WO2023198801A1

WO2023198801A1 - Optical fibre sensor for analysing the activity of a radioactive fluid

Info

Publication number: WO2023198801A1
Application number: PCT/EP2023/059596
Authority: WO
Inventors: Nouhaila TABTI; Nicolas DUFOUR; Adrien Sari
Original assignee: Commissariat A L'energie Atomique Et Aux Energies Alternatives
Priority date: 2022-04-16
Filing date: 2023-04-12
Publication date: 2023-10-19
Also published as: FR3134635A1

Abstract

The invention relates to a device (1) for analysing the activity of a fluid (3) capable of comprising a radionuclide emitting β− charged particles, the device comprising a wall (20) delimiting a chamber (2) intended to be occupied by the fluid, the wall extending along a thickness (e), and a sensing optical fibre (10) comprising a core (11) surrounded by a sheath (12), the core being formed of a scintillator material, the scintillator material emitting photons when it is irradiated by charged particles. The scintillator material is coupled to a photodetector. The sensing optical fibre extends outside the chamber, inside the thickness of the wall, such that under the effect of exposure to the charged particles emitted by the radionuclide, the photodetector generates a sensing signal (S, N) depending on the quantity of scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator material of the sensing optical fibre under the effect of exposure to the charged particles.

Description

Title: Fiber sensor for analyzing the activity of a radioactive fluid

TECHNICAL AREA

The technical field of the invention is the detection of the activity of a fluid capable of comprising a radioactive radionuclide, emitter P". The fluid can be a gas or a liquid.

PRIOR ART

In the nuclear or medical industry, it is common to analyze the activity of radioactive fluids. Such analyzes are for example carried out for the purposes of process control, or discharge control, or the control of an air or water distribution network.

Fluid analyzes are often performed on collected samples, and this has several disadvantages. A first difficulty is the time required to take samples and analyze them in the laboratory. This results in a significant time lag between taking the sample and its analysis. This is a so-called “offline” measurement technique, incapable of delivering a result in real time. A second difficulty is the contamination of the equipment used for sampling and analysis. This concerns in particular the equipment used for packaging and handling the sample. A third difficulty is linked to the representativeness of the samples taken. The question of representativeness arises particularly when the fluid to be analyzed is not homogeneous. It is then necessary to increase the number of samples taken, which increases complexity and cost.

Solutions have been developed which make it possible to carry out an online measurement of the activity of a fluid. Patent EP3542185 describes a device comprising a measuring chamber, intended to be filled with a fluid. The measuring chamber contains scintillating optical fibers. The latter are intended to generate scintillation light under the effect of irradiation with ionizing radiation. A disadvantage of this device is that the scintillation fibers are placed directly in contact with the fluid to be analyzed. Thus, when the fluid is contaminated, the measuring chamber, and the optical fibers placed inside the chamber, are potentially contaminated. It is therefore necessary to clean the optical fibers and/or direct them towards a nuclear waste channel. In addition, optical fibers can degrade on contact with fluid. The inventors propose a device, intended for the analysis of the activity of a fluid, which is not intrusive, that is to say whose elements sensitive to irradiation are not directly in contact with the fluid to be analyze. This avoids the need for decontamination operations. The device makes it possible to perform an online analysis of the activity of a fluid. In addition, the design of the device makes it compatible with implementation on different geometries.

STATEMENT OF THE INVENTION

A first object of the invention is a device for analyzing the activity of a fluid capable of comprising a radionuclide emitting charged particles of type /3~, the device comprising:

- a wall, delimiting a chamber, intended to be occupied by the fluid, the wall extending along a thickness;

- an optical detection fiber, comprising a core surrounded by a sheath, the core being formed of a scintillator material, the scintillator material emitting photons when exposed to charged particles;

- at least one photodetector, optically coupled to the optical detection fiber, so as to detect scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator material under the effect of exposure to charged particles;

- at least one processing circuit, configured to perform processing of the detection signal resulting from the or each photodetector;

- a calculation unit, connected to the processing circuit, the calculation unit being programmed to calculate an analysis result as a function of the detection signal generated by the or each photodetector; the device being characterized in that:

- the optical detection fiber is placed outside the chamber;

- all or part of the optical detection fiber extends in the thickness of the wall or against the wall; so that under the effect of exposure to charged particles emitted by the radionuclide, the photodetector generates a detection signal depending on a quantity of scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator material of the or each optical detection fiber under the effect of exposure to charged particles.

