WO2023222581A1 - Réduction de l'impact environnemental d'un vêtement - Google Patents

Réduction de l'impact environnemental d'un vêtement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2023222581A1
WO2023222581A1 PCT/EP2023/062923 EP2023062923W WO2023222581A1 WO 2023222581 A1 WO2023222581 A1 WO 2023222581A1 EP 2023062923 W EP2023062923 W EP 2023062923W WO 2023222581 A1 WO2023222581 A1 WO 2023222581A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
garment
score
design
durability
recyclability
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2023/062923
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Petter KLUSELL
Sarah HAYES
Original Assignee
H & M Hennes & Mauritz Gbc Ab
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by H & M Hennes & Mauritz Gbc Ab filed Critical H & M Hennes & Mauritz Gbc Ab
Publication of WO2023222581A1 publication Critical patent/WO2023222581A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0637—Strategic management or analysis, e.g. setting a goal or target of an organisation; Planning actions based on goals; Analysis or evaluation of effectiveness of goals

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates generally to a system and a method for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment.
  • the textile industry Since the textile industry has a relatively large environmental impact, it is desirable to try to reduce the environmental impact of the garments that are produced.
  • the total environmental impact of a garment depends on many different factors. A garment that is very durable would normally have a lower total environmental impact per day of use than a garment that is less durable. Similarly, a garment that the owner uses often could be considered to have a lower environmental impact per day of use than a garment that is rarely used. Generally, about 60% of the total environmental impact of a garment is determined during the design process. The relationship between the different factors determining the total environmental impact of a garment is however quite complex.
  • the above described problem is addressed by the claimed system for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during a garment design process.
  • the system preferably comprises a manufacturing scoring module, a durability scoring module, a recyclability scoring module, a user interface, and at least one processor.
  • the at least one processor is preferably configured to: calculate a manufacturing footprint score, reflecting the relative environmental footprint of the manufacturing of a garment, based on coefficients stored in the manufacturing scoring module; store the manufacturing footprint score in the manufacturing scoring module; calculate a durability score, reflecting the relative durability of the garment, i based on coefficients stored in the durability scoring module; store the durability score in the durability scoring module; calculate a recyclability score, reflecting the relative recyclability of the garment, based on coefficients stored in the recyclability scoring module; store the recyclability score in the recyclability scoring module; calculate a garment circular score for the garment based on at least the manufacturing footprint score, retrieved from the manufacturing scoring module, the durability score, retrieved from the durability scoring module, and the recyclability score, retrieved from the recyclability scoring module; and enable the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process by displaying the garment circular score for the designed garment via the user interface to a user of the system, so that design parameters for the garment may be selected in such
  • the above described problem is further addressed by the claimed method for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during a garment design process.
  • the method preferably comprises: calculating a manufacturing footprint score, reflecting the relative environmental footprint of the manufacturing of the garment; calculating a durability score, reflecting the relative durability of the garment; calculating a recyclability score, reflecting the relative recyclability of the garment; calculating a garment circular score for the garment based on at least the manufacturing footprint score, the durability score, and the recyclability score; and enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process by displaying the garment circular score for the designed garment to a garment designer, so that design parameters for the garment may be selected in such a way that the calculated garment circular score is optimized.
  • the garment circular score should preferably be calculated in such a way that an optimization means maximizing it, but it is of course also possible to calculate the garment circular score in such a way that an optimization means minimizing it.
  • a product purpose categorization is determined for the garment, and weightings are assigned to the manufacturing footprint score, the durability score, and the recyclability score, based on the determined product purpose categorization. These weightings are then used when calculating the garment circular score for the garment. This enables the adaptation of the garment circular score to the garment type and use category, and thus the optimization of the allocated resources based on the predicted use of the garment.
  • a garment design score is calculated for the garment, and the calculating of the garment circular score for the garment is based also on the calculated garment design score.
  • the garment design score may e.g. be based on a design score for each of a number of different design strategies, calculated by evaluating the design of the garment in relation to various design strategy success criteria.
  • the calculating of the garment design score for the garment may then e.g. be effected by weighing together the design scores for the different design strategies. This enables the garment circular score to take into account also the design strategies used for the garment.
  • the design strategies may e.g. include some or all of the following: increased durability of the garment as a whole; increased repairability of the garment as a whole; increased use of the garment; increased recyclability of the garment as a whole; and minimization of waste during production of the garment.
