19. The 85:15 benonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mix was nade at 25% solids us ing the method described in Example 5. The remaining pre- mixes were m ade using the methods described in Examples 1 and 2. The clay/carbonate coating formulation described in Example 3 and the cw/lindrical lab coater method described in Example 10 were used for the evaluation. In each case, pree-mix addition level was selected to give a cationic poly mer addition level of 0.075 parts based on coating pigment, and a cationic polymer addition concentration of 0.75%. Each pre-mix was stirred at the selected addition concentration for at least 25 minutes before addition to the coaating. The 85:15 bentonite:poly-DADMAC pre-mix was also tested using direxct addition to the coating starch without dilution. An untreated coating was evaluated as a control. Standard TAPP! (Technical Associatiorm of the Pulp and Paper Industry) methods were used to measure coated pa per opacity and brightness.

The pre-mixes made with the low molecular weight, high charge density poly-DADMAC, PRP-4440, gave the best results (See Table 19). The 85=15 bentonite:PRP-4440 pre-mix gave 0.4-0.8 point increasezs in opacity and brightness per coated side versus the untreated control. Excellent results were obtained when the pre-mix was diluted to 5% solids and added to the finished coating formulation, and when the undiluted pre-mix wsas added to the coating starch as part of the normal coating make-down procedure. The 70 :30 bentonite:PRP-4440 pre-mix gave similar increases In o=pacity and bri ghtness. The silica and aluminum-modified silica pre-mixes made with

PRP-4440 poly-DADMAC also significantly improved the optical properties of the coated paper, particularly opacity. : The pre-mixes made with Reten 203, the 75,000 My, DAA-epi cationic paslymer, Kymene 557, and Kymene 736 gave smaller increas-es in coating opeacity and brightness. In general, the pre-mixes made with h.igh charge density cationic polymers gave larger increases in opacity and brightness than the pre-mixes made with low charge density cationic polymers. For excample, the pre-mixes made with Reten 203 or the 75,000 M1, DMA-epi cationic polymer gave 0.2-0.5 point (per coated side) increases in coating opacity and brightness versus the untreated control. The bentonite pre-mixes m ade with the relatively low charge density Kymene 557 and Kymene 736 cationic polymers gave only small increases in coating opacity and brightness (O»-0.3 points per coated side). It is likely that the Kymene 557 and Kymene

736 based pre-mixes would give larger increases in opacity and brightness at addition levels higher than the 0.075 parts cationic polymer used in this study.

Based on these results, cationic polymers with a cationic charge density of at least 2 milliequivalents per gram are preferred. Cationic polymers with a charge density of at least 4 milliequuivalents per gram are more preferred. Poly-DADMAC cationic polymers a re most preferred. The pre-mixes can be made using either bentonite, silica, or aluminum-modified silica as the anionic particle.

7] N

DEB © [0] lr ® = LT a 38 3 °22 s- ceo cel

EN £ ES ; = _

BN © 8 I hr re = © , 8 0 S 8

CZ ES zLT © a Cm [. [. © | 2 5 aq 51%) |Se3Sez

Og EDO = YN = = — Lov En pry prver] 0% a “hy ls ;

T0002 TD ~ Oo $583 S88

Be BE £8 co | ret cor = - Ca o =n £0 id oF : }

[2] C- + - ’ Bg - :

REE :

Py ) 7) 0 » ® on 0 0

EE a a Q a a a a la

NE) #3 Oo 5) 3) Oo oO | Oo | oO

EE 3 oN Ted o Oo o o Q o

Eel 8 Ie} ~ = I © SS | ®

RE SH ~ < Dy o oS 0 |® cL Sn - ~ IY - Ne» a hag 3 > vc 89 ® | ® | =» 2 | 2 | 2 | ® |x 5S] © ~~ @ 3 2) ~ | ®

Sa [= oc co oS I= =) co |o xo : oi 0 - - a ig . aE | 2 R R oN 2 ® XR ~ ~— -— -— nes ~N oN ~N ~N S 3 3 |S

Spe a © a ‘8 G20 c .0

Ss ESR ES ®

C2 ES s i 0 5 a 3 0 = T

FQ °0 9 C20 “3 £&S

No Ss 2 Le : = H we

Za < 90 oS c®® £ may iE 8 a — os w a g i 3 OT = cEF PK o SARE = S =

E oo . r R

Q LC® i) Rl = PES < - 2

L0 PEP of EEE go ;

Ld I ET io Z 1 wo 0 n w on 0 on ¥3 a | al 8 a oa | a

Hah 3) g o (3) 2 Oo oO ol.

Be. ls | 8128 gl 2] 8 |g

EW N 0 of 8 © N=

NE - NN [® © - N |» eo

SAE a o Oo 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

EE < © © IN| ™ <€ nu |©

SR o o o o o o o o

A= I

Ce wy 336

SSE 2 RX XR XR xR xX |X v2 | KN ~~ ~ [IN| © © Ss |e

NET | ~ N «| ® a ® |® mb

W/O 2004/099321 PCT/US2004/013506 2B ololo| ool o|o | oo 22] o

No

Col E|E|E|E|E|E|E |EJE|E}EIE

ESN nlu|a(=lal=s|n la|r|a|n]|x gPgle|lmw|w|lviv]s | I | OT IYI

Th

Ta

PEER

2 alelalaela alll 88i818

Sa § $1881 8/8|8|&8]88|8|0

NM EQ oclolw|locolo |ocloleiolalo 9 [881%|8/8|8|5/8|2|8|8(8|8/8 |] sores salle | Ola -~— ke IS c A © TTT

E a

I. N : a [es I NP i © NIN XR! 0 oflw|l eR RX

Bl RE Sb |S ES 5 5inlnle|e gS | SE ©|K|& Clo|d|x|®

Ss elec lgigIisiglasl2le|ele 2 Fag olojo|[C|eP|P|P|C|c|o|o|o a [eT 2 > oe

CentER i= EE

Of |2@:2. NINIRIR|R|E|ININ|IRINIR~ ' fin o|lojcjlojlo|oojolo|ojo|lo lo

[32] BC AR (=) eo

NN EA ks c IL

Ko! . a

Q ap ol (fx ° e 8 | =E] Ll RN|RS5IRRH]R gH 8s lol IN|] 00

S| 8 “ir =o glo(a] Sf k= TaN A of |e [a3] uN a 1 IE of [Fh o Ey cles] ce ro) TA 210918