According to one embodiment, the detection wall extends around the chamber; all or part of the optical detection fiber extends around the chamber. According to one possibility, the optical detection fiber can form a spiral around the chamber. According to one possibility, the device comprises different optical detection fibers optically coupled to the photodetector, each optical detection fiber forming at least one turn around the chamber. According to one possibility:

- the wall extends around a longitudinal axis;

- the or each optical detection fiber extends parallel to the longitudinal axis.

According to one embodiment,

- the processing circuit is configured to determine a counting rate from the detection signal, the counting rate corresponding to a number of pulses detected by the photodetector per unit of time;

- the calculation unit is programmed to compare the counting rate to a predetermined threshold.

- and/or the calculation unit can be configured to quantify an activity of the radionuclide from the counting rate.

According to one possibility,

- the processing circuit is a spectrometry circuit, configured to establish a spectrum representative of the energy deposited in the scintillator material by the charged particles;

- the calculation unit is programmed to identify the radionuclide from the spectrum.

The calculation unit can be programmed to calculate an activity of each radionuclide identified from the spectrum.

According to one embodiment, the wall delimits all or part of a pipe or a tank or a barrel. The wall can form an external wall and/or an internal wall of a tubular conduit, the chamber extending between the internal wall and the external wall, the internal and external walls extending around a central axis, respectively according to an internal radius and an external radius, the internal radius being less than the external radius.

According to one possibility:

- the detection fiber, or each detection fiber, is placed against or in the external wall of the tubular pipe; the device comprises an auxiliary scintillator, arranged in contact with the internal wall, the auxiliary scintillator being connected to an auxiliary photodetector. A second object of the invention is a method for analyzing a fluid using a device according to the first object of the invention, the fluid extending in a chamber delimited by the wall of said device, the process comprising:

- a) acquisition of detection signals by the or each photodetector during an acquisition period;

- b) using the calculation unit, obtaining an analysis result.

According to one embodiment, step b) comprises:

- determination of a quantity of charged particles detected per unit of time;

- comparison of the quantity of charged particles detected per unit of time with a threshold value;

- depending on the comparison, generation of an alert signal.

According to one possibility:

- the processing circuit is a spectrometry circuit, configured to establish a spectrum representative of the energy deposited in the scintillator material by the charged particles detected;

- step b) comprises, from the detected spectrum, an identification of the radioelement present in the fluid.

The invention will be better understood on reading the presentation of the exemplary embodiments presented, in the remainder of the description, in connection with the figures listed below.

FIGURES

Figure IA schematizes a first embodiment, in which the device comprises an optical detection fiber, placed against a wall delimiting a chamber containing the fluid, the fiber being placed outside the chamber.

Figure IB shows a configuration according to which the detection fiber is arranged in contact with the wall, and extends parallel to a central axis around which the chamber extends. Figure IC shows a configuration according to which the detection fiber is arranged around the wall, in contact with the latter.

Figure 1D shows a configuration in which several detection fibers are arranged, each detection fiber forming a turn around the wall.

Figure 2A schematically shows a second embodiment, in which the device comprises an optical detection fiber, arranged in the thickness of a wall delimiting a chamber containing the fluid. Figure 2B shows a configuration according to which the detection fiber is arranged in the wall and extends parallel to a central axis around which the chamber extends.

Figure 2C shows a configuration according to which detection fibers, forming turns parallel to each other, are embedded in the wall, around the chamber.