  • a product purpose categorization is determined for the garment, and weightings are assigned to the design scores for the different design strategies based on the determined product purpose categorization. These weightings are then preferably used when calculating the garment design score for the garment.
  • the calculated garment circular score is displayed to the garment designer during the design process. If the garment circular score is presented to the garment designer in real time after each decision is registered in the system, this enables the garment designer to try out different options and directly see the effect on the garment circular score of different design choices.
  • the system proposes, to the garment designer during the design process, design options that would optimize the garment circular score, e.g. by increasing it.
  • the system may e.g. propose other materials or other components that would be equivalent for the garment as such but still increase the garment circular score. This increases the chances that the garment designer will be able to optimize/maximize the garment circular score, and thereby minimize the total environmental impact of the garment.
  • manufacturing footprint score should be interpreted broadly, as covering any score that in some way would reflect the relative environmental footprint of the manufacturing of a garment.
  • durability score should be interpreted broadly, as covering any score that in some way would reflect the relative durability of a garment.
  • recyclability score should be interpreted broadly, as covering any score that in some way would reflect the relative recyclability of a garment.
  • the various modules of the system may be physically separate modules between which information is sent, but they may also be virtual modules implemented on the same server, or simply software modules.
  • the claimed system for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process may be integrated into the regular garment design system, or it may be a separate system. If the system is separate from the regular garment design system, information from the regular garment design system may be automatically transferred to the claimed system.
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a system for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process, in accordance with one or more embodiments described herein.
  • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates an embodiment of an example flow that may be used in a system for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process, in accordance with one or more embodiments described herein.
  • Fig. 3 schematically illustrates the flow in the system for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process, in accordance with one or more embodiments described herein.
  • Fig. 4 schematically illustrates a method for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process, in accordance with one or more embodiments described herein.
  • the claimed system and method enables the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process.
  • the present disclosure relates generally to a system and method for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process. Embodiments of the disclosed solution are presented in more detail in connection with the figures.
  • One way of enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process is to calculate a garment circular score, which indicates the "circular potential” of the garment.
  • the garment circular score should preferably be calculated in such a way that an optimization means maximizing it, but it is of course also possible to calculate the garment circular score in such a way that an optimization means minimizing it.
  • the garment circular score may be calculated in many different ways, but is preferably based on at least the following parameters:
  • Fig. 1 schematically illustrates an embodiment of a system for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process.
  • the system 100 which may be termed a "scoring engine”, preferably comprises at least one processor 110, and a number of different modules where different coefficients are stored.
  • the system 100 schematically illustrated in Fig.
  • a product purpose category module 120 where various coefficients enabling a product purpose categorization for a garment may be stored, a manufacturing scoring module 130, where various coefficients enabling the calculation of an environmental footprint score for the manufacturing of a garment may be stored, a garment durability scoring module 140, where various coefficients enabling the calculation of a durability score for a garment may be stored, a garment recyclability scoring module 150, where various coefficients enabling the calculation of a recyclability score for a garment may be stored, and a garment design scoring module 160, where various coefficients enabling the calculation of a garment design score may be stored.
  • the system 100 does not necessarily comprise all these modules however, and may also comprise one or more other modules, where other coefficients may be stored.
  • One or more users 180 may interact with the system, preferably through a user interface 170.
  • the users 180 may input different coefficients into the system 100. If a user 180 inputs a coefficient related to a product purpose categorization for a garment, this is preferably stored in the product purpose category module 120. If a user 180 inputs a coefficient related to a relative environmental footprint of the manufacturing of a component of a garment, this is preferably stored in the manufacturing scoring module 130. If a user 180 inputs a coefficient related to a relative durability of a component of a garment, this is preferably stored in the garment durability scoring module 140.
  • a user 180 inputs a coefficient related to a relative recyclability of a component of a garment, this is preferably stored in the garment recyclability scoring module 150. If a user 180 inputs a coefficient related to design strategies for a garment, this is preferably stored in the garment design scoring module 160.