I E1515 0 €e1z/23|8]els|2/2|gl8|8lgl8 ge S| |S I< 1v IB I S|o|s|lb|S|o|a hy 5180 NID |d || N|K|O|® © I @

BE JE 3 »o— a— ol

E ala|a om

Low mln olo|lolo|olo|o(alo]o {he in A E-RE=-RE=-RR=-RE=-RE=RE=-RE-RE=-NE-RE-2E=)

EE EE EE RS RA SE SE RR Rs

WEB lBleleleliceclel sleclelelelele $15|8|815/5/813|808|5/8|5]3

Cel Tiled || |X |e |x

4S

By T ol lo ol o| ol o|lo| oo 2 0D

SCSI E|E|E|E|E| E|E|E|EIE|EIE

E29 =|la|~n|lnloln|lain|oa|x gO o|T|~|o|a| So @|T TF re ol wlolalae ‘a2 al 81 R18 8 dlalajalala

Ee al &| & gg gl 8|&|lelo|o

EQ ololojoleoela 288 |S2|8|2|8|8(5|2|28lF|8 x OT |¥ 20 SJ N|lN|a|lS|S] =

Q EES

Q I YS

L Jet Ya 7) I el | 5

Nd I 0 Sy gl 8:3. RIN eles 22|8 8 = SE vw inl Slislalglelelvlw 2 PEE |R(Rleietel|e|e|g|8|8|8

Or. ole ; ; ID lQejaele le 2 Hach oclelje|ele|e|CPlo|c|o|e 0 oo [&] ...

R22 rae > CNA 0] Pe) ° ° o ° ° ° ° ° ° =g RI IRR [RBS g 5 5, hilo lvl LiWw|[W |W

Bs Le = NINININ INININININ IRIN $ ed oclo|o|o |lo]jojo|]ofjo oO ol | = o . 3 8x ° Qo of | =E: Ll (R[RIS5|2|R|5 oy Qe Er Lio (RINK |Q|V| aw 0. oN ad ~ ~1 . ™o | CO I = Bi ™ ~ 2 18] A ' 8 = © o- ’ Bn J [=] [=] o laglZ|3|3je|s |EBIRIR|IQIB| E18 ro ga BIS S18 EE-ER-AR-BEER=-NE=1 N= — elm glo ol || dd | NI] O| DO

LG nei | @ »

RE AN — —

B wm: fae os clololo|lolo|lololeolole

Leh 1 Bs hi J

SE = JII¥ “SB slalalajia oalpijalolio|ala o Oly | ¥ | |g xj | { a alo |o|a|o|a|alaja|a)a

0 o o| ol o| o 258 o|2|2|2|2|2| BEE

ESQ clo ic lales|RII|SS . 2S © « . © fac |Q|w | |e |2|F|2|7 o

Q CL x

O TON, ® Co 24 [7 » 17] 0 0

LL I. .- oO 1 0 a 0» a a ty (£%|8|5|8|8|8|8 1388 iy] <Q o|lo| © gE | S08 & SII IBla|= 8 | g@<F|2 | o Ol MN] ® © a Si he -— - - - ~~ - ° A iy

Fo i

AT .

IND

? EAA p gl | 29 Rl | eles} R 2 | Ed |S 1818528 (8]|8 > pale ol |S S|aolojo oa clo |o|le|s|a|lsls c a N33

Bo

Q A oO kF— [} ERE

Sf BBE Ix |I¥I®I2 181818 o fsE| |p| |v|jw|L|lL]lL]|®©

CQ Ldg SRN NEN NNN 0] [de o > o|lo|o jo

V|oPaRe il Hg = oe ’ p 8x °o © ° °

S (2E =e 8 228 a |e 2IK|R|x lq) oo a8. A P—~ [2] N ~ ~ - ~~

IN 5 Ra cant ol pre El

E | 5 = Ce c iy 3 . R=]

HN 18olxl3 olo|o 3 (ESE SIR 8(F|B8|8(E = Oa [4] << — S— S—— ~~ ~~ ~~ gd 2815121218188 1218 gl |EF|D|pB |S |0|K|O |B | FO of (.8,. 2 2 =F a f CWE 0 oa el) ol a ou

J e EwlE o|Ea|Ex|E|Ex|EalEo

A EERE RISKERIERIERIENIER

205 NE NIE NE NE GE af'E NEN

EY -1 OI | «OOO | DDO

OY I LS {+ WT Of Sl [ [WO [WO WO [

[= 4 o jo jo) 88S E = £ £ 525 5 |e we | N ~~ B= 9 : ~— -~ a? E §

CED

CE \ n [7] 7] 12] on fo Fd [7] [72] x | E881 8 | 8| 81 8 g| 8] & 8 Iw 8 Q o o = o o ol og jo o S oS Flew 3 S 2 3 o > ® os = - © ~~ - -— - - w|i

Er al |.

AN - © g HES lll 258 © Ex 4 ~ oO oO oO o boy) I~ =F o ~ ~~, = - oS =) & SF S © = o o oS S >| sed f= : Cl ® | 0x

Jd [Ze 2 2 * | 2 | 8 ~ 2 oO |8E 0 0 0 ) 0 7) 7) aS N | RR | RRR IR oO o co o =} o o Ie] al |e < ns wl | : ~~ ARE ' < = LT xX o o o

Se 0 nl re) a 0 & wl no ~ : ai d - { p ° a 32] -~— -~— < Eola = wh NE IR 3 [fs c fe oa c

EE c wt a. 4 [= hd -— © OD i Xx © of ESE ZT |S | R| | 8 | 88 ’ 20 | 3 S S S S oS S o eX | o 5 Io) D ~ ® fre} + o | 8 0 rel = = © > (mn)