Figure 3A is a transparent view of the configuration shown in Figure 2B.

Figure 3B is a transparent view of the configuration shown in Figure 2C: detection fibers, forming turns parallel to each other, are embedded in the wall. Figure 3C is a transparent view of a configuration according to which the detection fiber forms a spiral, embedded in the wall, around the chamber.

Figure 4 shows, for different materials, the stopping power (y-axis) as a function of the energy of a particle P" (x-axis).

Figure 5A is a sectional view, in a radial plane, of a modeling of a measurement geometry according to which a detection fiber is placed forming a spiral around a wall delimiting a cylindrical chamber containing the fluid to be analyzed.

Figure 5B is a sectional view, in a longitudinal plane, of the modeling described in connection with Figure 5A.

Figure 6 shows a detection spectrum, representing the number of particles P- (ordinate axis) interacting in a scintillator material forming the heart of a detection fiber, as a function of the energy deposited, by each particle, in said scintillator material (x-axis).

Figure 7A describes an example of implementation of a device according to the invention.

Figure 7B is a detail of Figure 7A, which shows the main components of the device.

Figure 7C is a detail of Figure 7B.

Figure 8A is a sectional view, in a radial plane, of a modeling of a measurement geometry corresponding to the device described in connection with Figures 7A to 7C.

Figure 8B is a sectional view, in a longitudinal plane, of the modeling described in connection with Figure 8A.

Figure 9A shows a detection spectrum, as defined in connection with Figure 6, resulting from a detection fiber used in the device described in connection with Figures 7A to 7C.

Figure 9B shows a detection spectrum resulting from a solid auxiliary scintillator, of cylindrical shape, shown in Figure 7C.

Figure 10 schematizes different process steps implementing a device according to the invention. PRESENTATION OF SPECIAL MODES OF REALIZATION

Figure IA represents a first embodiment of a device 1 for characterizing the activity of a fluid 3. The device 1 comprises a wall 20, delimiting a chamber 2 inside which a fluid 3 extends to analyze. The fluid 3 can be a liquid or a gas. In this example, the wall 20 is cylindrical in shape, and extends around a central axis A. The central axis is parallel to a longitudinal axis Z. The measured fluid 3 can flow through the chamber 2, parallel to the central axis A.

Fluid 3 is likely to contain a radionuclide, emitter P" and possibly emitter y.

Device 1 comprises at least one detection fiber 10. Detection fiber 10 is a scintillating fiber. As described in EP3542185, a scintillator fiber is an optical fiber comprising a core 11 formed of a scintillator material surrounded by a sheath 12. The scintillator material can for example be an organic polymer doped with fluorophores. The scintillator material, forming the core 11, emits scintillation photons when it is irradiated by ionizing radiation. The sheath 12 has a refractive index lower than the refractive index of the scintillation material forming the core. The sheath can be formed from a PMMA (polymethyl methacrylate) type polymer. Fiber 10 forms a waveguide, in which the scintillation photons propagate to one end 13.

The end of the detection fiber 10 is optically coupled to a photodetector 14. It can be placed in contact with the photodetector 14, or be optically coupled by means of an optical system or by a conventional optical fiber, ensuring an optical link between the scintillation optical fiber and the photodetector.

Generally, a scintillation material is sensitive to any type of ionizing radiation, in particular charged particles a or P", or ionizing photons, X or gamma. In order to minimize sensitivity to ionizing photons, the diameter of the core is preferably less than 500 pm or 300 pm. A small diameter core reduces the probability of interaction of an ionizing photon propagating through the fiber.