  • the one or more users 180 may be garment designers, but they may also be people responsible for various parts of the garment manufacturing process, or for other aspects of the garment, such as e.g. sales and/or marketing. Coefficients may also be automatically entered into the system 100 from other systems, such as e.g. from a sourcing system.
  • the product purpose categorization for a garment may e.g. depend on the predicted total number of uses of the garment, using the categories "light use”, “mid/standard use”, and “extensive use”.
  • the predicted total number of uses of a garment may e.g. be determined based on the garment type and the use category for the garment.
  • Each garment type may have different use categories, since the total number of uses for e.g. a pair of trousers may be quite different depending on e.g. whether the trousers are intended for fancy dress occasions or for casual use.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably arranged to determine the product purpose categorization based on the coefficients stored in the product purpose category module 120, and store the determined product purpose categorization in the product purpose category module 120.
  • the environmental footprint of the manufacturing of a garment depends on e.g. the materials used, the proportion of different components to the whole of the garment, and the processing of the materials.
  • Data relating to the relative environmental footprint of different materials and processes is preferably stored as coefficients in the manufacturing scoring module 130, in order to enable a calculation of an environmental footprint score for the manufacturing of a garment. These coefficients are normally relatively constant for each material and process, but may change over time as new methods of manufacturing the materials or new process methods or chemicals are developed.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably arranged to calculate the environmental footprint score based on the coefficients stored in the manufacturing scoring module 130, and store the calculated environmental footprint score in the manufacturing scoring module 130.
  • the durability of a garment depends on the materials used, but may also depend on other factors, such as e.g. the type of stitching used for making the garment.
  • Data relating to the relative durability of different materials and methods is preferably stored as coefficients in the garment durability scoring module 140, in order to enable a calculation of a durability score for a garment. These coefficients are normally relatively constant for each material and method, but may change over time as materials and methods are developed. Each time a new fabric is used, coefficients regarding the typical durability of the fabric need to be entered into the garment durability scoring module 140. It may be useful for such coefficients to be automatically entered into the system 100 from e.g. a sourcing system, or directly from the various suppliers.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably arranged to calculate the durability score based on the coefficients stored in the garment durability scoring module 140, and store the calculated durability score in the garment durability scoring module 140.
  • the recyclability of a garment typically depends on both the materials used and the processing of these materials. Some materials are very recyclable, while others are not recyclable at all. Some types of processing are neutral for or may even increase the recyclability, while other types of processing decrease it.
  • Data relating to the relative recyclability of different materials and processes is preferably stored as coefficients in the garment recyclability scoring module 150, in order to enable a calculation of a recyclability score for a garment. These coefficients are normally relatively constant for each material and process, but may change over time as e.g. new methods of manufacturing the materials, new recycling processes, or new process methods or chemicals are developed.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably arranged to calculate the recyclability score based on the coefficients stored in the garment recyclability scoring module 150, and store the calculated recyclability score in the garment recyclability scoring module 150.
  • the design score for a garment depends on the selected design strategies. Data relating to the impact of different design strategies on different aspects of the total environmental impact of a garment is preferably stored as coefficients in the garment design scoring module 160, in order to enable a calculation of a garment design score. For each of a number of different design strategies, a design score may be calculated by evaluating the design of the garment using the coefficients stored in the garment design scoring module 160. Different design strategy success criteria may be visualized to the garment designer 180 in the user interface 170 in connection with the corresponding process step, and they may also be ranked by their relative importance in line with the product purpose. A garment design score for the garment may then be calculated by e.g. weighting together the design scores for the different design strategies.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably arranged to retrieve this product purpose categorization from the product purpose category module 120.
  • the garment design scoring module 160 different weightings for different design scores may be stored. For a garment intended for extensive use, the design score for increased durability of the garment may e.g. be assigned a weighting of 20%, while for a garment intended for light use, the design score for increased durability of the garment may be assigned a weighting of e.g. only 7%.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably arranged to calculate the garment design score using the weightings stored in the design scoring module 160, and store the calculated garment design score in the design scoring module 160.