Hola — — — — — — — — — o. QQ Q Q. QQ. QQ oo 28 lw. Su. Slur. uw. Sw. Sw. Sur + 3 52 [42842542504 2842204 2512 22 81 8 S=oS=5S vs2vs2vS=2 BSS 0 a a SMa Sag Na tM Sa Ma vt

PANT a =| © o > 28S £ | E | E

E oi eT N < a? 8 © Ts) < 8 Fis o ® 2 | 9 & a a = LE? | © Oo © s + 88 1 oe 4 S ok 32 =] < ~ x ETP An hl = 8 1 oe ey : br I EE a el Las o Oia ol (J o (J

El [|«® ay = x x a Et [oe rN ~~ osx 2 <Q e 8 haem © © oS q | LY 3 Toe 2 ARI . Ry = . UY; bea > . Ua 82 NS 2 3 [Remi © =] to

Of | a op gl [a

Sl |i pu -

Rl (2&1 2 x 2 ' SE ~~ <x py = [es al bie

Wy f— < HE] 2 | 8 0 PS 3 - = 2 af Q =] ge [£2 | EE | 8 | 8 = Q&S oS S

Sl [gel] ® « - ml 27

JE SAR o| ['@ 5 i) - @ gk 0 A T \ fu He rol c— J 'e o [o8 a.

LEY L888 a A > >

Te S=5<=53=5

TO Vi==2wv==10 ‘a 10 o (a)

49 i

BEB ol oo] Pl ooo] ooo] oo] ol @ ‘QS e®S| E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|] E| E|E

EON

HEF RN | Jae jalt Nw | @ WN gc ad |lw|Plald|ldlN|o jo) ow) ® oh + Te - 3 yh

Hl olw|lolea|leo| elo w | 0 w| ol o

Ll)

Cage tem Q [oR [eX

E-giE|o 55888 8g, 8 &| &| 8

E%elglglglel|elelg|e|glr|sle gos (veda |v|~|® SE I BN EE gl RE

IRN Phd als eR [ERI

Ef ok o | we

Seay |[|R | RXR | Rell {2 ak E54 vw LIS |S5|S5|o|lololo oot o opel 8 IB [=== lls 2% |°|°|°|°|°°|°|°|°|°]°]|°

Ql Tel [eo] Pl : RY

Qf TE of Ed

Shuts

Sh ZR! RRR RRR RRR RRR gas] |ele|k klk ib||blk |BIk|E

Sag S|o|s|(S|S|a|s|8|s-|8|s]|s =a 1 Bh 58

SE LL of ag

Ol up, s o X. ° =] =] o o o gl =F © | Rw R] eR [RR]

Si. WIR 83 wg |5d|3

Ss Mle | N= 7] - -|lo|o

De ght ofits

Of: v. af Ey : c c c=

AE S| 8|s8

AS S28 ol Xx

Ael=8|8(3|elalslg|8|8 ells

A Beg |S) << |s5|5|]5!l3|53| |ala]|S

Ql 5 {5 mig SS lolol ~ © 0 < Mm | N

HS = I I 1 o|B|D = RE . al l= lo jo lo Jo jo (lo jo |o lo |o (lo lo 9.10 |e c c c c c c c c c c c

CE NoslansloNagnslans(onsians]o ~

RB EE EN ER EE EE EE EE EE Ea = Ee = er EE 2 |S |EREBEB ERB CREB CRE RIER ERED

RN Rl A 2 2 VI PV AVI C2 I FO I A A I

Ie jo) | o o| o o| o

Tix o £ 8] E E| E E| E £ | E oS ~~ @ | ® Q | ® © | N rn «ng o - | © - | © oN | ™

GE

CLE 2 IP tn 0 [7] 0 Nn 2] 24 a 2 2

EE ag 8g ox 81588 & ol o| ©| © 88k o

Zeige |glslelglglelgle

QI wv | B8Bielel~s]ll 2x21 ol = r=! I rt we o o

Ts Ee ow - x o ° o XN | NX 3 ¥ | | RX

FES|L |B|S|8|8|B|B|E|E|Elk gl 57 ~~ | &b © | NNN

SE] |2ls|slslg(gl elgg) r— Lo Chad . - . - . o So al | ag o co | o co | o

EA

= I

[72] t. ol AR

Ql |. a .

Sle] RI RIR IRIN |RSS 2 ley |o|C|e|ejo|e}e|e|e|°

B= LO me © SEE

Q AS i { oO YR

EEE

8 =e o (=] =] (=) (2d oe ~ EE RNS IR| 5 | S| EN EN of MBE: HI RIB Ze |] |5|a|3 ol [eek Mol N|[<] YT | ~~ ]lol|o

El [&™

X Re oa 1 han . = | 8

Aan POI fd ol | EL WE Oo a [er E © gre | x oclolojolo |lololale

HB Ee Eel 8lR|8|F| 2 |@|IRIo|S

Sm |B I< |S|s|lc|s|s|c|lasjs|S

EE (Bg |x |S | 0 | FO |A |" 48 2 ‘a. o pe

Sa 78 1812lul2ultultultnltolBolt

E Slooco0lo0| cd TOO DOD OT © ~n.. | © EQREP Meo [%2] IEMs mis Mem ve ERIERIENERIER E~|ERIENIERIER

I-A B® I Ev [v2 Cv CV Fv Fo 2 2 FV £v2

S1 : «= Oy o| ol o| oo © oO 558 B|2|8|2|2|2|2| 2 E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E

E28 q|v|a|olal=|zl=||a x32 |2|2]|C ox ala|8(8al8lelsl glelelslelsls 8 ‘EW 1880018888 olo|o|ol oo) oD 2Q ole olololo|jw 4 8gleielB8|S|@ 288 IRIS ZIRT

A SL2ITIFIRIT|n|eid|l VN — ol O55 QI -|SIRIR QF |Q|q|§|=|~ 2 - sy pd Cit

Sl = = Rs = a

SE8d | Izlelslzlzlel gle 81888 ]5 8 oli: RILIB ISIS 8 RIRIRIRIE||0|& ql om ole|o|el|e|e] 2ie|e|ele|c|elc ng c|ocjoc|loc|oc|oc| o|c|c|c|oc|o|o|a ra >i Js 0 cs =} °