The thickness and the material forming the wall 20 are chosen so that the attenuation with respect to the particles P" is not too high. Thus, as shown in Figure IA, a part of the particles P" propagates through the wall 20, so as to irradiate the core 11 of the detection fiber 10. Taking into account the presence of the wall 20, and the sheath 12 surrounding the core 11, it is considered that possible particles a emitted by a radioelement present in the fluid 3 are absorbed before reaching the fiber. Thus, the detection fiber 10 is essentially sensitive to P- particles, and, to a lesser extent, to photons emitted by the fluid 3 occupying the chamber 2 or emitted into the environment of the device. The thickness of the sheath 12 must be as thin as possible, so as to limit the attenuation of the P- particles. It can for example be less than 10 pm.

Advantageously, the scintillating fiber 10 is flexible. This is an interesting feature of the invention, as described below.

In Figure IA, only one detection fiber 10 is shown, arranged along the wall 20, outside the chamber 2. Several detection fibers 10 can be used, as described in connection with the figure IB.

The photodetector 14, to which the or each detection fiber is optically coupled, can be a photodetector of the photodiode or photomultiplier type. When an ionizing particle p interacts in the scintillation material, forming the core of the fiber, several scintillation photons are produced, part of which reaches the end 13 of the fiber coupled to the photodetector 14. The number of scintillation photons produced is generally proportional to the energy deposited by the particle P" during the interaction. The number of scintillation photons created in the core is typically a few thousand per MeV deposited in the core. The scintillation photons are detected by the photodetector 14 and are converted into an electrical pulse whose amplitude depends on the number of scintillation photons generated. Thus, the amplitude of each electrical pulse resulting from the photodetector depends on the energy deposited, in the scintillation material, during a interaction with a particle P". The photodetector 14 generates a detection signal formed of pulses, each pulse corresponding to an interaction of a particle P".

The photodetector 14 is connected to a processing circuit 15, the latter being configured to process the pulses resulting from the photodetector. The processing circuit 15 is connected to a calculation unit 16. The calculation unit 16 is intended to establish a measurement result as a function of the detection signal resulting from the photodetector.

According to a first application, the processing circuit 15 generates, from each detection signal transmitted by the photodetector, a counting rate N, corresponding to a number of pulses detected per unit of time. The calculation unit 16 can then be configured to compare the counting rate to a threshold and emit an alert signal if the threshold is exceeded. According to a second application, we have an a priori on the radionuclide present in chamber 2. From the counting rate N, a first estimate of the activity A of the radionuclide can be made, using a detection efficiency q . The detection efficiency q makes it possible to establish a link between the counting rate and the activity of the radionuclide. The detection efficiency q can be established experimentally by placing, in the chamber, a calibration fluid whose activity is known. The detection efficiency can also be established on the basis of numerical modeling.

According to a third application, the processing circuit 15 is a spectrometry circuit. The processing circuit 15 generates a detection spectrum, corresponding to an amplitude histogram of the pulses detected during an acquisition period. The calculation unit 16 can be configured to carry out processing of the detection spectrum so as to identify one or more radionuclides present in the fluid 3 occupying the chamber 2 and possibly estimate an activity of each identified radionuclide.

The device 1 may include several detection fibers 10, respectively coupled to the same photodetector 14 or to several photodetectors 14. The calculation unit 16 receives the detection signal resulting from each photodetector 14, and processed by the processing circuit 15. The calculation unit 16 can be formed of an electronic circuit and/or a microprocessor. The calculation unit 16 is programmed to carry out steps described below, in connection with Figure 10.

Figure IB represents a device according to which several detection fibers 10 are distributed around a wall 20 delimiting a cylindrical chamber 2. Each detection fiber 10 is arranged in contact with the wall 20. Preferably, each detection fiber 10 is fixed relative to the wall 20. Each detection fiber can extend over a length of several tens of centimeters or several meters. Each detection fiber extends parallel to the central axis of the chamber 2. At least one end 13 of each detection fiber 10 is connected to a photodetector 14.

Figure IC represents a configuration according to which the detection fiber 10 forms a spiral arranged around the wall 20. Figure 1D represents a configuration according to which several detection fibers 10 are arranged, each detection fiber forming a turn around the wall 20. The configurations shown in Figures IC and 1D take advantage of the fact that the detection fiber, or each detection fiber, is flexible. Preferably, whatever the configuration, each detection fiber 10 is fixed in or on the wall. Preferably, on the configurations shown in Figures IB to 1D, the or each detection fiber is placed in contact with the wall.