  • the at least one processor 110 is preferably configured to calculate a garment circular score for a garment based on at least the environmental footprint score for the manufacturing of the garment, the durability score for the garment, and the recyclability score for the garment. These parameters are preferably retrieved by the at least one processor 110 from the modules 130-150, where they have been calculated.
  • the garment circular score can be used to enable the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process. If the garment circular score is presented to the garment designer 180 in the user interface 170 in real time after each decision is registered in the system 100, this enables the garment designer 180 to try out different options and directly see the effect on the garment circular score of different design choices.
  • the at least one processor 110 is configured to make a product purpose categorization for the garment, and based on the product purpose categorization for the garment assign different weightings when weighing together the environmental footprint score for the manufacturing of the garment, the durability score for the garment, and the recyclability score for the garment, in the calculation of the garment circular score.
  • the at least one processor 110 is configured to calculate the garment circular score based also on the calculated design circular score.
  • the calculations above may be used to determine what could be termed a circular component score, and the at least one processor 110 is configured to calculate the garment circular score also based on the design circular score, by e.g. adding the design circular score to the circular component score.
  • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates an embodiment of an example flow 200 that may be used in a system 100 for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process.
  • Fig. 3 schematically illustrates the flow 200 in the system 100 for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process.
  • a first step 210 the predicted total number of uses of the garment is determined, based on the garment type and the use category for the garment.
  • Each garment type may have different use categories, since the total number of uses of e.g. a pair of trousers may be quite different depending on e.g. whether the trousers are intended for fancy dress occasions or for casual use.
  • the garment designer 180 therefore in the first step 210 needs to select both the garment type and the use category for the garment.
  • the predicted total number of uses of the garment is determined based on the predicted/statistical average lifespan of each garment type, and the predicted/statistical frequency of use per year for each use category.
  • the product purpose category is determined, based on the predicted total number of uses of the garment.
  • the product purpose categories may e.g. be "light use”, "mid/standard use”, and "extensive use”.
  • the durability of a garment is e.g. much more important for garments that are typically used extensively, and therefore a less environmentally friendly production process may still lead to a lower total environmental impact for such a garment, if the durability of the garment is increased.
  • the most important aspect may instead be e.g. the recyclability of the garment. Such factors are often discussed using the term displacement.
  • a third step 230 the garment designer 180 selects components for the garment.
  • the garment circular component score is calculated for the garment based on the selected components.
  • the garment circular component score is calculated by weighting together the environmental footprint score for the manufacturing of the garment, the durability score for the garment, and the recyclability score for the garment, which are retrieved by the at least one processor 110 from the modules 130-150 where they have been determined.
  • the different weightings to be used, as determined in step 220, are retrieved from the product purpose category module 120.
  • the recyclability score may e.g. be assigned a weighting of 35% of the total score, while for a garment intended for extensive use, the recyclability score may be assigned a weighting of e.g. only 15%.
  • the garment circular component score is preferably calculated using these weightings.
  • the components of the garment may encompass both the materials used for the components and the processes used for the manufacturing.
  • a fifth step 250 the garment designer 180 selects different design options.
  • a sixth step 260 the selected design options are evaluated in relation to a number of different design strategies, such as e.g.:
  • a design score is calculated by evaluating the design options selected for the garment in relation to various proposed design strategy success criteria. Different design strategy success criteria may be visualized to the garment designer 180 in the user interface 170 in connection with the corresponding process step, and they may also be ranked by their relative importance in line with the product purpose.
  • a garment design score for the garment may then be calculated by e.g. adding together the design scores for the different design strategies, and retrieved by the at least one processor 110 from the module 160 where it has been calculated.
  • Design strategy success criteria for increased durability of the garment as a whole may e.g. involve selecting heavier thread for the stitches, and/or shorter stitch length.
  • the emotional attachment of the wearer to the garment, the "emotional durability” of the garment is also important. This may be increased by e.g. allowing the customer/wearer to influence the design of the particular garment, e.g. to choose certain design elements of the garment before it is produced.
  • the design score for durability preferably evaluates a number of different factors such as these.
  • Design strategy success criteria for increased repairability of the garment as a whole may e.g. involve providing spare components and/or repair information to the customer/wearer.
  • the design score for repairability preferably evaluates a number of different factors such as these.