S|43rg RRR RRR] RN RRR RRR qf 0.5, vinlnjvjiviv] vivjv|viIB|ILILVIWL

Qf. Jen = INI INININ] NINN

Os 0: olojlojojo|lo}] ojlojlolo|0O|]O|O | O [§ TES olf: of: 2 SHEEEREEEHE

DIB RIRI2INl oli |d|lg|a|® <b ek NAR IE RA EA EE =a =) = NEN d [oe] 8 . yo! EnEv—

Ss o

JAE EEE

[lain CT |T ke} 2.0.0] x olo|lwlol ojlololololele|e oleae 51222 SISSY S121L18/18(5(18/8 sesglalslslZ|slg|lg|gl 21818812 18!8|¢2

Sl © m 3) [5] O|M{O | 0] © NOI FT| ON] ~~

Ll [ag Nal Na ; ; {VO N

EAE olo|lololojo| olo|ololal|lolgle a — 2° g|® 3 3 S| 3 3 J

EE EFFI FIFITITF| TIFT Ni

EIA AA AEA AR AA A A A AR AE

IRE IL O « + a v A J + 2 + Oo A Os A I 0 4

CL olaojo jojo Qajajajlajoja (oo.

Er

BZ o o)) o|lojo| oo o) 200 E = EIE|E|E|E £ 529 lal ~i~lo|=|x ~ 25.9 5 i Slo |~|olo =) 26gS|3||S| 3

Ey FE 2 ol8lalalelglslelslslgld

ER | 8|8|8|8| &|5| TBST) 0 a , - o

Fialllgl8R18|8I2|I8|R|8|E

QB |DIF| NIH] ojo]

S HOS. BREE SI BS BN] lel N=] % of ki =

[72] eC —

E=1 NE EET o |x 2 EH RHERHEHEE = kd, a | B=: Piolo old ||| NINN o | §%- sls Sielalelelclaele gl lag c|@e|o| |c|lo|o|oc|oc|oc|o ih

Q Ng oo.

Q Teo N > AY ee \

CF 82 IRIEIR|IR|R|R|RIRIR IRN ol |'e® cololo]l olo|lo|lolo|oclo (oO oO Sa. - SH : nL ol 12E oo] Re |X| X|R]|R o 5.5 oH S Te} I 0 oO OiIN~l = 3

Ps) no : sl N 1 (Ne | ) a Thi x RENT td gl [av 3 CTI : 3 Fie ' Fora c of Eoojlx|Blo|lw]|o|lol|le|lolole|Q a E528 E222 8|8|8|8|8|E|g|2 cl |= oS = S|le|s|lsiclsis|s|isS|o

EEL EE EE EER El I I LR I

LC (] grt eleielelglgiglqlglgls

SHE HEHE EEE

CEE oiaja|dlalalala|aia|a 2 lil |d|d|le|lg|d|e|x : . aiala alalajoelajalolao

EE

LB

Eval ol | P| oo ol of oto 2 DD s¢8 E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E|E

ESN sion [=(=lala|t|nla

NE

Ne | BD [7] al ao [= 25 8/855 |B|B|B BE EIE|s 8. 2l2elx 8|8l8(218|2|8|8

Qo 0 | o © N|d|w|ols|[x]e|2 3 195 |1T|a CR RE AGE RE A

QO |S ne af [Ei = JR SS ol |g

BE [83] |2|welse|selR|2|2][2|22]2 = Ea LIS | SIs eval ol WES RII (22125151818 ol REE: si=|=|=|alelale|alale |=3g clo |e(@Pio|lolo|]o|lojo|@ 3 EN Rk g Eg RR BIRIRIFII (228

Broa Yo) nw | w in gS kaa] |RIBRIBIEIR|IR|RIRIR|R|N

Q [eis clo|o|o|o|c|c|o|jo|o|o

Of |-afx

WER wn oF

J | 3 0 KK g="y o ©o | 2 eo | 3 o | 2 | XR|XR|XN x LSE” RNRIDIRIB|IZBIZ|E|S

S| |e "slg Ri<cIN[22]R wl | fo » Ra 3 N [eo] JRL LT he) Ce 1X: 3 Aga 1 shot ’ c

Ng S = x o olololo|o|o 2 seg Ei 2228828 |8|E2|8|2 8B Cem e|<|s|w|jc|lc|s|lg|c!s|s|os

HO|EGE| 080 | 00K |® IIT) MN)

TE 2

EE (m}

A.

ER oclololo|lo|lo|o ololo 9 : = 3 k AEFI IRIE IRIE IRIE IE: ‘5.1 ey i) hi hE

Ek = T PS » PP + PO PO + A

EE NCR NARA lg [A lo A A A A a iy 2

Au I I< OO J = WN + WA (WA Io NA I WA I WO a Ho Wy a TO yo IS

EYER iE z=. au’ 1; rs

CxS oo OO | O ool ool oo ol oO 28 E |E|E|E EIE|E|E|E|E|E|E

EES ow allele o|NiN|e|le|ln|eln aR ES | F|o|A clo|lo|~|S|<=]|~|~ do a oe l2lalalalsla sl 8lelglslt £9. 2|O0|0|lo|lo|lo|olo|9|o ofS en Ql |lolo|lolo|l |e = 2 88S |S|3|5(8(8|58|8|2|8|8|8 =< I ET 7) ae a rrr fad 2. BAA

E ik Sd ° ° ° °

Ed OININIRj©0| © @|©| ©] © © ° [SE Slotlaol|laelalele|e|ele|le

S aS co|lo|o|joco|oc|jo|loc|oc|o|ocl|loclo dE! 8 ae Erie = EN: = SUNT = = 3 gl | 320 MILER ES EE EE EE 8 |e c|o|o|o|o|d|{c|c|o|lo|s|o ' Ren of | i & 2 x (3 3 ° oa [2 ele |Rle|R|e|R|R| RR 355 SEIREEREER LE

Qo: : g : : 2 : : 2 4 d 2 lek MW Imi N] [~~] |oO - OY. xl Eek

S| [Eee 4 TGR 3 a 1 AE c

Te) -E ole = 0 = Z| E of EPO =|1Z|3|2|v|ILI2IIIecIglx o 6LF S(<|<|(S|S|]|L2XT1LILIE5(X|L o [Eelam lsl=ld|8lels|grl|glels!|S