The configurations described in connection with Figures IA to 1D are adapted to walls 20 whose thickness is sufficiently thin so that a sufficient quantity of P- particles is transmitted through the wall. The emission energy of a P- particle follows a distribution, usually called emission spectrum, which is specific to each radionuclide. Thus, each radionuclide can be characterized by an average emission energy and a maximum particle emission energy P", the latter being several hundred keV or several MeV. For a detection fiber 10 to be exposed to particles P" whose residual energy, after passing through the wall 20, is sufficiently high, the wall is preferably formed of a plastic material, for example a polymer, or a light metal, for example aluminum or steel, and whose thickness is small, preferably less than 1 mm, or even 100 μm. Thus, the wall 20 forms a skin delimiting the chamber 2 in which the fluid to be analyzed 3 extends.

Figures 2A to 2D represent embodiments in which the or each detection fiber 10 is integrated (or embedded) in the wall 20 delimiting the chamber 2. The advantage of such a configuration is that the or each detection fiber 10 is arranged at a distance £ from the chamber 2 which is less than the thickness e of the wall 20. Compared to the first embodiment, this makes it possible to relax the constraint concerning the thickness of the wall. This also allows the distance between the interior of the chamber 2 and the (or each) detection fiber 10 to be small, for example less than 2 mm, or even 1 mm. The distance £ corresponds to an apparent thickness seen by the particles P" before reaching the detection fiber 10. The lower the apparent thickness £, the lower the average energy of the particles P" likely to interact in the fiber optical detection is high. This results in a better detection efficiency, the detection efficiency corresponding to the number of scintillation photons detected for a particle P" emitted inside the chamber 2.

In Figure 2B, there is shown a configuration according to which several detection fibers 10, parallel to each other, extend parallel to the central axis A of the chamber 2, inside the wall 20. On the Figure 2C shows a configuration according to which detection fibers extend around the chamber 2 forming several turns, embedded in the wall 20. Whatever the configuration chosen, the or each detection fiber 10 is arranged in outside of chamber 2. In the configurations shown in Figures 2A to 2C, the or each detection fiber 10 can be embedded in the wall 20 during the construction of the latter.

Figures 3A and 3B represent “transparent” views of configurations respectively described in connection with Figures 2B and 2C. Figure 3C represents a transparent view of a configuration according to which the detection fiber describes a spiral around the chamber 2. In Figures 3A, 3B and 3C, each detection fiber is embedded in the wall.

Figure 4 illustrates the stopping power (y-axis: MeV/cm unit), with regard to P particles of different materials as a function of the energy of said particles (x-axis - MeV unit). In Figure 4, the stopping powers of HDPE (high density polyethylene - curve a), concrete (curve b), stainless steel (curve c), water (curve d), air (curve e) and polystyrene are shown (curve f). We observe that for the same thickness, it is preferable for the wall to be made of a HDPE or polystyrene type material than of steel. Curves d and f are almost identical.

The inventors modeled the detection of particles P" by a device as described in connection with Figure IC. The configuration was modeled according to the following parameters: material of the wall 20: steel; thickness of the wall 20: 2 mm; radius of chamber 2: 20 cm; height of the chamber: 2 m; nature of the fluid: air modeled radioelement: ⁹⁰ Y - Average emission energy: 926 keV - Maximum emission energy: 2280 keV; diameter of the core of the detection fiber: 250 pm; material of the detection fiber: polystyrene - density 1.05; thickness of the sheath of the detection fiber: 7.5 pm; material of the sheath: PM MA number of turns: 3601.

The modeled optical fiber corresponds to the reference BCF-10 - manufacturer Saint Gobain.