  • Design strategy success criteria for increased use of the garment as a whole may e.g. involve increasing the versatility of the garment, e.g. by making it reversible, or convertible by detachable parts. Allowing the garment to be accessed through a leasing, rental or sharing service may also increase its use.
  • the design score for increased use preferably evaluates a number of different factors such as these.
  • Design strategy success criteria for increased recyclability of the garment as a whole may e.g. involve ensuring that all components of the garment belong to the same fiber type, and/or making the garment easy to disassemble.
  • the design score for recyclability preferably evaluates a number of different factors such as these.
  • Design strategy success criteria for minimization of waste during production of the garment may e.g. involve optimizing the pattern efficiency of the garment, and/or making the garment on demand.
  • the design score for minimization of waste preferably evaluates a number of different factors such as these.
  • the design circular score is determined by weighting together these different design scores.
  • the different design scores may be assigned different weightings.
  • the design score for increased durability of the garment may e.g. be assigned a weighting of 20%
  • the design score for increased durability of the garment may be assigned a weighting of e.g. only 7%. Based on the selected design options, a design circular score may be calculated using these weightings.
  • the garment circular score is calculated by e.g. adding the design circular score to the circular component score.
  • the garment circular score is then presented to the garment designer 180. If the garment circular score is presented to the garment designer 180 in real time after each decision is registered in the system 100, this enables the garment designer 180 to try out different options and directly see the effect on the garment circular score of different design choices.
  • Figure 4 schematically illustrates a method 400 for enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process.
  • the method 400 may comprise:
  • Step 420 calculating a manufacturing footprint score, reflecting the relative environmental footprint of the manufacturing of a garment.
  • Step 430 calculating a durability score, reflecting the relative durability of the garment.
  • Step 440 calculating a recyclability score, reflecting the relative recyclability of the garment.
  • Step 470 calculating a garment circular score for the garment based on at least the manufacturing footprint score, the durability score, and the recyclability score.
  • Step 480 enabling the reduction of the total environmental impact of a garment during the garment design process by displaying the garment circular score for the designed garment to a garment designer 180, so that design parameters for the garment may be selected in such a way that the calculated garment circular score is optimized.
  • Steps 420-440 may e.g. be conducted simultaneously, or in any order, as long as they are conducted before step 470.
  • the method 400 may further comprise at least one of:
  • Step 410 determining a product purpose categorization for the garment.
  • Step 415 assigning weightings to the manufacturing footprint score, the durability score, and the recyclability score, based on the determined product purpose categorization.
  • Step 450 calculating a design score for each of a number of different design strategies by evaluating the design of the garment in relation to various design strategy success criteria.
  • Step 455 assigning weightings to the design scores for the different design strategies based on the determined product purpose categorization.
  • Step 460 calculating a garment design score for the garment, preferably by weighing together the design scores obtained in step 450 for the different design strategies.
  • the calculating 470 of the garment circular score for the garment is then preferably based also on the calculated garment design score. This enables the garment circular score to take into account also the design strategies used for the garment.
  • Step 465 using the weightings assigned to the design scores for the different design strategies in step 455 when calculating 460 the garment design score for the garment.
  • Step 475 using the weightings assigned to the manufacturing footprint score, the durability score, and the recyclability score in step 415 when calculating 470 the garment circular score for the garment. This enables the adaptation of the garment circular score to the garment type and use category, and thus the optimization of the allocated resources based on the predicted use of the garment.
  • Step 485 displaying the calculated garment circular score to the garment designer 180 during the design process. If the garment circular score is presented to the garment designer 180 in real time after each decision is registered in the system 100, this enables the garment designer 180 to try out different options and directly see the effect on the garment circular score of different design choices.
  • Step 490 proposing design options that would increase the garment circular score to the garment designer 180 during the design process. Other materials or other components that would be equivalent for the garment as such but still increase the garment circular score may e.g. be proposed. This increases the chances that the garment designer will be able to optimize/maximize the garment circular score, and thereby minimize the total environmental impact of the garment.
  • These optional steps may be conducted in any order that makes technical sense. Step 410 needs to be conducted before steps 415 and 455, and steps 450 and 455 need to be conducted before step 465. Step 470 needs to be conducted before steps 485 and 490. However, steps 450-465 (if used) may be conducted simultaneously with steps 420-440, or in any order, as long as they are conducted before step 470.
  • the design strategies may e.g. include some or all of the following: increased durability of the garment as a whole; increased repairability of the garment as a whole; increased use of the garment; increased recyclability of the garment as a whole; and minimization of waste during production of the garment.