HO |SS®| | BBP | FF | BFS IN

Te 21 =z. 00 | =l2lg1g1g8(glgigiglglgigls

CE BIST FTIET E535

SE JRAR INK J J Hg J Mg Jc Wo WO SO I AO I SO I PO MR I a (lly @¥e ¥ eie oglu one a|lafajalaja|ja|jacfjala|ja|a

BORE wg o 1] o| o ool ol of o| o 888 E EE EIE|E|E|E|E god N «| - wv lwislw|al=s 20.2 oN clo clo|lo|a|a|n

Eg 0 | ® ig 2 Qlejeiaeia|gl2|l 88 ala

SEB c|8|8|8ls|5|8 8 500

THR oclwlo|lo|lolo|w|lole = 25 |18|18|8|S|8|2|2|8|8|8|E|S

J KOs SEIT ININ|||F|®|Q|~ oO Coals .

LL cle . ' (7s) , J r= 3) fou

El dda |oo|sio|eR|R2R2R = Ligh vlololulvlolw|lv iv] alo

Sid 588855 |8(8|8(8|8

Tv ‘Og ) ) d ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

S| Ed 9 - clo|lolojo|o|o|jo|c|lojo

FIX

@| FUEL [o} Ee. oo.

Q te Bal 2 Cage > AE o o gle IRIN IRIRIRIN ISIN INNS =| HE oe = clolo|locjc|loc|loc|lojolo|o [&] o- Shi ) EE : Te NANT of Lira 3 CREE

Td ed a EN Sl (3 o (=3 o [= o

EE SEE IHRE HEHE

SEE vieiRK|L|la|R|N|o|a|x = Tem MW Nj =| TIO] a -) BA . x tC g Cor — i Rr “ I © a = 5 .

A-SI o 2g2:/3/2|2lg|8lg|8lele|8ls 2 [eS s|<|S|als|s|s|3|s|als|s

FH GEED|3 (00S |K 60 |F |S A=

LQ: ©

RAs =A = i ‘a See 0

SE - YE

Ce 2iglglgigiglgig|glgle

EOIEIF|3333)3)3(33133

EE [2|¥ |Slalala|a|algialaiaia |g

Lf ole |e ||| |¢

EB alajd|lajaja|lajalaia|a

5:38 | BIE|R|2|E|E|E|E

E22 In Ble|e|n|s|a|®

FOR ENS olol|l ola ol ol o 3 Ry »latalalea lala og FEB Flo|lo| oo S S S

EO ola =) 2 1388 8|8|2|8|S|5(8 8

S$ $5 Flv] |~]~ N | N IAN £ Ho on a FB 2 Tg

Ng LOT. RRR eR = we bivlo|S|lniwlvlw a |ESe OlIN| OQ | Dd ||| D 8 igs Slalals|ele|e]e

Ol | pa” o|lo|o|C|o|o|o|o 2 2

Tn = AE

IR

O UY) Em 8 |a2 SIRIRIRIRIR INN = ed clolojo|lo|jo|o|© a -) ol Lr hi So : xX FL = XUN VI — a w po X al SE SIRHEREE 5] ESE 0 BR ode gE Lek: Nisa ale

E Boar)

FI

< Lorne 2 mer

Zz Es

Pa . c c © SE 21.9 ol |= x 3 ESe£|318|2|2|g|8|e|8 ' os [5] <L <C — ~~ =o pe ~~ ~~ todas %|8|8I21218!3 a IRE EC I T= EC EL I A I ha Kou of [FE 28 we Gem alo. . © RA * VI + : i i PE i

I r=

EE m

BE 8 a

NA

SN £2 |X [BE EE 95 o 23 £3 23 =| o g 3 = | e)] =] = =] =] “3 |E|E|E|585985235 E| E285

ERA AER EU El Ia EOL = ERIC IRS IES IES xT Ns BS [}] LE yi, qT 5 T 5 TO 5 qo £ I Al De 2c (Qc °c 0 fe (fo |a <5 o a ° Hg

Eo I 0 | a > 2a l21 8] & 2] g =a o| © oO ‘B I © 1 © ol o 8 SE0-@il| © 33 SS 3 ®¥S|TI9© SF > Eat ce £ E Bay = . se Bie

Q Re SR o rs: BIR |||] : Sh ly RRB o o =) Oo | © = 8 TSE clo = pr <== > £ aE pc = I oc oc clo c n EA i 2 3 SRC 2) LEE

XL .- LH

As

ZY | w= SIR IT ES EB BO <9 | a © © |°ef° ©

Qleol | is = EC

Q Gi < EE & = xX (2 (=) =) o o == gl xR x x EN RX | x

OS oh 0 | 0 © & | 8] & 5 «0 2 ~| - < | elas pac

S| hE &] JEG < <n NTE c = Ex S ‘= 0.0 o o o [on] oOo [e] of [Ecelg(3|2| 8 |8|8 |E|8| 8 [<3] = [=] Oo oO Oo oS ° S45 glo = ie] |8|R e = ro £ jo og (a) < : = ’ EE ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ie QD [5] [+}} a D [}] [4] [+5] © ok 5 2RRE 2 2S 22 2g 28 o | E |2|52|55 52|52| 52 (53583 §3 2 |. 5.187275 22 | 22 | 28 [2928] 2% = oR golenl ea ol eo aif: Fal 58

Co <<< < <- |<< <

LB

= £8 @

LE 0 | ale 2 alelele 28 E|E|E = ElE|E|E

CR o| ©] © 0 dll @]| 9

EO al al a o. Slajal a rata) Te) oN [To J I {oJ I oo 3183 < Sl8|IR|@ @re colo |o o Cloj{o|o oa

ZL. <3

EE.