Figures 5A and 5B are views of the configuration modeled respectively in a radial plane, defined by axes X and Y, and a longitudinal plane, defined by axes X and Z. Reference 4 corresponds to the ambient air. In each of Figures 5A and 5B, a detail of a part of the wall 20 against which the detection fiber 10 is assembled. In Figure 5B, the detection fiber 10 appears in the form of discs adjacent to each other.

Using the MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle) code, a detection spectrum of particles detected by the detection fiber was modeled, the detection spectrum being represented in Figure 6. The detection spectrum corresponds to a proportion of interactions detected for 1 particle emitted (y axis) as a function of the detection energy (x axis - MeV unit). Figure 6 shows a distribution of the energy deposited, by the detection fiber, of a particle P" emitted in chamber 2, the energy of the particle P" being emitted according to a distribution corresponding to the emission spectrum of ⁹⁰ Y. Due to the small volume of the fiber, a particle P" interacting in the fiber can only release part of its energy.

Figure 7A represents an example of application of a device according to the invention. In this example, a liquid is transported from a tank A to a tank B. The device 1 is integrated in the central part of a pipe C, connecting the tank A to the tank B. Figures 7B and 7C are details of the device 1. The device comprises a wall 20, against which is placed a detection fiber 10 as previously described. The detection fiber is arranged around the wall 20 forming a spiral, as described in connection with Figure IC.

Chamber 2 delimited by wall 20 is annular. It has an internal wall 20', which is, like wall 20, cylindrical. The radius of the internal wall 20' is less than the radius of the wall 20, the latter forming an external wall of the annular chamber 2. The device includes an auxiliary scintillator 10', applied against the internal wall 20'. In the example shown in Figures 7B and 7C, the auxiliary scintillator 10' is a solid scintillator, coupled to an auxiliary photodetector 14'. According to this embodiment, particles P" emitted in the annular chamber 2 can be detected either by the detection fiber 10 or by the auxiliary scintillator 10'. According to a variant, the solid auxiliary scintillator 10' is replaced by a fiber auxiliary detection fiber 10', wound against the internal wall 20', in the same way as the detection fiber 10 is wound against the wall 20. The advantage of detection fibers is their less sensitivity with regard to gamma radiation.

More generally, the device comprises an auxiliary detector 10' applied against the internal wall 20'. It may be an auxiliary scintillator, in particular fibered. It can also be a gas detector, the geometry of which is adapted to the internal wall 20'. It may in particular be a gas detector of cylindrical geometry. The inventors have modeled the configuration described in connection with Figures 7A to 7C, using the MCNP transport code. The modeling parameters are: detection fiber: constitution similar to the detection fiber described in connection with Figures 5A and 5B. 571 turns. radius of the internal wall 20': 2.5 cm; radius of wall 20: 4.5 cm; thickness of the internal wall 20' and of the wall 20: 1 mm; material of the internal wall 20' and the wall 20: stainless steel.

Figures 8A and 8B are views of the modeled configuration respectively in a radial plane, defined by axes X and Y, and a longitudinal plane, defined by axes a detail of a part of the wall 20 against which the detection fiber 10 is assembled. In Figure 8B, the detection fiber 10 appears in the form of discs adjacent to each other.

Figure 9A shows the detection spectrum of a p particle emitted by ⁹⁰ Y in the measurement chamber. This is a histogram discretized in energy (x-axis - MeV) and showing, at each energy, the probability of detection, by the detection fiber, at said energy, of a P- particle emitted in the chamber 2, the energy of the emitted particle being distributed according to the emission spectrum of ⁹⁰ Y. Figure 9B is a figure similar to Figure 9A, established by modeling the solid auxiliary scintillator 10'. The detection probabilities obtained with the solid scintillator are higher due to the larger volume of the latter, which increases the detection efficiency, to the detriment of increased detection sensitivity with regard to gamma photons.