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Professional, Industrial, Or Sporting Protective Garments (AREA)

Abstract

Conformément à un ou plusieurs modes de réalisation de la présente invention, l'invention concerne un système (100) pour permettre la réduction de l'impact environnemental total d'un vêtement pendant un processus de conception de vêtement. Le système (100) comprend au moins un processeur (110) configuré pour : calculer un score d'empreinte de fabrication reflétant l'empreinte environnementale relative de la fabrication du vêtement ; calculer un score de durabilité reflétant la durabilité relative du vêtement ; calculer un score de recyclabilité reflétant la recyclabilité relative du vêtement ; et calculer un score circulaire de vêtement pour le vêtement sur la base au moins du score d'empreinte de fabrication, du score de durabilité et du score de recyclabilité. Le ou les processeurs (110) sont en outre configurés pour permettre la réduction de l'impact environnemental total d'un vêtement pendant le processus de conception de vêtement par affichage du score circulaire de vêtement sur un concepteur de vêtement (180), de telle sorte que des paramètres de conception pour le vêtement peuvent être sélectionnés de telle sorte que le score circulaire de vêtement calculé est optimisé. L'invention concerne en outre un procédé (400) pour permettre la réduction de l'impact environnemental total d'un vêtement pendant un processus de conception de vêtement.
PCT/EP2023/062923 2022-05-19 2023-05-15 Réduction de l'impact environnemental d'un vêtement WO2023222581A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE2250600-0 2022-05-19
SE2250600 2022-05-19

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2023222581A1 true WO2023222581A1 (fr) 2023-11-23

Family

ID=86605155

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2023/062923 WO2023222581A1 (fr) 2022-05-19 2023-05-15 Réduction de l'impact environnemental d'un vêtement

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2023222581A1 (fr)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080319812A1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2008-12-25 Sustainable Minds, Llc Sustainable design decision support system
US20120150552A1 (en) * 2010-12-14 2012-06-14 Elwha LLC, a limited liability corporation of the State of Delaware Monitoring efficiency and ecological impact associated with a use of a product
WO2020051187A1 (fr) * 2018-09-05 2020-03-12 Gerber Technology Llc Procédé et appareil pour la production de vêtements

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080319812A1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2008-12-25 Sustainable Minds, Llc Sustainable design decision support system
US20120150552A1 (en) * 2010-12-14 2012-06-14 Elwha LLC, a limited liability corporation of the State of Delaware Monitoring efficiency and ecological impact associated with a use of a product
WO2020051187A1 (fr) * 2018-09-05 2020-03-12 Gerber Technology Llc Procédé et appareil pour la production de vêtements

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN110955206B (zh) 一种订单排程与分配调度方法及系统
Islam et al. Supply chain management on apparel order process: A case study in Bangladesh garment industry
Kimura Knowledge diffusion and modernization of rural industrial clusters: a paper-manufacturing village in northern Vietnam
Boffelli et al. “How to reshore”: Some evidence from the apparel industry
Hughes ABC/ABM–activity‐based costing and activity‐based management: A profitability model for SMEs manufacturing clothing and textiles in the UK
Pitimaneeyakul et al. Knitwear product development process: A case study
Békés et al. The ladder of internationalization modes: evidence from European firms
Kaplinsky From mass production to flexible specialization: A case study of microeconomic change in a semi-industrialized economy
US11415961B1 (en) Automated correlation of modeled product and preferred manufacturers
WO2023222581A1 (fr) Réduction de l'impact environnemental d'un vêtement
Ing et al. Automation in Indonesia: Productivity, quality, and employment
Dhesinghraja et al. An Overview of Supply Chain Management on Apparel Order Process in Garment Industries, Bangalore
Kouvelis et al. On the globalization of operations and supply chain strategies: a conceptual framework and its application
TW200905590A (en) System and method for providing an intelligent configuration rationalization solution
Whitfield et al. The Business Strategies of South African Textile Firms and Global Trends in 4IR and Sustainability Technologies
Samad et al. Reduction of Manufacturing Lead Time by Value Stream Mapping of a Selected RMG Factory in Bangladesh
CN1334513A (zh) 信息共享系统
Hjelmgren et al. Upcycling of pre-consumer waste: opportunities and barriers in the furniture and clothing industries
Becker et al. Pricing of Value Bundles-A Multi-Perspective Decision Support Approach
Arndt Trade integration and production networks in Asia: The role of China
Anuar et al. The understanding of lean practices and well-being harmonization in Malaysian SMEs
Al-Ghabban et al. Contemporary Cost Management Techniques: The appropriate alternative to the traditional cost accounting systems applied in the Iraqi industrial units-an applied case.
Elbert et al. Value chain analysis for polo shirts
Onken Strategic global mass customization: supporting generic and global strategies
Whitfield et al. Local Firms in Madagascar's Apparel Export Sector: Technological Capabilities and Participation in Global Value Chains

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 23726973

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1