OR of LE © 0. od vs ol Rie 9 FFE (5) .B of le8

Qo |e 3 SE Llliglelgieille) a

ES elelejleleis|i ele &]E 8 86 | o|oc| cil G| ec] © g £8 alalalajlalalalala] a

Ya NON HII OM 0 DO

BD Fox tS |®mjloe|T|N)|n |N]m INA © 0 olojofolojojo|@}jo | O ol (Es {LE 8 Of gl |: b= cE = LA. -

Le . — o

AE & o|Q = [@)] oe, § “= } © lool |8]|5 3 i=

A oO | 2 <s o o | 3] ~ | 0 r= 1 Na o|o |E

CREE EE RAEI EEE AR AL

Srl ElRgets | 2d 88s |a(5g . ey = .. rx} wl ogg] EE|I8(8 £3

El Oo |g8ls8 s|a|8|¥|¥|=2|£|E

EB o|EoEs EE |E2|lg| 8 ol ® » |20 al @mleEwslesl el sll Els]= ©

Emi += 10 10 © O [=] yd c Cc a. a) SEES E|Elg|els|L | IES

Tl 2loeeg ee EEE 55S

HE = RE =] oe oe -— Ke] Ke] © © ow : 0 Ol =| © Te] [= = 3S |o re ww WS ow s1a3118 —

Lo © 0 ~lo || B8I2I2i2I jo Ld oo oo o ~~ jo to EE ~~ I~

Claims (111)

CLAIMS What is claimed is:

1. A pigmented aqueous system comprising: (i) an additive pre-mix comprising a cationic polymer and an anionic particle.

2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the system contains pre-mix in amounts ranging from about 0.01 to about 2.0 «ry parts per 100 parts of pigment in the aqueous system.

3. The system according to claim 2, wherein the system contains pre-mix in amounts ranging from about 0.05 to about 1.0 dry parts per 100 parts of pigment in the aqueous system.

4. The system according to claim 3, wherein the system contains pre-mix in amounts ranging from about 0.1 to about 0.5 dry parts per 100 parts of pigment in the aqueous system.

5. The system according to claim 1, wherein the pre-mix has a solids content ranging from about 5% to about 40%.

6. The system according to claim 5, wherein the= pre-mix has a solids content ranging from about 15% to about 30%.

7. The system according to claim 1, wherein the cationic polymer has a weight average molecular weight ranging frorm about 5,000 to about 3,000,000 daltons.

8. The system according to claim 7, wherein the cationic polymer has a weight average molecular weight ranging frosm about 10,000 to about 1,000,000 daltons. 5s

9 The system according to claim 8, wherein thee cationic polymer has a weight average molecular weight ranging fro-m about 20,000 to about 500,000 daltons.

10. The system according to claim 1, wherein th e cationic polymer has a charge density of about 0.1 to about 8 meg/gram.

1. The system according to claim 10, wherein &he cationic polymer has a charge density of about 1 to about 8 meqg/gr-am.

12. The system according to claim 11, wherein the cationic polymer has a charge density of about 2 to about 6.5 meq/ gram.

13. The system according to claim 1, wherein tine cationic polymer comprises : quaternized salts of (co)polymers of N-alkyl substituted aminoalkyl esters of (meth)acrylic acid; quatemnized salts of reaction products of a polyamine and an acrylate type compound; (co)polymesrs of (methacryloyloxyethyl)trimethyl ammonium chloride; (co)polymers of acrylamide and quaternary ammonium compounds; quaternized vinyllactam-acrylamide (co)polymers; quatesmized salt of hydroxy- containing polyesters of unsaturated carboxylic acids; quaternary ammonium salt of polyimide-amines; quate mized polyamines; quaternized reaction products of amines and polyesterss; quatemnized salt of condensation (co)polymers of polyethylene=amines with dichloroethane, quatemized condensation products of polyaalkylene-polyamines and epoxy halides; quaternized condensation products of alkylene-polyamines and polyfunctional halohydrins; quaternized cordensation products of alkylene-polyamines and halohydrinrs; quatemized condensation (co)polymers of ammonia and halohydrins; quatemnized salt of polyvinyibenzyltrialkylamines; quaternized salt of (co)polymers of vinyl- heterocyclic monomers having a ring nitrogen, polydialkyldiallylammonium salt including polydiallyldimethyl annmonium chloride; (co)polymers of vinyl unsaturated acids, esters and amicies thereof and diallyldialkylammonium salts; polymethacrylamidopropyltrirmethylammonium chloride; quaternary ammonium salt of ammonia-ethyle=ne dichloride condensation (co)polymers; quaternized salt of epoxy halide (co)polymers, and mixtures thereof.

14. The system according to claim 13, wherein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymers of diallyldialkylammonium salts; (co)polymers of diallylamine; (co)polymers of diallylalkylamine; polyethylene imine; (co)polymers of dialkylamine/epichlorohydrin; (co)golymers of polyamine/epichlorohydrin; (copolymers of polyamide/epichlorohydrin; (co)polymers of polyamideamine; (co)polymers of polyamideamine/epichlorohydrin; : (co)polymers and quaternized (cor )polymers of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide and methacrylamide; and (co)polymers and quatemized (co)polymers of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate, methacrylate esters and mixtures thereof.

15. The system according to claim 1-4, wherein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymers of diallyldimethylammonium salts; (co)polymers of polyamine/epichlorohydrin; polyethylene imine; (co)polymers of dimethylamine/epichlorohydrin; p olyamideamine/epichlorohydrin polymers and mixtures thereof.

16. The system according to claim 15, wherein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymers of diallyldimethylanmmonium saits, (co)polymers of dimethylamine/epichliorohydrin amd mixtures thereof.

17. The system according to claim 1, wmerein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 2.5%.

18. The system according to claim 17, wherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 1.5%.

19. The system according to claim 18, wrherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 1.0%

20. The system according to claim 1, whaerein the anionic particle is a high surface area anionically charged ino rganic mineral, a high surface area anionically charged synthetic inorganic particle and mixtures thereof.

21. The system according to claim 20, wrherein the anionic particle comprises swelling clay, siliica-based particles and mixtures thereof.

22. The system according to claim 21, weherein the silica-based particle comprises colloidal silica, colloidal aluminum-modified silica, aluminum silicate and mixtures thereof.