The detection spectra shown in Figures 6, 9A and 9B can be used for the purposes of identifying a radionuclide present in the fluid 3 circulating in the chamber 2. In fact, the detection spectrum corresponds to a spectral signature of the or radionuclides present in fluid 3. The detection spectra shown in Figures 6, 9A and 9B are so-called unit spectra, because they correspond to the detection spectrum resulting from the presence of a single radionuclide, in this case ⁹⁰ Y, for a unit emission, in this case 1 particle p emitted.

It is possible to establish, in particular by modeling, unit detection spectra corresponding respectively to different radionuclides, for a unit activity of lBq. Each unit detection spectrum forms a direct model assigned to each radionuclide. He It is preferable that each unit detection spectrum is established by considering the same activity of each radionuclide, for example lBq. Thus, each radionuclide RN corresponds to a unit detection spectrum S _t . From each unit detection spectrum Si, we can form a response matrix M, each column of which corresponds to a unit detection spectrum S _t . From a measured detection spectrum S, the activity A, of each radionuclide RN, is defined according to the expression:

S = M x A (1) where

S is the detection spectrum, of dimension [7,1], K corresponding to the number of channels in the spectrum;

M is the response matrix, of dimension [K, I], where I corresponds to the number of RN radionuclides considered. The response matrix reflects the detection efficiency of the device.

A is a vector, of dimension [I, 1], each term of which corresponds to the activity A _t of each radionuclide RN _t .

S results from the measurement. M is established beforehand, on the basis of modeling, as described in connection with Figures 6 and 9A. M can be obtained on the basis of experimental measurements, using samples containing radionuclides whose activity is known. A can be estimated by inversion.

Since the matrix M is generally not invertible, a possible method for estimating A is the application of an iterative optimization algorithm of the ML-EM type (Maximum Likelihood-Expectation Maximization-expectation maximization method). Such an algorithm makes it possible to estimate, at each iteration of rank j, a vector Â ^J , using the following update expression:

M(k, j) is a term of the matrix M and S(/c) is a term of the vector S.

The optimization algorithm can be initialized, during the first iteration, by:

The use of an optimization algorithm, implementing the ML-EM method to quantify the activity of different radioelements, from a detection spectrum resulting from particle-sensitive detection fibers, was described in Dufour N, « Scintillating fiber based beta spectrometer: Proof of concept by Monte-Carlo simulation and first experimental assessment”, Nuclear Inst, and Methods in Physics research, A 1010 (2021).

Figure 10 shows different stages of implementation of the device according to the invention. Step 100 corresponds to the acquisition of detection signals, resulting from one or more photodetectors, during an acquisition period. According to a first embodiment, called counting mode, the processing circuit 15 establishes a counting rate N, corresponding to a number of pulses detected per unit of time, for example each second.

During step 110, the calculation unit 16 compares the counting rate with a threshold N _t h previously determined. During a step 120, the calculation unit 16 generates an alert signal if the counting rate N is greater than the threshold N _t h-

Complementarily or alternatively, the method may include a step 130, during which an estimate Â of the activity of a radionuclide RN _t is carried out as a function of a detection yield previously established for said radionuclide. Quantification of activity based on a simple counting rate assumes an a priori on the radionuclide (or on a mixture of radionuclides) present in the fluid. The detection efficiency r], relating the counting rate to the activity, is previously established by experimental measurements, on calibration fluids, whose activity is known, or from modeling.

As previously described, the processing circuit 15 can be a spectrometric circuit. In this case, from detection signals acquired during the acquisition period, the processing circuit generates a spectrum S of the amplitude of the pulses detected during the acquisition period. During a step 140, the calculation unit 16 takes into account a response matrix, as described in expression (1). The calculation unit implements an inversion algorithm, for example of the ML-EM type, to identify the radionuclides present in the fluid and possibly estimate their respective activities Â _t .

The invention can be implemented to carry out the control of fluids, liquids or gases, containing or likely to contain radionuclides. The invention makes it possible to carry out online monitoring of the fluid, in real time, without risk of contamination of the or each optical detection fiber, taking into account the fact that the or each detection fiber does not penetrate into the chamber. The use of a calculation unit collecting detection signals, after processing, makes it possible to obtain information in real time or near real time (a few minutes). The use of a flexible detection fiber allows adaptation to chambers with different geometries.

Claims

1. Device (1) for analyzing the activity of a fluid (3) likely to contain a radionuclide emitting charged particles of type /3~, the device comprising:

- a wall (20), delimiting a chamber (2) intended to be occupied by the fluid, the wall extending to a thickness (e);

- an optical detection fiber (10), comprising a core surrounded by a cladding, the core being formed of a scintillator material, the scintillator material emitting photons when exposed to charged particles;

- at least one photodetector (14), optically coupled to the optical detection fiber, so as to detect scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator material under the effect of exposure to charged particles;

- at least one processing circuit (15), configured to perform processing of the detection signal resulting from the or each photodetector;

- a calculation unit (16), connected to the processing circuit, the calculation unit being programmed to calculate an analysis result as a function of the detection signal generated by the or each photodetector;

- the optical detection fiber (10) is arranged outside the chamber (2);

- all or part of the optical detection fiber extends through the thickness of the wall; so that under the effect of exposure to charged particles emitted by the radionuclide, the photodetector generates a detection signal (S, N) depending on a quantity of scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator material of the optical fiber of detection under the effect of exposure to charged particles; the device being characterized in that the wall (20) extends around the chamber, the chamber forming all or part of a pipe or a tank or a barrel.

2. Device according to claim 1, wherein all or part of the optical detection fiber (10) extends around the chamber.

3. Device according to claim 2, in which the optical detection fiber forms a spiral around the chamber.

4. Device according to claim 2, comprising different optical detection fibers optically coupled to the photodetector, each optical detection fiber forming at least one turn around the chamber.

5. Device according to claim 1, in which:

- the wall extends around a longitudinal axis;

- the or each optical detection fiber (Z) extends parallel to the longitudinal axis.

6. Device according to any one of the preceding claims, in which:

- the processing circuit (15) is configured to determine a counting rate (N) from the detection signal, the counting rate corresponding to a number of pulses detected by the photodetector per unit of time;

- the calculation unit (16) is programmed to compare the counting rate to a predetermined threshold (N _t h).

7. Device according to claim 6, wherein the calculation unit is configured to quantify an activity of the radionuclide from the counting rate.

8. Device according to any one of the preceding claims, in which:

- the processing circuit (15) is a spectrometry circuit, configured to establish a spectrum (S) representative of the energy deposited in the scintillator material by the charged particles;

9. Device according to claim 8, in which the calculation unit is programmed to calculate an activity of each radionuclide identified from the spectrum.

10. Device according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the wall (20) forms an external wall or an internal wall of a tubular pipe, the chamber extending between the internal wall and the external wall, the internal walls and external extending around a central axis, respectively along an internal radius and an external radius, the internal radius being less than the external radius.

11. Device according to claim 10, in which:

- the detection fiber, or each detection fiber, is placed against or in the external wall of the tubular pipe; the device comprises an auxiliary detector (10'), placed in contact with the internal wall. Device according to claim 11, in which the auxiliary detector is an auxiliary scintillator connected to an auxiliary photodetector (14'). Method for analyzing a fluid (3) using a device (1) according to any one of the preceding claims, the fluid extending into a chamber (2) delimited by the wall (20) of said device, the method comprising:

- a) acquisition of detection signals by the or each photodetector (14) during an acquisition period;

- b) using the calculation unit (16), obtaining an analysis result. Method according to claim 13, in which step b) comprises:

- determination of a quantity (N) of charged particles detected per unit of time;

- comparison of the quantity of charged particles detected per unit of time with a threshold value (N _t h);

- depending on the comparison, generation of an alert signal. Method according to any one of claims 13 or 14, in which