23. The system according to claim 21, wrherein the swelling clay comprises bentonite, montmorillonite, montmorikllinite, beidelite, nontronite, hectroite, saponite, sepialite or attapulgite.

24. The system according to claim 23, wherein the anionic particle is bentonite.

25. The system according to claim 21, w herein the swelling clay has a particle size ranging from about 1 nanometer to about 1 micrometer.

26. The system according to claim 21, where the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 50 m%/g. :

27. The system according to clai m 26, wherein the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 100 m?/g.

28. The system according to claim 27, wherein the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 200 m?%/g.

29. The system according to claim 21, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size below about 50 nanometers.

30. The system according to claim 29, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size below about 20 nanometers. :

31. The system according to cla im 30, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size ranging from absout 1 to about 10 nanometers

32. The system according to cla im 21, wherein the silica-based particle has a. surface area of at least 50 m?/g.

33. The system according to cla im 32, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least 100 m?/g.

34. The system according to claim 33, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least about 200 mg.

35. The system according to claim 1, wherein the additive premix comprises about 95 wt-% to about 10 wit-% of the anionic particle and about 5 wt-% to about 80 wt-% of the cationic polymer.

36. The system according to claim 35, wherein the additive pre-mix comprises about 90 wrt-% to about 20 wt-% anionic particle and about 10 wt—% to about 80 wt-% of the cationic polymer.

37. The systermn according to claim 36, wherein the additive pre-mix c-omprises about 90 wst-% to about 40 wt-% of the anionic polymer and about 10 wt-% to about 60 wt-% of the cationic polymer.

38. The systerm according to claim 37, wherein the additive pre-mix comprises about 85 wwt-% to about 60 wt-% of the anionic particle and about 15 wt-% to about 4C wt-% of the cationic polymer).

39. The systerm according to claim 1, wherein the anionic particle is bentonite and the caationic polymer is poly-DADMAC.

40. The systerm according to claim 39, wherein the bentonite and pol y- DADMAC are in a ratio of about 92.5:7.5 to about 60:40 respectiwely.

41. The systerm according to claim 40, wherein the bentonite and pol y- DADMAC are in a ratio of about 70:30 to.about 85:15 respectivel vy.

42. A paper coated with a coating comprising the pigmented aqueou s system according to claim 1.

43. Aprocess for forming an aqueous system comprising: (1) mixing an anionic particle and a cationic polymer; wherein an additive pre-mix is formed, (2) optionally filtering the additive pre-mix; (3) optionally adding a stabilizing agent to the additive pre-mix; (4) optionally adding the additive pre-mix to a coating starch; (5) optIonally adding a biocide to the additive pre-mix; and

(6) adding the additive pre-mix to an aqueous system.

44. The process according to claim 43, further comprising: (7) coating a cellulose matrix; and (8) drying the cellulose matrix.

45. The process according to claim 43, wherein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymers of diallyldialkylaammonium salts; (co)polymers of diallylamine; (co)polymers of diallylalkylzamine; polyethylene imine, (co)polymers of dialkylamine/epichlorohyydrin; (co)polymers of polyamine/epichlorohydrin; (co)polymerss of polyamide/epichlorohydrin; (co)polymers of polyamideamine; (co)poslymers of polyamideamine/epichlorohydrin; (co)po lymers and quaternized (co)polymers of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylammide and methacrylamide; and (co)polymers and quaternized (co)polymers of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate methacrylate esters and mixtures thereof.

46. The process according to claim 45, whe rein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymers of diallyldimethwylammonium salts; (co)polymers of polyamine/epichlorohydrin; polyethylene imine; (co)polymers of dimethylamine/epichlorohydrin; polyamiedeamine/epichlorohydrin polymers and mixtures thereof.

47. The process according to claim 46, whe=rein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymers of diallyldimeth-ylammonium salts, (co)polymers of dimethylamine/epichlorohydrin, and mixctures thereof.

48. The process according to claim 43, whezrein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less thar about 2.5%.

49. The process according to claim 48, wherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in €he pre-mix of less than about 1.5%.

50. The process according to claim 49, wherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 1.0%

51. The process according to claim 43, wherein the anionic particle is a high surface area aniionically charged inorganic mineral, a high surface area anionically charged synthetic inorganic particle and mixtures thereof.

52. The process according to claim 51, wherein the anionic particle comprises swelling clay, si lilca-based particles and mixtures thereof.

53. The process according to claim 52, wherein the silica-based particle comprises colloidal silica, colloidal aluminum-modified silica, aluminum silicate and mixtures thereof.

54. The process according to claim 52, wherein the swelling clay comprises

. bentonite, montmorillonite, montmorillinite, beidelite, nontronite, hectroite, saponite, sepiailite or attapuigite.

55. The process a ccording to claim 54, wherein the anionic particle is bentonite. :

56. The process according to claim 52, wherein the swelling clay has a particle size ranging from about 1 nanometer to about 1 micrometer.

57. The process according to claim 52, where the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 50 m?/g.

58. The process according to claim 57, wherein the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 100 m?/g.

59. The process according to claim 58, wherein the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 200 m?/g.

60. The process according to claim 43, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size below about 50 nanometers.

61. The process according to claim 60, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size below about 20 nanometers. -

62. The process according to <laim 61, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size ranging from about 1 to about 10 nanometers

63. The process according to claim 43, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least 50 m?/g.

64. The process according to claim 63, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least 100 m?/g.

65. The process according tos claim 64, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least about 200 m?/g.

66. The process according to claim 43, wherein the stabilizing agent is nonionic or cationic.

67. The process according to claim 43 wherein the stabilizing agent comprises hydroxymethylhydroxyethhyl cellulose, butylglycidylether modified hydroxyehtyl cellulose, h ydroxypropyl cellulose, methylhydroxyethylcellul ose, methylhydroxypropyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, poly-N-vinylpyrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol , polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, polyacrylamide, starch ethers, starch esters, oxidized starch, guar, pectin, carrageenan, locust b ean gum, xanthan gum, water soluble proteins, hydrophobically associative paint thickeners, cationic starch, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl guar and cationic guar.

68. The process according to claim 67, wherein the stabilizing agent com prises hydroxypropyl guar or hydroxyethyicellulose. :

69. The process according to claim 68, wherein the stabilizing agent is hydwoxypropyl! guar.

70. The process according to claim 43,wherein the stabilizing agent is added in an amount of about 0.1% to about 5%, based on the total weight of the pre-mix.

71. The process according to claim 70,wherein the stabilizing agen tis added’ in an amount of about 0.2% to about 1.0%, based on the total wveight of the pre-mix.

72. The process according to claim 71,wherein the stabilizing agent is added in an amount of about 0.3% to about 0.7%, based on the total “weight of the pre-mix.

73. The process according to claim 43, wherein the aqueous system has a viscosity of at least 1000 cps.

74. The process according to claim 73, wherein the aqueous system has a viscosity of at least 2000 cps.

75. The process according to claim 74, wherein the aqueous system has a viscosity of at Least 3000 cps.

76. The process a ccording to claim 43, wherein the aqueous system has a viscosity rangi ng from about 2000 to about 3500 cps.

77. A cellulose matrix coated according to the process of claim 44.

78. A process for preparing a stable pre-mix comprising: (a) forming a pre-mix comprising an anionic particle and a cationic polymesr, (b) adding a stabilizing agent to the pre-mix, wherein a stable premix is formed; and (c) optionally adding a biocide to the pre-mix.

79. The process according to claim 78, wherein the cationic polymer : comprises (ceo)polymers of diallyldialkylammonium salts; (co)polymer-s of diallylamine; (co)polymers of diallylalkylamine; polyethylene imine, (co)polymerss of dialkylamine/epichlorohydrin; (copolymers of © 20 polyamine/epichlorohydrin; (co)polymers of polyamide/epichlorohydr in; polymers of polyamideamine; (co)polymers of polyamidearine/epichlorohydrin; (co)polymers and quaternized (co)polymerss of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylamide and methacrylamide; aand (co)polymerss, quaternized (co)polymers of dialkylaminoalkyl acrylates and methacrylate esters and mixtures thereof.

80. The processs according to claim 79, wherein the cationic polymer comprises (copolymers of diallyldimethylammonium salts; (co)polyrmers of polyamine/e pichlorohydrin; polyethylene imine; (co)polymers of dimethylami ne/epichlorohydrin; polyamideamine/epichlorohydrin polymers and mixturess thereof.

81. The process according to claim 80, wherein the cationic polymer comprises (co)polymerss of diallyldimethylammonium saits, (co) polymers of dimethylamine/epichlorohydrin, and mixtures thereof.

82. The process according to claim 78, wherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 2.5%.

83. The process according to claim 82, wherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 1.5%.

84. The process according to claim 83, wherein the cationic polymer has a concentration in the pre-mix of less than about 1.0%

85. The process according to claim 78, wherein the anionic particle is a high surface area anionicall y charged inorganic mineral, a high surface area : anionically charged symthetic inorganic particle and mixtures thereof.

86. The process according to claim 85, wherein the anionic particle comprises swelling clay, sililca-based particles and mixtures thereof.

87. The process according to claim 86, wherein the silica-based particle comprises colloidal silica, colloidal aluminum-modified silica, aluminum silicate and mixtures thereof.

88. The process according to claim 86, wherein the swelling clay comprises bentonite, montmorilianite, montmorillinite, beidelite, nontronite, hectroite, saponite, sepialite or attapuigite.

89. The process according to claim 88, wherein the anionic particle is bentonite.

T1

90. The process according to claim 86, wherein the swelling clay hasa particle size ranging from about 1 nanometer to about 1 micrometer.

91. The process according to claim 86, where the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 50 m?/g.

92. The process according to claim 91, wherein the swelling clay has a surface area of at least 100 m?/g.

93. The process according to claim 92, wherein the swelling clay has a . surface area of at least 200 m%/«g.

94. The process according to claim 86, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size below about 50 nanometers.

95. The process according to claims 86, wherein the silica-based particle has a’ particle size below about 20 na nometers.

96. The process according to claim 95, wherein the silica-based particle has a particle size ranging from about 1 to about 10 nanometers

97. The process according to clainm 86, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least 50 m%/g.

98. The process according to clairn 97, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least 100 m=/g.

99. The process according to clairn 98, wherein the silica-based particle has a surface area of at least about 200 m?/g.

100. The process according to claim 78, whereira the stabilizing agent is nonionic or cationic.

101. The process according to claim 78, wherein the stabilizing agent comprises hydroxymethylhydroxyethyi cellLslose, butyiglycidylether modified hydroxyehtyl cellulose, hydroxypreopyl cellulose, methylhydroxyethylcellulose, methylhydroxcypropyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, poly-N-vinylpyrofi done, polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene oxide, polypropylene oxide, p olyacrylamide, starch ethers, starch esters, oxidized starch, guar, pectin , carrageenan, locust bean gum, xanthan gum, water soluble proteins and hydrophobically associative paint thickeners, cationic starch, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl guar and cationic guar.

102. The process according to claim 101, wherein the stabilizing agent comprises hydroxypropyl guar or hydroxyethyl cellulose.

103. The process according to claim 102, wherein the stabilizing agent is hydroxypropy! guar.

20 .

104. The process according to claim 78,wherelin the stabilizing agent is added in an amount of about 0.1% to about 5%, based on the total weight of the pre-mix.

105. The process according to claim 104,wher-ein the stabilizing agent is added in an amount of about 0.2% to about 1.09%, based on the total weight of the pre-mix.

106. The process according to claim 105,wherein the stabilizing agent is added in an amount of about 0.3% to about 0.7%4, based on the total weight of the pre-mix.

407. The process according to claim 78, wherein the stable pre-mix has a viscosity of at least 1000 cps.

408. The process according to claim 107, wherein thae stable pre-mix has a viscosity of at least 2000 cps.

109. The process according to claim 108, wherein tine stable pre-mix has a viscosity of at least 3000 cps.

110. The process according to claim 78, wherein th e stable pre-mix has a viscosity ranging from about 2000 to about 35€0 cps.

111. A stable anionic particle/cationic polymer pre-smix produced according to the process of claim 78.